--- license: apache-2.0 pipeline_tag: text-generation widget: - text: "1.1.1.21" inference: parameters: top_k: 9 repetition_penalty: 1.2 --- # **ZymCTRL** ZymCTRL (Enzyme Control) ([Paper presented @ Machine Learning for Structural Biology workshop - December 2022](https://www.mlsb.io/papers_2022/ZymCTRL_a_conditional_language_model_for_the_controllable_generation_of_artificial_enzymes.pdf)) is a conditional language model for the generation of artificial functional enzymes. It was trained on the entire BRENDA database of enzymes, comprising over 37 M sequences. Given a user-defined Enzymatic Commission (EC) number, the model generates protein sequences that fulfill that catalytic reaction. The generated sequences are ordered, globular, and distant to natural ones, while their intended catalytic properties match those defined by users. If you don't know the EC number of your protein of interest, have a look at the BRENDA webpage: https://www.brenda-enzymes.org/ecexplorer.php?browser=1 See below for information about the model, how to generate sequences, and how to save and rank them by perplexity. ## **Model description** ZymCTRL is based on the [CTRL Transformer](https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.05858) architecture (which in turn is very similar to ChatGPT) and contains 36 layers with a model dimensionality of 1280, totaling 738 million parameters. ZymCTRL is a decoder-only transformer model pre-trained on the BRENDA database (version July 2022). The pre-training was done on the raw sequences without FASTA headers, with the EC classes prepended to each sequence. The databases will be uploaded soon. ZymCTRL was trained with an autoregressive objective, i.e., the model learns to predict the next token given a sequence context. Because the first tokens on each sequence encode the EC numbers, the model learns the dependencies among EC classes and their corresponding sequences and is able to _speak_ the enzyme language. There are stark differences in the number of members among EC classes, and for this reason, we also tokenized the EC numbers. In this manner, EC numbers '2.7.1.1' and '2.7.1.2' share the first three tokens (six, including separators), and hence the model can infer that there are relationships between the two classes. The figure below summarizes the process of training: ![plot](./github1.png) ## **How to use ZymCTRL** ZymCTRL can be used with the HuggingFace transformer python package. Detailed installation instructions can be found here: https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/installation Since ZymCTRL has been trained on the classical language model objective on enzyme sequences with their EC annotation, it particularly excels at generating enzyme sequences given a user-defined EC class, such as alcohol dehydrogenases ('1.1.1.2'). The model can generate in two ways: in a zero-shot fashion, i.e., directly generating from the checkpoint weights, or after fine-tuning. Fine-tuning allows augmenting the BRENDA datasets that were used during training, for example, if you have a curated internal dataset or a set of ancestrally-reconstructed sequences. This is entirely optional. One advantage of running the model in zero-shot is that it doesn't require any further training. ### **Example 1: Generating nitrilases (EC 3.5.5.1)** The script below will be used for the generation of any BRENDA class in a zero-shot fashion, here we showcase the generation of novel nitrilases. To run this script, you should download ZymCTRL to a local folder in your workstation. Then replace the placeholders in the script with your actual folder path. You can run it directly in the command line (once you have hugging face installed), with the following command: `python generate.py` The script will write each sequence in a fasta file in the folder you specify. In the fasta header, it will store the sequence's computed perplexity value. Perplexity is a measure of the model's confidence in that generation, with lower values being better. The sequences are ordered by perplexity before writing them out, so those that finish in *_0.fasta and *_1.fasta will be the best ones per batch. **Given that generation runs so fast, we recommend generating hundreds or thousands and then only picking the best 5% or less. With the script below, that would mean picking only those that finish in '_0.fasta'. Good perplexity values for this model so be below 1.75-1.5.** ``` import torch from transformers import GPT2LMHeadModel, AutoTokenizer import os from tqdm import tqdm import math def remove_characters(sequence, char_list): "This function removes special tokens used during training." columns = sequence.split('') seq = columns[1] for char in char_list: seq = seq.replace(char, '') return seq def calculatePerplexity(input_ids,model,tokenizer): "This function computes perplexities for the generated sequences" with torch.no_grad(): outputs = model(input_ids, labels=input_ids) loss, logits = outputs[:2] return math.exp(loss) def main(label, model,special_tokens,device,tokenizer): # Generating sequences input_ids = tokenizer.encode(label,return_tensors='pt').to(device) outputs = model.generate( input_ids, top_k=9, #tbd repetition_penalty=1.2, max_length=1024, eos_token_id=1, pad_token_id=0, do_sample=True, num_return_sequences=20) # Depending non your GPU, you'll be able to generate fewer or more sequences. This runs in an A40. # Check sequence sanity, ensure sequences are not-truncated. # The model will truncate sequences longer than the specified max_length (1024 above). We want to avoid those sequences. new_outputs = [ output for output in outputs if output[-1] == 0] if not new_outputs: print("not enough sequences with short lengths!!") # Compute perplexity for every generated sequence in the batch ppls = [(tokenizer.decode(output), calculatePerplexity(output, model, tokenizer)) for output in new_outputs ] # Sort the batch by perplexity, the lower the better ppls.sort(key=lambda i:i[1]) # duplicated sequences? # Final dictionary with the results sequences={} sequences[label] = [(remove_characters(x[0], special_tokens), x[1]) for x in ppls] return sequences if __name__=='__main__': device = torch.device("cuda") # Replace with 'cpu' if you don't have a GPU - but it will be slow print('Reading pretrained model and tokenizer') tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained('/path/to/zymCTRL/') # change to ZymCTRL location model = GPT2LMHeadModel.from_pretrained('/path/to/zymCTRL').to(device) # change to ZymCTRL location special_tokens = ['', '', '<|endoftext|>','',' ', ''] # change to the appropriate BRENDA EC classes labels=['3.5.5.1'] # nitrilases. You can put as many labels as you want. for label in tqdm(labels): # We'll run 100 batches per label. 20 sequences will be generated per batch. for i in range(0,100): sequences = main(label, model, special_tokens, device, tokenizer) for key,value in sequences.items(): for index, val in enumerate(value): # Sequences will be saved with the name of the label followed by the batch index, # and the order of the sequence in that batch. fn = open(f"/path/to/folder/{label}_{i}_{index}.fasta", "w") fn.write(f'>{label}_{i}_{index}\t{val[1]}\n{val[0]}') fn.close() ``` ## **Example 2: Fine-tuning on a set of user-defined sequences** This alternative to the zero-shot generation allows updating ZymCTRL's weights to new sequences. This strategy is not strictly necessary, in fact, we have observed good generations even for EC classes where there are only 1-2 representatives in Nature. But you might have an internal set of sequences that you'd like to incorporate into the model. For example, internal datasets after protein engineering efforts, ancestrally-reconstructed sets, or after searching against metagenomics databases. In these cases, it is advisable to fine-tune ZymCTRL, as it will learn new properties from your dataset and potentially improve the generation quality (especially for poorly populated EC classes). To fine-tune ZymCTRL, you will need to process your sequences quite a bit. The scripts below can exactly do that without any modifications. The only requisite is to start with an input file, 'sequences.fasta' which contains all the sequences in a fasta format. We recommend using at least 200 sequences to obtain the best results. But we've seen it working with fewer sequences, so if you don't have that many, give it still a go. ``` import random import transformers from transformers import AutoTokenizer # 1. Read the source file with open('sequences.fasta', 'r') as fn: data = fn.readlines() fn.close() # Put sequences into dictionary sequences={} for line in data: if '>' in line: name = line.strip() sequences[name] = ['2.7.3.12'] # modify with the actual EC class. continue sequences[name].append(line.strip()) # Process fasta files to be in single string - run this part only if the fastas were formated to 60 characters processed_sequences = {} for name, sequence in sequences.items(): processed_sequences[f"{sequence[0]};{name}"] = ''.join([x for x in sequence[1:]]) # Shuffle sequences sequences_list = [(key,value) for key,value in processed_sequences.items()] random.shuffle(sequences_list) # Load tokenizer tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained('/path/to/ZymCTRL') # the objective is to get here strings, that when tokenized, will span a window length of 1024. # for each sequence group its length and untokenized string print("procesing dataset") processed_dataset = [] for i in sequences_list: # length of the control code label = i[0].split(';')[0] sequence = i[1].strip() separator = '' control_code_length = len(tokenizer(label+separator)['input_ids']) available_space = 1021 - control_code_length # It is not 1024 because '<|endoftext|>', and start and end # Option 1: the sequence is larger than the available space (3-4% of sequences in BRENDA are over 1024) if len(sequence) > available_space: total_length = control_code_length + len(sequence[:available_space]) + 1 seq = f"{label}{separator}{sequence[:available_space]}<|endoftext|>" processed_dataset.append((total_length, seq)) # Option 2 & 3: The sequence fits in the block_size space with or without padding else: total_length = control_code_length + len(sequence) + 3 # in this case the sequence does not fit with the start/end tokens seq = f"{label}{separator}{sequence}<|endoftext|>" processed_dataset.append((total_length, seq)) # Helper function to group sequences def grouper(iterable): prev = None group = '' total_sum = 0 for item in iterable: if prev is None or item[0] + total_sum < 1025: group += item[1] total_sum += item[0] else: total_sum = item[0] yield group group = item[1] prev = item if group: total_sum = 0 yield group # Group sequences print("grouping processed dataset") grouped_dataset=dict(enumerate(grouper(processed_dataset),1)) # Save the processed file out fn = open("./2.7.3.13_processed.txt",'w') for key,value in grouped_dataset.items(): fn.write(value) fn.write("\n") fn.close() fn = open("./2.7.3.13_processed.txt",'w') for key,value in grouped_dataset.items(): padding_len = 1024 - len(tokenizer(value)['input_ids']) padding = ""*padding_len print(len(tokenizer(value+padding)['input_ids'])) fn.write(value+padding) fn.write fn.write("\n") fn.close() ``` The previous script will prepare a text file with the correct format for tokenization. Now we can use the tokenizer to convert its contents to tokens. ``` from datasets import load_dataset import transformers from transformers.testing_utils import CaptureLogger # Load the tokenizer again from transformers import AutoTokenizer tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained('/agh/projects/noelia/NLP/zymCTRL/dataset_preparation/tokenizer') #Load the data files data_files = {} dataset_args = {} validation_split_percentage = 10 # for a split 90/10 data_files["train"] = './2.7.3.12_processed.txt' extension = "text" raw_datasets = load_dataset(extension, data_files=data_files, cache_dir='.', **dataset_args) tok_logger = transformers.utils.logging.get_logger("transformers.tokenization_utils_base") # Load datasets using the HF datasets library: raw_datasets["train"] = load_dataset(extension, data_files=data_files, split=f"train[{validation_split_percentage}%:]", cache_dir='.', **dataset_args,) raw_datasets["validation"] = load_dataset(extension, data_files=data_files, split=f"train[:{validation_split_percentage}%]", cache_dir='.', **dataset_args,) def tokenize_function(examples): " This function tokenizes input" with CaptureLogger(tok_logger) as cl: output = tokenizer(examples["text"]) # clm input could be much much longer than block_size if "Token indices sequence length is longer than the" in cl.out: tok_logger.warning( "^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Please ignore the warning above - this long input will be chunked into smaller bits before being passed to the model." ) return output # tokenize in parallel tokenized_datasets = raw_datasets.map( tokenize_function, batched=True, num_proc=32, remove_columns=['text'], load_from_cache_file = False, desc="Running tokenizer on dataset", ) train_dataset = tokenized_datasets["train"] eval_dataset = tokenized_datasets["validation"] train_dataset.save_to_disk('./dataset/train') eval_dataset.save_to_disk('./dataset/eval') # This has saved the datasets tokenized. Now we need to group them into the block size of 1024 from datasets import load_from_disk train_dataset = load_from_disk('./2.7.3.13/dataset/train') eval_dataset = load_from_disk('./2.7.3.13/dataset/eval') from datasets.dataset_dict import DatasetDict tokenized_datasets = DatasetDict() tokenized_datasets["train"] = train_dataset tokenized_datasets["validation"] = eval_dataset block_size = 1024 def group_texts(examples): # Concatenate all texts. concatenated_examples = {k: sum(examples[k], []) for k in examples.keys()} total_length = len(concatenated_examples[list(examples.keys())[0]]) # We drop the small remainder, we could add padding if the model supported it instead of this drop, # you can customize this part to your needs. if total_length >= block_size: total_length = (total_length // block_size) * block_size # Split by chunks of max_len. result = { k: [t[i : i + block_size] for i in range(0, total_length, block_size)] for k, t in concatenated_examples.items() } result["labels"] = result["input_ids"].copy() return result lm_datasets = tokenized_datasets.map( group_texts, batched=True, num_proc=124, load_from_cache_file=False, desc=f"Grouping texts in chunks of {block_size}", ) train_dataset = lm_datasets["train"] eval_dataset = lm_datasets["validation"] train_dataset.save_to_disk('./dataset/train2') eval_dataset.save_to_disk('./dataset/eval2') ``` The processed datasets will be inside the folder dataset/, called train2 and eval2. You could also put the two previous scripts into a single one and run it in one go (that is what we do). Now you are ready to fine-tune the model. To do that, you can take the trainer file that we provide in this repository (5.run_clm-post.py), or use the trainer from Hugging Face. The command below shows an example at an specific learning rate, but you could try with other hyperparameters to obtain the best training and evaluation losses. ``` python 5.run_clm-post.py --tokenizer_name /path/to/ZymCTRL --do_train --do_eval --output_dir output --evaluation_strategy steps --eval_steps 10 --logging_steps 5 --save_steps 500 --num_train_epochs 28 --per_device_train_batch_size 1 --per_device_eval_batch_size 4 --cache_dir '.' --save_total_limit 2 --learning_rate 0.8e-04 --dataloader_drop_last True --model_type gpt2 --config_name /path/to/ZymCTRL --gradient_accumulation_steps 4 ``` In any case, the original HuggingFace script run_clm.py can be found here: https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/master/examples/pytorch/language-modeling/run_clm.py ### **Training specs** The model was trained on 48 NVIDIA A100 GPUs for eight epochs, using a block size of 1024 and a total batch size of 768. The optimizer used was Adam (beta1 = 0.9, beta2 = 0.999) with a learning rate of 0.8e-04. ### **Contact** We are the AI for Protein Design group at the Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona (https://www.aiproteindesign.com/). For any questions post an issue in this repository so that other people can benefit from the feedback, and I'll get back to you shortly. We are always open for collaborations, send an email to nfccri [at] ibmb [dot] csic [dot] es