|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from . import c_ast |
|
|
|
|
|
def fix_switch_cases(switch_node): |
|
""" The 'case' statements in a 'switch' come out of parsing with one |
|
child node, so subsequent statements are just tucked to the parent |
|
Compound. Additionally, consecutive (fall-through) case statements |
|
come out messy. This is a peculiarity of the C grammar. The following: |
|
|
|
switch (myvar) { |
|
case 10: |
|
k = 10; |
|
p = k + 1; |
|
return 10; |
|
case 20: |
|
case 30: |
|
return 20; |
|
default: |
|
break; |
|
} |
|
|
|
Creates this tree (pseudo-dump): |
|
|
|
Switch |
|
ID: myvar |
|
Compound: |
|
Case 10: |
|
k = 10 |
|
p = k + 1 |
|
return 10 |
|
Case 20: |
|
Case 30: |
|
return 20 |
|
Default: |
|
break |
|
|
|
The goal of this transform is to fix this mess, turning it into the |
|
following: |
|
|
|
Switch |
|
ID: myvar |
|
Compound: |
|
Case 10: |
|
k = 10 |
|
p = k + 1 |
|
return 10 |
|
Case 20: |
|
Case 30: |
|
return 20 |
|
Default: |
|
break |
|
|
|
A fixed AST node is returned. The argument may be modified. |
|
""" |
|
assert isinstance(switch_node, c_ast.Switch) |
|
if not isinstance(switch_node.stmt, c_ast.Compound): |
|
return switch_node |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new_compound = c_ast.Compound([], switch_node.stmt.coord) |
|
|
|
|
|
last_case = None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for child in (switch_node.stmt.block_items or []): |
|
if isinstance(child, (c_ast.Case, c_ast.Default)): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new_compound.block_items.append(child) |
|
_extract_nested_case(child, new_compound.block_items) |
|
last_case = new_compound.block_items[-1] |
|
else: |
|
|
|
|
|
if last_case is None: |
|
new_compound.block_items.append(child) |
|
else: |
|
last_case.stmts.append(child) |
|
|
|
switch_node.stmt = new_compound |
|
return switch_node |
|
|
|
|
|
def _extract_nested_case(case_node, stmts_list): |
|
""" Recursively extract consecutive Case statements that are made nested |
|
by the parser and add them to the stmts_list. |
|
""" |
|
if isinstance(case_node.stmts[0], (c_ast.Case, c_ast.Default)): |
|
stmts_list.append(case_node.stmts.pop()) |
|
_extract_nested_case(stmts_list[-1], stmts_list) |
|
|
|
|
|
def fix_atomic_specifiers(decl): |
|
""" Atomic specifiers like _Atomic(type) are unusually structured, |
|
conferring a qualifier upon the contained type. |
|
|
|
This function fixes a decl with atomic specifiers to have a sane AST |
|
structure, by removing spurious Typename->TypeDecl pairs and attaching |
|
the _Atomic qualifier in the right place. |
|
""" |
|
|
|
|
|
while True: |
|
decl, found = _fix_atomic_specifiers_once(decl) |
|
if not found: |
|
break |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typ = decl |
|
while not isinstance(typ, c_ast.TypeDecl): |
|
try: |
|
typ = typ.type |
|
except AttributeError: |
|
return decl |
|
if '_Atomic' in typ.quals and '_Atomic' not in decl.quals: |
|
decl.quals.append('_Atomic') |
|
if typ.declname is None: |
|
typ.declname = decl.name |
|
|
|
return decl |
|
|
|
|
|
def _fix_atomic_specifiers_once(decl): |
|
""" Performs one 'fix' round of atomic specifiers. |
|
Returns (modified_decl, found) where found is True iff a fix was made. |
|
""" |
|
parent = decl |
|
grandparent = None |
|
node = decl.type |
|
while node is not None: |
|
if isinstance(node, c_ast.Typename) and '_Atomic' in node.quals: |
|
break |
|
try: |
|
grandparent = parent |
|
parent = node |
|
node = node.type |
|
except AttributeError: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return decl, False |
|
|
|
assert isinstance(parent, c_ast.TypeDecl) |
|
grandparent.type = node.type |
|
if '_Atomic' not in node.type.quals: |
|
node.type.quals.append('_Atomic') |
|
return decl, True |
|
|