Update README.md

README.md

@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ Selection of 60+ photos of uncanny avant-garde Cubo-Futurist/Constructivist & Su
 
 *EKSTER & TAEUBER-ARP:* Two epochal artists and leading visionaries of their respective (and occasionally overlapping) creative mileus, both utterly distinctive stylists and ever-evolving experimentalists with a shared artistically omnidexterous zeal for expressing their singular geniuses in any and every mode, context, or sphere of expression presciently gleaned at the horizons of a given year or day. <br> 
 And though their names are seldomly mentioned in the same breath or abstract by researchers or curators, Ekster's & Taeuber-Arp's artistic trajectories do hold between them some measure of spectral rhyme, like a matching rhythm of two extremely long shadows tossed by two incomparable lives unto some unbestknown shared point of exact inbetweenness... <br> 
-...granted, comparing their arts, styles, or even specific works would likely be a pointless exercise, and at best an entertaining little mystification, with no exhaustive enough point of reference to speak of (with the closest plausible exception being the two marrionette sets that went into this LoRA; still... we'd rather treat these dolls as a signal echo, a commonality, not as some opportune like for critical dissection by contrast harnessing); <br>  
+...granted, comparing their arts, styles, or even specific works would likely be a pointless exercise, and at best an entertaining little mystification, with no exhaustive enough point of reference to speak of (with the closest plausible exception being the two marrionette sets that went into this LoRA; still... we'd rather treat these dolls as a signal echo, a commonality, not as some opportune overlay for critical dissection by contrast harnessing); <br>  
 ...moreover, every conclusion one might reach by placing the works/ways of two artists in direct contrast to each other (and, thereby, becoming all the more decontextualized in other ways) tends to be even more contrived and shallow than a museum retrospective brochure, or a random introductory write-up like this one ... So... What are we left with? Why, everything, of course! <br> 
 ...For the prime commonality of these particular two artists is, of course, condensed in the comparably monumental scale, kaleidoscopic variety, and pioneering resonance of the influence each and both had cast upon their largely-co-contemporaneous lifetimes, worlds, and arts... <br> 
 – with Ekster (co-)formulating (alongside Burlyuk, Goncharova, Malevich, Tatlin, Popova, & others) the premises and most prolifically refining the character of Eastern-European Cubo-Futurism, Suprematism, & Soviet Constructivism alike; <br>