--- license: cc-by-nc-4.0 language: - en metrics: - f1 pipeline_tag: text-classification tags: - transformers - argument-mining - opinion-mining - information-extraction - inference-extraction - Twitter widget: - text: 'Men shouldn’t be making laws about women’s bodies #abortion #Texas' example_title: Statement - text: >- ’Bitter truth’: EU chief pours cold water on idea of Brits keeping EU citizenship after #Brexit HTTPURL via @USER example_title: Notification - text: >- Opinion: As the draconian (and then some) abortion law takes effect in #Texas, this is not an idle question for millions of Americans. A slippery slope towards more like-minded Republican state legislatures to try to follow suit. #abortion #F24 HTTPURL example_title: Reason - text: '@USER Blah blah blah blah blah blah' example_title: None - text: republican men and karens make me sick example_title: Unlabeled 1 - text: No empire lives forever! Historical fact! GodWins! 🙏💪🇺🇲 example_title: Unlabeled 2 - text: >- Further author information regarding registration and visa support letters will be sent to the authors soon. #CIKM2023 example_title: Unlabeled 3 - text: Ummmmmm example_title: Unlabeled 4 - text: >- whoever says that The Last Jedi is a good movie is lying or trolling everyone example_title: Unlabeled 5 - text: >- I don’t think people realize how big this story is GBI Strategies, the group paid $11M+ by Biden PACs to harvest fraudulent voter registrations in *20 states*, may be the root source of Democrat election rigging @USER may have just exposed their entire fraud machine HTTPURL example_tite: Unlabeled 6 base_model: - vinai/bertweet-base --- # TACO -- Twitter Arguments from COnversations Introducing TACO, a baseline classification model built upon `AutoModelForSequenceClassification`, designed to identify tweets belonging to four distinct classes: Reason, Statement, Notification, and None. Tailored specifically for argument mining on Twitter, this baseline model is an evolution of the [BERTweet-base](https://huggingface.co/vinai/bertweet-base) architecture, which was originally pre-trained on Twitter data. Through fine-tuning with the [TACO dataset](https://github.com/TomatenMarc/TACO), the baseline model acquires its name and excels in the extraction of *Twitter Arguments from COnversations*. ## Class Semantics The TACO framework revolves around the two key elements of an argument, as defined by the [Cambridge Dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org). It encodes *inference* as *a guess that you make or an opinion that you form based on the information that you have*, and it also leverages the definition of *information* as *facts or details about a person, company, product, etc.*. Taken together, the following classes of tweets can be identified by TACO: * *Statement*, which refers to unique cases where only the *inference* is presented as *something that someone says or writes officially, or an action done to express an opinion*. * *Reason*, which represents a full argument where the *inference* is based on direct *information* mentioned in the tweet, such as a source-reference or quotation, and thus reveals the author’s motivation *to try to understand and to make judgments based on practical facts*. * *Notification*, which refers to a tweet that limits itself to providing *information*, such as media channels promoting their latest articles. * *None*, a tweet that provides neither *inference* nor *information*. In its entirety, TACO can classify the following hierarchy for tweets:
Notice: The tweets need to undergo preprocessing before classification.## Training The final model underwent training using the entire shuffled ground truth dataset known as TACO, encompassing a total of 1734 tweets. This dataset showcases the distribution of topics as: #abortion (25.9%), #brexit (29.0%), #got (11.0%), #lotrrop (12.1%), #squidgame (12.7%), and #twittertakeover (9.3%). For training, we utilized [SimpleTransformers](https://simpletransformers.ai). Additionally, the category and class distribution of the dataset TACO is as follows: | Argument | No-Argument | |--------------|------------------| | 865 (49.88%) | 869 (50.12%) | | Reason | Statement | Notification | None | |--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------| | 581 (33.50%) | 284 (16.38%) | 500 (28.84%) | 369 (21.28%) |
Notice: Our training involved TACO to forecast class predictions, where the categories (Argument/No-Argument) represent class aggregations based on the inference component.
### Dataloader
```
"data_loader": {
"type": "torch.utils.data.dataloader.DataLoader",
"args": {
"batch_size": 8,
"sampler": "torch.utils.data.sampler.RandomSampler"
}
}
```
Parameters of the fit()-Method:
```
{
"epochs": 5,
"max_grad_norm": 1,
"optimizer_class": "