Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
|
|
1 |
-
|
2 |
---
|
3 |
base_model: google/t5-v1_1-base
|
4 |
-
|
5 |
tags:
|
6 |
- datadreamer
|
7 |
- datadreamer-0.1.0
|
@@ -9,15 +7,83 @@ tags:
|
|
9 |
- gpt-4
|
10 |
- gpt-4
|
11 |
- text2text-generation
|
12 |
-
|
13 |
widget:
|
14 |
-
|
15 |
-
|
16 |
-
|
17 |
-
|
18 |
-
|
19 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
pipeline_tag: text2text-generation
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
---
|
22 |
# Model Card
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
---
|
2 |
base_model: google/t5-v1_1-base
|
|
|
3 |
tags:
|
4 |
- datadreamer
|
5 |
- datadreamer-0.1.0
|
|
|
7 |
- gpt-4
|
8 |
- gpt-4
|
9 |
- text2text-generation
|
|
|
10 |
widget:
|
11 |
+
- text: >-
|
12 |
+
In this paper, we delve into advanced techniques and methods in Natural
|
13 |
+
Language Processing (NLP), innovatively incorporating Transformer
|
14 |
+
architectures and self-supervised learning methods. We aim to reiterate the
|
15 |
+
current understanding of Transformer-based models in executing various
|
16 |
+
language tasks by dissecting their versatility and expandability on broad
|
17 |
+
language systems.
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
|
20 |
+
Moreover, stabilization measures, tokenization assortment, and interpreting
|
21 |
+
latent spaces provide an in-depth novelty to our pipeline, overcoming
|
22 |
+
long-known obstacles. We explore meta-architectural modifications focusing
|
23 |
+
on enhancing prompt language models' efficiency, allowing flexible
|
24 |
+
adaptations to the core Transformer technique's abundance in BERT, GPT-like
|
25 |
+
systems.
|
26 |
+
|
27 |
+
|
28 |
+
To implement these adaptations, several experiments were conducted on varied
|
29 |
+
benchmark datasets to evaluate core metrics such as Bleu, Rouge, and
|
30 |
+
Warp-CTC metrics in translation and transcription tasks. We carried out
|
31 |
+
significant analysis focusing on module interpretability, additional error
|
32 |
+
inspection, task-specific regulatory mechanisms, execution speed, and
|
33 |
+
computational considerations.
|
34 |
+
|
35 |
+
|
36 |
+
Our experimental results bring in distraction from widespread but
|
37 |
+
sub-optimal benchmarks and offer evidence underpinning the contrary yet
|
38 |
+
potent issues yet to be addressed methodically. We invite the community to
|
39 |
+
reflect on these novel insights, develop and refine our proposed techniques,
|
40 |
+
speeding technical progress, avoiding prototypical retrodiction in the
|
41 |
+
Natural Language Understanding ecosystem to respect inclusive, diverse, and
|
42 |
+
correctly perceived expressive content.
|
43 |
+
example_title: Example 1
|
44 |
+
- text: >-
|
45 |
+
In this research paper, we propose a novel approach to Natural Language
|
46 |
+
Processing (NLP) that addresses several limitations of existing methods. By
|
47 |
+
integrating deep learning architectures with traditional NLP techniques, we
|
48 |
+
have developed a model that shows significant improvements in performance
|
49 |
+
across several NLP tasks including sentiment analysis, text summarization,
|
50 |
+
and machine translation. We treat language processing not as a linear task
|
51 |
+
but rather an interconnected web of sub-tasks, each benefiting from mutual
|
52 |
+
feedback. The conceptual breakthrough of this approach is the shared
|
53 |
+
representation of linguistic features across these sub-tasks that allow for
|
54 |
+
robust understanding and language inference. We demonstrated the
|
55 |
+
effectiveness of our model in extensive empirical evaluations on several
|
56 |
+
benchmark datasets, where our method consistently outperforms
|
57 |
+
state-of-the-art solutions. We also discuss the theoretical justification of
|
58 |
+
our model. Overall, this paper extends the frontiers of NLP by broadening
|
59 |
+
the commonly used methods and setting BPM (Benchmarks Per Minute) records in
|
60 |
+
five major tasks. We hope this work encourages future researchers to adopt
|
61 |
+
an integrated perspective when building NLP models.
|
62 |
+
example_title: Example 2
|
63 |
+
- text: >-
|
64 |
+
In recent years, we have seen a significative progression in Natural
|
65 |
+
Language Processing (NLP) capabilities, primarily driven by advancements in
|
66 |
+
deep learning. However, creating accurate models capable of understanding
|
67 |
+
context, tone, and semantic meanings remains a significant challenge.
|
68 |
+
Several models struggle to maintain stable performance when presented with
|
69 |
+
different kinds of texts. In this paper, we address the problem of
|
70 |
+
language-context detection in diversely written text. We introduce new
|
71 |
+
approaches utilising transformer-based models combined with Domain-Adaptive
|
72 |
+
Fine Tuning, a technique that allows capturing various linguistic details
|
73 |
+
for enhanced comprehension of text. Extensive experiments on several
|
74 |
+
datasets reveal that it is not just the large scales of these models that
|
75 |
+
matter, but a proper, task-specific tuning, can significantly bring
|
76 |
+
reductions in model complexity, resource demands, and increase the
|
77 |
+
prediction performance, challenging the commonly held belief in "bigger is
|
78 |
+
better". We further suggest that our innovations will directly lead to
|
79 |
+
significant improvements in performance and the wide adoption of the NLP
|
80 |
+
models within real-world scenarios. AI model's ability to scale will see a
|
81 |
+
vital performance curve particularly under low-data regime conditions which
|
82 |
+
are prevalent in the commercial sector.
|
83 |
+
example_title: Example 3
|
84 |
pipeline_tag: text2text-generation
|
85 |
+
datasets:
|
86 |
+
- datadreamer-dev/abstracts_and_tweets
|
87 |
---
|
88 |
# Model Card
|
89 |
|