section
stringclasses 4
values | filename
stringlengths 6
32
| text
stringlengths 104
10.3M
| lang
stringclasses 44
values |
|---|---|---|---|
converted_docs | 356139 | **DiamondMEMS\***
John A. Carlisle
Materials Science Division & Center for Nanoscale Materials
Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne, Illinois 60439 USA
Diamond MEMS may offer many potential performance and reliability
advantages over traditional MEMS materials. For instance, its high
Young's modulus may enable diamond RF MEMS devices to operate at
unprecedented high frequencies, whereas the surface chemistry of
diamond, which gives rise to it's low friction and stiction properties,
may greatly enhance the reliability of these devices, simplify the
complexity of their design and also possibility greatly reduce packaging
costs (e.g. the need for anti-stiction coatings and hermetic packaging).
However, there are many challenges to be overcome if the dream is to
become a reality. Like any other thin film technology, diamond films
must integrate with many other different materials (semiconductors,
metals, oxides) in order to realize real MEMS devices. Over the past ten
years at ANL we have studied the growth of ultrananocrystalline diamond
(UNCD) using argon-rich Ar/CH~4~ plasmas with C~2~-dimers as the
principal growth species. These films consist of diamond grains 2-5 nm
in size and high-energy grain boundaries that are only 0.5 nm wide
consisting of a mixture of sp^3^ and sp^2^ bonding. UNCD possesses many
of the extreme materials properties of natural diamond (hardness,
modulus, etc.), and yet the growth chemistry may overcome many of the
materials integration issues mentioned above. In this talk I will focus
on the material integration and surface micromachining of UNCD films,
with particular emphasis on the low-temperature growth of UNCD and the
nanotribology of the UNCD surfaces. I will also discuss our work in
progress on the development of UNCD films for artificial retinas and
RF-MEMS. \*This work was supported by the US Department of Energy,
BES-Materials Sciences, under Contract W-13-109-ENG-38
| en |
converted_docs | 821154 | ### Section D. Claims for Service Connection for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
#### Overview
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| # | > This section contains the following topics: |
| #### In th | |
| is Section | |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
------------ ---------------------------------------------- ------------
Topic Topic Name See Page
13 General Information on Developing Claims for 1-D-2
Service Connection for PTSD
14 Requesting Evidence That a Stressor Occurred 1-D-9
15 Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service 1-D-15
Stressor
16 Completion of a Formal Finding of a Lack of 1-D-25
Information Required to Document the Claimed
Stressor(s)
17 Developing Claims for Service Connection for 1-D-27
PTSD Based on Personal Trauma
------------ ---------------------------------------------- ------------
#### 13. General Information on Developing Claims for Service Connection for PTSD
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### In | > This topic contains general information on developing |
| troduction | > claims for service connection for posttraumatic |
| | > stress disorder (PTSD). It includes information on |
| | |
| | - the requirements for establishing service |
| | connection for PTSD |
| | |
| | - the significance of prisoner-of-war (POW) and |
| | combat service |
| | |
| | - the definition of ***engaging in combat*** |
| | |
| | - decorations as evidence of combat |
| | |
| | - action to take if a veteran received a combat |
| | decoration but does not expressly state the nature |
| | of the stressor |
| | |
| | - what constitutes credible supporting evidence |
| | |
| | - the degree of stressor corroboration required |
| | |
| | - considering non-combat-related stressors |
| | |
| | - primary sources of evidence used to corroborate a |
| | claimed in-service stressor |
| | |
| | - examples of primary evidence, and |
| | |
| | - alternative sources of evidence that may |
| | corroborate a claimed in-service stressor. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### C | > September 5, 2008 |
| hange Date | |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### | > Service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder |
| a. Require | > (PTSD) requires |
| ments for | |
| Establishi | - credible evidence that the claimed in-service |
| ng Service | stressor occurred |
| Connectio | |
| n for PTSD | - medical evidence diagnosing the condition in |
| | accordance with [38 CFR |
| | 4.125](http://w |
| | ww.warms.vba.va.gov/regs/38CFR/BOOKC/PART4/S4_125.DOC), |
| | and |
| | |
| | - a link, established by medical evidence, between |
| | current symptoms and an in-service stressor. |
| | |
| | > ***Important***: The lay testimony of a combat |
| | > veteran alone may establish an in-service stressor |
| | > for the purposes of establishing service connection |
| | > for PTSD. |
| | > |
| | > ***Reference***: For more information on establishing |
| | > service connection for PTSD, see |
| | |
| | - [M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart iv, |
| | 4.H](../pt03_sp04_ch04_secH.xml#III.iv.4.H) |
| | |
| | - [38 CFR |
| | 3.304(f)](http://w |
| | ww.warms.vba.va.gov/regs/38CFR/BOOKB/PART3/S3_304.DOC), |
| | and |
| | |
| | - [38 U.S.C. |
| | 1154(b)](http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/ |
| | uscode/html/uscode38/usc_sec_38_00001154----000-.html). |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
13\. General Information on Developing Claims for Service Connection for
PTSD, Continued
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### b | > The veteran's testimony alone establishes the |
| . Signific | > occurrence of the claimed in-service stressor if |
| ance of PO | |
| W and Comb | - the evidence of record confirms the veteran |
| at Service | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - engaged in combat, or |
| | |
| | - was a prisoner-of-war (POW) as defined by [38 CFR |
| | 3.1(y)](http: |
| | //www.warms.vba.va.gov/regs/38CFR/BOOKB/PART3/S3_1.DOC) |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - the claimed stressor is related to that episode of |
| | combat or POW experience, |
| | |
| | - there is no clear and convincing evidence to the |
| | contrary, and |
| | |
| | - the claimed stressor is consistent with the |
| | circumstances, conditions, or hardships of the |
| | veteran's service. |
| | |
| | > ***Note***: There are no limitations as to the type |
| | > of evidence that may be accepted to confirm |
| | > engagement in combat. Any evidence that is probative |
| | > of (serves to establish the fact at issue) combat |
| | > participation may be used to support a determination |
| | > that a veteran engaged in combat. |
| | > |
| | > ***References***: For more information on |
| | |
| | - claims for service connection for PTSD, see |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - [38 CFR |
| | 3.304(f)](http://w |
| | ww.warms.vba.va.gov/regs/38CFR/BOOKB/PART3/S3_304.DOC), |
| | and |
| | |
| | - [38 U.S.C. |
| | 1154(b)](http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/ |
| | uscode/html/uscode38/usc_sec_38_00001154----000-.html), |
| | and |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - evidence that may be used to support a |
| | determination that a veteran engaged in combat with |
| | the enemy, see [*VAOPGCPREC Opinion |
| | 12-99*](http://vb |
| | aw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/Advisory/PRECOP/99op/Prc12_99.doc). |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### c. | > ***Engaging in combat*** with the enemy means |
| Definition | > personal participation in events constituting an |
| : Engaging | > actual fight or encounter with a military foe or |
| in Combat | > hostile unit or instrumentality. It includes presence |
| | > during such events either as a |
| | |
| | - combatant, or |
| | |
| | - service member performing duty in support of |
| | combatants, such as providing medical care to the |
| | wounded. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
13\. General Information on Developing Claims for Service Connection for
PTSD, Continued
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > When a veteran has received any of the combat |
| ### d. Dec | > decorations listed below, VA will presume that the |
| orations a | > veteran engaged in combat with the enemy, unless |
| s Evidence | > there is clear and convincing evidence to the |
| of Combat | > contrary: |
| | |
| | - Air Force Achievement Medal with "V" Device |
| | |
| | - Air Force Combat Action Medal |
| | |
| | - Air Force Commendation Medal with "V" Device |
| | |
| | - Air Force Cross |
| | |
| | - Air Medal with "V" Device |
| | |
| | - Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device |
| | |
| | - Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device |
| | |
| | - Combat Action Badge |
| | |
| | - Combat Action Ribbon (***Note***: Prior to February |
| | 1969, the Navy Achievement Medal with "V" Device |
| | was awarded.) |
| | |
| | - Combat Aircrew Insignia |
| | |
| | - Combat Infantry/Infantryman Badge |
| | |
| | - Combat Medical Badge |
| | |
| | - Distinguished Flying Cross |
| | |
| | - Distinguished Service Cross |
| | |
| | - Joint Service Commendation Medal with "V" Device |
| | |
| | - Medal of Honor |
| | |
| | - Navy Commendation Medal with "V" Device |
| | |
| | - Navy Cross |
| | |
| | - Purple Heart, and/or |
| | |
| | - Silver Star. |
| | |
| | > ***Important***: |
| | |
| | - Receipt of one of the decorations cited above is |
| | not the only acceptable evidence of engagement in |
| | combat. |
| | |
| | - If a veteran received a Global War on Terrorism |
| | Expeditionary Medal, Global War on Terrorism |
| | Service Medal, Afghanistan Campaign Medal, or Iraq |
| | Campaign Medal, but not one of the combat |
| | decorations cited above, develop for the claimed |
| | stressor as shown in [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, |
| | 1.D.14](../pt04_sp02_ch04_secH.xml#IV.ii.1.D.14). |
| | Receipt of these campaign medals alone does not |
| | generally indicate engagement in combat. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
13\. General Information on Developing Claims for Service Connection for
PTSD, Continued
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### e. A | > If a veteran received one of the combat decorations |
| ction to T | > cited in [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, |
| ake if Vet | > 1.D.13.d](http://vbaw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/M21-1MR |
| eran Recei | /pt04/sp02/ch01/pt04_sp02_ch01_secD.xml#IV.ii.1.D.13.d) |
| ved Combat | > but does not expressly state the nature of the |
| Decoratio | > stressor |
| n but Does | |
| Not State | - assume the stressor is combat-related |
| Nature of | |
| Stressor | - order an examination, if necessary to decide the |
| | claim, and |
| | |
| | - in the examination request |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - state that VA has verified the veteran's combat |
| | service, and |
| | |
| | - specify any details regarding the combat stressor |
| | contained in the record. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| #### | > Credible supporting evidence that an in-service |
| # f. What | > stressor actually occurred includes not only evidence |
| Constitute | > that specifically documents the veteran's personal |
| s Credible | > participation in the event, but evidence that |
| Supportin | |
| g Evidence | - indicates the veteran served in the immediate area |
| | and at the particular time in which the stressful |
| | event is alleged to have occurred, and |
| | |
| | - supports the description of the event. |
| | |
| | > ***Notes***: |
| | |
| | - Evaluate the evidence as a whole to determine |
| | whether a stressor is sufficiently corroborated. |
| | (See *[Moran v. |
| | Principi](h |
| | ttp://vbaw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/Advisory/CAVCDAD.htm#bmm),* |
| | 17 Vet.App. 149 (2003).) |
| | |
| | - Corroborating evidence of a stressor is *not* |
| | restricted to service records, but may be obtained |
| | from other sources. (See *[Doran v. |
| | Brown](h |
| | ttp://vbaw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/Advisory/CAVCDAD.htm#bmd),* |
| | 6 Vet.App. 283 (1994).) |
| | |
| | - The credible supporting evidence requirement does |
| | not necessarily demand the submission of official |
| | documentary evidence. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| #### | > Corroboration of every detail, including the |
| # g. The D | > claimant's personal participation in the claimed |
| egree of S | > stressful event, is not required. The evidence may be |
| tressor Co | > sufficient if it implies a veteran's personal |
| rroboratio | > exposure to the event. |
| n Required | > |
| | > ***Examples***: |
| | |
| | - When considered as a whole, evidence consisting of |
| | a morning report, radio log, and nomination for a |
| | Bronze Star with "V" device may be sufficient to |
| | corroborate a veteran's account of an event, even |
| | if it does not specifically include mention of the |
| | veteran's name. (See *[Suozzi v. |
| | Brown](h |
| | ttp://vbaw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/Advisory/CAVCDAD.htm#bms),* |
| | 10 Vet.App. 307 (1997).) |
| | |
| | - Unit records documenting the veteran's presence |
| | with a specific unit at the time mortar attacks |
| | occurred may be sufficient to corroborate a |
| | veteran's statement that she/he experienced such |
| | attacks personally. (See *[Pentecost v. |
| | Principi](h |
| | ttp://vbaw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/Advisory/CAVCDAD.htm#bmp),* |
| | 16 Vet.App. 124 (2002).) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
13\. General Information on Developing Claims for Service Connection for
PTSD, Continued
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### h. | > PTSD may result from a non-combat stressor, such as |
| Considerin | |
| g Non-Comb | - a plane crash |
| at-Related | |
| Stressors | - a ship sinking |
| | |
| | - an explosion |
| | |
| | - a rape or assault |
| | |
| | - duty in a burn ward or graves registration unit |
| | |
| | - witnessing the death, injury, or threat to the |
| | physical being of another person not caused by the |
| | enemy, and |
| | |
| | - actual or threatened death or serious injury, or |
| | other threat to one's own physical being not caused |
| | by the enemy. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### | > Primary evidence, generally considered the most |
| i. Primary | > reliable source for verifying in-service stressors, |
| Sources o | > is typically obtained from the |
| f Evidence | |
| Used to C | - U.S. Army and Joint Services Records Research |
| orroborate | Center (JSRRC) (formerly the U.S. Armed Services |
| a Claimed | Center for Unit Records Research (CURR)) |
| In-Servic | |
| e Stressor | - National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) |
| | |
| | - Marine Corps Archives and Special Collections |
| | (MCASC), or |
| | |
| | - Compensation and Pension (C&P) Service website |
| | links. |
| | |
| | > ***Note***: Carefully review primary evidence for |
| | > information corroborating participation in combat or |
| | > to otherwise corroborate a claimed in-service |
| | > stressor. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
13\. General Information on Developing Claims for Service Connection for
PTSD, Continued
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### j | > Primary evidence may include |
| . Examples | |
| of Primar | - unit and organizational histories |
| y Evidence | |
| | - daily staff journals |
| | |
| | - operational reports-lessons learned |
| | |
| | - after-action reports |
| | |
| | - radio logs, deck logs, and ship histories |
| | |
| | - muster rolls |
| | |
| | - command chronology and war diaries |
| | |
| | - monthly summary and reports |
| | |
| | - information from VBA-sanctioned websites located on |
| | the [PTSD Rating Job Aid |
| | w |
| | ebsite](http://vbaw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/rating/rat06.htm). |
| | |
| | > ***Note***: Generally, documents written or recorded |
| | > by the lowest possible unit in the chain of the |
| | > command are the most probative source of information |
| | > to verify a claimed stressor, because, by nature, |
| | > they tend to include details of events with greater |
| | > precision. ***Examples***: |
| | |
| | - A company commander's narrative is likely of |
| | greater relevance and specificity than a battalion |
| | commander's. |
| | |
| | - A Navy ship's deck log would likely yield more |
| | probative information than a fleet log. |
| | |
| | > ***Reference***: For information on where to send |
| | > requests for Navy deck logs, see [M21-1MR, Part IV, |
| | > Subpart ii, |
| | > 1.D.14.g](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD.xml#IV.ii.1.D.14.g). |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
13\. General Information on Developing Claims for Service Connection for
PTSD, Continued
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| # | > Alternative sources of evidence must be critically |
| #### k. Al | > and carefully reviewed for information confirming |
| ternative | > participation in combat or to otherwise corroborate a |
| Sources of | > claimed in-service stressor. |
| Evidence | > |
| That May C | > Alternative sources of evidence may include |
| orroborate | |
| a Claimed | - military occupational specialty (MOS) evidence |
| In-Servic | (***Note***: A veteran's MOS may be specified on |
| e Stressor | his/her *DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or |
| | Discharge from Active Duty*, or in the personnel |
| | folder.) |
| | |
| | - hazard pay records, which may be obtained from the |
| | Department of Defense Finance and Accounting |
| | Service (DFAS). |
| | |
| | - personnel folder, which may be requested via PIES. |
| | |
| | - service treatment records (STRs) |
| | |
| | - performance reports, which may be requested via |
| | PIES |
| | |
| | - verification that the veteran received |
| | Combat/Imminent Danger/Hostile Fire Pay |
| | (***Note***: This information may be requested |
| | through the Veterans Information Solution (VIS).) |
| | |
| | - buddy statements |
| | |
| | - contemporaneous letters and diaries |
| | |
| | - newspaper archives, and |
| | |
| | > ***Important***: |
| | |
| | - All sources of evidence obtained for purposes of |
| | stressor corroboration must be fully documented in |
| | the file. ***Example***: Print and file pages from |
| | a sanctioned website used in the determination of |
| | combat participation. |
| | |
| | - While confirmation of receipt of Combat/Imminent |
| | Danger/Hostile Fire Pay through the VIS alone does |
| | not constitute verification of a combat-related |
| | stressor, it may, in combination with other |
| | evidence, \"tip the scales\" in favor of the |
| | veteran\'s assertion of his/her involvement in |
| | combat. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
#### 14. Requesting Evidence That a Stressor Occurred
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### In | > This topic contains information on requesting |
| troduction | > evidence that a stressor occurred. It includes |
| | > information on |
| | |
| | - when to request hospital reports and clinical |
| | records |
| | |
| | - when to request evidence from the veteran |
| | |
| | - the information to request from the veteran |
| | |
| | - the minimum information required from the veteran |
| | |
| | - the PIES codes to use when submitting a records |
| | request |
| | |
| | - relevant personnel records in PTSD cases, and |
| | |
| | - where to send requests for Navy deck logs. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### C | > September 5, 2008 |
| hange Date | |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > Request hospital reports and clinical records if the |
| ### a. Whe | > veteran indicates pertinent treatment in a Department |
| n to Reque | > of Veterans Affairs (VA) facility, Vet Center, or |
| st Hospita | > elsewhere. |
| l Reports | |
| and Clinic | |
| al Records | |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### b. W | > Request the veteran to provide credible supporting |
| hen to Req | > evidence to establish that a stressor occurred if the |
| uest Evide | > evidence of record |
| nce From t | |
| he Veteran | - shows that the veteran was engaged in combat, but |
| | the claimed stressor is not related to that combat, |
| | or |
| | |
| | - does *not* show that the veteran was engaged in |
| | combat. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
14\. Requesting Evidence That a Stressor Occurred, Continued
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### c. | > Use the PTSD development letter in the Modern Awards |
| Informati | > Processing-Development (MAP-D) application to request |
| on to Requ | > information from the veteran. |
| est From t | > |
| he Veteran | > Enclose *VA Form 21-0781, Statement in Support of |
| | > Claim for Service Connection for Post-Traumatic |
| | > Stress Disorder (PTSD),* to solicit specific details |
| | > of each of the in-service stressful incidents, such |
| | > as the |
| | |
| | - date of the incident |
| | |
| | - place of the incident |
| | |
| | - unit of assignment at the time of the incident |
| | |
| | - detailed description of the event |
| | |
| | - medals or citations received as a result of the |
| | incident, and |
| | |
| | - name and other identifying information concerning |
| | any other individuals involved in the event, if |
| | appropriate. |
| | |
| | > ***Important***: Do not ask the veteran for specific |
| | > details in any case in which there is credible |
| | > supporting evidence that the claimed in-service |
| | > stressor occurred, such as evidence of internment as |
| | > a POW or receipt of one of the decorations listed in |
| | > [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, |
| | > 1.D.13.d](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD.xml#IV.ii.1.D.13.d) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| #### | > At a minimum, the veteran *must* provide the |
| # d. Minim | > following: |
| um Informa | |
| tion Requi | - a stressor that can be documented |
| red From t | |
| he Veteran | - the location where the incident took place |
| | |
| | - the approximate date (within a two-month period) of |
| | the incident, and |
| | |
| | - the unit of assignment at the time the stressful |
| | event occurred. |
| | |
| | > Inform the veteran that |
| | |
| | - the information is necessary to obtain supportive |
| | evidence of each of the stressful events, and |
| | |
| | - failure to respond or an incomplete response may |
| | result in denial of the claim. |
| | |
| | > ***Notes***: |
| | |
| | - Specific details of claimed stressful events may |
| | also be gathered from such sources as VA or private |
| | medical treatment reports and examination reports. |
| | |
| | - Veterans Service Representatives (VSRs) may obtain |
| | the date and location of well-documented events, |
| | such as the Tet Offensive, from VBA-sanctioned web |
| | sites (available through the [PTSD Rating Job Aid |
| | we |
| | bsite](http://vbaw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/rating/rat06f.htm)) |
| | and supply this information on the veteran's |
| | behalf. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
14\. Requesting Evidence That a Stressor Occurred, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| d\. | > ***Reference***: For information on the types of |
| Minimum | > stressors that may be impossible to corroborate, see |
| Inf | > the [*JSRRC Stressor Verification Guide, Section |
| ormation | > V*](http://vbaw. |
| Required | vba.va.gov/bl/21/publicat/Letters/TrngLtrs/TL04-02A.doc). |
| From the | |
| Veteran | |
| (co | |
| ntinued) | |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| #### | > Use the following PIES request codes to request records |
| # e. PIE | > required to process a claim for service connection for |
| S Codes | > PTSD: |
| Used to | |
| Submit a | - Use PIES request code O18 if |
| Records | |
| Request | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - the stressor is associated with an episode of |
| | personal trauma, such as rape, assault, and so forth, |
| | or |
| | |
| | - the veteran is claiming service connection for PTSD |
| | as a result of both personal trauma and other types |
| | of stressors. |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - Use PIES request code O19 for verification of all |
| | other types of stressors. |
| | |
| | > ***Notes***: |
| | |
| | - Only select documents from the veteran's personnel |
| | folder, including those listed under [M21-1MR, Part |
| | IV, Subpart ii, |
| | 1.D.14.f](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD.xml#IV.ii.1.D.14.f), |
| | are provided in response to submission of a PIES |
| | request under request code O19. |
| | |
| | - A copy of *all* documents within the personnel folder |
| | are provided in response to a PIES request submitted |
| | under request code O18. |
| | |
| | - Because of the time and cost involved in photocopying |
| | all documents within a personnel folder, do not |
| | submit a request to NPRC (address code 13) under |
| | request code O18 unless the claim involves personal |
| | trauma. |
| | |
| | - If documents not routinely provided by NPRC in |
| | response to a request submitted under request code |
| | O19 are needed, identify the documents in a |
| | customized request, using request code O99. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
14\. Requesting Evidence That a Stressor Occurred, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| # | > The table below identifies the forms that contain |
| #### f. | > information about the veteran's unit(s) of assignment, |
| Relevant | > military occupation, and service locations. |
| Personn | > |
| el Recor | > ***Note***: These forms are among the documents that |
| ds in PT | > will be provided in response to PIES requests submitted |
| SD Cases | > under request code O19. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Branch of Service | Name(s) of Forms |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Army | *DA Form 2-1*, *Personnel |
| | Qualification Record*. |
| | |
| | ***Notes***: |
| | |
| | - *DA Form 2-1* |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - is used for both officers and |
| | enlisted personnel, and |
| | |
| | - first came into use in January |
| | 1973. |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - Prior to January 1973, *DA Form |
| | 20*, *Enlisted* *Qualification* |
| | *Record* and *DA Form 66*, |
| | *Officer Qualification Record* |
| | were used. |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Navy | - enlisted record of *Transfer and |
| | Receipts*, pages |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - 12 |
| | |
| | - 32, and |
| | |
| | - 33 |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - enlisted record *Administrative |
| | Remarks*, pages |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - 4 through 9 |
| | |
| | - 13, and |
| | |
| | - 34, and |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - officer record, *NAVPERS |
| | 1301/5*1, *Officer Data Card*, |
| | page 35. |
| | |
| | ***Note***: *DD Form 214* and |
| | enlistment contracts are usually |
| | included. |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Air Force | - enlisted record, *AF Form 7*, |
| | *Airman Military Record*, pages |
| | 36 through 39 |
| | |
| | - officer record, *AF Form 11*, |
| | *Officer Military Record*, pages |
| | 39 and 40, and |
| | |
| | - performance reports for both |
| | enlisted personnel and officers. |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
14\. Requesting Evidence That a Stressor Occurred, Continued
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
f\. Relevant Personnel Records in PTSD Cases (continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Branch of Service | Name(s) of Forms |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Marine Corps | - enlistment contracts |
| | |
| | - discharge papers |
| | |
| | - *MABMC-11 (discharge order)*, and |
| | |
| | - service records, pages |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - 3 |
| | |
| | - 5 through 6 |
| | |
| | - 8 through 9 |
| | |
| | - 12 through 13, and |
| | |
| | - 17\. |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Coast Guard | - enlisted record |
| | |
| | - *Endorsement on Order Sheet, (DoT |
| | Form CG 3312B)* |
| | |
| | - officer record |
| | |
| | - *Service Records Card* |
| | |
| | - *DoT Form CG CG 3301* |
| | |
| | - *DoT Form CG CG 3303* |
| | |
| | - *DoT Form CG CG 3305*, pages 3, |
| | 5, 6-7 |
| | |
| | - *DD Form 214*, and |
| | |
| | - the enlistment contract. |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
14\. Requesting Evidence That a Stressor Occurred, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > Use the table below to determine the address to use |
| ### g. W | > when requesting Navy deck logs. |
| here to | |
| Send Req | |
| uests fo | |
| r Navy D | |
| eck Logs | |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| If the Navy deck logs ... | Then send the request to ... |
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| are dated 1940 or earlier | Old Military and Civil Records |
| | |
| | National Archives and Records |
| | Administration |
| | |
| | 700 Pennsylvania Ave., NW |
| | |
| | Washington, DC 20408 |
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| are dated between 1941 and 30 | Modern Military Branch |
| years prior to the current date | |
| | National Archives |
| | |
| | 8601 Adelphi Rd. |
| | |
| | College Park, MD 20740 |
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| are less than 30 years old | Department of the Navy |
| | |
| | Naval Historical Center |
| | |
| | 805 Kidder Breese, SE |
| | |
| | Washington Navy Yard |
| | |
| | Washington, DC 20374-5060 |
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| > ***Reference***: For more information on Navy deck logs and how to |
| > obtain them, see |
| > <http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/org15-1.htm>. |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
#### 15. Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service Stressor
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > This topic contains information on requesting |
| ### Intr | > verification of an in-service stressor. It includes |
| oduction | > information on |
| | |
| | - when to request corroboration of an in-service |
| | stressor |
| | |
| | - where to send a request for corroboration of an |
| | in-service stressor |
| | |
| | - what to include in requests to the U.S. Army and |
| | Joint Services Records Research Center (JSRRC) |
| | (formerly the U.S. Armed Services Center for Unit |
| | Records Research (CURR)) |
| | |
| | - sending requests for research of Marine Corps unit |
| | records to NARA |
| | |
| | - accessing Korean Conflict and Vietnam Era unit |
| | records through Virtual VA |
| | |
| | - requesting stressor corroboration from Marine Corps |
| | unit records dated after the Vietnam Era |
| | |
| | - the responsibilities of the Marine Corps Archives and |
| | Special Collections (MCASC) |
| | |
| | - information to include in requests to MCASC |
| | |
| | - sample letter to MCASC for a determination as to the |
| | availability of records required to corroborate a |
| | stressor |
| | |
| | - the duties of the JSRRC coordinator |
| | |
| | - invalid or incomplete requests |
| | |
| | - denying service connection because of an unconfirmed |
| | stressor |
| | |
| | - handling requests for more information, and |
| | |
| | - the failure of a veteran to provide sufficient |
| | information. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| # | > September 5, 2008 |
| #### Cha | |
| nge Date | |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
15\. Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service Stressor, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### a. | > Submit a request for corroboration of an in-service |
| When to | > stressor if |
| Request | |
| Corrobo | - the evidence does not corroborate the veteran's claim |
| ration o | that he/she engaged in combat or experienced other |
| f an In- | in-service stressor(s) |
| Service | |
| Stressor | - the in-service stressor claimed is capable of being |
| | documented |
| | |
| | - the veteran's records contain |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - evidence of a diagnosis of PTSD, such as outpatient |
| | treatment records showing treatment for PTSD, *or* |
| | |
| | - competent lay evidence of persistent or recurrent |
| | symptoms of PTSD, such as the veteran's description |
| | of symptoms indicative of PTSD, and |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - development is complete in every respect except for |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - corroboration of the in-service stressor, and |
| | |
| | - a confirmed diagnosis of PTSD. |
| | |
| | > ***Important***: |
| | |
| | - Do *not* schedule a VA examination before receiving |
| | corroboration of the claimed in-service stressor. A |
| | diagnosis of PTSD is not a prerequisite for |
| | initiating the stressor verification process. |
| | |
| | - Some stressors are clearly impossible to document and |
| | should not be referred to the U.S. Army and Joint |
| | Services Records Research Center (JSRRC) (formerly |
| | the U.S. Armed Services Center for Unit Records |
| | Research (CURR)), NARA, or the Marine Corps. If, |
| | after requesting/obtaining pertinent facts from the |
| | veteran, it is obvious that corroboration simply is |
| | not feasible, the claim should be decided based on |
| | the evidence of record. |
| | |
| | > ***References***: For information on |
| | |
| | - where to send a request for corroboration of an |
| | in-service stressor, see [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart |
| | ii, |
| | 1.D.15.b](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD.xml#IV.ii.1.D.15.b), |
| | and |
| | |
| | - the types of stressors that may be impossible to |
| | corroborate, see the [*JSRRC Stressor Verification |
| | Guide, Section |
| | V*](http://vbaw. |
| | vba.va.gov/bl/21/publicat/Letters/TrngLtrs/TL04-02A.doc). |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
15\. Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service Stressor, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| #### | > Use the table below to determine where to send a |
| # b. Whe | > request for corroboration of an in-service stressor. |
| re to Se | |
| nd a Req | |
| uest for | |
| Corrobo | |
| ration o | |
| f an In- | |
| Service | |
| Stressor | |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| If the stressor occurred | Send the request to ... |
| during service in the ... | |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| - Army | JSRRC (address code 55) via the PIES/ |
| | Defense Personnel Records Imaging System |
| - Navy | (DPRIS) interface under request code |
| | |
| - Air Force, or | - O40 - first (or only) stressor |
| | |
| - Coast Guard | - O41 - second stressor (if more than |
| | one is claimed), or |
| | |
| | - O42 - third stressor (if more than |
| | two are claimed). |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Marine Corps (*except* | ***Address***: |
| during assignment aboard | |
| a Navy ship) | Marine Corps Archives and Special |
| | Collections |
| | |
| | Alfred M. Gray Research Center |
| | |
| | 2040 Broadway Street, MCCDC |
| | |
| | Quantico, VA 22134-5107 |
| | |
| | ***Fax number***: |
| | |
| | \(703\) 784-4665. |
| | |
| | ***Note***: Submit a request for |
| | stressor corroboration to this address |
| | or fax number *only* if |
| | |
| | - the claimed stressor of a Korean |
| | Conflict or Vietnam Era veteran |
| | cannot be corroborated through |
| | review of Marine Corps unit records |
| | in Virtual VA, or |
| | |
| | - the claimed stressor occurred during |
| | service after the Vietnam Era. |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Marine Corps, during | ***Address***: |
| assignment aboard a Navy | |
| ship | U.S. Army and Joint Services Records |
| | Research Center |
| | |
| | 7701 Telegraph Road |
| | |
| | Kingman Building, Room 2C08 |
| | |
| | Alexandria, VA 22315-3852 |
| | |
| | ***Important***: Do *not* submit these |
| | requests for stressor verification to |
| | JSRRC via the PIES/DPRIS interface. |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
15\. Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service Stressor, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### | > The following information must be included when |
| c. Info | > submitting a request for stressor corroboration to |
| rmation | > JSRRC's mailing address or through the PIES/Defense |
| to Inclu | > Personnel Records Imaging System (DPRIS) interface: |
| de in Re | |
| quests t | - adequate identifying information, to include the |
| o JSRRC | claimant's full name and Social Security number (SSN) |
| | |
| | - a description of the claimed stressor(s) |
| | |
| | - month and year during which the stressful event |
| | occurred (JSRRC will research records dated 30 days |
| | before the date provided and 30 days after) |
| | |
| | - the veteran's unit of assignment at the time of the |
| | stressful event, and |
| | |
| | - the geographic location where the stressful event |
| | took place. |
| | |
| | > ***Note***: The telephone number for VA's liaison |
| | > officer at JSRRC is (703) 428-6915. |
| | > |
| | > ***Reference***: For a listing of the personnel |
| | > documents containing information about the veteran's |
| | > unit(s) of assignment and service locations, see |
| | > [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, |
| | > 1.D.14.f.](http://vbaw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/M21 |
| | -1MR/index.asp?id=pt04_sp02_ch01_secD.xml#IV.ii.1.D.14.f) |
| | > |
| | > Additional information identified by JSRRC as helpful |
| | > in conducting research includes |
| | |
| | - the medals or citations received by the veteran, and |
| | |
| | - the names of other soldiers or sailors involved in |
| | the stressful incident. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| #### | > Send a request for research of Marine Corps unit |
| # d. Sen | > records to NARA when |
| ding Req | |
| uests fo | - corroboration of a stressor is required, and |
| r Resear | |
| ch of Ma | - the unit records are dated prior to the Vietnam Era. |
| rine Cor | |
| ps Unit | > ***Exception***: Unit records covering the Korean |
| Records | > Conflict may be accessed through Virtual VA. For more |
| to NARA | > information, see [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, |
| | > 1.D.15.e](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD.xml#IV.ii.1.D.15.e) |
| | > |
| | > Use to table below to request stressor corroboration |
| | > from NARA. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Step Action
1 Access the inquiry form at [NARA's website
address](http://www.archives.gov/contact/inquire-form.html#part-b).
2 Select "Records created by the United States military" from the
drop-down list of question topics.
------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Continued on next page
15\. Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service Stressor, Continued
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
d\. Sending Requests for Research of Marine Corps Unit Records to NARA
(continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
| Step | Action |
+------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
| 3 | In the box provided |
| | |
| | - identify yourself as a VBA employee, and |
| | |
| | - indicate the specific information you are |
| | seeking, as well as the veteran's |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - name |
| | |
| | - rank |
| | |
| | - unit of assignment at the time of the |
| | stressful event, and |
| | |
| | - inclusive dates of service. |
+------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
| 4 | Furnish your contact information in the spaces |
| | provided. |
+------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > Marine Corps unit records covering the Korean Conflict |
| ### e. A | > and Vietnam Era are available to VA personnel through |
| ccessing | > Virtual VA. |
| Korean | > |
| Conflict | > Perform a thorough search of Virtual VA to obtain |
| and Vie | > information needed to corroborate the claimed |
| tnam Era | > stressor(s) of a Korean Conflict or Vietnam Era |
| Unit Re | > veteran. |
| cords Th | > |
| rough Vi | > ***Note***: The Marine Corps Archives and Special |
| rtual VA | > Collections (MCASC) maintains custodianship of the |
| | > records in Virtual VA and is the ultimate authority on |
| | > their content and organization. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| # | > Send requests for stressor corroboration from Marine |
| #### f. | > Corps unit records dated after the Vietnam Era directly |
| Requesti | > to MCASC. |
| ng Stres | > |
| sor Corr | > ***References***: For information on |
| oboratio | |
| n From M | - MCASC's mailing address and fax number, see [M21-1MR, |
| arine Co | Part IV, Subpart ii, |
| rps Reco | 1.D.15.b](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD#IV.ii.1.D.15.b) |
| rds Date | |
| d After | - what to include in the request to MCASC, see |
| the Viet | [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, |
| nam Era | 1.D.15.h](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD#IV.ii.1.D.15.h), and |
| | |
| | - a sample of a letter to MCASC for a determination as |
| | to the availability of records required to |
| | corroborate a stressor, see [M21-1MR, Part IV, |
| | Subpart ii, |
| | 1.D.15.i](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD#IV.ii.1.D.15.i). |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
15\. Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service Stressor, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > When a regional office (RO) cannot document the claimed |
| ### g. R | > stressor of a Marine Corps Korean Conflict or Vietnam |
| esponsib | > Era veteran following a thorough search of the records |
| ilities | > in Virtual VA, or the claim requires research of unit |
| of MCASC | > records dated after the Vietnam Era, staff at MCASC is |
| | > responsible for |
| | |
| | - identifying the record(s) required to document the |
| | stressors, or |
| | |
| | - providing confirmation that the claimed stressor(s) |
| | cannot be corroborated using records in its custody. |
| | |
| | > ***Important***: An RO cannot deny a claim for PTSD |
| | > based solely on the absence of a verified stressor |
| | > until MCASC or NARA has confirmed the RO's negative |
| | > findings. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ### | > The following information must be included in each |
| ## h. In | > request to MCASC for records needed to document a |
| formatio | > claimed stressor: |
| n to Inc | |
| lude in | - the veteran's name and VA file number |
| Record R | |
| equests | - the name of the veteran's squadron/battalion (or |
| to MCASC | higher echelon) |
| | |
| | - the date (month and year) the stressful event |
| | occurred (not to exceed a 60-day period) |
| | |
| | - a concise description of the stressful event |
| | |
| | - identification of the unit records reviewed through |
| | Virtual VA |
| | |
| | - the mailing address of the requesting RO, and |
| | |
| | - a point of contact at the RO. |
| | |
| | > ***Notes***: |
| | |
| | - The request may be faxed or mailed to MCASC, but it |
| | must be on VA letterhead and no more than one page in |
| | length. |
| | |
| | - Do *not* attach to the request any medical |
| | information or statement(s) from the veteran. |
| | |
| | - Submit a request to MCASC *only* after exhausting all |
| | efforts to document the claimed stressor(s) through |
| | other means, including Virtual VA and/or *official* |
| | military web sites. |
| | |
| | > ***Referencs***: For |
| | |
| | - MCASC's mailing address and fax number, see [M21-1MR, |
| | Part IV, Subpart ii, |
| | 1.D.15.b](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD#IV.ii.1.D.15.b), and |
| | |
| | - sample of a letter to MCASC for a determination as to |
| | the availability of records required to corroborate a |
| | stressor, see [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, |
| | 1.D.15.i](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD#IV.ii.1.D.15.i). |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
15\. Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service Stressor, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| # | > A sample letter to MCASC for a determination as to the |
| #### i. | > availability of records required to corroborate a |
| Sample L | > stressor is below. |
| etter to | > |
| MCASC f | > {width="5.082638888888889in" |
| or a Det | > height="6.590277777777778in"} |
| erminati | |
| on as to | |
| the Ava | |
| ilabilit | |
| y of Rec | |
| ords Req | |
| uired to | |
| Corrobo | |
| rate a S | |
| tressor | |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
15\. Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service Stressor, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### j. | > The JSRRC coordinator is the primary point of contact |
| Duties | > for all JSRRC-related related issues within each |
| of the J | > regional office and |
| SRRC Coo | |
| rdinator | - determines whether or not submission of a request for |
| | stressor verification is appropriate |
| | |
| | - serves as the MCASC and NARA point of contact for |
| | issues related to records requests |
| | |
| | - personally submits all of the RO's requests for |
| | stressor corroboration |
| | |
| | - notifies JSRRC, MCASC, or NARA when further action on |
| | a pending research request is no longer necessary, |
| | (i.e., evidence is received that verifies the claimed |
| | stressor or the claim is withdrawn altogether) |
| | |
| | - determines the status of research requests pending at |
| | JSRRC by checking the [stressor corroboration |
| | databa |
| | se](http://vbacodmoint1.vba.va.gov/currclts/default.asp), |
| | and |
| | |
| | - forwards inquiries from the regional office regarding |
| | JSRRC-related issues to the VACO JSRRC e-mailbox at |
| | VAVBAWAS/CO/CURR. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### k | > JSRRC, MCASC, or NARA will return to the appropriate |
| . Invali | > regional office any research request identified as |
| d or Inc | > invalid or incomplete, with an explanation of the |
| omplete | > deficiency(ies) identified. JSRRC, MCASC, or NARA then |
| Requests | > closes out the request; it must be resubmitted as a new |
| | > request to receive further consideration. |
| | > |
| | > JSRRC, MCASC, and NARA process research requests on a |
| | > first-come, first-served basis. Incomplete requests |
| | > that are later resubmitted lose their original "place |
| | > in line." For this reason, it is very important to |
| | > provide correct and complete information to JSRRC, |
| | > MCASC, and NARA at the time of the initial submission. |
| | > |
| | > ***Note***: ROs have the authority to deny a claim for |
| | > service connection for PTSD without requesting |
| | > corroboration of an in-service stressor from an |
| | > official records custodian, such as JSRRC, MCASC, or |
| | > NARA, if |
| | |
| | - the claimant fails to provide the minimum information |
| | required to conduct research, and |
| | |
| | - the JSRRC coordinator has taken the actions described |
| | in [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart |
| | ii.1.D.16](http://vbaw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/M21- |
| | 1MR/pt04/sp02/ch01/pt04_sp02_ch01_secD.xml#IV.ii.1.D.16). |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
15\. Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service Stressor, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### | > Denying service connection solely because of an |
| l. Denyi | > unconfirmed stressor is improper unless the appropriate |
| ng Servi | > records custodian, such as JSRRC, MCASC, or NARA, has |
| ce Conne | > confirmed that the claimed stressor cannot be |
| ction Be | > corroborated or |
| cause of | |
| an Unco | - the veteran has failed to provide the basic |
| nfirmed | information required to conduct research, ***and*** |
| Stressor | |
| | - the JSRRC coordinator has taken the actions described |
| | in [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart |
| | ii.1.D.16](http://vbaw.vba.va.gov/bl/21/M21- |
| | 1MR/pt04/sp02/ch01/pt04_sp02_ch01_secD.xml#IV.ii.1.D.16). |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### m | > Occasionally, JSRRC, MCASC, or NARA requires additional |
| . Handli | > information in order to conduct its research. When this |
| ng Reque | > occurs the RO must take immediate action to comply with |
| sts for | > the request. |
| More Inf | > |
| ormation | > ***Notes***: |
| | |
| | - The JSRRC coordinator may contact the veteran by |
| | telephone to obtain the additional information needed |
| | to document the in-service stressor. The substance of |
| | the telephone call must be documented on a *Report of |
| | Contact,* *VA Form 119.* |
| | |
| | - Failure by the veteran to respond substantively to |
| | the request for information is grounds for denial of |
| | the claim based on the absence of a verifiable |
| | stressor. |
| | |
| | > ***Reference***: For more information on stressor |
| | > corroboration and the additional evidence that may be |
| | > required to conduct research, see the [*JSRRC Stressor |
| | > Verification |
| | > Guide*](http://vbaw. |
| | vba.va.gov/bl/21/publicat/Letters/TrngLtrs/TL04-02A.doc). |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
15\. Requesting Corroboration of an In-Service Stressor, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### n. | > Use the table below to determine what action to take |
| Failure | > when a veteran fails to provide sufficient information |
| of a Ve | > about a claimed stressful event. |
| teran to | |
| Provide | |
| Suffici | |
| ent Info | |
| rmation | |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------+
| If a veteran ... | Then ... |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------+
| fails to respond within 30 days to the | refer the case to the |
| request for information about a claimed | JSRRC coordinator to make |
| stressful event | a formal finding that |
| | sufficient information |
| | required to corroborate |
| | the claimed stressor(s) |
| | does not exist. |
| | |
| | ***Reference***: For more |
| | information on action |
| | taken by the JSRRC |
| | coordinator, see |
| | |
| | - [M21-1MR, Part IV, |
| | Subpart ii, |
| | |
| | 1.D.16.a](../pt04_sp02_ |
| | ch01_secD#IV.ii.1.D.16.a), |
| | and |
| | |
| | - [M21-1MR, Part IV, |
| | Subpart ii, |
| | |
| | 1.D.16.b](../pt04_sp02_ |
| | ch01_secD#IV.ii.1.D.16.b). |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------+
| submits insufficient information in | send a 30-day follow-up |
| response to the initial request for | letter explaining |
| information | |
| | - what information is |
| | missing, and |
| | |
| | - why the information is |
| | needed. |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------+
| - fails to respond to the follow-up | refer the case to the |
| letter within 30 days, or | JSRRC coordinator to make |
| | a formal finding that |
| - submits information in response to | sufficient information |
| the follow-up letter that is still | required to corroborate |
| insufficient. | the claimed stressor(s) |
| | does not exist. |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------+
#### 16. Completion of a Formal Finding of a Lack of Information Required to Document the Claimed Stressor(s)
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > This topic contains information on completing a formal |
| ### Intr | > finding of a lack of information required to document |
| oduction | > the claimed stressor(s), including |
| | |
| | - action by the JSRRC coordinator |
| | |
| | - requirements for a formal finding, and |
| | |
| | - a sample of a formal finding. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| # | > September 5, 2008 |
| #### Cha | |
| nge Date | |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### a. | > The JSRRC coordinator will make a formal finding |
| Action | > regarding the lack of sufficient information in the |
| by the J | > claims folder to document the occurrence of the |
| SRRC Coo | > stressful event(s) and the veteran's involvement in it. |
| rdinator | > |
| | > To ensure that the information of record is |
| | > insufficient, the JSRRC coordinator should review the |
| | > claims folder to confirm |
| | |
| | - the claimant was properly notified of the information |
| | required to document the stressor(s), and |
| | |
| | - all relevant evidence, to include service records, |
| | has been considered in an attempt to confirm the |
| | occurrence of the stressful event. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > The formal finding |
| ### b. R | |
| equireme | - must be approved by the Veterans Service Center |
| nts for | Manager (VSCM) or his/her designee |
| a Formal | |
| Finding | - should be on a separate page to be filed in the |
| | claims folder, and |
| | |
| | - should note |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - the actions taken to obtain the required information |
| | |
| | - that all procedures have been properly followed |
| | |
| | - that evidence of all efforts to obtain the records is |
| | in the claims folder |
| | |
| | - that all efforts to obtain the needed information |
| | have been exhausted |
| | |
| | - that further efforts would be futile, and |
| | |
| | - that the information required to document the |
| | stressful event(s) is unavailable. |
| | |
| | > ***Note***: It is *not* necessary to contact the |
| | > veteran by telephone to |
| | |
| | - advise him/her of the formal finding, or |
| | |
| | - allow additional time to submit the needed |
| | information. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
16\. Completion of a Formal Finding of a Lack of Information Required to
Document the Claimed Stressor(s), Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| #### | > A sample of a formal finding of a lack of information |
| # c. Sa | > required to document the claimed stressor(s) is shown |
| mple of | > below: |
| a Formal | > |
| Finding | > {width="5.082638888888889in" |
| | > height="6.480555555555555in"} |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
#### 17. Developing Claims for Service Connection for PTSD Based on Personal Trauma
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > This topic contains information on developing claims |
| ### Intr | > for service connection for PTSD based on personal |
| oduction | > trauma. It includes information on |
| | |
| | - general information about personal trauma |
| | |
| | - the evidence required to establish service connection |
| | |
| | - the process for obtaining information from the |
| | veteran |
| | |
| | - the letters to use to obtain information from the |
| | veteran |
| | |
| | - the process for obtaining service records |
| | |
| | - the problems associated with development |
| | |
| | - alternative sources for information, and |
| | |
| | - the process for obtaining police reports. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| # | > September 5, 2008 |
| #### Cha | |
| nge Date | |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > Personal trauma is an event of human design that |
| ### a. G | > threatens or inflicts harm. Veterans claiming service |
| eneral I | > connection for disability due to in-service personal |
| nformati | > trauma face unique problems documenting their claims. |
| on About | > |
| Persona | > These incidents are often violent and may lead to the |
| l Trauma | > development of PTSD. |
| | > |
| | > ***Examples***: Rape, physical assault, domestic |
| | > battering, robbery, mugging, stalking, and harassment. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > To establish service connection for PTSD, there *must* |
| ### b. E | > be credible evidence to support the veteran's assertion |
| vidence | > that the stressful event occurred. |
| Required | > |
| to Esta | > This does *not* mean that the evidence actually proves |
| blish Se | > that the incident occurred, but that there is at least |
| rvice Co | > an approximate balance of positive and negative |
| nnection | > evidence that the event did occur. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
17\. Developing Claims for Service Connection for PTSD Based on Personal
Trauma, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### c | > Identifying possible sources of evidence to support the |
| . Obtain | > claim may require asking the veteran for information |
| ing Info | > concerning the traumatic incident. Make this request as |
| rmation | > compassionately as possible in order to avoid causing |
| From the | > further trauma. |
| Veteran | > |
| | > Although personal trauma is most often thought of as |
| | > involving female veterans, male veterans may also be |
| | > involved. Be sure requests for evidence/ information |
| | > reflect the appropriate gender of the veteran. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### d | > When writing a letter to obtain information from the |
| . Letter | > veteran regarding a claim based on personal trauma, use |
| s to Use | > MAP-D and select the personal assault option from the |
| to Obta | > PTSD special issues screen. Enclose *VA Form 21-0781a, |
| in Infor | > Statement in Support of Claim for Service Connection |
| mation F | > for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Secondary to |
| rom the | > Personal Trauma,* to solicit details of the claim. |
| Veteran | > |
| | > ***Important***: Letters used by ROs to solicit details |
| | > concerning a combat stressful incident are |
| | > inappropriate for PTSD claims based on personal trauma. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ## | > Review the claim and all attached documents. Request |
| ### e. O | > STRs and the entire personnel folder from the |
| btaining | > appropriate records custodian, if necessary. |
| Service | > |
| Records | > ***Note***: Veterans Service Representatives (VSRs) |
| | > must work closely with Rating Veterans Service |
| | > Representatives (RVSRs) when developing personal trauma |
| | > cases. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ##### | > Because personal trauma is an extremely personal and |
| f. Prob | > sensitive issue |
| lems Ass | |
| ociated | - many incidents of personal trauma are not officially |
| With Dev | reported, and |
| elopment | |
| | - the victims of this type of in-service trauma may |
| | find it difficult to produce evidence to support the |
| | occurrence of the stressor. |
| | |
| | > It is often necessary to seek alternative evidence. |
| | > |
| | > ***Reference***: For information on alternative sources |
| | > for information, see [M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, |
| | > 1.D.17.g](../pt04_sp02_ch01_secD#IV.ii.1.D.17.g). |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Continued on next page
17\. Developing Claims for Service Connection for PTSD Based on Personal
Trauma, Continued
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| #### | > Service records not normally requested may be needed to |
| # g. Alt | > develop claims for service connection for PTSD based on |
| ernative | > personal trauma, including in-service sexual assault. |
| Sources | > Responses to a request for information may identify |
| for Inf | > alternative sources for information, such as |
| ormation | |
| | - rape crisis center or center for domestic abuse |
| | |
| | - counseling facility |
| | |
| | - health clinic |
| | |
| | - family members or roommates |
| | |
| | - faculty members |
| | |
| | - civilian police reports |
| | |
| | - medical reports from civilian physicians or |
| | caregivers who may have treated the veteran either |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - immediately following the incident, or |
| | |
| | - sometime later |
| | |
| | ```{=html} |
| | <!-- --> |
| | ``` |
| | - chaplain or clergy |
| | |
| | - fellow service persons, or |
| | |
| | - personal diaries or journals. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| # | > Obtain reports, as appropriate, from |
| #### h. | |
| Obtainin | - military police |
| g Police | |
| Reports | - shore patrol |
| | |
| | - a provost marshal's office, or |
| | |
| | - other military law enforcement offices. |
| | |
| | > ***Note***: Requests may be submitted via phone, fax, |
| | > e-mail, or written correspondence, as long as the |
| | > request is properly documented in the claims folder. |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| en |
converted_docs | 991919 | {width="1.2902777777777779in"
height="1.229861111111111in"} April 28, 2005
**[VIA CERTIFIED MAIL]{.underline}**
**[RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED]{.underline}**
Ming-Hang Ho
Gilsson Technologies
2576 Barrington Court
Hayward, CA 94545
> Re: File No. EB-05-SE-005
Dear Mr. Ho:
This is an official **CITATION**, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5)
of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), 47
U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for importing and marketing an unauthorized radio
frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of
the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the
Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a). As explained below,
future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject
your company to monetary forfeitures.
By letter dated March 7, 2005,[^1] the Spectrum Enforcement Division of
the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into
whether Gilsson Technologies ("Gilsson") is marketing in the United
States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically the R-1 and
R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas. You responded by letter dated March 26,
2005.[^2] In your response, you admit that Gilsson began marketing the
R-1 (RA-45) and R-2 (RA-46 or Vortech) Re-Radiator GPS Antennas around
March 2002, and that the devices were available through your website
www.gilsson.com, through eBay.com, and an "antenna" brochure. In
addition, you stated that Gilsson has sold 50 units of R-1 and 100 units
of R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas.[^3] You identified the manufacturer of
the devices as San Jose Navigation, Inc., a company headquartered in
Taipei, Taiwan.
You further stated that Gilsson had assumed that San Jose Navigation had
secured any and all certifications for the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS
Antennas, as it did with other GPS related devices. You indicated that
as an importer of finished goods you were not aware of FCC regulations
relating to certification and asserted that you rely solely on the
manufacturers of goods to obtain certifications and approvals prior to
exporting to the United States. In addition, you asserted that Gilsson
had no reason to suspect that San Jose Navigation had not secured
necessary FCC certifications for its extensive exports to the United
States. You acknowledged that the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas
were not certified in accordance with Commission rules.
Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "\[n\]o person shall
manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home
electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply
with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section." Section
2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's implementing regulations provides that:
no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including
advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the
purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio
frequency device unless ... \[i\]n the case of a device subject to
certification, such device has been authorized by the Commission in
accordance with the rules in this chapter and is properly identified and
labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this
chapter.
Pursuant to Section 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b),
intentional radiators, such as the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas,
must be authorized in accordance with the FCC's certification procedures
prior to the initiation of marketing in the United States. Moreover, the
R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas operate in frequency bands used for
GPS, which are within the restricted frequency bands listed in Section
15.205(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.205(a). Section 15.205(a) allows
intentional radiators to transmit only spurious emissions[^4] in the
restricted frequency bands. Thus, the R-1 and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS
Antennas apparently cannot comply with the FCC's technical standards and
therefore would not be capable of receiving a grant of equipment
certification. Furthermore, Gilsson admits in its letter of March 26,
2005 that the manufacturer does not hold a certification for the R-1 and
R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas.[^5] Accordingly, it appears that Gilsson
has violated Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules
by importing and marketing in the United States unauthorized radio
frequency devices.
Your letter of March 26, 2005 indicates that Gilsson ordered 350 R-1 and
250 R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas on March 1, 2005, and Gilsson expects
the order to be delivered to its warehouse soon. You are cautioned that
the marketing of this shipment would constitute a further violation of
Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules.
**[If, after receipt of this citation, you violate the Communications
Act or the Commission's rules in any manner described herein, the
Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed \$11,000 for
each such violation or each day of a continuing
violation.]{.underline}** [^6]
If you choose to do so, you may respond to this citation within 30 days
from the date of this letter either through (1) a personal interview at
the Commission's Field Office nearest to your place of business, or (2)
a written statement. Your response should specify the actions that you
are taking to ensure that you do not violate the Commission's rules
governing the marketing of radio frequency equipment in the future.
**The nearest Commission field office appears to be the** **San
Francisco Office in Pleasanton, California. Please call Yasin Ozer at
202-418-1210 if you wish to schedule a personal interview. You should
schedule any interview to take place within 30 days of the date of this
letter. You should send any written statement within 30 days of the date
of this letter to:**
> Kathryn Berthot
Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division
Enforcement Bureau
Federal Communications Commission
445-12^th^ Street, S.W., Rm. 7-C802
Washington, D.C. 20554
Under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(e)(3), we are informing
you that the Commission's staff will use all relevant material
information before it, including information that you disclose in your
interview or written statement, to determine what, if any, enforcement
action is required to ensure your compliance with the Communications Act
and the Commission's rules.
The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the
concealment of any material fact, in reply to this citation is
punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.
Sincerely,
Kathryn Berthot
> Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division
Enforcement Bureau
Federal Communications Commission
[^1]: *See* Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Division, Spectrum
Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, to Ming-Hang Ho, Gilsson Technologies (March 7, 2005).
[^2]: *See* Letter from Ming-Hang Ho, Gilsson Technologies, to Thomas
Fitz-Gibbon and Yasin Ozer, Spectrum Enforcement Division,
Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (March 26,
2005) ("Response").
[^3]: You also indicated that Gilsson has permanently removed the R-1
and R-2 Re-Radiator GPS Antennas from its website.
[^4]: 47 C.F.R. § 2.1 defines spurious emissions as "Emission on a
frequency or frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth
and the level of which may be reduced without affecting the
corresponding transmission of information. Spurious emissions
include harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation
products and frequency conversion products, but exclude out-of-band
emissions."
[^5]: Response at 2.
[^6]: *See* 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(b)(3).
| en |
converted_docs | 406659 | PART I - SECTION B
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS
**[Clin 0001]{.underline}** Contractor shall provide all labor,
materials and equipment necessary for two small ashphalt parking lots
located on road "L" between Bessie Coleman drive and parking lot "B" in
accordance
with attached specifications.
**[Sub-clin]{.underline} [Supplies/Services]{.underline}
[Qty]{.underline} [Unit]{.underline} [Price Amount]{.underline}**
0001a**.** Utility Location and Beep Out 1 ls \$ \$
0001b. Soil Erosion Controls and CB Protection 1 ls \$ \$
0001c. Traffic Control, signs, barrels, cones etc 1 ls \$ \$
0001d. Saw cutting at curbs, pavement and 15" pipe crossing 360 lf \$ \$
0001e. Asphalt removal and disposal 100 sy \$ \$
0001f. 8" concrete curb and gutter removal disposal 140 If \$ \$
0001g. 8" concrete curb removal, no gutter and disposal 100 If \$ \$
0001h. 5" wide sidewalk removal and disposal 800 sf \$ \$
0001i. Clearing and grubbing. Trees up to 12" .23 ac \$ \$
(includes stumps/brush)
0001j. Removal of concrete slabs near CB. 280 sf \$ \$
0001k. Excavation of sidewalks and both parking lots, incl Disposal 200
cy \$ \$
00011\. Strip, remove and stock pile topsoil 150 cy \$ \$
0001m. Excavation for 15' CMP and disposal 60 cy \$ \$
0001n. Relocation of Existing Sign Park. Lot A-1 South 1 Is \$ \$
0001o. Manhole and water valve height adjustments 2 ea \$ \$
0001p. Install new "8X18" concrete curbs 300 If \$ \$
0001q. Install tapered curb at A-1 South 24 If \$ \$
0001r. Install new 4" Thk, 5' wide conc. Side walks on DGA and
w.w. reinforcement 1200 If \$ \$
0001s. Install new parking bumbers with pins 9 ea \$ \$
0001t. Install 15" CMP Storm sewer pipe complete 50 If \$ \$
0001u. Install Leaching Sys. Manhole with castings complete 1 ea \$ \$
0001v. Construct Grass swale with stone burms. 120 If \$ \$
0001w. Install new leaching system comp. w. 48" pipe, stone, etc 60 If
\$ \$
0001x. Install catch basin with Type "A" castings and grate. Comp. 1 ea
\$ \$
0001y. Sub Grade prepartation 700 sy \$ \$
0001z. Install 8" DGA for paving base 350 sy \$ \$
0001aa. Install I-5 Asphalt 3' thk, compact at 95%, for parking lots,
> Curb abutments, and 15" CMP pipe crossing 500 sy \$ \$
0001bb. Install backfill into 2' wide median between curbs and SW 12 cy
\$ \$
0001cc. Painting of stalls, roadway line and stop bar. 1 Is \$ \$
0001dd. Top soil and hydro seeding 400 sy \$ \$
Total all sub-clins \$ [\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_]{.underline}
> Total Labor \$ [\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_]{.underline}
>
> Total FFP Clin 0001 \$ [\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_]{.underline}
>
> PART I ‑ SECTION C
Construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the following
statement of work and in accordance with the associated drawings for
Construction of Parking Lot "A-1" located at the William J. Hughes
Technical Center, New Jersey 08405 and as listed in Section J --
Attachments.
C.1 **STATEMENT OF WORK**
Contractor to provide labor, materials, and equipment for construction
of two small asphalt parking lots located on road "L" between Bessie
Coleman Drive and Parking Lot "B", and a storm drainage-leaching field.
The finished asphalt parking lots shall have a new asphalt pavement that
is dense, uniform in texture, smooth and free of hollows, depressions,
roller marks and surface cracks. The drainage leaching fields shall be
completed as shown on the plans and inspected before any paving is
started.
The Intent of the Work consists of:
1. Set up soil erosion control and construction signs. This project is
near an existing 300 foot wetland buffer and shall not be encroached
upon outside of the authorized work area. Silt fencing erosion
controls and inlet protection shall be in place before any work is
started.
2. Install traffic controls.
3. Clearing and grubbing of brush and trees.
4. Removal existing concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks.
5. Relocation of existing Parking Lot "B" sign.
6. Saw cut and remove existing paving.
7. Removal of existing earth and prepare remaining sub grade by grading
and compacting.
8. Construction of new storm water grassy swale with stone burms as
shown on the plans details.
9. Construct storm water leaching system and storm sewer pipe and
inlet.
10. Install new 5' wide concrete sidewalks and new 8"x18"concrete curbs.
Work includes two new handicapped ramps, as located on the plans,
11. Install 8" thick DGA sub base and compact to 95%.
12. Repave new parking lot with 3" of I-5 asphalt, at final grade.
> Compaction of new asphalt to be 95% or better.
13. Joints where the new asphalt meets the old, will be sealed with a 3"
wide hot bituminous strip.
14. Contractor shall maintain existing grades, grades on plans and
ensure that no standing water will occur in the parking lot.
15. Tack coat shall be NJDOT Grade RS-1. Tack coat only to be used where
the asphalt abuts concrete and metal frames.
16. Paint new parking stalls. NJDOT Standard Road Construction
Specifications dated 2001, Section 912.10 Sub Para. "B" epoxy paint
for line striping and chevrons. Paint color shall be NJDOT Highway
white. Parking stripe will be 5" wide. Parking stalls (standard)
shall be 10 X 18 foot. Handicapped ramps paint and color shall meet
the ABAAS Standards. NJDOT Standard Road Construction Specifications
dated 2001, Section 912.10 Sub Para. "C" Thermoplastic paint for
arrows, writing on pavement, and crosswalk. The cross walk between
the two handicapped ramps shall be white. No parking zone stripping
shall be yellow.
17. Topsoil and hydro seeding of disturbed areas by construction.
18. All debris and unsuitable materials shall be removed from the site
and disposed by the contractor. Work area to be swept and broom
clean at the completion of the project.
19. Contractor to field verify all measurements and utility locations
prior to starting work.
20. Contractor shall be responsible for any damages grass areas or
adjacent property due to his construction operations and shall
repair/replace same at his own expense.
21. Contractor shall provide personnel having the minimum levels of
Professional/technical experience and education specified herein,
for each labor category. The contractor and all his employees are
required to comply with all security issues and requirements.
All work shall be in accordance with NJDOT Standard Specifications for
Road and Bridge Construction dated 2001 or latest Supplements or
Revisions.
Soil erosion measures shall comply with the Standard for Soil Erosion
and Sediment Control in New Jersey, revised July 1999, in accordance
with NJAC 2:90et. Seq. and the FAA WJH Technical Centers Standard
Environmental Protection Section 05160.
All Federal, State and FAA Safety Standards shall apply during the
performance of this project.
PART I, SECTION D
PACKAGING AND MARKING
**NOT APPLICABLE**
PART I ‑ SECTION E
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
3.1-1 CLAUSES AND PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (DECEMBER 2005)
This screening information request (SIR) or contract, as applicable,
incorporates by reference the provisions or clauses listed below with
the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon
request, the Contracting Officer will make the full text available, or
offerors and contractors may obtain the full text via Internet at:\
[[http://conwrite.faa.gov]{.underline}](http://conwrite.faa.gov/) (on
this web page, select \"Search and View Clauses\").
3.10.4-10 INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION (JULY 2001)
PART I ‑ SECTION F
DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE
3.1-1 CLAUSES AND PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (DECEMBER 2005)
This screening information request (SIR) or contract, as applicable,
incorporates by reference the provisions or clauses listed below with
the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon
request, the Contracting Officer will make the full text available, or
offerors and contractors may obtain the full text via Internet at:\
[[http://conwrite.faa.gov]{.underline}](http://conwrite.faa.gov/) (on
this web page, select \"Search and View Clauses\").
3.10.1-11 GOVERNMENT DELAY OF WORK (APR 1996)
3.2.2.3-62 PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE (JULY 2004)
The successful offeror must attend a pre-construction conference at a
site the Contracting Officer designates before starting the work.
3.2.2.3-71 STARTING, PERFORMING, AND COMPLETING WORK (JULY 2004)
The Contractor (you) must\
(a) begin work under this contract within [\_\_5\_\_\_\_]{.underline}\_
calendar days after the date you receive the notice to proceed,\
(b) perform the work diligently, and\
(c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than [\_\_\_60
days\_\_\_\_]{.underline}. The time allowed for completion must include
final cleanup of the premises.
F.1 WORK HOURS
Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor will be permitted to work
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Federal holidays (New Years Day, Martin Luther King Jr.\'s Birthday,
Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day,
Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day), that fall within the
work week will not be considered work days. When any of these designated
holidays falls on a Sunday, the following Monday will be observed as a
legal holiday. When a legal holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding
Friday is observed as a holiday.
In addition to the days designated as holidays, the Government observes
the following days: Any other day designated by Federal Statute, by
Executive Order, by the President's Proclamation,or by the Center's
Director. It is understood and agreed between the Government and the
Contractor that observance of such days by Government personnel shall
not otherwise be a reason for an additional period of performance. In
the event the Contractor's personnel work during the holiday, no form of
holiday or other premium compensation will be reimbursed, other than
their normal compensation of the time worked.
When the Federal, State, Local and other governmental entities grant
excused absence to its employees, assigned contractor personnel may also
be dismissed; however, they will not be directly reimbursed for the
excused absence. Information about Center delayed openings or closings
may be obtained by calling (609) 485-6100.
No work will be required during the period between 5:00 p.m. and 7:00
a.m., inclusive, and such period has not been considered in computing
the time allowed for completion. The contractor may, however, perform
work during all or any part of this period upon giving prior written
notice to the CO and receiving written approval for same. If the work
performed during such a period is less than the average monthly work
necessary to complete the contract within the time specified and the CO
maintains an inspection force during this period to inspect the work,
the contractor will be charged with the percentage of the cost of
maintaining such force that is less than the average monthly work
necessary to complete the contract within the time specified.
Work outside regular working hours requires the Contracting Officer's
approval. The contractor shall provide written request 5 calendar days
prior to the time the contractor desires to do the work.
F.2 COORDINATION MEETINGS
Beginning the week after the preconstruction meeting, and proceeding
every week at a mutually agreeable time, the Contractor shall meet with
the Resident Engineer at a location on the Center to discuss pertinent
topics concerning the project. The Contractor shall have in attendance
subcontractor personnel necessary to discuss topics which may arise.
PART I ‑ SECTION G
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA
3.10.1-23 CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE\--CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
(JULY 2007)
\(a\) The Contracting Officer may appoint other Government personnel to
accomplish certain contract administration matters. While there shall be
various titles and divisions of duties for these individuals,
generically they are known as Contracting Officer\'s Technical
Representatives (COTR\'s). The Contracting Officer will provide written
notice of COTR appointment(s), setting forth the authorities and
limitations, to the Contractor within \_[10]{.underline}\_\_\_ calendar
days prior to the notice to proceed. COTR duties may include, but are
not limited to:\
\
(1) Perform as the authorized representative of the Contracting Officer
for technical matters, including interpretation of specifications and
drawings, and inspection and review of work performed.\
\
(2) Perform as the authorized representative of the Contracting Officer
for administrative matters, including reviewing payments, and updated
delivery schedules.\
\
(b) These representatives are authorized to act for the Contracting
Officer in all specifically delegated matters pertaining to the
contract, except:\
\
(1) contract modifications that change the contract price or cost,
technical requirements or time for performance, unless delegated field
modification authority;\
\
(2) suspension or termination of the Contractor\'s right to proceed,
either for default or for convenience;\
\
(3) final decisions on any matters subject to appeal, e.g., disputes
under the \"Contract Disputes\" clause; and\
\
(4) final acceptance under the contract.
(End of clause)
3.3.1-33 CENTRALCONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (JANUARY 2008)
\(a\) Definitions. As used in this clause\
\
\"Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database\" means the primary
Government repository for Contractor information required for the
conduct of business with the Government.\
\
\"Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number\" means the 9-digit
number assigned by Dun and Bradstreet, Inc. (D&B) to identify unique
business entities.\
\
\"Data Universal Numbering System +4 (DUNS+4) number\" means the DUNS
number assigned by D&B plus a 4-character suffix that may be assigned by
a business concern. (D&B has no affiliation with this 4-character
suffix.) This 4-character suffix may be assigned at the discretion of
the business concern to establish additional CCR records for identifying
alternative Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) accounts for the same parent
concern.\
\
\"Registered in the CCR database\" means that the Contractor has entered
all mandatory information, including the DUNS number or the DUNS+4
number, into the CCR database.\
\
(b)(1) By submission of an offer, the offeror acknowledges the
requirement that a prospective awardee shall be registered in the CCR
database prior to award, during performance, and through final payment
of any contract, basic agreement, basic ordering agreement, or blanket
purchasing agreement resulting from this solicitation.\
\
(2) The offeror shall enter, in Representations, Certifications and
Other Statements of Offerors Section of the solicitation, the DUNS or
DUNS +4 number that identifies the offeror\'s name and address exactly
as stated in the offer. The DUNS number will be used by the Contracting
Officer to verify that the offeror is registered in the CCR database.\
\
(c) If the offeror does not have a DUNS number, it should contact Dun
and Bradstreet directly to obtain one.\
\
(1) An offeror may obtain a DUNS number\
(i) If located within the United States, by calling Dun and Bradstreet
at 1-866-705-5711 or via the Internet at
[http://www.dnb.com](http://www.dnb.com/)/; or\
(ii) If located outside the United States, by contacting the local Dun
and Bradstreet office.\
\
(2) The offeror should be prepared to provide the following
information:\
(i) Company legal business.\
(ii) Tradestyle, doing business, or other name by which your entity is
commonly recognized.\
(iii) Company Physical Street Address, City, State, and ZIP Code.\
(iv) Company Mailing Address, City, State and ZIP Code (if different
from physical street address).\
(v) Company Telephone Number.\
(vi) Date the company was started.\
(vii) Number of employees at your location.\
(viii) Chief executive officer/key manager.\
(ix) Line of business (industry).\
(x) Company Headquarters name and address (reporting relationship within
your entity).\
\
(d) If the offeror does not become registered in the CCR database in the
time prescribed by the Contracting Officer, the Contracting Officer may
proceed to award to the next otherwise successful registered offeror.\
\
(e) Processing time, which normally takes 48 hours, should be taken into
consideration when registering. Offerors who are not registered should
consider applying for registration immediately upon receipt of this
solicitation.\
\
(f) The Contractor is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of
the data within the CCR database, and for any liability resulting from
the Government\'s reliance on inaccurate or incomplete data. To remain
registered in the CCR database after the initial registration, the
Contractor is required to review and update on an annual basis from the
date of initial registration or subsequent updates its information in
the CCR database to ensure it is current, accurate and complete.
Updating information in the CCR does not alter the terms and conditions
of this contract and is not a substitute for a properly executed
contractual document.\
\
(g)(1)(i) If a Contractor has legally changed its business name, \"doing
business as\" name, or division name (whichever is shown on the
contract), or has transferred the assets used in performing the
contract, but has not completed the necessary requirements regarding
novation and change-of-name agreements in AMS Procurement Guidance
T3.10.1.A-8, the Contractor shall provide the responsible Contracting
Officer a minimum of one business day\'s written notification of its
intention to:\
\
(A) change the name in the CCR database;\
(B) comply with the requirements of T3.10.1.A-8; and\
(C) agree in writing to the timeline and procedures specified by the
responsible Contracting Officer. The Contractor must provide the
Contracting Officer with the notification, sufficient documentation to
support the legally changed name.\
\
(ii) If the Contractor fails to comply with the requirements of
paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this clause, or fails to perform the agreement at
paragraph (g)(1)(i)(C) of this clause, and, in the absence of a properly
executed novation or change-of-name agreement, the CCR information that
shows the Contractor to be other than the Contractor indicated in the
contract will be considered to be incorrect information within the
meaning of the \"Suspension of Payment\" paragraph of the electronic
funds transfer (EFT) clause of this contract.\
\
(2) The Contractor shall not change the name or address for EFT payments
or manual payments, as appropriate, in the CCR record to reflect an
assignee for the purpose of assignment of claims. Assignees shall be
separately registered in the CCR database. Information provided to the
Contractor\'s CCR record that indicates payments, including those made
by EFT, to an ultimate recipient other than that Contractor will be
considered to be incorrect information within the meaning of the
\"Suspension of payment\" paragraph of the EFT clause of this contract.\
\
(h) Offerors and Contractors may obtain information on registration and
annual confirmation requirements via the internet at
[http://www.ccr.gov](http://www.ccr.gov/)/ or by calling 1-888-227-2423,
or 269-961-5757.\
\
(End of clause)
3.3.1-34 PAYMENT BY ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER/CENTRAL CONTRACTOR
REGISTRATION (OCTOBER 2005)
\(a\) Method of payment.\
(1) All payments by the Government under this contract shall be made by
electronic funds transfer (EFT), except as provided in paragraph (a)(2)
of this clause. As used in this clause, the term \"EFT\" refers to the
funds transfer and may also include the payment information transfer.\
(2) In the event the Government is unable to release one or more
payments by EFT, the Contractor agrees to either---\
(i) Accept payment by check or some other mutually agreeable method of
payment; or\
(ii) Request the Government to extend the payment due date until such
time as the Government can make payment by EFT (but see paragraph (d) of
this clause).\
\
(b) Contractor\'s EFT information. The Government shall make payment to
the Contractor using the EFT information contained in the Central
Contractor Registration (CCR) database. In the event that the EFT
information changes, the Contractor shall be responsible for providing
the updated information to the CCR database.\
\
(c) Mechanisms for EFT payment. The Government may make payment by EFT
through either the Automated Clearing House (ACH) network, subject to
the rules of the National Automated Clearing House Association, or the
Fedwire Transfer System. The rules governing Federal payments through
the ACH are contained in 31 CFR Part 210.\
\
(d) Suspension of payment. If the Contractor\'s EFT information in the
CCR database is incorrect, then the Government need not make payment to
the Contractor under this contract until correct EFT information is
entered into the CCR database; and any invoice or contract financing
request shall be deemed not to be a proper invoice for the purpose of
prompt payment under this contract. The prompt payment terms of the
contract regarding notice of an improper invoice and delays in accrual
of interest penalties apply.\
\
(e) Liability for uncompleted or erroneous transfers.\
(1) If an uncompleted or erroneous transfer occurs because the
Government used the Contractor\'s EFT information incorrectly, the
Government remains responsible for---\
(i) Making a correct payment;\
(ii) Paying any prompt payment penalty due; and\
(iii) Recovering any erroneously directed funds.\
(2) If an uncompleted or erroneous transfer occurs because the
Contractor\'s EFT information was incorrect, or was revised within 30
days of Government release of the EFT payment transaction instruction to
the Federal Reserve System, and---\
(i) If the funds are no longer under the control of the payment office,
the Government is deemed to have made payment and the Contractor is
responsible for recovery of any erroneously directed funds; or\
(ii) If the funds remain under the control of the payment office, the
Government shall not make payment, and the provisions of paragraph (d)
of this clause shall apply.\
\
(f) EFT and prompt payment. A payment shall be deemed to have been made
in a timely manner in accordance with the prompt payment terms of this
contract if, in the EFT payment transaction instruction released to the
Federal Reserve System, the date specified for settlement of the payment
is on or before the prompt payment due date, provided the specified
payment date is a valid date under the rules of the Federal Reserve
System.\
\
(g) EFT and assignment of claims. If the Contractor assigns the proceeds
of this contract as provided for in the assignment of claims terms of
this contract, the Contractor shall require as a condition of any such
assignment, that the assignee shall register separately in the CCR
database and shall be paid by EFT in accordance with the terms of this
clause. Notwithstanding any other requirement of this contract, payment
to an ultimate recipient other than the Contractor, or a financial
institution properly recognized under an assignment of claims, is not
permitted. In all respects, the requirements of this clause shall apply
to the assignee as if it were the Contractor. EFT information that shows
the ultimate recipient of the transfer to be other than the Contractor,
in the absence of a proper assignment of claims acceptable to the
Government, is incorrect EFT information within the meaning of paragraph
(d) of this clause.\
\
(h) Liability for change of EFT information by financial agent. The
Government is not liable for errors resulting from changes to EFT
information made by the Contractor\'s financial agent.\
\
(i) Payment information. The payment or disbursing office shall forward
to the Contractor available payment information that is suitable for
transmission as of the date of release of the EFT instruction to the
Federal Reserve System. The Government may request the Contractor to
designate a desired format and method(s) for delivery of payment
information from a list of formats and methods the payment office is
capable of executing. However, the Government does not guarantee that
any particular format or method of delivery is available at any
particular payment office and retains the latitude to use the format and
delivery method most convenient to the Government. If the Government
makes payment by check in accordance with paragraph (a) of this clause,
the Government shall mail the payment information to the remittance
address contained in the CCR database.\
\
(End of clause)
G.1 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
\(a\) The Contracting Office Representative is:
Name: Kimberly Knight
Organization Code: AJP-7552
Telephone No.: (609) 485-4622
G.2 INVOICING PROCEDURES
The Contractor shall submit a properly executed original and three (3)
copies of the Contractor\'s regular invoice, identified by the Contract
Number to:
Original & 1 copy:
Federal Aviation Administration
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center
Accounting Branch, AMZ-110
PO Box 25082
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
1 copy:
FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center
AJP-7941 Chuck Hathaway
Atlantic City International Airport, New Jersey 08405
1 copy:
FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center
Acquisition Service Group AJP-7552
Attn: Kimberly Knight
Atlantic City International Airport, New Jersey 08405
Contractor\'s invoices must include the following items:
1\. Name and address of the contractor.
2\. Invoice date.
3\. Contract number or other authorization for supplies delivered or
services performed.
4\. Description, quantity, unit of measure, unit price, and extended
price of supplies delivered or services performed.
5\. Shipping and payment terms (e.g., shipment number and date of
shipment, prompt payment discount terms). Bill of lading number and
weight of shipment will be shown for shipments on Government bills of
lading.
6\. Name and address of contractor official to whom payment is to be
sent (must be the same as that in the contract or on a proper notice of
assignment).
7\. Name (where practicable), title, phone number, and mailing address
of person to be notified in event of a defective invoice.
8\. Any other information or documentation required by the contract
(such as evidence of shipment).
For purposes of financial tracking the contractor's invoice should
provide the following information (if not already provided in items 1
through 8, above):
The invoice should reflect all the expenditures to date for the entire
contract (Cumulative expenses), and the funds remaining with regard to
funding allocations and budgets. The original negotiated hours and/or
dollars.
Certification of the invoice will be based on COTR and Contracting
Officer (CO) review. Should any cost reflected on submitted invoices be
questioned, the CO may withhold all amounts in question until such time
as CO determines the cost are valid. In addition, the CO shall withhold
funds in accordance with applicable clauses.
G.3 CONTRACTOR REMITTANCE ADDRESS
Contractor remittance address, if different from that shown on the face
page of this document:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Contractor\'s Name
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Address
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
City, State, and Zip Code
If payment may be made via the electronic funds transfer method, the
contractor shall complete the following:
1\. Bank Name and Address:
2\. Routing Transit Number:
3\. Depositor Account Title:
4\. Depositor Account Number:
5\. Other Information:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
G.4 INTERPRETATION OR MODIFICATION
No oral statement of any person, and no written statement of anyone
other than the Contracting Officer, or his/her authorized
representative, shall modify or otherwise affect the terms or meaning of
the schedule or specifications. All requests for interpretation or
modifications shall be made in writing to the Contracting Officer.
Contractor response to oral contract changes from any source other than
the Contracting Officer or a person with such delegated authority is at
its own risk of liability.
G.5 GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES
\(a\) [General Duties and Responsibilities:]{.underline} To amplify the
differing roles and responsibilities of the various Government
representatives, the following descriptions are provided; they are not
intended to be restrictive but are for illustrative purposes only. The
contract clauses that define the various administrative roles and
responsibilities shall take precedence over these general descriptions.
\(b\) [Contracting Officer.]{.underline} The contract work will be under
the management and oversight of the Contracting Officer designated on
the SF 1442. Except where specifically stated otherwise, the Contracting
Officer will have complete charge of, and will exercise full supervision
of, the work so far as it affects the interests of the Government. The
Contracting Officer has authority to:
. Enter into contracts and bind the Government
. Administer contracts; ensure compliance with all the terms and
conditions of the contract
. Issue changes
. Terminate contracts
> . Ensure that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations,
> and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and
> approvals, have been met
. Safeguard the interests of the United States in its contractual
relationships
. Ensure that sufficient funds are available for obligation
> . Request and consider the advice of specialists in audit, law,
> engineering, and other fields as appropriate
Appoint a Resident Engineer and a Construction Representative, and
others as appropriate, to the project, except that these representatives
will [not]{.underline} be authorized to act on behalf of the Contracting
Officer in any matters pertaining to:
\(1\) contract modifications that change the contract price or time for
performance,
\(2\) suspension (except for emergency conditions) or termination of the
Contractor's right to proceed, either for default or for convenience of
the FAA; and
\(3\) final decisions on any matters subject to appeal, as provided in
the Disputes clause.
The Contracting Officer will appoint Contracting Officer Technical
Representatives (COTR's) in writing. COTR as used in this contract means
the Resident Engineer, the Construction Representative (also referred to
as Construction Inspectors), the FAA Safety Officer and the FAA's Fire
Inspector.
\(c\) [Resident Engineer.]{.underline} The Resident Engineer will be the
focal point for all technical matters that pertain to the contract. The
Resident Engineer will exercise the right of the Government to accept
materials, workmanship, and construction-in-place; and, when needed,
will initiate change order requests to the Contracting Officer. The
Resident Engineer has authority to:
. Monitor services being performed to assure that the Contractor uses
personnel meeting the requisite qualifications cited in the contract
. Ensure the Contractor's compliance with safety and security
requirements
. Serve as the principal contact through which the Contractor can relay
questions and problems of a technical nature
. Serve as the focal point for receipt, review, and approval of all
Contractor-provided shop drawings and other specified submittals to
demonstrate compliance with the contract specifications
. Review inspection reports and test results prepared by the Contractor
and the FAA Construction Representative
. Issue formal field changes as needed to document authorized variations
from the contract drawings and specifications that do not involve any
change in cost or impact the performance time
. Review and evaluate the technical and cost aspects of the Contractor's
proposals for formal change order requests, and furnish to the
Contracting Officer comments and recommendations; assist in negotiation
of supplemental agreements when needed
. Monitor the Contractor's monthly progress reports and review monthly
invoices and certify for payment
. Determine the amount (quantity) of the items of work to be paid for on
a unit-priced basis
. Arrange for and conduct progress review meetings with the Contractor
(and the principal subcontractors when needed)
. Keep the Contracting Officer informed of any technical or contractual
difficulties encountered, progress of work, and potential problem areas
under the contract.
\(d\) [Construction Representative.]{.underline} The Construction
Representative, also referred to as the Lead Construction Inspector in
this contract, will be the primary point of contact [at the
site]{.underline} between the Contractor and the Government. The
Construction Representative will review the Contractor's Quality Control
reports, perform surveillance of the Contractor's testing and inspection
procedures, and perform such job inspections and independent testing as
deemed appropriate by the Contracting Officer and the Resident Engineer.
The Construction Representative will visit the site on a regular basis,
usually at least once per day unless limited construction activity is
underway. The Construction Representative has authority to:
. Inspect all work, both during and after completion, as well as all
materials and equipment furnished. Such inspections may extend to all or
any part of the work and to the preparations, fabrication, or
manufacture of the materials or equipment to be used and incorporated
into the job.
. Notify the prime Contractor of any failure of the work or material to
conform to the specifications, drawings, and other contract terms and
conditions.
. Issue written Stop Work Orders under emergency conditions where
continuation of the work would adversely affect the completed project or
cause that portion of the work to be removed because it is clearly
unacceptable.
. Prepare daily inspection report of observations, etc. and review
documentation provided by the Contractor of their inspection and testing
efforts as part of the Contractor's quality control obligations, etc.
. Maintain general surveillance over the Contractor's and
subcontractor's safety practices, and request the Contractor to take
appropriate and timely action to correct shortcomings. Report to the
Contracting Officer, Resident Engineer, and the FAA Safety Officer as
soon as practical any instances in which the Contractor does not
promptly effect corrective action, or the Contractor has recurring
deficiencies of the same type.
. Arrange for inspection support from specialists in the various trades
as needed to properly address Contractor performance and adequacy of the
work (e.g. mechanical and plumbing work, electrical work, fire detection
and alarm systems)
\(e\) [FAA Safety Manager.]{.underline} Maintain general awareness of
the contract progress and perform on-site reviews of the Contractor's
compliance with his Safety Plan and with applicable OSHA standards
(namely 29 CFR 1926) for the work underway.
. Ensure that FAA safety policies are communicated to the Contractor
(usually at the pre-construction conference at the beginning of the job)
. Review and comment on the Contractor-provided safety plan for the job
(the FAA Safety Officer does [not]{.underline} approve the Contractor's
Safety Plan, as this is solely a Contractor's responsibility)
. Issue written Stop Work Orders under emergency conditions where
continuation of the work would obviously jeopardize the health or safety
of any of the Contractor's workers or any of the Government personnel in
the vicinity; for violations of a lessor nature, or repeated violations,
provide a written notice to the Construction Representative, Contracting
Officer, and Resident Engineer.
. If any accidents or mishaps occur on the job, review the Contractor's
documentation for sufficiency, etc. and, if appropriate, investigate and
prepare an independent report on apparent causes, etc.
\(f\) [FAA Fire Inspector:]{.underline} Maintain general awareness of
the job progress and conduct periodic inspections of the work site for
familiarity (in case it becomes necessary to respond to a fire or other
emergency). The FAA Fire Inspector has authority to:
. Review and comment on Contractor-provided shop drawings and other
submittals to ensure compliance with the contract requirements, the
requirements of the NFPA life safety codes, and conformity with local
detection and alarm systems
. Inspect the work site to ensure avenues of egress are maintained at
all times (not obstructed), combustibles are properly stored, etc.
. Issue permits for welding and burning/cutting
(g) [Contractor Responsibility Notwithstanding:]{.underline} The
provisions of this paragraph or provisions elsewhere in this
contract regarding supervision, approval, or direction by the
Contracting Officer, Resident Engineer, Construction Representative,
FAA Safety Officer, and FAA Fire Inspector are not intended to and
will not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for the
accomplishment of the work, either as regards sufficiency or the
time of performance.
G.6 CONTRACTING OFFICER'S TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE
Work to be performed under this contract shall be subject to the
technical direction of the following FAA Contracting Officer\'s
Technical Representative (COTR):
U.S. D.O.T./Federal Aviation Administration
William J. Hughes Technical Center
Facilities Services and Engineering Division, AJP-7941
Atlantic City International Airport, N.J. 08405
Attention: Chuck Hathaway
G.7 CONTRACTOR'S TRUSTED AGENT
Contractor shall provide the name and title of the representative who
will serve as the Trusted Agent under this contract. The Trusted Agent
is the individual who has been empowered to participate in the Personal
Identity Verification (PIV) registration and issuance process. They
perform the duties such as examination of Form I-9 "Employment
Eligibility Verification" documentation, photograph and fingerprinting
applicants, and forwarding required security forms to the William J.
Hughes Technical Center, ACT-8 Personnel Security Specialists.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Name Title
PART I ‑ SECTION H
SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
H.1 DEFINITIONS - CONSTRUCTION
\(a\) \"Contracting Officer\" means a person with the authority to enter
into, administer, and/or terminate contracts and make related
determinations and findings. The term includes certain authorized
representatives of the Contracting Officer acting within the limits of
their authority as delegated by the Contracting Officer in writing.
CO = Contracting Officer
COR = Contracting Officer\'s Representative
COTR = Contracting Officer's Technical Representative
RE = Resident Engineer
\(b\) \"Contractor\": The term \"Contractor\" as used in this contract
shall include the Contractor and each subcontractor at every tier. The
term \"subcontractor\" as used in this contract shall include any person
or firm which has a legal obligation to perform part of the work under a
subcontract at any tier, other than a subcontract primarily for the
supply of raw materials or commercial stock items or a subcontract that
does not exceed \$25,000.
\(c\) The \"contract award date\" is the date the Contracting Officer
signs the contract.
\(d\) Government = U.S. Government = Federal Government = Department of
Transportation (DOT) ‑ William J. Hughes Technical Center = Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA).
\(e\) \"Work\" includes, but is not limited to, materials, workmanship,
equipment, and manufacture and fabrication of components.
\(f\) \"Working day\" means a day other than a Saturday, a Sunday, or a
day on which either the Government\'s or the Contractor\'s office
administering this contract is officially closed for business.
\(g\) "Quality Control (QC)" is the means and methods the Contractor
uses to ensure contract conformance.
\(h\) "Quality Assurance (QA)" is the means and methods used by the
Government to ensure the Contractor has an acceptable QC program and to
otherwise ensure contract conformance.
\(i\) Wherever in the specifications or upon the drawings the words
\"directed\", \"required\", \"ordered\", \"designated\", \"prescribed\",
or words of like meaning are used, it shall be understood that the
\"direction\", \"requirement\", \"order\", \"designation\", or
\"prescription\", of the Contracting Officer is intended and similarly
the words \"approved\", \"acceptable\", \"satisfactory\", or words of
like import shall mean \"approved by,\" or \"acceptable to\", or
\"satisfactory to\" the Contracting Officer, unless otherwise expressly
stated.
\(j\) Where \"as shown,\" \"as indicated\", \"as detailed\", or words of
similar import are used, it shall be understood that the reference is
made to the drawings accompanying this contract unless stated otherwise.
The word \"provided\" as used herein shall be understood to mean
\"provide complete in place\", that is \"furnished and installed\".
H.1 SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS
The following drawings accompany the specifications and are a part
thereof. Drawings are the property of the Government and shall not be
used for any purpose other than that contemplated by the specification.
The drawings indicate general arrangements and approximate sizes and
relative locations of principal materials to be provided or tasks to be
completed. Drawings are diagrammatic and are a graphic representation of
contract requirements to the best available standards at the scale used.
Provide offsets to clear interference and supports which are not
specifically shown but which are obviously needed to make the work
complete and operable. Verify all grades, elevations, dimensions, and
clearances at the site to fabrication and installation.
[SPECIFICATION NO.]{.underline} [TITLE]{.underline}
Work Order \# 179339 "Work Statement and Specifications for the
Modifications and Extension for Parking Lot "A-1"
[DRAWING NO. Title]{.underline}
G-000 Title Sheet
C-101 Diagonal Parking Arrangement
C-002 Detail Sheet
C-003 Misc. Detail Sheet and Profile
The Contractor shall check all drawings furnished by the FAA prior to
starting the work and shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer of
any discrepancies. Figures marked on drawings shall in general be
followed in preference to scale measurements. Large-scale drawings shall
in general govern over small-scale drawings. The Contractor shall
compare all drawings and verify the figures before laying-out the work
and will be responsible for any errors that might have been avoided
thereby.
Anything mentioned in the specification and not shown on the drawings,
or shown on the drawings and not mentioned in the specification, shall
be of like effect as if shown or mentioned in both. In the case of
differences between the drawings and specification, the specification
shall govern. In the case of discrepancy in the figures, in the
drawings, or in the specification, the matter shall be promptly
submitted to the Contracting Officer, who shall promptly make a
determination in writing. Any adjustment by the Contractor without such
a determination shall be at his own risk and expense. The Contracting
Officer shall furnish from time to time such detailed drawings and other
information as considered necessary, unless otherwise provided.
Omissions from the drawings and specification or the mis-description of
details of work which are manifestly necessary to carry out the intent
of the drawings and specification, or which are customarily performed,
shall not relieve the Contractor from performing such omitted or
mis-described details of the work. Such details shall be performed as if
fully and correctly set forth and described in the drawings and
specification.
A complete set of drawings and specification must be on site and
available for FAA use.
H.4 RECORD DRAWINGS
The Contractor shall maintain at the job site two sets of contract
drawings marked to show any deviations which have been made from the
contract drawings, including concealed construction which is revealed
during the course of construction. The Contractor will be responsible to
record the horizontal and vertical location of all buried utilities that
differ from the contract drawings. These drawings shall be available for
review by the Contracting Officer at all times. Upon completion of the
work the marked sets of prints shall be delivered to the Contracting
Officer. Requests for partial payment will not be approved if the marked
prints are not keep current, and request for final payment will not be
approved until the marked prints are delivered to the Contracting
Officer. The Contractor\'s attention is directed to the clause titled
\"Submittals,\" subparagraph on Shop Drawings, for additional submittal
requirements.
H.5 PRICE BREAKDOWN
Promptly upon award of the contract, the Contractor shall submit a price
breakdown if he intends to request progress payments in accordance with
applicable contract provisions. Where several items of work are
involved, each shall be shown separately. This breakdown shall be
prepared using the items, major parts, and components which were
approved by the Contracting Officer for the approved schedule of
construction, as required above, so as to provide a schedule/price
correlation for the use in the assessment of progress payments, and
shall separate equipment and material prices from labor prices for each
portion of the work. No progress payments will be made until the price
breakdown has been submitted and approved. In determining progress
accomplished, the Contracting Officer will allow, as an element of work
accomplished (progress toward completion), 100 percent of the estimated
price of materials and equipment delivered to the site but not
installed.
H.6 PAYMENT FOR MATERIALS DELIVERED OFF-SITE
Materials delivered to the Contractor at locations other than the site
of the work may be taken into consideration in making payments if
included in payment estimates and if all the conditions of the contract
clauses are fulfilled. Payment for items delivered to locations other
than the work site will be limited to those materials which have been
approved, if required by the specifications, and are materials which
have been fabricated to the point where they are identifiable to an item
of work required under this contract. Such payment will be made only
after receipt of paid invoice or receipted invoices or invoices with
canceled check showing title to the items as the Contractor and
including the value of materials and labor incorporated into the item.
H.7 CONTRACTOR ACCESS AND USE OF PREMISES
Ensure that Contractor personnel become familiar with and obey FAA
regulations including safety, fire, traffic and security regulations.
Keep within the limits of the work and avenues of ingress and egress. To
minimize traffic congestion, delivery of materials shall be outside of
peak traffic hours (6:30 to 8:00 AM and 3:30 to 5:00 PM) unless
otherwise approved by the Contracting Officer. Wear hard hats in
designated areas. Do not enter any restricted areas unless required to
do so and until cleared for such entry. The Contractor's equipment shall
be conspicuously marked for identification.
H.6 IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES
The Contractor shall provide a list of key personnel of the Contractor
and any subcontractors including addresses and telephone numbers for use
in the event of an emergency. As changes occur, the Contractor shall
update the information contained in the list. In addition, the
Contractor shall be responsible for furnishing an identification badge
or card to each employee prior to the employee\'s work on the site.
H.7 MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP
### General
> The Contractor shall be responsible for all materials delivered and
> work performed until completion and acceptance of the entire work,
> except for any completed unit of work which may have been accepted
> under the contract.
### Material and Equipment
> All material, equipment and articles incorporated into the work
> covered by this contract shall be new and of the most suitable grade
> for the purpose intended, unless otherwise specifically provided in
> this contract. Use of recycled materials for the manufacture of such
> products is encouraged. Material, equipment or articles specified by
> trade name, make, or catalog number, shall be provided. Equivalent
> items are not acceptable unless specifically authorized in the
> specification.
##### Workmanship
All work under this contract shall be performed in a skillful and
workmanlike manner. The Contracting Officer may require, in writing,
that the Contractor remove from the work any employee the Contracting
Officer deems incompetent, careless, or otherwise objectionable.
H.8 PROGRESS SCHEDULE
Upon approval of the schedule of construction from the Contracting
Officer, this approved schedule shall be utilized by the contractor for
his contract progress schedule reporting as outlined below. This
schedule shall indicate the sequence of work the Contractor plans so as
to complete the contract within the specified completion period and
shall include activities for the following categories of work:
Mechanical
Electrical
Concrete
Weekly progress reports shall be prepared and shall show both the
approved schedule and the Contractor's current working schedule. The
approved schedule shall not be altered without written approval of the
Contracting Officer.
In the event changes in the approved schedule of construction are
granted, under applicable provisions of the contract, the Contractor
shall re-submit the schedule of construction reflecting such changes to
the Contracting Officer for approval.
The Contractor shall prepare and submit three copies of the following
report covering work accomplished during each month of contract
performance. The monthly progress schedule shall be prepared covering a
period from the fifteenth of one month to the fourteenth of the
following month and shall be submitted so as to be received no later
than one week following the reporting period. The Contractor shall
signify his approval of monthly reports being submitted by affixing his
signature to the progress schedule.
The weekly progress schedule shall be brief, factual, and informal, and
shall contain, but not be limited to:
Status versus plans
Significant Progress---A description of overall progress plus a separate
description for each reporting category on the contract progress
schedule on which effort was expended during the reporting period.
Corrective Actions --- A description of corrective action which has been
taken which is planned to correct any existing problem(s).
Plans --- A description of work to be performed during the next
reporting period.
Recommendations --- Recommendations for action on the part of the
FAA/WJHTC.
H9. PROTECTION OF EXISTING VEGETATION, STRUCTURES, EQUIPMENT, AND
UTILITIES
\(a\) The Contractor shall preserve and protect all structures,
equipment, and vegetation (such as trees, shrubs, and grass) on or
adjacent to the work site, which are not to be removed and which do not
unreasonably interfere with the work required under this contract. The
If any limbs or branches of trees are broken during contract
performance, or by the careless operation of equipment, or by workmen,
the Contractor shall trim those limbs or branches with a clean cut and
paint the cut with a tree‑pruning compound as directed by the
Contracting Officer.
\(b\) The Contractor shall protect from damage all existing improvements
and utilities (1) at or near the work site and (2) on adjacent property
of a third party, the locations of which are made known to or should be
known by the Contractor. The Contractor shall repair any damage to those
facilities, including those that are the property of a third party,
resulting from failure to comply with the requirements of this contract
or failure to exercise reasonable care in performing the work.
H9.1 SPECIAL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
> The Contractor shall keep dust and debris to a minimum by use of a wet
> type saw for all concrete saw cuts. No dry cuts will be permitted.
H10. AVAILABILITY AND USE OF UTILITY SERVICES
\(a\) FAA shall make all reasonable required amounts of utilities
available to the Contractor from existing outlets and products, as
specified in the contract. Unless otherwise provided in the contract,
the amount of each utility service consumed shall be charged to or paid
for by the Contractor at prevailing rates charged to the FAA, or at
reasonable rates determined by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor
shall carefully conserve any utilities furnished without charge.
\(b\) The Contractor, at its expense and in a workmanlike manner
satisfactory to the FAA, shall install and maintain all necessary
temporary connections and distribution lines, and all meters required to
measure the amount of each utility used. Prior to final acceptance of
the work by FAA, the Contractor shall remove all the temporary
connections, distribution lines, meters, and associated paraphernalia.
\(c\) The following utilities are available on site or at existing
building:
[Type]{.underline} [Cost]{.underline} [Remarks]{.underline}
Water free of charge
Electricity free of charge
Telephone external calls only local calls free of charge.
H11. SCHEDULING OF WORK AND INTERRUPTIONS TO UTILITY SYSTEMS
The Contractor shall provide the FAA at least two weeks notice before
start of actual work inside the test cell. This notice will give the FAA
ample time to remove, relocate and start-up equipment, if any, at a
temporary location.
PART II ‑ SECTION I
CONTRACT CLAUSES
3.1-1 CLAUSES AND PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (DECEMBER 2005)
This screening information request (SIR) or contract, as applicable,
incorporates by reference the provisions or clauses listed below with
the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon
request, the Contracting Officer will make the full text available, or
offerors and contractors may obtain the full text via Internet at:\
[[http://conwrite.faa.gov]{.underline}](http://conwrite.faa.gov/) (on
this web page, select \"Search and View Clauses\").
3.2.2.3-8 AUDIT AND RECORDS JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-25 PRICE REDUCTION FOR DEFECTIVE COST OR PRICING DATA JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-27 SUBCONTRACTOR COST OR PRICING DATA JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-33 ORDER OF PRECEDENCE JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-42 DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-43 SITE INVESTIGATION AND CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE WORK JULY
2004
3.2.2.3-45 MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-46 SUPERVISING THE CONTRACT WORK JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-47 PERMITS AND RESPONSIBILITIES JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-48 OTHER CONTRACTS JULY 2004
49. PROTECTION OF EXISTING VEGETATION, STRUCTURES,
EQUIPMENT, UTILITIES, AND IMPROVEMENTS. JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-50 PROPERTY PROTECTION JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-51 OPERATIONS AND STORAGE AREAS JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-52 USE AND POSSESSION BEFORE THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-53 CLEANING UP AND ROADWAY MAINTENANCE JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-54 PREVENTING ACCIDENTS JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-57 QUANTITY SURVEYS JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-58 LAYOUT OF WORK JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-60 SPECIFICATIONS, DRAWINGS, AND MATERIAL OFFERS JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-62 PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-66 CONTRACTOR'S DAILY LOG JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-67 SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS FOR WORK AT OPERATING AIRPORTS JULY 2004
68. SAFETY & HEALTH JULY 2004
3.2.2.3-75 REQUESTS FOR CONTRACT INFORMATION JULY 2004
6. PROTECTING THE GOVERNMENT'S INTEREST WHEN SUB-
CONTRACTING WITH CONTRACTORS DEBARRED, SUSPENDED,
OR PROPOSED FOR DEBARMENT APR 1996
3.2.5-1 OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT APR 1996
3.2.5-3 GRATUITIES OR GIFTS JAN 1999
3.2.5-4 CONTINGENT FEES OCT 1996
3.2.5-5 ANTI-KICKBACK PROCEDURES OCT 1996
3.2.5-6 RESTRICTIONS ON SUBCONTRACTOR SALES TO THE FAA APR 1996
3.2.5-8 WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION FOR CONTRACTOR
EMPLOYEES APR 1996
3.3.1-2 PAYMENTS UNDER FIXED PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS APR 1996
3.3.1-9 INTEREST JAN 2008
3.3.1-15 ASSIGNMENT OF CLAIMS APR 1996
3.3.1-19 PROMPT PAYMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS JAN 2003
3.3.2-1 FAA COST PRINCIPLES OCT 1996
3.4.1-7 NOTICE TO PROCEED APR 1996
3.4.1-10 INSURANCE \-\-- WORK ON A GOVERNMENT INSTALLATION JUL 1996
8. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL TAXES\--FIXED-PRICE CONTRACT APR 1996
3.5-1 AUTHORIZATION AND CONSENT APR 1996
3.5-3 PATENT INDEMNITY APR 1996
3.5-4 PATENT INDEMNITY\--CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS APR 1996
3.6.1-1 NOTICE OF TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE APR 1996
3.6.1-7 LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING AUG 1997
3.6.2-18 DAVIS BACON ACT APR 1996
3.6.2-9 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AUG 1998
12. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FOR SPECIAL DISABLED AND VIETNAM
ERA VETERANS APR 2007
3.6.2-13 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES APR 2000
3.6.2-14 EMPLOYMENT REPORTS ON SPECIAL DISABLED VETERANS AND
VETERANS OF VIETNAM ERA APR 2007
3.6.2-16 NOTICE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF LABOR DISPUTES APR 1996
3.6.2-19 WITHHOLDING\--LABOR VIOLATIONS APR 1996
3.6.2-20 PAYROLLS AND BASIC RECORDS JUN 1999
3.6.2-21 APPRENTICES, TRAINEES, AND HELPERS APR 1996
3.6.2-22 SUBCONTRACTS (LABOR STANDARDS) APR 1996
3.6.2-23 CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY APR 1996
3.6.2-35 PREVENTION OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT AUG 1998
3.6.3-2 CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN WATER APR 1996
13. RECYCLE CONTENT AND ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERABLE
PRODUCTS JAN 2002
3.6.3-14 USE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERABLE PRODUCTS JAN 2002
3.6.3-15 MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OCT 2002
3.6.4-3 BUY AMERICAN ACT\--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS JUL 1996
3.6.4-5 BUY AMERICAN\--STEEL AND MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS JUL 1996
3.9.1-1 CONTRACT DISPUTES NOV 2002
3.9.1-2 PROTEST AFTER AWARD AUG 1997
3.10.1-7 BANKRUPTCY APR 1996
3.10-1-8 SUSPENSION OF WORK AUG 1998
3.10.1-12 CHANGES\--FIXED-PRICE APR 1996
3.10.1-15 CHANGES\--CONSTRUCTION, DISMANTLING, DEMOLITION, OR
REMOVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS JUL 1996
3.10.1-16 CHANGES AND CHANGED CONDITIONS APR 1996
19. MODIFICATION COST PROPOSAL-PRICE BREAKDOWN
(CONSTRUCTION) APR 1996
3.10.1-20 WARRANTY\--CONSTRUCTION APR 1996
3.10.1-25 NOVATION AND CHANGE-OF-NAME AGREEMENTS JAN 2003
3.10.2-1 SUBCONTRACTS (FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS) OCT 2007
3.10.4-23 CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH
FASTNER ACT NOV 1997
3.10.6-1 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT
(FIXED PRICE) OCT 1996
3.10.6-6 DEFAULT (FIXED PRICE CONSTRUCTION) OCT 1996
3.13-3 PRINTING/COPYING DOUBLE-SIDED ON RECYCLED PAPER. APR 1996
3.13-5 SEAT BELT USE BY CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES JAN 1999
3.14-3 FOREIGN NATIONALS AS CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES JUL 2006
3.2.2.3-44 PHYSICAL DATA (JUL 2004)
Data and information furnished or referred to below is for the
Contractor\'s information. FAA shall not be responsible for any
interpretation of or conclusion drawn from the data or information made
available to the Contractor. Further, FAA specifically does not warrant
construction methodology which may be included in such documents.
\(a\) The indications of physical conditions on the drawings and in the
specifications are the result of site investigations by surveys.
\(b\) (i) Weather Conditions. The climate of the area is referred to as
\"continental\" by climatologists, characterized by cold winters and
moderately hot summers. Complete weather records and reports may be
obtained from the U.S. Weather Bureau Office located at the airport. The
Contractor shall satisfy himself as to the hazards likely to arise from
weather conditions during the construction period and make allowances
for them in his price.
\(ii\) Transportation Facilities. The Atlantic City Expressway, Garden
State Parkway, and local highways Route 30 (White Horse Pike) and Route
40 (Black Horse Pike) serve the locality of the proposed work. Atlantic
City International Airport is situated on the FAA\'s property and is
available for commercial uses. Roads within the Technical Center
boundaries may be used by the Contractor, subject to the approval of the
Contracting Officer and Base Security. The Contractor shall make his own
investigation of available routes and load limits of bridges. The
Contractor shall be responsible for the construction of any temporary
haul roads and bridges required for execution of the contract work. All
temporary construction shall be removed by the Contractor, and the areas
restored to the condition which existed prior to the start of the work.
3.3.1-35 CERTIFICATION of REGISTRATION in CENTRAL CONTRCTOR REGISTRATION
(CCR) (APRIL 2006)
In accordance with Clause 3.3.1-33, Central Contractor Registration,
offeror certifies that they are registered in the CCR Database and have
entered all mandatory information including the DUNS or DUNS+4 Number.\
\
Name: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
\
Title: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
\
Phone Number: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
3.6.2-24 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION
(NOV 1997)
Definitions.\
\
(1) \"Employer identification number,\" as used in this clause, means
the Federal Social Security number used on the employer\'s quarterly
federal tax return, U.S. Treasury Department Form 941.\
\
(2) \"Minority,\" as used in this clause, means\
\
(i) Black (all persons having origins in any of the black African racial
groups not of Hispanic origin);\
\
(ii) Hispanic (all persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or
South American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of
race);\
\
(iii) Asian and Pacific Islander (all persons having origins in any of
the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian
Subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands); and\
\
(iv) American Indian or Alaskan Native (all persons having origins in
any of the original peoples of North America and maintaining
identifiable tribal affiliations through membership and participation or
community identification).\
\
(b) If the Contractor, or a subcontractor at any tier, subcontracts a
portion of the work involving any construction trade, each such
subcontract in excess of \$10,000 shall include this clause, including
the goals for minority and female participation stated herein.\
\
(c) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in
percentage terms for the Contractor\'s aggregate work force in each
trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:\
\
Goals for minority participation:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**[17.3%]{.underline}\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**\
Goals for female participation:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**[6.9%]{.underline}\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**
(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) area office within 10
working days following award of any construction subcontract in
excess of \$10,000 at any tier for construction work under the
contract resulting from this screening information request. The
notification shall list the:\
\
(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor,\
\
(2) Employer identification number of the subcontractor;\
\
(3) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;\
\
(4) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and\
\
(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.\
\
(e) The Contractor shall implement the affirmative action procedures
in subparagraphs (f)(1) through (7) of this clause. The goals stated
in this contract are expressed as percentages of the total hours of
employment and training of minority and female utilization that the
Contractor should reasonably be able to achieve in each construction
trade in which it has employees in the covered area. If the
contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located
outside of the covered area, it shall apply the goals established
for the geographical area where that work is actually performed. The
Contractor is expected to make substantially uniform progress toward
its goals in each craft.\
\
(f) The contractor shall take affirmative action steps at least as
extensive as the following:
1. Ensure a working environment free of harassment, intimidation,
and coercion at all sites, and in all facilities where the
Contractor\'s employees are assigned to work. The Contractor, if
possible, will assign two or more women to each construction
project. The Contractor shall ensure that foremen,
superintendents, and other on-site supervision, personnel are
aware of and carry out the Contractor\'s obligation to maintain
such a working environment, with specific attention to minority
or female individuals working at these sites or facilities.
> \(2\) Immediately notify the OFCCP area office when the union or
> unions, with which the Contractor has a collective bargaining
> agreement, has not referred back to the Contractor a minority or woman
> sent by the Contractor, or when the Contractor has other information
> that the union referral process has impeded the Contractor\'s efforts
> to meet its obligations.\
> \
> (3) Develop on-the-job training opportunities and/or participate in
> training programs for the area that expressly include minorities and
> women, including upgrading programs and apprenticeship and trainee
> programs relevant to the Contractor\'s employment needs, especially
> those programs funded or approved by the Department of Labor. The
> Contractor shall provide notice of these programs to the sources
> compiled under subparagraph (f)(2) above.\
> \
> (4) Review, at least annually, the Contractor\'s equal employment
> policy and affirmative action obligations with all employees having
> responsibility for hiring, assignment, layoff, termination, or other
> employment decisions. Conduct reviews of this policy with all on-site
> supervision, personnel prior to initiation of construction work at a
> job site. A written record shall be made and maintained identifying
> the time and place of these meetings, persons attending, subject
> matter discussed, and disposition of the subject matter.\
> \
> (5) Disseminate the Contractor\'s equal employment policy externally
> by including it in any advertising in the news media, specifically
> including minority and female news media. Provide written notification
> to, and discuss this policy with, other Contractors and subcontractors
> with which the Contractor does or anticipates doing business.
\(6\) Conduct, at least annually, an inventory and evaluation at least
of all minority and female personnel for promotional opportunities.
Encourage these employees to seek or to prepare for, through appropriate
training, etc., opportunities for promotion.\
\
(7) Maintain a record of solicitations for subcontracts for minority and
female construction contractors and suppliers, including circulation of
solicitations to minority and -female contractor associations and other
business associations.\
\
(g) The Contractor is encouraged to participate in voluntary
associations that may assist in fulfilling one or more of the
affirmative action obligations contained in subparagraphs (f)(1) through
(7). The efforts of a contractor association, joint contractor-union,
contractor-community, or similar group of which the contractor is a
member and participant, may be useful in achieving one or more of its
obligations under subparagraphs (f)(1) through (7).\
\
(h) A single goal for minorities and a separate single goal for women
shall be established. The Contractor is required to provide equal
employment opportunity and to take affirmative action for all minority
groups, both male and female, and all women, both minority and
non-minority. Consequently, the Contractor may be in violation of
Executive Order 11246, as amended, if a particular group is employed in
a substantially disparate manner.\
\
(i) The contractor shall not use goals or affirmative action standards
to discriminate against any person because of race, color, religion,
sex, or national origin.\
\
(j) The Contractor shall not enter into any subcontract with any person
or firm debarred from Government contracts under Executive Order 11246,
as amended.
\(k\) The Contractor shall carry out such sanctions and penalties for
violation of this clause and of the Nondiscrimination and Affirmative
Action clause, including suspension, termination, and cancellation of
existing subcontracts, as may be imposed or ordered under Executive
Order 11246, as amended, and its implementing regulations, by the OFCCP.
Any failure to carry out these sanctions and penalties as ordered shall
be a violation of this clause and Executive Order 11246, as amended.\
\
(l) Nothing contained herein shall be construed as a limitation upon the
application of other laws that establish different standards of
compliance.
3.6.3-12 ASBESTOS-FREE CONSTRUCTION (AUGUST 1998)
In performing this contract, the Contractor shall not use asbestos or
asbestos-containing building materials during construction, renovation,
and/or modernization of this facility and shall provide to the
Contracting Officer (CO) a signed statement \[CO state due date of
statement here related to completion of the project\] indicating that to
the best of its knowledge, no asbestos or asbestos-containing building
materials were used during construction, renovation, and/or
modernization of this facility. The Contractor\'s certification under
this clause is considered to be a material requirement of the contract
and the FAA may withhold payment pending submittal and receipt of an
acceptable certification.\
\
The FAA CO may authorize sample testing of contractor building materials
used during construction, renovation, and/or modernization of this
facility to verify that they are asbestos-free. The FAA will bear the
expense of this testing unless the testing reveals that the Contractor
used asbestos-containing building material in performing this contract.
If asbestos-containing material is found, the Contractor shall remove
and replace the asbestos-containing material and decontaminate the site
of asbestos contamination caused by the Contractor at no additional cost
to the Government. In addition, the Contractor shall bear the expense of
the original testing and retesting to determine that the asbestos
removal and site decontamination are satisfactorily completed.
I.1 CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH FAA POLICIES
\(a\) The Contractor shall comply with all FAA policies affecting the
FAA workplace environment. Examples of specific policies are:
\(1\) harassment-free workplace;
\(2\) non-smoking workplace;
\(3\) workplace free of firearms and other weapons; and
\(4\) accident prevention and safety programs.
\(b\) The Contractor shall obtain from the Contracting Officer
information describing the policy requirements. A Contractor who fails
to enforce workplace policies is subject to suspension or termination of
the contract.
PART III ‑ SECTION J
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
[SPECIFICATION \#]{.underline} [TITLE]{.underline}
Work Order #179339-2007 "Work Statement and Specifications for the
Modifications and Extension for Parking Lot
A-1"
[DRAWING NO. Title]{.underline}
G-000 Title Sheet
C-001 Diagonal Parking Arrangement
C-002 Detail Sheet
C-003 Misc. Detail Sheet and Profile
[ATTACHMENT -TITLE NO.. of PAGES]{.underline}
Department of Labor General Wage Decision 35
No. NJ20070002 dated 01/25/2008
Bid Bond (SF-24) 2
Performance Bond (SF-24) 2
Payment Bond (SF-25A) 2
Business Declaration Form 2
PART IV - SECTION K
REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS, AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS
3.1-1 CLAUSES and PROVISIONS INCORPORATED by REFERENCE (DECEMBER 2005)
This screening information request (SIR) or contract, as applicable,
incorporates by reference one or more provisions or clauses listed below
with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon
request, the Contracting Officer will make the full text available, or
offerors and contractors may obtain the full text via Internet at:
[http://fast.faa.gov](http://204.108.10.60/conwrite) (on this web page,
select \"Contract Writing/Clauses\").
3.2.5-2 INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION (OCTOBER 1996)
3.6.2-5 CERTIFICATION of NONSEGREGATED FACTILITIES (APRIL 1996)
3.6.3-1 CLEAN AIR and WATER CERTIFICATION (APRIL 2000)
3.2.2.3-10 TYPE of BUSINESS ORGANIZATION (JULY 2004) By checking the
applicable box, the offeror (you) represents that\--\
\
(a) You operate as \[ \] a corporation incorporated under the laws of
the State of \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ , \[ \] an
individual, \[ \] a partnership, \[ \] a nonprofit organization, \[ \] a
joint venture or \[ \] other \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\[specify what type
of organization\].\
\
(b) If you are a foreign entity, you operate as \[ \] an individual, \[
\] a partnership, \[ \] a nonprofit organization, \[ \] a joint venture,
or \[ \] a corporation, registered for business in
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
.\
(country)\
\
(End of provision)
3.2.2.3-15 AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS (JULY 2004)
The offeror states that the following persons are authorized to
negotiate on your behalf with the FAA in connection with this offer:\
Name:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
Title:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
Phone number:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
\
(End of provision)
3.2.2.3-23 PLACE of PERFORMANCE (JULY 2004)
\(a\) The offeror (you), in fulfilling any contract resulting from this
SIR, \[ \] intends, \[ \] does not intend (check applicable block) to
use one or more plants or facilities located at a different address from
your address as stated in this offer.\
\
(b) If you check \'intends\' in paragraph (a) above, insert the
following information:\
Place of Performance Street:\
City:\
State:\
Zip Code:\
\
Name of owner and operator, if other than the owner\
\
(End of provision)
3.2.2.3-35 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS and CERTIFICATIONS (JULY 2004)
The offeror certifies that annual representations and certifications
(check the appropriate block):\
\
\[ \] (a) Dated \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (insert date of signature on offer)
which are incorporated by reference, have been submitted to the
contracting office issuing this SIR and that the information is current,
accurate, and complete as of the date of this offer, except as follows
(insert changes that affect only this SIR; if \'none,\' say so):\
\
\[ \] (b) Are enclosed.
(End of Provision)
3.2.2.3-70 TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION (JULY 2004)
\(a\) Definitions.\
\
(1) \"Common parent,\" as used in this clause, means a corporate entity
that owns or controls an affiliated group of corporations that files an
offeror\'s (you, your) Federal income tax returns on a consolidated
basis, and of which you are a member.\
\
(2) \"Corporate status,\" as used in this clause, means a designation as
to whether you are a corporate entity, an unincorporated entity (for
example, sole proprietorship or partnership), or a corporation providing
medical and health care services.\
\
(3) \"Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN),\" as used in this clause,
means the number the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) requires you use in
reporting income tax and other returns.\
\
(b) All offerors must submit the information required in paragraphs (c)
through (e) of this provision to comply with reporting requirements of
26 U.S.C. 6041, 6041A, and 6050M and implementing regulations issued by
IRS. The FAA will use this information to collect and report on any
delinquent amounts arising out of your relation with the Federal
Government, under Public Law 104 -134, the Debt Collection Improvement
Act of 1996, Section 31001(I)(3). If the resulting contract is subject
to the reporting requirements and you refuse or fail to provide the
information, the Contracting Officer (CO) may reduce your payments 31
percent under the contract.\
\
(c) Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN).\
\
\[ \] TIN: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
\[ \] TIN has been applied for.\
\[ \] TIN is not required because:\
\[ \] Offeror is a nonresident alien, foreign corporation, or foreign
partnership that does not leave income effectively connected with the
conduct of a trade or business in the U.S. and does not have an office
or place of business or a fiscal paying agent in the U.S.;\
\[ \] Offeror is an agency or instrumentality of a foreign government;\
\[ \] Offeror is an agency or instrumentality of a Federal, state, or
local government;\
\[ \] Other\--State basis.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.\
\
(d) Corporate Status.\
\
\[ \] Corporation providing medical and health care services, or engaged
in the billing and collecting of payments for such services;\
\[ \] Other corporate entity\
\[ \] Not a corporate entity\
\[ \] Sole proprietorship\
\[ \] Partnership\
\[ \] Hospital or extended care facility described in 26 CFR 501(c)(3)
that is exempt from taxation under 26 CFR 501(a).\
\
(e) Common Parent.\
\
\[ \] A common parent does not own or control the offeror as defined in
paragraph (a).\
\[ \] Name and TIN of common parent:\
Name
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
TIN
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
\
(End of provision)
3.2.2.3-76 REPRESENTATION- RELEASE of CONTRACT INFORMATION (JULY 2004)
\(a\) Any contract resulting from this SIR may be subject to release
under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. Section 552.\
\
(b) The offeror's (you, your) position regarding the possible release of
information you provide in response to this SIR is as follows:\
\
(c) REPRESENTATION CONCERNING RELEASE OF CONTRACT INFORMATION\--\
\
The offeror (you) represents that\--(1)\[ \] You have made a complete
review of your offer(s) in response to this SIR and no exemption from
mandatory release under FOIA exists, and, (2)\[ \] You have no objection
to the release of any contract you may be awarded in whole or in part
resulting from this SIR.
OR
The offeror (you) represents that \[ \] your offer(s) in response to
this SIR contains information that is exempt from mandatory release
under FOIA. Accordingly, you represent that\--(1)\[ \] You have
identified any sensitive documents you submitted in response to this SIR
by placing restrictive markings on them. This may include trade secrets,
proprietary information, or commercial or financial information that is
privileged or confidential, and (2)\[ \] As the party that provided the
information, you have provided the Contracting Officer (by separate
letter concurrent with this offer) detailed information listing the
page(s) to be withheld complete with any and all legal justifications
which would permit the FAA to invoke a FOIA exemption.\
\[End of Provision\]
3.2.2.7-7 CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, PROPOSED
DEBARMENT, and OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (APRIL 1996)
(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief,
that\--
\(i\) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals\--
\(A\) Are \[ \] are not \[ \] presently debarred, suspended, proposed
for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any
Federal agency;
\(B\) Have \[ \] have not \[ \] within a three-year period preceding
this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against
them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state,
or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or state
antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers: or commission
of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction
of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; and
\(C\) Are \[ \] are not \[ \] presently indicted for, or otherwise
criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission
of any of the offenses enumerated in subdivision (a)(1)(i)(B) of this
provision.
\(ii\) The Offeror has \[ \] has not \[ \] within a three-year period
preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default
by any Federal agency.
\(2\) \'Principals,\' for the purposes of this certification, means
officers; directors; owners; partners; and, persons having primary
management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity
(e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a subsidiary, division,
or business segment, and similar positions). THIS CERTIFICATION CONCERNS
A MATTER WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF AN AGENCY OF THE UNITED STATES AND
THE MAKING OF A FALSE, FICTITIOUS, OR FRAUDULENT CERTIFICATION MAY
RENDER THE MAKER SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION 1001, TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE.
\(b\) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the
Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the Offeror
learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become
erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
\(c\) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this
provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of an award
under this SIR. However, the certification will be considered in
connection with a determination of the Offeror\'s responsibility.
Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such
additional information as requested by the Contracting Officer may
render the Offeror nonresponsible.
\(d\) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require
establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith,
the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The
knowledge and information of an Offeror is not required to exceed that
which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course
of business dealings.
\(e\) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material
representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making award.
If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an
erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the
Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting
from this SIR for default.
(End of Provision)
3.5-14 REPRESENTATION of LIMITED RIGHTS DATA and RESTRICTED COMPUTER
SOFTWARE (OCTOBER 1996)
\(a\) This Screening Information Request (SIR) sets forth the work to be
performed if a contract award results, and the Government\'s known
delivery requirements for data, as defined in the clause \"Rights in
Data-General.\" Any resulting contract may also provide the Government
the option to order additional data under the \"Additional Data
Requirements\" clause, if included in the contract. Any data delivered
under the resulting contract will be subject to the \"Rights in
Data-General\" clause that is to be included in this contract. Under the
latter clause, a Contractor may withhold from delivery data that qualify
as limited rights data or restricted computer software, and deliver
form, fit, and function data in lieu thereof. The latter clause also may
be used with its Alternates II and/or III to obtain delivery of limited
rights data or restricted computer software, marked with limited rights
or restricted rights notices, as appropriate. In addition, use of
Alternate V with this latter clause provides the Government the right to
inspect such data at the Contractor\'s facility.\
\
(b) As an aid in determining the Government\'s need to include any of
the aforementioned Alternates in the clause \"Rights in Data-General,\"
the offeror\'s response to this Screening Information Request (SIR) may,
to the extent feasible, complete the representation in paragraph (b) of
this provision to either state that none of the data qualify as limited
rights data or restricted computer software, or identify which of the
data qualifies as limited rights data or restricted computer software.
Any identification of limited rights data or restricted computer
software in the offeror\'s response is not determinative of the status
of such data should a contract be awarded to the offeror.\
\
REPRESENTATION CONCERNING DATA RIGHTS\
\
Offeror has reviewed the requirements for the delivery of data or
software and states (offeror check appropriate block)\--\
\
\[ \] None of the data proposed for fulfilling such requirements
qualifies as limited rights data or restricted computer software.
\[ \] Data proposed for fulfilling such requirements qualify as limited
rights data or restricted computer software and are identified as
follows:\
\
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
\
Note: \"Limited rights data\" and \"Restricted computer software\" are
defined in the contract clause titled \"Rights In Data-General.\"\
\
(End of provision)
3.6.2-6 PREVIOUS CONTRACTS and COMPLIANCE REPORTS (APRIL 1996)
The offeror represents that\--(a) It \[ \] has, \[ \] has not,
participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject either to the
\"Equal Opportunity\" clause of this solicitation, the clause originally
contained in Section 310 of Executive Order No. 10925, or the clause
contained in Section 201 of Executive Order No. 11114; (b) It \[ \] has,
\[ \] has not, filed all required compliance reports; and (c)
Representations indicating submission of required compliance reports,
signed by proposed subcontractors, will be obtained before subcontract
awards.\
(End of Provision)
K.1 NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS)\
\
The NAICS code is 237110, with a size standard of \$23M.
PART IV ‑ SECTION L
INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFEROR
3.1-1 CLAUSES AND PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (DECEMBER 2005)
This screening information request (SIR) or contract, as applicable,
incorporates by reference the provisions or clauses listed below with
the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon
request, the Contracting Officer will make the full text available, or
offerors and contractors may obtain the full text via Internet at:\
[[http://conwrite.faa.gov]{.underline}](http://conwrite.faa.gov/) (on
this web page, select \"Search and View Clauses\").
3.1.7-4 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT of INTEREST SIR PROVISION (MARCH
2006)
3.2.2.3-1 FALSE STATEMENTS in OFFERS (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-3 AFFILIATED OFFERORS (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-6 SUBMITTALS in the ENGLISH LANGUAGE (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-7 SUBMITTALS in U.S. CURRENCEY (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-11 UNNECESSARILY ELABORATE SUBMITTALS (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-12 AMENDMENTS to SCREENING INFORMATION REQUESTS (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-13 SUBMISSION of INFORMATION/DOCUMENTATION/OFFERS (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-14 LATE SUBMISSIONS, MODIFICATIONS, and WITHDRAWALS of
SUBMITTALS (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-16 RESTRICTING, DISCLOSING and USING DATA (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-17 PREPARING OFFERS (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-18 PROSPECTIVE OFFEROR'S REQUESTS for EXPLANANTIONS (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-19 CONTRACT AWARD (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-20 ELECTRONIC OFFERS (JULY 2004)
3.2.2.3-31 FACILITIES CAPITAL COST of MONEY (JULY 2004)
3.13-4 CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION NUMBER---DATA UNIVERSAL NUMBERING
SYSTEM (DUNS) NUMBER (APRIL 1997)
PROVIDE DUNS
#\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
(End of provision)
3.2.4-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1996)
The FAA contemplates award of a FIRM-FIXED PRICE contract resulting from
this
Screening Information Request.
3.2.2.3-63 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (JULY 2004)
(a) AMS clauses 3.2.2.3-42, Differing Site Conditions, and 3.2.2.3-43,
Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be
included in any contract awarded under this SIR. Accordingly, FAA
urges and expects offerors to inspect the site where the work will
be performed.
(b) \(b\) Site visits may be arranged during normal duty hours by
contacting:\
\
Name: Kimberly
Knight\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
Address: Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center AJP 7952\_\_\_\_\_\
Atlantic City Int'l Airport NJ
08405\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
Telephone:\_609-485-4622
(c) Mandatory site visit to be held [02/21/2008 1:00 PM]{.underline}
meeting at Security Operations Center.\
\
(End of provision)
3.9.1-3 PROTEST (NOV 2002)
AS A CONDITION OF SUBMITTING AN OFFER OR RESPONSE TO THIS SIR (OR OTHER
SOLICITATION, IF APPROPRIATE), THE OFFEROR OR POTENTIAL OFFEROR AGREES
TO BE BOUND BY THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS RELATING TO PROTESTS:\
\
(a) Protests concerning Federal Aviation Administration Screening
Information Requests (SIRs) or awards of contracts shall be resolved
through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) dispute resolution
system at the Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition (ODRA) and
shall be governed by the procedures set forth in 14 C.F.R. Parts 14 and
17, which are hereby incorporated by reference. Judicial review, where
available, will be in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 46110 and shall apply
only to final agency decisions. A protestor may seek review of a final
FAA decision only after its administrative remedies have been
exhausted.\
\
(b) Offerors initially should attempt to resolve any issues concerning
potential protests with the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer
should make reasonable efforts to answer questions promptly and
completely, and, where possible, to resolve concerns or controversies.
The protest time limitations, however, will not be extended by attempts
to resolve a potential protest with the Contracting Officer.\
\
(c) The filing of a protest with the ODRA may be accomplished by mail,
overnight delivery, hand delivery, or by facsimile. A protest is
considered to be filed on the date it is received by the ODRA.\
\
(d) Only an interested party may file a protest. An interested party is
one whose direct economic interest has been or would be affected by the
award or failure to award an FAA contract. Proposed subcontractors are
not \"interested parties\" within this definition.\
\
(e) A written protest must be filed with the ODRA within the times set
forth below, or the protest shall be dismissed as untimely:\
\
(1) Protests based upon alleged improprieties in a solicitation or a SIR
that are apparent prior to bid opening or the time set for receipt of
initial proposals shall be filed prior to bid opening or the time set
for the receipt of initial proposals.\
\
(2) In procurements where proposals are requested, alleged improprieties
that do not exist in the initial solicitation, but which are
subsequently incorporated into the solicitation, must be protested not
later than the next closing time for receipt of proposals following the
incorporation.\
\
(3) For protests other than those related to alleged solicitation
improprieties, the protest must be filed on the later of the following
two dates:\
\
(i) Not later than seven (7) business days after the date the protester
knew or should have known of the grounds for the protest; or\
\
(ii) If the protester has requested a post-award debriefing from the FAA
Product Team, not later than five (5) business days after the date on
which the Product Team holds that debriefing.\
\
(f) Protests shall be filed at:\
\
(1) Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition, AGC-70,\
Federal Aviation Administration,\
800 Independence Ave., S.W.,\
Room 323,\
Washington, DC 20591,\
\
Telephone: (202) 267-3290,\
Facsimile: (202) 267-3720; or\
\
(2) other address as specified in 14 CFR Part 17.\
\
(g) At the same time as filing the protest with the ODRA, the protester
shall serve a copy of the protest on the Contracting Officer and any
other official designated in the SIR for receipt of protests by means
reasonably calculated to be received by the Contracting Officer on the
same day as it is to be received by the ODRA. The protest shall include
a signed statement from the protester, certifying to the ODRA the manner
of service, date, and time when a copy of the protest was served on the
Contracting Officer and other designated official(s).\
\
(h) Additional information and guidance about the ODRA dispute
resolution process for protests can be found on the ODRA Website at
[http://www.faa.gov](http://www.faa.gov/).
L.1 DEFINITIONS
\(a\) Wherever the word "bidder" appears it shall mean "offeror".
\(b\) Wherever the word "bid" appears it shall mean "offer".
\(c\) In this part, wherever the word "submittals" appears it shall be
meant to include, to the extent called for in the solicitation, a
completed SF 1442 with price(s) and acknowledgment of amendments,
completed bid schedules, qualifications data, product data, product
samples, bid bond, completed Representations and Certifications part,
Business Declaration Form, and other requirements specified in the
solicitation.
L.2 OFFEROR'S SUBMISSION
Offeror's submission shall consist of the following:
Part I -- Price Proposal
a\. Page Nos. 1 and 2 (SF-1442) fully executed;
b. Part I - Section B fully executed.
c. Part I - Section G fully executed
d\. Acknowledged amendment(s) (if applicable);
e\. Part IV -- Section K and L fully executed.
f\. Performance & Payment Bonds (SF25 & 25A)
> g\. Business Declaration Form (located in Part III -- Section J - List
> of Attachments).
Any submission received at the William J. Hughes Technical Center,
Acquisition Services Group, AJP-7952, 4th floor, Atlantic City
International Airport, New Jersey 08405, after [3/3/2008 2:00
PM]{.underline} **,** will not be considered, unless the conditions
under Provision No. 3.2.2.3-14, Late Submissions, Modifications, and
Withdrawals of Submittals, apply.
All questions regarding all requirements of the request for offer must
be submitted in writing by [2/27/2008 2:00 PM.]{.underline} Send
questions to Kim Knight at the WJH Technical Center, Acquisition
Services Group, AJP-7952, Atlantic City International Airport, NJ,
08405. Phone No. 609-485--4622, Fax. No. 609-485-4088, or through email
at <kimberly.a.knight@faa.gov>
IMPORTANT NOTE: Offerors are advised of the heightened security at the
FAA WJH Technical Center. Outside visitors will not have access to the
facility to hand-deliver proposals unless they are in possession of a
valid DOT/FAA photo ID. Therefore, proposals should be mailed to the
attention of the FAA Contracting Officer identified in Section L.2 of
this SIR. Additionally, offerors are reminded of the requirements
contained in AMS Clauses 3.2.2.3-13 "Submission of
Information/Documentation/Offers" and 3.2.2.3-14 "Late Submissions,
Modifications, and Withdrawals of Submittals".
L.3 PREPARATION OF SUBMITTALS
\(a\) Offers are expected to examine all drawings, specifications,
schedules, and instructions carefully and in their entirety. Failure to
do so will be at the offeror's risk.
\(b\) Offers shall submit their price proposal on the Standard Form (SF)
1442, in Item No. 17, or on copies of that form. The offer shall print
or type its name and manually sign and date the offer. Offers signed by
an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent's authority,
unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing
office. The person signing the form must initial each erasure or change
appearing on the form.
\(c\) The form may require bidders to submit prices for one or more
items on various bases; the offer must enter an amount for each item or
the offer will be rejected.
\(1\) lump sum proposal;
\(2\) alternate prices;
\(3\) units of construction; or
\(4\) any combination of subparagraphs (1) through (3) above.
\(d\) Alternate offers will not be considered unless this solicitation
authorizes their submission; i.e. offers for supplies or services other
than those specified will not be considered.
\(e\) Each offer shall furnish the information required by the
solicitation. Offers are expected to carefully examine the drawings,
specifications and all other contract clauses and instructions in their
entirety. For example, if a proposal guarantee (or bid bond) is
specified, it must be submitted with the offer or the offer will be
considered non-responsive. Another example is the submission of
qualifications data and references to show the minimum experience
specified for the type of work being contracted for; if this data is not
provided, and it is not already on file, the Government may reject the
offer provided. Offers are required to complete the Business Declaration
Form attached to this solicitation, and Part 2, Representations and
Certifications, in their entirety, and submit these with their offer.
\(f\) Unless specified in the solicitation, offers must state a definite
time for delivery of supplies or for performance of services. Time, if
stated as a number of days, will include Saturdays, Sundays, and
holidays, unless specifically stated otherwise.
L.4 EXPLANATIONS TO PROSPECTIVE OFFERS
Any prospective offer desiring an explanation or interpretation of the
solicitation, drawings, specifications, etc. must request it in writing
within 24 hours of the mandatory site visit. Oral explanations or
instructions given before the award of a contract will not be binding.
Any information given a prospective bidder concerning a solicitation
will be furnished to all other prospective offers as an amendment to the
solicitation, if that information is necessary in submitting offers or
if the lack of it would be prejudicial to other prospective offers.
Send questions to: Federal Aviation Administration
William J. Hughes Technical Center
Acquisition Services Sub-team, AJP-7952
Attn.: Kim Knight
Atlantic City Int'l Airport, NJ 08405
kimberly.a.knight@faa.gov
FAX #: (609) 485-4088
Please be advised that the project design was prepared by our in-house
architectural-engineering group (AJP-7940), however, any questions on
this solicitation document (including the drawings and specifications)
are to be directed [ONLY]{.underline} to the Contracting Officer at the
FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center as identified above.
PART IV ‑ SECTION M
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
M.1 CONTRACT AWARD
Award shall be made to low responsible offeror whose proposal responds
to all the terms and conditions of this solicitation. To be determined
responsible, an offeror must:
\- have adequate resources (financial, technical, etc.) to perform
the contract, or the ability to obtain them.
\- be able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or
performance
schedule, considering all existing business commitments;
\- have a satisfactory performance record;
\- have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics.
In addition, the offeror's must submit the documents identified in
"Offeror's Submission" (See Section L.2 of this document) and attended
the mandatory site visit.
\(b\) The Government may reject any or all submittals if such action is
in the public interest and waive informalities and minor irregularities
in offers received.
\(c\) A submittal in response to this solicitation should contain the
offeror\'s best terms from a cost or price standpoint. Offeror's will be
evaluated on the total Firm Fixed Price submitted.
> A written award or acceptance of offer mailed or otherwise furnished
> to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in
> the offer shall result in a binding contract without further action by
> either party.
| en |
markdown | 139601 | # Presentation: 139601
## GOAL 1
- Background
- Clinical Presentation
- Recognition and Diagnosis
- Personal Protective Equipment
- Decontamination
- Management
- Reporting
**To provide clinicians and public health officials with the following information related to ricin: **
## GOAL 2
- To provide clinicians and public health officials with information on epidemiological clues that may suggest illness associated with ricin or another chemical or biological toxin in the correct clinical context.
## Objectives
- Describe the epidemiology of nonterrorism-associated ricin poisoning
- Describe the epidemiology of terrorism-associated ricin poisoning
## Objectives
- Describe the clinical manifestations of oral, inhalational, and parenteral ricin poisoning
- Describe differential diagnosis for ricin poisoning
## Objectives
- Explain the diagnosis of ricin poisoning
- Identify epidemiological clues suggestive of a possible covert ricin (or other chemical/biological toxin) release
- Describe the clinical management of ricin poisoning
## Objectives
- Describe the disposition of patients with ricin-associated illness
- Identify the proper authorities for reporting of suspected or known ricin-associated illness
## CDC/ATSDR Training and Continuing Education Online System
- www.phppo.cdc.gov/phtnonline
## Caster Bean Photos
## Ricinus Communis
## Castor Beans
## Ricin Characteristics
- Ricin can be prepared in a liquid, crystalline, or dry powder form
- Ricin is water soluble, odorless, tasteless, and stable under ambient conditions
## Mechanism of Action and Toxicity of Ricin
## Biological Toxalbumins
- Abrus precatorius (contains abrin)
- Ricinus communis (contains ricin)
- Robinia pseudoacacia (contains robin
- and phasin)
- Hura crepitans
- Jatropha curcas
- Jatropha gossypifolia
## Category B Diseases/Agents
- are moderately easy to disseminate;
- result in moderate morbidity rates and low mortality rates; and
- require specific enhancements of CDC's diagnostic capacity and enhanced disease surveillance.
**Second highest priority agents include those that**
## Other Category B Bioterrorism Agents
- Brucellosis
- Glanders
- Q Fever
- Typhus Fever
- Psittacosis
- Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B
## Ricin Exposure
- Inhalation and intravenous injection are the most lethal routes
- Ricin is not well absorbed orally or dermally
## Oral Administration
- The absorption of orally administered ricin is poor, _but_ if enough ricin is ingested, the potential for significant morbidity and mortality exists.
## Ricin Absorbtion
- Not likely to be absorbed through unabraded skin; however, there are no reported studies on the dermal toxicity of ricin
- The effect of adding a carrier solvent to ricin to increase dermal absorption is unknown
## Nonterroism Ricin Poisoning
- Over 400 cases of poisoning by ingestion
- 14 deaths (12 prior to 1930)
## Ricin: Aerosol Exposure
## Ricin: Parenteral Exposure
## Ricin as a Chemotherapeutic Agent
## Ricin and Terrorism
- Properties make it a potential terrorist agent
- Would need to be aerosolized, added to food, beverage or consumer products
## Ricin and Terrorism
**Georgi Markov**
**500 micrograms of ricin was injected**
## Ricin and Terrorism
- 1991- Unsuccessful dermal attack plan to kill 100 people
- 1995-Agents find 130 grams of ricin at Canadian border, enough to kill 10,000 people.
## Ricin and Terrorism
## Ricin and Terrorism
- December 2002, six terrorist suspects were arrested in Manchester, England
- January 2003, subtoxic quantities of ricin were found in the Paris Metro, leading to an investigation of a plan to attack the Russian embassy
## Osama bin Ladin
## Clinical Manifestation
## Route of Exposure
- Inhalation
- Ingestion
- Parenteral
## Aerosol Dispersion
- Not considered persistent in the environment
- Particles under 5 microns may stay suspended for many hours
- Re-suspension of settled ricin may occur
- Technologically difficult to produce particles of this small size
## Systemic Toxicity
- Severe systemic toxicity has been described in humans only following ingestion or injection of ricin into the body
## Ricin Ingestion
- Ricin release from beans requires mastication
- Swallowing whole beans not likely to poison
- Beans have bitter taste
- No reports of people who have ingested purified ricin
## Ricin Fatal Dose
- Ingestion and mastication of 3-6 beans is the estimated fatal dose in adults (presumed less in children)
## Ricin: Mild Toxicity Symptoms
- Nausea
- Vomiting
- Diarrhea
- Abdominal cramping
- Oropharyngeal irritation
**Symptoms of mild toxicity include:**
## Onset of Gastrointestinal Symptoms
- Typically occurs in less than 10 hours.
- Delayed presentation of gastrointestinal symptoms, beyond ten hours of ingestion, is unlikely to occur.
## Moderate to Severe Toxicity
- Gastrointestinal symptoms persistent vomiting, voluminous diarrhea-bloody or non-bloody (which typically leads to significant fluid losses)
- Dehydration, hypovolemic shock, tachycardia, hypotension, decreased urine output, altered mental status (e.g., confusion, disorientation).
**May Include:**
**May Result In:**
## Severe Poisoning
- Hepatic and renal failure and death are possible within 36 – 72 hours of exposure
## Ricin Inhalation
- Very limited data in humans
- Animal studies suggest it is the most lethal form of exposure.
## Ricin Allergic Syndrome
- Nasal and throat congestion
- Eye irritation
- Hives and other skin irritation
- Chest tightness
- Wheezing (severe cases)
## 1940’s : An Unintentional and Sublethal Aerosol Exposure
- Fever
- Chest tightness
- Cough
- Dyspnea
- Nausea
- Arthralgias
- Diaphoresis
- No reported progression
## Progression
- Pulmonary edema and hemorrhage
- Hypotension
- Respiratory failure
- Death within 36-72 hours
## Parenteral Exposure
## Clinical Trial
- Flu-like symptoms
- Fatique
- Myalgias
- Symptoms lasting 1-2 days
## Lethal Injection (Markov-1978)
- Immediate pain
- Weakness within 5 hours
- Fever
- Vomiting
- Shock
- Multi-organ failure
- Death in 3 days
## Lethal Injection Example 2
- Nausea
- Weakness
- Dizziness
- Myalgias
- Anuria
- Hypotension
- Hepatorenal and cardiorespiratory failure
- Death
## Ricin: Clinical Course
## Significant ricin poisoning through inhalation, ingestion and parenteral exposure would consist of progressive worsening of symptoms over approximately 4-36 hours.
## Early Ricin poisoning through ingestion may resemble typical gastroenteritis-type or a respiratory illness through inhalation
## May be difficult to discern early poisoning from other common and less virulent illnesses such as an upper respiratory infection or gastroenteritis.
## Cases should be deemed suspicious in conjunction with
- A highly suspected or known exposure
- A credible threat
- An epidemiologic clue suggestive of a chemical release.
## Differential Diagnosis
## Inhalation:
- Staphylococcal enterotoxin B
- Exposure to pyrolysis by-products of organofluorines (Teflon, Kevlar)
- Oxides of nitrogen
- Phosgene
- Influenza
- Anthrax
- Q-fever
- Pneumonic plague
## Ingestion:
- Enteric pathogens (e.g., salmonella, shigella)
- Mushrooms
- Caustics
- Iron
- Arsenic
- Colchicine
## Clinical Diagnosis
## Overt Event
- Letter identifying ricin in contents of package
- Restaurant patrons unknowingly consume food contaminated with ricin
- Covert Event
## Illness Resulting from Covert Event
- Symptoms similar to flu or gastroenteritis
- Early symptoms may be nonexistent or mild
- Reports of illness may occur over a long period and in multiple locations
## Illness Resulting from Covert Event
- Symptoms may not suggest a single chemical
- Healthcare providers may be less familiar with clinical presentations of chemical or biological-induced poisonings
## Epidemiologic Clues Suggesting Covert Release of a Chemical or Biological toxin
- Unusual increase in patients with possible chemical or biological toxin related illness
- Unexplained deaths among healthy or young people
- Unexplained odors on patients
- Clusters of illness in people with common characteristics
## Epidemiologic Clues Suggesting Covert Release of a chemical or biological toxin
- Rapid onset of symptoms
- Unexplained death of plants, fish, or animals
- Presence of a particular syndrome associated with a chemical agent or biological toxin
## Clinical diagnosis largely depends on route of exposure
Clinical findings associated with ricin poisoning may be nonspecific and may mimic signs and symptoms of less virulent diseases
- Clinical findings associated with ricin poisoning may be nonspecific and may mimic signs and symptoms of less virulent diseases
## Confirmation of Ricin Poisoning
- Clinical manifestations of illness
- Laboratory detection of ricin in biological fluids or environmental samples
## Laboratory Testing
- No validated assays for detection of ricin in biologic fluids
- Testing of environmental samples may not be immediately available to assist in clinical decision making
## Suspicion and clinical diagnosis of ricin poisoning should occur when clinically compatible illness is present in conjunction with:
- A highly suspected or known exposure,
- A credible threat, OR
- An applicable epidemiologic clue
## Decontamination and Personal Protective Equipment
## Patient Contaminated with Ricin
- Provide gross decontamination at the scene unless medical condition dictates immediate transport to hospital
## Gross Decontamination
- Cut away/remove all suspected contaminated clothing
- Remove jewelry and watches
- Wash off obvious contamination with soap and copious amount of water
- Shower with liquid soap and warm water
## Gross Decontamination
- Provide privacy
- Secure personal belongings
- Explain procedure to victims
## Decontamination
- Clean environmental surfaces or equipment with soap and water or 0.1% sodium hypochlorite solution
- Double bag, label and secure victims’ clothing
## Decontamination of Nondisposable PPE
- Thoroughly rinse with soap and water
- Soak in 0.1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 15 minutes
- Rinse with water and air dry
## PPE for First Responders
- Determined by incident commander
- Based on hazard assessment and site conditions
- PPE should prevent droplets from contacting broken skin or mucosal membranes
## PPE if Victims Inadequately Decontaminated at Scene
- Chemical-resistant suit with gloves
- Surgical mask
- Eye/face protection
## Decontamination
- Should be done at scene or hospital but prior to entering emergency department
- Removing contaminated clothing reduces contaminant 75%-90%
## Standard Precautions
- Scrubs or disposable gown
- Lab coat
- Disposable nitrile gloves
- Surgical mask
- Safety glasses, goggles, or face shield
- Good hand hygiene
## Clinical Management
## Primary Management
- Supportive
- No antidote
- Dialysis ineffective
## Standard Precautions
- After skin decontamination
- With patient’s belongings
- With patient’s secretions
**Continue use:**
## Ricin Ingestion
- Patient presents <1 hour after exposure
- No vomiting
- No contraindications
**Consider gastric lavage if**
**If ricin powder ingested, may consider nasogastric tube**
## Ricin Ingestion
- If no vomiting and airway is secure, give a single dose of activated charcoal
## Ricin Ingestion
- Administer intravenous fluids
- Provide blood pressure support using intravenous vasopressors
- Consider alternative diagnoses and treat appropriately (e.g., antibiotics for possible infection)
## Inhalational and Parenteral Poisoning
- Supplemental oxygen
- Pulmonary toilet
- Mechanical ventilation
- May require hemodialysis
## National Poison Control Center Hotline
- 1-800-222-1222
## Disposition
- Is there a highly suspected or known exposure?
- Is there a credible threat?
- Is there an applicable epidemiologic clue to suggest an illness potentially related to a chemical or biological toxin?
## Disposition
- Treat and admit patients with clinical findings consistent with ricin poisoning plus
- A highly suspected or known exposure
- OR
- Presentation occurs with a credible threat
## Disposition
- Due to limited experience with ricin poisoning, a definitive period of observation cannot be specified at this time
## Disposition
- Asymptomatic patients exposed to highly suspected or known ricin-containing compound should be observed for symptoms
- Instruct patients sent home to return to hospital immediately if symptoms consistent with ricin poisoning develop
## Contact the regional poison control center and the local and/or state public health agency in all cases of illness consistent with ricin poisoning in the presence of:
- A suspected or known exposure
- A credible threat OR
- An applicable epidemiologic clue
## National Poison Control Center Hotline
- 1-800-222-1222
## Public Health Surveillance and Reporting
## Contact the regional poison control center and the local and/or state public health agency in all cases of illness consistent with ricin poisoning in the presence of:
- A suspected or known exposure,
- A credible threat, OR
- An applicable epidemiologic clue
## E-mail questions to:
- ricinquestions@cdc.gov
## Course Overview
- www.phppo.cdc.gov/phtn/ricin
## CDC Ricin Website
- www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/ricin
## Public Health Foundation
- Phone: 1-877-252-1200
- Fax: 301-843-0159
- Online: bookstore.phf.org
## CDC Training and Continuing Education Online System
- www.phppo.cdc.gov/phtnonline
## Course Numbers
- WC0048 - webcast
- WD0035 - web-on -demand
- CB3093 - CD-ROM
## Registration Questions:
- 800-41-TRAIN
- 404-639-1292
- E-mail ce@cdc.gov | en |
markdown | 517673 | # Presentation: 517673
## Office of Public Affairs Factors in Decisions on Communication about FDA Actions
**Heidi Rebello**
- Deputy Assistant Commissioner for
- Public Affairs
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
## Today’s Discussion
- Organizational overview
- FDA’s communication goals
- Key issues
- Criteria for issuing press
- Communications challenges
- New approaches
## Office of Public Affairs Statistics
- # of press officers: 10
- Media inquiries: 50-100/day
- Press releases: Up to 25/month
- Media briefings: 5-10/month
- Stand up press conferences: 5-10/year
- Public meetings: 20-30/year
- Congressional hearings: > 50 in 2007/2008
## FDA Communication Goals
- Give consumers timely, understandable, useful, actionable information
- Foster public trust and confidence
## Key Issues
- Product safety and surveillance
- --Food safety
- --Medical product safety
- Regulatory action
- Agency initiatives
## Criteria for Issuing Press Paper
- Has the agency taken an action?
- Do we have enough data or information?
- Do we understand the issue well enough to explain it?
- Do we have a clear message to the public?
- Can we assure the public that we are finding solutions?
## Communication Challenges
- Variety of audiences and expectations
- Issues are scientific and regulatory
- Legal limits on disclosure (Commercial Confidential Information, open investigation)
- Data not easily accessible
- Issues may be value-laden or emotional
## Other Challenges
- The public’s understanding & acceptance of:
- Scientific uncertainty
- Benefit/risk assessments
- Limitations with adverse event reporting
## More Challenges
- Consistency
- Crisis communications
- Reaching other audiences
- Evaluating the effectiveness of our communication program
## Some New Approaches
- Revamped Web site
- Risk Communication Advisory Committee
- Greater access to Subject Matter Experts (more interviews, editorial boards, tours of FDA science labs)
- Putting things into context
- Reaching out to science writers
## Summary
- Communications is a responsibility and
- top priority for FDA
- High-level support in the agency
- A real will and desire to keep the public informed
- We welcome your advice and guidance | en |
markdown | 517669 | # Presentation: 517669
## Viewers
- FRAMES-2.0 Workshop
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Bethesda, Maryland
- November 15-16, 2007
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Richland, Washington
**Notes:**
I would like to help set a positive tone for this workshop. This workshop is very important as it brings disparate groups together to coordinate development and assessment activities to solve complex environmental problems.
The focus is on communications to mutually benefit from each other’s development activities.
We have invested significant resources in development of these systems. Each system is valuable and meets a need of its developer. There is no “best” system; there are many acceptable systems, and even the acceptable systems are rendered unacceptable if implemented improperly.
## Introductions
**Introductions**
- Viewers refer to graphical figures and tabular files.
- All modules potentially have viewers associated with them.
- Right-Click Viewers: Specific to a particular module
- Icon-based Viewers: Drag-and-Drop icon viewers are usually linked to multiple icons.
- Many viewers use COTS software (e.g., Excel spreadsheets or GNU).
- The user has the choice of providing their own viewer, using DICtionaries.
## Viewers that are most often used
- Time Varying “Graphical View” or “Probability of Exeedence”
- SCF – Soil Concentration File
- WCF – Water Concentration File
- WFF – Water Flux File
- ATO – Air Transport Output (concentration or deposition rates)
- AFF – Air Flux File (flux to air)
- EPF – Exposure Pathway File (concentration in “food”)
- RIF – Receptor Intake File (intake rate or concentration)
- HIF – Health Impacts File (dose, risk, hazard)
- Time Varying “Graphical View” – Concentration or flux, as it varies in time
- “Probability of Exeedence”
- Probability that a dependent parameter will be equaled or exceeded over the duration of interest
- Many times this used to investigate how prevalent the results exceed a standard.
- HIF Summary Views of Risk, Hazard, and Dose
- RAGS – Risk Assessment Guidelines for Superfund
## Right-Click Viewers
## Each Icon/Model has
**Each Icon/Model has**
**its Own, Affiliated Viewers **
**Right Click over Icon**
**Choose ****View/Print Module Output**
**Choose the Applicable Viewer**
**Listing of Viewers**
## The results can be viewed by
**The results can be viewed by**
- • module
- • Location
- • Age (cohort)
- • Constituent
- • Measure (risk, dose, hazard)
- • Unit (carcinogen, non-carcinogen)
- • Route (ingestion, inhalation, etc.)
- • Pathway (water, soil, air, etc.)
- • Organ
- • Summation of ALL in many categories
- Dependent and Independent Parameter Datasets
**Plotting Criteria**
- • Use of non zero values (Avoids statistical skew in modeling
- results due to zero-laden tails)
- • Confidence Intervals (not used much)
- • Number of points plotted in figure
## Aquifer Water Concentrations
**Aquifer Water Concentrations**
**WCF Graphical View**
**1**
**2**
## Atmospheric Dispersion Module Output
**Atmospheric Dispersion Module Output**
## HIF Graphical View
**HIF Graphical**** View**
**1**
**2**
## HIF Probability of
**HIF Probability of**
**Exceedence ****View**
## Summary Views of Risk, Hazard, and Dose
**Summary Views of Risk, Hazard, and Dose**
## Icon-based Viewers
## Connect module to
**Connect module to**
**Viewer module**
**Listing of Viewers**
## After the user chooses viewer under General Info, but data from multiple modules are required for the viewer to successfully run, the system will automatically connect additional modules when the user exits General Info for certain viewers.
- The “Stop Lights” go from Red to Yellow, after the viewer is run.
## EPA’s Risk Assessment Guidelines
**Right Click over Icon**
**Choose “****Run Model****”**
**RAGS Viewer is an ICON because it links**
**to multiple Icons and performs analyses**
**EPA’s Risk Assessment Guidelines**
**for Superfund (RAGS) Viewer**
## RAGS User Interface
**Threshold Cut-Off Levels**
**Equivalent to the 5****th**** percentile of**
**Exceeding a level of Risk/Hazard**
**RAGS User Interface**
**CT and RME: EPA RAGS Choices**
**Time Varying: Modeling Simulation Results**
**Avoids statistical skew in modeling**
**results due to zero-laden tails**
## RAGS User Interface
**Values associated with the Central Tendency (CT) and Reasonable Maximum Exposure (RME) are designated by the user; therefore, the user needs to ensure that any values used actually represent a CT or RME.**
**RAGS User Interface**
## RAGS-Generated Summary Table
**RAGS-Generated Summary Table** | en |
converted_docs | 546477 | **1) Currently funded BES research projects of relevance to counter
terrorism**
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Materials Sciences Division
## Highly Sensitive, Rapid Biosensors Involving Detection of Magnetic Labels
Mark Alper, John Clarke, Paul A. Alivisatos
We have developed an extremely sensitive, fast, and versatile new
technique for detecting pathogenic organisms or molecules using a
"microscope" based on a Superconducting QUantum Interference Device
(SQUID). The target analytes are placed in the measurement cell of the
microscope, which has been coated with antibodies or other "molecular
recognition elements" designed to bind the target. A solution containing
nanometer-size superparamagnetic magnetite particles, also coated with
antibodies or other molecular recognition elements, is added. The
superparamagnetic particles bind to the target, a one second pulsed
magnetic field aligns their dipole moments, and then the SQUID measures
the magnetic relaxation signal. Unbound magnetic particles relax rapidly
(\~15 microseconds) by Brownian rotation and are not detected. Particles
bound to immobilized targets, if present, cannot rotate and instead
relax slowly by the Néel mechanism (\~1 second). As a result, only the
bound particles contribute to the signal, allowing for quantification of
the number of targets present without the need to wash away unbound
particles, as is required, for example, in fluorescence-based sensors.
For large targets (\>1.5 micrometers), the Brownian relaxation time is
longer than the measurement time, so the targets need not be immobilized
on the film in the microscope.
This technique could be used to detect bacteria, viruses, and molecules
such as toxins. There are several advantages to using magnetic particles
for the assay: They are stable (their magnetic signal does not change
over time) and non-toxic. In addition, very small quantities can be
detected using a SQUID, which is the most sensitive detector of magnetic
flux available. In this experiment, we use a high-transition temperature
SQUID (transition temperature \~ 90K), which can be cooled with either
liquid nitrogen or a cryocooler, making the apparatus potentially
transportable. This technique is very fast -- each reading takes only 2
seconds, for a total measurement time of 200s for 100 averages. Also,
only 1 microliter of sample is required, making detection possible when
only a limited sample is available or when the relevant antibodies are
scarce or expensive. Thus far, we have demonstrated a detection
sensitivity of 2000 magnetic particles. In the case of bacteria and
viruses, more than one particle binds to each target, making the
sensitivity to targets far greater. It will be further improved when
better magnetic particles (larger magnetic moment and more uniform size
distribution) are obtained. In principle, barring background
interference, detection of a single target is possible.
| en |
converted_docs | 539446 | {width="6.916666666666667in"
height="1.1159722222222221in"}
May 23, 2006
**Amendments to H.R. 5384, the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and
Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2007**
**Part II**
The following contains information on amendments provided for in the UC
agreement.
**[RSC Staff Contact]{.underline}**:
Paul Teller; <paul.teller@mail.house.gov>; x6-9718
Joelle Cannon; <Joelle.cannon@mail.house.gov>; x6-0718
Marcus Kelley; <marcus.kelley@mail.house.gov>; x6-9717
Sheila Cole; <sheila.cole@mail.house.gov>; x6-9719
**Amendments Not Pre-printed in the *Congressional Record***
***Blumenauer (D-OR).*** Provides that none of the funds may be used to
pay the salaries of federal employees who make loans to domestic sugar
processors under Section 156 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and
Reform Act of 1996, if the loans are made at a base rate over \$0.17/lb.
for sugarcane and over \$0.216/lb. for sugarbeets.
Under the U.S. Sugar Loan Program, sugar processors are able to get
non-recourse loans from the federal government. The processors may use
their sugar stocks as collateral to borrow money based on the price of
sugar. If the prices fall below a floor, the processors may repay the
loan based on the new, below floor price or forfeit the sugar. If the
processors forfeit the sugar, the federal government must then bear the
costs of storing the sugar. There are no penalties for processors who
forfeit the sugar to repay the loans. (source:
http://www.taxpayer.net/agriculture/learnmore/factsheets/TCSSugarCommodityFactSheet_2003.pdf)
***Slaughter (D-NY).*** According to the UC agreement, this amendment is
regarding funding for the Center for Veterinary Medicine. However, the
sponsor's office did not provide the text of the amendment or talking
points.
[]{.mark}
***Bonilla (R-TX).*** The UC made in order a Bonilla amendment regarding
overall funding levels. The sponsor has indicated he will only offer
this amendment if corrections are needed at the end of debate.
**Latham (R-IA).** Prohibits funds from being used to pay salaries and
expenses of personnel who implement or administer section 508(e)(3) of
the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1508(e)(3)) (regarding
conditions for crop insurance premium reductions) or any regulation,
bulletin, policy, or agency guidance issued pursuant to such section for
the 2007 and the 2008 reinsurance years, except that funds are available
to administer such section for policies for those producers who, before
the date of the enactment of this Act, had in effect a crop year 2006
crop insurance policy from a company eligible for the opportunity to
offer a premium reduction under such section for the 2006 reinsurance
year. **This amendment was withdrawn.**
**Hefley (R-CO).** The amendment is a rescission of \$178,120,000 from
the total agriculture appropriation. This is a 1% across-the-board
rescission on discretionary spending in the bill. **A recorded vote was
requested on this amendment.**
**Tiahrt (R-KS).** Prohibits funds from being used to promulgate
regulations without consideration of the effect of such regulations on
the competitiveness of American businesses. *This amendment is subject
to a point of order. The amendment sponsor will offer the amendment,
discuss the issue, and withdraw the amendment.* **This amendment was
withdrawn.**
**Paul (R-TX).** Provides that none of the funds made available may be
used to implement or administer the National Animal Identification
System (NAIS). NAIS requires all farmers and ranchers to tag their
livestock with a radio ID tag. According to the sponsor, tagging all
livestock could cost each farm thousands and burden the farms with
compliance with required federal paperwork and monitoring. The sponsor
asserts NAIS allows the federal government to enter farms and ranches
for warrantless searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth
Amendment and subjects the owner to liability for animals diseased
[after]{.underline} they leave the farm. The sponsor further contends
that the bill does not achieve its intended aims, is duplicative, and
harmful to the competitiveness of American farm products from livestock.
**A recorded vote was requested on this amendment.**
**King (R-IA).** Inserts language directing the Secretary of Agriculture
to submit to Congress, an economic impact study on the proposed National
Animal Identification System. The report is to include information on
the lessons from, and the effectiveness of, the pilot program.
According to the sponsor's office, Rep. King is offering the amendment
in an effort to speak about the Livestock Identification and Marketing
Opportunities Act (H.R. 3170). *This amendment is likely subject to a
point of order.* **This amendment was withdrawn.**
**Schwarz (R-MI).** Expresses the sense of Congress that the Secretary
of Agriculture should use his transfer authority to move funds from
Commodity Credit Corporation to a program for the eradication of the
Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana.
**Sweeney (R-NY).** According to the UC agreement, this amendment is
regarding a funding limitation on examination, inspection, and
processing of horses. However, the sponsor's office did not provide the
text of the amendment or talking points.
***Weiner (D-NY)*/ Schwarz (R-MI).** Increases funds for the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) by \$23 million (from \$898.1
million to \$921.1 million) and decreases funds for the common computing
environment account (which funds computer system upgrades for the
Agriculture Department) by \$25.576 million (from \$69.0 million to
\$43.4 million). This top-line reduction is broken down into reductions
for rural development activities, Natural Resource Conservation
Service-related activities, and Farm Service Agency-related activities.
A similar amendment increasing funds for APHIS last year (H.Amdt. 227)
passed by a vote of 226-201:
[[http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll230.xml]{.underline}](http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll230.xml).
**A recorded vote was requested for this amendment.**
**Carter (R-TX).** Permits the Secretary of Agriculture to use up to
\$3.6 million from the Federal Crop Insurance Program for a data mining
project.
The sponsor states the money comes from the Insurance Program's outreach
and education to fund a data mining project intended to eradicate
anomalous payouts in the program. According to the office, the mining
project is housed at Tarleton State University, located in Stephenville,
TX. The sponsor asserts that conservative estimates are that the program
spends \$20 million to identify fraud, waste and abuse to save \$450
million. **This amendment was agreed to by voice vote.**
**Chabot (R-OH).** Prohibits funds made available from being used to pay
the salaries of any employee administering section 203 of the
Agriculture Trade Act (7 U.S.C 5623), or to pay the salaries and
expenses of personnel who carry out a market program under this section.
According to the sponsor, the amendment prevents the federal government
from subsidizing advertising and marketing for agricultural
associations, cooperatives, and state and local groups in overseas
markets. **A recorded vote was requested for this amendment.**
**Lucas (R-OK).** Transfers \$50 million from the Natural Resources
Conservation Services National Headquarters salaries and expenses
account to be used on conservation technical assistance.
According to the sponsor's office, technical assistance at the state
level is "underfunded" and therefore faces difficulties in delivering
conservation funding. The \$50 million transfer is a reduction of over
50% to the National HQ's appropriation.
**Gutknecht (R-MN).* ***Provides that none of the funds can be used to
implement the limitation of the wetlands reserve program found in
section 720 of the Act. The section reads:
> SEC. 720. No funds shall be used to pay salaries and expenses of the
> Department of Agriculture to carry out or administer the calendar year
> 2007 wetlands reserve program as authorized by 16 U.S.C. 3837 in
> excess of 144,776 acres.
In addition, corresponding funds are reduced for the Agricultural
Research Service buildings and facilities by \$65.32 million from \$140
million to \$74.681 million. Funds are reduced for the Cooperative State
Research, Education, and Extension Service by \$16.681 million (from
\$651.606 million to \$634.925 million).
***Baca (D-CA)/Butterfield (D-NC)/Thompson (D-MS)/Hinojosa (D-TX).***
Increases funds for the Socially Disadvantaged Farmer and Rancher Grant
Program by \$100,000 (from \$6.9 million to \$7.0 million), increases
funds for the agricultural research programs at Hispanic Serving
Institutions by \$700,000 (from \$5.9 million to \$6.6 million), and
decreases funds for competitive research grants by \$800,000 (from \$190
million to \$189.2 million). *Note: The RSC Budget proposed the
termination of all funding for the Socially Disadvantaged Farmer
program.* **This amendment was agreed to by voice vote.**
**Gerlach (R-PA).** Prohibits funds from being used to implement the
funding limitation in the underlying bill for the Farm and Ranch Lands
Protection Program. This would have the effect of increasing funds for
this program by \$23.5 million (from \$50.0 million to \$73.5 million).
The amendment would also decrease funds for the common computing
environment account (which funds computer system upgrades for the
Agriculture Department) by \$23.5 million (from \$69.0 million to \$45.5
million).
**Reichert (R-WA).** Prohibits funds from being used to implement a
recent USDA producer-handler rule (part 1124 of title 7, Code of Federal
Regulations) for dairy farms that produce less than nine million pounds
of milk per month.
The USDA published a final rule effective April 1, 2006
([[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/06-1587.htm]{.underline}](http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/06-1587.htm)),
which establishes a [3 million pounds-per-month route disposition
limit]{.underline} for a producer-handler exemption, both in the Pacific
Northwest and the Arizona-Las Vegas order areas. In other words,
producer-handlers disposing of more than 3 million pounds, are not
exempted from pooling and pricing provisions of federal law. According
to CRS, this rule final USDA regulation would affect at least three
large producer handlers in the Pacific Northwest, as well as Arizona
producer-handler Hein Hettinga. Although the USDA regulation allows only
those with up to 3 million pounds to be exempt, the amendment
essentially would prohibit USDA from enforcing this rule against those
who dispose of between 3 and 9 million pounds a month. \[The House
recently addressed certain milk pricing rules when it passed S. 2120.\]
For additional information, please see this CRS report
[[http://www.congress.gov/erp/ib/pdf/IB97011.pdf]{.underline}](http://www.congress.gov/erp/ib/pdf/IB97011.pdf).
**Garrett (R-NJ)**. Provides that none of available funds may be used to
send or otherwise pay for the attendance of more than 50 employees from
a federal department or agency at any single conference occurring
outside the U.S. In addition, the amendment provides that not more than
\$8,167,978 (FY01 level), may be obligated or expended by a department
or agency for the purpose of sending or otherwise paying for employees
from the department or agency to attend conferences occurring outside
the U.S.
According to documents obtained by Senator Tom Coburn's office,
conference expenditures for the Department of Agriculture rose from
\$8.2 million in 2001 to \$10.2 million in 2005, a 49% increase. See the
attached PDF for more on agency conference spending.
**Garrett (R-NJ).** Prohibits funds to be expended under the Food Stamp
Program in contravention of section 213A of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1183a). This section of the Immigration and
Nationality Act discusses admission qualifications for aliens and
sponsorship. Specifically, the Act states that sponsors of
incoming-aliens must sign an affidavit that the immigrant will not
become dependent on Welfare programs for a certain number of years or
until they become a US citizen, whichever comes first. Upon notification
that a sponsored alien has received any means-tested public benefit, the
appropriate nongovernmental entity which provided such benefit or the
appropriate entity of the Federal Government, a State, or any political
subdivision of a State shall request reimbursement by the sponsor in an
amount which is equal to the unreimbursed costs of such benefit. A
similar amendment was offered last year and failed 169-258.
[[http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll237.xml]{.underline}](http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll237.xml).
***Engel (D-NY).*** Prohibits funds in this bill from being used to
acquire a motor vehicle (as defined in section 301 of the Energy Policy
Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 13211) other than an alternative fueled vehicle
(as defined in such section). An alternative fueled vehicle would be a
vehicle powered at least in part by "methanol, denatured ethanol, and
other alcohols; mixtures containing 85 percent or more (or such other
percentage, but not less than 70 percent, as determined by the
Secretary, by rule, to provide for requirements relating to cold start,
safety, or vehicle functions) by volume of methanol, denatured ethanol,
and other alcohols with gasoline or other fuels; natural gas, including
liquid fuels domestically produced from natural gas; liquefied petroleum
gas; hydrogen; coal-derived liquid fuels; fuels (other than alcohol)
derived from biological materials; electricity (including electricity
from solar energy); and any other fuel the Secretary determines, by
rule, is substantially not petroleum and would yield substantial energy
security benefits and substantial environmental benefits." **This
amendment was agreed to by voice vote.**
**Jackson-Lee (D-TX).** Provides that none of the funds may be used to
deny or delay compensation to individuals filing claims to be satisfied
out of the settlement fund approved by the court April 14, 1999 in
*Pigford v Glickman*, 185 F.R.D. 82 (D.D.C. 1999). According to the
sponsor, "Thousands of minority farmers say they were left out of a
landmark 1999 civil rights case stemming from years of being denied farm
loans from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. ... *Pigford v. Glickman*
is a class action lawsuit brought by African American farmers in 1999
who alleged that USDA discriminated against them on the basis of their
race in its farm credit and non-credit benefit programs. ... This
amendment emphasizes existing policy in the Department of Agriculture
that no funds may be used to in any way deny these farmers the
compensation they rightfully deserve."
**King (R-IA).** Prevents \$1 million of the funds available in the bill
for the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, from being available
until the Secretary of Agriculture submits to the Appropriations
Committee the report demanded in the previous amendment.
***Boren (D-OK).*** Provides that none of the funds made available for
the Agricultural Research Service may be obligated or expended to
reprogram programs and resources currently operating at Lane, Oklahoma.
According to the sponsor, the President's FY07 budget proposes redirects
the \$2 million and 30 personnel currently at Lane to other ARS
locations. This amendment would prevent this from occurring.
***Gordon (D-TN).*** According to the UC agreement, this amendment is
regarding energy standards for federal buildings. However, the office
did not provide the text of the amendment or the talking points. **This
amendment was agreed to by voice vote.**
**The following Flake amendments deal with provisions found in the
Committee Report, commonly called earmarks.**
**Flake (R-AZ) #1**. Regarding \$229,000 for funding for dairy education
in IA.
**Flake (R-AZ) #2**. Regarding \$350,000 for funding for fruit and
vegetable market analysis in AZ, MO.
**Flake (R-AZ) #3**. Regarding \$579,000 for funding for the Food
Marketing Policy Center in CT.
**Flake (R-AZ) #4**. Regarding \$726,000 for funding for greenhouse
nurseries in OH.
**Flake (R-AZ) #5**. Regarding \$900,000 for funding for aquaculture in
OH.
**Flake (R-AZ) #6**. Regarding \$180,000 for hydroponic tomato
production in OH.
**Flake (R-AZ) #7**. Regarding \$6,371,000 for wood utilization in OR,
MS, NC, MN, ME, MI, ID, TN, AK, WV.
**Flake (R-AZ) #8**. Regarding \$100,000 for the National Grape and Wine
Initiative in CA.
**Flake (R-AZ) #9**. Regarding \$1,247,000 for Income Enhancement
Demonstration in OH.
**Flake (R-AZ) #10**. Regarding \$874,244 for Appalachian Horticulture
Research in Mississippi.
**Flake (R-AZ) #11**. Regarding \$679,000 for the Competitiveness of
Agriculture Products in WA.
**Flake (R-AZ) #12.** Regarding \$455,000 for Value-added Product
Development for Agriculture Resources in MT.
\###
| en |
markdown | 051288 | # Presentation: 051288
## Scalable Systems Software Center Resource Management and Accounting Working Group Face-to-Face Meeting June 5-6, 2003
## Resource Management and Accounting Working Group
- Working group scope
- Progress over last quarter
- Next steps
- Topics for group consideration
## Working Group Scope
**The Resource Management Working Group is involved in the areas of resource management, scheduling and accounting.**
- This working group will focus on the following software components:
- Queue Manager
- Scheduler
- Accounting and Allocation Manager
- Meta Scheduler
- Other critical resource management components are being developed in the Process Management and Monitoring Working Group:
- Process Manager
- Cluster Monitor
## Proposed Component Architecture
- Queue
- Manager
- Allocation
- Manager
- Node
- Monitor
- Meta
- Scheduler
- Local
- Scheduler
- Node
- Manager
- Process
- Manager
- Security
- System
- Information
- Service
- Discovery
- Service
| Color Key | Working Group |
| --- | --- |
| | Resource Management and Accounting |
| | Execution Management and Monitoring |
| | Node Configuration and Infrastructure |
- Infrastructure Services
- Event
- Manager
## Resource Management Prototype Demonstration
- Queue
- Manager
- Allocation
- Manager
- Node
- Monitor
- Local
- Scheduler
- Process
- Manager
- Discovery
- Service
| Color Key | Working Group |
| --- | --- |
| | Resource Management and Accounting |
| | Execution Management and Monitoring |
| | Node Configuration and Infrastructure |
- Job
- Submission
- Client
- 1 Submit-Job
- 3 Query-Node
- 6 Exec-Process
- 4 Create-Reservation
- 2 Query-Job
- 5 Run-Job
- 8 Delete-Job
- 0 Service-Lookup
- 7 Query-Job
- 9 Withdraw-Allocation
- This demo runs a simple end-to-end test with a job being submitted running past it’s wallclock limit
## General Progress
- SSS front-end created for QBank
- Ready for re-release of v1.0 Initial SSS Resource Management Suite
- OpenPBS-SSS 2.3.15-1 + sss_xml front-end
- Maui Scheduler 3.2.6
- QBank 2.10.4 + sss_xml front-end
- Created Job Object Specification version 2.0
- Takes into account all stages of a job’s lifecycle
- Support for job steps, preferences, request choices, charging, meta-scheduling, dynamic jobs, multi-task jobs, awareness policy
- Distinguishes between requested, utilized and dedicated properties
## General Progress
- Completed version 2.0 of the SSSRMAP resource management interface specification
- Includes specifications for authentication and encryption
- Has been implemented by Gold Accounting and Allocation Manager (as a proof of design)
- Beginning to see adoption of SSSRMAP specification
- Commitment from SLURM (LLNL) to write interface to SSSRMAP
- Commitment from Cluxterworx (Linux Networx) to write interface to SSSRMAP
- Interest from bproc-based scheduler (Clemson University) to interface to queue manager via SSSRMAP
- CLUBMask resource manager (Penn State) to interface with scheduler via SSSRMAP
- Interest from CERN for a data manager interface to scheduler using SSSRMAP
## Scheduler Progress
- Implemented XML client-server interface (40% of clients now using SSSRMAP)
- New interfaces to support generic resource loads (paging space, I/o, processor load, etc) for resource limit enforcement and tracking
- Documentation on resource limit enforcement and tracking
- Added support for multi-task group jobs
- Support for dynamic reservations (growing and shrinking to support MPI dynamic jobs)
## Scheduler Progress
- Security -- support for a user specified keyfile containing the security token
- Performance -- continued efforts in memory-footprint reduction
- Fault tolerance – implemented a fallback server
- Ease of use -- Initial web-GUI developed (communicates directly with Maui server)
## Queue Manager Progress
- Updated service directory and event manager interfaces
- Implemented caching of service directory lookups and prioritizing the wire protocol types returned for fault tolerance and performance.
- Beginning implementation of SSSRMAP v2 wire protocol and xml specification.
## Accounting and Allocation Manager Progress
- Gold
- Added support for 95% of functionality from QBank
- Allocation design enhancements
- allocations shareable by users, projects and machines (also supports exclusions)
- Special wildcard types (ANY, NONE, MEMBER, DEFINED)
- Enhanced support for activation and expiration times (& active state)
- Support added for Deposits
- Use of deposit shares for non-interactive deposit defaults
- Support added for Hierarchical accounts (projects)
- Affected withdrawals, deposits, reservations, balance checks, etc.
- Support for recursive trickle up withdrawals and trickle down deposits
## Accounting and Allocation Manager Progress
- Gold
- Support added for Refunds
- Implemented Guaranteed Quotes
- Implemented Transfers
- Support added for debit vs. credit allocations
- Support for operations (aggregate functions) on returned query fields (sort, sum, max, unique, count, group by, etc)
- Negation of options
- Association metadata added to aid in GUI object navigation
- Enhanced support for transaction logging, journaling, undo, redo
- Implemented more flexible charging algorithm
## Accounting and Allocation Manager Progress
- Gold
- Implemented SSSRMAP version 2.0
- Implemented SSS Job Object version 2.0
- Infrastructure added for Role-Based Access Control
- Support added for method overriding and method scope resolution
- Progress on open source front (Gold and sss_xml front-ends)
- obtained approval from PNNL IP to apply a BSD open source license
- Sent letter to Fred requesting DOE approval to assert copyright
- Created Accounting and Allocation Manager Binding document describing use of SSSRMAP protocol
- Beginning effort to develop Web-based GUI (JSP)
- Implemented SSSRMAP v2 authentication
- Almost completed implementing SSSRMAP v2 encryption
## Meta-Scheduler Progress
- Added basic data scheduling! (tested with Globus)
- Created interface for data-cache scheduling
- Fault tolerance improvements
- job queue is persistent
- Will recover from network failure, system failure, loss of checkpoint files
- Major documentation in all areas
## Future Work
- Implement v2 SSS Resource Management and Accounting interface specification (all components)
- Implement v2 Job Object Specification
- Implement default SSSRMAP v2 security authentication and encryption for all components
- Release v1.0 Initial SSS Resource Management Suite and improve download and documentation webpages
- Release Portability enhancements (AIX, Tru64, possibly Cray)
- Create per-component interface specification documents (binding to SSSRMAP)
- Draft Design Specification documents
## Future Work
**Local Scheduler**
- Test interaction with checkpoint/restart mechanisms when interfaces ready
- Continued work on resource limit enforcement and tracking
- quality of service support for completion time guarantees
- Implement SSSRMAP v2.0
- Security integration (authentication and encryption)
- Support for maleable jobs (pre-execution)
- Abstracting resource manager interfaces to accept multiple sources of input data and control
- Enable simulation to live submission translator
## Future Work
**Queue manager**
- Implement persistence via database (replacing flat files)
- Add Epilogue/Prologue support and job submission verification script
- Interface with Node Monitor
- Full PBS qsub compatibility
- Implement full input/output handling (need to define PM interfaces, if any)
- Implement SSSRMAP v2.0 (including security)
## Future Work
**Accounting and Allocation manager**
- Implement SSSRMAP v2 encryption (and test authentication)
- Implement Role-Based Access Control (fine-grained command authorization)
- Integration with Directory Service
- Open source gold (BSD license)
- Progress on Web-based JSP GUI
## Future Work
**Meta Scheduler**
- Continued effort in allocation management, credential management, data management,
- Enablement of grid level prioritization and fairness policies
## Issues requiring inter-group discussion
| en |
converted_docs | 663680 | Required Report - public distribution
**Date:** 5/13/2004
**GAIN Report Number:** MY4022
MY4022
**Malaysia**
**Tobacco and Products**
**Annual**
**2004**
**Approved by:**
Bonnie Borris
U.S. Embassy, Kuala Lumpur
**Prepared by:**
Raymond Hoh
**Report Highlights:**
Tobacco has dropped from being America\'s second largest ag export item
in 2002 to the fifth largest ag export item to Malaysia in 2003. Due to
new import regulations, leaf imports plummeted in 2003. Outlook for leaf
imports in 2004 is even less promising in order to meet the GOM\'s new
requirement of using 70 percent domastic leaves. Post expects cigarette
output to drop 7 to 8% in 2003.
Includes PSD Changes: Yes
Includes Trade Matrix: Yes
Annual Report
Kuala Lumpur \[MY1\]
\[MY\]
Table of Contents
[Executive Summary 3](#executive-summary)
[Tobacco, Unmfg., Flue Cured: 4](#tobacco-unmfg.-flue-cured)
[Production 5](#production)
[Consumption 6](#consumption)
[Trade 7](#trade)
[Import Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Unmfg, Flue-Cured
10](#import-trade-matrix-for-tobacco-unmfg-flue-cured)
[Export Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Unmfg, Flue-Cured
11](#export-trade-matrix-for-tobacco-unmfg-flue-cured)
[Stocks 11](#stocks)
[Policy 11](#policy)
[Tobacco, Mfg., Cigarettes: 13](#tobacco-mfg.-cigarettes)
[Production 13](#production-1)
[Consumption 13](#consumption-1)
[Prices 14](#prices)
[Trade 15](#trade-1)
[Export Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Mfg, Cigarettes
21](#export-trade-matrix-for-tobacco-mfg-cigarettes)
[Import Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Mfg, Cigarettes
22](#import-trade-matrix-for-tobacco-mfg-cigarettes)
[Policy 22](#policy-1)
[Tobacco, Unmfg., Total: 24](#tobacco-unmfg.-total)
[Production 24](#production-2)
[Consumption 25](#consumption-2)
[Trade 25](#trade-2)
[Import Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Unmfg., Total
28](#import-trade-matrix-for-tobacco-unmfg.-total)
[Export Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Unmfg., Total
29](#export-trade-matrix-for-tobacco-unmfg.-total)
# Executive Summary
> Tobacco has dropped from being America's second largest ag export in
> 2002 to the fifth largest ag export item to Malaysia in 2003. Imports
> of U.S. flue-cured leaves plummeted from 13,170 in 2002 to 3,872 MT in
> 2003. Imports of burley from the US also fell from 10,185 MT in 2002
> to 1,276 MT in 2003. Mainly due the GOM's restriction on leaf imports
> and the GOM's new requirement of using 70 percent domestic leaves, US
> leaf exports are expected to dip even lower in 2004. In addition, the
> domestic cigarette market has not fully recovered from the hefty price
> increase in September 2003 following a hike in import tariff on
> cigarette and tobacco products.
Local output of flue-cured tobacco and burley rose to 11,691 MT and
1,835 MT respectively in 2003. The outlook for 2004 is bright with
flue-cured leaf output forecast at 11,880 MT, against a given quota of
13,200 MT. Domestic burley output is expected to reach 1,500 MT in 2004.
Domestic cigarette output rose by 4.8% in 2003 due to an increase in
domestic consumption as well as a jump in overseas demand for
cigarettes. With the restriction on leaf imports and limited local leaf
supply, Post expects cigarette output to drop in 2004. Imports of good
quality cigarettes are expected to increase to replace the short supply.
On Sept 24, 2004, Malaysia signed the WHO's Framework Convention on
Tobacco Control, a global initiative designed to reduce tobacco-related
deaths and diseases.
Exchange rates: Pegged at US\$1.00 = RM3.799 since 1998.
# Tobacco, Unmfg., Flue Cured:
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| **PSD | | | | | | |
| Table** | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| * | **Ma | | | | | |
| *Country** | laysia** | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| **C | ** | | | | ( | |
| ommodity** | Tobacco, | | | | HA)(MT) | |
| | U | | | | | |
| | nmfg.,** | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | **Flue | | | | | |
| | Cured** | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| | 2002 | Revised | 2003 | Est | 2004 | Fo |
| | | | | imate | | recast |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| | USDA | Post | USDA | Post | USDA | Post |
| | Official | E | Of | Est | O | Es |
| | \[Old\] | stimate | ficial | imate | fficial | timate |
| | | \[New\] | \ | \[ | \[Old\] | \ |
| | | | [Old\] | New\] | | [New\] |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| **Market | | 01/2002 | | 01 | | 0 |
| Year | | | | /2003 | | 1/2004 |
| Begin** | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| Area | 0 | 14390 | 0 | 13037 | 0 | 13100 |
| Planted | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| Beginning | 0 | 19202 | 0 | 20982 | 0 | 20815 |
| Stocks | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| Farm Sales | 0 | 11304 | 0 | 11691 | 0 | 11880 |
| Weight | | | | | | |
| Prod | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| Dry Weight | 0 | 10175 | 0 | 10520 | 0 | 10700 |
| Production | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| U.S. Leaf | 0 | 13170 | 0 | 3872 | 0 | 3000 |
| Imports | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| Other | 0 | 9764 | 0 | 6488 | 0 | 2000 |
| Foreign | | | | | | |
| Imports | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| TOTAL | 0 | 22934 | 0 | 10360 | 0 | 5000 |
| Imports | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| TOTAL | 0 | 52311 | 0 | 41862 | 0 | 36515 |
| SUPPLY | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| Exports | 0 | 879 | 0 | 347 | 0 | 300 |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| Dom. Leaf | 0 | 7450 | 0 | 10300 | 0 | 12500 |
| C | | | | | | |
| onsumption | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| U.S. Leaf | 0 | 13000 | 0 | 3900 | 0 | 3000 |
| Dom. | | | | | | |
| Consum. | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| Other | 0 | 10000 | 0 | 6500 | 0 | 2000 |
| Foreign | | | | | | |
| Consump. | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| TOTAL Dom. | 0 | 30450 | 0 | 20700 | 0 | 17500 |
| C | | | | | | |
| onsumption | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| TOTAL | 0 | 31329 | 0 | 21047 | 0 | 17800 |
| Dis | | | | | | |
| appearance | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| Ending | 0 | 20982 | 0 | 20815 | 0 | 18715 |
| Stocks | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
| TOTAL | 0 | 52311 | 0 | 41862 | 0 | 36515 |
| DI | | | | | | |
| STRIBUTION | | | | | | |
+------------+----------+---------+--------+-------+---------+--------+
## Production
The local tobacco leaf sector improved in 2003. Better weather
conditions resulted in an increase in harvested area. Yield per
harvested hectare showed a 14 percent increase and the output of
flue-cured tobacco rose to 11,691 MT in 2003. The total value of the
2003 crop was estimated at US\$42 million compared to US\$41 million in
2002.
The outlook for 2004 is bright. No adverse weather conditions ware
reported. A small increase in harvested area and a slight improvement in
yields should push the flue-cured leaf output to 11,880 MT, against a
given quota of 13,200 MT.
The following table provides a comparison of the domestic production
quota and actual output of tobacco over the past ten years:
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| Year | Production Quota | Actual Output | Actual/Quota |
| | | | |
| | (MT) | (MT) | (Percent +/-) |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 1994 | 9,764 | 6,172 | -36.8 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 1995 | 12,399 | 10,467 | -15.6 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 1996 | 12,561 | 11,988 | \- 4.6 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 1997 | 13,300 | 11,444 | -14.0 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 1998 | 14,160 | 11,361 | -19.8 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 1999 | 14,400 | 7,817 | -45.7 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 2000 | 15,100 | 7,259 | -51.9 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 2001 | 15,100 | 8,299 | -45.0 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 2002 | 15,100 | 11,304 | -25.1 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 2003 | 13,000 | 11,691 | -10.1 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
| 2004 1/ | 13,200 | 11,880 | 10.0 |
+--------------+------------------+---------------+-------------------+
1/ Estimate
An increase in harvested area and average yield in CY2003 contributed to
the increase in leaf output. The following table provides a comparison
of output, area, and yields over the past 10 years.
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Area (HA) Yield
(KG/HA)
Year Output (MT) Planted Harvested Planted Harvested
1994 6,172 10,219 6,871 603 898
1995 10,467 10,525 9,889 994 1,058
1996 11,988 10,982 10,431 1,092 1,149
1997 11,444 10,790 10,148 1,060 1,127
1998 11,361 14,200 11,739 800 968
1999 7,817 18,522 8,328 422 1,065
2000 7,259 15,764 9,129 460 795
2001 8,299 15,972 8,863 520 936
2002 11,304 14,390 11,936 786 947
2003 11,691 13,037 10,879 897 1,075
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
## Consumption
The sharp drop in domestic consumption of flue‑cured tobacco in 2003 was
largely due the difficulty in getting permits for the importation of raw
tobacco leaves. In addition, the domestic cigarette market has not fully
recovered from the hefty price increase in September 2003 following a
hike in import tariff on cigarette and tobacco products.
While tobacco manufacturers are keen to export more cut-fillers, GOM's
new requirement of using 70 percent domestic leaves is expected to
result in lower leaf consumption in 2004. The date of implementation was
on January 1^st^ 2004. With the further squeeze on imports of foreign
leaves, Post expects the domestic consumption of flue-cured leaves to
decline by 15 percent in 2004.
## Trade
Imports of U.S. flue-cured leaves plummeted from 13,170 in 2002 to 3,872
MT in 2003. The United States was still the top supplier, with a market
share of about 37 percent. As mentioned above, the main reason was the
difficulty in getting permits for the importation of raw tobacco leaves.
Imports of other foreign leaf also suffered the same fate.
The prospect in 2004 is even dimmer with the GOM imposing the new
requirement of using 70 percent domestic leaves in all domestically
manufactured cigarettes as well as in the manufacture of cigarettes and
tobacco products for export. Post expects imports to be halved in 2004.
Malaysia exports/re-exports of flue-cured tobacco , mainly to Australia
and the Philippines, also experienced a significant drop in 2003.
Trade Trends
Import volumes and values of Unmanufactured Flue‑Cured Tobacco in CY2002
are provided below :
------ --------------------- ------------------- ------------------------
**2002 (Jan‑Dec)**
**MT** **Value (US\$)**
1 U.S.A. 13,170 77,339,876
2 Brazil 2,747 7,524,041
3 Indonesia 2,020 5,805,635
4 Thailand 1,586 4,541,709
5 China 709 2,250,032
6 Zimbabwe 528 1,533,551
7 Switzerland 508 2,563,871
8 Canada 263 934,579
9 India 243 487,492
10 Spain 178 498,106
11 Pakistan 169 216,045
12 Argentina 165 515,033
13 Philippines 129 243,885
14 Italy 114 517,008
15 Vietnam 97 259,755
16 Turkey 86 232,701
17 Kenya 74 109,105
18 U.A.E. 62 72,704
19 Australia 54 143,709
20 Malawi 21 104,674
21 Netherlands 5 16,431
22 Germany, FR 5 33,673
**\--Total** **22,934** **105,943,614**
------ --------------------- ------------------- ------------------------
Trade Trends
Import volumes and values of Unmanufactured Flue‑Cured Tobacco in CY2003
are provided below:
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| | | **2003 | |
| | | (Jan-Dec)** | |
| | | | |
| | | **Total** | |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| | Country | MT | Value (US\$) |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 1 | U.S.A. | 3,872 | 28,851,057 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 2 | Indonesia | 1,510 | 4,765,186 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 3 | Brazil | 1,336 | 3,979,190 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 4 | Thailand | 530 | 1,693,710 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 5 | Vietnam | 503 | 1,339,954 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 6 | Switzerland | 426 | 2,929,248 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 7 | China | 319 | 647,941 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 8 | India | 281 | 692,560 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 9 | Philippines | 253 | 511,741 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 10 | Zimbabwe | 246 | 960,861 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 11 | Belgium | 231 | 1,677,487 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 12 | Pakistan | 210 | 315,421 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 13 | Australia | 152 | 551,945 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 14 | Canada | 141 | 707,349 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 15 | Italy | 82 | 353,618 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 16 | Cambodia | 79 | 140,699 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 17 | U.A.E. | 72 | 119,949 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 18 | Taiwan | 59 | 543,942 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 19 | Spain | 40 | 110,832 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 20 | Egypt | 10 | 24,207 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| 21 | Germany, FR | 8 | 61,765 |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
| | **\--Total** | **10,360** | **50,978,666** |
+-----+---------------------------+-----------------+------------------+
## Import Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Unmfg, Flue-Cured
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| **Import Trade | | | |
| Matrix** | | | |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| **Country** | Malaysia | | |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| **Commodity** | T | | |
| | obacco,Unmfg., | | |
| | | | |
| | Flue Cured | | |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Time Period | Jan-Dec | Units: | Metric Ton |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Imports for: | 2002 | | **2003** |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| U.S. | 13170 | U.S. | 3872 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Others | | Others | |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Brazil | 2747 | Indonesia | 1510 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Indonesia | 2020 | Brazil | 1336 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Thailand | 1586 | Thailand | 530 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| China | 709 | Vietnam | 503 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Zimbabwe | 528 | Switzerland | 426 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Switzerland | 508 | China | 319 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Canada | 263 | India | 281 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| India | 243 | Philippines | 253 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Spain | 178 | Zimbabwe | 246 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Pakistan | 169 | Belgium | 231 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Total for Others | 8951 | | 5635 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Others not Listed | 813 | | 853 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
| Grand Total | 22934 | | 10360 |
+-------------------+----------------+----------------+--------------+
##
## Export Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Unmfg, Flue-Cured
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| **Export Trade | | | |
| Matrix** | | | |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| **Country** | Malaysia | | |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| **Commodity** | Tobacco, | | |
| | Unmfg., | | |
| | | | |
| | Flue Cured | | |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| Time Period | Jan-Dec | Units: | Metric Ton |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| Exports for: | 2002 | | **2003** |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| U.S. | | U.S. | |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| Others | | Others | |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| Australia | 835 | Australia | 112 |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| Paraguay | 23 | Philippines | 106 |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| Philippines | 21 | Belgium | 99 |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| | | Thailand | 18 |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| | | China | 10 |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| | | Germany FR | 2 |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| | | | |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| | | | |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| | | | |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| | | | |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| Total for Others | 879 | | 347 |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| Others not | | | |
| Listed | | | |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
| Grand Total | 879 | | 347 |
+------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+
## Stocks
While there is a slight increase in the volume of local leaves in
storage for the 'maturing' process, manufacturers are working down
stocks during 2003. The stock level should continue to drop in 2004 with
the tight supply of foreign leaves.
## Policy
Production policy
In order to prepare the farmers to face the eventual removal of tariff
protection under the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) in 2010, the GOM
restructured the tobacco industry. Since January 1, 2004, tobacco
manufacturers are required to use 70 percent domestic leaves in all
domestically manufactured cigarettes as well as in the manufacture of
cigarettes and tobacco products for export.
In addition, the manufacturers will bear the cost of a special incentive
of RM2.00 for every kg of tobacco produced by the tobacco curers and
grower-curers. It is estimated that the exercise may cost the
manufacturers up to RM30 million (US\$7.9 million). Presently, the
tobacco industry generates an annual income of US\$53 million for some
100,000 people in the rural sector.
Tariff Changes
Import duties on imported tobacco leaves remain unchanged since Jan 1,
2002.
Non‑Tariff Barriers
All imports of flue‑cured or Virginia tobacco must be approved by the
Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI). While MPI has been quite lenient
in granting permits in the past, at least one cigarette manufacturer has
voiced difficulties in getting the requested volume in 2003. The
industry is also concerned with the new requirements on the usage of
local leaf in the manufacture of cigarettes/cut-fillers for the export
market.
Competitor Activities
Most competitor countries do little in the way of market promotion but
use lower prices as a selling point.
# Tobacco, Mfg., Cigarettes:
--------------- -------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
**PSD Table**
**Country** **Malaysia**
**Commodity** **Tobacco, (MIL PCS)
Mfg.,
Cigarettes**
2002 Revised 2003 Estimate 2004 Forecast
USDA Official Post USDA Post USDA Post
\[Old\] Estimate Official Estimate Official Estimate
\[New\] \[Old\] \[New\] \[Old\] \[New\]
**Market Year 01/2002 01/2003 01/2004
Begin**
Filter 23500 23500 25300 24620 0 22770
Production
Non-Filter 2600 2600 2800 2740 0 2530
Production
TOTAL 26100 26100 28100 27360 0 25300
Production
Imports 1657 1657 1400 2028 0 2500
TOTAL SUPPLY 27757 27757 29500 29388 0 27800
Exports 6925 6925 8000 7811 0 6000
Domestic 20832 20832 21500 21577 0 21800
Consumption
TOTAL 27757 27757 29500 29388 0 27800
DISTRIBUTION
--------------- -------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
## Production
The Malaysian cigarette industry is dominated by British American
Tobacco (M) Bhd (BAT) which accounts for 70 percent of the Malaysian
cigarette market. JT International (the former R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Company Bhd) and Philip Morris share the remaining 30 percent.
Domestic cigarette output rose by 4.8% in 2003 due to increase in
domestic consumption as well as a jump in overseas demand for
cigarettes. The 2004 lookout for cigarette manufacturing is less
promising with the restriction on leaf imports and limited local leaf
supply. Post expects cigarette output to drop in 2004.
## Consumption
In 2003, the top 4 brands sold in the country were Dunhill, Marlboro,
Salem and Benson & Hedges. The cigarette companies have again expressed
concern that high excise duty encourages smuggling of non-duty paid
cigarettes into the country. The non-duty paid (contra-bands and
counterfeit) cigarettes make up roughly 20-25 percent of the total
cigarette market. Reportedly, the GOM is losing about US\$263 million in
taxes due to such activities. The manufacturers are working with the GOM
to require all cigarette packs sold in the country to feature a visible
security marking in order to stem out the illegal cigarettes.
The estimate for cigarette consumption is only slightly higher in this
current year despite the sharp hike in cigarette price. Post expects
only one percent growth in the domestic consumption of cigarettes in
2004.
Younger Malaysians prefer to smoke American‑blended cigarettes. With
about half of the population below age 25, the demand for these
cigarettes should continue to climb. The local market share for
American‑blend cigarettes has expanded from 38 percent in 1998 to close
to 54 percent in 2003. Marlboro has overtaken Salem as the current
leading American‑blended cigarette brand. Other good sellers include
Camel, Winston, Kent, Lucky Strike and Peter Stuyvesant. In the straight
Virginia or English‑blend segment, Dunhill and Benson & Hedges are the
top brands.
## Prices
Following the hike in import duties on cigarettes and tobacco products,
local manufacturers increased the cigarette price by RM0.40 to 0.70
(US\$0.11 to 0.18) per packet of 20. (The previous price increase was in
Oct, 2001). Some representative cigarette prices are as follows (RM per
pack of 20):
--------------------------------------------- -------------------------
Cigarette Representatives Prices
Benson (sp. Filter) RM5.40
Rothmans International RM5.60
Pall Mall Kings RM5.70
Mild Seven King Size RM5.40
Lucky Strike RM5.60
Dunhill King Size RM5.40
Player's Gold Leaf 100\'s RM4.00
Peter Stuyvesant King Size RM5.40
SE 555 Kings RM5.40
Kent Kings RM5.40
Marlboro King Size RM5.40
Salem King Size RM5.40
Camel (Regular) RM5.60
--------------------------------------------- -------------------------
## Trade
Imports of cigarettes rose 22 percent in 2003. Imports from China
recorded substantial gains while imports of premium brands from
Switzerland and Singapore also showed record increases. In general, very
high Malaysian tariffs restrict imports of cigarettes for the local
market. For example, a popular Japanese brand amongst the Japanese
expatriates living in Malaysia is being produced in Malaysia instead of
being imported from Japan. However, with the restriction on the imports
tobacco leaf, post expects cigarettes imports to show big increases in
the near term. Imports of American and European cigarettes are destined
for the higher-priced specialty shops. Imports of 'kretek' cigarettes
from Indonesia also recorded a small increase.
Imports of cigarettes by volume and value in CY2002 are listed below:
------- ---------------------- -------------------- -------------------
**2002 (Jan‑Dec)**
**MT** **Value (US\$)**
1 U.S.A. 57 904,116
2 China 445 8,869,298
3 Hong Kong 309 5,546,492
4 Indonesia 266 3,548,670
5 Philippines 113 1,511,820
6 Singapore 104 1,796,987
7 Japan 100 1,353,482
8 U.K. 75 799,391
9 Switzerland 69 1,781,079
10 Germany 59 1,522,502
11 South Africa 54 751,556
12 Thailand 4 60,036
13 Vietnam 1 6,563
**Total** **1,657** **28,451,991**
------- ---------------------- -------------------- -------------------
Imports of cigarettes by volume and value in CY2003 are listed below:
---- --------------------------- -------------------- ------------------
**2003 (Jan-Dec)**
**MT** **Value (US\$)**
1 U.S.A. 23 422,592
2 China 609 11,805,833
3 Hong Kong 276 5,264,521
4 Indonesia 270 4,280,361
5 Switzerland 214 5,981,454
6 Singapore 184 3,544,989
7 Japan 87 1,419,483
8 U.A.E. 69 1,404,414
9 U.K. 68 940,320
10 Philippines 57 455,737
11 Mexico 29 564,399
12 Iran 29 159,542
13 Taiwan 21 447,839
14 South Africa 17 446,275
15 Cyprus 15 102,497
16 Chile 15 359,477
17 Germany 12 310,259
18 Mauritius 12 241,324
19 Thailand 9 176,062
20 Solomon Islands 5 69,539
21 Romania 4 19,155
22 Vietnam 2 47,295
**\--Total:** **2,028** **38,463,366**
---- --------------------------- -------------------- ------------------
Exports of cigarettes rose 13 percent to 7,811 MT in 2003 primarily due
to a sharp increase in demand from Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Post
expects cigarette exports to decline to 6,000 MT in 2004 due a smaller
supply of imported leaves.
Exports of cigarettes by volume and value in CY2002 are listed below:
--------- ------------------------ ------------------- -----------------
**2002 (Jan‑Dec)**
**MT** **Value (US\$)**
1 U.S.A. 290 1,895,028
2 Singapore 1,585 36,852,268
3 Hong Kong 1,243 16,223,936
4 Taiwan 1,070 9,565,769
5 Philippines 624 12,419,870
6 Thailand 481 6,343,652
7 Indonesia 393 2,574,989
8 Brunei 297 8,108,304
9 Iran 169 747,551
10 Vietnam 91 2,261,927
11 Cambodia 88 925,694
12 Japan 83 855,973
13 U. A. Emirates 66 401,079
14 Kuwait 48 308,364
15 Maldives 39 379,619
16 Moldova 36 353,067
17 Loa, PDR 29 285,592
18 Panama 29 176,464
19 Nepal 23 209,464
20 China 22 306,182
21 South Africa 21 122,210
22 United Kingdom 18 234,832
23 Benin 18 83,042
24 Australia 15 253,597
25 Germany 11 44,934
26 Chile 10 64,409
27 Jordan 10 77,502
28 Kenya 9 54,158
29 Saudi Arabia 9 59,041
30 Ireland 8 92,029
31 Netherlands 8 72,702
32 Uruguay 7 40,106
33 Greece 7 35,543
34 Romania 5 35,117
35 Congo 4 42,351
36 India 4 50,415
37 Pakistan 4 16,363
38 Mauritius 2 20,964
39 Korea Rep. 2 22,030
40 Burma 2 36,134
41 Others 49 747,307
**\--Total** **6,925** **103,399,580**
--------- ------------------------ ------------------- -----------------
Exports of cigarettes by volume and value in CY2003 are listed below:
---- ----------------------------- ------------------- ------------------
**2003 (Jan-Dec)**
MT **Value (US\$)**
1 U.S.A. 202 1,627,687
2 Singapore 1,970 41,587,569
3 Hong Kong 1,654 16,571,323
4 Taiwan 1,554 11,681,179
5 Philippines 641 10,549,097
6 Thailand 369 6,388,320
7 Brunei 304 9,625,751
8 Iran 267 1,407,287
9 Vietnam 103 2,950,281
10 Indonesia 95 1,866,890
11 U.A. Emirates 75 434,268
12 Maldives 66 602,398
13 China 60 864,936
14 Benin 56 196,672
15 United Kingdom 55 844,079
16 Saudi Arabia 45 317,543
17 Japan 38 506,081
18 Australia 37 520,884
19 Germany 34 215,073
20 Panama 22 137,945
21 India 21 189,805
22 Cambodia 17 229,889
23 Kuwait 16 114,230
24 New Zealand 14 82,033
25 Italy 13 207,552
26 Nepal 13 103,288
27 Belize 10 188,496
28 Djibouti 9 53,766
29 Greece 9 35,204
30 Kenya 9 54,142
31 Loa, PDR 8 82,768
32 Nigeria 4 23,769
33 Puerto Rico (U.S.) 3 21,055
34 Switzerland 3 1,621
35 Korea Rep. 3 58,959
36 France 3 41,195
37 Fiji 1 42,752
38 Burma 1 15,011
39 Bangladesh 1 5,136
40 Netherlands 1 9,755
41 Others 7 245,630
**\--Total** **7,811** **110,701,317**
---- ----------------------------- ------------------- ------------------
## Export Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Mfg, Cigarettes
-------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------
**Export Trade
Matrix**
**Country** Malaysia
**Commodity** Tobacco, Mfg.,
Cigarettes
Time Period Jan-Dec Units: Metric Ton
Exports for: 2002 **2003**
U.S. 290 U.S. 202
Others Others
Singapore 1585 Singapore 1970
Hong Kong 1243 Hong Kong 1654
Taiwan 1070 Taiwan 1554
Philippines 624 Philippines 641
Thailand 481 Thailand 369
Indonesia 393 Brunei 304
Brunei 297 Iran 267
Iran 169 Vietnam 103
Vietnam 91 Indonesia 95
Cambodia 88 U.A. Emirates 75
Total for Others 6041 7032
Others not Listed 594 577
Grand Total 6925 7811
-------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------
## Import Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Mfg, Cigarettes
------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------
**Import Trade
Matrix**
**Country** Malaysia
**Commodity** Tobacco, Mfg.,
Cigarettes
Time Period Jan-Dec Units: Metric Ton
Imports for: 2002 **2003**
U.S. 57 U.S. 23
Others Others
China 445 China 609
Hong Kong 309 Hong Kong 276
Indonesia 266 Indonesia 270
Philippines 113 Switzerland 214
Singapore 104 Singapore 184
Japan 100 Japan 87
United Kingdom 75 U.A. Emarates 69
Switzerland 69 United Kingdom 68
Germany 59 Philippines 57
South Africa 54 Mexico 29
Total for Others 1594 1863
Others not Listed 6 142
Grand Total 1657 2028
------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------
## Policy
Marketing Policy
On Sept 24, 2004, Malaysia signed the WHO's Framework Convention on
Tobacco Control, a global initiative designed to reduce tobacco-related
deaths and diseases. With immediate effect, all forms of cigarette
advertising will not be allowed with an exception for advertising in a
few sports such as the Formula One racing which will be permitted until
2006.
Tariff Changes
Effective Sep 12, 2003, the import and excise duties on cigarettes and
other tobacco products have been increased by 20% from RM216 (US\$56.84)
/kg to RM259 (US\$68.16) /kg and RM48 (US\$12.63) /kg to RM58
(US\$15.26) /kg, respectively.
Import Requirements
All cigarette packages are required by the GOM to carry the warning:
Amaran Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia‑merokok membahayakan kesihatan
(\"Warning by the Malaysian Ministry of Health‑smoking endangers
health\"). Labels must also state that the levels of tar and nicotine
are below the allowable maximum levels. Where the container is a packet
which is a rectangular block in shape, the words shall be placed on
either side panel of the packet. The words shall be in block letters of
not less than 3mm in height and in the same color and background as the
name of the brand. If the words appear on a label, the label shall be
securely affixed to the container. This rule applies to imported as well
as domestically manufactured cigarettes.
# Tobacco, Unmfg., Total:
--------------- -------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
**PSD Table**
**Country** **Malaysia**
**Commodity** **Tobacco, (HA)(MT)
Unmfg.,
Total**
2002 Revised 2003 Estimate 2004 Forecast
USDA Official Post USDA Post USDA Post
\[Old\] Estimate Official Estimate Official Estimate
\[New\] \[Old\] \[New\] \[Old\] \[New\]
**Market Year 01/2002 08/1901 01/2004
Begin**
Area Planted 14390 15579 11000 14345 0 14500
Beginning 19202 20658 21135 22606 20135 21910
Stocks
Farm Sales 11468 13012 12000 13526 0 13850
Weight Prod
Dry Weight 10320 11710 10800 12175 0 12470
Production
U.S. Leaf 13170 23355 11000 5148 0 4000
Imports
Other Foreign 9764 16320 8000 12014 0 6000
Imports
TOTAL Imports 22934 39675 19000 17162 0 10000
TOTAL SUPPLY 52456 72043 50935 51943 20135 44380
Exports 871 1277 700 1071 0 1000
Dom. Leaf 7450 8430 10300 11800 0 12800
Consumption
U.S. Leaf Dom. 13000 23180 12000 5148 0 4000
Consum.
Other Foreign 10000 16550 7800 12014 0 6000
Consump.
TOTAL Dom. 30450 48160 30100 28962 0 22800
Consumption
TOTAL 31321 49437 30800 30033 0 23800
Disappearance
Ending Stocks 21135 22606 20135 21910 0 20580
TOTAL 52456 72043 50935 51943 0 44380
DISTRIBUTION
--------------- -------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
## Production
The state of Sabah in East Malaysia remains the main burley growing area
in Malaysia followed by the states of Kelantan and Perlis in the
Peninsula. Total area rose from 1,189 hectares in 2002 to 1,308 hectares
in 2003. Domestic burley output rose to 1,835 MT in 2003, reflecting an
increase in planted area. Yield per hectare dropped from 1,437 kg/ha in
2002 to 1,403 kg/ha in 2003. For 2004, farmers plan to increase planted
area and Post expects domestic burley output to increase to 1,400 MT.
Summary for area and production for Flue-cured and Burley
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 1/
AREA
(Hectares)
Flue-Cured 15,972 14,390 13,037 13,100
Burley 832 1,189 1,308 1,400
\--TOTAL 16,804 15,579 14,345 14,500
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 1/
PRODUCTION
(Metric Tons)
Flue-Cured 8,299 11,304 11,691 11,880
Burley 1,096 1,708 1,835 1,970
\--TOTAL: 9,395 13,012 13,526 13.850
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1/ Estimate
## Consumption
As in the flue-cured sector, the requirement of using 70 percent of
domestic tobacco leaf will affect the decline in burley usage in the
near term.
## Trade
Imports of burley and oriental dropped sharply from 16,471 MT in 2002 to
6,802 MT in 2003 largely due to the restrictions on imports. Imports
from the US fell from 10,185 MT in 2002 to 1,276 MT in 2003. Burley and
oriental imports are expected to continue to decline in 2004.
In 2003, Malaysia exported/re-exported 724 MT of burley, mainly to
Australia, Thailand and the Philippines.
Imports volumes and value of Total Unmanufactured Tobacco CY2002 are
provided below:
------ --------------------- -------------------- -----------------------
**Jan ‑Dec 2002**
**MT** **Value (US\$)**
1 U.S.A. 23,355 141,664,716
2 Thailand 3,605 11,924,222
3 Brazil 3,006 8,552,500
4 Indonesia 2,770 7,561,009
5 Switzerland 1,271 9,565,197
6 Turkey 1,245 5,772,628
7 China 1,192 3,754,968
8 Malawi 745 2,485,557
9 Zimbabwe 528 1,533,551
10 Canada 263 934,579
11 India 243 487,492
12 Spain 198 557,522
13 Italy 191 998,366
14 Argentina 182 575,160
15 Pakistan 169 216,045
16 Germany, FR 143 541,589
17 Philippines 129 243,885
18 Vietnam 117 311,422
19 Greece 112 812,475
20 Kenya 74 109,105
21 U.A.E. 62 72,704
22 Australia 54 143,709
23 Netherlands 18 69,891
24 France 2 4,519
**\--Total** **39,675** **198,892,810**
------ --------------------- -------------------- -----------------------
Imports volumes and value of Total Unmanufactured Tobacco CY2003 are
provided below:
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| | | ######### | |
| | | Jan -Dec 2003 | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| | | ####### MT | **Value (US\$)** |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | U.S.A. | 5,148 | 39,191,815 |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | Indonesia | 2,298 | 7,335,765 |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 3 | Brazil | 1,840 | 5,675,729 |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 4 | Thailand | 1,666 | 6,075,186 |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 5 | Turkey | 1,117 | 4,155,374 |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 6 | China | 1,019 | 4,031,354 |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 7 | Switzerland | 674 | 4,999,986 |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 8 | Belgium | 567 | 4,446,279 |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 9 | Vietnam | 503 | 1,339,954 |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | Philippines | 464 | 1,192,428 |
| 0 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | India | 281 | 692,560 |
| 1 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | Zimbabwe | 247 | 965,223 |
| 2 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | Pakistan | 210 | 315,421 |
| 3 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | Greece | 168 | 1,366,119 |
| 4 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | Australia | 154 | 564,477 |
| 5 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | Italy | 143 | 738,880 |
| 6 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | Canada | 141 | 707,349 |
| 7 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | Germany, FR | 104 | 736,556 |
| 8 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 1 | British Virgin Islands | 86 | 274,408 |
| 9 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | Cambodia | 79 | 140,699 |
| 0 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | U.A.E. | 72 | 119,949 |
| 1 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | Taiwan | 59 | 543,942 |
| 2 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | Argentina | 43 | 135,582 |
| 3 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | Spain | 40 | 110,832 |
| 4 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | Montenegro | 13 | 40,596 |
| 5 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | Egypt | 10 | 24,207 |
| 6 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | Bulgaria | 10 | 56,280 |
| 7 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | Mexico | 3 | 18,016 |
| 8 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| 2 | Singapore | 1 | 29,909 |
| 9 | | | |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
| | **\--Total** | **17,162** | **86,024,877** |
+---+--------------------------+---------------+----------------------+
## Import Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Unmfg., Total
------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------
**Import Trade
Matrix**
**Country** Malaysia
**Commodity** Tobacco, Unmfg.,
Total
Time Period Jan-Dec Units: Metric Ton
Imports for: 2002 **2003**
U.S. 23355 U.S. 5148
Others Others
Thailand 3605 Indonesia 2298
Brazil 3006 Brazil 1840
Indonesia 2770 Thailand 1666
Switzerland 1271 Turkey 1117
Turkey 1245 China 1019
China 1192 Switzerland 674
Malawi 745 Belgium 567
Zimbabwe 528 Vietnam 503
Canada 263 Philippines 464
India 243 India 281
Total for Others 14868 10429
Others not Listed 1452 1585
Grand Total 39675 17162
------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------
## Export Trade Matrix for Tobacco, Unmfg., Total
------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------
**Export Trade
Matrix**
**Country** Malaysia
**Commodity** Tobacco, Unmfg.,
Total
Time Period Jan-Dec Units: Metric Ton
Exports for: 2002 **2003**
U.S. U.S.
Others Others
Australia 1125 Australia 394
Vietnam 74 Thailand 282
Philippines 31 Philippines 172
Singapore 24 Belgium 158
Paraguay 23 Singapore 50
China 11
United Kingdom 2
Germany FR 2
Total for Others 1277 1071
Others not Listed
Grand Total 1277 1071
------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------
| en |
log-files | 785259 | # Date 2008-01-16 Time 05:47:41 PST -0800 (1200491261.30 s)
#phil __OFF__
Command line arguments: "../882.param" "main.number_of_macro_cycles=5" "--overwrite"
HOST = idle.lbl.gov
HOSTTYPE = x86_64-linux
USER = phzwart
PID = 28355
JOB_ID = 5159
SGE_ARCH = lx24-amd64
SGE_TASK_FIRST = 1
SGE_TASK_LAST = 1330
SGE_TASK_ID = 882
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHENIX: Python-based Hierarchical ENvironment for Integrated Xtallography
User: phzwart
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
phenix.refine: Macromolecular Structure Refinement
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phenix developers include:
Paul Adams, Pavel Afonine, Vicent Chen, Ian Davis, Kreshna Gopal,
Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve, Li-Wei Hung, Robert Immormino, Tom Ioerger,
Airlie McCoy, Erik McKee, Nigel Moriarty, Reetal Pai, Randy Read,
Jane Richardson, David Richardson, Tod Romo, Jim Sacchettini,
Nicholas Sauter, Jacob Smith, Laurent Storoni, Tom Terwilliger,
Peter Zwart
Phenix home page:
http://www.phenix-online.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phenix components are copyrighted by:
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Los Alamos National Laboratory
- University of Cambridge
- Duke University
- Texas Agricultural Experiment Station &
Texas Engineering Experiment Station
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major third-party components of Phenix include:
Python, wxwidgets, wxPython, Boost, SCons, Clipper,
CCP4 Monomer Library, CCP4 I/O libraries, PyCifRW, FFTPACK, L-BFGS
Enter phenix.acknowledgments for details.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing inputs. This may take a minute or two.
Command line parameter definitions:
refinement.main.number_of_macro_cycles = 5
Working crystal symmetry after inspecting all inputs:
Unit cell: (70.9525, 46.4607, 85.0941, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/model.pdb
Monomer Library directory:
"/net/rosie/scratch3/phzwart/CCTBX/Sources/mon_lib"
Total number of atoms: 2823
Number of models: 1
Model: 0
Number of conformers: 2
Conformer: "A"
Number of atoms: 2769
Number of chains: 2
Number of residues, atoms: 302, 2333
Classifications: {'peptide': 302}
Modifications used: {'COO': 1}
Link IDs: {'PTRANS': 7, 'CIS': 1, 'TRANS': 293}
Number of residues, atoms: 436, 436
Classifications: {'water': 436}
Link IDs: {None: 435}
Conformer: "B"
Number of atoms: 2771
Common with "A": 2717
Number of chains: 2
Number of residues, atoms: 302, 2333
Classifications: {'peptide': 302}
Modifications used: {'COO': 1}
Link IDs: {'PTRANS': 7, 'CIS': 1, 'TRANS': 293}
bond proxies already assigned to first conformer: 2332
Number of residues, atoms: 438, 438
Classifications: {'water': 438}
Link IDs: {None: 437}
Time building chain proxies: 3.25, per 1000 atoms: 1.15
================================== X-ray data =================================
F-obs:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:FOBS,SIGMA
R-free flags:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:TEST
Miller array info: /net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:FOBS,SIGMA
Observation type: xray.amplitude
Type of data: double, size=19589
Type of sigmas: double, size=19589
Number of Miller indices: 19589
Anomalous flag: False
Unit cell: (70.9525, 46.4607, 85.0941, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
Systematic absences: 0
Centric reflections: 2427
Resolution range: 15.0395 1.97103
Completeness in resolution range: 0.9586
Completeness with d_max=infinity: 0.955701
Number of F-obs in resolution range: 19589
Number of F-obs <= 0: 0
Refinement resolution range: d_max = 15.0395
d_min = 1.9710
Miller array info: /net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:TEST
Observation type: None
Type of data: int, size=19589
Type of sigmas: None
Number of Miller indices: 19589
Anomalous flag: False
Unit cell: (70.9525, 46.4607, 85.0941, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
Systematic absences: 0
Centric reflections: 2427
Resolution range: 15.0395 1.97103
Completeness in resolution range: 0.9586
Completeness with d_max=infinity: 0.955701
Test (R-free flags) flag value: 1
Number of work/free reflections by resolution:
work free %free
bin 1: 15.0399 - 4.2182 [2143/2169] 1932 211 9.8%
bin 2: 4.2182 - 3.3604 [2063/2082] 1855 208 10.1%
bin 3: 3.3604 - 2.9392 [2032/2051] 1827 205 10.1%
bin 4: 2.9392 - 2.6721 [2014/2044] 1813 201 10.0%
bin 5: 2.6721 - 2.4815 [2017/2036] 1820 197 9.8%
bin 6: 2.4815 - 2.3357 [1987/2012] 1781 206 10.4%
bin 7: 2.3357 - 2.2192 [1990/2018] 1790 200 10.1%
bin 8: 2.2192 - 2.1228 [1968/2004] 1778 190 9.7%
bin 9: 2.1228 - 2.0413 [1974/2016] 1773 201 10.2%
bin 10: 2.0413 - 1.9710 [1401/2003] 1261 140 10.0%
overall 17630 1959 10.0%
Writing MTZ file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_882/model_refine_data.mtz
========================== Anomalous scatterer groups =========================
All atoms refined with f_prime=0 and f_double_prime=0.
========================== Set up restraints manager ==========================
Number of disulfides: simple=3, symmetry=0
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 168 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " distance=2.08
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 168 " - " SG BCYS A 201 " distance=1.98
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 254 " - " SG CYS A 260 " distance=2.05
Time building geometry restraints manager: 0.14 seconds
Histogram of bond lengths:
1.21 - 1.38: 943
1.38 - 1.56: 1465
1.56 - 1.73: 7
1.73 - 1.90: 21
1.90 - 2.08: 3
Bond restraints sorted by residual:
atom i - atom j ideal model delta weight residual
" SG CYS A 168 " - " SG BCYS A 201 " 2.031 1.983 0.048 2.50e+03 5.87e+00
" C GLN A 88 " - " N GLN A 89 " 1.329 1.360 -0.031 5.10e+03 4.97e+00
" SG CYS A 168 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " 2.031 2.075 -0.044 2.50e+03 4.89e+00
" CB CYS A 201 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " 1.808 1.738 0.070 9.18e+02 4.46e+00
" C PRO A 198 " - " N ILE A 199 " 1.329 1.301 0.028 5.10e+03 4.10e+00
... (remaining 2434 not shown)
Histogram of nonbonded interaction distances:
1.81 - 2.42: 29
2.42 - 3.04: 2207
3.04 - 3.66: 4753
3.66 - 4.28: 9098
4.28 - 4.90: 12409
Nonbonded interactions sorted by model distance:
atom i - atom j model vdw sym.op. j
" CE BMET A 47 " - " O BHOH Z 74 " 1.806 3.460
" O HOH Z 204 " - " O HOH Z 296 " 2.006 3.040 -x+1/2,-y+1,z+1/2
" O HOH Z 113 " - " O HOH Z 350 " 2.069 3.040 -x+1/2,-y+1,z+1/2
" O HOH Z 206 " - " O HOH Z 341 " 2.076 3.040 -x+1/2,-y+1,z+1/2
" NH2 ARG A 259 " - " O HOH Z 3 " 2.107 3.120 -x,y-1/2,-z+1/2
... (remaining 28491 not shown)
Histogram of dihedral angle deviations from ideal:
0.01 - 17.19: 754
17.19 - 34.36: 62
34.36 - 51.54: 27
51.54 - 68.71: 23
68.71 - 85.89: 4
Dihedral angle restraints sorted by residual:
" CA PHE A 192 "
" CB PHE A 192 "
" CG PHE A 192 "
" CD1 PHE A 192 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
90.00 7.91 82.09 2 2.50e-03 1.68e+01
" N PRO A 54 "
" CG PRO A 54 "
" CD PRO A 54 "
" CB PRO A 54 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
30.00 -27.17 57.17 3 4.44e-03 1.45e+01
" N PRO A 280 "
" CA PRO A 280 "
" CB PRO A 280 "
" CG PRO A 280 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
-25.00 38.44 56.56 3 4.44e-03 1.42e+01
... (remaining 867 not shown)
==================== Fixing bad ADP in input model (if any) ===================
============================== Scattering factors =============================
----------X-ray scattering dictionary----------
Number of scattering types: 4
Type Number sf(0) Gaussians
S 13 15.96 2
O 902 7.97 2
N 437 6.97 2
C 1471 5.97 2
sf(0) = scattering factor at diffraction angle 0.
====================== Modifying start model if requested =====================
==================== Fixing bad ADP in input model (if any) ===================
================== Extract refinement strategy and selections =================
individual_sites = True
rigid_body = False
individual_adp = True
group_adp = False
tls = False
individual_occupancies = True
group_occupancies = False
group_anomalous = False
size = 2823
n_use = 2823
n_use_u_iso = 2823
n_use_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_site = 0
n_grad_u_iso = 0
n_grad_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_occupancy = 0
n_grad_fp = 0
n_grad_fdp = 0
n_anisotropic_flag = 0
total number of scatterers = 2823
==================== Process input NCS or/and find new NCS ====================
Using existing and finding new NCS is disabled.
Use refinement.main.ncs=true to activate it.
Look at refinement.ncs for more NCS related parameters.
=================== Write initial parameters into .eff file ===================
Writing effective parameters to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_882/model_refine_001.eff
Writing geometry restraints to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_882/model_refine_001.geo
CPU time processing inputs: 8.84
============================ Non-default parameters ===========================
A complete record of all parameters was written to the .eff file above.
Below are only the non-defaults.
#phil __ON__
refinement {
crystal_symmetry {
unit_cell = 70.9525 46.4607 85.09415 90 90 90
space_group = "P 21 21 21"
}
input {
pdb {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/model.pdb"
}
xray_data {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns"
labels = "FOBS,SIGMA"
r_free_flags {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns"
label = "TEST"
test_flag_value = 1
}
}
}
output {
prefix = "model_refine"
serial = 1
}
main {
number_of_macro_cycles = 5
}
}
#phil __OFF__
============================= ml refinement start =============================
----------structure factors based statistics (before refinement)----------
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3738 r_free= 0.3727 ksol= 0.00 Bsol= 0.00 scale= 0.956 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.46 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.139405 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 15.0399 - 4.7050 0.99 1392 155 0.3082 0.3063 6.4013 6.3691|
| 2: 4.7050 - 3.7536 0.99 1343 146 0.2993 0.2809 6.5554 6.5136|
| 3: 3.7536 - 3.2848 0.99 1313 147 0.3294 0.3144 6.4442 6.5497|
| 4: 3.2848 - 2.9870 0.99 1315 153 0.3422 0.3794 6.342 6.3368|
| 5: 2.9870 - 2.7743 0.99 1297 139 0.3861 0.3840 6.2083 6.1933|
| 6: 2.7743 - 2.6117 0.99 1287 143 0.3987 0.4084 6.1418 6.141|
| 7: 2.6117 - 2.4815 0.99 1300 139 0.3989 0.3806 6.1166 6.0879|
| 8: 2.4815 - 2.3739 0.98 1261 151 0.4254 0.4036 6.0719 6.0493|
| 9: 2.3739 - 2.2828 0.98 1280 145 0.4083 0.3838 6.0096 5.9546|
| 10: 2.2828 - 2.2043 0.99 1280 138 0.4183 0.4621 5.9892 6.0529|
| 11: 2.2043 - 2.1356 0.98 1286 138 0.4415 0.4344 5.9625 5.9896|
| 12: 2.1356 - 2.0747 0.97 1241 139 0.4366 0.4700 5.9015 5.9623|
| 13: 2.0747 - 2.0202 1.00 1265 140 0.4343 0.4221 5.8003 5.7329|
| 14: 2.0202 - 1.9710 0.59 770 86 0.4739 0.4473 5.8053 5.7279|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 15.0399 - 4.7050 1392 155 0.78 27.09 0.86 0.80 46232.04|
| 2: 4.7050 - 3.7536 1343 146 0.81 25.28 0.96 0.90 58880.39|
| 3: 3.7536 - 3.2848 1313 147 0.75 31.01 0.99 0.93 62495.26|
| 4: 3.2848 - 2.9870 1315 153 0.70 35.57 0.99 0.89 58043.42|
| 5: 2.9870 - 2.7743 1297 139 0.63 41.05 0.95 0.84 48463.94|
| 6: 2.7743 - 2.6117 1287 143 0.62 42.00 0.97 0.83 42489.26|
| 7: 2.6117 - 2.4815 1300 139 0.64 40.99 0.98 0.84 37198.00|
| 8: 2.4815 - 2.3739 1261 151 0.62 42.29 0.95 0.86 33700.74|
| 9: 2.3739 - 2.2828 1280 145 0.63 41.72 1.01 0.85 31035.19|
| 10: 2.2828 - 2.2043 1280 138 0.59 44.68 1.02 0.83 31355.87|
| 11: 2.2043 - 2.1356 1286 138 0.55 48.08 1.02 0.81 31547.05|
| 12: 2.1356 - 2.0747 1241 139 0.55 48.55 1.01 0.80 29623.92|
| 13: 2.0747 - 2.0202 1265 140 0.52 50.62 1.01 0.78 25529.52|
| 14: 2.0202 - 1.9710 770 86 0.54 49.15 0.98 0.73 20767.49|
|alpha: min = 0.73 max = 0.93 mean = 0.84|
|beta: min = 20767.49 max = 62495.26 mean = 40594.97|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.64|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 89.95 mean = 40.14|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 89.98 mean = 40.34|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
============================== Outliers rejection =============================
basic_wilson_outliers = 0
extreme_wilson_outliers = 0
beamstop_shadow_outliers = 0
total = 0
====================== Target weights (before refinement) =====================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 5.462852 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 90.630 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 1.074332 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 88.901 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------Initial model statistics (before refinement)----------
|-Geometry statistics: start--------------------------------------------------|
| Histogram of deviations from ideal values for |
| Bonds | Angles | Nonbonded contacts |
| 0.000 - 0.007: 1367 | 0.001 - 0.989: 1519 | 1.806 - 2.115: 5 |
| 0.007 - 0.014: 729 | 0.989 - 1.976: 994 | 2.115 - 2.424: 24 |
| 0.014 - 0.021: 262 | 1.976 - 2.963: 470 | 2.424 - 2.734: 206 |
| 0.021 - 0.028: 63 | 2.963 - 3.950: 196 | 2.734 - 3.043: 2001 |
| 0.028 - 0.035: 15 | 3.950 - 4.938: 66 | 3.043 - 3.353: 1891 |
| 0.035 - 0.042: 0 | 4.938 - 5.925: 29 | 3.353 - 3.662: 2862 |
| 0.042 - 0.049: 2 | 5.925 - 6.912: 16 | 3.662 - 3.972: 4676 |
| 0.049 - 0.056: 0 | 6.912 - 7.899: 2 | 3.972 - 4.281: 4422 |
| 0.056 - 0.063: 0 | 7.899 - 8.887: 3 | 4.281 - 4.591: 5658 |
| 0.063 - 0.070: 1 | 8.887 - 9.874: 4 | 4.591 - 4.900: 6751 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-Geometry statistics: start--------------------------------------------------|
| Type | Count | Deviation from ideal | Targets | Target (sum) |
| | | rmsd max min | | |
| bond | 2439 | 0.010 0.070 0.000 | 0.254 | |
| angle | 3299 | 1.822 9.874 0.001 | 1.000 | |
| chirality | 348 | 0.101 0.314 0.000 | 0.257 | 0.164 |
| planarity | 436 | 0.009 0.055 0.000 | 0.973 | |
| dihedral | 870 | 15.968 85.889 0.013 | 1.071 | |
| nonbonded | 2439 | 4.110 4.900 1.806 | 0.212 | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.754)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 5.09 63.06 16.02 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 5.09 63.06 16.02 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 6.19 63.06 36.87 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 5.09 49.51 12.19 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 5.090 - 10.887: 1254 | 5: 34.075 - 39.872: 81 |
| 1: 10.887 - 16.684: 844 | 6: 39.872 - 45.669: 78 |
| 2: 16.684 - 22.481: 225 | 7: 45.669 - 51.466: 64 |
| 3: 22.481 - 28.278: 122 | 8: 51.466 - 57.263: 37 |
| 4: 28.278 - 34.075: 94 | 9: 57.263 - 63.060: 24 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-Occupancies statistics------------------------------------------------------|
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.30 number of occupancies < 0.1 = 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 1 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3738 r_free= 0.3727 ksol= 0.00 Bsol= 0.00 scale= 0.956 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.46 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.139405 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3627 r_free= 0.3625 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 39.44 scale= 0.972 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-1.64,-0.51,0.72,-0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= -0.48 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.46 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.127992 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 4.558455 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 90.735 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.511668 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 88.728 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.3627 final r-factor (work) = 0.2065 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.3625 final r-factor (free) = 0.2327 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 14.1295 = 4.56 * 0.50 * 6.1274 + 1.00 * 0.1639 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 13.4434 = 4.56 * 0.50 * 5.8659 + 1.00 * 0.0737 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.2065 final r-factor (work) = 0.1909 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.2327 final r-factor (free) = 0.2416 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 3.0077 = 0.51 * 1.00 * 5.8659 + 1.00 * 0.0063 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 2.8892 = 0.51 * 1.00 * 5.5859 + 1.00 * 0.0311 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 8 | number of function evaluations = 8 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.754)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 61.92 16.94 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 61.92 16.94 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 5.79 61.92 38.55 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 61.21 12.97 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 6.192: 299 | 5: 30.961 - 37.154: 108 |
| 1: 6.192 - 12.385: 1080 | 6: 37.154 - 43.346: 113 |
| 2: 12.385 - 18.577: 661 | 7: 43.346 - 49.538: 83 |
| 3: 18.577 - 24.769: 255 | 8: 49.538 - 55.731: 63 |
| 4: 24.769 - 30.961: 122 | 9: 55.731 - 61.923: 39 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1909 r_free = 0.2416 target_work(ml) = 5.603 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.30 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1904 r_free = 0.2417 target_work(ml) = 5.602 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 1 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 2 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1904 r_free= 0.2417 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 39.44 scale= 1.034 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-1.64,-0.51,0.72,-0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= -0.48 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.25 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.601773 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1892 r_free= 0.2395 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 39.44 scale= 0.998 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.24,-2.29,-1.24,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.92 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.25 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.598196 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 2.950038 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 94.651 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.352824 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 90.761 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1892 final r-factor (work) = 0.1379 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.2395 final r-factor (free) = 0.1831 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 8.3365 = 2.95 * 0.50 * 5.6019 + 1.00 * 0.0737 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 8.1268 = 2.95 * 0.50 * 5.4735 + 1.00 * 0.0532 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 28 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1379 final r-factor (work) = 0.1271 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1831 final r-factor (free) = 0.1699 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.9488 = 0.35 * 1.00 * 5.4735 + 1.00 * 0.0176 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.8709 = 0.35 * 1.00 * 5.2793 + 1.00 * 0.0083 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 26 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.754)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 1.20 74.54 17.10 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 1.20 74.54 17.10 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 5.69 73.52 39.72 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 1.20 74.54 12.95 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 1.204 - 8.537: 642 | 5: 37.871 - 45.204: 102 |
| 1: 8.537 - 15.871: 1279 | 6: 45.204 - 52.537: 97 |
| 2: 15.871 - 23.204: 371 | 7: 52.537 - 59.871: 71 |
| 3: 23.204 - 30.537: 115 | 8: 59.871 - 67.204: 28 |
| 4: 30.537 - 37.871: 108 | 9: 67.204 - 74.537: 10 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1271 r_free = 0.1699 target_work(ml) = 5.238 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 1 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1269 r_free = 0.1698 target_work(ml) = 5.238 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 1 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 3 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1269 r_free= 0.1698 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 39.44 scale= 1.011 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.24,-2.29,-1.24,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.92 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.14 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.237559 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1270 r_free= 0.1699 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 43.15 scale= 1.010 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.24,-2.29,-1.24,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.92 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.14 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.237769 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 1.957555 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 115.925 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.344174 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 130.827 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1270 final r-factor (work) = 0.1152 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1699 final r-factor (free) = 0.1574 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 5.2203 = 1.96 * 0.50 * 5.2791 + 1.00 * 0.0532 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 5.1370 = 1.96 * 0.50 * 5.1943 + 1.00 * 0.0529 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1152 final r-factor (work) = 0.1132 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1574 final r-factor (free) = 0.1553 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.7960 = 0.34 * 1.00 * 5.1943 + 1.00 * 0.0083 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.7799 = 0.34 * 1.00 * 5.1475 + 1.00 * 0.0083 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 29 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.754)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 1.03 83.95 17.00 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 1.03 83.95 17.00 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 4.66 80.18 39.43 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 1.03 83.95 12.88 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 1.026 - 9.318: 856 | 5: 42.487 - 50.780: 108 |
| 1: 9.318 - 17.610: 1205 | 6: 50.780 - 59.072: 70 |
| 2: 17.610 - 25.903: 279 | 7: 59.072 - 67.364: 33 |
| 3: 25.903 - 34.195: 134 | 8: 67.364 - 75.657: 16 |
| 4: 34.195 - 42.487: 118 | 9: 75.657 - 83.949: 4 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1132 r_free = 0.1553 target_work(ml) = 5.140 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 1 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1131 r_free = 0.1552 target_work(ml) = 5.140 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 2 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 4 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1131 r_free= 0.1552 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 43.15 scale= 1.011 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.24,-2.29,-1.24,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.92 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.14 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.139857 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1130 r_free= 0.1551 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 43.15 scale= 1.005 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.31,-2.50,-1.58,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -2.13 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.14 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.139482 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 2.288553 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 146.765 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.206621 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 145.648 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1130 final r-factor (work) = 0.1081 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1551 final r-factor (free) = 0.1532 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 5.9434 = 2.29 * 0.50 * 5.1478 + 1.00 * 0.0529 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 5.9192 = 2.29 * 0.50 * 5.1200 + 1.00 * 0.0605 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1081 final r-factor (work) = 0.1081 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1532 final r-factor (free) = 0.1530 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.0662 = 0.21 * 1.00 * 5.1200 + 1.00 * 0.0083 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.0637 = 0.21 * 1.00 * 5.1116 + 1.00 * 0.0075 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 32 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.754)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 1.45 85.25 16.66 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 1.45 85.25 16.66 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 5.67 81.93 38.00 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 1.45 85.25 12.74 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 1.452 - 9.832: 989 | 5: 43.349 - 51.728: 98 |
| 1: 9.832 - 18.211: 1125 | 6: 51.728 - 60.108: 57 |
| 2: 18.211 - 26.590: 247 | 7: 60.108 - 68.487: 19 |
| 3: 26.590 - 34.970: 139 | 8: 68.487 - 76.866: 12 |
| 4: 34.970 - 43.349: 133 | 9: 76.866 - 85.246: 4 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1081 r_free = 0.1530 target_work(ml) = 5.111 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 2 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1080 r_free = 0.1530 target_work(ml) = 5.111 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 2 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 5 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1080 r_free= 0.1530 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 43.15 scale= 1.003 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.31,-2.50,-1.58,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -2.13 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.13 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.111328 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1080 r_free= 0.1530 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 43.15 scale= 1.005 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.18,-2.42,-1.51,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -2.04 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.13 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.111345 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 1.286440 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 161.519 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.700974 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 154.897 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1080 final r-factor (work) = 0.1107 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1530 final r-factor (free) = 0.1541 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 3.3485 = 1.29 * 0.50 * 5.1117 + 1.00 * 0.0605 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 3.3436 = 1.29 * 0.50 * 5.1233 + 1.00 * 0.0482 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1107 final r-factor (work) = 0.1098 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1541 final r-factor (free) = 0.1554 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 3.5988 = 0.70 * 1.00 * 5.1233 + 1.00 * 0.0075 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 3.6007 = 0.70 * 1.00 * 5.1240 + 1.00 * 0.0089 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 26 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.754)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.53 92.32 16.87 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.53 92.32 16.87 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 6.21 85.11 39.40 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.53 92.32 12.73 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.527 - 9.706: 1004 | 5: 46.423 - 55.602: 103 |
| 1: 9.706 - 18.885: 1142 | 6: 55.602 - 64.782: 55 |
| 2: 18.885 - 28.065: 231 | 7: 64.782 - 73.961: 13 |
| 3: 28.065 - 37.244: 139 | 8: 73.961 - 83.140: 11 |
| 4: 37.244 - 46.423: 121 | 9: 83.140 - 92.319: 4 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1098 r_free = 0.1554 target_work(ml) = 5.130 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 2 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1098 r_free = 0.1554 target_work(ml) = 5.130 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 2 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1098 r_free= 0.1554 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 43.15 scale= 1.002 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.18,-2.42,-1.51,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -2.04 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.14 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.129621 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 15.0399 - 4.7050 0.99 1392 155 0.0985 0.1235 5.3668 5.4932|
| 2: 4.7050 - 3.7536 0.99 1343 146 0.0856 0.1107 5.4257 5.6123|
| 3: 3.7536 - 3.2848 0.99 1313 147 0.1052 0.1521 5.4689 5.8495|
| 4: 3.2848 - 2.9870 0.99 1315 153 0.1183 0.1534 5.4424 5.5763|
| 5: 2.9870 - 2.7743 0.99 1297 139 0.1311 0.1758 5.3124 5.529|
| 6: 2.7743 - 2.6117 0.99 1287 143 0.1180 0.1680 5.1821 5.4136|
| 7: 2.6117 - 2.4815 0.99 1300 139 0.1222 0.1557 5.1475 5.3279|
| 8: 2.4815 - 2.3739 0.98 1261 151 0.1139 0.1763 5.0206 5.3359|
| 9: 2.3739 - 2.2828 0.98 1280 145 0.1128 0.1714 5.0099 5.3154|
| 10: 2.2828 - 2.2043 0.99 1280 138 0.1081 0.1723 4.9308 5.1925|
| 11: 2.2043 - 2.1356 0.98 1286 138 0.1134 0.1751 4.9466 5.3054|
| 12: 2.1356 - 2.0747 0.97 1241 139 0.1087 0.1587 4.8761 5.0841|
| 13: 2.0747 - 2.0202 1.00 1265 140 0.1137 0.1793 4.7851 5.0827|
| 14: 2.0202 - 1.9710 0.59 770 86 0.0991 0.1653 4.6346 4.9107|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 15.0399 - 4.7050 1392 155 0.94 8.35 0.98 0.95 6309.02|
| 2: 4.7050 - 3.7536 1343 146 0.95 7.64 1.02 1.01 8531.97|
| 3: 3.7536 - 3.2848 1313 147 0.93 11.18 1.03 1.02 10178.60|
| 4: 3.2848 - 2.9870 1315 153 0.92 13.31 1.01 0.99 10036.70|
| 5: 2.9870 - 2.7743 1297 139 0.90 15.66 0.99 0.97 7995.53|
| 6: 2.7743 - 2.6117 1287 143 0.91 15.33 0.99 0.96 6692.00|
| 7: 2.6117 - 2.4815 1300 139 0.91 14.95 0.99 0.97 5970.93|
| 8: 2.4815 - 2.3739 1261 151 0.91 14.68 0.99 0.96 4750.15|
| 9: 2.3739 - 2.2828 1280 145 0.92 14.42 1.00 0.98 4700.30|
| 10: 2.2828 - 2.2043 1280 138 0.91 15.01 1.00 0.96 4096.98|
| 11: 2.2043 - 2.1356 1286 138 0.90 16.27 0.99 0.95 4395.14|
| 12: 2.1356 - 2.0747 1241 139 0.92 14.81 1.01 1.00 3984.09|
| 13: 2.0747 - 2.0202 1265 140 0.90 16.39 1.00 0.99 3358.35|
| 14: 2.0202 - 1.9710 770 86 0.92 14.08 0.98 0.94 2435.36|
|alpha: min = 0.94 max = 1.02 mean = 0.98|
|beta: min = 2435.36 max = 10178.60 mean = 6098.63|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.92|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 89.90 mean = 13.65|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 89.56 mean = 13.23|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1098 r_free= 0.1555 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 43.14 scale= 1.006 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.00,-2.26,-1.37,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.87 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.15 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.129699 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 1.97 - 15.04 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1098 r_free= 0.1555 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 43.14 scale= 1.006 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.00,-2.26,-1.37,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.87 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.15 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.129699 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 15.0399 - 4.7050 0.99 1392 155 0.0985 0.1236 5.3676 5.4944|
| 2: 4.7050 - 3.7536 0.99 1343 146 0.0856 0.1106 5.4261 5.6121|
| 3: 3.7536 - 3.2848 0.99 1313 147 0.1053 0.1522 5.4689 5.8497|
| 4: 3.2848 - 2.9870 0.99 1315 153 0.1183 0.1534 5.4424 5.5764|
| 5: 2.9870 - 2.7743 0.99 1297 139 0.1311 0.1758 5.3123 5.5286|
| 6: 2.7743 - 2.6117 0.99 1287 143 0.1180 0.1681 5.1821 5.4139|
| 7: 2.6117 - 2.4815 0.99 1300 139 0.1223 0.1557 5.1476 5.3281|
| 8: 2.4815 - 2.3739 0.98 1261 151 0.1139 0.1763 5.0207 5.3357|
| 9: 2.3739 - 2.2828 0.98 1280 145 0.1128 0.1713 5.0099 5.3156|
| 10: 2.2828 - 2.2043 0.99 1280 138 0.1080 0.1723 4.9309 5.1923|
| 11: 2.2043 - 2.1356 0.98 1286 138 0.1134 0.1750 4.9466 5.3055|
| 12: 2.1356 - 2.0747 0.97 1241 139 0.1087 0.1587 4.8758 5.084|
| 13: 2.0747 - 2.0202 1.00 1265 140 0.1137 0.1792 4.7849 5.0821|
| 14: 2.0202 - 1.9710 0.59 770 86 0.0991 0.1653 4.6345 4.9109|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 15.0399 - 4.7050 1392 155 0.94 8.36 0.98 0.95 6322.29|
| 2: 4.7050 - 3.7536 1343 146 0.95 7.65 1.02 1.01 8542.31|
| 3: 3.7536 - 3.2848 1313 147 0.93 11.18 1.03 1.03 10180.56|
| 4: 3.2848 - 2.9870 1315 153 0.92 13.31 1.01 0.99 10034.30|
| 5: 2.9870 - 2.7743 1297 139 0.90 15.66 1.00 0.97 7994.39|
| 6: 2.7743 - 2.6117 1287 143 0.91 15.33 0.99 0.96 6691.62|
| 7: 2.6117 - 2.4815 1300 139 0.91 14.95 1.00 0.98 5972.29|
| 8: 2.4815 - 2.3739 1261 151 0.91 14.68 0.99 0.97 4750.55|
| 9: 2.3739 - 2.2828 1280 145 0.92 14.43 1.01 0.99 4701.31|
| 10: 2.2828 - 2.2043 1280 138 0.91 15.01 1.00 0.96 4097.74|
| 11: 2.2043 - 2.1356 1286 138 0.90 16.27 1.00 0.96 4394.88|
| 12: 2.1356 - 2.0747 1241 139 0.92 14.81 1.01 1.00 3981.67|
| 13: 2.0747 - 2.0202 1265 140 0.90 16.38 1.01 1.00 3356.82|
| 14: 2.0202 - 1.9710 770 86 0.92 14.08 0.99 0.95 2434.91|
|alpha: min = 0.95 max = 1.03 mean = 0.98|
|beta: min = 2434.91 max = 10180.56 mean = 6100.26|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.92|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 89.90 mean = 13.65|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 89.56 mean = 13.23|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.754)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.51 92.30 16.85 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.51 92.30 16.85 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 6.19 85.09 39.38 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.51 92.30 12.71 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.510 - 9.689: 1004 | 5: 46.406 - 55.586: 103 |
| 1: 9.689 - 18.869: 1142 | 6: 55.586 - 64.765: 55 |
| 2: 18.869 - 28.048: 231 | 7: 64.765 - 73.944: 13 |
| 3: 28.048 - 37.227: 139 | 8: 73.944 - 83.123: 11 |
| 4: 37.227 - 46.406: 121 | 9: 83.123 - 92.303: 4 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========== residual map mFobs-DFmodel: highest peaks and deepst holes =========
----------peaks----------
Number of peaks found at mFobs-DFmodel map (map cutoff=3.00 sigma)= 300
Filter by distance & map next to the model:
mapped sites are within: 0.515 - 4.502
number of sites selected in [dist_min= 0.70, dist_max= 6.00]: 296 from: 300
mapped sites are within: 0.719 - 4.502
peak= 5.833 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 11 " = 1.190
peak= 5.788 closest distance to " CG PRO A 54 " = 1.254
peak= 5.553 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 2.017
peak= 5.404 closest distance to " CB GLN A 223 " = 1.415
peak= 5.245 closest distance to " CG PRO A 213 " = 1.244
peak= 5.206 closest distance to " CB ARG A 275 " = 0.907
peak= 5.100 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 56 " = 2.108
peak= 5.071 closest distance to " CB SER A 63 " = 1.259
peak= 4.973 closest distance to " O HOH Z 232 " = 2.323
peak= 4.943 closest distance to " CG PRO A 90 " = 1.103
peak= 4.848 closest distance to " CB PRO A 54 " = 0.972
peak= 4.848 closest distance to " O HOH Z 144 " = 1.693
peak= 4.848 closest distance to " CB GLU A 128 " = 1.043
peak= 4.749 closest distance to " O HOH Z 78 " = 1.828
peak= 4.729 closest distance to " C PRO A 198 " = 1.546
peak= 4.671 closest distance to " CB GLN A 183 " = 1.212
peak= 4.639 closest distance to " CG PRO A 198 " = 1.271
peak= 4.546 closest distance to " O HOH Z 427 " = 2.783
peak= 4.508 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 1.927
peak= 4.506 closest distance to " CG2 VAL A 257 " = 0.988
peak= 4.483 closest distance to " CB LEU A 228 " = 1.106
peak= 4.467 closest distance to " O HOH Z 236 " = 2.140
peak= 4.454 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 1.787
peak= 4.426 closest distance to " CA TYR A 30 " = 0.965
peak= 4.419 closest distance to " CB SER A 216 " = 0.836
peak= 4.364 closest distance to " O HOH Z 9 " = 2.266
peak= 4.320 closest distance to " CB ASN A 148 " = 1.319
peak= 4.284 closest distance to " CB TYR A 169 " = 0.719
peak= 4.278 closest distance to " CB GLU A 152 " = 1.292
peak= 4.265 closest distance to " CG PRO A 243 " = 1.090
peak= 4.263 closest distance to " O HOH Z 316 " = 3.028
peak= 4.233 closest distance to " CB SER A 3 " = 1.411
peak= 4.226 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 69 " = 2.630
peak= 4.215 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 187 " = 1.473
peak= 4.193 closest distance to " CG PRO A 280 " = 0.785
peak= 4.192 closest distance to " O HOH Z 369 " = 2.126
peak= 4.147 closest distance to " CA THR A 264 " = 0.836
peak= 4.141 closest distance to " O HOH Z 132 " = 2.315
peak= 4.071 closest distance to " CB TRP A 266 " = 0.997
peak= 4.058 closest distance to " CB VAL A 265 " = 1.247
peak= 4.044 closest distance to " O HOH Z 234 " = 3.731
peak= 4.013 closest distance to " CB TRP A 179 " = 1.350
peak= 3.997 closest distance to " O HOH Z 344 " = 3.162
peak= 3.988 closest distance to " O HOH Z 423 " = 1.505
peak= 3.981 closest distance to " O HOH Z 272 " = 1.803
peak= 3.974 closest distance to " CB ARG A 79 " = 1.392
peak= 3.941 closest distance to " O HOH Z 10 " = 1.860
peak= 3.933 closest distance to " CG1 ILE A 33 " = 1.275
peak= 3.932 closest distance to " O HOH Z 217 " = 3.105
peak= 3.931 closest distance to " CA ASN A 215 " = 1.210
peak= 3.919 closest distance to " CA ALA A 21 " = 1.154
peak= 3.908 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 286 " = 2.858
peak= 3.905 closest distance to " O HOH Z 128 " = 2.143
peak= 3.904 closest distance to " O HOH Z 368 " = 3.611
peak= 3.901 closest distance to " O HOH Z 1 " = 1.776
peak= 3.897 closest distance to " O HOH Z 303 " = 2.196
peak= 3.895 closest distance to " O HOH Z 425 " = 1.277
peak= 3.894 closest distance to " O HOH Z 214 " = 2.031
peak= 3.890 closest distance to " CD BLYS A 290 " = 1.152
peak= 3.890 closest distance to " O HOH Z 368 " = 1.915
peak= 3.875 closest distance to " O HOH Z 1 " = 1.894
peak= 3.861 closest distance to " O HOH Z 59 " = 1.745
peak= 3.841 closest distance to " O HOH Z 346 " = 1.696
peak= 3.830 closest distance to " CD ARG A 159 " = 0.765
peak= 3.821 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 255 " = 1.480
peak= 3.809 closest distance to " CD ARG A 66 " = 2.336
peak= 3.804 closest distance to " O HOH Z 108 " = 1.355
peak= 3.799 closest distance to " O HOH Z 9 " = 1.986
peak= 3.792 closest distance to " O HOH Z 144 " = 2.308
peak= 3.791 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 300 " = 1.235
peak= 3.761 closest distance to " O HOH Z 44 " = 1.801
peak= 3.747 closest distance to " O HOH Z 389 " = 1.832
peak= 3.740 closest distance to " O HOH Z 425 " = 2.090
peak= 3.733 closest distance to " O HOH Z 21 " = 1.667
peak= 3.729 closest distance to " NH1AARG A 145 " = 1.100
peak= 3.729 closest distance to " O HOH Z 219 " = 2.229
peak= 3.726 closest distance to " CE LYS A 76 " = 0.885
peak= 3.721 closest distance to " O HOH Z 61 " = 1.558
peak= 3.714 closest distance to " O HOH Z 64 " = 2.243
peak= 3.711 closest distance to " CA GLY A 241 " = 3.796
peak= 3.706 closest distance to " O HOH Z 180 " = 2.117
peak= 3.703 closest distance to " O HOH Z 189 " = 2.125
peak= 3.702 closest distance to " O HOH Z 61 " = 1.651
peak= 3.693 closest distance to " O HOH Z 163 " = 1.784
peak= 3.682 closest distance to " O HOH Z 403 " = 1.678
peak= 3.681 closest distance to " CB ARG A 139 " = 0.974
peak= 3.680 closest distance to " O HOH Z 158 " = 2.957
peak= 3.677 closest distance to " CG LEU A 167 " = 1.179
peak= 3.676 closest distance to " CB ARG A 190 " = 1.649
peak= 3.667 closest distance to " O SER A 87 " = 2.251
peak= 3.661 closest distance to " O MET A 105 " = 1.836
peak= 3.660 closest distance to " OD1BASN A 224 " = 2.258
peak= 3.659 closest distance to " O HOH Z 207 " = 1.763
peak= 3.656 closest distance to " ND1 HIS A 86 " = 1.750
peak= 3.654 closest distance to " O HOH Z 250 " = 1.395
peak= 3.648 closest distance to " CG2 THR A 221 " = 1.098
peak= 3.645 closest distance to " CA THR A 221 " = 0.969
peak= 3.644 closest distance to " O HOH Z 352 " = 1.855
peak= 3.634 closest distance to " O HOH Z 407 " = 2.276
peak= 3.633 closest distance to " O HOH Z 261 " = 1.804
peak= 3.632 closest distance to " N PHE A 130 " = 1.248
peak= 3.630 closest distance to " O HOH Z 108 " = 1.974
peak= 3.627 closest distance to " O HOH Z 419 " = 2.017
peak= 3.620 closest distance to " O HOH Z 371 " = 2.979
peak= 3.615 closest distance to " O HOH Z 40 " = 2.060
peak= 3.610 closest distance to " O HOH Z 66 " = 2.171
peak= 3.609 closest distance to " O HOH Z 211 " = 2.577
peak= 3.608 closest distance to " CB SER A 212 " = 1.070
peak= 3.597 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 218 " = 1.005
peak= 3.580 closest distance to " OG BSER A 164 " = 2.353
peak= 3.569 closest distance to " O HOH Z 327 " = 1.788
peak= 3.554 closest distance to " N ASN A 39 " = 1.341
peak= 3.551 closest distance to " O HOH Z 133 " = 1.585
peak= 3.550 closest distance to " O HOH Z 88 " = 3.320
peak= 3.545 closest distance to " O HOH Z 40 " = 1.919
peak= 3.534 closest distance to " O HOH Z 227 " = 2.114
peak= 3.528 closest distance to " CB ALA A 34 " = 1.044
peak= 3.524 closest distance to " CG1BVAL A 72 " = 1.478
peak= 3.523 closest distance to " CB LEU A 143 " = 1.114
peak= 3.523 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 1.676
peak= 3.523 closest distance to " CB ALA A 291 " = 1.398
peak= 3.517 closest distance to " O HOH Z 134 " = 1.304
peak= 3.512 closest distance to " O HOH Z 97 " = 1.974
peak= 3.506 closest distance to " CA MET A 40 " = 1.045
peak= 3.505 closest distance to " O HOH Z 227 " = 1.640
peak= 3.502 closest distance to " O HOH Z 295 " = 1.502
peak= 3.501 closest distance to " O HOH Z 135 " = 1.685
peak= 3.499 closest distance to " O HOH Z 437 " = 1.609
peak= 3.487 closest distance to " O HOH Z 371 " = 1.683
peak= 3.487 closest distance to " N GLN A 278 " = 1.067
peak= 3.485 closest distance to " O HOH Z 353 " = 2.723
peak= 3.483 closest distance to " CA ILE A 234 " = 1.017
peak= 3.477 closest distance to " O HOH Z 426 " = 1.653
peak= 3.459 closest distance to " N ARG A 156 " = 1.269
peak= 3.455 closest distance to " O HOH Z 265 " = 2.388
peak= 3.453 closest distance to " CB VAL A 202 " = 1.638
peak= 3.450 closest distance to " CG ARG A 159 " = 0.851
peak= 3.447 closest distance to " CD PRO A 243 " = 1.630
peak= 3.444 closest distance to " OG SER A 97 " = 3.494
peak= 3.442 closest distance to " O HOH Z 261 " = 2.061
peak= 3.441 closest distance to " O HOH Z 423 " = 2.528
peak= 3.439 closest distance to " O HOH Z 386 " = 3.145
peak= 3.427 closest distance to " O HOH Z 3 " = 1.876
peak= 3.421 closest distance to " O THR A 220 " = 1.393
peak= 3.419 closest distance to " CB VAL A 268 " = 0.845
peak= 3.406 closest distance to " CB SER A 62 " = 1.221
peak= 3.405 closest distance to " O HOH Z 286 " = 2.369
peak= 3.404 closest distance to " O HOH Z 402 " = 1.403
peak= 3.401 closest distance to " CB THR A 157 " = 1.063
peak= 3.399 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 156 " = 1.195
peak= 3.392 closest distance to " CE AMET A 47 " = 1.390
peak= 3.389 closest distance to " O HOH Z 409 " = 2.679
peak= 3.377 closest distance to " CB GLU A 236 " = 1.193
peak= 3.376 closest distance to " O HOH Z 213 " = 2.370
peak= 3.371 closest distance to " CB VAL A 265 " = 1.937
peak= 3.370 closest distance to " OG SER A 22 " = 2.763
peak= 3.368 closest distance to " CG1 ILE A 151 " = 0.971
peak= 3.365 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 1.999
peak= 3.362 closest distance to " CD2 TRP A 179 " = 1.351
peak= 3.357 closest distance to " CB LEU A 255 " = 0.796
peak= 3.356 closest distance to " O HOH Z 147 " = 1.735
peak= 3.352 closest distance to " CE1 TYR A 186 " = 1.379
peak= 3.351 closest distance to " O HOH Z 44 " = 3.239
peak= 3.350 closest distance to " CB ASN A 39 " = 0.908
peak= 3.350 closest distance to " O HOH Z 280 " = 3.069
peak= 3.348 closest distance to " O HOH Z 245 " = 1.238
peak= 3.347 closest distance to " O HOH Z 172 " = 3.320
peak= 3.341 closest distance to " NH2BARG A 145 " = 1.949
peak= 3.337 closest distance to " O HOH Z 236 " = 1.520
peak= 3.336 closest distance to " CB MET A 40 " = 0.775
peak= 3.335 closest distance to " CB ASP A 132 " = 4.020
peak= 3.329 closest distance to " O HOH Z 391 " = 2.978
peak= 3.329 closest distance to " O HOH Z 153 " = 1.616
peak= 3.328 closest distance to " O HOH Z 247 " = 1.219
peak= 3.326 closest distance to " O HOH Z 49 " = 2.027
peak= 3.325 closest distance to " CD ARG A 269 " = 0.961
peak= 3.325 closest distance to " CB LYS A 117 " = 1.180
peak= 3.325 closest distance to " CD LYS A 166 " = 1.253
peak= 3.323 closest distance to " CB MET A 47 " = 1.032
peak= 3.323 closest distance to " CD ARG A 219 " = 1.081
peak= 3.323 closest distance to " CB ALA A 248 " = 0.935
peak= 3.322 closest distance to " CB ARG A 79 " = 0.848
peak= 3.322 closest distance to " CB ASN A 142 " = 0.931
peak= 3.316 closest distance to " CA ALA A 233 " = 1.229
peak= 3.316 closest distance to " O HOH Z 271 " = 2.345
peak= 3.314 closest distance to " OG SER A 206 " = 1.241
peak= 3.314 closest distance to " CA LYS A 290 " = 1.284
peak= 3.314 closest distance to " O HOH Z 93 " = 2.453
peak= 3.314 closest distance to " CB GLU A 277 " = 3.547
peak= 3.313 closest distance to " O ALA A 1 " = 1.499
peak= 3.308 closest distance to " CA SER A 87 " = 1.013
peak= 3.307 closest distance to " O HOH Z 329 " = 3.607
peak= 3.307 closest distance to " O HOH Z 366 " = 2.891
peak= 3.306 closest distance to " CB TYR A 116 " = 0.823
peak= 3.304 closest distance to " CB ASP A 171 " = 0.927
peak= 3.302 closest distance to " CG GLN A 88 " = 1.010
peak= 3.300 closest distance to " O HOH Z 305 " = 3.598
peak= 3.297 closest distance to " OE1 GLN A 11 " = 2.142
peak= 3.295 closest distance to " N ASN A 127 " = 1.263
peak= 3.294 closest distance to " NH2AARG A 275 " = 3.731
peak= 3.293 closest distance to " CB ALA A 1 " = 4.502
peak= 3.291 closest distance to " CA ALA A 51 " = 0.969
peak= 3.291 closest distance to " CG MET A 113 " = 1.203
peak= 3.286 closest distance to " CB GLU A 152 " = 1.391
peak= 3.273 closest distance to " CD1 ILE A 106 " = 0.847
peak= 3.267 closest distance to " O HOH Z 188 " = 1.941
peak= 3.263 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 96 " = 0.807
peak= 3.261 closest distance to " CA ALA A 154 " = 0.968
peak= 3.258 closest distance to " CB PRO A 198 " = 0.992
peak= 3.256 closest distance to " CD LYS A 119 " = 1.124
peak= 3.255 closest distance to " CG MET A 185 " = 1.018
peak= 3.255 closest distance to " O HOH Z 345 " = 3.515
peak= 3.254 closest distance to " O HOH Z 2 " = 1.406
peak= 3.254 closest distance to " O HOH Z 435 " = 2.007
peak= 3.254 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 106 " = 1.047
peak= 3.252 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 208 " = 1.113
peak= 3.251 closest distance to " O HOH Z 63 " = 1.436
peak= 3.248 closest distance to " CA ARG A 102 " = 1.175
peak= 3.248 closest distance to " O BHOH Z 74 " = 1.346
peak= 3.241 closest distance to " N TYR A 15 " = 0.759
peak= 3.240 closest distance to " CB ASP A 140 " = 0.837
peak= 3.239 closest distance to " CG GLU A 277 " = 2.164
peak= 3.238 closest distance to " CB SER A 276 " = 1.176
peak= 3.235 closest distance to " NH2AARG A 190 " = 1.661
peak= 3.233 closest distance to " CA ARG A 36 " = 1.096
peak= 3.228 closest distance to " O HOH Z 273 " = 2.724
peak= 3.228 closest distance to " CG MET A 185 " = 1.235
peak= 3.227 closest distance to " CA ALA A 291 " = 0.972
peak= 3.227 closest distance to " O HOH Z 291 " = 1.630
peak= 3.222 closest distance to " CA ALA A 158 " = 1.154
peak= 3.220 closest distance to " OG SER A 62 " = 3.040
peak= 3.217 closest distance to " O HOH Z 340 " = 2.269
peak= 3.216 closest distance to " CA ASP A 140 " = 1.160
peak= 3.215 closest distance to " O HOH Z 43 " = 1.794
peak= 3.214 closest distance to " O HOH Z 175 " = 2.081
peak= 3.210 closest distance to " CA ASP A 162 " = 1.123
peak= 3.206 closest distance to " ND1 HIS A 81 " = 1.612
peak= 3.206 closest distance to " CG LYS A 76 " = 1.050
peak= 3.203 closest distance to " CB ILE A 120 " = 1.302
peak= 3.203 closest distance to " O GLY A 229 " = 1.593
peak= 3.203 closest distance to " CA TYR A 186 " = 1.539
peak= 3.194 closest distance to " O HOH Z 433 " = 1.774
peak= 3.189 closest distance to " NH1BARG A 145 " = 1.210
peak= 3.186 closest distance to " O GLY A 57 " = 2.603
peak= 3.186 closest distance to " CG2BVAL A 41 " = 0.868
peak= 3.184 closest distance to " O HOH Z 374 " = 2.597
peak= 3.182 closest distance to " C TYR A 214 " = 1.487
peak= 3.182 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 153 " = 0.929
peak= 3.178 closest distance to " O HOH Z 213 " = 1.805
peak= 3.178 closest distance to " CG GLN A 89 " = 1.442
peak= 3.177 closest distance to " CD GLN A 240 " = 1.641
peak= 3.171 closest distance to " O HOH Z 411 " = 1.768
peak= 3.170 closest distance to " CB ASN A 110 " = 1.115
peak= 3.169 closest distance to " O HOH Z 163 " = 1.921
peak= 3.169 closest distance to " O HOH Z 128 " = 2.115
peak= 3.164 closest distance to " OD1 ASP A 238 " = 1.074
peak= 3.164 closest distance to " NZ LYS A 119 " = 1.305
peak= 3.163 closest distance to " O HOH Z 291 " = 1.929
peak= 3.160 closest distance to " CB GLN A 88 " = 1.260
peak= 3.160 closest distance to " CD2 HIS A 81 " = 1.229
peak= 3.160 closest distance to " OG BSER A 99 " = 2.176
peak= 3.158 closest distance to " CA ARG A 195 " = 1.226
peak= 3.151 closest distance to " O HOH Z 403 " = 1.344
peak= 3.145 closest distance to " NZ LYS A 76 " = 1.396
peak= 3.144 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 73 " = 3.596
peak= 3.142 closest distance to " N ALA A 154 " = 0.912
peak= 3.141 closest distance to " CA ALA A 43 " = 1.223
peak= 3.138 closest distance to " CB ARG A 138 " = 1.016
peak= 3.137 closest distance to " O HOH Z 379 " = 1.899
peak= 3.130 closest distance to " CG2 VAL A 67 " = 1.041
peak= 3.130 closest distance to " O HOH Z 218 " = 2.273
peak= 3.129 closest distance to " CA GLY A 267 " = 1.280
peak= 3.121 closest distance to " CB ALA A 161 " = 0.911
peak= 3.118 closest distance to " O HOH Z 148 " = 3.281
peak= 3.107 closest distance to " CA LEU A 282 " = 1.101
peak= 3.105 closest distance to " O HOH Z 371 " = 3.281
peak= 3.105 closest distance to " O HOH Z 216 " = 2.505
peak= 3.101 closest distance to " O HOH Z 285 " = 1.601
peak= 3.098 closest distance to " O THR A 31 " = 1.533
peak= 3.093 closest distance to " CD1AILE A 234 " = 0.954
peak= 3.091 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 2.647
peak= 3.087 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 249 " = 0.886
peak= 3.084 closest distance to " CA THR A 221 " = 1.410
peak= 3.080 closest distance to " O ALA A 1 " = 1.667
peak= 3.078 closest distance to " N ASN A 252 " = 1.434
peak= 3.076 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 217 " = 1.620
peak= 3.071 closest distance to " O HOH Z 357 " = 1.835
peak= 3.070 closest distance to " CZ3 TRP A 123 " = 1.241
peak= 3.066 closest distance to " CB VAL A 126 " = 1.034
peak= 3.065 closest distance to " O HOH Z 217 " = 1.392
peak= 3.056 closest distance to " CB ALA A 43 " = 0.877
peak= 3.052 closest distance to " N SER A 134 " = 1.370
peak= 3.051 closest distance to " CB ASN A 215 " = 1.089
peak= 3.048 closest distance to " O ASN A 209 " = 1.362
peak= 3.031 closest distance to " CA ALA A 299 " = 0.912
peak= 3.003 closest distance to " O HOH Z 346 " = 1.398
----------holes----------
Number of peaks found at mFobs-DFmodel map (map cutoff=3.00 sigma)= 209
Filter by distance & map next to the model:
mapped sites are within: 0.754 - 5.550
number of sites selected in [dist_min= 0.70, dist_max= 6.00]: 208 from: 209
mapped sites are within: 0.754 - 5.550
peak= -4.488 closest distance to " O HOH Z 266 " = 4.585
peak= -4.433 closest distance to " O HOH Z 377 " = 1.970
peak= -4.433 closest distance to " CD ARG A 156 " = 1.946
peak= -4.315 closest distance to " CB PRO A 243 " = 2.579
peak= -4.276 closest distance to " O PRO A 198 " = 1.275
peak= -4.221 closest distance to " O HOH Z 372 " = 2.440
peak= -4.180 closest distance to " CG GLN A 223 " = 1.888
peak= -4.172 closest distance to " O HOH Z 435 " = 2.782
peak= -4.110 closest distance to " O HOH Z 290 " = 1.168
peak= -4.072 closest distance to " O HOH Z 198 " = 1.997
peak= -4.072 closest distance to " O HOH Z 407 " = 3.219
peak= -4.032 closest distance to " CZ3 TRP A 179 " = 1.166
peak= -4.019 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 59 " = 1.536
peak= -3.999 closest distance to " O HOH Z 389 " = 1.865
peak= -3.998 closest distance to " SG CYS A 254 " = 3.244
peak= -3.991 closest distance to " C HIS A 108 " = 1.039
peak= -3.964 closest distance to " OG BSER A 134 " = 1.188
peak= -3.923 closest distance to " CE MET A 105 " = 2.246
peak= -3.906 closest distance to " O HOH Z 351 " = 1.454
peak= -3.905 closest distance to " O HOH Z 231 " = 2.049
peak= -3.904 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 45 " = 1.117
peak= -3.900 closest distance to " O VAL A 67 " = 2.670
peak= -3.894 closest distance to " O HOH Z 185 " = 2.133
peak= -3.893 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 187 " = 1.549
peak= -3.862 closest distance to " O HOH Z 52 " = 1.355
peak= -3.859 closest distance to " N ALA A 43 " = 2.460
peak= -3.852 closest distance to " O HOH Z 43 " = 1.646
peak= -3.852 closest distance to " CA GLY A 98 " = 1.927
peak= -3.850 closest distance to " O HOH Z 353 " = 2.154
peak= -3.847 closest distance to " CE2 TYR A 30 " = 2.841
peak= -3.842 closest distance to " CG MET A 105 " = 0.950
peak= -3.839 closest distance to " CA GLY A 203 " = 2.295
peak= -3.834 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 1.825
peak= -3.832 closest distance to " CB ALA A 291 " = 2.177
peak= -3.812 closest distance to " CB ASN A 39 " = 2.227
peak= -3.806 closest distance to " O ARG A 145 " = 1.544
peak= -3.799 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 112 " = 2.891
peak= -3.795 closest distance to " O HOH Z 313 " = 2.016
peak= -3.790 closest distance to " CE2 PHE A 218 " = 2.506
peak= -3.768 closest distance to " O PRO A 163 " = 1.916
peak= -3.766 closest distance to " CD1 PHE A 59 " = 1.835
peak= -3.719 closest distance to " O ILE A 109 " = 2.614
peak= -3.717 closest distance to " N SER A 212 " = 1.765
peak= -3.713 closest distance to " O ALA A 161 " = 1.512
peak= -3.707 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 45 " = 1.592
peak= -3.698 closest distance to " O HOH Z 388 " = 2.002
peak= -3.695 closest distance to " OD1 ASP A 191 " = 1.818
peak= -3.692 closest distance to " O HOH Z 152 " = 5.166
peak= -3.684 closest distance to " CG ASP A 231 " = 0.778
peak= -3.673 closest distance to " O VAL A 67 " = 2.695
peak= -3.656 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 148 " = 1.634
peak= -3.640 closest distance to " CG PHE A 283 " = 2.771
peak= -3.639 closest distance to " CZ TYR A 169 " = 1.586
peak= -3.636 closest distance to " C ALA A 158 " = 1.313
peak= -3.629 closest distance to " O VAL A 153 " = 2.270
peak= -3.619 closest distance to " O SER A 135 " = 1.456
peak= -3.615 closest distance to " N GLN A 58 " = 1.720
peak= -3.610 closest distance to " CB TYR A 15 " = 2.141
peak= -3.607 closest distance to " CD ARG A 139 " = 1.485
peak= -3.595 closest distance to " O HOH Z 118 " = 2.983
peak= -3.587 closest distance to " N ASP A 286 " = 2.450
peak= -3.583 closest distance to " O TYR A 247 " = 2.823
peak= -3.579 closest distance to " CB CYS A 254 " = 2.164
peak= -3.574 closest distance to " O HOH Z 13 " = 1.437
peak= -3.567 closest distance to " O HOH Z 102 " = 1.654
peak= -3.559 closest distance to " O HOH Z 168 " = 1.933
peak= -3.559 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 1.206
peak= -3.553 closest distance to " CZ BARG A 275 " = 1.869
peak= -3.537 closest distance to " CG ARG A 269 " = 2.526
peak= -3.526 closest distance to " O HOH Z 98 " = 2.321
peak= -3.514 closest distance to " O HOH Z 385 " = 2.004
peak= -3.510 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 228 " = 2.243
peak= -3.501 closest distance to " O GLY A 211 " = 1.400
peak= -3.496 closest distance to " O HOH Z 24 " = 1.388
peak= -3.496 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 101 " = 2.414
peak= -3.487 closest distance to " OXT GLY A 302 " = 2.805
peak= -3.480 closest distance to " C LEU A 143 " = 1.246
peak= -3.480 closest distance to " CB ALA A 291 " = 2.357
peak= -3.471 closest distance to " CB ASP A 132 " = 2.286
peak= -3.466 closest distance to " O ALA A 180 " = 1.243
peak= -3.465 closest distance to " O HOH Z 198 " = 1.512
peak= -3.456 closest distance to " NH1 ARG A 195 " = 2.606
peak= -3.452 closest distance to " NH2AARG A 275 " = 5.387
peak= -3.451 closest distance to " C LEU A 222 " = 0.754
peak= -3.450 closest distance to " O HOH Z 93 " = 2.236
peak= -3.445 closest distance to " OE1 GLN A 88 " = 1.133
peak= -3.431 closest distance to " NH1AARG A 275 " = 1.768
peak= -3.430 closest distance to " O HOH Z 38 " = 1.611
peak= -3.430 closest distance to " O HOH Z 191 " = 5.550
peak= -3.428 closest distance to " OD1 ASP A 191 " = 1.436
peak= -3.425 closest distance to " O HOH Z 211 " = 1.577
peak= -3.422 closest distance to " CB PRO A 163 " = 2.548
peak= -3.419 closest distance to " O HOH Z 11 " = 1.868
peak= -3.419 closest distance to " CE3 TRP A 274 " = 2.397
peak= -3.411 closest distance to " OG SER A 97 " = 2.087
peak= -3.405 closest distance to " O ALA A 34 " = 2.597
peak= -3.404 closest distance to " CD2 PHE A 192 " = 2.016
peak= -3.398 closest distance to " CB TRP A 85 " = 2.401
peak= -3.394 closest distance to " O TRP A 70 " = 1.437
peak= -3.391 closest distance to " O GLY A 196 " = 1.034
peak= -3.378 closest distance to " CA ASP A 27 " = 2.450
peak= -3.373 closest distance to " CB ALA A 248 " = 1.976
peak= -3.353 closest distance to " CB ALA A 43 " = 2.474
peak= -3.350 closest distance to " CD ARG A 36 " = 1.962
peak= -3.346 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 249 " = 2.110
peak= -3.332 closest distance to " O HOH Z 417 " = 2.469
peak= -3.331 closest distance to " CB CYS A 201 " = 2.550
peak= -3.329 closest distance to " CA TRP A 70 " = 2.436
peak= -3.326 closest distance to " OXT GLY A 302 " = 3.447
peak= -3.321 closest distance to " OG BSER A 134 " = 1.615
peak= -3.320 closest distance to " CG2 VAL A 189 " = 1.998
peak= -3.317 closest distance to " OG SER A 87 " = 1.385
peak= -3.316 closest distance to " O HOH Z 250 " = 1.462
peak= -3.316 closest distance to " O HOH Z 281 " = 2.759
peak= -3.316 closest distance to " O HOH Z 309 " = 2.449
peak= -3.310 closest distance to " O HOH Z 324 " = 2.092
peak= -3.308 closest distance to " CE3 TRP A 123 " = 1.263
peak= -3.303 closest distance to " CA ARG A 139 " = 1.061
peak= -3.302 closest distance to " CB ALA A 131 " = 1.941
peak= -3.299 closest distance to " CG GLN A 88 " = 0.826
peak= -3.298 closest distance to " O HOH Z 10 " = 1.458
peak= -3.296 closest distance to " CG TRP A 266 " = 1.798
peak= -3.293 closest distance to " N SER A 276 " = 1.183
peak= -3.288 closest distance to " CB ILE A 33 " = 2.941
peak= -3.287 closest distance to " O HOH Z 266 " = 5.020
peak= -3.286 closest distance to " O PRO A 243 " = 2.503
peak= -3.273 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 197 " = 2.237
peak= -3.271 closest distance to " O VAL A 189 " = 2.482
peak= -3.271 closest distance to " O HOH Z 65 " = 1.307
peak= -3.268 closest distance to " CB ASP A 132 " = 2.195
peak= -3.266 closest distance to " CA TRP A 274 " = 1.517
peak= -3.266 closest distance to " O HOH Z 90 " = 2.746
peak= -3.261 closest distance to " O ASP A 162 " = 2.260
peak= -3.254 closest distance to " N ALA A 248 " = 1.558
peak= -3.253 closest distance to " CE LYS A 76 " = 2.735
peak= -3.252 closest distance to " N GLN A 122 " = 1.444
peak= -3.251 closest distance to " O VAL A 197 " = 1.404
peak= -3.246 closest distance to " N THR A 235 " = 1.303
peak= -3.242 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 88 " = 1.954
peak= -3.242 closest distance to " O GLN A 240 " = 2.031
peak= -3.240 closest distance to " CE MET A 93 " = 1.189
peak= -3.237 closest distance to " O HOH Z 168 " = 1.818
peak= -3.235 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 171 " = 1.738
peak= -3.234 closest distance to " O HOH Z 385 " = 1.964
peak= -3.234 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 191 " = 1.495
peak= -3.233 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 143 " = 2.570
peak= -3.233 closest distance to " CB ASP A 286 " = 2.211
peak= -3.232 closest distance to " O ASN A 249 " = 1.449
peak= -3.226 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 263 " = 2.303
peak= -3.223 closest distance to " CA GLY A 241 " = 2.222
peak= -3.220 closest distance to " O HOH Z 359 " = 3.204
peak= -3.219 closest distance to " O HOH Z 166 " = 1.492
peak= -3.219 closest distance to " O HOH Z 351 " = 1.685
peak= -3.216 closest distance to " CB ALA A 7 " = 2.086
peak= -3.213 closest distance to " O HOH Z 322 " = 1.573
peak= -3.213 closest distance to " CE3 TRP A 150 " = 2.019
peak= -3.210 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 250 " = 2.600
peak= -3.209 closest distance to " OH TYR A 169 " = 1.016
peak= -3.208 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 79 " = 1.886
peak= -3.207 closest distance to " SG ACYS A 201 " = 2.029
peak= -3.205 closest distance to " O HOH Z 417 " = 2.753
peak= -3.204 closest distance to " OG SER A 62 " = 1.635
peak= -3.201 closest distance to " O HOH Z 390 " = 2.432
peak= -3.199 closest distance to " O SER A 62 " = 1.977
peak= -3.198 closest distance to " O HOH Z 210 " = 1.055
peak= -3.195 closest distance to " N THR A 157 " = 1.464
peak= -3.192 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 171 " = 2.303
peak= -3.186 closest distance to " O HOH Z 266 " = 4.357
peak= -3.186 closest distance to " CA GLY A 133 " = 1.969
peak= -3.186 closest distance to " OH TYR A 214 " = 1.204
peak= -3.179 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 2.507
peak= -3.178 closest distance to " CD GLN A 58 " = 1.123
peak= -3.176 closest distance to " O HOH Z 350 " = 1.729
peak= -3.173 closest distance to " CG PRO A 163 " = 2.506
peak= -3.173 closest distance to " CD2 TYR A 293 " = 2.003
peak= -3.168 closest distance to " CZ2 TRP A 179 " = 2.291
peak= -3.165 closest distance to " O VAL A 174 " = 2.080
peak= -3.160 closest distance to " O HOH Z 137 " = 1.541
peak= -3.158 closest distance to " O HOH Z 97 " = 1.722
peak= -3.155 closest distance to " CB ALA A 248 " = 2.396
peak= -3.154 closest distance to " O GLY A 203 " = 2.466
peak= -3.150 closest distance to " OD1 ASP A 171 " = 1.565
peak= -3.149 closest distance to " O HOH Z 244 " = 2.041
peak= -3.146 closest distance to " CD GLU A 236 " = 1.061
peak= -3.146 closest distance to " OD1 ASP A 200 " = 1.408
peak= -3.134 closest distance to " O HOH Z 63 " = 1.483
peak= -3.125 closest distance to " O PRO A 198 " = 1.274
peak= -3.121 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 252 " = 1.583
peak= -3.115 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 300 " = 2.819
peak= -3.102 closest distance to " CG GLU A 277 " = 1.195
peak= -3.102 closest distance to " O SER A 22 " = 2.366
peak= -3.093 closest distance to " CA GLY A 241 " = 3.143
peak= -3.091 closest distance to " O HOH Z 423 " = 1.173
peak= -3.091 closest distance to " O HOH Z 222 " = 1.175
peak= -3.088 closest distance to " CG GLU A 152 " = 1.198
peak= -3.082 closest distance to " CD1 ILE A 199 " = 2.592
peak= -3.080 closest distance to " O HOH Z 361 " = 3.388
peak= -3.072 closest distance to " C MET A 188 " = 1.518
peak= -3.068 closest distance to " O HOH Z 28 " = 2.057
peak= -3.066 closest distance to " O HOH Z 128 " = 2.459
peak= -3.060 closest distance to " CD1 TYR A 247 " = 2.546
peak= -3.058 closest distance to " O HOH Z 111 " = 2.377
peak= -3.054 closest distance to " O HOH Z 348 " = 1.730
peak= -3.052 closest distance to " CZ2 TRP A 150 " = 2.221
peak= -3.048 closest distance to " CG ARG A 269 " = 2.032
peak= -3.045 closest distance to " O ASN A 209 " = 1.783
peak= -3.044 closest distance to " O HOH Z 170 " = 1.889
peak= -3.003 closest distance to " CD GLN A 223 " = 1.361
================= overall refinement statistics: step by step =================
****************** REFINEMENT STATISTICS STEP BY STEP ******************
leading digit, like 1_, means number of macro-cycle
0 : statistics at the very beginning when nothing is done yet
1_bss: bulk solvent correction and/or (anisotropic) scaling
1_xyz: refinement of coordinates
1_adp: refinement of ADPs (Atomic Displacement Parameters)
1_occ: refinement of individual occupancies
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R-factors, x-ray target values and norm of gradient of x-ray target
stage r-work r-free xray_target_w xray_target_t
0 : 0.3738 0.3727 6.139405e+00 6.135005e+00
1_bss: 0.3627 0.3625 6.127992e+00 6.112784e+00
1_xyz: 0.2065 0.2327 5.641615e+00 5.746951e+00
1_adp: 0.1909 0.2416 5.603276e+00 5.785078e+00
1_occ: 0.1904 0.2417 5.601773e+00 5.784177e+00
2_bss: 0.1892 0.2395 5.598196e+00 5.778399e+00
2_xyz: 0.1379 0.1831 5.314621e+00 5.531772e+00
2_adp: 0.1271 0.1699 5.238038e+00 5.458328e+00
2_occ: 0.1269 0.1698 5.237559e+00 5.458135e+00
3_bss: 0.1270 0.1699 5.237769e+00 5.457963e+00
3_xyz: 0.1152 0.1574 5.155451e+00 5.388866e+00
3_adp: 0.1132 0.1553 5.140030e+00 5.375324e+00
3_occ: 0.1131 0.1552 5.139857e+00 5.375417e+00
4_bss: 0.1130 0.1551 5.139482e+00 5.375267e+00
4_xyz: 0.1081 0.1532 5.111278e+00 5.360776e+00
4_adp: 0.1081 0.1530 5.111345e+00 5.359966e+00
4_occ: 0.1080 0.1530 5.111328e+00 5.360235e+00
5_bss: 0.1080 0.1530 5.111345e+00 5.360260e+00
5_xyz: 0.1107 0.1541 5.128574e+00 5.369069e+00
5_adp: 0.1098 0.1554 5.129665e+00 5.376699e+00
5_occ: 0.1098 0.1554 5.129621e+00 5.376675e+00
5_bss: 0.1098 0.1555 5.129699e+00 5.376727e+00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage k_sol b_sol b11 b22 b33 b12 b13 b23
0 : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_bss: 0.330 39.443 -1.640 -0.507 0.721 -0.000 0.000 0.000
1_xyz: 0.330 39.443 -1.640 -0.507 0.721 -0.000 0.000 0.000
1_adp: 0.330 39.443 -1.640 -0.507 0.721 -0.000 0.000 0.000
1_occ: 0.330 39.443 -1.640 -0.507 0.721 -0.000 0.000 0.000
2_bss: 0.324 39.443 -2.236 -2.286 -1.235 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
2_xyz: 0.324 39.443 -2.236 -2.286 -1.235 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
2_adp: 0.324 39.443 -2.236 -2.286 -1.235 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
2_occ: 0.324 39.443 -2.236 -2.286 -1.235 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_bss: 0.323 43.155 -2.236 -2.286 -1.235 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_xyz: 0.323 43.155 -2.236 -2.286 -1.235 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_adp: 0.323 43.155 -2.236 -2.286 -1.235 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_occ: 0.323 43.155 -2.236 -2.286 -1.235 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_bss: 0.323 43.155 -2.308 -2.496 -1.584 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_xyz: 0.323 43.155 -2.308 -2.496 -1.584 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_adp: 0.323 43.155 -2.308 -2.496 -1.584 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_occ: 0.323 43.155 -2.308 -2.496 -1.584 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_bss: 0.323 43.155 -2.182 -2.422 -1.515 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_xyz: 0.323 43.155 -2.182 -2.422 -1.515 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_adp: 0.323 43.155 -2.182 -2.422 -1.515 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_occ: 0.323 43.155 -2.182 -2.422 -1.515 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_bss: 0.323 43.138 -1.996 -2.262 -1.366 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage <pher> fom alpha beta
0 : 40.157 0.6432 0.8374 40596.746
1_bss: 38.898 0.6559 0.8421 37142.977
1_xyz: 22.302 0.8410 1.0043 14052.408
1_adp: 23.712 0.8259 0.9919 15280.072
1_occ: 23.696 0.8259 0.9913 15232.373
2_bss: 23.490 0.8277 0.9430 14941.782
2_xyz: 17.237 0.8870 0.9842 8499.592
2_adp: 15.401 0.9034 0.9899 7364.687
2_occ: 15.393 0.9034 0.9898 7355.532
3_bss: 15.380 0.9035 0.9896 7351.530
3_xyz: 13.965 0.9150 0.9931 6275.188
3_adp: 13.642 0.9178 0.9897 6116.884
3_occ: 13.644 0.9178 0.9896 6115.371
4_bss: 13.637 0.9179 0.9820 6114.078
4_xyz: 13.333 0.9202 0.9828 5918.502
4_adp: 13.287 0.9207 0.9793 5916.505
4_occ: 13.293 0.9206 0.9792 5919.493
5_bss: 13.293 0.9206 0.9824 5920.731
5_xyz: 13.436 0.9197 0.9814 6019.903
5_adp: 13.603 0.9184 0.9757 6098.804
5_occ: 13.604 0.9184 0.9756 6099.169
5_bss: 13.606 0.9184 0.9809 6100.797
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu geom_target
0 : 1.822 0.010 0.101 15.968 0.009 4.110 1.6386e-01
1_bss: 1.822 0.010 0.101 15.968 0.009 4.110 1.6386e-01
1_xyz: 1.134 0.008 0.074 15.061 0.005 4.107 7.3670e-02
1_adp: 1.134 0.008 0.074 15.061 0.005 4.107 7.3670e-02
1_occ: 1.134 0.008 0.074 15.061 0.005 4.107 7.3670e-02
2_bss: 1.134 0.008 0.074 15.061 0.005 4.107 7.3670e-02
2_xyz: 0.964 0.006 0.069 14.233 0.004 4.113 5.3248e-02
2_adp: 0.964 0.006 0.069 14.233 0.004 4.113 5.3248e-02
2_occ: 0.964 0.006 0.069 14.233 0.004 4.113 5.3248e-02
3_bss: 0.964 0.006 0.069 14.233 0.004 4.113 5.3248e-02
3_xyz: 0.935 0.006 0.070 14.390 0.004 4.114 5.2891e-02
3_adp: 0.935 0.006 0.070 14.390 0.004 4.114 5.2891e-02
3_occ: 0.935 0.006 0.070 14.390 0.004 4.114 5.2891e-02
4_bss: 0.935 0.006 0.070 14.390 0.004 4.114 5.2891e-02
4_xyz: 1.013 0.007 0.074 14.619 0.004 4.115 6.0548e-02
4_adp: 1.013 0.007 0.074 14.619 0.004 4.115 6.0548e-02
4_occ: 1.013 0.007 0.074 14.619 0.004 4.115 6.0548e-02
5_bss: 1.013 0.007 0.074 14.619 0.004 4.115 6.0548e-02
5_xyz: 0.878 0.005 0.066 14.268 0.003 4.115 4.8158e-02
5_adp: 0.878 0.005 0.066 14.268 0.003 4.115 4.8158e-02
5_occ: 0.878 0.005 0.066 14.268 0.003 4.115 4.8158e-02
5_bss: 0.878 0.005 0.066 14.268 0.003 4.115 4.8158e-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximal deviations:
stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu |grad|
0 : 9.874 0.070 0.314 85.889 0.055 1.806 2.3962e-01
1_bss: 9.874 0.070 0.314 85.889 0.055 1.806 2.3962e-01
1_xyz: 8.107 0.039 0.365 85.866 0.049 2.295 1.0097e-01
1_adp: 8.107 0.039 0.365 85.866 0.049 2.295 1.0097e-01
1_occ: 8.107 0.039 0.365 85.866 0.049 2.295 1.0097e-01
2_bss: 8.107 0.039 0.365 85.866 0.049 2.295 1.0097e-01
2_xyz: 8.280 0.045 0.231 83.414 0.039 2.345 4.6090e-02
2_adp: 8.280 0.045 0.231 83.414 0.039 2.345 4.6090e-02
2_occ: 8.280 0.045 0.231 83.414 0.039 2.345 4.6090e-02
3_bss: 8.280 0.045 0.231 83.414 0.039 2.345 4.6090e-02
3_xyz: 7.880 0.041 0.214 84.409 0.033 2.330 3.7429e-02
3_adp: 7.880 0.041 0.214 84.409 0.033 2.330 3.7429e-02
3_occ: 7.880 0.041 0.214 84.409 0.033 2.330 3.7429e-02
4_bss: 7.880 0.041 0.214 84.409 0.033 2.330 3.7429e-02
4_xyz: 7.298 0.039 0.229 83.716 0.040 2.284 4.5540e-02
4_adp: 7.298 0.039 0.229 83.716 0.040 2.284 4.5540e-02
4_occ: 7.298 0.039 0.229 83.716 0.040 2.284 4.5540e-02
5_bss: 7.298 0.039 0.229 83.716 0.040 2.284 4.5540e-02
5_xyz: 7.180 0.041 0.205 84.110 0.035 2.356 2.8318e-02
5_adp: 7.180 0.041 0.205 84.110 0.035 2.356 2.8318e-02
5_occ: 7.180 0.041 0.205 84.110 0.035 2.356 2.8318e-02
5_bss: 7.180 0.041 0.205 84.110 0.035 2.356 2.8318e-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|-----overall-----|---macromolecule----|------solvent-------|
stage b_max b_min b_ave b_max b_min b_ave b_max b_min b_ave
0 : 63.06 5.09 16.02 49.51 5.09 12.19 63.06 6.19 36.87
1_bss: 63.06 5.09 16.02 49.51 5.09 12.19 63.06 6.19 36.87
1_xyz: 63.06 5.09 16.02 49.51 5.09 12.19 63.06 6.19 36.87
1_adp: 61.92 0.00 16.94 61.21 0.00 12.97 61.92 5.79 38.55
1_occ: 61.92 0.00 16.94 61.21 0.00 12.97 61.92 5.79 38.55
2_bss: 61.92 0.00 16.94 61.21 0.00 12.97 61.92 5.79 38.55
2_xyz: 61.92 0.00 16.94 61.21 0.00 12.97 61.92 5.79 38.55
2_adp: 74.54 1.20 17.10 74.54 1.20 12.95 73.52 5.69 39.72
2_occ: 74.54 1.20 17.10 74.54 1.20 12.95 73.52 5.69 39.72
3_bss: 74.54 1.20 17.10 74.54 1.20 12.95 73.52 5.69 39.72
3_xyz: 74.54 1.20 17.10 74.54 1.20 12.95 73.52 5.69 39.72
3_adp: 83.95 1.03 17.00 83.95 1.03 12.88 80.18 4.66 39.43
3_occ: 83.95 1.03 17.00 83.95 1.03 12.88 80.18 4.66 39.43
4_bss: 83.95 1.03 17.00 83.95 1.03 12.88 80.18 4.66 39.43
4_xyz: 83.95 1.03 17.00 83.95 1.03 12.88 80.18 4.66 39.43
4_adp: 85.25 1.45 16.66 85.25 1.45 12.74 81.93 5.67 38.00
4_occ: 85.25 1.45 16.66 85.25 1.45 12.74 81.93 5.67 38.00
5_bss: 85.25 1.45 16.66 85.25 1.45 12.74 81.93 5.67 38.00
5_xyz: 85.25 1.45 16.66 85.25 1.45 12.74 81.93 5.67 38.00
5_adp: 92.32 0.53 16.87 92.32 0.53 12.73 85.11 6.21 39.40
5_occ: 92.32 0.53 16.87 92.32 0.53 12.73 85.11 6.21 39.40
5_bss: 92.30 0.51 16.85 92.30 0.51 12.71 85.09 6.19 39.38
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage Deviation of refined
model from start model
max min mean
0 : 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_bss: 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_xyz: 1.514 0.012 0.349
1_adp: 1.514 0.012 0.349
1_occ: 1.514 0.012 0.349
2_bss: 1.514 0.012 0.349
2_xyz: 0.989 0.022 0.431
2_adp: 0.989 0.022 0.431
2_occ: 0.989 0.022 0.431
3_bss: 0.989 0.022 0.431
3_xyz: 0.891 0.040 0.466
3_adp: 0.891 0.040 0.466
3_occ: 0.891 0.040 0.466
4_bss: 0.891 0.040 0.466
4_xyz: 0.976 0.047 0.484
4_adp: 0.976 0.047 0.484
4_occ: 0.976 0.047 0.484
5_bss: 0.976 0.047 0.484
5_xyz: 1.024 0.047 0.487
5_adp: 1.024 0.047 0.487
5_occ: 1.024 0.047 0.487
5_bss: 1.024 0.047 0.487
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU time actual refinement: 326.43
============================== Exporting results ==============================
Writing refined structure to PDB file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_882/model_refine_001.pdb
n_use = 2823
n_use_u_iso = 2823
n_use_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_site = 0
n_grad_u_iso = 0
n_grad_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_occupancy = 106
n_grad_fp = 0
n_grad_fdp = 0
n_anisotropic_flag = 0
total number of scatterers = 2823
Writing 2mFobs-DFmodel XPLOR map to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_882/model_refine_001_2mFobs-DFmodel.map
Writing mFobs-DFmodel XPLOR map to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_882/model_refine_001_mFobs-DFmodel.map
Writing map coefficients to MTZ file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_882/model_refine_001_map_coeffs.mtz
Writing default parameters for subsequent refinement:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_882/model_refine_002.def
=============================== Detailed timings ==============================
Pure refinement (no I/O, processing, etc)= 326.29
Macro-tasks:
bulk solvent and scale = 40.20
individual site refinement = 132.99
weights calculation = 29.94
collect and process = 6.78
model show statistics = 0.09
TOTAL for macro-tasks = 210.00
Micro-tasks:
mask = 1.13
f_calc = 104.11
alpha_beta = 8.40
target = 1.22
gradients_wrt_atomic_parameters = 108.42
fmodel = 6.76
r_factors = 0.20
phase_errors = 12.03
foms = 0.27
TOTAL for micro-tasks = 242.54
NUMBER OF MASK CALCS= 3
Time per interpreted Python bytecode instruction: 4.625 micro seconds
Total CPU time: 5.66 minutes
from_scatterers_fft: 640 calls, 103.54 s
gradients_fft: 585 calls, 96.89 s
=========================== phenix.refine: finished ===========================
# Date 2008-01-16 Time 05:53:21 PST -0800 (1200491601.10 s)
Start R-work = 0.3738, R-free = 0.3727 (no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale)
Final R-work = 0.1341, R-free = 0.1751 (no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale)
Start R-work = 0.3627, R-free = 0.3625
Final R-work = 0.1098, R-free = 0.1555
| en |
markdown | 290394 | # Presentation: 290394
## Thomas A. Kirk, Jr., Ph.D., Commissioner
Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services
A Healthcare Service Agency
June 2006
- Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services
*A Healthcare Service Agency*
*June 2006*
- CONNECTICUT**ACCESS TO RECOVERY**
- Federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration**National Advisory Council**
## Getting Started
**Getting Started**
**Notes:**
Hi, My name is TAK. I’m Commissioner of MH&AS for the State of Connecticut. Today, I’m going to present some of the exciting developments taking place in establishing best practices and innovative programs for people with serious mental illness. Because I come from an organization that also addresses the needs of people with serious substance use disorders, and because people with serious mental illness often have problems with substance use, and because the risk associated with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders is so great, I’m going to take the liberty of discussing both.
I’d like to begin by providing several elements of context First, why should we concern ourselves with best practices and program innovations? Is it because new is better? Its it because old isn’t good enough? Of course there are a lot of reasons – the ones you choose will depend on your unique perspective. If you’re a person with SMI or a member of their family, you want to get better, or have your loved one recover. If you’re a practitioner, you’ve got an ethical and professional responsibility to provide the best care. If you’re a Commissioner like me, you have responsibility for promoting recovery for as many people as possible by providing quality services within a system of care– Care that offers the greatest value to the consumer and the taxpayer. If you’re a legislature you also care about the tax dollar and you want the best possible outcome for each dollar spent – Like me, you’re concerned about value.
My point here is that for me, implementing best practices isn’t just about doing something new and innovative. There are always new things – tomorrow there will be a new innovation - it’s really about something more fundamental and important – it’s about using best practices and innovative programs as instruments of change, as a way of transforming a system of care, as a means of engaging service practitioners and keeping them on their toes, and as a way of involving consumers, family members, advocates and legislators in moving toward a value-driven, recovery-oriented system of care. For me that’s what it’s about. Using best practices and innovative programs can help to achieve this higher purpose. Today we’ll look at some examples, some have been developed under the auspices of the federal government, and some are homebrewed by the states.
The next element of context I’d like to cover involves providing some background about serious mental illness. I know that you covered some of this yesterday. I hope this won’t be redundant, but it is important to understand the relationship between the disorders we’re treating and the practices we’re developing.
## We are a healthcare service agency.
**Promote health**
**Recover and **
**sustain health**
**through prevention and early intervention services.**
**through treatment and recovery support services.**
## Doesn’t anybody ever get better?
**“****a chronic, relapsing disease”**
**“****severe persistent mental illness”**
**Doesn’t anybody ever get better?**
**What message are we conveying?**
## Substance Abuse as too often viewed by the funder and/or service provider
**Severe**
**Remission**
**Notes:**
Now let’s look at what happens in most forms of treatment.
Typically, the provider of mental health services begins to see the client when symptoms are very pronounced and the client is experiencing intense distress. In other words, they’re in the Acute Phase. Treatment is designed to reduce symptoms and distress. So, the client enters treatment here (point to graphic) and is discharged here.
## Service Response
- Acute symptoms
- Discontinuous treatment
- Crisis management
**Severe**
**Remission**
**Notes:**
Because the illness is persistent and recurring and the interventions of the treatment system tend to be in play only during the acute phase the so-called negative symptoms aren’t being addressed. Despite the fact that the illness is persistent with different symptoms at different points in time, treatment lacks continuity, not only temporal continuity, but also continuity of care giver, and is crisis oriented.
Again, symptoms occurring during the quiescent phase that can be extremely disabling are not addressed.
## Recovery-oriented response
**Severe**
**Remission**
**Notes:**
How should the system respond to minimize crises & enhance recovery?
## Many Paths to Recovery
- Many Paths to Recovery
**Notes:**
Connecticut, was one of 14 states plus selected for this competitive federal grant. We’ll $22.8 million over 3 years. People funded under ATR have a great deal of control over services they receive because it involves the use of vouchers to pay for services.
ATR covers traditional addiction treatment and rehabilitation, but it also covers non-traditional supports, such as sober houses, transportation, faith-based supports and vocational services that we can’t fund using traditional mechanisms.
For example, we know from research, and from the experiences of professionals and people in recovery, that having a job can be pivotal to recovery. A job can help to consolidate and sustain a person’s recovery by providing a focal-point in their life. So, if a person has a clearly established interest in a career path, we can help them to get there. We’ve sent people to be trained as certified nursing assistants, dieticians, and even cosmetologists. We’ve also learned that for some people, faith-based supports are helpful to recovery. Recognition of the role spirituality in recovery and of a “Higher Power” is ingrained within the AA tradition. Faith-based supports can also be useful for people with serious mental illness. Because of the flexibility of ATR program, we are able to reach populations that have been difficult to engage in treatment. The role of faith-based supports can be particularly helpful in reaching out to diverse racial/cultural communities.
## DMHAS APPROACH
## How Does ATR Fit Into CT’s Larger Picture?
- ATR is not just another program, it represents a significant investment in the promotion and enhancement of the Department’s overarching goal of a recovery-oriented system of care
- ATR builds upon a combination of previously undertaken steps and programs
## Connecticut’s ATR Model
- High degree of collaboration with other targeted state agencies
- Five regional networks - a total of 36 clinical and 130 recovery providers (including peer and faith-based) to ensure client choice
- One lead agency in each network assisting with implementation, certification of providers, auditing, etc.
## Collaborative Agencies & Programs
- Department of Correction
- Judicial Branch
- Department of Children and Families
- Department of Social Services
- Primary Healthcare Sites (Hospital ED & FQHC Sites)
- DMHAS-funded Outreach &
- Engagement Urban Initiatives
## Clinical Services
- Evaluation
- Brief Treatment
- Ambulatory Detoxification
- Intensive Outpatient (IOP)
- Methadone Maintenance
- Recently implemented: an evidenced based model of IOP for individuals using cocaine and/or methamphetamines
## Recovery Support Services
- Short-term Housing
- Case Management
- Childcare
- Transportation
- Vocational/Educational Services
- Basic Needs (food, clothing, personal care)
- Faith-based Services
- Peer-based Services
**Two thirds**** of CT’s ATR service budget is invested in Recovery Support Services, not clinical services.**
## What are Recovery Support Services?
- Complement the focus of treatment, outreach, engagement, and other strategies and interventions to assist people in establishing an environment supportive of recovery and in gaining the skills and resources needed to initiate and maintain recovery.
- Substance use,
- Symptoms,
- Relapse Triggers
- Recovery Capital
- Treatment Recovery Supports
- +
## Recovery Capital is . . .
** ****“**the quantity and quality of both internal and external resources that a person can bring to bear on the initiation and maintenance of recovery” (W. White, 2006)
- In contrast to people who achieve “natural” recovery (without care), most people with addictive disorders entering treatment have never had much recovery capital or have dramatically depleted such capital by the time they seek help.
## Recovery Support Services aim to:
- remove personal and environmental obstacles to recovery (e.g., through the provision of child care or transportation)
- enhance identification of and participation in the recovery community (e.g., through connecting people to treatment and to 12-step and other mutual support/recovery-oriented groups)
- enhance the person’s “recovery capital” (e.g., by assisting people in addressing their basic needs, gaining employment, going back to school, forming sober social relationships, etc.)
## Year To Date August 3, 2004 – June 11, 2006
- 10,158 Unduplicated Individuals Served
- Year 1 Total Unduplicated Individuals: 106
- Year 2 Total Unduplicated Individuals: 10,032
- Received over 75,000 service level authorizations (clinical and/or recovery support services)
- $10,228,529 total paid claims
## More people working and in housing, less inpatient costs
*Based on a Corporation for Supportive Housing study, these supportive housing units are projected to generate over $140 million in direct and indirect economic benefits for the state. *
* *
**% Working or in training**
**Inpatient costs**
**Notes:**
Here are some results from an evaluation of the impact of stable housing on other aspect of consumer recovery. Look at this. People in the supportive housing units who had a decent place to live and assistance finding work and getting other services they needed, like behavioral health and medical care, were much more likely to find jobs or to become enrolled in job training, and showed an equally dramatic decline in inpatient usage.
## Putting People to Work
** ****Enhancing Employment and Self-Sufficiency through **
**Vocational Rehabilitation**
*The likelihood that a person served by DMHAS will become gainfully employed is more than doubled when he/she receives vocational rehabilitation.*
**It pays!! **
**Notes:**
Here is an example of some evidence from our work in Connecticut that supports using Supported Employment. In these data we can see that the likelihood that a consumer will become gainfully employed more than doubles if the person is receiving vocational services. Work is at the heart of recovery and contributes to the persons self esteem and sense of control over their environment. It also opens the possibility of enhanced social relationships and helps provide the person with spending money to support social activities. The data presented here are from an administrative database, not from a study using random assignment of subjects in experimental and control groups. But does anyone doubt that vocational services contributed to the results??
## Client Vignettes
**“****Mary”** prior to discharge from York Correctional Institute for Women, met with an ATR case manager to review discharge plans. “Mary”, through informed choice, selected an intensive outpatient program from a list of providers and a faith-based housing provider from a list of housing providers. Additionally, the ATR case manager assisted “Mary” with transportation from the correctional facility to her housing provider. Once in the community, the housing provider submitted a request on behalf of “Mary” for food, clothing, personal care items and bus passes to attend her IOP program and look for employment.
## “Jim” was referred from the Judicial Branch-Probation Division, with a history of crack, cocaine, and alcohol abuse. As an important milestone in his recovery, he was returning to work as an electrical contractor. ATR paid for textbooks required for the Electrical Code Review Contractor Course and for the course itself. ATR also assisted “Jim” in purchasing the electrical contractor tools required for employment.
- Client Vignettes
## “Karen” has been receiving substance abuse treatment funded by non-ATR sources since May 2005. She is becoming self-sufficient and is now in classes at the Stone Academy, with ATR covering textbook costs.
“Frank” requested and is receiving ATR financial assistance to cover the cost of a Faith-based Men's Retreat where people support each other in their recovery.
“Patti” is attending Hairdressing school, requested and received ATR assistance in purchasing hairdressing supplies needed for her courses. Her treatment is being funded by the General Assistance funds.
**“****Frank”** requested and is receiving **ATR** financial assistance to cover the cost of a Faith-based Men's Retreat where people support each other in their recovery.
**“****Patti”** is attending Hairdressing school, requested and received **ATR** assistance in purchasing hairdressing supplies needed for her courses. Her treatment is being funded by the General Assistance funds.
- Client Vignettes
## Challenges
- Developing administrative infrastructure
- A voucher program requires an agency to have infrastructure to support the necessary administrative processes, including appropriate documentation of delivering the service
- Many grassroots organizations, including faith- based organizations, struggle with the paperwork that is required of a voucher (fee for service) program
## Lessons Learned
- ATR represents a major service system change that takes time and commitment from all entities
- Need to support Recovery Support Service (RSS) providers in building infrastructure to collect and maintain client, program, and administrative level data and documentation
- Some RSS providers over-extended themselves on their ATR business and ignored other potential revenue streams
## ATR’s Impact on the CT System
- Expands clinical continuum of care to include Cocaine/Meth. IOP and Brief Treatment Services
- Expands recovery services continuum to include an array of peer- and faith-based services
- Adds new “non-traditional” provider base (peer- and faith-based)
- Offers extension of ATR processes and services within CT’s General Assistance BHP (I.e, housing provider credentialing application, expansion of basic needs, etc.)
- Helps to improve continuity of care and maximize existing capacity of system.
## Helping People Move into Recovery Zone
- Helping People Move into Recovery Zone
- Improved client outcomes
**Severe**
**Remission**
## NEXT STEPS: SUSTAINING ATR IN CONNECTICUT
- Enhance credentialing process for on-going monitoring of quality of care, performance, and resource efficiency;
- Consider formal regional networks for integrated prevention, intervention, treatment, and recovery support services;
- Determine comparative effectiveness of recovery support services, including a cost effectiveness analysis; and
- Explore the feasibility of expanding recovery support services within its existing General Assistance Behavioral Health and Basic Needs Programs
## In addition to those outcomes already expected by ATR, recovery support services may lead to positive outcomes in the following domains:
- Sense of personal hope for recovery
- Work searches and applications submitted
- Work activities, including volunteer positions
- Educational searches and applications submitted
- Educational activities (academic and alternative educational and skill building pursuits)
- Friendships and social connections
- Time spent in self-selected valued social roles, including giving back to others
- Time spent in self-selected prosocial community-based activities
- Acquisition of symptom/illness self-management skills
## FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
- Thomas A. Kirk, Jr., Ph.D.
- 860-418-6700
- _[Thomas.Kirk@po.state.ct.us](mailto:Thomas.Kirk@po.state.ct.us)_
- www.dmhas.state.ct.us | en |
log-files | 786140 | # Date 2008-01-16 Time 00:27:24 PST -0800 (1200472044.38 s)
#phil __OFF__
Command line arguments: "../24.param" "adp.set_b_iso=10" "sites.shake=0.5" "main.number_of_macro_cycles=5" "--overwrite"
HOST = sunbird.lbl.gov
HOSTTYPE = x86_64-linux
USER = phzwart
PID = 25286
JOB_ID = 5158
SGE_ARCH = lx24-amd64
SGE_TASK_FIRST = 1
SGE_TASK_LAST = 1330
SGE_TASK_ID = 24
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHENIX: Python-based Hierarchical ENvironment for Integrated Xtallography
User: phzwart
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
phenix.refine: Macromolecular Structure Refinement
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phenix developers include:
Paul Adams, Pavel Afonine, Vicent Chen, Ian Davis, Kreshna Gopal,
Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve, Li-Wei Hung, Robert Immormino, Tom Ioerger,
Airlie McCoy, Erik McKee, Nigel Moriarty, Reetal Pai, Randy Read,
Jane Richardson, David Richardson, Tod Romo, Jim Sacchettini,
Nicholas Sauter, Jacob Smith, Laurent Storoni, Tom Terwilliger,
Peter Zwart
Phenix home page:
http://www.phenix-online.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phenix components are copyrighted by:
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Los Alamos National Laboratory
- University of Cambridge
- Duke University
- Texas Agricultural Experiment Station &
Texas Engineering Experiment Station
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major third-party components of Phenix include:
Python, wxwidgets, wxPython, Boost, SCons, Clipper,
CCP4 Monomer Library, CCP4 I/O libraries, PyCifRW, FFTPACK, L-BFGS
Enter phenix.acknowledgments for details.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing inputs. This may take a minute or two.
Command line parameter definitions:
refinement.modify_start_model.adp.set_b_iso = 10
refinement.modify_start_model.sites.shake = 0.5
refinement.main.number_of_macro_cycles = 5
Working crystal symmetry after inspecting all inputs:
Unit cell: (68.4938, 46.2261, 85.0941, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/model.pdb
Monomer Library directory:
"/net/rosie/scratch3/phzwart/CCTBX/Sources/mon_lib"
Total number of atoms: 2823
Number of models: 1
Model: 0
Number of conformers: 2
Conformer: "A"
Number of atoms: 2769
Number of chains: 2
Number of residues, atoms: 302, 2333
Classifications: {'peptide': 302}
Modifications used: {'COO': 1}
Link IDs: {'PTRANS': 7, 'CIS': 1, 'TRANS': 293}
Number of residues, atoms: 436, 436
Classifications: {'water': 436}
Link IDs: {None: 435}
Conformer: "B"
Number of atoms: 2771
Common with "A": 2717
Number of chains: 2
Number of residues, atoms: 302, 2333
Classifications: {'peptide': 302}
Modifications used: {'COO': 1}
Link IDs: {'PTRANS': 7, 'CIS': 1, 'TRANS': 293}
bond proxies already assigned to first conformer: 2332
Number of residues, atoms: 438, 438
Classifications: {'water': 438}
Link IDs: {None: 437}
Time building chain proxies: 3.27, per 1000 atoms: 1.16
================================== X-ray data =================================
F-obs:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:FOBS,SIGMA
R-free flags:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:TEST
Miller array info: /net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:FOBS,SIGMA
Observation type: xray.amplitude
Type of data: double, size=19589
Type of sigmas: double, size=19589
Number of Miller indices: 19589
Anomalous flag: False
Unit cell: (68.4938, 46.2261, 85.0941, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
Systematic absences: 0
Centric reflections: 2427
Resolution range: 14.6593 1.95058
Completeness in resolution range: 0.967693
Completeness with d_max=infinity: 0.964643
Number of F-obs in resolution range: 19589
Number of F-obs <= 0: 0
Refinement resolution range: d_max = 14.6593
d_min = 1.9506
Miller array info: /net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:TEST
Observation type: None
Type of data: int, size=19589
Type of sigmas: None
Number of Miller indices: 19589
Anomalous flag: False
Unit cell: (68.4938, 46.2261, 85.0941, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
Systematic absences: 0
Centric reflections: 2427
Resolution range: 14.6593 1.95058
Completeness in resolution range: 0.967693
Completeness with d_max=infinity: 0.964643
Test (R-free flags) flag value: 1
Number of work/free reflections by resolution:
work free %free
bin 1: 14.6597 - 4.1731 [2132/2159] 1917 215 10.1%
bin 2: 4.1731 - 3.3250 [2036/2052] 1834 202 9.9%
bin 3: 3.3250 - 2.9085 [2030/2049] 1827 203 10.0%
bin 4: 2.9085 - 2.6442 [1984/2014] 1782 202 10.2%
bin 5: 2.6442 - 2.4557 [1993/2012] 1797 196 9.8%
bin 6: 2.4557 - 2.3115 [1975/2000] 1780 195 9.9%
bin 7: 2.3115 - 2.1961 [1970/2004] 1773 197 10.0%
bin 8: 2.1961 - 2.1008 [1941/1972] 1743 198 10.2%
bin 9: 2.1008 - 2.0201 [1947/1988] 1753 194 10.0%
bin 10: 2.0201 - 1.9506 [1581/1993] 1424 157 9.9%
overall 17630 1959 10.0%
Writing MTZ file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/run_24/model_refine_data.mtz
========================== Anomalous scatterer groups =========================
All atoms refined with f_prime=0 and f_double_prime=0.
========================== Set up restraints manager ==========================
Number of disulfides: simple=3, symmetry=0
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 168 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " distance=2.08
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 168 " - " SG BCYS A 201 " distance=1.98
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 254 " - " SG CYS A 260 " distance=2.05
Time building geometry restraints manager: 0.14 seconds
Histogram of bond lengths:
1.21 - 1.38: 943
1.38 - 1.56: 1465
1.56 - 1.73: 7
1.73 - 1.90: 21
1.90 - 2.08: 3
Bond restraints sorted by residual:
atom i - atom j ideal model delta weight residual
" SG CYS A 168 " - " SG BCYS A 201 " 2.031 1.983 0.048 2.50e+03 5.87e+00
" C GLN A 88 " - " N GLN A 89 " 1.329 1.360 -0.031 5.10e+03 4.97e+00
" SG CYS A 168 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " 2.031 2.075 -0.044 2.50e+03 4.89e+00
" CB CYS A 201 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " 1.808 1.738 0.070 9.18e+02 4.46e+00
" C PRO A 198 " - " N ILE A 199 " 1.329 1.301 0.028 5.10e+03 4.10e+00
... (remaining 2434 not shown)
Histogram of nonbonded interaction distances:
0.93 - 1.72: 10
1.72 - 2.52: 99
2.52 - 3.31: 3917
3.31 - 4.11: 9736
4.11 - 4.90: 15474
Warning: very small nonbonded interaction distances.
Nonbonded interactions sorted by model distance:
atom i - atom j model vdw sym.op. j
" O HOH Z 52 " - " O HOH Z 183 " 0.929 3.040 -x+1,y+1/2,-z+1/2
" O HOH Z 37 " - " O HOH Z 416 " 0.935 3.040 -x+1,y-1/2,-z+1/2
" O HOH Z 18 " - " O HOH Z 102 " 1.488 3.040 -x+1,y+1/2,-z+1/2
" O HOH Z 271 " - " O HOH Z 342 " 1.604 3.040 -x+1/2,-y+1,z+1/2
" OE1 GLN A 55 " - " CB ASN A 285 " 1.609 3.440 -x+1,y-1/2,-z+1/2
... (remaining 29231 not shown)
Histogram of dihedral angle deviations from ideal:
0.01 - 17.19: 754
17.19 - 34.36: 62
34.36 - 51.54: 27
51.54 - 68.71: 23
68.71 - 85.89: 4
Dihedral angle restraints sorted by residual:
" CA PHE A 192 "
" CB PHE A 192 "
" CG PHE A 192 "
" CD1 PHE A 192 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
90.00 7.91 82.09 2 2.50e-03 1.68e+01
" N PRO A 54 "
" CG PRO A 54 "
" CD PRO A 54 "
" CB PRO A 54 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
30.00 -27.17 57.17 3 4.44e-03 1.45e+01
" N PRO A 280 "
" CA PRO A 280 "
" CB PRO A 280 "
" CG PRO A 280 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
-25.00 38.44 56.56 3 4.44e-03 1.42e+01
... (remaining 867 not shown)
==================== Fixing bad ADP in input model (if any) ===================
============================== Scattering factors =============================
----------X-ray scattering dictionary----------
Number of scattering types: 4
Type Number sf(0) Gaussians
S 13 15.96 2
O 902 7.97 2
N 437 6.97 2
C 1471 5.97 2
sf(0) = scattering factor at diffraction angle 0.
====================== Modifying start model if requested =====================
Setting all isotropic ADP = 10.000: selected atoms: all (2823)
Shaking sites (RMS = 0.500): selected atoms: all (2823)
==================== Fixing bad ADP in input model (if any) ===================
================== Extract refinement strategy and selections =================
individual_sites = True
rigid_body = False
individual_adp = True
group_adp = False
tls = False
individual_occupancies = True
group_occupancies = False
group_anomalous = False
size = 2823
n_use = 2823
n_use_u_iso = 2823
n_use_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_site = 0
n_grad_u_iso = 0
n_grad_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_occupancy = 0
n_grad_fp = 0
n_grad_fdp = 0
n_anisotropic_flag = 0
total number of scatterers = 2823
==================== Process input NCS or/and find new NCS ====================
Using existing and finding new NCS is disabled.
Use refinement.main.ncs=true to activate it.
Look at refinement.ncs for more NCS related parameters.
=================== Write initial parameters into .eff file ===================
Writing effective parameters to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/run_24/model_refine_001.eff
Writing geometry restraints to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/run_24/model_refine_001.geo
CPU time processing inputs: 11.17
============================ Non-default parameters ===========================
A complete record of all parameters was written to the .eff file above.
Below are only the non-defaults.
#phil __ON__
refinement {
crystal_symmetry {
unit_cell = 68.49375 46.22605 85.09415 90 90 90
space_group = "P 21 21 21"
}
input {
pdb {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/model.pdb"
}
xray_data {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns"
labels = "FOBS,SIGMA"
r_free_flags {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns"
label = "TEST"
test_flag_value = 1
}
}
}
output {
prefix = "model_refine"
serial = 1
}
main {
number_of_macro_cycles = 5
}
modify_start_model {
adp {
set_b_iso = 10
}
sites {
shake = 0.5
}
}
}
#phil __OFF__
============================= ml refinement start =============================
----------structure factors based statistics (before refinement)----------
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.5075 r_free= 0.5009 ksol= 0.00 Bsol= 0.00 scale= 0.791 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.89 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.299540 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 14.6597 - 4.6542 0.99 1383 153 0.4184 0.4210 6.6228 6.6536|
| 2: 4.6542 - 3.7139 0.99 1320 150 0.4466 0.4330 6.8389 6.85|
| 3: 3.7139 - 3.2503 0.99 1315 144 0.4823 0.4636 6.7251 6.7801|
| 4: 3.2503 - 2.9558 0.99 1293 139 0.4935 0.4572 6.5658 6.4947|
| 5: 2.9558 - 2.7454 0.99 1285 143 0.5412 0.5398 6.4003 6.4164|
| 6: 2.7454 - 2.5845 0.99 1277 145 0.5443 0.5625 6.306 6.2356|
| 7: 2.5845 - 2.4557 0.99 1284 144 0.5360 0.5004 6.2658 6.2001|
| 8: 2.4557 - 2.3492 0.98 1278 139 0.5522 0.5449 6.2029 6.2045|
| 9: 2.3492 - 2.2591 0.98 1245 141 0.5314 0.5649 6.1178 6.1656|
| 10: 2.2591 - 2.1814 0.98 1269 139 0.5440 0.5188 6.1333 6.1141|
| 11: 2.1814 - 2.1134 0.99 1266 143 0.5410 0.5810 6.0481 6.11|
| 12: 2.1134 - 2.0532 0.97 1244 136 0.5386 0.5297 5.9865 6.038|
| 13: 2.0532 - 1.9992 0.99 1282 140 0.5574 0.5013 5.9044 5.8506|
| 14: 1.9992 - 1.9506 0.71 889 103 0.5481 0.5198 5.8693 5.7716|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 14.6597 - 4.6542 1383 153 0.62 40.89 0.79 0.67 94238.48|
| 2: 4.6542 - 3.7139 1320 150 0.63 40.95 0.86 0.72 135213.51|
| 3: 3.7139 - 3.2503 1315 144 0.52 50.33 0.85 0.66 141015.07|
| 4: 3.2503 - 2.9558 1293 139 0.44 56.22 0.80 0.56 119985.00|
| 5: 2.9558 - 2.7454 1285 143 0.34 64.11 0.72 0.43 94149.04|
| 6: 2.7454 - 2.5845 1277 145 0.30 67.39 0.71 0.36 81057.30|
| 7: 2.5845 - 2.4557 1284 144 0.22 73.24 0.74 0.27 76766.27|
| 8: 2.4557 - 2.3492 1278 139 0.20 75.06 0.73 0.25 70426.08|
| 9: 2.3492 - 2.2591 1245 141 0.18 76.49 0.72 0.23 66082.28|
| 10: 2.2591 - 2.1814 1269 139 0.23 73.12 0.78 0.28 57111.75|
| 11: 2.1814 - 2.1134 1266 143 0.19 75.78 0.76 0.25 54393.92|
| 12: 2.1134 - 2.0532 1244 136 0.19 75.82 0.76 0.24 49529.67|
| 13: 2.0532 - 1.9992 1282 140 0.16 78.49 0.75 0.21 43229.29|
| 14: 1.9992 - 1.9506 889 103 0.20 75.17 0.74 0.23 33369.30|
|alpha: min = 0.21 max = 0.72 mean = 0.39|
|beta: min = 33369.30 max = 141015.07 mean = 81268.48|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.32|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 89.99 mean = 65.44|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 89.97 mean = 65.72|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
============================== Outliers rejection =============================
basic_wilson_outliers = 0
extreme_wilson_outliers = 0
beamstop_shadow_outliers = 0
total = 0
====================== Target weights (before refinement) =====================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 24.152980 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 83.766 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 2.445389 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 84.430 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------Initial model statistics (before refinement)----------
|-Geometry statistics: start--------------------------------------------------|
| Histogram of deviations from ideal values for |
| Bonds | Angles | Nonbonded contacts |
| 0.000 - 0.140: 597 | 0.009 - 7.457: 713 | 0.942 - 1.338: 5 |
| 0.140 - 0.280: 585 | 7.457 - 14.906: 711 | 1.338 - 1.734: 14 |
| 0.280 - 0.420: 441 | 14.906 - 22.354: 630 | 1.734 - 2.130: 100 |
| 0.420 - 0.560: 366 | 22.354 - 29.802: 474 | 2.130 - 2.525: 487 |
| 0.560 - 0.700: 237 | 29.802 - 37.251: 338 | 2.525 - 2.921: 1281 |
| 0.700 - 0.840: 127 | 37.251 - 44.699: 241 | 2.921 - 3.317: 2490 |
| 0.840 - 0.980: 59 | 44.699 - 52.147: 125 | 3.317 - 3.713: 4057 |
| 0.980 - 1.120: 17 | 52.147 - 59.595: 51 | 3.713 - 4.108: 5368 |
| 1.120 - 1.260: 9 | 59.595 - 67.044: 13 | 4.108 - 4.504: 7024 |
| 1.260 - 1.400: 1 | 67.044 - 74.492: 3 | 4.504 - 4.900: 8394 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-Geometry statistics: start--------------------------------------------------|
| Type | Count | Deviation from ideal | Targets | Target (sum) |
| | | rmsd max min | | |
| bond | 2439 | 0.414 1.400 0.000 | 454.651 | |
| angle | 3299 | 24.226 74.492 0.009 | 193.752 | |
| chirality | 348 | 2.119 6.404 0.009 | 112.240 | 52.530 |
| planarity | 436 | 0.145 0.405 0.000 | 250.485 | |
| dihedral | 870 | 33.790 144.062 0.019 | 20.704 | |
| nonbonded | 2439 | 4.084 4.900 0.942 | 3.628 | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.208)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 10.00 10.00 10.00 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 10.00 10.00 10.00 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 10.00 10.00 10.00 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 10.00 10.00 10.00 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 10.000 - 10.000: 2823 | 5: 10.000 - 10.000: 0 |
| 1: 10.000 - 10.000: 0 | 6: 10.000 - 10.000: 0 |
| 2: 10.000 - 10.000: 0 | 7: 10.000 - 10.000: 0 |
| 3: 10.000 - 10.000: 0 | 8: 10.000 - 10.000: 0 |
| 4: 10.000 - 10.000: 0 | 9: 10.000 - 10.000: 0 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-Occupancies statistics------------------------------------------------------|
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.30 number of occupancies < 0.1 = 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------Modify initial isotropic ADP----------
Randomizing
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.208)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.01 19.99 9.86 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.01 19.99 9.86 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 0.06 19.99 10.10 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.01 19.98 9.82 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.008 - 2.007: 301 | 5: 10.002 - 12.000: 285 |
| 1: 2.007 - 4.006: 276 | 6: 12.000 - 13.999: 292 |
| 2: 4.006 - 6.004: 309 | 7: 13.999 - 15.998: 289 |
| 3: 6.004 - 8.003: 285 | 8: 15.998 - 17.996: 266 |
| 4: 8.003 - 10.002: 251 | 9: 17.996 - 19.995: 269 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 1 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.5105 r_free= 0.5038 ksol= 0.00 Bsol= 0.00 scale= 0.761 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.90 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.300331 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.4977 r_free= 0.4903 ksol= 0.38 Bsol= 0.00 scale= 0.975 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (7.15,8.75,7.53,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 7.81 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.89 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.292591 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 18.281627 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 84.733 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 1.985291 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 81.041 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.4977 final r-factor (work) = 0.4324 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.4903 final r-factor (free) = 0.4521 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 110.0852 = 18.28 * 0.50 * 6.2965 + 1.00 * 52.5296 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 57.1741 = 18.28 * 0.50 * 6.2366 + 1.00 * 0.1661 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 26 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.4324 final r-factor (work) = 0.3894 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.4521 final r-factor (free) = 0.4393 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 12.3959 = 1.99 * 1.00 * 6.2366 + 1.00 * 0.0143 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 12.2940 = 1.99 * 1.00 * 6.1805 + 1.00 * 0.0240 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.208)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 84.36 15.50 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 84.36 15.50 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 0.00 84.36 25.94 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 77.46 13.58 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 8.436: 1019 | 5: 42.182 - 50.618: 82 |
| 1: 8.436 - 16.873: 780 | 6: 50.618 - 59.054: 38 |
| 2: 16.873 - 25.309: 477 | 7: 59.054 - 67.490: 20 |
| 3: 25.309 - 33.745: 262 | 8: 67.490 - 75.927: 5 |
| 4: 33.745 - 42.182: 136 | 9: 75.927 - 84.363: 4 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.3894 r_free = 0.4393 target_work(ml) = 6.166 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.30 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.3890 r_free = 0.4381 target_work(ml) = 6.165 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 13 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 2 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3890 r_free= 0.4381 ksol= 0.38 Bsol= 0.00 scale= 1.107 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (7.15,8.75,7.53,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 7.81 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.64 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.164605 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3872 r_free= 0.4327 ksol= 0.34 Bsol= 20.00 scale= 1.035 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (4.29,5.09,5.31,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 4.90 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.64 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.163866 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 7.627668 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 99.709 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.742610 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 126.561 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.3872 final r-factor (work) = 0.3173 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.4327 final r-factor (free) = 0.3769 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 23.7199 = 7.63 * 0.50 * 6.1759 + 1.00 * 0.1661 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 23.3087 = 7.63 * 0.50 * 6.0873 + 1.00 * 0.0927 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.3173 final r-factor (work) = 0.2995 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.3769 final r-factor (free) = 0.3599 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 4.5534 = 0.74 * 1.00 * 6.0873 + 1.00 * 0.0329 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 4.5005 = 0.74 * 1.00 * 5.9949 + 1.00 * 0.0486 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 16 | number of function evaluations = 17 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.208)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 86.25 15.00 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 86.25 15.00 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 0.00 86.25 30.63 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 84.56 12.13 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 8.625: 1127 | 5: 43.123 - 51.747: 62 |
| 1: 8.625 - 17.249: 810 | 6: 51.747 - 60.372: 32 |
| 2: 17.249 - 25.874: 413 | 7: 60.372 - 68.996: 9 |
| 3: 25.874 - 34.498: 208 | 8: 68.996 - 77.621: 8 |
| 4: 34.498 - 43.123: 151 | 9: 77.621 - 86.246: 3 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.2995 r_free = 0.3599 target_work(ml) = 5.976 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 13 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.2991 r_free = 0.3602 target_work(ml) = 5.976 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 13 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 3 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.2991 r_free= 0.3602 ksol= 0.34 Bsol= 20.00 scale= 1.089 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (4.29,5.09,5.31,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 4.90 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.42 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.975557 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.2963 r_free= 0.3593 ksol= 0.34 Bsol= 37.50 scale= 1.023 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (1.90,2.55,2.94,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 2.46 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.43 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.973335 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 4.133526 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 101.587 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 1.283194 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 94.099 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.2963 final r-factor (work) = 0.2280 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.3593 final r-factor (free) = 0.2874 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 12.4808 = 4.13 * 0.50 * 5.9940 + 1.00 * 0.0927 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 12.2014 = 4.13 * 0.50 * 5.8690 + 1.00 * 0.0717 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 28 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.2280 final r-factor (work) = 0.2035 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.2874 final r-factor (free) = 0.2696 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 7.5496 = 1.28 * 1.00 * 5.8690 + 1.00 * 0.0186 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 7.3292 = 1.28 * 1.00 * 5.6987 + 1.00 * 0.0167 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 26 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.208)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 112.61 15.92 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 112.61 15.92 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 2.36 90.12 40.09 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 112.61 11.48 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 11.261: 1566 | 5: 56.303 - 67.563: 76 |
| 1: 11.261 - 22.521: 650 | 6: 67.563 - 78.824: 25 |
| 2: 22.521 - 33.782: 223 | 7: 78.824 - 90.084: 12 |
| 3: 33.782 - 45.042: 156 | 8: 90.084 - 101.345: 2 |
| 4: 45.042 - 56.303: 111 | 9: 101.345 - 112.605: 2 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.2035 r_free = 0.2696 target_work(ml) = 5.670 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 13 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.2029 r_free = 0.2690 target_work(ml) = 5.668 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 14 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 4 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.2029 r_free= 0.2690 ksol= 0.34 Bsol= 37.50 scale= 1.057 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (1.90,2.55,2.94,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 2.46 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.27 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.668336 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.2028 r_free= 0.2685 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 33.39 scale= 1.029 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.90,1.43,2.10,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 1.47 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.27 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.666951 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 2.338293 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 99.345 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.145028 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 131.840 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.2028 final r-factor (work) = 0.1654 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.2685 final r-factor (free) = 0.2247 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 6.7363 = 2.34 * 0.50 * 5.7004 + 1.00 * 0.0717 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 6.5795 = 2.34 * 0.50 * 5.5821 + 1.00 * 0.0532 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 29 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1654 final r-factor (work) = 0.1614 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.2247 final r-factor (free) = 0.2087 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 0.8260 = 0.15 * 1.00 * 5.5821 + 1.00 * 0.0165 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 0.8370 = 0.15 * 1.00 * 5.4814 + 1.00 * 0.0420 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 28 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.208)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 101.03 14.36 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 101.03 14.36 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 3.73 83.52 36.00 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 101.03 10.39 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 10.103: 1572 | 5: 50.514 - 60.617: 57 |
| 1: 10.103 - 20.206: 690 | 6: 60.617 - 70.720: 19 |
| 2: 20.206 - 30.308: 194 | 7: 70.720 - 80.822: 6 |
| 3: 30.308 - 40.411: 159 | 8: 80.822 - 90.925: 5 |
| 4: 40.411 - 50.514: 120 | 9: 90.925 - 101.028: 1 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1614 r_free = 0.2087 target_work(ml) = 5.443 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 14 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1610 r_free = 0.2082 target_work(ml) = 5.441 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 15 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 5 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1610 r_free= 0.2082 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 33.39 scale= 1.037 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.90,1.43,2.10,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 1.47 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.18 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.440933 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1610 r_free= 0.2076 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 33.39 scale= 1.018 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.07,0.67,1.54,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.76 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.19 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.440648 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 1.629345 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 113.178 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 2.755891 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 90.291 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1610 final r-factor (work) = 0.1373 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.2076 final r-factor (free) = 0.1777 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 4.5204 = 1.63 * 0.50 * 5.4834 + 1.00 * 0.0532 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 4.4240 = 1.63 * 0.50 * 5.3646 + 1.00 * 0.0536 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1373 final r-factor (work) = 0.1338 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1777 final r-factor (free) = 0.1772 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 14.7997 = 2.76 * 1.00 * 5.3646 + 1.00 * 0.0155 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 14.5861 = 2.76 * 1.00 * 5.2784 + 1.00 * 0.0393 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 4 | number of function evaluations = 6 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.208)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 101.16 14.37 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 101.16 14.37 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 2.14 83.86 36.60 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 101.16 10.29 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 10.116: 1593 | 5: 50.581 - 60.697: 59 |
| 1: 10.116 - 20.232: 670 | 6: 60.697 - 70.813: 21 |
| 2: 20.232 - 30.349: 187 | 7: 70.813 - 80.930: 6 |
| 3: 30.349 - 40.465: 158 | 8: 80.930 - 91.046: 5 |
| 4: 40.465 - 50.581: 123 | 9: 91.046 - 101.162: 1 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1338 r_free = 0.1772 target_work(ml) = 5.278 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 15 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1336 r_free = 0.1771 target_work(ml) = 5.276 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 11 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1336 r_free= 0.1771 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 33.39 scale= 1.022 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.07,0.67,1.54,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.76 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.16 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.276373 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 14.6597 - 4.6542 0.99 1383 153 0.1111 0.1364 5.4793 5.6014|
| 2: 4.6542 - 3.7139 0.99 1320 150 0.1014 0.1345 5.5752 5.8174|
| 3: 3.7139 - 3.2503 0.99 1315 144 0.1307 0.1536 5.6491 5.8456|
| 4: 3.2503 - 2.9558 0.99 1293 139 0.1455 0.2101 5.5948 5.8357|
| 5: 2.9558 - 2.7454 0.99 1285 143 0.1550 0.1791 5.4599 5.5903|
| 6: 2.7454 - 2.5845 0.99 1277 145 0.1484 0.1968 5.3488 5.4899|
| 7: 2.5845 - 2.4557 0.99 1284 144 0.1465 0.1944 5.2762 5.4973|
| 8: 2.4557 - 2.3492 0.98 1278 139 0.1460 0.1959 5.2437 5.4743|
| 9: 2.3492 - 2.2591 0.98 1245 141 0.1435 0.2036 5.168 5.3762|
| 10: 2.2591 - 2.1814 0.98 1269 139 0.1356 0.1937 5.1071 5.3057|
| 11: 2.1814 - 2.1134 0.99 1266 143 0.1356 0.1943 5.0615 5.3936|
| 12: 2.1134 - 2.0532 0.97 1244 136 0.1377 0.1806 5.0265 5.2965|
| 13: 2.0532 - 1.9992 0.99 1282 140 0.1335 0.1954 4.9141 5.1749|
| 14: 1.9992 - 1.9506 0.71 889 103 0.1173 0.1898 4.7519 5.0118|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 14.6597 - 4.6542 1383 153 0.93 10.32 0.99 0.97 8671.71|
| 2: 4.6542 - 3.7139 1320 150 0.94 9.45 1.04 1.02 11095.89|
| 3: 3.7139 - 3.2503 1315 144 0.92 13.71 1.06 1.05 13686.01|
| 4: 3.2503 - 2.9558 1293 139 0.91 15.37 1.02 1.02 12711.57|
| 5: 2.9558 - 2.7454 1285 143 0.88 17.97 1.01 0.97 10146.75|
| 6: 2.7454 - 2.5845 1277 145 0.89 17.63 0.99 0.96 8515.39|
| 7: 2.5845 - 2.4557 1284 144 0.88 17.95 1.00 0.97 7498.77|
| 8: 2.4557 - 2.3492 1278 139 0.89 17.53 1.02 1.00 7086.36|
| 9: 2.3492 - 2.2591 1245 141 0.89 17.69 1.02 0.99 6294.23|
| 10: 2.2591 - 2.1814 1269 139 0.88 18.01 1.02 0.97 5684.33|
| 11: 2.1814 - 2.1134 1266 143 0.88 18.32 1.03 0.99 5463.20|
| 12: 2.1134 - 2.0532 1244 136 0.88 18.41 1.04 1.02 5237.78|
| 13: 2.0532 - 1.9992 1282 140 0.89 17.90 1.04 1.02 4148.27|
| 14: 1.9992 - 1.9506 889 103 0.90 15.75 1.02 0.98 2862.99|
|alpha: min = 0.96 max = 1.05 mean = 0.99|
|beta: min = 2862.99 max = 13686.01 mean = 7941.89|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.90|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 90.00 mean = 16.09|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 88.77 mean = 15.42|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1335 r_free= 0.1769 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 34.02 scale= 1.019 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-0.66,-0.14,0.80,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.16 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.275030 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 1.95 - 14.66 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1335 r_free= 0.1769 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 34.02 scale= 1.019 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-0.66,-0.14,0.80,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.16 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.275030 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 14.6597 - 4.6542 0.99 1383 153 0.1098 0.1358 5.4651 5.5896|
| 2: 4.6542 - 3.7139 0.99 1320 150 0.1021 0.1356 5.5799 5.8326|
| 3: 3.7139 - 3.2503 0.99 1315 144 0.1307 0.1533 5.6523 5.8416|
| 4: 3.2503 - 2.9558 0.99 1293 139 0.1456 0.2097 5.5935 5.8329|
| 5: 2.9558 - 2.7454 0.99 1285 143 0.1551 0.1770 5.4597 5.5833|
| 6: 2.7454 - 2.5845 0.99 1277 145 0.1482 0.1970 5.3475 5.4917|
| 7: 2.5845 - 2.4557 0.99 1284 144 0.1461 0.1933 5.2738 5.4938|
| 8: 2.4557 - 2.3492 0.98 1278 139 0.1458 0.1958 5.2418 5.4727|
| 9: 2.3492 - 2.2591 0.98 1245 141 0.1435 0.2035 5.1664 5.3771|
| 10: 2.2591 - 2.1814 0.98 1269 139 0.1351 0.1925 5.1053 5.3037|
| 11: 2.1814 - 2.1134 0.99 1266 143 0.1354 0.1943 5.0611 5.3937|
| 12: 2.1134 - 2.0532 0.97 1244 136 0.1376 0.1807 5.0258 5.2962|
| 13: 2.0532 - 1.9992 0.99 1282 140 0.1333 0.1951 4.9138 5.1726|
| 14: 1.9992 - 1.9506 0.71 889 103 0.1172 0.1901 4.7526 5.0139|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 14.6597 - 4.6542 1383 153 0.93 10.13 0.99 0.97 8410.11|
| 2: 4.6542 - 3.7139 1320 150 0.94 9.48 1.04 1.02 11084.75|
| 3: 3.7139 - 3.2503 1315 144 0.92 13.74 1.06 1.04 13828.21|
| 4: 3.2503 - 2.9558 1293 139 0.91 15.26 1.02 1.01 12613.39|
| 5: 2.9558 - 2.7454 1285 143 0.88 17.88 1.01 0.96 10057.23|
| 6: 2.7454 - 2.5845 1277 145 0.89 17.60 0.99 0.95 8487.68|
| 7: 2.5845 - 2.4557 1284 144 0.88 17.92 1.00 0.96 7476.70|
| 8: 2.4557 - 2.3492 1278 139 0.89 17.49 1.01 0.99 7051.25|
| 9: 2.3492 - 2.2591 1245 141 0.89 17.64 1.01 0.98 6263.99|
| 10: 2.2591 - 2.1814 1269 139 0.88 18.00 1.01 0.97 5670.80|
| 11: 2.1814 - 2.1134 1266 143 0.88 18.31 1.02 0.99 5461.57|
| 12: 2.1134 - 2.0532 1244 136 0.88 18.40 1.03 1.01 5235.19|
| 13: 2.0532 - 1.9992 1282 140 0.89 17.90 1.03 1.01 4148.21|
| 14: 1.9992 - 1.9506 889 103 0.90 15.80 1.01 0.97 2875.33|
|alpha: min = 0.95 max = 1.04 mean = 0.99|
|beta: min = 2875.33 max = 13828.21 mean = 7908.46|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.90|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 89.85 mean = 16.05|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 89.72 mean = 15.39|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.208)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.63 101.80 15.00 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.63 101.80 15.00 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 2.78 84.50 37.23 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.63 101.80 10.92 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.634 - 10.750: 1593 | 5: 51.215 - 61.331: 59 |
| 1: 10.750 - 20.866: 670 | 6: 61.331 - 71.447: 21 |
| 2: 20.866 - 30.982: 187 | 7: 71.447 - 81.563: 6 |
| 3: 30.982 - 41.099: 158 | 8: 81.563 - 91.680: 5 |
| 4: 41.099 - 51.215: 123 | 9: 91.680 - 101.796: 1 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========== residual map mFobs-DFmodel: highest peaks and deepst holes =========
----------peaks----------
Number of peaks found at mFobs-DFmodel map (map cutoff=3.00 sigma)= 350
Filter by distance & map next to the model:
mapped sites are within: 0.461 - 5.573
number of sites selected in [dist_min= 0.70, dist_max= 6.00]: 344 from: 350
mapped sites are within: 0.726 - 5.573
peak= 10.189 closest distance to " CB VAL A 296 " = 1.550
peak= 10.090 closest distance to " CB VAL A 230 " = 1.419
peak= 9.351 closest distance to " O HOH Z 178 " = 1.481
peak= 6.899 closest distance to " CG ARG A 138 " = 1.231
peak= 6.824 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 50 " = 0.726
peak= 6.446 closest distance to " O HOH Z 130 " = 1.642
peak= 6.436 closest distance to " CD1AILE A 234 " = 1.096
peak= 6.330 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 5 " = 1.374
peak= 6.295 closest distance to " O HOH Z 236 " = 1.814
peak= 5.828 closest distance to " O HOH Z 142 " = 2.022
peak= 5.601 closest distance to " O HOH Z 45 " = 1.035
peak= 5.510 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 1.896
peak= 5.470 closest distance to " O HOH Z 169 " = 0.862
peak= 5.448 closest distance to " O HOH Z 65 " = 1.313
peak= 5.382 closest distance to " O HOH Z 78 " = 1.625
peak= 5.359 closest distance to " O HOH Z 124 " = 1.716
peak= 5.337 closest distance to " O HOH Z 278 " = 1.434
peak= 5.321 closest distance to " CB ARG A 275 " = 1.160
peak= 5.114 closest distance to " O HOH Z 9 " = 1.295
peak= 5.111 closest distance to " O HOH Z 28 " = 1.535
peak= 5.066 closest distance to " NH1 ARG A 138 " = 1.015
peak= 5.052 closest distance to " O HOH Z 375 " = 1.376
peak= 5.029 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 1.846
peak= 4.993 closest distance to " O HOH Z 69 " = 1.514
peak= 4.845 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 11 " = 1.161
peak= 4.832 closest distance to " O HOH Z 424 " = 1.192
peak= 4.778 closest distance to " CB SER A 3 " = 1.242
peak= 4.774 closest distance to " CG PRO A 213 " = 1.261
peak= 4.643 closest distance to " CB GLN A 278 " = 0.846
peak= 4.635 closest distance to " O HOH Z 369 " = 2.164
peak= 4.624 closest distance to " O HOH Z 291 " = 1.613
peak= 4.618 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 55 " = 1.481
peak= 4.601 closest distance to " O HOH Z 178 " = 2.100
peak= 4.567 closest distance to " O HOH Z 423 " = 1.587
peak= 4.566 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 56 " = 1.887
peak= 4.562 closest distance to " O HOH Z 344 " = 1.518
peak= 4.553 closest distance to " NE1 TRP A 274 " = 1.027
peak= 4.522 closest distance to " O HOH Z 272 " = 1.805
peak= 4.509 closest distance to " O HOH Z 148 " = 1.828
peak= 4.509 closest distance to " O HOH Z 199 " = 1.212
peak= 4.508 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 234 " = 0.963
peak= 4.505 closest distance to " O PRO A 198 " = 1.333
peak= 4.445 closest distance to " O HOH Z 385 " = 0.746
peak= 4.422 closest distance to " CB VAL A 230 " = 1.136
peak= 4.372 closest distance to " O HOH Z 414 " = 1.743
peak= 4.349 closest distance to " O HOH Z 263 " = 1.573
peak= 4.338 closest distance to " CG LEU A 5 " = 1.281
peak= 4.319 closest distance to " CB VAL A 202 " = 1.647
peak= 4.314 closest distance to " O HOH Z 146 " = 1.720
peak= 4.271 closest distance to " O HOH Z 410 " = 1.338
peak= 4.263 closest distance to " CB GLN A 223 " = 1.623
peak= 4.258 closest distance to " O HOH Z 11 " = 1.930
peak= 4.256 closest distance to " O HOH Z 59 " = 1.712
peak= 4.251 closest distance to " O HOH Z 7 " = 1.564
peak= 4.250 closest distance to " O HOH Z 419 " = 1.828
peak= 4.250 closest distance to " O HOH Z 97 " = 1.650
peak= 4.248 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 228 " = 1.238
peak= 4.247 closest distance to " O HOH Z 238 " = 1.052
peak= 4.229 closest distance to " CG GLN A 11 " = 2.198
peak= 4.223 closest distance to " NE BARG A 275 " = 1.221
peak= 4.222 closest distance to " O HOH Z 406 " = 1.513
peak= 4.213 closest distance to " NH2BARG A 145 " = 1.571
peak= 4.209 closest distance to " O HOH Z 249 " = 1.311
peak= 4.204 closest distance to " CG PRO A 198 " = 1.322
peak= 4.194 closest distance to " O HOH Z 423 " = 1.661
peak= 4.186 closest distance to " O HOH Z 234 " = 1.930
peak= 4.182 closest distance to " O HOH Z 132 " = 1.184
peak= 4.172 closest distance to " CD ARG A 138 " = 0.888
peak= 4.156 closest distance to " CE AMET A 47 " = 1.050
peak= 4.150 closest distance to " O HOH Z 276 " = 1.500
peak= 4.145 closest distance to " O HOH Z 85 " = 1.413
peak= 4.140 closest distance to " NH1 ARG A 14 " = 0.998
peak= 4.134 closest distance to " O HOH Z 427 " = 2.249
peak= 4.124 closest distance to " O HOH Z 380 " = 1.839
peak= 4.110 closest distance to " O SER A 87 " = 2.311
peak= 4.108 closest distance to " O HOH Z 381 " = 1.222
peak= 4.107 closest distance to " O HOH Z 123 " = 1.363
peak= 4.084 closest distance to " O HOH Z 188 " = 1.009
peak= 4.081 closest distance to " O HOH Z 422 " = 0.801
peak= 4.034 closest distance to " O HOH Z 244 " = 1.809
peak= 4.029 closest distance to " NZ LYS A 117 " = 3.275
peak= 4.024 closest distance to " O HOH Z 222 " = 1.387
peak= 3.999 closest distance to " O HOH Z 179 " = 0.774
peak= 3.991 closest distance to " CA ASN A 284 " = 0.983
peak= 3.983 closest distance to " O HOH Z 43 " = 1.433
peak= 3.976 closest distance to " CB PRO A 54 " = 1.071
peak= 3.975 closest distance to " CG PRO A 243 " = 1.162
peak= 3.936 closest distance to " CG PRO A 54 " = 1.337
peak= 3.933 closest distance to " O HOH Z 316 " = 2.604
peak= 3.910 closest distance to " O HOH Z 234 " = 3.331
peak= 3.902 closest distance to " O HOH Z 130 " = 1.909
peak= 3.889 closest distance to " O HOH Z 137 " = 1.563
peak= 3.882 closest distance to " O HOH Z 59 " = 2.005
peak= 3.875 closest distance to " O HOH Z 371 " = 1.686
peak= 3.872 closest distance to " O HOH Z 69 " = 2.228
peak= 3.869 closest distance to " O HOH Z 250 " = 2.246
peak= 3.867 closest distance to " O HOH Z 80 " = 1.458
peak= 3.865 closest distance to " O HOH Z 233 " = 1.417
peak= 3.864 closest distance to " O HOH Z 88 " = 2.684
peak= 3.862 closest distance to " O HOH Z 222 " = 2.062
peak= 3.862 closest distance to " O HOH Z 44 " = 1.956
peak= 3.850 closest distance to " O HOH Z 213 " = 1.752
peak= 3.835 closest distance to " O HOH Z 260 " = 1.504
peak= 3.824 closest distance to " OG ASER A 134 " = 1.685
peak= 3.819 closest distance to " O HOH Z 47 " = 1.565
peak= 3.818 closest distance to " O HOH Z 24 " = 1.681
peak= 3.817 closest distance to " O HOH Z 192 " = 1.497
peak= 3.815 closest distance to " O HOH Z 95 " = 1.688
peak= 3.813 closest distance to " O HOH Z 51 " = 1.455
peak= 3.803 closest distance to " O HOH Z 427 " = 1.133
peak= 3.794 closest distance to " OE1 GLU A 44 " = 1.088
peak= 3.792 closest distance to " O HOH Z 214 " = 1.280
peak= 3.785 closest distance to " CB TRP A 179 " = 1.094
peak= 3.777 closest distance to " O HOH Z 390 " = 1.065
peak= 3.771 closest distance to " CA PRO A 163 " = 0.926
peak= 3.757 closest distance to " CA ARG A 275 " = 0.980
peak= 3.755 closest distance to " O HOH Z 28 " = 2.096
peak= 3.749 closest distance to " CA ILE A 234 " = 0.904
peak= 3.747 closest distance to " CB ALA A 1 " = 1.058
peak= 3.743 closest distance to " O HOH Z 97 " = 1.858
peak= 3.736 closest distance to " O HOH Z 347 " = 1.048
peak= 3.730 closest distance to " CG2 VAL A 257 " = 0.926
peak= 3.728 closest distance to " NH1AARG A 275 " = 1.095
peak= 3.720 closest distance to " O HOH Z 366 " = 2.010
peak= 3.714 closest distance to " O HOH Z 293 " = 1.467
peak= 3.714 closest distance to " O HOH Z 425 " = 2.120
peak= 3.705 closest distance to " OD1 ASP A 286 " = 1.019
peak= 3.697 closest distance to " CD GLN A 194 " = 1.404
peak= 3.693 closest distance to " O HOH Z 147 " = 1.646
peak= 3.678 closest distance to " O HOH Z 334 " = 1.576
peak= 3.665 closest distance to " O HOH Z 176 " = 1.808
peak= 3.658 closest distance to " NH2BARG A 190 " = 1.557
peak= 3.648 closest distance to " O HOH Z 130 " = 1.921
peak= 3.640 closest distance to " CB PHE A 130 " = 0.911
peak= 3.637 closest distance to " C ALA A 299 " = 0.993
peak= 3.637 closest distance to " N GLN A 278 " = 0.994
peak= 3.637 closest distance to " O HOH Z 56 " = 1.883
peak= 3.632 closest distance to " CA ALA A 21 " = 1.171
peak= 3.624 closest distance to " O HOH Z 153 " = 3.277
peak= 3.621 closest distance to " O HOH Z 120 " = 0.948
peak= 3.619 closest distance to " SD BMET A 47 " = 1.401
peak= 3.613 closest distance to " O HOH Z 352 " = 1.364
peak= 3.610 closest distance to " CB ASN A 69 " = 1.583
peak= 3.600 closest distance to " O HOH Z 259 " = 2.085
peak= 3.600 closest distance to " CZ AARG A 102 " = 1.692
peak= 3.598 closest distance to " CE BMET A 47 " = 1.470
peak= 3.590 closest distance to " O HOH Z 100 " = 1.172
peak= 3.588 closest distance to " O HOH Z 425 " = 1.457
peak= 3.584 closest distance to " O HOH Z 303 " = 1.734
peak= 3.581 closest distance to " CB ASN A 142 " = 1.089
peak= 3.578 closest distance to " O HOH Z 424 " = 2.165
peak= 3.577 closest distance to " CG LEU A 228 " = 1.251
peak= 3.576 closest distance to " CE1 PHE A 38 " = 1.015
peak= 3.571 closest distance to " CB ASN A 148 " = 1.287
peak= 3.571 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 58 " = 5.573
peak= 3.568 closest distance to " CB TYR A 30 " = 1.694
peak= 3.568 closest distance to " CB PRO A 90 " = 1.185
peak= 3.567 closest distance to " NH1AARG A 145 " = 0.748
peak= 3.566 closest distance to " O HOH Z 245 " = 1.418
peak= 3.563 closest distance to " O HOH Z 145 " = 1.878
peak= 3.562 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 5 " = 1.847
peak= 3.560 closest distance to " O HOH Z 4 " = 1.437
peak= 3.559 closest distance to " CB ALA A 248 " = 1.474
peak= 3.557 closest distance to " CA TYR A 30 " = 0.956
peak= 3.556 closest distance to " NZ LYS A 48 " = 1.957
peak= 3.556 closest distance to " O HOH Z 364 " = 1.814
peak= 3.555 closest distance to " CB GLU A 277 " = 1.075
peak= 3.551 closest distance to " O HOH Z 366 " = 2.526
peak= 3.548 closest distance to " O HOH Z 267 " = 2.021
peak= 3.545 closest distance to " OG1 THR A 246 " = 1.223
peak= 3.545 closest distance to " CG ARG A 66 " = 1.120
peak= 3.539 closest distance to " O HOH Z 344 " = 2.620
peak= 3.535 closest distance to " CB GLN A 183 " = 1.174
peak= 3.532 closest distance to " O HOH Z 35 " = 2.077
peak= 3.532 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 1.475
peak= 3.519 closest distance to " O HOH Z 118 " = 2.001
peak= 3.518 closest distance to " O HOH Z 261 " = 2.217
peak= 3.514 closest distance to " CB BVAL A 41 " = 1.024
peak= 3.507 closest distance to " O HOH Z 422 " = 2.179
peak= 3.502 closest distance to " O HOH Z 185 " = 1.233
peak= 3.499 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 286 " = 2.257
peak= 3.497 closest distance to " O HOH Z 119 " = 1.369
peak= 3.493 closest distance to " O HOH Z 368 " = 1.978
peak= 3.492 closest distance to " CG1AVAL A 121 " = 0.981
peak= 3.488 closest distance to " O HOH Z 289 " = 1.554
peak= 3.487 closest distance to " O HOH Z 189 " = 2.342
peak= 3.483 closest distance to " CB LEU A 255 " = 0.952
peak= 3.482 closest distance to " NH1BARG A 145 " = 1.596
peak= 3.481 closest distance to " O HOH Z 412 " = 1.594
peak= 3.479 closest distance to " O HOH Z 326 " = 2.037
peak= 3.479 closest distance to " O HOH Z 305 " = 3.124
peak= 3.473 closest distance to " CB VAL A 265 " = 1.234
peak= 3.472 closest distance to " CB ALA A 233 " = 1.198
peak= 3.468 closest distance to " CA PHE A 283 " = 1.129
peak= 3.467 closest distance to " O HOH Z 143 " = 1.615
peak= 3.460 closest distance to " O HOH Z 112 " = 1.377
peak= 3.460 closest distance to " O HOH Z 356 " = 1.580
peak= 3.459 closest distance to " CB PRO A 198 " = 1.099
peak= 3.457 closest distance to " CG LYS A 166 " = 1.426
peak= 3.451 closest distance to " O HOH Z 223 " = 1.091
peak= 3.450 closest distance to " O HOH Z 130 " = 2.422
peak= 3.445 closest distance to " CA ASN A 127 " = 1.086
peak= 3.439 closest distance to " O HOH Z 128 " = 1.930
peak= 3.436 closest distance to " CA SER A 210 " = 1.551
peak= 3.434 closest distance to " O HOH Z 404 " = 1.576
peak= 3.428 closest distance to " CB ASP A 200 " = 0.932
peak= 3.428 closest distance to " CD ARG A 269 " = 1.001
peak= 3.422 closest distance to " CG2 THR A 221 " = 1.264
peak= 3.421 closest distance to " O HOH Z 280 " = 1.537
peak= 3.416 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 73 " = 1.915
peak= 3.414 closest distance to " O BHOH Z 74 " = 1.175
peak= 3.400 closest distance to " CB ARG A 102 " = 0.811
peak= 3.398 closest distance to " O HOH Z 343 " = 2.993
peak= 3.398 closest distance to " O HOH Z 203 " = 1.504
peak= 3.398 closest distance to " O HOH Z 367 " = 3.859
peak= 3.395 closest distance to " O HOH Z 128 " = 2.030
peak= 3.392 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 1.753
peak= 3.391 closest distance to " O HOH Z 196 " = 1.434
peak= 3.391 closest distance to " O HOH Z 303 " = 2.237
peak= 3.389 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 20 " = 1.198
peak= 3.389 closest distance to " CB THR A 31 " = 1.488
peak= 3.388 closest distance to " CG LYS A 76 " = 1.454
peak= 3.386 closest distance to " CB ASN A 215 " = 1.233
peak= 3.375 closest distance to " O HOH Z 71 " = 1.557
peak= 3.375 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 1.911
peak= 3.373 closest distance to " O HOH Z 61 " = 1.614
peak= 3.369 closest distance to " O HOH Z 134 " = 1.357
peak= 3.362 closest distance to " O HOH Z 113 " = 1.962
peak= 3.361 closest distance to " O HOH Z 118 " = 1.780
peak= 3.361 closest distance to " O HOH Z 92 " = 1.198
peak= 3.360 closest distance to " N ASN A 148 " = 1.068
peak= 3.354 closest distance to " CB ASN A 148 " = 1.818
peak= 3.353 closest distance to " CG LEU A 281 " = 1.068
peak= 3.353 closest distance to " CA GLN A 194 " = 0.978
peak= 3.349 closest distance to " CB SER A 26 " = 1.532
peak= 3.349 closest distance to " CE1 PHE A 61 " = 1.140
peak= 3.348 closest distance to " O HOH Z 337 " = 1.762
peak= 3.347 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 153 " = 0.937
peak= 3.345 closest distance to " O HOH Z 358 " = 1.340
peak= 3.345 closest distance to " O HOH Z 156 " = 2.701
peak= 3.342 closest distance to " CB ASN A 110 " = 1.065
peak= 3.339 closest distance to " CB GLU A 128 " = 1.095
peak= 3.336 closest distance to " CB GLN A 88 " = 1.449
peak= 3.335 closest distance to " CA ARG A 195 " = 1.372
peak= 3.328 closest distance to " O HOH Z 402 " = 1.436
peak= 3.324 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 120 " = 1.387
peak= 3.317 closest distance to " OG SER A 62 " = 2.887
peak= 3.315 closest distance to " O HOH Z 357 " = 1.717
peak= 3.304 closest distance to " O HOH Z 411 " = 4.055
peak= 3.301 closest distance to " CA ALA A 51 " = 1.087
peak= 3.301 closest distance to " O HOH Z 227 " = 2.029
peak= 3.297 closest distance to " O HOH Z 109 " = 2.085
peak= 3.293 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 228 " = 1.615
peak= 3.293 closest distance to " SD MET A 40 " = 1.075
peak= 3.292 closest distance to " CB SER A 62 " = 1.103
peak= 3.291 closest distance to " CB ALA A 9 " = 1.556
peak= 3.290 closest distance to " CG GLN A 88 " = 1.038
peak= 3.284 closest distance to " N GLU A 277 " = 0.981
peak= 3.279 closest distance to " O HOH Z 8 " = 1.668
peak= 3.279 closest distance to " O HOH Z 388 " = 1.056
peak= 3.277 closest distance to " CB ALA A 114 " = 1.443
peak= 3.276 closest distance to " O HOH Z 61 " = 1.416
peak= 3.275 closest distance to " O HOH Z 35 " = 1.443
peak= 3.274 closest distance to " O HOH Z 279 " = 0.975
peak= 3.274 closest distance to " CA ASN A 217 " = 1.014
peak= 3.273 closest distance to " N ALA A 1 " = 3.325
peak= 3.271 closest distance to " O HOH Z 39 " = 1.454
peak= 3.269 closest distance to " O GLN A 58 " = 1.412
peak= 3.267 closest distance to " CA PRO A 90 " = 1.042
peak= 3.266 closest distance to " O HOH Z 374 " = 2.277
peak= 3.258 closest distance to " O HOH Z 261 " = 1.653
peak= 3.258 closest distance to " O HOH Z 388 " = 1.712
peak= 3.257 closest distance to " O HOH Z 37 " = 1.210
peak= 3.256 closest distance to " ND1 HIS A 81 " = 1.383
peak= 3.246 closest distance to " CB SER A 63 " = 1.093
peak= 3.245 closest distance to " O HOH Z 257 " = 1.324
peak= 3.244 closest distance to " CB ARG A 79 " = 1.503
peak= 3.243 closest distance to " CB SER A 276 " = 1.329
peak= 3.242 closest distance to " O HOH Z 261 " = 2.262
peak= 3.240 closest distance to " ND1 HIS A 81 " = 1.089
peak= 3.236 closest distance to " O ASP A 124 " = 1.247
peak= 3.234 closest distance to " CB PHE A 204 " = 0.997
peak= 3.233 closest distance to " CG LYS A 119 " = 1.008
peak= 3.232 closest distance to " O HOH Z 418 " = 2.108
peak= 3.231 closest distance to " O HOH Z 300 " = 2.177
peak= 3.231 closest distance to " O HOH Z 251 " = 1.731
peak= 3.227 closest distance to " NH1BARG A 190 " = 2.010
peak= 3.224 closest distance to " N GLU A 2 " = 1.372
peak= 3.224 closest distance to " O HOH Z 248 " = 2.101
peak= 3.223 closest distance to " O HOH Z 24 " = 1.550
peak= 3.219 closest distance to " O HOH Z 281 " = 1.955
peak= 3.217 closest distance to " O HOH Z 108 " = 1.147
peak= 3.216 closest distance to " O HOH Z 6 " = 2.156
peak= 3.215 closest distance to " CD LYS A 119 " = 1.623
peak= 3.211 closest distance to " CB GLU A 175 " = 1.028
peak= 3.203 closest distance to " O HOH Z 212 " = 1.568
peak= 3.202 closest distance to " O HOH Z 158 " = 3.078
peak= 3.202 closest distance to " CB ALA A 84 " = 1.599
peak= 3.200 closest distance to " O HOH Z 51 " = 1.662
peak= 3.196 closest distance to " O HOH Z 223 " = 1.758
peak= 3.191 closest distance to " O HOH Z 153 " = 1.577
peak= 3.187 closest distance to " O HOH Z 311 " = 1.375
peak= 3.187 closest distance to " O HOH Z 6 " = 1.359
peak= 3.186 closest distance to " O SER A 164 " = 1.288
peak= 3.185 closest distance to " O HOH Z 250 " = 1.442
peak= 3.181 closest distance to " CA GLY A 91 " = 1.522
peak= 3.178 closest distance to " O HOH Z 9 " = 1.962
peak= 3.172 closest distance to " CA LYS A 117 " = 1.136
peak= 3.171 closest distance to " O TRP A 274 " = 0.898
peak= 3.169 closest distance to " OE1 GLN A 58 " = 3.886
peak= 3.168 closest distance to " O ARG A 195 " = 1.414
peak= 3.166 closest distance to " O HOH Z 426 " = 1.078
peak= 3.164 closest distance to " NH2AARG A 190 " = 1.835
peak= 3.162 closest distance to " O HOH Z 41 " = 2.396
peak= 3.162 closest distance to " O HOH Z 112 " = 2.334
peak= 3.159 closest distance to " O HOH Z 435 " = 2.083
peak= 3.159 closest distance to " CB GLU A 152 " = 1.319
peak= 3.153 closest distance to " N TYR A 15 " = 1.145
peak= 3.146 closest distance to " CG2 THR A 220 " = 0.926
peak= 3.145 closest distance to " O HOH Z 287 " = 1.492
peak= 3.144 closest distance to " CB ASN A 187 " = 1.050
peak= 3.141 closest distance to " O HOH Z 411 " = 1.984
peak= 3.140 closest distance to " CB THR A 52 " = 1.183
peak= 3.140 closest distance to " O HOH Z 365 " = 5.496
peak= 3.139 closest distance to " O HOH Z 272 " = 2.132
peak= 3.138 closest distance to " NH1AARG A 145 " = 1.126
peak= 3.130 closest distance to " O HOH Z 433 " = 2.073
peak= 3.129 closest distance to " CG1BVAL A 72 " = 1.271
peak= 3.126 closest distance to " CB ARG A 138 " = 0.934
peak= 3.119 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 25 " = 1.193
peak= 3.118 closest distance to " O HOH Z 389 " = 1.483
peak= 3.117 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 297 " = 1.055
peak= 3.117 closest distance to " CZ AARG A 275 " = 3.245
peak= 3.116 closest distance to " O PHE A 59 " = 2.744
peak= 3.115 closest distance to " O HOH Z 1 " = 1.592
peak= 3.113 closest distance to " CB TRP A 266 " = 1.168
peak= 3.109 closest distance to " CG ARG A 36 " = 1.019
peak= 3.100 closest distance to " O HOH Z 365 " = 1.608
peak= 3.092 closest distance to " O HOH Z 279 " = 2.614
peak= 3.090 closest distance to " CB VAL A 126 " = 1.242
peak= 3.086 closest distance to " CB HIS A 108 " = 0.889
peak= 3.076 closest distance to " O HOH Z 183 " = 1.843
peak= 3.035 closest distance to " CG LYS A 76 " = 0.966
peak= 3.033 closest distance to " CB ASN A 39 " = 0.898
----------holes----------
Number of peaks found at mFobs-DFmodel map (map cutoff=3.00 sigma)= 193
Filter by distance & map next to the model:
mapped sites are within: 0.357 - 5.245
number of sites selected in [dist_min= 0.70, dist_max= 6.00]: 184 from: 193
mapped sites are within: 0.715 - 5.245
peak= -4.942 closest distance to " O HOH Z 69 " = 1.095
peak= -4.793 closest distance to " CD ARG A 138 " = 1.132
peak= -4.358 closest distance to " O SER A 135 " = 1.656
peak= -4.330 closest distance to " C HIS A 108 " = 1.232
peak= -4.306 closest distance to " CA VAL A 67 " = 2.801
peak= -4.281 closest distance to " O PRO A 198 " = 1.049
peak= -4.168 closest distance to " O HOH Z 429 " = 1.960
peak= -4.130 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 79 " = 1.998
peak= -4.125 closest distance to " O HOH Z 290 " = 0.821
peak= -4.097 closest distance to " C ASN A 285 " = 1.901
peak= -4.060 closest distance to " O HOH Z 385 " = 1.321
peak= -4.045 closest distance to " O HOH Z 377 " = 0.876
peak= -4.016 closest distance to " OG BSER A 134 " = 1.236
peak= -4.009 closest distance to " CG ARG A 138 " = 0.935
peak= -3.999 closest distance to " N THR A 52 " = 1.715
peak= -3.995 closest distance to " CG PHE A 283 " = 2.434
peak= -3.988 closest distance to " OG SER A 3 " = 1.155
peak= -3.946 closest distance to " O HOH Z 419 " = 0.715
peak= -3.879 closest distance to " O HOH Z 125 " = 3.259
peak= -3.876 closest distance to " CD GLU A 277 " = 0.867
peak= -3.876 closest distance to " O HOH Z 56 " = 1.678
peak= -3.870 closest distance to " CE3 TRP A 274 " = 2.162
peak= -3.860 closest distance to " O SER A 22 " = 2.284
peak= -3.844 closest distance to " O ALA A 161 " = 1.587
peak= -3.843 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 50 " = 1.548
peak= -3.843 closest distance to " O HOH Z 24 " = 1.034
peak= -3.818 closest distance to " CE2 TYR A 30 " = 2.966
peak= -3.809 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 255 " = 2.742
peak= -3.763 closest distance to " O HOH Z 164 " = 5.245
peak= -3.725 closest distance to " CG BARG A 275 " = 0.823
peak= -3.709 closest distance to " O HOH Z 234 " = 3.913
peak= -3.698 closest distance to " CE2 PHE A 218 " = 2.550
peak= -3.691 closest distance to " N HIS A 115 " = 2.058
peak= -3.676 closest distance to " O HOH Z 111 " = 4.448
peak= -3.662 closest distance to " CD GLN A 88 " = 1.047
peak= -3.648 closest distance to " O HOH Z 123 " = 0.905
peak= -3.644 closest distance to " OG ASER A 134 " = 1.250
peak= -3.640 closest distance to " CG PRO A 198 " = 1.657
peak= -3.617 closest distance to " O GLU A 152 " = 1.576
peak= -3.615 closest distance to " O HOH Z 423 " = 2.454
peak= -3.614 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 50 " = 1.508
peak= -3.591 closest distance to " O GLY A 118 " = 1.199
peak= -3.583 closest distance to " O HOH Z 79 " = 1.590
peak= -3.571 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 39 " = 1.913
peak= -3.570 closest distance to " OG SER A 97 " = 2.182
peak= -3.567 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 101 " = 2.219
peak= -3.553 closest distance to " O HOH Z 427 " = 1.660
peak= -3.552 closest distance to " CG GLN A 58 " = 0.889
peak= -3.549 closest distance to " O HOH Z 203 " = 1.734
peak= -3.546 closest distance to " O HOH Z 414 " = 2.651
peak= -3.543 closest distance to " O LYS A 117 " = 1.429
peak= -3.537 closest distance to " CG ARG A 219 " = 2.083
peak= -3.523 closest distance to " O HOH Z 235 " = 0.988
peak= -3.520 closest distance to " CA GLY A 23 " = 1.769
peak= -3.514 closest distance to " N GLN A 58 " = 1.115
peak= -3.506 closest distance to " CD ARG A 156 " = 1.974
peak= -3.506 closest distance to " CD ARG A 14 " = 2.707
peak= -3.501 closest distance to " N GLN A 122 " = 1.318
peak= -3.489 closest distance to " O HOH Z 103 " = 1.569
peak= -3.478 closest distance to " CG GLU A 152 " = 2.392
peak= -3.466 closest distance to " O HOH Z 130 " = 1.759
peak= -3.461 closest distance to " O HOH Z 140 " = 1.762
peak= -3.451 closest distance to " O HOH Z 392 " = 2.484
peak= -3.450 closest distance to " O HOH Z 307 " = 1.971
peak= -3.448 closest distance to " C LEU A 143 " = 1.048
peak= -3.442 closest distance to " O MET A 40 " = 2.833
peak= -3.442 closest distance to " O HOH Z 388 " = 2.097
peak= -3.427 closest distance to " CA GLY A 133 " = 1.898
peak= -3.417 closest distance to " O HOH Z 266 " = 4.581
peak= -3.411 closest distance to " CB ALA A 248 " = 1.867
peak= -3.411 closest distance to " O HOH Z 359 " = 1.789
peak= -3.409 closest distance to " CA SER A 210 " = 1.265
peak= -3.406 closest distance to " CD LYS A 289 " = 2.549
peak= -3.405 closest distance to " CB GLN A 11 " = 1.921
peak= -3.403 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 130 " = 0.826
peak= -3.396 closest distance to " O HOH Z 147 " = 1.231
peak= -3.394 closest distance to " O HOH Z 9 " = 1.476
peak= -3.393 closest distance to " O ASP A 107 " = 1.322
peak= -3.389 closest distance to " O HOH Z 368 " = 2.652
peak= -3.388 closest distance to " CD1 TRP A 179 " = 1.064
peak= -3.383 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 237 " = 2.466
peak= -3.382 closest distance to " OG BSER A 99 " = 1.182
peak= -3.381 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 59 " = 1.552
peak= -3.378 closest distance to " O HOH Z 407 " = 2.228
peak= -3.377 closest distance to " O HOH Z 98 " = 1.783
peak= -3.373 closest distance to " O HOH Z 179 " = 1.334
peak= -3.369 closest distance to " O HOH Z 365 " = 1.688
peak= -3.368 closest distance to " O HOH Z 88 " = 1.897
peak= -3.366 closest distance to " N GLN A 58 " = 2.170
peak= -3.361 closest distance to " O SER A 245 " = 1.270
peak= -3.358 closest distance to " O HOH Z 336 " = 2.508
peak= -3.357 closest distance to " OG SER A 245 " = 1.228
peak= -3.355 closest distance to " O HOH Z 100 " = 1.084
peak= -3.337 closest distance to " CD1 TYR A 169 " = 2.410
peak= -3.333 closest distance to " O HOH Z 404 " = 1.510
peak= -3.332 closest distance to " O HOH Z 372 " = 1.175
peak= -3.332 closest distance to " CE1 TYR A 247 " = 2.418
peak= -3.329 closest distance to " O ALA A 51 " = 1.194
peak= -3.328 closest distance to " CD1 PHE A 61 " = 2.905
peak= -3.324 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 58 " = 1.945
peak= -3.323 closest distance to " CA GLY A 203 " = 2.253
peak= -3.317 closest distance to " O HOH Z 113 " = 0.755
peak= -3.316 closest distance to " CG HIS A 108 " = 0.971
peak= -3.316 closest distance to " CB PHE A 59 " = 2.015
peak= -3.313 closest distance to " CB TRP A 274 " = 2.715
peak= -3.313 closest distance to " O HOH Z 220 " = 2.007
peak= -3.307 closest distance to " O HOH Z 131 " = 3.852
peak= -3.297 closest distance to " O HOH Z 184 " = 0.717
peak= -3.294 closest distance to " OH TYR A 214 " = 0.978
peak= -3.293 closest distance to " N ALA A 226 " = 1.881
peak= -3.288 closest distance to " O HOH Z 342 " = 2.123
peak= -3.284 closest distance to " O HOH Z 437 " = 1.900
peak= -3.283 closest distance to " OE2 GLU A 152 " = 1.196
peak= -3.283 closest distance to " O HOH Z 308 " = 1.640
peak= -3.279 closest distance to " OG SER A 206 " = 1.444
peak= -3.274 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 39 " = 1.408
peak= -3.269 closest distance to " C ALA A 158 " = 1.149
peak= -3.266 closest distance to " N GLN A 77 " = 1.416
peak= -3.264 closest distance to " O HOH Z 265 " = 2.004
peak= -3.264 closest distance to " CD PRO A 243 " = 2.034
peak= -3.263 closest distance to " CG PHE A 59 " = 2.226
peak= -3.256 closest distance to " CG ARG A 219 " = 2.681
peak= -3.256 closest distance to " CG2 THR A 264 " = 2.046
peak= -3.256 closest distance to " O HOH Z 169 " = 1.057
peak= -3.255 closest distance to " CB ALA A 244 " = 2.056
peak= -3.254 closest distance to " O HOH Z 397 " = 1.352
peak= -3.251 closest distance to " O HOH Z 28 " = 0.808
peak= -3.250 closest distance to " N PRO A 163 " = 1.574
peak= -3.246 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 69 " = 1.422
peak= -3.245 closest distance to " C ASP A 124 " = 1.093
peak= -3.241 closest distance to " OE2 GLU A 2 " = 0.940
peak= -3.241 closest distance to " O HOH Z 220 " = 0.887
peak= -3.240 closest distance to " CE LYS A 76 " = 2.920
peak= -3.240 closest distance to " OG1 THR A 178 " = 1.108
peak= -3.239 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 282 " = 2.143
peak= -3.237 closest distance to " CB ALA A 7 " = 1.977
peak= -3.232 closest distance to " CA ALA A 291 " = 2.539
peak= -3.231 closest distance to " O HOH Z 60 " = 2.183
peak= -3.226 closest distance to " O HOH Z 185 " = 1.467
peak= -3.225 closest distance to " OE1 GLU A 277 " = 2.224
peak= -3.218 closest distance to " O HOH Z 431 " = 1.427
peak= -3.213 closest distance to " N VAL A 72 " = 1.865
peak= -3.212 closest distance to " CB VAL A 230 " = 1.082
peak= -3.210 closest distance to " O HOH Z 65 " = 0.825
peak= -3.205 closest distance to " O HOH Z 313 " = 1.245
peak= -3.205 closest distance to " O ALA A 100 " = 2.455
peak= -3.204 closest distance to " CE3 TRP A 179 " = 2.251
peak= -3.200 closest distance to " O ARG A 145 " = 1.569
peak= -3.195 closest distance to " O HOH Z 77 " = 1.887
peak= -3.195 closest distance to " O HOH Z 134 " = 2.662
peak= -3.192 closest distance to " C LEU A 222 " = 1.345
peak= -3.192 closest distance to " O ARG A 24 " = 1.781
peak= -3.190 closest distance to " CD ARG A 219 " = 2.465
peak= -3.189 closest distance to " O THR A 182 " = 1.249
peak= -3.189 closest distance to " C GLN A 205 " = 1.922
peak= -3.186 closest distance to " OXT GLY A 302 " = 2.789
peak= -3.184 closest distance to " O HOH Z 249 " = 0.817
peak= -3.176 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 1.853
peak= -3.169 closest distance to " O HOH Z 191 " = 5.230
peak= -3.168 closest distance to " CB ALA A 43 " = 2.006
peak= -3.162 closest distance to " C ASN A 69 " = 1.394
peak= -3.159 closest distance to " O HOH Z 102 " = 1.869
peak= -3.157 closest distance to " OG1 THR A 246 " = 1.132
peak= -3.155 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 5 " = 0.971
peak= -3.145 closest distance to " CH2 TRP A 123 " = 1.946
peak= -3.133 closest distance to " O HOH Z 137 " = 1.514
peak= -3.130 closest distance to " O HOH Z 137 " = 1.422
peak= -3.129 closest distance to " O HOH Z 197 " = 5.050
peak= -3.128 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 127 " = 1.500
peak= -3.127 closest distance to " OG SER A 87 " = 1.548
peak= -3.123 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 45 " = 1.584
peak= -3.119 closest distance to " O HOH Z 51 " = 0.815
peak= -3.118 closest distance to " CE LYS A 166 " = 1.169
peak= -3.114 closest distance to " CB PRO A 163 " = 2.715
peak= -3.106 closest distance to " O HOH Z 424 " = 1.972
peak= -3.100 closest distance to " O MET A 188 " = 1.612
peak= -3.099 closest distance to " O ALA A 1 " = 1.629
peak= -3.092 closest distance to " O HOH Z 63 " = 1.224
peak= -3.091 closest distance to " O VAL A 67 " = 2.634
peak= -3.089 closest distance to " O HOH Z 385 " = 1.572
peak= -3.076 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 209 " = 1.942
peak= -3.049 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 16 " = 1.402
peak= -3.047 closest distance to " O ASN A 301 " = 1.615
peak= -3.044 closest distance to " O HOH Z 145 " = 2.475
================= overall refinement statistics: step by step =================
****************** REFINEMENT STATISTICS STEP BY STEP ******************
leading digit, like 1_, means number of macro-cycle
0 : statistics at the very beginning when nothing is done yet
1_bss: bulk solvent correction and/or (anisotropic) scaling
1_xyz: refinement of coordinates
1_adp: refinement of ADPs (Atomic Displacement Parameters)
1_occ: refinement of individual occupancies
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R-factors, x-ray target values and norm of gradient of x-ray target
stage r-work r-free xray_target_w xray_target_t
0 : 0.5075 0.5009 6.299540e+00 6.293640e+00
1_bss: 0.4977 0.4903 6.292591e+00 6.283576e+00
1_xyz: 0.4324 0.4521 6.219788e+00 6.244906e+00
1_adp: 0.3894 0.4393 6.165621e+00 6.231972e+00
1_occ: 0.3890 0.4381 6.164605e+00 6.231915e+00
2_bss: 0.3872 0.4327 6.163866e+00 6.228936e+00
2_xyz: 0.3173 0.3769 6.019506e+00 6.135289e+00
2_adp: 0.2995 0.3599 5.975635e+00 6.101139e+00
2_occ: 0.2991 0.3602 5.975557e+00 6.101771e+00
3_bss: 0.2963 0.3593 5.973335e+00 6.101433e+00
3_xyz: 0.2280 0.2874 5.751793e+00 5.927792e+00
3_adp: 0.2035 0.2696 5.669867e+00 5.875159e+00
3_occ: 0.2029 0.2690 5.668336e+00 5.873703e+00
4_bss: 0.2028 0.2685 5.666951e+00 5.872234e+00
4_xyz: 0.1654 0.2247 5.488085e+00 5.713361e+00
4_adp: 0.1614 0.2087 5.443301e+00 5.639343e+00
4_occ: 0.1610 0.2082 5.440933e+00 5.635681e+00
5_bss: 0.1610 0.2076 5.440648e+00 5.633330e+00
5_xyz: 0.1373 0.1777 5.292959e+00 5.494118e+00
5_adp: 0.1338 0.1772 5.278027e+00 5.493630e+00
5_occ: 0.1336 0.1771 5.276373e+00 5.491775e+00
5_bss: 0.1335 0.1769 5.275030e+00 5.490630e+00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage k_sol b_sol b11 b22 b33 b12 b13 b23
0 : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_bss: 0.381 0.000 7.150 8.748 7.533 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_xyz: 0.381 0.000 7.150 8.748 7.533 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_adp: 0.381 0.000 7.150 8.748 7.533 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_occ: 0.381 0.000 7.150 8.748 7.533 0.000 0.000 0.000
2_bss: 0.342 20.000 4.293 5.089 5.314 0.000 0.000 0.000
2_xyz: 0.342 20.000 4.293 5.089 5.314 0.000 0.000 0.000
2_adp: 0.342 20.000 4.293 5.089 5.314 0.000 0.000 0.000
2_occ: 0.342 20.000 4.293 5.089 5.314 0.000 0.000 0.000
3_bss: 0.342 37.498 1.897 2.554 2.942 0.000 0.000 0.000
3_xyz: 0.342 37.498 1.897 2.554 2.942 0.000 0.000 0.000
3_adp: 0.342 37.498 1.897 2.554 2.942 0.000 0.000 0.000
3_occ: 0.342 37.498 1.897 2.554 2.942 0.000 0.000 0.000
4_bss: 0.326 33.387 0.898 1.426 2.099 0.000 0.000 0.000
4_xyz: 0.326 33.387 0.898 1.426 2.099 0.000 0.000 0.000
4_adp: 0.326 33.387 0.898 1.426 2.099 0.000 0.000 0.000
4_occ: 0.326 33.387 0.898 1.426 2.099 0.000 0.000 0.000
5_bss: 0.326 33.387 0.073 0.668 1.543 0.000 0.000 0.000
5_xyz: 0.326 33.387 0.073 0.668 1.543 0.000 0.000 0.000
5_adp: 0.326 33.387 0.073 0.668 1.543 0.000 0.000 0.000
5_occ: 0.326 33.387 0.073 0.668 1.543 0.000 0.000 0.000
5_bss: 0.326 34.020 -0.656 -0.139 0.795 0.000 0.000 0.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage <pher> fom alpha beta
0 : 65.464 0.3225 0.3888 81258.243
1_bss: 64.260 0.3368 0.4993 77408.744
1_xyz: 55.258 0.4528 0.6663 63356.201
1_adp: 50.978 0.5082 0.8109 59418.437
1_occ: 50.932 0.5088 0.8102 59268.722
2_bss: 50.553 0.5132 0.7418 58348.339
2_xyz: 40.920 0.6318 0.9024 40380.548
2_adp: 38.138 0.6651 0.9580 35965.365
2_occ: 38.170 0.6647 0.9569 36058.455
3_bss: 37.979 0.6668 0.8784 35792.696
3_xyz: 28.785 0.7706 0.9852 21180.534
3_adp: 26.430 0.7966 1.0017 18632.584
3_occ: 26.356 0.7974 1.0020 18526.088
4_bss: 26.282 0.7981 0.9667 18424.849
4_xyz: 21.510 0.8470 0.9998 12814.046
4_adp: 19.292 0.8695 1.0131 11027.282
4_occ: 19.196 0.8704 1.0134 10924.064
5_bss: 19.132 0.8709 0.9865 10853.438
5_xyz: 16.124 0.8978 0.9988 8017.166
5_adp: 16.054 0.8985 0.9944 7971.176
5_occ: 16.019 0.8988 0.9949 7940.255
5_bss: 15.987 0.8990 0.9903 7906.844
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu geom_target
0 : 24.226 0.414 2.119 33.790 0.145 4.084 5.2530e+01
1_bss: 24.226 0.414 2.119 33.790 0.145 4.084 5.2530e+01
1_xyz: 1.835 0.015 0.112 18.327 0.007 4.103 1.6606e-01
1_adp: 1.835 0.015 0.112 18.327 0.007 4.103 1.6606e-01
1_occ: 1.835 0.015 0.112 18.327 0.007 4.103 1.6606e-01
2_bss: 1.835 0.015 0.112 18.327 0.007 4.103 1.6606e-01
2_xyz: 1.240 0.009 0.080 16.323 0.005 4.116 9.2692e-02
2_adp: 1.240 0.009 0.080 16.323 0.005 4.116 9.2692e-02
2_occ: 1.240 0.009 0.080 16.323 0.005 4.116 9.2692e-02
3_bss: 1.240 0.009 0.080 16.323 0.005 4.116 9.2692e-02
3_xyz: 1.080 0.008 0.074 15.689 0.004 4.108 7.1704e-02
3_adp: 1.080 0.008 0.074 15.689 0.004 4.108 7.1704e-02
3_occ: 1.080 0.008 0.074 15.689 0.004 4.108 7.1704e-02
4_bss: 1.080 0.008 0.074 15.689 0.004 4.108 7.1704e-02
4_xyz: 0.896 0.005 0.064 15.351 0.003 4.108 5.3218e-02
4_adp: 0.896 0.005 0.064 15.351 0.003 4.108 5.3218e-02
4_occ: 0.896 0.005 0.064 15.351 0.003 4.108 5.3218e-02
5_bss: 0.896 0.005 0.064 15.351 0.003 4.108 5.3218e-02
5_xyz: 0.916 0.005 0.064 15.335 0.003 4.108 5.3572e-02
5_adp: 0.916 0.005 0.064 15.335 0.003 4.108 5.3572e-02
5_occ: 0.916 0.005 0.064 15.335 0.003 4.108 5.3572e-02
5_bss: 0.916 0.005 0.064 15.335 0.003 4.108 5.3572e-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximal deviations:
stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu |grad|
0 : 74.492 1.400 6.404144.062 0.405 0.942 6.7957e+00
1_bss: 74.492 1.400 6.404144.062 0.405 0.942 6.7957e+00
1_xyz: 15.926 0.175 0.516 88.541 0.040 2.130 1.0786e-01
1_adp: 15.926 0.175 0.516 88.541 0.040 2.130 1.0786e-01
1_occ: 15.926 0.175 0.516 88.541 0.040 2.130 1.0786e-01
2_bss: 15.926 0.175 0.516 88.541 0.040 2.130 1.0786e-01
2_xyz: 7.757 0.105 0.385 79.084 0.040 2.114 6.6163e-02
2_adp: 7.757 0.105 0.385 79.084 0.040 2.114 6.6163e-02
2_occ: 7.757 0.105 0.385 79.084 0.040 2.114 6.6163e-02
3_bss: 7.757 0.105 0.385 79.084 0.040 2.114 6.6163e-02
3_xyz: 7.244 0.097 0.260 85.531 0.028 2.358 7.0038e-02
3_adp: 7.244 0.097 0.260 85.531 0.028 2.358 7.0038e-02
3_occ: 7.244 0.097 0.260 85.531 0.028 2.358 7.0038e-02
4_bss: 7.244 0.097 0.260 85.531 0.028 2.358 7.0038e-02
4_xyz: 7.965 0.031 0.232 88.482 0.022 2.372 3.6448e-02
4_adp: 7.965 0.031 0.232 88.482 0.022 2.372 3.6448e-02
4_occ: 7.965 0.031 0.232 88.482 0.022 2.372 3.6448e-02
5_bss: 7.965 0.031 0.232 88.482 0.022 2.372 3.6448e-02
5_xyz: 7.118 0.034 0.191 88.744 0.026 2.391 3.3847e-02
5_adp: 7.118 0.034 0.191 88.744 0.026 2.391 3.3847e-02
5_occ: 7.118 0.034 0.191 88.744 0.026 2.391 3.3847e-02
5_bss: 7.118 0.034 0.191 88.744 0.026 2.391 3.3847e-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|-----overall-----|---macromolecule----|------solvent-------|
stage b_max b_min b_ave b_max b_min b_ave b_max b_min b_ave
0 : 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
1_bss: 19.99 0.01 9.86 19.98 0.01 9.82 19.99 0.06 10.10
1_xyz: 19.99 0.01 9.86 19.98 0.01 9.82 19.99 0.06 10.10
1_adp: 84.36 0.00 15.50 77.46 0.00 13.58 84.36 0.00 25.94
1_occ: 84.36 0.00 15.50 77.46 0.00 13.58 84.36 0.00 25.94
2_bss: 84.36 0.00 15.50 77.46 0.00 13.58 84.36 0.00 25.94
2_xyz: 84.36 0.00 15.50 77.46 0.00 13.58 84.36 0.00 25.94
2_adp: 86.25 0.00 15.00 84.56 0.00 12.13 86.25 0.00 30.63
2_occ: 86.25 0.00 15.00 84.56 0.00 12.13 86.25 0.00 30.63
3_bss: 86.25 0.00 15.00 84.56 0.00 12.13 86.25 0.00 30.63
3_xyz: 86.25 0.00 15.00 84.56 0.00 12.13 86.25 0.00 30.63
3_adp: 112.61 0.00 15.92 112.61 0.00 11.48 90.12 2.36 40.09
3_occ: 112.61 0.00 15.92 112.61 0.00 11.48 90.12 2.36 40.09
4_bss: 112.61 0.00 15.92 112.61 0.00 11.48 90.12 2.36 40.09
4_xyz: 112.61 0.00 15.92 112.61 0.00 11.48 90.12 2.36 40.09
4_adp: 101.03 0.00 14.36 101.03 0.00 10.39 83.52 3.73 36.00
4_occ: 101.03 0.00 14.36 101.03 0.00 10.39 83.52 3.73 36.00
5_bss: 101.03 0.00 14.36 101.03 0.00 10.39 83.52 3.73 36.00
5_xyz: 101.03 0.00 14.36 101.03 0.00 10.39 83.52 3.73 36.00
5_adp: 101.16 0.00 14.37 101.16 0.00 10.29 83.86 2.14 36.60
5_occ: 101.16 0.00 14.37 101.16 0.00 10.29 83.86 2.14 36.60
5_bss: 101.80 0.63 15.00 101.80 0.63 10.92 84.50 2.78 37.23
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage Deviation of refined
model from start model
max min mean
0 : 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_bss: 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_xyz: 1.266 0.010 0.425
1_adp: 1.266 0.010 0.425
1_occ: 1.266 0.010 0.425
2_bss: 1.266 0.010 0.425
2_xyz: 1.576 0.015 0.574
2_adp: 1.576 0.015 0.574
2_occ: 1.576 0.015 0.574
3_bss: 1.576 0.015 0.574
3_xyz: 1.717 0.037 0.692
3_adp: 1.717 0.037 0.692
3_occ: 1.717 0.037 0.692
4_bss: 1.717 0.037 0.692
4_xyz: 1.767 0.042 0.762
4_adp: 1.767 0.042 0.762
4_occ: 1.767 0.042 0.762
5_bss: 1.767 0.042 0.762
5_xyz: 1.779 0.066 0.812
5_adp: 1.779 0.066 0.812
5_occ: 1.779 0.066 0.812
5_bss: 1.779 0.066 0.812
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU time actual refinement: 354.92
============================== Exporting results ==============================
Writing refined structure to PDB file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/run_24/model_refine_001.pdb
n_use = 2823
n_use_u_iso = 2823
n_use_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_site = 0
n_grad_u_iso = 0
n_grad_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_occupancy = 106
n_grad_fp = 0
n_grad_fdp = 0
n_anisotropic_flag = 0
total number of scatterers = 2823
Writing 2mFobs-DFmodel XPLOR map to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/run_24/model_refine_001_2mFobs-DFmodel.map
Writing mFobs-DFmodel XPLOR map to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/run_24/model_refine_001_mFobs-DFmodel.map
Writing map coefficients to MTZ file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/run_24/model_refine_001_map_coeffs.mtz
Writing default parameters for subsequent refinement:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/run_24/model_refine_002.def
=============================== Detailed timings ==============================
Pure refinement (no I/O, processing, etc)= 354.76
Macro-tasks:
bulk solvent and scale = 45.93
individual site refinement = 148.00
weights calculation = 32.47
collect and process = 6.49
model show statistics = 0.11
TOTAL for macro-tasks = 233.00
Micro-tasks:
mask = 3.10
f_calc = 110.45
alpha_beta = 8.54
target = 1.14
gradients_wrt_atomic_parameters = 120.52
fmodel = 7.93
r_factors = 0.30
phase_errors = 9.90
foms = 0.26
TOTAL for micro-tasks = 262.14
NUMBER OF MASK CALCS= 6
Time per interpreted Python bytecode instruction: 5.043 micro seconds
Total CPU time: 6.17 minutes
from_scatterers_fft: 637 calls, 110.16 s
gradients_fft: 583 calls, 107.77 s
=========================== phenix.refine: finished ===========================
# Date 2008-01-16 Time 00:33:34 PST -0800 (1200472414.11 s)
Start R-work = 0.5075, R-free = 0.5009 (no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale)
Final R-work = 0.1501, R-free = 0.1920 (no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale)
Start R-work = 0.4977, R-free = 0.4903
Final R-work = 0.1335, R-free = 0.1769
| en |
markdown | DWYYWIOQ6LCY2OO246FE6A5EKGGNBYCS | # Presentation: DWYYWIOQ6LCY2OO246FE6A5EKGGNBYCS
## RT2007 Status NPSS AdCom Meeting 7/22/06
- Margaret Votava
- FNAL
- RT2007 Chair
## Conference Venue
- Sunday April 29th -> Friday May 4th, 2007
- 2 short courses on Sunday
- ATCA – possibly Jeff Munch from ADLINK Technologies
- ?
- Plenary sessions from Monday – Friday
- Excursion/banquet Wednesday afternoon and evening
- On-site at Fermilab – either in WH1W or Ramsey auditorium depending on size
- No conference supplied transportation between hotel and FNAL
## Floor Space
- Poster sessions
- May need to split in two sessions due to floor space and mounting stands
- Each poster slotted a 5m description during plenary sessions
- Vendor support
- Up to 10 vendor areas
- NEED vendor support for conference bag or folder
- Help offset cost of banquet/reception
- Up to 2 “salesy” talks during plenary describing relevant technology.
- Inserts into conference bag
## Things that are done
- FNAL Approval
- Conference rooms reserved
- Local organizing team in place
- Except conference proceedings editor
- Website in place, mostly placeholders
- First draft of poster complete
- CANPS Committee notified
- IEEE Forms submitted
- Schedule, Insurance, Budget
## Local Organizing Committee
- Vendor Contact – Bakul Banerjee
- Abstract Coordinator – Jane Nachtman
- Registration/Hotel/Banquet – FNAL Conference office
- Webmaster – Mari Herrera
- Admin – Griselda Lopez
- Poster – Diana Canzone
- Conference Editor – TBD
- Abstract/program submission tool
- BNL
- JACOW
- Others local volunteers
- FNAL DAQ experts Jerry Guglielmo, Vince Pavlicek
- FNAL Scientists – Arlene Lennox, Jane Nachtman, Vivian O’Dell, G.P. Yeh
- Mike Haney UofI
## Deadlines
- Invitations to scientific committee. In Progress
- First announcement: late September
- Poster: late September
- Abstract submission open: late October
- Second call: early December
- Submission Deadline: late January
- Notification: late February
- Short courses set: late February
- Registration open: late February
- Presenter confirmation: early March
- Registration Deadline: late March
## Scientific Advisory Committee
- Announcement sent to CANPS committee late last week
- FNAL scientists, ANL
- Could use more nuclear science and medical imaging input, and more representation from Asia
## Budget Proposal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Category | | | Pessimistic (127) | | | Most Likely (180) | | | Optimistic (225) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| S U R P L U S | | | | | | 14740 | | | 23130 | | | 33141 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| T O T A L R E C E I P T S | | | | | | 73400 | | | 101000 | | | 129500 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| T O T A L O U T L A Y S | | | | | | 58660 | | | 77870 | | | 96359 |
## Receipts
- Registrations Fees: $300 - $400 ($150 for students)
- Tutorials $100 each
- URA Grant - $7500
- Banquet/excursion
- $150 if in Chicago (not including museum entrance fees)
## Banquet/Excursion
- Downtown Chicago
- Provide transport to/from downtown
- Afternoon at museum campus
- Natural history, aquarium, planetarium
- Dinner at midAmerica club overlooking Lake Michigan
- FNAL local
- Excursion
- Frank Lloyd Wright architecture tour in Oak Park
- Not so close
- No nearby banquet facilities
- Cantigny Park - Estate of Robert McCormick
- House tour
- Formal gardens, Greenhouse tour
- WWI Military Museum
- Banquet
- Arboretum (catered)
- Cantigny Golf Clubhouse
- Elmhurst Art Museum (catered)
- Companion program | en |
log-files | 843654 | # Date 2008-01-16 Time 04:09:33 PST -0800 (1200485373.94 s)
#phil __OFF__
Command line arguments: "../205.param" "main.number_of_macro_cycles=5" "--overwrite"
HOST = blackbird.lbl.gov
HOSTTYPE = x86_64-linux
USER = phzwart
PID = 25458
JOB_ID = 5159
SGE_ARCH = lx24-amd64
SGE_TASK_FIRST = 1
SGE_TASK_LAST = 1330
SGE_TASK_ID = 205
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHENIX: Python-based Hierarchical ENvironment for Integrated Xtallography
User: phzwart
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
phenix.refine: Macromolecular Structure Refinement
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phenix developers include:
Paul Adams, Pavel Afonine, Vicent Chen, Ian Davis, Kreshna Gopal,
Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve, Li-Wei Hung, Robert Immormino, Tom Ioerger,
Airlie McCoy, Erik McKee, Nigel Moriarty, Reetal Pai, Randy Read,
Jane Richardson, David Richardson, Tod Romo, Jim Sacchettini,
Nicholas Sauter, Jacob Smith, Laurent Storoni, Tom Terwilliger,
Peter Zwart
Phenix home page:
http://www.phenix-online.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phenix components are copyrighted by:
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Los Alamos National Laboratory
- University of Cambridge
- Duke University
- Texas Agricultural Experiment Station &
Texas Engineering Experiment Station
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major third-party components of Phenix include:
Python, wxwidgets, wxPython, Boost, SCons, Clipper,
CCP4 Monomer Library, CCP4 I/O libraries, PyCifRW, FFTPACK, L-BFGS
Enter phenix.acknowledgments for details.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing inputs. This may take a minute or two.
Command line parameter definitions:
refinement.main.number_of_macro_cycles = 5
Working crystal symmetry after inspecting all inputs:
Unit cell: (68.845, 47.3993, 87.2539, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/model.pdb
Monomer Library directory:
"/net/rosie/scratch3/phzwart/CCTBX/Sources/mon_lib"
Total number of atoms: 2823
Number of models: 1
Model: 0
Number of conformers: 2
Conformer: "A"
Number of atoms: 2769
Number of chains: 2
Number of residues, atoms: 302, 2333
Classifications: {'peptide': 302}
Modifications used: {'COO': 1}
Link IDs: {'PTRANS': 7, 'CIS': 1, 'TRANS': 293}
Number of residues, atoms: 436, 436
Classifications: {'water': 436}
Link IDs: {None: 435}
Conformer: "B"
Number of atoms: 2771
Common with "A": 2717
Number of chains: 2
Number of residues, atoms: 302, 2333
Classifications: {'peptide': 302}
Modifications used: {'COO': 1}
Link IDs: {'PTRANS': 7, 'CIS': 1, 'TRANS': 293}
bond proxies already assigned to first conformer: 2332
Number of residues, atoms: 438, 438
Classifications: {'water': 438}
Link IDs: {None: 437}
Time building chain proxies: 2.74, per 1000 atoms: 0.97
================================== X-ray data =================================
F-obs:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:FOBS,SIGMA
R-free flags:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:TEST
Miller array info: /net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:FOBS,SIGMA
Observation type: xray.amplitude
Type of data: double, size=19589
Type of sigmas: double, size=19589
Number of Miller indices: 19589
Anomalous flag: False
Unit cell: (68.845, 47.3993, 87.2539, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
Systematic absences: 0
Centric reflections: 2427
Resolution range: 14.8556 1.96084
Completeness in resolution range: 0.929975
Completeness with d_max=infinity: 0.927158
Number of F-obs in resolution range: 19589
Number of F-obs <= 0: 0
Refinement resolution range: d_max = 14.8556
d_min = 1.9608
Miller array info: /net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:TEST
Observation type: None
Type of data: int, size=19589
Type of sigmas: None
Number of Miller indices: 19589
Anomalous flag: False
Unit cell: (68.845, 47.3993, 87.2539, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
Systematic absences: 0
Centric reflections: 2427
Resolution range: 14.8556 1.96084
Completeness in resolution range: 0.929975
Completeness with d_max=infinity: 0.927158
Test (R-free flags) flag value: 1
Number of work/free reflections by resolution:
work free %free
bin 1: 14.8560 - 4.1957 [2213/2241] 1990 223 10.1%
bin 2: 4.1957 - 3.3428 [2118/2141] 1902 216 10.2%
bin 3: 3.3428 - 2.9239 [2085/2110] 1883 202 9.7%
bin 4: 2.9239 - 2.6582 [2089/2105] 1876 213 10.2%
bin 5: 2.6582 - 2.4686 [2037/2076] 1829 208 10.2%
bin 6: 2.4686 - 2.3236 [2068/2100] 1865 203 9.8%
bin 7: 2.3236 - 2.2077 [2043/2080] 1843 200 9.8%
bin 8: 2.2077 - 2.1118 [2037/2079] 1829 208 10.2%
bin 9: 2.1118 - 2.0308 [2017/2056] 1822 195 9.7%
bin 10: 2.0308 - 1.9608 [ 882/2076] 791 91 10.3%
overall 17630 1959 10.0%
Writing MTZ file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_205/model_refine_data.mtz
========================== Anomalous scatterer groups =========================
All atoms refined with f_prime=0 and f_double_prime=0.
========================== Set up restraints manager ==========================
Number of disulfides: simple=3, symmetry=0
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 168 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " distance=2.08
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 168 " - " SG BCYS A 201 " distance=1.98
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 254 " - " SG CYS A 260 " distance=2.05
Time building geometry restraints manager: 0.11 seconds
Histogram of bond lengths:
1.21 - 1.38: 943
1.38 - 1.56: 1465
1.56 - 1.73: 7
1.73 - 1.90: 21
1.90 - 2.08: 3
Bond restraints sorted by residual:
atom i - atom j ideal model delta weight residual
" SG CYS A 168 " - " SG BCYS A 201 " 2.031 1.983 0.048 2.50e+03 5.87e+00
" C GLN A 88 " - " N GLN A 89 " 1.329 1.360 -0.031 5.10e+03 4.97e+00
" SG CYS A 168 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " 2.031 2.075 -0.044 2.50e+03 4.89e+00
" CB CYS A 201 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " 1.808 1.738 0.070 9.18e+02 4.46e+00
" C PRO A 198 " - " N ILE A 199 " 1.329 1.301 0.028 5.10e+03 4.10e+00
... (remaining 2434 not shown)
Histogram of nonbonded interaction distances:
1.34 - 2.05: 13
2.05 - 2.76: 468
2.76 - 3.48: 4564
3.48 - 4.19: 9366
4.19 - 4.90: 13949
Nonbonded interactions sorted by model distance:
atom i - atom j model vdw sym.op. j
" O HOH Z 109 " - " O HOH Z 417 " 1.341 3.040 -x+1,y-1/2,-z+1/2
" O HOH Z 18 " - " O HOH Z 102 " 1.508 3.040 -x+1,y+1/2,-z+1/2
" O HOH Z 81 " - " O HOH Z 186 " 1.550 3.040 -x+1,y+1/2,-z+1/2
" O HOH Z 43 " - " O HOH Z 169 " 1.612 3.040 -x+1,y+1/2,-z+1/2
" NH1 ARG A 24 " - " O GLY A 91 " 1.744 3.120 -x+1,y+1/2,-z+1/2
... (remaining 28355 not shown)
Histogram of dihedral angle deviations from ideal:
0.01 - 17.19: 754
17.19 - 34.36: 62
34.36 - 51.54: 27
51.54 - 68.71: 23
68.71 - 85.89: 4
Dihedral angle restraints sorted by residual:
" CA PHE A 192 "
" CB PHE A 192 "
" CG PHE A 192 "
" CD1 PHE A 192 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
90.00 7.91 82.09 2 2.50e-03 1.68e+01
" N PRO A 54 "
" CG PRO A 54 "
" CD PRO A 54 "
" CB PRO A 54 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
30.00 -27.17 57.17 3 4.44e-03 1.45e+01
" N PRO A 280 "
" CA PRO A 280 "
" CB PRO A 280 "
" CG PRO A 280 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
-25.00 38.44 56.56 3 4.44e-03 1.42e+01
... (remaining 867 not shown)
==================== Fixing bad ADP in input model (if any) ===================
============================== Scattering factors =============================
----------X-ray scattering dictionary----------
Number of scattering types: 4
Type Number sf(0) Gaussians
S 13 15.96 2
O 902 7.97 2
N 437 6.97 2
C 1471 5.97 2
sf(0) = scattering factor at diffraction angle 0.
====================== Modifying start model if requested =====================
==================== Fixing bad ADP in input model (if any) ===================
================== Extract refinement strategy and selections =================
individual_sites = True
rigid_body = False
individual_adp = True
group_adp = False
tls = False
individual_occupancies = True
group_occupancies = False
group_anomalous = False
size = 2823
n_use = 2823
n_use_u_iso = 2823
n_use_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_site = 0
n_grad_u_iso = 0
n_grad_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_occupancy = 0
n_grad_fp = 0
n_grad_fdp = 0
n_anisotropic_flag = 0
total number of scatterers = 2823
==================== Process input NCS or/and find new NCS ====================
Using existing and finding new NCS is disabled.
Use refinement.main.ncs=true to activate it.
Look at refinement.ncs for more NCS related parameters.
=================== Write initial parameters into .eff file ===================
Writing effective parameters to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_205/model_refine_001.eff
Writing geometry restraints to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_205/model_refine_001.geo
CPU time processing inputs: 7.81
============================ Non-default parameters ===========================
A complete record of all parameters was written to the .eff file above.
Below are only the non-defaults.
#phil __ON__
refinement {
crystal_symmetry {
unit_cell = 68.845 47.3993 87.2539 90 90 90
space_group = "P 21 21 21"
}
input {
pdb {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/model.pdb"
}
xray_data {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns"
labels = "FOBS,SIGMA"
r_free_flags {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns"
label = "TEST"
test_flag_value = 1
}
}
}
output {
prefix = "model_refine"
serial = 1
}
main {
number_of_macro_cycles = 5
}
}
#phil __OFF__
============================= ml refinement start =============================
----------structure factors based statistics (before refinement)----------
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3886 r_free= 0.3825 ksol= 0.00 Bsol= 0.00 scale= 0.943 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.48 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.168308 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 14.8560 - 4.6797 0.99 1436 159 0.3065 0.3177 6.4175 6.4553|
| 2: 4.6797 - 3.7339 0.99 1388 154 0.3080 0.2939 6.5721 6.5617|
| 3: 3.7339 - 3.2676 0.99 1347 149 0.3495 0.3263 6.4936 6.4936|
| 4: 3.2676 - 2.9714 0.99 1351 147 0.3727 0.3751 6.3481 6.3658|
| 5: 2.9714 - 2.7599 0.98 1327 152 0.4069 0.3856 6.2323 6.226|
| 6: 2.7599 - 2.5981 0.99 1346 145 0.4103 0.4518 6.1584 6.0905|
| 7: 2.5981 - 2.4686 0.99 1285 156 0.4129 0.3741 6.1138 6.0258|
| 8: 2.4686 - 2.3616 0.99 1346 134 0.4456 0.4126 6.0906 6.0749|
| 9: 2.3616 - 2.2710 0.99 1324 151 0.4475 0.4067 6.054 6.0344|
| 10: 2.2710 - 2.1929 0.98 1318 142 0.4458 0.4231 6.0197 5.9687|
| 11: 2.1929 - 2.1245 0.98 1277 154 0.4569 0.4861 5.9624 6.0049|
| 12: 2.1245 - 2.0640 1.00 1324 143 0.4596 0.4512 5.8933 5.9183|
| 13: 2.0640 - 2.0098 0.91 1235 133 0.4661 0.5017 5.8283 5.8146|
| 14: 2.0098 - 1.9608 0.25 326 40 0.4599 0.4595 5.8548 5.6742|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 14.8560 - 4.6797 1436 159 0.75 29.66 0.86 0.76 52990.98|
| 2: 4.6797 - 3.7339 1388 154 0.80 26.38 0.97 0.88 64233.53|
| 3: 3.7339 - 3.2676 1347 149 0.74 31.90 0.95 0.90 65175.97|
| 4: 3.2676 - 2.9714 1351 147 0.67 37.59 0.96 0.85 58195.12|
| 5: 2.9714 - 2.7599 1327 152 0.61 42.96 0.94 0.81 49678.58|
| 6: 2.7599 - 2.5981 1346 145 0.60 43.73 0.95 0.79 43704.62|
| 7: 2.5981 - 2.4686 1285 156 0.60 43.64 0.98 0.80 39066.54|
| 8: 2.4686 - 2.3616 1346 134 0.61 43.47 0.97 0.82 34268.03|
| 9: 2.3616 - 2.2710 1324 151 0.62 42.52 0.96 0.85 31111.51|
| 10: 2.2710 - 2.1929 1318 142 0.60 43.86 0.98 0.83 29370.85|
| 11: 2.1929 - 2.1245 1277 154 0.55 48.64 0.98 0.80 32012.44|
| 12: 2.1245 - 2.0640 1324 143 0.48 54.19 0.98 0.74 32997.40|
| 13: 2.0640 - 2.0098 1235 133 0.45 56.32 0.97 0.70 30345.30|
| 14: 2.0098 - 1.9608 326 40 0.53 50.01 1.00 0.67 23034.99|
|alpha: min = 0.67 max = 0.90 mean = 0.81|
|beta: min = 23034.99 max = 65175.97 mean = 43232.94|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.62|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 90.00 mean = 41.82|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 89.93 mean = 42.10|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
============================== Outliers rejection =============================
basic_wilson_outliers = 0
extreme_wilson_outliers = 0
beamstop_shadow_outliers = 0
total = 0
====================== Target weights (before refinement) =====================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 6.734987 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 90.235 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.937187 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 89.619 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------Initial model statistics (before refinement)----------
|-Geometry statistics: start--------------------------------------------------|
| Histogram of deviations from ideal values for |
| Bonds | Angles | Nonbonded contacts |
| 0.000 - 0.007: 1367 | 0.001 - 0.989: 1519 | 1.341 - 1.697: 4 |
| 0.007 - 0.014: 729 | 0.989 - 1.976: 994 | 1.697 - 2.053: 9 |
| 0.014 - 0.021: 262 | 1.976 - 2.963: 470 | 2.053 - 2.409: 20 |
| 0.021 - 0.028: 63 | 2.963 - 3.950: 196 | 2.409 - 2.765: 448 |
| 0.028 - 0.035: 15 | 3.950 - 4.938: 66 | 2.765 - 3.121: 2219 |
| 0.035 - 0.042: 0 | 4.938 - 5.925: 29 | 3.121 - 3.476: 2345 |
| 0.042 - 0.049: 2 | 5.925 - 6.912: 16 | 3.476 - 3.832: 4411 |
| 0.049 - 0.056: 0 | 6.912 - 7.899: 2 | 3.832 - 4.188: 4955 |
| 0.056 - 0.063: 0 | 7.899 - 8.887: 3 | 4.188 - 4.544: 6298 |
| 0.063 - 0.070: 1 | 8.887 - 9.874: 4 | 4.544 - 4.900: 7651 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-Geometry statistics: start--------------------------------------------------|
| Type | Count | Deviation from ideal | Targets | Target (sum) |
| | | rmsd max min | | |
| bond | 2439 | 0.010 0.070 0.000 | 0.254 | |
| angle | 3299 | 1.822 9.874 0.001 | 1.000 | |
| chirality | 348 | 0.101 0.314 0.000 | 0.257 | 0.186 |
| planarity | 436 | 0.009 0.055 0.000 | 0.973 | |
| dihedral | 870 | 15.968 85.889 0.013 | 1.071 | |
| nonbonded | 2439 | 4.111 4.900 1.341 | 0.533 | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.799)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 5.09 63.06 16.02 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 5.09 63.06 16.02 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 6.19 63.06 36.87 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 5.09 49.51 12.19 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 5.090 - 10.887: 1254 | 5: 34.075 - 39.872: 81 |
| 1: 10.887 - 16.684: 844 | 6: 39.872 - 45.669: 78 |
| 2: 16.684 - 22.481: 225 | 7: 45.669 - 51.466: 64 |
| 3: 22.481 - 28.278: 122 | 8: 51.466 - 57.263: 37 |
| 4: 28.278 - 34.075: 94 | 9: 57.263 - 63.060: 24 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-Occupancies statistics------------------------------------------------------|
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.30 number of occupancies < 0.1 = 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 1 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3886 r_free= 0.3825 ksol= 0.00 Bsol= 0.00 scale= 0.943 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.48 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.168308 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3801 r_free= 0.3733 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 36.00 scale= 0.969 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-0.21,-0.05,0.27,-0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.48 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.155704 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 6.024772 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 89.968 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.530143 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 89.367 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.3801 final r-factor (work) = 0.2187 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.3733 final r-factor (free) = 0.2460 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 18.7449 = 6.02 * 0.50 * 6.1608 + 1.00 * 0.1864 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 17.8811 = 6.02 * 0.50 * 5.9072 + 1.00 * 0.0863 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.2187 final r-factor (work) = 0.1994 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.2460 final r-factor (free) = 0.2498 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 3.1383 = 0.53 * 1.00 * 5.9072 + 1.00 * 0.0067 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 3.0072 = 0.53 * 1.00 * 5.6275 + 1.00 * 0.0239 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 12 | number of function evaluations = 14 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.799)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 87.17 17.15 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 87.17 17.15 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 6.93 65.20 38.43 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 87.17 13.25 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 8.717: 760 | 5: 43.585 - 52.302: 132 |
| 1: 8.717 - 17.434: 1161 | 6: 52.302 - 61.019: 63 |
| 2: 17.434 - 26.151: 394 | 7: 61.019 - 69.736: 4 |
| 3: 26.151 - 34.868: 164 | 8: 69.736 - 78.453: 0 |
| 4: 34.868 - 43.585: 144 | 9: 78.453 - 87.170: 1 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1994 r_free = 0.2498 target_work(ml) = 5.638 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.30 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1992 r_free = 0.2498 target_work(ml) = 5.637 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.18 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 2 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1992 r_free= 0.2498 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 36.00 scale= 1.038 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-0.21,-0.05,0.27,-0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.26 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.637493 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1956 r_free= 0.2457 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 56.56 scale= 0.996 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.59,-1.53,-0.95,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.69 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.26 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.629619 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 2.884878 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 96.923 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.335665 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 94.128 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1956 final r-factor (work) = 0.1432 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.2457 final r-factor (free) = 0.1809 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 8.2247 = 2.88 * 0.50 * 5.6421 + 1.00 * 0.0863 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 8.0049 = 2.88 * 0.50 * 5.5094 + 1.00 * 0.0579 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 28 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1432 final r-factor (work) = 0.1328 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1809 final r-factor (free) = 0.1735 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.8677 = 0.34 * 1.00 * 5.5094 + 1.00 * 0.0183 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.7882 = 0.34 * 1.00 * 5.3012 + 1.00 * 0.0088 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 24 | number of function evaluations = 25 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.799)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 83.17 17.33 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 83.17 17.33 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 6.22 71.92 39.95 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 83.17 13.17 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 8.317: 594 | 5: 41.584 - 49.901: 115 |
| 1: 8.317 - 16.634: 1381 | 6: 49.901 - 58.218: 87 |
| 2: 16.634 - 24.951: 334 | 7: 58.218 - 66.535: 48 |
| 3: 24.951 - 33.268: 127 | 8: 66.535 - 74.852: 14 |
| 4: 33.268 - 41.584: 121 | 9: 74.852 - 83.169: 2 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1328 r_free = 0.1735 target_work(ml) = 5.278 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.18 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1326 r_free = 0.1734 target_work(ml) = 5.278 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.18 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 3 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1326 r_free= 0.1734 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 56.56 scale= 1.010 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.59,-1.53,-0.95,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.69 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.16 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.277596 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1326 r_free= 0.1732 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 56.56 scale= 1.000 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-3.10,-1.92,-1.05,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -2.02 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.16 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.276817 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 3.528784 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 109.403 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.161766 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 150.698 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1326 final r-factor (work) = 0.1143 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1732 final r-factor (free) = 0.1595 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 9.4130 = 3.53 * 0.50 * 5.3022 + 1.00 * 0.0579 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 9.2675 = 3.53 * 0.50 * 5.2117 + 1.00 * 0.0720 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1143 final r-factor (work) = 0.1130 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1595 final r-factor (free) = 0.1564 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 0.8518 = 0.16 * 1.00 * 5.2117 + 1.00 * 0.0088 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 0.8424 = 0.16 * 1.00 * 5.1623 + 1.00 * 0.0073 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 31 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.799)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 1.84 82.13 16.80 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 1.84 82.13 16.80 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 3.45 72.61 38.13 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 1.84 82.13 12.89 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 1.839 - 9.868: 963 | 5: 41.984 - 50.013: 94 |
| 1: 9.868 - 17.897: 1135 | 6: 50.013 - 58.042: 80 |
| 2: 17.897 - 25.926: 251 | 7: 58.042 - 66.071: 30 |
| 3: 25.926 - 33.955: 130 | 8: 66.071 - 74.100: 10 |
| 4: 33.955 - 41.984: 128 | 9: 74.100 - 82.129: 2 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1130 r_free = 0.1564 target_work(ml) = 5.153 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.18 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1128 r_free = 0.1565 target_work(ml) = 5.152 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.18 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 4 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1128 r_free= 0.1565 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 56.56 scale= 1.000 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-3.10,-1.92,-1.05,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -2.02 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.15 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.152161 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1128 r_free= 0.1565 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 50.81 scale= 1.000 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-3.10,-1.92,-1.05,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -2.02 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.15 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.152364 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 1.400762 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 144.388 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 1.049512 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 150.909 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1128 final r-factor (work) = 0.1154 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1565 final r-factor (free) = 0.1564 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 3.6872 = 1.40 * 0.50 * 5.1618 + 1.00 * 0.0720 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 3.6690 = 1.40 * 0.50 * 5.1645 + 1.00 * 0.0519 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 28 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1154 final r-factor (work) = 0.1138 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1564 final r-factor (free) = 0.1585 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 5.4276 = 1.05 * 1.00 * 5.1645 + 1.00 * 0.0073 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 5.4226 = 1.05 * 1.00 * 5.1576 + 1.00 * 0.0097 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.799)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.68 91.68 17.27 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.68 91.68 17.27 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 0.68 86.34 40.60 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.85 91.68 12.98 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.681 - 9.781: 980 | 5: 46.179 - 55.278: 104 |
| 1: 9.781 - 18.880: 1162 | 6: 55.278 - 64.378: 67 |
| 2: 18.880 - 27.980: 228 | 7: 64.378 - 73.477: 31 |
| 3: 27.980 - 37.079: 123 | 8: 73.477 - 82.577: 7 |
| 4: 37.079 - 46.179: 117 | 9: 82.577 - 91.676: 4 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1138 r_free = 0.1585 target_work(ml) = 5.165 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.18 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1138 r_free = 0.1585 target_work(ml) = 5.165 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.16 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 5 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1138 r_free= 0.1585 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 50.81 scale= 0.997 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-3.10,-1.92,-1.05,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -2.02 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.15 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.164834 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1137 r_free= 0.1584 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 52.63 scale= 1.001 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.98,-1.82,-0.86,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.89 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.16 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.164640 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 1.473964 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 152.469 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.210157 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 124.173 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1137 final r-factor (work) = 0.1121 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1584 final r-factor (free) = 0.1587 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 3.8530 = 1.47 * 0.50 * 5.1577 + 1.00 * 0.0519 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 3.8550 = 1.47 * 0.50 * 5.1585 + 1.00 * 0.0533 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 28 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1121 final r-factor (work) = 0.1129 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1587 final r-factor (free) = 0.1572 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.0937 = 0.21 * 1.00 * 5.1585 + 1.00 * 0.0096 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.0929 = 0.21 * 1.00 * 5.1622 + 1.00 * 0.0080 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 29 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.799)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 1.43 88.49 16.64 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 1.43 88.49 16.64 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 2.48 84.03 38.18 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 1.43 88.49 12.68 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 1.432 - 10.138: 1090 | 5: 44.962 - 53.668: 96 |
| 1: 10.138 - 18.844: 1075 | 6: 53.668 - 62.374: 45 |
| 2: 18.844 - 27.550: 217 | 7: 62.374 - 71.080: 27 |
| 3: 27.550 - 36.256: 128 | 8: 71.080 - 79.786: 7 |
| 4: 36.256 - 44.962: 135 | 9: 79.786 - 88.491: 3 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1129 r_free = 0.1572 target_work(ml) = 5.158 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.16 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1129 r_free = 0.1572 target_work(ml) = 5.158 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.12 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1129 r_free= 0.1572 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 52.63 scale= 0.995 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.98,-1.82,-0.86,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.89 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.15 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.158054 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 14.8560 - 4.6797 0.99 1436 159 0.1005 0.1309 5.4044 5.5688|
| 2: 4.6797 - 3.7339 0.99 1388 154 0.0861 0.1086 5.4348 5.618|
| 3: 3.7339 - 3.2676 0.99 1347 149 0.1071 0.1514 5.4629 5.8172|
| 4: 3.2676 - 2.9714 0.99 1351 147 0.1227 0.1554 5.4457 5.6082|
| 5: 2.9714 - 2.7599 0.98 1327 152 0.1312 0.1601 5.3155 5.4873|
| 6: 2.7599 - 2.5981 0.99 1346 145 0.1252 0.2113 5.2213 5.5081|
| 7: 2.5981 - 2.4686 0.99 1285 156 0.1242 0.1629 5.1621 5.364|
| 8: 2.4686 - 2.3616 0.99 1346 134 0.1163 0.1625 5.0866 5.2517|
| 9: 2.3616 - 2.2710 0.99 1324 151 0.1180 0.1886 5.0204 5.3352|
| 10: 2.2710 - 2.1929 0.98 1318 142 0.1135 0.1748 4.9493 5.1637|
| 11: 2.1929 - 2.1245 0.98 1277 154 0.1157 0.1790 4.9126 5.2585|
| 12: 2.1245 - 2.0640 1.00 1324 143 0.1174 0.1639 4.872 5.0918|
| 13: 2.0640 - 2.0098 0.91 1235 133 0.1163 0.1799 4.7913 5.0306|
| 14: 2.0098 - 1.9608 0.25 326 40 0.1068 0.1710 4.7359 4.9188|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 14.8560 - 4.6797 1436 159 0.94 9.46 0.97 0.95 7503.77|
| 2: 4.6797 - 3.7339 1388 154 0.95 8.00 1.01 1.00 8964.98|
| 3: 3.7339 - 3.2676 1347 149 0.93 11.39 1.02 1.01 10074.22|
| 4: 3.2676 - 2.9714 1351 147 0.92 13.94 1.00 0.99 10243.21|
| 5: 2.9714 - 2.7599 1327 152 0.90 15.86 0.99 0.96 8182.96|
| 6: 2.7599 - 2.5981 1346 145 0.90 16.41 0.98 0.96 7107.84|
| 7: 2.5981 - 2.4686 1285 156 0.91 15.56 0.98 0.95 6128.56|
| 8: 2.4686 - 2.3616 1346 134 0.90 15.82 1.00 0.97 5653.07|
| 9: 2.3616 - 2.2710 1324 151 0.90 15.77 0.99 0.95 4909.63|
| 10: 2.2710 - 2.1929 1318 142 0.90 15.71 0.99 0.96 4403.99|
| 11: 2.1929 - 2.1245 1277 154 0.91 15.63 0.99 0.96 4090.04|
| 12: 2.1245 - 2.0640 1324 143 0.90 16.06 1.00 0.99 3857.06|
| 13: 2.0640 - 2.0098 1235 133 0.90 16.40 0.98 0.97 3333.86|
| 14: 2.0098 - 1.9608 326 40 0.92 13.85 0.97 0.92 2711.06|
|alpha: min = 0.92 max = 1.01 mean = 0.97|
|beta: min = 2711.06 max = 10243.21 mean = 6476.07|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.91|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 89.99 mean = 14.23|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 88.43 mean = 13.81|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1128 r_free= 0.1570 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 50.90 scale= 0.999 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.83,-1.67,-0.64,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.72 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.15 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.156792 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 1.96 - 14.86 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1128 r_free= 0.1570 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 50.90 scale= 0.999 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.83,-1.67,-0.64,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.72 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.15 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.156792 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 14.8560 - 4.6797 0.99 1436 159 0.1002 0.1270 5.3949 5.5346|
| 2: 4.6797 - 3.7339 0.99 1388 154 0.0862 0.1084 5.4292 5.6177|
| 3: 3.7339 - 3.2676 0.99 1347 149 0.1072 0.1499 5.4611 5.8049|
| 4: 3.2676 - 2.9714 0.99 1351 147 0.1229 0.1557 5.4439 5.6071|
| 5: 2.9714 - 2.7599 0.98 1327 152 0.1311 0.1606 5.315 5.4855|
| 6: 2.7599 - 2.5981 0.99 1346 145 0.1252 0.2115 5.2209 5.5072|
| 7: 2.5981 - 2.4686 0.99 1285 156 0.1243 0.1634 5.1628 5.3663|
| 8: 2.4686 - 2.3616 0.99 1346 134 0.1162 0.1626 5.0874 5.2524|
| 9: 2.3616 - 2.2710 0.99 1324 151 0.1177 0.1884 5.0205 5.335|
| 10: 2.2710 - 2.1929 0.98 1318 142 0.1135 0.1749 4.9506 5.1657|
| 11: 2.1929 - 2.1245 0.98 1277 154 0.1157 0.1793 4.913 5.2593|
| 12: 2.1245 - 2.0640 1.00 1324 143 0.1173 0.1639 4.8721 5.0919|
| 13: 2.0640 - 2.0098 0.91 1235 133 0.1163 0.1804 4.7919 5.0311|
| 14: 2.0098 - 1.9608 0.25 326 40 0.1070 0.1705 4.7362 4.9182|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 14.8560 - 4.6797 1436 159 0.94 9.24 0.97 0.95 7137.87|
| 2: 4.6797 - 3.7339 1388 154 0.95 7.84 1.01 1.00 8706.30|
| 3: 3.7339 - 3.2676 1347 149 0.93 11.32 1.02 1.02 9970.08|
| 4: 3.2676 - 2.9714 1351 147 0.92 13.86 1.01 1.00 10150.27|
| 5: 2.9714 - 2.7599 1327 152 0.90 15.81 1.00 0.97 8137.63|
| 6: 2.7599 - 2.5981 1346 145 0.90 16.37 0.98 0.96 7098.53|
| 7: 2.5981 - 2.4686 1285 156 0.91 15.55 0.99 0.95 6132.50|
| 8: 2.4686 - 2.3616 1346 134 0.90 15.84 1.00 0.97 5667.99|
| 9: 2.3616 - 2.2710 1324 151 0.90 15.79 1.00 0.96 4922.20|
| 10: 2.2710 - 2.1929 1318 142 0.90 15.73 1.00 0.96 4413.32|
| 11: 2.1929 - 2.1245 1277 154 0.91 15.65 0.99 0.96 4098.32|
| 12: 2.1245 - 2.0640 1324 143 0.90 16.07 1.00 1.00 3863.13|
| 13: 2.0640 - 2.0098 1235 133 0.90 16.41 0.99 0.97 3338.31|
| 14: 2.0098 - 1.9608 326 40 0.92 13.86 0.98 0.93 2715.67|
|alpha: min = 0.93 max = 1.02 mean = 0.97|
|beta: min = 2715.67 max = 10150.27 mean = 6411.22|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.91|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 90.00 mean = 14.19|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 88.35 mean = 13.77|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 11.799)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 1.38 88.44 16.59 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 1.38 88.44 16.59 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 2.43 83.98 38.13 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 1.38 88.44 12.63 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 1.381 - 10.087: 1090 | 5: 44.911 - 53.617: 96 |
| 1: 10.087 - 18.793: 1075 | 6: 53.617 - 62.323: 45 |
| 2: 18.793 - 27.499: 217 | 7: 62.323 - 71.029: 27 |
| 3: 27.499 - 36.205: 128 | 8: 71.029 - 79.735: 7 |
| 4: 36.205 - 44.911: 135 | 9: 79.735 - 88.441: 3 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========== residual map mFobs-DFmodel: highest peaks and deepst holes =========
----------peaks----------
Number of peaks found at mFobs-DFmodel map (map cutoff=3.00 sigma)= 297
Filter by distance & map next to the model:
mapped sites are within: 0.456 - 4.838
number of sites selected in [dist_min= 0.70, dist_max= 6.00]: 293 from: 297
mapped sites are within: 0.709 - 4.838
peak= 5.668 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 56 " = 2.267
peak= 5.333 closest distance to " CB ARG A 275 " = 0.941
peak= 5.327 closest distance to " CG PRO A 54 " = 1.287
peak= 4.990 closest distance to " CG PRO A 90 " = 1.263
peak= 4.808 closest distance to " CB SER A 63 " = 1.131
peak= 4.769 closest distance to " CB GLN A 223 " = 1.400
peak= 4.738 closest distance to " CG PRO A 213 " = 1.304
peak= 4.720 closest distance to " CG PRO A 198 " = 1.215
peak= 4.695 closest distance to " O HOH Z 232 " = 2.373
peak= 4.693 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 1.887
peak= 4.629 closest distance to " CB GLU A 152 " = 1.185
peak= 4.605 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 1.759
peak= 4.560 closest distance to " O HOH Z 403 " = 1.683
peak= 4.552 closest distance to " CB GLN A 183 " = 1.247
peak= 4.518 closest distance to " O HOH Z 43 " = 2.085
peak= 4.491 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 187 " = 1.564
peak= 4.459 closest distance to " CB PRO A 54 " = 1.033
peak= 4.459 closest distance to " CB ARG A 79 " = 1.333
peak= 4.419 closest distance to " O HOH Z 402 " = 1.439
peak= 4.408 closest distance to " O HOH Z 40 " = 1.953
peak= 4.390 closest distance to " CA TYR A 30 " = 0.872
peak= 4.377 closest distance to " O HOH Z 234 " = 3.691
peak= 4.330 closest distance to " O HOH Z 250 " = 1.525
peak= 4.329 closest distance to " CG PRO A 243 " = 1.126
peak= 4.328 closest distance to " O HOH Z 44 " = 2.006
peak= 4.317 closest distance to " O HOH Z 369 " = 2.324
peak= 4.316 closest distance to " O SER A 87 " = 2.177
peak= 4.288 closest distance to " CD2 TRP A 179 " = 1.325
peak= 4.255 closest distance to " O HOH Z 97 " = 2.007
peak= 4.237 closest distance to " O HOH Z 287 " = 1.909
peak= 4.218 closest distance to " O HOH Z 406 " = 1.640
peak= 4.215 closest distance to " NH2BARG A 145 " = 2.088
peak= 4.198 closest distance to " O BHOH Z 74 " = 1.229
peak= 4.187 closest distance to " C PRO A 198 " = 1.523
peak= 4.183 closest distance to " O HOH Z 189 " = 2.578
peak= 4.159 closest distance to " CB ARG A 190 " = 1.691
peak= 4.156 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 11 " = 1.187
peak= 4.149 closest distance to " O HOH Z 209 " = 2.233
peak= 4.142 closest distance to " CB ARG A 79 " = 0.913
peak= 4.135 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 218 " = 1.085
peak= 4.090 closest distance to " O HOH Z 63 " = 1.900
peak= 4.079 closest distance to " O HOH Z 346 " = 1.586
peak= 4.079 closest distance to " NZ LYS A 117 " = 3.078
peak= 4.075 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 120 " = 1.234
peak= 4.060 closest distance to " O HOH Z 142 " = 1.650
peak= 4.052 closest distance to " O HOH Z 272 " = 1.880
peak= 4.044 closest distance to " O HOH Z 15 " = 2.190
peak= 4.039 closest distance to " CB ASN A 148 " = 1.416
peak= 4.038 closest distance to " CD ARG A 269 " = 1.033
peak= 4.035 closest distance to " O HOH Z 128 " = 2.245
peak= 3.971 closest distance to " CB VAL A 265 " = 1.210
peak= 3.968 closest distance to " O HOH Z 227 " = 1.668
peak= 3.967 closest distance to " O HOH Z 59 " = 2.208
peak= 3.963 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 1.710
peak= 3.955 closest distance to " O HOH Z 361 " = 3.618
peak= 3.953 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 1.827
peak= 3.941 closest distance to " CG ARG A 66 " = 2.633
peak= 3.940 closest distance to " N ASN A 39 " = 1.258
peak= 3.899 closest distance to " O HOH Z 368 " = 1.970
peak= 3.896 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 297 " = 0.950
peak= 3.891 closest distance to " CB GLU A 277 " = 3.595
peak= 3.879 closest distance to " O HOH Z 128 " = 1.918
peak= 3.874 closest distance to " CB SER A 141 " = 1.065
peak= 3.872 closest distance to " CA ARG A 36 " = 0.989
peak= 3.845 closest distance to " CB TRP A 179 " = 1.323
peak= 3.837 closest distance to " O HOH Z 389 " = 1.836
peak= 3.836 closest distance to " CB SER A 3 " = 1.256
peak= 3.832 closest distance to " CD LYS A 166 " = 1.308
peak= 3.830 closest distance to " O HOH Z 109 " = 1.484
peak= 3.825 closest distance to " O HOH Z 291 " = 1.519
peak= 3.822 closest distance to " CG1BVAL A 72 " = 1.714
peak= 3.815 closest distance to " CA ASN A 176 " = 1.166
peak= 3.800 closest distance to " CB TYR A 169 " = 0.709
peak= 3.788 closest distance to " O HOH Z 265 " = 2.232
peak= 3.788 closest distance to " O HOH Z 423 " = 1.999
peak= 3.744 closest distance to " O HOH Z 61 " = 1.598
peak= 3.733 closest distance to " CG2 VAL A 257 " = 0.793
peak= 3.729 closest distance to " O HOH Z 88 " = 2.743
peak= 3.726 closest distance to " CG AARG A 275 " = 1.169
peak= 3.726 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 2.318
peak= 3.726 closest distance to " O HOH Z 248 " = 1.611
peak= 3.724 closest distance to " O HOH Z 132 " = 2.712
peak= 3.714 closest distance to " CB ASN A 39 " = 0.837
peak= 3.713 closest distance to " N ARG A 156 " = 1.397
peak= 3.704 closest distance to " O HOH Z 421 " = 1.752
peak= 3.704 closest distance to " O HOH Z 303 " = 2.200
peak= 3.689 closest distance to " CG1 ILE A 33 " = 1.255
peak= 3.685 closest distance to " O HOH Z 353 " = 2.677
peak= 3.684 closest distance to " O HOH Z 327 " = 1.632
peak= 3.671 closest distance to " CG MET A 185 " = 1.068
peak= 3.669 closest distance to " O HOH Z 203 " = 1.831
peak= 3.657 closest distance to " CZ3 TRP A 266 " = 1.087
peak= 3.657 closest distance to " O HOH Z 78 " = 1.638
peak= 3.653 closest distance to " O HOH Z 173 " = 2.082
peak= 3.653 closest distance to " O HOH Z 180 " = 2.216
peak= 3.650 closest distance to " O HOH Z 316 " = 3.093
peak= 3.644 closest distance to " NH1AARG A 145 " = 1.321
peak= 3.643 closest distance to " CB GLU A 46 " = 1.033
peak= 3.643 closest distance to " O HOH Z 214 " = 2.311
peak= 3.643 closest distance to " O HOH Z 365 " = 2.721
peak= 3.642 closest distance to " CA ALA A 51 " = 0.905
peak= 3.640 closest distance to " CA ALA A 84 " = 1.137
peak= 3.640 closest distance to " O HOH Z 96 " = 2.120
peak= 3.634 closest distance to " CB VAL A 202 " = 1.485
peak= 3.634 closest distance to " CB SER A 26 " = 1.783
peak= 3.629 closest distance to " O ASN A 74 " = 1.467
peak= 3.628 closest distance to " O HOH Z 85 " = 1.364
peak= 3.622 closest distance to " O HOH Z 251 " = 1.602
peak= 3.611 closest distance to " CB TRP A 266 " = 1.016
peak= 3.604 closest distance to " O HOH Z 148 " = 3.376
peak= 3.597 closest distance to " O HOH Z 245 " = 1.416
peak= 3.594 closest distance to " O HOH Z 427 " = 2.919
peak= 3.591 closest distance to " O HOH Z 185 " = 1.807
peak= 3.586 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 20 " = 1.394
peak= 3.585 closest distance to " N ALA A 1 " = 2.988
peak= 3.583 closest distance to " CA ALA A 21 " = 1.137
peak= 3.580 closest distance to " O HOH Z 261 " = 1.945
peak= 3.576 closest distance to " OG BSER A 164 " = 2.194
peak= 3.574 closest distance to " O HOH Z 102 " = 1.260
peak= 3.572 closest distance to " CA ASN A 215 " = 1.023
peak= 3.563 closest distance to " O HOH Z 97 " = 2.253
peak= 3.562 closest distance to " CE LYS A 76 " = 0.893
peak= 3.556 closest distance to " O HOH Z 337 " = 3.654
peak= 3.555 closest distance to " O HOH Z 286 " = 2.185
peak= 3.554 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 38 " = 1.251
peak= 3.548 closest distance to " O HOH Z 345 " = 2.925
peak= 3.535 closest distance to " O HOH Z 54 " = 1.660
peak= 3.534 closest distance to " CG LEU A 167 " = 1.196
peak= 3.530 closest distance to " O HOH Z 411 " = 3.827
peak= 3.524 closest distance to " O HOH Z 163 " = 2.032
peak= 3.516 closest distance to " N PHE A 130 " = 1.262
peak= 3.515 closest distance to " O HOH Z 313 " = 1.930
peak= 3.514 closest distance to " CG GLU A 37 " = 0.922
peak= 3.508 closest distance to " O HOH Z 158 " = 2.984
peak= 3.508 closest distance to " CB THR A 31 " = 1.509
peak= 3.508 closest distance to " CA ARG A 195 " = 1.255
peak= 3.505 closest distance to " CA ALA A 248 " = 1.480
peak= 3.505 closest distance to " O HOH Z 357 " = 2.062
peak= 3.496 closest distance to " CG2BVAL A 41 " = 0.859
peak= 3.496 closest distance to " O HOH Z 371 " = 3.144
peak= 3.495 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 249 " = 0.901
peak= 3.488 closest distance to " O HOH Z 21 " = 1.871
peak= 3.487 closest distance to " CE LYS A 119 " = 1.165
peak= 3.485 closest distance to " O HOH Z 273 " = 2.918
peak= 3.480 closest distance to " CB GLN A 89 " = 1.412
peak= 3.480 closest distance to " CD LYS A 76 " = 2.035
peak= 3.473 closest distance to " O HOH Z 325 " = 2.307
peak= 3.469 closest distance to " O HOH Z 426 " = 1.481
peak= 3.468 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 77 " = 3.259
peak= 3.460 closest distance to " CA SER A 87 " = 1.001
peak= 3.455 closest distance to " O HOH Z 62 " = 2.390
peak= 3.448 closest distance to " CB PRO A 90 " = 0.940
peak= 3.431 closest distance to " CB SER A 62 " = 0.931
peak= 3.427 closest distance to " N TYR A 116 " = 1.557
peak= 3.426 closest distance to " O HOH Z 80 " = 1.676
peak= 3.423 closest distance to " CB ASN A 110 " = 1.048
peak= 3.423 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 1.571
peak= 3.419 closest distance to " CA SER A 32 " = 1.657
peak= 3.416 closest distance to " CB PHE A 16 " = 1.092
peak= 3.408 closest distance to " O ALA A 165 " = 1.424
peak= 3.400 closest distance to " OE1 GLU A 2 " = 2.213
peak= 3.398 closest distance to " O HOH Z 68 " = 2.028
peak= 3.396 closest distance to " CB ASN A 142 " = 1.065
peak= 3.396 closest distance to " CB ALA A 114 " = 0.987
peak= 3.395 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 298 " = 3.884
peak= 3.394 closest distance to " O BHOH Z 338 " = 2.270
peak= 3.391 closest distance to " CA ASN A 217 " = 1.300
peak= 3.389 closest distance to " CB ALA A 291 " = 1.159
peak= 3.388 closest distance to " CB PRO A 198 " = 1.077
peak= 3.377 closest distance to " CB LEU A 228 " = 1.125
peak= 3.373 closest distance to " O HOH Z 163 " = 1.601
peak= 3.371 closest distance to " O HOH Z 345 " = 1.711
peak= 3.361 closest distance to " CA ASP A 162 " = 1.099
peak= 3.360 closest distance to " O HOH Z 285 " = 1.608
peak= 3.358 closest distance to " CD ARG A 159 " = 0.731
peak= 3.358 closest distance to " O GLY A 91 " = 1.562
peak= 3.353 closest distance to " CA TRP A 85 " = 1.114
peak= 3.351 closest distance to " CG GLN A 11 " = 1.671
peak= 3.345 closest distance to " O HOH Z 63 " = 2.275
peak= 3.336 closest distance to " O HOH Z 19 " = 1.672
peak= 3.335 closest distance to " O HOH Z 48 " = 1.612
peak= 3.332 closest distance to " CA VAL A 125 " = 1.143
peak= 3.330 closest distance to " O HOH Z 147 " = 1.815
peak= 3.329 closest distance to " CB TYR A 169 " = 0.827
peak= 3.329 closest distance to " CB ILE A 120 " = 1.247
peak= 3.329 closest distance to " O HOH Z 282 " = 1.821
peak= 3.328 closest distance to " O HOH Z 66 " = 2.221
peak= 3.327 closest distance to " O HOH Z 422 " = 2.618
peak= 3.325 closest distance to " O HOH Z 344 " = 3.131
peak= 3.320 closest distance to " CB ASN A 45 " = 1.065
peak= 3.315 closest distance to " O HOH Z 49 " = 2.216
peak= 3.314 closest distance to " CB ALA A 104 " = 0.743
peak= 3.313 closest distance to " O HOH Z 427 " = 3.070
peak= 3.310 closest distance to " CA ILE A 106 " = 0.799
peak= 3.310 closest distance to " CB HIS A 108 " = 0.814
peak= 3.309 closest distance to " CA TYR A 116 " = 1.441
peak= 3.300 closest distance to " O HOH Z 305 " = 3.736
peak= 3.296 closest distance to " O HOH Z 108 " = 2.774
peak= 3.290 closest distance to " O THR A 220 " = 1.131
peak= 3.289 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 2.022
peak= 3.289 closest distance to " O HOH Z 234 " = 2.304
peak= 3.286 closest distance to " CB LEU A 83 " = 0.791
peak= 3.280 closest distance to " O THR A 182 " = 1.416
peak= 3.278 closest distance to " CA MET A 105 " = 1.052
peak= 3.278 closest distance to " CA ALA A 154 " = 0.982
peak= 3.278 closest distance to " N HIS A 108 " = 1.825
peak= 3.276 closest distance to " O HOH Z 47 " = 1.555
peak= 3.275 closest distance to " CB GLN A 88 " = 1.100
peak= 3.273 closest distance to " O HOH Z 258 " = 2.200
peak= 3.272 closest distance to " CA ILE A 263 " = 0.980
peak= 3.272 closest distance to " O HOH Z 30 " = 2.215
peak= 3.271 closest distance to " CB ASP A 191 " = 1.176
peak= 3.266 closest distance to " CB ASP A 140 " = 1.066
peak= 3.264 closest distance to " NH1 ARG A 138 " = 1.220
peak= 3.264 closest distance to " O HOH Z 359 " = 1.575
peak= 3.261 closest distance to " O HOH Z 89 " = 2.196
peak= 3.257 closest distance to " O HOH Z 124 " = 1.240
peak= 3.257 closest distance to " CB ALA A 9 " = 1.612
peak= 3.255 closest distance to " CA ALA A 233 " = 1.334
peak= 3.249 closest distance to " OE1 GLU A 236 " = 1.127
peak= 3.248 closest distance to " OH TYR A 116 " = 1.066
peak= 3.246 closest distance to " O HOH Z 250 " = 1.618
peak= 3.243 closest distance to " CB ALA A 242 " = 1.007
peak= 3.236 closest distance to " CG2 THR A 221 " = 1.071
peak= 3.233 closest distance to " CB GLN A 103 " = 0.823
peak= 3.232 closest distance to " CB THR A 52 " = 0.778
peak= 3.231 closest distance to " O HOH Z 435 " = 1.816
peak= 3.230 closest distance to " CD ARG A 66 " = 2.676
peak= 3.230 closest distance to " O HOH Z 246 " = 1.352
peak= 3.228 closest distance to " CB PRO A 243 " = 1.274
peak= 3.227 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 153 " = 0.937
peak= 3.226 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 69 " = 2.486
peak= 3.223 closest distance to " CA LYS A 290 " = 1.155
peak= 3.221 closest distance to " O HOH Z 299 " = 4.308
peak= 3.217 closest distance to " O HOH Z 392 " = 2.687
peak= 3.215 closest distance to " O HOH Z 1 " = 2.156
peak= 3.214 closest distance to " O HOH Z 416 " = 2.921
peak= 3.209 closest distance to " O HOH Z 213 " = 1.775
peak= 3.209 closest distance to " OE2 GLU A 53 " = 2.078
peak= 3.204 closest distance to " CB ASN A 215 " = 1.143
peak= 3.203 closest distance to " O HOH Z 233 " = 1.916
peak= 3.200 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 2.103
peak= 3.196 closest distance to " O HOH Z 329 " = 3.982
peak= 3.193 closest distance to " CB GLN A 205 " = 1.166
peak= 3.191 closest distance to " CB ALA A 1 " = 4.838
peak= 3.188 closest distance to " O HOH Z 267 " = 2.023
peak= 3.187 closest distance to " O HOH Z 285 " = 2.619
peak= 3.187 closest distance to " CG1 ILE A 120 " = 1.115
peak= 3.186 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 96 " = 0.717
peak= 3.185 closest distance to " O HOH Z 61 " = 1.467
peak= 3.184 closest distance to " CA ILE A 234 " = 0.923
peak= 3.182 closest distance to " O HOH Z 94 " = 2.410
peak= 3.178 closest distance to " O HOH Z 425 " = 1.895
peak= 3.178 closest distance to " CA GLY A 241 " = 0.990
peak= 3.177 closest distance to " CA ASP A 140 " = 1.172
peak= 3.176 closest distance to " O HOH Z 334 " = 1.394
peak= 3.175 closest distance to " O TRP A 274 " = 1.898
peak= 3.173 closest distance to " OG BSER A 134 " = 2.743
peak= 3.165 closest distance to " CG MET A 113 " = 1.069
peak= 3.165 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 156 " = 1.127
peak= 3.163 closest distance to " CG BARG A 102 " = 1.714
peak= 3.162 closest distance to " O GLY A 147 " = 1.610
peak= 3.158 closest distance to " O HOH Z 132 " = 2.573
peak= 3.158 closest distance to " CG1 ILE A 20 " = 1.373
peak= 3.157 closest distance to " N VAL A 265 " = 1.277
peak= 3.152 closest distance to " O HOH Z 261 " = 2.400
peak= 3.149 closest distance to " CA THR A 221 " = 0.959
peak= 3.148 closest distance to " O HOH Z 207 " = 1.570
peak= 3.147 closest distance to " CD1 ILE A 199 " = 1.086
peak= 3.146 closest distance to " CA ASP A 191 " = 0.876
peak= 3.144 closest distance to " CB SER A 210 " = 0.818
peak= 3.143 closest distance to " CB ARG A 139 " = 0.930
peak= 3.136 closest distance to " NE ARG A 24 " = 0.917
peak= 3.136 closest distance to " NZ LYS A 117 " = 1.610
peak= 3.129 closest distance to " CD GLN A 194 " = 1.586
peak= 3.126 closest distance to " CB ARG A 219 " = 0.926
peak= 3.114 closest distance to " CB GLN A 278 " = 0.833
peak= 3.105 closest distance to " CB ASN A 285 " = 1.015
peak= 3.104 closest distance to " O HOH Z 183 " = 1.722
peak= 3.102 closest distance to " CA ALA A 100 " = 1.028
peak= 3.101 closest distance to " O HOH Z 162 " = 1.836
peak= 3.100 closest distance to " O SER A 164 " = 1.089
peak= 3.097 closest distance to " CA ALA A 160 " = 0.886
peak= 3.096 closest distance to " O TYR A 116 " = 1.503
peak= 3.095 closest distance to " CA GLU A 152 " = 0.888
peak= 3.092 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 79 " = 1.358
peak= 3.091 closest distance to " CA ASP A 124 " = 0.763
peak= 3.075 closest distance to " O HOH Z 88 " = 1.661
peak= 3.069 closest distance to " OG BSER A 164 " = 1.974
peak= 3.067 closest distance to " CB PHE A 283 " = 0.751
peak= 3.065 closest distance to " CZ2 TRP A 150 " = 1.036
peak= 3.053 closest distance to " O HOH Z 152 " = 1.798
peak= 3.039 closest distance to " CB LYS A 290 " = 1.167
----------holes----------
Number of peaks found at mFobs-DFmodel map (map cutoff=3.00 sigma)= 199
Filter by distance & map next to the model:
mapped sites are within: 0.605 - 5.943
number of sites selected in [dist_min= 0.70, dist_max= 6.00]: 196 from: 199
mapped sites are within: 0.786 - 5.943
peak= -4.792 closest distance to " CG GLN A 58 " = 1.044
peak= -4.590 closest distance to " C HIS A 108 " = 1.125
peak= -4.516 closest distance to " O HOH Z 266 " = 5.197
peak= -4.364 closest distance to " O HOH Z 290 " = 0.983
peak= -4.346 closest distance to " CD ARG A 14 " = 3.404
peak= -4.268 closest distance to " OG BSER A 134 " = 1.307
peak= -4.152 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 49 " = 2.717
peak= -4.137 closest distance to " OXT GLY A 302 " = 2.885
peak= -4.120 closest distance to " CB PRO A 243 " = 2.688
peak= -4.116 closest distance to " CB ALA A 184 " = 2.363
peak= -4.087 closest distance to " O HOH Z 377 " = 1.981
peak= -4.063 closest distance to " CG GLN A 223 " = 1.958
peak= -4.021 closest distance to " O PRO A 198 " = 1.238
peak= -4.016 closest distance to " O VAL A 67 " = 2.636
peak= -3.990 closest distance to " N ALA A 248 " = 1.732
peak= -3.972 closest distance to " CZ3 TRP A 179 " = 1.279
peak= -3.950 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 25 " = 2.532
peak= -3.942 closest distance to " O HOH Z 198 " = 1.439
peak= -3.930 closest distance to " CD ARG A 156 " = 2.090
peak= -3.925 closest distance to " O HOH Z 351 " = 1.488
peak= -3.907 closest distance to " O HOH Z 6 " = 2.147
peak= -3.898 closest distance to " CD2 PHE A 192 " = 2.143
peak= -3.883 closest distance to " OG SER A 97 " = 2.203
peak= -3.873 closest distance to " O PRO A 163 " = 2.085
peak= -3.862 closest distance to " O VAL A 174 " = 2.177
peak= -3.841 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 112 " = 2.763
peak= -3.827 closest distance to " CE2 TYR A 30 " = 2.745
peak= -3.816 closest distance to " CB ALA A 161 " = 2.485
peak= -3.811 closest distance to " CA VAL A 67 " = 2.900
peak= -3.792 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 101 " = 2.454
peak= -3.788 closest distance to " CD2 TYR A 293 " = 2.003
peak= -3.736 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 45 " = 1.146
peak= -3.728 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 187 " = 1.530
peak= -3.716 closest distance to " CZ ARG A 66 " = 1.175
peak= -3.701 closest distance to " O HOH Z 165 " = 1.891
peak= -3.694 closest distance to " CG1AVAL A 41 " = 2.563
peak= -3.688 closest distance to " CZ TYR A 169 " = 1.828
peak= -3.671 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 148 " = 1.483
peak= -3.654 closest distance to " CB ALA A 248 " = 2.267
peak= -3.654 closest distance to " N THR A 52 " = 1.721
peak= -3.633 closest distance to " O SER A 95 " = 1.563
peak= -3.630 closest distance to " CB PHE A 208 " = 2.283
peak= -3.625 closest distance to " CA GLY A 241 " = 2.415
peak= -3.620 closest distance to " CB ASN A 39 " = 2.286
peak= -3.618 closest distance to " O PHE A 218 " = 1.580
peak= -3.615 closest distance to " N SER A 212 " = 2.114
peak= -3.613 closest distance to " O HOH Z 369 " = 2.300
peak= -3.599 closest distance to " CA ASP A 298 " = 1.083
peak= -3.597 closest distance to " CZ3 TRP A 274 " = 2.364
peak= -3.595 closest distance to " CE MET A 105 " = 2.414
peak= -3.595 closest distance to " O HOH Z 113 " = 1.960
peak= -3.572 closest distance to " OE1 GLN A 183 " = 1.576
peak= -3.569 closest distance to " CG GLN A 11 " = 1.740
peak= -3.560 closest distance to " O HOH Z 196 " = 1.914
peak= -3.556 closest distance to " O HOH Z 394 " = 1.493
peak= -3.551 closest distance to " CE2 PHE A 61 " = 2.621
peak= -3.543 closest distance to " CD1 PHE A 59 " = 1.977
peak= -3.543 closest distance to " O GLY A 80 " = 2.438
peak= -3.533 closest distance to " O HOH Z 43 " = 1.371
peak= -3.533 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 194 " = 1.909
peak= -3.532 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 171 " = 2.391
peak= -3.530 closest distance to " O HOH Z 183 " = 1.501
peak= -3.526 closest distance to " O HOH Z 185 " = 2.440
peak= -3.522 closest distance to " O HOH Z 166 " = 1.852
peak= -3.511 closest distance to " CG ASP A 132 " = 2.320
peak= -3.498 closest distance to " CZ TYR A 172 " = 1.917
peak= -3.490 closest distance to " O HOH Z 15 " = 1.543
peak= -3.487 closest distance to " O HOH Z 197 " = 2.180
peak= -3.485 closest distance to " O HOH Z 114 " = 3.265
peak= -3.482 closest distance to " O ALA A 34 " = 2.291
peak= -3.481 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 88 " = 0.991
peak= -3.477 closest distance to " O HOH Z 102 " = 1.630
peak= -3.474 closest distance to " O HOH Z 10 " = 1.505
peak= -3.472 closest distance to " CA GLY A 241 " = 3.239
peak= -3.468 closest distance to " O HOH Z 395 " = 5.142
peak= -3.464 closest distance to " O HOH Z 407 " = 2.804
peak= -3.459 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 79 " = 1.606
peak= -3.454 closest distance to " N GLN A 58 " = 1.611
peak= -3.442 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 39 " = 1.095
peak= -3.441 closest distance to " N THR A 220 " = 2.299
peak= -3.435 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 278 " = 1.898
peak= -3.425 closest distance to " O ALA A 10 " = 1.766
peak= -3.424 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 237 " = 2.522
peak= -3.424 closest distance to " OD1 ASP A 191 " = 1.420
peak= -3.421 closest distance to " O HOH Z 422 " = 1.369
peak= -3.416 closest distance to " CD2 TYR A 247 " = 2.442
peak= -3.413 closest distance to " N ALA A 43 " = 2.618
peak= -3.408 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 191 " = 1.447
peak= -3.404 closest distance to " O HOH Z 264 " = 1.668
peak= -3.388 closest distance to " O TRP A 92 " = 1.946
peak= -3.385 closest distance to " C SER A 206 " = 1.533
peak= -3.385 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 67 " = 3.046
peak= -3.375 closest distance to " O GLY A 196 " = 1.087
peak= -3.369 closest distance to " CD ARG A 79 " = 1.201
peak= -3.367 closest distance to " O HOH Z 377 " = 1.587
peak= -3.367 closest distance to " CG GLU A 53 " = 1.507
peak= -3.366 closest distance to " O HOH Z 283 " = 2.312
peak= -3.363 closest distance to " OD1 ASP A 171 " = 1.505
peak= -3.358 closest distance to " O HOH Z 211 " = 1.508
peak= -3.357 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 263 " = 2.210
peak= -3.355 closest distance to " CB PRO A 163 " = 2.519
peak= -3.355 closest distance to " O PRO A 198 " = 1.280
peak= -3.351 closest distance to " CE1 TYR A 247 " = 2.738
peak= -3.351 closest distance to " CG LEU A 83 " = 2.001
peak= -3.346 closest distance to " C THR A 279 " = 1.155
peak= -3.346 closest distance to " O ILE A 106 " = 1.844
peak= -3.341 closest distance to " CG GLU A 152 " = 0.899
peak= -3.341 closest distance to " O HOH Z 13 " = 1.676
peak= -3.338 closest distance to " CD1 ILE A 106 " = 2.228
peak= -3.337 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 112 " = 2.567
peak= -3.336 closest distance to " O VAL A 189 " = 1.827
peak= -3.330 closest distance to " O HOH Z 88 " = 4.541
peak= -3.329 closest distance to " OG BSER A 134 " = 1.904
peak= -3.327 closest distance to " O HOH Z 6 " = 1.565
peak= -3.322 closest distance to " SG ACYS A 201 " = 2.215
peak= -3.320 closest distance to " O HOH Z 38 " = 1.682
peak= -3.314 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 1.639
peak= -3.313 closest distance to " N ASP A 286 " = 2.163
peak= -3.306 closest distance to " CE3 TRP A 150 " = 2.223
peak= -3.304 closest distance to " CG PHE A 283 " = 2.547
peak= -3.303 closest distance to " CD PRO A 243 " = 2.038
peak= -3.303 closest distance to " O LEU A 167 " = 1.549
peak= -3.302 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 249 " = 2.312
peak= -3.297 closest distance to " CE BMET A 47 " = 1.508
peak= -3.294 closest distance to " CB TRP A 85 " = 2.469
peak= -3.294 closest distance to " C ILE A 234 " = 1.274
peak= -3.289 closest distance to " O HOH Z 174 " = 3.722
peak= -3.289 closest distance to " CG PRO A 243 " = 1.749
peak= -3.287 closest distance to " CB ALA A 291 " = 2.214
peak= -3.281 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 301 " = 1.980
peak= -3.276 closest distance to " O HOH Z 301 " = 2.324
peak= -3.276 closest distance to " O HOH Z 394 " = 1.142
peak= -3.273 closest distance to " O HOH Z 116 " = 1.399
peak= -3.273 closest distance to " NH2AARG A 275 " = 5.034
peak= -3.262 closest distance to " CD GLU A 44 " = 1.106
peak= -3.262 closest distance to " O HOH Z 60 " = 1.719
peak= -3.260 closest distance to " CD GLN A 223 " = 1.290
peak= -3.259 closest distance to " O HOH Z 281 " = 2.616
peak= -3.257 closest distance to " O HOH Z 364 " = 5.137
peak= -3.253 closest distance to " O HOH Z 372 " = 2.287
peak= -3.252 closest distance to " O HOH Z 243 " = 1.945
peak= -3.246 closest distance to " O HOH Z 63 " = 1.580
peak= -3.245 closest distance to " O HOH Z 37 " = 1.788
peak= -3.244 closest distance to " N ALA A 226 " = 1.906
peak= -3.236 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 39 " = 2.238
peak= -3.226 closest distance to " CG GLU A 277 " = 1.258
peak= -3.224 closest distance to " O HOH Z 19 " = 2.358
peak= -3.221 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 255 " = 2.727
peak= -3.218 closest distance to " O HOH Z 154 " = 1.859
peak= -3.218 closest distance to " OE1 GLN A 223 " = 2.004
peak= -3.218 closest distance to " CA TYR A 68 " = 3.058
peak= -3.214 closest distance to " O HOH Z 71 " = 2.097
peak= -3.213 closest distance to " O HOH Z 139 " = 3.236
peak= -3.212 closest distance to " O VAL A 189 " = 2.632
peak= -3.209 closest distance to " CG2 VAL A 296 " = 1.919
peak= -3.198 closest distance to " CB ALA A 291 " = 2.391
peak= -3.194 closest distance to " O HOH Z 389 " = 1.853
peak= -3.185 closest distance to " CH2 TRP A 150 " = 1.092
peak= -3.181 closest distance to " O HOH Z 421 " = 3.769
peak= -3.181 closest distance to " O GLN A 94 " = 2.238
peak= -3.174 closest distance to " O HOH Z 198 " = 1.484
peak= -3.173 closest distance to " O HOH Z 111 " = 3.658
peak= -3.171 closest distance to " CD GLN A 11 " = 0.943
peak= -3.168 closest distance to " O GLU A 152 " = 1.365
peak= -3.167 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 66 " = 5.747
peak= -3.165 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 237 " = 2.146
peak= -3.163 closest distance to " C LEU A 143 " = 0.987
peak= -3.163 closest distance to " O HOH Z 234 " = 3.985
peak= -3.156 closest distance to " O HOH Z 414 " = 1.479
peak= -3.152 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 237 " = 2.644
peak= -3.147 closest distance to " C ALA A 158 " = 1.400
peak= -3.142 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 69 " = 1.641
peak= -3.142 closest distance to " O HOH Z 265 " = 2.350
peak= -3.142 closest distance to " CD GLN A 223 " = 0.880
peak= -3.139 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 74 " = 0.786
peak= -3.135 closest distance to " SD MET A 105 " = 0.976
peak= -3.133 closest distance to " O HOH Z 423 " = 2.396
peak= -3.133 closest distance to " N SER A 276 " = 1.266
peak= -3.130 closest distance to " O MET A 40 " = 2.945
peak= -3.129 closest distance to " O ALA A 227 " = 1.465
peak= -3.125 closest distance to " O HOH Z 362 " = 5.943
peak= -3.125 closest distance to " CG ASP A 231 " = 0.837
peak= -3.122 closest distance to " NH1 ARG A 195 " = 2.606
peak= -3.121 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 228 " = 2.147
peak= -3.117 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 45 " = 1.458
peak= -3.116 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 1.973
peak= -3.115 closest distance to " O HOH Z 200 " = 4.924
peak= -3.113 closest distance to " OH TYR A 169 " = 0.940
peak= -3.112 closest distance to " O SER A 276 " = 1.671
peak= -3.112 closest distance to " CD ARG A 139 " = 1.596
peak= -3.103 closest distance to " O HOH Z 174 " = 2.300
peak= -3.099 closest distance to " CG2 THR A 178 " = 2.306
peak= -3.087 closest distance to " O HOH Z 105 " = 2.300
peak= -3.082 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 38 " = 2.001
peak= -3.067 closest distance to " O HOH Z 323 " = 1.285
peak= -3.040 closest distance to " CB ASP A 286 " = 1.806
================= overall refinement statistics: step by step =================
****************** REFINEMENT STATISTICS STEP BY STEP ******************
leading digit, like 1_, means number of macro-cycle
0 : statistics at the very beginning when nothing is done yet
1_bss: bulk solvent correction and/or (anisotropic) scaling
1_xyz: refinement of coordinates
1_adp: refinement of ADPs (Atomic Displacement Parameters)
1_occ: refinement of individual occupancies
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R-factors, x-ray target values and norm of gradient of x-ray target
stage r-work r-free xray_target_w xray_target_t
0 : 0.3886 0.3825 6.168308e+00 6.153068e+00
1_bss: 0.3801 0.3733 6.155704e+00 6.138725e+00
1_xyz: 0.2187 0.2460 5.686800e+00 5.786540e+00
1_adp: 0.1994 0.2498 5.637683e+00 5.813083e+00
1_occ: 0.1992 0.2498 5.637493e+00 5.813730e+00
2_bss: 0.1956 0.2457 5.629619e+00 5.804153e+00
2_xyz: 0.1432 0.1809 5.338575e+00 5.526330e+00
2_adp: 0.1328 0.1735 5.278242e+00 5.479644e+00
2_occ: 0.1326 0.1734 5.277596e+00 5.479299e+00
3_bss: 0.1326 0.1732 5.276817e+00 5.476512e+00
3_xyz: 0.1143 0.1595 5.166468e+00 5.396687e+00
3_adp: 0.1130 0.1564 5.152637e+00 5.378808e+00
3_occ: 0.1128 0.1565 5.152161e+00 5.378707e+00
4_bss: 0.1128 0.1565 5.152364e+00 5.379090e+00
4_xyz: 0.1154 0.1564 5.165953e+00 5.383716e+00
4_adp: 0.1138 0.1585 5.164913e+00 5.395207e+00
4_occ: 0.1138 0.1585 5.164834e+00 5.395299e+00
5_bss: 0.1137 0.1584 5.164640e+00 5.395044e+00
5_xyz: 0.1121 0.1587 5.158738e+00 5.396366e+00
5_adp: 0.1129 0.1572 5.158061e+00 5.389075e+00
5_occ: 0.1129 0.1572 5.158054e+00 5.389307e+00
5_bss: 0.1128 0.1570 5.156792e+00 5.385736e+00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage k_sol b_sol b11 b22 b33 b12 b13 b23
0 : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_bss: 0.316 35.998 -0.213 -0.047 0.272 -0.000 0.000 0.000
1_xyz: 0.316 35.998 -0.213 -0.047 0.272 -0.000 0.000 0.000
1_adp: 0.316 35.998 -0.213 -0.047 0.272 -0.000 0.000 0.000
1_occ: 0.316 35.998 -0.213 -0.047 0.272 -0.000 0.000 0.000
2_bss: 0.331 56.561 -2.590 -1.527 -0.947 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
2_xyz: 0.331 56.561 -2.590 -1.527 -0.947 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
2_adp: 0.331 56.561 -2.590 -1.527 -0.947 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
2_occ: 0.331 56.561 -2.590 -1.527 -0.947 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_bss: 0.327 56.561 -3.098 -1.917 -1.047 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_xyz: 0.327 56.561 -3.098 -1.917 -1.047 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_adp: 0.327 56.561 -3.098 -1.917 -1.047 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_occ: 0.327 56.561 -3.098 -1.917 -1.047 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_bss: 0.324 50.806 -3.098 -1.917 -1.047 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_xyz: 0.324 50.806 -3.098 -1.917 -1.047 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_adp: 0.324 50.806 -3.098 -1.917 -1.047 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_occ: 0.324 50.806 -3.098 -1.917 -1.047 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_bss: 0.321 52.627 -2.983 -1.823 -0.857 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_xyz: 0.321 52.627 -2.983 -1.823 -0.857 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_adp: 0.321 52.627 -2.983 -1.823 -0.857 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_occ: 0.321 52.627 -2.983 -1.823 -0.857 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_bss: 0.321 50.899 -2.831 -1.674 -0.644 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage <pher> fom alpha beta
0 : 41.847 0.6225 0.8089 43229.830
1_bss: 40.929 0.6318 0.8272 40461.064
1_xyz: 24.148 0.8211 1.0030 15565.019
1_adp: 24.986 0.8118 0.9958 16379.580
1_occ: 25.025 0.8114 0.9952 16416.409
2_bss: 24.695 0.8145 0.9396 15920.779
2_xyz: 17.325 0.8859 0.9854 8431.880
2_adp: 16.169 0.8967 0.9862 7732.275
2_occ: 16.157 0.8968 0.9862 7721.868
3_bss: 16.100 0.8972 0.9741 7651.982
3_xyz: 14.523 0.9104 0.9792 6554.147
3_adp: 14.146 0.9137 0.9759 6401.229
3_occ: 14.146 0.9137 0.9757 6391.952
4_bss: 14.158 0.9136 0.9755 6394.583
4_xyz: 14.111 0.9143 0.9756 6395.034
4_adp: 14.319 0.9127 0.9692 6511.299
4_occ: 14.319 0.9127 0.9691 6509.589
5_bss: 14.314 0.9127 0.9737 6504.374
5_xyz: 14.318 0.9127 0.9736 6539.016
5_adp: 14.181 0.9137 0.9694 6475.154
5_occ: 14.186 0.9137 0.9693 6475.151
5_bss: 14.147 0.9140 0.9735 6410.318
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu geom_target
0 : 1.822 0.010 0.101 15.968 0.009 4.111 1.8637e-01
1_bss: 1.822 0.010 0.101 15.968 0.009 4.111 1.8637e-01
1_xyz: 1.250 0.010 0.077 15.052 0.005 4.111 8.6337e-02
1_adp: 1.250 0.010 0.077 15.052 0.005 4.111 8.6337e-02
1_occ: 1.250 0.010 0.077 15.052 0.005 4.111 8.6337e-02
2_bss: 1.250 0.010 0.077 15.052 0.005 4.111 8.6337e-02
2_xyz: 1.016 0.006 0.070 14.454 0.004 4.123 5.7890e-02
2_adp: 1.016 0.006 0.070 14.454 0.004 4.123 5.7890e-02
2_occ: 1.016 0.006 0.070 14.454 0.004 4.123 5.7890e-02
3_bss: 1.016 0.006 0.070 14.454 0.004 4.123 5.7890e-02
3_xyz: 1.118 0.009 0.082 14.896 0.005 4.128 7.2019e-02
3_adp: 1.118 0.009 0.082 14.896 0.005 4.128 7.2019e-02
3_occ: 1.118 0.009 0.082 14.896 0.005 4.128 7.2019e-02
4_bss: 1.118 0.009 0.082 14.896 0.005 4.128 7.2019e-02
4_xyz: 0.926 0.006 0.071 14.447 0.004 4.112 5.1875e-02
4_adp: 0.926 0.006 0.071 14.447 0.004 4.112 5.1875e-02
4_occ: 0.926 0.006 0.071 14.447 0.004 4.112 5.1875e-02
5_bss: 0.926 0.006 0.071 14.447 0.004 4.112 5.1875e-02
5_xyz: 0.951 0.006 0.073 14.377 0.003 4.113 5.3331e-02
5_adp: 0.951 0.006 0.073 14.377 0.003 4.113 5.3331e-02
5_occ: 0.951 0.006 0.073 14.377 0.003 4.113 5.3331e-02
5_bss: 0.951 0.006 0.073 14.377 0.003 4.113 5.3331e-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximal deviations:
stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu |grad|
0 : 9.874 0.070 0.314 85.889 0.055 1.341 2.4185e-01
1_bss: 9.874 0.070 0.314 85.889 0.055 1.341 2.4185e-01
1_xyz: 8.045 0.062 0.307 84.258 0.033 2.230 8.3457e-02
1_adp: 8.045 0.062 0.307 84.258 0.033 2.230 8.3457e-02
1_occ: 8.045 0.062 0.307 84.258 0.033 2.230 8.3457e-02
2_bss: 8.045 0.062 0.307 84.258 0.033 2.230 8.3457e-02
2_xyz: 7.141 0.038 0.212 80.579 0.043 2.313 5.7549e-02
2_adp: 7.141 0.038 0.212 80.579 0.043 2.313 5.7549e-02
2_occ: 7.141 0.038 0.212 80.579 0.043 2.313 5.7549e-02
3_bss: 7.141 0.038 0.212 80.579 0.043 2.313 5.7549e-02
3_xyz: 7.811 0.050 0.281 83.714 0.036 2.281 6.2370e-02
3_adp: 7.811 0.050 0.281 83.714 0.036 2.281 6.2370e-02
3_occ: 7.811 0.050 0.281 83.714 0.036 2.281 6.2370e-02
4_bss: 7.811 0.050 0.281 83.714 0.036 2.281 6.2370e-02
4_xyz: 6.760 0.043 0.221 82.137 0.037 2.395 3.1951e-02
4_adp: 6.760 0.043 0.221 82.137 0.037 2.395 3.1951e-02
4_occ: 6.760 0.043 0.221 82.137 0.037 2.395 3.1951e-02
5_bss: 6.760 0.043 0.221 82.137 0.037 2.395 3.1951e-02
5_xyz: 6.926 0.043 0.227 82.490 0.029 2.375 3.7649e-02
5_adp: 6.926 0.043 0.227 82.490 0.029 2.375 3.7649e-02
5_occ: 6.926 0.043 0.227 82.490 0.029 2.375 3.7649e-02
5_bss: 6.926 0.043 0.227 82.490 0.029 2.375 3.7649e-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|-----overall-----|---macromolecule----|------solvent-------|
stage b_max b_min b_ave b_max b_min b_ave b_max b_min b_ave
0 : 63.06 5.09 16.02 49.51 5.09 12.19 63.06 6.19 36.87
1_bss: 63.06 5.09 16.02 49.51 5.09 12.19 63.06 6.19 36.87
1_xyz: 63.06 5.09 16.02 49.51 5.09 12.19 63.06 6.19 36.87
1_adp: 87.17 0.00 17.15 87.17 0.00 13.25 65.20 6.93 38.43
1_occ: 87.17 0.00 17.15 87.17 0.00 13.25 65.20 6.93 38.43
2_bss: 87.17 0.00 17.15 87.17 0.00 13.25 65.20 6.93 38.43
2_xyz: 87.17 0.00 17.15 87.17 0.00 13.25 65.20 6.93 38.43
2_adp: 83.17 0.00 17.33 83.17 0.00 13.17 71.92 6.22 39.95
2_occ: 83.17 0.00 17.33 83.17 0.00 13.17 71.92 6.22 39.95
3_bss: 83.17 0.00 17.33 83.17 0.00 13.17 71.92 6.22 39.95
3_xyz: 83.17 0.00 17.33 83.17 0.00 13.17 71.92 6.22 39.95
3_adp: 82.13 1.84 16.80 82.13 1.84 12.89 72.61 3.45 38.13
3_occ: 82.13 1.84 16.80 82.13 1.84 12.89 72.61 3.45 38.13
4_bss: 82.13 1.84 16.80 82.13 1.84 12.89 72.61 3.45 38.13
4_xyz: 82.13 1.84 16.80 82.13 1.84 12.89 72.61 3.45 38.13
4_adp: 91.68 0.68 17.27 91.68 0.85 12.98 86.34 0.68 40.60
4_occ: 91.68 0.68 17.27 91.68 0.85 12.98 86.34 0.68 40.60
5_bss: 91.68 0.68 17.27 91.68 0.85 12.98 86.34 0.68 40.60
5_xyz: 91.68 0.68 17.27 91.68 0.85 12.98 86.34 0.68 40.60
5_adp: 88.49 1.43 16.64 88.49 1.43 12.68 84.03 2.48 38.18
5_occ: 88.49 1.43 16.64 88.49 1.43 12.68 84.03 2.48 38.18
5_bss: 88.44 1.38 16.59 88.44 1.38 12.63 83.98 2.43 38.13
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage Deviation of refined
model from start model
max min mean
0 : 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_bss: 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_xyz: 1.794 0.018 0.390
1_adp: 1.794 0.018 0.390
1_occ: 1.794 0.018 0.390
2_bss: 1.794 0.018 0.390
2_xyz: 1.714 0.028 0.462
2_adp: 1.714 0.028 0.462
2_occ: 1.714 0.028 0.462
3_bss: 1.714 0.028 0.462
3_xyz: 1.559 0.029 0.514
3_adp: 1.559 0.029 0.514
3_occ: 1.559 0.029 0.514
4_bss: 1.559 0.029 0.514
4_xyz: 1.504 0.038 0.519
4_adp: 1.504 0.038 0.519
4_occ: 1.504 0.038 0.519
5_bss: 1.504 0.038 0.519
5_xyz: 1.479 0.024 0.529
5_adp: 1.479 0.024 0.529
5_occ: 1.479 0.024 0.529
5_bss: 1.479 0.024 0.529
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU time actual refinement: 277.62
============================== Exporting results ==============================
Writing refined structure to PDB file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_205/model_refine_001.pdb
n_use = 2823
n_use_u_iso = 2823
n_use_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_site = 0
n_grad_u_iso = 0
n_grad_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_occupancy = 106
n_grad_fp = 0
n_grad_fdp = 0
n_anisotropic_flag = 0
total number of scatterers = 2823
Writing 2mFobs-DFmodel XPLOR map to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_205/model_refine_001_2mFobs-DFmodel.map
Writing mFobs-DFmodel XPLOR map to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_205/model_refine_001_mFobs-DFmodel.map
Writing map coefficients to MTZ file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_205/model_refine_001_map_coeffs.mtz
Writing default parameters for subsequent refinement:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_205/model_refine_002.def
=============================== Detailed timings ==============================
Pure refinement (no I/O, processing, etc)= 277.50
Macro-tasks:
bulk solvent and scale = 32.10
individual site refinement = 117.62
weights calculation = 24.14
collect and process = 5.42
model show statistics = 0.08
TOTAL for macro-tasks = 179.36
Micro-tasks:
mask = 1.51
f_calc = 89.09
alpha_beta = 6.91
target = 1.01
gradients_wrt_atomic_parameters = 97.31
fmodel = 5.10
r_factors = 0.14
phase_errors = 8.97
foms = 0.26
TOTAL for micro-tasks = 210.30
NUMBER OF MASK CALCS= 4
Time per interpreted Python bytecode instruction: 3.910 micro seconds
Total CPU time: 4.81 minutes
from_scatterers_fft: 646 calls, 88.79 s
gradients_fft: 591 calls, 85.39 s
=========================== phenix.refine: finished ===========================
# Date 2008-01-16 Time 04:14:21 PST -0800 (1200485661.78 s)
Start R-work = 0.3886, R-free = 0.3825 (no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale)
Final R-work = 0.1366, R-free = 0.1760 (no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale)
Start R-work = 0.3801, R-free = 0.3733
Final R-work = 0.1128, R-free = 0.1570
| en |
all-txt-docs | 369201 | [Federal Register: January 8, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 5)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1391-1418]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08ja99-22]
[[Page 1391]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part V
Postal Rate Commission
_______________________________________________________________________
39 CFR Part 3001
Amendments to Domestic Mail Classification Schedule; Final Rule
[[Page 1392]]
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3001
[Docket Nos. RM99-1, R97-1; Order No. 1225]
Amendments to Domestic Mail Classification Schedule
AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document sets forth the changes to the Domestic Mail
Classification Schedule (DMCS) as a result of recent Governors' action
on recommended decisions of the Postal Rate Commission in Docket No.
R97-1. The changes affect classification and fee provisions for postal
services.
DATES: This rule is effective January 10, 1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to a formal request from the
Postal Service for recommendations on changes in postal rates, fees,
and classifications, the Commission established Docket No. R97-1.
Notice of the docket was published at 62 FR 39660 (July 23, 1997). The
docket culminated in action of the Governors of the Postal Service on
recommendations set forth in the PRC's May 11, 1998 initial decision
and a September 24, 1998 further decision upon reconsideration of
several matters. The decisions of the Commission and the Governors are
available for review at the Commission's docket section. They also can
be accessed electronically via the Commission's website at www.prc.gov.
The culmination of Docket No. R97-1 entails extensive changes in
the domestic mail classification schedule. This schedule includes legal
descriptions of the Service's offerings and rates and schedules. The
accompanying material presents these changes. It also reflects minor
editorial and conforming technical changes required for consistency,
clarity or similar reasons. Consistent with past Commission practice,
specific rates and fees are not shown in the rate schedules.
Dated: January 4, 1999.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 3001
Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Postal Rate Commission
amends 39 CFR part 3001 as follows:
PART 3001--RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
1. The authority citation for part 3001 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 404(b), 3603, 3622-24, 3661, 3662.
2. Amend Appendix A to Subpart C--Postal Service Rates and Changes
as follows:
a. Amend the Table of Contents by revising section 222 to read
``Cards Subclass'; by revising section 223 to read ``Priority Mail
Subclass'; by revising section 362 to read ``Parcel Post, Bound Printed
Matter, Special, and Library Subclasses''; and by revising section 382
to read ``Special and Library Subclasses''.
b. Amend the Table of Contents by removing Classification Schedules
SS-1--Address Correction Service through SS-22--Shipper-Paid Forwarding
and adding Classification Schedule 900--Special Services as set forth
below.
c. Revise the table in section 160 to read as set forth below.
d. Revise section 221.21 to read as set forth below.
e. In section 221.22, in the first sentence of the introductory
text, remove the term ``Presort'' and add in its place the term
``presort'.
f. Redesignate sections 221.24 and 221.25 as sections 221.26 and
221.27, respectively.
g. Add new section 221.24 to read as set forth below.
h. Add and reserve new section 221.25.
i. Revise the heading of section 222 to read ``Cards Subclass.''
j. Remove section 222.11 and redesignate sections 222.12 and 222.13
as 222.11 and 222.12 respectively.
k. Revise newly designated sections 222.11 and 222.12 to read as
set forth below.
l. Revise section 222.31 to read as set forth below.
m. In the introductory text to sections 222.32 and 222.41, remove
the phrase ``Stamped Cards and Post''.
n. Add and reserve section 222.33.
o. Add section 222.34 to read as set forth below.
p. Revise the heading of section 223 to read ``Priority Mail
Subclass''.
q. Revise section 223.2 to read as set forth below.
r. Remove and reserve section 223.3.
s. In sections 240 and 280, remove the phrase ``single piece'' and
add in its place the term ``single-piece'' each time it appears.
t. Revise the table in section 260 to read as set forth below.
u. Revise section 270 and add sections 271 and 272 to read as set
forth below.
v. In section 280 remove the term ``Rate'' before ``Schedule''.
w. In section 311(b), remove the parenthetical phrase and add in
its place ``(The transient rate applied to individual copies of second-
class mail (currently Periodicals class mail) forwarded and mailed by
the public, as well as to certain sample copies mailed by
publishers.)''
x. Remove and reserve section 321.1 and remove references to this
section in sections 321.21, 321.31, 321.41, and 321.51.
y. Add section 321.25 to read as set forth below.
z. Add section 321.37 to read as set forth below.
aa. In the second sentence of section 321.412, remove the term
``special'' and add in its place the term ``nonprofit''.
bb. Add section 321.45 to read as set forth below.
cc. Add section 321.57 to read as set forth below.
dd. Revise sections 322.12, 322.13, 322.14, and 322.15 to read as
set forth below. Section 400.0202 which immediately follows section
322.13 is removed.
ee. Redesignate sections 322.16 and 322.17 as 322.17 and 322.18
respectively.
ff. Add section 322.16 to read as set forth below.
gg. Revise newly redesignated section 322.17 to read as set forth
below.
hh. In the first sentence of section 322.34 add the term
``presort'' between the terms ``route'' and ``rate''.
ii. Add section 322.35 to read as set forth below.
jj. In section 323.11 (a) and (e), in the last sentence, remove the
term ``The'' and add in its place the term ``These''; remove the phrase
``permitted in this subsection'' each time it appears.
kk. In section 323.14 add an ``s'' to the term ``mailing''.
ll. Add section 323.15 to read as set forth below.
mm. In sections 323.211(a)-(c) remove the term ``subsection'' and
add in its place the term ``section'' each time it appears.
nn. In the introductory text of section 323.213, remove the phrase
``section 323.211a'' and add in its place the phrase ``subsection a of
section 323.211''.
oo. In the introductory text of section 323.214 remove the phrase
``section 323.211b'' and add in its place the phrase ``subsection b of
section 323.211''; in subsection e remove the phrase ``section 323.214
a through d'' and add in its place the phrase ``subsections a through d
of section 323.214''.
[[Page 1393]]
pp. In section 323.215, the second sentence, remove the phrase
``section 323.211c'' and add in its place the phrase ``subsection c of
section 323.211''.
qq. Revise section 323.22 to read as set forth below.
rr. Add sections 323.23, 323.24 and 323.25 to read as set forth
below.
ss. In section 331 add the phrase ``Except as provided in section
322.161,'' at the beginning of the section, before the phrase
``Standard Mail''.
tt. Remove section 333.
uu. In section 341, the second sentence, remove the phrase ``Single
Piece,''.
vv. In section 344.1 in the heading, remove the phrase ``Single
Piece,''.
ww. In section 344.12 remove the phrase ``section 210 b through d''
and add in its place the phrase ``subsections b through d of section
210''.
xx. In section 344.21 remove the phrase ``Single Piece,''.
yy. In section 344.22 remove the phrase ``section 323.11 a and e,''
and add in its place the phrase ``subsections a and e of section
323.11''.
zz. In section 344.23 remove the phrase ``section 210, b through
d'' and add in its place the phrase ``subsections b through d of
section 210''.
aaa. Revise section 353.1 to read as set forth below.
bbb. Amend section 353.2 by revising the last sentence to read as
set forth below.
ccc. In section 361, in the table under the column ``schedule'',
remove the designations SS-1 and SS-4 and add in their place the
designations 911 and 947, respectively; in the text following the
table, remove the term ``by'' and add in its place the term ``with''.
ddd. Revise section 362 as set forth below.
eee. In the table in section 363 remove the designations ``SS-21''
and ``SS-22'' and add in their place the designations ``935'' and
``936'', respectively.
fff. Revise section 370 to read as set forth below.
ggg. In sections 381, 383 and 484 remove the term ``Rate'' before
the term ``Schedule''.
hhh. Revise section 382 to read as set forth below.
iii. In section 383 add the phrase, ``Destination SCF or
Destination Delivery Unit'' after the phrase ``Destination BMC''.
jjj. In section 411.1 remove the term ``of'' after the term
``all''.
kkk. In section 421.31 remove the designations ``421.32 or 421.33''
and add in their place the designations ``421.32, 421.33, or 421.34''.
lll. Revise section 421.32 to read as set forth below.
mmm. Redesignate section 421.33 as section 421.34 and add section
421.33 to read as set forth below.
nnn. In sections 421.41 and 421.42 remove the term ``and'' after
the designation 421.31 and add in its place the punctuation mark for a
comma; add the designations ``, and 421.33'' following the designation
``421.32''.
ooo. In section 421.43 and 421.44 remove the designation ``421.33''
and replace it with the designation ``421.34''.
ppp. In section 423.21(b) remove the term ``of'' after the term
``one-half''.
qqq. In section 423.71 remove the designations ``423.72 or 423.73''
and add in their place the designations ``423.72, 423.73, or 423.74''.
rrr. Revise section 423.72 to read as set forth below.
sss. Redesignate section 423.73 as section 423.74 and add section
423.73 as set forth below.
ttt. In sections 423.81 and 423.82 remove the designations ``423.71
and 423.72'' and add in their place the designations ``423.71, 423.72,
and 423.73''.
uuu. Revise section 423.83 to read as set forth below.
vvv. In section 423.84 remove the designation ``423.73'' and add in
its place the designation ``423.74''; remove the phrase ``walk
sequence'' and add in its place the term ``walk-sequence''.
www. Revise sections 441 and 442 to read as set forth below.
xxx. In section 443.1, in the first parenthetical phrase, remove
the phrase ``Single Piece,''; and remove the term ``or'' and add the
phrase ``or Nonprofit Enhanced Carrier Route'' after the word
``Nonprofit''.
yyy. In section 443.2, remove the phrase ``sections 210 b through
d'' and add in its place the phrase ``subsections b through d of
section 210''.
zzz. In section 453, in the third sentence, remove the term
``Standard'' and add in its place the term ``First-Class''.
aaaa. Add sections 910 through 971 to read as set forth below.
bbbb. In section 1003.3, remove the phrase ``he is required to pay
to acquit himself'' and add in its place the phrase ``required for
acquittal''.
cccc. In section 1009, the fourth sentence of the introductory
text, in the second sentence of subsection (d), and in the introductory
text to subsection (h) remove the term ``which'' and add in its place
the term ``that''; in the introductory text of subsection (h) remove
the term ``of''.
dddd. In section 2010(a) and (d) remove the designation ``SS-10''
and add in its place the designation ``921''; in the same subsections,
remove the term ``Rate'' and add in its place the term ``Fee''.
eeee. In section 2025(a) remove the phrase ``change of address''
and add in its place the phrase ``change-of-address''.
ffff. In section 2027 remove the term ``address'' and add in its
place the term ``delivery''.
gggg. In section 2031, remove the phrase ``mail piece'' and add in
its place the term ``mailpiece''; and remove the phrase ``change of
address'' and add in its place the phrase ``change-of-address''.
hhhh. Revise section 2033 to read as set forth below.
iiii. Revise subsection 3010(d) to read as set forth below.
jjjj. In section 3040 remove the term ``by'' and add in its place
the term ``with''; add the term ``indicia'' after the term ``meter''.
kkkk. In section 3050, in the first sentence, remove the term
``Rate'' before the term ``Schedule''; in the third sentence remove the
term ``Rate'' before the term ``Schedule'' and add in its place the
term ``Fee''; remove the designation ``SS-12'' and add in its place the
designation ``933''.
llll. In section 3080, the second sentence, remove the term
``later'' and add the phrase ``after acceptance'' after the term
``mailer''.
mmmm. In section 3090 remove the term ``minimum-per-piece'' and add
in its place the phrase ``minimum per piece''.
nnnn. In section 4052, in the first sentence, remove the first
``which'' and add in its place the term ``that''; remove the second
``which''; and remove the phrase ``armed forces'' and add in its place
the phrase ``Armed Forces'' each time it appears.
oooo. In section 6030 add the phrase ``or subclass'' after the term
``class''; add ``322.16,'' after ``230''.
pppp. Remove Classification Schedules SS-1 through SS-22 which
follow immediately after section 6030.
qqqq. Revise the section ``Rate Schedules'' to read as set forth
below.
rrrr. Remove the tables for schedules SS-1 through SS-1000 at the
end of the Appendix.
ssss. In sections 110, 122.1 and 445 remove the phrase ``in
accordance with'' and add in its place the term ``under''.
tttt. In sections 221.1, 221.31 introductory text, and 223.1(a)
remove the number ``11'' and add in its place ``13''.
uuuu. In sections 240, 342 and 343 remove the term ``ascertaining''
and add in its place the term ``determining''.
[[Page 1394]]
vvvv. In sections 322.32 and 323.12 in the heading remove the
phrase ``Single Piece'' and add in its place the term ``Single-Piece'';
in the text remove the phrase ``single piece'' and add in its place the
term ``single-piece''.
wwww. In sections 222.2 and 323.11 (a) and (e) remove the phrase
``post card'' and add in its place the term ``postcard''.
xxxx. Remove the term ``prescribed'' wherever it appears and add in
its place the term ``specified'' in sections 122.3, 123.1, 123.2, 154,
181, 182.3(a) and (b), 182.4(a) and (b), 221.22(b), 221.31(c), 221.33,
221.34, 221.35, 222.2, 222.32(b) and (c), 222.41(c) and (d), 222.43,
222.44, 222.45, 223.6, 321.221(b) and (c), 321.223, 321.231(b)-(d),
321.233, 321.234, 321.236, 321.24, 321.31(b)-(e), 321.33, 321.34,
321.35, 321.36, 321.421(b) and (c), 321.423, 321.431(b)-(d), 321.433,
321.434, 321.436, 321.44, 321.51(b)-(e), 321.53, 321.54, 321.55,
321.56, newly designated 322.18, 322.33, 322.34, 323.13, 323.14,
323.211, 342, 344.11, 344.21, 344.22, 353.2, 421.1(a) and (b), newly
designated 421.34, 421.41, 421.42, 421.43, 421.44, newly designated
423.74, 423.81, 423.82, 423.84, 443.1, 446, 453, 3030, 3040, 3060,
5020.
Appendix A to Subpart C--Postal Service Rates and Charges
* * * * *
Classification Schedule 900--Special Services
Sec.
910 Addressing
911 Address Correction Service
912 Mailing List Services
920 Delivery Alternatives
921 Post Office Box and Caller Service
930 Payment Alternatives
931 Business Reply Mail
932 Merchandise Return Service
933 On-Site Meter Setting
934 Reserved
935 Bulk Parcel Return Service
936 Shipper-Paid Forwarding
940 Accountability & Receipts
941 Certified Mail
942 Registered Mail
943 Insurance
944 Collect on Delivery
945 Return Receipt
946 Restricted Delivery
947 Certificate of Mailing
948 Delivery Confirmation
950 Parcel Handling
951 Parcel Airlift (PAL)
952 Special Handling
960 Stamped Paper
961 Stamped Envelopes
962 Stamped Cards
970 Postal Money Orders
971 Domestic Postal Money Orders
* * * * *
160 Ancillary Services
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Address correction........................................ 911
b. Return receipts........................................... 945
c. COD....................................................... 944
d. Express Mail Insurance.................................... 943
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
221.21 Single-Piece Rate Category. The single-piece rate category
applies to regular rate Letters and Sealed Parcels subclass mail not
mailed under section 221.22 or 221.24.
* * * * *
221.24 Qualified Business Reply Mail Rate Category. The qualified
business reply mail rate category applies to Letters and Sealed Parcels
subclass mail that:
a. Is provided to senders by the recipient, an advance deposit
account business reply mail permit holder, for return by mail to the
recipient;
b. Bears the recipient's preprinted machine-readable return
address, a barcode representing not more than 11 digits (not including
``correction'' digits), a Facing Identification Mark, and other
markings specified and approved by the Postal Service; and
c. Meets the letter machinability and other preparation
requirements specified by the Postal Service.
* * * * *
222.11 Cards. The Cards subclass consists of Stamped Cards,
defined in section 962.11, and postcards. A postcard is a privately
printed mailing card for the transmission of messages. To be eligible
to be mailed as a First-Class postcard, a card must be of uniform
thickness and must not exceed any of the following dimensions:
a. 6 inches in length;
b. 4\1/4\ inches in width;
c. 0.016 inch in thickness.
222.12 Double Cards. Double Stamped Cards or double postcards may
be mailed as Stamped Cards or postcards. Double Stamped Cards are
defined in section 962.12. A double postcard consists of two attached
cards, one of which may be detached by the receiver and returned by
mail as a single postcard.
* * * * *
222.31 Single-Piece Rate Category. The single-piece rate category
applies to regular rate Cards subclass mail not mailed under section
222.32 or 222.34.
* * * * *
222.34 Qualified Business Reply Mail Rate Category. The qualified
business reply mail rate category applies to Cards subclass mail that:
a. Is provided to senders by the recipient, an advance deposit
account business reply mail permit holder, for return by mail to the
recipient;
b. Bears the recipient's preprinted machine-readable return
address, a barcode representing not more than 11 digits (not including
``correction'' digits), a Facing Identification Mark, and other
markings specified and approved by the Postal Service; and
c. Meets the card machinability and other preparation requirements
specified by the Postal Service.
* * * * *
223.2 Single-Piece Priority Mail Rate Category. The single-piece
Priority Mail rate category applies to Priority Mail subclass mail not
mailed under section 223.4.
* * * * *
260 Ancillary Services
* * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Address correction........................................ 911
b. Business reply mail....................................... 931
c. Certificates of mailing................................... 947
d. Certified mail............................................ 941
e. COD....................................................... 944
f. Insurance................................................. 943
g. Registered mail........................................... 942
h. Return receipt (limited to merchandise sent by Priority
Mail)....................................................... 945
i. Merchandise return........................................ 932
j. Delivery Confirmation (limited to Priority Mail).......... 948
------------------------------------------------------------------------
270 Rates and Fees
271 The rates for First-Class Mail are set forth in the following
schedules:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Letters and Sealed Parcels................................ 221
b. Cards..................................................... 222
c. Priority Mail............................................. 223
------------------------------------------------------------------------
272 Keys and Identification Devices. Keys, identification cards,
identification tags, or similar identification devices that:
a. Weigh no more than 2 pounds;
b. Are mailed without cover; and
c. Bear, contain, or have securely attached the name and address
information, as specified by the Postal Service, of a person,
organization, or concern, with instructions to return to the address
and a statement guaranteeing the payment of postage due on delivery;
are subject to the following rates and fees:
i. The applicable single-piece rates in schedules 221 or 223;
ii. The fee set forth in fee schedule 931 for payment of postage
due charges
[[Page 1395]]
if an active business reply mail advance deposit account is not used,
and
iii. If applicable, the surcharge for nonstandard size mail, as
defined in section 232.
* * * * *
321.25 Residual Shape Surcharge. Regular subclass mail is subject
to a surcharge if it is prepared as a parcel or if it is not letter or
flat shaped.
* * * * *
321.37 Residual Shape Surcharge. Enhanced Carrier Route subclass
mail is subject to a surcharge if it is prepared as a parcel or if it
is not letter or flat shaped.
* * * * *
321.57 Residual Shape Surcharge. Nonprofit subclass mail is
subject to a surcharge if it is prepared as a parcel or if it is not
letter or flat shaped.
* * * * *
322.12 Description of Rate Categories.
322.121 Inter-BMC Rate Category. The Inter-BMC rate category
applies to all Parcel Post subclass mail not mailed under section
322.122, 322.123, 322.124, or 322.125.
322.122 Intra-BMC Rate Category. The Intra-BMC rate category
applies to Parcel Post subclass mail originating and destinating within
a designated BMC or auxiliary service facility service area, Alaska,
Hawaii or Puerto Rico.
322.123 Destination Bulk Mail Center (DBMC) Rate Category. The
destination bulk mail center rate category applies to Parcel Post
subclass mail prepared as specified by the Postal Service in a mailing
of at least 50 pieces entered at a designated destination BMC,
auxiliary service facility, or other equivalent facility, as specified
by the Postal Service.
322.124 Destination Sectional Center Facility (DSCF) Rate
Category. The destination sectional center facility rate category
applies to Parcel Post subclass mail prepared as specified by the
Postal Service in a mailing of at least 50 pieces sorted to five-digit
destination ZIP Codes as specified by the Postal Service and entered at
a designated destination processing and distribution center or
facility, or other equivalent facility, as specified by the Postal
Service.
322.125 Destination Delivery Unit (DDU) Rate Category. The
destination delivery unit rate category applies to Parcel Post subclass
mail prepared as specified by the Postal Service in a mailing of at
least 50 pieces, and entered at a designated destination delivery unit,
or other equivalent facility, as specified by the Postal Service.
322.13 Bulk Parcel Post. Bulk Parcel Post mail is Parcel Post mail
consisting of properly prepared and separated single mailings of at
least 300 pieces or 2,000 pounds. Pieces weighing less than 15 pounds
and measuring over 84 inches in length and girth combined or pieces
measuring over 108 inches in length and girth combined are not mailable
as Bulk Parcel Post mail.
322.131 Barcoded Discount. The barcoded discount applies to Bulk
Parcel Post mail that is entered at designated facilities, bears a
barcode specified by the Postal Service, is prepared as specified by
the Postal Service, and meets all other preparation and machinability
requirements of the Postal Service.
322.14 Bulk Mail Center (BMC) Presort Discounts.
322.141 BMC Presort Discount. The BMC presort discount applies to
Inter-BMC Parcel Post subclass mail that is prepared as specified by
the Postal Service in a mailing of 50 or more pieces, entered at a
facility authorized by the Postal Service, and sorted to destination
BMCs, as specified by the Postal Service.
322.142 Origin Bulk Mail Center (OBMC) Discount. The origin bulk
mail center discount applies to Inter-BMC Parcel Post subclass mail
that is prepared as specified by the Postal Service in a mailing of at
least 50 pieces, entered at the origin BMC, and sorted to destination
BMCs, as specified by the Postal Service.
322.15 Barcoded Discount. The barcoded discount applies to Inter-
BMC, Intra-BMC, and DBMC Parcel Post subclass mail that is entered at
designated facilities, bears a barcode specified by the Postal Service,
is prepared as specified by the Postal Service in a mailing of at least
50 pieces, and meets all other preparation and machinability
requirements of the Postal Service.
322.16 Oversize Parcel Post.
322.161 Excessive Length and Girth. Parcel Post subclass mail
pieces exceeding 108 inches in length and girth combined, but not
greater than 130 inches in length and girth combined, are mailable.
322.162 Balloon Rate. Parcel Post subclass mail pieces exceeding
84 inches in length and girth combined and weighing less than 15 pounds
are subject to a rate equal to that for a 15 pound parcel for the zone
to which the parcel is addressed.
322.17 Nonmachinable Surcharge. Inter-BMC Parcel Post subclass
mail that does not meet machinability criteria specified by the Postal
Service is subject to a nonmachinable surcharge.
* * * * *
322.35 Barcoded Discount. The barcoded discount applies to single-
piece rate and bulk rate Bound Printed Matter subclass mail that is
entered at designated facilities, bears a barcode specified by the
Postal Service, is prepared as specified by the Postal Service in a
mailing of at least 50 pieces, and meets all other preparation and
machinability requirements of the Postal Service.
* * * * *
323.15 Barcoded Discount. The barcoded discount applies to single-
piece rate and Level B presort rate Special subclass mail that is
entered at designated facilities, bears a barcode specified by the
Postal Service, is prepared as specified by the Postal Service in a
mailing of at least 50 pieces, and meets all other preparation and
machinability requirements of the Postal Service.
* * * * *
323.22 Single-Piece Rate Category. The single-piece rate category
applies to Library subclass mail not mailed under section 323.23 or
323.24.
323.23 Level A Presort Rate Category. The Level A presort rate
category applies to mailing of at least 500 pieces of Library subclass
mail, prepared and presorted to five-digit destination ZIP Codes as
specified by the Postal Service.
323.24 Level B Presort Rate Category. The Level B presort rate
category applies to mailing of at least 500 pieces of Library subclass
mail, prepared and presorted to destination Bulk Mail Centers as
specified by the Postal Service.
323.25 Barcoded Discount. The barcoded discount applies to Library
subclass mail that is entered at designated facilities, bears a barcode
specified by the Postal Service, is prepared as specified by the Postal
Service in a mailing of at least 50 pieces, and meets all other
preparation and machinability requirements of the Postal Service.
* * * * *
353.1 Regular, Enhanced Carrier Route, Nonprofit and Nonprofit
Enhanced Carrier Route Subclasses (section 321)
Undeliverable-as-addressed Standard Mail mailed under section 321
will be returned on request of the mailer, or
[[Page 1396]]
forwarded and returned on request of the mailer. Undeliverable-as-
addressed combined First-Class and Standard pieces will be returned as
specified by the Postal Service. Except as provided in section 935, the
applicable First-Class Mail rate is charged for each piece receiving
return only service. Except as provided in section 936, charges for
forwarding-and-return service are assessed only on those pieces which
cannot be forwarded and are returned. Except as provided in sections
935 and 936, the charge for those returned pieces is the appropriate
First-Class Mail rate for the piece plus that rate multiplied by a
factor equal to the number of section 321 Standard pieces nationwide
that are successfully forwarded for every one piece that cannot be
forwarded and must be returned.
353.2 Parcel Post, Bound Printed Matter, Special, and Library
Subclasses (sections 322 and 323)
* * * When Standard Mail mailed under sections 322 and 323 is
forwarded or returned from one post office to another, additional
charges will be based on the applicable single-piece Standard Mail rate
under 322 or 323.
* * * * *
362 Parcel Post, Bound Printed Matter, Special, and Library
Subclasses Parcel Post, Bound Printed Matter, Special, and Library
subclass mail will receive the following additional services upon
payment of the appropriate fees:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Certificates of mailing................................... 947
b. COD....................................................... 944
c. Insurance................................................. 943
d. Special handling.......................................... 952
e. Return receipt (merchandise only)......................... 945
f. Merchandise return........................................ 932
g. Delivery Confirmation..................................... 948
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insurance, special handling, and COD services may not be used
selectively for individual pieces in a multi-piece Standard Mail
mailing unless specific methods approved by the Postal Service for
determining and verifying postage are followed.
370 Rates and Fees
The rates and fees for Standard Mail are set forth as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Regular subclass.......................................... 321.2
b. Enhanced Carrier Route subclass........................... 321.3
c. Nonprofit subclass........................................ 321.4
d. Nonprofit Enhanced Carrier Route subclass................. 321.5
e. Parcel Post subclass:
Inter-BMC................................................ 322.1A
Intra-BMC................................................ 322.1B
Destination BMC.......................................... 322.1C
Destination SCF.......................................... 322.1D
Destination Delivery Unit................................ 322.1E
f. Bound Printed Matter subclass:
Single-Piece............................................. 322.3A
Bulk and Carrier Route................................... 322.3B
g. Special subclass.......................................... 323.1
h. Library subclass.......................................... 323.2
i. Fees...................................................... 1000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
382 Special and Library Subclasses
A presort mailing fee as set forth in Schedule 1000 must be paid
once each year at each office of mailing by or for any person who mails
presorted Special or Library subclass mail. Any person who engages a
business concern or other individuals to mail presorted Special or
Library subclass mail must pay the fee.
* * * * *
421.32 Three-Digit Rate Category. The three-digit rate category
applies to Regular subclass mail presorted to single or multiple three-
digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by the Postal Service.
421.33 Five-Digit Rate Category. The five-digit rate category
applies to Regular subclass mail presorted to single or multiple five-
digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by the Postal Service.
* * * * *
423.72 Three-Digit Rate Category. The three-digit rate category
applies to Preferred Rate Periodicals entered under sections 423.2,
423.3, 423.4, or 423.5 that are presorted to single or multiple three-
digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by the Postal Service.
423.73 Five-Digit Rate Category. The five-digit category applies
to Preferred Rate Periodicals entered under sections 423.2, 423.3,
423.4, or 423.5 that are presorted to single or multiple five-digit ZIP
Code destinations as specified by the Postal Service.
* * * * *
423.83 High Density Discount. The high density discount applies to
Preferred Rate Periodicals mailed under section 423.74, presented in
walk-sequence order, and meeting the high density and preparation
requirements specified by the Postal Service, except that mailers of
Within County mail may qualify for such discount also by presenting
otherwise eligible mailings containing pieces addressed to a minimum of
25 percent of the addresses per carrier route.
* * * * *
441 Postage. Postage must be paid on Periodicals class mail as set
forth in section 3000.
442 Presortation. Periodicals class mail must be presorted as
specified by the Postal Service.
* * * * *
Special Services
910 Addressing
911 Address Correction Service
911.1 Definition.
911.11 Address correction service is a service which provides the
mailer with a method of obtaining the correct address, if available to
the Postal Service, of the addressee or the reason for nondelivery.
911.2 Description of Service.
911.21 Address correction service is available to mailers of
postage prepaid mail of all classes. Periodicals class mail will
receive address correction service.
911.22 Address correction service is not available for items
addressed for delivery by military personnel at any military
installation.
911.23 Address correction provides the following service to the
mailer:
a. If the correct address is known to the Postal Service, the
mailer is notified of both the old and the correct address.
b. If the item mailed cannot be delivered, the mailer will be
notified of the reason for nondelivery.
911.3 Requirements of the Mailer.
911.31 Mail, other than Periodicals class mail, sent under this
section must bear a request for address correction service.
911.4 Fees.
911.41 There is no charge for address correction service when the
correction is provided incidental to the return of the mailpiece to the
sender.
911.42 A fee, as set forth in Fee Schedule 911, is charged for all
other forms of address correction service.
912 Mailing List Services
912.1 Definition.
912.11 Mailing list services include:
a. Correction of mailing lists;
b. Change-of-address information for election boards and
registration commissions;
c. ZIP coding of mailing lists; and
d. Arrangement of address cards in the sequence of delivery.
912.12 Correction of mailing list service provides current
information concerning name and address mailing lists or correct
information concerning occupant mailing lists.
912.13 ZIP coding of mailing lists service is a service
identifying ZIP Code addresses in areas served by multi-ZIP coded
postal facilities.
[[Page 1397]]
912.2 Description of Service.
912.21 Correction of mailing list service is available only to the
following owners of name and address or occupant mailing lists:
a. Members of Congress;
b. Federal agencies;
c. State government departments;
d. Municipalities;
e. Religious organizations;
f. Fraternal organizations;
g. Recognized charitable organizations;
h. Concerns or persons who solicit business by mail.
912.22 The following corrections will be made to name and address
lists:
a. Names to which mail cannot be delivered or forwarded will be
deleted;
b. Incorrect house, rural, or post office box numbers will be
corrected;
c. When permanent forwarding orders are on file for customers who
have moved, new addresses including ZIP Codes will be furnished;
d. New names will not be added to the list.
912.23 The following corrections will be made to occupant lists:
a. Numbers representing incorrect or non-existent street addresses
will be deleted;
b. Business or rural route addresses will be distinguished if
known;
c. Corrected cards or sheets will be grouped by route;
d. Street address numbers will not be added or changed.
912.24 Corrected lists will be returned to customers at no
additional charge.
912.25 Residential change-of-address information is available only
to election boards or registration commissions for obtaining, if known
to the Postal Service, the current address of an addressee.
912.26 ZIP coding or mailing list service provides that addresses
will be sorted to the finest possible ZIP Code sortation.
912.27 Gummed labels, wrappers, envelopes, Stamped Cards, or
postcards indicative of one-time use will not be accepted as mailing
lists.
912.28 Sequencing of address cards service provides for the
removal of incorrect addresses, notation of missing addresses and
addition of missing addresses.
912.3 Requirements of Customer.
912.31 A customer desiring correction of a mailing list or
arrangement of address cards in sequence of carrier delivery must
submit the list or cards as specified by the Postal Service.
912.4 Fees.
912.41 The fees for mailing list services are set forth in Fee
Schedule 912.
920 Delivery Alternatives
921 Post Office Box and Caller Service
921.1 Caller Service.
921.11 Definition.
921.111 Caller service is a service which permits a customer to
obtain mail addressed to the customer's box number through a call
window or loading dock.
921.12 Description of Service.
921.121 Caller service uses post office box numbers as the address
medium but does not actually use a post office box.
921.122 Caller service is not available at certain postal
facilities.
921.123 Caller service is provided to customers on the basis of
mail volume received and number of post office boxes used at any one
facility.
921.124 A customer may reserve a caller number.
921.125 Caller service cannot be used when the sole purpose is, by
subsequently filing change-of-address orders, to have mail forwarded or
transferred to another address by the Postal Service free of charge.
921.13 Fees.
921.131 Fees for caller service are set forth in Fee Schedule 921.
921.2 Post Office Box Service.
921.21 Definition.
921.211 Post office box service is a service which provides the
customer with a private, locked receptacle for the receipt of mail
during the hours when the lobby of a postal facility is open.
921.22 Description of Service.
921.221 The Postal Service may limit the number of post office
boxes occupied by any one customer.
921.222 A post office boxholder may ask the Postal Service to
deliver to the post office box all mail properly addressed to the
holder. If the post office box is located at the post office indicated
on the piece, it will be transferred without additional charge, under
existing regulations.
921.223 Post office box service cannot be used when the sole
purpose is, by subsequently filing change-of-address orders, to have
mail forwarded or transferred to another address by the Postal Service
free of charge.
921.23 Fees.
921.231 Fees for post office box service are set forth in Fee
Schedule 921.
921.232 In postal facilities primarily serving academic
institutions or the students of such institutions, fees for post office
boxes are:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of box use Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
95 days or less........................... \1/2\ semiannual fee.
96 to 140 days............................ \3/4\ semiannual fee.
141 to 190 days........................... Full semiannual fee.
191 to 230 days........................... 1\1/4\ semiannual fee.
231 to 270 days........................... 1\1/2\ semiannual fee.
271 days to full year..................... Full annual fee.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
921.233 No refunds will be made for post office box fees paid
under section. 921.232. For purposes of this section, the full annual
fee is twice the amount of the semi-annual fee.
930 Payment Alternatives
931 Business Reply Mail
931.1 Definitions.
931.11 Business reply mail is a service whereby business reply
cards, envelopes, cartons and labels may be distributed by or for a
business reply distributor for use by mailers for sending First-Class
Mail without prepayment of postage to an address chosen by the
distributor. A distributor is the holder of a business reply license.
931.12 A business reply mail piece is nonletter-size for purposes
of this section if it meets addressing and other preparation
requirements, but does not meet the machinability requirements
specified by the Postal Service for mechanized or automated letter
sortation. This provision expires June 7, 1999.
931.2 Description of Service.
931.21 The distributor guarantees payment on delivery of postage
and fees for all returned business reply mail. Any distributor of
business reply cards, envelopes, cartons and labels under any one
license for return to several addresses guarantees to pay postage and
fees on any returns refused by any such addressee.
931.3 Requirements of the Mailer.
931.31 Business reply cards, envelopes, cartons and labels must be
preaddressed and bear business reply markings.
931.32 Handwriting, typewriting or handstamping are not acceptable
methods of preaddressing or marking business reply cards, envelopes,
cartons, or labels.
931.4 Fees.
931.41 The fees for business reply mail are set forth in Fee
Schedule 931.
931.42 To qualify as an active business reply mail advance deposit
trust account, the account must be used solely for business reply mail
and contain sufficient postage and fees due for returned business reply
mail.
931.43 An accounting fee as set forth in Fee Schedule 931 must be
paid each year for each advance deposit business reply account at each
facility where the mail is to be returned.
[[Page 1398]]
931.5 Experimental Reverse Manifest Fees.
931.51 A set-up/qualification fee as set forth in Fee Schedule 931
must be paid by each business reply mail advance deposit trust account
holder at each destination postal facility at which it applies to
receive nonletter-size business reply mail for which the postage and
fees will be accounted for through a reverse manifest method approved
by the Postal Service for determining and verifying postage. A
distributor must pay this fee for each business reply mail advance
deposit trust account for which participation in the nonletter-size
business reply mail experiment is requested. This provision expires
June 7, 1999.
931.52 A nonletter-size reverse manifest monthly fee as set forth
in Fee Schedule 931 must be paid each month during which the
distributor's reverse manifest account is active. This fee applies to
the (no more than) 10 advance deposit account holders which are
selected by the Postal Service to participate in the reverse manifest
nonletter-size business reply mail experiment and which utilize reverse
manifest accounting methods approved by the Postal Service for
determining and verifying postage and fees. This provision expires June
7, 1999.
931.6 Experimental Weight Averaging Fees.
931.61 A set-up/qualification fee as set forth in Fee Schedule 931
must be paid by each business reply mail advance deposit trust account
holder at each destination postal facility at which it applies to
receive nonletter-size business reply mail for which the postage and
fees will be accounted for through a weight averaging method approved
by the Postal Service for determining and verifying postage. A
distributor must pay this fee for each business reply mail advance
deposit trust account for which participation in the nonletter-size
business reply mail experiment is requested. This provision expires
June 7, 1999.
931.62 A nonletter-size weight averaging monthly fee as set forth
in Fee Schedule 931 must be paid each month during which the
distributor's weight averaging account is active. This fee applies to
the (no more than) 10 advance deposit account holders which are
selected by the Postal Service to participate in the weight averaging
nonletter-size business reply mail experiment. This provision expires
June 7, 1999.
931.7 Authorizations and Licenses.
931.71 In order to distribute business reply cards, envelopes,
cartons or labels, the distributor must obtain a license or licenses
from the Postal Service and pay the appropriate fee as set forth in Fee
Schedule 931.
931.72 Except as provided in section 931.73, the license to
distribute business reply cards, envelopes, cartons, or labels must be
obtained at each office from which the mail is offered for delivery.
931.73 If the business reply mail is to be distributed from a
central office to be returned to branches or dealers in other cities,
one license obtained from the post office where the central office is
located may be used to cover all business reply mail.
931.74 The license to mail business reply mail may be canceled for
failure to pay business reply postage and fees when due, and for
distributing business reply cards or envelopes that do not conform to
prescribed form, style or size.
931.75 Authorization to pay experimental nonletter-size business
reply mail fees as set forth in Fee Schedule 931 may be canceled for
failure of a business reply mail advance deposit trust account holder
to meet the standards specified by the Postal Service for the
applicable reverse manifest or weight averaging accounting method. This
provision expires June 7, 1999.
932 Merchandise Return Service
932.1 Definition.
932.11 Merchandise return service provides a method whereby a
shipper may authorize its customers to return a parcel with the postage
paid by the shipper. A shipper is the holder of a merchandise return
permit.
932.2 Description of Service.
932.21 Merchandise return service is available to all shippers who
obtain the necessary permit and who guarantee payment of postage and
fees for all returned parcels.
932.22 Merchandise return service is available for the return of
any parcel under the following classification schedules:
a. First-Class Mail;
b. Standard Mail.
932.3 Requirements of the Mailer.
932.31 Merchandise return labels must be prepared at the shipper's
expense to specifications set forth by the Postal Service.
932.32 The shipper must furnish its customer with an appropriate
merchandise return label.
932.4 Other Services.
932.41 The following services may be purchased in conjunction with
Merchandise Return Service:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
Service schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Certificate of mailing.................................... 947
b. Insurance................................................. 943
c. Registered mail........................................... 942
d. Special handling.......................................... 952
------------------------------------------------------------------------
932.42 Only the shipper may purchase insurance service for the
merchandise return parcel by indicating the amount of insurance on the
merchandise return label before providing it to the customer. The
customer who returns a parcel to the shipper under merchandise return
service may not purchase insurance.
932.5 Fees.
932.51 The fee for the merchandise return service is set forth in
Fee Schedule 932. This fee is paid by the shipper.
932.6 Authorizations and Licenses.
932.61 A permit fee as set forth in Schedule 1000 must be paid
once each calendar year by shippers utilizing merchandise return
service.
932.62 The merchandise return permit may be canceled for failure
to maintain sufficient funds in a trust account to cover postage and
fees on returned parcels or for distributing merchandise return labels
that do not conform to Postal Service specifications.
933 On-Site Meter Setting
933.1 Definition.
933.11 On-site meter setting or examination service is a service
whereby the Postal Service will service a postage meter at the mailer's
or meter manufacturer's premises.
933.2 Description of Service.
933.21 On-site meter setting or examination service is available
on a scheduled basis, and meter setting may be performed on an
emergency basis for those customers enrolled in the scheduled on-site
meter setting or examination program.
933.3 Fees.
933.31 The fees for on-site meter setting or examination service
are set forth in Fee Schedule 933.
934 [Reserved]
935 Bulk Parcel Return Service
935.1 Definition.
935.11 Bulk Parcel Return Service provides a method whereby high-
volume parcel mailers may have undeliverable-as-addressed machinable
parcels returned to designated postal facilities for pickup by the
mailer at a predetermined frequency specified by the Postal Service or
delivered by the Postal Service in bulk in a manner and frequency
specified by the Postal Service.
[[Page 1399]]
935.2 Description of Service.
935.21 Bulk Parcel Return Service is available only for the return
of machinable parcels, as defined by the Postal Service, initially
mailed under the following Standard Mail subclasses: Regular and
Nonprofit.
935.3 Requirements of the Mailer.
935.31 Mailers must receive authorization from the Postal Service
to use Bulk Parcel Return Service.
935.32 To claim eligibility for Bulk Parcel Return Service at each
facility through which the mailer requests Bulk Parcel Return Service,
the mailer must demonstrate receipt of 10,000 returned machinable
parcels at a given delivery point in the previous postal fiscal year or
must demonstrate a high likelihood of receiving 10,000 returned parcels
in the postal fiscal year for which the service is requested.
935.33 Payment for Bulk Parcel Return Service is made through
advance deposit account, or as otherwise specified by the Postal
Service.
935.34 Mail for which Bulk Parcel Return Service is requested must
bear endorsements specified by the Postal Service.
935.35 Bulk Parcel Return Service mailers must meet the
documentation and audit requirements of the Postal Service.
935.4 Other Services.
935.41 The following services may be purchased in conjunction with
Bulk Parcel Return Service:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
Service schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Address Correction Service................................ 911
b. Certificate of Mailing.................................... 947
c. Shipper-Paid Forwarding................................... 936
------------------------------------------------------------------------
935.5 Fee.
935.51 The fee for Bulk Parcel Return Service is set forth in Fee
Schedule 935.
935.6 Authorizations and Licenses.
935.61 A permit fee as set forth in Schedule 1000 must be paid
once each calendar year by mailers utilizing Bulk Parcel Return
Service.
935.62 The Bulk Parcel Return Service permit may be canceled for
failure to maintain sufficient funds in an advance deposit account to
cover postage and fees on returned parcels or for failure to meet the
specifications of the Postal Service.
936 Shipper-Paid Forwarding
936.1 Definition.
936.11 Shipper-Paid Forwarding provides a method whereby mailers
may have undeliverable-as-addressed machinable parcels forwarded at
applicable First-Class Mail rates for up to one year from the date that
the addressee filed a change-of-address order. If the parcel, for which
Shipper-Paid Forwarding is elected, is returned, the mailer will pay
the applicable First-Class Mail rate, or the Bulk Parcel Return Service
fee, if that service was elected.
936.2 Description of Service.
936.21 Shipper-Paid Forwarding is available only for the
forwarding of machinable parcels, as defined by the Postal Service,
initially mailed under the following Standard Mail subclasses: Regular
and Nonprofit.
936.3 Requirements of the Mailer.
936.31 Shipper-Paid Forwarding is available only in conjunction
with automated Address Correction Service in section 911.
936.32 Mail for which Shipper-Paid Forwarding is purchased must
meet the preparation requirements of the Postal Service.
936.33 Payment for Shipper-Paid Forwarding is made through advance
deposit account, or as otherwise specified by the Postal Service.
936.34 Mail for which Shipper-Paid Forwarding is requested must
bear endorsements specified by the Postal Service.
936.4 Other Services.
936.41 The following services may be purchased in conjunction with
Shipper-Paid Forwarding:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
Service schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Certificate of Mailing.................................... 947
b. Bulk Parcel Return Service................................ 935
------------------------------------------------------------------------
936.5 Applicable Rates.
936.51 Except as provided in section 935, single-piece rates under
the Letters and Sealed Parcels subclass or the Priority Mail subclass
of First-Class Mail, as set forth in Rate Schedules 221 and 223, apply
to pieces forwarded or returned under this section.
940 Accountability & Receipts
941 Certified Mail
941.1 Definition.
941.11 Certified mail service is a service that provides a mailing
receipt to the sender and a record of delivery at the office of
delivery.
941.2 Description of Service.
941.21 Certified mail service is provided for matter mailed as
First-Class Mail.
941.22 If requested by the mailer, the time of acceptance by the
Postal Service will be indicated on the receipt.
941.23 A record of delivery is retained at the office of delivery
for a specified period of time.
941.24 If the initial attempt to deliver the mail is not
successful, a notice of attempted delivery is left at the mailing
address.
941.25 A receipt of mailing may be obtained only if the article is
mailed at a post office, branch or station, or given to a rural
carrier.
941.26 Additional copies of the original mailing receipt may be
obtained by the mailer.
941.3 Deposit of Mail.
941.31 Certified mail must be deposited in a manner specified by
the Postal Service.
941.4 Other Services.
941.41 The following services may be obtained in conjunction with
mail sent under this section upon payment of the applicable fees:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
Service schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Restricted Delivery....................................... 946
b. Return Receipt............................................ 945
------------------------------------------------------------------------
941.5 Fees.
941.51 The fees for certified mail service are set forth in Fee
Schedule 941.
942 Registered Mail
942.1 Definition.
942.11 Registered mail is a service that provides added protection
to mail sent under this section and indemnity in case of loss or
damage.
942.2 Description of Service.
942.21 Registered mail service is available to mailers of prepaid
mail sent as First-Class Mail except that registered mail must meet the
minimum requirements for length and width regardless of thickness.
942.22 Registered mail service provides insurance up to a maximum
of $25,000, depending upon the actual value at the time of mailing,
except that insurance is not available for articles of no value.
942.23 There is no limit on the value of articles sent under this
section.
942.24 Registered mail service is not available for:
a. All delivery points because of the high security required for
registered mail; in addition, not all delivery points will be available
for registry and liability is limited in some geographic areas;
b. Mail of any class sent in combination with First-Class Mail;
c. Two or more articles tied or fastened together, unless the
envelopes are enclosed in the same envelope or container.
942.25 The following services are provided as part of registered
mail
[[Page 1400]]
service at no additional cost to the mailer:
a. A receipt;
b. A record of delivery, retained by the Postal Service for a
specified period of time;
c. A notice of attempted delivery will be left at the mailing
address if the initial delivery attempt is unsuccessful;
d. When registered mail is undeliverable-as-addressed and cannot be
forwarded, a notice of nondelivery is provided.
942.26 A claim for complete loss of insured articles may be filed
by the mailer only. A claim for damage or for partial loss of insured
articles may be filed by either the mailer or addressee.
942.27 Indemnity claims for registered mail must be filed within a
period of time, specified by the Postal Service, from the date the
article was mailed.
942.3 Deposit of Mail.
942.31 Registered mail must be deposited in a manner specified by
the Postal Service.
942.4 Service.
942.41 Registered mail is provided maximum security.
942.5 Forwarding and Return.
942.51 Registered mail is forwarded and returned without
additional registry charge.
942.6 Other Services.
942.61 The following services may be obtained in conjunction with
mail sent under this section upon payment of applicable fees:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
Service schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Collect on delivery....................................... 944
b. Restricted delivery....................................... 946
c. Return receipt............................................ 945
d. Merchandise return (shippers only)........................ 932
------------------------------------------------------------------------
942.7 Fees
942.71 The fees for registered mail are set forth in Fee Schedule
942.
943 Insurance
943.1 Express Mail Insurance.
943.11 Definition.
943.111 Express Mail Insurance is a service that provides the
mailer with indemnity for loss of, rifling of, or damage to items sent
by Express Mail.
943.12 Description of Service.
943.121 Express Mail Insurance is available only for Express Mail.
943.122 Insurance coverage is provided, for no additional charge,
up to $500 per piece for document reconstruction, up to $5,000 per
occurrence regardless of the number of claimants. Insurance coverage is
also provided, for no additional charge, up to $500 per piece for
merchandise. Insurance coverage for merchandise valued at more than
$500 is available for an additional fee, as set forth in Fee Schedule
943. The maximum liability for merchandise is $5,000 per piece. For
negotiable items, currency, or bullion, the maximum liability is $15.
943.123 Indemnity claims for Express Mail must be filed within a
specified period of time from the date the article was mailed.
943.124 Indemnity will be paid under terms and conditions
specified by the Postal Service.
943.125 Among other limitations specified by the Postal Service,
indemnity will not be paid by the Postal Service for loss, damage or
rifling:
a. Of nonmailable matter;
b. Due to improper packaging;
c. Due to seizure by any agency of government; or
d. Due to war, insurrection or civil disturbances.
943.13 Fees.
943.131 The fees for Express Mail Insurance service are set forth
in Fee Schedule 943.
943.2 General Insurance.
943.21 Retail Insurance.
943.211 Retail Insurance is a service that provides the mailer
with indemnity for loss of, rifling of, or damage to mailed items.
943.212 The maximum liability of the Postal Service for Retail
Insurance is $5000.
943.213 Retail Insurance is available for mail sent under the
following classification schedules:
a. First-Class Mail, if containing matter that may be mailed as
Standard Mail;
b. Parcel Post, Bound Printed Matter, Special, and Library
subclasses of Standard Mail.
943.214 Retail Insurance is not available for matter offered for
sale, addressed to prospective purchasers who have not ordered or
authorized their sending. If such matter is received in the mail,
payment will not be made for loss, rifling, or damage.
943.215 For Retail Insurance, the mailer is issued a receipt for
each item mailed. For items insured for more than $50, a receipt of
delivery is obtained by the Postal Service.
943.216 For items insured for more than $50, a notice of attempted
delivery is left at the mailing address when the first attempt at
delivery is unsuccessful.
943.217 Retail insurance provides indemnity for the actual value
of the article at the time of mailing.
943.22 Bulk Insurance.
943.221 Bulk Insurance service is available for mail entered in
bulk at designated facilities and in a manner specified by the Postal
Service, including the use of electronic manifesting, and sent under
the following classification schedules:
a. First-Class Mail, if containing matter that may be mailed as
Standard Mail;
b. Parcel Post, Bound Printed Matter, Special, and Library
subclasses of Standard Mail.
943.222 Bulk Insurance bears endorsements and identifiers
specified by the Postal Service. Bulk Insurance mailers must meet the
documentation requirements of the Postal Service.
943.223 Bulk Insurance provides indemnity for the lesser of the
actual value of the article at the time of mailing, or the wholesale
cost of the contents to the sender.
943.23 Claims.
943.231 For Retail Insurance, a claim for complete loss may be
filed by the mailer only, and a claim for damage or for partial loss
may be filed by either the mailer or addressee. For Bulk Insurance, all
claims must be filed by the mailer.
943.232 A claim for damage or loss on a parcel sent merchandise
return under section 932 may be filed only by the purchaser of the
insurance.
943.233 Indemnity claims must be filed within a specified period
of time from the date the article was mailed.
943.24 Deposit of Mail.
943.241 Mail insured under section 943.2 must be deposited as
specified by the Postal Service.
943.25 Forwarding and Return.
943.251 By insuring an item, the mailer guarantees forwarding and
return postage unless instructions on the piece mailed indicate that it
not be forwarded or returned.
943.252 Mail undeliverable as addressed will be returned to the
sender as specified by the sender or by the Postal Service.
943.26 Other Services.
943.261 The following services, if applicable to the subclass of
mail, may be obtained in conjunction with mail sent under this section
upon payment of the applicable fees:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
Service schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Parcel Airlift............................................ 951
b. Restricted delivery (for items insured for more than $50). 946
c. Return receipt (for items insured for more than $50)...... 945
d. Special handling.......................................... 952
e. Merchandise return (shippers only)........................ 932
------------------------------------------------------------------------
943.27 Fees.
[[Page 1401]]
943.271 The fees for Insurance are set forth in Fee Schedule 943.
944 Collect on Delivery
944.1 Definition
944.11 Collect on Delivery (COD) service is a service that allows
a mailer to mail an article for which full or partial payment has not
yet been received and have the price, the cost of postage and fees, and
anticipated or past due charges collected by the Postal Service from
the addressee when the article is delivered.
944.2 Description of Service.
944.21 COD service is available for collection of $600 or less
upon the delivery of postage prepaid mail sent under the following
classification schedules:
a. Express Mail;
b. First-Class Mail;
c. Parcel Post; Bound Printed Matter, Special, and Library
subclasses of Standard Mail.
944.22 Service under this section is not available for:
a. Collection agency purposes;
b. Return of merchandise about which some dissatisfaction has
arisen, unless the new addressee has consented in advance to such
return;
c. Sending only bills or statements of indebtedness, even though
the sender may establish that the addressee has agreed to collection in
this manner; however, when the legitimate COD shipment consisting of
merchandise or bill of lading, is being mailed, the balance due on a
past or anticipated transaction may be included in the charges on a COD
article, provided the addressee has consented in advance to such
action;
d. Parcels containing moving-picture films mailed by exhibitors to
moving-picture manufacturers, distributors, or exchanges;
e. Goods that have not been ordered by the addressee.
944.23 COD service provides the mailer with insurance against
loss, rifling and damage to the article as well as failure to receive
the amount collected from the addressee. This provision insures only
the receipt of the instrument issued to the mailer after payment of COD
charges, and is not to be construed to make the Postal Service liable
upon any such instrument other than a Postal Service money order.
944.24 A receipt is issued to the mailer for each piece of COD
mail. Additional copies of the original mailing receipt may be obtained
by the mailer.
944.25 Delivery of COD mail will be made in a manner specified by
the Postal Service. If a delivery to the mailing address is not
attempted or if a delivery attempt is unsuccessful, a notice of
attempted delivery will be left at the mailing address.
944.26 The mailer may receive a notice of nondelivery if the piece
mailed is endorsed appropriately.
944.27 The mailer may designate a new addressee or alter the COD
charges by submitting the appropriate form and by paying the
appropriate fee as set forth in Fee Schedule 944.
944.28 A claim for complete loss may be filed by the mailer only.
A claim for damage or for partial loss may be filed by either the
mailer or addressee.
944.29 COD indemnity claims must be filed within a specified
period of time from the date the article was mailed.
944.3 Requirements of the Mailer.
944.31 COD mail must be identified as COD mail.
944.4 Deposit of Mail.
944.41 COD mail must be deposited in a manner specified by the
Postal Service.
944.5 Forwarding and Return.
944.51 A mailer of COD mail guarantees to pay any return postage,
unless otherwise specified on the piece mailed.
944.52 For COD mail sent as Standard Mail, postage at the
applicable rate will be charged to the addressee:
a. When an addressee, entitled to delivery to the mailing address
under Postal Service regulations, requests delivery of COD mail that
was refused when first offered for delivery;
b. For each delivery attempt, to an addressee entitled to delivery
to the mailing address under Postal Service regulations, after the
second such attempt.
944.6 Other Services.
944.61 The following services, if applicable to the subclass of
mail, may be obtained in conjunction with mail sent under this section
upon payment of the applicable fee:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
Service schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Registered mail, if sent as First-Class................... 942
b. Restricted delivery....................................... 946
c. Special handling.......................................... 952
------------------------------------------------------------------------
944.7 Fees.
944.71 Fees for COD service are set forth in Fee Schedule 944.
945 Return Receipt
945.1 Definition.
945.11 Return receipt service is a service that provides evidence
to the mailer that an article has been received at the delivery
address.
945.2 Description of Service.
945.21 Return receipt service is available for mail sent under the
following sections or classification schedules:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Certified mail............................................ 941
b. COD mail.................................................. 944
c. Insurance (if insured for more than $50).................. 943
d. Registered mail........................................... 942
e. Delivery Confirmation..................................... 948
f. Express Mail..............................................
g. Priority Mail (merchandise only)..........................
h. Standard Mail (limited to merchandise sent by Parcel Post,
Bound Printed Matter, Special, and Library subclasses)......
------------------------------------------------------------------------
945.22 Return receipt service is available at the time of mailing
or, when purchased in conjunction with certified mail, COD, Insurance
(if for more than $50), registered mail, or Express Mail, after
mailing.
945.23 Mailers requesting return receipt service at the time of
mailing will be provided, as appropriate, the signature of the
addressee or addressee's agent, the date delivered, and the address of
delivery, if different from the address on the mailpiece.
945.24 Mailers requesting return receipt service after mailing
will be provided the date of delivery and the name of the person who
signed for the article.
945.25 If the mailer does not receive a return receipt within a
specified period of time from the date of mailing, the mailer may
request a duplicate return receipt. No fee is charged for a duplicate
return receipt.
945.3 Fees.
945.31 The fees for return receipt service are set forth in Fee
Schedule 945.
946 Restricted Delivery
946.1 Definition.
946.11 Restricted delivery service is a service that provides a
means by which a mailer may direct that delivery will be made only to
the addressee or to someone authorized by the addressee to receive such
mail.
946.2 Description of Service.
946.21 This service is available for mail sent under the following
sections:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Certified Mail............................................ 941
b. COD Mail.................................................. 944
c. Insurance (if insured for more than $50).................. 943
d. Registered Mail........................................... 942
------------------------------------------------------------------------
946.22 Restricted delivery is available to the mailer at the time
of mailing or after mailing.
[[Page 1402]]
946.23 Restricted delivery service is available only to natural
persons specified by name.
946.24 A record of delivery will be retained by the Postal Service
for a specified period of time.
946.25 Failure to provide restricted delivery service when
requested after mailing, due to prior delivery, is not grounds for
refund of the fee or communications charges.
946.3 Fees.
946.31 The fees for restricted delivery service are set forth in
Fee Schedule 946.
947 Certificate of Mailing
947.1 Definition.
947.11 Certificate of mailing service is a service that furnishes
evidence of mailing.
947.2 Description of Service.
947.21 Certificate of mailing service is available to mailers of
matter sent under the classification schedule to any class of mail.
947.22 A receipt is not obtained upon delivery of the mail to the
addressee. No record of mailing is maintained at the post office.
947.23 Additional copies of certificates of mailing may be
obtained by the mailer.
947.3 Other Services.
947.31 The following services, if applicable to the subclass of
mail, may be obtained in conjunction with mail sent under this
classification schedule upon payment of the applicable fees:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
Service schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Parcel airlift............................................ 951
b. Special handling.......................................... 952
------------------------------------------------------------------------
947.4 Fees.
947.41 The fees for certificate of mailing service are set forth
in Fee Schedule 947.
948 Delivery Confirmation
948.1 Definition.
948.11 Delivery confirmation service provides electronic
confirmation to the mailer that an article was delivered or that a
delivery attempt was made.
948.2 Description of Service.
948.21 Delivery confirmation service is available for Priority
Mail and the Parcel Post, Bound Printed Matter, Special and Library
subclasses of Standard Mail.
948.22 Delivery confirmation service may be requested only at the
time of mailing.
948.23 Mail for which delivery confirmation service is requested
must meet preparation requirements established by the Postal Service,
and bear a barcode specified by the Postal Service.
948.24 Matter for which delivery confirmation service is requested
must be deposited in a manner specified by the Postal Service.
948.3 Fees.
948.31 Delivery confirmation service is subject to the fees set
forth in Fee Schedule 948.
950 Parcel Handling
951 Parcel Airlift (PAL)
951.1 Definition.
951.11 Parcel airlift service is a service that provides for air
transportation of parcels on a space available basis to or from
military post offices outside the contiguous 48 states.
951.2 Description of Service.
951.21 Parcel airlift service is available for mail sent under the
Standard Mail Classification Schedule.
951.3 Physical Limitations.
951.31 The minimum physical limitations established for the mail
sent under the classification schedule for which postage is paid apply
to parcel airlift mail. In no instance may the parcel exceed 30 pounds
in weight, or 60 inches in length and girth combined.
951.4 Requirements of the Mailer.
951.41 Mail sent under this section must be endorsed as specified
by the Postal Service.
951.5 Deposit of Mail.
951.51 PAL mail must be deposited in a manner specified by the
Postal Service.
951.6 Forwarding and Return.
951.61 PAL mail sent for delivery outside the contiguous 48 states
is forwarded as set forth in section 2030 of the General Definitions,
Terms and Conditions. PAL mail sent for delivery within the contiguous
48 states is forwarded or returned as set forth in section 353 as
appropriate.
951.7 Other Services.
951.71 The following services, if applicable to the subclass of
mail, may be obtained in conjunction with mail sent under this section
upon payment of the applicable fees:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
Service Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Certificate of mailing.................................... 947
b. Insurance................................................. 943
c. Restricted delivery (if insured for more than $50)........ 946
d. Return receipt (if insured for more than $50)............. 945
e. Special handling.......................................... 952
------------------------------------------------------------------------
951.8 Fees.
951.81 The fees for parcel airlift service are set forth in Fee
Schedule 951.
952 Special Handling
952.1 Definition.
952.11 Special handling service is a service that provides
preferential handling to the extent practicable during dispatch and
transportation.
952.2 Description of Service.
952.21 Special handling service is available for mail sent under
the following classification schedules:
a. First-Class Mail;
b. Parcel Post; Bound Printed Matter; Special, and Library
subclasses of Standard Mail.
952.22 Special handling service is mandatory for matter that
requires special attention in handling, transportation and delivery.
952.3 Requirements of the Mailer.
952.31 Mail sent under this section must be identified as
specified by the Postal Service.
952.4 Deposit of Mail.
952.41 Mail sent under this section must be deposited in a manner
specified by the Postal Service.
952.5 Forwarding and Return.
952.51 If undeliverable as addressed, special handling mail that
is forwarded to the addressee is given special handling without
requiring payment of an additional handling fee. However, additional
postage at the applicable Standard Mail rate is collected on delivery.
952.6 Other Services.
952.61 The following services, if applicable to the subclass of
mail, may be obtained in conjunction with mail sent under this section
upon payment of the applicable fees:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
Service schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. COD mail.................................................. 944
b. Insurance................................................. 943
c. Parcel airlift............................................ 951
d. Merchandise return (shippers only)........................ 932
------------------------------------------------------------------------
952.7 Fees.
952.71 The fees for special handling service are set forth in Fee
Schedule 952.
960 Stamped Paper
961 Stamped Envelopes
961.1 Definition.
961.11 Plain stamped envelopes and printed stamped envelopes are
envelopes with postage thereon offered for sale by the Postal Service.
961.2 Description of Service.
961.21 Stamped envelopes are available for:
a. First-Class Mail within the first rate increment.
[[Page 1403]]
b. Standard Mail mailed at a minimum per piece rate as specified by
the Postal Service.
961.22 Printed stamped envelopes may be obtained by special
request.
961.3 Fees.
961.31 The fees for stamped envelopes are set forth in Fee
Schedule 961.
962 Stamped Cards
962.1 Definition.
962.11 Stamped Cards. Stamped Cards are cards with postage
imprinted or impressed on them and supplied by the Postal Service for
the transmission of messages.
962.12 Double Stamped Cards. Double Stamped Cards consist of two
attached cards, one of which may be detached by the receiver and
returned by mail as a single Stamped Card.
962.2 Description of Service. Stamped Cards are available for
First-Class Mail.
962.3 Fees. The fees for Stamped Cards are set forth in Fee
Schedule 962.
970 Postal Money Orders
971 Domestic Postal Money Orders
971.1 Definition.
971.11 Money order service is a service that provides the customer
with an instrument for payment of a specified sum of money.
971.2 Description of Service.
971.21 The maximum value for which a domestic postal money order
may be purchased is $700. Other restrictions on the number or dollar
value of postal money order sales, or both, may be imposed by law or
under regulations prescribed by the Postal Service.
971.22 A receipt of purchase is provided at no additional cost.
971.23 The Postal Service will replace money orders that are
spoiled or incorrectly prepared, regardless of who caused the error,
without charge if replaced on the date originally issued.
971.24 If a replacement money order is issued after the date of
original issue because the original was spoiled or incorrectly
prepared, the applicable money order fee may be collected from the
customer.
971.25 Inquiries or claims may be filed by the purchaser, payee,
or endorsee.
971.3 Fees.
971.31 The fees for domestic postal money orders are set forth in
Fee Schedule 971.
* * * * *
2033 Applicable provisions. The provisions of sections 150, 250,
350, 450, 935 and 936 apply to forwarding and return.
* * * * *
3010 Packaging.
* * * * *
d. It is marked by the mailer with a material that is neither
readily water soluble nor easily rubbed off or smeared, and the marking
will be sharp and clear.
* * * * *
BILLING CODE 7710-12-U
Rate Schedules
Calculation of Postage
* * * * *
Express Mail Schedules 121, 122 And 123
[Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule 123 Schedule 123
Schedule 121 Schedule 122 next day and next day and
Weight not exceeding (Pounds) same day custom designed second day PO second day PO
airport service to PO to addressee
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1/2\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
[[Page 1404]]
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The applicable 2-pound rate is charged for matter sent in a `flat rate' envelope provided by the Postal
Service
\2\ Add $______ for each pickup stop.
\3\ Add $______ for each Custom Designed delivery stop.
First-Class Mail Rate Schedule 221--Letters and Sealed Parcels
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate
(cents)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regular
Single Piece: First Ounce
Presort \1\
Qualified Business Reply Mail
Additional Ounce \2\
Nonstandard Surcharge
Single Piece
Presort
Automation--Presort \1\
Letters \3\
Basic Presort \4\
3-Digit Presort \5\
5-Digit Presort \6\
Carrier Route Presort \7\
Flats \8\
\3/5\-Digit Presort \10\
Additional Ounce \2\
Nonstandard Surcharge
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A mailing fee of $______ must be paid once each year at each office
of mailing by any person who mails other than Single Piece First-Class
Mail. Payment of the fee allows the mailer to mail at any First-Class
rate. For presorted mailings weighing more than 2 ounces, subtract
$______ cents per piece.
\2\ Rate applies through 13 ounces. Heavier pieces are subject to
Priority Mail rates.
\3\ Rates apply to bulk-entered mailings of at least 500 letter-size
pieces, which must be delivery point barcoded and meet other
preparation requirements specified by the Postal Service.
\4\ Rate applies to letter-size Automation-Presort category mail not
mailed at 3-Digit, 5-Digit, or Carrier Route rates.
\5\ Rate applies to letter-size Automation-Presort category mail
presorted to single or multiple three-digit ZIP Code destinations
specified by Postal Service.
\6\ Rate applies to letter-size Automation-Presort category mail
presorted to single or multiple five-digit ZIP Code destinations
specified by the Postal Service.
\7\ Rate applies to letter-size Automation-Presort category mail
presorted to carrier routes specified by the Postal Service.
\8\ Rates apply to bulk-entered mailings of at least 500 flat-size
pieces, each of which must be delivery-point barcoded or bear a ZIP+4
barcode, and must meet other preparation requirements specified by the
Postal Service.
\9\ Rate applies to flat-size Automation-Presort category mail not
mailed at the \3/5\-Digit rate.
\10\ Rate applies to flat-size Automation-Presort category mail
presorted to single or multiple three- and five-digit ZIP Code
destinations as specified by the Postal Service.
[[Page 1405]]
First-Class Mail Rate Schedule 222--Cards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate
(cents)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regular
Single Piece
Presort <SUP>1
Qualified Business Reply Mail
Automatic-Presort <SUP>1,2
Basic Presort <SUP>3
3-Digit Presort <SUP>4
5-Digit Presort <SUP>5
Carrier Route Presort <SUP>6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<SUP>1 A mailing fee of $______ must be paid once each year at each office of
mailing by any person who mails other than Single Piece First-Class
Mail. Payment of the fee allows the mailer to mail at any First-Class
rate.
<SUP>2 Rates apply to bulk-entered mailings of at least 500 pieces, which
must be barcoded and meet other preparation requirements specified by
the Postal Service.
<SUP>3 Rate applies to Automation-Presort category mail not mailed at 3-
Digit, 5-Digit, or Carrier Route rates.
<SUP>4 Rate applies to Automation-Presort category mail presorted to single
or multiple three-digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by the
Postal Service.
<SUP>5 Rate applies to Automation-Presort category mail presorted to single
or multiple five-digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by the
Postal Service.
<SUP>6 Rate applies to Automation-Presort category mail presorted to carrier
routes specified by the Postal Service.
First-Class Mail Schedule 223--Priority Mail Subclass
[Dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight not exceeding (pounds) L, 1, 2, 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
[[Page 1406]]
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<SUP>1 The 2-pound rate is charged for matter sent in a `flat rate' envelope provided by the Postal Service.
<SUP>2 Add $______ for each pickup stop.
<SUP>3 Exception: Parcels weighing less than 15 pounds, measuring over 84 inches in length and girth combined, are chargeable with a minimum rate equal to
that for a 15-pound parcel for the zone to which addressed.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 321.2A--Regular Subclass Presort Category <SUP>1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate
(cents)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter Size
Piece Rate
Basic
3/5-Digit
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
Non-Letter Size <SUP>2
Piece Rate
Minimum per Piece <SUP>3
Basic
3/5 Digit
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
Pound Rate <SUP>3
Plus per Piece Rate
Basic
3/5-Digit
Destination Entry Discount per Pound
BMC
SCF
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<SUP>1 A fee $______ must be paid each 12-month period for each bulk mailing
permit.
<SUP>2 Residual shape pieces are subject to a surcharge of $______ per piece.
<SUP>3 Mailer pays either the minimum piece rate or the pound rate, whichever
is higher.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 321.2B--Regular Subclass Automation Category
<SUP>1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate
(cents)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter Size <SUP>2
Piece Rate
Basic Letter <SUP>3
3-Digit Letter <SUP>4
5-Digit Letter <SUP>5
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
Flat Size <SUP>6
Piece Rate
Minimum per Piece <SUP>7
Basic Flat <SUP>8
3/5-Digit Flat <SUP>9
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
Pound Rate <SUP>7
Plus per piece Rate
Basic Flat <SUP>8
3/5-Digit Flat <SUP>9
Destination Entry Discount per Pound
BMC
SCF
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A fee of $______ must be paid once each 12-month period for each
bulk mailing permit.
\2\ For letter-size automation pieces meeting applicable Postal Service
regulations.
\3\ Rate applies to letter-size automation mail not mailed at 3-digit, 5-
digit or carrier route rates.
\4\ Rate applies to letter-size automation mail presorted to single or
multiple three-digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by the Postal
Service.
\5\ Rate applies to letter-size automation mail presorted to single or
multiple five-digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by the Postal
Service.
\6\ For flat-size automation mail meeting applicable Postal Service
regulations.
\7\ Mailer pays either the minimum piece rate or the pound rate,
whichever is higher.
\8\ Rate applies to flat-size automation mail not mailed at 3/5-digit
rate.
\9\ Rate applies to flat-size automation mail presorted to single or
multiple three- and five-digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by
the Postal Service.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 321.3--Enhanced Carrier Route Subclass <SUP>1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate
(cents)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter Size
Piece Rate
Basic
Basic Automated Letter <SUP>2
High Density
Saturation
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
DDU
Non-Letter Size <SUP>3
Piece Rate
Minimum per Piece <SUP>4
Basic
High Density
Saturation
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
DDU
Pound Rate <SUP>4
Plus per Piece Rate
Basic
High Density
Saturation
Destination Entry Discount per Pound
BMC
SCF
[[Page 1407]]
DDU
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A fee of $______ must be paid each 12-month period for each bulk
mailing permit.
\2\ Rate applies to letter-size automation mail presorted to routes
specified by the Postal Service.
\3\ Residual shape pieces are subject to a surcharge of $______ per
piece.
\4\ Mailer pays either the minimum piece rate or the pound rate,
whichever is higher.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 321.4A--Nonprofit Subclass Presort
Categories <SUP>1
[Full rates]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rates
(cents)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter Size
Piece Rate
Basic
3/5-Digit
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
Non-Letter Size <SUP>2
Piece Rate
Minimum per Piece <SUP>3
Basic
3/5-Digit
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
Pound Rate <SUP>3
Plus per Piece Rate
Basic
3/5-Digit
Destination Entry Discount per Pound
BMC
SCF
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<SUP>1 A fee of $______ must be paid once each 12-month period for each bulk
mailing permit.
<SUP>2 Residual shape pieces are subject to a surcharge off $______ per
piece.
<SUP>3 Mailer pays either the minimum piece rate or the pound rate, whichever
is higher.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 321.4B--Nonprofit Subclass Automation
Categories <SUP>1
[Full rates]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rates
(cents
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter Size <SUP>2
Piece Rate
Basic Letter <SUP>3
3-Digit Letter <SUP>4
5-Digit Letter <SUP>5
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
Flat Size <SUP>6
Piece Rate
Minimum per Piece <SUP>7
Basic Flat <SUP>8
3/5-Digit Flat <SUP>9
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
Pound Rate <SUP>7
Plus per Piece Rate
Basic Flat <SUP>8
3/5-Digit <SUP>9
Destination Entry Discount per Pound
BMC
SCF
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<SUP>1 A fee of $______ must be paid once each 12-month period for each bulk
mailing permit.
<SUP>2 For letter-size automation pieces meeting applicable Postal Service
regulations.
<SUP>3 Rate applies to letter-size automation mail not mailed at 3-digit, 5-
digit or carrier route rates.
<SUP>4 Rate applies to letter-size automation mail presorted to single or
multiple three-digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by the Postal
Service.
<SUP>5 Rate applies to letter-size automation mail presorted to single or
multiple five-digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by the Postal
Service.
<SUP>6 For flat-size automation mail meeting applicable Postal Service
regulations.
<SUP>7 Mail pays either the minimum piece rate or the pound rate, whichever
is higher.
<SUP>8 Rate applies to flat-size automation mail not mailed at 3/5-digit
rate.
<SUP>9 Rate applies to flat-size automation mail presorted to single or
multiple three- and five-digit ZIP Code destinations as specified by
the Postal Service.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 321.5--Nonprofit Enhanced Carrier Route
Subclass <SUP>1
[Full rates]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rates
(cents)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter Size
Piece Rate
Basic
Basic Automated Letter <SUP>2
High Density
Saturation
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
DDU
Non-Letter Size <SUP>3
Piece Rate
Minimum per Piece <SUP>4
Basic
High Density
Saturation
Destination Entry Discount per Piece
BMC
SCF
DDU
Pound Rate <SUP>4
Plus per Piece Rate
Basic
High Density
Saturation
Destination Entry Discount per Pound
BMC
SCF
DDU
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<SUP>1 A fee of $______ must be paid once each 12-month period for each bulk
mailing permit.
<SUP>2 Residual shape pieces are subject to a surcharge off $______ per
piece.
<SUP>3 Mailer pays either the minimum piece rate or the pound rate, whichever
is higher.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 322.1A *--Parcel Post Subclass Inter-BMC Rates
[Dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight not exceeding (pounds) Zone 1 & 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
[[Page 1408]]
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
Oversize parcels <SUP>6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Notes:
\1\ For nonmachinable Inter-BMC parcels, add: $______ per piece.
\2\ For each pickup stop, add: $______
\3\ For Origin Bulk Mail Center Discount, deduct $______ per piece.
\4\ For BMC Presort, deduct $______ per piece.
\5\ For Barcoded Discount, deduct $______ per piece.
\6\ See DMCS section 322.161 for oversize Parcel Post.
\7\ Parcel Post pieces exceeding 84 inches in length and girth combined and weighing less than 15 pounds are subject to a rate equal to that for a 15
pound parcel for the zone to which the parcel is addressed.
[[Page 1409]]
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 322.1B*--Parcel Post Subclass Intra-BMC Rates
[Dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight not exceeding (pounds) Local Zone 1 & 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
Oversize parcels <SUP>3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Notes:
[[Page 1410]]
<SUP>1 For each pickup stop, add $______.
<SUP>2 For Barcoded Discount, deduct $______.
<SUP>3 See DMCS section 322.161 for oversize Parcel Post.
<SUP>4 Parcel Post pieces exceeding 94 inches in length and girth combined and weighing less than 15 pounds are subject to a rate equal to that for a 15
pound parcel for the zone to which the parcel is addressed.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 322.1C*--Parcel Post Subclass Destination BMC Rates
[Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight not exceeding (pounds) Zone 1 & 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
[[Page 1411]]
67
68
69
70
Oversize parcels <SUP>2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Notes:
<SUP>1 For Barcoded Discount, deduct $______.
<SUP>2 See DMCS section 322.161 for oversize Parcel Post.
<SUP>3 Parcel Post pieces exceeding 84 inches in length and girth combined and weighing less than 15 pounds are
subject to a rate equal to that for a 15 pound parcel for the zone to which the parcel is addressed.
<SUP>4 A fee of ______ must be paid each for DBMC, DSCF, and DDU.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 322.ID*--Parcel Post Subclass Destination
SCF Rates
[Dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight (pounds) Weight (pounds)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
................................. 36
2.................................. 37
3.................................. 38
4.................................. 39
5.................................. 40
6.................................. 41
7.................................. 42
8.................................. 43
9.................................. 44
10................................. 45
11................................. 46
12................................. 47
13................................. 48
14................................. 49
15................................. 50
16................................. 51
17................................. 52
18................................. 53
19................................. 54
20................................. 55
21................................. 56
22................................. 57
23................................. 58
24................................. 59
25................................. 60
26................................. 61
27................................. 62
28................................. 63
29................................. 64
30................................. 65
31................................. 66
32................................. 67
33................................. 68
34................................. 69
35................................. 70
Oversize parcels \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Notes:
\1\ See DMCS section 322.161 for oversize Parcel Post.
\2\ Parcel Post pieces exceeding 84 inches in length and girth combined
and weighing less than 15-pounds are subject to a rate equal to that
for a 15 pound parcel for the zone to which the parcel is addressed.
\3\ A fee of $______ must be paid each year for DBMC, DSCF, and DDU.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 322.1E*--Parcel Post Subclass Destination
Delivery Unit Rates
[Dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight (pounds) Weight (pounds)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
................................. 36
2.................................. 37
3.................................. 38
4.................................. 39
5.................................. 40
6.................................. 41
7.................................. 42
8.................................. 43
9.................................. 44
10................................. 45
11................................. 46
12................................. 47
13................................. 48
14................................. 49
15................................. 50
16................................. 51
17................................. 52
18................................. 53
19................................. 54
20................................. 55
21................................. 56
22................................. 57
23................................. 58
24................................. 59
25................................. 60
26................................. 61
27................................. 62
28................................. 63
29................................. 64
30................................. 65
31................................. 66
32................................. 67
33................................. 68
34................................. 69
35................................. 70
Oversize parcels \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Notes:
\1\ See DMCS section 322.161 for oversize Parcel Post.
\2\ Parcel Post pieces exceeding 84 inches in length and girth combined
and weighing less than 15-pounds are subject to a rate equal to that
for a 15 pound parcel for the zone to which the parcel is addressed.
\3\ A fee of $______ must be paid each year for DBMC, DSCF, and DDU.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 322.3A*--Bound Printed Matter Subclass Single Piece Rates \1\
[Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight not Zones
exceeding Local -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(pounds) 1 & 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
[[Page 1412]]
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Per Piece Rate
Per Pound Rate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Notes:
\1\Includes both catalogs and similar bound printed matter.
\2\ For barcoded discount, deduct $______ per piece.
Standard Mail Rate Schedule 322.3B--Bound Printed Matter Subclass Bulk and Carrier Route Presort Rates \1\
[Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone Per piece\3\ Carrier route\2\ Per pound
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local
1&2
3
4
5
6
7
8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes both catalogs and similar bound printed matter.
\2\ Applies to mailings of at least 300 pieces presorted to carrier route as specified by the Postal Service.
\3\ For Barcoded Discount, deduct $______ per piece.
Standard Mail Rate Schedules 323.1 and 323.2 Special and Library Rate
Subclasses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rates
(cents)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule 323.1: Special
First Pound..................................................
Not presorted <SUP>4............................................
LEVEL A Presort (5-digits) <SUP>1 <SUP>2.............................
LEVEL B Presort (BMC) <SUP>1 <SUP>3 <SUP>4................................
Each additional pound through 7 pounds.......................
Each additional pound over 7 pounds..........................
Schedule 323.2: Library
First Pound..................................................
Not presorted <SUP>4............................................
LEVEL A Presort (5-digits) <SUP>1 <SUP>2.............................
LEVEL B Presort (BMC) <SUP>1 <SUP>3 <SUP>4................................
Each additional pound through 7 pounds.......................
Each additional pound over 7 pounds..........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A fee of $ ______ must be paid once 12-month period for each permit.
\2\ For mailings of 500 or more pieces properly prepared and presorted
to five-digit destination ZIP Codes.
\3\ For mailings of 500 or more pieces properly prepared and presorted
to Bulk Mail Centers.
\4\ For Barcoded Discount, deduct $ ______ per-piece.
Periodicals Rate Schedule 421--REGULAR SUBCLASS \1\ \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postage rate unit Rates (cents)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Pound:
Nonadvertising Portion............................. Pound.................................
[[Page 1413]]
Advertising Portion:
Delivery Office\4\............................. Pound.................................
SCF \5\........................................ Pound.................................
1&............................................. Pound.................................
3.............................................. Pound.................................
4.............................................. Pound.................................
5.............................................. Pound.................................
6.............................................. Pound.................................
7.............................................. Pound.................................
8.............................................. Pound.................................
Science of Agriculture:
Delivery Office................................ Pound.................................
SCF............................................ Pound.................................
Zones 1&2...................................... Pound.................................
Per Piece:
Less Nonadvertising Factor\6\...................... ......................................
Required Preparation\7\............................ Piece.................................
Presorted to 3-digit............................... Piece.................................
Presorted to 5-digit............................... Piece.................................
Presorted to Carrier Route......................... Piece.................................
Discounts:
Prepared to Delivery Office\4\................. Piece.................................
Prepared to SCF \5\............................ Piece.................................
High Density\8\................................ Piece.................................
Saturation\9\.................................. Piece.................................
Automation Discounts for Automation Compatible Mail
\10\
From Required:
Prebarcoded letter size.................... Piece.................................
Prebarcoded flats.......................... Piece.................................
From 3-Digit:
Prebarcoded letter size.................... Piece.................................
Prebarcoded flats.......................... Piece.................................
From 5-Digit:
Prebarcoded letter size.................... Piece.................................
Prebarcoded flats.......................... Piece.................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The rates in this schedule also apply to commingled nonsubscriber, non-requester, complimentary, and sample
copies in excess of 10 percent allowance in regular-rate, non-profit, and classroom periodicals.
\2\ Rated do not apply to otherwise regular rate mail that qualifies for the Within County rates in Schedule
423.2.
\3\ Changes are computed by adding the appropriate per-piece charge to the sum of the nonadvertising portion and
the advertising portion, as applicable.
\4\ Applies to carrier route (including high density and saturation) mail delivered within the delivery area of
the originating post office.
\5\ Applies to Mail delivered with the SCF area of the originating SCF office.
\6\ For postage calculations, multiply the proportion of nonadvertising content by this factor and subtract from
the applicable piece rate.
\7\ Mail not eligible for carrier-route, 5-digit or 3-digit rates.
\8\ Applicable to high density mail, deducted from carrier route presort rate.
\9\ Applicable to saturation mail, deducted from carrier route presort rate.
\10\ For automation compatible mail meeting applicable Postal Service regulations.
Periodicals Rate Schedule 423.2--Within County
[Full rates]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate
(cents)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Pound
General
Delivery Office \1\
Per Piece
Required Presort
Presorted to 3-digit
Presorted to 5-digit
Carrier Route Presort
Per Piece Discount
Delivery Office \2\
High Density (formerly 125 piece) \3\
Automation Discounts for Automation Compatible Mail \4\
From Required:
Prebarcoded Letter size
Prebarcoded Flat size
From 3-digit:
Prebarcoded Letter size
Prebarcoded Flat size
From 5-digit:
Prebarcoded Letter size
Prebarcoded Flat size
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Applicable only to carrier route (including high density and
saturation) presorted pieces to be delivered within the delivery area
of the originating post office.
\2\ Applicable only to carrier presorted pieces to be delivered within
the delivery area of the originating post office.
\3\ Applicable to high density mail, deducted from carrier route presort
rate. Mailers also may qualify for this discount on an alternative
basis as provided in DMCS section 423.83.
\4\ For automation compatible pieces meeting applicable Postal Service
regulations.
[[Page 1414]]
Periodicals Rate Schedule 423.3--Publications of Authorized Nonprofit Organizations \10\
[Full rates]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate \1\
Postage rate unit (cents)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Pound:
Nonadvertising portion............................. Pound.................................
Advertising portion.\9\
Delivery Office \2\............................ Pound.................................
SCF \3\........................................ Pound.................................
1&2............................................ Pound.................................
3.............................................. Pound.................................
4.............................................. Pound.................................
5.............................................. Pound.................................
6.............................................. Pound.................................
7.............................................. Pound.................................
8.............................................. Pound.................................
Per Piece:
Less Nonadvertising Factor \4\.....................
Required Preparation \5\........................... Piece.................................
Presorted to 3-digit............................... Piece.................................
Presorted to 5-digit............................... Piece.................................
Presorted to Carrier Route......................... Piece.................................
Discounts:
Prepared to Delivery Office \2\................ Piece.................................
Prepared to SCF \3\............................ Piece.................................
High Density (formerly 125-Piece) \6\.......... Piece.................................
Saturation \7\................................. Piece.................................
Automation Discounts for Automation Compatible Mail
\8\
From Required:
Prebarcoded letter size.................... Piece.................................
Prebarcoded flats.......................... Piece.................................
From 3-Digit:
Prebarcoded letter size.................... Piece.................................
Prebarcoded flats.......................... Piece.................................
From 5-Digit:
Prebarcoded letter size.................... Piece.................................
Prebarcoded flats.......................... Piece.................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Charges are computed by adding the appropriate per-piece charge to the sum of the nonadvertising portion and
the advertising portion, as applicable.
\2\ Applies to carrier route (including high density and saturation) mail delivered within the delivery area of
the originating post office.
\3\ Applies to mail delivered within the SCF area of the originating SCF office.
\4\ For postage calculation, multiply the proportion of nonadvertising content by this factor and subtract from
the applicable piece rate.
\5\ Mail not eligible for carrier route, 5-digit or 3-digit rates.
\6\ Applicable to high density mail, deducted from carrier route presort rate.
\7\ Applicable to saturation mail, deducted from carrier route presort rate.
\8\ For automation compatible mail meeting applicable Postal Service regulations.
\9\ Not applicable to publications containing 10 percent or less advertising content.
\10\ If qualified, nonprofit publications may use Within County rates for applicable portions of a mailing.
Periodicals Rate Schedule 423.4--Classroom Publications <SUP>10
[Full rates]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postage rate unit Rate <SUP>1 (cents)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Pound:
Nonadvertising Portion............................. Pound.................................
Advertising Portion:\9\
Delivery Office \2\............................ Pound.................................
SCF \3\........................................ Pound.................................
1&2............................................ Pound.................................
3.............................................. Pound.................................
4.............................................. Pound.................................
5.............................................. Pound.................................
6.............................................. Pound.................................
7.............................................. Pound.................................
8.............................................. Pound.................................
Per Piece:
Less Nonadvertising Factor: \4\....................
Required Preparation \5\........................... Piece.................................
Presorted to 3-digit............................... Piece.................................
Presorted to 5-digit............................... Piece.................................
Presorted to Carrier Route......................... Piece.................................
[[Page 1415]]
Discounts:
Prepared to Delivery Office \2\................ Piece.................................
Prepared to SCF................................ Piece.................................
High Density (formerly 125-Piece) \6\.......... Piece.................................
Saturation \7\................................. Piece.................................
Automation Discounts for Automation Compatible Mail
\8\
From Required:
Prebarcoded Letter size.................... Piece.................................
Prebarcoded Flats.......................... Piece.................................
From 3-Digit:
Prebarcoded Letter size.................... Piece.................................
Prebarcoded Flats.......................... Piece.................................
From 5-Digit
Prebarcoded Letter Size.................... Piece.................................
Prebarcoded Flats.......................... Piece.................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Charges are computed by adding the appropriate per-piece charge to the sum of the nonadvertising portion and
the advertising portion, as applicable.
\2\ Applies to carrier route (including 125-piece walk sequence and saturation) mail delivered within the
delivery area of the originating post office.
\3\ Applies to mail delivered within the SCF area of the originating SCF office.
\4\ For postage calculation, multiply the proportion of nonadvertising content by this factor and subtract from
the applicable piece rate.
\5\ Mail not eligible for carrier route, 5-digit, or 3-digit rates.
\6\ For walk sequenced mail in batches of 125 pieces or more from carrier route presorted mail.
\7\ Applicable to saturation mail; deducted from carrier route presort rate.
\8\ For automation compatible mail meeting applicable Postal Service regulations.
\9\ Not applicable to publications containing 10 percent or less of advertising content.
\10\ If qualified, classroom publication may use Within County rates for applicable portions of a mailing.
Fee Schedule 911--Address Corrections
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per manual correction
Per automated correction
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 912
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zip Coding of Mailing Lists:
Per thousand addresses
Correction of Mailing Lists:
Per submitted address
Minimum charge per list corrected
Address Changes for Election Boards and Registration
Commissions:
Per change of address
Corrections Associated With Arrangement of Address Cards in
Carrier Delivery Sequence:
Per Correction
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
When rural routes have been consolidated or changed to another post
office, no charge will be made for correction if the list contains
only names of persons residing on the route or routes involved.
Fee Schedule 921--Post Office Boxes and Caller Service
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A B C D E
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Semi-annual Box Fees
\1\:
Box Size \2\:
1
2
3
4
5
II. Semi-annual Caller
Service Fees:
Fee Group:
A
B
C
D
III. Annual Call Number
Reservation Fee:
(All applicable Fee
Groups)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A customer ineligible for carrier delivery may obtain a post office box at Group E fees, subject to
administrative decisions regarding customer's proximity to post office.
\2\ Box Size 1=under 296 cubic inches; 2=296-499 cubic inches; 3=500-999 cubic inches; 4=1000-1999 cubic inches;
5=2000 cubic inches and over.
[[Page 1416]]
Fee Schedule 931 \1\ Business Reply Mail
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Active business reply advance deposit account:
Per piece:
Qualified
Nonletter-size, using reverse manifest (experimental)
Nonletter-size, using weight averaging (experimental)
Other.
Payment of postage due charges if active business reply mail
advance deposit account not used:
Per piece
Annual License and Accounting Fees:
Accounting Fee for Advance Deposit Account
Permit fee (with or without Advance Deposit Account)
Monthly Fees for customers using a reverse manifest or weight
averaging for nonletter-size business reply:
Nonletter-size, using reverse manifest (experimental)
Nonletter-size, using weight averaging (experimental)
Set-up/Qualification fee for customers using a reverse
manifest or weight averaging for nonletter-size business
reply:
Nonletter-size, using reverse manifest (experimental)
Nonletter-size, using weight averaging (experimental)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Experimental per piece, monthly, and set-up/qualification fees are
applicable only to participants selected by the Postal Service for the
nonletter-size business reply mail experiment. The experimental fees
expire June 7, 1999.
Fee Schedule 932--Merchandise Return
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Transaction:
Shipper must have an advance deposit account (see DMCS
Schedule 1000)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 933--On-Site Meter Setting
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Meter:
By appointment
Unscheduled request
Additional meters:
Checking meter in or out of service (per meter)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 934--[Reserved]
Fee Schedule 935--Bulk Parcel Return Service
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Returned Piece
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 941--Certified Mail
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee (in
addition
Description to
postage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service (per mailpiece)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 942--Registered Mail
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Declared value of article <SUP>1 (in dollars) Fee (in addition to postage) Handling charge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0................................................. ............................ None.
0.01 to 100....................................... ............................ None.
100.01 to 500..................................... ............................ None.
500.01 to 1,000................................... ............................ None.
1,000.01 to 2,000................................. ............................ None.
2,000.01 to 3,000................................. ............................ None.
3,000.01 to 4,000................................. ............................ None.
4,000.01 to 5,000................................. ............................ None.
5,000.01 to 6,000................................. ............................ None.
6,000.01 to 7,000................................. ............................ None.
7,000.01 to 8,000................................. ............................ None.
8,000.01 to 9,000................................. ............................ None.
9,000.01 to 10,000................................ ............................ None.
10,000.01 to 11,000............................... ............................ None.
11,000.01 to 12,000............................... ............................ None.
12,000.01 to 13,000............................... ............................ None.
13,000.01 to 14,000............................... ............................ None.
14,000.01 to 15,000............................... ............................ None.
15,000.01 to 16,000............................... ............................ None.
16,000.01 to 17,000............................... ............................ None.
17,000.01 to 18,000............................... ............................ None.
18,000.01 to 19,000............................... ............................ None.
19,000.01 to 20,000............................... ............................ None.
20,000.01 to 21,000............................... ............................ None.
21,000.01 to 22,000............................... ............................ None.
22,000.01 to 23,000............................... ............................ None.
23,000.01 to 24,000............................... ............................ None.
24,000.01 to 25,000............................... ............................ None.
25,000 to 1 million............................... ............................ Plus ______ cents for each
$1000 (or fraction thereof)
over $25,000.
Over $1 million to 15 million..................... ............................ Plus ______ cents for each
$1000 (or fraction thereof)
over $1 million.
[[Page 1417]]
Over 15 million................................... ............................ Plus amount determined by the
Postal Service based on
weight, space and value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<SUP>1 Articles with a declared value of more than $25,000 can be registered, but compensation for loss or damage is
limited to $25,000.
Fee Schedule 943--Insurance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coverage Fee (in addition to postage)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Reconstruction:
$0.01 to $500.......................................... no charge
Mechandise:
$0.01 to $500.......................................... no charge
500.01 to 5000......................................... $______ for each $100 (or fraction thereof) over
$500 is value.
General Insurance <SUP>1
$0.01 to $50............................................... ...................................................
50.01 to 100............................................... ...................................................
100.01 to 5000............................................. $______ plus $______ for each $100 (or fraction
thereof) over $100 in coverage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<SUP>1 For bulk insurance, deduct $______ per piece.
Fee Schedule 944--Collect on Delivery
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee (in
addition
to
postage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount to be collected, or Insurance Coverage Desired:
$0.01 to $50
50.01 to 100
100.01 to 200
200.01 to 300
300.01 to 400
400.01 to 500
500.01 to 600
Notice of nondelivery of COD
Alteration of COD charges or designation of new addressee
Registered COD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 945--Return Receipts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee (in
addition
Description to
postage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Receipt Issued at Time of Mail: \1\
Items other than Merchandise
Merchandise (without another special service)
Receipt Issued after Mailing: \2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This receipt shows the signature of the person to whom the mailpiece
was delivered, the date of delivery and the delivery address, if such
address is different from the address on the mailpiece.
\2\ This receipt shows to whom the mailpiece was delivered and the date
of delivery.
Fee Schedule 946--Restricted Delivery
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee (in
addition
to
postage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Piece
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 947--Certificate of Mailing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee (in
addition
to
postage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Pieces:
Original certificate of mailing for listed pieces of all
classes of ordinary mail (per piece)
Three or more pieces individually listed in a firm
mailing book or an approved customer provided manifest
(per piece)
Each additional copy of original certificate of mailing
or original mailing receipt for registered, insured,
certified, and COD mail (each copy)
Bulk Pieces:
Identical pieces of First-Class and Regular, Enhanced
Carrier Route, Nonprofit, and Nonprofit Enhanced Carrier
Route Standard Mail paid with ordinary stamps,
precanceled stamps, or meter stamps are subject to the
following fees:
Up to 1,000 pieces (one certificate for total number)
Each additional 1,000 pieces or fraction
Duplicate copy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 948--Delivery Confirmation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee (in
addition
Service to
postage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Used in Conjunction with Priority Mail:
Electronic
Manual
[[Page 1418]]
Used in Conjunction with Parcel Post, Bound Printed Matter,
Library, and Special Standard Mail:
Electronic
Manual
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 951--Parcel Air Lift
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee (in
addition
to Parcel
Post
postage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 2 pounds
Over 2 up to 3 pounds
Over 3 up to 4 pounds
Over 4 pounds
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 952--Special Handling
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee (in
addition
to
postage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not more than 10 pounds
More than 10 pounds
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 961--Stamped Envelopes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee (in
addition
Description to
postage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single Sale
Single Sale Hologram
PLAIN BULK (500) #6\3/4\ size:
Regular
Window
PRINTED BULK (500) #6\3/4\ size:
Regular
Window
BANDED (500) #6\3/4\ size
PLAIN BULK (500) size >#6\3/4\ through #10: \1\
Regular
Window
Hologram
PRINTED BULK (500) size >#6\3/4\ through #10:
Regular
Window
Savings Bond
Hologram
BANDED (500) size >#6\3/4\ size through #10
Multi-Color Printing (500):
#6\3/4\ size
#10 size \1\
Printing Charge per 500 Envelopes (for each type of printed
envelope):
Minimum Order (500 envelopes)
Order for 1,000 or more envelopes
Double Window (500) size >#6\3/4\ through #10 \1\
Household (50):
Size #6\3/4\:
Regular
Window
Size >#6\3/4\ through #10:
Regular
Window
Hologram
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Fee for precancelled envelopes is the same.
Fee Schedule 962--Stamped Cards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee (in
addition
Description to
postage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stamped Card
Double Stamped Card
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Schedule 971--Money Orders
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Domestic:
$0.01 to $700
APO-FPO:
$0.01 to $700
Inquiry Fee, which includes the issuance of copy of a paid
money order
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule 1000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First-Class Presorted Mailing
Periodicals:
A. Original Entry
B. Additional Entry
C. Re-entry
D. Registration for News Agents
Regular, Enhanced Carrier Route, Nonprofit, and Nonprofit
Enhanced Carrier Route Standard Mail Bulk Mailing
Parcel Post: Destination BMC, SCF, and DDU
Special and Library Standard Mail Presorted Mailing
Authorization to Use Permit Imprint
Merchandise Return (per facility receiving merchandise return
labels)
Business Reply Mail Permit (see Fee Schedule 931)
Authorization to Use Bulk Parcel Return Service
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 99-326 Filed 1-7-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
| en |
converted_docs | 034506 | FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:
November 2, 1999 Mike Balmoris at (202) 418-0253
Email: <mbalmori@fcc.gov>
COMMON CARRIER ACTION
## Federal Communications Commission Adopts Rules APPLICABLE to THE SALE OF High-Speed Internet Services
Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) took
action today to promote the availability of broadband Internet access
for residential and small business users. In the Order, the Commission
clarified that digital subscriber line services (xDSL) used to provide
high-speed Internet service are not subject to the discounted resale
obligations of the 1996 Telecommunications Act when sold in bulk to
Internet Service Providers (ISPs). The discounted resale obligations
require ILECs to offer their retail telecommunications services to
resellers at wholesale rates.
The Commission's actions will enable ISPs to buy DSL services in bulk
from Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) to offer high-speed
Internet services to consumers on a more cost-effective basis. Consumers
will ultimately benefit through lower prices and greater and more
expeditious access to innovative, diverse broadband applications by
multiple providers of advanced services.
The Commission further clarified that advanced telecommunications
services sold directly to residential and business end-users are not
exempt from the resale obligations of the Act. In a parallel proceeding,
the Commission terminated its investigation of a Bell Atlantic tariff,
which raised similar issues.
Action by the Commission on November 2, 1999, by Second Report and Order
and Order Terminating Investigation. Chairman Kennard and Commissioners
Ness, Furchtgott-Roth, Powell and Tristani.
-FCC-
Report No. CC 99-51
CC Docket Nos. 98-147, 99-201
FCC Nos. 99-330, 99-331
Common Carrier Bureau Contact: Staci Pies, (202) 418-1580.
| en |
all-txt-docs | 198697 | THE OFFICE OF ADVOCACY
U.S. Small Business Administration
Background Paper
on the
Office of Advocacy
1994 - 2000
November 1, 2000
FOREWORD
This document discusses the statutory mandates and work of
the Office of Advocacy. It was reviewed by the entire
Advocacy staff to ensure accuracy, thoroughness and
objectivity.
The report summarizes what has transpired during the past
seven years under the current Chief Counsel (1994-2000) and
the impacts Advocacy's work has had on public policy
initiatives. It includes commentaries on issues that are
still pending which may need to be addressed by the Chief
Counsel some time in the future - issues that are either
legislative, regulatory, administrative or research related.
We hope the material provided encompasses enough information
about the Office of Advocacy, its work and its mission to be
useful in developing guidance for the future.
Jere W. Glover
Chief Counsel for Advocacy
November 1, 2000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreword
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
Are Small Firms Important?
Congressional Response to the Question
Mission of the Office of Advocacy
The Public Policy Information Challenge
THE ROLE OF DATA AND RESEARCH
Advocacy's Research Mandates
Small Business: Its Role in the Economy, in a Nutshell
Research - Generic and Specialized
Advocacy: The Source of Generic Data on Small Business
Database Uses - Published Reports
Issue-Specific Research
Research Impact on Public Policy
Conclusion
THE IMPACT OF THE REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ACT
Introduction
The Role of the Office of Advocacy
SBREFA and Judicial Review
Regulatory Review Processes
Regulatory Savings
Conclusion
THE PUBLIC POLICY ROLE OF SMALL BUSINESS STAKEHOLDERS
Introduction
White House Conference on Small Business
Industry Roundtables
Small Entities and SBREFA Panels
State Conferences
Small Business Week
Communications Services
Conclusion
PENDING ISSUES
Introduction
Research
Regulatory Development
Certification
Direct vs. Indirect Costs (Regulatory Flexibility Analyses)
Legislative Issues
Administrative Issues
THE NEW ECONOMY
Introduction
Advocacy Initiatives
Conclusion
CONCLUSION
Advocacy as an Independent Entity within SBA
History is Prologue
Appendices
Statutory Authority for the Office of Advocacy
The RFA as Amended by SBREFA
Examples of Policy and Administrative Changes Proposed or
Supported by Advocacy
Chief Counsel for Advocacy Independent Positions Before
Congress
List of Testimony by Current Chief Counsel
Current Staffing of the Office of Advocacy and
Organizational Chart
Research Reports and Publications, 1994-2000
Memorandum of the Chief Counsel on PRO-Net, February 20,
1998
Staff Organization by Issue
RFA Court Decisions
SBREFA EPA and OSHA Panels through FY 2000
Regulatory Cost Savings, 1998
Legislation Implementing Recommendations of the 1995 White
House Conference on Small Business
List of Advocacy Sponsored Research Still Pending
Rules Awaiting Final Action
Suggested Budget Line Item
Chronology of Memoranda on Chief Counsel's Amicus Curiae
Authority
June 1999 Memorandum on Ombudsman Function
Office of Advocacy Employees - Headquarters, 1991-2000
Memorandum: Contributions of Small High Tech Firms to The
New Economy
Special 20th Anniversary Edition of the Small Business
Advocate
INTRODUCTION
Are Small Firms Important?
The answer to this question provides the rationale for
why the Office of Advocacy was established by Congress in
1976. The question must also be answered whenever voice is
given to small business issues in policy deliberations.
A book commissioned by the Office of Advocacy
specifically asked academic experts to develop their own
responses.(1) In the book's Preface, the Chief Counsel
pointed to the stream of visitors to the United States from
countries ".struggling to get their economic feet on the
ground."(2) What these visitors want to know is why small
business and entrepreneurship thrive in the United States.
The answer is both simple and complex.
The simple answer is that the United States is
committed to preserving competition. Competition keeps
capitalism efficient and fosters innovation. Small business
is the source of competition. "Preserving competition" then
means that the birth and growth of small business should be
encouraged and that anti-competitive practices or barriers
that harm small business' development and growth must be
discouraged. Therein lies the complexity.
Congressional Response to the Question
The national commitment to healthy competition is
reflected in the laws, enacted at different times in our
history, to outlaw anti-competitive practices: the Sherman
Antitrust Act, the Clayton Act, the Federal Trade Commission
Act and the Robinson-Patman Act. These laws focus on
punishing anti-competitive practices or defining what
practices are illegal.
The Small Business Act. Congress recognized, however,
that there is a role for government in addressing problems
that do not emerge as the result of illegal conduct but
nevertheless exist, and that cannot be addressed by the
marketplace itself.
In 1953 Congress passed the Small Business Act to
address imperfections in financial markets that erect
barriers to small business growth. The following is taken
from the Act's preamble:
The essence of the American economic
system of private enterprise is free
competition. Only through full and free
competition can free markets, free entry
into business, and opportunities for the
expression and growth of personal
initiative and individual judgment is
assured. Such. well being cannot be
realized unless the actual and potential
capacity of small business is encouraged
and developed.(3)
The Office of Advocacy. Later, Congress recognized
that small business needed a voice in policy deliberations
that included but also transcended financial issues to
offset that of the lobbyists for large business. Congress
established the Office of Advocacy in 1976 within the U.S.
Small Business Administration to be an independent voice for
small business in the formulation of public policy across
the entire federal government.(4) The Office is headed by a
Chief Counsel appointed by the President from the private
sector and confirmed by the Senate. The duties assigned to
the Office are several, among which are (1) generating
research on small business trends, characteristics, and
contributions to the economy (Appendix A),(5) and (2)
monitoring agency compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA),(6) as amended by the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA).(7) (Appendix B)
Specifically, one of the Office's primary functions is
to:
[E]xamine the role of small business in
the American economy and the
contribution which small business can
make in improving
competition.restraining inflation,
spurring production, expanding
employment opportunities, increasing
productivity, promoting exports,
stimulating innovation and
entrepreneurship, and providing an
avenue through which new and untested
products and services can be brought to
the marketplace.(8) (Appendix A)
With this mandate, the Office of Advocacy was, in
effect, made a partner of other Federal agencies, such as
the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of
Justice (DOJ), with different but complementary
responsibilities to preserve competition.
The main difference in the mandate given to the Office
of Advocacy as compared to that given to the FTC and the DOJ
is that it is expected to be proactive - not proscriptive.
It is to identify market imperfections that harm small
business, find solutions, suggest public policy initiatives
to help small business, ensure that public policy fosters
competition rather than erect barriers, and represent small
business interests in public policy deliberations.(9)
Thus, the Congressional response to the question, "Are
Small Firms Important" clearly has been and continues to be
"Yes."
Mission of the Office of Advocacy: Consensus at Both Ends
of Pennsylvania Avenue
Being an effective spokesperson for small business
means being politic but not
partisan. Effectiveness is measured by how often consensus
is achieved at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue - how often
issues are brought to closure with workable solutions.
Policymakers at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue must have
assurance that the information provided by the Office of
Advocacy is the best available, is impartial and can
withstand scrutiny. Some issues take years to resolve and
persist beyond changes at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and in
the U.S. Congress.(10) In such circumstances, the Office, to
maintain its credibility, has had to remain faithful to
small business concerns, regardless of where the initiative
for change rests - be it with the Congress or with the
Administration.
Establishing credibility with the Executive Branch is
helped by the Office of Advocacy being part - but
independent - of the Administration. To the extent Advocacy
can establish its impartiality and objectivity, it can be
guaranteed early access to policymakers at the highest
levels in the Executive Branch.(11) Confidence in Advocacy's
ability to speak objectively on behalf of small business
poses no risk to the Executive Branch since Advocacy
provides information needed to formulate sound public
policy.
As such, objectivity is a potent force in ensuring
responsiveness on the part of the Executive Branch to any
Advocacy recommendations - so that Advocacy is not just
being heard - it is being listened to. Because of the
credibility it has established, Advocacy can be, and has
been, proactive in initiating several discussions on
recommended policy changes as well as regulatory changes.
(Appendix C)
As for Congress, it needs to be assured that
information being provided by Advocacy is consistent with
what is being provided to the Administration; that the
information is objective; and that Advocacy is truly
speaking for small business. Given shifting political
sands, Congress needs constant assurance that Advocacy is
not being partisan.
Independence - Advocacy's Hallmark. To guard against
undue partisan influence, the Office of Advocacy has been
empowered by Congress to be an independent voice for small
business. Nevertheless, since the Chief Counsel is a
presidential appointee, some have expressed skepticism about
the Chief Counsel's independence. Skepticism is kept at bay
by the Chief Counsel working impartially with both the
Majority and the Minority. Doing so reinforces the concept
that small business issues and the preservation of
competition are not partisan issues, as evidenced by
initiatives undertaken by both Democratic and Republican
Administrations.
Achieving consensus at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue
takes time. With this in objective clearly in mind, the
current Chief Counsel has disagreed publicly with both the
Administration (Appendix D), and the Congress (Appendix E),
when it was deemed to be in the best interests of small
business to do so in order to move both branches closer to
consensus.
No Clearance. To this end, the Office of Advocacy does
not clear the following with the SBA Administrator or the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) prior to publication:
Y testimony
Y reports to Congress (with one exception)(12)
Y comments on regulatory proposals
Y comments on legislation
Y publications
Y press releases
Y web-site material
Public Law Hiring Authority. To ensure that the staff
of the Office has
the skills to represent small business on any public policy
issue, Advocacy staff is hired without regard to civil
service competitive requirements or White House
clearance.(13) (See Appendix F for current staffing.) This
flexibility allows the Chief Counsel to change the
professional mix of the staff as dictated by trends in the
economy or changes in regulatory/legislative priorities.
Policy Initiatives Need Rapid Response. In order for
Advocacy to be an effective spokesperson for small business,
it must respond quickly to emerging issues; it has to get to
the top of the learning curve rapidly. "Quick response" has
often meant action within 24 or 72 hours in response to
initiatives of other entities, primarily the Congress and
regulatory agencies. This modus operandi is not expected to
change in the near term.
Advocacy also has a proactive role - that of being on
the cutting edge of economic trends. Research data drives
Advocacy's proactive role and helps it identify emerging
problems, construct/suggest/pilot test programmatic
solutions - but not manage programs over the long term.
The Public Policy Information Challenge
This document started with the question: Are small
firms important? While we believe the answer is obvious and
well documented in industrial organization economic
literature, two barriers exist of which Advocacy staff need
to be mindful when analyzing public policy impacts on small
business:
Barrier No. 1. Not all policy makers understand or
accept the important role played by small business in
maintaining competition. Too often they are familiar only
with the literature produced by business schools and
research that addresses big business issues. The adverse
long term impacts of industrial concentration on price,
innovation and choice are not readily understood. This
means that Advocacy constantly has to provide information to
policymakers on the truisms of small business economics and
the positive effects small business has on the structure of
the U.S. economy. And, since the universe of policymakers
is constantly in flux in both the legislative and executive
branches of government, there is always a new group of
policymakers in need of the information. Overcoming this
information gap is essential if small business reforms are
to be accepted and implemented.
Barrier No. 2. Laws to ensure a level playing field
for small business (e.g., the RFA) are often interpreted by
some policymakers as establishing special treatment for
small business at the expense of other important public
policy concerns. However, the art of governance is the
ability to strike a workable balance among various national
goals, and not just focus exclusively on statutory or agency-
specific goals to the exclusion of other national
objectives. As applied to small business, this means that
policymakers and regulators are obligated to find ways to
avoid anti-competitive or inequitable impacts on small
business without compromising the specific public policy
agendas assigned to them by Congress. This concept needs to
be re-enforced constantly in order to gain support for
Advocacy positions or recommendations on public policy.
The foregoing has described the legal and policy
underpinnings of the Office of Advocacy. It forms the
backdrop for what the Office of Advocacy has done during the
tenure of the current Chief Counsel. The material that
follows discusses:
Y the role of data and research
Y the impact of the regulatory flexibility act
Y the public policy role of small business stakeholders
Y pending issues
Y the new economy
The document concludes with a discussion of the issues that
are likely to emerge in the coming months and the work that
Advocacy has already done on some of them.
THE ROLE OF DATA AND RESEARCH
"Information Rationalizes Markets" - Tibor Skitovsky
Advocacy's Research Mandates
For over one hundred years, Congress has re-affirmed
through its legislative decisions that a vibrant small
business community is essential to a dynamic economy.
National policy has consistently treated small business as
the engine that drives competition.
When Congress created the Office of Advocacy it
assigned to it the following major research responsibilities
(paraphrased from the enabling legislation; see Appendix A
for complete text) (14)
Y examine the role of small business in the American
economy and the contribution which small business can make
in improving competition
Y measure the direct costs and other effects of
government regulation on small business
Y determine the impact of the tax structure on small
businesses
Y determine the financial resource availability and
alternative means to deliver financial assistance to
minority enterprises, including methods for securing equity
capital
Y provide information on the status and potential for
development and strengthening of minority and other small
business enterprises
Y identify and describe those measures that create an
environment in which all businesses will have the
opportunity to compete effectively
Y ascertain the common reasons for small business
successes and failures
Small Business: Its Role in the Economy, in a Nutshell
It is estimated that there were 24.8 million firms in
the U.S. in 1999 (based on
business tax returns), which employed over 117 million
people. Of those firms, 99.9% were small businesses with
less than 500 employees, and they employed 56.5% of the
nation's private sector workforce. Nearly half (47%) of all
sales revenues in the nation come from small firms. Small
firms contributed 52% of non-farm Gross Domestic Product
(GDP) in 1992. With only the smallest number of exceptions,
America's large businesses began as small businesses. Most
net new jobs have been created by small firms - at least 75%
during the decade of the nineties.
Research - Generic and Specialized
The foregoing are generic data developed by the Office
of Advocacy and are updated annually. They have become
ingrained in the nation's rhetoric. They have been used in
State of the Union addresses; in speeches by congressional
leaders; by the Administrator of the SBA; and by the media
such as Entrepreneur and Inc. magazines and The Wall Street
Journal. Yet, despite the graphic picture they draw of
small business' role, total acceptance by policy makers of
the importance of small business to the economy remains
elusive. The importance of small business is always being
challenged. The question always has to be answered anew:
Are small firms important?.
Is the problem one of image? Does the phrase "small
business" automatically conjure up images of local dry
cleaning establishments, fast food franchises, auto repairs
shops, florists, travel agencies, liquor stores,
Laundromats, gas stations - and nothing more? What about
small community banks, small venture capital funds,
biomedical firms, computer software design firms, safety
engineering firms, wireless telecommunications providers,
auto parts manufacturers, small oil refiners, chemical
producers, wastewater treatment facilities, etc.? These are
all industries where small firms are thriving, in some
cases, struggling and are all affected by public policy.
Or is the problem small business' relative invisibility
in the governmental arena? Their lack of high paid
lobbyists? Their limited resources to monitor and
participate in public processes? It is easy for Fortune 500
companies to access congressional or regulatory agency
offices. Their well known corporate identities open doors.
But, while small businesses can and have been visible on
some issues, such as tax deductibility for health insurance
premiums for the self-employed, it is not that easy, say,
for a small tool and die manufacturer to get a hearing on
new mandatory laboratory testing protocols established by
the National Institutes of Science and Technology (NIST).
The challenge then is to document - to draw the "big
picture" of small business' role in the economy in global
terms. It is important to know exactly what the percentage
of small firms is in the overall economy. It is also
important to know how many people small businesses employ;
what percentage of the GDP they contribute; and how many net
new jobs small businesses develop. The generic data can
also document in which industries small business growth is
occurring and geographically where the growth is changing.
Without this data, the question of small firm importance
cannot be answered, particularly as the structure of the
economy shifts. When there are downturns in the economy or
when there is a credit crunch, this data become particularly
important in determining the steps to be taken to avoid
disastrous consequences for this sector of the economy and
for the economy as a whole.
Advocacy: The Source of Generic Data on Small Business
Advocacy funds the publication of most of the small
business data in the federal government. If it were not for
the Office of Advocacy, there would be no small business
data to influence, shape, or alter public policy. Nor would
there be any impartial data to measure the impact of public
policy on small business or how public policy should be
altered. Because Advocacy's economic research mandate is
both broad and unique, the data it has generated is in wide
demand, as measured by the numerous and constant data
requests Advocacy receives on a daily basis.
The data sources developed or funded by the Office of
Advocacy are as follows:
Y Statistics of U.S. Businesses (SUSB). This database
has been constructed at the U.S. Bureau of the Census with
funding from the Office of Advocacy to generate data on an
annual 4-digit SIC basis. The beauty of this database is
its flexibility. It can be used to document trends. It can
also be used to measure accurately the number of firms and
employees affected by particular regulatory or legislative
proposals (e.g., the ergonomics rule of the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA); changes in the
minimum wage; Americans With Disabilities Act). It cannot,
however, estimate the cost of regulations. Other
complementary research is needed to measure regulatory
costs.
Y IRS Based Data. With funding from the Office of
Advocacy, the Statistics of Income Division of the Internal
Revenue Service produces annual data by gender on the number
of proprietorships, receipts, net income and broad
breakdowns of the data by industry and geographical regions.
Recently, the data has been expanded to provide information
on male and female sole proprietors in the most common
business sectors, in the most populous states, in different
size classes for receipts and net income.
Y Entrepreneurial Research Consortium Data. The
Consortium gathers the most extensive set of information
available anywhere about "nascent entrepreneurs" - those in
the process of starting a business. It is a voluntary
association of universities, research organizations and
foundations, 20 of which are located in the United States
and 10 located abroad. The Office of Advocacy has been the
only federal government member of the ERC since its founding
in 1995. Some 100 researchers are beginning the process of
examining the data from almost a thousand interviews of
entrepreneurs to see why these individuals start businesses.
Researchers and the government are interested in learning
what motivates someone to take the risk to start a new
buisness.
Finally, a new database,
Y Business Information Tracking Series (BITS). This is a
new database constructed at the request of and funded by
Advocacy within the past two years. Data in this Census
Bureau series traces the growth of firms with employees
over time. This database helps identify which types of jobs
come from new small firms, how long they last, and how both
existing and new firms contribute to the growth of
particular industrial sectors. The data has been
particularly helpful in analyzing growth in rural areas
where almost all firms are small businesses.
This new database finally helps address the
question: what happens to specific firms over
time - year to year. (Note: Firm identities
are kept confidential.) It provides data on
the dynamics of small business growth rather
than just providing a snapshot of what exists
at a point fixed in time.
Database Uses - Published Reports(15)
The SUSB database is available on Advocacy's web site
at www.sba.gov/advo/stats. The ready availability of this
data on the Internet is intended to encourage more use by
researchers and the media, as well as by policymakers.
Reports have been developed from these generic
databases and have been published annually by the Office of
Advocacy.
Y State of Small Business: A Report of the President.
This is an annual report mandated by law(16) that has
developed an international reputation for its depth of
information, statistical appendices on federal procurement
and minority and women-owned firms. It contains discussions
of topical issues such as The White House Conference on
Small Business: Implementing the Recommendations (1996
Report); Financing Small Business (1997 Report- which also
included a discussion of Venture Capital Funds); New Data
for Analysis of Small Business Job Creation (1998 Report);
and The Regulatory Flexibility Act Is Changing the Culture
of Federal Agencies (1999 DRAFT Report)
Y Small Business Economic Indicators. This booklet
brings together all of the available information on small
business formation and dissolution, income, and self-
employment, as well as the number of firms by state. The
data is useful to state and local economic development
officials, marketing departments, demographers and nearly
every congressional office interested in the economic health
of their state.
Y State Small Business Profiles. These three-page
summaries provide, on a state-by-state basis, a concise
summary of the leading small business job creating sectors.
They also include the latest data on women- and minority-
owned firms and on the top banks making loans to small
business. In addition, information is provided on the top
five sectors with the most small business jobs. Detail is
also provided on small business income growth. These
profiles are in demand in part because they are concise
snapshots that can be easily quoted in the business pages of
local newspapers and for speeches.
Issue-Specific Research
The data discussed in the preceding, as important as
they are, nevertheless have limitations. They do not
provide data on:
Y small business' share of federal procurement
Y the cost of regulations
Y how small business meets and survives competition from
large companies
Y the impact of mergers on the growth or terminations (as
opposed to failures) of companies
Y the small business lending patterns of all banks
Y how small businesses are using or being harmed by the
competition posed by the Internet
Y barriers to the development of employee benefit plans
in small business
Y the differences in health coverage and charges made to
small business by HMOs
Nor can the data tell us how small businesses grow or
what barriers are hindering growth. All these issues
require specialized research in order to assess what the
role of public policy should be and to answer questions from
the Administration, the Congress and the small business
community. The need for this specialized research is
implied in the research mandates given to the Office of
Advocacy by Congress.
Some of Advocacy's research mission has been
established by statute with some specificity, such as
analyzing financial markets and assistance to minority
enterprises, availability of equity financing, tax
provisions that help or harm small business, etc. Since
these are fundamental issues, Advocacy has conducted or
sponsored research on a somewhat regular basis to monitor
trends and to identify possible new barriers.
Financial Markets. Advocacy has spent a good deal of
effort analyzing and reporting on financial market
imperfections.
1. Bank Lending Studies. During the past five years,
Advocacy has published reports analyzing the small business
lending patterns of banks on a national and on a state-by-
state basis. National and state rankings have been
developed using information furnished by banks to bank
regulators. This information is public but had never been
used in a manner useful either to banks or small business.
The studies provide a compilation and analysis of the
information that the market could not generate on its own
and have, therefore, been of significant interest to the
media, both national and local.(17) Informal feedback from
banks indicate that the information is indeed being tracked
by banks and that they are relying on it to increase market
share, namely competing for business from small businesses.
The same data have been used to produce reports on bank
holding company lending patterns to small business and
patterns in micro lending (loans of less than $100,000).
2. National Survey of Small Business Finances. Advocacy
has helped fund this survey conducted by the Federal Reserve
in 1988, 1993-94 and 1998-99 of 4,000 nationally
representative firms that documents how small businesses
finance their operations. It documents the extent of the
use of credit cards for business purposes and shows by race
and gender the amounts borrowed, the balances carried and
who has been denied credit. This important information
identifies barriers to competitive financing for small
firms.
3. Consumer Finance Survey. Advocacy also worked closely
with the Federal Reserve on this survey of personal finances
of American families that is conducted every three or four
years. Holdings of all forms of assets, including ownership
of private businesses, and liabilities are identified. This
data can be used to estimate how many high net-worth
families are business owner-managers and/or angel investors.
The database is currently being analyzed by Professor George
Haynes of Montana State University, under a contract with
the Office of Advocacy, to study the characteristics of
business owners and the self-employed.
4. Impact of Bank Mergers on Small Business. Within the
past 5-10 years there has been an increased number of bank
mergers. How this trend is changing the structure of the
industry, altering credit scoring practices and affecting
credit availability for small business are questions that
cannot await research. The need for information is
immediate. Advocacy has sponsored two conferences that
brought leading scholars together to discuss how the
structural changes in the industry may be hurting the
ability of small firms to secure loans. Nearly all
presenters confirmed that concern is warranted and that the
trend needs monitoring. Several, however, struck an
optimistic note that community banks will survive because
they serve very different markets than large banks.
Procurement. The U.S. Government spends billions of
tax dollars procuring goods and services from the private
sector. How the Government spends those dollars can
influence the structure of the economy. The question is:
are government expenditures of tax dollars increasing
industrial concentration, or are tax dollars being marshaled
to ensure competitive markets? If ensuring competition is
one of the goals of government procurement, then there need
to be policy directives to this end. Government procurement
is a great business opportunity for small business. With
more and new potential suppliers, government in the long run
will pay less and get more for each tax dollar expended.
In recent years, however, policy makers have been
trying to find ways to reduce the operating costs of
government contracting. Reforms have been initiated by both
the Administration and the Congress to make contracting more
efficient. Contracting officers have been given greater
discretion in contract awards. At the same time, the number
of contracting officers has been greatly reduced. Advocacy,
while supportive of the overall objective of increasing
efficiency, resisted many of the specific reforms. In the
end, however, operating efficiency reforms won out over
"open competition" procedures that would have helped small
business.
Advocacy has continued to monitor the impact of the
reforms on small business and here are some of the results
of its research.
1. Contract Bundling. Contract bundling is the grouping
of contracts into one large contract. Studies done by
Advocacy within the last three years show that bundling is
effectively eliminating the ability of many small firms to
bid successfully on such contracts as prime contractors.
Advocacy has documented that there is an increased tendency
to bundle contracts and that it appears to be harming small
firms.(18)
2. Data on Procurement Centers. Data was collected on the
dollar value of contracts awarded to large and small firms
by each of the federal procurement centers located
throughout the United States. The data is not conclusive on
the value of contracts awarded locally to small firms since
several of the centers finance contracts outside their
districts (e.g., a military base which purchases goods and
services from all over the country). Nonetheless, this was
the first study of its kind and did provide some insights on
the decisions of the procurement centers.(19)
Job Generation. There has been considerable debate
over how many net new jobs
are created by large business as compared to those created
by small business. Until the development of the Business
Information Tracking Series (BITS), the debate persisted
because the only "dynamic" data available was on the
manufacturing sector. The data on the rest of the economy
only provided the equivalent of a snapshot of what existed
at a particular point in time and did not document
individual firm growth over time. As long as there was no
database that could track the growth of small firms,
monitoring how they grow, when they hire and add new
employees, or when they no longer can be considered small
business, gaps in the data were used to refute claims about
the net new jobs being created by small firms. Using BITS
and the annual updates to the data, Advocacy is now able to
demonstrate the role of small business in creating jobs.
The new BITS file is filling the data gap and putting the
debate to rest.
1. Survival of Minority and Women-Owned Firms. The BITS
database has been used to study the survival rate of women-
and minority-owned firms.(20) These studies document
survival rates and demonstrate the enormous potential the
BITS database offers for understanding the dynamics of the
U.S. economy.
2. Mergers and Acquisitions in the United States. A
recent Advocacy study(21) showed that the merger of two
small firms frequently resulted in the creation of new jobs,
while the merger of two larger firms frequently had the
opposite effect. When a small firm was acquired by a large
firm, jobs may or may not have been created, depending on a
host of variables.
And, finally,
3. Job Creation by Small Firms. Several recent studies
authored or sponsored by the Office of Advocacy have finally
resolved the age-old question: what percentage of new jobs
is created by small firms, and how long do they last?(22)
These studies, using the BITS data base and employing a
variety of different methodologies, show that, over a 4-5
year period, about three-fourths (75-80%) of new jobs have
been shown to come from small firms. About 30-40% of these
new jobs have come from the births of new firms and 60-70%
from rapidly expanding "gazelle" firms.(23)
Additional Advocacy-Sponsored Research. Each year
Advocacy solicits proposals from independent researchers -
all small businesses - on a variety of issues. Some of this
research has been cited in the preceding section, e.g.,
research on contract bundling. There have been other
interesting research results from work performed under
contract with the Office of Advocacy. The research is also
issue-specific but extremely diverse and addresses issues
that do not necessarily require constant monitoring such as
the research already discussed on Financial Markets,
Procurement or Job Generation. Some of the more recent
research include:
Small Business and Access to Health Insurers,
Particularly HMOs, Consult, Inc, Orangeburg, South
Carolina (September 2000). This study examined
the multitude of state laws and regulations
covering health plans that insurers must offer to
small employers, surveyed insurance companies in
10 states to learn their actual practices, and
interviewed a variety of small businesses in one
state to document their perception of the
information and insurance policies that are, in
fact, available to them.
Developing High-Technology Communities: San Diego,
Innovation Associates, Reston, Virginia (April
2000). This report describes the individuals,
institutions and processes that transformed San
Diego's declining defense based economy to one
that boasts numerous clusters of locally based,
mostly small, high-technology businesses in
several fields. Lessons learned will be useful to
other communities.
Small Business Survival in Competition with Large
Multi-Unit Retail Firms, Jack Faucett Associates,
Bethesda, Maryland (January 2000). Included in
this study is an examination of the impact of the
Internet and other technological developments on
retail booksellers. The data has implications for
other retail sectors.
Homebased Business: The Hidden Economy, Joanne H.
Pratt, Dallas, Texas (August 1999). This report
provided a detailed portrait of home-based
businesses and their owners. Home-based business
data are then compared to non-home-based firms,
using special tabulations from the 1992
Characteristics of Business Owners survey. In
brief, the data document significant growth in
this sector.
Retirement Plan Coverage in Small and Large Firms,
David Kennell, Arnold Brooks, and Terry Savela,
Lewin-ICF (1992). The research documented the
reasons for the low level of pension coverage for
employees of small firms, most of which have since
been used to justify changes in pension tax laws
and regulations.
A complete list of reports on Advocacy research
produced during the past seven years can be found in
Appendix G.
Research Impact on Public Policy
The ultimate test of the value of Advocacy's research
is the knowledge it contributes to the body politic.
Another test is how it has been used to shape public policy.
Much of the foregoing discussion of data helps answer the
question: Are Small Firms Important? But there is other
research that has had a direct impact on Administration
initiatives, legislation or regulatory design. The
following illustrates how research has influenced and shaped
public policy initiatives and reforms.
Equity Markets - ACE-Net. Advocacy research documented
that the equity marketplace was not meeting the needs of
small business. Small businesses had difficulty raising
equity capital in amounts between $250,000 and $5,000,000.
The existing institutional venture capital fund market was
not investing at these levels. At the same time, the
experience of Small Business Investment Companies (SBICs)
was, and continues to be, that they cannot fund all the
worthwhile applications they receive.
The equity funding gap is aggravated by the fact that
the average investment in a company by venture capital firms
is now approaching more than $14 million. "Angel" investors
(private accredited individuals), who are an alternative
investment source, are not an easily identifiable group of
investors. They cherish their anonymity and cannot be
approached directly by small firms. Another factor that
contributes to the inefficiency of this market is the cost
of negotiating an investment agreement. Accountant and
lawyer fees can amount to 20% of the total dollar investment
covered by an agreement. This is because each agreement is
custom-designed, despite the existence of somewhat standard
terms and conditions found in nearly all such agreements.
The solution constructed and funded by the Office of
Advocacy is called ACE-Net, an acronym for Access to Capital
Electronic Network. Funding for ACE-Net started in 1996.
It is an Internet-based securities listing service managed
by 63 operators in 45 states, the District of Columbia, and
Puerto Rico.(24) The network operators are nonprofit,
university- or state-based entrepreneurial development
centers. They mentor small businesses and help them develop
business plans and marketing strategies. Companies ready to
seek equity capital can then list their securities offering
on the Internet service. The centralized database is
located and secured by the University of New Hampshire,
Whittemore School of Business and Economics. "Angel"
investors, wherever located, can obtain secured passwords
for a nominal fee structured to cover administrative costs.
The passwords give them access to the system to identify
investment opportunities. These investors can then contact
and negotiate investment agreements outside the system (off
line) in accordance with applicable state securities
requirements.
Currently, there are approximately 340 active investors
and an additional 735 new investors to whom passwords have
been issued. There are 234 active companies using the
system to list their equity needs. Another 912 companies
have enrolled with ACE-Net, evidence that the pool of
potential investment opportunities is expanding. The
service is now reaching a critical mass. Because of this
momentum, it is estimated that approximately $1 billion has
been raised by companies through ACE-Net and through the
network operators largely within the past few years.
This new Internet-based service received a "no action"
letter from the staff of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). The legal impact of this letter is that,
as designed and as long as the program operates under
conditions specified in the letter, ACE-Net does not violate
federal securities laws. As for state securities laws, 40
states have adopted the Model Accredited Investor Exemption
(or variations thereof) developed by the North American
Securities Administrators Association (NASAA). This
accredited investor exemption is based on the premise that
accredited investors are capable of undertaking their own
due diligence and gauging the risk factors before making any
investments. Significantly, these exemptions reduce some of
the state regulatory hurdles investors and firms would
otherwise have to overcome and are helping to establish
uniformity among state securities laws for the small
business sector without increasing investor risk.
From the very beginning, it was never intended that ACE-
Net would be a government program. Advocacy's role was to
be a catalyst in constructing a "fix" for the small business
equity gap. Advocacy's involvement, and that of the
government, would eventually cease once the service was
operational and could be moved to the private sector.
Federal seed money has been used to stimulate the
development of a national investment market to meet the
needs of small firms that the existing market could not
accomplish on its own. Explorations are currently underway
to privatize the entire Internet service in the near future.
What Advocacy did in this instance was identify a market
imperfection that the market could not address, craft a
solution and test it. Advocacy is now working to pass it on
to the private sector to underwrite and manage.
More information about ACE-Net can be found on its web
site at www.ace-net.org.
Procurement - PRO-Net. As discussed earlier,
procurement reforms have introduced procedures that in many
instances are harmful to small business. An objection often
raised by contracting officers is that they cannot find
small firms with the expertise or competence to bid on
government proposals. To overcome this objection, PRO-Net
was designed and tested by Advocacy. Like ACE-Net, PRO-Net
is an Internet-based service that lists profile information
on over 200,000 small firms interested in obtaining
government contracts. The electronic profile of each
registered small business includes the identification of the
business, organization/ownership, products and services, and
performance/history. A key feature of the system is that
participating firms can continually update their profiles
with the most current information on their companies, new
products and services. PRO-Net has links to information on
both public and private contract opportunities and can be
used by contracting officers in both the public and private
sectors to find qualified vendors.
PRO-Net was modeled after the computer program
developed for ACE-Net. Advocacy funded the original design
and tested its feasibility. It has now become a fixed
program within the SBA to help the agency fulfill its
mandate to monitor federal agency goals for awarding
contracts to small business.(25)
Bankruptcy Reform. In recent years there has been a
great deal of congressional interest in reforming the
bankruptcy laws to address the backlog of cases pending in
the courts. Research by the Office of Advocacy demonstrated
that small businesses account for only a very small
percentage of all bankruptcies filed each year, and that
small business debtors have not imposed a critical burden on
the bankruptcy system. Working with both the U.S. House of
Representatives and the U.S. Senate, Advocacy succeeded in
preserving some of the flexibility that exists in current
law for small business. Specifically, the Office of
Advocacy was successful in adding a provision in the
Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2000 that would provide an
extension of time (up to 90 days in the House-passed version
and up to 300 days in the Senate-passed version) for small
businesses to file reorganization plans with the bankruptcy
courts. Final action on this bill has not been taken by the
Congress as of this date. This is a difficult issue on
which to achieve consensus since there are small business
debtors as well as small business creditors, including the
SBA itself.
Cost of Regulations. At the direction of Congress, the
Office of Advocacy prepared a report in October 1995 on The
Changing Burden of Regulation, Paperwork, and Tax Compliance
on Small Business: A Report to Congress. The report was
based on research funded by Advocacy under a contract with
Thomas D. Hopkins of the Rochester Institute of
Technology.(26) The research confirmed the original premise
of the RFA namely, that small firms suffer a
disproportionate impact from federal regulations. The data
in the report show that small firms with fewer than 20
employees pay 40% more than large businesses per dollar of
sales; or, measured differently, 33% more than large
businesses per employee.
The data generated by this research has been widely
used by congressional leaders. While there is no evidence
to make a direct connection between this research and
legislative reforms, we suspect that the information on
regulatory costs was influential in Congress' decision to
require EPA and OSHA to convene Small Business Advocacy
Review Panels(27) prior to publishing a rule for public
comment.
Follow-on research funded by Advocacy includes Impacts
of Federal Regulations, Paperwork, and Tax Requirements on
Small Business(28) and projects currently being conducted by
CONSAD, Inc., Management and Planning Corp., and an update
by Hopkins and W. Mark Crain.(29)
Conclusion
The role of research and data cannot be overstated.
Information rationalizes markets. It also rationalizes
government decisions, as evidenced by the foregoing. In
addition, data and regulatory impact analyses performed by
Advocacy staff and its contractors have also played a major
role in analyzing the small business impacts of regulations,
leading to almost all of the regulatory reforms discussed in
the following chapter.
THE IMPACT OF THE REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ACT(30)
"Information Rationalizes Public Policy" - Anon.
Introduction
In 1980, Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) with a mandate that federal regulatory agencies
analyze the impact of their regulations on small entities
and consider alternatives that would be equally effective in
achieving public policy goals without unduly burdening small
entities. In passing the law, Congress made several
findings that are consistent with other congressional
mandates regarding the preservation of competition. They
are:
1. when adopting regulations to protect the health, safety
and economic welfare of the nation, Federal agencies should
seek to achieve statutory goals as effectively and
efficiently as possible without imposing unnecessary burdens
on the public
2. laws and regulations designed for application to large
scale entities have been applied uniformly to small
businesses. even though the problems. may not have been
caused by those smaller entities
3. uniform Federal regulatory and reporting requirements
have in numerous instances imposed unnecessary and
disproportionately burdensome demands. upon small
businesses.
4. the failure to recognize differences in the scale and
resources of regulated entities has in numerous instances
adversely affected competition in the marketplace,
discouraged innovation and restricted improvements in
productivity
5. unnecessary regulations create entry barriers. and
discourage. entrepreneurs from introducing beneficial
products and processes
6. the practice of treating all regulated businesses. as
equivalent may lead to inefficient use of regulatory agency
resources, enforcement problems, and. actions inconsistent
with the legislative intent of. legislation
7. alternative regulatory approaches which do not conflict
with the stated objectives of applicable statutes may be
available which minimize the significant economic impact of
rules on small businesses.
8. the process by which Federal regulations are developed
and adopted should be reformed to require agencies to
solicit the ideas and comments of small businesses. to
examine the impact of proposed and existing rules on such
entities and to review the continued need for existing
rules(31)
And to ensure that the intent of Congress was clear, it
stated:
It is the purpose of this act to
establish as a principle of regulatory
issuance that agencies shall endeavor,
consistent with the objectives. of
applicable statutes, to fit regulatory
and informational requirements to the
scale of businesses. To achieve this
principle, agencies are required to
solicit and consider flexible regulatory
proposals and to explain the rationale
for their actions to assure that such
proposals are given serious
consideration.(32)
In 1996, Congress enacted the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)(33) which amended the RFA
in several significant ways. First, it gave the courts
jurisdiction to review agency compliance with the RFA, thus
providing for the first time an enforcement venue to ensure
agency compliance with the law. Second, it mandated that
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) convene
Small Business Advocacy Review Panels(34) to elicit
information from small entities on regulations expected to
have a significant impact on them and to do so before the
regulations are published for public comment. This
formalized for these two agencies a process for involving
small entities early in the agencies' deliberations on the
small business impacts of regulations and to force
consideration of equally effective alternatives. Third,
SBREFA reaffirmed the authority for the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy to file amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs
in appeals brought by small entities from agency final
actions.(35)
The Role of the Office of Advocacy
Regulatory Development. When Congress created the
Office of Advocacy in 1976 within the U.S. Small Business
Administration, Congress mandated that the Office measure
the "direct costs and other effects of government regulation
on small business."(36)
The RFA, enacted four years later, requires the Chief
Counsel to report annually to the President and the Congress
on agency compliance with the law,(37) and the SBREFA,
enacted in 1996, made the Chief Counsel a statutory member
of the EPA and OSHA Small Business Advocacy Review
Panels.(38)
Essential to these mandates are:
Y research on small business trends in the economy
Y independent analyses of the impact of proposed
regulations on small business
Y two-way communications with small business trade
associations and leaders throughout the country on
regulatory impacts and emerging issues
Y ad hoc industry-specific roundtables to discuss small
business sector concerns, and
Y meaningful small business participation in the
development of public policy
Regulatory Issues - More Diverse and More Complex. In
recent years, the economy has been extremely dynamic -
constantly churning - with technology changing industry
structure at an extremely rapid pace, creating new
challenges for analyses of regulatory impacts on small
business. Small business is a major force in the changing
economic landscape, contributing major technological
innovations that are spurring growth in the economy and
creating most of the new jobs. As such, the continued
viability of small business must be ensured.
As the economy becomes more technology based, not
surprisingly, regulations are dealing with more and more
complex and technical societal issues on which there may be
little or conflicting data.
Staff Expertise. This requires more sophisticated
impact analyses than before and a level of expertise in the
staff that can only be developed over time or, in the
alternative, by changing the professional mix of the staff
at the discretion of the Chief Counsel.(39) Currently
Advocacy's regulatory staff is organized around issues on
which they are very well versed and on which they continue
to expand their expertise. On some issues, teams have been
developed to ensure continuity and back-up. (See Appendix
I)
Data Sources - Statistical as well as Anecdotal. If
regulations are unduly burdensome, they could dampen the
economic growth experienced in recent years. Therefore,
regulatory impact analyses are taking on an ever more
important role in public policy deliberations. Policy
makers are increasingly aware that the key to rational
decision making is data.
To provide some of the answers as to the impact of
proposed regulations on small business, the Office of
Advocacy makes available its unique database - Statistics of
U.S. Businesses (SUSB) - on its web site at
www.sba.gov.advo/stats. Agencies can refer to this database
to estimate the number of firms that could be affected by a
proposed regulation.
However, this data only address one part of the impact
equation. To supplement it, Advocacy has issued task order
contracts,(40) under which assignments are given to the
contractor to estimate the compliance costs of a proposed
regulation on the regulated industry, as well as to develop
estimates on the amount of the problem that is solved by
applying the regulation to small entities. The information
provided by contractors has been extremely helpful in
evaluating EPA and OSHA regulations. Information made
available to these agencies early in the process has
significantly influenced agency deliberations and the design
of regulatory proposals. More often than not, the
contractor's data has been corroborated by small entities
participating in the Small Business Regulatory Review
Panels.
Finally, current (anecdotal) data have been compiled
through discussions with small businesses, their
representatives and economic experts. Advocacy has convened
ad hoc industry-specific roundtable meetings and conference
calls with small entities. These activities have generated
additional information on small business impacts.
SBREFA and Judicial Review
RFA Litigation. By the end of FY 2000, SBREFA will
have been in effect for a little over four years. It is
clear that the 1996 amendments are having a major impact on
the work of federal agencies. Much of this impact is due to
the fact that small entities are increasingly seeking
judicial review of agency compliance with the RFA and having
some success. Several court decisions have remanded rules
to agencies for failure to comply with the RFA. All of the
known RFA court decisions are summarized in Appendix J. The
decisions have been Shepardized and the tabulation is posted
on Advocacy's web site at
www.sba.gov/advo/laws/rfa_shep.pdf.
Advocacy as Amicus Curiae. When the RFA was enacted,
agency compliance with the law was not reviewable by the
courts in regulatory appeals. Nevertheless, Congress
authorized the Chief Counsel to file as amicus curiae in
such appeals.
In 1986, the Chief Counsel for Advocacy filed its first
amicus curiae brief, but later withdrew it after it was
challenged by the DOJ. The DOJ maintained that the Chief
Counsel's amicus curiae authority was unconstitutional on
the grounds that it would impair the ability of the
Executive Branch to fulfill its constitutional functions.
The Department cited Executive Order 12146, Section 1-402,
which states that legal disputes between two agencies are to
be resolved by the Attorney General. The then Chief Counsel
argued that an executive order could not override a statute,
namely the RFA, but nevertheless withdrew the brief.
Then in September 1994, the current Chief Counsel
decided to file as amicus curiae in a Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) proceeding. The brief was prepared but the
issue was resolved with the Commission before the filing
deadline. During discussions with the FCC, DOJ attempted to
object to the filing arguing that the Chief Counsel's
authority was narrow and could not address the merits of the
rule. The issue was mooted by the out-of-court resolution
of the dispute.
Subsequently, in 1995 when Congress was debating
possible changes to the RFA (not enacted at the time),
Congress addressed the Chief Counsel's amicus curiae
authority as follows:
The ability to appear as amicus curiae
is important to the ability of the SBA
Chief Counsel for Advocacy to represent
the interests of small businesses in the
rulemaking process. Furthermore, if
this bill should become law, with its
provisions to permit judicial review of
agency compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, the importance of the
Chief Counsel's ability to file amicus
briefs will be magnified.(41)
The Chief Counsel had suggested that the exact scope of
the authority needed clarification. When Congress enacted
SBREFA in 1996, it in fact clarified the Chief Counsel's
authority to authorize comments on: (1) agency compliance
with the RFA; (2) the adequacy of an agency's rulemaking
record with respect to small entities; and (3) the effect of
a rule on small entities.
Advocacy's first brief was filed in Northwest Mining
Assoc. v. Babbitt.(42) The court agreed with the issues
raised by Advocacy and remanded the rule to the Department
of Interior for further analysis. The DOJ did not file
formal objections to the filing with the court.
Other Impacts of SBREFA. Agencies are watching court
decisions closely and are increasingly seeking assistance
from the Office of Advocacy in the earliest stages of
regulatory development, presumably not just to avoid
appeals, but also to avoid having Advocacy appear as amicus
curiae. This is evidenced by the marked increase in
requests for Advocacy's assistance prior to publication of a
rule for public comment. This is a change from Advocacy's
pre-SBREFA experience or experience prior to Advocacy's
successful filing of its first amicus curiae brief. There
is also increased willingness on the part of regulatory
agencies to participate in Advocacy's ad hoc industry
roundtables where discussions focus on current problems.
These roundtables play an important role in opening up
dialogue between small entities and government regulators.
All of this indicates that a cultural change is
underway in regulatory agencies. The potential for judicial
review provides a significant incentive for agencies to do
more in-depth small business impact analyses and to take
other steps to strengthen in-house regulatory development
processes. For example, the National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) has instituted some internal changes that
could lead to improved impact analyses. Other noticeable
improvements have occurred at the Health Care Financing
Administration (HCFA) and at the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS). Industries regulated by these agencies are
part of the basic structure of the economy and are dominated
by small entities. While regulations affecting these
industries are not front-page news, regulatory impacts can
often mean the difference between survival and extinction of
small entities.
Having said this, it is important to note, however,
that this cultural change is by no means uniform within or
among regulatory agencies. The largest hurdle to overcome
remains agency resistance to the concept that regulatory
alternatives that are less burdensome on small business may,
in fact, be equally effective in achieving public policy
objectives. (See supra "Barrier No. 2" p. 7.) Economic
data thus become the force majeure in overcoming this
resistance.
Small Business Advocacy Review Panels. The value of
economic data and good regulatory flexibility analyses has
been demonstrated time and again in the work of the OSHA and
EPA Small Business Advocacy Review Panels mandated by
SBREFA.
Since enactment of SBREFA, work has been completed on
24 Small Business Advocacy Review Panels - 21 EPA panels and
3 OSHA panels. (Appendix K) Approximately 300-400 small
entities have been consulted on a very diverse array of
rules. Independent data on the impact of regulatory
proposals have played an important role in the deliberations
of the panels. The additional input from small entity
representatives has spotlighted real-life consequences of
proposals under consideration. Regulations that have
emerged from this process have been changed in response to
the information provided and are, for the most part, less
burdensome than the regulations originally considered. In
one instance, a regulation was withdrawn entirely because
the data clearly demonstrated that there was no need for
national regulation, saving small business approximately
$103 million annually.(43)
It is important to emphasize that, although the
regulations that emerge from panel deliberations are likely
to be less burdensome on small entities, public policy
objectives have not been compromised.
The panel process has confirmed that: (1) credible
economic and scientific data, as well as sound analytical
methods, are crucial to rational decision-making in solving
societal problems, and, (2) information provided by small
businesses themselves on real-world impacts is truly
invaluable in identifying equally effective regulatory
alternatives.
Although work on the panels has been productive, it has
also been labor-intensive. We estimate that Advocacy alone
has spent an average of 500-600 hours per panel - for a
total of between 3500 and 4000 hours on the panels completed
in FY 1999. Work on one OSHA panel completed in 1999 -
given the scope of the regulation's application to almost
all industries - probably consumed more than the average.
Work on the seven panels completed in FY 2000 consumed 4000
hours or a little under 700 hours per panel.
None of the OSHA rules reviewed by SBREFA panels have
been finalized. EPA has finalized seven rules that have
been the subject of SBREFA panels, and all seven contained
significant modifications to mitigate burdensome small
business impacts.
A question emerges from this data. Why have only seven
rules have been finalized out of the 24 that were the
subject of SBREFA panels, particularly those reviewed in
1997 or 1998? Some agencies have attempted to argue that
the 60-day panel process delays rules. This is one of the
objections some agencies have raised to avoid having the
panel process applied to them. But this rebuttal begs the
question that the analyses required by the RFA, which is
what SBREFA panels do, is what agencies should be doing and
are required to do by the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA). These agencies simply have not institutionalized the
process.
So the question remains: Does the 60-day panel process
actually result in additional delay or is it more likely
that the data and impact analyses generated through panel
deliberations and the balance of the regulatory process
force agencies to re-evaluate their proposals? If the
latter, then the panel process contributes constructively to
regulatory deliberations. This question ultimately may only
be answered when the rules are finalized and their
provisions compared with panel recommendations and data
generated by the process.
Regulatory Review Processes
Advocacy's regulatory review processes primarily
involve analysis of regulatory proposals published in the
Federal Register and crafting public record communications
on the impact of the proposals on small business. These
public record documents also address the issue whether
regulatory justifications and analyses of alternatives
comply with the RFA. This review is significant and is in
addition to Advocacy's work on EPA and OSHA panels. It
encompasses the regulatory initiatives of approximately 18
additional regulatory agencies. The issues reviewed range
from procurement to taxes to resource quotas to
telecommunications to food and product safety to
transportation safety to antitrust to mergers to Internet
policies to securities and banking regulations, etc. The FY
1999 RFA report and the FY 2000 RFA report (currently under
development) highlight some of those public record
communications and illustrate the range of issues Advocacy
has addressed.
In selecting issues for analysis and public comment,
Advocacy targets its resources to those regulations where
Advocacy could reasonably be expected to make a difference
or where the small business interest is significant but
underrepresented in the regulatory process. To this end,
Advocacy reviewed approximately 2600 proposed and final
rules in the past two fiscal years and submitted
approximately 160 comments for the public record.(44)
Since enactment of the SBREFA judicial review
amendment, Advocacy has been
experiencing an increased workload involving pre-proposal
consultations with regulatory agencies. These consultations
and any written materials generated by this work are not a
matter of public record. They are, however, as important as
Advocacy's public record comments in effecting changes to
regulatory proposals. In addition, Advocacy has
increasingly been requested by OMB to participate in its
review of regulations pursuant to OMB's responsibility under
Executive Order 12866.
It should be noted that Advocacy does not restrict its
activities exclusively to RFA issues. It has in fact
intervened in other matters where the impact on small
business is significant. Reports for the last two years,
although they are technically reports on compliance with the
RFA, nevertheless have contained descriptions of Advocacy's
activities involving two entities not subject to the APA or
the RFA. These entities are the Internet Corporation of
Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)(45) and the U.S. Postal
Service.(46) Advocacy became involved with these two
entities because of their market dominance and because their
activities are having a major impact on small businesses.
Advocacy is of the view that small business needs a
spokesperson to represent them in the proceedings of all
government or quasi-government bodies.
Regulatory Savings(47)
The impact of SBREFA goes beyond modifications just to
EPA and OSHA
regulatory processes. The impact is affecting the work of
all regulatory agencies. As stated earlier, agencies
logically wish to avoid judicial challenges to their rules
and are
taking greater care to comply with the RFA. Rules have been
changed to minimize burdens on small entities. We estimate
that changes made to rules in 1998 resulted in $3.2 billion
in savings to small business as a whole.(48) (Appendix L)
Changes made to rules in FY 1999 reduced the potential cost
of regulations by $5.3 billion. (Table I) In FY 2000, the
estimated cost savings to small business are $3.4 billion
(Table II).
Conclusion
The RFA report for FY 2000, to be submitted by the
current Chief Counsel, will be the nineteenth report since
enactment of the RFA in 1980. It will mark the 20th
anniversary of enactment of the RFA and it will be the fifth
report since enactment of the 1996 SBREFA amendments. A
cursory review of these and earlier reports will reveal
different levels of compliance by regulatory agencies, even
by different agencies within a department. The main
improvements to be noted, however, are the changing role of
data in regulatory development and the impact judicial
review has had on agency compliance. Cost savings that
result from modifications to regulatory proposals can now be
documented using the data generated by the regulatory
agencies themselves and/or by other third-party sources.
These savings are the true measure of SBREFA's impact.
While the savings are, on the one hand, good news, they
are at the same time bad news because agencies are still not
doing enough in-depth small business impact analyses before
proposing regulations. For this reason, Advocacy maintains
that the biggest hurdles to overcome are agency resistance
to understanding the importance of small business to the
economy (see supra "Barrier No. 1" p. 7), and to accepting
the notion that less burdensome alternatives can be equally
effective in accomplishing public policy objectives (see
supra "Barrier No. 2" p. 7). These concepts need to be
inculcated into regulatory agency deliberations in order for
the RFA to have a meaningful impact on reducing the
regulatory burden for small business. Very likely this will
remain the challenge for Advocacy in the coming years.
THE PUBLIC POLICY ROLE OF SMALL BUSINESS STAKEHOLDERS
"Small Business Voices Rationalize Public Policy" - Anon.
Introduction
Small businesses in the U.S. - 24.8 million strong -
are diverse, fragmented, and located in every city in the
United States. Entrepreneurs are busy running their
businesses with little time for monitoring or devoting time
to federal or state legislative or regulatory processes,
despite the impact governmental decisions could have on
their livelihood. Congress recognized this dichotomy and it
is one of the reasons the Office of Advocacy was created,
namely, to ensure that there would be an informed small
business voice participating early enough in federal
deliberations that small business impacts would be
adequately addressed and barriers to competition avoided.
Research and statistical data are vital to sound public
policy. But research data are historical. They reflect
what has already occurred. While the data admittedly can
provide some insights on what the economic trends are likely
to be - insights that are important to public policy - they
do not mirror what is happening now in the marketplace.
Only small businesses can provide this information.
The challenge then, is how to make small businesses
visible in the process; how to establish two-way
communications with them; how to maintain a network
throughout the U.S. to identify emerging problems and new
small business leaders; and how to create a continuum of
contacts at the local level on an ongoing basis.
The following describes techniques that have had
demonstrable success in accomplishing these objectives.
White House Conference on Small Business
Congress enacted a law establishing a Commission, with
funding, to organize a White House Conference on Small
Business (WHCSB) to be held in 1995.
The Process. Beginning in 1994, conferences were held
in each state of the union (two in the larger states)
attended by qualified small business owners who wished to
attend. The attendees were provided an Issues Handbook
prepared by the Office of Advocacy that was intended to help
the delegates identify issues they wanted included on the
agenda of the national conference. Advocacy's regional
staff played a pivotal role in coordinating these 50-plus
state meetings, promoting attendance, discussing issues with
potential attendees and ensuring that a full range of small
businesses was represented.
Attendees at the state conferences elected delegates to
six regional conferences who would in turn be delegates to
the national conference. The White House, each Member of
Congress and Governors also nominated an additional number
of delegates. In June 1995, over 2000 small business people
convened in Washington, D.C. They heard presentations by
the President, the Vice President, Congressional leaders and
Cabinet officials. The delegates debated issues in 10 broad
topic categories, eventually consolidating their
deliberations into 60 recommendations.
Before the national conference, the Office of Advocacy
held a series of 15 focus groups to tap the insights,
experiences and perspectives of a diverse group of experts
who were knowledgeable about small business issues. The
discussions were summarized in a publication, The Third
Millennium, distributed at the conference to all the
delegates.(49)
Implementation. The Office of Advocacy had the
responsibility for monitoring implementation of the
recommendations - whether the recommendations required
legislative or administrative action. The active support of
the Executive Branch and the Congress was essential to the
successful implementation of the recommendations.
Advocacy created a network of Regional Implementation
Chairs, elected by the WHCSB delegates; a committee of State
Chairs; and ten committees of Issue Chairs, each focussing
on one of the 10 broad topics debated by the WHCSB
delegates. This network worked closely with the Office of
Advocacy over a period of three years on implementation
efforts. During this time, cabinet sponsored meetings were
held with agencies to discuss the recommendations and how to
address them, distinguishing those that could be implemented
administratively from those that required congressional
action. Periodic reports were made to the President at his
request on the progress being made.
A directory was compiled by Advocacy and distributed to
Congress of "issue" experts (WHCSB delegates) who expressed
an interest in working with the Congress on small business
issues. The directory was designed to help Congress
identify potential witnesses expert on small business issues
for upcoming hearings.
The Office of Advocacy also had the responsibility for
filing annual reports to the President and the Congress on
the status of the recommendations. The final report was
submitted in July 2000(50) in which the Office was able to
report an unprecedented record of policy actions, surpassing
that of both the 1986 and 1980 Conferences. A list of
legislative actions taken to implement some of the
recommendations is included in Appendix M.
Outgrowth. Two committees of Issue Chairs have
remained active to this date: Tax Chairs and Technology
Chairs. Their dedication is further evidence of how
effective small entities can be in influencing public policy
when a working partnership is established between them and
government officials.
(1) Tax Chairs. This group of Issue Chairs has
remained extremely active, in part because of tax
legislation introduced by Congress to implement
recommendations of the WHCSB. The Chairs have also been
very active keeping members of Congress informed on small
business tax concerns and have played a major role in the
adoption of administrative initiatives by the IRS. Their
expertise has been invaluable in several meetings with
senior policymakers at the Treasury Department convened to
discuss major tax issues, meetings in which the Tax Chairs
have been extremely persuasive in arguing the small business
agenda. Issues discussed included independent contractor
definitions and pending legislation, IRS reform, cash versus
accrual accounting; electronic tax reporting and paying;
pension plan expansion. Treasury officials have been very
responsive and receptive to problems identified by the Tax
Chairs. The IRS has also appointed 4 different Tax Issue
Chairs to several advisory councils including the Internal
Revenue Service Advisory Council; the Electronic Tax
Administration Advisory Council and the Commission on
Restructuring. Most recently, the Employee Benefits
Division of the U.S. Department of the Treasury sought
Advocacy's opinion on regulatory proposals related to "new
comparability cross testing."(51) By consulting with
Advocacy first and then with others recommended by Advocacy,
Treasury was able to produce a stronger, more defensible
proposal that protected small businesses while protecting
pension participants and taxpayers.
(2) Technology Chairs. Reflecting the growing
importance of the technology sector in the U.S. economy,
technology based small businesses were represented at the
1995 WHCSB in greater numbers than in earlier conferences.
In addition to remaining involved with technology issues,
such as R&D tax credits, universal access to the Internet,
the Small Business Innovation Research Program, patent and
intellectual property reform, etc., these chairs organized
the Small Business Technology Coalition. The Coalition has
as its mission ensuring the evolution of sound public policy
to promote technology and is the first such organization
dedicated to monitoring and participating in governmental
deliberations on the role of technology in the economy.
Coalition members have testified before Congress on a wide
variety of technology issues.
Industry Roundtables
As noted earlier in this document, information on
current trends and regulatory impacts can be most effective
when it comes from small businesses themselves. Historical
data on specific industries does not always exist from which
inferences can be taken as to the impact of specific
regulations. In order to develop some knowledge about
current industry structure, etc., ad hoc industry-specific
roundtable meetings have been convened by Advocacy to
discuss pending issues informally with small business
representatives. Representatives from relevant regulatory
agencies and congressional committee staff have also been
invited to participate. The meetings have uniformly been
viewed as helpful in identifying and raising awareness of
small business issues.
Industry-specific roundtables have been convened on:
Y environmental issues (sulfur emissions, toxic release
inventories, etc.)
Y fisheries (quotas, Fishery Council decisions, etc.)
Y transportation (hours of work, accommodations for the
disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act, etc.)
Y telecommunications (universal service, ICANN, etc.)
Y worker safety (health and safety programs and
ergonomics)
Y mineral resource allocation and land management (site
reclamation, mill site descriptions, bonding )
Y tax (pensions, independent contractor, employee
benefits, etc.), and
Y procurement (procurement reforms, small business'
experiences with contract bundling, etc.)
Participation by entities outside the Washington, D.C.
area has been actively encouraged through the simultaneous
use of conference calls.
Finally, a roundtable of legal practitioners who
represent small businesses has been convened on a number of
occasions to discuss and share information on pending
litigation in which they are personally involved. New
precedents (court decisions) under the RFA have been
discussed. The stated purpose of this group is to
understand the issues being raised by litigants before the
courts and the patterns that may be emerging in the legal
precedents - both good and bad.
Small Entities and SBREFA Panels(52)
Both EPA and OSHA must convene Small Business Advocacy
Review Panels whenever these agencies are considering a
regulation that is likely to have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The review panel must
consult with small entities that could be affected by the
rule and submit a report to the head of the agency within 60
days summarizing the input from the small entities. In
nearly every instance to date, information provided by small
entities, in combination with other data, has proved
invaluable in establishing a reality check for these
regulatory agencies, namely, what the real impact of the
regulation is likely to be and the actual compliance costs
small entities will have to bear.
Technology is making it easier for small entities to
participate in the panels. Conference calls, e-mails and
faxes - all facilitate information sharing and fast
communications. Small entities do not have to come to
Washington to be effective participants in panel
deliberations. They can influence public policy working out
of their own offices or production facilities, wherever they
are situated in the United States. What this means is that
policy makers can reach out to a more diverse and more
geographically dispersed group of small entities. Agencies
are no longer limited to having discussions only with
Washington-based small business representatives. They can
have round robin conference call discussions with small
refiners in Oklahoma on sulfur emission standards, or animal
feed operators in Missouri or Kansas or Iowa on water
polluting run-offs, or home health care providers in Ohio on
limiting employee exposure to tuberculosis. Technology is
making it easier to reach more small entities if they can be
identified. That is the challenge.
State Conferences
Delegates to the 1995 White House Conference on Small
Business voiced strong concern about the impact of state
regulations and policies, which, they argued, could be
equally as onerous as federal regulations. The statutory
mandate of the Office of Advocacy, however, extends only to
federal policies, legislation and regulation. Nevertheless,
to draw attention to the impact of state actions on small
business and the role state and local policymakers play, the
Office of Advocacy has sponsored three conferences within
the past seven years (a total of 15 such conferences since
establishment of the Office). At these conferences
innovative and successful local small business initiatives
have been showcased in the expectation that unique
initiatives might be replicated elsewhere. Through
presentations and workshops, state and local issues have
been discussed and awards made to truly innovative programs
that help small business. Descriptions of the award-winning
initiatives have been published by Advocacy in a booklet
that characterizes the programs as Models of Excellence.
The most recent publication is available on Advocacy's
Internet web site at www.sba.gov/advo/vision.html.
One of the important messages of these conferences is
that creative solutions to small business problems are not
always crafted in Washington. Information gleaned from
these conferences about state and local initiatives confirms
the adage that the states are often major incubators, not
only for identifying societal problems, but for solving them
as well.
A significant by-product of these conferences is the
expansion of Advocacy's outreach to an ever-increasing
number of small entities and emerging local leaders in both
the public and private sectors, who can in turn be effective
spokespersons in public policy deliberations at the national
level. Small businesses, wherever situated in the U.S., can
be effective partners in the deliberations of their
government. All it takes is a commitment to reach out to
them.
Small Business Week
The question - Are small firms important - is answered
to a large extent by research. Even more impressive than
numbers on a chart are real life examples of successful
start-up businesses or innovative small businesses. Each
year, during Small Business Week, Advocacy honors the:
Y Accountant Advocate of the Year
Y Entrepreneurial Success of the Year
Y Financial Services Advocate of the Year
Y Home-Based Business of the Year
Y Minority Small Business Advocate of the Year
Y Small Business Exporter of the Year
Y Small Business Journalist of the Year
Y Women in Business Advocate of the Year;
Y Veteran Small Business Advocate of the Year, and
Y SBA Young Entrepreneur of the Year
Regional publicity solicits nominations from every state in
the union for these awards. Applications are culled and
recommendations developed by a local network of small
business leaders convened for this purpose in each of the 10
federal regions.
Each year these awards spotlight the work of innovative
companies and small business leaders who would otherwise be
largely invisible to the press, to policy makers and even to
members of their own business communities. Small Business
Week provides a platform and a showcase for all to see the
role small business plays in the economy and how small
business continues to stimulate competition.
Communications Services
The Small Business Advocate. This is a monthly
publication distributed to a mailing list of approximately
10,000 individuals and businesses. It is designed to
provide highlights of pending small business issues,
specific updates on pending regulations, data on new
research and a list of upcoming events of interest to small
business.
OpEd Page Articles. This past year, Advocacy's
regional staff drafted several articles to appear in weekly
newspapers, often the most read periodicals in the country.
The OpEd pieces addressed small business' role in the
economy and were independently edited to enhance their
appeal to regional readership.
Web Site (www.sba.gov/advo). Within the past year,
Advocacy has remodeled its web site so that it can be used
by anyone seeking information on Advocacy's research and
economic reports, small business statistics, public record
comments filed by Advocacy on regulations, testimony of the
Chief Counsel, SBREFA panel reports, press releases and
Advocacy's newsletter, The Small Business Advocate.
Information provided by SBA's Office of the Chief
Information Officer indicates that Advocacy's web site
receives a significant number of hits, ranking in the top
ten on SBA's web site.
Most recently, a Shepardized compilation of RFA court
decisions has been posted for use by lawyers representing
small entities. This information should help reduce the
time they would otherwise have to spend researching current
legal precedents. Finally, a new E-Commerce Regulations and
Policy web page was developed to provide small businesses
with up-to-date information on Internet policies,
conferences, etc.
On July 12, 2000, Advocacy's small business state
profiles page received a Links2Go "Key Resource" award.
This award is based on an analysis of millions of web pages
to determine which pages are most heavily used.
Conclusion
There are approximately 600,000 employer and thousands
more non-employer small business start-ups in the United
States each year. There is no centralized directory of
these firms. These firms are known, however, to local
Chambers of Commerce, to state and local economic
development offices, to local bank officials, and to venture
capitalists, among others. Identifying and making contact
with these firms cannot be done effectively or efficiently
from Washington, D.C. - at least that has been the
experience of the Office of Advocacy to date.
To illustrate, one of the major objectives of the WHCSB
was ensuring that the delegates truly represented a cross-
section of small businesses. This meant generating
sufficient publicity to all industries and all groups of
entrepreneurs, including women and minorities, to guarantee
representative attendance at the conferences. Advocacy's
regional staff worked with local leaders and organizations
that had networks through which small businesses could be
encouraged to participate. Regional staff also worked with
local media to garner stories about the state and national
conferences and the importance of the deliberations to take
place.
In addition, increased credibility can be established
for Small Business Advocacy Review Panels when there is a
diverse geographic representation of an industry
participating in the discussion. These entities can only be
readily identified by regional staff working closely with
Advocacy's headquarters staff working on regulations on
which small entity input is needed. This was Advocacy's
experience when it needed to identify small petroleum
refiners which could discuss sulfur content limitations in
gasoline and to find articulate feedlot operators to work on
anti-water polluting runoff standards (both EPA regulations)
or to find home health care providers or homeless shelter
managers to discuss the impact of OSHA's tuberculosis rule
to limit employee exposure to the disease.
There have also been occasions when Advocacy's regional
staff received data from their contacts that was pertinent
to national deliberations. For instance, regional staff
drew Advocacy's attention to the U.S. Postal Service's
proposal on commercial mail receiving agencies well in
advance of national trade organizations hearing about the
issue from members. In another instance, information
obtained through Advocacy's regional staff provided data
showing that the number of injuries and illnesses among
workers had not decreased as the result of instituting
health and safety programs, contradicting an important OSHA
assertion.
Opportunities have also developed at the local level
where someone on site and in tune with the local economy
could be helpful to small businesses. For example, an Air
Force General was persuaded by Advocacy's regional staff to
work with the small business community to find new business
opportunities to offset potential losses from the phased-in
closure of an Air Force base. Regional staff has also been
working with universities to establish small business
entrepreneurship programs as part of the college curriculum.
Having the capability to expand the involvement of
small businesses in national policy deliberations has
leveraged the work of the Office of Advocacy. Technology is
making involvement in national policy deliberations a low-
cost activity for small business and public policy has been
the direct beneficiary. The capacity to expand the
involvement of geographically dispersed small entities can
only be developed over time by maintaining day-to-day and
one-on-one contacts with local leaders and with the ever-
changing landscape of state and local officials. It has
always been and will continue to be a work in process and
clearly not a task that can be performed effectively or
efficiently out of Washington, D.C.
PENDING ISSUES
"Information Can Forecast the Future" - Anon.
Introduction
Following is a litany of issues, in no particular order
of priority, on which the Chief Counsel for Advocacy may be
asked to take some action some time in the future..
Research
Outstanding Research Contracts. Several research
contracts were awarded this year and work still remains to
be completed by contractors on others. A complete list of
contracts with work outstanding may be found in Appendix N.
Data Tabulations at Census. Near the end of each
fiscal year an Interagency Agreement is signed with the U.S.
Census Bureau to do new small business tabulations in the
coming year. The work is paid for in advance with contract
funds being transferred by SBA's finance office to Census.
The data are received over a period of time beginning in the
middle of the fiscal year.
IRS Tabulations. A small contract is issued each year
to IRS for tables on female and male operated sole
proprietorships, by size, profitability, industry, state and
filing status.. These tabulations are received close to the
end of the fiscal year under an interagency agreement, at
which time IRS presents the bill for work performed.
BITS File. Several contracts have been issued to
independent researchers that are based on the contractors
having access to BITS data. The data in this file is
information on particular firms, allowing their growth and
employment patterns to be tracked over time. (See supra p.
14 for discussion of the significance of this file)
The Center for Economic Studies (CES) at Census has to
approve research proposals and also has to review the
research results to ensure that the data is sufficiently
camouflaged as not to reveal the identity of any particular
firm. The IRS recently became concerned about procedures to
protect the privacy of the data, as required by law, and is
now also reviewing research proposals. Work on these
contracts was delayed until IRS was satisfied that
procedures were secure enough to guarantee privacy for the
firms in the data file. This issue is likely to remain
thorny and procedures to limit access may surface as more
researchers become familiar with the value of the BITS file
and submit research proposals conditioned on access to the
file.
GAO Studies. Two GAO studies may raise issues for
Advocacy. One study looks at the availability of equity
capital for small business. Advocacy and SBA's Investment
Division worked closely with GAO in identifying sources -
limited as they are - for equity investments in small
business. GAO's mandate was merely to report on what is
happening in equity markets and not to develop any specific
suggestions for congressional or agency action. The draft
report, reviewed by Advocacy and SBA staff, is comprehensive
and does a reasonably good job in identifying data gaps. It
does, however, implicitly point to future research that
might be undertaken.
A second study attempts to document the impact of
recent procurement reforms on small business. This study
needs to be reviewed very carefully when it is finalized to
see if any of the data it provides could mislead policy
makers. A lot of variables, not just procurement reforms,
are having an effect on federal procurement (e.g., a
reduction in the number of contracting officers), making it
difficult to see exactly where corrective actions may be
needed to ensure small business access to federal
procurement, as well as ensure the government's access to
truly competitive vendor products and services. To the
extent that GAO's report may show that small business' share
of federal procurement is remaining constant, despite
credible complaints from small businesses about their
inability to get contracts, achieving increased reliance on
PRO-Net by both vendors and contracting officers takes on
renewed importance.
Rural Issues. During the past year, Advocacy and SBA
have co-sponsored rural roundtables in several states to
determine if small entities, including small farms, were
having difficulty obtaining loans. Advocacy also published
a report on bank lending in rural areas.(53) SBA's New
Markets Initiative proposal, which has the support of the
Administration, includes assistance for rural areas. More
discrete research will likely be called for in the coming
years on rural issues.
Regulatory Development
Pending Regulations. Appendix O contains a list of
regulations on which Advocacy submitted comments for the
record but which have not yet been finalized as of November
1, 2000. These regulations need to be monitored since, once
they are finalized, small entities can file appeals. The
issue will then arise as to how Advocacy's comments are used
by appellants, whether Advocacy can resolve any remaining
disputes with regulatory agencies outside the appeal, and,
finally, whether Advocacy should file as amicus curiae.
FY 2000 Report on Agency Compliance with the RFA. This
report will be finalized and distributed in December 2000.
It will provide information on which agencies are
substantially complying with the law and those that are not.
Certification
The RFA allows agency agencies to certify that a
regulation will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. However, the law also
requires the agencies to provide a factual basis for the
certification. The intent of this provision is to provide
the public with enough information to rebut the
certification, if appropriate.
Implicit in satisfying the requirement for a "factual
basis" is that agencies must do some analysis of small
business impacts, something less than a full blown
regulatory flexibility, but certainly something more than
just an opinion, albeit informed. Some agencies are not
taking this provision of the law seriously and provide
"boiler plate" certification statements. This issue may
require some modification to the RFA.
Direct vs. Indirect Costs (Regulatory Flexibility Analyses)
Mid-Tex Decision on Indirect Costs. In Mid-Tex
Electric Co-op Inc. v. F.E.R.C.,(54) the court held that
agencies doing regulatory flexibility analyses are in
compliance with RFA if they only estimate the costs to be
incurred by those entities that will be directly subject to
a regulation. Agencies do not have to take into account
indirect costs that occur as the result of, but which are
not mandated by, a regulation. This decision is causing
concern in those instances where indirect costs are
foreseeable and measurable, as opposed to those that are
not. Advocacy has argued that all foreseeable and
measurable costs, direct and indirect, should be taken into
account by a regulatory agency in order to evaluate the full
impact of a regulation on small business.
The National Federation of Independent Business has
issued a contract for the development of a cost-benefit
model that will also attempt to construct a formula for
estimating indirect costs.
Legislative Issues
Extending the SBREFA Panel Process to Other Agencies.
Two proposals were pending this past year, on which no final
action was taken, to mandate Small Business Advocacy Review
Panels for regulations proposed by the Department of Labor's
Mine Safety and Health Administration and for all IRS
interpretive rules.
Advocacy testified on the Mine Safety proposal,
describing Advocacy's favorable experience to date with EPA
and OSHA panels. (See Appendix E) Advocacy did not testify
on the IRS proposal but has stated publicly that IRS needs
to do more analyses of the small business impacts of its
regulatory proposals.
Advocacy has also taken the position that agencies
could convene SBREFA-like panels on their own initiative
since they are obligated under the RFA to reach out to small
businesses in the development of regulations. Agencies have
been reminded that their outreach activities are now
reviewable under RFA and that SBREFA-like panels would be
one way to satisfy their obligations under the law.
Independent Advocacy Proposals. Two proposals were
introduced in the last congressional session (on which no
final action was taken) that were designed to increase
Advocacy's independence. One proposal would have (1)
established a separate budget line item in SBA's budget for
the Office of Advocacy, and (2) defined conditions under
which the Chief Counsel could be removed. At the request of
the Chair of the Senate Small Business Committee, Advocacy
developed a budget for consideration as a line item in SBA's
budget. (Appendix P)
The second proposal would have (1) created a 3-member
independent Commission; (2) given it power to intervene in
adjudicative proceedings; (3) given it rulemaking authority
over compliance with the RFA; and (4) mandated a majority
vote for all official Commission actions, including comments
submitted for the public record on regulatory proposals.
The Chief Counsel testified on the Independent
Commission bill. (See June 21, 2000 Testimony of the Chief
Counsel in Appendix E.)
Amicus Curiae Authority. Whenever a dispute arose in
the past several years in which Advocacy considered filing
as amicus curiae, the Chief Counsel first contacted the
regulatory agency and the DOJ to see if Advocacy's concerns
could be resolved. In most instances resolution was
achieved, except in the Northwest Mining Assoc. v.
Babbitt(55) case in which the Office of Advocacy filed its
first amicus curiae brief.
Prior to this filing, meetings had been convened by the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) with regulatory agency
representatives to discuss compliance with the RFA in
general terms. At one of these meetings, the DOJ raised
questions about the Chief Counsel's amicus curiae authority,
which it alleges raises constitutional issues. However, DOJ
raised no formal objections to Advocacy's amicus curiae
filing in Northwest Mining and has worked with Advocacy in
other cases to resolve issues involved in regulatory
appeals. There is no way of knowing if the incoming
administration at DOJ will be aggressive in objecting to the
Chief Counsel's amicus curiae authority. (See Appendix Q
for additional information.)
Due Deference to Advocacy Interpretations of the RFA.
In American Trucking Association v. EPA,(56) the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that SBA
"neither administers nor has any policy making role under
the RFA; at most its role is advisory. Therefore, we do not
defer to the SBA's interpretation of the RFA." This
appellate court decision may not be binding on lower courts
in other circuits. It could nevertheless carry some weight
and also undermine Advocacy's effectiveness in promoting
compliance with the RFA.
Conversely, in Southern Offshore Fishing v. Daley,(57)
the court quoted from
Advocacy's comments that critiqued the lack of justification
for Department of Commerce's certification that the
reduction in the shark quota would not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The court
in this case remanded the rule to the Department so that it
could do a proper regulatory flexibility analysis.
Quadrennial Small Business Conference. One of the
recommendations of the 1995 White House Conference on Small
Business urged that a conference on small business be held
every four years. The White House indicated support for
such a proposal. However, no action has been taken by
Congress to implement the recommendation. Nor was any
action taken by Congress on a recent proposal calling for a
"Quadrennial Small Business Conference" to be organized by a
commission.
One issue to be considered is whether or not a
conference organized by a commission would have the same
impact as a "White House Conference on Small Business."
Another issue is the scope of Advocacy's involvement
with such a conference, if one is mandated by Congress. If
the process replicates that of the 1995 Conference, then
Advocacy's role could involve a significant commitment of
resources - the time of headquarters and regional staff and
expenses, principally travel.
Y For the 1995 conference, Advocacy's headquarters staff
prepared two issue handbooks(58) - one for the state
conferences and another for the national conference that
included changes to reflect what had transpired at the state
conferences.
Y Advocacy's regional staff were heavily involved in
conference preparations over a period of 18-24 months,
beginning with the first state conference through 50+ state
conferences, 6 regional conferences and the national
conference. Managing the logistics for these conferences in
each of the 50 states was very time consuming and included
arranging for conference sites, promoting attendance,
working with Governors' offices and small business trade
associations to elicit their involvement, answering attendee
questions about issues and procedures, etc.
Y Advocacy's reporting responsibilities included
preparation and publication of the Conference's final report
and 3 annual reports on implementation of the conference's
recommendations. These reports were mailed to all 2000
WHCSB delegates.
Taxes. As this paper is being drafted, Congress is
considering a bill that includes small business tax
incentives. The President has threatened to veto the bill
unless certain Medicare and pension charges are made. The
bill also includes an increase in the federal minimum wage.
The small business issues in the bill include the
following (and may re-surface in the next session of
Congress if not enacted now):
Y an increase in section 179 expensing to $35,000
Y 100% deduction for the cost of medical insurance for
the self-employed
Y some permissible installment income calculations for
accrual basis taxpayers
Y clarified cash accounting rules for small business to
permit cash accounting without limitation
Y extension of the Work Opportunity Tax Credit through
June 30, 2004
Y increase in the business meals deduction to 70% in
2001, and
Y increases in contributions to 401K and simplified
pension plans
Small Business Innovation Research Program.(59) This
program, which had its genesis at the National Science
Foundation (NSF) and was subsequently established as a
national program by an act of Congress, was strongly
supported by the first Chief Counsel of the Office of
Advocacy. The program represents a $1 billion annual
investment by major federal agencies such as the Department
of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, in small business high-tech innovative
research and development that benefits the work of federal
agencies. It is now a program overseen by SBA, but Advocacy
has remained involved from the very beginning because of the
program's importance to small high-tech companies.
However, despite the program's major successes and
despite several GAO reports confirming its benefits to the
government, the program inexplicably repeatedly comes under
attack. SBA and Advocacy have been vigilant in identifying
flaws in arguments posed by the program's opponents. With
the changeover in administrations and the possible loss of
institutional knowledge, the program is likely to come under
attack again. Any weakening or the demise of the program
would be a significant loss to small business and to the
Government, which is the direct beneficiary of the R&D
performed for it by these high-tech SBIR award winners.
Re-authorization of the program is currently pending in
Congress.
Bankruptcy Reform. Reform legislation that was pending
failed to pass this Congress. It will likely return in the
next session. (See supra p. 23 for discussion of this
issue.) The issue will then be whether the protections for
small business worked out in this congressional session will
survive in the next session of the Congress.
Administrative Issues
ACE-Net. As explained earlier, ACE-Net was never
intended to be a permanent federal program. An independent
non-profit ACE-Net, Inc., has been formed and is in the
process of receiving funding from organizations and
foundations supporting small business and entrepreneurship.
Over 97 percent of the operating cost of ACE-Net is
currently being borne by the local Network Operators and
they have voting control of the management of the system.
The only federal funding for ACE-Net is in support of
the Internet site management at the University of New
Hampshire, Whittemore School of Business and Economics,
which will end on November 30, 2001. At that time, the
program will be entirely independent of the federal
government.
State Conference. Three state conferences have been
convened by the Office of Advocacy under the current Chief
Counsel in December of 1995, 1998, and 1999. In addition
there was a reunion in 1996 of the delegates to the WHCSB to
review the status of implementing the conference's 60
recommendations. No conferences were planned for 1996 or
2000 (election years) to avoid any appearance of
partisanship. In all, 15 such conferences have been held
since establishment of the Office of Advocacy.
These conferences have been an effective vehicle for
showcasing innovations at the state and local level that
help small business. The issue is whether to have a
conference in 2001, or, more realistically, in 2002 or 2003.
Organizing such a conference involves a significant amount
of advance work by Advocacy's regional staff to identify new
state and local small business innovations that would be the
focus of the conference and around which the conference
would be organized.
Ombudsman. When SBREFA established the Ombudsman
position, the question was raised as to who should be the
Ombudsman. The question could re-surface in the future. A
memorandum outlining the pros and cons on who should serve
as Ombudsman is contained in Appendix R.
Advocacy's Current Budget. Advocacy does not have a
line item in SBA's budget for its entire budget that
includes salaries and expenses. Therefore, its budget and
staffing are driven by SBA's support and budget constraints.
Advocacy, therefore, can only do as much or as little as the
budget allows.
In brief, Advocacy has three major budgetary issues.
They are: (1) the number of staff Advocacy can have on
board (currently 49,(60) including any personnel detailed to
Advocacy from other agencies or under the Intergovernmental
Personnel Act (IPAs)); (2) travel funds; and (3) the amount
of money available for research.
Over the years, Advocacy's personnel ceiling has
declined dramatically (see Appendix S), despite increases in
the Office's statutory responsibilities. By the same token,
staff productivity has increased dramatically because staff
has increased its expertise in their issue areas. However,
there is lingering concern that major issues may be going un-
addressed. Thus far, staff has been able to avoid any major
omissions in its regulatory review.
Travel remains an issue in order to have adequate funds
to allow Advocacy's regional staff to develop, nurture and
maintain small business contacts in all 50 states.
As for economic research, there was a period of time
when there was no separate line item for Advocacy research
in the SBA budget. In both FY 97 and 98, the SBA
Administrator re-programmed $700,000 to Advocacy from
discretionary funds. A line item for research in the amount
of $800,000 was re-established by Congress in the FY 1999
SBA budget. In FY 2000, the research line item was
$1,091,000. The Conference Report on SBA's FY 2002 budget
recommends $1,100,000 for Advocacy research. As this
document is being written, SBA is developing its FY 2002
budget request for submission to OMB. Advocacy is
requesting $2.5 million for economic research.
RFP Process. Advocacy's efforts to award research
contracts have been somewhat thwarted by inefficiencies in
the RFP process. For example, SBA continues to require
paper (hard copy) communications throughout the process. It
does not allow for Internet or e-mail correspondence. This
has resulted in delays, despite efforts by Advocacy to get
the RFPs out in a timely fashion. Work on Advocacy's
outside research, therefore, should begin as soon as budget
approval is received to avoid unnecessary delays. More
important, distribution of RFP information should coincide
with the academic calendar so that qualified professors and
graduate students could bid as independent researchers and
complete contract work during the summer months.
THE NEW ECONOMY
"Information is Power" - Anon.
Introduction
Seven years ago, when the current Chief Counsel took
office, it was clear that major changes were underway in the
economy that could alter its very structure - changes as
significant as those wrought by the Industrial Revolution.
Computers were becoming omnipresent, space technology was
generating commercially viable products, communications
technology was innovating faster than the market could
arguably handle, and information-based services were
multiplying and demand for them increasing. While it was
not clear exactly how these forces would alter the economic
landscape, it was clear that the phenomena warranted
attention. This was necessary to ensure, not only that
small business would benefit from the new technology, but
that small business' role in the development of what is
being called "The New Economy" would be protected to
maintain U. S. leadership in this important sector.
Advocacy Initiatives
1995 White House Conference on Small Business. The
WHCSB provided a major opportunity to address technology
issues. Significant efforts were made to ensure
participation in the conference by high tech firms and these
efforts were successful. Two important technology
recommendations were supported by all the delegates and were
included in the conference's 60 recommendations. Almost all
of the issues contained in the recommendations have been
addressed by policymakers.
U.S. Business Advisor. Very early, Advocacy decided to
work on an initiative with SBA officials and others involved
with the National Performance Review program (NPR), to
develop the U.S. Business Advisor. This is an Internet-
based user-friendly program designed to answer questions
business might ask about government programs, regulations
and services. The program provides information about
regulations with which businesses must comply and how to
contact regulatory agencies. It is a one-stop regulatory
information service. The program and all of its
participants received a "Hammer Award" from NPR. It can be
viewed on the Internet at www.business.gov.
ACE-Net and PRO-Net. Earlier in this paper these
Internet-based programs were discussed in the context of
public policy. Here they are being cited for their
utilization of technology, which involves a combination of
custom-designed interfaces and standard "off-the-shelf"
software databases and Internet tools to create new small
business services. They expand and facilitate the exchange
of information on two important issues - equity investment
needs and procurement opportunities. They are typical of
how government can use computer technology to improve the
flow of information, thereby making markets more efficient.
More information on these services is available on the
Internet at www.ace-net.org and www.pro-net.sba.gov.
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
The Office of Advocacy worked closely with the U.S. Economic
Classification Policy Committee and the Bureau of Economic
Analysis to ensure that the new classification system (to
replace the SICs) was structured so that data on emerging
technology industries could be collected - data that would
be essential to sound public policy decisions by Congress
and the Executive Branch.
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small
Business Technology Transfer Research (STTR) Programs. The
Office of Advocacy has supported the SBIR program since it
was signed into law in 1983. Congress mandated that
agencies, with extramural R&D budgets in excess of $100
million, such as the Department of Defense (DOD) and the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), set
aside 2.5% of these budgets for awards to small high
technology firms. The total federal investment amounts to
$1 billion per year to stimulate research by small firms.
The SBIR is not a give-way program; it is not a
"special treatment" program for small business. Proposals
are subject to peer review and the projects funded must
advance and enrich the R&D research mandates of the specific
agencies making the awards. Congress correctly recognized
that small businesses are major product innovators and that
the government should take advantage of their creativity.
Congress' objective for these programs has been validated by
the success of the SBIR and STTR programs and the research
performed by the 50,000 companies that have received awards
or contracts during the programs' five year existence.
To increase the visibility of the program and to
promote networking among SBIR award winners, an award
program was established by the Office of Advocacy in the
name of the individual who was responsible for initiating
the program at the NSF, before the SBIR program was
institutionalized by act of Congress - Roland Tibbetts.
Senior members of the Administration have hosted Tibbetts
award winners at events at the White House, and senior
Senators and Representatives have hosted receptions and
meeting at the Capitol. The award program itself has now
become institutionalized within SBA on an annual basis.
Patent and Intellectual Property Reform. The American
Investors Protection Act of 1999 was enacted November 29,
1999, and includes a number of provisions specifically
developed by the Office of Advocacy in cooperation with
small business high tech trade associations and inventor's
groups. Provisions include, among others: (1) certainty of
patent term; (2) limitations on pre-publication of
applications before grant of patent; (3) limitations on
patent re-examinations; and (4) improved definitions on
"prior use" rights.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Product Approvals.
Studies conducted at the University of California San Diego
(UCSD) indicated that delays in product approvals after
completion of clinical trials did not result from lack of
scientific data, but from internal management processes.
Through the intervention of the Chief Counsel, the UCSD
researchers presented their findings to the FDA Commissioner
in the summer of 2000. It is not yet clear what corrective
actions will be taken by FDA.
Internet Domain Names. ICANN is the private non-profit
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which
has been charged by the Department of Commerce to administer
the technical management of the Internet on a worldwide
basis. Its task is monumental, particularly given the speed
of technological development and use of the Internet by
millions of businesses on a global scale.
Advocacy has become concerned that small business
issues are not being addressed adequately; that procedures
of ICANN might inhibit small business participation in the
corporation's policy deliberations; and, in some instances,
the corporation is not taking enough time to consider the
ramifications of its decisions on small firms. In defense
of ICANN, fast action is needed on technical policies, and
ICANN's budget is very small given the responsibilities
assigned to it. Therefore, in addition to commenting on
ICANN proposals, Advocacy has initiated efforts to inform
the small business community, dependent on or developing
products/services for the Internet, about the importance of
their involvement. A new web site has been developed on
Advocacy's home page to keep small businesses informed of
the actions of ICANN and other Federal agencies that affect
e-commerce.
Finally, Advocacy has been developing information on
small business' role in the New Economy. (See Appendix G
for related research.) It seems clear, just from media
accounts alone, that small businesses have been driving much
of the technological development of the Internet and related
telecommunications products and services, some firms even
becoming large businesses in the process, e.g., Qualcomm.
As for users of the Internet, Advocacy's research(61)
estimates that 85% of small firms will be conducting
business over the Internet by the year 2002. Business-to-
business e-commerce, while still a small aspect of this new
economy, is growing rapidly; some project a compound annual
growth rate of 41 percent over the next five years. It is
unclear which small business sectors will benefit most from
these trends - and which will face new barriers to
competition.
As high-tech innovators, it is estimated that in 1997
there were 231,000 establishments in computer programming,
data processing and other computer-related service
industries. This is more than three times greater than the
Census Bureau's reported number of these establishments in
1994. They contributed $134 billion to the GDP and small
firms dominated the industry. (See Appendix T for
additional data.)
Related to this growth is the large number of
scientists and engineers employed by small firms which has
grown steadily as large businesses downsized and reduced
their investments in corporate research laboratories. The
most recent data from NSF shows that small businesses now
employ more degreed scientists and engineers than large
businesses, and more than the universities and federal labs
combined.(62)
Conclusion
The only certainty about the New Economy is that it
will bring change. And that change will involve new and
unforeseen regulatory issues in a variety of federal
agencies. Efforts need to continue to forecast the future
of small business as was done for the 1995 WHCSB with
publication of the Third Millennium, updated in 1999. New
predictions need to be developed in the context of the New
Economy. This will be one way to provide a voice in
Washington for the high tech industry, which thus far has
largely been the role played by the Office of Advocacy,
providing the industry early warning signals about
initiatives affecting them.
Clearly, small business has a major stake in the New
Economy. The public policy issues are numerous and thorny.
Significant debate has already started on some of them:
Y Taxation of goods and services sold over the Internet
Y Privacy
Y Fraud and identity theft
Y Patent reform
Y Copyright and trademark protection
Y New top level domain name development
Y Abusive domain name registration
Y Encryption controls
Y Exportation of e-commerce goods
Y Unsolicited e-mail
Y Network integrity and security
Y Uniformity of law - federal, state, and international
Y The digital divide
Y Privacy and insurance issues for genetic testing
Y Extended patent life for medical products that involve
long clinical trials
Even the most expert cannot predict where the New
Economy will take us. The
road is strewn with speed bumps, as well as opportunities
for small business. It is fair to conclude that New Economy
issues will preoccupy the Office of Advocacy for some time
to come.
CONCLUSION
"Historical Information is Prologue" - Anon.
Advocacy as an Independent Entity within SBA
This paper would be incomplete without a discussion of
the relationship between the SBA Administrator and the Chief
Counsel. The relationship influences the overall
effectiveness of the Office of Advocacy, largely because
Advocacy's budget is part of SBA's budget. If that
relationship is solid, the Administrator can reinforce
Advocacy's message in cabinet meetings. Small business is
then the beneficiary.
SBA's Strategic Plan. Being a voice for small business
is one of the goals of SBA's most recent strategic plan.
Advocacy is that "voice" since its role is to be a voice for
small business on the cutting edge of policy deliberations
spanning the entire federal government. By contrast, the
bulk of SBA's mission is to develop and implement programs
that address market imperfections in financial markets. It
does not have the staff or the expertise to address the wide
range of policy issues that come within the purview of the
Office of Advocacy. However, the two roles cross when the
SBA Administrator sits in cabinet meetings discussing small
business policy.
Advocacy's Independence. The tension that tends to
exist is created by Advocacy's stature as an independent
entity within SBA. Advocacy and the SBA Administrator can
be partners/advocates on small business policy issues that
transcend SBA's programs until the White House formalizes a
position. At that point, the Administrator must speak for
the Administration while the Chief Counsel can speak
independently and has done so when it served small business
interests. (See Appendix D) How that tension is addressed
by the SBA Administrator is key to whether or not the
working relationship is productive. Also key is the respect
each shows for the role of the other. But, while this
unique relationship could cause some tension, Advocacy has
thus far found that the tension can be managed
constructively. More importantly, the tension is a small
price to pay for being part of the Administration, thus
ensuring that Advocacy has early access to policy makers at
the highest levels within the Executive Branch. Early
access provides the best opportunity for the Chief Counsel
to influence policy decisions affecting small business.
History is Prologue
What has been reported here is what has transpired
during the administration of the current Chief Counsel (1994-
2000) to track and document the contributions made by small
business to the economy and to ensure that public policy
does not erect barriers to competition. As long as
preserving competition remains a national goal, the answer
to the question "Are small firms important?" will always
need to be up-dated in the context of what is currently
occurring in the economy.
The work and projects undertaken during the past seven
years built upon the experiences of the Office's earlier
activities. That earlier experience was reviewed in a
special edition of the Small Business Advocate on the
occasion of the Office's 20th Anniversary in 1996. That
issue of the Advocate is included in Appendix U.
We trust that the material contained herein has been
enlightening and that it suggests ways to increase the
impact of the Office of Advocacy.
ENDNOTES
1. Zoltan J. Acs, Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and
Impact (Kluwer Academe Publishers Group 1999).
2. Id.
3. 15 U.S.C. 631(a) (Declaration of Policy).
4. Id. 634(a) et seq.
5. Id.
6. The Regulatory Flexibility Act, Pub. L. No. 96-354, 94
Stat. 1164 (codified at 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), became law
on September 19, 1980.
7. The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 857 (codified at 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), became law on March 29, 1996.
8. 15 U.S.C. 634b.
9. Id.
10. One such issue was whether courts could review agency
compliance with the RFA during appeals from regulations.
The issue first arose after enactment of the RFA in 1980 and
was finally resolved with enactment of SBREFA in 1996 which
authorized courts to review agency compliance with the RFA.
11. Having the SBA Administrator as a member of the Cabinet
provides additional access to major policymakers in the
Executive Branch.
12. The State of Small Business - A Report of the President
is prepared annually by the Office of Advocacy. Since the
report is a report of the President, it goes through
complete review by Executive Branch agencies, often,
however, with inordinate delays. Copies of the latest
report are available in Advocacy's publication room.
13. 15 U.S.C. 634d(1).
14. Id. 634(b)-(c).
15. A complete list of economic research reports published
within the past 7 years, including reports on sponsored
research, can be found in Appendix G.
16. The Small Business Economic Policy Act of 1980, Pub. L.
No. 96-302 (1980).
17. Advocacy's data has been published in Entrepreneur and
Inc. magazines and in the New York Times, Los Angeles Times,
and Dallas Morning News.
18. The Impact of Contract Bundling on Small Business, FY
1992-FY 1999 (Eagle Eye Publishers 2000).
19. Federal Procurement from Small Firms: United States
Summary - National Ranking of Federal Procurement Centers on
their Procurement from Small Firms in FY 1998 (Office of
Advocacy 1999).
20. Alicia Robb, The Role of Race, Ethnicity, and
Discrimination on Business Survival (Office of Advocacy
forthcoming 2000); Brian Headd, Business Success: Factors
Leading to Surviving and Closing Successfully (Office of
Advocacy forthcoming 2000).
21. Mergers and Acquisitions in the United States: 1990-1994
(Office of Advocacy 1998).
22. Zoltan J. Acs, Catherine Armington, and Alicia Robb,
Measures of Job Flow Dynamics in the U.S. Economy (prepared
under contract with the Office of Advocacy 1999).
23. Using data from BITS, it has been estimated that 72% of
new information technology jobs came from firms with fewer
than 500 employees between 1992 and 1996. See Richard J.
Boden, Establishment Employment: Change and Survival, 1992-
1996 (prepared under contract with the Office of Advocacy
2000).
24. ACE-Net network operators contribute in kind to the
operations of the network.
25. See Appendix H for Chief Counsel's memorandum of
February 20, 1998, in which PRO-Net's potential is
discussed.
26. Thomas D. Hopkins, Profiles of Regulatory Costs
(prepared under contract with the Office of Advocacy 1995).
27. 5 U.S.C. 609(b).
28. Henry R. Beale, Impacts of Federal Regulations,
Paperwork, and Tax Requirements on Small Business
(Microeconomic Applications 1998).
29. See Pending Issues section of this document for
additional discussion of pending research.
30. 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
31. Id. (Congressional Findings and Declaration of Purpose).
32. Id. (b)
33. Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 857 (codified at 5 U.S.C.
601 et seq. (1996)).
34. See discussion infra p. 52.
35. The RFA, enacted in 1980, gave the Chief Counsel
authority to file amicus curiae briefs. Subsequently,
there was some dispute over the scope of this authority.
SBREFA reaffirmed and clarified the Chief Counsel's
authority. See discussion infra under section "SBREFA and
Judicial Review" p. 31.
36. 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(3).
37. 5 U.S.C. 612(a).
38. Id. 609(b).
39. Under the Chief Counsel's Public Law hiring authority
(15 U.S.C. 634d), staff are hired under 12 month renewable
contracts.
40. Task order contracts increase Advocacy's flexibility in
addressing complex issues, avoiding the need to hire staff
with expertise in limited subject areas.
41. H.R. Rep. No. 49, 104th Cong., 1st Sess., pt. 1, at 4
(1995).
42. 5 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 1998).
43. In July 1999, EPA decided to withdraw the industrial
laundries water pollution regulation. Based on the EPA's
economic analysis, we estimate the savings to be $103
million annually. See press release on Advocacy's home page
at www.sba.gov/advo.
44. The number of comments does not include reports of the
Small Business Advocacy Review Panels or non-public
communications generated by Advocacy is pre-proposal
discussions with agencies, work that is significantly on the
increase.
45. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
is a private, non-profit organization that has been tasked
by the Department of Commerce with technical management of
the Internet and has significant influence over how
information is transmitted over the Internet. It also has
authority to determine domain name categories and
registration policies.
46. The U.S. Postal Service proposed a rule that would have
a significant impact on commercial mail receiving agencies.
The Service is not subject to the APA or the RFA. Advocacy
nevertheless critiqued the proposal because of its adverse
impact on small business and the lack of justification for
the rule's underlying rationale. See FY 1999 RFA Report.
47. Prior to 1998, Advocacy's impact was measured by
activities, such as the number of letters critiquing
regulatory proposals. These activity measures were an
imprecise measure of Advocacy's effectiveness. As a result,
in 1998, Advocacy switched to impact measures, namely the
savings achieved through changes made to regulatory
proposals that reduce the cost of compliance. These impact
measures will be somewhat more difficult to estimate in FY
2000 and will be even more difficult in years to come given
the increase in pre-proposal work by Advocacy, work that
results in changes prior to publication of rules for
comment. See FY 2000 RFA report for a discussion of this
issue.
48. The estimates for 1998 were developed by staff without
third party verification (unlike FY 1999 and FY 2000). The
estimates, in our opinion, are conservative.
49. Insights recorded in this publication have proven to be
remarkably accurate. The publication was updated in 1999
after another round of focus groups.
50. Building the Foundation for a New Century: Final Report
on Implementation of the Recommendations of the 1995 White
House Conference on Small Business (Office of Advocacy
2000).
51. This process used to take into account age and
experience of older employees when calculating fair
contribution levels for pension plans.
52. SBREFA panels have been discussed elsewhere in this
document. The point of discussing them here is to discuss
the impact small entities, wherever located in the U.S., can
and have had on public policy - how their input rationalizes
public policy.
53. Small Business Lending in Rural America (Office of
Advocacy 2000).
54. 773 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
55. 5 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 1998).
56. 173 F.3d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
57. 55 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (M.D. Fla. 1999).
58. Copies of the Issues Handbook distributed at the 1995
WHCSB can be found in Advocacy's publications room.
59. See infra p. 73 for additional discussion.
60. Congress included funds in the FY 2001 Department of
Agriculture budget for 2 additional positions within the
Office of Advocacy.
61. Small Business Expansions in Electronic Commerce (Office
of Advocacy 2000).
62. National Science Foundation, Division of Science
Resources Studies, Will Small Business Become the Nation's
Leading Employer of Graduates with Bachelor's Degrees in
Science and Engineering?, NSF 99-322, Project Officers, John
Tsapogas and Lawrence M. Rausch; Mary Collins, (Westat
1999).
| en |
markdown | 910216 | # Presentation: 910216
## Slide 1
## Hiram Maxim - 1894
- Hiram Maxim - 1894
- 6000 pound aircraft , 2 steam engines, 18 foot props
## Otto Lilienthal
- Otto Lilienthal
- Years of Glider Experiments
- Killed in glider accident
- 1897
## Slide 4
## Slide 5
## Slide 6
## Slide 7
## Slide 8
## Slide 9
## Slide 10
## Slide 11
## Slide 12
## Slide 13
## Slide 14
## Slide 15
## Slide 16
## Slide 17
## Slide 18
## Slide 19
## Slide 20
## Slide 21
## Slide 22
## Slide 23
## Slide 24
## Slide 25
| en |
converted_docs | 061882 | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ## redberry juniper {#redberry-juniper .Title-Header} |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| *Juniperus pinchotii* Sudw. |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Plant Symbol = JUPI |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Contributed by: USDA NRCS National Plant Data Center
### Alternate Names{width="2.884027777777778in" height="4.116666666666666in"}
Pinchot's juniper
##### Uses
*Ethnobotanic*: The Comanche used Pinchot's juniper as a treatment for
headaches, vertigo, and ghost sickness. For these ailments the Comanche
would sprinkle dried leaves over hot coals and inhale the smoke. The
Comanche also used an extract of the dried and pulverized roots of
Pinchot's juniper for menstrual problems.
##### Status
Please consult the PLANTS Web site and your State Department of Natural
Resources for this plant's current status (e.g. threatened or endangered
species, state noxious status, and wetland indicator values).
##### Description
######## General: Cypress Family (Cupressaceae). Pinchot's juniper grows to be a shrub or small tree, reaching a maximum height of 6 meters. Multiple stems coming from the base of the tree form a dense clump. The bark is thin and ashy-gray colored with longitudinal fissures. The branches are rigid, with slender ascending tips. Pinchot's juniper has white sapwood and reddish-brown heartwood. The leaves on mature fruiting branches are triangular-ovate and pressed together in groups of two or three (1.5-2.5 mm long). The leaf margins are serrated with teeth that point forward. The fruits are variable in size, ranging in color from reddish to copper-brown. Each fruit has either one or two seeds. The seeds are 5 mm long, have a broad oval shape, and are chestnut brown in color.
*Distribution*: For current distribution, please consult the Plant
Profile page for this species on the PLANTS Web site.
*Habitat*: Found on open flats, dry hills, in arroyos, and in canyons.
##### Adaptation
Low to moderate intensity fires will kill seedlings and saplings. Mature
trees, will resprout after top-kill by fire if soil is protecting the
basal bud zone. Once top-killed, mature trees require 3-50 years to
attain pre-fire height.
##### Establishment
Pinchot's juniper requires two years of above average precipitation for
seedling establishment. The optimal soil temperature for germination is
64 degrees Fahrenheit. Reproduction also occurs from resprouting of
already established plants. Following injury or top removal, Pinchot's
juniper will resprout from the base of the stem.
##### Management
Fire has been successfully used to prevent the encroachment of Pinchot's
juniper on rangeland. For further information regarding the use of fire
to manage the tree consult your local land management agency.
##### Pests and Potential Problems
Grown in its native habitat and using local seed stock, Pinchot's
juniper should not be prone to debilitating pests.
### Cultivars, Improved and Selected Materials (and area of origin)
Contact your local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) office for more information. Look in the phone
book under "United States Government." The Natural Resources
Conservation Service will be listed under the subheading "Department of
Agriculture."
##### References
Correl, D.S. & M.C. Johnston 1970. *Manual of the vascular plants of
Texas*. Texas Research Foundation, Renner, Texas. 1881 pp.
Great Plains Flora Association 1986. *Flora of the Great Plains.*
University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. 1392 pp.
Jones, D.E. 1968. *Comanche plant medicine*. Papers in Anthropology
9:1-13.
McPherson, G.R. & H.A. Wright 1997. *Factors affecting reproductive
maturity of redberry juniper* (*Juniperus pinchotii*). Forest Ecology
and Management 21:191-196.
Moerman, D.E. 1998. *Native American ethnobotany*. Timber Press,
Portland, Oregon. 927 pp.
Moerman, D.E. 1999. *Native American ethnobotany database: Foods, drugs,
dyes and fibers of native North American peoples*. The University of
Michigan-Dearborn, Michigan. <http://www.umd.umich.edu/cgi-bin/herb>.
Texas A&M University 2002. *Native trees of Texas*. Department of
Horticulture, College Station, Texas.
\<http://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/ornamentals/natives/indexscientific.htm\>.
Accessed: 30May2002.
United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 2001. *Fire
effects information system*. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire
Science Laboratory, Boise, ID.
<http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/junpin/index.html>
##### Prepared By:
##### *Matthew D. Hurteau*
##### Formerly USDA, NRCS, National Plant Data Center, c/o Environmental Horticulture Department, University of California, Davis, California
##### Species Coordinator:
##### *M. Kat Anderson*
##### USDA, NRCS, National Plant Data Center, c/o Plant Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, California
##### Edited: 30May2002 jsp; 21may03 ahv; 060801 jsp
For more information about this and other plants, please contact your
local NRCS field office or Conservation District, and visit the PLANTS
Web site\<[http://plants.usda.gov](http://plants.usda.gov/)\> or the
Plant Materials Program Web site
\<[http://Plant-Materials.nrcs.usda.gov](http://Plant-Materials.nrcs.usda.gov/)\>
*The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in
all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national
origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual
orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases
apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille,
large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA\'s [TARGET
Center](http://www.usda.gov/oo/target.htm) at 202-720-2600 (voice and
TDD).*
*To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence
Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice or
TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.*
*Read about [Civil Rights at the Natural Resources Convervation
Service](http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/about/civilrights/).*
| en |
log-files | 845807 | ! Started logfile: J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_uvs.log on Fri Dec 14 17:21:38 2007
obs J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_uva.fits
! Reading UV FITS file: J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_uva.fits
! AN table 1: 54 integrations on 190 of 190 possible baselines.
! AN table 2: 134 integrations on 190 of 190 possible baselines.
! Apparent sampling: 0.26327 visibilities/baseline/integration-bin.
! *** This seems a bit low - see "help observe" on the binwid argument.
! Found source: J1159+2914
!
! There are 4 IFs, and a total of 4 channels:
!
! IF Channel Frequency Freq offset Number of Overall IF
! origin at origin per channel channels bandwidth
! ------------------------------------------------------------- (Hz)
! 01 1 8.40997e+09 8e+06 1 8e+06
! 02 2 8.47997e+09 8e+06 1 8e+06
! 03 3 8.79497e+09 8e+06 1 8e+06
! 04 4 8.89997e+09 8e+06 1 8e+06
!
! Polarization(s): RR
!
! Read 2418 lines of history.
!
! Reading 37616 visibilities.
select I
! Polarization I is unavailable.
! Selecting polarization: RR, channels: 1..4
! Reading IF 1 channels: 1..1
! Reading IF 2 channels: 2..2
! Reading IF 3 channels: 3..3
! Reading IF 4 channels: 4..4
print "field_size =",field_size
! field_size = 256
print "field_cell =",field_cell
! field_cell = 0.2
print "taper_size =",taper_size
! taper_size = 70
![@muppet J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus]
integer clean_niter
clean_niter = 100
float clean_gain
clean_gain = 0.03
float dynam
dynam = 6.0
float soltime1
soltime1 = 120
float soltime2
soltime2 = 20
float thresh
thresh = 0.5
float win_mult
win_mult = 1.8
float time_av
time_av = 16
float old_peak
float new_peak
float flux_cutoff
mapsize field_size, field_cell
! Map grid = 256x256 pixels with 0.200x0.200 milli-arcsec cellsize.
startmod
! Applying default point source starting model.
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 1 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 1 components and 1 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
! A total of 738 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 1.
! A total of 1340 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 2.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
! A total of 738 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 1.
! A total of 1340 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
! A total of 738 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 1.
! A total of 1340 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 2.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
! A total of 738 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 1.
! A total of 1340 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 2.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=1.623751Jy sigma=0.014544
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.737944Jy sigma=0.007192
! clrmod: Cleared the established, tentative and continuum models.
! Redundant starting model cleared.
uvw 2,-1
! Uniform weighting binwidth: 2 (pixels).
! Gridding weights will be scaled by errors raised to the power -1.
! Radial weighting is not currently selected.
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.365% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=0.5158 mas, bmaj=0.9512 mas, bpa=-4.245 degrees
! Estimated noise=837.215 mJy/beam.
repeat
if (peak(flux) > flux_cutoff) peakwin win_mult
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
selfcal
new_peak = peak(flux)
until(new_peak<=flux_cutoff)
! Added new window around map position (0, 0).
! clean: niter=100 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 1.25002 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 1.54531 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 100 components = 1.54531 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.045192 max=0.122011 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000961 rms=0.013999 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.54531 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 5 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 5 components and 1.54531 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.340406Jy sigma=0.002982
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.340341Jy sigma=0.002981
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.365% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! clean: niter=100 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.135716 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.208554 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 100 components = 0.208554 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.029018 max=0.053539 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000434 rms=0.009512 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.75387 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 6 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 7 components and 1.75387 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.274694Jy sigma=0.002071
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.274691Jy sigma=0.002071
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.365% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
print "************** FINISHED UNIFORM WEIGHTING CLEAN **************"
! ************** FINISHED UNIFORM WEIGHTING CLEAN **************
!
uvw 0,-1
! Uniform weighting is not currently selected.
! Gridding weights will be scaled by errors raised to the power -1.
! Radial weighting is not currently selected.
win_mult = win_mult * 1.6
clean_niter = clean_niter * 2
dynam = dynam - 0.5
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.365% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=0.6421 mas, bmaj=1.262 mas, bpa=-6.091 degrees
! Estimated noise=415.759 mJy/beam.
repeat
if (peak(flux) > flux_cutoff) peakwin win_mult
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
selfcal
new_peak = peak(flux)
until(new_peak<=flux_cutoff)
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.0547327 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.0797658 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.0911475 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.0934093 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.0934093 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.020213 max=0.030252 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.001731 rms=0.006769 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.84728 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 19 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 19 components and 1.84728 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.267121Jy sigma=0.001922
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.267039Jy sigma=0.001921
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.365% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
print "************** FINISHED NATURAL WEIGHTING CLEAN **************"
! ************** FINISHED NATURAL WEIGHTING CLEAN **************
!
gscale true
! Performing overall amplitude self-cal
!
! Correcting IF 1.
! A total of 3 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 1.
! Telescope amplitude corrections in sub-array 1:
! BR 1.00 FD 0.98 GC 0.96 HH 1.00*
! HN 1.00* KK 0.93 KP 1.02 LA 1.04
! MC 1.00* MK 0.97 NY 1.01 ON 1.00*
! OV 0.99 PT 1.03 SC 1.00* TS 0.98
! WF 1.00* WZ 1.00* GN 2.13 NL 1.06
!
! A total of 15 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 2.
! Telescope amplitude corrections in sub-array 2:
! BR 0.98 FD 1.01 GC 1.02 HH 1.00*
! HN 0.93 KK 1.00* KP 1.01 LA 1.00
! MC 0.99 MK 1.00* NY 1.00 ON 1.01
! OV 1.03 PT 0.99 SC 1.04 TS 1.00*
! WF 1.01 WZ 1.00 GN 1.01 NL 0.98
!
!
! Correcting IF 2.
! A total of 3 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 1.
! Telescope amplitude corrections in sub-array 1:
! BR 0.98 FD 0.99 GC 0.91 HH 1.00*
! HN 1.00* KK 0.93 KP 0.97 LA 1.04
! MC 1.00* MK 0.98 NY 1.01 ON 1.00*
! OV 1.00 PT 1.02 SC 1.00* TS 0.97
! WF 1.00* WZ 1.00* GN 2.37 NL 1.02
!
! A total of 15 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 2.
! Telescope amplitude corrections in sub-array 2:
! BR 0.98 FD 1.01 GC 0.97 HH 1.00*
! HN 0.92 KK 1.00* KP 0.96 LA 0.99
! MC 0.99 MK 1.00* NY 0.99 ON 1.01
! OV 1.03 PT 0.97 SC 0.99 TS 1.00*
! WF 1.01 WZ 0.99 GN 1.00 NL 0.98
!
!
! Correcting IF 3.
! A total of 3 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 1.
! Telescope amplitude corrections in sub-array 1:
! BR 0.96 FD 0.99 GC 0.94 HH 1.00*
! HN 1.00* KK 0.93 KP 0.99 LA 1.04
! MC 1.00* MK 0.97 NY 0.99 ON 1.00*
! OV 0.98 PT 1.01 SC 1.00* TS 0.98
! WF 1.00* WZ 1.00* GN 2.20 NL 1.03
!
! A total of 15 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 2.
! Telescope amplitude corrections in sub-array 2:
! BR 0.95 FD 1.01 GC 1.00 HH 1.00*
! HN 0.93 KK 1.00* KP 0.98 LA 0.99
! MC 0.97 MK 1.00* NY 0.96 ON 1.02
! OV 1.02 PT 0.98 SC 1.00 TS 1.00*
! WF 1.02 WZ 1.01 GN 1.01 NL 0.98
!
!
! Correcting IF 4.
! A total of 3 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 1.
! Telescope amplitude corrections in sub-array 1:
! BR 0.98 FD 0.98 GC 0.94 HH 1.00*
! HN 1.00* KK 0.92 KP 0.97 LA 1.05
! MC 1.00* MK 0.94 NY 1.04 ON 1.00*
! OV 0.99 PT 1.00 SC 1.00* TS 0.98
! WF 1.00* WZ 1.00* GN 2.62 NL 1.05
!
! A total of 15 telescope corrections were flagged in sub-array 2.
! Telescope amplitude corrections in sub-array 2:
! BR 0.98 FD 1.01 GC 1.01 HH 1.00*
! HN 0.93 KK 1.00* KP 0.96 LA 0.99
! MC 1.00 MK 1.00* NY 1.01 ON 1.02
! OV 1.02 PT 0.98 SC 0.99 TS 1.00*
! WF 1.00 WZ 1.00 GN 1.00 NL 0.98
!
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.267039Jy sigma=0.001921
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.210951Jy sigma=0.001319
dynam = dynam - 0.5
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=0.6423 mas, bmaj=1.266 mas, bpa=-5.856 degrees
! Estimated noise=415.942 mJy/beam.
repeat
if (peak(flux) > flux_cutoff) peakwin win_mult
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
selfcal
new_peak = peak(flux)
until(new_peak<=flux_cutoff)
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.00566016 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.00549145 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.00534663 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.00534884 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.00534884 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.006631 max=0.016022 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.001250 rms=0.003404 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.85263 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 10 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 25 components and 1.85263 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.210498Jy sigma=0.001314
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.210666Jy sigma=0.001314
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
selfcal true, true, soltime1
! Performing amp+phase self-cal over 120 minute time intervals
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.210666Jy sigma=0.001314
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.210232Jy sigma=0.001313
dynam = dynam - 0.75
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=0.6408 mas, bmaj=1.267 mas, bpa=-5.839 degrees
! Estimated noise=416.295 mJy/beam.
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.00464881 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.00466092 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.00453954 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.00454448 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.00454448 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.006597 max=0.016014 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.001248 rms=0.003372 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.85717 Jy
selfcal
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 12 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 27 components and 1.85717 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.209931Jy sigma=0.001310
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.209910Jy sigma=0.001310
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
repeat
if (peak(flux) > flux_cutoff) peakwin win_mult
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
selfcal
new_peak = peak(flux)
until(new_peak<=flux_cutoff)
! Added new window around map position (3.2, 5.6).
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.0154291 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.0245564 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.0307044 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.0350018 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.0350018 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.005008 max=0.009423 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000794 rms=0.002140 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.89217 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 19 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 44 components and 1.89217 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.208916Jy sigma=0.001288
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.208849Jy sigma=0.001287
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Added new window around map position (-0.4, 5.8).
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.0100552 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.0157154 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.019514 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.0224644 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.0224644 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.004771 max=0.008272 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000507 rms=0.001700 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.91464 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 29 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 68 components and 1.91464 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.208410Jy sigma=0.001279
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.208384Jy sigma=0.001278
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Added new window around map position (-2, 11.6).
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.00640422 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.00871772 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.0102246 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.0109416 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.0109416 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.004699 max=0.006135 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000348 rms=0.001589 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.92558 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 25 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 84 components and 1.92558 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.208135Jy sigma=0.001275
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.208112Jy sigma=0.001275
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
selfcal true, true, soltime2
! Performing amp+phase self-cal over 20 minute time intervals
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.208112Jy sigma=0.001275
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.207350Jy sigma=0.001273
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=0.6392 mas, bmaj=1.268 mas, bpa=-5.819 degrees
! Estimated noise=416.26 mJy/beam.
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.00360735 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.00524199 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.00621889 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.00666126 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.00666126 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.004260 max=0.005665 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000288 rms=0.001486 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.93224 Jy
selfcal
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 24 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 92 components and 1.93224 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.207173Jy sigma=0.001271
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.207165Jy sigma=0.001271
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
repeat
if (peak(flux) > flux_cutoff) peakwin win_mult
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
selfcal
new_peak = peak(flux)
until(new_peak<=flux_cutoff)
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.000771783 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.00108188 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.00145056 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.00172868 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.00172868 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.004172 max=0.005487 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000266 rms=0.001458 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.93397 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 27 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 94 components and 1.93397 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.207103Jy sigma=0.001270
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.207098Jy sigma=0.001270
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
uvtaper 0.3,taper_size
! Gaussian taper: value 0.3 at UV radius = 70 mega-wavelengths.
win_mult = win_mult * 1.2
selfcal true, true, soltime2
! Performing amp+phase self-cal over 20 minute time intervals
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.207098Jy sigma=0.001270
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.206822Jy sigma=0.001270
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=2.566 mas, bmaj=2.808 mas, bpa=40.84 degrees
! Estimated noise=532.353 mJy/beam.
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.00555269 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.00895419 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.010407 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.0105673 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.0105673 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.006294 max=0.007005 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000458 rms=0.002650 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.94454 Jy
selfcal
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 18 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 107 components and 1.94454 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.206765Jy sigma=0.001269
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.206753Jy sigma=0.001269
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
repeat
if (peak(flux) > flux_cutoff) peakwin win_mult
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
selfcal
new_peak = peak(flux)
until(new_peak<=flux_cutoff)
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.00107668 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.00136732 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.00149957 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.00156408 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.00156408 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.005935 max=0.006865 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000419 rms=0.002628 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.9461 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 18 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 108 components and 1.9461 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.206762Jy sigma=0.001269
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.206759Jy sigma=0.001269
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
uvtaper 0,0
! No UV-taper is currently set.
win_mult = win_mult / 1.2
print "************** FINISHED AMPLITUDE SELF-CAL **************"
! ************** FINISHED AMPLITUDE SELF-CAL **************
restore
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=0.6382 mas, bmaj=1.269 mas, bpa=-5.807 degrees
! Estimated noise=416.452 mJy/beam.
! restore: Substituting estimate of restoring beam from last 'invert'.
! Restoring with beam: 0.6382 x 1.269 at -5.807 degrees (North through East)
! Clean map min=-0.0034792 max=1.6792 Jy/beam
if(peak(flux) > thresh)
selfcal true, true
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
selfcal
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
repeat
if (peak(flux) > flux_cutoff) peakwin win_mult
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
selfcal
new_peak = peak(flux)
until(new_peak<=flux_cutoff)
selfcal true, true
end if
! Performing amp+phase self-cal
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.206759Jy sigma=0.001269
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.198403Jy sigma=0.001185
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=0.638 mas, bmaj=1.269 mas, bpa=-5.79 degrees
! Estimated noise=416.718 mJy/beam.
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.00137433 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.000840138 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.000197458 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = -0.000171318 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = -0.000171318 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.003587 max=0.005072 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000177 rms=0.001282 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.94593 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 22 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 117 components and 1.94593 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.198293Jy sigma=0.001184
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.198292Jy sigma=0.001184
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = -0.000202658 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = -0.000534864 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = -0.00072157 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = -0.000781048 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = -0.000781048 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.003595 max=0.004928 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000188 rms=0.001273 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.94515 Jy
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 26 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 122 components and 1.94515 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.198240Jy sigma=0.001184
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.198239Jy sigma=0.001184
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Performing amp+phase self-cal
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.198239Jy sigma=0.001184
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.198126Jy sigma=0.001183
print "************** CLEARING MODEL AND STARTING OVER **********"
! ************** CLEARING MODEL AND STARTING OVER **********
clrmod true
! clrmod: Cleared the established and tentative models.
uvw 2,-1
! Uniform weighting binwidth: 2 (pixels).
! Gridding weights will be scaled by errors raised to the power -1.
! Radial weighting is not currently selected.
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=0.5132 mas, bmaj=0.9573 mas, bpa=-3.542 degrees
! Estimated noise=875.6 mJy/beam.
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 1.25602 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 1.54844 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 1.67691 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 1.74473 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 1.74473 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.014642 max=0.033090 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000499 rms=0.003932 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.74473 Jy
uvw 0,-1
! Uniform weighting is not currently selected.
! Gridding weights will be scaled by errors raised to the power -1.
! Radial weighting is not currently selected.
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
! Adding 8 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 8 components and 1.74473 Jy
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=0.6374 mas, bmaj=1.269 mas, bpa=-5.777 degrees
! Estimated noise=416.87 mJy/beam.
repeat
if (peak(flux) > flux_cutoff) peakwin win_mult
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
keep
new_peak = peak(flux)
until(new_peak<=flux_cutoff)
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.0627677 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.0930024 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.11254 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.127492 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.127492 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.005869 max=0.011322 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.001160 rms=0.002967 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.87222 Jy
! Adding 38 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 41 components and 1.87222 Jy
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
uvtaper 0.3,taper_size
! Gaussian taper: value 0.3 at UV radius = 70 mega-wavelengths.
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=2.567 mas, bmaj=2.81 mas, bpa=41.07 degrees
! Estimated noise=533.283 mJy/beam.
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.0244023 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.0403194 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.0514023 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.0593881 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.0593881 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.007357 max=0.007150 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.001002 rms=0.003196 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.93161 Jy
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
repeat
if (peak(flux) > flux_cutoff) peakwin win_mult
clean clean_niter,clean_gain
flux_cutoff = imstat(rms) * dynam
keep
new_peak = peak(flux)
until(new_peak<=flux_cutoff)
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.0059614 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.0104371 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.0138151 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.0161905 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = 0.0161905 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.006835 max=0.006692 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000419 rms=0.002665 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.9478 Jy
! Adding 61 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 93 components and 1.9478 Jy
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
uvtaper 0,0
! No UV-taper is currently set.
clean
! Inverting map and beam
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! Estimated beam: bmin=0.6374 mas, bmaj=1.269 mas, bpa=-5.777 degrees
! Estimated noise=416.87 mJy/beam.
! clean: niter=200 gain=0.03 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.00030552 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = -0.000486487 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = -0.000169942 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = -1.56053e-05 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 200 components = -1.56053e-05 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.004505 max=0.005555 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000165 rms=0.001380 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.94778 Jy
selfcal
! Performing phase self-cal
! Adding 20 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 105 components and 1.94778 Jy
!
! Correcting IF 1.
!
! Correcting IF 2.
!
! Correcting IF 3.
!
! Correcting IF 4.
!
! Fit before self-cal, rms=0.199088Jy sigma=0.001189
! Fit after self-cal, rms=0.199029Jy sigma=0.001189
wmodel J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_map.mod
! Writing 105 model components to file: J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_map.mod
wobs J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_uvs.fits
! Writing UV FITS file: J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_uvs.fits
wwins J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_map.win
! wwins: Wrote 4 windows to J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_map.win
x = (field_size-8) * field_cell / 4
addwin -x,x,-x,x
clean (field_size*4),0.01
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! clean: niter=1024 gain=0.01 cutoff=0
! Component: 050 - total flux cleaned = 0.00225853 Jy
! Component: 100 - total flux cleaned = 0.00349442 Jy
! Component: 150 - total flux cleaned = 0.00442295 Jy
! Component: 200 - total flux cleaned = 0.00538164 Jy
! Component: 250 - total flux cleaned = 0.00630209 Jy
! Component: 300 - total flux cleaned = 0.00691559 Jy
! Component: 350 - total flux cleaned = 0.00744425 Jy
! Component: 400 - total flux cleaned = 0.00795793 Jy
! Component: 450 - total flux cleaned = 0.00845804 Jy
! Component: 500 - total flux cleaned = 0.00894458 Jy
! Component: 550 - total flux cleaned = 0.00930106 Jy
! Component: 600 - total flux cleaned = 0.00970909 Jy
! Component: 650 - total flux cleaned = 0.00999478 Jy
! Component: 700 - total flux cleaned = 0.0103315 Jy
! Component: 750 - total flux cleaned = 0.0106064 Jy
! Component: 800 - total flux cleaned = 0.0108772 Jy
! Component: 850 - total flux cleaned = 0.0111441 Jy
! Component: 900 - total flux cleaned = 0.0114589 Jy
! Component: 950 - total flux cleaned = 0.0116658 Jy
! Component: 1000 - total flux cleaned = 0.0118191 Jy
! Total flux subtracted in 1024 components = 0.0119202 Jy
! Clean residual min=-0.002777 max=0.002521 Jy/beam
! Clean residual mean=0.000060 rms=0.000984 Jy/beam
! Combined flux in latest and established models = 1.9597 Jy
keep
! Adding 72 model components to the UV plane model.
! The established model now contains 176 components and 1.9597 Jy
![Exited script file: muppet]
wmap "J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus\_map.fits"
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
! restore: Substituting estimate of restoring beam from last 'invert'.
! Restoring with beam: 0.6374 x 1.269 at -5.777 degrees (North through East)
! Clean map min=-0.0029345 max=1.6816 Jy/beam
! Writing clean map to FITS file: J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_map.fits
float peak_flux
peak_flux = peak(flux,max)
print "The peak flux is",peak_flux
! The peak flux is 1.6816
invert
! Inverting map
! Your choice of large map pixels excluded 0.366% of the data.
! The x-axis pixel size should ideally be below 0.1957 milli-arcsec
float image_rms
image_rms = imstat(rms)
print "The final image rms is",image_rms
! The final image rms is 0.000981013
device "J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus\_map.eps/VPS"
! Attempting to open device: 'J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_map.eps/VPS'
loglevs 100*3*image_rms/peak_flux
! The new contour levels are:
! -0.175014 0.175014 0.350028 0.700057 1.40011 2.80023 5.60045 11.2009 22.4018 44.8036 89.6073
print "clev=",int(3*image_rms*10000)/10000
! clev= 0.0029
print "peak=",int(1000*peak_flux)/1000
! peak= 1.681
mapcolor none
! Mapplot colormap: none, contrast: 1 brightness: 0.5.
mapplot cln
! restore: Substituting estimate of restoring beam from last 'invert'.
! Restoring with beam: 0.6374 x 1.269 at -5.777 degrees (North through East)
! Clean map min=-0.0029345 max=1.6816 Jy/beam
mapcolor color, 0.9
! Mapplot colormap: rainbow, contrast: 0.9 brightness: 0.5.
device "J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus\_map.gif/vgif"
! Attempting to open device: 'J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_map.gif/vgif'
mapplot cln
quit
! Quitting program
! Log file J1159+2914_X_1999_12_20_pus_uvs.log closed on Fri Dec 14 17:21:49 2007
| en |
all-txt-docs | 057793 | RD Instruction 1951-0
Table of Contents
Page 1
PART 1951 - SERVICING AND COLLECTIONS
Subpart O - Servicing Cases Where Unauthorized Loan(s) or Other Financial
Assistance Was Received--Community and Insured Business Programs
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sec. Page
1951.701 Purpose. 1
1951.702 Definitions. 1
1951.703 Policy. 2
1951.704 - 1951.705 [Reserved] 2
1951.706 Initial determination that unauthorized 2
assistance was received.
1951.707 Determination of the amount of unauthorized
assistance. 4
(a) Unauthorized loan amount. 4
(b) Unauthorized grant amount. 4
1951.708 Notification to recipient. 4
1951.709 Decision on servicing actions. 6
(a) Payment in full. 6
(b) Continuation with recipient. 7
(c) Appeals. 7
(d) Liquidation of loan(s) or legal action
to enforce collection. 7
1951.710 [Reserved] 9
1951.711 Servicing options in lieu of liquidation or legal
action to collect. 9
(a) Continuation on modified terms. 10
(b) Continuation on existing terms. 11
1951.712 - 1951.714 [Reserved] 11
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-0
Table of Contents
Page 2
Sec. Page
1951.715 Account adjustments. 11
(a) Entire loan unauthorized. 12
(b) Portion of loan unauthorized. 12
(c) Unauthorized subsidy benefits received. 13
(d) Liquidation pending. 13
(e) Liquidation not initiated. 13
(f) Unauthorized grant assistance. 13
(g) Delinquent accounts. 14
1951.716 Reporting requirements to National Office. 14
1951.717 Exception Authority. 14
1951.718 1951.750 [Reserved] 14
Attachments: Exhibits A and B
oOo
RD Instruction 1951-O
PART 1951 - SERVICING AND COLLECTIONS
Subpart O - Servicing Cases Where Unauthorized Loan(s) or Other Financial
Assistance Was Received--Community and Insured Business
Programs
1951.701 Purpose.
This subpart prescribes the policies and procedures for servicing Community and Business Program loans and/or grants made by Rural Development when it is determined that the borrower or grantee was not eligible for all or part of the financial assistance received in the form of a loan, grant, or subsidy granted, or any other direct financial assistance. It does not apply to guaranteed loans. Loans sold without insurance by Rural Development to the private sector will be serviced in the private sector and will not be serviced under this subpart. The provisions of this subpart are not applicable to such loans. Future changes to this subpart will not be made applicable to such loans. This subpart does not apply to Water and Waste Programs of the Rural Utilities Service, Watershed loans, and Resource Conservation and Development loans, which are serviced under part 1782 of this title. (Revised 10-29-07, SPECIAL PN.)
1951.702 Definitions.
As used in this subpart, the following definitions apply:
Active borrower. A borrower who has an outstanding account in the records of the office of the Deputy Chief Financial Officer (DCFO), including collection-only or an unsatisfied account balance where a voluntary conveyance was accepted without release from liability or foreclosure did not satisfy the indebtedness.
Assistance. Financial assistance in the form of a loan, grant, or subsidy received.
Debt instrument. Used as a collective term to include promissory note, assumption agreement, grant agreement, or bond.
False information. Information, known to be incorrect, provided with the intent to obtain benefits which would not have been obtainable based on correct information.
_____________________________________________________________________________
DISTRIBUTION: WSAL Account Servicing
Servicing and Collections
1
(Revision 1)
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.702 (Con.)
Inaccurate information. Incorrect information provided inadvertently without intent to obtain benefits fraudulently.
Inactive borrower. A former borrower whose loan(s) has (have) been paid in full or assumed by another party(ies) and who does not have an outstanding account in the records of the DCFO.
Recipient. "Recipient" refers to an individual or entity that received a loan, or portion of a loan, an interest subsidy, a grant, or a portion of a grant which was unauthorized.
Rural Development. A mission area within the U.S. Department of Agriculture consisting of the Office of the Under Secretary for Rural Development, Office of Community Development, Rural Business-Cooperative Service, Rural Housing Service and Rural Utilities Service and their successors.
Servicing official. For Community Programs, the servicing official is the Rural Development Manager, the Assistant Rural Development Manager, or the Rural Development Specialist so designated. For Business Programs, the servicing official is the State Director or Designee.
Unauthorized assistance. Any loan, interest subsidy, grant, or portion thereof received by a recipient for which there was no regulatory authorization or for which the recipient was not eligible. Interest subsidy includes subsidy benefits received because a loan was closed at a lower interest rate than that to which the recipient was entitled, whether the incorrect interest rate was selected erroneously by the approval official, or the documents were prepared in error.
1951.703 Policy.
When unauthorized assistance has been received, an expeditious effort must be made to collect from the recipient the sum which is determined to be unauthorized, regardless of amount.
1951.704 - 1951.705 [Reserved]
1951.706 Initial determination that unauthorized assistance was received.
Unauthorized assistance may be identified through audits conducted by the USDA Office of the Inspector General (OIG); through reviews made by Rural Development personnel; or through other means such as information provided by a private citizen who documents that unauthorized assistance has been received by a recipient of Rural Development assistance.
2
(Revision 1)
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.706 (Con.)
If the servicing official has reason to believe unauthorized assistance as received, but is unable to determine whether or not the assistance was in fact unauthorized, the case file including the advice of the Regional Office of the General Counsel (OGC) will be referred to the National Office for review and comment.
In every case where it is known or believed by Rural Development that the assistance was based on false information, investigation by the OIG will be requested. (See RD Instruction 2012-A in the case of audits and Instruction 2012-B in the case of investigations.)
If OIG conducts an audit or investigation, the notification actions outlined in
1951.708 will be deferred until the OIG investigation is completed and the report is received by the Agency.
For each recommendation identified in an OIG audit report that is associated with the recovery of a monetary amount, the demand letter as prescribed in 1951.708 of this subpart must be sent to the recipient within 30 days of the date of the audit report. A copy of the demand letter(s) will be needed to be received by OIG in order to meet the requirements of Appendix A of DR 1720-1 and to reach a management decision on a course of action. In essence, the final OIG report is issued, and within 30 days the demand letter must be sent to the recipient, OIG and DCFO. This allows DCFO 30 days to process the demand letter and establish an account receivable on the Agency's accounting records. This process will allow for reaching a management decision within 60 days of report issuance as contemplated in Departmental Regulations.
In all cases, the reason(s) for the unauthorized assistance being received by the recipient will be well documented in the case file, and will specifically state whether it was due to:
(1) Submission of inaccurate information by the recipient;
(2) Submission of false information by the recipient;
(3) Submission of inaccurate or false information by another authorized party acting on the recipient's behalf including professional consultants such as engineers, architects, and attorneys, when the recipient did not know the other party had submitted inaccurate or false information;
3
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.706 (Con.)
(4) Error by Rural Development personnel, either in making computations or failure to follow published regulations or other Agency issuances; or
(5) Error in preparation of a debt instrument which caused a loan to be closed at an interest rate lower than the correct rate in effect when the loan was approved.
1951.707 Determination of the amount of unauthorized assistance.
(a) Unauthorized loan amount. The unauthorized loan amount will be the unauthorized principal plus any interest accruing on the unauthorized principal at the note interest rate until the date paid unless otherwise agreed to in writing by Rural Development.
(b) Unauthorized grant amount. The unauthorized grant amount is the amount actually expended under the grant agreement plus interest accrued beginning on the date of the demand letter at the interest rate stipulated in the respective executed grant agreement for default cases until the date paid unless otherwise agreed in writing by Rural Development.
Interest would ordinarily accrue beginning on the date of the demand letter unless the demand letter specifies another date for the onset of interest accrual. For example, the demand letter may state the recipient may avoid accrued charges if the stated demand amount is received by Rural Development by a specified date. Accrual of amounts owed are unaffected by the suspension of the obligation to pay in the event of an extension pursuant to 1951.708(b).
1951.708 Notification to recipient.
(a) Upon determination that unauthorized assistance was received, Rural Development will send a demand letter to the recipient that:
(1) specifies the amount of unauthorized assistance, including any accrued interest to be repaid, and the standards for imposing accrued interest;
(2) states the amount of penalties and administrative costs to be paid, the standards for imposing them and the date on which they will begin to accrue;
4
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.708(a) (Con.)
(3) provides detailed reason(s) why the assistance was determined to be unauthorized;
(4) states the amount is immediately due and payable to Rural Development;
(5) describes the rights the recipient has for seeking review of Rural Development's determination pursuant to 7 CFR Part 11;
(6) describes the Agency's available remedies regarding enforced collection, including referral of debt delinquent more than 180 days for Federal salary, benefit and tax offset under the Department of Treasury Offset Program (TOP); and
(7) provides an opportunity for the recipient to meet with Rural Development and to provide to Rural Development facts, figures, written records or other information which might refute Rural Development's determination.
(b) If the recipient meets with Rural Development, Rural Development will outline to the recipient why the assistance was determined to be unauthorized. The recipient will be given an opportunity to provide information to refute Rural Development's findings. When requested by the recipient, Rural Development may grant additional time for the recipient to assemble documentation. Such extension of time for payment will be valid only if Rural Development documents the extension in writing and specifies the period in days during which period the payment obligation created by the demand letter (but not the ongoing accrual of interest) will be suspended. Interest and other charges will continue to accrue pursuant to the initial demand letter during any extension period unless the terms of the demand letter are modified in writing by Rural Development.
(c) Unless Rural Development modifies the original demand, it will remain in full force and effect.
Copies of all correspondence between Rural Development and the recipient pursuant to this section must be relayed to the DCFO, and the Direct Loan and Grant Branch (DLGB), Mail Stop FC 340.
5
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.708(c) (Con.)
The demand letter substantially similar to Exhibit A must be sent at the earliest practicable time (sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested). Note that 1951.706(d) indicates that the timing of this letter should coincide with the issuance of the OIG report to the Agency in cases where OIG is conducting an investigation. In all other cases, the Agency should send this demand letter when it makes its initial determination, with a copy to the State Director, and for a case identified in an OIG audit report, a copy to the OIG office which conducted the audit, and the Financial Management Division of the National Office. In cases where unauthorized grant assistance was identified, a copy of the letter will also be sent to the DCFO, DLGB, Mail Stop FC 340.
When a recipient is granted additional time to provide information to refute Rural Development's findings, the servicing official must document support in the file for the decision to grant an extension for time to respond. Accruals are independent of and not affected by the suspension of the payment obligation created by the demand letter. Interest will continue to accrue during the extension period.
Where the unauthorized assistance is not a direct loan, an account receivable should be established at the time the demand letter is sent, the terms of which correspond to the terms of the demand letter.
1951.709 Decision on servicing actions.
When the servicing official is the same individual who approved the unauthorized assistance, the next-higher supervisory official must review the case before further actions are taken by the servicing official. Determinations pursuant to 1951.709(b) and 1951.711(b) may only be made by the Administrator.
The Agency must timely pursue liquidation or other legal action in the absence of Administrator-approved alternatives.
(a) Payment in full. If the recipient agrees with Rural Development's determination or will pay the amount in question, Rural Development may allow a reasonable period of time (usually not to exceed 90 days) for the recipient to arrange for repayment. The amount due will be determined according to 1951.707.
The servicing official will remit collections according to the Forms Manual Insert (FMI) for Form RD 451-2, "Schedule of Remittances," with a copy of the notification letter as prescribed in Exhibit A. Note that accruals continue to run until the payoff date.
6
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.709 (Con.)
(b) Continuation with recipient. If the recipient agrees with Rural Development's determination or is willing to pay the amount in question but cannot repay the unauthorized assistance within a reasonable period of time, continuation is authorized and servicing actions outlined in
1951.711 will be taken provided all of the following conditions are met:
(1) The recipient did not provide false information as defined in
1951.702;
(2) It would be highly inequitable to require prompt repayment of the unauthorized assistance; and
(3) Failure to collect the unauthorized assistance in full will not adversely affect Rural Development's financial interests.
The servicing official must document support in the file for the determination that the required conditions for continuing with the recipient have been met. Until and unless repayment terms pursuant to a continuation arrangement have been agreed to in writing by the Agency and the recipient, or are otherwise precluded by appeal proceedings, the Agency may not cease efforts to pursue liquidation and collection.
Note that determinations under this paragraph may only be made by the Administrator, including what constitutes a reasonable repayment period, per 1951.709 above.
(c) Appeals. Appeals resulting from the letter prescribed in
1951.708 will be handled according to 7 CFR Part 11. All appeal provisions will be concluded before proceeding with further actions.
In the event the recipient does not pursue an appeal within prescribed time frames, withdraws its appeal, or is not successful in its appeal, the servicing official will document the case file accordingly and proceed to service the case in accordance with the applicable sections of this regulation.
(d) Liquidation of loan(s) or legal action to enforce collection. When a case cannot be handled according to the provisions of paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section, or if the recipient refuses to execute the documents necessary to establish an obligation to repay the unauthorized assistance as provided in 1951.711 of this subpart, one of the following actions will be taken:
7
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.709(d) (Cont.)
(1) Active borrower with a secured loan.
(i) Rural Development will attempt to have the recipient liquidate voluntarily. If the recipient does not agree to voluntary liquidation, or agrees but it cannot be accomplished within a reasonable period of time (usually not more than 90 days), forced liquidation action will be initiated in accordance with applicable provisions of subpart A of part 1955 of this chapter unless:
(A) The amount of unauthorized assistance outstanding, including principal, accrued interest, and any recoverable costs charged to the account, is less than $1,000; or
(B) It would not be in the best financial interest of the Government to force liquidation. If the servicing official wishes to make an exception to forced liquidation on this basis, a request for an exception in accordance with 1951.717 of this subpart may be made.
If the recipient agrees to liquidate voluntarily, this will be documented in the case file. Where real property is involved, a letter will be prepared by the servicing official and signed by the recipient agreeing to voluntary liquidation. A resolution of the governing body may be required.
(ii) When all of the conditions of paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section are met, but the recipient does not repay or refuses to execute documents to effect necessary account adjustments according to the provisions of 1951.711, forced liquidation action will be initiated as provided in paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section.
(iii) When forced liquidation would be initiated except that the loan is being handled in accordance with paragraph (d)(1)(i)(A) or (d)(l)(i)(B) of this section, continuation with the loan on existing terms may be provided. (In these cases, the recipient will be notified by letter of the actions taken.)
(iv) If the debt is not otherwise resolved, Rural Development will take appropriate debt collection actions in accordance with 7 C.F.R. part 3, subparts B and C, and the Federal Claims Collection Standards at 31 C.F.R. parts 900-904.
8
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.709 (d)(2) (Cont.)
No additional notice to the recipient of a transfer to U.S. Treasury for TOPS or cross servicing is required, however, this transfer should not be made earlier than 60 days after the date of the demand letter.
(2) Grantee, inactive borrower, or active borrower with unsecured loan (such as collection-only, or unsatisfied balance after liquidation). Rural Development may pursue all reasonable legal remedies. The servicing official will document the facts in the case file and submit it to the State Director, if the servicing official is other than the State Director, who will request the advice of the OGC on pursuing legal action to effect collection.
The case file, the recommendation of the State Director and OGC comments will be forwarded to the National Office for review and authorization to implement recommended servicing actions. The State Director will tell OGC what assets, if any, are available from which to collect.
The account receivable that is established pursuant to 1951.708 is a claim for purposes of the Debt Collection Improvement Act and is subject to transfer to U.S. Treasury for collection when it is 180 days past due. It is USDA policy to send out a 60 day notice letter advising the recipient that the claim will be transferred, but the 60 day notice letter is not legally required if the initial demand letter is in the form of Exhibit A to these instructions. It is the practice of the St. Louis office to consult with the state office on the timing of this 60 day notice; the system is not programmed to automatically send this letter out for these account receivables.
1951.710 [Reserved]
1951.711 Servicing options in lieu of liquidation or legal action to collect.
When the conditions outlined in 1951.709(a) or (b) of this subpart are met, the servicing options outlined in this section will be considered. Accounts will be serviced according to this section. (See 1951.715 as well.)
In the event the receivable is fully paid, a letter acknowledging that the demand letter has been satisfied may be sent by Rural Development to the recipient.
9
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.711 (Con.)
(a) Continuation on modified terms. When the recipient has the legal and financial capabilities, the case will be serviced according to one of the following, as appropriate.
In each instance, the servicing official will advise the DCFO by memorandum of the actions necessary to effect the account adjustment in accordance with 1951.715 below.
(1) Unauthorized loan. A loan for the unauthorized amount determined according to 1951.707(a) will remain accelerated per the demand letter sent in accordance with 1951.708 unless modified terms are timely reached with the recipient, and accrue at the interest rate specified in the outstanding debt instrument or at the present market interest rate, whichever is greater, for the respective Community and Business program area. The loan will be amortized per a repayment schedule satisfactory to Rural Development but in no event may the revised repayment schedule exceed a period of fifteen (15) years, the remaining term of the original loan, or the remaining useful life of the facility, whichever is shorter.
(2) Unauthorized grant. The unauthorized grant amount determined according to 1951.707(b) will be converted to a loan at the market interest rate for the respective Community and Business program area in effect on the date the financial assistance was provided. In all cases, the receivable will be amortized per a repayment schedule satisfactory to Rural Development but in no event may the amortization period exceed fifteen (15) years. The recipient will be required to execute a debt instrument to evidence this receivable, and the best security position practicable in a manner which will adequately protect Rural Developments interest during the repayment period will be taken as security.
For rural business program grants, the interest rate charged on the receivable will be fixed at the 26-week Treasury Bill rate in effect as of the date the recipient was originally notified of the unauthorized assistance as provided in 1951.708. For community facilities program grants, the interest rate will be the market rate in effect for community facilities program loans as of the date the recipient was originally notified of the unauthorized assistance as outlined in
1951.708.
(3) Unauthorized subsidy benefits received. When the recipient was eligible for the loan but should have been charged a higher interest rate than that in the debt instrument, which resulted in the receipt of unauthorized subsidy benefits, the case will be handled as follows:
10
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.711 (a)(3) (Con.)
(i) the recipient will be given the option to submit a written request that the interest rate be adjusted to the lower of the rate for which they were eligible that was in effect at the date of loan approval or loan closing (See Exhibit B for interest rates); and
(ii) any accrued unauthorized subsidy will be handled in accordance with 1951.709.
Rural Development servicing officials will make a concerted effort to collect all unauthorized subsidy benefits from the recipient and will contact the OGC in each case for advice in accomplishing corrective actions.
(b) Continuation on existing terms. When the recipient does not have the legal and/or financial capabilities for the options outlined in paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this section, the recipient may be allowed to continue to meet the loan obligations outlined in the existing loan instruments. Rural Development will not continue with unauthorized grants on existing terms.
For cases of unauthorized grants, where the final determination is made that liquidation or legal action to enforce collection will not be pursued, or servicing options will not be pursued, the servicing official will advise the DCFO, DLGB, Mail Stop FC 340, by memorandum, of this determination. The DCFO will use this notification to remove the accounts receivable from the financial records that was established by the original letter of notification submitted in accordance with
1951.708 of this subpart.
Note that determinations under this paragraph may only be made by the Administrator according to 1951.709.
1951.712 1951.716 [Reserved]
1951.715 Account adjustments.
Cases of unauthorized assistance which require DCFO notification and action will be submitted to the DCFO, DLGB, Mail Stop FC 340, by memorandum from the servicing official, as provided in 1951.711.
11
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.715 (Con.)
(a) Entire loan unauthorized. When the entire loan is unauthorized because the recipient was not eligible or because the loan was approved for unauthorized purposes, the servicing official will advise the DCFO, DLGB, Mail Stop FC 340, by memorandum, which of the following servicing actions will be taken. Each memorandum should include account (borrower) name, case number, fund code, loan number, and an explanation of the actions to be taken.
(1) Repayment in full. If the recipient has arranged to repay the unauthorized loan in full through refinancing or other available resources, the payment will be remitted with Form RD 451-2, in accordance with 1951.709 (a). The schedule number assigned to Form RD 451-2 will be included in the memorandum.
(2) Continuation with loan on existing or modified terms. When it is determined, according to 1951.711(a)(1) or (b), that continuation with the loan or account receivable on existing or modified terms will be provided, the servicing official will advise the DCFO by memorandum of this determination and, if applicable, include an explanation of the modified terms.
(b) Portion of loan unauthorized. When only a portion of the loan has been determined to be for unauthorized purposes, the servicing official will advise the DCFO, DLGB, Mail Stop FC 340, by memorandum which of the following actions will be taken. Each memorandum should include account (borrower) name, case number, fund code, loan number, and an explanation of the actions to be taken.
(1) Repayment in full of unauthorized portion. If the recipient has arranged to repay the unauthorized portion of the loan through refinancing or other available resources, the remittance will be submitted with Form RD 451-2 in accordance with 1951.709(a). The schedule number assigned to Form RD 451-2 will be included in the memorandum.
(2) Continuation with unauthorized portion of loan on existing or modified terms. When it is determined, according to 1951.711 (a) (1) or (b), that continuation with the unauthorized portion of the loan on existing or modified terms will be provided, the servicing official will advise the DCFO, DLGB, Mail Stop FC 340, by memorandum of this determination, and, if applicable, include an explanation of the modified terms. The authorized portion will retain the original loan number with installments adjusted
12
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.715(b)(2) (Con.)
accordingly. Payments previously made will not be reversed and reapplied. The amortized unauthorized amount will be assigned the next available loan number. Installments for the authorized and unauthorized loans will be scheduled and paid concurrently. Failure to timely pay on one loan shall constitute a cross default for purposes of the other loan.
(c) Unauthorized subsidy benefits received. The unauthorized subsidy benefits received will be serviced according to 1951.711(a)(3) or (b).
(d) Liquidation pending. When liquidation is initiated under the provisions of this subpart, the servicing official will advise the DCFO, DLGB, Mail Stop FC 340, by memorandum, that an unauthorized assistance account is to be established. This account will be flagged "FAP" (Foreclosure Action Pending) or "CAP" (Court Action Pending), as applicable.
(e) Liquidation not initiated. Cases in which liquidation would normally be initiated, but where it is not because of the provisions
of 1951.709(d)(l), will be serviced in accordance with
1951.709(d)(l)(iii).
(f) Unauthorized grant assistance. A grant that is to be repaid will be serviced as follows:
(1) Rural business program grants. When it is determined that a rural business program grant is to be repaid according to
1951.711(a)(2), the servicing official will advise the DCFO, DLGB, Mail Stop, FC 340, by memorandum. The memorandum should include the account (borrower) name, address, phone number, address of the location of any security property (if applicable), tax ID/social security number, amount of receivable, effective date, interest rate, term of repayment to include repayment period, name and phone number of the servicing official, a copy of the original grant agreement and/or a copy of the debt instrument, and a copy of the OIG audit report of investigation, if applicable.
The DCFO will establish a receivable based on the repayment terms. The servicing official will collect all payments from the recipient and remit the payments to the Wholesale Lockbox in accordance with the FMI for Form RD451-2, and subpart B of part 1951. If provided for in the debt instrument, recipients that do not make their payments by the installment due date may be assessed late fees in the amount of 4 percent of the payment due. However, interest will not accrue on late fees.
13
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.715(f) (Con.)
(2) Community facilities program grants. When it is determined that a community facilities program grant is to be repaid according to
1951.711(a)(2), the servicing official will advise the DCFO, DLGB, Mail Stop FC 340, by memorandum. Each memorandum should include account (recipients) name, case number, amount of receivable, effective date, interest rate, term of repayment to include repayment period, a copy of the original grant agreement and/or a copy of the debt instrument. The DCFO will establish a receivable based on the repayment terms. The servicing official will collect all payments from the recipient and remit the payments to the Wholesale Lockbox in accordance with the FMI for Form RD 451-2, and subpart B of part 1951.
(g) Delinquent accounts. The organization maintaining the receivable will report delinquent receivables to the applicable servicing official for collection efforts. Delinquent receivables will be subject to referral under the TOP or Cross Servicing, as applicable, in accordance with subpart C of part 1951.
1951.716 Reporting requirements to National Office.
An annual report will be submitted by the State Office to the Deputy Administrators for each of the respective program areas within 30 days following the end of the Government's fiscal year for each case of unauthorized assistance or subsidy benefits. The report will include for each case the account name, case number, fund code, OIG audit number (if applicable), amount collected during period, and the balance owed on the unauthorized assistance. Each State Office is responsible for coordinating with the servicing official's office so that this information can be accumulated and consolidated by the State Office within the allotted time.
A negative report is required from States which have no unauthorized assistance cases.
1951.717 Exception authority.
The Administrator may, in individual cases, make an exception to any requirement or provision of this subpart, provided that any such exception is not inconsistent with any applicable law or opinion of the Comptroller General and provided further, the Administrator determines that application of the requirement or provision would adversely affect the Government's interest.
14
RD Instruction 1951-0
1951.717 (Con.)
Requests for exceptions must be made in writing by the State Director and submitted through the Deputy Administrator for Community Programs or Deputy Administrator for Business Programs, as applicable. Requests will be supported with documentation to explain the adverse effect on the Government's interest, propose alternative courses of action, and show how the adverse effect will be eliminated or minimized if the exception is granted.
1951.718 - 1951.750 [Reserved]
Attachments: Exhibits A and B
oOo
15
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-O
Exhibit A
[Purpose: This letter will be sent to demand repayment of unauthorized assistance from individual and entity debtors/grantees. Do not send this letter if the recipient has filed for protection under the Bankruptcy Code.]
Guide Letter to Recipients of Unauthorized Assistance
___ ___
|For audit cases, show: |
|Re: Audit report number |
|___ and Finding number ___|
(Recipient's Name and Address)
Dear ____________________________,
Rural Development has determined that you received unauthorized financial assistance in the form of a (loan, grant, subsidy) in the amount of $_________.
[Insert a paragraph briefly describing the circumstances under which the unauthorized assistance was extended, including any detailed reasons why the assistance was determined to be unauthorized. Include references to applicable regulations.]
Accordingly, the unauthorized assistance amount above is immediately due and payable to [Name of Agency. Please submit your check or money order payable to [Name of Agency] to our office at the following address for payment in full:
[Insert address where payment should be sent]
The unauthorized assistance amount will accrue interest from the date of this notice at the [note interest rate/interest rate stipulated in the grant agreement for default/interest rate agreed to in writing by Rural Development] rate of ___% until your date of payment. [note to agency: If none of these apply, the default rate is that established by Treasury annually in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 31 CFR 901.9] This standard for accruing interest is established by Rural Development regulation, 7 CFR 1951.707.
Beginning on the date of this notice, Rural Development will also assess administrative costs incurred for processing and handling the debt based on the actual cost to the agency in accordance with 31 CFR, section 901.9.
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-O
Exhibit A
Page 2
Interest and administrative costs will be waived on any portion of the debt paid within 30 days from the date of this notice.
If the debt is delinquent for more than 90 days, Rural Development will charge a penalty of ___% per year on the amount due in accordance with 31 CFR section 901.9. [note: the penalty fee may not exceed 6% and must be the same for all cases unless some distinction is established by regulation.] The charge will accrue from the date of this notice.
Debt Collection Actions
If this debt is not resolved through payment or use of Debtors Rights (listed below), Rural Development will begin collection actions. Rural Development will notify USDA agencies to collect the debt by administrative offset. Rural Development also must transfer debts delinquent for more than 180 days to the U.S. Department of Treasury (Treasury) for collection. Treasury will collect the debt by centralized administrative offset from the following Federal Government sources:
(1) Treasury Offset Program (TOP) (To obtain income tax refunds; contract or vendor payments; certain Federal benefit payments such as Social Security (other than Supplement Security Income), Railroad Retirement (other than tier 2), and Black Lung (part B) benefits; and other Federal payments including certain loans to you that are not exempt from offset.
(2) Federal salary pay, including military pay (through Treasurys centralized computer matching program, not to exceed 15 percent of disposable pay.)
(3) Federal retirement and disability fund, including military retirement pay (from the Office of Personnel Management, in most cases not to exceed 50 percent of the net annuity.)
Rural Development intends to enforce collection by referring the debt to the Department of Justice to initiate litigation if you fail to pay or otherwise resolve the debt.
Debtors Rights
(1) Meeting. We have scheduled an appointment at _______[AM/PM] on __[insert date SUGGESTED: within 15 calendar days of notice] for you to come into this office [specify address if different from where payment should be sent] to discuss the basis for Rural Developments claim. You may provide facts, figures, written records, or other information you have that might alter Rural Developments determination that the assistance you have received was unauthorized. Necessary servicing actions also will be discussed. If you are unable to keep
RD Instruction 1951-O
Exhibit A
Page 3
this appointment, please telephone this office at [insert telephone number] to change the appointment.
(2) File review. You may inspect and copy your Agency file regarding this debt. If you wish to review your Agency file, you must notify the Rural Development office below in writing within 20 calendar days from your receipt of this notice. In response, Rural Development will notify you regarding a time and place for your review. If you desire copies of any documents, one copy will be provided at our expense.
(3) Repayment agreement. At any time within 20 calendar days of your receipt of this notice, you may present a written agreement to repay the debt as an alternative to administrative offset. Your proposed repayment agreement must document your ability to pay the amount due within a short period of time.
(4) Appeal. You may appeal this determination directly to the National Appeals Division (NAD), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), pursuant to regulations published at 7 C.F.R. part 11 (copy attached). If you wish to appeal this decision, your written request for appeal must be postmarked no later than 30 calendar days from the date you received this notice. Send the request for appeal to the office of the Area Supervisor, NAD, [insert NAD address]. Your request for appeal must include a copy of this letter and a statement explaining why you think the notice is incorrect. A copy should be sent to this office. NAD will advise you of the time and place of any hearing and any procedural requirements. When you request appeal, there will be an immediate stay of administrative offset until a final NAD decision is issued.
Please do not delay in paying the amount due or exercising the debtors rights offered in this notice. No additional advance notice will be sent before referral of the debt to Treasury for collection. You should advise your local RD office if you or another person liable for this debt files bankruptcy.
[for individual recipients only]
The Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age (provided the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding contract); because all or part of the applicants income derives from any public assistance program; or because the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. The Federal agency that administers compliance with this law is the Federal Trade Commission, Equal Credit Opportunity, Washington, D.C. 20580.
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-O
Exhibit A
Page 4
USDA regulations prohibit discrimination in USDA programs because of your race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, marital status, familial status, sexual orientation, disability; or because all or part of your income derives from any public assistance program; or because you filed a program complaint, participated in any program complaint proceeding, or opposed a prohibited practice. If you believe you have been discriminated against for any of the reasons stated above, you may file a complaint with the Director, Office of Civil Rights, United States Department of Agriculture, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410.
Sincerely,
[to be signed by the servicing official]
Rural Development
United States Department of Agriculture
Attachment
[Attach a copy of 7 CFR part 11]
oOo
RD Instruction 1951-O
Exhibit B
Page 1
Effective Dates and Interest Rates
Community and Business Programs
COMMUNITY PROGRAMS
Rate in effect on January 1, 1977, and through September 30, 1981, was 5.00 percent.
Poverty Line Intermediate Market
Effective Date Rate (%) Rate (%) Rate (%)
October 1, 1981 5.0 ----- 12.250
January 1, 1982 5.0 ----- 11.375
April 1, 1982 5.0 ----- 12.375
July 1, 1982 5.0 ----- 11.625
July 9, 1982 5.0 8.375 11.625
October 1, 1982 5.0 7.875 10.625
January 1, 1983 5.0 7.375 9.750
April 1, 1983 5.0 7.125 9.125
October 1, 1983 5.0 7.250 9.500
April 1, 1984 5.0 7.250 9.625
July 1, 1984 5.0 7.750 10.500
October 1, 1984 5.0 7.500 10.000
April 1, 1985 5.0 7.250 9.500
July 1, 1985 5.0 6.750 8.625
October 1, 1985 5.0 7.000 9.000
January 1, 1986 5.0 6.625 8.375
April 1, 1986 5.0 6.125 7.125
July 1, 1986 5.0 6.375 7.625
October 1, 1986 5.0 6.000 6.875
January 1, 1987 5.0 5.875 6.625
April 1, 1987 5.0 5.750 6.500
July 1, 1987 5.0 6.500 7.875
January 1, 1988 5.0 6.375 7.750
April 1, 1988 5.0 6.125 7.375
July 1, 1988 5.0 6.375 7.750
January 1, 1989 5.0 6.250 7.500
April 1, 1989 5.0 6.250 7.375
July 1, 1989 5.0 6.000 7.125
October 1, 1989 5.0 6.000 7.000
April 1, 1990 5.0 6.000 7.125
October 1, 1990 5.0 6.125 7.250
January 1, 1991 5.0 6.000 7.000
April 1, 1991 5.0 5.875 6.750
July 1, 1991 5.0 5.875 6.875
October 1, 1991 5.0 5.875 6.750
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-0
Exhibit B
Page 2
Effective Dates and Interest Rates
Community and Business Programs
COMMUNITY PROGRAMS (CON.)
Poverty Line Intermediate Market
Effective Date Rate (%) Rate (%) Rate (%)
January 1, 1992 5.0 5.750 6.625
July 1, 1992 5.0 5.625 6.375
October 1, 1992 5.0 5.500 6.125
January 1, 1993 5.0 5.625 6.250
April 1, 1993 5.0 5.250 5.625
October 1, 1993 5.0 5.125 5.250
January 1, 1994 5.0 5.125 5.375
April 1, 1994 4.5 5.000 5.500
July 1, 1994 4.5 5.250 6.125
January 1, 1995 4.5 5.625 6.875
April 1, 1995 4.5 5.250 6.000
July 1, 1995 4.5 5.125 5.750
October 1, 1995 4.5 5.250 6.000
January 1, 1996 4.5 5.000 5.500
April 1, 1996 4.5 4.875 5.375
July 1, 1996 4.5 5.125 5.875
October 1, 1996 4.5 5.125 5.750
January 1, 1997 4.5 5.000 5.500
October 1, 1997 4.5 4.875 5.375
January 1, 1998 4.5 4.875 5.250
April 1, 1998 4.5 4.750 5.125
October 1, 1998 4.5 4.750 5.000
July 1, 1999 4.5 4.750 5.125
October 1, 1999 4.5 5.000 5.500
January 1, 2000 4.5 5.125 5.750
April 1, 2000 4.5 5.125 5.875
October 1, 2000 4.5 5.000 5.500
April 1, 2001 4.5 4.750 5.125
July 1, 2001 4.5 4.875 5.250
October 1, 2001 4.5 4.750 5.000
January 1, 2002 4.5 4.750 5.125
April 1, 2002 4.5 4.750 5.000
July 1, 2002 4.5 4.750 5.125
October 1, 2002 4.5 4.625 4.875
April 1, 2003 4.5 4.625 4.750
July 1, 2003 4.5 4.375 4.250
October 1, 2003 4.5 4.750 5.000
January 1, 2004 4.5 4.500 4.625
April 1, 2004 4.5 4.375 4.375
RD Instruction 1951-O
Exhibit B
Page 3
(Revision 6)
Effective Dates and Interest Rates
Community and Business Programs
COMMUNITY PROGRAMS (CON.)
Poverty Line Intermediate Market
Effective Date Rate (%) Rate (%) Rate (%)
April 1, 2004 4.5 4.375 4.375
July 1, 2004 4.5 4.750` 5.000
October 1, 2004 4.5 4.500 4.625
January 1, 2005 4.5 4.500 4.500
April 1, 2005 4.5 4.375 4.250
July 1, 2005 4.5 4.250 4.125
October 1, 2005 4.5 4.375 4.250
January 1, 2006 4.5 4.500 4.500
April 1, 2006 4.5 4.375 4.375
July 1, 2006 4.5 4.500 4.500
October 1, 2006 4.5 4.375 4.375
January 1, 2007 4.5 4.250 4.125
July 1,2007 4.5 4.375 4.250
October 1, 2007 4.5 4.500 4.500
January 1, 2008 4.5 4.375 4.375
April 1, 2008 4.5 4.625 4.750
July 1, 2008 4.5 4.500 4.500
January 1,2009 4.5 4.750 5.125
(03-30-07) SPECIAL PN
RD Instruction 1951-O
Exhibit B
Page 4
(Revision 6)
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY INSURED PROGRAM
Insured Rate (%) Used To
Effective Date Insured Rate (%) Finance Community Facilities
November 1, 1979 10.750 5.0
December 15, 1979 11.625 5.0
January 8, 1980 12.500 5.0
April 7, 1980 13.500 5.0
April 12, 1980 14.500 5.0
June 28, 1980 12.875 5.0
August 14, 1980 11.500 5.0
December 11, 1980 14.000 5.0
October 1, 1981 14.000 12.250
January 1, 1982 14.000 11.375
April 1, 1982 14.000 12.375
July 1, 1982 14.000 11.625
October 1, 1982 14.000 10.625
January 1, 1983 14.000 9.750
April 1, 1983 14.000 9.125
December 1, 1983 14.000 9.500
oOo
2
| en |
markdown | 185640 | # Presentation: 185640
- Martin Cooper, Los Alamos
- Co-spokesperson and Contract Project Manager
- for the EDM Project
- for presentation to
- The EDM Collaboration
- Oak Brook, IL
- June 6, 2007
- Collaboration Business
## Thank You
**Bob Golub**
## Outline
- Collaboration Business
- New institution vote
- DOE annual review
- NSF participation
- Budgetary information
- The Nuclear Physics Long Range Plan (Brad Filippone)
- The next collaboration meeting
- Coffee and Registration with Bob Golub
- The Path to CD-2
- R&D schedule
- Upgrading the schedule and work packages
- MOU
- CD-2/CD-3a steps
## Election of New Collaborating Institution
- Brown University
- George Seidel et al.
- Cryogenics consulting
- 4He Purification
- HV consulting
## DOE Annual Review
- From the DOE: Jehanne Simon-Gillo, Wlodek Guryn, Gene Henry, Eugene Colton
- From the NSF: Brad Keister
- Technical Advisors: Blas Cabrera (Stanford University), John Haines (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), Roy Holt (Argonne National Laboratory), John Wilkerson (University of Washington), and Barry Holstein (University of Massachusetts)
- From EDM: See Agenda
- Institutional Managers: Jack Shlachter, Susan Seestrom, Geoff Greene
- August 20-21, 2007 in Los Alamos – Maybe
- Martin would like a rehearsal the day before the review, which could be a Sunday
## Annual Review Draft Agenda
- Collaboration business
- Ongoing research summaries
- Individual research results
- Committee interactions
## Annual Review Draft Agenda
- Monday, August 20, 2007
- 8:00 -9:00 AM Executive session
- 9:00 -10:00 AM Project overview (Martin Cooper – 40 min.)
- 10:00 -10:30 AM Coffee
- 10:30 -11:00 AM Project Management (Kim Selvage – 20 min)
- 11:00 -11:30 AM Engineering in preparation for CD-2 (Jan Boissevain – 20 min.)
- 11:30 -12:15 PM R&D Progress I: Light collection, the dual-use cryostat, high voltage studies, SQUID signal from 3He, room temperature magnet prototypes (Martin Cooper – 30 min.)
- 12:15 -1:15 PM Working lunch
- 1:15 -2:00 PM R&D Progress II: Full valve tests, geometric phase, 4He evaporative purification, 3He injection (Paul Huffman – 30 min.)
## Annual Review Draft Agenda
- 2:00 -2:20 PM 3He relaxation (Haiyan Gao – 15 min.)
- 2:20 -3:00 PM 3He relaxation/bucket dewar tests (Steve Williamson – 30 min.)
- 3:00 -3:20 PM PMT operation at 4K (Hans Meyer – 15 min.)
- 3:20 -3:50 PM Coffee
- 3:50 -4:10 PM SQUID performance in a HV environment (Chen-Yu Liu – 15 min.)
- 4:10 -4:50 PM Electrode materials selection/neutron storage time (Takeyasu Ito – 30 min.)
- 4:50 -5:30 PM Slow controls/simulation plan (Jim Miller – 30 min.)
- 5:30 -5:50 PM Neutron Guide Design (Wolfgang Korsch – 15 min.)
- Prior to 8 PM Committee Dinner at Trinity Beverage Company
## Annual Review Draft Agenda
- Tuesday, August 21, 2007
- 8:00 -9:00 AM Executive session/meeting with LANL management
- 9:00 -10:00 AM Tour of the nEDM laboratory
- 10:00 -10:30 AM Coffee
- 10:30 -11:00 AM Interface with the FNPB and the SNS (Geoff Greene – 20 min.)
- 11:00 -11:30 AM Follow-up questions with collaboration leadership
- 11:30 -12:00 PM Executive session
- 12:00 -1:00 PM Working lunch
- 1:00 -2:30 PM Executive session
- 2:30 -3:00 PM Brief of findings to the collaboration
- Adjourn
## Writing Assignments
- We will provide written material to the committee in advance of the review
- If you are a speaker, you will provide a one page summary of your results that includes 0-2 figures to Martin by July 23, 2007
- If you are responsible for ongoing work presented by Martin or Paul, you will provide a 1-2 paragraph summary of your status to whomever is speaking about it by July 9, 2007. Paul will collate his 4 topics and give his material to Martin by July 23, 2007.
- Martin will produce a uniform document and circulate it to the executive committee for comment by August 6, 2007. The executive committee will make their comments by August 9, 2007.
- Martin will circulate the document to the review committee by August 13, 2007.
- All presentations must be turned in by August 13 for posting and printing
## NSF Participation
- The NSF will likely be a funding partner to DOE for about $6-7M
- The NSF wants a proposal by September 30, 2007
- I recommend that the principal editors be Brad Filippone and Doug Beck
- I recommend that they be the proposal PI
- They will be strongly supported by Martin Cooper and Kim Selvage to make the proposal consistent with the general project plan
- Each of the other NSF PI should supply material to the principal editors as requested
## NSF Participation
- Terms of participation are to be negotiated
- One possible solution
- Each year, funds to go directly to the NSF institutions as determined by the proposal PI with consultation from the contractor project manager, Martin Cooper
- The NSF institutions have their own scope and must deliver it for the funds they get from the NSF – overruns are the responsibility of the NSF
- NSF institutions are still responsible to Martin Cooper for the quality of their work
- NSF institutions are still responsible to Martin Cooper for meeting the overall project schedule and milestones
## NSF Participation
- Open Issues
- What is the NSF scope?
- Does it include new scope that recently has moved to a NSF institution, e.g. the electronics and software subsystem that is now at Boston University?
- Does it include the work of DOE institutions that report to NSF institutions, e.g. Duke working on the 3He services that are managed by Illinois?
- Can it include engineering at DOE Universities?
- What budget profile will be supported by the NSF, especially in 2010?
- Who will own the property?
## Budgetary Information
- Received $430k from DOE as OPC for R&D
- $370k distributed or in the works
- $60k is contingency – $10k is for the 3He tri-coil can
- LANL funds are very tight as the dual-use cryostat costs climb – asking for more
- Received $770k from DOE as capital for engineering
- ~$500k is being distributed according to the engineering plan
- ~$270k is being held as contingency and for project office
- Received $130k from the NSF for R&D and engineering
- Promised $70k from the NSF for engineering
- Total is $1,400k – equals nEDM request for FY’07
- LANL to pay GRT on pass-through DOE capital funds
- DOE has mentioned FY’08 problems – an NSF rescue?
## The Nuclear Physics Long Range Plan
- Brad Filippone
## The Next Collaboration Meeting
- November?
- Where?
## Coffee
- Enjoy!
- Register with Bob Golub
## Outline
- Collaboration Business
- New institution vote
- DOE annual review
- NSF participation
- Budgetary information
- The Nuclear Physics Long Range Plan (Brad Filippone)
- The next collaboration meeting
- Coffee and Registration with Bob Golub
- The Path to CD-2
- R&D schedule
- Upgrading the schedule and work packages
- MOU
- CD-2/CD-3a steps
## R&D Schedule
- Many items to be completed by the annual review
- Everything to be completed by the end of the calendar year – An important level 2 milestone that could impact a level one milestone, the CD-2/CD-3a review
## Upgrading the Project Files
- The project files had a number of problems
- Fixing the problems makes it easier to prepare for CD-2
- Kim has been working with subsystem managers
- PERT logic charts to straighten out or augment the logic
- Work package modifications where necessary
- All systems except 3He Services and Electronics have gotten some attention, and she is ready to start on them
- Martin has some material to hand out to some subsystem managers
- Next steps after the restructuring
- Martin will attempt to fix the interactions of subsystems
- Kim will try to resource load
- Kim will begin tracking progress
## MOU
- Written agreements between LANL and all participating institutions plus FNPB signed by some senior authorities
- Non-enforceable if possible
- Institutional responsibility
- Cost, schedule and quality assurance
- Personnel commitments
- Property agreements where appropriate
## CD-2/CD-3a Steps
- Martin and Kim attend the GRETINA CD-2 review
- Completion of R&D by end of the calendar year
- Build the project schedule and work packages to be baselined with modifications from the R&D results
- Calculation of forecasted sensitivity
- Build the cost book
- Complete preliminary engineering
- Convert the preliminary documents to final documents
- MOU
- Work package leaders must be identified
- Answer outstanding management questions
- LANL Rehearsal? | en |
all-txt-docs | 719703 | Federal Communications Commission DA 07-933
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Cox Southwest Holdings, LP
d/b/a Cox Communications West Texas
Ten Unopposed Petitions for Determination of
Effective Competition in 17 Local Franchise Areas
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CSR 6877-E
CSR 6878-E
CSR 6879-E
CSR 6880-E
CSR 6881-E
CSR 6882-E
CSR 6883-E
CSR 6884-E
CSR 6885-E
CSR 6886-E
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Adopted: February 28, 2007 Released: March 2, 2007
By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Cox Southwest Holdings, LP (Cox) has filed ten unopposed petitions with the Commission
pursuant to Sections 76.7, 76.905(b)(2) and 76.907 of the Commission's rules for a determination that Cox
is subject to effective competition pursuant to Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended ("Communications Act"),1 and the Commission's implementing rules,2 and is therefore exempt
from cable rate regulation in the communities listed in Attachment A (the Communities). No opposition
to any petition was filed. We grant the petitions finding that the Cox systems are subject to effective
competition in the Communities listed in Attachment A, and deny with respect to two franchising areas, the
City of Tye, Texas and the Village of Lake Tanglewood, Texas.
1 47 U.S.C. 543(1).
2 47 C.F.R. 76.905(b)(2).
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-933
2
2. In the absence of a demonstration to the contrary, cable systems are presumed not to be subject
to effective competition,3 as that term is defined by Section 623(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 76.905 of the Commission's rules.4 The cable operator bears the burden of rebutting
the presumption that effective competition does not exist with evidence that effective competition is present
within the relevant franchise area.5
II. DISCUSSION
A. Competing Provider Effective Competition
3. Section 623(l)(1)(B) of the Communications Act provides that a cable operator is subject to
effective competition if its franchise area is (a) served by at least two unaffiliated multi-channel video
programming distributors ("MVPD") each of which offers comparable video programming to at least 50
percent of the households in the franchise area; and (b) the number of households subscribing to
programming services offered by MVPDs other than the largest MVPD exceeds fifteen percent of the
households in the franchise area.6 Turning to the first prong of this test, we find that the DBS service of
DirecTV Inc. (DirecTV) and DISH Network (Dish) is presumed to be technically available due to its
nationwide satellite footprint, and presumed to be actually available if households in a franchise area are
made reasonably aware that the service is available.7 The two DBS providers subscriber growth reached
approximately 26.1 million as of June, 2005, comprising approximately 27.7 percent of all MVPD
subscribers nationwide; DirecTV has become the second largest, and EchoStar has become the third
largest, MVPD provider.8 In view of this DBS growth data, and the data discussed below showing that
more than 15 percent of the households in each of the Communities listed in Attachment A are DBS
subscribers, we conclude that the population of the Communities at issue here may be deemed reasonably
aware of the availability of DBS services for purposes of the first prong of the competing provider test.
With respect to the issue of program comparability, we find that the programming of the DBS providers
satisfies the Commission's program comparability criterion because the DBS providers offer substantially
more than 12 channels of video programming, including more than one non-broadcast channel.9 We further
find that Cox has demonstrated that the Communities are served by at least two unaffiliated MVPDs,
namely the two DBS providers, each of which offers comparable video programming to at least 50 percent
of the households in the franchise area.10 Therefore, the first prong of the competing provider test is
satisfied.
4. The second prong of the competing provider test requires that the number of households
subscribing to MVPDs, other than the largest MVPD, exceed 15 percent of the households in a franchise
area. Cox sought to determine the competing provider penetration in the Communities by purchasing a
3 47 C.F.R. 76.906.
4 See 47 U.S.C. 543(1) and 47 C.F.R. 76.905.
5 See 47 C.F.R. 76.906 & 907.
6 47 U.S.C. 543(1)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. 76.905(b)(2).
7 See MediaOne of Georgia, 12 FCC Rcd 19406 (1997).
8See Twelfth Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video
Programming, FCC 06-11, 21 FCC Rcd 2503 at 6, 13, 72-73 (rel. March 3, 2006).
9See 47 C.F.R. 76.905(g).
10 Cox Petition at Exhibit 4.
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-933
3
subscriber tracking report that identified the number of subscribers attributable to the DBS providers
within the Communities on a zip code basis. Cox asserts that it is the largest MVPD in the Communities
because their subscribership exceeds the aggregate DBS subscribership for those franchise areas.11 Based
upon the aggregate DBS subscriber penetration levels as reflected in Attachment A, calculated using 2000
Census household data, we find that Cox has demonstrated that the number of households subscribing to
programming services offered by MVPDs, other than the largest MVPD, exceeds 15 percent of the
households in the Communities listed in Attachment A. Therefore, the second prong of the competing
provider test is satisfied with respect to these Communities. Based on the foregoing, we conclude Cox has
submitted sufficient evidence demonstrating that their cable systems serving the Communities set forth on
Attachment A are subject to competing provider effective competition.12
5. With respect to the City of Tye, Texas and Village of Lake Tanglewood, Texas, however, we
reach a different conclusion. Cox provides the requisite 2000 Census total community occupied households
information for these communities, and provides numbers relating to occupied households by zip code, but
it does not indicate which zip codes pertain to which communities.13 Further, the 2000 Census information
is significantly lower than the unidentified zip code information in these communities.14 Given this
discrepancy, and Coxs failure to indicate which zip codes correspond to which communities, it is it is
impossible for the Commission to accurately calculate whether effective competition is present in the
relevant areas. For this reason, we find that the second prong of the competing provider test is not met with
regard to Tye and Lake Tanglewood. In reaching this conclusion, we do not suggest that the calculations
provided for Tye and Lake Tanglewood are incorrect. Rather, Cox has not provided sufficient information
to confirm their analysis. Accordingly, we deny the Petition with respect to those franchise areas. Our
denial with respect to Tye and Lake Tanglewood is without prejudice to refiling should Cox later choose to
provide additional or corrected information.
11 In the Petitions involving Shallowater, Wolfforth and Lubbock, Cox was not able to determine the largest MVPD
because the DBS providers aggregated subscriber counts were larger than Coxs subscriber count, and because of
the presence of additional MVPDs. In those instances, Cox was able to establish that the competing provider test
was met because the penetration rate of both the DBS providers and Cox exceeded the 15 percent rate required by
the competing provider test.
12 Given that these Communities are subject to effective competition under the competing provider standard, it is
not necessary to address Coxs arguments regarding LEC effective competition.
13 In fact, Cox does not provide corresponding zip code information for any community in its petition. See Cox
Petition, Exhibits 1, 3. Yet, the Commission was able to independently verify the corresponding zip code
information for all communities, except Lake Tanglewood and Tye.
14 Cox Petition, Exhibits 1, 3. The 2000 Census information indicates that there are 342 total community occupied
households in Lake Tanglewood, while the total zip code occupied households is listed as 4,466. In Tye, the 2000
Census information on total community occupied households is 426, whereas the the total zip code occupied
households is listed as 9,100.
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-933
4
III. ORDERING CLAUSES
6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petitions filed by Cox for a determination of
effective competition in the Franchise Areas IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the certifications to regulate basic cable service rates
granted to any of the local franchising authorities in Attachment A overseeing Cox ARE REVOKED.
8. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the
Commissions rules.15
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Steven A. Broeckaert
Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau
1547 C.F.R. 0.283.
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-933
5
Attachment A
Communities Subject to Competing Provider Effective Competition
CSR-6877-E, CSR-6878-E, CSR-6879-E, CSR-6880-E, CSR-6881-E, CSR-6882-E, CSR-6883-E, CSR-
6884-E, CSR-6885-E, CSR-6886-E
2000
Census DBS
Communities CUIDS CPR* Households+ Subscribers+
Clovis NM0015 27.08% 12,458 3374
Texico NM0048 38.41% 381 146
Farwell TX0005 37.33% 499 186
Lubbock TX0004 19.46% 77,527 15,090
Shallowater TX2277 32.34% 745 241
Wolfforth TX2278 40.00% 900 360
Floydada TX0447 26.47% 1,304 345
Abilene TX0139 23.72% 41,570 9,860
Snyder TX0129 27.77% 4,068 1,130
Sweetwater TX0136 26.10% 4,545 1,186
Amarillo TX0152 21.75% 67,699 14,727
Canyon TX0371 28.88% 4,802 1,387
Andrews TX0218 15.12% 3,478 526
Big Spring TX0012 17.61% 8,155 1,436
Plainview TX0111 19.54% 7,626 1,490
CPR= Percent DBS penetration
+ = See Cox Petitions, Exhibit 3.
| en |
all-txt-docs | 024992 | From nr2001@maths.unisa.ac.za Fri Jun 8 08:41:30 2001
Return-Path: <nr2001@maths.unisa.ac.za>
Received: from milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov (milkyway [128.183.16.143])
by godel.gsfc.nasa.gov (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f58Cf7F14058
for <choi@godel.gsfc.nasa.gov>; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:41:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from maths.unisa.ac.za (maths.unisa.ac.za [163.200.145.226])
by milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f58CepF05734
for <choi@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov>; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:40:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (nr2001@localhost)
by maths.unisa.ac.za (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA13109;
Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:50:00 +0200
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:50:00 +0200 (SAST)
From: GR16 Post Conference <nr2001@maths.unisa.ac.za>
To: Alicia Sintes Olives <sintes@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>,
Anthony.Lun@sci.monash.edu.au, baiotti@sissa.it, Bala Iyer <bri@rri.res.in>,
bishont@unisa.ac.za, bursra@sph.maths.monash.edu.au,
Carlos F Sopuerta <carlos.sopuerta@port.ac.uk>,
Carlos Lousto <lousto@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>,
Carsten Gundlach <C.Gundlach@maths.soton.ac.uk>,
"Dae-Il (Dale) Choi" <choi@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov>,
David Hobill <David.Hobill@obspm.fr>,
Denis Pollney <pollney@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>, eseidel@aei-potsdam.mpg.de,
Florian Siebel <florian@MPA-Garching.MPG.DE>,
Gabrielle Allen <allen@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>, govinder@nu.ac.za,
"J. Frauendiener" <joergf@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>,
Jim Skea <jimsk@dft.if.uerj.br>,
"Joan M. Centrella" <joan@sparrow.drexel.edu>,
John Miller <miller@sissa.it>,
"Jose M. Martin-Garcia" <J.M.Martin-Garcia@maths.soton.ac.uk>,
Luis Lehner <luisl@physics.ubc.ca>,
Manuela Campanelli <manuela@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>,
marcelo salgado <marcelo@iris.nuclecu.unam.mx>,
Michael Koppitz <koppitz@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>,
Mihai Bondarescu <mihai@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>, mmaharaj@pixie.udw.ac.za,
montero@sissa.it, Motoyuki Saijo <saijo@astro.physics.uiuc.edu>,
naidom@unisa.ac.za, Nina Jansen <jansen@tac.dk>,
"Osvaldo M. Moreschi" <moreschi@fis.uncor.edu>,
Peter Diener <diener@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>, Philippe.Grandclement@obspm.fr,
R.M.Williams@damtp.cam.ac.uk, rdi@maths.soton.ac.uk,
Richard Matzner <richard@einstein.ph.utexas.edu>,
Sascha Husa <shusa@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>,
"Scott H. Hawley" <shawley@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>,
"Shin'ichiro Yoshida" <yoshida@ap.sissa.it>, shinkai@atlas.riken.go.jp,
Shrirang Deshingkar <shrir@rri.res.in>, starel@mail.maths.monash.edu.au,
Theresa Velden <velden@aei-potsdam.mpg.de>, tradke@aei.mpg.de
Subject: nr2001
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10106081542290.12892-101000@maths.unisa.ac.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-928793493-1179920757-992008200=:12892"
Status: R
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info.
---928793493-1179920757-992008200=:12892
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Dear Colleague,
The draft program is attached. Kindly check that no errors have crept in
to your entries (abstract, and list of delegates). Don't worry about the
layout - that will be improved before printing.
We would like any corrections by Tuesday 12 June.
Thanks,
Nigel Bishop.
---928793493-1179920757-992008200=:12892
Content-Type: APPLICATION/x-tex; name="prog2.tex"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10106081550000.12892@maths.unisa.ac.za>
Content-Description:
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="prog2.tex"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---928793493-1179920757-992008200=:12892--
| en |
markdown | 261942 | # Presentation: 261942
## Office of Scientific and Technical Information
- United States Department of Energy
- STIP Meeting April 20-21, 2005
- The Range of OSTI Activities
***Sharon M. Jordan***
**Assistant Director**
## FY 2005 Overview
- OSTI Organization
- OSTI’s Internal and External Roles
- Products/Services
- The STI Program
## Slide 3
## Budget and Staffing Over Time
**Budget and Staffing Over Time**
## OSTI and the Office of Science
- OSTI is a component of SC’s IM office (SC-33)
- SC-33 includes IT and corporate systems
- “TIMP” is no longer a budget line item
- Opportunities to make science and scientific information more visible
## Relationship with Office of Communications
**To make science more visible:**
** ****World Year of Physics**
** ****AAAS**, **NSTA, other exhibits**
**To support science communications**
** ****Expertise with e-journals and searching**
** ****Web policy and practices**
** ****Publications and images**
## STI and Other DOE Programs
- OSTI continues to work with a number of HQ Programs on projects specific to their needs
- EIA partnership on STI plus other docs
- EE Programs seeking STI in specific subject areas (e.g., geothermal)
## In Federal arena ... looking out for impacts to STIP
- OMB requirements
- Peer review of scientific information
**OMB issued final guidance December 17, 2004**
- Follows Information Quality Act of 2002
- DOE implementation due June 2005 for 1st set
- Web content
- ICGI working groups
- Taxonomies
- Access, search, etc.
## PEER REVIEW OF GOVERNMENT SCIENCE DOCUMENTS
**http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/infopoltech.html**
**Applies to:**
***"influential" scientific information***** - information the agency reasonably can determine will have or does have a clear and substantial impact on important public policies or private sector decisions**
***"highly influential scientific assessments,"***** which could affect the public or private sector by more than $500 million in any one year or which are novel, controversial, or precedent-setting or are of significant interest to more than one agency**
## International: ETDE
**ETDEWEB continues to grow: over 3.5 million records, 115,000 direct full text and many more with links**
**Special project in 2004: close to 300,000 records now have DOIs in ETDEWEB**
**Added the ability to download citations and make newer PDFs fast Web viewable**
**In 2004, access to ETDE opened to many developing countries, supporting the G8 Energy Ministers' commitment to push energy technologies to developing world. **
## International: ETDE
**August 2004: Secretary of State Colin Powell issued a cable to all U.S. embassies announcing availability of ETDE to developing countries in support of the G8 Energy Ministers' goal to push energy technologies to the developing world. **
***"State Department officials at embassies and consulates in the following countries are strongly encouraged to communicate this new access to their government counterparts in each country as well as to research and academic institutions/societies where appropriate . . . The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information, within the Office of Science, fulfills U.S. obligations to the ETDE agreement." ***
## International: INIS
**INIS will be demonstrating new INIS database end of April, which enhances full-text linking capability**
## 1940’s
**1940’s**
**Atomic Energy Commission Created**
**Technical Information Program Established**
**Nuclear Science Abstracts Began**
**Microcard/Microfiche Program **
**Full Text Dissemination of STI to GPO**
**Atoms-For-Peace Program**
**1950’s**
**1960’s**
**Computer Technology Used**
**International Nuclear Information System (INIS) Created**
**1970’s**
**AEC abolished; ERDA Established**
**Energy Data Base (EDB) Began**
**ERDA Abolished; DOE Established**
**DOE O 1340.1 includes Technical Reports**
**Technical Information Meetings Initiated**
**1980’s**
**International Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) **
**Non-nuclear Energy Information Shared**
**Hierarchical Data Structure **
**DOE STI Orders Created**
**Digitization of Report Literature**
**Evolution of the Internet**
**Streamlined Directive**
**STIP Strategic Plan**
**DOE Collaboration w/GPO**
**Adopted Dublin Core**
**2000’s**
**Web Information Tools**
**Distributed Searching**
**Relevancy ranking**
**Alert Services **
**Technology Innovations**
**Increased STI Usage via Web**
**Electronic Transition Complete**
**1990’s**
**The STI Program Through the Decades**
## Chronology of STIP, Pre-Web
**Internet Era of DOE STI**
## 2005 and beyond - We’re not done yet!....
**Internet Era of DOE STI (cont.)**
***July 2003***
***May 2004***
- Science.gov 2.0 launched
- Relevancy ranking introduced
- PrePRINT Network expanded
- Renamed E-print Network
***April 2004***
- ScienceLab launched
- NSTA National Convention
***April 2005***
- DOE community
- SRC launched to
## Measurable Progress since last year
- Path to comprehensiveness
- Patents
- Conferences
- Efficiency improvements
- E-Link and Dublin Core integration
- Data clean up
- Harvesting
## Special Delivery to DOE
**For DOE and DOE contractors only**
**Offers features not yet seen in our public products**
**Special Delivery to DOE**
## SRC Access Policies Finely Tuned
- IP Address authenticated (DOE sites)
- Can view unclassified, unlimited categories of bib data and full text; searches run across all bib data
- Registered users, logged in
- Can view ALL bib data and unclass., unlimited FT; then request approval for other categories
- Registered users, with specific access approval
- Can view ALL bib data, all unlimited FT, and FT for which they have been granted specific access approval
## Document Access Approvals
- Defined Category-by-Category (see chart)
- Individual Documents by Individual Requestor (service shift)
- Scanning upon Request (free)
- Merging Data Cleanup for Documents and Records (sunset and release dates)
## Alert Service
_**Recently added to:**_
- Science.gov
- E-Print Network
- SRC
## Recently upgraded to include relevancy ranking, author search in Web sites, and postscript to PDF conversion.
**Alert Service offered to patrons of ArXiv, as one of sources in E-Print Network.**
**Now combines full-text searching of over 590,000 e-prints and 17,200 Web sites, as well as links to 2,300 science societies. **
## Leveraging Alert Service
- At _[http://arxiv.org/](http://arxiv.org/)_ is stated: The Cornell University Library acknowledges the support of Sun Microsystems and U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information (providers of the _[E-Print Alert Service](http://www.osti.gov/eprints/arxivalerts.html)_, which automatically notifies users of the latest information posted on arXiv and other related
- http://www.osti.gov/eprints/arxivalerts.html is a special interface for the eprint archive patrons
## Focus areas for STIP
** ****Source data (numeric data)**
** ****STI Policy**
** ****Distribution of effort**
** ****Data consistency**
** ****Future of reference linking**
** ****Archival/preservation**
** ****Backfiles/digitized legacy docs**
## Policy – Philosophy or fundamental values; sets framework; states purpose; other directives flow from policy.
Order – Objectives, requirements, and responsibilities.
Notice – Timely notifications of changes.
Manual – More specific requirements
Guide – Non-mandatory best practices.
**Policy – Philosophy or fundamental values; sets framework; states purpose; other directives flow from policy.**
**Order – Objectives, requirements, and responsibilities.**
**Notice – Timely notifications of changes.**
**Manual – More specific requirements**
**Guide – Non-mandatory best practices.**
**DOE O 241.1A**
**DOE G 241.1-1A**
## Making Accommodations
**In a distributed STI environment, OSTI’s actions affect you – and vice versa.**
**We understand that we do not own the full text.**
**Value-added service is our goal.**
## Rethinking Business Rules
**For a Broader, Distributed STI Program**
**Many of our business rules written for reports**
**Distribution of product types – journal citations, conference papers – required revisions**
## DOIs: The Opportunity
**CrossRef membership offers capability to assign DOIs to DOE’s documents**
**If site provides a DOI, we will retain it in record**
**For documents in IB which have no DOI, OSTI will acquire one via its CrossRef subscription **
**Coordination up front is our goal**
## Information and Data
- Emerging issue is data as a key source information
- Data management issues follow similar rationale to STI
- Also opportunity for linking text and data
## Reference Linking
**Proof of concept: To link full-text documents cited in the references of DOE reports in the Information Bridge. **
**Purpose: To demonstrate linking of resource material *****within***** a document.**
## Reference Linking Proposal
- OSTI will continue to offer to prove concept
- No requirement to participate – the choice is yours
- Sites that are offering similar service will be excluded
## Archival/preservation
- NARA dialog ongoing
- OSTI poised for new practice
- Proposed:
- For site-hosted documents, OSTI to download and keep copy for “backup” access if needed and long-term preservation
- Access would remain as distributed function
## Digitizing Backfiles (Legacy Documents)
- OSTI will soon be set to add digitized full text to records (FT scanned or MF blowback)
- Multiple sources to be coordinated (INIS, OSTI, labs)
- Originating site is the ‘final’ authority
## Goals Still Targeted
_**Software (ESMS)**_
**Still in the works**
**Web 241.4**
**Online searchable catalog**
## Stats Tell a Story
- Location
- Methods
- Preferences
- Scope
## Site-Hosted vs. Submitted Full-Text
## Harvested vs. Submitted STI
**Harvested vs. Submitted STI**
## Publicly Released Categories
**Publicly Released Categories **
**FY2001-FY2005**
- Number from OpenNet, not Elink
- Submitted as OPN Doc Type = “Technical Report”
## Trends in Journal Articles Announced to OSTI
**Trends in Journal Articles Announced to OSTI**
** ****FY2001-FY2005**
## Published Citations Are Gaining on Gray Lit
**Published Citations Are Gaining on Gray Lit**
**FY2001-FY2005**
## Limited Access STI Covers Range of Possibilities
**FY2001-FY2005**
## Comparison of Collection Methods FY2001-FY2005
**Comparison of Collection Methods ****FY2001-FY2005**
**FY2005 numbers are as of March 31, 2005**
## Slide 43
## STIP brings a lot of resources to the table
**STIP brings a lot of resources to the table**
**Over the next two days, how will we use those resources to broaden STIP horizons in the coming year?**
## Speaking of progress ...
**Speaking of progress ...**
- Farm Livin' Is the Life for Me! | en |
converted_docs | 553320 | **FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR INFORMATION CONTACT:**
Tammi Schone - (605) 352-1102
**CATHOLIC CHANCERY OF SIOUX FALLS RECEIVES FEDERAL FUNDING**\
**[*Advancements Offer Videoconferencing Sites and Video Streamlining*\
]{.underline}**
**(Sioux Falls, South Dakota -- February 7, 2006)** Lynn D. Jensen,
State Director for USDA Rural Development in South Dakota, today
presented the Catholic Chancery of Sioux Falls with a distance learning
and telemedicine grant in the amount of \$173,429 to assist with distant
learning and telemedicine education.
Jensen said, "Bringing federal dollars to rural South Dakota in support
of distance learning and telemedicine technology for advancing
education, retention, and recruitment advancement is vital to this area.
This project will benefit over 1,320 students and serve eighteen
counties including Brule, Charles Mix, Clay, Codington, Day, Edmunds,
Grant, Hand, Hutchinson, Lake, Marshall, McCook, Minnehaha, Moody,
Potter, Shannon, Spink, and Walworth."
This project will provide advanced placement courses, college courses,
foreign languages, art, and
collaborative projects to rural students and residents. Technology
deployed will include interactive video conferencing and a
video-streaming server for digital recording capability. Information
technology is critical to rural Americans. The ability to gain access to
education programs is significantly improved and it betters prepares
them to compete in the global market.
"This grant will give us the opportunity to extend the present video
conferencing system put in place four years ago, to the areas in east
river South Dakota where we have gaps in service. The value of video
conferencing for rural education goes without saying. It is a marvelous
way to reach across endless miles of prairie to give the children
instruction and experiences unheard of in their parents time," said Sr.
Nathalie Meyer, OP, Director of Education Formation Superintendent of
Schools.
USDA Rural Development General Field Representative Kim Anderson also
attended the event. USDA Rural Development has ten offices in the state
that assist rural communities. Office locations include a state office
in Huron, along with area offices in Aberdeen, Huron, Mitchell, Pierre,
Rapid City, Sioux Falls, Sturgis, Watertown, and Yankton.
USDA Rural Development's mission is to deliver programs in a way that
will support increasing economic opportunity and improve the quality of
life of rural residents. As a venture capital entity, Rural Development
provides equity and technical assistance to finance and foster growth in
homeownership, business development, and critical community and
technology infrastructure. Further information on rural programs is
available at a local USDA Rural Development office or by visiting USDA's
web site at <http://www/rurdev.usda.gov>.
**- USDA -**
| en |
markdown | 061424 | # Presentation: 061424
## CBIIT Proteomics Projects
**May, 2008**
## Agenda
**CPAS – Computational Portal and Analysis System**
**CPAS-MART – BioMart module for CPAS **
**CPAS-Grid – caGrid enabled CPAS**
**Demonstration**
## CPAS
**CPAS**
## Developed by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Mass Spectrometry experiments data
Proteomics Analysis Tools
Proteomics Repository for Mouse Proteomic Technology Initiative
**Mass Spectrometry experiments data**
**Proteomics Analysis Tools**
**Proteomics Repository for Mouse Proteomic Technology Initiative**
**CPAS**
**Notes:**
First release in 2006, CBIIT is running version 2.2
open-source, web-based analysis platform that organizes and annotates general biological experiments
peptide sequence database
MASS Spectrometry experiments.
CPAS incorporates tools for proteomics analysis, such as X!Tandem search engine, the PeptideProphet and ProteinProphet.
CPAS can be switched to use other search engines, including Mascot and SEQUEST
## CPAS Application Architecture
- Site Admin
- Data Storage (Relational Database + File System)
- Experiment Services (Shared Ontologies, XAR)
- Portal / Wiki
- Protein Services
- MS1
- MS2
- Experiment
- Sample
- Mouse
- = Shared services
- MS2Search
- = Modules
- Flow Cytometry
- Data Pipeline
- Study
- Query
**CPAS Application Architecture**
**Notes:**
consists of a core system of services that provide underlying system functionality such as data storage, security, web interface, query, experiment and protein services.
Modules are plugged into the core to provide data handling and analytical support
With this design, The CPAS system is easily extensible.
This architecture allows new modules to be added and integrated without having to modify the core system
CBIIT installation has additional module called MS2Search for Peptides Sequenece query.
## NCI-CPAS Home Page
- http://cpas.nci.nih.gov
**Notes:**
MS2 Statistics - 2 years of data
Private and public access to browse data
security mechanism that allows only those with proper permission to access specific data
## Project, Experiment, Run
**Notes:**
CPAS use folder concept to store data.
The folders are organized using Projects, Experiments and Runs hierarchy.
## Peptides in MS/MS Run
**Notes:**
This slide shows all the Peptides for a MS2 Run
MS2 Run summary is displayed at the top, followed by are customizable view of peptides information
Predefined filters can be applied to the view
The column headings that appear in the display grids allow user to sort peptide list.
Peptides and Proteins columns are clickable.
Click the Peptide name will go to the Peptide Spectrum page, which displays the MS2 spectrum of the fragmented peptide.
## MS/MS Spectrum
**Notes:**
Click the Peptide name to go to the Peptide Spectrum page, which displays the MS2 spectrum of the fragmented peptide.
The graph shows RAW spectrum profile data, similar to DNA sequence database (Gene DB).
Click the Protein name to go to the Protein Details page, which displays information on that protein and the peptides that matched it.
## Protein Annotations
**Notes:**
Click the Protein name to go to the Protein Details page, which displays information on that protein and the peptides that matched it.
## NCI Implementation of Peptide Query
**Search performance**
**Blast algorithm**
**Query by Peptide sequence module **
**NCI Implementation of Peptide Query**
**Notes:**
People wants to see if a peptide exists in the current database
Blast algorithm – commonly use sequence matching algorithm
Performance is very good.
NCI’s installation has been customized to include Query by Peptides sequence search capability.
Use Blast as the underlying search engine
## Query By Peptide Sequence
**Notes:**
The Peptide sequence search is implemented under the MS2Search module.
User first selects which folder to search on
Type in any AMINO acids sequence to search on, select one or more subfolders
Any nested subfolders will also be included in the search.
Since we are using the Blast algorithm, search result usually displayed within seconds
## CPAS Peptide Query Results
**Notes:**
Peptide sequence query results are grouped by Runs
Adapted similar interface as MS2 Run,
results can be exported to various format, such as Excel
## CPAS MART
**CPAS MART**
## CPAS MART
**Need to create complex queries**
**More flexible filters**
**Subset of data fields can be selected to include in the query results**
**Results can be exported to files**
**Generic query services for CPAS data built upon BioMart version 0.6**
**Notes:**
We found out that sometimes we need to look at the proteomic data in different way other than grouped by MS2 Run.
There is need to ...
BioMart is a query-oriented data management system developed by the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OiCR) and the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI).
## CPAS Mart Architecture
**CPAS Mart Architecture**
**:**
**CPAS DB**
**exp, msruns****,**
**Prot etc..**
**XML**
**Configuration**
**MartBuilder**
**MartEditor**
**Mart** **Explorer**
**Mart** **Shell**
**CPAS Mart** **View**
**Schema**
**Transformation**
**dbSNP, **
**UniProt,**
**Ensembl etc**
**Public Data**
**Notes:**
Biomart comes with a set of tools, likes Mart Explorer, Mart Shell, Mart Builder, and MartEditor
Starting with MartBuilder to select what kind of data to expose in the current CPAS schema
A new CPAS Mart schema was created with data imported from CPAS schema.
MartEditor is the tool to configure and customize the CPAS mart schema. e.g. create additional field
Since it is a separate schema, it will not affect the original CPAS schema and application
Use Uniprot DB – IPI (international protein index)
## http://cpas-mart-stage.nci.nih.gov/
- CPAS MART
**Notes:**
The current CPAS Mart provides four datasets, namely Experiment Run, MS2 Run, Peptides, and Protein Sequence
User start a new search by specifying which dataset to search on
Then select one or more attributes for display
Optional filters can be specified
Related datasets can be joined together.
## CPAS MART Results
- CPAS MART Results
**Notes:**
Query results can be viewed online or exported to file in HTML, TSV, Excel CSV, or TEXT formats
For complex query or query with large result sets, user can select Email Notification option. The user will receive an email containing a link to download the query result.
## CPAS-Grid
**CPAS-Grid**
## CPAS-Grid (caGrid enabled CPAS)
**Made CPAS public data accessible thru the caGrid**
**caBIG silver-compliant experimental information**
**Used CPAS caBIG development kit and caCore SDK to generate caGrid service components and client API.**
**Used “Introduce” toolkit to package the components and deployment**
**Notes:**
Starting CPAS 2.1, it is caBIG silver-compliant
application programming interface to the principal objects (project, experiment, protocol, run, peptide)
## How to access CPAS data thru caGrid
**Apache Tomcat 5.0.28**
**caGrid**** **
**Data and Query**
**Services**
**caGrid Portal (browser)**
_***or***_
**Application using caGrid API to Query CPAS caGrid Service**
**CPAS DB**
**Apache Tomcat 5.5.20**
**CPAS**** caGrid**
**Data Service**
**-----------------**
**CPAS Application**
** **
**Service**
** ****caGrid Index Server and Discovery Service**
**Notes:**
CPAS caGrid service provides a set of APIs for the project, experiment, protocol, run, peptide objects.
User can either use the APIs or the caGrid Portal to retrieve CPAS data.
Use the Index Server and Discovery Service to find out what kind of service is available and where the service is located.
User can submit a CQL query thru the grid to the caGrid data and Query services for data mapping and transformation.
Object query will be formed and submitted to the CPAS data service.
Result Objects will be returned back to user
CQL - caGrid Query Language
## http://cagrid-portal.nci.nih.gov/
_**[http://cagrid-portal.nci.nih.gov/](http://cagrid-portal.nci.nih.gov/)**_** **
- NCI caGrid Portal
**Notes:**
The caGrid Portal contains all the Data and Analytical services that registered to NCI.
The home page shows a graphic representation where each service is located
Clicking the icons will show you the hosting center information and the services it provides.
User can use the TOOLS menu to browse the available services or search for a particular one.
## Submit Query using NCI caGrid Portal
- Submit Query using NCI caGrid Portal
**Notes:**
Left side shows the summary for the CPAS caGrid service, Domain model etc.
Right side is the Data Services Query box.
User can submit CQLs to retrieve CPAS data, the current example shows ....
## Results Displayed using NCI caGrid Portal
- Results Displayed using NCI caGrid Portal
**Notes:**
Results can be exported to Excel format
## Demonstration
**Demonstration** | en |
markdown | 524425 | # Presentation: 524425
## Developing Risk-Based Financial Analysis Tools and Techniques to Aid IV&V Decision-Making
**FY2001 CENTER SOFTWARE INITIATIVE PROPOSAL (CSIP)**
**for the**
**NASA Independent Verification and Validation Facility**** **
**COTR: Kenneth McGill**
**PI: Nancy Eickelmann**
**Contract #S-54493-G**
**September 4, 2002**
**Notes:**
Phd in Computer Science at University of California Irvine
MS CS
MBA Information and Decision Systems
Bachelor’s in Finance
I’ve been in WV for a year working on the IV&V ROI project, just prior to that I was with Advanced Research Program at MCC after spending 4 years at Hughes Research Labs in Malibu CA.
## Agenda
- Why we need ASK IVEY
- Consequences and Likelihood of Failure
- IV&V Yield
- Probability of IV&V Yield: Min, Max, Most Likely
- ROI and Magnitude of Return of IV&V
- What ASK IVEY can do
## Why we need ASK IVEY
- NASA program managers are asked to quantify the ROI and evaluate the cost/benefit of applying IV&V technologies.
- This is a prediction of future events based on decisions and actions taken in the present.
- A point estimate is likely to be inaccurate, whereas a probability of yield has a history of providing a scope of potential yield and an extent of likelihood of expected yield.
## Calculating ROI a Financial Analysis Prompt Map
## Consequences of Failure
- NPG 2820 IV&V Criteria
## Likelihood of Failure
## IV&V YIELD
- Ultimately, the yield of an IV&V program is based upon the difference between the net resource flow with IV&V and without IV&V.
- If the resources saved (e.g., reduced rework) or returns gained (e.g., improved customer satisfaction or increased safety) are greater than the resources consumed to save/gain these resources, we have a net benefit.
- Should the resources saved be less than the resources consumed, we have a net cost.
## Cost of Poor Quality
- Defect Leakage
- If discovered internally
- defect management
- rework
- retesting
- If discovered externally
- technical support
- complaint investigation
- defect notification
## Stephen Knox “Modeling the Cost of Software Quality,” Digital Technical Journal, (Fall 1993)
## Raytheon Cost of Poor Quality Haley and Dion
## How Process Maturity Levels Affect IV&V
**LEVEL 1**
**INITIAL**
- UNPREDICTABLE &
- POORLY CONTROLLED
**LEVEL 2**
**REPEATABLE**
- CAN REPEAT
- PREVIOUSLY
- MASTERED TASKS
**LEVEL 3**
**DEFINED**
- PROCESS
- CHARACTERIZED,
- FAIRLY WELL
- UNDERSTOOD
**LEVEL 4**
**MANAGED**
- PROCESS MEASURED
- AND CONTROLLED
**LEVEL 5**
**OPTIMIZED**
- FOCUS ON PROCESS
- IMPROVEMENT
- KEY PROBLEMS:
- CONFIG. MGMT.
- PROJECT MGMT.
- SOFTWARE QA
- PROJECT PLANNING
- EASTIMATING
- COST
- SCHEDULE
- KEY PROBLEMS:
- PROPER TRAINING
- DEVELOPMENT OF PRACTICE & PROCEDURES
- STANDARDS
- ORGANIZATION
- KEY PROBLEMS:
- ACCURATE PROJECT MEASUREMENT
- OBJECTIVE PROCESS ANALYSIS
- QUANTITATIVE QUALITY PLANS
- PRIORITIES:
- - DECIDING WHAT TO IMPROVE FIRST
- - BALANCING THE PROCESS AND THE ORGANIZATION
- KEY PROBLEMS:
- CHANGING TECHNOLOGY
- PROBLEM ANALYSIS
- PROBLEM PREVENTION
- ORGANIZATIONAL OPTIMIZATION
- KEY PROBLEMS:
- STILL HUMAN INTENSIVE PROCESS
- DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN OPTIMUM ORGANIZATION
- DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN TOOLS & PRACTICES AT STATE OF THE ART
- IV&V
- SOMEWHAT
- UNPREDICTABLE
- UNABLE TO ESTIMATE
- NON-TECH %
**IV&V**
**IV&V**
**IV&V**
**IV&V**
**NON-TECH UP TO 25%**
**NON-TECH UP TO 15%**
**NON-TECH UP TO 6-8%**
**NON-TECH UP TO 3-4%**
**MATURITY**
## Cost of Leakage Grows Over Time
- Relative cost of fixing a problem found in design/coding, testing, or after release are:
- 1:20:82 (Remus, 1983)
- 1:13:92 (Kan, 1989)
- 10:100:1000 (Coyle, 1999)
## Cost of Rework in Each Phase
- Rework*product design* =
- leakage*requirements* * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 10
- Rework*programming* =
- leakage*requirements* * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 100
- leakage*design* * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 10
- Rework*integration* =
- leakage*requirements* * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 1000
- leakage*design* * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 100
- leakage*programming* * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 10
- Rework*deployment* =
- leakage*requirements* * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 10000
- leakage*design* * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 1000
- leakage*programming* * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 100
## Rework at Deployment
- Tremendous cost
- rework plus
- product recall
- technical support
- field visits
- cost factor may be over 10,000
## Leakage: An Example
- Rework*product design* =
- 49r * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 10 = 490
- Rework*programming* =
- 39r * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 100 = 3,900
- 113d * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 10 = 1,130
- Rework*integration* =
- 26r * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 1000 = 26,000
- 49d * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 100 = 4,900
- 418p * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 10 = 4,180
- Rework*deployment* =
- 8r * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 10000 = 80,000
- 16d * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 1000 = 16,000
- 56p * cost-to-fix*nominal* * 100 = 5,600 **142,200**
## CMM Maturity and Leakage
- There is some evidence to suggest organizations with increased maturity have reduced rework costs
- Knox: Percent of Budget to Rework:
- Level 1: 55%
- Level 2: 45%
- Level 3: 35%
- Level 4: 20%
- Level 5: 6%
## IV&V and Defect Leakage
- Application of IV&V can reduce leakage to subsequent phases
- The goal of the financial model is to propose a range of potential savings
- Specific parameters will need to be established empirically
## Timing of benefits for IV&V
- Full In-Phase IV&V
- prevention of errors starting at requirements - can potentially bar any errors from leaking through
- Partial IV&V
- prevention of errors at point of insertion - no errors from this phase will leak
- Endgame IV&V
- discovery of errors at the end of development - can potentially bar any errors from leaking to deployment
- Audit Level IV&V
## Rework and Return from IV&V By Maturity Level
## Components to Return on Investment
- Cost of IV&V
- Expected Return
- cost savings - measured as hours of rework
- Likelihood of Returns
- how effective is the organization at minimizing rework?
- how effective will IV&V be?
## Independence...
- An organization *independent* from the developers study the artifacts of software production [IEEE Std. 1012-1998].
- This requires:
***Technical independence****. M*embers of the IV&V team may not be personnel involved in the development of the software.
- .***Managerial independence****. *The responsibility for IV&V belongs to an organization outside the contractor and program organizations that develop the software.*** ***
***Financial independence****.* Control of the IV&V budget is retained in an organization outside the contractor and program organization that develop the software.
- IV&V is often perceived as testing the code after the development is completed .....NASA IV&V is _*full life cycle*_ activities
## IV&V is NOT SQA
- IV&V is a full life cycle set of acivities that are applied to defect prevention, defect detection, and certification. NASA IV&V conforms to IEEE Standard 1012-1998.
- IV&V and Software Quality Assurance (SQA) are not redundant activities. SQA as defined by DOD-Std 2168 defines 10 activities of SQA that are complemented by IV&V activities. There are 32 types of activities conducted by IV&V, of these 32, 22 are unique to IV&V and 10 are complemented by SQA.
## Ask Ivey Prototype
- What ASK IVEY can do...
## Ask Ivey Input Screen
## Ask Ivey Pull Down Menu
## Ask Ivey Numeric Entry
## Ask Ivey On-Line Report
## Ask Ivey Printed Report
## Ask Ivey On-Line Help
## Questions?
- Ask Ivey... | en |
converted_docs | 514737 | **Trainings:**
1\. **Pro-Se Plus Divorce Clinic** - Sponsored by the DC Bar Pro Bono
Program. When: Nov. 16, 6:00-9:00 pm. Where: DC Bar Conference Center,
1250 H Street NW, B-1 Level. Fee: \$10. Participants will be trained to
volunteer for the DC Bar Pro Bono Program Pro-Se-Plus Divorce Clinic,
which teaches a basic overview of substantive DC divorce law to
un-represented litigants. Participants are expected to volunteer at the
clinic. To register or for more information, visit Also being held on
May 17, 2005.
2\. **Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Small Business Pro Bono
Legal Work** - Sponsored by the DC Bar Pro Bono Program Community
Economic Development Project. When: Nov. 18, 8:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m. Where:
Piper Rudnick, 1200 19^th^ Street NW. Fee: \$15. Attorneys only. The
program will focus on business formation, raising money, buying and
selling small businesses, real estate issues, intellectual property
considerations, and employment law as they relate to the unique
circumstances of small neighborhood based businesses. Participants are
expected to volunteer at two Small Business Brief Advice Clinics.
Breakfast and lunch provided. CLE available. To register or for more
information, visit
3\. **Innovations in Child Custody: Part I - Parent Coordinators** -
Sponsored by the Family Law Section of the DC Bar. When: Nov. 30,
5:30-7:30 p.m. Where: DC Bar Conference Center, 1250 H Street NW, B-1
Level. A discussion of the latest tool for resolution of custody cases
and promoting healthy co‑parenting relationships, including a
description of how and why it works! A discussion of when and how Parent
Coordinators are being appointed by the Court, as well as the new Parent
Coordinator Pilot Project in D.C. Superior Court\'s Family Court. Light
refreshments will be served. To register, visit
4\. **Legal Needs of the Homeless** - Sponsored by Washington Legal
Clinic for the Homeless and Covenant House DC. When: Dec. 3, 9:00-5:00.
Where: DC Bar Conference Center, 1250 H Street NW, B-1 Level. Fee:
Attorneys - \$25; paralegals - \$15. Participants are expected to take a
case from one of the sponsoring organizations. To register or for more
information, visit
5\. **Child Custody** - Sponsored by the Children's Law Center, the
Archdiocesan Legal Network, Bread for the City, Legal Aid Society of DC.
When: February 25, 9:00-5:00. Where: DC Bar Conference Center, 1250 H
Street NW, B-1 Level. Fee: Attorneys - \$25; paralegals - \$15. Basic
substantive and procedural law and advocacy strategies need to litigate
child custody proceedings involving indigent or low income DC families.
Participants are expected to take a case from one of the sponsoring
organizations. (Note: The Children's Law Center does not provide
malpractice insurance coverage to pro bono attorneys, therefore it is
recommended that attorneys take cases from the other sponsors.) To
register or for more information, visit
6\. **Combating Real Estate Scams** - Sponsored by the Legal Counsel for
the Elderly. When: March 18, 9:00-5:00. Where: DC Bar Conference Center,
1250 H Street NW, B-1 Level. No fee. Participants will learn about
warning signs of predatory loans; laws governing mortgages; legal
remedies and consumer defenses to predatory loans; how to use the DC
predatory lending law; and special challenges of predatory mortgage
cases. Participants are expected to take a case the sponsoring
organization. To register or for more information, visit
7\. **Wills and Advance Directives** - Sponsored by Legal Counsel for
the Elderly and the Archdiocesan Legal Network. When: June 2, 12:00
noon - 4:15. Where: DC Bar Conference Center, 1250 H Street NW, B-1
Level. Fee: Attorneys - \$25; paralegals - \$15. The course will focus
on proper drafting of wills and advance directives (durable powers of
attorney, health care powers of attorney, and living wills).
Participants are expected to take a case from one of the sponsoring
organizations. To register or for more information, visit
| en |
markdown | PZOXK7UACEFH5YZN7NEG63VDKAYIBY4U | # Presentation: PZOXK7UACEFH5YZN7NEG63VDKAYIBY4U
## Figure 2. Study protocol. NASA-TLX = National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index.
- Sharma V, Simpson RC, LoPresti EF, Schmeler M. Clinical evaluation of semiautonomous smart wheelchair architecture (Drive-Safe System) with visually impaired individuals. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(1):35–50.http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2010.03.0022
**Figure 2. **Study protocol. NASA-TLX = National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index.
**Notes:**
Figure 2. Study protocol. NASA-TLX = National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index. | en |
all-txt-docs | 297910 | General Decision Number: WI080008 12/19/2008 WI8
Superseded General Decision Number: WI20070008
State: Wisconsin
Construction Types: Heavy (Sewer and Water Line and Tunnel)
Counties: Wisconsin Statewide.
TUNNEL, SEWER & WATER LINE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Modification Number Publication Date
0 02/08/2008
1 02/29/2008
2 05/02/2008
3 06/13/2008
4 06/27/2008
5 07/25/2008
6 08/08/2008
7 08/15/2008
8 08/22/2008
9 08/29/2008
10 09/12/2008
11 10/03/2008
12 10/10/2008
13 11/07/2008
14 12/19/2008
BRWI0001-002 06/01/2008
CRAWFORD, JACKSON, JUNEAU, LA CROSSE, MONROE, TREMPEALEAU, AND
VERNON COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 29.24 13.80
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0002-002 06/01/2008
ASHLAND, BAYFIELD, DOUGLAS, AND IRON COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 35.24 13.35
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0002-005 06/01/2008
ADAMS, ASHLAND, BARRON, BROWN, BURNETT, CALUMET, CHIPPEWA,
CLARK, COLUMBIA, DODGE, DOOR, DUNN, FLORENCE, FOND DU LAC,
FOREST, GREEN LAKE, IRON, JEFFERSON, KEWAUNEE, LANGLADE,
LINCOLN, MANITOWOC, MARATHON, MARINETTE, MARQUETTE, MENOMINEE,
OCONTO, ONEIDA, OUTAGAMIE, POLK, PORTAGE, RUSK, ST CROIX, SAUK,
SHAWANO, SHEBOYGAN, TAYLOR, VILAS, WALWORTH, WAUPACA, WAUSHARA,
WINNEBAGO, AND WOOD COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 28.15 12.80
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0003-002 06/01/2008
BROWN, DOOR, FLORENCE, KEWAUNEE, MARINETTE, AND OCONTO COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 29.24 13.80
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0004-002 06/01/2008
KENOSHA, RACINE, AND WALWORTH COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 32.88 14.50
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0006-002 06/01/2008
ADAMS, CLARK, FOREST, LANGLADE, LINCOLN, MARATHON, MENOMINEE,
ONEIDA, PORTAGE, PRICE, TAYLOR, VILAS AND WOOD COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 29.74 13.30
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0007-002 06/01/2008
GREEN, LAFAYETTE, AND ROCK COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 30.41 14.30
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0008-002 06/01/2008
MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE, WASHINGTON, AND WAUKESHA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 32.71 14.54
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0009-001 06/01/2008
GREEN LAKE, MARQUETTE, OUTAGAMIE, SHAWANO, WAUPACA, WASHARA,
AND WINNEBAGO COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 29.24 13.80
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0011-002 06/01/2008
CALUMET, FOND DU LAC, MANITOWOC, AND SHEBOYGAN COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 29.24 13.80
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0013-002 06/01/2008
DANE, GRANT, IOWA, AND RICHLAND COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 30.61 14.10
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0019-002 06/01/2008
BARRON, BUFFALO, BURNETT, CHIPPEWA, DUNN, EAU CLAIRE, PEPIN,
PIERCE, POLK, RUSK, ST. CROIX, SAWYER AND WASHBURN COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 28.99 14.05
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0021-002 06/01/2008
DODGE AND JEFFERSON COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 30.88 13.85
----------------------------------------------------------------
BRWI0034-002 06/04/2007
COLUMBIA AND SAUK COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER.......................$ 30.66 14.05
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARP0087-001 05/01/2007
BURNETT (W. of Hwy 48), PIERCE (W. of Hwy 29), POLK (W. of Hwys
35, 48 & 65), AND ST. CROIX (W. of Hwy 65) COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Carpenter & Piledrivermen........$ 26.76 11.61
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARP0252-002 06/01/2008
ADAMS, BARRON, BAYFIELD (Eastern 2/3), BROWN, BUFFALO,
BURNETT (E. of Hwy 48), CALUMET, CHIPPEWA, CLARK, COLUMBIA,
CRAWFORD, DANE, DODGE, DOOR, DUNN, EAU CLAIRE, FLORENCE (except
area bordering Michigan State Line), FOND DU LAC, FOREST,
GRANT, GREEN, GREEN LAKE, IOWA, IRON, JACKSON, JEFFERSON,
JUNEAU, KEWAUNEE, LA CROSSE, LAFAYETTE, LANGLADE, LINCOLN,
MANITOWOC, MARATHON, MARINETTE (except N.E. corner), MARQUETTE,
MENOMINEE, MONROE, OCONTO, ONEIDA, OUTAGAMIE, PEPIN, PIERCE (E.
of Hwys 29 & 65), POLK (E. of Hwys 35, 48 & 65), PORTAGE,
PRICE, RICHLAND, ROCK, RUSK, SAUK, SAWYER, SHAWANO, SHEBOYGAN,
ST CROIX (E. of Hwy 65), TAYLOR, TREMPEALEAU, VERNON, VILAS,
WALWORTH, WASHBURN, WAUPACA, WAUSHARA, WINNEBAGO, AND WOOD
COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
CARPENTER
CARPENTER...................$ 27.51 13.36
MILLWRIGHT..................$ 29.11 13.36
PILEDRIVER..................$ 28.01 13.36
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARP0252-010 05/27/2007
ASHLAND COUNTY
Rates Fringes
Carpenters
Carpenter...................$ 23.82 11.26
Millwright..................$ 27.71 11.26
Pile Driver.................$ 24.81 10.43
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARP0264-003 06/01/2008
KENOSHA, MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE, RACINE, WAUKESHA, AND WASHINGTON
COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
CARPENTER........................$ 30.52 14.41
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARP0361-004 05/01/2008
BAYFIELD (Western 1/3) AND DOUGLAS COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
CARPENTER........................$ 29.77 13.40
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARP2337-001 06/01/2008
ZONE A: MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE, WAUKESHA AND WASHINGTON
ZONE B: KENOSHA & RACINE
Rates Fringes
PILEDRIVERMAN
Zone A......................$ 27.25 19.46
Zone B......................$ 24.47 19.46
----------------------------------------------------------------
CARP2337-003 06/02/2008
Rates Fringes
MILLWRIGHT
Zone A......................$ 27.92 19.08
Zone B......................$ 26.82 19.08
ZONE DEFINITIONS
ZONE A: MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE, WAUKESHA AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES
ZONE B: KENOSHA & RACINE COUNTIES
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0014-002 06/01/2007
ASHLAND, BARRON, BAYFIELD, BUFFALO, BURNETT, CHIPPEWA, CLARK
(except Maryville, Colby, Unity, Sherman, Fremont, Lynn &
Sherwood), CRAWFORD, DUNN, EAU CLAIRE, GRANT, IRON, JACKSON, LA
CROSSE, MONROE, PEPIN, PIERCE, POLK, PRICE, RICHLAND, RUSK, ST
CROIX, SAWYER, TAYLOR, TREMPEALEAU, VERNON, AND WASHBURN
COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 28.91 27.8%+6.60
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0127-002 06/01/2008
KENOSHA COUNTY
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 33.59 28%+7.56
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0158-002 06/01/2007
BROWN, DOOR, KEWAUNEE, MANITOWOC (except Schleswig),
MARINETTE(Wausuakee and area South thereof), OCONTO, MENOMINEE
(East of a ine 6 miles West of the West boundary of Oconto
County), SHAWANO (Except Area North of Townships of Aniwa and
Hutchins) COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 26.75 26.75%+7.12
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0159-003 06/01/2008
COLUMBIA, DANE, DODGE (Area West of Hwy 26, except Chester and
Emmet Townships), GREEN, LAKE (except Townships of Berlin,
Seneca, and St. Marie), IOWA, MARQUETTE (except Townships of
Neshkoka, Crystal Lake, Newton, and Springfield), and SAUK
COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 31.00 3%+15.77
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0219-004 06/02/2008
FLORENCE COUNTY (Townships of Aurora, Commonwealth, Fern,
Florence and Homestead) AND MARINETTE COUNTY (Township of
Niagara)
Rates Fringes
Electricians:
Electrical contracts over
$90,000.....................$ 27.61 15.03
Electrical contracts under
$90,000.....................$ 25.42 14.96
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0242-005 06/02/2008
DOUGLAS COUNTY
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 31.08 59.25%
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0388-002 03/01/2007
ADAMS, CLARK (Colby, Freemont, Lynn, Mayville, Sherman,
Sherwood, Unity), FOREST, JUNEAU, LANGLADE, LINCOLN, MARATHON,
MARINETTE (Area North of the town of Wausaukee), MENOMINEE
(Area West of a line 6 miles West of the West boundary of
Oconto County), ONEIDA, PORTAGE, SHAWANO (Area North of the
townships of Aniwa and Hutchins), VILAS AND WOOD COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 27.68 15.23
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0430-002 06/01/2008
RACINE COUNTY (Except Burlington Township)
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 32.212 17.18
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0494-005 06/01/2008
MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE, WASHINGTON, AND WAUKESHA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 31.14 14.85%+$13.95
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0494-006 06/01/2008
CALUMET (Township of New Holstein), DODGE (East of Hwy 26
including Chester Township), FOND DU LAC, MANITOWOC
(Schleswig), and SHEBOYGAN COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 28.33 3%+$17.21
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0577-003 06/01/2008
CALUMET (except Township of New Holstein), GREEN LAKE (N. part
including Townships of Berlin, St Marie, and Seneca), MARQUETTE
(N. part including Townships of Crystal Lake, Neshkoro, Newton,
and Springfield), OUTAGAMIE, WAUPACA, WAUSHARA, AND WINNEBAGO
COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 27.40 26.5%+7.65
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELEC0890-003 12/01/2007
DODGE (Emmet Township only), GREEN, JEFFERSON, LAFAYETTE,
RACINE (Burlington Township), ROCK AND WALWORTH COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Electricians:....................$ 28.34 26.45%+8.11
----------------------------------------------------------------
ENGI0139-003 06/01/2008
REMAINING COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Power Equipment Operator
Group 1.....................$ 32.12 16.20
Group 2.....................$ 31.12 16.20
Group 3.....................$ 30.42 16.20
Group 4.....................$ 29.89 16.20
Group 5.....................$ 27.82 16.20
Group 6.....................$ 27.19 16.20
EPA PREMIUMS:
Level "A" Protection: $3.00 per hour
Level "B" Protection: $2.00 per hour
Level "C" Protection: $1.00 per hour
POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATORS CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Cranes, Tower Cranes and Derricks with or without
attachments with a lifting capacity of over 100 tons;
Cranes, Tower Cranes, and Derricks with boom, leads and/or
jib lengths 176 ft or longer.
GROUP 2: Backhoes (Excavators) weighing 130,00 lbs and over;
Cranes, Tower Cranes and Derricks with or without
attachments with a lifting capacity of 100 tons or less;
Cranes, Tower Cranes, and Derricks with boom, leads, and/or
jib lengths 175 ft or less; Caisson Rigs; Pile Driver
GROUP 3: Backhoes (Excavators) weighing under 130,000 lbs;
Travelling Crane (bridge type); Milling Machine; Concrete
Paver over 27 E; Concrete Spreader and Distributor;
Concrete Laser Screed; Concrete Grinder and Planing
Machine; Slipform Curb and Gutter Machine; Boring Machine
(Directional); Dredge Operator; Skid Rigs; over 46 meter
Concrete Pump.
GROUP 4: Hydraulic Backhoe (tractor or truck mounted);
Hydraulic Crane, 10 tons or less; Tractor, Bulldozer, or
End Loader (over 40 hp); Motor Patrol; Scraper Operator;
Bituminous Plant and Paver Operator; Screed-Milling
Machine; Roller over 5 tons; Concrete pumps 46 meter and
under; Grout Pumps; Rotec type machine; Hydro Blaster,
10,000 psi and over; Rotary Drill Operator; Percussion
Drilling Machine; Air Track Drill with or without integral
hammer; Blaster; Boring Machine (vertical or horizontal);
Side Boom; Trencher, wheel type or chain type having 8 inch
or larger bucket; Rail Leveling Machine (Railroad); Tie
Placer; Tie Extractor; Tie Tamper; Stone Leveler; Straddle
Carrier; Material Hoists; Stack Hoist; Man Hoists; Mechanic
and Welder; Off Road Material Haulers.
GROUP 5: Tractor, Bulldozer, or Endloader (under 40 hp);
Tampers -Compactors, riding type; Stump Chipper, large;
Roller, Rubber Tire; Backfiller; Trencher, chain type
(bucket under 8 inch); Concrete Auto Breaker, large;
Concrete Finishing Machine (road type); Concrete Batch
Hopper; Concrete Conveyor Systems; Concrete Mixers, 14S or
over; Pumps, Screw Type and Gypsum); Hydrohammers, small;
Brooms and Sweeeprs; Lift Slab Machine; Roller under 5
tons; Industrial Locomotives; Fireman (Pile Drivers and
Derricks); Pumps (well points); Hoists, automatic; A-Frames
and Winch Trucks; Hoists (tuggers); Boats (Tug, Safety,
Work Barges and Launches); Assistant Engineer
GROUP 6: Shouldering Machine Operator; Farm or Industrial
Tractor mounted equipment; Post Hole Digger; Auger
(vertical and horizontal); Skid Steer Loader with or
without attachments; Robotic Tool Carrier with or without
attachments; Power Pack Vibratory/Ultra Sound Driver and
Extractor; Fireman (Asphalt Plants); Screed Operator; Stone
Crushers and Screening Plants; Air, Electric, Hydraulic
Jacks (Slip Form); Prestress Machines; Air Compressor, 400
CFM or over; Refrigeration Plant/Freese Machine; Boiler
Operators (temporary heat); Forklifts; Welding Machines;
Generators; Pumps over 3"; Heaters, Mechanical; Combination
small equipment operator; Winches, small electric; Oiler;
Greaser; Rotary Drill Tender; Conveyor; Elevator Operator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ENGI0139-007 06/02/2008
DODGE, FOND DU LAC, JEFFERSON, KENOSHA, MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE,
RACINE, SHEBOYGAN, WALWORTH, WASHINGTON, AND WAUKESHA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Power Equipment Operator
Group 1.....................$ 31.39 16.40
Group 2.....................$ 30.61 16.40
Group 3.....................$ 29.66 16.40
Group 4.....................$ 28.61 16.40
Group 5.....................$ 27.21 16.40
POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATORS CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Cranes, Tower Cranes, and Derricks with or without
attachments, with a lifting capacity of over 100 tons; or
Cranes, Tower Cranes, and Derricks with boom, leads, and/or
jib lengths measuring 176 feet or longer; Backhoes
(Excavators) 130,000 lbs and over; Caisson Rigs and Pile
Drivers
GROUP 2: Cranes, Tower Cranes and Derricks with or without
attachments with a lifting capacity of 100 tons or under;
or Cranes, Tower Cranes, and Derricks with boom, lead,
and\or jib lengths measuring 175 feet or under; Backhoes
(Excavators) under 130,000 lbs; Skid Rigs; Dredge Operator:
Traveling Crane (Bridge type); Concrete Paver over 27 E;
Concrete Spreader and Distributor; Concrete Pumps and
Boring Machines (directional)
GROUP 3: Material Hoists; Stack Hoists; Tractor or Truck
mounted Hydraulic Backhoe; Tractor or Truck Mounted
Hydraulic Crane, 5 tons or under; Manhoist; Tractor over 40
hp; Bulldozer over 40 hp; Endloader over 40 hp; Forklift,
25 ft and over; Motor Patrol; Scraper Operator; Sideboom;
Straddle Carrier; Mechanic and Welder; Bituminous Plant and
Paver Operator; Roller over 5 tons; Percussion Drill
Operator; Rotary Drill Operator; Blaster; Air Track Drill;
Trencher (wheel type or chain type having over 8 inch
bucket); Elevator; Milling Machine and Boring Machine
(horizontal or vertical); Backhoe Mounted Compactor
GROUP 4: Backfiller; Concrete Auto Breaker (large); Concrete
Finishing Machine (road type); Roller, Rubber Tire;
Concrete Batch Hopper; Concrete Conveyor System; Concrete
Mixers (14S or over); Screw type Pumps and Gypsum Pumps;
Grout Pumps; Tractor, Bulldozer, End Loader, under 40 hp;
Pumps (well points); Trencher (chain type 8 inch or smaller
bucket; Industrial Locomotives; Roller under 5 tons;
Fireman (Piledrivers and Derricks); Robotic Tool Carrier
with or without attachments.
GROUP 5: Hoists (Automatic); Forklift, 12 ft to 25 ft;
Tamper-Compactors, riding type; A-Frame andWinch Trucks;
Concrete Auto Breaker; Hydrohammer, small; Brooms and
Sweepers; Hoist (Tuggers); Stump Chipper, large; Boats
(Tug, Safety, Work Barges and Launch); Shouldering Machine
Operator; Screed Operator; Farm or Industrial Tractor; Post
Hole Digger; Stone Crushers and Screening Plants; Firemen
(Asphalt Plants); Air Compressor (400 CFM or over); Augers
(vertical and horizontal); Generators, 150 KW and over;
Air, Electric Hydraulic Jacks (Slipform); Prestress
Machines; Skid Steer Loader with or without attachments;
Boiler operators (temporary heat); Forklift, 12 ft and
under; Screed Operator Milling Machine; Refrigeration
Plant/Freeze Machine; Power Pack Vibratory/Ultra Sound
Driver and Extractor; Generators under 150 KW; Combination
small equipment operator; Compressors under 400 CFM;
Welding Machines; Heaters, Mechanical; Pumps; Winches,
Small Electric; Oiler and Greaser; Conveyor; High pressure
utility locating machine (daylighting machine).
----------------------------------------------------------------
IRON0008-002 06/01/2008
BROWN, CALUMET, DOOR, FOND DU LAC, KEWAUNEE, MANITOWOC,
MARINETTE, OCONTO, OUTAGAMI, SHAWANO, SHEBOYGAN, AND WINNEBAGO
COUNTIES:
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKER.......................$ 27.73 19.04
----------------------------------------------------------------
IRON0008-003 06/01/2008
KENOSHA, MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE, RACINE, WALWORTH (N.E. 2/3),
WASHINGTON, AND WAUKESHA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKER.......................$ 30.06 19.04
----------------------------------------------------------------
IRON0383-001 06/01/2008
ADAMS, COLUMBIA, CRAWFORD, DANE, DODGE, FLORENCE, FOREST,
GRANT, GREENE, (Excluding S.E. tip), GREEN LAKE, IOWA,
JEFFERSON, JUNEAU, LA CROSSE, LAFAYETTE, LANGLADE, MARATHON,
MARQUETTE, MENOMINEE, MONROE, PORTAGE, RICHLAND, ROCK (Northern
area, vicinity of Edgerton and Milton), SAUK, VERNON, WAUPACA,
WAUSHARA, AND WOOD COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKER.......................$ 30.30 15.73
----------------------------------------------------------------
IRON0498-005 06/01/2008
GREEN (S.E. 1/3), ROCK (South of Edgerton and Milton), and
WALWORTH (S.W. 1/3) COUNTIES:
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKER.......................$ 34.34 25.72
----------------------------------------------------------------
IRON0512-008 05/01/2008
BARRON, BUFFALO, CHIPPEWA, CLARK, DUNN, EAU CLAIRE, JACKSON,
PEPIN, PIERCE, POLK, RUSK, ST CROIX, TAYLOR, AND TREMPEALEAU
COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKER.......................$ 32.80 19.42
----------------------------------------------------------------
* IRON0512-021 05/01/2008
ASHLAND, BAYFIELD, BURNETT, DOUGLAS, IRON, LINCOLN, ONEIDA,
PRICE, SAWYER, VILAS AND WASHBURN COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
IRONWORKER.......................$ 28.66 18.50
----------------------------------------------------------------
LABO0113-004 06/04/2007
MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE, WASHINGTON, AND WAUKESHA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Laborers: (Open Cut)
Group 1.....................$ 13.55 12.00
Group 2.....................$ 15.25 12.00
Group 3.....................$ 24.92 12.00
Group 4.....................$ 25.04 12.00
Group 5.....................$ 25.09 12.00
Group 6.....................$ 26.74 12.00
Group 7.....................$ 28.87 12.00
Group 8.....................$ 29.33 12.00
LABORERS CLASSIFICATIONS [OPEN CUT]
GROUP 1: Yard Laborer
GROUP 2: Landscaper
GROUP 3: Paving Laborer
GROUP 4: General Laborer on Surface; Top Man
GROUP 5: Mud Mixer
GROUP 6: Mucker; Form Stripper; Bottom Digger and Misc;
Bottom Man and Welder on Surface
GROUP 7: Concrete Manhole Builder; Caisson Worker; Miner;
Pipe Layer; Rock Driller and Joint Man; Timber Man and
Concrete Brusher; Bracer in Trench Behind Machine & Tight
Sheeting; Concrete Formsetter and Shoveler; Jackhammer
Operator
GROUP 8: Blaster
NOTE: Hazardous & Toxic Waste Removal: add $0.15 per hour.
----------------------------------------------------------------
LABO0113-008 06/04/2007
MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE, WASHINGTON & WAUKESHA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Laborers: (Tunnel-Free Air)
Group 1.....................$ 25.04 12.00
Group 2.....................$ 25.09 12.00
Group 3.....................$ 26.74 12.00
Group 4.....................$ 26.84 12.00
Group 5.....................$ 28.87 12.00
Group 6.....................$ 29.33 12.00
LABORERS CLASSIFICATIONS [TUNNEL - FREE AIR]:
GROUP 1: General Laborer on surface; Tower Man
GROUP 2: Saw Man; Top Man
GROUP 3: Form Stripper; Car Pusher
GROUP 4: Mucker; Dinkey; Welder (rate on surface)
GROUP 5: Concrete Manhole Builder; Mucking Machine; Miner;
Mining Machine; Welder; Rock Driller; Concrete Buster; Jack
Hammer Operator; Caisson Worker; Pipelayer and Joint Man;
Bracerman; Nozzle Man on Gunnite; Timber Man; Concrete
Brusher
GROUP 6: Blaster
NOTE: Hazardous & Toxic Waste Removal: add $0.15 per hour.
----------------------------------------------------------------
* LABO0113-009 06/04/2007
MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE, WASHINGTON & WAUKESHA COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Laborers: (Tunnel -
*COMPRESSED AIR 0 - 15 lbs.)
Group 1.....................$ 25.04 12.00
Group 2.....................$ 27.15 12.00
Group 3.....................$ 27.74 12.00
Group 4.....................$ 27.84 12.00
Group 5.....................$ 29.87 12.00
Group 6.....................$ 30.33 12.00
LABORERS CLASSIFICATIONS [TUNNEL - COMPRESSED AIR]:
*Compressed Air 15 - 30 lbs add $2.00 to all classifications
*Compressed Air over 30 lbs add $3.00 to all classifcations
GROUP 1: General Laborer on surface
GROUP 2: Lock Tender on surface
GROUP 3: Form Stripper; Car Pusher
GROUP 4: Mucker; Dinkey
GROUP 5: Mucking Machine; Miner; Mining Machine; Welder &
Rock Driller; Lock Tender in tunnel; Concrete Buster; Jack
Hammer Operator; Caisson Worker; Pielayer and Joint Man;
Bracerman; Nozzle Man on Gunite; Timber Man; Concrete
Brusher;
GROUP 6: Blaster
NOTE: Hazardous & Toxic Waste Removal: add $0.15 per hour.
----------------------------------------------------------------
LABO0140-005 06/04/2007
ADAMS, ASHLAND, BARRON, BROWN, BUFFALO, CALUMET, CHIPPEWA,
CLARK, COLUMBIA, CRAWFORD, DODGE, DOOR, DUNN, EAU CLAIRE,
FLORENCE,FOND DU LAC, FOREST, GRANT, GREEN, GREEN LAKE, IOWA,
JACKSON, JEFFERSON, JUNEAU, LACROSSE, LAFAYETTE, LANGLADE,
LINCOLN, MANITOWOC, MARATHON, MARINETTE, MARQUETTE, MENOMINEE,
MONROE, OCONTO, ONEIDA, OUTAGAMIE, PEPIN, PIERCE, POLK,
PORTAGE, PRICE, RICHLAND, ROCK, RUSK, ST CROIX, SAUK, SAWYER,
SHAWANO, SHEBOYGAN, TAYLOR, TREMMPEALEAU, VERNON, VILAS,
WALWWORTH, WASHBURN, WAUPACA, WAUSHARA, WINNEBAGO, AND WOOD
COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Laborers: (SEWER & WATER)
Group 1.....................$ 21.18 11.14
Group 2.....................$ 23.03 11.14
Group 3.....................$ 23.23 11.14
Group 4.....................$ 23.58 11.14
FOR ALL TUNNEL WORK UNDER COMPRESSED AIR:
0 - 15 lbs., add $1.00
15-30 lbs., add $2.00
Over 30 lbs., add $3.00
LABORERS CLASSIFICATIONS:
GROUP 1: Flagperson
GROUP 2: General Laborer, Wellpoint Installation; Form
Stripper; Strike Off worker
GROUP 3: Sheeting Formsetting; Patch Finisher; Bottom Man;
Joint Sawer; Gunnite Man; Manhole Builder; Welder;
Torchman; Blaster; Caulker Bracer; Bull Float; Mucker and
Car Pusher; Raker and Luteman; Hydraulic jacking of
shields, Shield Drivers; Mining Machine; Lock Tenders;
Mucking Machine Operators; Motor Men and Gauge Tenders;
Power Tool Operators
GROUP 4: Pipelayer, Miner, and Laser Operator
----------------------------------------------------------------
LABO0237-004 06/04/2007
SEWER, TUNNEL & UNDERGROUND
KENOSHA AND RACINE COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Laborers:
Group 1.....................$ 17.85 12.71
Group 2.....................$ 22.29 12.71
Group 3.....................$ 24.19 12.71
Group 4.....................$ 25.54 12.71
TUNNEL WORK UNDER COMPRESSED AIR:
0 - 15 lbs add $1.00 to all classifications
15 - 30 lbs add $2.00 to all classifications over 30 lbs
add $3.00 to all classifications
LABORERS CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Flagperson
GROUP 2: General Laborer, Landscaper, Wellpoint
Installation, Wire Mesh and Reinforcement, Concrete Worker,
Form Stripper, Strike-off Worker
GROUP 3: Machine and Equipment Operator, Sheeting, Form
Setting, Patch Finisher,Bottom Man, Joint Sawer, Gunnite
Man, Manhole Builder, Welder-Torchman, Blaster, Caulker,
Bracer, Bull Float, Conduit Worker, Mucker and Car Pusher,
Raker and Luteman, Hydraulic Jacking of Shields, Shield
Drivers, Mining Machine, Lock Tenders, Mucking Machine
Operator, Motor Men & Gauge Tenders and operation of
incidental Mechanical Equipment and all Power Driven Tools
GROUP 4: Pipelayer, Miner and Laser Operator
----------------------------------------------------------------
LABO0464-002 06/04/2007
DANE AND DOUGLAS COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Laborers:
Group 1.....................$ 21.08 11.14
Group 2.....................$ 23.28 11.14
Group 3.....................$ 23.48 11.14
Group 4.....................$ 23.83 11.14
FOR ALL TUNNEL WORK UNDER COMPRESSED AIR:
0 - 15 lbs., add $1.00
15- 30 lbs., add $2.00
Over 30 lbs. add $3.00
LABORERS CLASSIFICATIONS:
GROUP 1: Flagperson
GROUP 2: General Laborer; Wellpoint Installation; Concrete
Worker; Form Stripper; Strike Off worker
GROUP 3: Sheeting Formsetting; Patch Finisher; Bottom Man;
Joint Sawer; Gunnite Man; Manhole Builder; Welder;
Torchman; Blaster; Caulker Bracer; Bull Float; Mucker and
Car Pusher; Raker and Luteman; Hydraulic jacking of
shields, Shield Dirvers; Mining Machine; Lock Tenders;
Mucking Machine Operators; Motor Men and Gauge Tenders;
Power Tool Operators
GROUP 4: Pipelayer, Miner, and Laser Operator
----------------------------------------------------------------
LABO1050-005 06/04/2007
BAYFIELD, BURNETT, IRON, SAWYER, AND WASHBURN COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
Laborers: (SEWER & WATER)
Group 1.....................$ 20.87 11.14
Group 2.....................$ 22.93 11.14
Group 3.....................$ 23.13 11.14
Group 4.....................$ 23.48 11.14
FOR ALL TUNNEL WORK UNDER COMPRESSED AIR:
0 - 15 lbs., add $1.00
15-30 lbs., add $2.00
Over 30 lbs., add $3.00
LABORERS CLASSIFICATIONS:
GROUP 1: Flagperson
GROUP 2: Laborers, Wellpoint Installation; Form Stripper;
Strike Off worker
GROUP 3: Sheeting Formsetting; Patch Finisher; Bottom Man;
Joint Sawer; Gunnite Man; Manhole Builder; Welder;
Torchman; Blaster; Caulker Bracer; Bull Float; Mucker and
Car Pusher; Raker and Luteman; Hydraulic jacking of
shields, Shield Dirvers; Mining Machine; Lock Tenders;
Mucking Machine Operators; Motor Men and Gauge Tenders;
Power Tool Operators
GROUP 4: Pipelayer, Miner, and Laser Operator
----------------------------------------------------------------
PLAS0599-010 06/01/2007
Rates Fringes
CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER
Area 1......................$ 28.27 12.73
Area 2 (BAC)................$ 28.15 12.80
Area 3......................$ 26.10 13.65
Area 4......................$ 26.82 12.93
Area 5......................$ 26.97 12.78
Area 6......................$ 24.08 15.67
AREA DESCRIPTIONS
AREA 1: BAYFIELD, DOUGLAS, PRICE, SAWYER, AND WASHBURN
COUNTIES
AREA 2: ADAMS, ASHLAND, BARRON, BROWN, BURNETT, CALUMET,
CHIPPEWA, CLARK, COLUMBIA, DODGE, DOOR, DUNN, FLORENCE,
FOND DU LAC, FOREST, GREEN LAKE, IRON, JEFFERSON, KEWAUNEE,
LANGLADE, LINCOLN, MANITOWOC, MARATHON, MARINETTE,
MARQUETTE, MENOMINEE, OCONTO, ONEIDA, OUTAGAMIE, POLK,
PORTAGE, RUSK, ST CROIX, SAUK, SHAWANO, SHEBOYGAN, TAYLOR,
VILAS, WALWORTH, WAUPACA, WAUSHARA, WINNEBAGO, AND WOOD
COUNTIES
AREA 3: BUFFALO, CRAWFORD, EAU CLAIRE, JACKSON, JUNEAU, LA
CROSSE MONROE, PEPIN, PIERCE, RICHLAND, TREMPEALEAU, AND
VERNON COUNTIES
AREA 4: MILWAUKEE, OZAUKEE, WASHINGTON, AND WAUKESHA COUNTIES
AREA 5: DANE, GRANT, GREEN, IOWA, LAFAYETTE, AND ROCK
COUNTIES
AREA 6: KENOSHA AND RACINE COUNTIES
----------------------------------------------------------------
TEAM0039-001 05/01/2008
Rates Fringes
TRUCK DRIVER
1 & 2 Axles.................$ 22.59 14.30
3 or more Axles; Euclids
Dumptor & Articulated,
Truck Mechanic..............$ 22.74 14.30
------------------------------------------------------------
WELL DRILLER.....................$ 16.52 3.70
----------------------------------------------------------------
WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing
operation to which welding is incidental.
================================================================
Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within
the scope of the classifications listed may be added after
award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses
(29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the listing above, the "SU" designation means that rates
listed under the identifier do not reflect collectively
bargained wage and fringe benefit rates. Other designations
indicate unions whose rates have been determined to be
prevailing.
----------------------------------------------------------------
WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS
1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can
be:
* an existing published wage determination
* a survey underlying a wage determination
* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on
a wage determination matter
* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling
On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests
for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour
Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted
because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the
Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial
contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)
and 3.) should be followed.
With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal
process described here, initial contact should be with the
Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:
Branch of Construction Wage Determinations
Wage and Hour Division
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210
2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an
interested party (those affected by the action) can request
review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator
(See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:
Wage and Hour Administrator
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210
The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the
interested party's position and by any information (wage
payment data, project description, area practice material,
etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.
3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an
interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative
Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:
Administrative Review Board
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210
4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.
================================================================
END OF GENERAL DECISION
| en |
converted_docs | 996681 | ### District of Columbia
http://www.k12.dc.us
# School and Teacher Demographics
------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
Per pupil expenditures \$10,107
(CCD, 1999-2000)
------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
Number of Districts 1
(CCD, 2000-01)
------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
Number of Charter Schools 33
(CCD, 2000-01)
------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
Number of Public Schools
(CCD)
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
**1993-94** **2000-01**
Elementary 111 112
Middle 26 10
High 18 16
Combined 5 10
Total 160 148
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
**1993-94** **2000-01**
Elementary 2,297 3,395
Middle 905 325
High 977 841
Combined 173 282
Total 4,352 4,843
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades
7-12
(SASS)
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
**1994** **2000**
English 90% 68%
Math 82 87
Science \# n/a
Social Studies \# 74
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Sources of Funding
District Average
(CCD, 1999-2000)
{width="1.429861111111111in"
height="1.2201388888888889in"}
### Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
**1993-94** **2000-01**
Pre-K 5,216 4,289
K-8 53,903 46,687
9-12 17,854 13,781
Total (K-12) 71,757 60,468
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Race/ethnicity
(CCD)
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
**1993-94** **2000-01**
American Indian/Alaskan \* \*
Natives
Asian/Pacific Islander 1% 2%
Black 89 85
Hispanic 6 9
White 4 5
Other \- \-
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Students with disabilities 1993-94 2000-01
(OSEP) 9% 12%
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Students with limited 1993-94 2000-01
English proficiency 6% 8%
(ED/NCBE)
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Migratory students 1993-94 2000-01
(OME) \* 1%
----------------------------- -------------------- --------------------
All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free
and Reduced-Price Lunch Program\* (CCD, 2000-01)
{width="2.20625in" height="1.3020833333333333in"}
\*2 schools did not report
### Statewide Accountability Information
# (Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)
# Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
Decrease by 2 percent students at Below Basic level; Increase by 2
percent students at Proficient level; Stable or increased performance at
Advanced level.
# Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Move 10 percent from Below Basic, move 5 percent to Proficient, 5
percent to Advanced for reading and math (variations based on baseline
data). Decrease secondary dropout rate by 10 percent. Achieve 93 percent
attendance for elementary, 90 percent for middle and high schools.
# Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Same as School Improvement Expectation.
### Title I 2000-01
### (ED Consolidated Report, 2000-01)
+----------------+----------------+----------------+-----------------+
| | **Schoolwide** | **Targeted | **Total** |
| | | Assistance** | |
| | **Programs** | | |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+-----------------+
| Number of | 158 | 3 | 161 |
| schools | | | |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+-----------------+
| | 98% | 2% | 100% |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+-----------------+
| Schools | 146 | 3 | 149 |
| meeting AYP | | | |
| Goal | | | |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+-----------------+
| | 92% | 100% | 93% |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+-----------------+
| Schools | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| identified for | | | |
| Improvement | | | |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+-----------------+
| | 8% | \- | 7% |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+-----------------+
------------------------------ ----------------------------------------
Title I Allocation \$27,684,305
------------------------------ ----------------------------------------
(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures,
Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED,
2000-01)
### NAEP State Results
+-----------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| | Grade 4 | Grade 8 |
+-----------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| # Reading, 2002 | # | # |
+-----------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| Proficient level and above | 10% | 9% |
+-----------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| Basic level and above | 32 | 47 |
+-----------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| | | |
+-----------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| # Math, 2000 | # | # |
+-----------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| Proficient level and above | 6% | 6% |
+-----------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| Basic level and above | 25 | 23 |
+-----------------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
**District of Columbia**
# Student Achievement 2000-01
Assessment:
Stanford Achievement Test, Version 9.
State Definition of Proficient:
Represents solid academic performance that students are prepared for
this grade level.
## Elementary School
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Grade 1-6** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Reading** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students in: | Below | Basic | P | Advanced |
| | Basic | | roficient | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| All schools | 26% | 46% | 22% | 6% |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Title I schools | 28 | 47 | 21 | 4 |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| High poverty | 29 | 48 | 20 | 4 |
| Schools | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 39 | 47 | 13 | 1 |
| limited | | | | |
| | | | | |
| English proficiency | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Migratory students | 26 | 47 | 24 | 3 |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 55 | 38 | 6 | 1 |
| Disabilities | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Grade 1-6** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Mathematics** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students in: | Below | Basic | P | Advanced |
| | Basic | | roficient | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| All schools | 30% | 39% | 23% | 8% |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Title I schools | 32 | 40 | 22 | 6 |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| High poverty | 33 | 40 | 21 | 5 |
| Schools | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 35 | 43 | 19 | 3 |
| limited | | | | |
| | | | | |
| English proficiency | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Migratory students | 32 | 42 | 21 | 5 |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 71 | 22 | 7 | 1 |
| Disabilities | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
## Middle School
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Grade 7-8** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Reading** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students in: | Below | Basic | P | Advanced |
| | Basic | | roficient | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| All schools | 29% | 47% | 21% | 3% |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Title I schools | 33 | 49 | 17 | 1 |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| High poverty | 37 | 49 | 14 | \* |
| Schools | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 73 | 26 | 1 | 0 |
| limited | | | | |
| | | | | |
| English proficiency | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Migratory students | 23 | 54 | 19 | 5 |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 75 | 23 | 2 | \* |
| Disabilities | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Grade 7-8** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Mathematics** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students in: | Below | Basic | P | Advanced |
| | Basic | | roficient | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| All schools | 62% | 27% | 9% | 2% |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Title I schools | 67 | 26 | 6 | 1 |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| High poverty | 71 | 23 | 5 | \* |
| Schools | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 81 | 12 | 6 | 1 |
| limited | | | | |
| | | | | |
| English proficiency | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Migratory students | 54 | 34 | 9 | 2 |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 95 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Disabilities | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
## High School
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Grade 9-11** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Reading** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students in: | Below | Basic | P | Advanced |
| | Basic | | roficient | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| All schools | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Title I schools | 56 | 37 | 7 | \* |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| High poverty | 57 | 36 | 6 | \* |
| Schools | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 90 | 10 | \* | 0 |
| limited | | | | |
| | | | | |
| English proficiency | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Migratory students | 52 | 40 | 7 | 1 |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 85 | 13 | 1 | 1 |
| Disabilities | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Grade 9-11** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| **Mathematics** | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students in: | Below | Basic | P | Advanced |
| | Basic | | roficient | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| All schools | 69% | 22% | 8% | 2% |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Title I schools | 77 | 19 | 4 | \* |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| High poverty | 79 | 18 | 3 | \* |
| Schools | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 74 | 21 | 5 | 1 |
| limited | | | | |
| | | | | |
| English proficiency | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Migratory students | 73 | 18 | 7 | 1 |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Students with | 92 | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| Disabilities | | | | |
+---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+---------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| ### High School Indicators | ### 1993-94 | ### 2000-01 |
+---------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| High school dropout rate (CCD, | 10% | n/a |
| event) | | |
+---------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| | **1994-95** | **2000-01** |
+---------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| Postsecondary enrollment | 71% | 48% |
| | | |
| (NCES, High school grads | | |
| enrolled in college) | | |
+---------------------------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| en |
markdown | 589959 | # Presentation: 589959
## USEPA REGION 4 METHOD PERFORMANCE AND DATA COMPARABILITY PILOT PROJECT
- L. Huff1, 2, R. Frydenborg2, 4, M. Brossett2, 5, C. Jones2, 5, T. Pugh2, 5, M. Vogel2, 6, A. Dossett2, 7, B. Crouch2, 8, J. Glover2, 9, D. Arnwine2, 10, L. Dorn2, 11, C. Decker2, 11, J. Harrison2, 12, D. Melgaard2, 12, L. Gabanski13,** **J. Diamond3, 14, S. Stribling3, 14, J. Gerritsen3, 14
**1****AL Dept of Environmental Management; 1400 Coliseum Boulevard, PO Box 301463, Montgomery, AL 36130-1463; e mail: **_[esh@adem.state.al.us](mailto:esh@adem.state.al.us)_**; ****2****R4 Workgroup Member; ****3****Technical Support; ****4****FL Dept. of Environmental Protection; ****5****GA Dept. of Natural Resources; ****6****KY Dept of Environmental Protection; ****7****MS Dept of Environmental Quality; ****8****NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources; ****9****SC Dept. of Health and Environmental Control; ****10****TN Dept. of Environment and Conservation; ****11****R4 EPA-Athens; ****12****R4 EPA-Atlanta; ****13****EPA Headquarters; ****14****Tetra Tech, Inc.**
- Introduction
- The water quality program of each EPA Region 4 state includes biological monitoring as an integral part of its assessment of water quality.
- Documenting method performance characteristics is essential as states struggle to develop biological indicators that link nutrient enrichment, sedimentation, and habitat degradation to biological community response.
- Documentation of data quality objectives and method performance characteristics will help R4 states to objectively determine how bioassessment data produced by their own and outside agencies should be used in management decisions.
- EPA conducted the National Wadeable Stream Assessment (WSA) using a single biological assessment protocol at over 500 sites. The WSA provides an estimate of water quality on a national scale, but results may not agree with state results. Documentation of method performance characteristics may provide EPA with a consistent measure to determine what data should be used to assess water quality, concentrate resources into improving state methods, and help understand why state assessments differ.
- There is currently no guidance for developing and documenting performance characteristics and comparability of bioassessment methods.
- We are conducting a region-wide pilot project to:
- Propose a framework for states to calculate and report data quality and performance characteristics of macroinvertebrate bioassessment methods .
- Review, test, and revise agreed-upon methods
- Development of a Regionalized General Stressor Gradient and Independent Assessments of Water Quality
- Bias, sensitivity, and responsiveness cannot be measured without independent assessment of the degree of impairment at each bioassessment site. A critical element of this project is the development of a regional Generalized Stressor Gradient (RGSG).
- RGSG Factors: Quantifying Watershed Stress
**Landscape Level**:
- 2000 MRLC % Land Cover
- % Urban, % Agriculture, and Road Density
- Absolute Scale: Gradient thresholds set based on literature
**Habitat Alteration**:
- Habitat assessment data from each state
- Agencies use variations of the RR/GP forms in EPA’s RBP manual (Barbour et al. 1999)
- Relative Scale: Gradient thresholds based on “best available” in region.
**Chemical Pollution**:
- Water quality data collected by each agency
- Differences in parameters collected, when data collected, and number of site visits
- Most states have conductivity and nutrient data (NO3/NO2-N, NH3-N, TP)
- Relative Scale: Gradient thresholds based on “best available” in region.
- Majors Cr (Baldwin Co., AL)
- R4 1996 Joint Bioassessment Exercise
- Sougahatchee Cr (Lee Co., AL)
- R4 2004 Joint Bioassessment Exercise
- Data used to calculate and document Method Performance
- Region 4 includes 14 Level 3 Ecoregions and 99 Level 4 Ecoregions, none of which are present in all eight states. The project will be restricted to bioregions shared by 2 or more states, with existing data or where data can be collected during 2006.
- A survey conducted by ADEM was used to integrate the R4 MPDC Pilot Project into each state’s baseline monitoring activities and to use existing data where available.
- _Data used to measure method performance will include at least:_
- 5 pairs of duplicate samples along stressor gradient
- 10 reference reach samples within a site class
- 10 “test” reach samples along a stressor gradient
- Independent assessment of water quality at each site
- 1) B: Bioregion; L3: Level 3 Ecoregion; L4: Level 4 Ecoregion; 2) Bioregion or L4 in which project will be focused; AA: All available; 3) Months for which macroinvertebrate bioassessment criteria developed; 4) E: existing data; 2006: data collected during 2006; 5) JB: Joint Bioassessments – 3-6 conducted at a gradient of good, fair, and poor sites.
- Table 1. Summary of project areas, data sources, and joint bioassessments.
- Level 3 and 4 Ecoregions of the southeastern US
| | Focus Region | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 45 | | 65 | | | | 66 | | 71 | | 75 | |
| | NC | SC | AL | EPA | FL | MS | NC | TN | KY | TN | FL | GA |
| Site Classification1 | L3 | L3 | B | L3 | B | B | L3 | B | B | B | B | L4 |
| Focus Area2 | AA | AA | 65d/i | AA | | | AA | 66d/e/g | 71a/b/c/e/f/g/h | 71e & 71f/g/h | 75f/e | 75f |
| Sampling Period3 | 1-12 | 6-9 | 5-6 | 1-12 | 1-12 | 12-2 | 1-12 | 1-12 | 5-9 | 1-12 | 1-12 | 9-2 |
| Reference4 | E | E | E | 2006 | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | 2006 |
| Test4 | E | E | E | 2006 | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | 2006 |
| Duplicate4 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | E | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | E | 2006 |
| JBs5 | 3 in NC & 3 in SC | | 3 in AL | | 3 in MS | | 3 in NC & 3 in TN | | 3 in KY & 3 in TN | | 5 in FL | |
- Method Performance Measures
- The project focuses on performance characteristics of each agency’s final assessments based on their established protocol. Four performance characteristics will be measured: precision, sensitivity, bias, and responsiveness. Several methods of measuring these characteristics will be evaluated.
| Quality Control Measures | Definition | Calculation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sorting and Subsampling | | |
| Bias: Percent Sorting Efficiency (PSE) | A second sorter checks for missed specimens | PSE=(A/(A+B))*100
Where A=# of organisms found by 1st sorter; and,
B= # orgs. missed by 1st sorter |
| Taxonomy | | |
| Precision: % difference in enumeration (PDE) | A 2nd taxonomist rechecks organism counts | PDE=([n1-n2]/(n1+n2))*100
Where n1= # of orgs counted by 1st tax; and,
n2= # of orgs counted by 2nd tax |
| Precision: % taxonomic disagreement (PTD) | A 2nd taxonomist re-identifies organisms | PTD=[1-(comppos/N)]*100
Where comppos= # of agreements; and, N=total # organisms in lger of two counts. |
**Table 2**. Quality control measures of specific steps in protocol to be calculated for each agency.
- R4 Joint Bioassessments
- We assume that methods with similar performance will provide similar assessments of water quality (Barbour et al. 1999). With the RGSG, combined with results of side-by-side bioassessments, it may be possible to :
- evaluate the use of performance characteristics as a measure of data comparability, and
- determine what other information is needed to accurately evaluate data comparability.
- Six “mini” joint bioassessment workshops will be conducted among subsets of the nine participating agencies (Table 1). Each agency is conducting 3-6 joint bioassessments with another agency that shares the same bioregion or ecoregion.
- Quality Control Measures
- Method Performance Documentation Form and Database
- We are developing forms for submitting bioassessment data to the state.
- Entities will provide the following tables for reference, duplicate, and “test” sites:
- 1. Site description
- 2. Reference Reach Criteria
- 3. Bioassessment data
- 4. Ancillary data
- An ACCESS database will be created to house all R4 method performance data, evaluate the data in terms of site class, sampling period, and overall dataset, and to calculate and report performance characteristics.
- If performance characteristics do not meet data quality requirements, this information may help each agency determine how they could potentially address the problem by identifying those steps that are most variable. If our assessments do differ, this information, in conjunction with the meta data associated with each of the reference and test samples, may help us determine why. | en |
converted_docs | 370335 | **§43.21 Payment.**
\(a\) *Scope.* This section prescribes the basic standard and the
methods under which a Federal agency will make payments to grantees, and
grantees will make payments to subgrantees and contractors.
\(b\) *Basic standard.* Methods and procedures for payment shall
minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and
disbursement by the grantee or subgrantee, in accordance with Treasury
regulations at 31 CFR part 205.
\(c\) *Advances.* Grantees and subgrantees shall be paid in advance,
provided they maintain or demonstrate the willingness and ability to
maintain procedures to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer
of the funds and their disbursement by the grantee or subgrantee.
\(d\) *Reimbursement.* Reimbursement shall be the preferred method when
the requirements in paragraph (c) of this section are not met. Grantees
and subgrantees may also be paid by reimbursement for any construction
grant. Except as otherwise specified in regulation, Federal agencies
shall not use the percentage of completion method to pay construction
grants. The grantee or subgrantee may use that method to pay its
construction contractor, and if it does, the awarding agency's payments
to the grantee or subgrantee will be based on the grantee's or
subgrantee's actual rate of disbursement.
\(e\) *Working capital advances.* If a grantee cannot meet the criteria
for advance payments described in paragraph (c) of this section, and the
Federal agency has determined that reimbursement is not feasible because
the grantee lacks sufficient working capital, the awarding agency may
provide cash or a working capital advance basis. Under this procedure
the awarding agency shall advance cash to the grantee to cover its
estimated disbursement needs for an initial period generally geared to
the grantee's disbursing cycle. Thereafter, the awarding agency shall
reimburse the grantee for its actual cash disbursements. The working
capital advance method of payment shall not be used by grantees or
subgrantees if the reason for using such method is the unwillingness or
inability of the grantee to provide timely advances to the subgrantee to
meet the subgrantee's actual cash disbursements.
\(f\) *Effect* of *program income, refunds, and audit recoveries on
payment.*
\(1\) Grantees and subgrantees shall disburse repayments to and interest
earned on a revolving fund before requesting additional cash payments
for the same activity.
\(2\) Except as provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this section, grantees
and subgrantees shall disburse program income, rebates, refunds,
contract settlements, audit recoveries and interest earned on such funds
before requesting additional cash payments.
\(g\) *Withholding payments.*
\(1\) Unless otherwise required by Federal statute, awarding agencies
shall not withhold payments for proper charges incurred by grantees or
subgrantees unless:
\(i\) The grantee or subgrantee has failed to comply with grant award
conditions, or
\(ii\) The grantee or subgrantee is indebted to the United States.
\(2\) Cash withheld for failure to comply with grant award condition,
but without suspension of the grant, shall be released to the grantee
upon subsequent compliance. When a grant is suspended, payment
adjustments will be made in accordance with §43.43(c).
\(3\) A Federal agency shall not make payment to grantees for amounts
that are withheld by grantees or subgrantees from payment to contractors
to assure satisfactory completion of work. Payments shall be made by the
Federal agency when the grantees or subgrantees actually disburse the
withheld funds to the contractors or to escrow accounts established to
assure satisfactory completion of work.
\(h\) *Cash depositories.*
\(1\) Consistent with the national goal of expanding the opportunities
for minority business enterprises, grantees and subgrantees are
encouraged to use minority banks (a bank which is owned at least 50
percent by minority group members). A list of minority owned banks can
be obtained from the Minority Business Development Agency, Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230.
\(2\) A grantee or subgrantee shall maintain a separate bank account
only when required by Federal-State agreement.
\(i\) *Interest earned on advances*. Except for interest earned on
advances of funds exempt under the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act (31
U.S.C. 6501, *et seq.*) and the Indian Self-Determination Act (23 U.S.C.
450), grantees and subgrantees shall promptly, but at least quarterly,
remit interest earned on advances to the Federal agency. The grantee or
subgrantee may keep interest amounts up to \$100 per year for
administrative expenses.
| en |
all-txt-docs | 285525 | Understanding and Promoting Physical Activity
Cardinal BJ, Sachs ML. Prospective analysis of stage-of-
exercise movement following mail-delivered, self-in-
structional exercise packets. American journal ofHealth
Promotion 1995;9:430-432.
CarletonRA,LasaterTM,AssafAR, FeldmanHA,McKinlay
S, Pawtucket Heart Health Program Writing Group.
The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: community
changes in cardiovascular risk factors and projected
disease risk. American Journal of Public Healrh
1995;85:777-785.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines
forschooland community health programs to promote
physical activity among youth. Atlanta: U.S. Depart-
ment of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (in press).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines
for school health programs to promote lifelong healthy
eating. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1996;45
(No. RR-9):1-42.
Centers for Disease Control. Promoting physicaf activity
among adults; a CDC community intervention hand-
book. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease
Contro1,1988.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Worksite
and community health promotion/risk reduction
project-Virginia, 1987-1991. Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Report 1992;41:55-57.
Collins JL, Small ML, Kann L, Pateman BC, Gold RS,
Kolbe LJ. School health education. Journal of School
Health 1995;65:302-311.
Courneya KS. Understanding readiness for regular physi-
cal activity in older individuals: an application of the
theory of planned behavior. Health Psychology
1995;14:80-87.
Courneya KS, McAuley E. Are there different determi-
nants of the frequency, intensity, and duration of
physical activity? Behavioral Medicine 1994;20:84-90.
Courneya KS, McAuley E. Cognitive mediators of the
social influence-exercise adherence relationship: a test
of the theory ofplanned behavior.Joumal ofBehavioral
Medicine 1995;18:499-515.
Crow R, Blackburn H, Jacobs D, Hannan P, Pirie P,
Mittelmark M, et al. Population strategies to enhance
physical activity: the Minnesota Heart Health Pro-
gram. Acta Medica Scandirlavica Supplementurn
I986;711:93-112.
DempseyJM, KimiecikJC, HornTS. Parental influence on
children's moderate to vigorous physical activity par-
ticipation: an expectancy-value approach. Pediatric
Exercise Science 1993;5:151-167.
DePue JD, Wells BL, Lasater TM, Carleton RA. Volunteers
as providers of heart health programs in churches: a
report on implementation. AmericanJournal of Health
Promotion 1990;4:361-366.
Desmond AW, Conrad KM, Montgomery A, Simon Kx.
Factors associated with male workers' engagement in
physical activity. AAOHNJoumal 1993;41:73-83.
Dietz WH. Children and television. In: Green M, Hagerty
RJ, editors. Ambulatory pediatrics IV. Philadelphia:
W.B. Saunders, 1990:39-41.
DiGilio DA, Howze EA, Schack FK. The cost-effectiveness
of peer-led exercise programs. In: Harris S, Harris R,
Harris WS, editors. Physical activity, aging, and sports.
Vol. 2. Practice, program, and policy. Albany, NY: Cen-
ter for the Study of Aging, 19921226-231.
Dishman RK. Increasing and maintaining exercise and
physical activity. Behavior Therapy 1991;22:345-378.
Dishman RK, Steinhardt M. Health locus of control pre-
dicts free-living, but not supervised, physical activity:
a test of exercise-specific control and outcome-expect-
ancy hypotheses. Research Quarterly for Exercise and
Sport 1990;61:383-394.
Donovan RJ, Owen N. Social marketing and population
interventions. In: Dishman RK, editor. Advances in
exercise adherence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics,
1994:249-290.
DuCharme KA, Brawley LR. Predicting the intentions
and behavior of exercise initiates using two forms of
self-efficacy. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1995;18:
479-497.
Duffy ME, MacDonald E. Determinantsoffunctional health
of older persons. Gerontologist 1990;30:503-509.
Duncan HH, Travis SS, McAuley WJ. An emergent theo-
retical model for interventions encouraging physical
activity (mall walking) among older adults.Journal of
Applied Gerontology 1995;34:64-77.
Duncan TE, McAuley E. Social support and efficacy cogni-
tions in exercise adherence: a latent growth curve analy-
sis.Joumal o/Behavioral Medicine 1993;16:199-218.
Dwyer T, Coonan WE, Leitch DR, HetzelBS, Baghurst RA.
An investigation of the effects of daily physical activity
on the health of primary school students in South
Australia. International Journal of Epidemiology
1983;12:308-313.
251
physical Activity and Health
Dwyer T, Coonan WE, Worsley A, Leitch DR. An assess-
ment of the effectsof two physical activity programmes
on coronary heart disease risk factors in primary school
children. Community Health Studies 1979;IlI: 196-202.
Eaton CB, Reynes J, Assaf AR, Feldman H, Lasater T,
Carleton RA. Predicting physical activity change in
men and women in two New England communi-
ties. American]ournal alPreventive Medicine 1993;9:
209-219.
Edmundson E, Parcel GS, Perry CL, Feldman HA,
Smyth M,Johnson CC. et al. The effects of the Child
and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health in-
tervention on psychosocial determinants of cardio-
vascular disease risk behavior among third-grade
students. American journal of Health Promotion
1996;10:217-225.
Elward K, Larson E, Wagner E. Factors associated with
regular aerobic exercise in an elderly population.
Journal ofthe American Board ofFamily Practice 1992;5:
467-474.
Eng E, Hatch J, Callan A. Institutionalizing social support
through the church and into the community. Health
Education Quarterly 1985;12:81-92.
Eng E, Hatch JW. Networking between agencies and
black churches: the lay health advisor model. Prevcn-
tion in Human Services 1991;10:123-146.
Epstein LH, McCurley J, Wing RR, Valoski A. Five-year
follow-up of family-based behavioral treatments for
childhood obesity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology 1990;58:661-664.
Epstein LH, Valoski A, Wing RR, McCurley J. Ten-year
follow-up of behavioral, family-based treatment for
obese children. Journal 01 the American Medical Asso-
ciation 1990;264:2519-2523.
Epstein LH, Valoski A, Wing RR, McCurley J. Ten-year
outcomes of behavioral family-based treatment for child-
hood obesity. Hcafth Psychology 1994;13: 373-383.
Epstein LH, Wing RR, Valoski A. Childhood obesity.
Pediatric Clinics of Nor-th America 1985;32:363-379.
Errecart MT, Ross JG, Robb W, Warren CW, Kann L,
CollinsJL, et al. Methodology.Joumal ofSchool Health
1995;65:295-301.
Farquhar JW, Foartmann SP, Flora JA, Taylor CB, Haskell
WL, Williams PT, Maccoby N, Wood PD. Effects of
communitywide education on cardiovascular disease
risk factors; the Stanford Five-City Project. Journal of
the American Medical Association 1990;264:359-365
Felton GM, Parsons MA. Factors influencing physical
activity in average-weight and overweight young
women. Journal of Community Health Nursing
1994;11:109-119.
Ferguson KJ, Yesalis CE, Pomrehn PR, Kirkpatrick MB.
Attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs as predictors of exer-
cise intent and behavior in schoolchildren. Journal of
School Health 1989;59:112-115.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behav-
ior: an introduction to theory and research. Boston:
Addison-Wesley, 1975.
Fletcher GF, Blair SN, Blumenthal J, Caspersen C,
Chaitman B, Epstein 5, et al. Benefits and recommen-
dations for physical activity programs for all Ameri-
cans A statement for hearth professionals by the
Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of
the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart
Association. Circulation 1992;96:340-344.
Flora JA, Maccoby N, Farguhar JW. Communication
campaign to prevent cardiovascular disease: the
Stanford Community Studies. In: Rice RD, Atkin, CK,
editors. Public communication campaigns. 2nd ed.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 1989:233-252.
Fries JF, Bloch DA, Harrington H, Richardson N, Beck R.
Two-year results of a randomized controlled trial of a
health promotion program in a retiree population: the
Bank of America study. American Journal of Medicine
1993;94:455-462.
Frost H, Moffett JAK, MoserJS, Fairbank JCT. Randomised
controlled trial for evaluation of fitness programme for
patients with chronic low back pain. British Medical
journal 1995;310:151-154.
Glanz K, Rimer BK. Theory at a glance: a guidefor health
promotion practice. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, Public Health Service,
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Insti-
tute, July 1995.
Garcia AW, Broda MAN, Frenn M, Coviak C, Pender NJ,
Ronis DL. Gender and deve!opmental differences in
exercise beliefs among youth and prediction of their
exercise behavior. journal of SchooI Health 1995;65:
213-219.
Godbey G, Graefe A, James SW. The benefits of local
recreation and park services: a nationwide study of the
perceptions ol the American public. Arlington, VA: Na-
tional Recreation and Park Association, 1992.
252
Understanding and Promoting Physical Activity
Godin G, Desharnais R, Valois P, Bradet R. Combining
behavioral and motivational dimensions to identify
and characterize the stages in the process of adherence
to exercise. Psychology and Health 1995;10:333-344.
Godin G. Shephard RJ. Psychosocial factors influencing
Intentions to exercise of young students from grades 7
to 9. Research Quar-tcr-I,, for Exercise and Sport
1986;57:41-52.
Godin G, Desharnais R, Jobin J, Cook J. The impact of
physical fitness and health-age appraisal upon exercise
Intentionsand behavior.Joumnf ofBchaviora/Medicine
1987;10:241-250.
~;odin G, Valois P. JobinJ. Ross A. Prediction of intention
to exercise of individuals who have suffered from
coronary heart disease. journaf of Clinical Psychology
1991;47:762-772.
Godin G, Valois P, Lepage 1. The pattern of influence of
perceived behavioral control upon exercising behav-
ior: an application of Ajzen`s theory of planned behav-
ior. joumal of Behavioral Medicine 1993;16:81-102.
Gvssard D, Haskell WL, Taylor CB, Mueller JK, Rogers F,
Chandler M, et al. Effects of low- and high-intensity
home-based exercise training on functional capacity in
healthy middle-aged men. AmericanJournal ofcardiol-
ogy 1986;57:446-449.
Gottlieb NH, Chen M. Sociocultural correlates of child-
hood sporting activities: their implications for heart
health. Social Scicncc nr~d Medicine 1985;21:533-539.
C;rccn LW, Simons-Morton DC. Education and life-style
determinants of health and disease. In: Holland WW,
Dctels R, Knox G, editors. Oxford tcxtboolz of public
hcaltll. 2nd ed. Vol. I: It$uences of public health. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1996:181-195.
Greenan-Fowler E, Powell C, Varm JW. Behavioral treat-
ment of adherence to therapeutic exercise by children
with hemophilia. Archives of Physical Medicine and
Rchubilitation 1987;68:846-849.
I tJtch JW, Cunningham XC. Woods WW, Snipes FC. The
Fitness Through Churches project: description of a
community-based cardiovascular health promotion
intervention. Hygic 1986;5:9-12.
Hawkes JM, Holm K. Gender differences in exercise
determinants. Nursing Research 1993;42:166-172.
Heath GW, Leonard BE, Wilson RH, Kendrick JS, Powell
KE. Community-based exercise intervention: Zuni Dia-
betes Project. Diabctcs Care 1987;10:579-583.
Heath GW, Wilson RH, Smith J, Leonard BE. Commu-
nity-based exercise and weight control: diabetes risk
reduction and glycemic control in Zuni Indians. Ameri-
canJournal ofClinical Nutrition 1991;53:1642S-16465.
Heirich MA, Foote A, Erfurt JC, Konopka B. Work-site
physical fitness programs: comparing the impact of
different program designs on cardiovascular risks.
Journal of Occupational Medicine 1993;35:510-517.
Hochbaum GM. Public participation in medical screening
programs: a sociopsychological study. Washington, DC:
U.S. Public Health Service, 1958. Publication No.
(PHS)572.
Hofstetter CR, Hovel1 MF, Macera C, Sallis JF, Spry V,
Barrington E, et al. Illness, cnjury, and correlates of
aerobic exercise and walking: a community study.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1991;62:1-9.
Horne TE. Predictors of physical activity intentions and
behaviour for rural homemakers. CanadianJournal of
Public Health 1994;85:132-135.
Hovel1 MF, Barrington E, Hofstetter R, Sallis JF, Rauh M,
Black D. Correlates of physical activity in overweight
and not overweight persons: an assessment. Perspec-
tives in Practice 1990;90:1260.
Hovel1 M, Sallis J, Hofstetter R, Barrington E, Hackley M,
Elder J, et al. Identification of correlates of physical
activity among Latin0 adults. journal of Community
Health 1991;16:23-36.
Howze EH, Smith M, DiGilio DA. Factors affecting the
adoption of exercise behavior among sedentary older
adults. Health Education Research, Theory and Practice
1989;4:173-180.
Indianapolis Department of Parks and Recreation. India-
napofis greenways plan. Indianapolis: Indianapolis De-
partment of Parks and Recreation, 1994.
Israel BA, Schurman SJ. Social support, control, and the
stress process. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK,
editors. Healrh behavior and health education: theory,
rcscar-ch, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub-
lishers, 1990:187-215.
Jeffcry RW. Community programs for obesity prevention:
the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Obesity Rrsearch
1995;3 Supplement:283s-288s.
Kann L, CollinsJL, Pateman BC, Small ML, RossJC, Kolbe
LJ. The School Health Policies and Programs Stud)
(SHPPS): rationale for a nationwide status report on
school health programs.Journal ofSchool Health 1995;
65:291-294.
253
physical Activity and Health
Kelder SH, Perry CL, Klepp KI. Community-wide youth
exercise promotion: long-term outcomes of the Min-
nesota Heart Health Program and the Class of 1989
Study.]oumal ofSchool Health 1993;63:218-223.
Kelder SH, Perry CL, Peters RJ Jr, Lytle LL, Klepp Kl.
Gender differences in the Class of 1989 Study: the
school component of the Minnesota Heart Health
Program. Journal of Health Education 1995;26
(Supplement):S36-S44.
Killen JD, Telch MJ. Robinson TN, Maccoby N, Taylor
CB, Farquhar JW. Cardiovascular disease risk reduc-
tion for tenth graders: a multiple-factor school-based
approach. Journal of the American Medical Association
1988;260:1728-1733.
Kimiecik J. Predicting vigorous physical activity of corpo-
rate employees: comparing the theories of reasoned
action and planned behavior. ]oumaI of Sport and
Exercise Psychology 1992;14:192-206.
King AC. Community intervention for promotion of
physical activity and fitness. Exercise and Sport Sciences
Reviews 1991;19:21 l-259.
King AC, Blair SN, Bild DE, Dishman RK, Dubbert PM,
Marcus BH, et al. Determinants of physical activity and
interventions in adults. Medicine and Science in Sports
and Exercise 1992;24:5221-S223.
King AC, Carl F, Birkel L, Haskell WL. Increasing exercise
among blue-collar employees: the tailoring of worksite
programs to meet specific needs. Preventive Medicine
1988;17:357-365.
King AC, Frederiksen LW. Low-cost strategies for in-
creasing exercise behavior; relapse preparation train-
ing and social support. Behavior Modification
1984;8:3-21.
King AC, Frey-Hewitt B, Dreon DM, Wood PD. Diet vs
exercise in weight maintenance: the effects of minimal
intervention strategies on long-term outcomes in men.
Archives oflntcrnal Medicine 1989;149:2741-2746.
King AC, Haskell WL. Young DR, Oka RK, Stefanick ML.
Long-term effects of varying intensities and formats of
physical activity on participation rates, fitness. and
lipoproteins in men and women aged 50 to 65 years.
Circulation 1995;91:2596-2604.
King AC, Jeffery RW, Fridinger F, Dusenbury L, Provence
S, Hedlund 5, et al. Environmental and policy ap-
proaches to cardiovascular disease prevention through
physical activity: issues and opportunities. Health Edu-
cation !&arterly 1995;22:499-5 11.
King AC, Taylor CB, Haskell WL, Debusk RF. Strategies
for increasing early adherence to and long-term main-
tenance of home-based exercise training in healthy
middle-aged men and women. American Journal of
Cardiology 1988;61:628-632.
Klesges RC, Coates TJ, Moldenhauer -Klesges LM, Holzer
B, Gustavson J, Barnes J. The fats: an observational
system for assessing physical activity in children and
associated parent behavior. Behavioral Assessment
1984;6:333-345.
Klesges RC, Eck LH, Hanson CL, Haddock CK, Klesges
LM. Effects of obesity, social interactions, and physical
environmentonphysicalactivityinpreschoolers.HeaIth
Psychology 1990;9:435-449,
Klesges RC, Malcott JM, Boschee PF, Weber JM. The
effects of parental influences on children's food intake,
physical activity, and relative weight. International
Journal of Eating Disorders 1986;5:335-346.
Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL.
Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults.
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Sur-
veys, 1960 to 1991. Journal of the American Medical
Association 1994;272:205-211.
Lasater TM, Wells BL, Carleton RA, Elder JP. The role of
churches in disease prevention research studies. Public
Health Reports 1986;101:125-131.
Lee C. Attitudes, knowledge, and stages of change: a
survey of exercise patterns in older Australian women.
Health Psychology 1993;12:476-480.
Leonard B, Leonard C, Wilson R. Zuni Diabetes Project.
Public Health Reports 1986;101:282-288.
Lewis CE, Raczynski JM, Heath GW, Levinson R, Hilyer
JC Jr, Cutter GR. Promoting physical activity in low-
income African-American communities: the PARR
project. Ethnicity and Disease 1993;3:106-118.
Logsdon DN, Lazaro CM, Meier RV. The feasibility of
behavioral riskreduction in primary medical care.Ameri-
can]oumal of Preventive Medicine 1989;5:249-256.
Lombard DN, Lombard TN, Winett RA. Walking to meet
health guidelines: the effect of prompting frequency and
prompt structure. Health Psychology 1995;14: 164-170.
Luepker RV. Community trials. Preventive Medicine
1994;23:602-605.
Luepker RV, Murray DM, Jacobs DR Jr, Mittelmark MB.
Bracht N, Carlaw R, et al. Community education for
cardiovascular disease prevention: risk factor changes
in the Minnesota Heart Health Program. American
Journal of Public Health 1994;84:1383-1393.
254
Understanding and Promoting Physical Activity
Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM. Nader PR, Parcel
GS, Stone EJ, et al. Outcomes of a field trial to improve
children's dietary patterns and physical activity: the
Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health
(CATCH).Joumal ojthe American Medical Associchon
1996;275:768-776.
Lynch DJ, Birk TJ, Weaver MT, Gohara AF, Leighton RF,
Repka FJ, et al. Adherence to exercise interventions in
the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Journal of Be-
havioral Medicine 1992;15:365-377.
Macera CA, Croft JB, Brown DR, Ferguson JE, Lane MJ.
Predictors of adopting leisure-time physical activity
among a biracial community cohort. AmericanJournal
of Epidemiology 1995;142:629-635
Marcus BH, Banspach SW, Lefebvre RC, Rossi JS, Carleton
RA, Abrams DB. Using the stages of change model to
increase the adoption of physical activity among com-
munityparticipants. Americanjournal olHealth Promo-
tion 1992;6:424-429.
Marcus BH, Eaton CA, Rossi JS, Harlow LL. Self-efficacy,
decision-making, and stages of change: an integrative
model of physical exercise. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology 1994;24:489-508.
Marcus BH, Owen N. Motivational readiness, self-effi-
cacy, and decision making for exercise. Journal O/
Applied Social Psychology 1992;22:3-16.
Marcus BH, Pinto BM, Simkin LR, AudrainJE, Taylor ER.
Application of theoretical models to exercise behavior
among employed women. American Journal of Health
Promotion 1994;9:49-55.
Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Rossi JS. Assessing motiva-
tional readiness and decision making for exercise.
Health Psychology 1992;11:257-261.
Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Rossi JS. Self-efficacy
and the stages of exercise behavior change. Research
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1992;63:60-66.
Marcus BH, Stanton AL. Evaluation of relapse prevention
and reinforcement interventions to promote exercise
adherence in sedentary females. Research Quarterfyfor
Exercise and Sport 1993;64:447-452.
hlarlatt GA, George WH. Relapse prevention and the
maintenance of optimal health In: Shumaker SA,
Schron EB, Ockene, editors. The Handbook of Health
Behavior Change, New York: Springer Publishing
Company, 1990: 44-63.
Llarlatt GA, Gordon JR. Relapse prevenlion: maintenance
strategies in the treatment oJ addictive behaviors. New
York: Guilford Press. 1985.
Mayer JA, Jermanovich A. Wright BL, Elder JP. Drew JA,
Williams SJ. Changes in health behaviors of older
adults: the San Diego Medicare Preventive Health
Project. Preventive Medicine 1994;23:127-133.
McAuley E. Efficacy, attributional, and affective responses
to exercise participation. Journal of Sport G Exercise
Psychology 1991;13:382-393.
McAuley E, Courneya KS, Rudolph DL, Lox CL. Enhanc-
ing exercise adherence in middle-aged males and fe-
males. Preventive Medicine 1994;23:498-506.
McAuley E, Lox C, Duncan TE. Long-term maintenance
of exercise, self-efficacy, and physiological change in
older adultsJournal ofGerontology 1993;48:218-224.
McKenzie TL, Feldman H,*Woods SE, Romero KA,
Dahlstrom V, Stone EJ, et al. Children's activity levels
and lesson context during third-grade physical educa-
tion. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
1995;66:184-193.
McKenzie TL, Nader PR, Strikmiller PK, Yang M, Stone
EJ, Perry CL, et al. School physical education: effect of
the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular
Health (CATCH). Preventive Medicine (in press).
McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Faucette N, Roby JJ, Kolody B.
Effects of a curriculum and inservice program on the
quantity and quality of elementary physical education
classes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
1993;64:178-187.
McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Nader PR, Patterson TL, Elder, JP,
Berry CC, Ruff JW, Atkins CJ, Buono MJ, Nelson JA.
Beaches: anobservationalsystemforassessingchildren's
eating and physical activity behavior and associated
events. journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991; 24:
141-151.
McKenzie TL, Strikmiller PK, Stone EJ, Woods SE, Ehlinger
S, Romero KA. et al. CATCH: physical activity process
evaluation in a multicenter trial. Health Education
Quarterly 1994;21(2 Suppl):S73-589.
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological
perspective on health promotion programs. Health
Education Quarterly 1988;15:351-377.
McMurray RB, Bradley CB, Harrell JS, Bernthal PR,
Frauman AC, Bangdiwala SI. Parental influences on
childhood fitness and activity patterns. Research Quar-
terlyfor Exercise and Sport 1993;64:249-255.
Minor MA, Brown JD. Exercise maintenance of persons
with arthritis after participation in a class experience.
Health Education Quarterly 1993;20:83-95.
255
Physical Activity and Health
Mirotznik J, Feldman L, Stein R. The health belief model
and adherence with a community center-based, super-
vised coronary heart disease exercise program.Joumal
0JCommunity Health 1995;20:233-247.
Mittelmark MB, Luepker RV, Jacobs DR. Bracht NF,
Carlaw RW, Crow RS, et al. Community-wide preven-
tion of cardiovascular disease: education strategies of
the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Preventive Medi-
cine 1986;15:1-17.
Moore LL, Lombardi DA, White MJ, Campbell JL, Oliveria
SA, Ellison C. Influence, of parents' physical activity
levels on activity levels of young children. Journal of
Pediatrics 1991;118:215-219.
Mullen PD, Tabak ER. Patterns of counseling techniques
used by family practice physicians for smoking, weight,
exercise, and stress. Medical Care 1989;27:694-704.
Nader PR, Sallis JF, Patterson TL, Abramson IS, Rupp JW,
Senn KL, et al. A family approach to cardiovascular risk
reduction: results from the San Diego Family Health
Project. Wealth Education Quarterly 1989;16:229-244.
Nader PR, Taras HL, Sallis JF, Patterson TL. Adult heart
disease prevention in childhood: a national survey of
pediatricians' practices and attitudes. Pediatrics
1987;79:843-850.
National Association for Sport and Physical Education.
Moving into thefuture: national physical education stan-
dards-a guide to content and assessment. New York:
Mosby, 1995.
National Association of Governor's Councils on Physical
Fitness and Sports. Injurmation brochure. Indianapolis:
National Association of Governor's Councils on Physi-
cal Fitness and Sports, 1996.
National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States,
1990. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Public Health Servlce, Centers for Dis-
ease Control, National Center for Health Statistics, 1991.
National Center for Health Statistics, Kovar MG, LaCroix
AZ. Aging in the eighties: ability to perform work-
related activities. Data from the supplement on aging
to the National Health Interview Survey: United States,
1984. Advance dataJrom Vital and Health Statistics, No.
136. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Public Health Service, National Cen-
ter for Health Statistics, May 8, 1987. DHHS Publica-
tion No. (PHS)87-1250.
National Coalition for Promoting Physical Activity. Na-
tional Coalition for Promoting Physical Activity sets
its sites (sic> on motivating America (press release).
May 31, 1995.
National Park Service. An Americans'network ofparks and
open space: creating a conservation and recreation legaq.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior,
National Park Service, National Park System Advisory
Board, 1994.
Neuberger GB, Kasal 5, Smith KV, Hassanein R, DeVine)
S. Determinants of exercise and aerobic fitness in
outpatients with arthritis. Nursing Research 1994;43:
1 l-17.
Oldridge NB, Streiner DL. The health belief model: pre-
dicting compliance and dropout in cardiac rehabilita-
tion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
1990;22:678-683.
Orleans CT, George LK, Houpt JL, Brodie KH. Health
promotion in primary care: a survey of U.S. family
practitioners. Preventive Medicine 1985;14:636-647.
Osler M, Jespersen NB. The effect of a community-based
cardiovascular disease prevention project in a Danish
municipality, Danish Medical Bulletin 1993;40:485-489.
Owen N, Bauman A, Booth M, Oldenburg B, Magnus P.
Serial mass-media campaigns to promote physical ac-
tivity: reinforcing or redundant? American Journal of
Public Health 1995;85:244-248.
Owen N, Lee C, Naccarella L, Haag K. Exercise by mail:
a mediated behavior-change program for aerobic exer-
cise. Journal of Sport Psychology 1987;9:346-357.
Parcel GS, Simons-Morton BG, O'Hara NM, Baranowski
T, Kolbe LJ, Bee DE. School promotion of healthful
diet and exercise behavior: an integration of organiza-
tional change and social learning theory interventions.
journal ofSchool Health 1987;57:150-156.
Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA,
Bouchard C, et al. Physical activity and public health:
a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Con-
trol and Prevention and the American College of
Sports Medicine.Joumal ofthe American Medical Asso-
ciation 1995;273:402-407.
Pate RR, Small ML, Ross JG, YoungJC, Flint KH, Warren
CW. Schoolphysicaleducation.Joumal ofSchool Health
1995;65:312-318.
Perri MG, McAllister DA, Gange JJ, Jordan RC, McAdoo
WG, Nezu AM. Effects of four maintenance programs
on the long-term management of obesity. Journal o/
Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1988;56:529-534,
Perry CL, Parcel GS, Stone E, Nader P, McKinlay SM,
Luepker RV, Webber LS. The Child and Adolescent
Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH): overview of
the intervention program and evaluation methods.
Cardiovascular Risk Factors 1992;2:36-44.
256
Understanding and Promoting Physical Activity
Perty CL, Stone EJ, Parcel GS, Ellison RC, Nader PR,
Webber LS, et al. School-based cardiovascular health
promotion: the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardio-
vascular Health (CATCH). Journal of School Health
1990;60:406-413.
Perusse L, Tremblay A, Leblanc C, Bouchard C. Genetic
and environment influences on level of habitual physi-
cal activity and exercise participation. Amcricanjour-
nal of Epidemiology 1989;129:1012-1022.
Poag-DuCharme KA, Brawley LR. Self-efficacy theory:
use in the prediction of exercise behavior in the com-
munity setting. Journal oj Applied Sport Psychology
1993;5:178-194.
Pocst CA, Williams JR, Witt DD, Atwood ME. Physical
activity patterns of preschool children. Early Child-
hood Research C&arterly 1989;4:367-376.
Pomchtera-Mulcare JA. Exercise and multiple sclerosis.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1993;25:
45 l-465.
Powell KE, Dysinger W. Childhood participation in orga-
nized school sports as precursors of adult physical
activity. Amer.ican Journal of Preventive Medicine
1987;3:276-281.
President's Council on Physical Fitness. Ihe physician's Rx:
exercise. Washington, DC: President's Council on Physi-
cal Fitness and Sports, 1992.
President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports and
Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association. American
uttitudes toward physical activity and fitness: (I national
sutvey. Washington, DC: President's Council on Physi-
cal Fitness and Sports, 1993.
Prtnceton Survey Research Associates. Prevention maga-
zines children's health index. Prevention 1994 Sep.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtlteorctical ap-
proach: crossing traditional boundaries of change.
Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press, 1984.
ProchaskaJO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy:
toward a more integrative model of change. Psycho-
tftcrapy: Tfreory,Rescarcft,andPractice 1982;20:161-173.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of
how people change: applications to addictive behav-
iors. American Ps?/cftologist 199247: 1102-l 114.
Resnicow K, Cohn 1, Reinhardt J, Cross D, Futterman R,
Kirschner E, et al. A three-year evaluation of the Know
Your Body program in inner-city schoolchildren. Health
Education Quarterly 1992;19:463-$80.
Reynolds KD, Killen JD, Bryson SW, Maron DJ, Taylor
CB, Maccoby N, et al. Psychosocial predictors of physi-
cal activity in adolescents. Preventive Medicine
1990;19:541-551.
Robertson D, Keller C. Relationships among health be-
liefs, self-efficacy, and exercise adherence in patients
with coronary artery disease. Heart and Lung
1992;21:56-63.
Robison Jr, Rogers MA, Carlson JJ, Mavis BE, Stachnik T,
Stoffelmayr B, et al. Effects of a 6-month incentive-
based exercise program on adherence and work capac-
ity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
1992;24:85-93. r
Rosenstock IM. The health beliefmodel: explaining health
behavior through expectancies. In: health behavior and
healtfr education. Theory, research, and practice. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990:39-62.
Rosenstock IM. What research in motivation suggests for
public health. American journal of Public Health
1960;50:295-301.
Rosenstock IM. Why people use health services. Milbank
Memorial Fund Quarterly 1966;44(Suppl):94-124.
Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning
theory and the health belief model. Health Education
Quarterly 1988;15:175-183.
Rowland TW. Exercise and children's health. Champaign,
IL: Human Kinetics, 1990.
Sallis JF, Alcaraz JE, McKenzie TL, Hovel1 MF, Kolody B,
Nader PR. Parental behavior in relation to physical
activity and fitness in 9-year-old children. American
Journal of Diseases of Children 1992; 146: 1383-1388.
Sallis JF, Hovel1 MF, Hofstetter CR. Predictors of adoption
and maintenance of vigorous physical activity in men
and women. Preventive Medicine 1992;21:237-251.
Sallis JF, Hovel1 MF, Hofstetter CR, ElderJP, Hackley M,
Caspersen CJ, et al. Distance between homes and
exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise
among San Diego residents. Public Health Reports 1990;
105: 179-185.
Salhs JF, Hovel1 MF, Hofstetter CR, Faucher P, Elder JP,
Blanchard J, et al. A multivariate study of determinants
of vigorous exercise in a community sample. Preventive
Medicine 1989;18:20-34.
Saflis JF, McKenzie TL, Alcaraz JE. Habitual physical
activity and health-related physical fitness in fourth-
grade children. AmericanJournal ofDiseases ofchildren
1993;147:890-896.
257
Physical Activity and Health
Sallis JF, Nader PR, Broyles SL, Berry CC, Elder JP,
McKenzie TL, et al. Correlates of physical activity at
home in Mexican-American and Anglo-American pre-
school children. Health Psychology 1993;12:390-398.
Sallis JF, Patterson TL, Buono MJ, Atkins CJ, Nader PR.
Aggregation of physical activity habits in Mexican-
American and Anglo families. ~ou~na[ of Behavioral
Medicine 1988; 11:3 1-41.
Sallis JF, Patterson TL, McKenzie TL, Nader PR. Family
variables and physical activity in preschool children.
Journal oJ Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics
1988;9:57-61.
SallisJF, Simons-Morton BG, Stone EJ, Corbin CB, Epstein
LH, Faucette N, et al. Determinants of physical activity
and interventions in youth. Medicine and Science in
Sports and Exercise 1992;2$(6 Suppl):S248-S257.
Schmid TL, Pratt M, Howze E. Policy as intervention:
environmental and policy approaches to the preven-
tion of cardiovascular disease. American Journal of
Public Health 1995;85:1207-1211.
Sharp PA, Connell CM. Exercise beliefs and behaviors
among older employees: a health promotion trial.
Gerontologist 1992:32;444-449.
Shephard RJ. Worksite fitness and exercise programs: a
review of methodology and health impact. American
Jourd of Health Promotion (in press).
Simons-Morton BG, Parcel GS, Baranowski T, Forthofer
R, O'Hara NM. Promoting physical activity and a
healthful diet among children: results of's school-
based intervention study. American Journal of Public
Health 1991;81:986-991.
Simons-Morton BG, Parcel GS, O'Hara NM. Implement-
ing organizational changes to promote healthful diet
and physical activity at school. Health Education Quar-
terly 1988;15: 115-130.
Simons-Morton BG, Parcel GS, O'Hara NM, Blair SN, Pate
RR. Health-related physical fitness in childhood: status
and recommendations, Annual Review ofPublic Health
1988;9:403-425.
Simons-Morton BG, Taylor WC, Snider SA, Huang IW.
The physical activity of fifth-grade students during
physical education classes. American journal of Public
Health 1993;83:262-264.
Simons-Morton BG, Taylor WC, Snider SA, Huang IW,
Fulton JE. Observed levels of elementary and middle
school children's physical activity during physical edu-
cation classes. Preventive Medicine 1994;23:437-441.
Simons-Morton DB, Simons-Morton BG, Parcel GS,
Bunker JF. influencing personal and environmental
conditions for community health: a multilevel inter-
vention model. Community Health 1988;11:25-35.
Skinner BF. Science and human behavior. New York: Free
Press, 1953.
Skinner CS, Strecher VJ, Hospers H. Physicians' recom-
mendations for mammography: do tailored messages
make a difference? American Journal of Public Health
1994;84:43-49.
Stokols D. Establishing and maintaining healthy environ-
ments: toward a social ecology of health promotion.
American Psychologist 1992;47:6-22.
Stone EJ. Foreword to processevalu&ionin the Multicenter
Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health
(CATCH). Health Education Quarterly 1994;21(2
Suppl):S3-s4.
Stone EJ, Baranowski T, Sallis JF, Cutler JA. Review of
behavioral research for cardiopulmonary health: em-
phasis on youth, gender, and ethnicity. Journal of
Heaflh Education 1995;26(Suppl):S9-S17.
Strasburger VC. Children, adolescents, and television.
Pediatrics in Review 1992;13:144-151.
Stucky-Ropp RC, DiLorenzo TM. Determinants of exercise
in children. Preventive Medicine 1993;22:880-889.
Taggart HM, Connor SE. The relation of exercise habits to
health beliefs and knowledge about osteoporosis.Jour-
nal ofAmerican College Health 1995;44:127-130.
Tappe MK, Duda JL, Menges-Ehrnwald P. Personal in-
vestment predictors of adolescent motivation orienta-
tion toward exercise. CanadianJournal ofSport Sciences
1990;15:185-192.
Tinsley BJ, Holtgrave DR. Reise SP, Erdley C, Cupp RG.
Developmental status, gender, age, and self-reported
decision-making influences on students' risky and
preventive health behaviors. Health Education Quar-
terly 1995;22:3244-259.
Treiber FA, Baranowski T, Braden DS, Strong WB, Levy
M, Knox W. Social support for exercise: relationship
to physical activity in young adults. Preventive Medi-
cine 1991;20:737-750.
Troiano RP, Flegal KM, Kaczmarski RJ, Campbell SM,
Johnson CL. Overweight prevalence and trends for
children and adolescents. The National Health and
Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1963 to 1991. AY-
chives. Pediatriatrics and Adolescent Medicine 1995;
149:1085-1091.
258
Trost SG, Pate RR, Dowda M, Saunders R, Ward DS,
Felton G. Gender differences in physical activity and
determinants of physical activity in rural fifth grade
children.Joumal of School Health 1996;66:145-150.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services. Nutrition and your health: di-
etary guidelines for Americans. 4th ed. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1995. Home and
Garden Bu&tin No. 232.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy
people 2000: national health promotion and disease pre-
vention objectives. Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service,
1990. DHHS Publication No. (PHS)91-50212.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1992
National Survey of Worlzsite Health Promotion Activities.
Washington, DC: Office of Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion, Winter and Spring 1993.
U.S. Department of Transportation. Final report: the Na-
tional Bicycling and WalkingStudy: transportationchoices
for a changing America. Washington, DC: U.S. Depart-
ment of Transportation, Federal Highway Administra-
tion, 1994. Publication No. FHWA-PD-94-023.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Zehnpfenning G.
Measures toovercome impediments to bicycling and walk-
ing: the National Bicycling and Walking Study, cast
study No. 4. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Transportation,FederalHighwayAdministration, 1993.
Publication No. FHWA-PD-93-031.
5. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical
preventive services. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins,
1989.
S. Preventive Services Task Force. Cuidc to clinical
preventive services. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and
Wilkins, 1996.
Walter HJ. Primary prevention of chronic disease among
children: the school-based Know Your Body intervention
trials. Health Education Quarterly 1989;16:201-214.
LVeber J, Wertheim EH. Relationships of self-monitoring,
special attention, body fat percent, and self-motivation
to attendance at a community gymnasium. Journal 01
Sport and Exercise Psychology 1989;11:105-114.
Wechsler H. Levine S, Idelson RK, Schor EL, Coakley E.
The physician's role in health promotion revisited-a
survey of primary care practitioners. New England
Journal of Medicine 1996;334:996-998.
Understanding and Promoting Physical Activity
Weiss CH. Research evaluation; methods for assessing pro-
gram e@ctiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,
Inc., 1972.
Wells KB, Lewis CE, Leake B, Schleiter MK, Brook RH.
The practices of general and subspecialty internists in
counseling about smoking and exercise. AmericanJour-
nal oJPubIic Health 1986;76:1009-1013.
Wells KB, Lewis CE, Leake B, Ware JE Jr. Do physicians
preach what they practice? A study of physicians'
health habits and counseling practices. Journal of the
American Medical Association 1984;252:2846-2848.
Wilbur CS. The Johnson and Johnson program. Preven-
tive Medicine 1983;12:672-681.
Williams CL, Carter BJ, Eng A. The Know Your Body
program: a developmental approach to health educa-
tion and disease prevention. Preventive Medicine 1980;
9:371-383.
Wilson MG, Crossman L, Davis D, McCarthy. Pychosocial
and organizational characteristics of fitness program
participants. AmericanJournal ofHealth Promotion 1994:
8;422-424.
Wing RR. Changing diet and exercise behaviors in indi-
viduals at risk for weight gain. Obesity Research 1995;
3(Supp1 2):277-282.
Winkleby MA. The future of community-based cardio-
vascular disease intervention studies. American Jour-
nal oJPublic Health 1994;84:1369-1372.
Yordy GA, Lent RW. Predicting aerobic exercise partici-
pation: social cognitive, reasoned action, and planned
behavior models.Joutnaf ofSport and Exercise PsychoI-
ogy 1993;15:363-374.
Young DR, Haskell WL, Taylor CB, Fortmann SP. Effect
of community health education on physical activity
knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: the Stanford Five-
City Project. American Journaf of Epidemiology (in
press).
Zakarian JM, Hovel1 MF, Hofstetter CR, Sallis JF, Keating
KJ. Correlates of vigorous exercise in a predominantly
low SES and minority high school population. Prevcn-
tive Mcdicinc 1994;23:314-321.
259
Physical Activity and Health
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
Chapter 2: Historical Background, Terminology, Evolution of Recommendations,
and Measurement
Table 2-l. Glossary of terms
Table 2-2. Selected physical activity recommendations in the United States (1965-1996)
Table 2-3. Assessment procedures and their potential use in epidemiologic research
Table 2-4. Classification of physical activity intensity, based on physical activity lasting up to
60 minutes
Table 2.5. Correlation of twosurvey instruments with physiologic measures of caloric exchange
Chapter 3: Physiologic Responses and Long-Term Adaptations to Exercise
Table 3-1.
Table 3-2.
Figure 3-l.
Figure 3-2.
Figure 3-3.
Figure 3-4.
Figure 3-5.
A summary of hormonal changes during an episode of exercise
A hypothetical example of alterations in selected physiological variables consequent
to a B-month endurance training program in a previously sedentary man compared
with those of a typical elite endurance runner
Changes in cardiac output (A), heart rate (B), and stroke volume (0 with increasing
rates of work on the cycle ergometer
Changes in arterial and mixed venous oxygen content with increasing rates of work
on the cycle ergometer
Changes in oxygen uptake and blood lactate concentrations with increasing rates of
work on the cycle ergometer
Changes in irOL max with increasing age from 6 to 18 years of age in boys and girls
Changes in 90, max with aging, comparing an active population and sedentary
population (the figure also illustrates the expected increase in o02 max when a
previously sedentary person begins an exercise program)
Chapter 4: The Effects of Physical Activity on Health and Disease
Table 4-1. Population-based studies of association of physical activity or cardiorespiratory
fitness with total cardiovascular diseases
Table 4-2. Population-based studies of association of physical activity or cardiorespiratory
fitness with coronary heart disease
Table 4-3. Population-based studies of association of physical activity with stroke (CVA)
Table 4-4. Population-based cohort studies of association of physical activity with hypertension
261
A Report of the Surgeon General
Table 4-5. Epidemiologic studies of leisure-time or leisure-time plus occupational
physical activity and colon cancer
Table 4-6. Epidemiologic studies of leisure-time or leisure-time plus occupational
physical activity and hormone-dependent cancers in women
Table 4-7. Epidemiologic studies of leisure-time or total physical activity or
cardiorespiratory fitness and prostate cancer
Table 4-8. Cohort studies of association of physical activity with non-insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)
Table 4-9. Longitudinal population-based studies of physical activity as related to
depressive symptoms I
Table 4-10. Duration of various activities to expend 150 kilocalories for an average
70 kg adult
Chapter 5: Patterns and Trends in Physical Activity
Table 5-l.
Table 5-2.
Table 5-3.
Table 5-4.
`Table 5-5.
Table 5-6.
Table 5-7.
Sources of national and state-based data on physical activity
Percentage of adults aged 18+ years reporting no participation in leisure-time
physical activity, by various demographic characteristics, National Health
Interview Survey (NHIS), Third National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey (NHANES III), and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System (BRFSS), United States
Percentage of adults aged 18+ years reporting participation in no activity;
regular, sustained activity; and regular, vigorous activity, by state,* Behavioral
Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 1994, United States
Percentage of adults aged 18+ years reporting participation in regular,
sustained physical activity (5+ times per week for 30+ minutes per occasion),
by various demographic characteristics, National Health Interview Survey
(NHIS) and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS),
United States
Percentage of adults aged 18+ years participating in regular, vigorous
physical activity (3+ times per week for 20+ minutes per occasion at 50+
percent of estimated age- and sex-specific maximum cardiorespiratory
capacity) by various demographic characteristics, National Health Interview
Survey (NHIS) and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS),
United States
Percentage of adults aged 18+ years reporting participation in selected
common physical activities in the prior 2 weeks, by sex and age, National
Health Interview Survey (NHIS), United States, 1991
Percentage of adults aged 18+ years reporting participation in any
strengthening activities or stretching exercises in the prior 2 weeks, by
various demographic characteristics, National Health Interview Survey
(NHIS), United States, 199 1
262
Physical Activity and Health
Table 5-8.
Table 5-9.
Table 5-10.
Table 5-l 1.
Table 5-12.
Table 5-13.
Table 5-14.
Table 5-15.
Table 5-16.
Figure 5-l.
Figure 5-2.
Figure 5-3.
Figure 5-4.
Trends in the percentage of adults aged 18+ years reporting participation in
no activity; regular, sustained activity; and regular, vigorous activity, by sex,
National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance System (BRFSS), from 1985-1994
Percentage of young people reporting no participation in vigorous or moderate
physical activity during any of the 7 days preceding the survey, by demographic group,
1992 National Health Interview Survey-Youth Risk Behavior Survey (NHIS-YRBS)
and 1995 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), United States
Percentage of young people reporting participation in vigorous physical activity
during 3 or more of the 7 days preceding the survey, by demographic group, 1992
National Health Interview Survey-Youth Risk Behavior Survey (NHIS-YRBS) and
1995 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), United States r
Percentage of young people reporting participation in strengthening or toning
activities during 3 or more of the 7 days preceding the survey, by demographic group,
1992 National Health Interview Survey-Youth Risk Behavior Survey (NHIS-YRBS)
and 1995 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), United States
Percentage of young people reporting participation in stretching activities during
3 or more of the 7 days preceding the survey, by demographic group, 1992
National Health Interview Survey-Youth Risk Behavior Survey (NHIS-YRBS) and
1995 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), United States
Percentage of young people reporting participation in walking or bicycling for 30
minutes or more during 5 or more of the 7 days preceding the survey, by demographic
group, 1992 National Health Interview Survey-Youth Risk Behavior Survey
(NHIS-YRBS) and 1995 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), United States
Percentage of young people reporting participation in selected physical activities
during 1 or more of the 7 days preceding the survey, by demographic group,
1992 National Health Interview Survey-Youth Risk Behavior Survey (NHIS-YRBS),
United States
Percentage of students in grades 9-12 reporting enrollment in physical education
class, daily attendance in physical education class, and participation in exercise
or sports for at least 20 minutes during an average physical education class, by
demographic group, 1995 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), United States
Percentage of students in grades 9-12 reporting participation on at least one sport
team run by a school or by other organizations during the year preceding the survey,
by demographic group, 1995 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), United States
Percentage of adults aged 18+ years reporting no participation in leisure-time physical
activity by sex and age
Percentage of adults aged 18+ years reporting no participation in leisure-time physical
activity by month
Trends in leisure-time physical activity of adults aged 18+ years, NHIS
Trends in the percentage of adults aged 18+ years participating in no leisure-time
activity, BRFSS
263
A Report of the Surgeon General
Chapter 6: Understanding and Promoting Physical Activity
Table 6- 1.
Table 6-2.
Table 6-3.
Table 6-4.
Table 6-5.
Figure 6-l.
Figure 6-2.
Summary of theories and models used in physical activity research
Studies of interventions to increase physical activity among adults
Summary of progress toward Healthy People 2000 objective 1.10
Percentage of all physical education courses in which more than one class period
was devoted to each activity, by activity, School Health Policies and Programs
Study, 1994
Studies of interventions to increase physical activity among children and adolescents
Results of the Minnesota Heart Health Program on physical activity. Graph
compares the percentage of respondents reporting regular physical activity in
intervention cities and the secular trend estimated from control cities
Moderate-to-vigorous and vigorous physical activity observed during Child and
Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) physical education classes
264
| en |
all-txt-docs | 508130 | CDS 182..2068
CDS 2230..3066
CDS 3076..3315
CDS 3328..3813
CDS 3817..4347
CDS 4368..5900
CDS 5954..6817
CDS 6842..8230
CDS 8242..8658
CDS 8848..10233
CDS 10399..12237
CDS complement(12243..13604)
CDS complement(13661..15283)
CDS complement(15535..15855)
CDS complement(15893..16036)
CDS 16358..17467
CDS 17566..19977
CDS 20102..22273
CDS 22260..23618
CDS 23625..24623
CDS 24633..25418
CDS 25461..26279
CDS complement(26330..26818)
CDS complement(26828..30082)
CDS complement(30092..31222)
CDS complement(31233..32030)
CDS 32290..33360
CDS 34105..34482
CDS 34525..34995
CDS 35041..37158
CDS 37981..38325
CDS 38330..38884
CDS 38997..39887
CDS 39892..40872
CDS 40924..42081
CDS 42068..44200
CDS complement(44197..44652)
CDS complement(44781..45458)
CDS 45617..46027
CDS 46031..46432
CDS 46485..47324
CDS 47376..48608
CDS 48619..49359
CDS 49376..50158
CDS 50205..50891
CDS 50901..52013
CDS 52015..52317
CDS 52406..54043
CDS 54078..55019
CDS complement(55039..55809)
CDS complement(55812..56084)
CDS complement(56094..56885)
CDS complement(56895..57224)
CDS complement(57221..57628)
CDS complement(57633..58592)
CDS complement(58599..59087)
CDS complement(59149..60384)
CDS complement(60381..60833)
CDS complement(60838..62214)
CDS complement(62211..62870)
CDS complement(62863..63849)
CDS complement(63846..65549)
CDS 65797..66126
CDS complement(66160..66552)
CDS complement(66578..68095)
CDS 68298..69563
CDS complement(69626..70573)
CDS complement(70638..73118)
CDS complement(73379..74134)
CDS complement(74186..74659)
CDS 74707..75447
CDS complement(75536..76117)
CDS 76243..77223
CDS 77376..78221
CDS complement(78231..79538)
CDS 79688..80032
CDS complement(80078..81145)
CDS complement(81230..81466)
CDS complement(82131..82493)
CDS complement(82454..83269)
CDS complement(83256..83855)
CDS complement(83947..84783)
CDS complement(84806..85507)
CDS 85827..87737
CDS 87700..88290
CDS 88380..88580
CDS 88625..88978
CDS 89116..90117
CDS 90128..92539
CDS complement(92559..93608)
CDS complement(93717..96068)
CDS 96416..97090
CDS 97050..97385
CDS 97518..97697
CDS 97697..98641
CDS 98638..99372
CDS 99504..99740
CDS 99853..100899
CDS 100886..101590
CDS 101594..102583
CDS 102583..103377
CDS 103420..103761
CDS 103858..105165
CDS complement(105179..107236)
CDS 107487..108692
CDS 108694..109374
CDS 109346..109657
CDS 109825..110625
CDS complement(110647..112041)
CDS complement(112153..113259)
CDS 113657..114541
CDS 114740..116014
CDS 116454..118301
CDS 118416..119414
CDS complement(119533..120189)
CDS 120308..121195
CDS complement(121214..121654)
CDS 121720..122202
CDS 122671..124353
CDS 124416..124901
CDS complement(124935..125732)
CDS complement(125763..126461)
CDS 126635..127960
CDS complement(127977..129317)
CDS 129798..130253
CDS 130289..130549
CDS 130709..132325
CDS 132576..134045
CDS 134389..135843
CDS 135860..136378
CDS 141730..142926
CDS complement(142930..143574)
CDS complement(143672..145093)
CDS 145373..145663
CDS 145749..146570
CDS complement(146588..148972)
CDS 149259..150989
CDS complement(151011..152555)
CDS complement(152624..153637)
CDS 153868..154842
CDS 155079..155885
CDS complement(155914..157281)
CDS complement(157354..158910)
CDS 159224..160663
CDS complement(160672..164562)
CDS complement(164618..165073)
CDS complement(165127..165516)
CDS complement(165538..165966)
CDS complement(166053..167159)
CDS 167313..167684
CDS 167776..169149
CDS complement(169179..171059)
CDS complement(171081..171983)
CDS 172241..172543
CDS complement(172523..173425)
CDS 173693..174541
CDS 174604..176568
CDS 176586..177203
CDS 177200..177529
CDS 177561..178427
CDS complement(178436..180322)
CDS complement(180382..182712)
CDS complement(182895..184142)
CDS complement(184236..184820)
CDS complement(184934..186241)
CDS complement(186668..187834)
CDS complement(188010..189023)
CDS 189447..190418
CDS 190415..192379
CDS 192437..193297
CDS 193264..194952
CDS complement(194967..195350)
CDS complement(195316..195579)
CDS complement(195679..196113)
CDS complement(196110..196673)
CDS complement(196754..197683)
CDS complement(197724..198341)
CDS 198753..201347
CDS 201337..201858
CDS 201872..202915
CDS 202915..203550
CDS 203887..205596
CDS 205618..206718
CDS 206758..207990
CDS 208052..208702
CDS 208729..209679
CDS complement(209761..209970)
CDS complement(210258..211010)
CDS complement(211151..212455)
CDS complement(212680..214812)
CDS complement(214865..216064)
CDS complement(216232..217659)
CDS 217960..218928
CDS 218987..219250
CDS 219521..220729
CDS 220765..221754
CDS complement(222555..223901)
CDS complement(224028..224705)
CDS complement(224745..225467)
CDS complement(225484..226257)
CDS complement(226290..227072)
CDS complement(227354..227980)
CDS 228282..230081
CDS 230106..231047
CDS 231140..231820
CDS 231927..232664
CDS 232655..233074
CDS 233242..233982
CDS complement(234013..236511)
CDS complement(236659..237555)
CDS complement(237588..238742)
CDS complement(238799..240055)
CDS complement(240096..240824)
CDS complement(240845..242272)
CDS complement(242294..243373)
CDS complement(243370..244515)
CDS complement(244530..245846)
CDS complement(245848..246930)
CDS complement(246911..248302)
CDS complement(248299..249789)
CDS complement(249808..251496)
CDS complement(251532..251846)
CDS complement(251839..252768)
CDS complement(252905..253399)
CDS 253457..253687
CDS complement(253702..254754)
CDS 254973..255677
CDS complement(255732..257465)
CDS complement(257471..259219)
CDS complement(259378..261129)
CDS complement(261158..263275)
CDS complement(263372..263641)
CDS complement(263762..264745)
CDS complement(264696..265073)
CDS complement(265136..267661)
CDS complement(267684..269168)
CDS complement(269576..269917)
CDS complement(269977..271317)
CDS complement(271307..272107)
CDS complement(272201..274108)
CDS 274187..274468
CDS complement(274431..274772)
CDS complement(274883..275359)
CDS complement(275701..278322)
CDS complement(278424..279419)
CDS 279549..280586
CDS complement(280655..281296)
CDS 281667..282878
CDS 282948..283166
CDS 283269..284144
CDS 284141..284878
CDS 285143..285994
CDS complement(286018..287409)
CDS 287552..288298
CDS 288355..288849
CDS 288830..289930
CDS 289964..291481
CDS 291535..292875
CDS 292923..293165
CDS 293174..293296
CDS 293293..293694
CDS 293714..294214
CDS 294211..294450
CDS 294467..294814
CDS complement(294827..295558)
CDS complement(295563..295733)
CDS complement(295802..296893)
CDS complement(296859..298604)
CDS 299222..299563
CDS complement(299584..300441)
CDS complement(300479..301108)
CDS complement(301221..302861)
CDS complement(302907..303200)
CDS complement(303537..303743)
CDS complement(304074..304526)
CDS complement(304569..304796)
CDS complement(304915..305256)
CDS 305690..307090
CDS 307583..308074
CDS 308131..311382
CDS 311419..314907
CDS 315053..316057
CDS 316867..317277
CDS 317405..318085
CDS 318194..319288
CDS 319379..320209
CDS 320258..320974
CDS 321005..323164
CDS 323297..324244
CDS complement(324239..325009)
CDS complement(325080..325829)
CDS 326030..327196
CDS complement(327225..328580)
CDS complement(328558..329100)
CDS 330158..330373
CDS 330636..331544
CDS 331562..332332
CDS 332401..333531
CDS complement(333709..334233)
CDS complement(334301..335461)
CDS 335658..336467
CDS 336617..337297
CDS 337818..338387
CDS 338486..340135
CDS complement(340141..340647)
CDS complement(340732..342015)
CDS 342123..343301
CDS complement(343315..344262)
CDS complement(344274..344735)
CDS complement(344754..347573)
CDS complement(347566..348528)
CDS 348688..348954
CDS complement(348974..350164)
CDS complement(350225..351349)
CDS complement(351424..353349)
CDS 354408..354941
CDS complement(355634..356188)
CDS complement(356800..357948)
CDS complement(357968..359227)
CDS complement(359362..359700)
CDS 360154..361338
CDS 361361..362431
CDS 362541..363293
CDS 363893..364135
CDS 364200..365336
CDS 365375..366169
CDS 366273..367133
CDS 367171..368457
CDS 368538..369026
CDS 369054..370466
CDS 370539..371120
CDS complement(371530..372078)
CDS 372580..373737
CDS 373905..374555
CDS complement(374559..375377)
CDS 375563..376402
CDS 376418..377212
CDS complement(377214..378644)
CDS complement(378711..380201)
CDS complement(380215..382875)
CDS 383537..384412
CDS complement(384456..384749)
CDS 384985..385551
CDS 385538..386011
CDS 386031..386750
CDS complement(386747..387730)
CDS 388313..388585
CDS 388614..389870
CDS complement(389905..390660)
CDS complement(390660..391556)
CDS complement(391748..392788)
CDS 393111..393731
CDS 393772..394092
CDS complement(394117..394764)
CDS 395221..395655
CDS 395750..396400
CDS 396339..397727
CDS complement(397742..398371)
CDS complement(398380..398931)
CDS complement(399041..400435)
CDS complement(400483..401307)
CDS complement(401355..402200)
CDS complement(402235..403080)
CDS complement(403085..404179)
CDS complement(404202..405464)
CDS 405616..405810
CDS 405813..406226
CDS 406187..407101
CDS 407163..408080
CDS 408155..408730
CDS 408773..409846
CDS 409881..410810
CDS complement(410807..412138)
CDS complement(412187..413845)
CDS 414110..414343
CDS complement(414377..414811)
CDS complement(414829..416061)
CDS complement(416058..417344)
CDS complement(417319..418059)
CDS complement(418111..419631)
CDS complement(419570..420007)
CDS 420266..421060
CDS complement(421114..421812)
CDS 422347..422940
CDS 423854..424627
CDS 424838..426325
CDS 426735..427142
CDS complement(427252..428598)
CDS complement(428659..429498)
CDS 429728..430597
CDS 430685..431488
CDS 431491..432183
CDS complement(432203..432478)
CDS complement(432465..433298)
CDS complement(433309..434001)
CDS 434225..435298
CDS complement(435368..436825)
CDS complement(436884..437837)
CDS complement(437834..441313)
CDS complement(441335..442492)
CDS complement(442508..443296)
CDS complement(443286..443756)
CDS complement(443873..444895)
CDS complement(444895..445404)
CDS complement(445490..447907)
CDS complement(447944..449284)
CDS complement(449291..450160)
CDS complement(450135..450917)
CDS complement(451109..452302)
CDS complement(452411..452968)
CDS complement(453030..453329)
CDS complement(453359..453775)
CDS complement(453793..454605)
CDS complement(454650..455372)
CDS 455620..456399
CDS 456535..457359
CDS 457957..459396
CDS 459441..459812
CDS 460610..461284
CDS 461469..463511
CDS complement(463527..463835)
CDS complement(463814..465016)
CDS 465082..465744
CDS complement(465741..466202)
CDS complement(466186..467400)
CDS 467680..467916
CDS 467909..468076
CDS complement(468087..468275)
CDS complement(468326..468949)
CDS complement(469163..469588)
CDS complement(470322..471545)
CDS complement(472134..473057)
CDS complement(473309..474061)
CDS complement(474082..474594)
CDS complement(474635..475930)
CDS complement(475985..476740)
CDS complement(476776..477189)
CDS complement(477179..477886)
CDS complement(478018..478893)
CDS complement(478874..480064)
CDS complement(480134..481375)
CDS complement(481388..484117)
CDS complement(484199..484942)
CDS complement(484944..486710)
CDS complement(486721..487062)
CDS complement(487056..487475)
CDS complement(487595..488344)
CDS complement(488375..489991)
CDS 490237..490749
CDS complement(491724..494987)
CDS complement(495015..495878)
CDS 496137..496697
CDS complement(496750..497397)
CDS complement(497548..498735)
CDS complement(498740..500071)
CDS 500198..500536
CDS complement(500583..504533)
CDS complement(504830..506605)
CDS 507068..507793
CDS complement(507840..508769)
CDS 508908..509162
CDS 509181..510923
CDS 511256..512092
CDS 512171..513652
CDS complement(513658..514251)
CDS 514373..515476
CDS complement(515504..516184)
CDS 516367..518910
CDS complement(518941..520440)
CDS complement(520511..520969)
CDS complement(520984..521850)
CDS complement(521860..522657)
CDS complement(523185..524030)
CDS 524160..524723
CDS complement(524770..526071)
CDS 526171..527196
CDS 527190..528377
CDS 528364..529119
CDS 529112..529795
CDS complement(529802..530860)
CDS complement(530869..531942)
CDS 532107..533612
CDS 533696..536341
CDS 536440..537369
CDS 537574..538728
CDS 538755..539219
CDS 539233..539358
CDS 539424..539651
CDS 539665..540654
CDS 540659..541159
CDS 541395..542198
CDS complement(542374..544179)
CDS complement(544259..546007)
CDS complement(546067..546282)
CDS 546461..547483
CDS 547487..547846
CDS 547879..548682
CDS complement(548679..549860)
CDS complement(549913..550926)
CDS complement(551028..551291)
CDS complement(551305..551616)
CDS 551734..552705
CDS 553002..553988
CDS 554083..554622
CDS complement(554700..556949)
CDS complement(557189..557908)
CDS complement(557905..559644)
CDS complement(559826..561490)
CDS complement(561558..562118)
CDS complement(562335..563420)
CDS 563664..564263
CDS complement(564307..565626)
CDS complement(565684..566973)
CDS complement(567055..567675)
CDS complement(567753..568247)
CDS 568538..569482
CDS 569560..570849
CDS complement(570866..572245)
CDS complement(572299..573258)
CDS complement(573308..573766)
CDS 574055..574615
CDS 574805..575536
CDS 575696..577093
CDS 577155..577646
CDS complement(577670..578932)
CDS complement(579178..579834)
CDS 580297..580614
CDS complement(580634..581755)
CDS complement(581766..582530)
CDS complement(582531..582746)
CDS complement(582736..582900)
CDS complement(582994..583497)
CDS complement(583484..584131)
CDS complement(584133..585947)
CDS 586253..587335
CDS 587709..587981
CDS complement(588056..589360)
CDS complement(589375..590964)
CDS 591184..592206
CDS 592203..592970
CDS complement(593030..593827)
CDS 594570..595754
CDS 595775..596158
CDS 596160..596705
CDS 596751..597179
CDS 597181..597909
CDS 597999..598484
CDS 598524..598895
CDS 599101..603129
CDS 603173..607390
CDS complement(607573..607776)
CDS 607794..607922
CDS 608213..609310
CDS 609366..609674
CDS 609735..611651
CDS 611679..612311
CDS 612344..613309
CDS 613618..614277
CDS complement(614360..614833)
CDS complement(614839..615528)
CDS complement(615551..615802)
CDS complement(615964..616644)
CDS 616722..617666
CDS 617742..617927
CDS 618446..619546
CDS complement(619557..621209)
CDS 621398..621988
CDS 622318..623013
CDS complement(623472..624461)
CDS complement(624649..624882)
CDS complement(624907..625335)
CDS 625817..626128
CDS 626166..626813
CDS 626825..627430
CDS 627427..627732
CDS 627747..628574
CDS 628591..628869
CDS 628889..629224
CDS 629241..629951
CDS 629955..630365
CDS 630365..630571
CDS 630537..630815
CDS 630921..631292
CDS 631310..631624
CDS 631643..632179
CDS 632189..632494
CDS 632514..632906
CDS 632926..633462
CDS 633466..633819
CDS 633838..634338
CDS 634349..634525
CDS 634529..634963
CDS 634963..636312
CDS 636330..636446
CDS 636557..636913
CDS 636932..637327
CDS 637293..637970
CDS 638000..638986
CDS 638999..639367
CDS 639483..639911
CDS 639965..641062
CDS 641232..641708
CDS 641779..642879
CDS 642902..644200
CDS 644295..644696
CDS 644792..646162
CDS complement(646210..647835)
CDS 648310..648831
CDS 649280..650104
CDS 650195..650896
CDS 650913..651917
CDS complement(651914..653923)
CDS complement(653926..654885)
CDS complement(655014..655925)
CDS 656084..656863
CDS 656931..657245
CDS complement(657618..659255)
CDS complement(659401..659997)
CDS complement(660030..661433)
CDS complement(661526..661987)
CDS 662318..664765
CDS complement(664788..665813)
CDS 665990..666898
CDS 666895..668979
CDS complement(668934..669056)
CDS complement(669031..669657)
CDS complement(669724..671514)
CDS 672550..674235
CDS 674329..675975
CDS complement(675981..676487)
CDS complement(676502..677410)
CDS complement(677464..678507)
CDS 678993..679451
CDS 679455..680792
CDS complement(685954..687486)
CDS 687812..689275
CDS 689380..690948
CDS 690979..691842
CDS 691957..693834
CDS complement(693847..694821)
CDS complement(694843..696957)
CDS complement(696950..697375)
| en |
markdown | 842332 | # Presentation: 842332
## How to Write a Successful JGLR Web Release
**Thursday, May 31, 2007 3:40 pm**
**School for Scientists**
**By Carol A. Stepien, Ph.D.**
*** ******IAGLR Outreach Committee Co-Chair &***
*** ******Journal of Great Lakes Research Associate Editor***
**Web Release Instructions:**
**http://www.iaglr.org/jglr/instruct_release.php**
## Why Bother to Write A Web Release?
**Transfer scientific research knowledge to the public **** **
**Entice the press & public to seek out JGLR authors **** **
**Avenue for media & headlines**** **
**Web releases are posted on a press listserver & the IAGLR web site **
## First Step: Catchy Title
**Short, Interesting, clever**** **
**Sums up your results in a single phrase**** **
**A good title often contains strong (action) words**** **
**Example: *****An Invading Phytoplankter in Lake Erie That Likes it Hot***
## Other Good Web Release Titles
***Are Low-head Dams Bad News for Darters?****** ***
**Recent Titles****Volume 33, Number 1 (3/23/07)**** **
***New Zealand Mud Snails Invade Lake Erie!****** ***
***Crayfish dine on Great Lakes trout and salmon (eggs)!****** ***
***Who’s moved into Lake Erie rivers?****** ***
***Lake trout swim deep in Lake Mistassini***
## Second Step: Writing the Release
**Write your release to be easily understood by a non-scientist - a neighbor or a friend**** **
**Write as if to read it out loud to them**
**Avoid jargon and strictly scientific terms**
**K.I.S. = Keep it Simple**
## Other Release Writing Points
**Determine why someone would want to read your release & write accordingly**** **
**Inverted "pyramid style" of writing: **
** ****put the most important part first**
**Follow the 5 W's: **
** *****Who, Where, What, When, Why***** **
**Short words and sentences**** ****e.g.,***** "use" *****not *****"utilize."****** ***
## 4 Parts to the Body:
**1-2 sentences that explain the problem clearly & in an interesting way**** **
**1 sentence stating the most important results & findings of the work**
**A quote about the significance of the work. *****Why should people care?***** **
** ****Natural speaking style & present tense**
**1 sentence summarizing or explaining, if necessary**
## 1. Explain the Problem: Examples
***Cylindrospermopsis*****, a potentially-toxic, filamentous phytoplankton genus native to southeast-Asia and Africa, has been documented in Lake Erie for the first time.**** **
**When the Munroe Falls low-head dam was built on the Cuyahoga River in 1817, people didn’t know its effects on resident fish populations.**
## 2. A sentence that details the most important results & findings
** ****Studying the dynamics of phytoplankton (the microscopic plants that form the base of the food web) in Sandusky Bay and Lake Erie offshore sites in 2005, doctoral researcher Joe Conroy and a team of other Ohio State University scientists found *****Cylindrospermopsis***** in a community composed largely of cyanobacteria.**
## 3. A quote about the significance of the work: Why do we care?
- “**Finding *****Cylindrospermopsis *****in Lake Erie was surprising since it most often occurs in tropical locations,” Mr. Conroy said. “We discovered that it was particularly abundant in Sandusky Bay because of the high temperatures, low light, and abundant nutrients found there.” **
## Another quote example
- “**We found evidence that the dam had reduced gene flow in the logperch darter, but had no apparent effect on the greenside darter”, says Amanda Haponski. “This could be the result of the logperch being naturally more migratory than the sedentary greenside darter.”**
## 4. Summary
** **** ****In addition to *****Cylindrospermopsis,***** Sandusky Bay is rich in other cyanobacterial groups***** *****throughout the spring and summer and could be a potential source of harmful algal blooms found in Lake Erie late in the summer. Mr. Conroy and Dr. David Culver are conducting further research on this “Algal Loading Hypothesis” with funding provided by the Ohio Lake Erie Protection Fund and the Ohio Sea Grant College Program.**
## Another Summary Example
**The Munroe Falls dam was removed in November 2005, making this a potentially valuable baseline study. Follow-up data should be collected on genetic variation of darters throughout the Cuyahoga River, evaluating further potential barriers to gene flow.**
## Part 3: Reference
**Original Publication Information ****Results of this study, "*****Cylindrospermopsis *****in Lake Erie: testing its association with other cyanobacterial genera and limnological parameters," are reported by Joe Conroy, Erin Quinlan, Doug Kane, and David Culver in an article in the *****Journal of Great Lakes Research*****, (Volume 33, No. xxx, pp. xxx-xxx) published by the International Association for Great Lakes Research, 2007.**
## Contacts
** ****For more information about the study, contact Joe Conroy, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio, **_[conroy.27@osu.edu](file:///E:/My%20Documents/Research/Research%20Presentations/LEC/program%20files/qualcomm/eudora/attach/conroy.27@osu.edu)_**, (614) 292-5230. **
## Journal Source
- **For information about the Journal of Great Lakes Research, contact Marlene Evans, Editor, National Water Research Institute, 11 Innovation Boulevard, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 3H5, Canada; **_[marlene.evans@ec.gc.ca](mailto:marlene.evans@ec.gc.ca)_**; (306) 975-5310**** ** | en |
converted_docs | 944847 | +-------+---+-----------------------+-----------+----------------+----+
| # O | # | | | | # |
| | # | | | | |
| ## | # | | | | # |
| | # | | | | |
| | | | | | # |
| | O | | | | # |
| | C | | | | |
| | C | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | 2 | | | | |
| | 0 | | | | |
| | 0 | | | | |
| | 5 | | | | |
| | - | | | | |
| | 4 | | | | |
| | 2 | | | | |
+-------+---+-----------------------+-----------+----------------+----+
| | * | | | | |
| | * | | | | |
| | O | | | | |
| | C | | | | |
| | C | | | | |
| | B | | | | |
| | U | | | | |
| | L | | | | |
| | L | | | | |
| | E | | | | |
| | T | | | | |
| | I | | | | |
| | N | | | | |
| | * | | | | |
| | * | | | | |
+-------+---+-----------------------+-----------+----------------+----+
| ## Co | | | | | |
| mptro | | | | | |
| ller | | | | | |
| of th | | | | | |
| e Cur | | | | | |
| rency | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| > Adm | | | | | |
| inist | | | | | |
| rator | | | | | |
| > of | | | | | |
| > Nat | | | | | |
| ional | | | | | |
| > | | | | | |
| Banks | | | | | |
+-------+---+-----------------------+-----------+----------------+----+
| # | | ## Interim Final Rule | ## Des | ## Asse | |
| # Sub | | | cription: | ssment of Fees | |
| ject: | | | | | |
+-------+---+-----------------------+-----------+----------------+----+
**TO:** Chief Executive Officers of All National Banks, Federal Branches
and Agencies,
Department and Division Heads, and All Examining Personnel
On November 17, 2005, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
(OCC) published in the *Federal Register* the attached interim final
rule, with a request for comment, amending part 8 of the OCC's rules
concerning the timing of payments of OCC assessments. The effective date
of the interim rule is December 19, 2005. Comments are due by December
19, 2005.
The interim final rule revises the current process for assessment
collection. Under the current process, national banks must make the
initial calculation of the amount due to the OCC. Under the revised
process established by this interim rule, the OCC, rather than each
national bank, will calculate the semiannual assessment based on the
most recent Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (call report).
The assessment will be due by March 31 and September 30 of each year,
which is two months later than under the current process. For example,
in the coming year, payments that would have been due on January 31,
2006, will instead be due on March 31, 2006. The OCC will notify each
national bank of the amount of its semiannual assessment and will deduct
automatically that amount from each bank's designated bank account on
the payment due date. The interim rule changes the assessment collection
process only; it does not make changes to the method for calculating
assessments due from national banks.
For further information, contact Bruce Halper, team leader--Revenue,
Financial Management, at (202) 874-2199, or Jean Campbell, senior
attorney, or Mitchell Plave, counsel, Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division, at (202) 874-5090.
Julie L. Williams
First Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel
Attachment: [70 FR
69641](http://www.occ.treas.gov/fr/fedregister/70fr69641.pdf)
\[http://www.occ.treas.gov/fr/fedregister/70fr69641.pdf\]
| en |
converted_docs | 885153 | January 13, 2005
> MORTGAGEE LETTER 2005-04
**TO: ALL APPROVED MORTGAGEES**
####### SUBJECT: Update to Mortgagee Letter 2004-45
> **Single Family Real Estate Owned (Property Disposition)**
>
> **National Management and Marketing Contractors**
The purpose of this Mortgagee Letter is to provide updated information
to Mortgagee Letter 2004-45 issued November 19, 2004. With the exception
of the information contained in this Mortgagee Letter, all other
information contained in Mortgagee Letter 2004-45 remains in effect.
***Effective immediately***, there has been a name change for the
Management and Marketing contractor responsible for the states of New
Jersey and New York. The name is now National Home Management Solutions
of New York, LLC. All other information remains unchanged.
***Effective December 15, 2004***, Southern California (*Orange, San
Diego, Imperial, San Bernardino, Riverside, Inyo, Mono, Los Angeles,
Santa Barbara, Ventura, and San Luis Obispo Counties*) is handled by:
> PEMCO, LTD
>
> 5312 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 101
>
> Huntington Beach, CA 92649
>
> Phone Number: (714) 899-5501
Fax Number: (714) 899-5601
> Email address: laura.hennes@pemco-socal.com
>
> Website: www.hudpemco.com
###### Effective December 20, 2004,Illinois and Indiana are handled by:
> Harrington, Moran, Barksdale, Inc.
>
> 8600 W. Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 600 South
>
> Chicago, IL 60631
>
> Phone Number: (773) 714-9200; Toll Free: (866) 702-6600
>
> Fax Number: (773) 714-1669
>
> Email address: chicago@hmbireo.com
>
> Website: www.hmbireo.com
***Effective December 22, 2004, the District of Columbia is handled
by:***
First Preston Management
> 616 Marriott Drive, Suite 300
>
> Nashville, TN 37214
>
> Phone Number: (615) 620-3065, ext. 410
>
> Fax Number: (615) 620-3069
>
> Email address: <mmasitis@firstpreston.com>
Website: www.firstpreston.com
> Preservation and Protection requests and extension of time requests
> for the District of Columbia properties should be sent to:
>
> First Preston Foreclosure Specialists
>
> 5040 Addison Circle, Suite 400
>
> Addison, TX 75001
>
> Phone Number: (972) 419-6917
>
> Fax Number: (972) 392-2123
>
> Email address: <jbatts@firstpreston.com>
***Effective January 8, 2005***, the Santa Ana Homeownership Center will
be responsible for the management and oversight of contractors in the
following states: North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota,
Wisconsin, Oklahoma, Missouri and Kansas. When issues arise regarding
property condition and re-conveyance appeals, please contact Virginia
Howell, the Government Technical Representative, at the Santa Ana
Homeownership Center. The Real Estate Owned Division Director at the
Santa Ana Homeownership Center is Thomas Rose. The address and telephone
numbers are as follows:
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Santa Ana Homeownership Center
1600 North Broadway
Santa Ana, CA 92706
Telephone Number for Virginia Howell: (888) 827-5605, ext. 3552
Telephone Number for Thomas Rose: (888) 827-5605, ext. 3554
Mortgagees must take the appropriate steps to effect this change
immediately. Please direct any questions to Wanda Sampedro of the Office
of Single Family Asset Management at (202) 708-1672.
> Sincerely,
>
> John C. Weicher
>
> Assistant Secretary for Housing-
>
> Federal Housing Commissioner
| en |
log-files | 819525 | commit 67d112842586aa11506b7a8afec29391bf8f3cca
Merge: d3f1580... 2576c99...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat Nov 1 10:36:30 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'x86-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'x86-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
x86: fix AMDC1E and XTOPOLOGY conflict in cpufeature
x86: build fix
commit d3f15800d5752ca4814270180798ab8323157d28
Author: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Oct 31 12:47:23 2008 +0800
init/do_mounts_md.c: remove duplicated #include
Removed duplicated #include <linux/delay.h> in init/do_mounts_md.c.
The same compile error ("error: implicit declaration of function
'msleep'") got fixed twice:
- f8b77d39397e1510b1a3bcfd385ebd1a45aae77f ("init/do_mounts_md.c:
msleep compile fix")
- 73b4a24f5ff09389ba6277c53a266b142f655ed2 ("init/do_mounts_md.c must
#include <linux/delay.h>")
by people adding the <linux/delay.h> include in two slightly different
places. Andrew's quilt scripts happily ignore the fuzz, and will
re-apply the patch even though they had conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 1f98757776eafe31065be9118db6051afcf8643c
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat Nov 1 10:17:22 2008 -0700
x86: Clean up late e820 resource allocation
This makes the late e820 resources use 'insert_resource_expand_to_fit()'
instead of doing a 'reserve_region_with_split()', and also avoids
marking them as IORESOURCE_BUSY.
This results in us being perfectly happy to use pre-existing PCI
resources even if they were marked as being in a reserved region, while
still avoiding any _new_ allocations in the reserved regions. It also
makes for a simpler and more accurate resource tree.
Example resource allocation from Jonathan Corbet, who has firmware that
has an e820 reserved entry that covered a big range (e0000000-fed003ff),
and that had various PCI resources in it set up by firmware.
With old kernels, the reserved range would force us to re-allocate all
pre-existing PCI resources, and his reserved range would end up looking
like this:
e0000000-fed003ff : reserved
fec00000-fec00fff : IOAPIC 0
fed00000-fed003ff : HPET 0
where only the pre-allocated special regions (IOAPIC and HPET) were kept
around.
With 2.6.28-rc2, which uses 'reserve_region_with_split()', Jonathan's
resource tree looked like this:
e0000000-fe7fffff : reserved
fe800000-fe8fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
fe800000-fe8fffff : reserved
fe900000-fe9d9aff : reserved
fe9d9b00-fe9d9bff : 0000:00:1f.3
fe9d9b00-fe9d9bff : reserved
fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : 0000:00:1a.7
fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : reserved
fe9da000-fe9dafff : 0000:00:03.3
fe9da000-fe9dafff : reserved
fe9db000-fe9dbfff : 0000:00:19.0
fe9db000-fe9dbfff : reserved
fe9dc000-fe9dffff : 0000:00:1b.0
fe9dc000-fe9dffff : reserved
fe9e0000-fe9fffff : 0000:00:19.0
fe9e0000-fe9fffff : reserved
fea00000-fea7ffff : 0000:00:02.0
fea00000-fea7ffff : reserved
fea80000-feafffff : 0000:00:02.1
fea80000-feafffff : reserved
feb00000-febfffff : 0000:00:02.0
feb00000-febfffff : reserved
fec00000-fed003ff : reserved
fec00000-fec00fff : IOAPIC 0
fed00000-fed003ff : HPET 0
and because the reserved entry had been split and moved into the
individual resources, and because it used the IORESOURCE_BUSY flag, the
drivers that actually wanted to _use_ those resources couldn't actually
attach to them:
e1000e 0000:00:19.0: BAR 0: can't reserve mem region [0xfe9e0000-0xfe9fffff]
HDA Intel 0000:00:1b.0: BAR 0: can't reserve mem region [0xfe9dc000-0xfe9dffff]
with this patch, the resource tree instead becomes
e0000000-fed003ff : reserved
fe800000-fe8fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
fe9d9b00-fe9d9bff : 0000:00:1f.3
fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : 0000:00:1a.7
fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : ehci_hcd
fe9da000-fe9dafff : 0000:00:03.3
fe9db000-fe9dbfff : 0000:00:19.0
fe9db000-fe9dbfff : e1000e
fe9dc000-fe9dffff : 0000:00:1b.0
fe9dc000-fe9dffff : ICH HD audio
fe9e0000-fe9fffff : 0000:00:19.0
fe9e0000-fe9fffff : e1000e
fea00000-fea7ffff : 0000:00:02.0
fea80000-feafffff : 0000:00:02.1
feb00000-febfffff : 0000:00:02.0
fec00000-fec00fff : IOAPIC 0
fed00000-fed003ff : HPET 0
ie the one reserved region now ends up surrounding all the PCI resources
that were allocated inside of it by firmware, and because it is not
marked BUSY, drivers have no problem attaching to the pre-allocated
resources.
Reported-and-tested-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 42c0202363194007a1ac377d047a95aa39246eb0
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat Nov 1 09:53:58 2008 -0700
reserve_region_with_split: Fix GFP_KERNEL usage under spinlock
This one apparently doesn't generate any warnings, because the function
is only used during system bootup, when the warnings are disabled. But
it's still very wrong.
The __reserve_region_with_split() function is called with the
resource_lock held for writing, so it must only ever do GFP_ATOMIC
allocations.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit cdce1f0931831cebfbeb811a266a2f4adf5c8a35
Merge: 0242909... c5ec6fb...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat Nov 1 09:52:43 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'link_removal' of git://www.jni.nu/cris
* 'link_removal' of git://www.jni.nu/cris:
[CRIS] Remove links from CRIS build
[CRIS] Merge asm-offsets.c for both arches into one file.
commit 0242909a6135e10a28822c64f9ad50fdad52757c
Merge: 0a6d2fa... 556dcee...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat Nov 1 09:51:51 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'cris_move' of git://www.jni.nu/cris
* 'cris_move' of git://www.jni.nu/cris:
[CRIS] Move header files from include to arch/cris/include.
[CRISv32] Remove warning in io.h
commit 0a6d2fac615972142715d736289abeeb7382e81d
Merge: 76f8bef... 37dd0bd...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat Nov 1 09:50:38 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6:
SELinux: properly handle empty tty_files list
commit 76f8bef0db031f03bf286c8bbccfaf83f0b22224
Author: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Oct 31 22:50:04 2008 +0800
remove unused #include <version.h>'s
The file(s) below do not use LINUX_VERSION_CODE nor KERNEL_VERSION.
drivers/leds/leds-hp-disk.c
drivers/misc/panasonic-laptop.c
This patch removes the said #include <version.h>.
Signed-off-by: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 233e70f4228e78eb2f80dc6650f65d3ae3dbf17c
Author: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri Oct 31 23:28:30 2008 +0000
saner FASYNC handling on file close
As it is, all instances of ->release() for files that have ->fasync()
need to remember to evict file from fasync lists; forgetting that
creates a hole and we actually have a bunch that *does* forget.
So let's keep our lives simple - let __fput() check FASYNC in
file->f_flags and call ->fasync() there if it's been set. And lose that
crap in ->release() instances - leaving it there is still valid, but we
don't have to bother anymore.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 3318a386e4ca68c76e0294363d29bdc46fcad670
Author: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 11:52:23 2008 -0500
file caps: always start with clear bprm->caps_*
While Linux doesn't honor setuid on scripts. However, it mistakenly
behaves differently for file capabilities.
This patch fixes that behavior by making sure that get_file_caps()
begins with empty bprm->caps_*. That way when a script is loaded,
its bprm->caps_* may be filled when binfmt_misc calls prepare_binprm(),
but they will be cleared again when binfmt_elf calls prepare_binprm()
next to read the interpreter's file capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit e06f42d6c127883e58b747048752f44ae208ae47
Merge: f891caf... d7dc61d...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 15:44:08 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-2.6.28' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux
* 'for-2.6.28' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux:
NLM: Set address family before calling nlm_host_rebooted()
nfsd: fix failure to set eof in readdir in some situations
commit 37dd0bd04a3240d2922786d501e2f12cec858fbf
Author: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Oct 31 17:40:00 2008 -0400
SELinux: properly handle empty tty_files list
SELinux has wrongly (since 2004) had an incorrect test for an empty
tty->tty_files list. With an empty list selinux would be pointing to part
of the tty struct itself and would then proceed to dereference that value
and again dereference that result. An F10 change to plymouth on a ppc64
system is actually currently triggering this bug. This patch uses
list_empty() to handle empty lists rather than looking at a meaningless
location.
[note, this fixes the oops reported in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469079]
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
commit c5ec6fb08d7806cf1a9e4fceed15f5d4a69f885e
Author: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 23:57:53 2008 +0200
[CRIS] Remove links from CRIS build
Remove the links to architecture and machine dependent directories
(boot, lib, drivers, arch, mach)
The links were created and used mostly from the arch/cris/Makefile,
so why not dispense with them altogether?
Changed $(ARCH) to "cris" in Makefile, it is easier to read this way.
The CRISv32 head.S common files for the kernel and compressed images
needed to be modified to use ifdefs instead of using the now removed
mach link. Since there are only two versions, this is not a huge loss
in readability.
The link to vmlinux.lds.S is also replaced with a merged version
which uses ifdefs to select the correct layout.
System.map before and after are identical.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit 0365f707c99bf940a51c2a3ffc19f3ade2f700d4
Author: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Date: Tue Oct 21 22:10:27 2008 +0200
[CRIS] Merge asm-offsets.c for both arches into one file.
Eliminates the link to arch specific asm-offsets.c from CRIS
architecture build system.
Resulting asm-offsets.s are identical before and after change
for both arch-v10 and arch-v32.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit f891caf28febf9d4129716e848227148654b5993
Merge: 1fe01cb... 5663a12...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 08:14:15 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'merge' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc
* 'merge' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc: (23 commits)
Revert "powerpc: Sync RPA note in zImage with kernel's RPA note"
powerpc: Fix compile errors with CONFIG_BUG=n
powerpc: Fix format string warning in arch/powerpc/boot/main.c
powerpc: Fix bug in kernel copy of libfdt's fdt_subnode_offset_namelen()
powerpc: Remove duplicate DMA entry from mpc8313erdb device tree
powerpc/cell/OProfile: Fix on-stack array size in activate spu profiling function
powerpc/mpic: Fix regression caused by change of default IRQ affinity
powerpc: Update remaining dma_mapping_ops to use map/unmap_page
powerpc/pci: Fix unmapping of IO space on 64-bit
powerpc/pci: Properly allocate bus resources for hotplug PHBs
OF-device: Don't overwrite numa_node in device registration
powerpc: Fix swapcontext system for VSX + old ucontext size
powerpc: Fix compiler warning for the relocatable kernel
powerpc: Work around ld bug in older binutils
powerpc/ppc64/kdump: Better flag for running relocatable
powerpc: Use is_kdump_kernel()
powerpc: Kexec exit should not use magic numbers
powerpc/44x: Update 44x defconfigs
powerpc/40x: Update 40x defconfigs
powerpc: enable heap randomization for linkstations
...
commit 1fe01cb57c6272577ebb107a03253484f6dabe7c
Merge: 63b40456... 216813a...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 07:53:17 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6: (21 commits)
sh: fix sh2a cache entry_mask
sh: Enable NFS root in Migo-R defconfig.
sh: FTRACE renamed to FUNCTION_TRACER.
sh: Fix up the shared IRQ demuxer's control bit testing logic.
Define SCSPTR1 for SH 7751R
sh: Add sci_rxd_in of SH4-202
Add support usb setting on sh 7366
sh: Change register name SCSPTR to SCSPTR2
sh: use the new byteorder headers.
sh: SHmedia ISA tuning fixups.
sh: Kill off long-dead HD64465 cchip support.
sh: Revert "SH 7366 needs SCIF_ONLY"
sh: Simplify and lock down the ISA tuning.
sh: sh7785lcr: Select uImage as default image target.
sh: Add on-chip RTC support for SH7722.
SH 7366 needs SCIF_ONLY
gdrom: Fix compile error
sh: Provide a sample defconfig for the UL2 (SH7366) board.
sh: Fix FPU tuning on toolchains with mismatched multilib targets.
sh: oprofile: Fix up the SH7750 performance counter name.
...
commit 63b40456a30912084c90753582137b9e0495c5c3
Merge: eff2502... 770a424...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 07:52:51 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-2.6
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-2.6:
sparc64: Add missing null terminating entry to bq4802_match[].
sparc: use the new byteorder headers
rtc-m48t59: shift zero year to 1968 on sparc (rev 2)
dbri: check dma_alloc_coherent errors
sparc64: remove byteshifting from out* helpers
commit eff2502801e9a3a34882c6bd720470d65394522e
Merge: f73aaf1... a996031...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 07:52:12 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4
* 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
delay capable() check in ext4_has_free_blocks()
merge ext4_claim_free_blocks & ext4_has_free_blocks
jbd2: Call the commit callback before the transaction could get dropped
ext4: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext4_abort
ext3: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext3_abort
commit f73aaf10ae14ee8f9644b0f7abe252fe7eeb17f5
Merge: 721d5df... 9ce8e30...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 07:47:57 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'upstream-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev
* 'upstream-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev:
libata: add whitelist for devices with known good pata-sata bridges
sata_via: fix support for 5287
libata: Avoid overflow in ata_tf_to_lba48() when tf->hba_lbal > 127
ATA: remove excess kernel-doc notation
commit 5663a1232bd557b4b2141ad345dd56785fa51c2a
Author: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 22:27:17 2008 +1100
Revert "powerpc: Sync RPA note in zImage with kernel's RPA note"
This reverts commit 91a00302959545a9ae423e99732b1e46eb19e877, plus
commit 0dcd440120ef12879ff34fc78d7e4abf171c79e4 ("powerpc: Revert CHRP
boot wrapper to real-base = 12MB on 32-bit") which depended on it.
Commit 91a00302 was causing NVRAM corruption on some pSeries machines,
for as-yet unknown reasons, so this reverts it until the cause is
identified.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit bfb99f8258b5981ef7a2ec8099db56317ea16695
Merge: ebdba9a... 65325d5...
Author: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 21:34:56 2008 +1100
Merge branch 'merge' of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc into merge
commit ebdba9af940d63e469dc8e46b4aa1fc474e8ee2d
Author: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 21:34:09 2008 +1100
powerpc: Fix compile errors with CONFIG_BUG=n
This makes sure we don't try to call find_bug or is_warning_bug when
CONFIG_BUG=n and CONFIG_XMON=y. Otherwise we get these errors:
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c: In function ‘print_bug_trap’:
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:1364: error: implicit declaration of function ‘find_bug’
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:1364: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:1367: error: implicit declaration of function ‘is_warning_bug’
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:1374: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/xmon] Error 2
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit 2576c9991758e431b73e374f6019d6e1e12a8d36
Author: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date: Tue Oct 7 13:33:12 2008 -0700
x86: fix AMDC1E and XTOPOLOGY conflict in cpufeature
Impact: fix xsave slowdown regression
Fix two features from conflicting in feature bits.
Fixes this performance regression:
Subject: cpu2000(both float and int) 13% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/28/36
Reported-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Bisected-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 8ba4773aee23a5e2e1ce386c5bd86e407496de99
Author: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:51:32 2008 +0000
powerpc: Fix format string warning in arch/powerpc/boot/main.c
Fix format string warning in arch/powerpc/boot/main.c. Also correct
a typo ("uncomressed") on the same line.
BOOTCC arch/powerpc/boot/main.o
arch/powerpc/boot/main.c: In function 'prep_kernel':
arch/powerpc/boot/main.c:65: warning: format '%08x' expects type
'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit 2dccbf4ea05d2c3603b8c1359019bf7148a316a5
Author: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:37:05 2008 +0000
powerpc: Fix bug in kernel copy of libfdt's fdt_subnode_offset_namelen()
There's currently an off-by-one bug in fdt_subnode_offset_namelen()
which causes it to keep searching after it's finished the subnodes of
the given parent, and into the subnodes of siblings of the original
node which come after it in the tree. This bug was introduced in
commit ed95d7450dcbfeb45ffc9d39b1747aee82b49a51 ("powerpc: Update
in-kernel dtc and libfdt to version 1.2.0").
A patch has already been submitted to dtc/libfdt mainline. We don't
really want to pull in a new upstream version during the 2.6.28 cycle,
but we should still fix this bug, hence this standalone version of the
fix for the in-kernel libfdt.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit b342797c1e5116a130841527b47dfaa462ed0968
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Fri Oct 31 09:31:38 2008 +0100
x86: build fix
Impact: build fix on certain UP configs
fix:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c: In function 'cpu_init':
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1141: error: 'boot_cpu_id' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1141: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1141: error: for each function it appears in.)
Pull in asm/smp.h on UP, so that we get the definition of
boot_cpu_id.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 65325d5c45a4363b4ad2ce2a55793a131b667de6
Author: Mike Dyer <mike.dyer@provision-comm.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 10:10:06 2008 +0000
powerpc: Remove duplicate DMA entry from mpc8313erdb device tree
Commit 574366128db29e7da609ec1f9c01bf9d80adec87 added a duplicate
DMA controller node.
Signed-off-by: Mike Dyer <mike.dyer@provision-comm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
commit 216813a8bb4db97eb7a6e75c533894430053df48
Author: Yoshihiro Shimoda <shimoda.yoshihiro@renesas.com>
Date: Thu Aug 7 13:54:59 2008 +0900
sh: fix sh2a cache entry_mask
fix sh2a cache entry_mask in __flush_{purge,invalidate}_region.
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <shimoda.yoshihiro@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 464f763d5aeac1c31f6c626afbc4ea086c78a7b4
Author: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Date: Fri Oct 31 16:01:19 2008 +0900
sh: Enable NFS root in Migo-R defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 694f94f263bee30ada18bab178b98a0d10917e68
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 16:20:36 2008 +0900
sh: FTRACE renamed to FUNCTION_TRACER.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 0803d540db06f53acd2fabf1347d5b665218f14a
Merge: a8884e3... 721d5df...
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 16:18:02 2008 +0900
Merge branch 'master' of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6
commit a8884e3415c29c58a5875d54c109c4a7fcaa6fb4
Author: Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@yahoo.it>
Date: Fri Oct 31 16:10:23 2008 +0900
sh: Fix up the shared IRQ demuxer's control bit testing logic.
Correct the interrupt handler in sh4 serial device, return the correct
value and check for what is anabled in the SCSCR register. The sh7722 is
broken just sending a break using minicom.
Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 7abc404a5a1e3785749acb8dbfcc558223f78444
Author: Matt Fleming <mjf@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 07:16:02 2008 +0000
Define SCSPTR1 for SH 7751R
After the recent commit to kill off SCI/SCIF special casing SH 7751R
fails to compile with CONFIG_SH_RTS7751R2D set. This is because SCSPTR1
is undefined. Take the value for SCSPTR1 from the SH7751R Group Hardware
Manual.
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <mjf@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 961e9ff9025ef2dfdebe843549b7e1ec4d48c17c
Author: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 13:33:45 2008 +0900
sh: Add sci_rxd_in of SH4-202
SH4-202 doesn't have SCSXX1. But it is treated so that there is SCSPTR1 in
current code. This patch add sci_rxd_in of SH4-202.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 47c2968c84cb737f8dd8b79e34b75242ec7e0796
Author: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 14:49:03 2008 +0900
Add support usb setting on sh 7366
This patch add usb setting for sh 7366
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit aeffd54ad7e3af513c6a0dadda71e6316e5ba230
Author: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 13:34:50 2008 +0900
sh: Change register name SCSPTR to SCSPTR2
This change a name of SCSPTR used in sci_rxd_in of SH5-101.
SCSPTR is not declared and will become the error.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 140626673289a25f677fb006fafb3f6a95b8eb97
Author: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Oct 31 16:01:22 2008 +0900
sh: use the new byteorder headers.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit ddb72b02414228844ad46f7cbd42eccea01fb485
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 15:58:53 2008 +0900
sh: SHmedia ISA tuning fixups.
SH-5 doesn't support any elaborate ISA inheritance schemes (-dsp, -up,
etc.), so only bother with that if we are building an sh32 kernel.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 770a424112cb2c3a3e39221299eaf5244b76479a
Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu Oct 30 22:58:06 2008 -0700
sparc64: Add missing null terminating entry to bq4802_match[].
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit 9ce8e3073d9cfd6f859c22a25441db41b85cbf6e
Author: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Date: Wed Aug 27 15:23:18 2008 +0200
libata: add whitelist for devices with known good pata-sata bridges
libata currently imposes a UDMA5 max transfer rate and 200 sector max
transfer size for SATA devices that sit behind a pata-sata bridge. Lots
of devices have known good bridges that don't need this limit applied.
The MTRON SSD disks are such devices. Transfer rates are increased by
20-30% with the restriction removed.
So add a "blacklist" entry for the MTRON devices, with a flag indicating
that the bridge is known good.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit b9d5b89b487517cbd4cb4702da829e07ef9e4432
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Wed Oct 22 00:46:36 2008 +0900
sata_via: fix support for 5287
5287 used to be treated as vt6420 but it didn't work. It's new family
of controllers called vt8251 which hosts four SATA ports as M/S of the
two ATA ports. This configuration is rather peculiar in that although
the M/S devices are on the same port, each have its own SCR (or
equivalent link status/control) registers which screws up the
port-link-device hierarchy assumed by libata. Another controller
which falls into this category is ata_piix w/ SIDPR access.
libata now has facility to deal with this class of controllers named
slave_link. A low level driver for such controllers can just call
ata_slave_link_init() on the respective ports and libata will handle
all the difficult parts like following up with single SRST after
hardresetting both ports.
This patch creates new controller class vt8251, implements slave_link
aware init sequence and config space based SCR access for it and moves
5287 to the new class.
This patch is based on Joseph Chan's larger patch which was created
before slave_link was implemented in libata.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.commits.mm/40640
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Joseph Chan <JosephChan@via.com.tw>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit ba14a9c291aa867896a90b3571fcc1c3759942ff
Author: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 16:52:20 2008 -0700
libata: Avoid overflow in ata_tf_to_lba48() when tf->hba_lbal > 127
In ata_tf_to_lba48(), when evaluating
(tf->hob_lbal & 0xff) << 24
the expression is promoted to signed int (since int can hold all values
of u8). However, if hob_lbal is 128 or more, then it is treated as a
negative signed value and sign-extended when promoted to u64 to | into
sectors, which leads to the MSB 32 bits of section getting set
incorrectly.
For example, Phillip O'Donnell <phillip.odonnell@gmail.com> reported
that a 1.5GB drive caused:
ata3.00: HPA detected: current 2930277168, native 18446744072344861488
where 2930277168 == 0xAEA87B30 and 18446744072344861488 == 0xffffffffaea87b30
which shows the problem when hob_lbal is 0xae.
Fix this by adding a cast to u64, just as is used by for hob_lbah and
hob_lbam in the function.
Reported-by: Phillip O'Donnell <phillip.odonnell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 5b97fbd093ac2e0da0c7eec894fee065a04af55d
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 22:35:08 2008 -0700
ATA: remove excess kernel-doc notation
Remove excess kernel-doc function parameter notation from drivers/ata/:
Warning(drivers/ata/libata-core.c:1622): Excess function parameter or struct member 'fn' description in 'ata_pio_queue_task'
Warning(drivers/ata/libata-core.c:4655): Excess function parameter or struct member 'err_mask' description in 'ata_qc_complete'
Warning(drivers/ata/ata_piix.c:751): Excess function parameter or struct member 'udma' description in 'do_pata_set_dmamode'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 210434d7633d477aa503454d68511fa2904e418e
Author: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 05:06:45 2008 +0000
powerpc/cell/OProfile: Fix on-stack array size in activate spu profiling function
The size of the pm_signal_local array should be equal to the
number of SPUs being configured in the array. Currently, the
array is of size 4 (NR_PHYS_CTRS) but being indexed by a for
loop from 0 to 7 (NUM_SPUS_PER_NODE). This could potentially
cause an oops or random memory corruption since the pm_signal_local
array is on the stack. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Carl Love <carll@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit 3c10c9c45e290022ca7d2aa1ad33a0b6ed767520
Author: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 18:01:39 2008 +0000
powerpc/mpic: Fix regression caused by change of default IRQ affinity
The Freescale implementation of MPIC only allows a single CPU destination
for non-IPI interrupts. We add a flag to the mpic_init to distinquish
these variants of MPIC. We pull in the irq_choose_cpu from sparc64 to
select a single CPU as the destination of the interrupt.
This is to deal with the fact that the default smp affinity was
changed by commit 18404756765c713a0be4eb1082920c04822ce588 ("genirq:
Expose default irq affinity mask (take 3)") to be all CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit f9226d572d2f8b5f564596db8c6a13e458c46191
Author: Mark Nelson <markn@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 20:38:08 2008 +0000
powerpc: Update remaining dma_mapping_ops to use map/unmap_page
After the merge of the 32 and 64bit DMA code, dma_direct_ops lost
their map/unmap_single() functions but gained map/unmap_page(). This
caused a problem for Cell because Cell's dma_iommu_fixed_ops called
the dma_direct_ops if the fixed linear mapping was to be used or the
iommu ops if the dynamic window was to be used. So in order to fix
this problem we need to update the 64bit DMA code to use
map/unmap_page.
First, we update the generic IOMMU code so that iommu_map_single()
becomes iommu_map_page() and iommu_unmap_single() becomes
iommu_unmap_page(). Then we propagate these changes up through all
the callers of these two functions and in the process update all the
dma_mapping_ops so that they have map/unmap_page rahter than
map/unmap_single. We can do this because on 64bit there is no HIGHMEM
memory so map/unmap_page ends up performing exactly the same function
as map/unmap_single, just taking different arguments.
This has no affect on drivers because the dma_map_single_attrs() just
ends up calling the map_page() function of the appropriate
dma_mapping_ops and similarly the dma_unmap_single_attrs() calls
unmap_page().
This fixes an oops on Cell blades, which oops on boot without this
because they call dma_direct_ops.map_single, which is NULL.
Signed-off-by: Mark Nelson <markn@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit b30115ea8f685bcd1769553fe8511745f985053c
Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 19:48:47 2008 +0000
powerpc/pci: Fix unmapping of IO space on 64-bit
A typo/thinko made us pass the wrong argument to __flush_hash_table_range
when unplugging bridges, thus not flushing all the translations for
the IO space on unplug. The third parameter to __flush_hash_table_range
is `end', not `size'.
This causes the hypervisor to refuse unplugging slots.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit e90a13184600ec756875238ad130e2f205cd9a1b
Author: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 19:48:17 2008 +0000
powerpc/pci: Properly allocate bus resources for hotplug PHBs
Resources for PHB's that are dynamically added to a system are not
properly allocated in the resource tree.
Not having these resources allocated causes an oops when removing
the PHB when we try to release them.
The diff appears a bit messy, this is mainly due to moving everything
one tab to the left in the pcibios_allocate_bus_resources routine.
The functionality change in this routine is only that the
list_for_each_entry() loop is pulled out and moved to the necessary
calling routine.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit 6098e2ee14849e0819ffa887ebf470dcfad4a2be
Author: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 21:51:25 2008 +0000
OF-device: Don't overwrite numa_node in device registration
Currently, the numa_node of OF-devices will be overwritten during
device_register, which simply sets the node to -1. On cell machines,
this means that devices can't find their IOMMU, which is referenced
through the device's numa node.
Set the numa node for OF devices with no parent, and use the
lower-level device_initialize and device_add functions, so that the
node is preserved.
We can remove the call to set_dev_node in of_device_alloc, as it
will be overwritten during register.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit 16c29d180becc5bdf92fd0fc7314a44a671b5f4e
Author: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 00:42:36 2008 +0000
powerpc: Fix swapcontext system for VSX + old ucontext size
Since VSX support was added, we now have two sizes of ucontext_t;
the older, smaller size without the extra VSX state, and the new
larger size with the extra VSX state. A program using the
sys_swapcontext system call and supplying smaller ucontext_t
structures will currently get an EINVAL error if the task has
used VSX (e.g. because of calling library code that uses VSX) and
the old_ctx argument is non-NULL (i.e. the program is asking for
its current context to be saved). Thus the program will start
getting EINVAL errors on calls that previously worked.
This commit changes this behaviour so that we don't send an EINVAL in
this case. It will now return the smaller context but the VSX MSR bit
will always be cleared to indicate that the ucontext_t doesn't include
the extra VSX state, even if the task has executed VSX instructions.
Both 32 and 64 bit cases are updated.
[paulus@samba.org - also fix some access_ok() and get_user() calls]
Thanks to Ben Herrenschmidt for noticing this problem.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit b160544cccb403310cf38ddb3ebc156ea454848a
Author: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Date: Wed Oct 22 19:39:49 2008 +0000
powerpc: Fix compiler warning for the relocatable kernel
Fixes this warning:
arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c:447:5: warning: "kernstart_addr" is not defined
which arises because PHYSICAL_START is no longer a constant when
CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit 2a4b9c5af82035c591adca951a9af1665ad1a2b0
Author: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Date: Wed Oct 22 18:43:45 2008 +0000
powerpc: Work around ld bug in older binutils
Commit 549e8152de8039506f69c677a4546e5427aa6ae7 ("powerpc: Make the
64-bit kernel as a position-independent executable") added lines to
vmlinux.lds.S to add the extra sections needed to implement a
relocatable kernel. However, those lines seem to trigger a bug in
older versions of GNU ld (such as 2.16.1) when building a
non-relocatable kernel. Since ld 2.16.1 is still a popular choice for
cross-toolchains, this adds an #ifdef to vmlinux.lds.S so the added
lines are only included when building a relocatable kernel.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit 8b8b0cc1c736ddca39b60bb098bd0a23daaa495f
Author: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 18:41:09 2008 +0000
powerpc/ppc64/kdump: Better flag for running relocatable
The __kdump_flag ABI is overly constraining for future development.
As of 2.6.27, the kernel entry point has 4 constraints: Offset 0 is
the starting point for the master (boot) cpu (entered with r3 pointing
to the device tree structure), offset 0x60 is code for the slave cpus
(entered with r3 set to their device tree physical id), offset 0x20 is
used by the iseries hypervisor, and secondary cpus must be well behaved
when the first 256 bytes are copied to address 0.
Placing the __kdump_flag at 0x18 is bad because:
- It was taking the last 8 bytes before the iseries hypervisor data.
- It was 8 bytes for a boolean flag
- It had no way of identifying that the flag was present
- It does leave any room for the master to add any additional code
before branching, which hurts debug.
- It will be unnecessarily hard for 32 bit code to be common (8 bytes)
Now that we have eliminated the use of __kdump_flag in favor of
the standard is_kdump_kernel(), this flag only controls run without
relocating the kernel to PHYSICAL_START (0), so rename it __run_at_load.
Move the flag to 0x5c, 1 word before the secondary cpu entry point at
0x60. Initialize it with "run0" to say it will run at 0 unless it is
set to 1. It only exists if we are relocatable.
Signed-off-by: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit 62a8bd6c9246c0e1f19dfb8fc65ad7c4f7cac8bb
Author: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 15:39:04 2008 -0500
powerpc: Use is_kdump_kernel()
linux/crash_dump.h defines is_kdump_kernel() to be used by code that
needs to know if the previous kernel crashed instead of a (clean) boot
or reboot.
This updates the just added powerpc code to use it. This is needed
for the next commit, which will remove __kdump_flag.
Signed-off-by: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit 1767c8f392857694899403a65942cc70b5b7d132
Author: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 10:39:18 2008 +0000
powerpc: Kexec exit should not use magic numbers
Commit 54622f10a6aabb8bb2bdacf3dd070046f03dc246 ("powerpc: Support for
relocatable kdump kernel") added a magic flag value in a register to
tell purgatory that it should be a panic kernel. This part is wrong
and is reverted by this commit.
The kernel gets a list of memory blocks and a entry point from user space.
Its job is to copy the blocks into place and then branch to the designated
entry point (after turning "off" the mmu).
The user space tool inserts a trampoline, called purgatory, that runs
before the user supplied code. Its job is to establish the entry
environment for the new kernel or other application based on the contents
of memory. The purgatory code is compiled and embedded in the tool,
where it is later patched using the elf symbol table using elf symbols.
Since the tool knows it is creating a purgatory that will run after a
kernel crash, it should just patch purgatory (or the kernel directly)
if something needs to happen.
Signed-off-by: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
commit 8694a1c6056f1f5f006a0442428f2df5171b9656
Merge: 43271c4... 8531b7a...
Author: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Date: Fri Oct 31 16:08:14 2008 +1100
Merge branch 'merge' of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jwboyer/powerpc-4xx into merge
commit 721d5dfe7e516954c501d5e9d0dfab379cf4241a
Merge: f2347df... 934d9c2...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 18:36:16 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://neil.brown.name/md
* 'for-linus' of git://neil.brown.name/md:
md: destroy partitions and notify udev when md array is stopped.
commit f2347dfcd14fd9e30714656cb27be2b7abe59c63
Merge: 74c75f5... 526e5ab...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 18:35:09 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-for-linus
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-for-linus:
lguest: fix irq vectors.
lguest: fix early_ioremap.
lguest: fix example launcher compile after moved asm-x86 dir.
commit 74c75f524ec5a48a00a8f01864a754c1d0e4a44b
Merge: 0b23e30... 1c4acdb...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 18:33:46 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'x86-fixes-for-linus-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'x86-fixes-for-linus-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
x86: cpu_index build fix
x86/voyager: fix missing cpu_index initialisation
x86/voyager: fix compile breakage caused by dc1e35c6e95e8923cf1d3510438b63c600fee1e2
x86: fix /dev/mem mmap breakage when PAT is disabled
x86/voyager: fix compile breakage casued by x86: move prefill_possible_map calling early
x86: use CONFIG_X86_SMP instead of CONFIG_SMP
x86/voyager: fix boot breakage caused by x86: boot secondary cpus through initial_code
x86, uv: fix compile error in uv_hub.h
i386/PAE: fix pud_page()
x86: remove debug code from arch_add_memory()
x86: start annotating early ioremap pointers with __iomem
x86: two trivial sparse annotations
x86: fix init_memory_mapping for [dc000000 - e0000000) - v2
commit 0b23e30b48b0b634fdc8c8198ea9dfec8c091968
Merge: 147db6e... a0e5ebd...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 18:32:03 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'sched-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'sched-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
sched: remove sched-design.txt from 00-INDEX
sched: change sched_debug's mode to 0444
commit 147db6e9474b444149238b77ceae335ca20e7b4a
Merge: 4390819... 9244489...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 18:31:42 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'tracing-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'tracing-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
ftrace: handle archs that do not support irqs_disabled_flags
commit 43908195e04ee27779a60c55b5bb47aebf1c46ae
Merge: 7105212... d68612b...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 18:31:27 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'core-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'core-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
resources: fix x86info results ioremap.c:226 __ioremap_caller+0xf2/0x2d6() WARNINGs
commit 526e5ab200ce483dcdf146806f4936bd58daa800
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri Oct 31 11:24:27 2008 -0500
lguest: fix irq vectors.
do_IRQ: cannot handle IRQ -1 vector 0x20 cpu 0
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:219!
We're not ISA: we have a 1:1 mapping from vectors to irqs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
commit ad5173ff8a387191dbacf889becb92c59aba5d59
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri Oct 31 11:24:27 2008 -0500
lguest: fix early_ioremap.
dmi_scan_machine breaks under lguest:
lguest: unhandled trap 14 at 0xc04edeae (0xffa00000)
This is because we use current_cr3 for the read_cr3() paravirt
function, and it isn't set until the first cr3 change. We got away
with it until this happened.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
commit d5d02d6dd394b295abcadd6b0ce4932c07916fdf
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri Oct 31 11:24:25 2008 -0500
lguest: fix example launcher compile after moved asm-x86 dir.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
commit 1c4acdb467f8a6704855a5670ff3d82e3c18eb0b
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Fri Oct 31 00:43:03 2008 +0100
x86: cpu_index build fix
fix:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c: In function 'early_identify_cpu':
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:553: error: 'struct cpuinfo_x86' has no member named 'cpu_index'
as cpu_index is only available on SMP.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit bfcb4c1becf93b1592f4a03a4d6e00a3ab89d5ec
Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:13:37 2008 -0500
x86/voyager: fix missing cpu_index initialisation
Impact: fix /proc/cpuinfo output on x86/Voyager
Ever since
| commit 92cb7612aee39642d109b8d935ad265e602c0563
| Author: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
| Date: Fri Oct 19 20:35:04 2007 +0200
|
| x86: convert cpuinfo_x86 array to a per_cpu array
We've had an extra field in cpuinfo_x86 which is cpu_index.
Unfortunately, voyager has never initialised this, although the only
noticeable impact seems to be that /proc/cpuinfo shows all zeros for
the processor ids.
Anyway, fix this by initialising the boot CPU properly and setting the
index when the secondaries update.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit b3572e361b6b2ac5e724bc4bb932b7774b720b95
Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:00:59 2008 -0500
x86/voyager: fix compile breakage caused by dc1e35c6e95e8923cf1d3510438b63c600fee1e2
Impact: build fix on x86/Voyager
Given commits like this:
| Author: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
| Date: Tue Jul 29 10:29:19 2008 -0700
|
| x86, xsave: enable xsave/xrstor on cpus with xsave support
Which deliberately expose boot cpu dependence to pieces of the system,
I think it's time to explicitly have a variable for it to prevent this
continual misassumption that the boot CPU is zero.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 7105212bd309752b589a3ba816afdd7fed190b85
Merge: 65fc716... b73b925...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:16:39 2008 -0700
Merge master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-arm
* master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-arm:
[ARM] 5326/1: AFEB9260: Fix for i2c_board_info structure
[ARM] mx31ads: Add missing include
[ARM] MXC: Fix mxc_gpio_get(), which must read PSR register instead DR.
[ARM] MX3: Use ioremap wrapper to map SoC devices nonshared
[ARM] gpio_free might sleep, arm architecture
[ARM] ep93xx: fix OHCI DMA mask
leds: da903x: (da9030 only) led brightness reversed.
[ARM] sharpsl_pm: fix compilation w/o CONFIG_PM
[ARM] pcm037: map AIPS1 and AIPS2 as nonshared area
[ARM] build fixes for netX serial driver
[ARM] 5323/1: Remove outdated empeg documentation.
[ARM] 5299/1: Add maintainer for Mobilepro 900/c
[ARM] corgi_lcd: fix simultaneous compilation with corgi_bl
[ARM] pxa/spitz: fix spi cs on spitz
[ARM] 5322/1: Fix fastpath issue in mmci.c
[ARM] xsc3: revert writethrough memory-type encoding change
commit 9244489a7b69fe0746dc7cb3957f02e05bd1ceb0
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Fri Oct 24 09:42:59 2008 -0400
ftrace: handle archs that do not support irqs_disabled_flags
Impact: build fix on non-lockdep architectures
Some architectures do not support a way to read the irq flags that
is set from "local_irq_save(flags)" to determine if interrupts were
disabled or enabled. Ftrace uses this information to display to the user
if the trace occurred with interrupts enabled or disabled.
Besides the fact that those archs that do not support this will fail to
compile, unless they fix it, we do not want to have the trace simply
say interrupts were not disabled or they were enabled, without knowing
the real answer.
This patch adds a 'X' in the output to let the user know that the
architecture they are running on does not support a way for the tracer
to determine if interrupts were enabled or disabled. It also lets those
same archs compile with tracing enabled.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 9e41bff2708e420e61e6b89a54c15232857069b1
Author: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 13:59:21 2008 -0700
x86: fix /dev/mem mmap breakage when PAT is disabled
Impact: allow /dev/mem mmaps on non-PAT CPUs/platforms
Fix mmap to /dev/mem when CONFIG_X86_PAT is off and CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM is
off
mmap to /dev/mem on kernel memory has been failing since the
introduction of PAT (CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM=n case). Seems like
the check to avoid cache aliasing with PAT is kicking in even
when PAT is disabled. The bug seems to have crept in 2.6.26.
This patch makes sure that the mmap to regular
kernel memory succeeds if CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM=n and
PAT is disabled, and the checks to avoid cache aliasing
still happens if PAT is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Tested-by: Tim Sirianni <tim@scalemp.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 8531b7a805833649591fa324cadbab7d6b667f4b
Author: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 18:18:46 2008 -0400
powerpc/44x: Update 44x defconfigs
Update the PowerPC 44x defconfigs for 2.6.28
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit c4cd9ec48a2075a2692ff90a040e745b8f8cd83a
Author: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 18:16:14 2008 -0400
powerpc/40x: Update 40x defconfigs
Update the PowerPC 40x defconfigs for 2.6.28
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit ee477524b461324ed8fc950f451c3671dc79f12e
Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:28:35 2008 -0500
x86/voyager: fix compile breakage casued by x86: move prefill_possible_map calling early
Impact: fix build failure on x86/Voyager
Before:
| commit 329513a35d1a2b6b28d54f5c2c0dde4face8200b
| Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
| Date: Wed Jul 2 18:54:40 2008 -0700
|
| x86: move prefill_possible_map calling early
prefill_possible_mask() was hidden under CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU rendering
it invisitble to voyager. Since this commit it's exposed, but not
provided by the voyager subarch, so add a dummy stub to fix the link
breakage.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 017d9d20d88cacb0a6a29f343b23c95e203f6645
Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:05:39 2008 -0500
x86: use CONFIG_X86_SMP instead of CONFIG_SMP
Impact: fix x86/Voyager boot
CONFIG_SMP is used for features which work on *all* x86 boxes.
CONFIG_X86_SMP is used for standard PC like x86 boxes (for things like
multi core and apics)
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 08c33308575b370c89b4ed1198ece5f93145a2aa
Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:08:38 2008 -0500
x86/voyager: fix boot breakage caused by x86: boot secondary cpus through initial_code
Impact: boot up secondary CPUs as well on x86/Voyager systems
This commit:
| commit 3e9704739daf46a8ba6593d749c67b5f7cd633d2
| Author: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
| Date: Wed May 28 13:01:54 2008 -0300
|
| x86: boot secondary cpus through initial_code
removed the use of initialize_secondary. However, it didn't update
voyager, so the secondary cpus no longer boot. Fix this by adding the
initial_code switch to voyager as well.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit d7dc61d0a70371b1c6557ea8ffbc60fff94c8168
Author: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@ORACLE.COM>
Date: Thu Oct 23 00:50:35 2008 -0400
NLM: Set address family before calling nlm_host_rebooted()
The nlm_host_rebooted() function uses nlm_cmp_addr() to find an
nsm_handle that matches the rebooted peer. In order for this to work,
the passed-in address must have a proper address family.
This fixes a post-2.6.28 regression introduced by commit 781b61a6, which
added AF_INET6 support to nlm_cmp_addr(). Before that commit,
nlm_cmp_addr() didn't care about the address family; it compared only
the sin_addr.s_addr field for equality.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
commit 8d7c4203c681a3ec359eccff4e53bc8c0ccf403b
Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Date: Thu Oct 30 13:48:33 2008 -0400
nfsd: fix failure to set eof in readdir in some situations
Before 14f7dd632011bb89c035722edd6ea0d90ca6b078 "[PATCH] Copy XFS
readdir hack into nfsd code", readdir_cd->err was reset to eof before
each call to vfs_readdir; afterwards, it is set only once. Similarly,
c002a6c7977320f95b5edede5ce4e0eeecf291ff "[PATCH] Optimise NFS readdir
hack slightly", can cause us to exit without nfserr_eof set. Fix this.
This ensures the "eof" bit is set when needed in readdir replies. (The
particular case I saw was an nfsv4 readdir of an empty directory, which
returned with no entries (the protocol requires "." and ".." to be
filtered out), but with eof unset.)
Cc: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
commit 65fc716fa673cf98fb5887180fd3c52ca0371198
Merge: 814b3be... 15a2ee7...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:55:49 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/kbuild-fixes
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/kbuild-fixes:
Fix incompatibility with versions of Perl less than 5.6.0
kbuild: do not include arch/<ARCH>/include/asm in find-sources twice.
kbuild: tag with git revision when git describe is missing
kbuild: prevent modpost from looking for a .cmd file for a static library linked into a module
kbuild: fix KBUILD_EXTRA_SYMBOLS
adjust init section definitions
scripts/checksyscalls.sh: fix for non-gnu sed
scripts/package: don't break if %{_smp_mflags} isn't set
kbuild: setlocalversion: dont include svn change count
kbuild: improve check-symlink
kbuild: mkspec - fix build rpm
commit 814b3bed63c23f310121befa0fe004a20dec95b2
Merge: e61467e... 29fa058...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:54:03 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wim/linux-2.6-watchdog
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wim/linux-2.6-watchdog:
[PATCH] Switch all my contributions stuff to a single common address
[WATCHDOG] pci: use pci_ioremap_bar() in drivers/watchdog
commit e61467e9b6c88e97560873603cf9aceaf7435480
Merge: c732acd... 09d9327...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:53:33 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'upstream' of git://ftp.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/upstream-linus
* 'upstream' of git://ftp.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/upstream-linus:
CHAR: Delete old and now unused M48T35 RTC driver for SGI IP27.
CHAR: Delete old and now unused DS1286 driver.
MIPS: Sort out CPU type to name translation.
MIPS: Use the new byteorder headers
MIPS: Probe for watch registers on cores of all vendors, not just MTI.
MIPS: Switch FPU emulator trap to BREAK instruction.
MIPS: SMP: Do not initialize __cpu_number_map/__cpu_logical_map for CPU 0.
MIPS: Consider value of c0_ebase when computing value of exception base.
MIPS: Clean up MIPSxx-optimized bitop functions
MIPS: New feature test macro cpu_has_mips_r
MIPS: RBTX4927: Add GPIO-LED support
MIPS: TXx9: Fix RBTX4939 ethernet address initialization
commit c732acd96085347027b11961463a243c568d9aab
Merge: 1b2d3d9... 5cb02ff...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:52:53 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brodo/pcmcia-2.6
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brodo/pcmcia-2.6:
fdomain_cs: Sort out modules with duplicate description
pcmcia: Whine harder about use of EXCLUSIVE
pcmcia: IRQ_TYPE_EXCLUSIVE is long obsoleted
commit 1b2d3d94ec878c3529153061cd8cceb876e01a3e
Merge: 8bd93ca... 5f707eb...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:51:42 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'bugfixes' of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6
* 'bugfixes' of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6:
SUNRPC: Fix potential race in put_rpccred()
SUNRPC: Fix rpcauth_prune_expired
NFS: Convert nfs_attr_generation_counter into an atomic_long
SUNRPC: Respond promptly to server TCP resets
commit 8bd93ca7b03f38a7bc1a4ed9e93e8c006e753d5b
Merge: 7f82f00... 87c6f40...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:50:59 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'x86-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'x86-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
x86, gart: fix gart detection for Fam11h CPUs
x86: 64 bit print out absent pages num too
x86, kdump: fix invalid access on i386 sparsemem
x86: fix APIC_DEBUG with inquire_remote_apic
x86: AMD microcode patch loader author update
x86: microcode patch loader author update
mailmap: add Peter Oruba
x86, bts: improve help text for BTS config
doc/x86: fix doc subdirs
commit 7f82f000ed030d1108b4de47d9e2d556092980c6
Merge: d6c3112... 879129d...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:16:38 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agk/linux-2.6-dm
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agk/linux-2.6-dm:
dm snapshot: wait for chunks in destructor
dm snapshot: fix register_snapshot deadlock
dm raid1: fix do_failures
commit d6c3112abe44d7f718bd5aec8ab9469fecff6041
Merge: fce4877... 3b15e58...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:09:44 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jbarnes/pci-2.6
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jbarnes/pci-2.6:
x86/PCI: build failure at x86/kernel/pci-dma.c with !CONFIG_PCI
commit fce4877a6792ad72b88f6fd7556d19da5f20364d
Author: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 15:54:12 2008 +0000
tty: Fix USB kref leak
When we close we must clear the extra reference we got when we read
port->tty. Setting the port tty NULL will clear the kref held by the driver
but not the one we obtained ourselves while doing the lookup.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 0fb7f4f0cef8e7d2944189ff2cb68694ef4b683a
Merge: cdcba02... da6801e...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:07:25 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'i2c-for-linus' of git://jdelvare.pck.nerim.net/jdelvare-2.6
* 'i2c-for-linus' of git://jdelvare.pck.nerim.net/jdelvare-2.6:
i2c-s3c2410: Correct use of ! and &
i2c: The i2c mailing list is moving
scx200_i2c: Add missing class parameter
commit cdcba02a5f64f4df20b6749a0169124e38ecb733
Merge: 53387b0... fa157bd...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 11:51:43 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/hid
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/hid:
HID: add quirk entry for no-name keyboard (0x13ba/0x0017)
HID: fix hid_device_id for cross compiling
HID: sync on deleted io_retry timer in usbhid driver
HID: fix oops during suspend of unbound HID devices
commit 53387b0151260f6c3513adeca77f05ed052d6217
Merge: 52e8e19... 1133283...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 11:50:57 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core-2.6
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core-2.6:
Driver core: fix 'dynamic_debug' cmd line parameter
HOWTO: Sync patch for jp_JP/HOWTO
Update stable tree documentation
sysfs: Fix return values for sysdev_store_{ulong,int}
driver core: drivers/base/sys.c: update comments
Document kernel taint flags properly
commit 52e8e19b019ca7ad6951d7a39b78d24b198238bc
Merge: 908c3d8... 61fbeba...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 11:49:12 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb-2.6
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb-2.6:
USB: prevent autosuspend during hub initialization
USB: Unusual dev for the "Kyocera / Contax SL300R T*" digital camera.
USB: usbtmc: Use explicit unsigned type for input buffer instead of char*
USB: fix crash when URBs are unlinked after the device is gone
commit 908c3d8c005f19f807c67105cede0bd2c352a8e6
Merge: 3a7029d... 1841c0f...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 11:47:21 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lrg/voltage-2.6
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lrg/voltage-2.6:
regulator: da903x regulator bug fix
regulator: Build on non-ARM platforms
commit 3a7029d822d3aef4502269dae5fe8fbb83672bc5
Merge: 4ac08d3... 48e5eca...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 11:46:28 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6:
amd8111e: Fix rx return code
pktgen: fix multiple queue warning
mac80211.h: fix kernel-doc excesses
p54: fix build warnings
ath5k: Reset key cache on interface up, thus fixing resume
mac80211: correct warnings in minstrel rate control algorithm
RFKILL: fix input layer initialisation
p54: fix misbehavings when firmware can't be found
dm9601: runtime mac address change support
via-velocity: use driver string instead of dev->name before register_netdev()
drivers/net/wan/syncppp: Fix unused-var warnings
mlx4: Setting the correct offset for default mac address
mlx4_en: remove duplicated #include
ibm_newemac: Fix typo in flow control config option
ehea: Detect 16GB hugepages for firmware restriction
dmfe: check pci_alloc_consistent errors
qeth: avoid skb_under_panic for malformatted inbound data
qeth: remove unnecessary support ckeck in sysfs route6
qeth: fix offset error in non prealloc header path
qeth: remove non-recover-thread checkings
commit 4ac08d36aa9c556556c7b150caee263c6d542645
Merge: 0b54968... 71c21b4...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 11:44:35 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6:
ALSA: ASoC: Fix WM9713 ALC Decay Time name
ALSA: ASoC: Fix some minor errors in mpc5200 psc i2s driver
ALSA: ASoC: Fix mono controls after conversion to support full int masks
ALSA: sound/ice1712: indentation & braces disagree - add braces
ALSA: usb - Add quirk for Edirol UA-25EX advanced modes
sound: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()
ALSA: hda - Add reboot notifier
ALSA: Warn when control names are truncated
ALSA: intel8x0 - add Dell Optiplex GX620 (AD1981B) to AC97 clock whitelist
ALSA: hda - Fix SPDIF mute on IDT/STAC codecs
ALSA: hda: Add HDA vendor ID for Wolfson Microelectronics
ALSA: hda - Add another HP model for AD1884A
commit 0b54968f667585aa4b98a7225f4d4df63917703c
Merge: effdb94... f3384b2...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 11:44:09 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'tracing-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'tracing-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
ftrace: fix trace_nop config select
ftrace: perform an initialization for ftrace to enable it
commit effdb9492de01a51f8123e62e87e3330688f9bf1
Author: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:21 2008 -0700
spi: fix compile error
Fix compile error below:
LD drivers/spi/built-in.o
CC [M] drivers/spi/spi_gpio.o
In file included from drivers/spi/spi_gpio.c:26:
include/linux/spi/spi_bitbang.h:23: error: field `work' has incomplete type
make[2]: *** [drivers/spi/spi_gpio.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/spi] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 731572d39fcd3498702eda4600db4c43d51e0b26
Author: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:20 2008 -0700
nfsd: fix vm overcommit crash
Junjiro R. Okajima reported a problem where knfsd crashes if you are
using it to export shmemfs objects and run strict overcommit. In this
situation the current->mm based modifier to the overcommit goes through a
NULL pointer.
We could simply check for NULL and skip the modifier but we've caught
other real bugs in the past from mm being NULL here - cases where we did
need a valid mm set up (eg the exec bug about a year ago).
To preserve the checks and get the logic we want shuffle the checking
around and add a new helper to the vm_ security wrappers
Also fix a current->mm reference in nommu that should use the passed mm
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Reported-by: Junjiro R. Okajima <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp>
Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 6c89161b10f5771ee0b51ada0fce0e8835e72ade
Author: Scott James Remnant <scott@canonical.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:18 2008 -0700
ipmi: add MODULE_ALIAS to load ipmi_devintf with ipmi_si
The ipmi_devintf module contains the userspace interface for IPMI devices,
yet will not be loaded automatically with a system interface handler
driver.
Add a MODULE_ALIAS for the "platform:ipmi_si" MODALIAS exported by the
ipmi_si driver, so that userspace knows of the recommendation.
Signed-off-by: Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Tim Gardner <tcanonical@tpi.com>
Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.27.x, maybe earlier?]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 120a37470c2831fea49fdebaceb5a7039f700ce6
Author: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:17 2008 -0700
framebuffer compat_ioctl deadlock
Fix deadlock in fb_compat_ioctl. fb_compat_ioctl acquires a mutex and
calls fb_ioctl that tries to acquire that mutex too. A regression added
during BKL removal.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 51b7616e36fbad93d7ba9e41f11fb57143d11252
Author: Yauhen Kharuzhy <jekhor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:16 2008 -0700
rtc S3C: add device_init_wakeup() invokation
tAdd adds device_init_wakeup() ivokation to probe function of
s3c2410_rtc_driver. Without of this wakealarm sysfs attribute does not
initialise.
Signed-off-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy <jekhor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 7106a27b52940085c2c3f6e42742d3a2a84d872a
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:15 2008 -0700
kernel.h: fix might_sleep kernel-doc
Put the kernel-doc for might_sleep() _immediately_ before the macro
(no intervening lines). Otherwise kernel-doc complains like so:
Warning(linux-2.6.27-rc3-git2//include/linux/kernel.h:129): No description found for parameter 'file'
Warning(linux-2.6.27-rc3-git2//include/linux/kernel.h:129): No description found for parameter 'line'
because kernel-doc is looking at the wrong function prototype (i.e.,
__might_sleep). [Yes, I have a todo note to myself to check/warn for that
inconsistency in scripts/kernel-doc.]
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@digi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 89a056df78b113fcab21d71cd24aa1893c09225b
Author: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:14 2008 -0700
Rationalise Randy's address a bit
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit bcc378e777514832c11b09d194a7f946e7ad803a
Author: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:13 2008 -0700
rtc: ds3234 doesn't link when built-in
When ds3234 is built-in, the final links fails with the following vague error
message:
`.exit.text' referenced in section `.data' of drivers/built-in.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/built-in.o
ds3234_remove() cannot be marked __exit, as it's accessed via __devexit_p().
In addition, mark ds3234_probe() __devinit while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 81365c31afcea2bd6d551a029282d59c89e8fd54
Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:12 2008 -0700
MAINTAINERS: add LTP info to the list
Cc: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit c08b6acc9b996ba6231105cb12a4125c957e0c97
Author: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 11:33:19 2008 -0700
x86, uv: fix compile error in uv_hub.h
Impact: include file dependency cleanup
Fix compile errors of files that include asm/uv/uv_hub.h but do
not include linux/timer.h.
[ such files are not mainline right now. ]
Signed-of-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit b7f7b07479de2d91443b81938db1e1940c56b13c
Author: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:12 2008 -0700
sgi-xp: only build for ia64-sn2 when CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC specified
For the time being build for ia64-sn2 alone when CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC is
specified.
This eliminates a dependency of the XP/XPC drivers on having the GRU
driver insmod'd in order to insmod them, when running on an ia64-sn2
system.
On such a system the GRU driver serves no useful purpose.
Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit d25141a818383b3c3b09f065698c544a7a0ec6e7
Author: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:11 2008 -0700
'kill sig -1' must only apply to caller's namespace
Currently "kill <sig> -1" kills processes in all namespaces and breaks the
isolation of namespaces. Earlier attempt to fix this was discussed at:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/23/148
As suggested by Oleg Nesterov in that thread, use "task_pid_vnr() > 1"
check since task_pid_vnr() returns 0 if process is outside the caller's
namespace.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit e74481e23283fb080d4591c258de20785cc3b6c3
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:10 2008 -0700
fs: remove excess kernel-doc
Delete excess kernel-doc notation in fs/ subdirectory:
Warning(linux-2.6.27-git10//fs/jbd/transaction.c:886): Excess function parameter or struct member 'credits' description in 'journal_get_undo_access'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit e99c97ade53fb6f5e665f2960eb86c624a532d7b
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:09 2008 -0700
mm: fix kernel-doc function notation
Delete excess kernel-doc notation in mm/ subdirectory.
Actually this is a kernel-doc notation fix.
Warning(/var/linsrc/linux-2.6.27-git10//mm/vmalloc.c:902): Excess function parameter or struct member 'returns' description in 'vm_map_ram'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit b77b0ef207624c9d9f8064ccbfd6da169780df44
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:09 2008 -0700
i2o: fix kernel-doc warnings
Fixup i2o kernel-doc warnings:
Warning(linux-next-20081022//drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:579): No description found for parameter 'bdev'
Warning(linux-next-20081022//drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:579): No description found for parameter 'mode'
Warning(linux-next-20081022//drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:608): No description found for parameter 'disk'
Warning(linux-next-20081022//drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:608): No description found for parameter 'mode'
Warning(linux-next-20081022//drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:657): No description found for parameter 'bdev'
Warning(linux-next-20081022//drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:657): No description found for parameter 'mode'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 87b811c3f96559e466403e22b1fa99d472571625
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:08 2008 -0700
ecryptfs: fix memory corruption when storing crypto info in xattrs
When ecryptfs allocates space to write crypto headers into, before copying
it out to file headers or to xattrs, it looks at the value of
crypt_stat->num_header_bytes_at_front to determine how much space it
needs. This is also used as the file offset to the actual encrypted data,
so for xattr-stored crypto info, the value was zero.
So, we kzalloc'd 0 bytes, and then ran off to write to that memory.
(Which returned as ZERO_SIZE_PTR, so we explode quickly).
The right answer is to always allocate a page to write into; the current
code won't ever write more than that (this is enforced by the
(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - offset) length in the call to
ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set). To be explicit about this, we now send
in a "max" parameter, rather than magically using PAGE_CACHE_SIZE there.
Also, since the pointer we pass down the callchain eventually gets the
virt_to_page() treatment, we should be using a alloc_page variant, not
kzalloc (see also 7fcba054373d5dfc43d26e243a5c9b92069972ee)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit ce05fcc30ea41c85f9d50bee1ce289f7cb7fb223
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:07 2008 -0700
kernel/profile: fix profile_init() section mismatch
profile_init() calls in to alloc_bootmem() on early initialization. While
alloc_bootmem() is __init, the reference itself is safe in that it is
tucked below a !slab_is_available() check. So, flag profile_init() as
__ref.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 84ad6d70001df969d7e8569dd18d98d9550277fb
Author: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:06 2008 -0700
memcg: update menuconfig help text
page_cgroup is now allocated at boot and memmap doesn't includes pointer
for page_cgroup. Fix the menu help text.
Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 99e87fd19a2dfba8ec0f2110f6f1b63062a52a6f
Author: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:05 2008 -0700
hdpuftrs: fix build
drivers/misc/hdpuftrs/hdpu_nexus.c:118: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
drivers/misc/hdpuftrs/hdpu_nexus.c:119: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit f8b77d39397e1510b1a3bcfd385ebd1a45aae77f
Author: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:05 2008 -0700
init/do_mounts_md.c: msleep compile fix
init/do_mounts_md.c:285: error: implicit declaration of function 'msleep'
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 6158d3a2323835546c7cf83a170316fa77b726e0
Author: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:03 2008 -0700
sony-laptop: ignore missing _DIS method on pic device
At least the Vaio VGN-Z540N doesn't have this method, so let's not fail
to suspend just because it doesn't exist.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit def1be2d727a1764205479b3e3e3ba16ffbad028
Author: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:01 2008 -0700
fbcon: don't inline updatescrollmode
Updatescrollmode is marked inline, but it's big and is called only from
non-critical codepaths (fbcon_resize, fbcon_switch, fbcon_modechanged).
Dropping it saves almost 800 bytes of text size.
text data bss dec hex filename
23859 287 8448 32594 7f52 drivers/video/console/fbcon.o.before
23065 287 8448 31800 7c38 drivers/video/console/fbcon.o.after
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Cc: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 992b692dcf43612be805465ca4b76f434c715023
Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:01:00 2008 -0700
edac: fix enabling of polling cell module
The edac driver on cell turned out to be not enabled because of a missing
op_state. This patch introduces it. Verified to work on top of Ben's
next branch.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Osterkamp <jens@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit eb944db0cfeb0ee934e2a74d5b3516f80cf2c208
Author: Yauhen Kharuzhy <jekhor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:59 2008 -0700
rtc-s3c: fix section mismatch warnings
Warnings was appeared when compile rtc-s3c.c because
platform_driver structure s3c2410_rtcdrv has wrong name.
Signed-off-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy <jekhor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit e11e3643f300f2e3a3ea21658e9f80b412c2c8a1
Author: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:58 2008 -0700
docs: fix ManagementStyle book name
Just corrected the book name. I'm probably the only one who ever read
this file :-)
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit a34645f56a5dae70233701275fb8b2d979a664fd
Author: Hans Ulrich Niedermann <hun@n-dimensional.de>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:57 2008 -0700
docbook: fix command spacing
The total width of the command name plus spaces should be
8 characters, but were 7 and 9, respectively. With 8 chars,
all commands are now lining up nicely.
The mandocs, psdocs, xmldocs commands are OK.
Before:
HOSTCC scripts/basic/docproc
DOCPROC Documentation/DocBook/deviceiobook.xml
HTML Documentation/DocBook/deviceiobook.html
DOCPROC Documentation/DocBook/wanbook.xml
PDF Documentation/DocBook/wanbook.pdf
After:
HOSTCC scripts/basic/docproc
DOCPROC Documentation/DocBook/deviceiobook.xml
HTML Documentation/DocBook/deviceiobook.html
DOCPROC Documentation/DocBook/wanbook.xml
PDF Documentation/DocBook/wanbook.pdf
Signed-off-by: Hans Ulrich Niedermann <hun@n-dimensional.de>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 4e02ed4b4a2fae34aae766a5bb93ae235f60adb8
Author: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:55 2008 -0700
fs: remove prepare_write/commit_write
Nothing uses prepare_write or commit_write. Remove them from the tree
completely.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: schedule simple_prepare_write() for unexporting]
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 9b913735e53ab0da4a792bac0de8e178cc13dcfb
Author: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:54 2008 -0700
cgroups: tiny cleanups
- remove 'private' field from struct subsys
- remove cgroup_init_smp()
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 51308ee59dee1136ed599d875ea8968d7be55c91
Author: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:54 2008 -0700
freezer_cg: simplify freezer_change_state()
Just call unfreeze_cgroup() if goal_state == THAWED, and call
try_to_freeze_cgroup() if goal_state == FROZEN.
No behavior has been changed.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 00c2e63c31d0f431952ff2a671c5c6997dd4f8b2
Author: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:53 2008 -0700
freezer_cg: use thaw_process() in unfreeze_cgroup()
Don't duplicate the implementation of thaw_process().
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make __thaw_process() static]
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 80a6a2cf3bebcf20285cf05373b9c5ec96816577
Author: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:52 2008 -0700
freezer_cg: remove redundant check in freezer_can_attach()
It is sufficient to check if @task is frozen, and no need to check if the
original freezer is frozen.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 7ccb97437bcc818d0ba6067513475f6ee8177a15
Author: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:51 2008 -0700
freezer_cg: fix improper BUG_ON() causing oops
The BUG_ON() should be protected by freezer->lock, otherwise it can be
triggered easily when a task has been unfreezed but the corresponding
cgroup hasn't been changed to FROZEN state.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit df8bc08c192f00f155185bfd6f052d46a728814a
Author: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@clustcom.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:50 2008 -0700
edac x38: new MC driver module
I wrote a new module for Intel X38 chipset. This chipset is very similar
to Intel 3200 chipset, but there are some different points, so I copyed
i3200_edac.c and modified.
This is Intel's web page describing this chipset.
http://www.intel.com/Products/Desktop/Chipsets/X38/X38-overview.htm
I've tested this new module with broken memory, and it seems to be working
well.
Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@clustcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit c17dad6905fc82d8f523399e5c3f014e81d61df6
Author: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:50 2008 -0700
.gitignore updates
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 75b7edfdc12c213402b17a62e5cfe7a802a4ab57
Author: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:49 2008 -0700
viafb: removed duplicated #include's
Removed duplicated #include's in drivers/video/via/global.h.
debug.h
viafbdev.h
viamode.h
Signed-off-by: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@gmail.com>
Cc: Joseph Chan <josephchan@via.com.tw>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 0833422274ff00729a603b020fac297e69a03e40
Author: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:00:48 2008 -0700
mm: increase the default mlock limit from 32k to 64k
By default, non-privileged tasks can only mlock() a small amount of
memory to avoid a DoS attack by ordinary users. The Linux kernel
defaulted to 32k (on a 4k page size system) to accommodate the needs of
gpg.
However, newer gpg2 needs 64k in various circumstances and otherwise
fails miserably, see bnc#329675.
Change the default to 64k, and make it more agnostic to PAGE_SIZE.
Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit b73b925a6b9d69478c6ae4e74ef20607fd24aeaa
Author: Sergey Lapin <slapin@ossfans.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 07:43:45 2008 +0100
[ARM] 5326/1: AFEB9260: Fix for i2c_board_info structure
i2c_board_info array was filled incorrectly.
Due to circumstances, the way it is filled works.
This patch fills array properly.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Lapin <slapin@ossfans.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
commit 1841c0f2bf6835aa3d18216e3a932371efa902f0
Author: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:03:48 2008 +0000
regulator: da903x regulator bug fix
Changes the device registration part of the probe function to supply the
regulator device rather than its parent (the mfd device) as this caused
problems when the regulator core attempted to find constraints associated
with the regulators.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
commit ab3bd08a257d4b92384de2720b7294b444578ba5
Merge: 9c65685... 2eca047...
Author: Russell King <rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu Oct 30 15:04:22 2008 +0000
Merge branch 'for-rmk-rc' of git://pasiphae.extern.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6
commit 2eca047b289307594d0d6ce62c8237fa9c5b9b5e
Author: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri Oct 17 16:10:38 2008 +0200
[ARM] mx31ads: Add missing include
mx31ads_defconfig compilation failed with
arch/arm/mach-mx3/mx31ads.c: In function 'mxc_init_imx_uart':
arch/arm/mach-mx3/mx31ads.c:102: error: 'mxc_uart_device0' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/arm/mach-mx3/mx31ads.c:102: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/arm/mach-mx3/mx31ads.c:102: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-mx3/mx31ads.o] Error 1
Add missing include
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
commit 5cac9d6558009d0fcdb7a0f38247ca578c8c685b
Author: Darius Augulis <augulis.darius@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 15 10:38:30 2008 +0200
[ARM] MXC: Fix mxc_gpio_get(), which must read PSR register instead DR.
The Data register holds the value we have written to a gpio. To
get the input value we must read the Pad Status Register MX3 (or Sample
Status register in MX1/2 terms)
Signed-off-by: Darius Augulis <augulis.darius@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
commit eadefeff9c5572d82c2f5d907a0bfb3ba55ce901
Author: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed Oct 15 09:50:23 2008 +0200
[ARM] MX3: Use ioremap wrapper to map SoC devices nonshared
The internal devices of the MX3 Processor have to be mapped
MT_DEVICE_NONSHARED devices, otherwise cache corruptions occur.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <lg@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
commit da6801e38b7fba28fbdc0ceae6681d5a261a42a6
Author: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Date: Thu Oct 30 15:55:47 2008 +0100
i2c-s3c2410: Correct use of ! and &
In commit e6bafba5b4765a5a252f1b8d31cbf6d2459da337, a bug was fixed that
involved converting !x & y to !(x & y). The code below shows the same
pattern, and thus should perhaps be fixed in the same way. In particular,
the result of !readl(i2c->regs + S3C2410_IICCON) & S3C2410_IICCON_IRQEN is
always 0.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@@ expression E; constant C; @@
(
!E & !C
|
- !E & C
+ !(E & C)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
commit 846557d3ceb6c7493e090921db5d6158ec237228
Author: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 15:55:47 2008 +0100
i2c: The i2c mailing list is moving
Replace all references to the old i2c mailing list.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
commit 4a029abee0f1d69cb0445657d6fa5a38597bd17d
Author: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Thu Oct 30 15:55:47 2008 +0100
scx200_i2c: Add missing class parameter
The scx200_i2c driver is missing the .class parameter, which means no
i2c drivers are willing to probe for devices on the bus and attach to
them.
Signed-off-by: Len Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
commit 09d9327b3420002c9952a81db37effec9dc1135e
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 13:10:29 2008 +0000
CHAR: Delete old and now unused M48T35 RTC driver for SGI IP27.
It was only used by this one SGI platform which recently was converted to
RTC_LIB and with RTC_LIB enabled the legacy drivers are no more selectable.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 4bdebe5b4a7216bd6bfca9e9b368abad8e9f9bd9
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 16:12:13 2008 +0000
CHAR: Delete old and now unused DS1286 driver.
It was only used by two SGI platforms which recently were converted to
RTC_LIB and with RTC_LIB enabled the legacy drivers are no more selectable.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
commit cea7e2dfdef53fe55f359d00da562a268be06fd2
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 13:38:45 2008 +0000
MIPS: Sort out CPU type to name translation.
As noticed by David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, the old long switch
statement did not comply with the Linux C coding style. It was also yet
another place of code to be changed when adding a new processor type
leading to annoying bugs for example in /proc/cpuinfo.
Fixed by moving the setting of the CPU type string into the core of the
probing code and a few BUG_ON() test to ensure the CPU probing code indeed
did its job and removing multiple now redundant tests.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 255a12fbf994664125983e389c975b4403aea167
Author: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:21:32 2008 -0700
MIPS: Use the new byteorder headers
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 558ce12494e9e0321b77b9f1ef62c16d0b893cf5
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 12:33:34 2008 +0000
MIPS: Probe for watch registers on cores of all vendors, not just MTI.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Acked-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
commit ba3049ed4086737dab200b6087138a4b8e06915d
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 17:38:42 2008 +0000
MIPS: Switch FPU emulator trap to BREAK instruction.
Arguably using the address error handler has always been ugly. But with
processors that handle unaligned loads and stores in hardware the
current mechanism ceases to work so switch it to a BREAK instruction and
allocate break code 514 to the FPU emulator.
Yoichi Yuasa provided a build fix for CONFIG_BUG=n.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
commit 076c6e4f4d81113615f50e5bc2c569f628bcd54a
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 10:03:57 2008 +0000
MIPS: SMP: Do not initialize __cpu_number_map/__cpu_logical_map for CPU 0.
A system isn't necessarily booted on physical processor 0 as this code
assumes. Also the array happens to be allocated in .bss so it's zero
initialized anyway. Systems which need to override this can do so in
their mp_ops->smp_setup() method.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 566f74f6b2f8b85d5b8d6caaf97e5672cecd3e3e
Author: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 17:56:35 2008 -0700
MIPS: Consider value of c0_ebase when computing value of exception base.
It just so happens to be zero on all currently supported systems so this
hasn't bitten yet ...
[Ralf: Original patch from Cavium; handling of set_uncached_handler() and
de-ifdef'ed trap_init() implementation by me.]
Signed-off-by: Tomaso Paoletti <tpaoletti@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 4816227b54d2366cba785e6f3b9f81495b83a5f1
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:40:35 2008 +0000
MIPS: Clean up MIPSxx-optimized bitop functions
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit c46b302b948e2070cb713171207c42e9586f131a
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:37:47 2008 +0000
MIPS: New feature test macro cpu_has_mips_r
cpu_has_mips_r is true if a processor is MIPS32 or MIPS64, any architecture
revision.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 864cbf804ddfb3d63d3ba3cca7afdeb98be23434
Author: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Tue Sep 2 22:44:38 2008 +0900
MIPS: RBTX4927: Add GPIO-LED support
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 9cc4581528233e2a4eb8720621c1e2f613d7c38a
Author: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Thu Sep 11 00:44:04 2008 +0900
MIPS: TXx9: Fix RBTX4939 ethernet address initialization
Fix location of ethernet adddress when booted from external ROM.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 9c6568501cbf731a910db2fcb7d094977dcb154c
Author: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:14:54 2008 -0700
[ARM] gpio_free might sleep, arm architecture
According to the documentation gpio_free should only be called from task
context only. To make this more explicit add a might sleep to all
implementations.
This patch changes the gpio_free implementations for the arm architecture.
DaVinci is skipped on purpose to simplify the merge process for patches
switching it over to use gpiolib as per request by David Brownell.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
commit 63890a0ee1af994122094bd01f87ea6251631a3f
Author: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@kaehlcke.net>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:14:52 2008 -0700
[ARM] ep93xx: fix OHCI DMA mask
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@kaehlcke.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
commit 05cd2544f4b64d9a9eca0d170191867495e01feb
Merge: 27f680a... a0601c8...
Author: Russell King <rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu Oct 30 14:26:45 2008 +0000
Merge branch 'fix' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ycmiao/pxa-linux-2.6
commit a0601c8944dc08c2d349c24bd9c0b09c406229fc
Author: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 11:05:00 2008 +0000
leds: da903x: (da9030 only) led brightness reversed.
The brightness control register calculation (for the pwm) is
effectively the reverse of what would be expected.
1 is maximum brightness, 255 minimum.
This patch inverts this.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
commit 56e7d85cf982dda4b453c157f3f64aea1478bc4d
Author: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 02:34:41 2008 +0400
[ARM] sharpsl_pm: fix compilation w/o CONFIG_PM
Fix compilation of sharpsl_pm when CONFIG_PM in unselected.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
commit 879129d208f725267366296b631aef31409cf304
Author: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 13:33:16 2008 +0000
dm snapshot: wait for chunks in destructor
If there are several snapshots sharing an origin and one is removed
while the origin is being written to, the snapshot's mempool may get
deleted while elements are still referenced.
Prior to dm-snapshot-use-per-device-mempools.patch the pending
exceptions may still have been referenced after the snapshot was
destroyed, but this was not a problem because the shared mempool
was still there.
This patch fixes the problem by tracking the number of mempool elements
in use.
The scenario:
- You have an origin and two snapshots 1 and 2.
- Someone writes to the origin.
- It creates two exceptions in the snapshots, snapshot 1 will be primary
exception, snapshot 2's pending_exception->primary_pe will point to the
exception in snapshot 1.
- The exceptions are being relocated, relocation of exception 1 finishes
(but it's pending_exception is still allocated, because it is referenced
by an exception from snapshot 2)
- The user lvremoves snapshot 1 --- it calls just suspend (does nothing)
and destructor. md->pending is zero (there is no I/O submitted to the
snapshot by md layer), so it won't help us.
- The destructor waits for kcopyd jobs to finish on snapshot 1 --- but
there are none.
- The destructor on snapshot 1 cleans up everything.
- The relocation of exception on snapshot 2 finishes, it drops reference
on primary_pe. This frees its primary_pe pointer. Primary_pe points to
pending exception created for snapshot 1. So it frees memory into
non-existing mempool.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
commit 60c856c8e2f57a3f69c505735ef66e3719ea0bd6
Author: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 13:33:12 2008 +0000
dm snapshot: fix register_snapshot deadlock
register_snapshot() performs a GFP_KERNEL allocation while holding
_origins_lock for write, but that could write out dirty pages onto a
device that attempts to acquire _origins_lock for read, resulting in
deadlock.
So move the allocation up before taking the lock.
This path is not performance-critical, so it doesn't matter that we
allocate memory and free it if we find that we won't need it.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
commit b34578a48459ed1bd5396631aaa4a65d6bcc7726
Author: Ilpo Jarvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu Oct 30 13:33:07 2008 +0000
dm raid1: fix do_failures
Missing braces. Commit 1f965b1943 (dm raid1: separate region_hash interface
part1) broke it.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Jarvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Heinz Mauelshagen <hjm@redhat.com>
commit 71c21b4cf62177a9d1ea46ff4c6073c907122226
Merge: 0552f29... 8cd2b26... 13d622b...
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu Oct 30 14:26:24 2008 +0100
Merge branches 'topic/fix/misc' and 'topic/fix/asoc' into for-linus
commit 13d622b33dfbd99205a7add5751ba47445e480a6
Author: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:37:10 2008 +0000
ALSA: ASoC: Fix WM9713 ALC Decay Time name
The control had an extra space at the end of the name.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit f06c8fd73e3658a659d5e5b56c44bd80fe244268
Author: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:37:09 2008 +0000
ALSA: ASoC: Fix some minor errors in mpc5200 psc i2s driver
Fix missing unsigned for irqsave flags in psc i2s driver
Make attribute visiblity static
Collect all sysfs errors before checking status
[Word wrapped DEVICE_ATTR() lines for 80 columns -- broonie]
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit 762b8df748d83c14070afbf0c6f8c0f4a91a13bf
Author: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 12:37:08 2008 +0000
ALSA: ASoC: Fix mono controls after conversion to support full int masks
When ASoC was converted to support full int width masks SOC_SINGLE_VALUE()
omitted the assignment of rshift, causing the control operatins to report
some mono controls as stereo. This happened to work some of the time due
to a confusion between shift and min in snd_soc_info_volsw().
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit 8cd2b264d92bb949ddccfb6db6a82254bb07af75
Author: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu Oct 30 13:09:55 2008 +0200
ALSA: sound/ice1712: indentation & braces disagree - add braces
Neither has any significance currently to the flow
because err is checked for the same condition before
the place of disagreement.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit ab00fee30cddf975200b3c97aef25bea144a0d89
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 10:37:21 2008 +0000
i386/PAE: fix pud_page()
Impact: cleanup
To the unsuspecting user it is quite annoying that this broken and
inconsistent with x86-64 definition still exists.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit a0e5ebdc1d16871222f9815f5066e4ca47e368fa
Author: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 15:23:39 2008 +0800
sched: remove sched-design.txt from 00-INDEX
Impact: remove stale documentation reference
sched-design.txt has been removed.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit a9cf4ddb3b2ce03c3027929b22a920aeff933009
Author: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu Oct 30 15:23:34 2008 +0800
sched: change sched_debug's mode to 0444
Impact: change /proc/sched/debug from rw-r--r-- to r--r--r--
/proc/sched_debug is read-only.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit e2736261b4c85e36f7c8a66dd082ec0751230460
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon Oct 20 16:07:45 2008 +0200
ALSA: usb - Add quirk for Edirol UA-25EX advanced modes
Added the quirk for UA-25EX advanced modes.
UA-25EX is almost compatible with UA-25.
Tested-by: Serge Perinsky <sergebass@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit 6c1249e588cbf0484fc3e6b0f0fc4a5892749b4d
Author: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu Sep 18 15:48:23 2008 +0200
[ARM] pcm037: map AIPS1 and AIPS2 as nonshared area
The internal devices of the MX3 Processor have to be mapped
MT_DEVICE_NONSHARED devices, otherwise cache corruptions occur.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
commit fb881f785f0003fc904c6db82909d937d968bcc9
Author: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Date: Tue Oct 14 18:13:45 2008 +0200
[ARM] build fixes for netX serial driver
Make the netX serial driver tristate (as the help text implied). Make the
serial driver build correctly if the netX serial console is disabled. Do not
allow the netX serial console if the netX serial driver is build as a module.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
commit 096a957169ff1c31d9d8fbf4e59e45497cfae10d
Author: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Date: Thu Oct 30 02:27:20 2008 +0100
sound: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-By: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit fa157bdfe87c5ea98a80b96cb08f1ab509e21a52
Author: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Thu Oct 30 01:06:13 2008 +0100
HID: add quirk entry for no-name keyboard (0x13ba/0x0017)
This patch (as1157) adds a no-name PS/2-to-USB keyboard+mouse adapter
to the hid-dell driver. (The device shows up with a Product string
saying "Generic USB K/B", nothing more.) This will force an initial
"Set-LEDs" report to be sent to the device, without which it won't
send any keystroke information. Several bug reports mentioning this
device have been filed in various forums; the patch should resolve
them.
This is just a temporary stop-gap for 2.6.28. A later patch for
2.6.29 will introduce a more generic mechanism for "Set-LEDs", making
this change (and the entire hid-dell driver) unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 398cf93a394a6f2e42b8e61b1071fc32ecf18647
Author: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 15:36:00 2008 -0700
sparc: use the new byteorder headers
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit 12a9ee3cce256ae0f178d604f2c8764fb2942cfe
Author: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
Date: Wed Oct 29 15:35:24 2008 -0700
rtc-m48t59: shift zero year to 1968 on sparc (rev 2)
Shift the first year to 1968 for Sun SPARC machines.
Move this logic from platform specific files to rtc driver
as this fixes problems with calculating a century bit.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
Tested-by: Alexander Beregalov
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit be376649344ba2c3d00021f8bbf64392aa01ad55
Author: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed Oct 29 15:34:39 2008 -0700
dbri: check dma_alloc_coherent errors
Needs to check for dma_alloc_coherent() allocation failure.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit 1758ef68a07f42983371dc1d2bf0ae80b4d8ea16
Author: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 15:33:28 2008 -0700
sparc64: remove byteshifting from out* helpers
__raw_write avoids the need to byteswap, as we are reading from a
host-endian area, just deref the pointers directly, taking care
of alignment.
As before, outsw must be called with a 2-byte aligned pointer.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit 113328306dbdfd5f146f257e447364dc66d025d4
Author: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 12:05:14 2008 -0400
Driver core: fix 'dynamic_debug' cmd line parameter
In testing 2.6.28-rc1, I found that passing 'dynamic_printk' on the command
line didn't activate the debug code. The problem is that dynamic_printk_setup()
(which activates the debugging) is being called before dynamic_printk_init() is
called (which initializes infrastructure). Fix this by setting setting the
state to 'DYNAMIC_ENABLED_ALL' in dynamic_printk_setup(), which will also
cause all subsequent modules to have debugging automatically started, which is
probably the behavior we want.
Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 555ac6482ea7d0f29ec524b816f2f547ec94e882
Author: Tsugikazu Shibata <tshibata@ab.jp.nec.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 18:05:40 2008 +0900
HOWTO: Sync patch for jp_JP/HOWTO
Sync the jp_JP version of HOWTO to contain the latest updates
From: Tsugikazu Shibata <tshibata@ab.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 79cd80a1d9a4e13c150ba43f140f18b202adce65
Author: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 10:10:42 2008 -0400
Update stable tree documentation
Update the documentation for the stable tree rules to reflect
that device IDs and quirks are also suitable for -stable
kernels.
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 4e318d7c6c9dd5cdae48bcf61558bbc0c09b12ac
Author: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon Oct 13 12:03:03 2008 +0200
sysfs: Fix return values for sysdev_store_{ulong,int}
SYSFS: Fix return values for sysdev_store_{ulong,int}
Always return the full size instead of the consumed
length of the string in sysdev_store_{ulong,int}
This avoids EINVAL errors in some echo versions.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 65151365ad59af00e229d0fe33b4f1f9350c685f
Author: Qinghuang Feng <s3c24xx@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Oct 13 18:05:04 2008 +0800
driver core: drivers/base/sys.c: update comments
There are no functions named sys_device_shutdown or sys_device_suspend
in the kernel.
They should be fixed to sysdev_shutdown and sysdev_suspend respectively.
Signed-off-by: Qinghuang Feng <qhfeng.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit bb20698d46bac1b2b48cfe1fcb33e54ac885946a
Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Date: Fri Oct 17 15:01:07 2008 -0700
Document kernel taint flags properly
This fills in the documentation for all of the current kernel taint
flags, and fixes the number for TAINT_CRAP, which was incorrectly
described.
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 27f680adc65ca08bf72ed85d3a48d1ee70f77c7a
Author: Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 13:52:49 2008 +0100
[ARM] 5323/1: Remove outdated empeg documentation.
The documents aren't particularly useful anyway and the hardware in
question has never run anything newer than a v2.2.14 kernel to my
knowledge.
Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
commit 9624dfe6165826745481cfa55b2ef21f3a43d89d
Author: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Oct 9 16:50:46 2008 +0100
[ARM] 5299/1: Add maintainer for Mobilepro 900/c
This patch adds the new maintainer for the
Mobilepro 900/c handheld.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michael Petchkovsky <mkpetch@internode.on.net>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
commit 61fbeba11c553c489ba5284c0ed67067dc7b7c0f
Author: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon Oct 27 12:07:44 2008 -0400
USB: prevent autosuspend during hub initialization
This patch (as1153) fixes a potential problem in hub initialization.
Starting in 2.6.28, initialization was split into several tasks to
help speed up booting. This opens the possibility that the hub may be
autosuspended before all the initialization tasks can complete.
Normally that wouldn't matter, but with incomplete initialization
there is a risk that the hub would never autoresume -- especially if
devices were plugged into the hub beforehand. The solution is a
simple one-line change to suppress autosuspend until the
initialization is finished.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 74511bb340059be5a3fceb032213c7f325344694
Author: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@taprogge.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 18:16:09 2008 +0100
USB: Unusual dev for the "Kyocera / Contax SL300R T*" digital camera.
The camera reports an incorrect size and fails to handle PREVENT-ALLOW
MEDIUM REMOVAL commands. The patch marks the camera as an unusual dev
and adds the flags to enable the workarounds for both shortcomings.
Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@taprogge.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit b361a6e348a5de9e18eb17542663d34a57740e87
Author: Chris Malley <mail@chrismalley.co.uk>
Date: Sat Oct 25 22:07:32 2008 +0100
USB: usbtmc: Use explicit unsigned type for input buffer instead of char*
Silences compiler warning about comparison with 0x80, and type now matches the
corresponding _bulk_out function.
drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c: In function ‘usbtmc_ioctl_abort_bulk_in’:
drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c:163: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
Signed-off-by: Chris Malley <mail@chrismalley.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit cde217a556ec552d28ac9e136c5a94684a69ae94
Author: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue Oct 21 15:28:46 2008 -0400
USB: fix crash when URBs are unlinked after the device is gone
This patch (as1151) protects usbcore against drivers that try to
unlink an URB after the URB's device or bus have been removed. The
core does not currently check for this, and certain drivers can cause
a crash if they are running while an HCD is unloaded.
Certainly it would be best to fix the guilty drivers. But a little
defensive programming doesn't hurt, especially since it appears that
quite a few drivers need to be fixed.
The patch prevents the problem by grabbing a reference to the device
while an unlink is in progress and using a new spinlock to synchronize
unlinks with device removal. (There's no need to acquire a reference
to the bus as well, since the device structure itself keeps a
reference to the bus.) In addition, the kerneldoc is updated to
indicate that URBs should not be unlinked after the disconnect method
returns.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
commit 15a2ee74d22674c58f347b16b3af5601fa4e15db
Author: Jeremy Huntwork <jhuntwork@lightcubesolutions.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:20:13 2008 -0700
Fix incompatibility with versions of Perl less than 5.6.0
Fix headers_install.pl and headers_check.pl to be compatible with versions
of Perl less than 5.6.0. It has been tested with Perl 5.005_03 and 5.8.8.
I realize this may not be an issue for most people, but there will still
be some that hit it, I imagine. There are three basic issues:
1. Prior to 5.6.0 open() only used 2 arguments, and the versions of
the scripts in 2.6.27.1 use 3.
2. 5.6.0 also introduced the ability to use uninitialized scalar
variables as file handles, which the current scripts make use of.
3. Lastly, 5.6.0 also introduced the pragma 'use warnings'. We can use
the -w switch and be backwards compatible.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huntwork <jhuntwork@lightcubesolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit de2addf592894b31b8149cca008f00d8102401e9
Author: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Date: Tue Oct 28 13:36:25 2008 +0000
kbuild: do not include arch/<ARCH>/include/asm in find-sources twice.
Architectures which have moved their includes to arch/<ARCH>/include
now list the headers twice in the source listing used by "make
cscope" and friends, causing those tools to list symbols twice.
Skipping these files in the ALLSOURCE_ARCHS pass rather than removing
the ALLINCLUDE_ARCHS pass preserves the semantics of the later.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit f03b283f081f538ec71b9e87cb8411bb62e2abc9
Author: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@freescale.com>
Date: Fri Sep 12 12:26:24 2008 -0700
kbuild: tag with git revision when git describe is missing
setlocalversion used to use an abbreviated git commit sha1 to generate the
tag. This was changed in commit d882421f4e08ddf0a94245cdbe516db260aa6f41
"kbuild: change CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO to use a git-describe-ish format"
to use git describe to come up with a tag. Which is nice, but git describe
sometimes can't describe the revision.
Commit 56b2f0706d82535fd8d85503f2dcc0be40c8e55d ("setlocalversion: do not
describe if there is nothing to describe") addressed this, but there is still
no tag generated.
So, generate a plain abbreviated sha1 tag like setlocalversion used to when
git describe comes up short.
Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@freescale.com>
CC: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit e6e6733ed9451827165d853f25bf99ba55e12feb
Author: Ashutosh Naik <ashutosh@chelsio.com>
Date: Sat Oct 25 15:02:53 2008 -0700
kbuild: prevent modpost from looking for a .cmd file for a static library linked into a module
This fixes a compile time warning which occurs whenever a static library
is linked into a kernel module. MODPOST tries to look for a
".<modulename>.cmd" file to look for its dependencies, but that file
doesn't exist or get generated for static libraries.
This patch prevents modpost from looking for a .cmd file when a module is
linked with a static library
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Naik <ashutosh.naik@gmail.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit 92f83cc56eeafdb8fcf07ceb89fd9a0212bd498c
Author: Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat Oct 25 15:02:52 2008 -0700
kbuild: fix KBUILD_EXTRA_SYMBOLS
Taken from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11567
If you even define KBUILD_EXTRA_SYMBOLS in Makefile it will not be expanded
into command line argument for modpost.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit 3f5e26cee443eb4d3900cd3085664c3e51b72135
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Date: Sat Oct 25 15:02:51 2008 -0700
adjust init section definitions
Add rodata equivalents for assembly use, and fix the section attributes
used by __REFCONST.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit bd8f89ff47f11941a109220dbd51d81fd7ed2058
Author: Thomas Volpini <tvolpini@gmx.net>
Date: Sat Oct 25 15:02:50 2008 -0700
scripts/checksyscalls.sh: fix for non-gnu sed
Make the checksyscalls script work even on systems where sed is non-gnu.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit 13797b77d419fc1b16eebf2993bf7b5cea65f0bf
Author: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Date: Sat Oct 25 15:02:47 2008 -0700
scripts/package: don't break if %{_smp_mflags} isn't set
Currently, if we do a 'make rpm-pkg' without the _smp_mflags rpm macro
defined, the build fails with:
[snip]
Executing(%build): /bin/bash -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.67959
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/jk/devel/kernel-snapshot/rpm/BUILD
+ cd kernel-2.6.26
+ make clean
+ make '%{_smp_mflags}'
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `%{_smp_mflags}'. Stop.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.67959 (%build)
This change uses the 'null if not set' reference to the _smp_mflags
macro instead.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit e3da2fb712bb75b6035ba0743f3256df1de30bce
Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat Oct 25 17:43:50 2008 -0400
kbuild: setlocalversion: dont include svn change count
The number of pending changes is pretty useless, so encoding it into the
version is just annoying by the constant shuffle in corresponding modules.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit dcc2da1a9693807096e9ac5137b499a829c51268
Author: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Date: Sat Oct 25 22:58:23 2008 +0200
kbuild: improve check-symlink
o if include/asm point to a nonexisting directory remove the asm symlink
o if include/asm is a directory error out
This fixes a situation where one could be left with a symlink
to asm-x86 but that directory no longer exist and thus the build
would error out.
include/asm may be a directory if the kernel tree has been copied
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
commit 46dca86cb93db80992a45e4b55737ff2b2f61cd0
Author: Evgeniy Manachkin <sfstudio@mail.ru>
Date: Wed Oct 15 23:37:26 2008 +0600
kbuild: mkspec - fix build rpm
This is patch to fix incorrect mkspec script to make rpm correctly at 2.6.27 vanilla kernel.
This is regression in 2.6.27. 2.6.26 make rpm work good.
In 2.6.27 'make rpm' say error from rpmbuild "Many unpacked files (*.fw)."
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Manachkin <sfstudio@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Stable <stable@kernel.org>
commit 556dcee7b829e5c350c3ffdbdb87a8b15aa3c5d3
Author: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Date: Tue Oct 21 17:45:58 2008 +0200
[CRIS] Move header files from include to arch/cris/include.
Change all users of header files to correct path.
Remove some unneeded headers for arch-v32.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
commit 242bfafc8e42da4697c1e2dea108049d14dbac4b
Merge: 1d63e72... a54373e...
Author: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 17:28:40 2008 +0100
Merge branch 'for-next' of git://www.jni.nu/cris into cris_merge
commit f3384b28a05624783b53836ccfed95ecde66a7ad
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 11:15:57 2008 -0400
ftrace: fix trace_nop config select
Impact: build fix on non-function-tracing architectures
The trace_nop is the tracer that is defined when no tracer is set in
the ftrace infrastructure.
The trace_nop was mistakenly selected by HAVE_FTRACE due to the confusion
between ftrace infrastructure and the ftrace function tracer (which has
been solved by renaming the function tracer).
This patch changes the select to the approriate TRACING.
This patch should fix compile errors on architectures that do not define
the FUNCTION_TRACER.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 0552f297951d0ab3a1027f9b06fa40c9be8378ba
Merge: 0a9b863... 0cbf009... 366840d...
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed Oct 29 16:40:00 2008 +0100
Merge branches 'topic/fix/hda' and 'topic/fix/misc' into for-linus
commit 0cbf00980f0fc4cc064a15ab3dfce19b5fae9130
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed Oct 29 16:18:25 2008 +0100
ALSA: hda - Add reboot notifier
The current snd-hda-intel driver seems blocking the power-off on some
devices like eeepc. Although this is likely a BIOS problem, we can add
a workaround by disabling IRQ lines before power-off operation.
This patch adds the reboot notifier to achieve it.
The detailed problem description is found in bug#11889:
http://bugme.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11889
Tested-by: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit 366840d7e1ece4331bb3ccc2a53e3bc355529f21
Author: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:40:30 2008 +0000
ALSA: Warn when control names are truncated
This is likely to confuse user interfaces since the end of the control
name is interpreted (eg, "Volume", "Switch").
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit 78fad343a4fd4c837e3034dcbca13269a783e0f6
Author: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Date: Wed Oct 29 12:59:05 2008 +0000
ALSA: intel8x0 - add Dell Optiplex GX620 (AD1981B) to AC97 clock whitelist
alsa-info.sh output at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441087#c49
Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit fe8b868eccb9f85a0e231e35f0abac5b39bac801
Author: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 16:43:14 2008 -0700
x86: remove debug code from arch_add_memory()
Impact: remove incorrect WARN_ON(1)
Gets rid of dmesg spam created during physical memory hot-add which
will very likely confuse users. The change removes what appears to
be debugging code which I assume was unintentionally included in:
x86: arch/x86/mm/init_64.c printk fixes
commit 10f22dde556d1ed41d55355d1fb8ad495f9810c8
Signed-off-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 1d6cf1feb854c53c6d59e0d879603692b379e208
Author: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 22:46:04 2008 -0700
x86: start annotating early ioremap pointers with __iomem
Impact: some new sparse warnings in e820.c etc, but no functional change.
As with regular ioremap, iounmap etc, annotate with __iomem.
Fixes the following sparse warnings, will produce some new ones
elsewhere in arch/x86 that will get worked out over time.
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:402:9: warning: cast removes address space of expression
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:406:10: warning: cast adds address space to expression (<asn:2>)
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:782:19: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit c1e99bd9d6a0c82f4fa9078ed1f570e57b2f3944
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed Oct 29 08:03:42 2008 +0100
ALSA: hda - Fix SPDIF mute on IDT/STAC codecs
The SPDIF mute switch code seems broken. It doesn't set unmute bits
properly. Also it contains the duplicated lines (merge error?) to be
cleaned up.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit 9352f5698db2c6d7f2789f6cd37e3996d49ac4b5
Author: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 23:05:22 2008 -0700
x86: two trivial sparse annotations
Impact: fewer sparse warnings, no functional changes
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:87:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:87:14: expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*addr
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:87:14: got void *[assigned] address
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:88:22: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:88:22: expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*addr
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:88:22: got void *
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:100:23: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:100:23: expected void volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*addr
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:100:23: got void *
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:101:23: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:101:23: expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*addr
arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c:101:23: got void *
arch/x86/mm/gup.c:235:6: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
arch/x86/mm/gup.c:235:6: expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:1>*<noident>
arch/x86/mm/gup.c:235:6: got unsigned long [unsigned] [assigned] start
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 5cbff9603a77d01315859690a8f125f817bed73b
Author: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 20:26:40 2008 +0300
[ARM] corgi_lcd: fix simultaneous compilation with corgi_bl
corgi_lcd has symbol conflict with corgi_bl driver.
Fix it by renaming common symbol in new corgi_lcd driver.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
commit b6e642e498097e3d66e25ee9499f7719976263cf
Author: Dmitry Baryshkov <[dbaryshkov@gmail.com]>
Date: Wed Oct 29 11:40:46 2008 +0800
[ARM] pxa/spitz: fix spi cs on spitz
On spitz configure SPI CS GPIOs as outputs to unbreak spi chip selection.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
commit 8175fe2dda1c93a9c596921c8ed4a0b4baccdefe
Author: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: Sun Oct 26 00:30:18 2008 +0200
HID: fix hid_device_id for cross compiling
struct hid_device_id contains hidden padding which is bad for cross
compiling. Make the padding explicit and consistent across
architectures.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 48e5ecae691cfb50aa39036ba9fc193f5c24dbb3
Author: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 15:50:54 2008 -0700
amd8111e: Fix rx return code
The amd8111e rx poll routine currently mishandles the case when we
process exactly the number of packets specified in the budget.
This patch is basically as suggested by David Miller.
Signed-off-by: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit f49d81a8992c4ec43480195a93f30ab4b736f960
Author: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Wed Oct 15 11:53:34 2008 +0100
regulator: Build on non-ARM platforms
When the regulator API was merged it was added to the separate Kconfig
which ARM uses for drivers but not the generic one in drivers/. Since
there is nothing ARM-specific about the API add it there too.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
commit 882716604ecf388b2ff09bc76eb2a752aa9cc76b
Author: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 13:21:51 2008 -0700
pktgen: fix multiple queue warning
when testing the new pktgen module with multiple queues and ixgbe with:
pgset "flag QUEUE_MAP_CPU"
I found that I was getting errors in dmesg like:
pktgen: WARNING: QUEUE_MAP_CPU disabled because CPU count (8) exceeds number
<4>pktgen: WARNING: of tx queues (8) on eth15
you'll note, 8 really doesn't exceed 8.
This patch seemed to fix the logic errors and also the attempts at
limiting line length in printk (which didn't work anyway)
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Olsson <robert.olsson@its.uu.se>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit f96f57d91c2df75011d1e260c23edca429f37361
Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 12:39:23 2008 -0700
x86: fix init_memory_mapping for [dc000000 - e0000000) - v2
Impact: change over-mapping to precise mapping, fix /proc/meminfo output
v2: fix less than 1G ram system handling
when gart aperture is 0xdc000000 - 0xe0000000
it return 0xc0000000 - 0xe0000000
that is not right.
this patch fix that will get exact mapping
on 256g sytem with that aperture after patch
LBSuse:~ # cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 264742432 kB
MemFree: 263920628 kB
Buffers: 1416 kB
Cached: 24468 kB
...
DirectMap4k: 5760 kB
DirectMap2M: 3205120 kB
DirectMap1G: 265289728 kB
it is consistent to
LBSuse:~ # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kernel_page_tables
..
---[ Low Kernel Mapping ]---
0xffff880000000000-0xffff880000200000 2M RW GLB x pte
0xffff880000200000-0xffff880040000000 1022M RW PSE GLB x pmd
0xffff880040000000-0xffff8800c0000000 2G RW PSE GLB NX pud
0xffff8800c0000000-0xffff8800d7e00000 382M RW PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffff8800d7e00000-0xffff8800d7fa0000 1664K RW GLB NX pte
0xffff8800d7fa0000-0xffff8800d8000000 384K pte
0xffff8800d8000000-0xffff8800dc000000 64M pmd
0xffff8800dc000000-0xffff8800e0000000 64M RW PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffff8800e0000000-0xffff880100000000 512M pmd
0xffff880100000000-0xffff880800000000 28G RW PSE GLB NX pud
0xffff880800000000-0xffff880824600000 582M RW PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffff880824600000-0xffff8808247f0000 1984K RW GLB NX pte
0xffff8808247f0000-0xffff880824800000 64K RW PCD GLB NX pte
0xffff880824800000-0xffff880840000000 440M RW PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffff880840000000-0xffff884000000000 223G RW PSE GLB NX pud
0xffff884000000000-0xffff884028000000 640M RW PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffff884028000000-0xffff884040000000 384M pmd
0xffff884040000000-0xffff888000000000 255G pud
0xffff888000000000-0xffffc20000000000 58880G pgd
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 5f707eb429e2c98dfd564ffbbd9f536bf493d869
Author: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 15:21:42 2008 -0400
SUNRPC: Fix potential race in put_rpccred()
We have to be careful when we try to unhash the credential in
put_rpccred(), because we're not holding the credcache lock, so the call to
rpcauth_unhash_cred() may fail if someone else has looked the cred up, and
obtained a reference to it.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
commit eac0d18d44705f8a1b72cccec3a453e1a43eb20a
Author: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 15:21:41 2008 -0400
SUNRPC: Fix rpcauth_prune_expired
We need to make sure that we don't remove creds from the cred_unused list
if they are still under the moratorium, or else they will never get
garbage collected.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
commit ae05f269400533cbb32bfba131ab528d78dffd16
Author: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 15:21:40 2008 -0400
NFS: Convert nfs_attr_generation_counter into an atomic_long
The most important property we need from nfs_attr_generation_counter is
monotonicity, which is not guaranteed by the current system of smp memory
barriers. We should convert it to an atomic_long_t, and drop the memory
barriers.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
commit 2a9e1cfa23fb62da37739af81127dab5af095d99
Author: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 15:21:39 2008 -0400
SUNRPC: Respond promptly to server TCP resets
If the server sends us an RST error while we're in the TCP_ESTABLISHED
state, then that will not result in a state change, and so the RPC client
ends up hanging forever (see
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11154)
We can intercept the reset by setting up an sk->sk_error_report callback,
which will then allow us to initiate a proper shutdown and retry...
We also make sure that if the send request receives an ECONNRESET, then we
shutdown too...
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
commit 29fa0586de4fe518f122a915b8c6e92d12e8ca7f
Author: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon Oct 27 15:17:56 2008 +0000
[PATCH] Switch all my contributions stuff to a single common address
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
commit d68612b257b5f4ea2e6535859c5a26b10011a9df
Author: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:45:42 2008 -0700
resources: fix x86info results ioremap.c:226 __ioremap_caller+0xf2/0x2d6() WARNINGs
Impact: avoid false-positive WARN_ON()
Andi Kleen reported:
> When running x86info on a 2.6.27-git8 system I get
>
> resource map sanity check conflict: 0x9e000 0x9efff 0x10000 0x9e7ff System RAM
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at /home/lsrc/linux/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:226 __ioremap_caller+0xf2/0x2d6()
> ...
Some of the pages below the 1MB ISA addresses will be shared typically by both
BIOS and system usable RAM. For example:
BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f800 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 000000000009f800 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
x86info reads the low physical address using /dev/mem, which internally
uses ioremap() for accessing non RAM pages. ioremap() of such low
pages conflicts with multiple resource entities leading to the
above warning.
Change the iomem_map_sanity_check() to allow mapping a page spanning multiple
resource entities (minimum granularity that one can map is a page anyhow).
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 0b6e4d56bf71866a2b58daa8323cf747988ce7e4
Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 20:17:38 2008 +0100
ftrace: perform an initialization for ftrace to enable it
Impact: corrects a bug which made the non-dyn function tracer not functional
With latest git, the non-dynamic function tracer didn't get any trace.
The problem was the fact that ftrace_enabled wasn't initialized to 1
because ftrace hasn't any init function when DYNAMIC_FTRACE is disabled.
So when a tracer tries to register an ftrace_ops struct,
__register_ftrace_function failed to set the hook.
This patch corrects it by setting an init function to initialize
ftrace during the boot.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit b3ed4bc082077045f680400c8bb02fa8d9c9ecf5
Merge: ea2d8b5... 753dcfe...
Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:01:07 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'davem-fixes' of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6
commit e946217e4fdaa67681bbabfa8e6b18641921f750
Merge: a186576... 60063a6...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:52:25 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'tracing-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'tracing-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip: (31 commits)
ftrace: fix current_tracer error return
tracing: fix a build error on alpha
ftrace: use a real variable for ftrace_nop in x86
tracing/ftrace: make boot tracer select the sched_switch tracer
tracepoint: check if the probe has been registered
asm-generic: define DIE_OOPS in asm-generic
trace: fix printk warning for u64
ftrace: warning in kernel/trace/ftrace.c
ftrace: fix build failure
ftrace, powerpc, sparc64, x86: remove notrace from arch ftrace file
ftrace: remove ftrace hash
ftrace: remove mcount set
ftrace: remove daemon
ftrace: disable dynamic ftrace for all archs that use daemon
ftrace: add ftrace warn on to disable ftrace
ftrace: only have ftrace_kill atomic
ftrace: use probe_kernel
ftrace: comment arch ftrace code
ftrace: return error on failed modified text.
ftrace: dynamic ftrace process only text section
...
commit a1865769254dd4eefbc1e857d17bc2a77d5f8580
Merge: 0d8762c... e45948b...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:50:11 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'kvm-updates/2.6.28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm
* 'kvm-updates/2.6.28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm:
KVM: ia64: Makefile fix for forcing to re-generate asm-offsets.h
KVM: Future-proof device assignment ABI
KVM: ia64: Fix halt emulation logic
KVM: Fix guest shared interrupt with in-kernel irqchip
KVM: MMU: sync root on paravirt TLB flush
commit 0d8762c9ee40cf83d5dbf3a22843bc566912b592
Merge: cf76ddd... 6afe40b...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:49:27 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'core-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'core-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
lockdep: fix irqs on/off ip tracing
lockdep: minor fix for debug_show_all_locks()
x86: restore the old swiotlb alloc_coherent behavior
x86: use GFP_DMA for 24bit coherent_dma_mask
swiotlb: remove panic for alloc_coherent failure
xen: compilation fix of drivers/xen/events.c on IA64
xen: portability clean up and some minor clean up for xencomm.c
xen: don't reload cr3 on suspend
kernel/resource: fix reserve_region_with_split() section mismatch
printk: remove unused code from kernel/printk.c
commit cf76dddb22c019f03ada6479210f894f19bd591b
Merge: 8ca6215... 3786fc7...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:48:25 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'irq-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'irq-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
irq: make variable static
commit 8ca6215502462f564d7bcae2d8dcc825aa95d743
Merge: f8245e9... 4078e35...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:46:20 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'sched-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'sched-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
sched: fix documentation reference for sched_min_granularity_ns
sched: virtual time buddy preemption
sched: re-instate vruntime based wakeup preemption
sched: weaken sync hint
sched: more accurate min_vruntime accounting
sched: fix a find_busiest_group buglet
sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
commit f8245e91a5121acc435e509aa56cd04d445a74c7
Merge: b30fc14... 60817c9...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:45:31 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'x86-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
* 'x86-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip:
x86, memory hotplug: remove wrong -1 in calling init_memory_mapping()
x86: keep the /proc/meminfo page count correct
x86/uv: memory allocation at initialization
xen: fix Xen domU boot with batched mprotect
commit b30fc14c5c94728baa42b7c17d83ea17185b5c40
Merge: 3c136f2... ea4bfdf...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:44:59 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git390.osdl.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6
* 'for-linus' of git://git390.osdl.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6:
[S390] s390: Fix build for !CONFIG_S390_GUEST + CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE
[S390] No more 4kb stacks.
[S390] Change default IPL method to IPL_VM.
[S390] tape: disable interrupts in tape_open and tape_release
[S390] appldata: unsigned ops->size cannot be negative
[S390] tape block: complete request with correct locking
[S390] Fix sysdev class file creation.
[S390] pgtables: Fix race in enable_sie vs. page table ops
[S390] qdio: remove incorrect memset
[S390] qdio: prevent double qdio shutdown in case of I/O errors
commit 3c136f29ba5ae8dfcae4958bbcb581420b43a74d
Merge: 49fdf67... 87943ac...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:42:48 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'upstream-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev
* 'upstream-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev:
libata: ahci enclosure management bit mask
libata: ahci enclosure management led sync
pata_ninja32: suspend/resume support
libata: Fix LBA48 on pata_it821x RAID volumes.
libata: clear saved xfer_mode and ncq_enabled on device detach
sata_sil24: configure max read request size to 4k
libata: add missing kernel-doc
libata: fix device iteration bugs
ahci: Add support for Promise PDC42819
ata: Switch all my stuff to a common address
commit 87c6f40128f92621698f97a62d2ead5184d1dd97
Author: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 16:13:54 2008 +0100
x86, gart: fix gart detection for Fam11h CPUs
Impact: fix AMD Family 11h boot hangs / USB device problems
The AMD Fam11h CPUs have a K8 northbridge. This northbridge is different
from other family's because it lacks GART support (as I just learned).
But the kernel implicitly expects a GART if it finds an AMD northbridge.
Fix this by removing the Fam11h northbridge id from the scan list of K8
northbridges. This patch also changes the message in the GART driver
about missing K8 northbridges to tell that the GART is missing which is
the correct information in this case.
Reported-by: Jouni Malinen <jkmalinen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 11a6b0c933b55654a58afd84f63a5dde1607d78f
Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Oct 14 18:59:18 2008 -0700
x86: 64 bit print out absent pages num too
so users are not confused with memhole causing big total ram
we don't need to worry about 32 bit, because memhole is always
above max_low_pfn.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit e7706fc691513b0f06adb3de3d6ac04293180146
Author: Ken'ichi Ohmichi <oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>
Date: Mon Oct 20 13:51:52 2008 +0900
x86, kdump: fix invalid access on i386 sparsemem
Impact: fix kdump crash on 32-bit sparsemem kernels
Since linux-2.6.27, kdump has failed on i386 sparsemem kernel.
1st-kernel gets a panic just before switching to 2nd-kernel.
The cause is that a kernel accesses invalid mem_section by
page_to_pfn(image->swap_page) at machine_kexec().
image->swap_page is allocated if kexec for hibernation, but
it is not allocated if kdump. So if kdump, a kernel should
not access the mem_section corresponding to image->swap_page.
The attached patch fixes this invalid access.
Signed-off-by: Ken'ichi Ohmichi <oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 1281675e9c0d4d42d993697f4daab45ef22d49da
Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Oct 14 18:59:17 2008 -0700
x86: fix APIC_DEBUG with inquire_remote_apic
APIC_DEBUG is always 2.
need to update inquire_remote_apic to check apic_verbosity with
it instead.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 3c52204bb90834bca8e9e78a3628d886ad6d4db5
Author: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 15:30:38 2008 +0200
x86: AMD microcode patch loader author update
Removed author's email address from MODULE_AUTHOR.
Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 36b75da27bb51dc34e358d0b7487406132806c46
Author: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 15:30:37 2008 +0200
x86: microcode patch loader author update
Removed one author's email address from module init message.
Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 17c22978562df42e608a9c10bc46a0e7f5660094
Author: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 15:30:36 2008 +0200
mailmap: add Peter Oruba
Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 531f6ed7de911e975352fbb2b228367121da630a
Author: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 09:09:27 2008 +0200
x86, bts: improve help text for BTS config
Improve the help text of the X86_PTRACE_BTS config.
Make X86_DS invisible and depend on X86_PTRACE_BTS.
Reported-by: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 71cced6eb044f5b096d35755963f3a2035603b73
Author: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Date: Mon Oct 20 09:32:21 2008 -0700
doc/x86: fix doc subdirs
The Documentation/i386 and Documentation/x86_64 directories and their
contents have been moved into Documentation/x86. Fix references to
those files accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 60063a66236c15f5613f91390631e06718689782
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 10:44:24 2008 -0400
ftrace: fix current_tracer error return
The commit (in linux-tip) c2931e05ec5965597cbfb79ad332d4a29aeceb23
( ftrace: return an error when setting a nonexistent tracer )
added useful code that would error when a bad tracer was written into
the current_tracer file.
But this had a bug if the amount written was more than the amount read by
that code. The first iteration would set the tracer correctly, but since
it did not consume the rest of what was written (usually whitespace), the
userspace utility would continue to write what was not consumed. This
second iteration would fail to find a tracer and return -EINVAL. Funny
thing is that the tracer would have already been set.
This patch just consumes all the data that is written to the file.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 8199de3b29d7f22f3163fcf03f7a61644c93c2ea
Author: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 14:50:13 2008 +0000
ALSA: hda: Add HDA vendor ID for Wolfson Microelectronics
Add Wolfson Microelectronics to the HDA vendor ID table.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit 43271c4128071c39ac8f7bfda4780c28b6401545
Author: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Date: Mon Oct 13 01:51:17 2008 -0300
powerpc: enable heap randomization for linkstations
The current defconfig for Linkstation/Kuroboxes has the "Disable Heap
Randomization" option enabled.
Since some of these machines are facing the internet, it helps to have
heap randomization enabled. This patch enables it.
Signed-off-by: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
commit 3420a982c74eddcf9d2a5d504dd2b272cceddae7
Author: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Date: Mon Oct 13 01:07:03 2008 -0300
powerpc: compile kernel for linkstations optimized for size
Since Linkstations and Kuroboxes often have *very* little memory (as
they are embedded systems), it is desirable to get their kernels
compiled optimized for size.
Signed-off-by: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
commit 22e181ba7f09197dd6f35a48013cb86289644eb6
Author: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:05:56 2008 +0200
powerpc: fix i2c on PPC linkstation / kurobox machines
The i2c bus defn is broken on linkstation / kurobox machines since at
least 2.6.27. Fix it. Also remove CONFIG_SERIAL_OF_PLATFORM, which, if
enabled, breaks the serial console after the
"console handover: boot [udbg0] -> real [ttyS1]" message.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
commit 5695ff44160e62d9193c0201706853bcfe2a077f
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue Oct 28 15:39:26 2008 +0100
ALSA: hda - Add another HP model for AD1884A
Added a quirk entry for another HP mobile device with AD1884A codec.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit c8d7aa91bc38e2de5c74c48ba33b9c950c28ffac
Author: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 04:31:58 2008 +0000
powerpc/40x: Don't enable HCU4 board by default
Fix the HCU4 Kconfig option to 'default n'. We don't want the
board to always be enabled for other board defconfigs.
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit e45948b071d8be59044ac232d99a2ca83fd93266
Author: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 10:37:06 2008 +0800
KVM: ia64: Makefile fix for forcing to re-generate asm-offsets.h
To avoid using stale asm-offsets.h.
Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
commit bb45e202e695dea8657bb03a01d1522c37558672
Author: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date: Sun Oct 19 16:39:45 2008 +0200
KVM: Future-proof device assignment ABI
Reserve some space so we can add more data.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
commit decc90162a99b4e51c534ab63f9b6fc5cb0f2596
Author: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Thu Oct 16 15:58:15 2008 +0800
KVM: ia64: Fix halt emulation logic
Common halt logic was changed by x86 and did not update ia64. This patch
updates halt for ia64.
Fixes a regression causing guests to hang with more than 2 vcpus.
Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
commit 5550af4df179e52753d3a43a788a113ad8cd95cd
Author: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed Oct 15 20:15:06 2008 +0800
KVM: Fix guest shared interrupt with in-kernel irqchip
Every call of kvm_set_irq() should offer an irq_source_id, which is
allocated by kvm_request_irq_source_id(). Based on irq_source_id, we
identify the irq source and implement logical OR for shared level
interrupts.
The allocated irq_source_id can be freed by kvm_free_irq_source_id().
Currently, we support at most sizeof(unsigned long) different irq sources.
[Amit: - rebase to kvm.git HEAD
- move definition of KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID to common file
- move kvm_request_irq_source_id to the update_irq ioctl]
[Xiantao: - Add kvm/ia64 stuff and make it work for kvm/ia64 guests]
Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
commit 6ad9f15c94822c3f067a7d443f3b414e08b34460
Author: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Oct 15 07:45:08 2008 -0200
KVM: MMU: sync root on paravirt TLB flush
The pvmmu TLB flush handler should request a root sync, similarly to
a native read-write CR3.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
commit 3eeebf17f31c583f83e081b17b3076477cb96886
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 20:07:44 2008 +0900
sh: Kill off long-dead HD64465 cchip support.
This code has been dead for many years. The last update it received
was in 2003 in order to update it for the driver model changes, though
it had already been in disarray and unused before that point. The only
boards that ever used this chip have not had users in many years either,
so it is finally safe to just kill it off and move on with life.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 5ff0594e2f6fb3242a1a2a4794286244e95afab1
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 19:45:47 2008 +0900
sh: Revert "SH 7366 needs SCIF_ONLY"
This reverts commit 5ca8c4852fcbbc8a8497c4ee8b2a0a7466f3524c.
With the killing off of SCIF_ONLY and its spawn in sh-sci, we no longer
require this change, so just revert it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 86d758ef2cb0677b471a88ffe33a29cdfec4ceca
Merge: b2d86a3... 15c73aa... 2a88b6e...
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 19:44:15 2008 +0900
Merge branches 'sh/serial-rework' and 'sh/oprofile'
commit b2d86a3fd9855380598c0c039e712a20086e119f
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 19:37:05 2008 +0900
sh: Simplify and lock down the ISA tuning.
The ISA tuning as it is today can not cope with all of the different
variations that are possible, so all we can do is a best attempt based on
the CPU family. The DSP and FPU generation are already at odds with each
other, and the nommu tuning we weren't handling at all. Additionally,
for platforms that never had an FPU, the -nofpu variant never existed,
meaning that we would lose out on family granular tuning completely in
certain cases.
With tat out of the way, we were also using -up versions, allowing for
later instructions that branched off of a particular subset of the ISA,
but are not actually reflected on the hardware being targetted. This
leads to some confusion, and the possibility of bogus instructions on
older parts. Kill that off and lock it down to the family being built
for specifically.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 6afe40b4dace385d7ba2faf24b352f066f3b71bf
Author: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:14:58 2008 +0100
lockdep: fix irqs on/off ip tracing
Impact: fix lockdep lock-api-caller output when irqsoff tracing is enabled
81d68a96 "ftrace: trace irq disabled critical timings" added wrappers around
trace_hardirqs_on/off_caller. However these functions use
__builtin_return_address(0) to figure out which function actually disabled
or enabled irqs. The result is that we save the ips of trace_hardirqs_on/off
instead of the real caller. Not very helpful.
However since the patch from Steven the ip already gets passed. So use that
and get rid of __builtin_return_address(0) in these two functions.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit ea4bfdf52a5a84492cce881baadc5fab36adeade
Author: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:10:22 2008 +0100
[S390] s390: Fix build for !CONFIG_S390_GUEST + CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE
The s390 kernel does not compile if virtio console is enabled, but guest
support is disabled:
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/s390/kernel/built-in.o: In function `setup_arch':
/space/linux-2.5/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:773: undefined reference to
`s390_virtio_console_init'
The fix is related to
commit 99e65c92f2bbf84f43766a8bf701e36817d62822
Author: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jul 25 15:50:04 2008 +0200
KVM: s390: Fix guest kconfig
Which changed the build process to build kvm_virtio.c only if CONFIG_S390_GUEST
is set. We must ifdef the prototype in the header file accordingly.
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
commit 7f5a8ba6b0297ca941f43f8f5cbf0e5c8c4dd916
Author: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:10:21 2008 +0100
[S390] No more 4kb stacks.
We got a stack overflow with a small stack configuration on a 32 bit
system. It just looks like as 4kb isn't enough and too dangerous.
So lets get rid of 4kb stacks on 32 bit.
But one thing I completely dislike about the call trace below is that
just for debugging or tracing purposes sprintf gets called (cio_start_key):
/* process condition code */
sprintf(dbf_txt, "ccode:%d", ccode);
CIO_TRACE_EVENT(4, dbf_txt);
But maybe its just me who thinks that this could be done better.
<4>Kernel stack overflow.
<4>Modules linked in: dm_multipath sunrpc bonding qeth_l2 dm_mod qeth ccwgroup vmur
<4>CPU: 1 Not tainted 2.6.27-30.x.20081015-s390default #1
<4>Process httpd (pid: 3807, task: 20ae2df8, ksp: 1666fb78)
<4>Krnl PSW : 040c0000 8027098a (number+0xe/0x348)
<4> R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0
<4>Krnl GPRS: 00d43318 0027097c 1666f277 9666f270
<4> 00000000 00000000 0000000a ffffffff
<4> 9666f270 1666f228 1666f277 1666f098
<4> 00000002 80270982 80271016 1666f098
<4>Krnl Code: 8027097e: f0340dd0a7f1 srp 3536(4,%r0),2033(%r10),4
<4> 80270984: 0f00 clcl %r0,%r0
<4> 80270986: a7840001 brc 8,80270988
<4> >8027098a: 18ef lr %r14,%r15
<4> 8027098c: a7faff68 ahi %r15,-152
<4> 80270990: 18bf lr %r11,%r15
<4> 80270992: 18a2 lr %r10,%r2
<4> 80270994: 1893 lr %r9,%r3
Modified calltrace with annotated stackframe size of each function:
stackframe size
|
0 304 vsnprintf+850 [0x271016]
1 72 sprintf+74 [0x271522]
2 56 cio_start_key+262 [0x2d4c16]
3 56 ccw_device_start_key+222 [0x2dfe92]
4 56 ccw_device_start+40 [0x2dff28]
5 48 raw3215_start_io+104 [0x30b0f8]
6 56 raw3215_write+494 [0x30ba0a]
7 40 con3215_write+68 [0x30bafc]
8 40 __call_console_drivers+146 [0x12b0fa]
9 32 _call_console_drivers+102 [0x12b192]
10 64 release_console_sem+268 [0x12b614]
11 168 vprintk+462 [0x12bca6]
12 72 printk+68 [0x12bfd0]
13 256 __print_symbol+50 [0x15a882]
14 56 __show_trace+162 [0x103d06]
15 32 show_trace+224 [0x103e70]
16 48 show_stack+152 [0x103f20]
17 56 dump_stack+126 [0x104612]
18 96 __alloc_pages_internal+592 [0x175004]
19 80 cache_alloc_refill+776 [0x196f3c]
20 40 __kmalloc+258 [0x1972ae]
21 40 __alloc_skb+94 [0x328086]
22 32 pskb_copy+50 [0x328252]
23 32 skb_realloc_headroom+110 [0x328a72]
24 104 qeth_l2_hard_start_xmit+378 [0x7803bfde]
25 56 dev_hard_start_xmit+450 [0x32ef6e]
26 56 __qdisc_run+390 [0x3425d6]
27 48 dev_queue_xmit+410 [0x331e06]
28 40 ip_finish_output+308 [0x354ac8]
29 56 ip_output+218 [0x355b6e]
30 24 ip_local_out+56 [0x354584]
31 120 ip_queue_xmit+300 [0x355cec]
32 96 tcp_transmit_skb+812 [0x367da8]
33 40 tcp_push_one+158 [0x369fda]
34 112 tcp_sendmsg+852 [0x35d5a0]
35 240 sock_sendmsg+164 [0x32035c]
36 56 kernel_sendmsg+86 [0x32064a]
37 88 sock_no_sendpage+98 [0x322b22]
38 104 tcp_sendpage+70 [0x35cc1e]
39 48 sock_sendpage+74 [0x31eb66]
40 64 pipe_to_sendpage+102 [0x1c4b2e]
41 64 __splice_from_pipe+120 [0x1c5340]
42 72 splice_from_pipe+90 [0x1c57e6]
43 56 generic_splice_sendpage+38 [0x1c5832]
44 48 do_splice_from+104 [0x1c4c38]
45 48 direct_splice_actor+52 [0x1c4c88]
46 80 splice_direct_to_actor+180 [0x1c4f80]
47 72 do_splice_direct+70 [0x1c5112]
48 64 do_sendfile+360 [0x19de18]
49 72 sys_sendfile64+126 [0x19df32]
50 336 sysc_do_restart+18 [0x111a1a]
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
commit 46e7951f9431b5e6bfbeb3044fdb4b522f58101c
Author: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:10:20 2008 +0100
[S390] Change default IPL method to IPL_VM.
allyesconfig and allmodconfig built kernels have a tape IPL record.
A the vmreader record makes much more sense, since hardly anybody will
ever IPL a kernel from tape. So change the default.
As I side effect I can test these kernels without fiddling around with
the kernel config ;)
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
commit b3c21e4919c8598c58faaa0a650dc398baddd993
Author: Frank Munzert <munzert@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:10:19 2008 +0100
[S390] tape: disable interrupts in tape_open and tape_release
Get tape device lock with interrupts disabled. Otherwise lockdep will issue a
warning similar to:
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.27 #1
---------------------------------
inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
vol_id/2903 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(sch->lock){++..}, at: [<000003e00004c7a2>] tape_open+0x42/0x1a4 [tape]
{in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
[<000000000007ce5c>] __lock_acquire+0x894/0xa74
[<000000000007d0ce>] lock_acquire+0x92/0xb8
[<0000000000345154>] _spin_lock+0x5c/0x9c
[<0000000000202264>] do_IRQ+0x124/0x1f0
[<0000000000026610>] io_return+0x0/0x8
irq event stamp: 847
hardirqs last enabled at (847): [<000000000007aca6>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x2a/0x38
hardirqs last disabled at (846): [<0000000000076ca2>] trace_hardirqs_off+0x2a/0x38
softirqs last enabled at (0): [<000000000004909e>] copy_process+0x43e/0x11f4
softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by vol_id/2903:
#0: (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<000000000010e0f4>] do_open+0x78/0x358
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 Not tainted 2.6.27 #1},
Process vol_id (pid: 2903, task: 000000003d4c0000, ksp: 000000003d4e3b10)
0400000000000000 000000003d4e3830 0000000000000002 0000000000000000
000000003d4e38d0 000000003d4e3848 000000003d4e3848 00000000000168a8
0000000000000000 000000003d4e3b10 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
000000003d4e3830 000000000000000c 000000003d4e3830 000000003d4e38a0
000000000034aa98 00000000000168a8 000000003d4e3830 000000003d4e3880
Call Trace:
([<000000000001681c>] show_trace+0x138/0x158)
[<0000000000016902>] show_stack+0xc6/0xf8
[<00000000000170d4>] dump_stack+0xb0/0xc0
[<0000000000078810>] print_usage_bug+0x1e8/0x228
[<000000000007a71c>] mark_lock+0xb14/0xd24
[<000000000007cd5a>] __lock_acquire+0x792/0xa74
[<000000000007d0ce>] lock_acquire+0x92/0xb8
[<0000000000345154>] _spin_lock+0x5c/0x9c
[<000003e00004c7a2>] tape_open+0x42/0x1a4 [tape]
[<000003e00005185c>] tapeblock_open+0x98/0xd0 [tape]
Signed-off-by: Frank Munzert <munzert@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
commit 13f8b7c5e6fa13622592042f3b5aa88ba785cec2
Author: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:10:18 2008 +0100
[S390] appldata: unsigned ops->size cannot be negative
unsigned ops->size cannot be negative
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
commit 7a4a1ccd44c85c7d92b20a361e3854431c6935e0
Author: Frank Munzert <munzert@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:10:17 2008 +0100
[S390] tape block: complete request with correct locking
__blk_end_request must be called with request queue lock held. We need to use
blk_end_request rather than __blk_end_request.
Signed-off-by: Frank Munzert <munzert@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
commit da5aae7036692fa8d03da1b705c76fd750ed9e38
Author: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:10:16 2008 +0100
[S390] Fix sysdev class file creation.
Use sysdev_class_create_file() to create create sysdev class attributes
instead of sysfs_create_file(). Using sysfs_create_file() wasn't a very
good idea since the show and store functions have a different amount of
parameters for sysfs files and sysdev class files.
In particular the pointer to the buffer is the last argument and
therefore accesses to random memory regions happened.
Still worked surprisingly well until we got a kernel panic.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
commit 250cf776f74b5932a1977d0489cae9206e2351dd
Author: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:10:15 2008 +0100
[S390] pgtables: Fix race in enable_sie vs. page table ops
The current enable_sie code sets the mm->context.pgstes bit to tell
dup_mm that the new mm should have extended page tables. This bit is also
used by the s390 specific page table primitives to decide about the page
table layout - which means context.pgstes has two meanings. This can cause
any kind of bugs. For example - e.g. shrink_zone can call
ptep_clear_flush_young while enable_sie is running. ptep_clear_flush_young
will test for context.pgstes. Since enable_sie changed that value of the old
struct mm without changing the page table layout ptep_clear_flush_young will
do the wrong thing.
The solution is to split pgstes into two bits
- one for the allocation
- one for the current state
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
commit 2c78091405d6f54748b1fac78c45f2a799e3073a
Author: Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:10:14 2008 +0100
[S390] qdio: remove incorrect memset
Remove the memset since zeroing the string is not needed and use
snprintf instead of sprintf.
Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
commit 7c045aa2c8eb731996b0c5c6552356b8946e6894
Author: Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:10:13 2008 +0100
[S390] qdio: prevent double qdio shutdown in case of I/O errors
In case of I/O errors on a qdio subchannel qdio_shutdown may be
called twice by the qdio driver and by zfcp. Remove the
superfluous shutdown from qdio and let the upper layer driver
handle the error condition.
Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
commit 3f8793e30269cb9ba5975f02faa7ddf75853bde9
Merge: 9e94302... 6bee00d...
Author: Russell King <rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:55:45 2008 +0000
Merge branch 'fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/xscaleiop
commit 1a30603233fdd104aba430fd8f3443160474b6bb
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 18:50:00 2008 +0900
sh: sh7785lcr: Select uImage as default image target.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit b4d36a254f30e266fb47aec502978f615b8f7ca4
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 18:40:19 2008 +0900
sh: Add on-chip RTC support for SH7722.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 46fec7ac40e452a2ea5e63648d98b6bb2b5898f9
Author: qinghuang feng <qhfeng.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 17:24:28 2008 +0800
lockdep: minor fix for debug_show_all_locks()
When we failed to get tasklist_lock eventually (count equals 0),
we should only print " ignoring it.\n", and not print
" locked it.\n" needlessly.
Signed-off-by: Qinghuang Feng <qhfeng.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 21798a84ab383cdac0e7ee3368e0792b718b867d
Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 09:43:26 2008 +0100
tracing: fix a build error on alpha
Impact: build fix on Alpha
When tracing is enabled, some arch have included <linux/irqflags.h>
on their <asm/system.h> but others like alpha or m68k don't.
Build error on alpha:
kernel/trace/trace.c: In function 'tracing_cpumask_write':
kernel/trace/trace.c:2145: error: implicit declaration of function 'raw_local_irq_disable'
kernel/trace/trace.c:2162: error: implicit declaration of function 'raw_local_irq_enable'
Tested on Alpha through a cross-compiler (should correct a similar issue on m68k).
Reported-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 5ca8c4852fcbbc8a8497c4ee8b2a0a7466f3524c
Author: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 15:33:48 2008 +0900
SH 7366 needs SCIF_ONLY
SH 7366 has compile bug.
because there is no SCIF_ONLY for SH 7366.
this patch add it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 545727f32049f6e7269f73a49904e3229192988e
Author: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 11:32:27 2008 +0900
gdrom: Fix compile error
Return value and argument of block_device_operations.release of gdrom
was changed.
This patch fix this problem.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit e00afb64239dc764193d48a28bbfba6da2b3b5de
Author: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 17:36:11 2008 +0900
sh: Provide a sample defconfig for the UL2 (SH7366) board.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 60817c9b31ef7897d60bca2f384cbc316a3fdd8b
Author: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 13:03:18 2008 -0700
x86, memory hotplug: remove wrong -1 in calling init_memory_mapping()
Impact: fix crash with memory hotplug
Shuahua Li found:
| I just did some experiments on a desktop for memory hotplug and this bug
| triggered a crash in my test.
|
| Yinghai's suggestion also fixed the bug.
We don't need to round it, just remove that extra -1
Signed-off-by: Yinghai <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 8a2fd5f3ab6535035f08d7d0fda90abe73c6d282
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue Oct 28 17:19:35 2008 +0900
sh: Fix FPU tuning on toolchains with mismatched multilib targets.
Presently there is very little standing in the way of using an SH-4
toolchain for building an SH-2 kernel, and vice versa. Binutils itself
has no limitations whatsoever and supports explicit ISA hinting, which
we already use with varying degrees of success today.
This leaves GCC as the odd one out, due to a rather dubious policy
decision by the GCC folks to not include all of the CPU family variants
in the default list of multilib targets in GCC4. Despite best efforts to
the contrary, libgcc itself already contains awareness of the various CPU
types and remains generally usable, allowing it to safely be referenced
even on a mismatched target (and indeed, explicit ISA tuning by binutils
keeps us honest in terms of ensuring that we do not link incompatible
objects in).
In order to support this, a couple of changes had to be made. Firstly,
the introduction of MAYBE_DECLARE_EXPORT(), which provides a __weak
extern reference for libgcc resident routines when finer-grained
-m<cpu-family> based tuning is not supported by the toolchain. This
fixes up the __sdivsi3_i4i and __udivsi3_i4i references when dealing
with SH-2 kernels linked with an SH-4 libgcc. Secondly, in case where we
are unable to find a suitable match for CPU family tuning but still
have a toolchain that defaults to FP instruction generation, a suitable
nofpu target must be selected. This is accomplished by selecting the
first nofpu multilib target supported by the toolchain, which is
also necessary for selecting the proper libgcc to link against.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit 934d9c23b4c7e31840a895ba4b7e88d6413c81f3
Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Tue Oct 28 17:01:23 2008 +1100
md: destroy partitions and notify udev when md array is stopped.
md arrays are not currently destroyed when they are stopped - they
remain in /sys/block. Last time I tried this I tripped over locking
too much.
A consequence of this is that udev doesn't remove anything from /dev.
This is rather ugly.
As an interim measure until proper device removal can be achieved,
make sure all partitions are removed using the BLKRRPART ioctl, and
send a KOBJ_CHANGE when an md array is stopped.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
commit 87943acf60898a3efb6b5ee85d4cc789898bf5e8
Author: David Milburn <dmilburn@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Oct 13 14:38:36 2008 -0500
libata: ahci enclosure management bit mask
Enclosure management bit mask definitions.
Signed-off-by: David Milburn <dmilburn@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit eb40963c835c69681af516388a2a92b57e2f0fe7
Author: David Milburn <dmilburn@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Oct 16 09:26:19 2008 -0500
libata: ahci enclosure management led sync
Synchronize ahci_sw_activity and ahci_sw_activity_blink with ata_port lock.
Signed-off-by: David Milburn <dmilburn@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit e7c0d217cdaa837d30bc265eddac4d176969fd68
Author: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 19:08:31 2008 +0100
pata_ninja32: suspend/resume support
I had assumed that the standard recovery would be sufficient for this
hardware but it isn't. Fix up the other registers on resume as needed. See
bug #11735
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit a996031c87e093017c0763326a08896a3a4817f4
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 00:08:17 2008 -0400
delay capable() check in ext4_has_free_blocks()
As reported by Eric Paris, the capable() check in ext4_has_free_blocks()
sometimes causes SELinux denials.
We can rearrange the logic so that we only try to use the root-reserved
blocks when necessary, and even then we can move the capable() test
to last, to avoid the check most of the time.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
commit 8c3bf8a01c005385e9be0bc992e10abfb355278c
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Oct 28 00:08:12 2008 -0400
merge ext4_claim_free_blocks & ext4_has_free_blocks
Mingming pointed out that ext4_claim_free_blocks & ext4_has_free_blocks
are largely cut & pasted; they can be collapsed/merged as follows.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
commit 6c20ec850360bc6e5c66a787f0523a80450d65ab
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Tue Oct 28 21:08:20 2008 -0400
jbd2: Call the commit callback before the transaction could get dropped
The transaction can potentially get dropped if there are no buffers
that need to be written. Make sure we call the commit callback before
potentially deciding to drop the transaction. Also avoid
dereferencing the commit_transaction pointer in the marker for the
same reason.
This patch fixes the bug reported by Eric Paris at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11838
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Acked-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
commit 054e5f616b5becdc096b793407dc33fe379749ac
Author: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 18:10:19 2008 -0400
libata: Fix LBA48 on pata_it821x RAID volumes.
[http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/18/82]
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 90484ebfc96c5dc5c498ed72cf2d370575db9b76
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 15:43:03 2008 +0900
libata: clear saved xfer_mode and ncq_enabled on device detach
libata EH saves xfer_mode and ncq_enabled at start to later set
DUBIOUS_XFER flag if it has changed. These values need to be cleared
on device detach such that hot device swap doesn't accidentally miss
DUBIOUS_XFER.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit e8b3b5e9f54512bfdb7c154da07ec0408cbd6c56
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Sat Oct 25 14:26:54 2008 +0900
sata_sil24: configure max read request size to 4k
Due to request posting limitations, bandwidth of sil3132 is limited to
around 120MB/s with the minimum pci-e payload size (128bytes) which is
used by most consumer systems. However, write throughput can be
slightly (~3%) increased by increasing the max read requeset size.
Configure it to 4k which is the maximum supported. This optimization
is also done by SIMG's windows driver.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 3cd8ddbd86e4ea6f2f6582da217651f048d76130
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Sun Oct 26 20:19:32 2008 -0700
libata: add missing kernel-doc
Fix libata missing kernel-doc:
Warning(lin2628-rc2//drivers/ata/libata-core.c:4562): No description
found for parameter 'tag'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 4a9c7b3359889399aacb94019bbdfc9f38d4cff7
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 19:59:23 2008 +0900
libata: fix device iteration bugs
There were several places where only enabled devices should be
iterated over but device enabledness wasn't checked.
* IDENTIFY data 40 wire check in cable_is_40wire()
* xfer_mode/ncq_enabled saving in ata_scsi_error()
* DUBIOUS_XFER handling in ata_set_mode()
While at it, reformat comments in cable_is_40wire().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit c77a036beceabbfd85b366193685cb49f38292bd
Author: Mark Nelson <mdnelson8@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 14:08:16 2008 +1100
ahci: Add support for Promise PDC42819
Add an appropriate entry for the Promise PDC42819 controller. It has an
AHCI mode and so far works correctly with board_ahci.
This chip is found on Promise's FastTrak TX2650 (2 port) and TX4650 (4 port)
software-based RAID cards (for which there is a binary driver, t3sas) and
can be found on some motherboards, for example the MSI K9A2 Platinum,
which calls the chip a Promise T3 controller.
Although this controller also supports SAS devices, its default bootup mode
is AHCI and the binary driver has to do some magic to get the chip into the
appropriate mode to drive SAS disks.
Seeing as no documentation is provided by Promise, adding this entry to the
ahci driver allows the controller to be useful to people as a SATA
controller (with no ill effects on the system if a SAS disk is connected -
probing of the port just times out with "link online but device
misclassified"), without having to resort to using the binary driver. Users
who require SAS or the proprietary software raid can get this functionality
using the binary driver.
Signed-off-by: Mark Nelson <mdnelson8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit ab77163008c596aad9624ceab190d840c0143fa8
Author: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon Oct 27 15:09:10 2008 +0000
ata: Switch all my stuff to a common address
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit ef2cabf7c6d838eb0ee2b4fb8ef84f7c06ce16d9
Author: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 22:53:05 2008 -0400
ext4: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext4_abort
Vegard Nossum reported a bug which accesses freed memory (found via
kmemcheck). When journal has been aborted, ext4_put_super() calls
ext4_abort() after freeing the journal_t object, and then ext4_abort()
accesses it. This patch fix it.
Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
commit 44d6f78756560e95903de239e10f8a40a6eae444
Author: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 22:51:46 2008 -0400
ext3: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext3_abort
Vegard Nossum reported a bug which accesses freed memory (found via
kmemcheck). When journal has been aborted, ext3_put_super() calls
ext3_abort() after freeing the journal_t object, and then ext3_abort()
accesses it. This patch fix it.
Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
commit 9e9430213f85ebdaf40026ec790295420efd0f91
Author: Linus Walleij <triad@df.lth.se>
Date: Fri Oct 24 21:17:50 2008 +0100
[ARM] 5322/1: Fix fastpath issue in mmci.c
Fix fastpath issues
Since mmci_request() can be called from a non-interrupt
context, and does, during kernel init, causing a host
of debug messages during boot if you enable spinlock debugging,
we need to use the spinlock calls that save IRQ flags and
restore them.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <triad@df.lth.se>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
commit ea2d8b59bc7b770fde03de2bb9b3ee46e8bdc8d5
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 09:47:03 2008 -0700
mac80211.h: fix kernel-doc excesses
Fix mac80211.h kernel-doc: it had some extra parameters that were
no longer valid and incorrect format for a return value in 2 places.
Warning(lin2628-rc2//include/net/mac80211.h:1487): Excess function parameter or struct member 'control' description in 'ieee80211_beacon_get'
Warning(lin2628-rc2//include/net/mac80211.h:1596): Excess function parameter or struct member 'control' description in 'ieee80211_get_buffered_bc'
Warning(lin2628-rc2//include/net/mac80211.h:1632): Excess function parameter or struct member 'rc4key' description in 'ieee80211_get_tkip_key'
Warning(lin2628-rc2//include/net/mac80211.h:1735): Excess function parameter or struct member 'return' description in 'ieee80211_start_tx_ba_session'
Warning(lin2628-rc2//include/net/mac80211.h:1775): Excess function parameter or struct member 'return' description in 'ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
commit f2c2e25554991f9c17bcd24028db5e1c50ecb0ad
Author: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Date: Sat Oct 25 16:14:14 2008 +0200
p54: fix build warnings
On Saturday 25 October 2008 10:24:10 Johannes Berg wrote:
> just FYI in case you haven't seen them. the p54 one looks like a genuine
> problem.
>
> drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c: In function ‘p54_parse_eeprom’:
> drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c:325: warning: ‘synth’ may be used uninitialized in this function
There you go. Yes, it is a genuine problem, if the device's eeprom is screwed really up.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
commit bc1b32d6bdd2d6f3fbee9a7c01c9b099f11c579c
Author: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
Date: Fri Oct 24 21:59:18 2008 +0200
ath5k: Reset key cache on interface up, thus fixing resume
After a s2ram / resume cycle, resetting the key cache does not work
unless it is deferred until after the hardware has been reinitialised by
a call to ath5k_hw_reset(). This fixes a regression introduced by
"ath5k: fix suspend-related oops on rmmod".
Signed-off-by: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
commit 51b94bf0654a14600ff9706f7bc0f7685265f6cd
Author: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 19:41:34 2008 -0400
mac80211: correct warnings in minstrel rate control algorithm
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
commit d8b105f900d93bd103c002bf4c923f50f16c5441
Author: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 20:52:55 2008 +0400
RFKILL: fix input layer initialisation
Initialise correctly last fields, so tasks can be actually executed.
On some architectures the initial jiffies value is not zero, so later
all rfkill incorrectly decides that rfkill_*.last is in future.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
commit 35961627d3e7a4093eb307d782541700e9addec6
Author: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Date: Wed Oct 22 14:19:56 2008 +0200
p54: fix misbehavings when firmware can't be found
This patch fixes a double-free error in p54pci
( http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11782 )
Trying to free already-free IRQ 10
Pid: 108, comm: pccardd Not tainted 2.6.27-05577-g0cfd810-dirty #1
Call Trace:
[<c01265dc>] free_irq+0xad/0xb9
[<c01050dd>] dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x0/0xd7
[<c01ba8e6>] p54p_stop+0x4a/0x1fa
[<c01050dd>] dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x0/0xd7
[<c02348c5>] p54p_probe+0x23e/0x302
Tested-by: Sean Young
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
commit 753dcfeecc0e293dbe6f3d59643741af9e610f4f
Author: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Date: Fri Oct 24 09:08:27 2008 +0200
dm9601: runtime mac address change support
Implement set_mac_address for runtime mac address change.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 07b5f6a6fd0ce47390f7fbec966cd5c70127e597
Author: Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de>
Date: Thu Oct 23 13:03:44 2008 +0000
via-velocity: use driver string instead of dev->name before register_netdev()
This patch corrects a message bug in the via-velocity driver which
bothered me for some time.
The messages printed during device init look like the following:
[ 8.486422] eth%d: set value of parameter Wake On Lan options to 0
^^!
[ 8.487340] eth0: VIA Networking Velocity Family Gigabit Ethernet Adapter
Note the unresolved format string.
dev->name is unavailable before register_netdev, so use
dev_driver_string(&pdev->dev), which is also consistent with other
drivers.
"char *devname" parameters had to be converted to "const char *devname" to
be consistent with dev_driver_string return value.
Signed-off-by: Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 404b12c10d2f4d77649a193af2ec69f77b852926
Author: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 15:06:51 2008 -0400
drivers/net/wan/syncppp: Fix unused-var warnings
Fix !CONFIG_INET warnings.
Spotted, and original patch authored by: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit e65b95915d6ac8cd86152cfac762af8fc5fb3ff4
Author: Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@mellanox.co.il>
Date: Sun Oct 26 17:13:24 2008 +0200
mlx4: Setting the correct offset for default mac address
Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@mellanox.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 9de14eb59d0b28a2566344a961d716886fa85776
Author: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Oct 26 23:05:42 2008 +0800
mlx4_en: remove duplicated #include
Removed duplicated #include <linux/cpumask.h> in
drivers/net/mlx4/en_main.c.
Signed-off-by: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit c778e11d686dd4bde9efe12d8135a9bcbfef17ef
Author: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 09:53:14 2008 -0400
ibm_newemac: Fix typo in flow control config option
The recent build fix for ibm_newemac has a typo in the config
option #ifdef used for disabling flow control. This corrects
it to the proper Kconfig option name.
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 3fd09c45bfbcf77949ed6db36e67c1681424fedb
Author: Thomas Klein <tklein@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 10:38:46 2008 +0100
ehea: Detect 16GB hugepages for firmware restriction
All kernel memory which is used for kernel/hardware data transfer must
be registered with firmware using "memory regions". 16GB hugepages
may not be part of a memory region due to firmware restrictions.
This patch modifies the walk_memory_resource callback fn to filter
hugepages and add only standard memory to the busmap which is later
on used for MR registration.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein <tklein@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 74d5e8acd95ae934194303138a43b60005fcfad6
Author: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu Oct 23 18:01:13 2008 +0900
dmfe: check pci_alloc_consistent errors
We need to check the address that pci_alloc_consistent() returns since
it might fail.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 2d488c2f514a6c5248a0773c78345626abdc1818
Author: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 11:16:55 2008 +0200
qeth: avoid skb_under_panic for malformatted inbound data
To make the qeth driver more robust in case of malformatted inbound
packets due to hardware problems, an additional check for
OSN-card-type is added for OSN-type packets.
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit cc181282fb2fa1af6d532f1333dd42af4814ff17
Author: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 11:16:54 2008 +0200
qeth: remove unnecessary support ckeck in sysfs route6
Removing this check improves usability because you do not have to
set the device online to initially set ipv6 routing option.
Signed-off-by: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit e1f03ae8029cb8046ef3031e66d74430730c2727
Author: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 11:16:53 2008 +0200
qeth: fix offset error in non prealloc header path
For the non preallocated qeth header code path we should not
change the header length.
Signed-off-by: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 0f5623c9ebfc6576c5682ab3b335c57812f6c87e
Author: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 11:16:52 2008 +0200
qeth: remove non-recover-thread checkings
IP-threads have been removed from the qeth driver. Only the
recover-thread is left over. This makes checkings for
non-recover threads superfluous.
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
commit 49fdf6785fd660e18a1eb4588928f47e9fa29a9a
Merge: b70a6b2... 43a49cb...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 11:41:51 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block:
libata: fix NCQ devices behind port multipliers
scsi: make sure that scsi_init_shared_tag_map() doesn't overwrite existing map
commit 43a49cbdf31e812c0d8f553d433b09b421f5d52c
Author: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 19:23:06 2008 +0100
libata: fix NCQ devices behind port multipliers
For devices behind sata port multipliers, we have to make sure that
they share a tag map since all tags for that PMP must be unique.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
commit 3070f69b66b7ab2f02d8a2500edae07039c38508
Author: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 19:20:59 2008 +0100
scsi: make sure that scsi_init_shared_tag_map() doesn't overwrite existing map
Right now callers have to check whether scsi_host->bqt is already
set up, it's much cleaner to just have scsi_init_shared_tag_map()
does this check on its own.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
commit 3afa39493de510c33c56ddc76e6e1af7f87c5392
Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Date: Sat Oct 25 22:58:21 2008 -0700
x86: keep the /proc/meminfo page count correct
Impact: get correct page count in /proc/meminfo
found page count in /proc/meminfo is nor correct on 1G system in VirtualBox 2.0.4
# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 1017508 kB
MemFree: 822700 kB
Buffers: 1456 kB
Cached: 26632 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
...
Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
DirectMap4k: 4032 kB
DirectMap2M: 18446744073709549568 kB
with this patch get:
...
DirectMap4k: 4032 kB
DirectMap2M: 1044480 kB
which is consistent to kernel_page_tables
---[ Low Kernel Mapping ]---
0xffff880000000000-0xffff880000001000 4K RW PCD GLB x pte
0xffff880000001000-0xffff88000009f000 632K RW GLB x pte
0xffff88000009f000-0xffff8800000a0000 4K RW PCD GLB x pte
0xffff8800000a0000-0xffff880000200000 1408K RW GLB x pte
0xffff880000200000-0xffff88003fe00000 1020M RW PSE GLB x pmd
0xffff88003fe00000-0xffff88003fff0000 1984K RW GLB NX pte
0xffff88003fff0000-0xffff880040000000 64K pte
0xffff880040000000-0xffff888000000000 511G pud
0xffff888000000000-0xffffc20000000000 58880G pgd
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 4078e359c4688541a0093fde0dff35dc7190c4f5
Author: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Date: Mon Oct 27 17:41:58 2008 +0100
sched: fix documentation reference for sched_min_granularity_ns
Impact: documentation fix
sched-design-CFS.txt wrongly references sched_granularity_ns sysctl,
as its name in fact is sched_min_granularity_ns.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit b70a6b27ed4cbb9ea7a4e1abc080ed65692ecb9b
Merge: 1d63e72... 3a63913...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 09:54:23 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'upstream' of git://ftp.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/upstream-linus
* 'upstream' of git://ftp.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/upstream-linus: (33 commits)
MIPS: lemote/lm2e: Added io_map_base to pci controller
MIPS: TXx9: Make firmware parameter passing more robust
MIPS: Markeins: Remove unnecessary define and cleanup comments, etc.
MIPS: Markeins: Extract ll_emma2rh_* functions
MIPS: Markeins: Remove runtime debug prints
MIPS: EMMA: Fold arch/mips/emma/{common,markeins}/irq*.c into markeins/irq.c
MIPS: EMMA2RH: Remove emma2rh_gpio_irq_base
MIPS: EMMA2RH: Remove emma2rh_sw_irq_base
MIPS: EMMA2RH: Remove emma2rh_irq_base global variable
MIPS: EMMA2RH: Remove emma2rh_sync on read operation
MIPS: EMMA: Move <asm/emma2rh> to <asm/emma> dir
MIPS: EMMA: Move arch/mips/emma2rh/ into arch/mips/emma/
MIPS: EMMA: Kconfig reorganization
MIPS: Add CONFIG_CPU_R5500 for NEC VR5500 series processors
MIPS: RB532: Disable the right device
MIPS: Add support for NXP PNX833x (STB222/5) into linux kernel
MIPS: TXx9: CONFIG_TOSHIBA_RBTX4939 spelling
MIPS: Fix KGDB build error
INPUT: sgi_btns: Add license specification
MIPS: IP22: ip22-int.c header file weeding.
...
commit 1d63e726408dfdb3e10ed8f00c383b30ebb333d3
Merge: 31390d0... cd1f70fd...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 09:37:16 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ieee1394/linux1394-2.6
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ieee1394/linux1394-2.6:
firewire: fw-sbp2: fix races
firewire: fw-sbp2: delay first login to avoid retries
firewire: fw-ohci: initialization failure path fixes
firewire: fw-ohci: don't leak dma memory on module removal
firewire: fix struct fw_node memory leak
firewire: Survive more than 256 bus resets
commit 31390d0fde1ac9cf47002729660ffd7cd2ae1d75
Merge: 6634160... 0a9b863...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 09:36:33 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6:
ALSA: ASoC: Blackfin: update SPORT0 port selector (v2)
ALSA: hda - Restore default pin configs for realtek codecs
sound: use a common working email address
pci: use pci_ioremap_bar() in sound/
commit 3a63913f607832a2629545467e715a40ec930c32
Author: Zhang Le <r0bertz@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 23:33:24 2008 +0000
MIPS: lemote/lm2e: Added io_map_base to pci controller
Signed-off-by: Zhang Le <r0bertz@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 97b0511ce125b0cb95d73b198c1bdbb3cebc4de2
Author: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 15:25:49 2008 +0100
MIPS: TXx9: Make firmware parameter passing more robust
When booting Linux on a txx9 board with VxWorks boot loader, it crashes in
prom_getenv(), as VxWorks doesn't pass firmware parameters in a0-a3 (in my
case, the actual leftover values in these registers were 0x80002000,
0x80001fe0, 0x2000, and 0x20).
Make the parsing of argc, argv, and envp a bit more robust by checking if
argc is a number below CKSEG0, and argv/envp point to CKSEG0.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Acked-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit d1a8e2a6da5bea09452495748891a4ea9e42035e
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:36:33 2008 +0900
MIPS: Markeins: Remove unnecessary define and cleanup comments, etc.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 49618d652b2fe9c63808c7a2cc7089aa594cf521
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:35:59 2008 +0900
MIPS: Markeins: Extract ll_emma2rh_* functions
These functions are completely ineffective.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit a9c2aa17a8b8b7a813d31e66da5d31cfdd006f4b
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:33:10 2008 +0900
MIPS: Markeins: Remove runtime debug prints
Remove runtime db_* macros as we don't need them any more. In general,
such helpers are useful for initial porting, but once approved, they are
not indispensable.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 9ae9fd79af28d6488e97311a3b60379b59ff4c90
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:32:40 2008 +0900
MIPS: EMMA: Fold arch/mips/emma/{common,markeins}/irq*.c into markeins/irq.c
Current EMMA2RH irq code is mess. Before cleaning it up, gather them
in one place as a first step.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit fcb3cfe7f087fb27c35be911791883fb725055b1
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:32:11 2008 +0900
MIPS: EMMA2RH: Remove emma2rh_gpio_irq_base
Let's use immediate value, instead. This also saves memory footprint,
and probably a little bit faster.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 68ed1ca9120506b2a0f80e4542deea24f89081ab
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:31:43 2008 +0900
MIPS: EMMA2RH: Remove emma2rh_sw_irq_base
Let's use immediate value, instead. This also saves memory footprint,
and probably a little bit faster.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 9b6c04bc9726edf2655dd69d2e40c0ae4f07e525
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:31:16 2008 +0900
MIPS: EMMA2RH: Remove emma2rh_irq_base global variable
Let's use immediate value, instead. This also saves memory footprint,
and probably a little bit faster.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 27bd804582d9a45cad8304e703c9de65ddd67bc5
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:30:48 2008 +0900
MIPS: EMMA2RH: Remove emma2rh_sync on read operation
It's totally a waste of CPU cycles.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit d91f2cbe698cf70b50099343dac1ec8061bfd045
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:30:20 2008 +0900
MIPS: EMMA: Move <asm/emma2rh> to <asm/emma> dir
We'll put all EMMA related headers there in the future.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit f27655e34171b0ae9ea5a0aadae894e817f0f875
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:29:16 2008 +0900
MIPS: EMMA: Move arch/mips/emma2rh/ into arch/mips/emma/
git mv arch/mips/{emma2rh,emma} and fixups Makefiles. We'll put all NEC
EMMA series based machines there in the future.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit cd741b604b94a4d5bebf2672626ffec7de44652c
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 06:00:01 2008 +0900
MIPS: EMMA: Kconfig reorganization
- Move EMMA related stuff into arch/mips/emma/Kconfig
- Create CONFIG_SOC_EMMA* to handle more EMMA SoCs effectively
- Rename CONFIG_MARKEINS into CONFIG_NEC_MARKEINS
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 542c1020ac1cbc2f50934086ad893384a2cbd233
Author: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri Oct 24 01:27:57 2008 +0900
MIPS: Add CONFIG_CPU_R5500 for NEC VR5500 series processors
We already have sufficient infrastructure to support VR5500 and VR5500A
series processors. Here's a Makefile support to make it selectable by
ports, and enable it for NEC EMMA2RH Markeins board.
This patch also fixes a confused target help, and adds 1Gb PageMask bits
supported by VR5500 and its variants.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit bc4c4e832a203f66959e5eb2ecc56b0b9525173e
Author: Phil Sutter <n0-1@freewrt.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 02:29:57 2008 +0100
MIPS: RB532: Disable the right device
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit edb6310aaa0dfc3da303a4ba6dff9dce3fbaa8d3
Author: Daniel Laird <daniel.j.laird@nxp.com>
Date: Mon Jun 16 15:49:21 2008 +0100
MIPS: Add support for NXP PNX833x (STB222/5) into linux kernel
The following patch add support for the NXP PNX833x SOC. More
specifically it adds support for the STB222/5 variant. It fixes
the vectored interrupt issue.
Signed-off-by: daniel.j.laird <daniel.j.laird@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 537fa37c8606793b9998c35de0abfcb7d549a3f2
Author: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 16:43:13 2008 +0200
MIPS: TXx9: CONFIG_TOSHIBA_RBTX4939 spelling
Fix a typo in the comment for the TOSHIBA_RBTX4939 config option
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Acked-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit f6a3176a18b724154e7beede0e10da56e47abe2b
Author: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
Date: Sat Oct 25 17:30:35 2008 +0900
MIPS: Fix KGDB build error
In file included from include/linux/ptrace.h:49,
from arch/mips/kernel/kgdb.c:25:
/home/yuasa/src/linux/test/mips/linux/arch/mips/include/asm/ptrace.h:123: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '__s64'
/home/yuasa/src/linux/test/mips/linux/arch/mips/include/asm/ptrace.h:124: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '__s64'
/home/yuasa/src/linux/test/mips/linux/arch/mips/include/asm/ptrace.h:126: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '__u32'
/home/yuasa/src/linux/test/mips/linux/arch/mips/include/asm/ptrace.h:127: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '__u32'
make[1]: *** [arch/mips/kernel/kgdb.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 4c2bdcdc62e7a07bd0786fd2048e4ac97ae74e6e
Author: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
Date: Sat Oct 25 01:46:57 2008 +0300
INPUT: sgi_btns: Add license specification
The SGI Volume Button interface driver uses GPL-only symbols
platform_driver_unregister and platform_driver_register, but
lacks license specification. Thus, when compiled as a module,
this driver cannot be installed. This patch fixes this by
adding the MODULE_LICENSE() specification.
Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 2f123e503dccde75550a0384982d5070d41b8a52
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Sat Oct 25 15:51:48 2008 +0100
MIPS: IP22: ip22-int.c header file weeding.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 14823ccbf8c3209a84a544e846feaf886cb59be9
Author: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
Date: Sat Oct 25 01:46:56 2008 +0300
MIPS: IP22: Small cleanups
The following functions
disable_local1_irq()
disable_local2_irq()
disable_local3_irq()
are needlessly defined global, so make them static. While at it, fix a
whitespace error in the same file.
Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 1ba5a1767416cfa4fa37096e160e764c56e1460a
Author: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Tue Oct 21 00:01:06 2008 +0900
MIPS: RBTX4939: Add smc91x support
Add smc91x platform device to RBTX4939 board and some hacks for big endian.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit bc89b2bdefa5f56133d0b19a220880d4ada62560
Author: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Mon Oct 20 23:28:50 2008 +0900
MIPS: TXx9: 7 segment LED support
Add sysfs interface for 7 segment LED and implement access routine for
RBTX4939.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit f591eb1e6896e26675e91a319cc93f3800dbaad4
Author: Manuel Lauss <mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net>
Date: Tue Oct 21 08:59:14 2008 +0200
MIPS: Alchemy: Wire up SD controller on DB/PB1200 boards.
Add au1xmmc platform data for PB1200/DB1200 boards and wire up the 2 SD
controllers for them.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss <mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit fa36b04386422951a7c73f9210403d1a2eaffe92
Author: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Date: Fri Oct 24 19:53:55 2008 +0200
MIPS: RB532: Set gpio interrupt status and level for CompactFlash
This patch sets the correct interrupt status and level
in order to get the CompactFlash adapter working.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 052ac71c4b85e5ce7e70d4f9b3555caa647d884a
Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Date: Sun Oct 12 16:01:35 2008 +0300
MIPS: RB532: Fix build error
mips/pci/fixup-rc32434.c must #include <asm/mach-rc32434/irq.h>
This patch fixes the following compile error caused by
commit 606a083b1e1a357cb66454e4581b80f1a67d8368
(MIPS: RB532: Cleanup the headers again):
<-- snip -->
...
CC arch/mips/pci/fixup-rc32434.o
arch/mips/pci/fixup-rc32434.c: In function 'pcibios_map_irq':
arch/mips/pci/fixup-rc32434.c:46: error: 'GROUP4_IRQ_BASE' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/mips/pci/fixup-rc32434.c:46: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/mips/pci/fixup-rc32434.c:46: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[2]: *** [arch/mips/pci/fixup-rc32434.o] Error 1
<-- snip -->
A virtually identical patch was also submitted by Yoichi Yuasa
<yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit c944013518cc3ba407057e9ee910d0258c0a47dd
Author: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 09:31:13 2008 -0700
MIPS: Fix KGDB build error
<asm/ptrace.h> is exported to userland so can't include <linux/ptrace.h>,
so replace the C99 types with their basic C type equivalents.
Bug originally reported and initial patch by Yoichi Yuasa
<yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit fb498e2570eedc6c9c3d165e370624dfc3aed97b
Author: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Sat Oct 25 01:17:23 2008 +0900
MIPS: Set ENOSYS to errno on illegal system call number for syscall(2)
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit bda8229bdd087167f463ad5e74299987924f8137
Author: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Sat Oct 25 01:17:22 2008 +0900
MIPS: Set positive error number to errno on illegal_syscall
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 7920c4d658ff2b0f7b8acf3bd7c700875c2bc163
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Sat Oct 18 13:23:10 2008 +0100
MIPS: SMP: Don't reenable interrupts in stop_this_cpu; use WAIT instruction.
Noticed by Anirban Sinha <ASinha@zeugmasystems.com>; patch by me.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit f67ae98352284d7ac1e03f3a872e33c68ea35a5b
Author: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 17:48:53 2008 -0700
MIPS: Don't unmap the memory for dma_sync*.
We were getting away with this for so long only because the only platform
with a non-empty plat_unmap_dma_mem() doesn't call dma_sync_sg_for_cpu()
and dma_sync_sg_for_device() from its commonly used drivers.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit b517531ce53794f2a2eae1fff1d1216b9db4da9f
Author: Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 19:12:35 2008 +0800
MIPS: Fix debugfs_create_*'s error checking method for mips/kernel/
debugfs_create_*() returns NULL on error. Make its callers return -ENODEV
on error.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit ecab1f4479abb88d739bc1aac5545e8399fbad66
Author: Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 19:12:30 2008 +0800
MIPS: Fix debugfs_create_*'s error checking method for arch/mips/math-emu/
debugfs_create_*() returns NULL on error. Make its caller debugfs_fpuemu
return -ENODEV on error.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
commit 0a9b86381c76e9d33a9b6edb66aef32d7a3306e3
Merge: bfd4e66... c3e5203... e044c39... 2f1e593... 2f5ad54...
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon Oct 27 17:08:11 2008 +0100
Merge branches 'topic/fix/asoc', 'topic/fix/hda', 'topic/fix/misc' and 'topic/pci-ioremap-bar' into for-linus
commit c3e5203bed1999df716e3c7119f6749523eb952f
Author: Cliff Cai <cliff.cai@analog.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 17:09:25 2008 +0800
ALSA: ASoC: Blackfin: update SPORT0 port selector (v2)
- Setting the TFS pin selector for SPORT 0 based on whether the selected
port id F or G. If the port is F then no conflict should exist for the
TFS. When Port G is selected and EMAC then there is a conflict between
the PHY interrupt line and TFS. Current settings prevent the conflict
by ignoring the TFS pin when Port G is selected. This allows both
ssm2602 using Port G and EMAC concurrently.
- some code cleanup
Signed-off-by: Cliff Cai <cliff.cai@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit e044c39ae258678d6ebb09fccb2a0fdf7ec51847
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon Oct 27 16:56:24 2008 +0100
ALSA: hda - Restore default pin configs for realtek codecs
Some machines have broken BIOS resume that doesn't restore the default
pin configuration properly, which results in a wrong detection of HP
pin. This causes a silent speaker output due to missing HP detection.
Related bug: Novell bug#406101
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=406101
This patch fixes the issue by saving/restoring the default pin configs
by the driver itself.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit 8115f3f0c939c5db0fe3c6c6c58911fd3a205b1e
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Fri Oct 24 09:12:17 2008 -0400
ftrace: use a real variable for ftrace_nop in x86
Impact: avoid section mismatch warning, clean up
The dynamic ftrace determines which nop is safe to use at start up.
When it finds a safe nop for patching, it sets a pointer called ftrace_nop
to point to the code. All call sites are then patched to this nop.
Later, when tracing is turned on, this ftrace_nop variable is again used
to compare the location to make sure it is a nop before we update it to
an mcount call. If this fails just once, a warning is printed and ftrace
is disabled.
Rakib Mullick noted that the code that sets up the nop is a .init section
where as the nop itself is in the .text section. This is needed because
the nop is used later on after boot up. The problem is that the test of the
nop jumps back to the setup code and causes a "section mismatch" warning.
Rakib first recommended to convert the nop to .init.text, but as stated
above, this would fail since that text is used later.
The real solution is to extend Rabik's patch, and to make the ftrace_nop
into an array, and just save the code from the assembly to this array.
Now the section can stay as an init section, and we have a nop to use
later on.
Reported-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit ea31e72d753e5817a97de552f152d0cb55c7defc
Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 19:26:23 2008 +0200
tracing/ftrace: make boot tracer select the sched_switch tracer
Impact: build fix
If the boot tracer is selected but not the sched_switch,
there will be a build failure:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `boot_trace_init':
trace_boot.c:(.text+0x5ee38): undefined reference to `sched_switch_trace'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `disable_boot_trace':
(.text+0x5eee1): undefined reference to `tracing_stop_cmdline_record'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `enable_boot_trace':
(.text+0x5ef11): undefined reference to `tracing_start_cmdline_record'
This patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit f66af459a931f25807e1df7915b2b66bb5978d82
Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 19:14:55 2008 +0200
tracepoint: check if the probe has been registered
Impact: fix kernel crash that can trigger during tracing
If we try to remove a probe that has not been already registered,
the tracepoint_entry_remove_probe() function will dereference a NULL
pointer.
Check the probe before removing it to avoid crashes.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 6634160abfdbac39bd5ebda516b15b078a0f598e
Merge: 526719b... 8b5f12d...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 08:41:13 2008 -0700
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6:
syncookies: fix inclusion of tcp options in syn-ack
libertas: free sk_buff with kfree_skb
btsdio: free sk_buff with kfree_skb
Phonet: do not reply to indication reset packets
Phonet: include generic link-layer header size in MAX_PHONET_HEADER
commit 526719ba51e7d7bd31f7af9ab04b015b70096685
Author: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon Oct 27 15:19:48 2008 +0000
Switch to a valid email address...
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 77122d0b5d1fb2276b1fe7bce6366f22b2f96606
Author: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon Oct 27 15:10:23 2008 +0000
Tidy up addresses in random drivers
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit b9b54aa2a60dcd9c06b76f6610e1b466bc93e3cd
Author: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 17:48:50 2008 +0800
leds: da903x: fix the building failure of incomplete type of 'work'
The leds-da903x LED driver was missing the proper #include of
linux/workqueue.h, but happened to compile on ARM due to implied
includes through other header files.
We do need the explict include on other architectures (reported at least
for x86-64).
Reported-tested-and-acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 2f1e593d4209d0194f9639c5d11aa91171435963
Author: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon Oct 27 15:21:19 2008 +0000
sound: use a common working email address
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit b170060c6ccd719eebb53b10c98df2a4e6968f28
Author: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 12:16:16 2008 +0100
HID: sync on deleted io_retry timer in usbhid driver
When suspending, make sure that the timer is not running
any more.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 3d5afd324a4bf9f64f59599bf1e93cd7dd1dc97a
Author: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 12:16:15 2008 +0100
HID: fix oops during suspend of unbound HID devices
Usbhid structure is allocated on start invoked only from probe
of some driver. When there is no driver, the structure is null
and causes null-dereference oopses.
Fix it by allocating the structure on probe and disconnect of
the device itself. Also make sure we won't race between start
and resume or stop and suspend respectively.
References: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11827
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit ef020ab0109aa5cd6eac2e93519b7641c9862828
Author: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 17:54:05 2008 -0500
x86/uv: memory allocation at initialization
Impact: on SGI UV platforms, fix boot crash
UV initialization is currently called too late to call alloc_bootmem_pages().
The current sequence is:
start_kernel()
mem_init()
free_all_bootmem() <--- discard of bootmem
rest_init()
kernel_init()
smp_prepare_cpus()
native_smp_prepare_cpus()
uv_system_init() <--- uses alloc_bootmem_pages()
It should be calling kmalloc().
Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 9f32d21c981bb638d0991ce5675a20337312066b
Author: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 17:40:25 2008 -0700
xen: fix Xen domU boot with batched mprotect
Impact: fix guest kernel boot crash on certain configs
Recent i686 2.6.27 kernels with a certain amount of memory (between
736 and 855MB) have a problem booting under a hypervisor that supports
batched mprotect (this includes the RHEL-5 Xen hypervisor as well as
any 3.3 or later Xen hypervisor).
The problem ends up being that xen_ptep_modify_prot_commit() is using
virt_to_machine to calculate which pfn to update. However, this only
works for pages that are in the p2m list, and the pages coming from
change_pte_range() in mm/mprotect.c are kmap_atomic pages. Because of
this, we can run into the situation where the lookup in the p2m table
returns an INVALID_MFN, which we then try to pass to the hypervisor,
which then (correctly) denies the request to a totally bogus pfn.
The right thing to do is to use arbitrary_virt_to_machine, so that we
can be sure we are modifying the right pfn. This unfortunately
introduces a performance penalty because of a full page-table-walk,
but we can avoid that penalty for pages in the p2m list by checking if
virt_addr_valid is true, and if so, just doing the lookup in the p2m
table.
The attached patch implements this, and allows my 2.6.27 i686 based
guest with 768MB of memory to boot on a RHEL-5 hypervisor again.
Thanks to Jeremy for the suggestions about how to fix this particular
issue.
Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 5209f08dc8e5f520ca81b87fa9a7142f58a109f4
Author: Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 25 11:49:20 2008 +0200
asm-generic: define DIE_OOPS in asm-generic
Impact: build fix
DIE_OOPS is now used in the generic trace handling code so it needs to
be defined for all architectures. Define it in asm-generic so that it's
available to all by default and doesn't cause build errors for
architectures that rely on the generic implementation.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit e2862c9470beb842d3f1c1965b03a2112114c160
Author: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon Oct 27 17:43:28 2008 +1100
trace: fix printk warning for u64
A powerpc ppc64_defconfig build produces these warnings:
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c: In function 'rb_add_time_stamp':
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:969: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'u64'
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:969: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'u64'
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:969: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'u64'
Just cast the u64s to unsigned long long like we do everywhere else.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 4944dd62de21230af039eda7cd218e9a09021d11
Merge: f17845e... 0173a32...
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Mon Oct 27 10:50:54 2008 +0100
Merge commit 'v2.6.28-rc2' into tracing/urgent
commit 8b5f12d04b2e93842f3dda01f029842047bf3f81
Author: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Sun Oct 26 23:10:12 2008 -0700
syncookies: fix inclusion of tcp options in syn-ack
David Miller noticed that commit
33ad798c924b4a1afad3593f2796d465040aadd5 '(tcp: options clean up')
did not move the req->cookie_ts check.
This essentially disabled commit 4dfc2817025965a2fc78a18c50f540736a6b5c24
'[Syncookies]: Add support for TCP options via timestamps.'.
This restores the original logic.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit b700a98c70401c2a48e509b91b47f58a883806bc
Author: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>
Date: Sun Oct 26 23:09:27 2008 -0700
libertas: free sk_buff with kfree_skb
free sk_buff with kfree_skb, instead of kree
Signed-off-by: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit cbfd24a75f98fe731547d3bc995f3a1f1fed6b20
Author: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>
Date: Sun Oct 26 23:08:48 2008 -0700
btsdio: free sk_buff with kfree_skb
free sk_buff with kfree_skb, instead of kree
Signed-off-by: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit c3a90c788b743303c4d824780a3a7271693fb64a
Author: Remi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Date: Sun Oct 26 23:07:25 2008 -0700
Phonet: do not reply to indication reset packets
This fixes a potential error packet loop.
Signed-off-by: Remi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit e214a8cc7a81f20ed7cb4f6373cf15048556bbac
Author: Remi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Date: Sun Oct 26 23:06:31 2008 -0700
Phonet: include generic link-layer header size in MAX_PHONET_HEADER
This fixes an OOPS in hard_header if a Phonet address is assigned to a
non-Phonet network interface.
Signed-off-by: Remi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit 2a88b6e81589b1d064e03db066feaaa58f6a2d13
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri Oct 24 14:30:51 2008 +0900
sh: oprofile: Fix up the SH7750 performance counter name.
Rather than varying this on a subtype level, we use the counter type as a
generic identifier. This simplifies logic in the userspace tools where no
fundamental difference exists across the various subtypes.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
commit f8d56f1771e4867acc461146764b4feeb5245669
Merge: 3d6eadc... 92850bb...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 16:42:18 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://neil.brown.name/md
* 'for-linus' of git://neil.brown.name/md:
md: allow extended partitions on md devices.
md: use sysfs_notify_dirent to notify changes to md/dev-xxx/state
md: use sysfs_notify_dirent to notify changes to md/array_state
commit 3d6eadcb5008beca1b289983ffd7771d1e947bac
Merge: a483ab1... 2a0bd75...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 16:40:59 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input:
Input: psmouse - add support for Elantech touchpads
Input: i8042 - add Blue FB5601 to noloop exception table
commit a483ab1dddf86a0e8924e94cf838eed602602b39
Merge: eba966a... 9c36645...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 16:37:37 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.o-hand.com/linux-mfd
* 'for-linus' of git://git.o-hand.com/linux-mfd:
mfd: Make WM8400 depend on I2C until SPI is submitted
mfd: add missing Kconfig entry for da903x
commit eba966a4e780199e31e8fd1d21bc9d187b1c9eaf
Merge: ecc96e7... ae5d82c...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 16:35:41 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-upstream' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dvrabel/uwb
* 'for-upstream' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dvrabel/uwb:
uwb: build UWB before USB/WUSB
commit ecc96e79202ed7225f7a2e2b7cb5a9e09fc74aa6
Merge: a1a739c... cc6e0bb...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 16:34:14 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/hid
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/hid:
HID: Add support for Sony Vaio VGX-TP1E
HID: fix lock imbalance in hiddev
HID: fix lock imbalance in hidraw
HID: fix hidbus/appletouch device binding regression
HID: add hid_type to general hid struct
HID: quirk for OLED devices present in ASUS G50/G70/G71
HID: Remove "default m" for Thrustmaster and Zeroplus
HID: fix hidraw_exit section mismatch
HID: add support for another Gyration remote control
Revert "HID: Invert HWHEEL mappings for some Logitech mice"
commit a1a739c56ad031b8bf8b3804f568ac88899f8dd7
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Sat Oct 25 17:24:36 2008 -0700
docbooks: fix fatal filename errors
Fix docbook fatal errors (file location changed):
docproc: lin2628-rc1/include/asm-x86/io_32.h: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [Documentation/DocBook/deviceiobook.xml] Error 1
docproc: lin2628-rc1/include/asm-x86/atomic_32.h: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [Documentation/DocBook/kernel-api.xml] Error 1
docproc: lin2628-rc1/include/asm-x86/mca_dma.h: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [Documentation/DocBook/mcabook.xml] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 890c78c2d681a8dc89c78eb9177990cad3a77dc3
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Sat Oct 25 17:06:43 2008 -0700
kernel-doc: allow more whitespace in macros
Allow macros that are annotated with kernel-doc to contain whitespace
between the '#' and "define". It's valid and being used, so allow it.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 7eea5b897eb6bbb79d7e6e398f4fbb61fcee57c7
Merge: 0173a32... 9fb3c5c...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun Oct 26 16:29:12 2008 -0700
Merge branch 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6
* 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6:
leds-hp-disk: fix build warning
ACPI: Oops in ACPI with git latest
ACPI suspend: build fix for ACPI_SLEEP=n && XEN_SAVE_RESTORE=y.
toshiba_acpi: always call input_sync() after input_report_switch()
ACPI: Always report a sync event after a lid state change
ACPI: cpufreq, processor: fix compile error in drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
i7300_idle: Fix compile warning CONFIG_I7300_IDLE_IOAT_CHANNEL not defined
i7300_idle: Cleanup based review comments
i7300_idle: Disable ioat channel only on platforms where ile driver can load
commit cd1f70fdb4823c97328a1f151f328eb36fafd579
Author: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 15:26:20 2008 -0400
firewire: fw-sbp2: fix races
1: There is a small race between queue_delayed_work() and its
corresponding kref_get(). Do the kref_get first, and _put it again
if the queue_delayed_work() failed, so there is no chance of the
kref going to zero while the work is scheduled.
2: An SBP2_LOGOUT_REQUEST could be sent out with a login_id full of
garbage. Initialize it to an invalid value so we can tell if we
ever got a valid login_id.
3: The node ID and generation may have changed but the new values may
not yet have been recorded in lu and tgt when the final logout is
attempted. Use the latest values from the device in
sbp2_release_target().
Signed-off-by: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
commit 0dcfeb7e3c8695c5aa3677dda8efb9bef2e7e64d
Author: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Wed Oct 22 00:28:36 2008 +0200
firewire: fw-sbp2: delay first login to avoid retries
This optimizes firewire-sbp2's device probe for the case that the local
node and the SBP-2 node were discovered at the same time. In this case,
fw-core's bus management work and fw-sbp2's login and SCSI probe work
are scheduled in parallel (in the globally shared workqueue and in
fw-sbp2's workqueue, respectively). The bus reset from fw-core may then
disturb and extremely delay the login and SCSI probe because the latter
fails with several command timeouts and retries and has to be retried
from scratch.
We avoid this particular situation of sbp2_login() and fw_card_bm_work()
running in parallel by delaying the first sbp2_login() a little bit.
This is meant to be a short-term fix for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466679. In the long run,
the SCSI probe, i.e. fw-sbp2's call of __scsi_add_device(), should be
parallelized with sbp2_reconnect().
Problem reported and fix tested and confirmed by Alex Kanavin.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
commit 7007a0765e33bf89182e069e35ec6009fa54f610
Author: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sun Oct 26 09:50:31 2008 +0100
firewire: fw-ohci: initialization failure path fixes
Fix leaks when pci_probe fails. Simplify error log strings.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
commit a55709ba9d27053471f9fca8ee76b41ecefc14cd
Author: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 15:59:42 2008 -0400
firewire: fw-ohci: don't leak dma memory on module removal
The transmit and receive context dma memory was not being freed on
module removal. Neither was the config rom memory. Fix that.
The ab->next assignment is pure paranoia.
Signed-off-by: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
commit 77e557191701afa55ae7320d42ad6458a2ad292e
Author: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Oct 16 18:00:15 2008 -0400
firewire: fix struct fw_node memory leak
With the bus_resets patch applied, it is easy to see this memory leak
by repeatedly resetting the firewire bus while running slabtop in
another window. Just watch kmalloc-32 grow and grow...
Signed-off-by: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
commit 4f9740d4f5a17fa6a1b097fa3ccdfb7246660307
Author: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Oct 16 15:51:59 2008 -0400
firewire: Survive more than 256 bus resets
The "color" is used during the topology building after a bus reset,
hovever in "struct fw_node"s it is stored in a u8, but in struct fw_card
it is stored in an int. When the value wraps in one struct, but not
the other, disaster strikes.
Signed-off-by: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10922.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
commit 9fb3c5ca3dabe06758c35f790c68e273ed749e19
Merge: 438f8de... f371be6...
Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date: Sat Oct 25 04:07:44 2008 -0400
Merge branch 'i7300_idle' into release
commit 438f8de46bc261b35d84771ae9992cfff3ff4dd8
Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date: Sat Oct 25 03:52:16 2008 -0400
leds-hp-disk: fix build warning
drivers/leds/leds-hp-disk.c:59: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘acpi_evaluate_integer’ from incompatible pointer type
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit f8123381bae8d581d81f24b55719db3d9a6a262c
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri Oct 24 21:50:31 2008 +0200
ACPI: Oops in ACPI with git latest
ACPI Warning (nseval-0168): Insufficient arguments - method [_OSC] needs 5, found 4 [20080926]
ACPI Warning (nspredef-0252): \_SB_.PCI0._OSC: Parameter count mismatch - ASL declared 5, expected 4 [20080926]
ACPI Error (nspredef-0163): \_SB_.PCI0._OSC: Missing expected return value [20080926]
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000
IP: [<c0237671>] acpi_run_osc+0xa1/0x170
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Tested-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit 92daa7b53b76984565dfdfda5d9c679884121fb2
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu Oct 23 21:46:43 2008 +0200
ACPI suspend: build fix for ACPI_SLEEP=n && XEN_SAVE_RESTORE=y.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit cab08969188e2da09923fe9c4a99ec9b934b0708
Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 15:39:47 2008 -0400
toshiba_acpi: always call input_sync() after input_report_switch()
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit df316e939100e789b3c5d4d102619ccf5834bd00
Author: Guillem Jover <guillem.jover@nokia.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 00:28:33 2008 +0300
ACPI: Always report a sync event after a lid state change
Currently not always an EV_SYN event is reported to userland
after the EV_SW SW_LID event has been sent. This is easy to verify
by using “input-events” from input-utils and just closing and opening
the lid.
Signed-off-by: Guillem Jover <guillem.jover@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit 16be87ea170ae6cfaa9f47f79d14f7577d8cb420
Author: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 17:22:04 2008 +0800
ACPI: cpufreq, processor: fix compile error in drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
When trying to build 2.6.28-rc1 on ia64, make aborts with:
CC drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.o
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c:41:28: error: asm/cpufeature.h: No such file or directory
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c: In function ‘acpi_processor_get_performance_info’:
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c:364: error: implicit declaration of function ‘boot_cpu_has’
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c:364: error: ‘X86_FEATURE_EST’ undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c:364: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c:364: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[2]: *** [drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/acpi] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
this patch fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit 3b15e581981b3ad35809f56d8131d5c19b6da1bd
Author: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 16:51:00 2008 -0700
x86/PCI: build failure at x86/kernel/pci-dma.c with !CONFIG_PCI
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 04:09:52PM -0700, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `iommu_setup':
> pci-dma.c:(.init.text+0x36ad): undefined reference to `forbid_dac'
> pci-dma.c:(.init.text+0x36cc): undefined reference to `forbid_dac'
> pci-dma.c:(.init.text+0x3711): undefined reference to `forbid_dac
This patch partially reverts a patch to add IOMMU support to ia64. The
forbid_dac variable was incorrectly moved to quirks.c, which isn't built
when PCI is disabled.
Tested-by: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
commit 6bee00dbbcb1e9feb0510e9a7104b4af00adc574
Author: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 10:21:45 2008 -0700
[ARM] xsc3: revert writethrough memory-type encoding change
Commit 40df2d1d "[ARM] Update Xscale and Xscale3 PTE mappings" was
fingered by git-bisect for a boot failure on iop13xx. The change made
L_PTE_MT_WRITETHROUGH mappings L2-uncacheable. Russell points out that
this mapping is used for the vector page. Given the regression, and the
fact this page is used often, restore the old behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
commit f371be6352cdde3df2253b76acb979480e93ce4f
Author: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 15:39:06 2008 -0700
i7300_idle: Fix compile warning CONFIG_I7300_IDLE_IOAT_CHANNEL not defined
When I7300_idle driver is not configured, there is a compile time
warning about IDLE_IOAT_CHANNEL not defined. Fix it.
Reported-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Reported-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit 33093e186c8f80b443fafb1d347a140bdd2b86c6
Author: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 16:51:03 2008 -0700
i7300_idle: Cleanup based review comments
Cleanup of i7300 idle driver based on review comments from Randy Dunlap,
Andi Kleen and Len Brown.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit 3ad0b02e4c1d5feba44b8ff48dccd1ba61a826b0
Author: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 16:34:52 2008 -0700
i7300_idle: Disable ioat channel only on platforms where ile driver can load
Based on input from Andi Kleen:
share the platform detection code with ioat_dma and disable the channel in
dma engine only for specific platforms.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit 9c366452e0b2df06f3ce0aabc6a53c94c595cd00
Author: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 17:16:11 2008 +0200
mfd: Make WM8400 depend on I2C until SPI is submitted
Otherwise we could build in WM8400 but not I2C.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
commit 8e2eaabfd9f7d375a1bb202e644ce2dcc0659592
Author: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 17:10:05 2008 +0200
mfd: add missing Kconfig entry for da903x
This one was accidentally left out during the rc1 mfd merge.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
commit ae5d82cb8d600989338bbda5ea38f5c0ff47175a
Author: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>
Date: Fri Oct 24 16:46:22 2008 +0100
uwb: build UWB before USB/WUSB
The WHCI-HCD driver in drivers/usb/host/ depends on the umc driver in
drivers/uwb/.
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>
commit f17845e5d97ead8fbdadfd40039e058ec7cf4a42
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Fri Oct 24 12:47:10 2008 +0200
ftrace: warning in kernel/trace/ftrace.c
this warning:
kernel/trace/ftrace.c:189: warning: ‘frozen_record_count’ defined but not used
triggers because frozen_record_count is only used in the KCONFIG_MARKERS
case. Move the variable it there.
Alas, this frozen-record facility seems to have little use. The
frozen_record_count variable is not used by anything, nor the flags.
So this section might need a bit of dead-code-removal care as well.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 3f3a490480d8ab96e0fe30a41f80f14e6a0c579d
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Fri Oct 24 11:06:16 2008 +0200
sched: virtual time buddy preemption
Since we moved wakeup preemption back to virtual time, it makes sense to move
the buddy stuff back as well. The purpose of the buddy scheduling is to allow
a quickly scheduling pair of tasks to run away from the group as far as a
regular busy task would be allowed under wakeup preemption.
This has the advantage that the pair can ping-pong for a while, enjoying
cache-hotness. Without buddy scheduling other tasks would interleave destroying
the cache.
Also, it saves a word in cfs_rq.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 464b75273f64be7c81fee975bd6ca9593df3427b
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Fri Oct 24 11:06:15 2008 +0200
sched: re-instate vruntime based wakeup preemption
The advantage is that vruntime based wakeup preemption has a better
conceptual model. Here wakeup_gran = 0 means: preempt when 'fair'.
Therefore wakeup_gran is the granularity of unfairness we allow in order
to make progress.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 0d13033bc9257fe65c1aa25e84568b1608da0901
Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Date: Fri Oct 24 11:06:14 2008 +0200
sched: weaken sync hint
Mysql+oltp and pgsql+oltp peaks are still shifted right. The below puts
the peaks back to 1 client/server pair per core.
Use the avg_overlap information to weaken the sync hint.
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 1af5f730fc1bf7c62ec9fb2d307206e18bf40a69
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Fri Oct 24 11:06:13 2008 +0200
sched: more accurate min_vruntime accounting
Mike noticed the current min_vruntime tracking can go wrong and skip the
current task. If the only remaining task in the tree is a nice 19 task
with huge vruntime, new tasks will be inserted too far to the right too,
causing some interactibity issues.
min_vruntime can only change due to the leftmost entry disappearing
(dequeue_entity()), or by the leftmost entry being incremented past the
next entry, which elects a new leftmost (__update_curr())
Due to the current entry not being part of the actual tree, we have to
compare the leftmost tree entry with the current entry, and take the
leftmost of these two.
So create a update_min_vruntime() function that takes computes the
leftmost vruntime in the system (either tree of current) and increases
the cfs_rq->min_vruntime if the computed value is larger than the
previously found min_vruntime. And call this from the two sites we've
identified that can change min_vruntime.
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 01c8c57d668d94f1036d9ab11a22aa24ca16a35d
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Fri Oct 24 11:06:12 2008 +0200
sched: fix a find_busiest_group buglet
In one of the group load balancer patches:
commit 408ed066b11cf9ee4536573b4269ee3613bd735e
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Fri Jun 27 13:41:28 2008 +0200
Subject: sched: hierarchical load vs find_busiest_group
The following change:
- if (max_load - this_load + SCHED_LOAD_SCALE_FUZZ >=
+ if (max_load - this_load + 2*busiest_load_per_task >=
busiest_load_per_task * imbn) {
made the condition always true, because imbn is [1,2].
Therefore, remove the 2*, and give the it a fair chance.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 8c82a17e9c924c0e9f13e75e4c2f6bca19a4b516
Merge: 4ce72a2... 57f8f7b...
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Fri Oct 24 12:48:46 2008 +0200
Merge commit 'v2.6.28-rc1' into sched/urgent
commit af4c293ffcdd76fc97469beb7d8861662232d92e
Author: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun Sep 28 16:21:43 2008 -0700
[WATCHDOG] pci: use pci_ioremap_bar() in drivers/watchdog
Use the newly introduced pci_ioremap_bar() function in drivers/watchdog.
pci_ioremap_bar() just takes a pci device and a bar number, with the goal
of making it really hard to get wrong, while also having a central place
to stick sanity checks.
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
commit 03967c5267b0e7312d1d55dc814d94cf190ca573
Author: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu Oct 23 23:14:29 2008 +0900
x86: restore the old swiotlb alloc_coherent behavior
This restores the old swiotlb alloc_coherent behavior (before the
alloc_coherent rewrite):
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/12/200
The old alloc_coherent avoids GFP_DMA allocation first and if the
allocated address is not fit for the device's coherent_dma_mask, then
dma_alloc_coherent does GFP_DMA allocation. If it fails,
alloc_coherent calls swiotlb_alloc_coherent (in short, we rarely used
swiotlb_alloc_coherent).
After the alloc_coherent rewrite, dma_alloc_coherent
(include/asm-x86/dma-mapping.h) directly calls swiotlb_alloc_coherent.
It means that we possibly can't handle a device having dma_masks >
24bit < 32bits since swiotlb_alloc_coherent doesn't have the above
GFP_DMA retry mechanism.
This patch fixes x86's swiotlb alloc_coherent to use the GFP_DMA retry
mechanism, which dma_generic_alloc_coherent() provides now
(pci-nommu.c and GART IOMMU driver also use
dma_generic_alloc_coherent).
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 75bebb7f0c2a709812cccb4d3151a21b012c5cad
Author: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu Oct 23 20:46:55 2008 +0900
x86: use GFP_DMA for 24bit coherent_dma_mask
dma_alloc_coherent (include/asm-x86/dma-mapping.h) avoids GFP_DMA
allocation first and if the allocated address is not fit for the
device's coherent_dma_mask, then dma_alloc_coherent does GFP_DMA
allocation. This is because dma_alloc_coherent avoids precious GFP_DMA
zone if possible. This is also how the old dma_alloc_coherent
(arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c) works.
However, if the coherent_dma_mask of a device is 24bit, there is no
point to go into the above GFP_DMA retry mechanism. We had better use
GFP_DMA in the first place.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Tested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit a2b89b596c5a0b288adac84b17bdda6bde8d144e
Author: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu Oct 23 18:42:03 2008 +0900
swiotlb: remove panic for alloc_coherent failure
swiotlb_alloc_coherent calls panic() when allocated swiotlb pages is
not fit for a device's dma mask. However, alloc_coherent failure is
not a disaster at all. AFAIK, none of other x86 and IA64 IOMMU
implementations don't crash in case of alloc_coherent failure.
There are some drivers that don't check alloc_coherent failure but not
many (about ten and I've already started to fix some of
them). alloc_coherent returns NULL in case of failure so it's likely
that these guilty drivers crash immediately. So swiotlb doesn't need
to call panic() just for them.
Reported-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Tested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit ff3c536291ce96ef6f45704cd37eaed71127dd42
Author: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Date: Tue Oct 14 17:50:44 2008 -0700
xen: compilation fix of drivers/xen/events.c on IA64
use set_xen_guest_handle() instead of direct assigning.
> linux-2.6/drivers/xen/events.c: In function 'xen_poll_irq':
> linux-2.6/drivers/xen/events.c:757: error: incompatible types in assignment
> make[4]: *** [drivers/xen/events.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 75909fd619d15400e7c6d0fc3af09838ee8b166e
Author: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Date: Tue Oct 14 17:50:41 2008 -0700
xen: portability clean up and some minor clean up for xencomm.c
clean up of xencomm.c. is_phys_contiguous() is arch dependent
function that depends on how virtual memory are laid out.
So split out the function into arch specific code.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
commit ed6e5e507e4752c3fb1090d0601f46e7a78c860e
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Date: Tue Oct 14 17:50:40 2008 -0700
xen: don't reload cr3 on suspend
It isn't necessary, and it makes the code needlessly non-portable.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit bea92112415635ecb7e681355834413c7c048f67
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Wed Oct 22 19:31:11 2008 +0900
kernel/resource: fix reserve_region_with_split() section mismatch
Impact: cleanup, small kernel text size reduction, no functionality changed
reserve_region_with_split() calls in to __reserve_region_with_split(),
which is an __init function. The only caller of reserve_region_with_split()
is an __init function, so make it __init too.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit acff181d3574244e651913df77332e897b88bff4
Author: roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 21 19:49:09 2008 -0400
printk: remove unused code from kernel/printk.c
both log_buf_copy() and log_buf_len are unused.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit a54373eee6e9f5e986a251e852ee1bb83e03671b
Author: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 16:44:29 2008 +0200
[CRISv32] Remove warning in io.h
Variable flags need to be unsigned.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
commit 66b0de3569b00f61978782b9f97aa4803dbec0fb
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Thu Oct 23 16:11:03 2008 +0200
ftrace: fix build failure
fix:
kernel/trace/ftrace.c: In function 'ftrace_release':
kernel/trace/ftrace.c:271: error: implicit declaration of function 'ftrace_release_hash'
release_hash is not needed without dftraced.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 15adc048986f6b54b6044f2b6fc4b48f49413e2f
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:33:08 2008 -0400
ftrace, powerpc, sparc64, x86: remove notrace from arch ftrace file
The entire file of ftrace.c in the arch code needs to be marked
as notrace. It is much cleaner to do this from the Makefile with
CFLAGS_REMOVE_ftrace.o.
[ powerpc already had this in its Makefile. ]
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 08f5ac906d2c0faf96d608c54a0b03177376da8d
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:33:07 2008 -0400
ftrace: remove ftrace hash
The ftrace hash was used by the ftrace_daemon code. The record ip function
would place the calling address (ip) into the hash. The daemon would later
read the hash and modify that code.
The hash complicates the code. This patch removes it.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 4d296c24326783bff1282ac72f310d8bac8df413
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:33:06 2008 -0400
ftrace: remove mcount set
The arch dependent function ftrace_mcount_set was only used by the daemon
start up code. This patch removes it.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit cb7be3b2fc2cf089ee52b16f0fd9ebb29e9944e1
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:33:05 2008 -0400
ftrace: remove daemon
The ftrace daemon is complex and error prone. This patch strips it out
of the code.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 07c4cc1cdaa08fcb6c0275dd7be49eae37260169
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:33:04 2008 -0400
ftrace: disable dynamic ftrace for all archs that use daemon
The ftrace daemon is complex and can cause nasty races if something goes
wrong. Since it affects all of the kernel, this patch disables dynamic
ftrace from any arch that depends on the daemon. Until the archs are
ported over to the new MCOUNT_RECORD method, I am disabling dynamic
ftrace from them.
Note: I am leaving in the arch/<arch>/kernel/ftrace.c code alone since
that can be used when the arch is ported to MCOUNT_RECORD. To port
the arch to MCOUNT_RECORD, the scripts/recordmcount.pl needs to be
updated. I will make that easier to do for 2.6.29. For 28, we will keep
the archs disabled.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 6912896e994ddaf06cc0f6d3f2098bc4b59bdd84
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:33:03 2008 -0400
ftrace: add ftrace warn on to disable ftrace
Add ftrace warn on to disable ftrace as well as report a warning.
[ Thanks to Andrew Morton for suggesting using the WARN_ON return value ]
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 81adbdc029ecc416d56563e7f159100181dd711d
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:33:02 2008 -0400
ftrace: only have ftrace_kill atomic
When an anomaly is detected, we need a way to completely disable
ftrace. Right now we have two functions: ftrace_kill and ftrace_kill_atomic.
The ftrace_kill tries to do it in a "nice" way by converting everything
back to a nop.
The "nice" way is dangerous itself, so this patch removes it and only
has the "atomic" version, which is all that is needed.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit ab9a0918cbf0fa8883301838df8dbc8fc085ff50
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:33:01 2008 -0400
ftrace: use probe_kernel
Andrew Morton suggested using the proper API for reading and writing
kernel areas that might fault.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 76aefee57657428fb77cbd8624119c1a440bee44
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:33:00 2008 -0400
ftrace: comment arch ftrace code
Add comments to explain what is happening in the x86 arch ftrace code.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 593eb8a2d63e95772a5f22d746f18a997c5ee463
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:32:59 2008 -0400
ftrace: return error on failed modified text.
Have the ftrace_modify_code return error values:
-EFAULT on error of reading the address
-EINVAL if what is read does not match what it expected
-EPERM if the write fails to update after a successful match.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 34698bcbdf7b0629d6c873b5da7c63073fb45361
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:32:58 2008 -0400
ftrace: dynamic ftrace process only text section
The text section stays in memory without ever leaving. With the exception
of modules, but modules know how to handle that case. With the dynamic
ftrace tracer, we need to make sure that it does not try to modify code
that no longer exists. The only safe section is .text.
This patch changes the recordmcount script to only record the mcount calls
in the .text sections.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit dce9d18adde74b8e36b9e4a8a49ddf066bad0b3b
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 09:32:57 2008 -0400
ftrace: handle generic arch calls
The recordmcount script requires that the actual arch is passed in.
This works well when ARCH=i386 or ARCH=x86_64 but does not handle the
case of ARCH=x86.
This patch adds a parameter to the function to pass in the number of
bits of the architecture. So that it can determine if x86 should be
run for x86_64 or i386 archs.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit cc6e0bbb47f02fd36cd55b3189c0c79079096ab8
Author: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Date: Thu Oct 23 12:58:38 2008 +0200
HID: Add support for Sony Vaio VGX-TP1E
The Sony Vaio VGX-TP1E multimedia PC has a wireless keyboard with
a touchpad.
The mouse pointer is wrongly declared as constant non-data variable, which make
HID code to completely ignore all the "Pointer" usages.
Fix the report descriptor before it enters the parser to contain touchpad
pointer description that is correctly parsable (declaring data rather than
constant).
Reported-by: Stefan Hundhammer <sh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit eb9910894d7857c273e049b297fd6251e5ecc43e
Author: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 01:47:34 2008 +0200
HID: fix lock imbalance in hiddev
Don't forget to unlock_kernel() in hiddev_ioctl_usage().
Added in 7961df16819085b8a357720d89d0239036e6af2a
(HID: Switch hiddev to unlocked_ioctl).
Corresponing sparse warning:
drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:515:10: warning: context imbalance in 'hiddev_ioctl_usage': wrong count at exit
drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:515:10: context 'kernel_lock': wanted 0, got 1
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 0f2c5945a917e776ccd394f0e1924e9502c2795f
Author: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Oct 23 01:47:30 2008 +0200
HID: fix lock imbalance in hidraw
Add omitted unlock_kernel() to hidraw_ioctl().
Added in 979c407e3b89b606e810fa494ef316896eadbfad
(HID: Push down BKL into ioctl handler in hidraw).
Corresponing sparse warning:
drivers/hid/hidraw.c:267:9: warning: context imbalance in 'hidraw_ioctl': wrong count at exit
drivers/hid/hidraw.c:267:9: context 'kernel_lock': wanted 0, got 1
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 6ae2a0765ab764da11cc305058ee5333810228f4
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Mon Oct 13 10:22:06 2008 -0400
ring-buffer: fix free page
The pages of a buffer was originally pointing to the page struct, it
now points to the page address. The freeing of the page still uses
the page frame free "__free_page" instead of the correct free_page to
the address.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 06d1cd267ca0a2a76beb9a762465572dd3d0cce6
Author: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date: Tue Oct 14 14:19:15 2008 +0100
tracing/fastboot: fix row order in bootgraph.pl
When bootgraph.pl parses a file, it gives one row for each initcall's
pid. But they are displayed in random (perl hash) order. Let's
sort the pids by the start time of their first initcall instead.
This helps trace module initcalls, where each has a separate pid.
bootgraph.pl will show module initcalls during the initramfs; it may
also be adapted to show subsequent module initcalls.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Acked-by: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 2a813f8cd8ce91d588a595c5709502dece3af289
Author: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date: Tue Oct 14 14:18:07 2008 +0100
tracing/fastboot: fix bootgraph.pl to run with "use strict"
As a perl novice, I would prefer to have the benefit of the interpreters'
wisdom. It turns out there were already some warnings, so let's fix them.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Acked-by: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit b4d8e4736c94e78fd846dca0c95a3a0710582584
Author: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 14:47:18 2008 +0200
HID: fix hidbus/appletouch device binding regression
The appletouch mouse devices are grabbed by the hid bus and not
released even if apple driver says ENODEV (as expected) -- these
are composite USB devices, for which we only ignore the mouse
interface. This is currently not handled by hidbus code properly.
Move the ignoring one level upper to forbid the hid layer to grab the
device.
Reported-by: Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit a73a63701f8f23e70674b3c5e367a0a726c18468
Author: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 14:45:11 2008 +0200
HID: add hid_type to general hid struct
Add type to the hid structure to distinguish to which device type
(now only mouse) we are talking to. Needed for per device type ignore
list support.
Note: this patch leaves the type as unknown for bluetooth devices,
there is not support for this in the hidp code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 4ce72a2c063a7fa8e42a9435440ae3364115a58d
Author: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed Oct 22 15:25:26 2008 +0800
sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
a patch from Henrik Austad did this:
>> Do not declare select_task_rq as part of sched_class when CONFIG_SMP is
>> not set.
Peter observed:
> While a proper cleanup, could you do it by re-arranging the methods so
> as to not create an additional ifdef?
Do not declare select_task_rq and some other methods as part of sched_class
when CONFIG_SMP is not set.
Also gather those methods to avoid CONFIG_SMP mess.
Idea-by: Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 17d80fd07d35ae1d231b3378ee4f00ace54f9d31
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue Oct 21 16:31:18 2008 +0200
tracing: create tracers menu
We seem to have plenty tracers, lets create a menu and not clutter
the already cluttered debug menu more.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit debfcaf93ed500a051489db6646d71f29fe86a68
Merge: 2515ddc... 81520a1...
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Wed Oct 22 09:08:14 2008 +0200
Merge branch 'tracing/ftrace' into tracing/urgent
commit 3786fc710c32b61464c322e5cd0c3d1d34ae72d0
Author: roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 21 19:49:09 2008 -0400
irq: make variable static
This variable is only used in the source file, so make it static.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 2f5ad54ea6e2e38156bfb889964deee991f3087a
Author: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun Sep 28 16:20:09 2008 -0700
pci: use pci_ioremap_bar() in sound/
Use the newly introduced pci_ioremap_bar() function in sound/.
pci_ioremap_bar() just takes a pci device and a bar number, with the goal
of making it really hard to get wrong, while also having a central place
to stick sanity checks.
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit 92850bbd71228730c80efd491e7427650188d359
Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Tue Oct 21 13:25:32 2008 +1100
md: allow extended partitions on md devices.
The new extended partition support provides a much nicer was
to have partitions on md devices that the 'mdp' alternate major.
We cannot really get rid of 'mdp' at this time, but we can
enable extended partitions as that will probably make life
easier for sysadmins.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
commit 3c0ee63a64a20351ed6c16ec797e1f8c850741ea
Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Tue Oct 21 13:25:28 2008 +1100
md: use sysfs_notify_dirent to notify changes to md/dev-xxx/state
The 'state' file for a device reports, for example, when the device
has failed. Changes should be reported to userspace ASAP without
the possibility of blocking on low-memory. sysfs_notify does
have that possibility (as it takes a mutex which can be held
across a kmalloc) so use sysfs_notify_dirent instead.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
commit b62b75905d571c29262a6c38cf9e5f089c203871
Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Tue Oct 21 13:25:21 2008 +1100
md: use sysfs_notify_dirent to notify changes to md/array_state
Now that we have sysfs_notify_dirent, use it to notify changes
to md/array_state.
As sysfs_notify_dirent can be called in atomic context, we can
remove the delayed notify and the MD_NOTIFY_ARRAY_STATE flag.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
commit 81520a1b0649d0701205b818714a8c1e1cfbbb5b
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Mon Oct 6 21:24:18 2008 -0400
ftrace: stack tracer only record when on stack
The stack trace API does not record if the stack is not on the current
task's stack. That is, if the stack is the interrupt stack or NMI stack,
the output does not show. Also, the size of those stacks are not
consistent with the size of the thread stack, this makes the calculation
of the stack size usually bogus.
This all confuses the stack tracer. I unfortunately do not have time to
fix all these problems, but this patch does record the worst stack when
the stack pointer is on the tasks stack (instead of bogus numbers).
The patch simply returns if the stack pointer is not on the task's stack.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 3ce83aea86bf46fd1bff59d2e6d16f48fdce22fc
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Mon Oct 6 19:06:13 2008 -0400
ftrace: rename the ftrace tracer to function
To avoid further confusion between the ftrace infrastructure and the
function tracer. This patch renames the "ftrace" function tracer
to "function".
Now in available_tracers, instead of "ftrace" there will be "function".
This makes more sense, since people will not know exactly what the
"ftrace" tracer does.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit 606576ce816603d9fe1fb453a88bc6eea16ca709
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Mon Oct 6 19:06:12 2008 -0400
ftrace: rename FTRACE to FUNCTION_TRACER
Due to confusion between the ftrace infrastructure and the gcc profiling
tracer "ftrace", this patch renames the config options from FTRACE to
FUNCTION_TRACER. The other two names that are offspring from FTRACE
DYNAMIC_FTRACE and FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD will stay the same.
This patch was generated mostly by script, and partially by hand.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit c2db8054c1eaf99983d8deee347876b01c26c2cf
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Mon Oct 6 19:06:11 2008 -0400
ftrace: fix depends
A lot of tracers have HAVE_FTRACE as a dependent config where it
really should not. The HAVE_FTRACE is a misnomer (soon to be fixed)
and describes if the architecture has the function tracer (mcount)
implemented. The ftrace infrastructure is implemented in all archs.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit bd95b88d9e51fcbf392a7e90338a8fcc3499cbd6
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu Oct 16 09:31:27 2008 -0400
ftrace: release functions from hash
The x86 architecture uses a static recording of mcount caller locations
and is not affected by this patch.
For architectures still using the dynamic ftrace daemon, this patch is
critical. It removes the race between the recording of a function that
calls mcount, the unloading of a module, and the ftrace daemon updating
the call sites.
This patch adds the releasing of the hash functions that the daemon uses
to update the mcount call sites. When a module is unloaded, not only
are the replaced call site table update, but now so is the hash recorded
functions that the ftrace daemon will use.
Again, architectures that implement MCOUNT_RECORD are not affected by
this (which currently only x86 has).
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit c513867561eeb07d24a0bdda1a18a8f91921a301
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue Oct 14 18:08:48 2008 -0400
ftrace: do not enclose logic in WARN_ON
In ftrace, logic is defined in the WARN_ON_ONCE, which can become a
nop with some configs. This patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
commit ac2d98998c32fcdc8d8919b7a4536a7945fd0422
Author: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Date: Mon Oct 20 12:37:43 2008 +0200
HID: quirk for OLED devices present in ASUS G50/G70/G71
The new revision of OLED device (0x0b05/0x175b) found in ASUS G50/G70/G71
should be ignored the same way we currently do for 0x1726, so that asus_oled
driver can make use of the device.
Reported-by: Costin Grigoras <costin.grigoras@cern.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 550cb3c3c1fa48171c6358b8641bd01119f5386f
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun Oct 19 20:34:31 2008 +0200
HID: Remove "default m" for Thrustmaster and Zeroplus
No reason at all to make these obscure drivers default m
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 3e10e879a8c334a5927d800a3663a24d562cfa31
Merge: 98d9c66... 0cfd810...
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Sun Oct 19 19:04:47 2008 +0200
Merge branch 'linus' into tracing-v28-for-linus-v3
Conflicts:
init/main.c
kernel/module.c
scripts/bootgraph.pl
commit 5cb02ff3489d710c73b4a21bb804feedeacce116
Author: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Date: Sun Oct 5 17:39:16 2008 +0100
fdomain_cs: Sort out modules with duplicate description
The PCMCIA one provides its own description so in PCMCIA mode we should use
that.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
commit 7bbfd39bb9a5623cb8e0bcc54aee9b43d9ee97b9
Author: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Date: Sun Oct 5 17:35:59 2008 +0100
pcmcia: Whine harder about use of EXCLUSIVE
The exclusive IRQ line support is a legacy and any remaining drivers that
cannot share interrupts need tidying up so whine harder about them.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
commit aafcf998c333a2a29e12093437eef32a60a8018d
Author: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Date: Sun Oct 5 17:35:41 2008 +0100
pcmcia: IRQ_TYPE_EXCLUSIVE is long obsoleted
Switch more drivers to dynamic sharing after checking their IRQ handlers
use dev_id and are robust
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
commit 140ae3eb6feb6ae96ba1ff073049beb985ea00e8
Author: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 18:04:48 2008 +0200
HID: fix hidraw_exit section mismatch
hidraw_exit() marked as __exit is called from __init function
from HID core. Remove the section placement from that function.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 1e093206734568e780c2717da1c89b97e9471954
Author: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Date: Fri Oct 17 11:52:23 2008 +0200
HID: add support for another Gyration remote control
There is a slightly different Gyration remote control, which
requires the quirks we already have in place for the 0x0002 PID,
plus KEY_MEDIA mapping is different.
Reported-by: Marc Randolph <mrand@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 022b7024d4bb1f9a2f30021a2672a0f940ebfa7a
Author: Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Oct 17 11:29:46 2008 +0200
Revert "HID: Invert HWHEEL mappings for some Logitech mice"
This reverts commit 740f370dc61dc478d891d7d47660bb3ae39ddb4f.
It turned out to be correct in the first place: a positive value should
be sent when the wheel is moved to the right, and a negative value when
moved to the left. This is the behavior expected by the Xorg evdev
driver. I must have had a remapping somewhere else in my system when
originally testing this. Testing on another system shows that the
unpatched kernel is correct.
Here is a bug report from Mandriva that brought the problem to my
attention:
https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=44309#c19
Signed-off-by: Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
commit 2a0bd75e5e687a9c34921e942c18477ea7ec2d63
Author: Arjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net>
Date: Thu Oct 16 22:10:19 2008 -0400
Input: psmouse - add support for Elantech touchpads
This is version 5 of the driver. Relative mode support has been
dropped (users wishing to use touchpad in relative mode can use
standard PS/2 protocol emulation done in hardware). The driver
supports both original version of Elantech protocol and the newer
one used by touchpads installed in EeePC.
Signed-off-by: Arjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
commit 2c6f2cb83b239b7d45da9246cafd27ee615ee35b
Author: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Date: Thu Oct 16 22:00:56 2008 -0400
Input: i8042 - add Blue FB5601 to noloop exception table
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
commit 15c73aaa44e09222e9cccaa9f80e29f7f5351f2b
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Thu Oct 2 19:47:12 2008 +0900
serial: sh-sci: Kill off all of the SCI/SCIF special casing.
This was added at a time when the compiler did a less than stellar job of
optimizing out dead code. These days this tends to be less of a concern,
so kill it all off.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
| en |
converted_docs | 163703 | **GUÍA DE LA FDA**
**PARA LA INDUSTRIA 68**
**GUÍA DE CUMPLIMIENTO DE PEQUEÑAS ENTIDADES**
**PARA MEZCLADORES DE PROTEÍNAS, FABRICANTES DE ALIMENTOS PARA ANIMALES
Y DISTRIBUIDORES**
> Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de EUA
>
> (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)
>
> Administración de Drogas y Alimentos (FDA)
>
> (Food and Drug Administration)
>
> Centro para Medicina Veterinaria
>
> (Center for Veterinary Medicine)
>
> Febrero 1998
**GUÍA DE LA FDA PARA LA INDUSTRIA 68**
Esta guía reemplaza a aquellas partes de la Guía para la industria 60,
Junio 17, 1997, que aplicaban para mezcladores de proteínas, fabricantes
de alimentos para animales y distribuidores.
**GUÍA DE CUMPLIMIENTO DE**
**PEQUEÑAS ENTIDADES**
**PARA MEZCLADORES DE PROTEÍNAS, FABRICANTES DE ALIMENTOS PARA ANIMALES
Y DISTRIBUIDORES**
Este documento está destinado para proporcionar la guía para "PROTEÍNAS
ANIMALES PROHIBIDAS PARA SU USO EN ALIMENTOS PARA RUMIANTES," Título 21,
Código de Reglamentos Federales, Parte 589.2000, Fecha efectiva: Agosto
4, 1997.
**Envíe sus comentarios y dudas a: Gloria Dunnavan, Director, Division
of Compliance (HFV-230), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for
Veterinary Medicine, 7500 Standish Place, Room 405, Rockville, MD 20855,
(301) 827-1166.**
La FDA ha preparado esta guía de acuerdo con la sección 212 del Decreto
de Equidad de Reforzamiento Regulatorio de Empresas Pequeñas. Este
documento de guía representa el pensamiento actual de la agencia acerca
del cumplimiento con el reglamento 21 CFR 589.2000 \"Proteínas animales
prohibidas para alimentos de rumiantes\". Éste no crea o confiere ningún
derecho para o sobre cualquier persona y no opera para obligar a la FDA
o al público. Se puede usar una propuesta alternativa si tal propuesta
satisface los requisitos del estatuto aplicable, reglamentos o ambos.
> Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de EUA
>
> (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)
>
> Administración de Drogas y Alimentos
>
> (Food and Drug Administration)
>
> Centro para Medicina Veterinaria
>
> (Center for Veterinary Medicine)
>
> Febrero 1998
**¿CUÁL ES EL PROPÓSITO Y ALCANCE DE ESTE REGLAMENTO?**
Este reglamento está diseñado para prevenir el establecimiento y la
propagación de la Encefalopatía Espongiforme Bovina (EEB) (Bovine
Spongiform Encephalopathy, BSE-por sus siglas en inglés), algunas veces
llamada como la "Enfermedad de las vacas locas", a través de los
alimentos para animales. Este reglamento prohíbe el uso de ciertas
proteínas derivadas del tejido de mamíferos para alimentar a animales
rumiantes. Un ejemplo de esto pueden ser la harina de carne huesos
derivadas del ganado bovino. Sin embargo, ciertos productos están
**exentos** del reglamento:
- Los siguientes productos proteicos provenientes de mamíferos están
**exentos:**
- Sangre y productos de sangre Gelatina
- Productos lácteos (leche y proteínas de la leche)
- Proteína porcina pura (cerdo) o proteína equina pura (caballo)
- Productos cárnicos inspeccionados, tales como restos de
alimentos que hayan sido cocidos y ofrecidos para la
alimentación humana, y procesados adicionalmente mediante calor
para la alimentación de animales.
- Los siguientes productos proteicos que no provienen de mamíferos
están **exentos**:
- Aves de corral Marinos (pescado)
- Vegetales
```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
- Los siguientes también están **exentos** porque no son proteínas o
tejidos:
```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
- Grasa Materia Grasa Aminoácidos
- Sebo Aceite Fosfato dicálcico
Si usted recibe y procesa **SÓLO** los productos exentos anteriores (o
productos que contengan los productos exentos), no se requiere que
cumpla con las disposiciones de este reglamento. Este material es
mencionado como "**material no prohibido**" a lo largo de esta guía.
Todas las otras proteínas de mamíferos serán mencionadas como
"**material prohibido**" a lo largo de esta guía. Si usted recibe y
procesa este material, debe cumplir con las disposiciones de este
reglamento.
Los animales rumiantes son cualquier animal con un estómago de cuatro
cámaras, incluyendo al ganado vacuno, ovejas, cabras, búfalos, alces y
venados.
**¿MI COMPAÑÍA SE VE AFECTADA POR ESTE REGLAMENTO?**
Este reglamento define a los mezcladores, fabricantes de alimentos y
distribuidores de la siguiente manera :
- \"Mezclador\" significa cualquier compañía que obtiene proteína
animal procesada de más de una fuente o de más de una especie, y
subsiguientemente mezcla (homogeniza) o re-distribuye un producto
animal. "Mezcladores" bajo el reglamento son mezcladores de
proteínas, que son intermediarios entre los extractores de grasa por
fusión y los fabricantes de alimentos.
- \"Fabricante de alimentos\" incluye a fabricantes y mezcladores de
alimentos completos e intermedios destinados para los animales.
Incluye las operaciones de mezcla de alimentos en la granja; sin
embargo, aquellos con mezcladores en la granja deben referirse a la
guía separada para los alimentadores de animales rumiantes con
operaciones de mezclado de alimentos en la granja (Guía de la FDA
para la Industria 69). El término incluye a los fabricantes de
alimentos para mascotas.
- \"Distribuidor\" incluye a las personas que distribuyen o
transportan alimentos o los ingredientes de los alimentos destinados
para los animales. **Esto incluye a minoristas de alimentos y
productos alimenticios; a las actividades de distribución de los
mezcladores y fabricantes del alimento; y a los transportistas
independientes.**
\* Aún cuando usted caiga dentro de la definición de mezclador,
fabricante de alimentos, o distribuidor, usted no está sujeto al
reglamento si usted no recibe, procesa, ni distribuye cualquier material
prohibido o productos que contengan el material prohibido.
Si usted sabe o tiene una razón para saber que un producto entrante
contiene o que puede contener el material prohibido, usted está sujeto
al reglamento. Los extractores de grasa por fusión puede que no sean
capaces de determinar las especies del material entrante; el producto
graso extraído por fusión a partir de tal material es considerado como
"material prohibido" porque **\"contiene o puede contener\"** material
prohibido. Usted puede desear tener una garantía de su proveedor de
materias primas acerca del contenido del producto. Esto podría incluir
un certificado del proveedor, o especificación de la fuente en un
contrato comercial.
El reglamento proporciona procedimientos para dos categorías generales
de mezcladores, fabricantes de alimentos y distribuidores que están
sujetos al reglamento: aquellos que **NO** separan el material prohibido
del material que no está prohibido, y aquellos que sí lo hacen.
**¿CÓMO CUMPLO CON EL NUEVO REGLAMENTO?**
**A. Las compañías que manejan únicamente el material prohibido, o tanto
el material prohibido como el no prohibido pero no lo separan,
necesitan:**
> 1\. Etiquetar todos los productos salientes que contengan o que puedan
> contener material prohibido con el siguiente enunciado de precaución:
**"No es alimento para ganado vacuno ni para otros rumiantes"**
> 2\. Mantener registros suficientes para rastrear los materiales
> durante el transcurso de la recepción, procesamiento y distribución, y
> tener los registros disponibles para su inspección y copiado. Las
> facturas o documentos similares para productos entrantes y salientes
> cumplirán con este requisito. Los registros deben contener la
> información que se espera normalmente que esté incluida en tales
> documentos --
- Fecha de la recepción o compra y venta o entrega
- Nombre y dirección del vendedor
- Nombre y dirección del destinatario
- Identificación del producto
- Cantidad
3\. Mantener los registros por un mínimo de un año.
**B. Las compañías que sí separan materiales prohibidos de los no
prohibidos, tienen dos requisitos adicionales:**
> 4\. Proporcionar las medidas para evitar la mezcla o contaminación
> cruzada de los materiales prohibidos y los materiales no prohibidos.
>
> 5\. Mantener procedimientos escritos que documenten las medidas que
> adoptan para prevenir las mezclas o la contaminación cruzada.
**¿QUÉ NECESITO SABER ACERCA DE LA DECLARACIÓN PREVENTIVA?**
- El término "etiqueta" significa un despliegue de asuntos escritos,
impresos, o gráficos acerca del envase inmediato de cualquier
producto. El término "etiquetado" significa todas las etiquetas y
otros asuntos escritos, impresos o gráficos (1) en cualquier
artículo o cualquiera de sus envases o envolturas, o (2) que
acompañen a tal artículo.
- La declaración preventiva se requiere sólo si los productos
contienen o pudieran contener material prohibido.
- Este requisito **NO** aplica para **productos alimenticios para
mascotas** que se venden o están destinados a la venta al menudeo, o
a los alimentos para los **animales de laboratorio que no son
rumiantes**. Si los productos alimenticios para mascotas o los
alimentos para animales de laboratorio se venden o están destinados
para la venta como artículos rebajados o de salvamento, entonces se
requiere la declaración preventiva. Los artículos rebajados o de
salvamento pueden darse como alimento o pueden ser componentes de
alimentos para otros animales incluyendo a los rumiantes.
- Se requiere que el etiquetado de todos los otros alimentos para
animales contenga la declaración preventiva, **incluso los alimentos
destinados para animales que no son rumiantes**.
- La declaración preventiva debe ponerse de forma sobresaliente en la
etiqueta o etiquetado. Debe ser eminente comparada con otras
declaraciones en el etiquetado. Debe colocarse en el etiquetado para
que sea posible que el individuo ordinario pueda leerla y entenderla
bajo las condiciones usuales de compra y uso.
- La FDA sugiere que la declaración preventiva tenga un tamaño de
letra o color diferente de otras etiquetas, o que usted use algunos
otros medios para resaltar la declaración para que el comprador la
note fácilmente.
- Para productos transportados a granel, la declaración preventiva
debe aparecer en la factura u otro documento y cartel, o cualquier
otro etiquetado que acompañe físicamente al embarque.
- Para productos que se envían en bolsas u otros envases pequeños, la
declaración preventiva debe aparecer en las etiquetas del producto.
Las etiquetas pueden anexarse o pueden ser parte de la bolsa u otro
envase.
- La declaración preventiva debe ser incluida en cualquier otra
etiqueta de los productos. Esto puede incluir hojas impresas,
folletos y otros materiales del etiquetado, ya sea que éstos
acompañen físicamente o no al embarque de los productos. Un ejemplo
podría ser un folleto de venta que usted manda por correo a los
clientes actuales y potenciales.
**¿QUÉ NECESITO SABER ACERCA DEL REQUISITO DEL MANTENIMIENTO DE
REGISTROS?**
- No se requiere que cree un nuevo conjunto de registros. La
información debe estar disponible en los registros comerciales
normales y usuales mantenidos por usted y/o su compañía.
- La información podría mantenerse en varios documentos diferentes
incluyendo facturas, comprobantes de recepción, bitácoras de
recepción, registro de desembolsos, recibos por el peso, órdenes de
compra, u otros registros comerciales o documentos.
- Los registros pueden mantenerse en conjunto para un embarque y no
tienen que mantenerse por cada envase individual dentro de un
embarque.
- Los registros necesitan identificar el producto:
- El uso del nombre común o usual del producto en la factura o el
documento de venta similar cumplirá, en parte, el requisito del
reglamento de los "registros", así como el requisito legal de
que la etiqueta del producto lleve su nombre común o usual.
- Los nombres comunes o usuales de los productos dados son
típicamente aquellos incluidos en las definiciones publicadas
por la Asociación Estadounidense de Oficiales de Control de
Alimentos (AAFCO- Association of American Feed Control
Officials), tal como la \"harina de carne y huesos."
- Los reglamentos de la FDA permiten que las etiquetas de
alimentos contengan términos colectivos en lugar de los nombres
comunes o usuales, en ciertas circunstancias. Por ejemplo,
pueden usarse los \"productos de proteína animal" donde el
producto contiene ciertos ingredientes como la harina de carne y
huesos. La agencia no objetará al uso continuado de términos
colectivos, siempre y cuando el alimento destinado para los
rumiantes no contenga proteína del material prohibido, o que el
producto contenga la declaración preventiva.
- Los registros deben mantenerse para que estén disponibles para la
inspección y copiado. Estos deben mantenerse en una condición que
los mantenga legibles y con una pronta localización.
- Los registros deben mantenerse durante un año, lo que significa un
año desde la fecha del embarque del producto.
**¿CÓMO PUEDO EVITAR LA MEZCLA O LA CONTAMINACIÓN CRUZADA?**
1. **[Separación]{.underline}**
- Usted podría tener el equipo separado o las instalaciones para
la producción, procesamiento, mezclado, o almacenaje de
materiales prohibidos y no prohibidos. Ésta podría lograrse con
edificios, cuartos, u otras locaciones completamente separadas;
o recipientes de almacenaje separados para el material entrante
y el producto terminado, mezcladoras y equipo de manejo por
separado.
- Los equipos separados para el material prohibido deben estar
claramente identificados para ayudar a asegurar que el material
prohibido no se agregue equivocadamente al producto destinado
para contener sólo el material no prohibido. **O**
2. **[Limpieza]{.underline}**
- La limpieza podría ser la limpieza física, enjuague, secuencia, u
otros medios, ya sea solos o en combinación con medidas de
separación que sean adecuadas para prevenir el arrastre de material
prohibido hacia el material que no está prohibido. Los
procedimientos de limpieza deben usarse en todo el equipo y bandas
transportadoras que manejan los dos materiales: el prohibido y el no
prohibido.
- La documentación de la limpieza debe incluir una descripción de cómo
se lleva a cabo la limpieza - quién es responsable; cómo se
supervisa y verifica la limpieza; cómo se determinó el volumen del
material
> de enjuague de limpieza; y una descripción de cómo se maneja el
> material de enjuague de limpieza. **O**
3. **[Combinación de separación y limpieza]{.underline}**
> Un ejemplo sería el uso de algunos equipos por separado y otros en uso
> común (la limpieza se requeriría para el último).
Necesita **procedimientos por escrito**, ya sea que use la separación,
la limpieza o una combinación:
- Los procedimientos escritos deben incluir los procedimientos
seguidos desde el momento de la recepción del material entrante
hasta el momento del embarque de los productos terminados. Estos
deben reflejar lo que realmente sucede en su operación.
- Los procedimientos escritos deben tener suficientes detalles para
proporcionar una comprensión clara de sus procedimientos reales. Un
investigador debe ser capaz de identificar fácilmente las
operaciones que están descritas en los procedimientos escritos.
**¿CUÁLES SON ALGUNAS DE LAS MEDIDAS DE LIMPIEZA QUE PODRÍA USAR?**
Incluya una o más de las siguientes, u otros procedimientos igualmente
eficaces. Estos procedimientos están adaptados de las Buenas Prácticas
de Manufactura actuales para los reglamentos de alimentos medicados,
Título 21, Código de Reglamentos Federales, Parte 225.
- Use limpieza por medios físicos, por ejemplo aspirar, barrer, lavar,
etc.
- Se pueden usar de manera alterna, el enjuague, la secuencia u otras
técnicas igualmente eficaces. Bajo estos métodos, el equipo se
limpia a través del uso de un producto no prohibido, por ejemplo un
alimento que no contiene el material prohibido.
- El volumen de material enjuagado debe ser suficiente para prevenir
el arrastre de productos que contienen o que pueden contener el
material prohibido. Debido al grado de variabilidad entre las
instalaciones, los molinos de alimentación deben determinar las
características individuales de sus instalaciones, y deben aplicar
el tiempo apropiado y los requisitos de volumen para enjuagar el
material con el fin de lograr el objetivo de los procedimientos. El
volumen usado debe declararse en los procedimientos escritos, y debe
estar basado en un análisis documentado o en la prueba del sistema
de la empresa.
- El material no prohibido usado en la limpieza debe considerarse como
prohibido y debe identificarse, guardarse y manejarse para que no se
incorpore en el alimento para los animales rumiantes.
- La secuencia debe hacerse en una base predeterminada y debe
diseñarse para prevenir contaminación insegura de los alimentos para
rumiantes. Un ejemplo apropiado sería producir un alimento para
cerdos que contenga el material prohibido, seguido por alimento para
cerdos o aves que contenga el material no prohibido, seguido por un
alimento para rumiantes que contenga el material no prohibido.
**¿QUÉ OTRA INFORMACIÓN NECESITO PARA QUE ME AYUDE A CUMPLIR CON EL
REGLAMENTO?**
- Los productos que contienen **sólo** el material no prohibido no
tienen requisitos bajo este reglamento.
- La Asociación Estadounidense de Oficiales de Control de Alimentos
(AFFCO -Association of American Feed Control Officials) ha
identificado los siguientes ingredientes en su Publicación Oficial
como material prohibido:
Carne
Sub-productos de la carne
Hígado de animales
Solubles de carne seca
Hidrolizados de carne
Alimentos de carne
Alimentos de carne y huesos
- Alimentos de sub-productos de animales
- Composta de alimentos de carne
- Composta de alimentos de carne y huesos
- Cabello hidrolizado
- Alimentos de piel hidrolizados
- Alimentos glandulares y alimentos de extracción glandular
Cadáveres de becerros nonatos
- Digestión animal
- Médula ósea cocida
- Hidrolizado de piel
- Aislamiento de proteína de carne
Médula ósea separada mecánicamente
Alimento de hueso, cocido
Alimento de hueso, cocido al vapor
Extractos de carne
Basura deshidratada
Desperdicios de alimentos deshidratados
**PRODUCTOS PARA IMPORTACIÓN**
- Todos los productos proteicos de mamíferos importados por EUA están
sujetos a los mismos requisitos de este reglamento como proteína de
mamífero obtenida de fuentes domésticas. Las personas responsables
de importar proteína de mamífero deben determinar el origen y la
especie del producto importado para asegurarse de que cualquier
material prohibido se maneje en apego a este reglamento. **NOTA: La
importación de ciertos productos proteicos animales de ciertos
países está prohibida por el reglamento USDA.**
# PRODUCTOS PARA EXPORTACIÓN
- El producto que contiene material prohibido que está destinado para
la exportación debe marcarse **\"SÓLO PARA EXPORTACIÓN"** en los
recipientes del embarque si es apropiado y en los documentos que
acompañan al embarque. Ningún otro etiquetado se requeriría para los
propósitos de este reglamento pero puede haber requisitos de
etiquetado adicionales para el país de destino.
- Cualquier producto proteico prohibido destinado para la exportación
que se desvía de regreso al comercio doméstico por cualquier razón
(derecho de salvamento, la calidad, etc.), estará sujeto a todos los
requisitos del reglamento. Esto incluirá el requisito de etiquetar
el producto con la declaración preventiva **\"No es alimento para
ganado vacuno ni para otros rumiantes.\"**
- La Responsabilidad de estos productos proteicos prohibidos descansa
en el dueño de las mercancías (el poseedor del título de las
mercancías). El dueño tiene la responsabilidad de asegurar que éstas
no se desvían de regreso al comercio doméstico a menos que estas
reúnan los requisitos del reglamento, incluyendo la declaración
preventiva del etiquetado.
**¿HAY ALGUNAS DISPOSICIONES PARA QUE LOS PRODUCTOS PROHIBIDOS SEAN
EXENTOS DE ESTE REGLAMENTO?**
El reglamento mantiene dos tipos de exención de la declaración
preventiva o los requisitos de registros para productos prohibidos:
**NOTA: LA FDA no ha validado métodos que reúnan los requisitos para
cualquiera de las exenciones anteriores. Si la agencia lo hace, y cuando
lo hiciera, proporcionará la guía adicional como sea necesaria para la
aplicación de tales exenciones.**
1\) Los mezcladores de proteína, fabricantes de alimentos para animales
y distribuidores pueden estar exentos de la declaración preventiva y los
requisitos de registros sí, entre otras cosas, ellos:
> a\) Compran productos proteicos animales de extractores de grasa por
> fusión que certifiquen el apego a un método de fabricación validado
> para desactivar al agente que causa la encefalopatía espongiforme
> transmisible (Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy,TSE) (BSE es una
> TSE), que rutinariamente use un método de prueba validado para
> detectar la presencia del agente que causa las TSEs, o que usen
> exclusivamente un método validado para controlar el proceso de
> fabricación que minimice el riesgo de ingreso del agente de la TSE al
> producto; o
>
> b\) se apegan a estas disposiciones de exención.
2\) Los mezcladores de proteína, fabricantes de alimentos para animales
y distribuidores pueden exentarse del requisito de los registros solo
si, entre otras cosas, ellos:
> a\) Compran productos de proteína animal que están marcados por un
> método permanente, aprobado por la FDA, indicando la presencia de los
> materiales prohibidos; o
>
> b\) se apegan a este requisito de señalización.
Number range CHAPTER
| es |
converted_docs | 126541 | {width="5.997916666666667in"
height="8.214583333333334in"}
{width="2.248611111111111in"
height="0.8131944444444444in"} March 27, 2003
This is the final version of the cost estimate/WBS for the Fermilab Main
Injector (FMI).
Although the FMI staff kept the cost estimate/WBS up-to-date for most of
the duration of the project, they discontinued the updating near the end
of the project. The last update was in March 1998. At that stage, they
still had \$ 4.0 M remaining unassigned contingency out of a total
project cost of \$ 229.6 M. This will give some indication of the final
maturity of the numbers contained in this file. In my evaluation, there
would be little likelihood of any future updating, considering 5 years
have passed and all the participants have move on to other projects.
Similarly, it seems difficult to resurrect the actual data files for
this WBS compilation. What is presented here is a scanned copy of the
printed March 1998 report to the DOE, which has been placed into an MS
Word file and put into a readable format (by hand, by yours truly). I
apologize for the errors that were likely to sneak in by this labor
intensive procedure. Please let me know if an EXCEL or MacProject
version is really needed and we can try to resurrect the original files.
This WBS has about 400-500 elements, going often to Level 6 (once to
Level 7). In addition to this compilation, there are an equivalent
number of pages with more details and notes for each of the lowest level
(work package) WBS element. I was not up to scanning and formatting
another comparable data set. Please let me know if you need that level
of detail, and I'll copy and send it to you.
Finally, this compilation is available on my website in both MS Word
(.doc) and .pdf formats.
[http://home.fnal.gov/\~peterg/USLC/FMI_WBS.doc](http://home.fnal.gov/~peterg/uslc/FMI_WBS.doc)
<http://home.fnal.gov/~peterg/USLC/FMI_WBS.pdf>
Peter
Peter H. Garbincius
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 1 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
S-00l l FERMILAB MAIN INJECTOR 183,235.2 46,364.7 229,600.0 1 183,235.2
46,364.7 229,600.0
TOTAL FERMILAB MAIN INJECTOR PROJECT 1 183,235.2 46,364.7 229,600.0
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 2 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
S-002 1.1 FERMILAB MAIN INJECTOR TECHNICAL COMPONEN
> 59,875.6 35,695.6 95,511.2 1 59,875.6 35,695.6 95,571.2
S-003 1.2 MAIN INJECTOR CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION
> 84,717.2 3,836.6 88,553.9 1 84,717.2 3,836.6 88,553.9
S-004 1.3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
> 1,840.2 6,832.5 8,672.7 1 1,840.2 6,832.5 8,672.7
384 1.4 MAIN INJECTOR CONTINGENCY
> 3,968.3 0.0 3.968.3 1 3,968.3 0.0 3,968.3
385 1.5 MAIN INJECTOR ESCALATION
> 32,833.9 0.0 32,833.9 1 32,833.9 0.0 32,833.9
S-00l l FERMILAB MAIN INJECTOR === ======= ====== =======
> 1 183,235.2 46,364.7 229,600.0
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 3 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
S-005 1.1.1 MAIN INJEC\'I\'OR MAGNETS
> 30,444.2 13,698.1 44,142.3 1 30,444.2 13,698.1 44,142.3
S-006 1.1.2 MAIN INJEC\'I\'OR VACUUM
> 3,563.2 1,364.1 4,927.3 1 3,563.2 1,364.1 4,927.3
S-007 1.1.3 POWER SUPPLIES
> 7,363.7 5,301.1 12,664.8 1 7,363.7 5,301.1 12,664.8
S-008 1.1.4 RF SYSTEMS
> 4,262.1 1,839.2 6,101.3 1 4,262.1 1,839.2 6,101.3
S-009 1.1.6 KICKERS/SLOW EXTRACTION
> 1,835.7 2,468.6 4,304.3 1 1,835.7 2,468.6 4,304.3
S-010 1.1.7 RECYCLER-STOCHASTIC COOLING-SYSTEM
> 1,009.3 192.6 1,201.8 1 1,009.3 192.6 1,201.8
S-011 1.1.8 MIR INSTRUMENTATION
> 1,722.3 1,144.2 2,866.5 1 1,722.3 1,144.2 2.866.5
S-012 1.1.9 CONTROLS
> 1,602.3 1,729.1 3,331.4 1 1.602.3 1,729.1 3,331.4
S-013 1.1.10 SAFETY
> 399.4 398.8 798.2 1 399.4 398.8 798.2
S-014 1.1.12 MIR UTILITIES& ABORT
> 5,845.4 4,223.7 10,069.1 1 5,845.4 4,223.7 10,069.1
S-015 1.1.13 INSTALLATION
> 1,828.0 3,336.2 5,164.2 1 1,828.0 3,336.2 5,164.2
S-002 1.1 FERMILAB MAIN INJEC\'I\'OR TECHNICAL COMPONENTS === ======
====== ======
> 1 59,875.6 35,695.6 95,571.2
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 3 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
S-016 1.2.1 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/PHASE 1
> 12,668.4 0.0 12,668.4 1 12,668.4 0.0 12,668.4
S-017 1.2.2 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/PHASE 2
> 50,440.1 0.0 50,440.1 1 50,440.1 0.0 50,440.1
S-018 1.2.3 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/PHASE 3
> 10,288.9 0.0 10,288.9 1 10,288.9 0.0 10,288.9
S-019 1.2.4 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/PHASE 4
> 1,496.1 0.0 1,496.1 1 1,496.1 0.0 1,496.1
S-020 1.2.14 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION ED&I
> 9,823.8 3,836.6 13,660.4 1 9,823.8 3,836.6 13,660.4
S-003 1.2 MAIN INJEC\'I\'OR CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION === ====== =====
=======
> 1 84,717.2 3,836.6 88,553.9
381 1.3.1 MAIN INJEC\'I\'OR PROJECT MANAGEMENT
> 500.0 4,751.9 5,251.9 1 500.0 4,751.9 5,251.9
382 1.3.2 MAIN INJEC\'I\'OR ACCELERATOR PHYSICS
> 0.0 2,080.6 2,080.6 1 0.0 2,080.6 2,080.6
383 1.3.3 MAIN INJEC\'I\'OR G&A
> 1,340.2 0.0 1,340.2 1 1,340.2 0.0 1,340.2
S-004 1.3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT === ====== ====== ======
> 1 1,840.2 6,832.5 8,672.7
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 4 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
S-021 1.1.1.1 MAIN INJECTOR RING MAGNETS
> 23,832.2 2,569.4 26,401.7 1 23,832.2 2,569.4 26,401.7
S-022 1.1.1.2 8 GEV LINE MAGNETS
> 827.4 249.9 1,077.3 1 827.4 249.9 1,077.3
S-023 1.1.1.3 150 GEV PROTON (MI52-F0) MAGNETS
> 476.7 569.4 1,046.1 1 476.7 569.4 1,046.1
S-024 1.1.1.4 150 GEV PBAR (MI62-F0) MAGNETS
> 476.7 569.4 1,046.1 1 476.7 569.4 1,046.1
S-025 1.1.1.5 120 GEV (F0-l\'17) MAGNETS
> 29.9 65.4 95.3 1 29.9 65.4 95.3
S-026 1.1.1.6 SLOW SPILL (F1S-SY) MAGNETS
> 8.7 14.0 22.7 1 8.7 14.0 22.7
S-027 1.1.1.8 ABORT LINE MAGNETS
> 176.1 142.0 318.1 1 176.1 142.0 318.1
S-028 1.1.1.10 MAGNET TOOLING
> 1,584. 4 493.5 2,077.9 1 1,584.4 493.5 2,077.9
101 1.1.1.14 MAGNET ED&I
> 298.3 6,909.8 7.208.0 1 298.3 6,909.8 7.208.0
102 1.1.1;15 TSS-CODE-MAX
> 0.0 1,487.0 1,487.0 1 0.0 1,487.0 1.487.0
103 1.1.1.16 TSS-FACILITY PREPATATION
> 0.0 177.7 177.7 1 0.0 177.7 177.7
S-029 1.1.1.18 CHESTER
> 2,733.6 450.7 3,184.4 1 2,733. 6 450.7 3,184.4
S-005 1.1.1 MAIN INJECTOR MAGNETS === ====== ====== ======
> 1 30,444.2 13,698.1 44,142.3
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 4 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
S-030 1.1.2.1 MIR VACUUM SYSTBM
> 2,246.1 91.7 2,337.8 1 2.246.1 91.7 2,337.8
S-031 1.1.2.10 BML VACUUM SYSTBM
> 496.2 44.0 540.1 1 496.2 44.0 540.1
S-032 1.1.2.12 MI-MIR ABORT VACUUM
> 44.9 6.5 51.4 1 44.9 6.5 51.4
S-033 1.1.2.13 MI-VACUUM INSTALLATION
> 64.0 234.5 298.5 1 64.0 234.5 298.5
137 1.1.2.14 VACUUM ED&I
> 8.5 801.2 809.6 1 8.5 801.2 809.6
S-034 1.1.2.18 VACUUM RECYCLER
> 703.4 186.4 889.8 1 703.4 186.4 889.8
S-006 1.1.2 MAIN INJECTOR VACUUM === ===== ===== =====
> 1 3,563.2 1,364.1 4,927.3
S-035 1.1.3.1 MIR POWER SUPPLIES
> 4,734.5 1,400.0 6,134.5 1 4,734.5 1,400.0 6,134.5
S-036 1.1.3.2 8GEV LINE/POWER SUPPLY
> 185.1 84.7 269.8 1 185.1 84.7 269.8
S-037 1.1.3.3 150 GEV PROT LINE/POWER SUPPLIES
> 779.5 159.4 938.9 1 779.5 159.4 938.9
S-038 1.1.3.4 150GEV PBAR LINE/POWER SUPPLIES
> 28.0 16.0 44.1 1 28.0 16.0 44.1
S-039 1.1.3.5 PBAR PROD LINE(F11 TO F17/POWER SUPPLIES
> 245.0 46.5 291.5 1 245.0 46.5 291.5
S-040 1.1.3.6 SLOW SPILL LINE/POWER SUPPLIES
> 206.0 58.4 264.4 1 206.0 58.4 264.4
166 1.1.3.7 BML PS CONTROLLERS
> 5.8 23.7 29.5 1 5.8 23.7 29.5
S-041 1.1.3.12 MI-CABLES INSTALLATION
> 751.5 1,163.1 1,914.6 1 751.5 1,163.1 1,914.6
S-042 1.1,3.13 MI-P.S. INSTALLATION
> 404.4 173.1 577.5 1 404.4 173.1 577.5
171 1.1.3.14 POWER SUPPLIES ED&I
> 0.0 2,132.2 2,132.2 1 0.0 2,132.2 2,132.2
S-043 1.1.3.18 RECYCLER POWER SUPPLIES
> 23.9 44.0 67.9 1 23.9 44.0 67.9
S-007 1.1.3 POWER SUPPLIES === ===== ===== ======
> 1 7,363.7 5,301.1 12,664.8
S-044 1.1.4.1 RF SYSTEMS/RING
> 3,769.0 309.3 4,078.3 1 3,769.0 309.3 4,078.3
182 1.1.4.10 RF SYSTEMS/RING REFURBISHING
> 100.8 207.2 308.0 1 100.8 207.2 308.0
S-045 1.1.4.13 FO INSTALLATION
> 201.7 305.0 506.7 1 201.7 305.0 506.7
185 1.1.4.14 RF SYSTEMS ED&I
> 4.2 943.7 948.0 1 4.2 943.7 948.0
S.046 1,l.4.18 RF SYSTEMS RECYCLER
> 186.4 74.0 260.4 1 186.4 74.0 260.4
S-008 1.1.4 RF SYSTEMS === ===== ===== =====
> 1 4,262.1 1,839.2 6,101.3
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 4 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
S-047 1.1.6.1 MIR EXTRACTION
> 940.1 477.5 1,417.6 1 940.1 477.5 1,417.6
S-048 1.1.6.2 SLOW EXTRACTION
> 371.7 129.6 501.3 1 371.7 129.6 501.3
S-049 1.1.6.3 TEV 150 GEV PBAR INJECTION
> 62.0 69.1 131.1 1 62.0 69.1 131.1
\~05 1.1.6.14 KICKERS & SLOW EXTRACTION ED&I
> 4.2 1,515.0 1,519.2 1 4.2 1,515.0 1,519.2
S-050 1.1.6.18 KICKERS/RECYCLER
> 457.7 277.4 735.1 1 457.7 277.4 735.1
S-009 1.1.6 KICKERS , SLOW EXTRACTION === ===== ===== =====
> 1 1,835.7 2,468.6 4,304.3
209 1.1.7.14 RECYCLER-STOCHASTIC COOLING-EDIA
> 4.2 185.2 189.5 1 4.2 185.2 189.5
S-051 1.1.7.18 RECYCLER-STOCHASTIC COOLING
> 1,005.0 7.4 1,012.4 1 1,005.0 7.4 1,012.4
S-010 1.1.7 RECYCLER-STOCHASTIC COOLING-SYSTBM === ===== ==== =====
> 1 1,009.3 192.6 1,201.8
S-052 1.1.8.1 MIR INSTRUMENTATION
> 374.5 87.7 462.2 1 374.5 87.7 462.2
S-057 1.1.8.10 MIR INSTRUMENTATION
> 619.4 51.6 671.0 1 619.4 51.6 671.0
S-058 1.1.8.13 MI-INSTRUMENTATION INSTALLATION
> 0.0 186.4 186.4 1 0.0 186.4 186.4
232 1.1.8.14 INSTRUMENTATION ED&I
> 4.2 721.8 726.0 1 4.2 721.8 726.0
S-059 1.l.8.18 INSTRUMENTATION RECYCLER
> 724.2 96.7 820.8 1 724.2 96.7 820.8
S-Ol1 1.1.8 MIR INSTRUMENTATION === ===== ===== =====
> 1 1,722.3 1,144.2 2,866.5
S-060 1.1.9.1 MIR CONTROLS
> 1,072.9 641.4 1,714.2 1 1,072.9 641.4 1,714.2
S-061 1.1.9.10 BEAMLINE AGGREGATE
> 424.8 65.2 490.0 1 424.8 65.2 490.0
256 1.1.9.14 CONTROLS ED&I
> 0.0 993.7 993.7 1 0.0 993.7 993.7
S-062 1.1.9.18 CONTROLS-RECYCLER
> 104.7 28.9 133.6 1 104.7 28.9 133.6
S-012 1.1.9 CONTROLS === ===== ===== =====
> 1 1,602.3 1,729.1 3,331.4
259 1.1.10.1 MIR SAFETY SYSTEM
> 197.0 58.6 255.5 1 197.0 58.6 255.5
260 1.1.10.2 BML SAFETY SYSTEM
> 152.2 28.5 180.7 1 152.2 28.5 180.7
!S-063 1.1.10.13 MI-SAFETY SYSTBM INSTALLATION
> 25.3 103.9 129.2 1 25.3 103.9 129.2
263 1.1.10.14 SAFETY SYSTEMS ED&I
> 0.0 203.9 203.9 1 0.0 203.9 203.9
S-064 1.1.10.18 SAFETY SYSTBMS RECYCLER
> 24.9 4.0 28.9 1 24.9 4.0 28.9
S-013 1.1.10 SAFETY === ==== ==== ====
> 1 399.4 398.8 798.2
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 4 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
S-065 1.1.12.1 MIR MECHANICAL UTILITIBS
> 3,656.8 1,661.9 5,318.8 1 3,656.8 1,661.9 5,318.8
S-066 1.1,12.10 BEAMLINE AGGRBGATE
> 571.0 293.4 864.4 1 571.0 293.4 864.4
S-067 1.1.12.13 MI-BUS INSTALLATION
> 1,598.0 850.6 2,448.7 1 1,598.0 850.6 2,448.7
290 1.1.12.14 UTILITIES. ABORT ED&I
> 0.0 1,376.7 1,376.7 1 0.0 1,376.7 1,376.7
S-068 1.1.12.18 UTILITIES-RECYCLER RING
> 19.5 41.1 60.6 1 19.5 41.1 60.6
S-014 1.1.12 MIR UTILITIES . ABORT === ===== ===== ======
> 1 5,845.4 4,223.7 10,069.1
S-069 1.1.13.1 MIR INSTALLATION
> 1,290.9 974.5 2,265.3 1 1,290.9 974.5 2,265.3
S-070 1.1.13.2 8 GEV LINE
> 115.0 192.5 307.5 1 115.0 192.5 307.5
S-071 1.1.13.3 150 GEV PROT LINE
> 167.2 73.5 240.7 1 167.2 73.5 240.7
S-074 1.1.13.6 SLOW SPILL INSTALLATION
> 28.0 14.4 42.4 1 28.0 14.4 42.4
S-075 1.1.13.7 MIR/NEW TEV VACUUM
> 0.0 13.9 13.9 1 0.0 13.9 13.9
S-076 1.1.13.8 MIR/NEW F0 REMQVAL AND REINSTALLATION
> 20.0 128.2 148.2 1 20.0 128.2 148.2
349 1.1.13.14 INSTALLATION ED&I
> 0.0 1,810.9 1,810.9 1 0.0 1,810.9 1,810.9
350 1.1.13.18 INSTALLATION-RECYCLER
> 207.0 128.4 335.4 1 207.0 128.4 335.4
S-015 1.1.13 INSTALLATION === ===== ===== =====
> 1 1,828.0 3,336.2 5,164.2
351 1.2.1.1 WETLAND MITIGATION, PHASE 1
> 590.6 0.0 590.6 1 590.6 0.0 590.6
356 1.2.2.1 INJECTOR ENCLOSURE AT MI60, PHASE 2
> 3,750.0 0.0 3,750.0 1 3,750.0 0.0 3,750.0
357 1.2.2.3 INJECTORR ENCLOSURE AT MI62-MI52, PHASE 2
> 17,743.0 0.0 17,743.0 1 17,743.0 0.0 17,743.0
358 1.2.2.3 SERVICE BLDGS 10,20,30,40,50, PHASE 2
> 2,290.5 0.0 2,290.5 1 2,290.5 0.0 2,290.5
359 1.2.2.4 MI52 & 62 SERVICE BUILDING, PHASE 2
> 1,571.5 0.0 1,571.5 1 1,571.5 0.0 1,571.5
360 1.2.2.5 MI60 SERVICE BUILDING, PHASE 2
> 3,065.0 0.0 3,065.0 1 3,065.0 0.0 3,065.0
361 1.2.2.6 SERVICE BLDG. FO N. ADDITION, PHASE 2
> 1,197.5 0.0 1,197.5 1 1,197.5 0.0 1,197.5
362 1.2.2.7 8 GEV BEAM ENCLOSURE, PHASE 2
> 3,648.1 0.0 3,648.1 1 3,648.1 0.0 3,648.1
363 1.2.2.8 MI8/NORTH HATCH BUILDING, PHASE 2
> 1.196.4 0.0 1,196.4 1 1,196.4 0.0 1,196.4
364 1.2.2.9 345 KV TRANSMISSION LINE, PHASE 2
> 3,565.6 0.0 2,565.6 1 2,565.6 0.0 2,565.6
365 1.2.2.10 KAUTZ ROAD SUBSTATION, PHASE 2
> 6,187.5 0.0 6,187.5 1 6,187.5 0.0 6,187.5
365 1.2.2.11 COOLING WATER SYSTEM, PHASE 2
> 1,759.0 0.0 1,759.0 1 1,759.0 0.0 1,759.0
357 1.2.2.13 PRECAST CONCRETE ELEMENTS, PHASE 2
> 2,977.0 0.0 2,977.0 1 2,977.0 0.0 2,977.0
368 1.2.2.13 SHIELDING STEEL, PHASE 2
> 2,489.0 0.0 2,489.0 1 2,489.0 0.0 2,489.0
S-017 1.2.2 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/PHASE 2
> 1 50,440.1 0.0 50,440.1
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 4 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
369 1.2.3.1 F0 ENCL. & BLDG F0 MODS, F-17 BLDG, PHASE 3
> 7,253.2 0.0 7,253.2 1 7,253.2 0.0 7,253.2
370 1.2.3.2 8 GEV BOOSTER ENCL. CONNECTION, PHASE 3
> 2,497.3 0.0 2,497.3 1 2,497.3 0.0 2,497.3
371 1.2.3.3 8 GEV ENCLOSURE AT ANTIPROTON, PHASE 3
> 263.5 0.0 263.5 1 263.5 0.0 263.5
372 1.2.3.18 STOCHASTIC COOL LIGHT LINK PENETRATIONS
> 274.8 0.0 274.8 1 274.8 0.0 274.8
S-018 1.2.3 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/PHASE 3 === ====== === ======
> 1 10,288.9 0.0 10,288.9
373 1.2.4.1 LANDSCAPING & PAVING, PHASE 4
> 746.1 0.0 746.1 1 746.1 0.0 746.1
374 1.2.4.2 F-SECTOR SHIELDING
> 400.0 0.0 400.0 1 400.0 0.0 400.0
375 1.2.4.3 CIVIL PHASE 4 REMEDIATION
> 350.0 0.0 350.0 1 350.0 0.0 350.0
S-019 1.2.4 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/PHASE 4 === ===== == =====
> 1 1,496.1 0.0 1,496.1
376 1.2.14.1 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/Phase 1 ED&I
> 1,195.2 462.6 1,657.8 1 1,195.2 462.6 1,657.8
377 1.2.14.2 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/Phase 2 ED&I
> 7,005.7 2,569.0 9,574.7 1 7,005.7 2,569.0 9,574.7
378 1.2.14.3 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/Phase 3 ED&I
> 1,565.1 575.0 2,140.0 1 1,565.1 575.0 2,140.0
379 1.2.14.4 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION/Phase 4 ED&I
> 57.8 80.1 137.9 1 57.8 80.1 137.9
380 1.2.14.5 CIVIL MANAGES SERVICES FOR AS-BUILT DRAWINGS
> 0.0 150.0 150.0 1 0.0 150.0 150.0
S-020 1.2.14 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION ED&I === ===== ===== ======
> 1 9,823.8 3,836.6 13,660.4
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 5 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
S-080 1.1.1.1.1 MIR MAGNETS/DIPOLES
> 21,405.6 940.7 22,346.3 1 21,405.6 940.7 22,346.3
S-081 1.1.1.1.2 MIR MAGNETS/QUADS
> 1,509.1 1,025.8 2,535.5 1 1,509.7 1,025.8 2,535.5
S-082 1.1.1.1.3 MIR MAGNETS/CORRECTORS
> 381.0 557.1 938.2 1 381.0 557.1 938.2
S-083 1.1.1.l.4 MIR MAGNETS/TRIM DIPOLES
> 535.9 45.8 581.7 1 535.9 45.8 581.1
S-02l l.1.1.1 MAIN INJECTOR RING MAGNETS === ====== ===== ======
> 1 23,832.2 2,569.4 26,401.7
S-084 1.1.1.2.1 8GEV MAGNETS/DIPOLES
> 255.8 19.7 335.5 1 255.8 79.7 335.5
S-085 1.1.1.2.2 8GEV MAGNETS/QUADS
> 561.6 159.2 720.9 1 561.6 159.2 720.9
S-086 1.1.1.2.4 8GEV MAGNETS/TRIM DIPOLES
> 10.0 11.0 21.0 1 10.0 11.0 21.0
S-088 1.1.1.3.1 150GEV P MAGNETS/DIPOLES
> 8.2 7.9 16. 1 8.2 7.9 16.1
S-089 1.1.1.3.2 150GEV P MAGNETS/QUADS
> 125.3 289.0 414.2 1 125.3 289.0 414.2
S-090 1.1.1.3.4 150GEV P MAGNETS/DIPOLE TRIMS
> 4.2 4.6 8.8 1 4.2 4.6 8.8
S-091 1.1.1.3.5 150GEV PROTON/LAMBERTSONS
> 339.1 267.9 606.9 1 339.1 261.9 606.9
S-023 1.1.1.3 150 GEV PROTON (MI52-F0) MAGNETS === ==== ==== =====
> 1 476.7 569.4 1,046.1
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 5 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
S-092 1.1.1.4.1 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/DIPOLES
> 8.2 7.9 16.1 1 8.2 7.9 16.1
S\'-093 1.1.1.4.2 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/QUADS
> 125.3 289.0 414.2 1 125.3 289.0 414.2
S-094 1.1.1.4.4 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/TRIM DIPOLES
> 4.2 4.6 8.8 1 4.2 4.6 8.8
S-095 1.1.1.4.5 150GEV PBAR/LAMBERTSONS
> 339.1 261.9 606.9 1 339.1 267.9 606.9
S-024 1.1.1.4 150 GEV PBAR (MI62-F0) MAGNETS === ==== ==== =====
> 1 416.1 569.4 1,046.1
S-096 1.1.1.5.1 120GEV MAGNETS/DIPOLES
> 4.4 4.2 8.6 1 4.4 4.2 8.6
S-097 1.1.1.5.2 120GEV MAGS/84" MR QUAD BQB
> 23.9 59.4 83.3 1 23.9 59.4 83.3
S-098 1.1.1.5.4 120GEV MAGNETS/TRIM DIPOLES
> 1.6 1.8 3.4 1 1.6 1.8 3.4
S-025 1.1.1.5 120 GEV (F0-F17) MAGNETS === === === ===
> 1 29.9 65.4 95.3
S-099 1.1.1.6.1 SLOW SPILL MAGNETS/DIPOLES
> 2.8 6.5 9.3 1 2.8 6.5 9.3
S-100 1.1.1.6.2 SLOW SPILL MAGS/BQB
> 0.4 1.3 1.7 1 0.4 1.3 1.7
S-101 1.1.1.6.4 SLOW SPILL MAGNETS/BUMPS
> 5.6 6.2 11.8 1 5.6 6.2 11.8
S-026 1.1.1.6 SLOW SPILL (F1S-SY) MAGNETS === === === ===
> 1 8.7 14.0 22.7
S-102 1.1.1.8.1 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/DIPOLES
> 1.1 1.1 2.1 1 1.1 1.1 2.1
S-103 1.1.1.8.2 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/QUADS
> 1.3 4.7 6.0 1 1.3 4.7 6.0
S-104 1.1.1.8.4 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/TRIM DIPOLES
> 0.8 0.9 1.7 1 0.8 0.9 1.7
S-105 1.1.1.8.5 ABORT/LAMBERTSONS
> 173.0 135.3 308.3 1 173.0 135.3 308.3
S-027 1.1.1.8 ABORT LINE MAGNETS === ==== ==== ====
> 1 176.1 142.0 318.1
S-106 1.1.1.10.1 DIPOLE TOOLING
> 863.3 129.4 992.7 1 863.3 129.4 992.7
S-107 1.1.1.10.2 QUADRUPOLB TOOLING
> 302.3 180.8 483.1 1 302.3 180.8 483.1
S-108 1.1.1.10.3 SPECIAL MAGNET TOOLING
> 22.8 88.9 111.7 1 22.8 88.9 111.7
S-109 1.1.1.10.4 SPECIAL MAGNET TOOLING
> 51.9 6.7 58.5 1 51.9 6.7 58.5
S-110 1.1.1.10.5 LAMBERTSON MAGNET TOOLING
> 344.1 87.8 432.0 1 344.1 87.8 432.0
S-028 1.1.1.10 MAGNET TOOLING === ===== ==== =====
> 1 1,584.4 493.5 2,077.9
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 5 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
S-111 1.1.1.18.1 RECYCLER-PM VERTICAL BEND DIPOLE
> 53.5 7.2 60.7 1 53.5 7.2 60.7
S-112 1.1.1.18.2 RECYCLER-PM STANDARD AND BYPASS QUADRUPOL
> 134.7 37.0 171.6 1 134.7 37.0 171.6
S-113 1.1.1.18.3 RECYCLER-CORRECTION ELEMENTS
> 13.8 15.4 29.2 1 13.8 15.4 29.2
S-114 1.1.1.18.4 RECYCLER-REUSED HOR. & VER. TRIM DIPS
> 4.1 5.3 9.4 1 4.1 5.3 9.4
S-115 1.1.1.18.5 RECYCLER-PERMANENT MAGNET LAMBERTSON
> 42.3 9.2 51.5 1 42.3 9.2 51.5
S-116 1.1.1.18.6 RECYCLER-FOC,DEFOC , MIRR GRAD. DIPS
> 2,402.2 347.2 2,749.3 1 2,402.2 347.2 2,749.3
117 1.1.1.18.10 CHESTER
> 83.1 29.4 112.5 1 83.1 29.4 112.5
S-029 1.1.1.18 CHESTER === ===== ==== =====
> 1 2,733.6 450.7 3,184.4
118 1.1.2.1.1 MIR VACUUM SYS/VACUUM CHAMBER,BELLOWS
> 1.022.3 63.9 1.086.2 1 l,022.3 63.9 l,086.2
119 1.1.2.1.2 MIR VACUUM SYS/ROUGH PUMPS,TURBO CARTS
> 782.4 2.4 784.8 1 782.4 2.4 784.8
120 1.1.2.1.3 MIR VACUUM SYS/GAUGES, CABLES
> 441.4 25.4 466.8 1 441.4 25.4 466.8
S-030 1.1.2.1 MIR VACUUM SYSTEM === ===== === =====
> 1 2,246.1 91.7 2,337.8
S-117 1.1.2.10.1 BML VACUUM/CHAMBERS , BELLOWS
> 223.3 40.3 263.5 1 223.3 40.3 263.5
S-118 1.1.2.10.2 BML VACUUM/ROUGH PUMPS/TURBO CARTS
> 207.9 2.0 209.9 1 207.9 2.0 209.9
S-119 1.1.2.10.3 BML VACUUM/GAUGES , CABLES
> 65.0 1.7 66.7 1 65.0 1.7 66.7
S-031 1.1.2.10 BML VACUUM SYSTEM === ==== === ====
> 1 496.1 44.0 540.1
S.l20 1.1.2.12.1 MI-MIR ABORT VACUUM
> 44.9 6.5 51.4 1 44.9 6.5 51.4
S.032 1.1.2.12 MI-MIR ABORT VACUUM === === === ===
> 1 44.9 6.5 51.4
131 1.1.2.13.1 MI-MIR VACUUM INSTALLATION
> 0.0 145.4 145.4 1 0.0 145.4 145.4
132 1.1,2.13.3 MI-8 GEV VACUUM INSTALLATION
> 0.0 42.7 42.7 1 0.0 42.7 42.7
133 1.1.2.13.4 MI-150 GEV VACUUM INSTALLATION
> 0.0 16.3 16.3 1 0.0 16.3 16.3
134 1.1.2.13.5 MI-SLOW SPILL VACUUM INSTALLATION
> 0.0 16.6 16.6 1 0.0 16.6 16.6
135 1.1.2.13.6 MI-NEW TEV F0 VACUUM
> 35.3 9.9 45.2 1 35.3 9.9 45.2
136 1.1.2.13.7 MI-MIR/NEW TEV E0 VACUUM
> 28.7 3.7 32.4 1 28.7 3.7 32.4
S-033 1.1.2.13 MI-VACUUM INSTALLATION === === ==== ====
> 1 64.0 234.5 298.5
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 5 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
138 1.1.2.18.1 VACUUM - RING. TRANSFER LINES (SHEET A)
> 703.4 59.3 762.7 1 703.4 59.3 762.7
139 1.1.2.18.13 VACUUM-INSTALLATION (ULTRA HIGH VAC) (SHE
> 0.0 127.1 127.1 1 0.0 127.1 127.1
S-034 1.1.2.18 VACUUM RECYCLER === ==== ==== ====
> 1 703.4 186.4 889.8
S-l21 1.1.3.1.1 MIR PWR SUP/DIPOLE SUPPLY
> 3,355.9 820.9 4,176.7 1 3,355.9 820.9 4,176.7
142 1.1.3.1.2 MIR PWR SUP/QUADRUPOLE SUPPLIES
> 108.2 34.8 143.0 6 649.4 208.6 858.0
143 1.1.3.1.3 MIR PWR SUP/SEXTUPOLE SUPPLIES
> 272.1 28.4 300.5 1 272.1 28.4 300.5
144 1.1.3.1.4 MIR PWR SUP/CORRECTION ELEMENT SUPPLIES
> 296.6 254.4 551.1 1 296.6 254.4 551.1
145 1.1.3.1.6 MIR INJECTOR REGULATION SYSTEM
> 99.1 33.6 132.8 1 99.1 33.6 132.8
146 1.1.3.1.7 MIR REGULATION SUPPLIES
> 22.4 35.5 57.8 1 22.4 35.5 57.8
147 1.1.3.1.8 MIR ABORT SUPPLY
> 39.0 18.6 57.6 1 39.0 18.6 57.6
S-035 1.1.3.1 MIR POWER SUPPLIES === ===== ===== =====
> 1 4,734.5 1,400.0 6,134.5
148 1.1.3.2.1 8GEV LINE/DIPOLE POWER SUPPLIES
> 18.3 2 6.0 44.3 1 18.3 26.0 44.3
149 1.1.3.2.2 8GEV LINE/ QUADRUPOLE POWER SUPPLIES
> 62.3 17.8 80.1 1 62.3 17.8 80.1
150 1.1.3.2.3 8GEV LINE/CORR ELEMBNT POWER SUPPLIES
> 104.5 40.9 145.4 1 104.5 40.9 145.4
152 1.1.3.3.1 150GEV PROT LINE/DIPOLE SUPPLIES
> 237.5 92.4 329.9 1 237.5 92.4 329.9
153 1.1.3.3.2 150GEV PROT LINE/QUADRUPOLE SUPPLIES
> 514.0 50.9 564.9 1 514.0 50.9 564.9
154 1.1.3.3.3 150GEV PROT LINE/CORR ELE SUPPLIES
> 28.0 16.0 44.0 1 28.0 16.0 44.0
158 1.1.3.4.3 150GEV PBAR LINE/CORR BLEMENT SUPPLIES
> 28.0 16.0 44.1 1 28.0 16.0 44.1
160 1.1.3.5.1 PBAR PROD LINE(Fll TO F17)/DIPOLE SUPPLIES
> 133.0 29.4 162.4 1 133.0 29.4 162.4
161 1.1.3.5.2 PBAR PROD LINE(Fll TO F17)/QUADRUPOLE SUP
> 112.0 17.1 129.1 1 112.0 17.1 129.1
163 1.1.3.6.1 SLOW SPILL LINE/DIPOLE SUPPLIES
> 162.0 47.2 209.2 1 162.0 47.2 209.2
164 1.1.3.6.2 SLOW SPILL LINE/QUADRUPOLE SUPPLIES
> 44.0 11.1 55.1 1 44.0 11.1 55.1
167 1.1.3.12.1 MI-MIR CABLE INSTALLATION
> 310.2 694.5 1,004.7 1 310.2 694.5 1,004.7
168 1.1;3.12.2 MI-BML INSTALL CABLES
> 441.3 468.6 910.0 1 441.3 468.6 910.0
S-041 1.1.3.12 MI-CABLES INSTALLATION === ==== ===== =====
> 1 751.5 1,163.1 1,914.6
169 1.1.3.13.1 MI-MIR HARMONIC FILTER
> 354.9 6.1 361.0 1 354.9 6.1 361.0
170 1.1.3.13.2 MI-BML PROT P.S. INSTALLATION
> 49.5 167.0 216.4 1 49.5 167.0 216.4
S-042 1.1.3.13 MI-P.S. INSTALLATION === ==== ==== ====
> 1 404.4 173.1 577.5
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 5 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
172 1.1.3.18.13 POWER SUPPLIES RECYCLER PS INSTALL
> 3.0 5.5 8.5 8 23.9 44.0 67.9
S-043 1.1.3.18 RECYCLER POWER SUPPLIES
> 1 23.9 44.0 67.9
S-122 1.1.4.1.1 MIR RF 53 MHZ
> 3,748.8 299.4 4,048.2 1 3,748.8 299.4 4,048.2
S-123 1.1.4.1.2 COALESCING SYSTEM
> 20.2 9.9 30.1 1 20.2 9.9 30.1
S-044 1.1.4.1 RF SYSTEMS/RING === ===== ==== =====
> 1 3.769.0 309.3 4,078.3
184 1.1.4.13.6 MI-F0 TEV REINSTALLATION
> 201.7 305.0 506.1 1 201.7 305.0 506.1
S-045 1.1.4.13 F0 INSTALLATION === ==== ==== ====
> 1 201.7 305.0 506.7
186 1.1.4.18.1 RF SYSTEMS RECYCLER RING
> 186.4 59.5 245.9 1 186.4 59.5 245.9
181 1.1.4.18.13 RF SYSTEMS RECYLER INSTALLATION
> 0.0 14.5 14.5 1 0.0 14.5 14.5
S-046 1.1.4.18 RF 8YSTEMS RECYCLER === ==== === ====
> 1 186.4 74.0 260.4
S-124 1.1.5.1.1 8 GEV PROT INJ KICKER
> 365.2 192.1 557.8 1 365.2 192.7 557.8
S-125 1.1.5.1.2 8 GEV PBAR INJECTION KICKER
> 338.0 165.9 503.9 1 338.0 165.9 503.9
B-127 1.1.5.1.4 MIR 150 GEV PBAR EXT KICKER
> 28.0 55.8 83.8 1 28.0 55.8 83.8
B-128 1.1.5.1.5 MIR EXT PROTON ABORT KICKER
> 208.9 63.1 212.0 1 208.9 63.1 212.0
S-047 1.1.5.1 MIR EXTRACTION === ==== ==== =====
> 1 940.1 477.5 1,417.6
198 1.1.5.2.1 MIR SLOW EXT/ELECTROSTATIC SEPTUM
> 167.5 113.7 281.2 1 167.5 113.7 281.2
199 1.1.5.2.2 MIR SLOW EXT/SPBCIAL MAGNETIC ELEMENTS
> 142.0 0.0 142.0 1 142.0 0.0 142.0
200 1.1.5.2.3 MIR SLOW EXT/QXR SY8TEM
> 52.3 15.9 78.1 1 52.3 15.9 78.1
S-048 1.1.5.2 SLOW EXTRACTION === ==== ==== ====
> 1 371.7 129.5 501.3
S-129 1.1.5.3.1 TEV 150 GEV PROT INJ KICKER
> 49.0 42.2 91.2 1 49.0 42.2 91.2
S-130 1.1.5.3.2 TEV 150 GEV PBAR INJ KICKER
> 13.0 26.9 39.9 1 13.0 26.9 39.9
S-049 1.1.5.3 TEV 150 GEV PBAR INJECTION === === === ====
> 1 62.0 69.1 131.1
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 5 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
206 1.1.6.18.1 KICKERS/RECYCLER MAGNETS
> 65.3 29.4 94.7 3 195.9 88.1 284.0
207 1.1.6.18.2 KICKERS/RECYCLER POWER SUPPLIES
> 74.7 46.0 120.7 3 224.1 138.1 362.1
208 1.1.6.18.13 KICKERS/RECYCLER INSTALLATION
> 12.6 17.1 29.7 3 37.7 51.3 89.0
S-050 1.1.6.18 KICKERS/RECYCLER === ==== ==== ====
> 1 457.7 277.4 735.1
210 1.1.7.18.1 RECYCLER-STOCHASTIC COOLING-RING
> 1,005.0 0.0 1,005.0 1 1,005.0 0.0 1,005.0
211 1.1.7.18.13 RECYCLER-STOCHASTIC COOLING-INSTALLATION
> 0.0 7.4 7.4 1 0.0 7.4 7.4
S-051 1.1.7.18 RECYCLER-STOCHASTIC COOLING === ===== === =====
> 1 1,005.0 7.4 1,012.4
212 1.1.8.1.1 MIR INST/BPM SYSTEM
> 197.0 49.7 246.7 1 197.0 49.7 246.7
213 1.1.8.1.2 MIR INST/BLM SYSTEM
> 15.5 2.9 18.4 1 15.5 2.9 18.4
214 1.1.8.1.3 MIR INST/LONGI\~INAL PICKUP
> 25.3 11.0 36.3 1 25.3 11.0 36.3
215 1.1.8.1.4 MIR INST/TRANSVBRSB PICKUP
> 12.9 0.0 12.9 2 25.9 0.0 25.9
216 1.1.8.1.5 MIR INST/DAMPERS
> 7.5 1.5 9.0 2 15.0 3.1 18.1
217 1.1.8.1.6 MIR INST/FLYING WIRES
> 9.8 15.8 25.7 1 9.8 15.8 25.7
218 1.1.8.1.7 MIR INST/D.C.C.T.
> 0.0 1.5 1.5 1 0.0 1.5 1.5
220 1.1.8.1.9 MIR ION PROFILE MONITORS (IPM)
> 78.0 0.0 78.0 1 78.0 0.0 78.0
221 1.1.8.1.10 MIR TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY SENSORS
> 8.0 3.7 11.7 1 8.0 3.7 11.7
S-052 1.1.8.1 MIR INSTRUMENTATION === ==== === ====
> 1 374.5 87.7 462.2
226 1.1.8.10.1 MIR INST/BEAMLINE AGGREGATE BPM SYSTEM
> 299.9 10.8 310.8 1 299.9 10.8 310.8
227 1.1.8.10.2 MIR INST/BEAMLINE
> 43.9 2.5 46.4 1 43.9 2.5 46.4
228 1.1.8.10.7 MIR INST/AGGREGATE TORROIDS
> 3.9 1.1 5.0 10 39.3 10.8 50.1
229 1.1.8.10.9 MIR INST/BEAMLINE SEMS
> 236.2 27.5 263.7 1 236.2 27.5 263.7
S-057 1.1.8.10 MIR INSTRUMBNTATION === ==== === ====
> 1 619.4 51.6 671.0
230 1.1.8.13.1 MI-MIR INSTR INSTALLATION
> 0.0 102.9 102.9 1 0.0 102.9 102.9
231 1.1.8.13.2 MI-8 GEV INSTR INSTALLATION
> 0.0 83.5 83.5 1 0.0 83.5 83.5
S-058 1.1.8.13 MI-INSTRUMENTATION INSTALLATION === === ==== ====
> 1 0.0 186.4 186.4
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 5 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
233 1.1.8.18.1 INSTRUMENTATION RECYCLER (RING)
> 724.2 74.2 798.4 1 724.2 74.2 798.4
234 1.1.8.18.13 INSTRUMENTATION RECYCLER INSTALLATION
> 0.0 22.5 22.5 1 0.0 22.5 22.5
S-059 1.1.8.18 INSTRUMENTATION RECYCLER === ==== === ====
> 1 724.2 96.7 820.8
235 1.1.9.1.1 MIR CONTROLS/COMPUTERS,LINKS
> 76.4 41.2 117.6 1 76.4 41.2 117.6
236 1.1.9.1.2 MIR CONTROLS/CRATES,CARDS,RELAY RACKS,CAB
> 375.1 0.0 375.1 1 375.1 0.0 375.1
237 1.1.9.1.3 MIR CONTROLS/CATV SYSTEM
> 150.7 31.7 182.4 1 150.7 31.7 182.4
238 1.1.9.1.4 MIR CONTROLS/FIRUS SYSTEM
> 11.4 15.3 26.7 1 11.4 15.3 26.7
239 1.1.9.1.5 MIR CONTROLS/ETHERNET
> 64.5 0.0 64.5 1 64.5 0.0 64.5
240 1.1.9.1.6 MIR CONTROL8/NETWORKING INFRASTRUCTURE
> 96.5 0.0 96.5 1 96.5 0.0 96.5
241 1.1.9.1.7 MIR CONTROLS/NETWORKING INSTALLATION
> 18.0 337.1 355.1 1 18.0 337.1 355.1
242 1.1.9.1.8 MIR CONTROLS/VACUUM
> 31.6 3.3 35.0 1 31.6 3.3 35.0
243 1.1.9.1.9 MIR CONTROLS/INSTALLATION
> 6.7 111.8 118.6 1 6.7 111.8 118.6
244 1.1.9.1.10 MIR CONTROLS VME
> 81.2 3.2 84.4 1 81.2 3.2 84.4
245 1.1.9.1.12 MI LCW CONTROL SYSTEM
> 160.7 97.7 258.4 1 160.7 97.7 258.4
S-060 1.1.9.1 MIR CONTROLS === ===== ==== =====
> 1 1,072.9 641.4 1,714.2
246 1.1.9.10.1 BML CONTROLS/COMPUTERS,LINKS
> 47.4 0.0 47.4 1 47.4 0.0 47.4
247 1.1.9.10.2 BML CONTROLS/CRATES,RELAY RACKS,CABLING
> 273.2 25.4 298.6 1 273.2 25.4 298.6
250 1.1.9.10.5 BML CONTROLS/NE\'I\'WORKING EQUIPMENT
> 54.4 0.0 54.4 1 54.4 0.0 54.4
251 1.1.9.10.6 BML CONTROLS/NETWORKING INFRASTRUCTURE
> 16.3 0.0 16.3 1 16.3 0.0 16.3
252 1.1.9.10.7 BML CONTROLS/NETWORKING INSTALLATION
> 0.0 3.8 3.8 1 0.0 3.8 3.8
253 1.1.9.10.8 BEAMLINE CONTROLS/VACUUM
> 7.0 1.0 7.9 1 7.0 1.0 7.9
254 1.1.9.10.9 BML CONTROLS/INSTALLATION
> 12.3 33.6 45.9 1 12.3 33.6 45.9
255 1.1.9.10.10 BML CONTROLS VME
> 14.2 1.4 15.6 1 14.2 1.4 15.6
S-061 1.1.9.10 BEAMLINE AGGREGATE
> 1 424.8 65.2 490.0
257 1.1.9.18.1 CONTROLS-RECYCLER (RING)
> 104.7 0.0 104.7 1 104.7 0.0 104.7
258 1.1.9.18.13 CONTROLS-RECYCLER (INSTALLATION)
> 0.0 28.9 28.9 1 0.0 28.9 28.9
S-062 1.1.9.18 CONTROLS-RECYCLER MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION,
CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST
> 1 104.7 28.9 133.6
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 5 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
261 1.1.10.13.1 MI-MIR SAFETY SYSTEM INSTALLATION 1
> 4.2 54.5 68.7 1 14.2 54.5 68.7
262 1.1.10.13.Z MI-BML SAFETY SYSTEM INSTALLATION
> 11.1 49.4 60.5 1 11.1 49.4 60.5
S-063 1.1.10.13 MI-SAFETY SYSTEM INSTALLATION === === ==== ====
> 1 25.3 103.9 129.2
264 1.1.10.18.1 SAFETY SYSTEMS RECYCLER-RING
> 23.8 1.5 25.3 1 23.8 1.5 25.3
265 1.1.10.18.13 SAFBTY SYSTEMS RECYCLER-INSTALLATION
> 1.1 2.4 3.6 1 1.1 2.4 3.6
S-064 1.1,10.18 SAFETY SYSTEMS RECYCLER === === === ===
> 1 24.9 4.0 28.9
S-131 1.1.12.1.1 MIR INSTALL WATER SYSTEM
> 3,549.8 1,628.4 5,178.2 1 3,549.8 1,628.4 5,178.2
S-133 1.1.12.1.3 MIR ABORT SYSTEMS
> 107.0 33.5 140.5 1 107.0 33.5 140.5
S-065 1.1.12.1 MIR MECHANICAL UTILITIES === ===== ===== =====
> 1 3,656.8 1,661.9 5,318.8
S-134 1.1.12.10.1 BML WATER SYSTEMS
> 571.0 293.4 864.4 1 571.0 293.4 864.4
288 1.1.12.13.1 MI-MIR MAGNET BUS INSTALLATION
> 1,575.8 783.1 2,358.9 1 1,575.8 783.1 2.358.9
289 1.1.12.13.2 MI-BML PROT PWR DIST MAGNET BUS INSTALL
> 22.2 67.5 89.7 1 22.2 67.5 89.7
S-067 1.1.12.13 MI-BUS INSTALLATION === ===== ==== =====
> 1 1,598.0 850.6 2,448.7
291 1.1.12.18.1 UTILITIES-RECYCLER RING
> 19.5 0.0 19.5 1 19.5 0.0 19.5
292 1.1.12.18.13 UTILITIES-RECYCLER RING INSTALLATION
> 0.0 41.1 41.1 1 0.0 41.1 41.1
S-068 1.1.12.18 UTILITIBS-RECYCLER RING === === === ===
> 1 19.5 41.1 60.6
S-136 1.1.13.1.1 MIR MAGNET INSTALLATION
> 1,276.0 964.7 2,240.7 1 1,276. 0 964.7 2,240.7
S-138 1.1.13.1.6 MIR ABORT INSTALLATION
> 14.9 9.8 24.7 1 14.9 9.8 24.7
S-140 1.1.13.2.1 8 GEV LINE/SURVEY, ALIGN MAGNETS
> 115.0 192.5 307.5 1 115.0 192.5 307.5
S-141 1.1.13.3.1 150 GEV PROT LINE MAGNET INSTALLATION
> 167.2 73.5 240.7 1 167.2 73.5 240.7
S-144 1.1.13.6.1 SLOW SPILL/MAGNET INSTALLATION
> 28.0 14.4 42.4 1 28.0 14.4 42.4
S-145 1.1.13.7.2 MIR/NEW TEV F0 VACUUM
> 0.0 13.9 13.9 1 0.0 13.9 13.9
S-075 1.1.13.7 MIR/NEW TEV VACUUM === === === ===
> 1 0.0 13.9 13.9
343 1.1.13.8.1 F0 MAGNET REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION
> 0.0 58.4 58.4 1 0.0 58.4 58.4
344 1.1.13.8.2 F0 CRYO REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION
> 20.0 69.8 89.8 1 20.0 69.8 89.8
S-076 1.1.13.8 MIR/NEW F0 REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION === === ==== ====
> 1 20.0 128.2 148.2
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11: 19: 58 LEVEL 5 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
352 1.2.1.2.1 CIVIL CONSTR PH l/SITE PREPARATION
> 1,395.4 0.0 1,395.4 1 1,395.4 0.0 1,395.4
353 1.2.1.2.2 CIVIL CONSTR PH 2/COOLING PONDS
> 2,772.1 0.0 2,772.1 1 2,772.1 0.0 2.772.1
354 1.2.1.3.1 CIVIL CONSTR PH l/ROADS, UTILITIES
> 4,695.0 0.0 4,695.0 1 4,695.0 0.0 4,695.0
355 1.1.1.3.1 CIVIL CONSTR PH 1/13.8 KV POWER === ====== === ======
> 3,215.1 0.0 3,215.2 1 3,215.2 0.0 3,215.2
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11:19:58 LEVEL 6 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
1 1.1,1.1.1.1 MIR MAGNETS/240\' DIPOLES IDA
> 70.8 3.5 74.3 105 7,437.1 366.6 7,803.6
2 1.1.1.1.1.2 MIR MAGNETS/240\' DIPOLES IDB
> 69.3 3.0 72.3 105 7,281.7 313.3 7,594.9
3 1.1.1.1.1.3 MIR MAGNETS/160\" DIPOLES IDC
> 55.1 2.3 57.4 61 3,360.2 143.2 3,503.4
4 1.1.1.1.1.4 MIR MAGNETS/160\" DIPOLES IDD
> 54.5 1.9 56.5 61 3,326.7 117.7 3.444.4
S-080 1.1.1.1.1 MIR MAGNETS/DIPOLES === ====== ==== ======
> 1 21,405.6 940.7 22,346.3
5 1.1.1.1.2.3 MIR MAGNETS/100\" QUADS IQC (NEW)
> 15.3 12.9 28.2 31 474.4 399.7 874.1
6 1.1.1.1.2.4 MIR MAGNETS/116\" QUAD IQD (NEW)
> 17.3 9.2 26.5 47 813.6 431.2 1,244.7
7 1.1.1.1.2.5 MIR MAGNETS/84\" QUADS BQB (REWORK)
> 1.7 1.5 3.3 127 220.1 193.4 413.5
8 1.1.1.1.2.9 MIR MAGNETS/84\" QUADS BQB ROLLED (REWORK)
> 1.7 1.5 3.3 1 1.7 1.5 3.3
S-081 1.1.1.1.2 MIR MAGNETS/QUADS === ===== ===== =====
> 1 1,509.7 1,025.8 2,535.5
9 1.1.1.1.3.1 MIR MAGNETS/SEXTUPOLES 18\" ISA (NEW)
> 3.1 4.7 7.9 108 339.0 509.6 848.6
10 1.1.1.1.3.2 MIR MAGNETS/TRIM QUAD (REWORK)
> 0.4 0.4 0.8 16 6.4 7.0 13.4
11 1.1.1.1.3.3 MIR MAGNETS/SKEW QUAD (REWORK)
> 0.4 0.4 0.8 18 7.2 7.9 15.1
14 1.1.1.1.3.6 MIR MAGNETS/OCTUPOLES (REWORK)
> 0.4 0.5 0.9 62 26.4 29.0 55.4
15 1.1.1.1.3.7 MIR MAGNETS/CR SKEW QUADS
> 0.5 0.9 1.4 4 2.0 3.5 5.5
S-082 1.1.1.1.3 MIR MAGNETS/CORRECTORS === ==== ==== ====
> 1 381.0 557.1 938.2
16 1.1.1.1.4.2 MIR MAGNETS/HORIZ TRIM - IDH (NEW)
> 2.3 0.2 2.6 104 244.3 22.9 267.2
17 1.1.1.1.4.4 MIR MAGNETS/VERT TRIM DIP IDV (NEW)
> 2.8 0.2 3.0 104 291.6 22.9 314.5
21 1.1.1.2.1.8 8GEV MAGNETS/PERM.MAG. ARC DIPOLE(B2 RBP
> 5.1 1.4 6.5 49 249.2 69.5 318.7
22 1.1.1.2.1.12 8GEV MAGNETS/EPB DIPOLE 5-1.5-120 (REWORK
> 1.6 2.6 4.2 4 6.5 10.2 16.7
25 1.1.1.2.2.7 8GEV MAGNETS/SQA(17\" QUADS) (REWORK)
> 0.4 1.1 1.5 16 6.2 18.0 24.1
26 1.1.1.2.2.8 8GEV MAGNETS/PERM. MAG. ARC GRAD.MAG
> 8.3 2.1 10.3 65 537.8 133.8 671.5
27 1.1.1.2.2.9 8GEV MAGNETS/PERM. MAG.l/2 METER QUADS
> 2.0 0.8 2.8 9 17.7 7.5 25.2
S-085 1.1.1.2.2 8GEV MAGNETS/QUADS
> 1 561.6 159.2 720.9
28 1.1.1.2.4.1 8GEV MAGNETS/H TRIM DIPOLE HDC (REWORK)
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 25 5.0 5.5 10.5
29 1.1.1.2.4.3 8GEV MAGNETS/V TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 25 5.0 5.5 10.5
S-086 1.1.1.2.4 8GEV MAGNETS/TRIM DIPOLES
> 1 10.0 11.0 21.0
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11:19:58 LEVEL 6 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
32 1.1.1.3.1.7 150GEV P MAGNETS/B2(240\") DIP BDM (REWORK
> 0.5 0.5 1.1 15 8.2 7.9 16.1
S-088 1.1.1.3.1 150GEV P MAGNETS/DIPOLES === === === ===
> 1 8.2 7.9 16.1
33 1.1.1.3.2.5 150GEV P MAGNETS/3Q84 QUADS BQB (REWORK)
> 0.4 1.5 1.9 7 2.8 10.7 13.5
35 1.1.1.3.2.12 150GEV MAGNETS/3Q120 QUAD (MORE)
> 14.9 31.9 46.8 7 104.4 223.3 327.7
36 1.1.1.3.2.13 150GEV MAGNETS/3Q60 QUAD (MORE)
> 9.0 27.5 36.5 2 18.1 55.0 73.1
S-089 1.1.1.3.2 150GEV P MAGNETS/QUADS === === === ===
> 1 25.3 89.0 14.2
37 1.1.1.3.4.1 150GEV P MAGNETS/H TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 7 1.4 1.5 2.9
38 1.1.1.3.4.3 150GEV P MAGNETS/V TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 14 2.8 3.1 5.9
S-090 1.1.1.3.4 150GEV P MAGNETS/DIPOLE TRIMS === === === ===
> 1 4.2 4.6 8.8
39 1.1.1.3.5.2 150GEV P/MI LAMBERTSON 110\" (2.8M) (NEW)
> 52.6 40.9 93.5 5 262.9 204.4 467.3
41 1.1.1.3.5.5 150GEV P/MI C-MAGNET 132\" (NEW)
> 15.2 12.7 27.9 5 76.2 63.5 139.7
S-09 1.1.1.3.5 150GEV PROTON/LAMBERTSONS === ==== ==== ====
> 1 339.1 267.9 606.9
42 1.1.1.4.1.7 150GEV PBAR/B2 240\" DIPOLES BDM (REWORK)
> 0.5 0.5 1.1 15 8.2 7.9 16.1
S-092 1.1.1.4.1 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/DIPOLES === == == ===
> 1 8.2 7.9 16.1
43 1.1.1.4.2.5 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/84\" QUADS BQB (REWORK
> 0.4 1.5 1.9 7 2.8 10.7 13.5
45 1.1.1.4.2.12 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/3Q120 QUADS (MORE)
> 14.9 31.9 46.8 7 104.4 223.3 327.7
46 1.1.1.4.2.13 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/3Q60 QUADS (MORE)
> 9.0 27.5 36.5 2 18.1 55.0 73.1
S-093 1.1.1.4.2 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/QUADS === ==== ==== ====
> 1 125.3 289.0 414.2
47 1.1.1.4.4.1 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/H TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 7 1.4 1.5 2.9
48 1.1.1.4.4.3 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/V TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 14 2.8 3.1 5.9
S-094 1.1.1.4.4 150GEV PBAR MAGNETS/TRIM DIPOLES === === === ===
> 1 4.2 4.6 8.8
49 1.1.1.4.5.2 150GEV PBAR/MI LAMBERTSON 110\" (2.8M) (NEW
> 52.6 40.9 93.5 5 262.9 204.4 467.3
51 1.1.1.4.5.5 150GEV PBAR/MI C-MAGNET 132\" (NEW)
> 15.2 12.7 27.9 5 76.2 63.5 139.7
S-095 1.1.1.4.5 150GEV PBAR/LAMBERTSONS === ==== ==== ====
> 1 339.1 267.9 606.9
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11:19:58 LEVEL 6 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
52 1.1.1.5.1.13 120GEV MAGNETS/B3 DIPOLS ODM (REWORK)
> 0.5 0.5 1.1 8 4.4 4.2 8.6
55 1.1.1.5.2.12 120GEV MAGS/3Q120 QUAD (MORE)
> 14.9 31.9 46.8 1 14.9 31.9 46.8
56 1.1.1.5.2.13 120GEV MAGS/3Q60 QUAD (MORE)
> 9.0 27.5 36.5 1 9.0 27.5 36.5
S-097 1.1.1.5.2 120GEV MAGS/84\" MR QUAD BQB === === === ===
> 1 23.9 59.4 83.3
57 1.1.1.5.4.1 120GEV MAGNETS/HDC TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 4 0.8 0.9 1.7
58 1.1.1.5.4.3 120GEV MAGNETS/VDC MR TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 4 0.8 0.9 1.7
S-098 1.1.1.5.4 120GEV MAGNETS/TRIM DIPOLES === === === ===
> 1 1.6 1.8 3.4
60 1.1.1.6.1.12 SLOW SPILL MAGNETS/EPB 1-1.5-120 (REWORK)
> 0.6 4.4 5.0 1 0.6 4.4 5.0
61 1.1.1.6.1.13 SLOW SPILL MAGS/B3 DIPOLE ODM (REWORK)
> 0.5 0.5 1.1 4 2.2 2.1 4.3
63 1.1.1.6.2.5 SLOW SPILL MAGS/84\" QUADS BQB (REWORK)
> 0.4 1.3 1.7 1 0.4 1.3 1.7
65 1.1.1.6;4.1 SLOW SPILL MAGS/H TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 14 2.8 3.1 5.9
66 1.1.1.6.4.3 SLOW SPILL MAGS/V TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 14 2.8 3.1 5.9
S-101 1.1.1.6.4 SLOW SPILL MAGNETS/BUMPS === === === ===
> 1 5.6 6.2 11.8
67 1.1.1.8.1.7 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/B2 BDM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 0.5 0.5 1.1 2 1.1 1.1 2.1
S-102 1.1.1.8.1 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/DIPOLES === === === ===
> 1 1.1 1.1 2.1
68 1.1.1.8.2.5 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/3Q52 QUADS BQB (REWORK
> 0.4 1.5 1.9 2 0.8 3.0 3.8
69 1.1.1.8.2.6 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/3Q52 QUADS BQA (REWORK
> 0.5 1.7 2.1 1 0.5 1.7 2.1
S-103 1.1.1.8.2 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/QUADS === === === ===
> 1 1.3 4.7 6.0
70 1.1.1.8.4.1 ABORT LINK MAGNETS/H TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 2 0.4 0.4 0.8
71 1.1.1.8.4.3 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/V TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 0.2 0.2 0.4 2 0.4 0.4 0.8
S-l04 1.1.1.8.4 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/TRIM DIPOLES === === === ===
> 1 0.8 0.9 1.7
72 1.1.1.8.5.2 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/MI LAMBERTSON 110\" (2.
> 52.6 40.9 93.5 3 157.7 1226 280.4
74 1.1.1.8.5.5 ABORT LINE MAGNETS/MI C-MAGNET 13\~\" (NEW)
> 15.2 12.7 27.9 1 15.2 12.7 27.9
S-105 1.1.1.8.5 ABORT/LAMBERTSONS === ==== ==== ====
> 1 173.0 135.3 308.3
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11:19:58 LEVEL 6 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
75 1.1.1.10.1.1 DIPOLE TOOLING/MIR DIPOLE
> 842.5 127.6 970.1 1 842.5 127.6 970.1
77 1.1.1.10.1.7 DIPOLE TOOLING/B2 240\" DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 1.0 0.9 1.9 1 1.0 0.9 1.9
78 1.1.1.10.1.8 8 GEV LINE TOOLING
> 18.8 0.0 18.8 1 18.8 0.0 18.8
79 1.1.1.10.1.12 DIPOLE TOOLING/EPB DIPOLE 5-1.5-120 (MORE
> 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0
80 1.1.1.10.1.13 DIPOLE TOOLING/B3 DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 1.0 0.9 1.9 1 1.0 0.9 1.9
S-106 1.1.1.10.1 DIPOLE TOOLING === ==== ==== ====
> 1 863.3 129.4 992.7
81 1.1.1.10.2.3 MI QUAD TOOLING (NEW)
> 267.7 151.0 418.8 1 267.7 151.0 418.8
82 1.1.1.10.2.5 QUAD TOOLING/OLD MR 84\"
> 2.0 1.8 3.8 1 2.0 1.8 3.8
83 1.1.1.10.2.6 QUAD TOOLING/BOA 52\" (REWORK)
> 1.0 0.9 1.9 1 1.0 0.9 1.9
84 1.1.1.10.2.7 QUAD TOOLING/SQA 17\" (REWORK)
> 3.0 7.0 10.0 1 3.0 7.0 10.0
86 1.1.1.10.2.12 QUAD TOOLING/3Ql20A
> 0.5 10.0 10.6 1 0.5 10.0 10.6
87 1.1.1.10.2.13 QUAD TOOLING/3Q60A
> 28.0 10.0 38.0 1 28.0 10.0 38.0
S-107 1.1.1.10.2 QUADRUPOLE TOOLING === ==== ==== ====
> 1 302.3 180.8 483.1
88 1.1.1.10.3.1 MR TOOLING/SEXTUPOLE (NEW)
> 19.8 86.2 106.0 1 19.8 86.2 106.0
89 1.1.1.10,3.2 MR TOOLING/TRIM QUAD (REWORK)
> 1.0 0.9 1.9 1 1.0 0.9 1.9
90 1.1.1.10.3.3 MR TOOLING/SKBW QUAD (REWORK)
> 1.0 0.9 1.9 1 1.0 0.9 1.9
93 1.1.1.10.3.6 MR TOOLING/OCTUPOLE (REWORK)
> 1.0 0.9 1.9 1 1.0 0.9 1.9
S-108 1.1.1.10.3 SPBCIAL MAGNET TOOLING === === === ====
> 1 22.8 88.9 111.7
94 1.1.1.10.4.1 MR TOOLING/HORZ TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 1.0 0.9 1.9 1 1.0 0.9 1.9
95 1.1.1.10.4.2 MR TOOLING/HORZ TRIM DIPOLE (NEW)
> 25.0 4.0 29.0 1 25.0 4.0 29.0
96 1.1.1.10.4.3 MR TOOLING/VERT TRIM DIPOLE (REWORK)
> 1.0 0.9 1.9 1 1.0 0.9 1.9
97 1.1.1.10.4.4 MR TOOLING/VERT TRIM DIPOLE (NEW)
> 24.9 0.9 25.7 1 24.9 0.9 25.7
S-109 1.1.1.10.4 SPBCIAL MAGNET TOOLING === === === ===
> 1 51.9 6.7 58.5
99 1.1.1.10.5.2 LAMBERTSON TOOLING/MI 110\" (NEW)
> 317.3 42.4 359.8 1 317.3 42.4 359.8
100 1.1.1.10.5.5 TOOLING/F-17 C 132\" MAGNET(MORE)
> 26.8 45.4 72.2 1 26.8 45.4 72.2
S-110 1.1.1.10.5 LAMBERTSON MAGNET TOOLING === ==== ==== ====
> 1 344.1 87.8 432.0
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11:19:58 LEVEL 6 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
104 1.1.1.18.1.15 RECYCLER-PM VERTICAL BEND DIPOLE
> 7.6 1.0 8.7 7 53.5 7.2 60.7
S-111 1.1.1.18.1 RECYCLER-PM VBRTICAL BEND DIPOLE === === === ===
> 1 53.5 7.2 60.7
105 1.1.1.18.2.14 RECYCLER-PM STANDARD QUADRUPOLES-.05 M LO
> 1.7 0.5 2.1 64 107.7 29.6 137.3
106 1.1.1.18.2.15 RECYCLER-PM BYPASS QUADRUPOLES-.05 M LONG
> 1.7 0.5 2.1 16 26.9 7.4 34.3
S-112 1.1.1.18.2 RECYCLER-PM STANDARD AND BYPASS QUADRUPOLES === ====
=== ====
> 1 134.7 37.0 171.6
107 1.1.1.18.3.2 RECYCLER-CORRECTION ELEMENTS TROMBONE QUA
> 0.4 0.4 0.8 9 3.6 4.0 7.5
108 1.1.1.18.3.3 RECYCLER-CORRECTION ELEMENTS SQEW QUADS
> 0.4 0.4 0.8 2 0.8 0.9 1.7
109 1.1.1.18.3.5 RECYCLER-CORRECTION ELEMENTS SEXTUPOLES
> 0.4 0.4 0.8 24 9.5 10.6 20.0
S-113 1.1.1.18.3 RECYCLER-CORRECTION ELEMENTS === === === ===
> 1 13.8 15.4 29.2
110 1.1.1.18.4.1 RECYCLER-REURBISHED MR HOR. TRIM DIPS
> 0.1 0.1 0.2 24 2.0 2.6 4.7
111 1.1.1.18.4.3 RECYCLER-REFURBISHED MR VER. TRIM DIPS
> 0.1 0.1 0.2 24 2.0 2.6 4.7
S-114 1.1.1.18.4 RECYCLER-REUSED HOR. & VER. TRIM DIPS === === === ===
> 1 4.1 5.3 9.4
112 1.1.1.18.5.7 RECYCLER-PERMANBNT MAGNET LAMBERTSON
> 8.5 1.8 10.3 5 42.3 9.2 51.5
S-115 1.1.1.18.5 RECYCLER-PERMANENT MAGNET LAMBERTSON === === === ===
> 1 42.3 9.2 51.5
113 1.1.1.18.6.2 RECYCLER-PERM. MAGNET FOC. GRAD. DIPS
> 7.6 1.0 8.7 108 825.1 111.7 936.8
114 1.1.1.18.6.3 RECYCLER-PERM. MAGNET DEFOC. GRAD. DIPS
> 7.6 1.0 8.7 108 825.1 111.7 936.8
115 1.1.1.18.6.4 RECYCLER-PERM MAG GRAD DIPS DISPER SUPPR
> 5.3 0.9 6.2 136 721.3 119.7 841.0
116 1.1.1.18.6.5 RECYCLER-PERM. MAGNET MIRR GRAD. DIPS
> 7.6 1.0 8.7 4 30.6 4.1 34.7
S-116 1.1.1.18.6 RECYCLER.FOC.DEFOC & MIRR GRAD. DIPS === ===== =====
=====
> 1 2,402.2 347.2 2,749.3
121 1.1.2.10.1.1 BML VACUUM SYS/8GEV CHAMBER.BELLOWS
> 136.7 21.7 158.4 1 136.7 21.7 158.4
122 1.1.2.10.1.2 BML VACUUM SYS/150GEV BELLOWS. CHAMBERS
> 83.9 11.9 95.7 1 83.9 11.9 95.7
123 1.1.2.10.1.3 BML VACUUM SYS/SPILL BELLOWS. CHAMBERS
> 2.7 6.7 9.4 1 2.7 6.7 9.4
S-117 1.1.2.10.1 BML VACUUM/CHAMBERS & BELLOWS === ==== === ====
> 1 323.3 40.3 263.5
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11:19:58 LEVEL 6 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
124 1.1.2.10.2.1 BML VACUUM SYS/8GEV PUMPS
> 174.4 1.7 176.1 1 174.4 1.7 176.1
125 1.1.2.10.2.2 BML VACUUM SYS/150GEV PUMPS
> 33.5 0.3 33.9 1 33.5 0.3 33.9
127 1.1.2.10.3.1 BML VACUUM SYS/8GEV GAUGES
> 42.8 1.0 43.8 1 42.8 1.0 43.8
128 1.1.2.10.3.2 BML VACUUM SYS/150GEV GAUGES
> 22.2 0.7 22.9 1 22.2 0.7 22.9
130 1.1.2.12.1.2 MI-MIR ABORT VACUUM
> 44.9 6.5 51.4 1 44.9 6.5 51.4
S-120 1.1.2.12.1 MI-MIR ABORT VACUUM === === === ===
> 1 44.9 6.5 51.4
140 1.1.3.1.1.1 MIR PWR SUP/DIPOLE SUPPLY
> 21.8 49.3 71.2 11 240.2 542.6 782.8
141 1.1.3.1.1.2 MIR PWR SUP/DIPOLE SUPPLY
> 283.2 25.3 308.5 11 3,115.6 278.3 3,393.9
S-121 1.1.3.1.1 MIR PWR SUP/DIPOLE SUPPLY === ===== ==== =====
> 1 3,355.9 820.9 4,176.7
S-147 1.1.4.1.1.1 MIR RF 53MHZ/POWER AMPLIFIERS
> 1,700.9 166.2 1,867.0 1 1,700.9 166.2 1,867.0
S-148 1.1.4.1.1.2 MIR RF 5)MHZ/ANODE SUPPLIES/MODULATORS
> 1,809.1 70.5 1,879.5 1 1,809.1 70.5 1,879.5
177 1.1.4.1.1.3 MIR RF 53MHZ/LOW LEVEL
> 11.3 14.5 25.8 1 11.3 14.5 25.8
178 1.1.4.1.1.4 MIR RF 53MHZ/TRANSMISSION LINE
> 200.5 35.9 236.5 1 200.5 35.9 236.5
179 1.1.4,1.1.6 MIR RF 53MHZ/H=588 CAVITIES
> 27.0 12.3 39.3 1 27.0 12.3 39.3
S-122 1.1.4.1.1 MIR RF 53 MHZ === ===== ==== =====
> 1 3,748.8 299.4 4,048.2
180 1.1.4.1.2.1 COAL/RF CAVITIES
> 0.0 7.1 7.1 1 0.0 7.1 7.1
181 1.1.4.1.2.4 COAL/TRANSMISSION LINE RF
> 20.2 2.8 23.0 1 20.2 2.8 23.0
S-123 1.1.4.1.2 COALESCING SYSTEM === === == ===
> 1 20.2 9.9 30.1
188 1.1.6.1.1.1 MIR 8 GEV PROT INJ/KICKER MAGNET
> 92.0 128.9 220.9 1 92.0 128.9 220.9
189 1.1.6.1.1.2 MIR 8 GEV PROT INJ/POWER SUPPLY
> 273.2 63.8 337.0 1 273.2 63.8 337.0
S-124 1.1.6.1.1 8 GEV PROT INJ KICKER === ==== ==== ====
> 1 365.2 192.7 557.8
190 1.1.6.1.2.1 8 GEV PBAR INJ/KICKER MAGNET
> 140.0 61.2 201.2 1 140.0 61.2 201.2
191 1.1.6.1.2.2 8 GEV PBAR INJ/KICKER POWER SUPPLY
> 198.0 104.7 302.7 1 198.0 104.7 302.7
S-125 1.1.6.1.2 8 GEV PBAR INJECTION KICKER === ==== ==== ====
> 1 338.0 165.9 503.9
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11:19:58 LEVEL 6 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
194 1.1.6.1.4.1 150 GEV PBAR EXT/KICKER MAGNET
> 0.0 18.3 18.3 1 0.0 18.3 18.3
195 1.1.6.1.4.2 150 GEV PBAR EXT/KICKER POWER SUPPLY
> 28.0 37.4 65.4 1 28.0 37.4 65.4
S-127 1.1.6.1.4 MIR 150 GEV PBAR EXT KICKER == === === ===
> 1 28.0 55.8 83.8
196 1.1.6.1.5.1 PROT ABORT KICKER MAGNET
> 10.0 21.9 31.9 1 10.0 21.9 31.9
197 1.1.6.1.5.2 PROT ABORT KICKER POWER SUPPLY
> 198.9 41.3 240.2 1 198.9 41.3 240.2
S-128 1.1.6.1.5 MIR EXT PROTON ABORT KICKER === ==== === ====
> 1 208.9 63.1 272.0
201 1.1.6.3.1.1 TEV 150 GEV PROT INJ KICKER
> 36.0 15.3 51.3 1 36.0 15.3 51.3
202 1.1.6.3.1.2 TEV 150 GEV PROT INJ KICKER POWER SUPPLY
> 13.0 26.9 39.9 1 13.0 26.9 39.9
S-129 1.1.6.3.1 TEV 150 GEV PROT INJ KICKER === === === ===
> 1 49.0 42.2 91.2
204 1.1.6.3.2.2 TEV 150 GEV PBAR INJ KICKER POWER SUPPLY
> 13.0 26.9 39.9 1 13.0 26.9 39.9
S-130 1.1.6.3.2 TEV 150 GEV PBAR INJ KICKER === === === ===
> 1 13.0 26.9 39.9
266 1.1.12.1.1.1 MIR WATER SYS/POND PUMP SYSTEM
> 154.5 71.5 226.0 1 154.5 71.5 226.0
267 1.1.12.1.1.2 MIR WATER SYS/HEAT EXCHANGE
> 525.0 17.1 542.1 1 525.0 17.1 542.1
261 1.1.12.1.1.3 MIR WATER SYS/LCW PROCESSING
> 256.3 130.2 386.5 1 256.3 130.2 386.5
269 1.1.12.1.1.4 MIR WATER SYS/LCW PUMP SYSTEM
> 316.0 57.1 373.1 1 316.0 57.1 373.1
270 1.1.12.1.1.5 MIR WATER SYS/LCW PIPING
> 1,445.1 928.8 2,373.9 1 1,445.1 928.8 2,373.9
271 1.1.12.1.1.6 RF-95 DEG LCW/HEAT EX & PUMP SYS
> 265.0 31.9 297.0 1 265.0 31.9 297.0
272 1.1.12.1.1.7 RF-95 DEG LCW/PROCESSING
> 92.8 35.0 127.8 1 92.8 35.0 127.8
273 1.1.12.1.1.8 RF-95 DEG LCW/PIPING
> 248.8 193.4 442.2 1 248.8 193.4 442.2
274 1.1.12.1.1.9 RP-55 DEG LCW/PROCESSING
> 73.0 31.7 104.7 1 73.0 31.7 104.7
275 1.1.12.1.1.10 RP-55 DEG LCW/HEAT EX & PUMP SYS
> 44.4 29.7 74.1 1 44.4 29.7 74.1
276 1.1.12.1.1.11 RP-55 DEG LCW/CHILLEP LCW PIPING
> 128.9 101.9 230.8 1 128.9 101.9 230.8
S-131 1.1.12.1.1 MIR INSTALL WATER SYSTEM === ====== ===== =====
> 1 3,549.8 1,628.4 5,178.2
279 1.1.12.1.3.1 MIR ABORT/BEAM PUMP SYSTEM
> 107.0 33.5 140.5 1 107.0 33.5 140.5
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11:19:58 LEVEL 6 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
281 1.1.12.10.1.1 BML WATER SYS/PONP PUMP SYSTEM
> 40.4 17.4 57.8 1 40.4 17.4 57.8
282 1.1.12.10.1.2 BML WATER SYS/HEAT EXCHANGER
> 91.5 7.8 99.3 1 91.5 7.8 99.3
283 1.1.12.10.1.3 BML WATER SYS/LCW PROCESSING
> 87.0 39.9 127.0 1 87.0 39.9 127.0
284 1.1.12.10.1.4 BML WATER SYS/LCW PUMP SYSTEMS
> 74.8 26.9 101.7 1 74.8 26.9 101.7
285 1.1.12.10.1.5 BML WATER SYS/LCW PIPING
> 277.2 201.3 478.6 1 277.2 201.3 478.6
S-134 1.1.12.10.1 BML WATER SYSTEMS === ==== ==== ====
> 1 571.0 293.4 864.4
293 1.1.13.1.1.1 MIR/INSTALL MAGNET STANDS
> l,062.3 34.7 1,097.0 1 l,062.3 34.7 1,097.0
294 1.1.13.1.1.2 MIR/INSTALL MAGNETS
> 195.0 396.0 591.0 1 195.0 396.0 591.0
295 1.1.13.1.1.3 MIR/SURVEY , ALIGN MAGNETS
> 16.5 331.2 347.7 1 16.5 331.2 347.7
296 1.1.13.1.1.4 OLD MR MAGNET REMOVAL
> 2.2 202.8 205.0 1 2.2 202.8 205.0
S-136 1.1.13.1.1 MIR MAGNET INSTALLATION === ===== ==== =====
> 1 1,276.0 964.7 2,240.7
304 1.1.13.1.6.1 MIR ABORT STAND INSTALLATION
> 14.9 1.0 15.9 1 14.9 1.0 15.9
305 1.1.13.1.6.2 MIR ABORT MAGNETS INSTALLATION
> 0.0 8.7 8.7 1 0.0 8.7 8.7
S-138 1.1.13.1.6 MIR ABORT INSTALLATION === === === ===
> 1 14.9 9.8 24.7
309 1.1.13.2.1.1 8 GEV LINE/INSTALL MAGNET STANDS
> 87.3 8.8 96.1 1 87.3 8.8 96.1
310 1.1.13.2.1.2 8 GEV LINE/INSTALL MAGNETS
> 19.9 47.8 67.7 1 19.9 47.8 67.7
311 1.1.13.2.1.3 8 GEV LINE/8URVEY & ALIGN MAGNETS
> 7.8 135.9 143.7 1 7.8 135.9 143.7
S-140 1.1.13.2.1 8 GEV LINE/SURVEY & ALIGN MAGNETS === ==== ==== ====
> 1 115.0 192.5 307.5
315 1.1.13.3.1.1 150 GEV PROT LINE/INSTALL MAGNET STANDS
> 167.2 5.7 172.9 1 167.2 5.7 172.9
316 1.1.13.3.1.2 150 GEV PROT LINE/INSTALL MAGNET8
> 0.0 67.8 67.8 1 0.0 67.8 67.8
333 1.1.13.6.1.1 SLOW SPILL/INSTALL MAGNET STANDS
> 28.0 2.3 30.3 1 28.0 2.3 30.3
334 1.1.13.6.1.2 SLOW SPILL/INSTALL MAGNETS
> 0.0 12.1 12.1 1 0.0 12.1 12.1
340 1.1.13.7.2.1 MIR/F0 COMPONENT REMOVAL
> 0.0 13.9 13.9 1 0.0 13.9 13.9
173 1.1.4.1.1.1.1 MIR RF 53MHZ/200KW POWER AMPLIFIERS
> 41.9 6.5 55.4 15 733.4 97.4 830.1
174 1.1.4.1.1.1.2 MIR RF 53MHZ/4KWATT SOLID STATE AMP
> 64.5 4.6 69.1 15 967.5 61.1 1,036.3
S-147 1.1.4.1.1.1 MIR RF 53MHZ/POWER AMPLIFIERS === ===== ==== =====
> 1 1,700.9 166.2 1,867.0
MAIN INJECTOR FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY - B
PRINTED 27-MAR-98 11:19:58 LEVEL 7 SUMMARY - DIRECT COST
DETAIL WBS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL QUANT MAT\'L LABOR GRAND
PAGE# DESCRIPTION K\$ K\$ K\$ REQ\'D K\$ K\$ TOT K\$
175 1.1.4.1.1.2.1 MIR RF 53MHZ/ANODE SUPPLIES
> 111.5 27.5 916.0 1 111.5 27.5 916.0
176 1.1.4.1.1.2.2 MIR RF 53MHZ/MODULATORS
> 920.6 43.0 963.5 1 920.6 43.0 963.5
S-148 1.1.4.1.1.2 MIR RF 53MHZ/ANODE SUPPLIES/MODULATORS === ===== ===
=====
> 1 1,109.1 70.5 1,879.5
| en |
all-txt-docs | 429803 | This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-05-540
entitled 'Military Transformation: Actions Needed by DOD to More
Clearly Identify New Triad Spending and Develop a Long-term Investment
Approach' which was released on June 30, 2005.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility.
Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data
integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features, such
as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed
at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are
provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of
the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an
exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your
feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or
accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
Report to the Subcommittee on Strategic Forces, Committee on Armed
Services, House of Representatives:
June 2005:
Military Transformation:
Actions Needed by DOD to More Clearly Identify New Triad Spending and
Develop a Long-term Investment Approach:
GAO-05-540:
GAO Highlights:
Highlights of GAO-05-540, a report to the Subcommittee on Strategic
Forces, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives:
Why GAO Did This Study:
In its December 2001 Nuclear Posture Review, the Department of Defense
(DOD) created a New Triad by significantly changing its definition and
conceptual framework for its strategic capabilities to include not only
the nuclear capabilities of the old Triad that consisted of
intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic
missiles, and strategic bombers, but also the capabilities of offensive
conventional strike forces, active and passive defenses, and a
revitalized defense infrastructure (see figure).
GAO was asked to determine the extent to which DOD has (1) identified
the projected spending for the New Triad in its Future Years Defense
Program (FYDP) and (2) developed a long term investment approach to
identify and manage future spending for the New Triad.
What GAO Found:
Although DOD broadened its definition of strategic capabilities during
the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review and established a New Triad, it has not
developed a way to use the FYDP to identify the total amount it plans
to spend to sustain and enhance New Triad capabilities during the next
few years. The FYDP is one of the principal tools available to help
inform DOD and Congress about spending plans for the next 5 years and
to make informed decisions in light of competing priorities. While DOD
has identified some New Triad spending included in the FYDP, it has not
identified all associated spending. GAOs notional analysis of New
Triad-related programs in the FYDP through 2009 shows that overall
spending could be significantly greater than DODs limited analyses
have identified to date. According to DOD officials, DOD has not fully
identified spending in the FYDP because of the diversity and broad
scope of the concept. A mechanism for aggregating FYDP data, known as a
virtual major force program, could help DOD address these obstacles
and provide the Secretary of Defense and Congress with better
visibility into overall DOD spending plans for the New Triad.
DOD also faces long-term affordability challenges in funding the New
Triad. However, it has not developed an overarching and integrated long-
term investment approach to identify the projected resource
requirements and funding timelines to acquire and sustain New Triad
capabilities beyond the period of time covered by FYDP. Long-term
capital investment planning is an important tool to help organizations
establish priorities and develop future budgets. DOD is likely to face
significant affordability challenges in the long term in deciding the
mix of nuclear and conventional capabilities needed to implement the
vision of the New Triad, as existing nuclear weapons platforms begin to
reach the end of their lives within the next 15 years and missile
defense capabilities are expanding. While DOD has identified some near-
term investments, its investment plans are incomplete and it lacks a
comprehensive strategy for developing a long-term plan.
Transformation of U.S. Strategic Capabilities:
[See PDF for image]
[End of figure]
What GAO Recommends:
GAO recommends that DOD take actions designed to provide greater
visibility of the projected spending and future investments for DODs
efforts to create the New Triad and acquire future capabilities.
Although GAO requested them, DOD did not provide comments by the time
the final report went to print.
www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-05-540.
To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on
the link above. For more information, contact Janet St. Laurent at
(202) 512-4402 or stlaurentj@gao.gov.
[End of section]
Contents:
Letter:
Results in Brief:
Background:
DOD Has Not Fully Identified Projected New Triad Spending in the FYDP:
DOD Lacks an Overarching and Integrated Long-term Investment Approach
for Acquiring and Sustaining New Triad Capabilities:
Conclusions:
Recommendations for Executive Action:
Agency Comments:
Appendixes:
Appendix I: U.S. Strategic Command Missions:
Appendix II: Scope and Methodology:
Appendix III: GAO's Notional Analysis of the Programs and Projected
Spending on the New Triad in the Future Years Defense Program:
Appendix IV: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments:
Tables:
Table 1: New Triad Weapons Systems and Capabilities:
Table 2: GAO Notional Analysis of Projected Spending for New Triad
Program Elements in the FYDP for Fiscal Years 2004-2009:
Table 3: U.S. Strategic Command Missions:
Table 4: GAO's Categorization of New Triad-Related FYDP Program
Elements:
Table 5: Projected Spending for the New Triad by Major Force Program
Category, Fiscal Years 2004 through 2009:
Figures:
Figure 1: The New Triad:
Figure 2: Comparison of New Triad-Related Program Elements Identified
in DOD and GAO Analyses:
Figure 3: Projected Spending for the New Triad by Primary Appropriation
Category, Fiscal Years 2004 through 2009:
Figure 4: Projected Spending for the New Triad by DOD Organizations,
Fiscal Years 2004 through 2009:
Abbreviations:
DOD: Department of Defense:
FYDP: Future Years Defense Program:
JCIDS: Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System:
Letter June 30, 2005:
The Honorable Terry Everett:
Chairman:
The Honorable Silvestre Reyes:
Ranking Member:
Strategic Forces Subcommittee:
Committee on Armed Services:
House of Representatives:
In its December 2001 Nuclear Posture Review,[Footnote 1] the Department
of Defense (DOD) presented a conceptual framework for transforming U.S.
strategic capabilities.[Footnote 2] The review proposed that the United
States move away from depending heavily on nuclear weapons and instead
bring together the capabilities of nuclear and conventional offensive
strike forces, active and passive defenses, and a revitalized defense
infrastructure, to create a New Triad to achieve the desired strategic
effects. Enhanced command and control, planning, and intelligence
capabilities would also support the New Triad. The review stated that
the synergism achieved through the integration of nuclear and
conventional offensive strike and defensive capabilities would provide
the President and Secretary of Defense with a broad array of military
options to better address the spectrum of potential opponents and
contingencies that may arise in the coming decades.
The 2001 Nuclear Posture Review also concluded that new defense
initiatives and investments would be required to transform U.S.
strategic capabilities and realize the full potential of the New Triad.
The Future Years Defense Program (FYDP), a DOD centralized report
consisting of thousands of program elements[Footnote 3] that provides
information on DOD's current and planned out year budget requests, is
one of DOD's principal tools to manage the spending for its
transformation of strategic capabilities. The FYDP provides visibility
over DOD's projected spending and helps inform DOD and Congress about
resource data relating to identifying priorities and trade-offs.
DOD is transforming its strategic capabilities at a time when it is
also faced with fiscal challenges brought about by ongoing military
operations and other major initiatives to transform the way it prepares
to fight and win wars. In our February 2005 report entitled 21st
Century Challenges: Reexamining the Base of Government, we concluded
that the magnitude of funding and potential for current investments and
operations to turn into long-term financial commitments are prompting
real questions about the affordability and sustainability of the rate
of growth in defense spending.[Footnote 4] We also observed that the
role, size, and structure of forces and capabilities comprising the
strategic triad are key issues that may need to be assessed in view of
the new security and fiscal environment.
At your request, we reviewed the progress made by DOD in determining
and allocating resources needed to implement the New Triad today and in
the future. Specifically, you asked us to determine the extent to which
DOD has (1) identified the projected spending for the New Triad in its
FYDP and (2) developed a long-term investment approach to identify and
manage future investments needed to achieve the synergistic
capabilities envisioned for the New Triad.
To obtain information on DOD's efforts to identify projected spending
and develop future investment strategies for the New Triad, we reviewed
documents and interviewed officials in the Office of the Secretary of
Defense, the Joint Staff, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Marine Corps
headquarters, and the U.S. Strategic Command. We also conducted a
notional analysis to identify projected spending for the New Triad by
analyzing resource data for program elements related to the New Triad
included in the FYDP prepared to support the President's fiscal year
2005 budget submission to Congress. The results of our notional
analysis are not meant to provide a definite accounting of the
projected New Triad spending included in the FYDP but rather to
illustrate an approach that could be used to align the concepts and
capabilities of the New Triad with program elements in the
FYDP.[Footnote 5] We did not analyze resource data from the FYDP
prepared to support the President's fiscal year 2006 budget submission
because the data were not yet available during our review. In
conducting our analysis, we determined that the automated FYDP data
were sufficiently reliable for meeting our objectives. Additionally, we
compared DOD's investment planning actions for the New Triad against
the best practices identified for leading capital decision making to
determine the extent that DOD has followed these practices. We
conducted our review from December 2003 through April 2005 in
accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. See
appendix II for a more complete description of our scope and
methodology.
Results in Brief:
Although DOD established its New Triad in 2001, it has not developed a
way to fully identify projected spending for New Triad programs in its
FYDP. In light of the challenges DOD faces in transforming strategic
capabilities in the current fiscal environment, decision makers need to
have the best and most complete data available about the resources
being allocated to the New Triad. Although DOD has identified some
spending related to the New Triad in the FYDP, our notional analysis of
such spending included in the FYDP through 2009 indicates that overall
spending for the New Triad could be much greater than DOD's limited
analyses have identified. DOD has not fully identified New Triad
spending because the diversity and scope of the New Triad and ambiguity
of the concept make it difficult for DOD officials to reach agreement
on a complete list of programs, according to DOD officials.
Additionally, the current FYDP structure does not readily identify and
aggregate New Triad spending. A mechanism to aggregate FYDP spending,
known as a "virtual major force program," has been used by DOD to
identify space funding and could be beneficial in tracking New Triad
funding, according to some DOD officials including the Commander of the
U.S. Strategic Command. Without some mechanism to aggregate funding
associated with the New Triad, DOD will be limited in its ability to
guide and integrate New Triad spending.
Despite the long lead time generally needed to develop and acquire new
systems and the need to consider long-term affordability issues, DOD
has not developed an overarching and integrated long-term investment
approach for acquiring new capabilities and replacing some or all of
its aging systems that provide New Triad capabilities. Best practices
show that long-term capital planning is needed to help organizations
define direction, establish priorities, and plan future budgets. While
DOD has identified some near-term investments, its investment plans are
incomplete because some key capabilities for the New Triad have not
been fully assessed in context of the New Triad and long-term
replacement of key platforms have not been assessed in the context of
the new security environment and DOD-wide affordability challenges.
Although DOD recognizes the need for a long-term investment approach,
it has not begun to develop one because its concepts for nonnuclear
strike and missile defense are not fully mature. However, delaying the
preparation of a long-term investment approach puts DOD at risk of not
developing an affordable strategy. Additionally, DOD and Congress will
not have sufficient information to effectively determine future
investment costs, the priorities, and trade-offs needed to sustain New
Triad implementation. While we agree that some concepts are continuing
to evolve, and that new systems are still under development, we do not
believe that these circumstances preclude DOD from beginning to plan
for the future of the New Triad. As new information becomes available,
we would expect to see adjustments in DOD's plans-that is the nature of
long-term planning.
We are making recommendations designed to provide greater visibility of
the projected spending and future investments for DOD's efforts to
create the New Triad and acquire future capabilities. On April 28,
2005, we provided a draft of this report to DOD for review and comment.
As of the time this report went to final printing, DOD had not provided
comments as requested.
Background:
In its 2001 Nuclear Posture Review, DOD significantly expanded the
range of strategic capabilities to include not only the old Triad,
which consisted of nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles,
submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and strategic bombers, but also
conventional and nonkinetic offensive strike and defensive
capabilities. The review also called for revitalizing the U.S. research
and development and industrial infrastructure that would develop,
build, and maintain offensive forces and defensive systems and be
capable of responding in a timely manner to augment U.S. military
capabilities when necessary. According to DOD, the three legs of the
New Triad-offensive strike, active and passive defenses, and responsive
infrastructure-are intended to be supported by timely and accurate
intelligence, adaptive planning, and enhanced command and control
capabilities. Figure 1 shows the three legs of the New Triad and its
supporting elements.
Figure 1: The New Triad:
[See PDF for image]
Note: ICBMs = intercontinental ballistic missiles; SLBMs = submarine-
launched ballistic missiles.
[End of figure]
DOD concluded in the 2001 review that while nuclear weapons will
continue to play a critical role in defending the United States, the
combination of capabilities included in the New Triad would increase
the military options available to the President and Secretary of
Defense and allow for the development of responsive, adaptive, and
interoperable joint forces that could be employed in a wider range of
contingencies. DOD's review indicated that the additional capabilities
provided by the New Triad would partially mitigate the effects of any
reductions in the number of operationally deployed strategic nuclear
warheads that are planned through 2012.[Footnote 6] Table 1 shows the
weapons systems and capabilities that make up the New Triad.
Table 1: New Triad Weapons Systems and Capabilities:
Leg: Offensive strategic strike;
Element: Nuclear strike;
Weapon system or capability:
* Intercontinental ballistic missiles;
* Submarine- launched ballistic missiles;
* Strategic bombers;
* Nuclear-armed sea- launched cruise missiles (held in reserve).
Element: Nonnuclear strike;
Weapon system or capability:
* Advanced conventional weapon systems;
* Offensive information operations;
* Special operations forces.
Leg: Defenses;
Element: Active defense;
Weapon system or capability:
* Ballistic missile defenses;
* Air defenses.
Element: Passive defense;
Weapon system or capability: Measures that:
* Reduce vulnerability through mobility, dispersal, redundancy,
deception, concealment, and hardening;
* Warn of imminent attack;
* Support consequence management activities.
Leg: Responsive infrastructure;
Element: Research and development and industrial infrastructure;
Weapon system or capability:
* Research facilities;
* Manufacturing capacity;
* Skilled personnel.
Element: Elements that support the New Triad:
* Adaptive planning;
* Enhanced command and control;
* Timely and accurate intelligence.
Source: Annual Defense Report to the President and the Congress, 2002,
Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense.
[End of table]
In its 2001 Nuclear Posture Review, DOD indicates that new initiatives
and investments would be required to achieve a mix of new or improved
capabilities that compose the offensive, defensive, and responsive
infrastructure legs and supporting command and control, intelligence,
and adaptive planning elements of the New Triad. In particular, the
review found that major investment initiatives would be needed in the
areas of advanced nonnuclear strike, missile defenses, command and
control, and intelligence. DOD also plans to improve existing New Triad-
related capabilities by modernizing existing weapon systems and
enhancing the tools used to build and execute strike plans to provide
more flexibility in adapting or developing military options during
crises. An Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics official in the
Office of the Secretary of Defense told us that DOD intends to
partially address near-term affordability issues for the New Triad by
enhancing capability characteristics of current weapon systems, such as
range, and leveraging capabilities already in development. In March
2003, DOD published a Nuclear Posture Review Implementation Plan that
is intended to identify initiatives for developing the New Triad and
institutionalizing the Nuclear Posture Review.[Footnote 7] DOD plans to
implement the New Triad concept and many of the capabilities identified
by the Nuclear Posture Review by 2012. However, DOD states that further
investments are likely to be needed beyond that time frame as existing
nuclear platforms age, such as the Minuteman III intercontinental
ballistic missile system,[Footnote 8] and follow-on nuclear weapon
systems are proposed.
The Nuclear Posture Review also states that DOD should conduct periodic
assessments to determine its progress in developing and integrating
capabilities for the New Triad. Specifically, these strategic
capability assessments are to review the (1) progress to date in
reducing the number of operationally deployed strategic nuclear
weapons, (2) state of the security environment, and (3) progress made
in the development of the New Triad. An assessment team, which included
representatives from DOD and the Department of Energy, completed its
first Nuclear Posture Review strategic capability assessment and
associated report in April 2005. An Office of the Secretary of Defense
official told us that DOD plans to update its first assessment in the
fall of 2005 to support the department's conduct of the Quadrennial
Defense Review. DOD intends to conduct subsequent assessments about
every 2 years through 2012.
Many DOD organizations, including the Joint Staff, military services,
combatant commands, and defense agencies, and the Department of Energy,
have responsibilities for implementing various aspects of the New
Triad. These responsibilities are broadly defined in relevant New Triad
implementation and guidance documents. Within the Office of the
Secretary of Defense, two organizations have key responsibilities for
overseeing and managing the New Triad implementation efforts:
* The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy is
responsible for developing the policy and guidance to implement the
2001 Nuclear Posture Review and for establishing an organizational
framework for coordinating New Triad initiatives within DOD.
* The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology and Logistics is responsible for providing oversight for the
development and deployment of New Triad capabilities.
The U.S. Strategic Command also has a significant role in implementing
the New Triad and supporting its missions. In addition to its
responsibilities for strategic nuclear deterrence and military space
operations missions, the command was assigned several new missions
related to the New Triad in January 2003. These missions are: global
strike; integrated missile defense; DOD information operations; and
command, control, communications, computers, intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance. In January 2005, the Secretary of
Defense also assigned the command responsibility for the mission of
combating weapons of mass destruction. Appendix I provides additional
information about the U.S. Strategic Command's missions.
Additionally, the Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation in the
Office of the Secretary of Defense is responsible for assembling and
distributing the FYDP, which DOD uses to formulate the estimated
projected resources and proposed appropriations to support DOD
programs, projects, and activities, including those related to the New
Triad. The office is also responsible for coordinating with DOD
components any proposed changes to the FYDP's structure, such as
updates to existing program element titles and definitions. The Office
of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) has responsibility for
the annual budget justification material that is presented to Congress.
These offices work collaboratively to ensure that the data presented in
the budget justification material and the FYDP are equivalent at the
appropriation account level.
The FYDP is a report that resides in an automated database, which is
updated and published at least 3 times a year to coincide with DOD's
internal budget development activities and annual budget submission to
Congress. It provides projections of DOD's near and midterm funding
needs and reflects the total resources programmed by DOD, by fiscal
year. The FYDP includes data on estimates for the fiscal year reflected
in the current budget request and at least 4 subsequent years.[Footnote
9] Both detailed data and a summary report are generally provided to
Congress with DOD's annual budget submission.
The FYDP is used as a source of data both for analysis and as an input
to alternative ways of displaying and portraying actual and programmed
resources. It contains data related to the forces, manpower, and total
obligation authority for each program element. The FYDP is organized
into 11 major force program categories, comprising combat forces and
support programs, which are used as a basis for internal DOD program
review. The major force program categories include strategic forces,
general-purpose forces, research and development, and special
operations forces. The FYDP is further arranged according to the
appropriation structure utilized by Congress to review budget requests
and enact appropriations, which includes major appropriation categories
for procurement; operation and maintenance; military personnel;
research, development, test, and evaluation; and military construction.
Therefore, the FYDP's structure serves the purpose of crosswalking
DOD's internal review structure with the congressional review
structure.
In 2003, DOD began implementing the Joint Capabilities Integration and
Development System (JCIDS) process to identify improvements to existing
capabilities and guide development of new capabilities from a joint
perspective that recognizes the need for trade-off analysis. The new
process is designed to provide an approach to defense planning that
looks at the broad range of capabilities to address contingencies that
the United States may confront in the future. When fully implemented,
JCIDS is intended to provide an enhanced methodology utilizing joint
concepts that will identify and describe existing or future
shortcomings in capabilities and identify integrated solutions that
meet those capability needs. The system is also expected to provide
better linkage to the acquisition process and improve prioritization of
validated joint warfighting capability proposals. Specifically, it is
intended to provide a broader review of proposals than did the previous
planning process by involving additional participants, including the
combatant commands, early in the process. The analyses conducted during
the process are to result in a set of potential solutions, including
additional resources or changes to doctrine and training designed to
correct capability shortcomings. These solutions are then incorporated
into roadmaps that show the resource strategies to develop and acquire
the needed capabilities.
DOD Has Not Fully Identified Projected New Triad Spending in the FYDP:
DOD has not fully identified the projected spending for New Triad in
the FYDP to date. In light of the challenges DOD faces in transforming
strategic capabilities, decision makers need to have the best and most
complete data available about the resources being allocated to the New
Triad in making decisions on the affordability, sustainability, and
trade-offs among the efforts to develop and acquire capabilities. The
FYDP is one of the principal tools available to help inform DOD and
Congress about resource data relating to these efforts. While DOD has
identified some New Triad spending in its analyses and in relevant New
Triad documents, our notional analysis of New Triad-related program
elements indicates that overall projected spending for the New Triad
through fiscal year 2009 could be much greater when other program
elements that provide New Triad capabilities are considered.
Additionally, the current FYDP data structure does not expressly
identify and aggregate New Triad program elements that would allow
identification of New Triad spending, and the program elements included
in the FYDP's existing major force program category for strategic
forces do not fully capture the broader range of strategic capabilities
that were envisioned in the Nuclear Posture Review. DOD does not plan
to develop a complete and approved inventory of New Triad-related
program elements in its FYDP because DOD officials believe that it is
difficult to reach agreement on the program elements to be included in
such an inventory. However, an inventory of New Triad-related program
elements that provides a more complete and clear identification of the
projected spending currently planned for the New Triad could help DOD
and Congress make decisions on the affordability and spending needed
for programs to develop and acquire New Triad capabilities.
DOD Has Not Fully Aligned Projected Spending with New Triad
Capabilities:
While DOD has identified some program elements related to the New Triad
in documents and internal reviews, it still has not fully identified
projected spending associated with the New Triad. DOD documents related
to the New Triad, including the Nuclear Posture Review, the Nuclear
Posture Review Implementation Plan, and the Secretary of Defense's
fiscal year 2002 Annual Defense Report to the President and the
Congress, broadly describe the capabilities of the New Triad and
indicate the range and types of activities and weapon systems that
provide these capabilities. DOD has also identified and directed
resources for some New Triad programs. For example, as the Nuclear
Posture Review was being completed in late 2001, DOD issued guidance
for preparing its fiscal year 2003 budget that identified 12
initiatives that were considered key to developing the New Triad, such
as programs to provide capabilities to defeat hard and deeply buried
targets.[Footnote 10]
In anticipation of a potential requirement to identify New Triad
program elements in the FYDP, DOD's Office of Program Analysis and
Evaluation conducted an analysis in 2003 that identified a list of 188
FYDP program elements, which accounted for about $186.7 billion in then-
year dollars of projected spending for fiscal years 2004 through
2009.[Footnote 11] The office identified another $17.4 billion for
programs and activities that are not readily identifiable in the
FYDP,[Footnote 12] bringing the total to about $204.1 billion. However,
Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation officials told us that the
analysis included only those program elements that supported the
initiatives identified in DOD's programming guidance or otherwise
clearly provide New Triad capabilities. The officials said that the
list of programs identified in this analysis was never agreed upon and
approved within DOD and there are no current plans to update the
analysis.
Office of the Secretary of Defense officials told us that the team
conducting the first strategic capability assessment for the New Triad
performed a subsequent survey of current program elements in the FYDP
to determine the capabilities these program elements would provide for
the New Triad by 2012. An Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation
official said that the survey included all of the program elements on
their list. However, the official did not know whether the survey
identified any additional program elements.
In addition to DOD's projected spending in the FYDP for the New Triad,
the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration
identified $41.7 billion for nuclear weapons activities for fiscal
years 2004 through 2009 in its Future Years Nuclear Security Program
prepared for the fiscal year 2005 President's budget submission. This
agency is responsible for maintaining the infrastructure to support
nuclear weapons capabilities, including the refurbishment and service-
life extension of currently deployed nuclear warheads.
New Triad Spending Could be Much Greater Than DOD Has Currently
Identified:
DOD's analyses of FYDP program elements did not include many of the
program elements that make up several capabilities identified for the
New Triad in the Nuclear Posture Review, such as special operations and
intelligence, or those that provide capabilities that are needed to
perform New Triad missions but also have wider military applications.
If these additional program elements are considered, the overall
projected spending for the New Triad could be much greater than DOD has
currently identified in New Triad-related documents and in either of
the analyses conducted by its Office of Program Evaluation and Analysis
or strategic capability assessment team.
We conducted a notional analysis to identify any additional spending
for New Triad-related program elements included in the FYDP. Our
notional analysis considered a broader range of FYDP program elements
than either of the analyses conducted by DOD's Office of Program
Evaluation and Analysis or strategic capability assessment team and
included many elements that provide capabilities for conducting New
Triad missions, but also have wider military applications, such as
communications, intelligence, and special operations program elements.
Using available DOD definitions of New Triad capabilities, we reviewed
each of the FYDP's 4,725 program elements to determine to what extent
the elements provided capabilities needed for New Triad missions. We
further distinguished the program elements we identified as being fully
dedicated to the missions of the New Triad or not fully dedicated to
the New Triad because the capabilities provided by these latter program
elements could be used in a wider range of military applications than
just for the New Triad.
Compared to the 188 program elements and $204.1 billion in then-year
spending for fiscal years 2004 through 2009 identified by the Office of
Program Analysis and Evaluation, our notional analysis identified a
total of 737 program elements in the FYDP that are aligned with New
Triad capabilities, with a total associated spending of $360.1 billion
over the same period, or about $156.0 billion more than the DOD
analysis.[Footnote 13] Of the 737 program elements that we identified,
385 program elements provide capabilities that would be fully dedicated
to New Triad missions, such as program elements for weapons of mass
destruction defense technologies and for the Joint Theater Air and
Missile Defense Organization. The other 352 program elements we
identified provide capabilities, such as special operations, that would
be used in conducting New Triad missions but could also be used for
other military missions. Figure 2 shows the number of New Triad program
elements identified by the Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation
and the number of additional program elements identified in GAO's
analysis.
Figure 2: Comparison of New Triad-Related Program Elements Identified
in DOD and GAO Analyses:
[See PDF for image]
[A] In its analysis, the Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation
determined that the capabilities provided by about 7 of the 188 program
elements it had identified, or 4 percent, were not fully dedicated to
the New Triad. However, using the criteria we developed for our
analysis, we determined that all 188 program elements were fully
dedicated.
[End of figure]
Of the $360.1 billion we identified in projected spending for the New
Triad, $231.8 billion was for programs that are fully dedicated to the
New Triad and $128.3 billion for programs that are not fully
dedicated.[Footnote 14] As table 2 shows, we broke out the spending
into the New Triad's four capability areas-offensive strike; active and
passive defenses; responsive infrastructure; and command and control,
intelligence, and planning-and created a fifth area for program
elements that supported more than one capability area. Our notional
analysis shows that projected spending for offensive strike and
enhanced command and control, intelligence, and planning capability
areas almost doubles when program elements that are not fully dedicated
to the New Triad are included. The offensive strike capability area
represents the largest amount of the projected spending, $156.0 billion
in then-year dollars, and the command and control, intelligence, and
planning capability area is next with $108.0 billion in projected
spending. Together, these two capability areas account for 73 percent,
or about $264.0 billion, of the $360.1 billion total projected spending
identified in our analysis. Most of the $86.3 billion of projected
spending for the active and passive defenses capability area is in the
fully dedicated category. Appendix III provides additional information
on the results of our analysis.
Table 2: GAO Notional Analysis of Projected Spending for New Triad
Program Elements in the FYDP for Fiscal Years 2004-2009:
Total obligation authority in billions of then-year dollars.
New Triad capability areas: Offensive strike;
Projected spending for program elements fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $82.4;
Projected spending for program elements not fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $73.6;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $156.0.
New Triad capability areas: Active and passive defenses;
Projected spending for program elements fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $85.2;
Projected spending for program elements not fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $1.1;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $86.3.
New Triad capability areas: Responsive infrastructure[A];
Projected spending for program elements fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $1.3;
Projected spending for program elements not fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $0.1;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $1.4.
New Triad capability areas: Command and control, intelligence, and
planning;
Projected spending for program elements fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $56.6;
Projected spending for program elements not fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $51.4;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $108.0.
New Triad capability areas: Multiple capability areas[B];
Projected spending for program elements fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $6.3;
Projected spending for program elements not fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $2.1;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $8.5.
Total;
Projected spending for program elements fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $231.8;
Projected spending for program elements not fully dedicated to the New
Triad: $128.3;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $360.1.
Source: GAO analysis of DOD data.
Notes: Totals may not add due to rounding.
[A] Spending amounts do not include $41.7 billion from fiscal years
2004 through 2009 in the Department of Energy's Future Years Nuclear
Security Program for nuclear weapons activities.
[B] Projected spending associated with program elements that support
more than one New Triad capability area.
[End of table]
Officials with Program Analysis and Evaluation, Policy, and
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics in the Office of the Secretary
of Defense and the U.S. Strategic Command stated that the methodology
we used for our notional analysis was reasonable. Officials from the
Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation and from U.S. Strategic
Command told us that the program elements we identified were consistent
with the capabilities defined for the New Triad. Officials from the
Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation also said that our analysis
used a more systematic approach in identifying New Triad-related
program elements included in the FYDP than was followed in DOD's
analyses. The officials added that when they were compiling their own
analysis of New Triad-related program elements, many of the documents
that GAO used to identify relevant programs had not yet been published.
Therefore, while DOD did not include many program elements that are not
fully dedicated to the New Triad in their analyses, the officials told
us that it was not unreasonable to include those program elements in
our analysis. As our notional analysis shows, including these program
elements not only provides greater transparency of the projected
spending for the New Triad in the FYDP but also identifies many
additional program elements that provide capabilities necessary for
carrying out New Triad missions.
New Triad Spending Is Not Readily Identified in the FYDP's Structure:
While the FYDP is a report that provides DOD and Congress with a tool
for looking at future funding needs, the current FYDP structure does
not readily identify and aggregate New Triad-related program elements
to provide information on current and planned resource allocations-
including spending changes, priorities, and trends-for the New Triad.
In conducting our analysis of FYDP program elements, we observed that
DOD has not created any data fields in the FYDP's structure that would
expressly identify program elements as being relevant to the New Triad.
According to DOD Program Analysis and Evaluation officials, there is no
plan to modify the data fields in the FYDP structure to allow the ready
identification of New Triad program elements and associated spending
because they have not received direction to do so. Additionally, these
officials told us that if DOD were to modify the FYDP structure to
allow such identification, it would need to develop an approved list of
existing New Triad program elements to allow capture of these elements
in the data fields.
Additionally, as we have reported in the past, the FYDP's 11 major
force program categories have remained virtually unchanged since the
1960s.[Footnote 15] Our notional FYDP analysis indicates that the
FYDP's definition of the existing major force program for strategic
forces[Footnote 16]-one of the key major force program categories
associated with the New Triad- does not fully capture the projected New
Triad spending for the broader range of strategic capabilities that are
envisioned for the New Triad in the Nuclear Posture Review. We
determined that only $55.6 billion, or about 15 percent of the $360.1
billion of projected spending that we identified in our notional
analysis of FYDP program elements, is associated with the FYDP's
strategic forces major force program category, which largely captures
projected spending on offensive nuclear capabilities. The remaining
$304.6 billion is dispersed among the other 10 major force programs.
For example, program elements for the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff
Missile, which is an autonomous, stealthy, long-range, conventional,
air-to-ground, precision cruise missile designed to destroy high-value,
well-defended fixed or moveable targets, and the Patriot missile
defense system, which contributes to the defense leg of the New Triad,
are included in the FYDP's general- purpose forces major force program.
Similarly, intelligence-related program elements for hard and deeply
buried targets and to support U.S. Strategic Command are part of the
FYDP's command, control, communications, and intelligence major force
program.
In the past, DOD created new aggregations of program elements and
changed the FYDP's structure as decision makers needed information not
already captured in the FDYP. For example, a recent aggregation allows
data that relate to every dollar, person, and piece of equipment in the
FYDP to be identified as being in either a force or infrastructure
category. DOD has also made it possible to identify program elements in
the FYDP that are related to activities to capture the resources
associated with specific areas of interest, such as space activities.
In 2001, DOD established a "virtual major force program" for space to
increase the visibility of resources allocated for space activities.
This is a programming mechanism that aggregates most space-unique
funding by military department and function crosscutting DOD's 11
existing major force program categories.[Footnote 17] The Commander of
the U.S. Strategic Command, who has key responsibilities for
implementing the New Triad, told us that creating a virtual major force
program for the New Triad could help align New Triad capabilities with
the projected spending in the FYDP, identify responsible organizations,
reduce ambiguity of the New Triad concept, and provide better
visibility and focus for DOD efforts to develop and acquire New Triad
capabilities. The Commander suggested that it could be necessary to
create more than one virtual major force program, possibly one for each
of the New Triad legs, because of the diversity and scope of New Triad
capabilities. Some Office of the Secretary of Defense officials also
told us that creating a virtual major force program could provide
Congress with more visibility of DOD's efforts underway to develop the
capabilities needed for the New Triad. Until such time as a tool such
as a virtual major force program becomes available that can capture and
categorize the projected spending for the New Triad in the FYDP, we
believe that DOD will be limited in its ability to guide and direct all
its efforts to develop, acquire, and integrate New Triad capabilities
and Congress will not have full visibility of the resources being
allocated.
DOD Lacks a Plan to Fully Identify New Triad Spending:
DOD has not established a requirement to develop a complete and
approved list of the program elements included in the FYDP that are
associated with New Triad spending. Office of the Secretary of Defense
officials told us that DOD has not established such a requirement
because the diversity and scope of the New Triad make it difficult for
DOD officials to reach agreement on a complete list of programs. They
also told us that because the New Triad is an ambiguous concept, the
program elements included in such a list would change as the New Triad
evolves and becomes better defined.
However, without a complete and approved DOD list of New Triad program
elements included in the FYDP, there is some uncertainty about the
total range of programs and projected spending that are being pursued
to achieve New Triad capabilities. It also will be difficult for
Congress to assess DOD's progress in achieving the goals identified in
the Nuclear Posture Review without having complete information on the
resources being spent or needed in the future to meet those goals.
Additionally, the broad scope of the New Triad concept and large number
of organizations with New Triad-related spending responsibilities makes
it even more important to have complete information available on the
projected spending being provided for each of the New Triad capability
areas and for each of the many organizations developing and acquiring
New Triad capabilities. For example, our notional analysis identified
as many as 23 defense organizations, including the military services,
offices within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff,
several combatant commands, and defense agencies, with FYDP spending
related to the New Triad. Office of the Secretary of Defense officials
told us that having an approved program list would promote a common
understanding of the New Triad and benefit future department program
reviews. Additionally, an Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation
official told us that an approved program list would aid DOD in making
resource decisions for the New Triad. In preparing DOD's fiscal year
2006 budget, the official told us that an approved list of programs
would have made it easier to evaluate the effects of programming
changes proposed by the military services on capabilities being
acquired for the New Triad.
DOD Lacks an Overarching and Integrated Long-term Investment Approach
for Acquiring and Sustaining New Triad Capabilities:
While several New Triad documents and DOD's recent strategic capability
assessment identify investment needs through 2012, DOD's near-term
investment direction is incomplete. Additionally, DOD has not yet
developed an overarching and integrated long-term investment approach
to identify and plan investments needed to acquire and sustain
capabilities for the New Triad. A long-term investment approach is an
important tool in an organization's decision-making process to define
direction, establish priorities, assist with current and future
budgets, and plan the actions needed to achieve goals. Although DOD
recognizes the need for a long-term investment approach, it does not
plan to develop one until nonnuclear strike and missile defense
concepts are mature. DOD has not identified a specific date for when
this will occur. The new JCIDS process could complement any long-term
investment approach developed for the New Triad by providing additional
analysis and discussions to support New Triad investment and the
development of a plan.
Long-term Investment Approach Is a Useful Tool to Establish Priorities:
In our past reporting on leading capital decision-making
practices,[Footnote 18] we have determined that leading organizations
have decision-making processes in place to help them assess where they
should invest their resources for the greatest benefit over the long
term. These processes help an organization determine whether its
investments are the most cost effective, support its goals, and
consider alternatives before making a final selection. A long-term
investment approach is an important tool in an organization's decision-
making process to define direction, establish priorities, assist with
current and future budgets, and plan the actions needed to achieve
goals. Our analysis of several investment plans showed that such an
approach includes information on future investment requirements,
projected resources, investment priorities and trade-offs, milestones,
and funding timelines, and is intended to be a dynamic document, which
would be updated to adapt to changing circumstances.
In the past, DOD has developed and maintained long-term investment
planning documents for major defense capabilities-such as the Unmanned
Aerial Vehicles Roadmap 2002-2027 and the "Bomber Roadmap"-to provide
senior decision makers options in the development of broad strategies
that will define future DOD force structure and help with the resource
allocation process.[Footnote 19] In 2003, DOD also published an
Information Operations Roadmap, which supports collaboration of broad
information operations efforts and endorses the need for the department
to better track information operations investments.
DOD's Near-term Investment Direction for the New Triad Is Incomplete:
As noted earlier, Office of the Secretary of Defense officials told us
that New Triad documents-including the Nuclear Posture Review, Nuclear
Posture Review Implementation Plan, and the first strategic capability
assessment-identify some of the near-term investments needed to provide
capabilities for the New Triad. However, this investment direction is
incomplete and does not address long-term affordability challenges that
DOD may be faced with in sustaining and developing new capabilities to
implement the New Triad. Office of the Secretary of Defense officials
told us that the strategic capability assessment provides a near-term
investment approach by identifying priorities for focusing resources to
keep investment efforts on track to reach New Triad implementation
goals for 2012. According to the officials, the team conducting the
strategic capability assessment developed a list of capabilities that
were needed in key areas, such as strategic strike and missile defense,
from the Nuclear Posture Review's vision of the New Triad. The team
then reviewed current operation activities, acquisition programs of
record, and a potential range of new technologies to determine any
capability shortcomings. Based on this review, the assessment team was
able to determine whether initiatives to develop New Triad capabilities
in the key areas were (1) met or on track to be satisfied by 2012; (2)
on track, but would not be met by 2012; or (3) not on track to be met
by 2012 unless additional funding was provided. Office of the Secretary
of Defense officials told us that by determining the status of meeting
capabilities in each of the key areas, DOD would be able to better
prioritize future investment decisions for the New Triad.
However, Office of the Secretary of Defense for Policy officials
acknowledge that the first strategic capability assessment provides
only a limited, near-term investment approach for the New Triad. These
officials told us that the assessment did not review and assess some
key capabilities of the New Triad, such as cruise missile defense,
information operations, and passive defense, and may not have fully
surveyed existing capabilities in the areas that were included in the
assessment. Further, it does not address the potential for further
investments to replace one or more existing nuclear platforms that will
approach the end of their useful lives. These officials told us that
they expect future strategic capability assessments to include New
Triad key areas not reviewed in the first assessment. Additionally,
Office of the Secretary of Defense officials told us that while the
assessment's recommendations are not binding on DOD programming and
budgeting decisions, the assessment was used during the department's
last program review in developing the fiscal year 2006 defense budget.
DOD, in its 2003 Nuclear Posture Review Implementation Plan, called for
the creation of an overarching strategic planning document for the New
Triad that would establish the strategies and plans for developing new
strategic capabilities to meet national security goals stated in the
Nuclear Posture Review. The plan also was to provide broad guidance for
integrating the elements of the New Triad as new capabilities came on
line and for the development of future forces, supporting systems,
planning and the creation of a responsive infrastructure. However,
Office of the Secretary of Defense Policy officials told us that while
a draft plan was prepared, they decided not to circulate the draft for
comments because they believed the results of the first strategic
capability assessment would result in too many changes to the plan.
Instead, the officials told us that the strategic capability assessment
process would develop the strategy, plans, and guidance that were to be
provided by the plan.
DOD Does Not Plan to Develop a New Triad Long-term Investment Approach
Until Concepts Mature:
In its Nuclear Posture Review Implementation Plan, DOD states a need
for a long-term investment strategy for the New Triad, and according to
the plan, intends to conduct a study to evaluate options for preparing
an integrated, long-term investment strategy for strike capabilities,
defensive capabilities, and infrastructure when nonnuclear strike and
missile defense concepts are mature. Policy and Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics officials in the Office of the Secretary of
Defense told us that there are several concepts related to New Triad
capabilities being developed, including the Strategic Deterrence Joint
Operating Concept and concept and operational plans for global strike
and integrated ballistic missile defense. The officials told us that
once nonnuclear strike and missile defense concepts are developed,
specific programs could be better identified to implement these
concepts, including new programs to develop capabilities that do not
currently exist. These officials told us that they recognize the
importance of a long-term investment approach for the New Triad to
provide a basis for decisions on resources for future capabilities
initiatives. However, they do not believe the development of the
nonnuclear strike and missile defense concepts are far enough along to
begin the study leading to development of a long-term investment
strategy. These officials did not provide us with an estimate for when
these concepts would be considered sufficiently mature to begin the
study.
While we agree that some concepts are continuing to evolve, and that
new systems are still under development, we do not believe that these
circumstances preclude DOD from beginning to plan for the future of the
New Triad. For example, although DOD is still developing concepts for
missile defense, it is planning to spend billions of dollars over the
next several years to develop a range of missile defense capabilities.
As new information becomes available, we would expect to see
adjustments in DOD's plans-that is the nature of long-term planning.
Further, without the context of a long-term investment approach for
acquiring new capabilities and replacing some or all of its aging
systems that provide New Triad capabilities, DOD will continue to
invest billions of dollars on capabilities that will affect the long-
term composition of the New Triad. DOD is likely to face significant
affordability challenges in the long term as some existing nuclear
weapons platforms begin reaching the end of their expected service
lives within the next 15 years and as missile defense capabilities are
expanding. Given the length of time to develop and acquire capabilities
for the New Triad and the need to consider long-term affordability
issues, DOD is also at risk of not considering the best approaches to
developing and sustaining capabilities needed to provide the broad
range of military options for the President and Secretary of Defense
that are envisioned for the New Triad. DOD is further at risk of not
effectively integrating the wide range of diverse New Triad
capabilities as they are developed and being able to effectively
determine future investment costs and the priorities and trade-offs
needed to sustain New Triad implementation. In our February 2005 report
addressing the challenges that the nation faces by its growing fiscal
imbalance in the 21st century, we stated that DOD's current approach to
planning and budgeting often results in a mismatch between programs and
budgets and that DOD does not always fully consider long-term resource
implications and the opportunity cost of selecting one alternative over
another.[Footnote 20]
JCIDS Process Could Complement Any Long-term Investment Approach:
The new JCIDS process could play a role in any long-term investment
approach that is eventually prepared for the New Triad by providing a
forum for additional analyses and assessments to support New Triad
investment decisions and ensure that those decisions are in concert
with DOD's overall investment priorities. The JCIDS process is intended
to provide a means to ensure that new capabilities are conceived and
developed in a joint warfighting context. The process intends to (1)
focus on achieving joint operational capabilities rather than on
individual weapon systems and (2) provide a systematic means to
identify capability gaps, propose solutions, and establish roadmaps for
future investments to acquire needed capabilities. Capability
assessments, developed through the process, are designed to have a long-
term focus, consider a wide range of potential materiel and nonmateriel
solutions across the military services, analyze trade-offs among
different solutions, and identify areas where existing capabilities are
redundant or excessive. The process offers proposed solutions that are
intended to be integrated and prioritized and would eventually be
incorporated into resource roadmaps that show the investment strategies
to develop and acquire the needed capabilities.
JCIDS also intends to involve the combatant commanders early in the
decision-making process to provide a strong warfighter perspective in
identifying capabilities and resource priorities. The U.S. Strategic
Command has created mission capabilities teams within its Capability
and Resource Integration Directorate that closely align its missions
with the JCIDS process to strengthen its ability to more effectively
advocate for the capabilities needed to perform its missions. The
Commander of the U.S. Strategic Command told us that his intent is for
these teams to play an active role in identifying and developing New
Triad capabilities.
New Triad capabilities span most of the functional areas established in
the JCIDS process, including command and control and force application.
Officials in the Joint Staff's Office of Requirements Assessment told
us that the JCIDS process does not currently identify and track joint
warfighting capabilities as capabilities for the New Triad and Office
of the Secretary of Defense officials told us that there are no efforts
at this time to crosswalk the JCIDS' joint warfighting capabilities
with the New Triad. However, Joint Staff officials said that
organizations with New Triad responsibilities, such as the U.S.
Strategic Command, do participate in the working groups and other
activities throughout the JCIDS process to ensure that their equities
are addressed. The JCIDS process could provide benefits to defense
planning, but because the process is still very early in its
development it is unclear whether or how DOD plans to use JCIDS to
address its New Triad investments.
Conclusions:
It is important for DOD and congressional decision makers to have the
most complete accounting possible of the projected spending planned for
the New Triad over the next several years as they deliberate the
budget. Until DOD reaches agreement on the program elements that
comprise New Triad spending in its FYDP, and creates a way to aggregate
spending, neither defense officials nor Congress will have visibility
over all of the projected spending planned in the near-term for the New
Triad. Importantly, the Commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, who
has been assigned significant responsibilities for coordinating and
integrating New Triad capabilities from a warfighter perspective, will
not have the resource visibility needed to effectively carry out this
new role. This information is needed to accurately assess the
affordability of the various activities and weapon systems that make up
the New Triad, and to make timely and informed decisions on the funding
required to develop, acquire, and integrate the wide range of diverse
New Triad capabilities.
Moreover, without an overarching and integrated long-term investment
approach for the New Triad, information on affordability challenges,
future funding priorities, and requirements beyond the current FYDP is
not fully known. While DOD believes it is still too early to develop a
long-term investment approach, further delaying the start of this
effort puts the department at risk of not developing and acquiring
capabilities for the New Triad when needed. As a result, the President
and Secretary of Defense can not be assured that DOD has the broad
range of military options envisioned in the New Triad. Although New
Triad concepts are continuing to evolve and mature, laying the
foundation now for a long-term investment approach would provide DOD
with an additional planning tool for future development of the New
Triad concept-a tool that could be continuously improved and updated as
better information becomes available and as changing security and
fiscal circumstances warranted. The need for such an approach becomes
increasingly important as existing nuclear platforms begin approaching
the end of their useful lives and decisions to replace one or more of
the platforms are required. Additionally, without such an approach,
decision makers lack information on projected costs, spending
priorities and trade-offs, resource requirements, and funding timelines
in making decisions on the spending commitments needed to sustain New
Triad implementation. Further, without a long-term investment approach,
the large number of New Triad stakeholders, such as the military
services, defense agencies, and combatant commands, will lack the
direction and focus they need to effectively prepare future funding
plans to develop, acquire, and integrate the capabilities. Lastly,
while the new JCIDS process is intended to provide a better approach to
identifying solutions to capability shortcomings and strengthen the
role of combatant commanders in making decisions on capability
investments, it is yet unclear how the process will be used to
specifically support investment decisions for the New Triad.
Recommendations for Executive Action:
To strengthen DOD's implementation of the New Triad and provide greater
transparency of resources that are being applied to developing,
acquiring, and sustaining the needed capabilities, we recommend that
the Secretary of Defense take the following four actions:
* Direct the Director, Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation, in
consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), to (1)
develop and obtain approval of a comprehensive list of program elements
in the FYDP, which support activities for developing, acquiring, and
sustaining New Triad capabilities; (2) modify the FYDP to establish a
virtual major force program for the New Triad by creating new data
fields that would clearly identify and allow aggregation of New Triad-
related program elements to provide increased visibility of the
resources allocated for New Triad activities; and (3) report each year
the funding levels for New Triad activities and capabilities in the
department's summary FYDP report to Congress. The Secretary of Defense
should direct that these three actions be completed at or about the
time when the President's budget for fiscal year 2007 is submitted to
Congress.
* Direct the Under Secretaries of Defense for Policy and Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics to develop an overarching and integrated long-
term investment approach for the New Triad that provides decision
makers with information about future joint requirements, projected
resources, spending priorities and trade-offs, milestones, and funding
timelines. As part of developing and implementing this approach, DOD
should leverage the analyses, assessments, and other information
prepared under the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development
System process. The Secretary of Defense should direct that development
of a long-term investment approach be completed in time for it to be
considered in the department's preparation of its submission for the
President's budget for fiscal years 2008 and 2009 and be updated, as
needed, to adapt to changing circumstances.
Agency Comments:
On April 28, 2005, we provided a draft of this report to DOD for review
and comment. As of the time this report went to final printing, DOD had
not provided comments as requested. However, DOD did provide technical
changes, which have been incorporated in this report as appropriate.
We are sending copies of this report to interested congressional
committees; the Secretary of Defense; the Commander, U.S. Strategic
Command; and the Director, Office of Management and Budget. We will
make copies available to others upon request. In addition the report
will be available at no charge on the GAO Web site at [Hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov].
If you or your staff have any questions, please call me on (202) 512-
4402. Contact points for our Offices of Congressional Relations and
Public Affairs may be found on the last page of this report. Staff
members who made key contributions to this report are listed in
appendix IV.
Signed by:
Janet A. St. Laurent:
Director, Defense Capabilities and Management:
[End of section]
Appendixes:
Appendix I: U.S. Strategic Command Missions:
U.S. Strategic Command has a significant role in implementing the New
Triad, advocating for the development of New Triad capabilities, and
supporting its missions. It derives these responsibilities from
missions assigned by the President and the Secretary of Defense. Table
3 describes U.S. Strategic Command's current missions.
Table 3: U.S. Strategic Command Missions:
Mission: Strategic deterrence;
Description:
* Plan, target, and employ during wartime intercontinental ballistic
missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and bombers;
Basis of authority: Assumed the mission in June 1992 from the
disestablished Strategic Air Command and Joint Strategic Target
Planning Staff.
Mission: Military space operations;
Description:
* Develop desired characteristics and capabilities;
* Plan, advocate, and conduct military space operations; and;
* Serve as the single point of contact for military space operational
matters;
Basis of authority: Change 1 of the Unified Command Plan,[A] effective
July 2002.
Mission: Global strike;
Description:
* Provide integrated global strike planning and command and control
support to deliver rapid, extended- range, precision kinetic and
nonkinetic (e.g., elements of space and information operations) effects
in support of theater and national objectives;
Basis of authority: Change 2 of the Unified Command Plan, effective
January 2003.
Mission: Integrated missile defense;
Description:
* Advocate desired global missile defense and missile-warning
characteristics and capabilities for active and passive ballistic
missile defenses for all combatant commands; and;
* Provide centralized planning, coordination, and integration of global
ballistic missile defenses, missile warning systems, and battle
management, command control, communications, and intelligence system
and architecture;
Basis of authority: Change 2 of the Unified Command Plan, effective
January 2003.
Mission: DOD information operations;
Description:
* Integrate and coordinate DOD information operations (including
computer network attack, computer network defense, electronic warfare,
operations security, military psychological operations, and military
deception) across geographic areas of responsibility;
Basis of authority: Change 2 of the Unified Command Plan, effective
January 2003.
Mission: Command, control, communications, computers, intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance;
Description:
* Plan, integrate, and coordinate intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance in support of strategic and global operations, as
directed; and;
* Task and coordinate command, control, communications, computers,
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities in support
of strategic force employment, including global strike, missile
defense, and associated planning;
Basis of authority: Change 2 of the Unified Command Plan, effective
January 2003.
Mission: Combating weapons of mass destruction;
Description:
* Plan, integrate, and synchronize DOD efforts with the efforts of
other agencies;
* Integrate other U.S. Strategic Command capabilities (e.g., global
strike) and provide operational support to other combatant commands and
organizations conducting combating weapons of mass destruction
missions;
* Synchronize DOD operations for combating weapons of mass destruction
with the intelligence community;
* Advocate desired capabilities for combating weapons of mass
destruction;
* Sponsor relevant joint doctrine; and;
* Provide military representation to U.S. national and international
agencies;
Basis of authority: Memorandum from the Secretary of Defense, effective
January 2005.
Source: Unified Command Plan:
Note: Change 1 and Change 2 incorporated), April 20, 2002, and
Memorandum from the Secretary of Defense, January 6, 2005, designating
responsibilities for combating weapons of mass destruction to
Commander, U.S. Strategic Command.
[A] The Unified Command Plan is a classified document approved by the
President, published by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and
addressed to the commanders of combatant commands. It establishes the
combatant commands, identifies geographic areas of responsibility,
assigns primary missions, defines authority of the commanders,
establishes command relationships, and gives guidance on the exercise
of combatant command.
[End of table]
[End of section]
Appendix II: Scope and Methodology:
To determine the extent to which the Department of Defense (DOD) has
fully identified projected spending for the New Triad in its Future
Years Defense Program (FDYP), we reviewed key DOD documentation to
identify and define the New Triad's capabilities and determine whether
DOD had identified specific, related programs in the FYDP.
Specifically, we obtained and reviewed relevant documents on the New
Triad, including the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review, the Nuclear Posture
Review Implementation Plan, the Secretary of Defense's fiscal year 2002
Annual Defense Report, the Defense Science Board's February 2004
report, Future Strategic Strike Forces, briefings by DOD officials, and
relevant programming guidance. We also obtained the results of an
analysis performed by the Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation
that identified New Triad spending in the FYDP, and discussed the
purpose, scope, methodology, and limitations of the analysis with
officials from this office. In addition, we interviewed officials from
the Office of the Secretary of Defense, including officials from the
Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Forces Policy,
the Office of Strategic and Space Programs in the Office of Program
Analysis and Evaluation, the Office of the Deputy Assistant of the
Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Matters, and the Office of the Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. We
also interviewed officials from the Joint Staff, U.S. Air Force
headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps headquarters, and the Department of
Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration to gain an
understanding of their role in implementing the New Triad. We met with
officials of the U.S. Strategic Command in Omaha, Nebraska, to discuss
the command's missions that are relevant to the New Triad.
As part of our effort to determine the extent to which DOD has
identified the projected spending for the New Triad in its FYDP, we
performed our own notional analysis of the FYDP to identify resources
associated with the New Triad. In doing so, we examined the FYDP's
structure and related documentation to determine whether the FYDP was
designed to capture information that would identify specific program
elements as being related to the New Triad. We met with relevant DOD
officials to discuss our approach, and reviewed the analysis performed
by the Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation. We also reviewed
prior GAO work to gain a better understanding of whether the FYDP has
been modified to allow for new program element aggregations. In
performing our analysis, we assessed the reliability of the FYDP data
by (1) performing electronic testing of required data elements, (2)
reviewing existing information about the data and the system that
produced them, (3) interviewing a knowledgeable DOD official about the
data, and (4) reviewing data reliability tests on these data previously
performed by GAO. We determined that the data were sufficiently
reliable for the purposes of this report. Additional details about how
we performed our notional analysis are presented in appendix III.
To determine the extent to which DOD has developed a long-term
investment approach to identify and manage future investments needed to
achieve the synergistic capabilities envisioned for the New Triad, we
interviewed officials and reviewed key documentation to determine
whether DOD has taken steps to develop and follow such an approach.
Specifically, to identify best practices for a long-term investment
approach, we reviewed relevant GAO reports, and identified and reviewed
investment approaches of other organizations. We then compared DOD's
approach for the New Triad against these elements that we had
identified in other organizations to determine the extent to which DOD
had these elements in place. In addition, we obtained and reviewed
relevant documents, including the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review, the
Nuclear Posture Review Implementation Plan, the Secretary of Defense's
fiscal year 2002 Annual Defense Report, the Defense Science Board's
February 2004 report, Future Strategic Strike Forces, briefings
provided by DOD officials, and relevant programming guidance to
identify investments and investment priorities in building New Triad
capabilities. We also met with officials from the Joint Staff's
Directorate for Force Structure, Resources, and Assessments to discuss
the development and implementation of the department's new Joint
Capabilities Integration and Development System, and to determine
whether the New Triad's plans for achieving desired capabilities were
aligned to this new system.
Additionally, we interviewed officials from the Office of the Secretary
of Defense, including officials from the Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Forces Policy, the Office of Strategic and
Space Programs in the Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation, the
Office of the Deputy Assistant of the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear
Matters, and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. We also interviewed officials
from the Joint Staff, U.S. Air Force headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps
headquarters, and the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security
Administration to gain their perspectives. In addition, we visited the
headquarters of the:
U.S. Strategic Command in Omaha, Nebraska, and met with command
officials to discuss investments needed to acquire capabilities and
implement the command's missions.
Our review was conducted between December 2003 and April 2005 in
accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
[End of section]
Appendix III: GAO's Notional Analysis of the Programs and Projected
Spending on the New Triad in the Future Years Defense Program:
To determine how much the Department of Defense (DOD) plans to spend on
the New Triad, we performed a notional analysis of the Future Years
Defense Program (FYDP) to identify programs and projected spending
associated with New Triad capabilities. This analysis identifies 737
program elements that are either "fully dedicated" or "not fully
dedicated" to the New Triad. "Fully dedicated" program elements provide
capabilities that primarily execute or support New Triad missions,
whereas "not fully dedicated" program elements provide capabilities
that have wider military application than just the New Triad.
Our notional analysis is based on certain assumptions, which we
considered to be relevant and reasonable, about how to align New Triad
capabilities to FYDP program elements. For example, we assume that:
* All program elements in the FYDP that are not defined as "historical"
are currently active and valid for analysis, even though there may not
be any spending currently associated with the program elements over the
fiscal years 2004 through 2009 time frame.
* Certain FYDP field values, or combinations of values, can be used to
identify groups of program elements as being related to the New Triad.
For example, certain combinations of Force and Infrastructure Codes and
Defense Mission Codes can be used to identify particular New Triad
capabilities.
To ensure that our assumptions were reasonable, we discussed our
overall approach with budget experts at GAO and the Congressional
Budget Office and with DOD officials. Generally, these officials agreed
with our approach to identify the projected spending associated with
the New Triad included in the FYDP. However, DOD officials cautioned
that identifying program elements that are not fully dedicated to the
New Triad can be difficult because of the subjectivity required in
deciding on the extent to which a program element provides capabilities
for the New Triad. Therefore, our notional analysis suggests a
methodology that can be used to conduct a comprehensive accounting of
the spending plans for the New Triad, and is not meant to provide a
definitive accounting of projected New Triad spending. We recognize
that the assumptions we made are subjective, and that other analyses to
identify projected spending on New Triad capabilities in the FYDP may
use different assumptions and obtain somewhat different results.
Our Methodology for Identifying FYDP Program Elements Related to the
New Triad:
To identify DOD's definitions of the four New Triad capabilities--
offensive strike; active and passive defenses; responsive
infrastructure; and command and control, intelligence, and planning--we
used relevant DOD documentation, such as the 2001 Nuclear Posture
Review, the Nuclear Posture Review Implementation Plan, the Secretary
of Defense's fiscal year 2002 Annual Defense Report, and the Defense
Science Board's February 2004 report, Future Strategic Strike Forces.
We compared these capability definitions with information about each of
the 4,725 FYDP program elements[Footnote 21] we reviewed. When we
determined that a program element was related to one or more of the New
Triad's capabilities, we categorized it according to the particular
capability that it supported.
We then determined whether the program elements that we identified were
either fully dedicated or not fully dedicated to the New Triad. In
making this determination, we assumed that all of the program elements
identified in the Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation analysis
were fully dedicated to the New Triad. Table 4 summarizes the criteria
we used to identify and categorize program elements that are linked to
the New Triad.
Table 4: GAO's Categorization of New Triad-Related FYDP Program
Elements:
Offensive strike:
Description: Kinetic (e.g., advanced conventional and nuclear) and
nonkinetic (e.g., information operations) systems that provide the
ability to rapidly plan and deliver limited-duration and extended-range
attacks to achieve precision effects against highly valued adversary
assets. Includes special operations capabilities;
Fully dedicated program elements:
* All relevant program elements identified in the Office of Program
Analysis and Evaluation analysis;
* Additional program elements, identified by GAO, that provide or
support conventional, nuclear, and information operations strike
capabilities;
Not fully dedicated program elements: GAO-identified program elements
that mainly support special operations, cryptology, and certain
counterintelligence capabilities.
Active and passive defenses:
Description: Programs designed to defend the U.S. homeland, allies, and
forces abroad. Active defenses include (1) ballistic and cruise missile
defense capabilities and (2) air defenses. Passive defenses include
measures that reduce vulnerability through mobility, dispersal,
redundancy, deception, concealment, and hardening; warn of imminent
attack; and support consequence management activities;
Fully dedicated program elements:
* All relevant program elements identified in the Office of Program
Analysis and Evaluation analysis;
* Additional program elements, identified by GAO, that provide or
support missile defenses, defense of U.S. airspace, and passive
defenses, particularly consequence management activities;
Not fully dedicated program elements: GAO-identified program elements
that mainly provide headquarters support and certain counterdrug
activities.
Responsive infrastructure:
Description: Programs that address the ability of the U.S. technology
base to deal with or hedge against uncertainties in the nature and
timing of potential strategic threats, the capability of the technology
and industrial base to respond in a timely manner, and the adequacy and
responsiveness of science and technology programs related to possible
future strategic capabilities;
Fully dedicated program elements:
* All relevant program elements identified in the Office of Program
Analysis and Evaluation analysis;
* Additional program elements, identified by GAO, that support the
upkeep of important test ranges and facilities;
Not fully dedicated program elements: GAO-identified program elements
that support activities at key facilities that support or execute New
Triad- related missions.
Command and control, intelligence, and planning:
Description: Programs that (1) provide or support nuclear, national,
and global military command and control systems, including key
communications infrastructure and platforms; (2) provide "exquisite"
intelligence of an adversary's capabilities; and (3) support adaptive
planning;
Fully dedicated program elements:
* All relevant program elements identified in the Office of Program
Analysis and Evaluation analysis;
* Additional program elements, identified by GAO, that historically
provided nuclear command and control capabilities;
Not fully dedicated program elements: GAO-identified program elements
supporting a broad range of command and control, intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities at the national level,
including space-, air-and ground-based surveillance and reconnaissance
platforms.
Source: GAO analysis of DOD documentation.
[End of table]
We then used the FYDP data to identify the projected spending
associated with these program elements for fiscal years 2004 through
2009, and expressed our results in then-year dollars. The data for the
projected spending are current as of the President's budget submission
to Congress for fiscal year 2005.
Projected New Triad Spending by FYDP Major Force Program:
The FYDP's strategic forces major force program, one of 11 major force
programs in the FYDP, includes $55.6 billion in then-year dollars for
the New Triad for fiscal years 2004 through 2009, or 15 percent of the
$360.1 billion of total spending that we identified. The offensive
forces and weapons systems in this program are primarily nuclear-
focused. As indicated in table 5, the remaining $304.6 billion, or 85
percent of the projected spending that we identified, is dispersed
among 7 of the remaining 10 major force programs in the FYDP. The
command, control, communications, and intelligence program accounted
for the largest share of New Triad-related spending--$133.5 billion, or
37 percent of the projected spending that we identified. We did not
identify any projected spending on the New Triad in major force
programs for central supply and maintenance; training, medical, and
other general personnel activities; and support of other nations.
Table 5: Projected Spending for the New Triad by Major Force Program
Category, Fiscal Years 2004 through 2009:
Total obligation authority in billions of then-year dollars.
Strategic Forces;
* B-52 Squadrons;
* Minuteman Squadrons;
* Service Support to U.S. Strategic Command;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $55.6;
Percent: 15%.
General Purpose Forces;
* Tomahawk Cruise Missile;
* Tomahawk and Tomahawk Mission Planning Center;
* Domestic Preparedness Against Weapons of Mass Destruction;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $29.7;
Percent: 8%.
Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence;
* E-4B National Airborne Operations Center;
* U.S. Army Space Activities;
* Defense Reconnaissance Support Activities;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $133.5;
Percent: 37%.
Mobility Forces;
* Special Operations Forces;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $3.5;
Percent: 1%.
Guard and Reserve Forces;
* B-52 Squadrons, Air Force Reserve;
* F-16 Air Defense Squadrons, Air National Guard;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $4.8;
Percent: 1%.
Research and Development;
* Army Missile Defense Systems Integration;
* Space-based Radar;
* Next Generation Bomber;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $98.2;
Percent: 27%.
Central Supply and Maintenance;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: n/a;
Percent: n/a.
Training, Medical, and Other General Personnel Activities;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: n/a;
Percent: n/a.
Administration and Associated Activities;
* Management Headquarters, Missile Defense Agency; Total obligation
authority in billions of then-year dollars: Total projected spending
for New Triad program elements: $0.9;
Percent: <1%.
Support of Other Nations;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: n/a;
Percent: n/a.
Special Operations Forces;
* Psychological Operations Activities, Active Army;
* Joint Special Operations Forces Intelligence Activities;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $33.8;
Percent: 9%.
Total;
Total projected spending for New Triad program elements: $360.1;
Percent: 100%.
Source: GAO analysis of DOD data.
Note: Total projected spending does not add to $360.1 billion and total
percent does not add to 100 due to rounding.
[End of table]
Projected New Triad Spending by Primary Appropriation Category:
We analyzed the $360.1 billion of projected spending associated with
the New Triad based on primary appropriation category, as illustrated
in figure 3. We determined that the largest amount of projected
spending is for research, development, test, and evaluation funding,
which accounts for $141.8 billion or 39 percent of the $360.1 billion
in projected spending that we identified. We identified $111.0 billion
in projected spending for operation and maintenance appropriations, or
31 percent of the total spending that we identified.
Figure 3: Projected Spending for the New Triad by Primary Appropriation
Category, Fiscal Years 2004 through 2009:
[See PDF for image]
Note: Total obligation authority in billions of then-year dollars.
[End of figure]
Projected New Triad Spending by DOD Organizations:
Defensewide programs, including programs managed by the Missile Defense
Agency, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and intelligence-
related defense agencies such as the Defense Intelligence Agency,
account for 50 percent of the $360.1 billion of projected spending that
we identified as being associated with the New Triad. Spending for
Missile Defense Agency-related program elements totals $53.1 billion
during fiscal years 2004 through 2009 and is greater than the spending
we identified for either the departments of the Army or Navy. As shown
in figure 4, among the military departments the Air Force accounts for
the largest share of New Triad spending--$112.9 billion, or 31 percent
of the $360.1 billion that we identified for fiscal years 2004 through
2009. Spending by the Air Force, Army, and Navy includes service
support for defense agencies and combatant commands, such as the U.S.
Strategic Command.
Figure 4: Projected Spending for the New Triad by DOD Organizations,
Fiscal Years 2004 through 2009:
[See PDF for image]
Note: Total obligation authority in billions of then-year dollars.
[A] Includes Marine Corps.
[End of figure]
[End of section]
Appendix IV: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments:
GAO Contact:
Janet A. St. Laurent (202) 512-4402:
Acknowledgments:
In addition to the individual named above, Gwendolyn R. Jaffe, Mark J.
Wielgoszynski, David G. Hubbell, Kevin L. O'Neill, Julie M. Tremper,
and Renee S. McElveen made key contributions to this report.
(350475):
FOOTNOTES
[1] In the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2001 (Pub. L. No. 106-398), Congress directed the Secretary
of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, to "conduct a
comprehensive review of the nuclear posture of the United States for
the next 5 to 10 years". The 2001 Nuclear Posture Review was the second
post-Cold War review of U.S. strategic nuclear forces. The first one
was conducted in 1994.
[2] Strategic capabilities are those required to conduct strategic
missions, which are operations directed against one or more of a
selected series of enemy targets with the purpose of progressive
destruction and disintegration of the enemy's capacity and will to make
war. As opposed to tactical operations, strategic operations are
designed to have a long-range rather than an immediate effect on the
enemy and its military forces. There may be times, however, when
strategic capabilities need to produce timely effects.
[3] Program elements are the primary data elements in the FYDP that
generally represent organizational entities and their related
resources. They represent descriptions of the various missions of DOD
and are the building blocks of the FYDP, and they may be aggregated in
different ways, including to show total resources assigned to a
specific program, and to identify selected functional groupings of
resources.
[4] GAO, 21st Century Challenges: Reexamining the Base of the Federal
Government, GAO-05-325SP (Washington, D.C.: February 2005). This report
presents illustrative questions for policymakers to consider across
major areas of the budget and federal operations as they carry out
their responsibilities.
[5] In conducting our analysis we relied on DOD's definitions of New
Triad capabilities to determine the relevant program elements in the
FYDP that were aligned with those capabilities. However, we made
certain assumptions about how to make these linkages, such as the
extent to which capabilities provided by program elements were
dedicated to New Triad missions.
[6] The Nuclear Posture Review states that the United States plans to
reduce its operationally deployed strategic nuclear warheads to a range
between 1,700 to 2,200 warheads by 2012. This warhead range and the
year the goal is to be reached are also set forth in the May 2002
Moscow Treaty between the United States and Russia. An operationally
deployed strategic nuclear warhead is one that is fully ready for use
and is either mated on or allocated to an operational delivery system,
such as a ballistic missile or strategic bomber.
[7] The Nuclear Posture Review Implementation Plan is intended to
provide general guidance for developing several key New Triad
capabilities, including advanced nonnuclear strike and ballistic
missile defenses, and for modernizing and extending the service lives
of existing strategic nuclear platforms.
[8] DOD plans to extend the service life of the Minuteman III
intercontinental ballistic missile system until 2020.
[9] The FYDP submitted with DOD's fiscal year 2005 budget includes data
through fiscal year 2009.
[10] Hard and deeply buried targets are structures ranging from
hardened surface bunker complexes to deep, underground tunnel
facilities, which are used to conceal and protect critical leadership,
military, and industrial personnel; weapons; equipment; and activities
that constitute serious threats to U.S. security. These structures are
typically large, complex, and well concealed, incorporating strong
physical security, modern air defenses, protective siting, multifaceted
communications, and other important features that make many of them
survivable against existing conventional methods of attack.
[11] All projected spending associated with the New Triad is expressed
as total obligation authority in then-year dollars and is current as of
the budget submitted to Congress for fiscal year 2005.
[12] These programs and activities include special access programs,
weapons systems, and other activities that are not identifiable with
discrete program elements.
[13] Of the 737 program elements we identified, 271 did not have any
resources assigned to them for fiscal years 2004 through 2009 at the
time the President's 2005 budget was released. However, these program
elements remain active in the FYDP, and therefore may have spending
associated with them in the future.
[14] For not fully dedicated program elements, we included all
projected spending for the elements in our analysis and we did not
attempt to assign any specific portion of the spending to the New
Triad.
[15] GAO, Future Years Defense Program: Actions Needed to Improve
Transparency of DOD's Projected Resource Needs, GAO-04-514 (Washington,
D.C.: May 2004). This report also discusses a number of other
limitations in the FYDP. For example, the FYDP's current usefulness is
limited in providing Congress visibility over the implementation of the
capabilities-based defense strategy and associated risk management
framework, important 2001 Quadrennial Defense Review initiatives. We
made recommendations aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of the FYDP,
including: (1) aligning the program elements in the FYDP to defense
capabilities needed to meet the defense strategy and the dimensions of
the risk management framework and (2) reporting funding levels in its
summary FYDP report to Congress.
[16] The FYDP defines strategic forces as those organizations and
associated weapon systems whose force missions encompass
intercontinental or transoceanic intertheater responsibilities. Program
elements in the strategic forces major force program include strategic
offensive forces, such as those related to intercontinental and
submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and strategic defensive forces,
such as ballistic missile early-warning systems.
[17] We have issued several reports addressing DOD's progress in
creating its virtual major force program for space. See: GAO,
Technology Development: New DOD Space Science and Technology Strategy
Provides Basis for Optimizing Investments, but Future Versions Need to
Be More Robust, GAO-05-155 (Washington, D.C.: January 2005); Defense
Space Activities: Organizational Changes Initiated, but Further
Management Actions Needed, GAO-03-379 (Washington, D.C.: April 2003);
and Military Space Operations: Planning, Funding, and Acquisition
Challenges Facing Efforts to Strengthen Space Control, GAO-02-738
(Washington, D.C.: September 2002).
[18] GAO, Executive Guide: Leading Practices in Capital Decision-
Making, GAO/AIMD-99-32 (Washington, D.C.: December 1998).
[19] DOD, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Roadmap 2002-2027, Office of the
Secretary of Defense (Washington, D.C.: December 2002). Also see GAO,
Force Structure: Improved Strategic Planning Can Enhance DOD's Unmanned
Aerial Vehicles Efforts, GAO-04-342 (Washington, D.C.: March 2004). For
information on the "Bomber Roadmap", see GAO, Operation Desert Storm:
Limits on the Role and Performance of B-52 Bombers in Conventional
Conflicts, GAO/NSIAD-93-138 (Washington, D.C.: May 1993) and Strategic
Bombers: Adding Conventional Capabilities Will Be Complex, Time-
Consuming, and Costly, GAO/NSIAD-93-45 (Washington, D.C.: February
1993).
[20] GAO, 21st Century Challenges: Reexamining the Base of the Federal
Government, GAO-05-325SP (Washington, D.C.: February 2005).
[21] FYDP resources fall into three broad categories--total obligation
authority, manpower, or forces--that are identifiable by resource
identification codes. In our review of the FYDP's structure, we
identified 4,725 unique, active program elements associated with total
obligation authority resource identification codes.
GAO's Mission:
The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of
Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional
responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability
of the federal government for the American people. GAO examines the use
of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides
analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help Congress make
informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO's commitment to
good government is reflected in its core values of accountability,
integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony:
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no
cost is through the Internet. GAO's Web site ( www.gao.gov ) contains
abstracts and full-text files of current reports and testimony and an
expanding archive of older products. The Web site features a search
engine to help you locate documents using key words and phrases. You
can print these documents in their entirety, including charts and other
graphics.
Each day, GAO issues a list of newly released reports, testimony, and
correspondence. GAO posts this list, known as "Today's Reports," on its
Web site daily. The list contains links to the full-text document
files. To have GAO e-mail this list to you every afternoon, go to
www.gao.gov and select "Subscribe to e-mail alerts" under the "Order
GAO Products" heading.
Order by Mail or Phone:
The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent.
Orders should be sent to:
U.S. Government Accountability Office
441 G Street NW, Room LM
Washington, D.C. 20548:
To order by Phone:
Voice: (202) 512-6000:
TDD: (202) 512-2537:
Fax: (202) 512-6061:
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs:
Contact:
Web site: www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470:
Public Affairs:
Jeff Nelligan, managing director,
NelliganJ@gao.gov
(202) 512-4800
U.S. Government Accountability Office,
441 G Street NW, Room 7149
Washington, D.C. 20548:
| en |
markdown | 109287 | # Presentation: 109287
## Reading Programs
**Reading Programs**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Programs Committee
**Marcy Stein, Ph.D., Development Team Leader**
*University of Washington, Tacoma*
**Mo Anderson, M.Ed.**
*Washington State Reading Excellence Act*
**Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D.**
*Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network *
**Diane Kinder, Ph.D.**
*University of Washington, Tacoma*
**Jo Robinson, M.Ed.**
*Washington State Reading Excellence Act*
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Programs
- Historical Background
- Defining Characteristics of Scientifically Based Reading Programs
- Procedures for Selecting K-3 Reading Programs
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Historical Background
- Types of Reading Programs
- 1980’s
- 1990’s
**Notes:**
Notes:
The historical background section will include an overview of the types of reading programs that have been available to teachers during the last two decades.
## Types of Reading Programs
- Historically, different types of reading programs have been used in American schools. These include:
**comprehensive basal reading programs**
**literature-based reading programs**
**supplemental reading programs**
**intervention reading programs**
**Notes:**
Notes:
Different types of reading programs have been developed throughout the years including comprehensive basal reading programs, literature-based reading programs, supplemental and intervention programs. In this section, we will discuss the use of comprehensive basal reading programs and literature-based reading programs only because these programs were predominant in the 80’s and 90’s. These programs were designed as the primary means of teaching reading in grades K-3. Later we will discuss supplemental and intervention programs in more detail.
## Historical Background: 1980’s
- In the 1980’s, **comprehensive basal reading** **programs** were available in almost every elementary classroom.
- Chall and Squire noted that these programs were used in more than 95% of school districts.
- Chall, J & Squire, J. (1991). The publishing industry and textbooks. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), *Handbook of Reading Research,* Vol. 2, (pp. 120-146). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
**Notes:**
Notes:
These programs are called comprehensive because their intent is to provide complete instructional programs for children learning to read and write.
## Comprehensive Basal Reading Programs
- Program Features:
**commercially-developed**
**teacher-directed lessons**
**small group instruction**
**skills instruction**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Comprehensive Basal Reading Programs
- Program Components:
**teacher manuals**
**student readers**
**student workbooks**
**assessment packages**
- Copyright © 2002 by SRA./McGraw-Hill
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Comprehensive Basal Reading Programs
- Many of the comprehensive basal reading programs of the 1980’s did ***not**** *include features that current research tells us are important.
- For example, the programs encouraged students to memorize words rather than teaching them explicit phonics strategies.
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Historical Background: 1990’s
- A Competing Theory:
**“****Individuals become literate not from the formal instruction they receive, but from what they read and write about and who they read and write with.”**
- Smith, F. (1989). Overselling literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(5), 353-359.
**Notes:**
Notes:
A predominant theory of the early nineties is exemplified by this quote from Frank Smith. The theory proposed that children would learn to read as naturally as they learned to talk in environments that promoted literacy. Systematic instruction was considered unnecessary, if not harmful.
## Historical Background: 1990’s
**READING FAILURE**
**FOR MANY STUDENTS**
**Notes:**
Notes:
The movement from basal reading programs to literature-based instruction was influenced by:
Dissatisfaction with basal reading programs of the 80’s
Reading failure with large numbers of students
Competing reading philosophies
## Literature-based Instruction
- Literature-based instruction is characterized by the use of authentic, engaging literature with limited systematic instruction, especially related to word reading.
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Literature-based Instruction
- Program Features:
**teacher- or commercially-developed**
**student-initiated activities **
**whole class instruction**
**mini-phonics lessons**
**emphasis on context and picture clues**
**emphasis on silent reading**
**leveled books**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Literature-based Instruction
- Program Features (continued):
**guided reading**
**guided writing**
**shared reading**
**shared writing**
**interactive reading**
**interactive writing**
**uninterrupted reading**
**uninterrupted writing**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Literature-based Instruction
**Literature-based Instruction**
- Program Components:
**big books; trade books**
**journals**
**portfolio assessment**
**independent reading centers**
- Copyright © 1991 Macmillan/McGraw-Hill School Publishing Company
**Notes:**
Notes:
## National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
- NAEP 1999
- NAEP 2000
- “...68 percent of fourth grade students in the United States are reading below the proficient level.”
- Since 1980, there has been little change in reading test scores.
## Scientifically Based Perspective: 2002
**1980**
**Basal Reading Programs**
**1990**
**Literature-based Instruction**
**Notes:**
Notes:
Because of the convergence of scientific findings about reading
reading programs can now include scientifically based instruction
the potential exists for greater reading achievement
## Reading First Legislation
**Reading First Legislation**
- SEC. 1201. PURPOSES.
- (1) To provide assistance to State educational agencies and local educational agencies in establishing reading programs for students in kindergarten through grade 3 that are based on scientifically based reading research...
- (4) ...in selecting or developing effective instructional materials (including classroom-based materials to assist teachers in implementing the essential components of reading instruction)...
**Notes:**
Notes:
Reading First Legislation requires
the establishment of scientifically based reading programs in grades K-3
assistance in selection or development of scientifically based instructional materials
## Defining Characteristics of Scientifically Based Reading Programs
- Instructional Content
- Instructional Design
**Notes:**
Notes:
Next we will provide an overview of the characteristics of the instructional content of scientifically based reading programs. We will include examples of instruction from current reading programs for the core elements of reading that were introduced in the Effective Reading Instruction presentation. We also will discuss key features of instructional design and show examples from well-designed reading programs.
## Instructional Content
- Core elements of scientifically based programs include:
**phonemic awareness instruction**
**systematic, explicit phonics instruction**
**fluency instruction**
**vocabulary instruction**
**text comprehension instruction**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Phonemic Awareness Instruction
- “Phonemic awareness is the ability to hear, identify, and manipulate individual sounds in spoken words.”
- “Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read.”
*Put Reading First*, pp. 10, 6
**Notes:**
Notes:
## examples of
- phonemic awareness activitiesgo here
**Notes:**
Notes:
Examples of two phonemic awareness exercises
teachers are given explicit instructions for teaching phonemic awareness
(first exercise) students orally blend sounds to form words
(second exercise) students identify the beginning sound in spoken words
## Systematic and Explicit Phonics Instruction
- “Systematic and explicit phonics instruction is more effective than non-systematic or no phonics instruction.”
- “Systematic and explicit phonics instruction significantly improves children’s reading comprehension.”
*Put Reading First*, pp. 13, 14
**Notes:**
Notes:
Systematic, explicit “Phonics instruction teaches students the relationships between the letters... of written language and the individual sounds... of spoken language.” (Put Reading First, p.12.)
It is important to understand that phonics instruction is not just about word reading. As was discussed earlier, research has demonstrated a strong relationship between phonics instruction and students’ ability to understand what they read.
## example of
- explicit phonics instructiongoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
An example of explicit phonics instruction
teachers are given explicit instruction for teaching phonics
students sound out words containing sounds recently taught
students read sentences containing words with sounds recently taught
## Fluency Instruction
- “Reading fluency is the ability to read a text accurately and quickly.”
- “Repeated and monitored oral reading improves reading fluency and overall reading achievement.”
*Put Reading First*, pp. 21, 24
**Notes:**
Notes:
Teachers need to closely monitor their students’ reading fluency to ensure their success in reading. Reading programs should provide teachers with specific directions in how to do this.
## example of fluency exercise goes here
- example offluency exercisegoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
An example of a fluency exercise in a reading program
teachers are encouraged to have students read aloud or with a partner for fluency practice
teachers are given explicit instructions for evaluating students’ reading rates to determine fluency levels
## Vocabulary Instruction
- “Although a great deal of vocabulary is learned indirectly, some vocabulary should be taught directly.”
*Put Reading First*, p. 36
**Notes:**
Notes:
“Readers cannot understand what they are reading without knowing what most of the words mean.” (Put Reading First, p.34)
One means of teaching new vocabulary involves teaching students specific word meanings. Teaching vocabulary also can involve teaching students how to figure out the meanings of words from reading the surrounding text.
## example of vocabulary instruction goes here
- example ofvocabulary instructiongoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
An example of vocabulary instruction
teachers are given explicit instruction for teaching students new vocabulary
students are explicitly taught how to figure out word meanings by looking for clues in the surrounding text
students are given guided practice in applying that vocabulary strategy
## Text Comprehension Instruction
- “Text comprehension can be improved by instruction that helps readers use specific comprehension strategies.”
- “Effective comprehension strategy instruction is explicit, or direct.”
*Put Reading First*, pp. 49, 53
**Notes:**
Notes:
Text comprehension instruction involves teaching students how to understand what they read. Research suggests that students benefit when that instruction is explicit or direct.
## example of text comprehension instruction goes here
- example oftext comprehension instructiongoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
An example of comprehension instruction
the teacher is given explicit instructions for teaching students how to compare and contrast two characters from a story
students are taught to use a graphic organizer (Venn diagram) to help them organize and remember how these characters are alike and different
## Instructional Design
- Features of well-designed programs include:
**explicit instructional strategies**
**coordinated instructional sequences**
**ample practice opportunities**
**aligned student materials**
**Notes:**
Notes:
We have just been discussing examples of instructional content from comprehensive reading programs. Now we are going to talk about some general features of well-designed programs and a show few examples that illustrate those features. This section focuses on how program components are organized and how the lessons are designed. These organizational features include: explicit instructional strategies, coordinated instructional sequences, ample practice opportunities, and aligned student materials.
## example of explicit instruction strategy goes here
- example ofexplicit instruction strategygoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
An example of an explicit instructional strategy for teaching letter/sound correspondences
the teacher is directed to explicitly model the sound /g/ for students
the teacher also is directed to have students say words with /g/ and identify the sound
## Instructional Design
- Features of well-designed programs include:
**explicit instructional strategies**
**coordinated instructional sequences**
**ample practice opportunities**
**aligned student materials**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## example of coordinated instructional sequence goes here
- example ofcoordinated instructional sequencegoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
An example of a coordinated instructional sequence with three different instructional activities ( phonological awareness, connecting sound-spelling, and practice/apply) with the letter/sound m
first students practice oral blending focusing on the /m/ sound
then students learn to connect the sound with the letter m
finally, students read words which include the /m/ sound
## Instructional Design
- Features of well-designed programs include:
**explicit instructional strategies**
**coordinated instructional sequences**
**ample practice opportunities**
**aligned student materials**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## example of ample practice opportunities goes here
- example ofample practice opportunitiesgoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
An example of ample practice opportunities to promote reading fluency
the program provides teachers with various practice exercises to promote fluency on a daily basis
the program provides teachers with activities organized to accommodate a range of reading abilities
## Instructional Design
- Features of well-designed programs include:
**explicit instructional strategies**
**coordinated instructional sequences**
**ample practice opportunities**
**aligned student materials**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Aligned Student Materials
- Research suggests that:
**“... ****a high proportion of the words in the earliest selections children read should conform to the phonics they have already been taught. Otherwise they will not have enough opportunity to practice, extend, and refine their knowledge of letter-sound relationships.”**
- Anderson, R.C., Hiebert, E.H., Scott, J.A., & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1985). *Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading*. Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
**Notes:**
Notes:
One way a program aligns student materials with instruction is by providing materials for the students to read that reflect that instruction.
## example of aligned student materials goes here
- example ofaligned student materialsgoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
An example of aligned student materials
This example illustrates one way that a program can align student materials. It demonstrates the close alignment between the phonics instruction students receive and the text selections that they read.
In this example the students are given a book which contains words made up of previously taught phonics elements. The teacher is directed to have students use their phonics knowledge to figure out difficult words.
## example of decodable text goes here
- example ofdecodable textgoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
This is an example of a decodable text, one for which the students have been taught the appropriate phonics that will enable them to read the selection.
## Procedures for Selecting Reading Programs
- Reading Program Classification
- Reading Program Evaluation
- Reading Program Examples
**Notes:**
Notes:
In the previous sections, we have discussed what a scientifically based reading program looks like. In this section we will be talking about how you identify these programs. First we’ll discuss some general issues related to reading program evaluation. Next we’ll talk about how to classify different types of reading programs. Finally, we’ll provide examples from currently published programs that illustrate scientifically based research, and examples from earlier published programs that do not.
## Reading Program Evaluation
- If the present reading program in a district is ***not*** successful with a large number of students, that district needs to consider either:
**selecting a new comprehensive reading program**
**modifying its existing program **
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Program Evaluation
- Reading program evaluation may include:
**classifying K-3 reading programs**
**evaluating K-3 comprehensive reading programs**
**evaluating supplemental/intervention programs**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Program Evaluation
- Reading program evaluation should help educators assess:
**program appropriateness: **
*the extent to which different programs are used for their intended purposes*
**program quality: **
*the extent to which reading programs are grounded in scientific research*
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Program Classification
- A classification process for K-3 reading programs should classify programs as:
**comprehensive reading programs**
**supplemental reading programs**
**intervention reading programs**
**Notes:**
Notes:
One reason for evaluating a reading program is to ensure that the program is being used for its intended purpose. We’ve already discussed comprehensive reading programs and how they are used to teach reading to many students. The next slides will address supplemental and intervention reading programs.
## Comprehensive Reading Programs
- Purpose: **to provide complete instruction in the core components of reading**
- Examples:
***Trophies*****, Harcourt, Inc.**
***Houghton Mifflin Reading*****, Houghton Mifflin Co.**
***Open Court Reading*****, SRA/McGraw Hill **
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Supplemental Reading Programs
- Purpose: **to provide additional instruction in one or more areas of reading**
- Examples:
**phonemic awareness programs**
***Phonemic Awareness in Young Children: A Classroom Curriculum*****, Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.**
**fluency building programs**
***Read Naturally*****, Read Naturally, Inc.**
**comprehension strategy programs**
***Soar to Success*****, Houghton Mifflin Co.**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Intervention Reading Programs
- Purpose: **to provide additional instruction to students performing below grade level**
- Examples:
***stand-alone***** intervention programs**
***Corrective Reading*****, SRA/McGraw-Hill **
***in-program***** intervention programs**
***components of comprehensive programs***
**Notes:**
Notes:
The term “intervention” can be used in many ways. For example, a reading intervention could involve providing summer school for struggling readers. The term intervention as used here refers to specific programs designed to provide additional assistance for those students performing below grade level.
Stand-alone intervention programs are remedial programs that can be used by themselves or in conjunction with other reading programs. They are designed to address one or more reading skills.
In-program intervention programs are components of comprehensive reading programs. The in-program intervention programs contain lessons that are coordinated with comprehensive programs. In their most recent reading curriculum adoption, California required all comprehensive reading programs to include an intervention component.
## Classification Process
**Notes:**
Notes:
This is an overview of a process that can be used for classifying reading programs. On the next few slides we will walk through the process. It is designed to help evaluators choose an appropriate evaluation process.
## Classification Process
**Notes:**
Notes:
Before a program can be evaluated, it must be determined that the program contains detailed teacher instructions and explicit student practice examples.
## Classification Process
**Notes:**
Notes:
Once it has been determined that specific teacher directions and student practice examples are provided, evaluators look for the core program components suggested by research. If all five of the core components are present, then the program is classified as a comprehensive reading program.
## Classification Process
**Notes:**
Notes:
If the program does not contain all five of the core program components, then an additional step is required. In order to conduct the appropriate evaluation, evaluators must determine the purpose of the program. That is, whether the program is designed to be used as a comprehensive reading program but is incomplete, as a supplemental program, or as an intervention program.
If the program is intended to be a comprehensive reading program but is missing one or more core components, the program is classified as an incomplete comprehensive reading program. Evaluators then would ascertain the quality of the existing core components. The results of this evaluation would be used to determine whether to modify or replace the program.
If the programs are classified as supplemental or intervention, evaluators would use an appropriate evaluation process to determine program quality.
## Evaluating K-3 Comprehensive Reading Programs
- An evaluation of K-3 comprehensive reading programs must assess the degree to which the core content and instructional design are scientifically based.
**Notes:**
Notes:
Once a program has been classified as a comprehensive reading program, the extent to which the core program content and instructional design represent scientifically based instruction should be determined.
## Evaluating K-3 Comprehensive Reading Programs
- The following examples illustrate how an evaluation process might assess the extent to which reading programs contain:
**systematic, explicit phonics instruction**
**aligned student materials **
**fluency instruction**
**Notes:**
Notes:
The next slides show how different programs address instructional content and design including systematic, explicit phonics instruction; aligned student materials; and fluency. Examples taken from recently published programs represent scientifically based instruction; those from earlier published programs do not. An effective evaluation process for K-3 reading programs should help educators distinguish those programs that are scientifically based from those that are not.
## Systematic, Explicit Phonics Instruction
- Systematic, Explicit
***sounding out***
- Not Systematic or Explicit
***context and picture clues***
- examplegoes here
- examplegoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
These examples highlight the differences between systematic, explicit instruction and instruction that is not explicit or systematic. As illustrated earlier, programs containing explicit phonics strategies encourage students to sound out words to read them. In contrast, programs using non-explicit and non-systematic strategies encourage students to use other kinds of clues like context and pictures to figure out words. Research strongly suggests that poor readers use these other kinds of clues, not good readers.
## Systematic, Explicit Phonics Instruction
| Basal Reading Programs | Systematic, Explicit Phonics | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | YES | NO |
| Harcourt Brace Signatures | | |
| Houghton Mifflin Invitations to Literacy | | |
| McMillan/McGraw-Hill Spotlight on Literacy | | |
| Open Court Collections for Young Scholars | | |
| Scholastic Literacy Place | | |
| Scott Foresman Celebrate Reading! | | |
| Silver Burdett Ginn Literature Works | | |
**1996 California Adoption List:**
**Predominant Approach to Beginning Reading**
- Stein, M., Johnson, B., & Gutlohn, L. (1999). Analyzing beginning reading programs. *Remedial and Special Education, 20*. 275-287.
**Notes:**
Notes:
In 1999, a curriculum evaluation of the reading programs that were put on the California state curriculum adoption list was conducted. Note that the programs listed here were all published approximately 7 years ago. Most of the publishers listed here have current versions of their programs that contain substantial changes derived from scientifically based research. It is important to note that in the 1996 California curriculum adoption, only one program used explicit phonics as the predominant strategy to teach beginning reading.
Currently, all of the programs that appear on both the 1999 Texas Reading Adoption list and the 2001 California Reading Adoption list contain systematic, explicit phonics instruction.
## example of instruction from 1991 program goes here
- example ofinstruction from 1991 programgoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
The next three slides show the changes that one publisher made in their beginning reading programs from 1991 to 2003. (Publishers are permitted advance copyright dates when they submit to state adoptions.)
1991 – teachers directions are vague; programs uses both phonics and context strategies; there is no systematic or explicit phonics instruction
## example of instruction from 1999 program goes here
- example ofinstruction from 1999 programgoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
1999 – teacher directions are less vague; context and picture clues are still emphasized; there is no explicit or systematic phonics instruction
## example of instruction from 2003 program goes here
- example ofinstruction from 2003 programgoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
2003 – teacher directions are clear; program uses systematic and explicit phonics instruction; there are no picture or context clues
## Aligned Student Materials
**1996 California Adoption List:**
**Text Selection Analysis**
| Basal Reading Programs | WORDS TAUGHT | WORDS NOT TAUGHT |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Harcourt Brace Signatures | 68% | 32 % |
| Houghton Mifflin Invitations to Literacy | 48% | 52% |
| McMillan/McGraw-Hill Spotlight on Literacy | 43% | 57% |
| Open Court Collections for Young Scholars | 98% | 2% |
| Scholastic Literacy Place | 44% | 56% |
| Scott Foresman Celebrate Reading! | 49% | 51% |
| Silver Burdett Ginn Literature Works | 61% | 39% |
**Aligned Student Materials**
**Notes:**
Notes:
For the 1996 California curriculum evaluation referred to earlier, evaluators also examined the alignment of student materials by noting the relationship of phonics instruction to text selections that students were given to read.
The evaluators examined the first half of the first grade text selections. They counted the number of words that the students had been taught, and the number of words that were not taught and determined the percentage of words that the students would be able to read. Evaluators found that students in first grade were asked to read books which contained many words that they had not been taught to read. In fact, in four of the seven programs evaluated, students were taught fewer than half of the words they were expected to read. Clearly, the alignment of student materials to instruction in these programs was quite weak.
## example of poorly aligned student materials goes here
- example ofpoorly aligned student materialsgoes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
This is an example of a program that designated only two words on the first two pages of the student text as decodable words (words that could be sounded out based on the phonics instruction students received).
Today, most of the comprehensive basal reading programs include text that is aligned with the phonics instruction provided.
## Fluency Instruction
**2003**
**1991**
- Copyright © 1991, 2003 by Houghton Mifflin Company
**Fluency Instruction**
- example of
- program without
- fluency instruction
- goes here
- example of
- program with
- fluency instruction
- goes here
**Notes:**
Notes:
This example also illustrates how research is beginning to have an impact on comprehensive reading programs.
1991 –the program contains no entry for fluency in the index of the beginning reading program
2003 –the program contains 18 entries for fluency practice or assessment
## Conclusion: Reading Programs PLUS
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Programs PLUS
- Reading programs can make a valuable contribution to raising the reading achievement of at-risk students in the early grades, **however...**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Programs PLUS
- Reading programs work best when implementation of the reading program is linked to:
**effective instruction**
**assessment**
**professional development**
**instructional leadership**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Programs PLUS
- Effective Instruction:
**The reading program should provide explicit directions to teachers about how best to teach reading according to scientifically based research.**
- Assessment:
**Districts should help teachers implement ongoing and frequent monitoring of student progress in the reading program to ensure student success.**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Programs PLUS
- Professional Development:
**Districts should provide substantive and frequent support for the implementation of the reading program using information from the assessment to inform staff development.**
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Programs PLUS
- Reading programs contain ***numerous*** activities:
- Professional development should help teachers choose those activities essential for effective reading instruction.
| Weekly Count for First Grade Reading Programs | Program
A | Program
B | Program
C | Program
D | Program
E |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Instructional Activities | 179 | 227 | 165 | 190 | 165 |
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Programs PLUS
- Instructional Leadership:
**District leadership should provide coordination between the implementation of the reading program and support for teachers. **
**Notes:**
Notes:
## Reading Programs PLUS
**EFFECTIVE**
**INSTRUCTION**
**PROFESSIONAL**
**DEVELOPMENT**
**ASSESSMENT**
**LEADERSHIP**
**SCIENTIFICALLY BASED**
**READING PROGRAMS**
**Notes:**
Notes:
Reading achievement for at-risk students can be improved. Scientifically based reading programs will provide the foundation for this effort. In concert with effective instruction, assessment, and professional development, and under good leadership, all students will learn to read.
| en |
converted_docs | 680061 | Nd-144
Reviewed by T. Nakagawa, JAERI, March 2003
# 1. Files
***ENDF/B-VI***: Evaluation was made by Schenter et al. in 1980. Their
results were adopted in ENDF/B-VI.
***JENDL-3.3***: In 1984, the evaluation was made by JNDC FPND working
group for JENDL-2. The data were revised in 1990 \[Ka92\] for JENDL-3.1.
The resonance parameters were updated \[Ka01\] for JENDL-3.2. JENDL-3.3
is the same as JENDL-3.2.
***JEFF-3.0***: JEF-2.2 adopted RCN-3 evaluation. The resonance
parameters were updated in 1986. The charged particle emission cross
sections were included in 1989 adopting REAC-ECN-4. Resonance parameters
were updated in 1990. JEFF-3.0 is the same as JEF-2.2.
***CENDL-3***: New evaluation was made in 2000 by Shen et al. \[Sh01\]
***BROND-2***: No data are given in BROND-2.
# 2. Thermal and resonance region
The resonance parameters are summarized in Table 1.
***ENDF/B-VI***
Resolved resonance parameters compiled by Mughabghab et al. \[Mu73\]
were adopted. Background cross sections were given to the capture and
elastic scattering cross sections.
Unresolved resonance parameters were not given.
***JENDL-3.3***
Resolved resonance parameters were evaluated on the basis of Tellier et
al. \[Te71\] and Musgrove et al. \[Mu77\]. Average radiative widths of
47 and 41 meV were assumed for the s- and p-wave resonances,
respectively. The parameters of a negative resonance were adjusted so as
to reproduce the thermal cross sections of 3.60.3 barns recommended by
Mughabghab et al. \[Mu81\]
Unresolved resonance parameters were given to reproduce the cross
sections calculated with the optical model code CASTHY in the energy
range from 12 to 100 keV. Strength functions were calculated with
CASTHY, and level spacing was adjusted to the capture cross section.
***JEFF-3.0***
Based on the recommendation by Mughabghab et al. \[Mu81\]
Unresolved resonance parameters were given in the energy range from 12
to 50 keV together with background cross sections.
***CENDL-3***
JENDL-3.2 was adopted.
Thermal cross sections and resonance integral of capture cross section
are listed in Table 2. ENDF/B-VI gives the resolved resonance parameters
for the single-level Breit-Wigner formula. Therefore, the elastic
scattering and total cross section have negative values at some
energies.
**[Recommendation/conclusion for the thermal and resonance
region]{.underline}**
***JENDL-3.3*** is recommended.
# 3. Fast neutron region
**(1) Methodology**
***ENDF/B-VI***
Theoretical calculation was performed using Moldauer potential \[Mo63\].
Inelastic scattering cross sections were calculated with the COMNUC-3
code considering 8 discrete levels. The capture cross section was
calculated with the NCAP code. Adjustment of the capture cross section
was made by considering integral and differential data. No threshold
reactions were considered.
The angular distributions were assumed to be isotropic in the laboratory
system.
Evaporation spectra were given to the inelastically scattered neutrons.
***JENDL-3.3***
The total, elastic and inelastic scattering, and capture cross sections
were calculated with the spherical optical model and statistical model
code CASTHY. The gamma-ray strength function was determined so as to
reproduce the capture cross section of 70 mb at 30 keV \[Mu78, Ko78\].
For the inelastic scattering, 5 levels were considered. Direct inelastic
scattering was calculated with the DWUCK-4 code. The direct/semi-direct
capture was calculated from a simple formula of Benzi and Reffo \[Be69\]
Other reaction cross sections were calculated with the preequilibrium
and multi-step evaporation model code PEGASUS. The (n,p) and (n,)
reaction cross sections were normalized to 12 mb recommended by Forrest
\[Fo86\] and 5.4 mb \[Gu83, Qa84\] at 14.5 MeV, respectively.
Angular distributions of elastic and inelastic scattering were
calculated with the CASTHY code. Isotropic distributions were assumed to
the other reactions. The energy distributions were calculated with the
PEGASUS code.
***JEFF-3.0***
All cross section data were calculated with the SASSI-ECN code using
optical potential of Igarasi et al. \[Ig74\] Charged particle emission
cross sections were included from REAC-ECN-4 library.
***CENDL-3***
Calculated with the SUNF code. Optical model parameters were determined
with the APMN code considering various experimental data. Contributions
from direct process were calculated with the DWUCK4 code.
**(2) Total cross section (MT=1)**
See Fig:
[http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/](http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/Nd144.htm#mt1)Nd144.htm#mt1
and Fig. A1
JENDL-3.3 is not in good agreement with experimental data of Shamu et
al. \[Sh80\] above 1 MeV. ***The Other evaluations*** are better than
JENDL-3.3 in the energy range above 1 MeV. However, in the energy range
below 100 keV, ***JENDL-3.3*** is the best.
**(3) Capture cross section (MT=102)**
See Fig:
[http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/](http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/Nd144.htm#mt102)Nd144.htm#mt102
and Fig. A2
CENDL-3 has a strange structure around 90 keV, and too large in the
energy range from 100 to 500 keV. ***The Other evaluations*** are almost
the same in the energy range where the experimental data are available..
**(4) Elastic scattering cross section (MT=2)**
See Fig:
[http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/](http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/Nd144.htm#mt2)Nd144.htm#mt2
and Fig. A3
Two experimental data are available in the MeV region. All evaluations
are almost in agreement with them.
**(5) Inelastic scattering cross section (MT=4, 51 -- 91)**
See Fig:
[http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/](http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/Nd144.htm#mt4)Nd144.htm#mt4
Discrete levels considered in the evaluations are as follows:
ENDF/B-VI 8 levels up to 2.36 MeV
JENDL-3.3 5 levels up to 1.7913 MeV
JEFF-3.0 14 levels up to 2.218 MeV
CENDL-3 15 levels up to 2.2951 MeV
Direct inelastic was considered for ***CENDL-3*** and ***JENDL-3.3***.
The cross-section shape of ENDF/B-VI is not correct.
**(6) (n,2n) reaction cross section (MT=16)**
See Fig:
[http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/](http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/Nd144.htm#mt16)Nd144.htm#mt16
The data of JEFF-3.0 is too large. ***JENDL-3.3*** and ***CENDL-3***
agree well with experimental data.
**(7) (n,p) reaction cross section (MT=103)**
See Fig:
[http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/](http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/Nd144.htm#mt103)Nd144.htm#mt103
***JENDL-3.3*** and ***CENDL-3*** are in good agreement with the
experimental data.
**(8) (n,) reaction cross section (MT=107)**
See Fig:
[http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/](http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sg21/fp21/htm/Nd144.htm#mt107)Nd144.htm#mt107
***CENDL-3*** is in very good agreement with recent experimental data.
**(9) Other reactions**
The following reaction cross sections are given:
ENDF/B-VI None
JENDL-3.3 (n,3n), (n,n), (n,np), (n,nd), (n,nt), (n,d), (n,t), (n,^3^He)
JEFF-3.0 (n,d), (n,t), (n,^3^He), (n,2p)
CENDL-3 (n,3n), (n,n), (n,np), (n,d), (n,t), (n,^3^He)
**[Recommendation/conclusion for the fast energy region]{.underline}**
***CENDL-3*** is recommended except for the capture cross section.
***JENDL-3.3*** is recommended for the capture cross section. However,
the total cross section of CENDL-3 is too small in the energy range from
100 keV to 1 MeV.
# References
\[Be69\] Benzi V. and Reffo G.: *CCDN-NW/*10 (1969).
\[Ca68\] Cabell M.J. et al.: *J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.*, **30**, 897
(1968), EXFOR21467.
\[Fo86\] Forrest R.A.: *AERE-R* 12419 (1986).
\[Gu83\] Gumca S. et al.: *Acta Phys. Solvoca*, **33**, 9 (1983).
\[Ig74\] Igarasi S. et al.: *JAERI-M* 5752 (1974).
\[Ka92\] Kawai M. et al.: *J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.*, **29**, 195 (1992).
\[Ka01\] Kawai M. et al.: *J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.*, **38**, 261 (2001).
\[Ko78\] Kononov V.N. et al.: *Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.*, **27**, 5 (1978).
\[Mo63\] Moldauer P.A.: *Nucl. Phys.*, **47**, 65 (1963).
\[Mu73\] Mughabghab S.F. and Garber D.I.: *BNL*-325 3rd Edition (1973).
\[Mu77\] Musgrove A.R.de L. et al.: *AAEC/E*401 (1977).
\[Mu78\] Musgrove A.R.DeL. et al.: 78Harwell, p.449 (1978).
\[Mu81\] Mughabghab S.F. et al.: *Neutron Cross Sections, Vol. 1, part
A*, Academic press (1981).
\[Mu01\] Mughabghab S.F.: *INDC(NDS)*-424, p.69 (2001).
\[Po52\] Pomerance H.: *Phys. Rev.*, **88**, 412 (1952), EXFOR11507.
\[Qa84\] Qaim S.M.: *Radiochim. Acta*, **35**, 9 (1984).
\[Sh80\] Shamu R.E. et al.: *Phys. Rev.* **C22**, 1857 (1980),
EXFOR10615.
\[Sh01\] Shen Q. et al.: *Commun. Nucl. Data Prog.*, **25**, 29 (2001).
\[Te71\] Tellier H.: *CEA-N-*1459 (1971).
\[Ve74\] Vertebnyj V.P. et al.: *YFI*-17, 37 (1974), EXFOR40290.
Table 1 Summary for Resolved and Unresolved Resonance Region: Nd-144
\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--
Library RRP URP Remarks
\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--
ENDF/B-VI 9.9996 keV, SLBW No URP
JENDL-3.3 12 keV, MLBW 100 keV
JEFF-3.0 12 keV, MLBW 50 keV
CENDL-3 12 keV, MLBW 100 keV JENDL-3.2 was adopted
\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--
Table 2 Thermal Cross Sections and Resonance Integral: Nd-144
Unit: barns
\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--
Library/Experiment Total Elastic Capture Res.Integ.
\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--
ENDF/B-VI 0.964 4.564 3.600 5.49
JENDL-3.3, CENDL-3 4.604 1.001 3.603 4.30
JEFF-3.0 3.842 0.259 3.582 4.20
Mughabghab et al. \[Mu81,Mu01\] 1.00.2 3.60.3 3.90.5^\*2^
Pomerance \[Po52\] 4.812%^\*1^
Cabell et al. \[Ca68\] 3.580.31^\*1^
Vertebnyj et al. \[Ve74\] 1.00.2
\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--
\*1 Maxwellian spectrum average
\*2 Calculated from resonance parameters
{width="8.009722222222223in"
height="6.710416666666666in"}
Fig. A1 Nd-144 total cross section
{width="8.010416666666666in"
height="6.708333333333333in"}
Fig. A2 Nd-144 capture cross section
{width="8.010416666666666in"
height="6.708333333333333in"}
Fig. A3 Nd-144 elastic scattering cross section
| en |
all-txt-docs | 540344 | CORS REPORT FOR DAY = 171 OF 2008
**************************************
Solution involved 157 sites.
No data at site = TMGO.
No data at site = KOD5.
No data at site = KOK5.
No data at site = KYW5.
No data at site = PUR5.
No data at site = MCN5.
No data at site = BOGT.
No data at site = ANG5.
No data at site = SRZN.
No data at site = ABL1.
No data at site = COH3.
No data at site = COH5.
Large positional residual at STAY
dx = -0.0410, dy = -0.0061, dz = 0.0273 meters.
dn = 0.0001, de = -0.0312, du = 0.0387 meters.
No data at site = VINU.
Large positional residual at WLA1
dx = -0.0218, dy = -0.0551, dz = 0.0467 meters.
dn = 0.0118, de = -0.0163, du = 0.0727 meters.
No data at site = KAR3.
No data at site = PRDU.
No data at site = CTA1.
No data at site = UT01.
No data at site = LOY6.
No data at site = WWED.
No data at site = YMTS.
No data at site = EFAY.
No data at site = WMTS.
No data at site = FMTS.
No data at site = XMTS.
_________________________
/disk2/Coopprod/Sum/sum.nrm1.08171 RESULTS
L3 EST POST-FIT RMS: 0.0158 M FROM 447082 OBSERVATIONS; 3867 OMITTED
_________________________
/disk2/Coopprod/Sum/sum.nrm2.08171 RESULTS
L3 EST POST-FIT RMS: 0.0190 M FROM 413654 OBSERVATIONS; 6752 OMITTED
FEW DD OBSERVATIONS ON BASELINE jbd2-mdo1 = 4381
_________________________
/disk2/Coopprod/Sum/sum.nrm3.08171 RESULTS
L3 EST POST-FIT RMS: 0.0204 M FROM 470940 OBSERVATIONS; 20246 OMITTED
_________________________
/disk2/Coopprod/Sum/sum.nrm4.08171 RESULTS
L3 EST POST-FIT RMS: 0.0162 M FROM 493097 OBSERVATIONS; 13216 OMITTED
_________________________
/disk2/Coopprod/Sum/sum.nrm5.08171 RESULTS
L3 EST POST-FIT RMS: 0.0169 M FROM 478965 OBSERVATIONS; 6320 OMITTED
_________________________
/disk2/Coopprod/Sum/sum.nrm6.08171 RESULTS
L3 EST POST-FIT RMS: 0.0147 M FROM 36205 OBSERVATIONS; 378 OMITTED
_________________________
NA-backbone RESULTS
L3 EST POST-FIT RMS: 0.0166 M FROM 376285 OBSERVATIONS; 4053 OMITTED
| en |
markdown | 333826 | # Presentation: 333826
## Wrong Turn on the Highway to Love
- Leonore Tiefer,PhD
- Department of Psychiatry
- NYU School of Medicine
- Prepared for
- FDA Advisory Committee
- Hearing on Intrinsa 12/2/04
## Selected Sexology Credentials
- Past-President International Academy of Sex Research
- Author or co-author of over 100 sexology publications since 1969
- Editorial Board of 11 sexology journals
- 2004 Distinguished Scientific Achievement Award, Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality
## Intrinsa: An “experiment” on women (Handout available on each topic)
- Dangers of Extended Testosterone Treatment
- Problems with HSDD Definitions and Measures
- Limitations of Intrinsa Trials
- P&G’s Plans to Promote Off-label Use of Intrinsa to Professionals and Consumers
## Recommendations
- 1) Postpone application until
- a) Larger and longer safety and efficacy trials with likely marketing targets:
- Postmenopausal intact women (w/ and w/o E & P)
- Premenopausal intact women
- Women on oral contraceptives
- b) Affordable testosterone assay for women
- 2) Add qualitative research component to assess individual experience
- 3) DDMAC monitoring of P&G CME and DTC advertising materials
## Endorsers of this Presentation (list with contact information available)
- Peggy Kleinplatz, PhD
- Richard B. Krueger, MD
- Meg Kaplan, PhD
- Anne Katz, RN, PhD
- Ellen Cole, PhD
- Marilyn Safir, PhD
- Maureen McHugh, PhD
- Lucy M.. Candib, MD
- Lisa Cosgrove, PhD
- Gina Ogden, PhD
- Sharon B. Diamond, MD
- Susan E. Bennett, MD
- Linda Perlin Alperstein, MSW
- Petra Boynton, PhD
- Arthur Zitrin, MD
- Patricia Whelehan, PhD
- Brunhild Kring, MD
- Anne Peplau, PhD
- Susan Mahler, MSW
- Peter R. Mansfield, MD
- Healthy Skepticism
- Canadian Women’s Hlth Netwrk
- Nat’l Women’s Hlth Netwrk
- Women & Health Protection
- Our Bodies Our Selves
- (As of 11/29/04) | en |
converted_docs | 324217 | Telework and the New Workplace of the 21^st^ Century - Executive Summary
America may be witnessing another historic transformation of the
workplace. In the pre-industrial world, workers lived in isolation,
usually on farms, and had little contact with one another. The
Industrial Revolution brought people into central locations \--
factories for most workers \-- to work in a strict top-down hierarchy.
The Information Age may return workers to their homes, and yet connect
them via modern technology to \"the virtual office.\"
Such a shift holds huge implications for how we work and how we live.
One thing we know for certain about telework \-- as working from home by
means of modern technology is now most often called \-- is that we
don\'t know enough about it. To increase national understanding of this
important phenomenon, Secretary of Labor Alexis M. Herman convened a
national symposium at Xavier University in New Orleans on October 16,
2000. This unprecedented gathering brought together for a day of
challenging, in-depth discussion more than 150 leading experts on
telework, including academics, social scientists, practitioners, public
officials, corporate executives, and representatives of organized labor.
A dozen studies presented at the symposium have been published as
\"Telework: The New Workplace of the 21^st^ Century\" and are available
on the Department of Labor\'s web site, www.dol.gov. These studies
provide the most comprehensive review of the literature on telework now
available. This Executive Summary reviews some of the most important
themes and conclusions in those papers.
The studies suggest that telework holds vast potential to benefit
workers, employers, and the American economy as a whole: to help
employees balance the demands of work and family, to promote diversity
and new opportunities for Americans who are outside the economic
mainstream, and to increase worker productivity and help companies
compete in the global marketplace.
Some have asked, \"Where will the new world of telework lead us?\" That
is the wrong question. The right questions are, how do we manage the new
world of work and the changing workplace, and, as a society, what must
we do to ensure that telework\'s benefits outweigh its costs. But before
we can make the choices that will lead to the best results, we must
understand telework better.
**Telework \-- Who Does it Now?**
The typical teleworker appears to be a college-educated white man,
between the ages of 34 and 55, who owns a home computer and earns more
than \$40,000 a year. Telework is best suited to jobs that are
information-based, portable and predictable, or that demand a high
degree of privacy and concentration. Typically, teleworkers have been
information workers in mid-level or senior positions, but the trend is
toward teleworking at all levels of employment.
By some estimates, there are between 13 and 19 million teleworkers in
America today. Some people telework full-time, but a larger number
telework one or two days a week.
**The Federal Initiative**
The federal government, with the support of Congress, has actively
supported telework since 1990, but could do much more. The federal
initiative has included both individuals working from home and regional
telecenters where federal agencies can lease workstations for their
employees. The telecenters program, begun in 1993, now includes 17 such
centers in the Washington, D.C., area and others across America.
One of the reports presented at the New Orleans symposium examined this
federal telework initiative and found it generally effective. The report
cited the General Services Administration New England regional office in
Boston, which set \-- and surpassed \-- a goal of having 10% of its
people work from home after a huge highway construction project made
commuting extremely difficult.
The report also cited the Consumer Product Safety Commission which now
has 95 of its 130 field employees working from home, with an estimated
savings of \$3 million in rental costs since the program began in 1993.
The federal initiative has also stressed telework as a means of
expanding opportunities for workers with disabilities.
The Department of Labor now has about 350 employees who are formally
teleworking and 2000 more who telework on an informal basis. One example
is Laura Patton-Watson, a cost negotiator in Washington, DC. Soon after
Laura married, her husband, an army officer, was assigned to a base in
Germany. Not wanting to lose a valuable employee, Laura\'s supervisor
arranged for her to telework from Germany for two years. When Laura
returned to Washington, she received a promotion. Then her husband was
transferred again, and now she is teleworking from Yorktown, Virginia.
Labor\'s teleworkers also include more than 30 staff attorneys who work
at home one to three days a week, using e-mail and on-line legal
research just as they do at the office. This has enabled their agencies
to minimize office space because the teleworkers share offices and most
often are not there at the same time.
Although the number of federal teleworkers increased from about 4,000 to
an estimated 25,000 during the Clinton Administration, that still
amounts to only about 2% of the federal workforce*,* compared with an
estimated 10% teleworking in the private sector. A management culture
that often resists change is largely responsible for the relatively low
number of federal teleworkers. Since the federal program was motivated
by the need to hire and retain outstanding employees, as well as to help
workers balance work and family, the federal government clearly should
do better.
As telework expands in both the public and private sectors, it should
not be simply a fringe benefit for the most skilled and educated
workers, but a powerful tool for bringing into the economic mainstream
millions of people who have too often been denied opportunity, such as
Americans with disabilities. Researchers and policy makers must focus on
questions of access to technology and technology literacy as a basic
element of our future investigation of telework.
**Workers: Benefits, Costs, and Open Questions**
[Balancing Work and Family]{.underline}
Telework can provide much-needed flexibility to working parents, thus
reducing \"role overload\" and enhancing family life. Still, the
assumption that teleworkers spend more \"quality time\" with their
children was challenged by a new national survey. Older children (grades
7 to 12) of teleworking fathers were 11% more likely to agree that \"my
father does not have the energy to do things with me because of his
job\" and \"my father has not been in a good mood with me because of his
job\" than the children of fathers who work in an office. Telework may
well be beneficial for parents in some cases, but much depends on how
each parent interacts with his or her children.
[Blurred Boundaries Between \"Work\" and \"Home\"]{.underline}
Thanks to e-mail, mobile phones and pagers, people who work at home may
find themselves on call around the clock. Some teleworkers may thrive on
round-the-clock pressure, but others will want to maintain clear
boundaries between work time and personal time. They may find it useful
to have a clearly-defined home office. And they may raise questions
about overtime pay when work spills over into personal time.
One participant at the New Orleans symposium noted that, when parents
work at home with children in the house, men may see the kids as a
\"temptation\" while women see them as a \"responsibility.\" Thus, the
participant said, a physically separate home office and a fixed schedule
are particularly important when women work at home with children in the
house.
[Social Isolation or the Virtual Community]{.underline}
On Labor Day 1999, Secretary Herman issued a study entitled
\"*futurework*: Trends and Challenges for Work in the 21^st^ Century.\"
The report posed important questions about the impact of technology on
human interactions in the workplace.
As technology continues to spread, questions emerge: What are we losing
as a society? What is the effect on social relations? Work, after all,
is more than just a job or paycheck. It is where we meet friends, share
ideas, and build a common sense of purpose and a social network. With
voice mail, e-mail, and computer networks, how do we preserve the human
network and the social interaction that work has helped to facilitate?
What takes its place?
As this suggests, isolation is a danger for those who live and work at
home. Still, the evidence suggests that teleworkers are generally
included in office networks and find themselves able to maintain
personal relationships with co-workers. In fact, the \"virtual office\"
can support genuine social interaction. This may be the result of an
important cultural shift in American life: close personal relationships
that develop and continue across sizable distances.
In fact, it appears that virtual groups are able to go beyond a business
environment to build personal relationships: one of the participants
told about a \"virtual roast\" she had organized for another member of
her virtual workteam.
Despite its benefits, telework must not be allowed to further isolate
individuals, certain occupations, or geographical areas \-- for many
people may need human contact as much as they need income. Managers must
seek ways to keep teleworkers involved with the central office as well
as with the other teleworkers on their \"virtual team.\"
The workforce of the future is going to include a great many people who
have often been excluded because of age, gender, race, geography or
disability. One of the challenges facing America is to leverage our
diversity \-- to make full use of all the talents of all the people in
our uniquely diverse, multi-racial, multi-cultural society. Only by
doing so can we live up to our highest ideals and compete with all our
strength in the world economy. For Americans with disabilities, and
other groups as well, telework can help meet that challenge.
[Avoiding the Commute]{.underline}
For many teleworkers, the number-one motivation for seeking an
alternative work arrangement is to reduce or eliminate the increasingly
long and brutal commute that so many American workers now endure. Some
have speculated that the growth of telework could eventually have a
dramatic impact on our society, both in terms of where workers would
choose to live \-- if liberated from the commute \-- and in terms of
environmental gains if fewer commuters are on the highways and fewer
cars are polluting the air. In theory, full-time teleworkers could move
to isolated areas, but there is no evidence that substantial numbers
have done so thus far or would in the future.
Telework offers benefits \-- relief from commuting among them \-- but it
is far from clear that the elimination, or even the serious reduction,
of pollution or gridlock is on the horizon. If workers stop commuting,
they and their families may drive just as far to shop or attend school.
We need continued efforts to bring labor economists together with urban
planning, environmental science, and transportation scholars, among
others, to assess the relationship between telework and the commute.
**Employers: Benefits, Costs, and Open Questions**
[Increasing Productivity]{.underline}
Proponents of telework say it will increase productivity for several
reasons. Teleworkers may have a clearer sense of expectations because of
more specific instructions from their supervisors. Teleworkers may use
their time better at home and suffer fewer interruptions. They can
arrange their workplaces in whatever way suits them best. Given more
autonomy, teleworkers may assume more responsibility for meeting or
exceeding goals. At best, telework may enable motivated workers to
unleash their talents with the help of managers who are willing to try
new ideas that may benefit both workers and employers.
Nowhere is research more needed than on the question of whether telework
increases productivity. Some objective evaluations do exist, but most
often claims of increased productivity are based on subjective
evaluations by the teleworkers themselves or by their supervisors. Most
of these subjective evaluations report productivity gains of 20 to 35%
or more, but experts view self-assessments with polite skepticism.
Studies typically do not compare the productivity of teleworkers to
workers in traditional arrangements. If they do, the evaluations do not
make clear how much of the increased productivity is due solely to
telework and how much of it is because managers have selected their most
productive and motivated workers for telework assignments.
Telework clearly appeals to many managers, but those who resist it may
cite a lack of \"hard\" evidence that cost savings and increased
productivity will compensate for start-up costs such as training and new
equipment. They may also cite a lack of evidence that productivity gains
will be permanent. We need more and better objective evaluations of the
relationship between telework and productivity.
[Retaining the Best People]{.underline}
Many companies now regard telework and other flexible work arrangements
as vital to attracting and keeping the employees they want.
*Business Week* noted recently that \"the best that corporations can do
is to create an environment that makes the best people want to stay.\"
Today\'s young, educated, in-demand skilled workers can often write
their own tickets, and they may see flexible work arrangements as a
\"must\" along with the pay and benefits they can command.
Moreover, losing valuable employees is expensive. By one estimate, it
costs an employer one-third of a worker\'s annual salary to replace that
individual. If telework can reduce turnover, it can be a high-return
investment for employers. The existing evidence suggests that telework
can lower turnover, but it is scant and we need to learn more.
**Telework in Practice**
Telework represents a dramatic restructuring of relationships between
workers and managers and presents both opportunities and challenges to
organizations. It can be a mirror that forces organizations to take a
hard look at themselves, at how they make decisions, and at their most
basic assumptions about work, workers and work locations.
The first challenge for managers is to identify the jobs best suited to
distance work. Jobs in sales, customer service, and auditing, for
example, can be converted to full-time telework, but jobs requiring
face-to-face contact with co-workers or customers are difficult if not
impossible to perform from home. There is still much room for creativity
in shaping the world of telework.
A second challenge is closely related: managers must select teleworkers
who are suited to the new work environment. Teleworkers must share the
work ethic and values of the organization and, therefore, may best be
selected from within the employer\'s workforce. Teleworkers need
time-management skills and they must be self-motivated, trustworthy, and
able to work independently. Even the most skilled teleworkers may need
training in how to work effectively in a new environment.
The third challenge is how to evaluate teleworkers. The traditional
system based on direct observation won\'t work. Instead, telemanagers
must rely on such evidence as the time it takes the worker to respond to
phone calls or e-mails, or simply on overall productivity. With fewer
opportunities for informal discussions, in the hallway or at the water
cooler, on how a project is progressing, the manager must be more clear
about expectations before a teleworker begins a task. Telemanagers may
have to learn new skills and management techniques, with emphasis on
results-based evaluation. Some managers say that, in learning to manage
teleworkers, they have also improved their ability to manage in the
office.
**Empowering Workers**
Telework has the potential to shift power toward the individual.
Sociologist George Gilder wrote in 1989, \"Rather than pushing decisions
up through the hierarchy, the power of microelectronics pulls them
remorselessly down to the individual.\"
In workplace mythology, the employer has often been seen as the
all-wise, all-powerful parent. Yet modern technology encourages
workplace paternalism to give way to self-actualization. Management may
evolve from parent to partner. One writer calls this the end of
America\'s adolescence, as the worker becomes a responsible adult who
takes responsibility for decisions. One of the basic goals of the
Clinton-Gore Administration\'s far-reaching reinvention of government
was to empower front-line workers to make more decisions. Telework can
accelerate that trend both in government and the private sector of the
economy.
**Unanswered Questions**
Telework raises far more questions than we have been able to address in
this summary. Some of these questions are examined in the collection of
papers from the New Orleans symposium and we recommend it to those
seeking more information.
Many questions exist relating to telework tax incentive programs, the
impact of telework on unions and unionization, pay policies and overtime
for telework, how telework should be defined, how it can be made
accessible to more workers, how managers can be made to understand and
accept it, and its potential for abuse. One participant in the New
Orleans symposium suggested a future in which a core of central
employees would direct a much larger staff of contract workers. If so,
what would be the terms of employment for those contract workers? Would
they have to fight for status and benefits as today\'s \"temp\" workers
have? Some argue that, in exchange for the benefits of working at home,
teleworkers should accept lower pay \-- and others respond that
increased productivity might just as well justify *higher* pay.
Amid all the questions surrounding telework, we have two certainties: it
will continue to grow and we need to know more about it. The potential
of telework cannot be realized without an expanded national research and
demonstration effort that more fully evaluates the costs and benefits of
this powerful new force in our society.
**Summing Up**
The United States has a rich history with regard to telecommunications
and transportation policy. In the 1950s, we built the greatest national
highway system in the world. In the late 1970s and 1980s, we originated
the information superhighway that came to be known as the Internet. We
must continue our pioneering commitment to universal access into the
realm of telework. Our education system must do more to train teachers
and students in the use of information technology and entire communities
must create economic development plans that maximize technology\'s role.
In today\'s economy, the traditional Three R\'s are not enough - we all
need the Fourth R of Technological Readiness.
We do not yet know the full potential of telework to change our society,
but we do know that technology can break down many walls. As John
Chambers, CEO of Cisco Systems, says, \"There are two fundamental
equalizers in life - the Internet and education.\" We must make full use
of them both.
Telework is not a silver bullet for solving skills shortages, helping
workers balance work and family, and increasing diversity in the
workplace. But it provides a unique example of the power of technology
to break down barriers. What will be the impact of telework on our
society? The answer depends on whether or not we grow to understand
telework and then to manage it properly.
| en |
all-txt-docs | 079299 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Release No. 7525 / April 23, 1998
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 39905 / April 23, 1998
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-9582
:
:
In the Matter of:
:
MERIDIAN SECURITIES, INC.,:ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
CORESTATES CAPITAL MARKETS:PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS
(as successors to MERIDIAN:AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL
CAPITAL MARKETS, INC.), AND:SANCTIONS AND CEASE-AND-
MARTIN J. STALLONE,:DESIST ORDER
:
Respondents.:
:
:
:
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
appropriate and in the public interest that administrative
proceedings be instituted pursuant to Section 8A of the
Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and Sections 15(b), 15B
and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act")
against Meridian Securities, Inc. ("Meridian Securities"), a
broker-dealer registered with the Commission, CoreStates Capital
Markets ("CoreStates Capital"), a municipal securities dealer
registered with the Commission, and Martin J. Stallone
("Stallone").
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Meridian
Securities, CoreStates Capital and Stallone have submitted Offers
of Settlement which the Commission has determined to accept.
Solely for purposes of these proceedings and any other proceeding
brought by or on behalf of the Commission or in which the
Commission is a party, without admitting or denying the findings
contained herein, except that Meridian Securities, CoreStates
Capital and Stallone admit that the Commission has jurisdiction
over them and over the subject matter of these proceedings,
Meridian Securities, CoreStates Capital and Stallone consent to
the entry of an Order Instituting Public Proceedings, Making
Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and Cease-and-Desist
Order ("Order") as set forth below.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that proceedings against Meridian
Securities, CoreStates Capital and Stallone be, and hereby are,
instituted.
II.
On the basis of this Order, and the Offers of Settlement
submitted by Meridian Securities, CoreStates Capital and
Stallone, the Commission finds that: [1]
A.At all times relevant to this proceeding, Meridian Securities,
headquartered inReading, Pennsylvania, was registered with the
Commission as a broker-dealer. It isthe successor, in form, to
the municipal securities dealer registration of Meridian Capital
Markets, Inc. ("Meridian Capital").[2]
B.At all times relevant to this proceeding, CoreStates Capital, a
division ofCoreStates Bank, N.A. ("CoreStates Bank"), was
registered with the Commission as amunicipal securities dealer
pursuant to Section 15B(a)(2) of the Exchange Act.[3]CoreStates
Capital is the de facto successor to Meridian Capital and is
named as aRespondent solely on that basis. It has continued the
operations of Meridian Capital,including advance refunding
transactions. Meridian Capital's customer accounts havebeen
transferred to CoreStates Capital. Although certain key
personnel, formerlyassociated with Meridian Capital, are now
employed by CoreStates Capital, the seniormanagement of Meridian
Capital and the senior officers of Meridian Capital's Public
Finance Department with primary responsibility for the
transactions described hereinwere not employed by CoreStates
Capital or any of its affiliates following the mergerbetween
CoreStates Bank and Meridian Bank.
C.At all times relevant to this proceeding, Stallone was
registered as a municipalsecurities representative with Meridian
Capital. Stallone joined Meridian Capital in1989 at age 24 and
became a vice-president of Meridian Capital's Public Finance
Department in 1993. Despite his title, Stallone did not have a
managerial position atany time during his employment at Meridian
Capital, and he voluntarily resigned fromMeridian Capital prior
to the merger between CoreStates Bank and Meridian Bank.
D.From at least March 1993 through December 1995, Meridian
Capital, Stalloneand another employee of Meridian Capital
willfully violated Section 17(a) of theSecurities Act and Section
10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, in theoffer
and sale and in connection with the purchase and sale, of
securities in that they,directly and indirectly, by the use of
the means or instruments of transportation orcommunication in
interstate commerce, or the means and instrumentalities of
interstatecommerce, or of the mails, employed devices, schemes,
or artifices to defraud;obtained money and property by means of,
or otherwise made, untrue statements ofmaterial fact or omitted
to state material facts necessary to make the statements made,in
the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading; orengaged in acts, transactions, practices or courses
of business which would and didoperate as a fraud or deceit upon
the purchasers of such securities and on other persons,such as
the issuers of municipal securities.
E.Meridian Capital, Stallone and another employee of Meridian Capital
engaged in a scheme to generate substantial profits by charging various
Pennsylvania and West Virginia municipalities excessive, undisclosed mark-
ups on U.S. Treasury securities ("Treasury securities") sold in connection
with various tax-exempt advance refunding transactions and in two other
cases involving another type of refinancing. They increased the prices of
Treasury securities in order to reduce the yield, thereby purporting to
comply with the federal tax laws governing tax-exempt advance refunding
transactions. This practice is commonly known as "yield burning."
Meridian Capital, Stallone and another employee of Meridian Capital
calculated mark-ups on a portfolio basis and, as a result, charged
excessive mark-ups on individual Treasury securities ranging as high as
13.78 percent in connection with various advance refunding transactions and
as high as 46.29 percent in two other cases involving another type of
refinancing. The mark-ups were excessive based upon all of the relevant
facts and circumstances surrounding the sales of the particular Treasury
securities. On five occasions, Meridian Capital, Stallone and/or another
employee of Meridian Capital also falsely certified in writing that the
prices charged for the Treasury securities were in essence fair market
prices, as defined by federal tax regulations. In addition, Meridian
Capital and others engaged in an undisclosed payment arrangement in order
to secure Meridian Capital's selection as escrow provider in certain
transactions. As a result of this pattern of conduct, Meridian Capital
earned substantial profits and Stallone and another employee of Meridian
Capital earned substantial commissions.
F.Excessive Mark-ups
1.Beginning in 1988, Meridian Capital solicited various
municipalities toundertake various financing transactions,
including advance refundingtransactions. In an advance refunding
transaction, a municipality issues tax-exempt municipal
securities (the "refunding bonds") in order to defease a pre-
existing issue of bonds usually bearing higher interest rates.
Because the pre-existing bonds cannot be paid off immediately,
the proceeds of the refundingbonds are invested in Treasury
securities, which are deposited into an escrowaccount established
on behalf of the municipality and irrevocably pledged to paythe
principal and interest on the old bonds as they become due.
Advancerefunding transactions generally enable municipalities to
realize savings, in partbecause the refunding bonds are issued at
lower interest rates.
2.Meridian Capital's Public Finance Department ("Public Finance"), inwhich
Stallone and others were employed, handled many advance refunding
transactions in addition to other types of municipal financings. In
connectionwith these advance refunding transactions, Meridian Capital often
acted as theunderwriter for the municipal issuer as well as the escrow
provider. As theunderwriter, Meridian Capital sold the bonds that were
issued by themunicipalities. As the escrow provider, the firm selected the
Treasurysecurities for the escrow account and sold them to the
municipalities.
3.The Pennsylvania Public Finance Group ("Pennsylvania Group"), which
primarily conducted business in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware, was
a part of Public Finance. The employees of the Pennsylvania Group, which
included Stallone, were compensated through commissions based upon a
percentage of the profits earned by Public Finance, including mark-ups on
Treasury securities sold in connection with advance refunding transactions.
4.Stallone and another employee of Meridian Capital were primarily
responsible for selecting and pricing the Treasury securities that Meridian
Capital sold to the municipalities. Specifically, they identified the
Treasury securities needed for the escrow accounts and set the prices at
which Meridian Capital sold these securities. Although an entire portfolio
of securities selected for an escrow account was sold to the municipality,
Meridian Capital generated a separate confirmation slip for each individual
Treasury security.
5.In accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and Internal
RevenueService ("IRS") regulations in effect during the relevant
time period, where amunicipality issued tax-exempt advance
refunding bonds, the overall yield onthe investments held in the
escrow account could not materially exceed (whichunder the tax
regulations essentially meant that it could not be more than one-
thousandth of one percentage point higher than) the yield on the
refundingbonds. If the overall yield on the escrow securities
materially exceeded theyield on the bonds, the bonds would be
deemed "arbitrage bonds" and the tax-exempt status of the
refunding bonds would be jeopardized. If the yield on theopen
market escrow securities, purchased at fair market value, were to
materially exceed the yield on the refunding bonds (a "positive
arbitrage"situation), the IRS regulations effectively required
that the excess yield (knownas "arbitrage profit") be reduced by
investing a portion of the escrow account inState and Local
Government Series ("SLGS") - customized securities issued bythe
U.S. Treasury at below market interest rates specifically for the
purpose ofallowing municipal issuers to comply with the IRS yield
restrictions. A mix ofTreasury securities and SLGS in the escrow
account can be used to ensure thatthe yield on the escrow account
will not be higher than the yield on therefunding bonds.
6.One way to circumvent these yield limitations is through a practice
commonly known as "yield burning" - that is, lowering the yield earned on
escrowsecurities by excessively increasing the price an issuer pays for
those securities.Such an increase in the price paid by the issuer has no
direct economic impact onthe issuer in a positive arbitrage situation,
because any increased markup paid bythe issuer would otherwise have to be
transferred tothe U.S. Treasury through thepurchase of SLGS. Thus, this
practice enriches the seller of the escrow securitiesat the expense of the
U.S. Treasury, which otherwise would receive the arbitrageprofit. It also
exposes the issuer and its investors to the risk of losing the bonds'tax-
exempt status. In a negative arbitrage situation (i.e., when the yield of
theopen market escrow securities, when purchased at fair market value,
would notexceed the yield on the refunding bonds), any increase in the
price paid for theescrow securities directly harms the issuer, but does not
have federal taximplications.
7.Applicable provisions of the IRS regulations in effect at the time of the
transactions at issue here generally required that the escrow investments
bepurchased at fair market value. In particular, the Treasury securities
had to bevalued at the price at which a willing buyer would purchase the
investment froma willing seller in a bona fide, arm's-length transaction.
26 C.F.R. 1.148-5(d)(6), T.D. 8476, 58 F.R. 33510 (June 18, 1993).
8.Pursuant to the IRS regulations, municipalities issuing tax-
exempt bondswere required to certify, based on their reasonable
expectations, that the bondswere not arbitrage bonds. In various
advance refundings handled by MeridianCapital during the relevant
time period, the municipalities made suchcertifications.
9.Meridian Capital, Stallone and another employee of Meridian Capital
improperly retained the arbitrage profits generated from the sale of
Treasury securities without the knowledge or consent of the municipalities.
The conduct entailed inflating the prices for certain individual Treasury
securities in order to reduce the overall yield earned on the portfolio of
Treasury securities, thereby meeting the yield restrictions. The
undisclosed mark-ups charged on the individual Treasury securities (which
reached as high as 13.78 percent) in the various advance refundings were
excessive based upon all of the relevant facts and circumstances
surrounding the sales of the particular Treasury securities.
10.In two instances, Meridian Capital, Stallone and another employee of
Meridian Capital charged municipalities excessive, undisclosed mark-ups in
advance refunding transactions which, notwithstanding the size of the mark-
ups, did not exceed applicable yield restrictions and, therefore, did not
raise any issue of compliance with IRS regulations. The mark-ups charged
on these securities transactions were excessive based upon all of the
relevant facts and circumstances, and, as a result, the municipalities
involved in these two transactions (the Reading School Authority and the
Borough of Ambler) were financially harmed.
G.Misrepresentations and Omissions
1.In connection with the sale of Treasury securities to the municipalities,
Meridian Capital, Stallone and/or another employee of Meridian Capital also
made certain material misrepresentations and omissions. In 5 instances,
they provided documents in the form of certifications that in essence
represented that the prices on the Treasury securities were at fair market
value and established without an intent to reduce yield. In fact, the
prices on the Treasury securities in those transactions exceeded their fair
market value by reason of the mark-ups that were charged, and were
established with an intent to reduce the yield on the Treasury securities.
The municipalities relied upon these representations in making their
certifications that the bonds were not arbitrage bonds.
2.In certain advance refunding transactions, Meridian Capital served as
both underwriter and escrow provider. In such transactions, Stallone and
others advised municipalities with respect to how the transactions should
be structured, including, but not limited to, the investment of the
refunding bond proceeds. The municipalities relied upon Meridian Capital,
Stallone and others to provide Treasury securities that were suitable for
retiring the pre-existing issue of municipal bonds in accordance with IRS
yield restriction requirements.
3.Meridian Capital, Stallone and another employee of Meridian Capital
failed to disclose to the municipalities that they had sold the Treasury
securities to the municipalities for more than their fair market value by
reason of the mark-ups that were charged and, thereby, jeopardized the tax-
exempt status of the refunding bonds.
4.As underwriter of various advance refunding bonds, Meridian Capital had
an obligation to have a reasonable basis for belief in the truthfulness and
completeness of the key representations made in the disclosure documents
used in the securities offerings. Exch. Act Rel. No. 26100 (Sept. 22,
1988). In addition, employees of Meridian Capital participated in the
preparation of those offering documents, and were responsible for various
representations contained in those documents. The offering documents did
not disclose to potential bond purchasers that Meridian Capital, Stallone
and another employee of Meridian Capital had sold the Treasury securities
to the municipalities for more than their fair market value by reason of
the mark-ups that were charged. Nor did the documents disclose that they
did so in order to receive arbitrage profits in those advance refundings
and had, thereby, placed the tax-exempt status of the refunding bonds in
jeopardy. Therefore, Meridian Capital, Stallone and another employee of
Meridian Capital also failed to disclose material facts in the offering
documents which were distributed to the bond purchasers in those advance
refunding transactions.
H.Undisclosed Payments
1.Meridian Capital and others also engaged in an undisclosedfinancial
arrangement involving three advance refundings with municipalities inWest
Virginia. In these advance refundings, Meridian Capital was responsiblefor
providing the Treasury securities sold to the municipalities, but was not
theunderwriter. Meridian Capital secured its role as the escrow provider
by payingundisclosed fees to two financial consultants.
2.One of the financial consultants, an independent contractor,
providedservices to the underwriter on the three West Virginia
advance refundingransactions. Among other things, he was
responsible for selecting a broker ora dealer to provide the
Treasury securities needed for the escrow accounts.
3. During the fall of 1993, before Meridian Capital became involved in the
West Virginia advance refunding transactions, the two financial consultants
contacted an employee of Meridian Capital about Meridian Capital becoming
the escrow provider in the first of the three advance refundings. In order
to ensure Meridian Capital's selection, an employee of Meridian Capital
entered into an undisclosed arrangement with the two financial consultants
whereby it was agreed that Meridian Capital would pay them a pre-determined
percentage of the profits generated from Meridian Capital's sale of
Treasury securities to the West Virginia municipality. In addition to
securing Meridian Capital's selection in the first advance refunding, the
arrangement ensured Meridian Capital's selection as the escrow provider in
future advance refundings in which the two financial consultants were
involved.
4.In the same manner as they had done in the other advance refundings,
Meridian Capital, Stallone and another employee of Meridian Capital charged
excessive mark-ups on the Treasury securities sold to the West Virginia
municipalities in order to retain the arbitrage profits.
5.After the Treasury securities were sold to the municipalities, Meridian
Capital made payments to the two financial consultants, as previously
agreed. In addition, an employee of Meridian Capital directed the two
financial consultants to generate invoices, which falsely reflected that
they had provided services to Meridian Capital in exchange for the
payments. Neither of the consultants performed any services in exchange
for the payments, other than securing Meridian Capital's selection as
escrow provider.
6.In each of the three West Virginia advance refundings, Meridian Capital,
Stallone and another employee of Meridian Capital provided certificates
directly to the municipalities in which they made affirmative
misrepresentations concerning the suitability of the Treasury securities
and compliance with the IRS yield restriction requirements. The West
Virginia municipalities were unaware of the financial arrangement.
I.Other Excessive Mark-ups
1.In June 1994 and May 1995, Meridian Capital, Stallone and another
employee of Meridian Capital handled two refinancings that involved the
establishment of sinking funds on behalf of two Pennsylvania
municipalities. In these refinancings, the municipalities sought to
defease prior offerings of tax-exempt municipal bonds. However, rather
than using proceeds from the issuance of refunding bonds, the
municipalities used other sources of funds to defease the old bonds.
2.Meridian Capital, Stallone and another employee of Meridian Capital were
responsible for providing the Treasury securities that were deposited into
escrow accounts established on behalf of the municipalities in these two
transactions. As with advance refunding transactions, the Treasury
securities in the escrow account were subject to yield restriction
requirements under the federal tax laws.
3.With respect to these two refinancings, Meridian Capital, Stallone and
another employee of Meridian Capital calculated mark-ups on a portfolio
basis and, as a result, charged excessive mark-ups on individual Treasury
securities that reached as high as 46.29 percent. Neither the mark-ups nor
the fact that Meridian Capital had earned arbitrage profits in these
refinancings, was ever disclosed to the municipalities. The mark-ups were
excessive based upon all of the relevant facts and circumstances.
III.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission deems it
appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions
specified in the Offers of Settlement submitted by Meridian
Securities, CoreStates Capital, and Stallone:
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
A.Meridian Securities' registration as a broker-dealer is
revoked;
B.Stallone be, and hereby is, censured;
C.CoreStates Capital and Stallone shall cease and desist from committingor
causing any violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the
Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
thereunder;
D.CoreStates Capital and Stallone are directed to comply with their
undertakingsto pay an aggregate of $3,820,884, to be apportioned as
follows:$3,720,884 shall be paid by CoreStates Capital, and $100,000 shall
be paid byStallone;
1. Of the aggregate amount, $414,070 shall be paid to the Reading
SchoolAuthority and $6,814 shall be paid to the Borough of Ambler
within ten days ofthe date of entry of this Order;
2.The remaining $3.4 million shall be paid to the United States
Treasurypursuant to an agreement simultaneously entered into
between MeridianSecurities, CoreStates Financial Corp, the
Internal Revenue Service and theUnited States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York;
3.CoreStates Capital and Stallone shall provide written confirmation to
Ronald C. Long, District Administrator, Securities and Exchange Commission,
Philadelphia District Office, 601 Walnut Street, Suite 1120E.,
Philadelphia, PA19106, that the payments specified in sub-paragraphs D.1.
and D.2. above,havebeen duly made;
E.Stallone shall pay a civil penalty of $15,000 to the United
States Treasury. Suchpayment shall be: (1) paid within thirty
days of the date of the entry of this Order; (2)made by United
States postal money order, certified check, bank cashier's check,
or bankmoney order; (3) made payable to the Securities and
Exchange Commission; (4) hand-delivered or mailed to the
Comptroller, Securities and Exchange Commission, Mail Stop0-3,
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549; and (5) submitted
under coverletter which identifies Stallone as a Respondent in
this proceeding and the file number ofthis proceeding. A copy of
the cover letter and money order or check shall besimultaneously
sent to Ronald C. Long, District Administrator, Securities and
ExchangeCommission, Philadelphia District Office, 601 Walnut
Street, Suite 1120E., Philadelphia,PA 19106;
F.Stallone be, and hereby is, suspended from association with any
broker, dealer,municipal securities dealer, investment adviser,
or investment company, for a period oftwelve months, effective on
the second Monday following the entry of this Order; and
G.Stallone shall provide to the Commission, within thirty days
after the end of thetwelve month suspension period described in
paragraph F. above, an affidavit that hehas complied fully with
the suspension.
By the Commission.
Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary
**FOOTNOTES**
[1]:The findings herein are made pursuant to the Offers of Settlement of
Meridian Securities, CoreStates Capital, and Stallone and are not binding
on any other person or entity named as a respondent in this or any other
proceeding.
[2]:Meridian Capital was a municipal securities dealer registered with the
Commission pursuant to Section 15B(a)(2) of the Exchange Act from February
1987 through November 1996, when the entity officially ceased operations.
[3]:On April 9, 1996, CoreStates Financial Corp., the holding company for
CoreStates Bank, N.A. merged with Meridian Bancorp, Inc., the holding
company for Meridian Bank. By operation of the merger, on June 27, 1996,
Meridian Bank, together with its division Meridian Capital, was dissolved,
and its operations and personnel became part of CoreStates Bank and
CoreStates Capital.
| en |
converted_docs | 877409 | DENVER HOMEOWNERSHIP CENTER
SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING
UNDERWRITING INDEX (J -- M)
(Revised May 1, 2006)
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| # SUBJECT | **HANDBOOK** | * |
| | | *MORTGAGEE |
| | **(HB)** | LETTER |
| | | (ML)** |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| ## J | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| JUDGMENTS | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 2-3C | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| ## K | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| KICK BACK | See Conflict of | |
| | Interest | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| KIDDIE CONDOS | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 1-8B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| ## L | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LAND | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Excess | HB 4150.2, | |
| | | |
| | Sections 4-4; | |
| | 4-5A(2) | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LAND CONTRACTS/CONTRACTS FOR DEED | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 1-8E | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LATE CHARGERS ON NOTE | HB 4330.1, REV-5 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LATE SUBMISSION & PAY HISTORY | HB 4004.2, | MLs 04-14; |
| | Section 5-2 | 90-41 |
| | | |
| | HB 4165.1, | |
| | | |
| | Sections 3-1, | |
| | B-3 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LEAD-BASED PAINT | HB 4150.2, | MLs 99-18; |
| | | 97-27; |
| | Section 3-6A | |
| | (17) | 96-67; |
| | | 96-29; |
| | | 96-10 |
| | | |
| | | Directive |
| | | 00-20 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Contractor's Disclosure (EPA) Form | | MLs 99-18; |
| | | 99-22 ; |
| | | |
| | | Notice |
| | | 96-78 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Disclosure, Section 1018 Rule | | Notice H |
| | | 99-01; |
| | | |
| | | Notice |
| | | 97-31 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| EPA Pamphlet | | ML 00-01 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| HECM & 203K | HB 4235.1, | ML 00-01 |
| | Section 3-5E | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| REO | | Directive |
| | | 01-1; |
| | | |
| | | Notice |
| | | 96-78 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| # SUBJECT | **HANDBOOK** | * |
| | | *MORTGAGEE |
| | **(HB)** | LETTER |
| | | (ML)** |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LEASEHOLD (Leased Land) | HB 4150.1, | ML 94-2 |
| | Chapter 6, | |
| | Section 5 (6-30 | 24 CFR |
| | to 6-33) | 203.41 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LENDER APPROVAL | HBs 4000.4; | MLs 95-36; |
| | | 96-10; |
| | HB 4000.2, | 96-18; |
| | Section 1-4; | 97-14; |
| | | 94-47 |
| | HB 4700.2; | |
| | | |
| | HB 4060.1 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Net Branching | | ML 00-15 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LENDER EMPLOYEES/PART TIME | | MLs 94-39; |
| | | 95-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LENDER INSURANCE PROGRAM | | ML 05-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LENDERS | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Closing in Name of Correspondent or | | ML 95-36 |
| Sponsor | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Contracting Out Origination | | ML 95-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Employees | | MLs 95-36; |
| | | 94-39 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Elimination of Brick and Mortar | | ML 95-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Exclusive Employment | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 2-14 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Extra Territory | HB 4000.1, | ML 95-36 |
| | Section 2-18A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Geographic Locations | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 2-18 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Mortgagee Approval | HB 4060.1 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Net Branching | | MLs 00-15; |
| | | 00-05 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| QC Plan Requirements | | ML 95-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Real Estate Agent | | ML 96-18 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Territorial Approval | HB 4060.1, | |
| | | |
| | Section 2-18 & | |
| | 2-19 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LIABILITIES | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Child Support | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 2-11A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Contingent | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 2-11B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Not To Be Considered | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 2-11D | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Projected (Student Loans) | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 2-11C | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Recurring | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 2-11A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Less than 10 months | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 2-11A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LIENS | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Federal Tax (Subordination) | HB 4155.1, | ML 97-26 |
| | Section 2-5B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| # SUBJECT | **HANDBOOK** | * |
| | | *MORTGAGEE |
| | **(HB)** | LETTER |
| | | (ML)** |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LOAN CALCULATION | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Purchase Money Mortgage | | MLs 98-31; |
| | | 98-29; |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Hi-ratio Construction | | MLs 98-31; |
| | | 98-29; |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Rounding | | ML 96-46 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Storm Shelters | | ML 00-04 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Streamline Refinance | | ML 01-12 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LOAN CLOSING | HB 4000.2, | |
| | Section 5-1 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LOAN/MORTGAGE LIMITS | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Land Contract Payoff | HB 4155.1, | ML 94-07 |
| | Section 1-8E | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Maximum Mortgage Limits | | ML 03-23 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Multiples of \$1.00 | | ML 94-46 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Rounding | | ML 96-46 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LOAN ORIGINATION/CONTRACTING OUT | | ML 95-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Flood Plain | | MLs 97-41; |
| | | 97-22; |
| | | 90-16 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| New/Proposed Construction | HB 4150.1, | |
| | Section 1(1); | |
| | | |
| | HB 4150.2 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LOAN TO VALUE | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Streamline Refinance | | ML 91-26, |
| | | #2-5 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LOMA (Letter of Map Amendment) | HB 4150.2, | |
| | Section 2-2L | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LOMR (Letter of Map Revision) | HB 4150.2, | |
| | Section 2-2L | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| LOSS MITIGATION | | ML 00-05 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Claims Instructions | | ML 99-27 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Default Counseling | | ML 00-05 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Model Note/Mortgage | | ML 97-17 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Partial Claim | | MLs 01-14; |
| | | 00-05 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Performance Scores | | ML 02-11 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Special Forbearance Modification | | ML 01-14 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Time Frame Clarification | | ML 01-14 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| # SUBJECT | **HANDBOOK** | * |
| | | *MORTGAGEE |
| | **(HB)** | LETTER |
| | | (ML)** |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| ## M | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MANUFACTURED HOMES | HB 4145.1, | |
| | | |
| | App. 11 and 12 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Appraisal | HB 4150.2, 8 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Eligibility | HB 4145.1, | |
| | Section 3-4 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Less Than One Year Old | HB 4145.1, | |
| | | |
| | Chap. 3 Section | |
| | 4 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Not Moved From Another Location | HB 4145.1, | |
| | Section 3-4A5 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Red Tag (IBTS) | | \(703\) |
| | | 482-2010 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Required Documents (High & Low | | ML 96-29 |
| Ratio) | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Permanent Foundation Guide | | ML 97-36; |
| | | |
| | | HUD 7584 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| VA/CRV -- Not for Manufactured | HB 4155.1, | |
| Homes | Section 1-11E | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MAXIMUM MORTGAGE AMOUNTS | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 1-6 | |
| | | |
| | HB 4000.2, | |
| | Section 1-8 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MAXIMUM MORTGAGE CASH INVESTMENT | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 1-7 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Inducements to Purchase | 4155.1, Section | |
| | 7B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MILITARY | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 3-5A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Occupancy | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 2-2E | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Power of Attorney | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 3-5A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MODIFIED COST | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 3-12 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGE BROKER FEE | | ML 96-12 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGE CREDIT REJET | HB 4000.2, | |
| | Section 4-2A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGE INSURANCE | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| By Lender | | ML 05-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Condominium (UFMIP + Monthly) | | ML 05-38 |
| January 1, 2006 | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Correction format (Suggestion) | HB 4000.2, App. | |
| | VII | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Electronic Submission (MIP) | | \(202\) |
| | | 708-9906 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Late UFMIP | HB 4000.2, | ML 90-41 |
| | Section 5-2 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Monthly MIP | | MLs 00-46; |
| | | 00-38 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Mortgage Insurance | HB 4000.2, | MLs 00-46: |
| | Section 1-12 | 00-38; |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Premium | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Annual | HB 4000.2, | ML 91-26 |
| | Section 1-12B | (Base) |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Condominium | | ML 05-38 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| # SUBJECT | **HANDBOOK** | * |
| | | *MORTGAGEE |
| | **(HB)** | LETTER |
| | | (ML)** |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGE INSURANCE (Continued) | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Cancellation of Annual MIP | HB 4000.2, | |
| | Section 1-11C | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Electronic Submission | | \(202\) |
| | | 708-9906 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Monthly | HB 4000.2, | |
| | Section 1-12C | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Netting Premium Refunds | | ML 00-46 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Refund Exceeding New MIP | | ML 00-46 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Refund Computations | HB 4000.2, | MLs 00-46; |
| | Section 1-11A | 93-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Refinance MIP | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 1-12 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Up-front MIP | HB 4000.2, | ML 00-38 |
| | Section 1-12A | |
| | | |
| | HB 4000.2, | |
| | Section 1-11A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Remitting -- Monthly (202) 708-9906 | | |
| or 0614 | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| UFMIP -- All Financed or None | HB 4155.1, | |
| | Section 1-9F | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| UFMIP -- 1^st^ Time Homebuyer | | ML 00-38 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| UFMIP -- Odd Cents | | ML 97-26 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGE INSURANCE CERTIFICATE | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Elimination of Paper | | ML 03-17 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| 15 Year Loans | | ML 00-46 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Annual | HB 4000.2, | |
| | Section 1-11B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Certificate (Closed in name of Loan | | ML 96-12, |
| Correspondent | | #2 |
| | | |
| Sponsor | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Cancellation (MMI Fund -- 78% LTV) | HB 4000.2, | MLs 00-38; |
| | Section 1-11A | 00-46 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Collection (Periodic) | | MLS 99-25; |
| | | 98-24; |
| | | 98-22 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Computation Refund (UFMIP) | HB 4000.2, | MLs 00-46; |
| | Section 1-11A | 00-38 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Condominium (Monthly + Up From MIP) | | ML 05-38 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Elimination of | | ML 05-03 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Late UFMIP Penalties & Interest | HB 4000.2, | ML 90-41 |
| | Section 5-2 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Monthly MIP | | MLs 00-38; |
| | | 91-26 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Refinance | | ML 00-46 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| UFMIP | | MLs 00-46; |
| | | 00-38; |
| | | 96-48; |
| | | 97-37; |
| | | 94-14 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| UFMIP-Paid in Cash or Financed | | ML 97-26 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGE NOTE & FORMS | HB 4165.1, Chap. | |
| | 4 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGEE APPROVAL | HB 4060.1 | MLs 95-36; |
| | | 94-47 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Address (headquarters) | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 4-2 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Application Approval | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 2-3 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Application Coordinator | | ML 99-17 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Application Fee | HB 4060.1, | ML 94-47 |
| | Section 2-3 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| # SUBJECT | **HANDBOOK** | * |
| | | *MORTGAGEE |
| | **(HB)** | LETTER |
| | | (ML)** |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGEE APPROVAL (Continued) | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Application Processing | HB 4060.1 | MLs 00-40; |
| | | 6-10, #I; |
| | | |
| | | 95-36, #6; |
| | | 94-47 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Approval Forms | | ML 96-64 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Authorized Agent | HB 4000.4, | ML 96-12, |
| | Section 2-12 | #5 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Definition | HB 4060.1, | ML 94-47, |
| | Section 2-27 | #6 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Branch Offices | | MLs 96-12; |
| | | 94-47 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Loan Approval | | ML 95-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| New Branching | | ML 00-15 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| CHUMS ID | | ML 96-10 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Conflict of Interest | HB 4060.1, | ML 94-39 |
| | Section 2-24 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Contract Employees | | MLs 96-18; |
| | | 94-39 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Conversion of Type | HB 4060,1, | ML 94-39 |
| | Section 5-9 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Credit Report | | ML 94-47 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Residential Mortgage | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Business | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| DE Approval | | MLs 96-10, |
| | | #I; |
| | | |
| | | 94-47, #4 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Test Cases | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 2-10 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Closed, Prior to HUD Review | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 2-10A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| DE Registration | | ML 96-10, |
| | | #I |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Employees | HB 4060.1, | ML 96-18 |
| | Sections 2-11; | |
| | 2-13; 2-14 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Fee | | ML 94-47, |
| | | #5 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Fidelity Bond/Errors & Omissions | HB 4060.1, | |
| Coverage | Section 2-6 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Financial Statements | | ML 94-39 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| FHA Connection -- Lender Approval | | ML 99-17 |
| Functions | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Funding Program | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 3-3C | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Government Institution Mortgagee | HB 4000.4, | |
| | | |
| | Section 2-8A(2) | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Ineligible Participants | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 2-23 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Lending Area | | ML 95-36, |
| | | Page 3 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Licensing by State | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 2-9 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Loan Correspondent | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 2-13; | |
| | | |
| | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 3-4 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Activities | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 3-4B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Branch Office | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 3-4D | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Definition | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 1-3C | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Loan Origination Functions | | ML 95-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Loan Origination Requirements | HB 4060,1, | |
| | Section 2-25 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Monthly MIP | | ML 00-38 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Monitoring Reports | HB 4000.4, | ML 99-15 |
| | Section 4-14 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| # SUBJECT | **HANDBOOK** | * |
| | | *MORTGAGEE |
| | **(HB)** | LETTER |
| | | (ML)** |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGEE APPROVAL (Continued) | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Multiple Employers | HB 40060.1, | ML 96-18 |
| | Section 2-14 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Net Worth Requirements | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 2-4 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Non-performing | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 4-10C | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Non-supervised Mortgagee | HB 4000.4, | |
| | | |
| | Section 2-8A(3); | |
| | | |
| | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 3-3 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Activities | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Sections 3-3A & | |
| | 3-3D | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Definition | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Sections 1-3B, & | |
| | 3-3 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Number of Staff | | ML 94-39 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Office Facilities | HB 4060.1, | MLs 95-36, |
| | Section 2-16 | 2; |
| | | |
| | | 94-47 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Home Office | | ML 96-12, |
| | | #1 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Part Time Employees | HB 4060.1, | ML 94-39 |
| | Section 2-14 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Permissible Payments | HB 4060.1, | |
| | | |
| | Sections C & D | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Pre-closing Review | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 2-10A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Processing | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 4-12 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Probation | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 5-5 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Prohibited Compensation | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 2-24B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Prohibited Payments | HB 4060.1, | |
| | | |
| | Sections 2-24 A | |
| | & B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Quality Control Plan | HB 4060.1, | ML 94-47 |
| | Section 6 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Rating Reports | | ML 95-36, |
| | | Page 4 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Re-Certification | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 1-6 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Reporting Business Changes | | ML 95-36 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Required Documents | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 4-6 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Loan Correspondent | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 4-9 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Non-Supervised Mortgagee | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 4-8 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Supervised Mortgagee | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 4-7 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Additional Requests | | ML 94-47, |
| | | #5 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Changing ID Numbers | | ML 99-7 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Staffing Requirements | HB 4060.1, | ML 95-36 |
| | Section 2-12 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Starter Kit | | ML 00-40 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Supervised Mortgagee | HB 4000.1, | |
| | | |
| | Section 2-8A(1); | |
| | | |
| | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 3-2 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Activities | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 3-2A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Definition | HB 4000.1, | |
| | Section 1-3A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Territorial Approval | HB 4060.1, | MLs |
| | Section 2-18A | 96-12,3; |
| | | 95-36; |
| | | |
| | | 94-47 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| # SUBJECT | **HANDBOOK** | * |
| | | *MORTGAGEE |
| | **(HB)** | LETTER |
| | | (ML)** |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGEE APPROVAL (Continued) | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Training | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 2-9 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Underwriter | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 2-4 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Underwriter Changes, Additions, | | MLs 96-10; |
| Transfers, etc. | | 99-17 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MORTGAGEE MONITORING | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 5-2; | |
| | | |
| | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 7 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Administration Sanctions/Penalties | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 1-7 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Credit Watch Status | | MLs 01-23; |
| | | 99-15; |
| | | 00-3 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Deficiencies | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 5-3 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Indemnification | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Agreement | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 5-4B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Manual Records | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 5-8 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| On-site Review | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 5-2C | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Post-Endorsement Technical Review | HB 4060.1, | |
| | | |
| | Sections 7-3 & | |
| | 7-4 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Probation | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 5-2A | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Quality Control Reports | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 5-5 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Record Retention | HB 4000.4, | ML 99-15 |
| | Section 5-2B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Termination | HB 4000.2, | |
| | Section 5-10; | |
| | | |
| | HB 4060.1, | |
| | Section 1-4B | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| Withdrawal of DE Status | HB 4000.4, | |
| | Section 5-6 | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| MULTIPLE EMPLOYERS (LENDERS) | | ML 96-18 |
+-------------------------------------+------------------+------------+
| en |
all-txt-docs | 253086 | aux Indes Occidentales. o*.
riture dans la bouche , par le moien
d'une Sarbacane, craignant qu'il
ne mourut de faim aprs fa mort.
Ils le pleuraient plufieurs jours, 8c
mettoient fa figure en bois fur le
fepulchre. L'Artifan y apportoit fes
ouvrages, Sc le foldat y mettoit
fes armes : tout cela pour honorer
la mmoire du dfunt. Le deuil
du Roi ou Tnca duroit pendant
toute l'anne : le premier mois fans
rlche, 8c dans le cours de l'anne
on le renouvelloit tous les quinze
jours.
Je ne fai pas s'ils ont eu quelque
communication avec le Diable , ni
s'ils lui faifoient des demandes, 8e s'ils
en recevoient des reponfes. Tout ce
qui n'eft pas Chriftianifme,8c tout
ce qui eft Herefie doit toujours
s'attribuer l'artifice du Diable: mais
quoi qu'il en foit du Culte que nos
Thologiens Catholiques, Apoftoli-
ques 8c Romains prtendent que
tous les fndiens ont rendu au Diable; fi
les Perouans l'ont fervi, ce n'etoit pas
un fet de leur refped, mais de leur
crainte; Car ils ont toujours regar-
d le Soleil comme le Dieu Souve-
rain, Lorfque Frere Vincent de Val-
ver- | fr |
converted_docs | 243658 | **IT Division April 2008 Walk-through**
1) Are you experiencing any work related discomfort? If so what?
2) Are you aware of hazards other than ergonomic ones in your work
areas?
3) Did you know that ergonomic evaluations will not be required after
office moves? Instead employees will be asked to take the Remedy
Online Ergo Self Assessment (OES). This will also be an annual
training requirement for folks who use a computer daily. If you
answer all questions and the system finds you to be at
[low]{.underline} risk of an injury, no further action will be
needed. If you are found to be at [moderate to high
risk,]{.underline} you will be asked to re-take the evaluation at 30
and/or 60 days until your risk profile has been improved. If you are
still at moderate to high risk after these re-assessments, an ergo
advocate or ergonomist will come and review your work set-up. You
can go to the IT Safety pages to learn more about Remedy OES or go
here:
<https://login.remedyint.com/app/index.cfm?company_id=5B504FC4-1143-FDA5-ACF83C6DB5CA6E4B>
Remember though you can always request an ergo evaluation by going
here: <https://ehswprod2.lbl.gov/Ergo/Login.asp>
4) Where would you call to find out the status of the Lab in case of
emergency? (1-800-445-5830) This number can be found on the back of
your employee ID badge.
Questions or comments?
I \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ have
discussed the above three
(employee)
questions with my supervisor
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
on\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.
(supervisor) (date)
I know I am responsible for ensuring my own safety. My current office
location(s) is/are:
| en |
all-txt-docs | 422704 | Douglas Isbell
Headquarters, Washington, DC September 24, 1996
(Phone: 202/358-1753)
Diane Ainsworth
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
(Phone: 818/354-5011)
RELEASE: 96-192
SECOND NEW MILLENNIUM FLIGHT WILL SEND
MICROPROBES TO THE SURFACE OF MARS
Two small science probes will be sent to Mars in 1999
to demonstrate innovative new technologies brought to the
forefront by NASA's New Millennium program.
Under terms of a new agreement between the New
Millennium and Mars Exploration programs, the microprobes
will hitchhike to Mars aboard NASA's 1998 Mars Surveyor Lander.
"A successful demonstration of the microprobe
technologies will enable a wide range of scientific
activities that would not be affordable with conventional
technologies," said Dr. John McNamee, manager of the 1998
Mars Surveyor Lander and Orbiter project at NASA's Jet
Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena, CA.
"In particular, scientific investigations which
require a relatively large number of surface stations
distributed over the surface of Mars, such as seismic or
meteorology networks, will be made possible by the microprobe
concept," McNamee said. "In addition, microprobe penetrators
may be the most efficient and effective way of obtaining soil
samples and measurements from below the sterilized Martian surface."
In the process of enabling future characterization
of the Martian climate by a meteorological network, the Mars
microprobes will complement the climate-related scientific
focus of the 1998 Mars Surveyor Lander by demonstrating an
advanced, rugged microlaser system for detecting subsurface
water. Such data on polar subsurface water, in the form of
ice, should help put limits on scientific projections for the
global abundance of water on Mars.
Future missions to the planet could use similar
penetrators to search for subsurface ice and minerals that
could contribute to the search for evidence of life on Mars.
The 1998 Mars Surveyor Lander will be launched in
January 1999 and spend 11 months en route to the Red Planet.
Just prior to its entry into the Martian atmosphere, the
microprobes, mounted on the spacecraft's cruise ring, will
separate and plummet to the surface using a single-stage
entry aeroshell system. Chosen for its simplicity, this
aeroshell does not separate from the microprobes, as have
traditional aeroshells on previous spacecraft, such as the
Mars Pathfinder and the Viking landers of the mid-1970s.
The probes will plunge into the surface of Mars at an
extremely high velocity of about 446 miles per hour (200
meters per second) to ensure maximum penetration of the
Martian terrain. They should impact the surface within 120
miles (200 kilometers) of the main Mars '98 lander, which is
targeted for the planet's icy south polar region.
Upon impact, the aeroshells will shatter and the
microprobes will split into a forebody and aftbody system.
The forebody, which will be lodged between one to six feet
underground, will contain the primary electronics and
instruments. The aftbody, connected to the forebody by an
electrical cable, will stay close to the surface to collect
meteorological data and deploy an antenna for relaying data
back to Earth.
The microprobes will weigh less than 4.5 pounds (2
kilograms) each and be designed to withstand both very low
temperatures and high deceleration. Each highly integrated
package will include a command and data system, a
telecommunications system, a power system, and primary and
secondary instruments. Nearly all electrical and mechanical
designs will be new to space flight.
"In addition to a team of industrial partners that
will help develop advanced technologies to be demonstrated
during the mission, we have just selected Lockheed Martin
Electro-Optical Systems as a primary industry partner to
participate in the integration and test program for the
microprobes," said Sarah Gavit, Mars microprobe flight leader
at JPL.
Technologies proposed for demonstration on this
second New Millennium flight include a light weight, single-
stage entry aeroshell, a miniature, programmable
telecommunication subsystem, power microelectronics with
mixed digital/analog integrated circuits, an ultra low-
temperature lithium battery, a microcontroller and flexible
interconnects for system cabling.
In-situ instrument technologies for making direct
measurements of the Martian surface will include a water and
soil sample experiment, a meteorological pressure sensor and
temperature sensors for measuring the thermal properties of
the Martian soil.
"The Mars microprobe mission will help chart the
course for NASA's vision of space science in the 21st
century, a vision that incorporates the concept of 'network
science' through the use of multiple planetary landers," said
Kane Casani, manager of the New Millennium program. The
probes will become the first technology to be validated in
this new network approach to planetary science.
"Networks of spacecraft will address dynamic, complex
systems," Casani said. "For example, a single lander can
report on the weather at one spot on a planet, but a network
of landers is needed to characterize the planet's dynamic
climate. Similarly, a single seismometer will indicate if a
quake has occurred on a planet, but a network of seismometers
can measure the size of a planetary core. We need multiple
spacecraft to go beyond our initial reconnaissance to
completely characterize dynamic planetary systems the way we
are able to do on Earth."
The New Millennium program is managed by JPL for
NASA's Office of Space Science and Office of Mission to
Planet Earth, Washington, DC. The Mars `98 lander, managed
by JPL for the Office of Space Science, is in development at
Lockheed Martin Astronautics Corp., Denver, CO, under
contract to JPL.
-end-
| en |
converted_docs | 411358 | **Industry Updates: Paul **/ Skip/ **Bruce Proposed Outline of Items**
**I. Industry Update**
**. Paul - Debrief on (4/18) Industry Meeting with Dave**
**Drabkin & Emily Murphy**
** . Gov Works April 18 GSA Memo instructing**
** Contracting Officers not to require contractors to**
** certify work is in scope.**
**. ODC\'s - GSA will issue an Acquisition Letter**
**. IFF- GSA is contemplating lowering the fee.**
**. FPDS-NG (Federal Procurement Data System- Next**
**Gen)**
**. Acquisition Workforce Training**
**. ttSPD (Homeland Security Presidential Directive)**
**. Paul - California \$10 fee - Results of 4/26 ITAA**
** Conference Call **
i\. GSA and Navy (DoD lead for the Department) have
agreed that this is a Tax not a FEE
ii\. Deliver monitor in CA, \$10 recycling fee
iii\. Penalty can range from \$2500 to \$ 7500
iv\. Battle between CA and GSA- GSA said it will sue
v\. Working with Policy- Debbie to clarify and send out
official GSA policy
vi\. CA Board of Equalization has not received a formal
position from GSA. Per ITAA
vii\. ITAA working/talking with all parties in CA & GSA
viii\. ITAA to send EMERGENCY letter by COB 4/27 to CA that states \"No
penalty be applied to retailers\" issued resolved and retailers able to
collect TAX from the buyers.
ix\. ITAA reported that Dianna Henry of GSA Has been
assigned this issue
**. Paul- GSA will add voice services to the widely used Schedule 70
contract for information technology, agency spokeswoman Mary Alice
Johnson confirmed. That contract includes a broad range of IT products
and service offered by many companies and lets agencies buy goods and
services quickly. GSA officials would have to add the voice services
through a formal modification process.**
. **Paul - DoD Watch**
** . Oct. 29- Air Force Memo ( Provided Copy)**
** i. Guidance on procurement of non-DoD contracts**
** . Jan 27- Air Force Memo**
** i. Information Technology Purchasing- Network**
** Centric Solutions (NETCENTS) Action**
** Memorandum**
** 1. Manadatory Use**
** 2. Primary source for acquiring**
** communications hardware and software.**
** 3. System engineering, integration, and**
** installation**
** . Mar 24 - Office of the Under Secretary Of Defense**
** i. Proper Use of Interagency Agreements for Non**
** Department of defense Contracts**
** 1. Coordinate with GSA to return unobligated**
** balances by 6/1/05**
** 2. DoD Services must Certify actions**
** completed by 6/30/05**
** 3. Other services issuing follow-on**
** instructions**
**. Skip - DoD Iraq (Update)**
** . Old Bullet Items Below **\*\*\* **Add **New\*\*\*\* **Old Items**
** below**
i\. They will produce a guide about how to Get it Right
and it will be great.
ii\. DOD training effort is being put in place
iii\. Get it Right is not going to apply only to GSA
vehicles. Will apply toall non-DoD and DOD
contracts
**. Skip - One GSA white paper **\*\*\* **Add New **\*\*\*\* **Old
Items**
** Below**
x\. Industry/government perspective
xi\. Concerns getting a common answer from GSA
xii\. Suggested that there should be a place you can call
for an answer by high level procurement people
xiii\. How do you communicate in its entirety the
uniqueness of GSA- 30 second elevator speech
1\. Potential of undoing harm
**. Skip - Coalition created a draft memo for DoD to realign**
** guidance for using schedules**
xiv\. Intended for Dee Lee to send out
xv\. Realigns guidance from Dee Lee to say there is
nothing wrong with using Schedules or GWACs
. Bruce - FSS- FTS Merger (Back-up You requested)
Several companies and organizations (PSC and CGP included) read and
provided statements to Donna Bennett and Barbara Shelton (Commissioners
of the FSS and FTS). They then asked several questions of each
presenter. The key recommendations from industry were:
0 Don\'t reorganize the old way of doing business. First look at the
current marketplace and update GSA
business processes to better serve the client.
0 Involve industry and clients in the process
0 Merge the IT and General Funds - eliminates
controversy on appropriate scope for funding ( an IG audit issue)
0 Make regional acquisition people (CO and ITM) responsible to central
office for implementing consistent policy and practices. (Seeks to
eliminate disharmony in process and procedures like each region
differently interpreting rules on ODCs, payment clause for subs on T&M
contracts, etc.)
0 Consolidate GSA Schedule Service offerings so projects that involve
both IT and systems engineering can be bid by the same vendor using both
IT and PES schedule skill categories.
0 Don\'t lower the IFF from .75% - instead use the current surplus to
fund training for GSA, client and contractor people, and for
improvements in the
acquisition workforce
0 March 17- Tom Davis Meeting
0 Proposed Time LIne
. First cut of plan 5/31
. Final Plan 7/31
. Changes take effect lOll
.
. Bruce- Post Award & Pre Award Audits.
. Bruce - Proposed GSAR rule for Consequential Damages.
. Bruce - DCAA\'s (4/9) Audit Guidance on FSS Payments under T&M
Contracts. Alliant DRAFT RFP contains a clause restricting mark-up on
Subcontracts. GSA setting up a meeting with DCAA
. Bruce- Summarize recent GAO Audit Report \"GSA Best
Value\"
0 \"Wasn\'t able to ascertain whether or not they got the
lowest price
. Paul - Other Topics
. DoD Radio Frequency Identification - (Proposed rule
(70 Federal Register 20726, April 21) (DFARS Case
2004-D01)
1\. Require contractors to affix passive RFID
Tags at case and pallet load level.
2\. Comments due June 20
. DoD Unique Item Identification and Valuation (UID)
(Final Rule) (70 Federal Register 20831, April 22)
(DFARS Case 2004-D001)
1\. Policy for Unique Identification and
valuation of items delivered to DoD
2\. Rule effective 4/2
FOR GSA
. Update From Roger Waldron - Section 1423 Panel - Panel has one year to
review acquisition laws, regs and policies with respect to commercial
practices, performance-based contracts, the acquisition workforce and
small business
issues.
Questions for GSA
. Status of \"Messaging\", what follows \"Get It Right\" . Status update
on Training
| en |
all-txt-docs | 047163 | Pjt No,Pjt Name,Terrty,Office,Main Grp,Catgy No,Catgy Name,Subcatgy,SoA,NC/Refi,Mtg Amt,Units,Pjt Street,Pjt City,Pjt ST,Pjt Zip,Cty No,County,MSA No,MSA Name,Lat,Lon,IE FY,Orig No,Orig Name,Hldr No,Holder Name,Serv No,Servicer Name,Serv ST
05310008,MOORE COUNTY ADDITION,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/207 ,ZSB,Impvmts,"$695,400 ",30,PINEHURST AVENUE,CARTHAGE,NC,28327,125,Moore,0,NM,35.3081,-79.3924,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05310009,THE OAKS OF BURLINGTON A,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 241,ZSQ,Impvmts,"$263,600 ",9,1670 WESTBROOK AVENUE,BURLINGTON,NC,27215,1,Alamance,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.0835,-79.5173,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05310011,COLLEGE PINES ADDITION,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 241,ZSQ,Impvmts,"$856,100 ",40,LOCUST STREET,VALDESE,NC,28690,23,Burke,3290,"HICKORY-MORGANTON, NC",35.7436,-81.5671,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05310012,ASHEVILLE MANOR,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/207 ,ZSB,Impvmts,"$387,800 ",18,308 OVERLOOK ROAD,ASHEVILLE,NC,28803,21,Buncombe,0480,"ASHEVILLE, NC",35.4895,-82.5377,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05310014,HIGH POINT MANOR ADDITIO,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 241,ZSQ,Impvmts,"$545,400 ",22,201,HIGH POINT,NC,27260,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.9564,-79.9869,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311063,ARCHDALE APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,091,800 ",144,LIBERTY ROAD,ARCHDALE,NC,27260,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.9289,-80.0294,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311064,HUNTERSVILLE APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,923,000 ",174,US HWY 21,HUNTERSVILLE,NC,28078,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.4224,-80.8669,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311066,BRITTANY PLACE APARTMENT,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,485,300 ",120,600 BRITTANY PLACE,FAYETTEVILLE,NC,28302,51,Cumberland,2560,"FAYETTEVILLE, NC",35.0488,-78.8413,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05311069,LAKE HILL APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,330,600 ",183,MONROE ROAD & SHADE VALL,CHARLOTTE,NC,28205,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1926,-80.7804,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311071,HUNTINGTON APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,054,700 ",144,CENTRAL DRIVE OFF HIGHWA,CONCORD,NC,28025,25,Cabarrus,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.3948,-80.5583,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311072,NORTHWOODS APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,642,200 ",84,MILLING ROAD (S.R. 1600),MOCKSVILLE,NC,27028,59,Davie,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.9213,-80.5319,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311073,STONEWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,329,400 ",68,MILLS AVENUE,MOORESVILLE,NC,28115,97,Iredell,0,NM,35.5864,-80.8172,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311074,PEPPERTREE APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,320,600 ",72,TRINITY AVENUE OFF WENDO,GREENSBORO,NC,27407,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.0319,-79.8653,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311075,SABAL POINT ARROWOOD CRO,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$6,708,500 ",204,2109 Arrowcreek Dr,Charlotte,NC,28273,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1361,-80.9393,FY94,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05311076,SUMMIT HOLLOW II,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,640,700 ",96,QUAIL WOOD DRIVE,CHARLOTTE,NC,28226,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1552,-80.7866,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311077,SHERWOOD COLONY APARTMEN,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,391,500 ",190,3501 TRAFALGAR SQUARE,WINSTON-SALEM,NC,27106,67,Forsyth,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.12,-80.3169,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311078,STADLER PLACE APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$5,018,000 ",144,2 Stadler Pl,Greensboro,NC,27410,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.100917,-79.89463,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311079,WESTERN MANOR APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,657,900 ",118,2300 AVENT FERRY ROAD,RALEIGH,NC,27606,183,Wake,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.7755,-78.6797,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05311080,KINGS PARK APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,488,300 ",110,2425-1 KINGSPARK DRIVE,CHARLOTTE,NC,28208,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2178,-80.8909,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05311081,PARK WEST APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,652,000 ",104,VALENCIA DRIVE,JACKSONVILLE,NC,28546,133,Onslow,3605,"JACKSONVILLE, NC",34.758,-77.3669,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311082,BEAR CREEK APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,504,500 ",140,BEAR CREEK ROAD,ASHEVILLE,NC,28801,21,Buncombe,0480,"ASHEVILLE, NC",35.577,-82.5557,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311084,OAKWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,783,200 ",84,S. R. 1163,NEWTON,NC,28609,35,Catawba,3290,"HICKORY-MORGANTON, NC",35.6719,-81.0431,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311085,WELLINGTON ARMS APARTMEN,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,337,500 ",100,1424 WELLINGTON AVENUE,WILMINGTON,NC,28401,129,New Hanover,9200,"WILMINGTON, NC",34.1976,-77.9267,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311086,FOREST GROVE APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,001,100 ",278,928 CIRCLE DRIVE,GREENSBORO,NC,27405,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.0836,-79.7733,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311087,EVERGREEN RIDGE APARTMEN,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,892,800 ",191,50 RICEVILLE ROAD,ASHEVILLE,NC,28805,21,Buncombe,0480,"ASHEVILLE, NC",35.5892,-82.4865,FY95,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,TN
05311089,OAKS AT EDGEMONT,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,662,500 ",176,330 TRIANON DRIVE,GASTONIA,NC,28054,71,Gaston,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2663,-81.1589,FY95,77349,REILLY MORTGAGE ASSOCIATES LP,77349,REILLY MORTGAGE ASSOCIATES LP,77349,REILLY MORTGAGE ASSOCIATES LP,VA
05311090,ASHEWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,080,000 ",204,NORTH FAYETTEVILLE STREE,ASHEBORO,NC,27203,151,Randolph,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.6931,-79.8199,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311091,NORTH CROSS TOWNHOMES,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,055,300 ",99,1801 Griers Grove Rd,Charlotte,NC,28216,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.282951,-80.861017,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311093,SHARONWEST APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,113,600 ",72,1357 SHARON ROAD WEST,CHARLOTTE,NC,28210,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1189,-80.8803,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05311095,THE OAKS APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,370,400 ",88,3911 Water Oak Dr,Raleigh,NC,27604,183,Wake,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.84448,-78.57324,FY96,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05311096,SHARONRIDGE APARTMENTS P,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$743,700 ",30,1937 SHARON ROAD WEST,CHARLOTTE,NC,28210,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1182,-80.8692,FY96,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05311097,"PHASEII,SHARONRIDGE APTS",4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,032,900 ",45,1937 SHARON ROAD WEST,CHARLOTTE,NC,28210,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1182,-80.8692,FY96,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05311098,WENDOVER GLEN APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,528,700 ",96,740 N Wendover Rd,Charlotte,NC,28211,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.189388,-80.799551,FY96,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05311099,THE CHASE OF COMMONWEALT,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,230,000 ",132,2728 COMMONWEALTH AVENUE,CHARLOTTE,NC,28205,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2123,-80.8003,FY96,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05311100,THE COURTYARD APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,615,000 ",55,5312-5 MONTAGUE STREET,CHARLOTTE,NC,28205,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1853,-80.7761,FY96,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05311101,THE LANDING ON FARMHURST,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,170,500 ",125,711 FARMHURST DRIVE,CHARLOTTE,NC,28217,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1467,-80.8911,FY96,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05311102,EMERY LANEMASON MANOR AP,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,490,500 ",101,122 NORTHGATE,HIGH POINT,NC,27265,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.0043,-80.0396,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05311103,THE CROSSING,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,898,500 ",156,2122 Crossing Way Ct,High Point,NC,27262,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.984917,-80.014927,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05311104,AMBASSADOR COURT,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,913,000 ",196,2501 Ambassador Ct,High Point,NC,27265,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.0019,-80.0208,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05312001,CAPITAL TOWERS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/236 ,ZSR,Impvmts,"$1,262,800 ",208,4812 SIX FORKS ROAD,RALEIGH,NC,27609,183,Wake,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.8458,-78.6438,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05315011,MANORHOUSE PERSONAL CARE RET,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,12,Other FHA,Optg loss 232,XTQ,Other,"$478,800 ",98,Wade Ave & Dixie Trai,Raleigh,NC,27607,183,Wake,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.8026,-78.6882,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05322002,ASHEVILLE HEALTH CARE CE,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,166,600 ",120,1270 BLACK MOUNTAIN HWY.,SWANNANOA,NC,28778,21,Buncombe,0480,"ASHEVILLE, NC",35.6023,-82.4055,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05335634,MONROE APARTMENTS PHASE,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$1,226,000 ",44,NELDS DRIVE,MONROE,NC,28110,179,Union,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.0241,-80.5803,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05335635,TANGLEWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,203,300 ",80,101 TANGLEWOOD DRIVE,SOUTHERN PINES,NC,28387,125,Moore,0,NM,35.1845,-79.4117,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05335636,TAMARACK ON THE LAKE,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,092,300 ",120,LANDAN ROAD,FAYETTEVILLE,NC,28303,51,Cumberland,2560,"FAYETTEVILLE, NC",35.0915,-79.0164,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05335637,OAK CREEK APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,666,200 ",100,700 SPENCE AVENUE,GOLDSBORO,NC,27530,191,Wayne,2980,"GOLDSBORO, NC",35.3805,-78.015,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05335639,SOUTHERN VILLAGE APARTME,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$13,390,200 ",250,PITTSBORO ROAD (15-501 S,CHAPEL HILL,NC,27516,135,Orange,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.9175,-79.1,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05335642,BENNINGTON WOODS APARTME,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,778,400 ",134,CARY PARKWAY,CARY,NC,27511,183,Wake,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.7643,-78.7873,FY95,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,SC
05335644,MALLARD COVE,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$2,853,300 ",80,AMERICAN LEGION ROAD,SANFORD,NC,27330,105,Lee,0,NM,35.472179,-79.153998,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05335658,BEAR CREEK,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,466,500 ",90,BEAR CREEK,ASHEVILLE,NC,28801,21,Buncombe,0480,"ASHEVILLE, NC",35.577,-82.5557,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05341002,LONG DRIVE I APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$559,000 ",50,1234 CAUTHEN DRIVE,ROCKINGHAM,NC,28379,153,Richmond,0,NM,34.9204,-79.7585,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341003,RALEIGH NORTH APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$3,896,500 ",150,1201 GLASCOCK STREET,RALEIGH,NC,27610,183,Wake,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.7925,-78.6145,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341004,MILLBANK COURT APARTMENT,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,979,700 ",80,1201 GLASCOCK STREET,RALEIGH,NC,27610,183,Wake,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.7925,-78.6145,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341005,BEAUMONT AVENUE APARTMEN,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,861,300 ",100,1336 N Beaumont Ct,Burlington,NC,27217,1,Alamance,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.10502,-79.41523,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341006,TUCKER STREET APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,860,400 ",99,616 D CENTER AVENUE,BURLINGTON,NC,27217,1,Alamance,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.1301,-79.4119,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341007,MARKET NORTH II APARTMEN,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f BMIR ,ZFL,,"$2,404,000 ",100,111 Darlington Ave,Wilmington,NC,28403,129,New Hanover,9200,"WILMINGTON, NC",34.239798,-77.902781,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341008,MARKET NORTH I APARTMENT,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$2,166,300 ",104,111 Darlington Ave,Wilmington,NC,28403,129,New Hanover,9200,"WILMINGTON, NC",34.239798,-77.902781,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341009,GLENDALE COURT APARTMENT,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f BMIR ,ZFL,,"$2,323,000 ",100,31 Glendale Ct,Greenville,NC,27834,147,Pitt,3150,"GREENVILLE, NC",35.619,-77.3976,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341010,CALICO COURT APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$776,500 ",50,108 OGLESBY LOOP ROAD,MOREHEAD CITY,NC,28557,31,Carteret,0,NM,34.7325,-76.727259,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341011,JOHNSON COURT APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,213,400 ",70,2228 KAY DRIVE,SMITHFIELD,NC,27577,101,Johnston,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.4859,-78.366,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341012,FRANKLIN COURT APARTMENT,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$708,900 ",50,105 N. CHURCH STREET,LOUISBURG,NC,27549,69,Franklin,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",36.0987,-78.3032,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341013,JEFFERSON COURT APARTMEN,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,147,400 ",60,1100 NORTH JEFFERSON STR,GOLDSBORO,NC,27530,191,Wayne,2980,"GOLDSBORO, NC",35.3805,-78.015,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05341014,COLERIDGE ROAD APARTMENT,4,Greensboro,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$814,600 ",100,31 GLENDALE COURT,ASHEBORO,NC,27834,147,Pitt,3150,"GREENVILLE, NC",35.65601,-77.38487,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05343107,AMERICARE OF EASTERN CAR,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$1,881,200 ",64,MARKET STREET,NEWPORT,NC,28570,31,Carteret,0,NM,34.7374,-76.8628,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343108,MECKLENBURG HEALTH CARE,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$2,716,000 ",100,SANDY PORTER ROAD,CHARLOTTE,NC,28210,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1306,-80.8577,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343113,AUTUMN CARE OF MOCKSVILL,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$3,470,600 ",108,DUKE STREET AT HOWARD ST,MOCKSVILLE,NC,27028,59,Davie,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.8831,-80.5645,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343117,WILORA LAKE HEALTH CARE,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$3,177,000 ",90,WILORA LAKE ROAD,CHARLOTTE,NC,28212,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2157,-80.7565,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343118,THE OAKS OF ROCKY MOUNT,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$1,729,500 ",57,1309 S Winstead Ave,Rocky Mount,NC,27803,127,Nash,6895,"ROCKY MOUNT, NC",35.9253,-77.8348,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343123,ELIZABETHTOWN NURSING CE,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$3,590,400 ",94,MERCER ROAD & MCCLEOD ST,ELIZABETHTOWN,NC,28337,17,Bladen,0,NM,34.6486,-78.5737,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343126,SPRING ARBOR OF DURHAM,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$2,161,900 ",60,4523 HOPE VALLEY ROAD,DURHAM,NC,27707,63,Durham,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.9263,-78.9536,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343127,LINVILLE MANOR,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH A7,REQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,015,900 ",60,HARDIN DRIVE,SHELBY,NC,28150,45,Cleveland,0,NM,35.2847,-81.5356,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343129,SPRING ARBOR OF HENDERSO,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$2,224,800 ",60,PISGAH DRIVE,LAUREL PARK,NC,28739,89,Henderson,0,NM,35.319,-82.4987,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343130,HAMPTON WOODS BOARD & CA,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH A7,REQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,859,800 ",78,HIGHWAY 305 N,JACKSON,NC,27845,131,Northampton,0,NM,36.3927,-77.4694,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343131,BROOKSIDE OF CHARLOTTE,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH A7,REQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,730,100 ",120,1700 I-85 SERVICE ROAD,CHARLOTTE,NC,28216,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.267977,-80.855053,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05343133,REYNOLDA PARK,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$1,956,100 ",74,REYNOLDA ROAD,WINSTON-SALEM,NC,27127,67,Forsyth,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.0281,-80.3032,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343135,SPRING ARBOR OF HICKORY,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$2,348,500 ",66,"29TH AVE DR,NE AND 20TH",HICKORY,NC,28601,35,Catawba,3290,"HICKORY-MORGANTON, NC",35.7606,-81.3231,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343136,SPRING ARBOR OF WILSON,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$1,944,800 ",60,WARD BOULEVARD,WILSON,NC,27893,195,Wilson,0,NM,35.7308,-77.8952,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343137,GREENSBORO MANOR,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$2,038,900 ",62,OLD OAK RIDGE ROAD,GREENSBORO,NC,27410,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.1014,-79.8794,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343145,MEADOWBROOK MANOR OF DUR,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$5,689,100 ",140,5935 MT SINAI ROAD,DURHAM,NC,27707,63,Durham,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.965,-78.9298,FY95,76815,DDM MORTGAGE CORP,76815,DDM MORTGAGE CORP,76815,DDM MORTGAGE CORP,NC
05343146,MANORHOUSE PERSONAL CARE,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH A7,REQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,472,000 ",108,801 DIXIE TRAIL,RALEIGH,NC,27607,183,Wake,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.7995,-78.6759,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05343147,HOMESTEAD HILLS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$3,092,100 ",66,BURKE MILL ROAD & GRIFFI,WINSTON-SALEM,NC,27103,67,Forsyth,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.0594,-80.3096,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
053EE018,METRO ARMS APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$747,600 ",12,113 WEST FOURTH STREET,WASHINGTON,NC,27889,13,Beaufort,0,NM,35.5457,-77.0539,FY95,,,,,,,
053EE020,MOUNTAIN PLACE,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,287,600 ",24,PINE TERRACE ROAD,MOUNT AIRY,NC,27030,171,Surry,0,NM,36.492681,-80.605898,FY94,,,,,,,
053EE021,BULLOCKMCLEOD APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,637,300 ",48,WEST MOUNT DRIVE,ROCKY MOUNT,NC,27803,127,Nash,6895,"ROCKY MOUNT, NC",35.9347,-77.8562,FY94,,,,,,,
053EE029,VILLAGE GARDENS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,275,600 ",37,DAIRY ROAD,CLAYTON,NC,27520,101,Johnston,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.6721,-78.4723,FY95,,,,,,,
053EE030,ST JOSEPHS OF THE PINES,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,396,200 ",24,N POPLAT STREET,ABERDEEN,NC,28315,125,Moore,0,NM,35.1328,-79.4043,FY94,,,,,,,
053EE032,ROYAL HEIGHTS APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,326,500 ",40,CORNER OF 10TH ST & VERD,GREENVILLE,NC,27858,147,Pitt,3150,"GREENVILLE, NC",35.5857,-77.3478,FY95,,,,,,,
053EE035,FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,650,300 ",41,MARION STREET AND STEEL STR,LUMBERTON,NC,28358,155,Robeson,0,NM,34.6291,-79.0079,FY96,,,,,,,
053HD009,MHANC ROWAN CO. APTS.,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$640,700 ",11,GRANT STREET,SPENCER,NC,28159,159,Rowan,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.7024,-80.4197,FY94,,,,,,,
053HD011,MHANC ASHE CO. APTS.,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$391,900 ",7,FAIRVIEW DRIVE,WEST JEFFERSON,NC,28694,9,Ashe,0,NM,36.390501,-81.487944,FY94,,,,,,,
053HD024,MHANC WATAUGA CO. APTS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$551,000 ",11,WINKLERS MEADOW DR.,BOONE,NC,28607,189,Watauga,0,NM,36.214,-81.6635,FY94,,,,,,,
053HD042,ARC HDS GASTON CO GH #7,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$246,500 ",6,HILLCREST ST AND SPRINGDALE,GASTONIA,NC,28052,71,Gaston,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2433,-81.2162,FY94,,,,,,,
053HD045,CHGH MONTGOMERY COUNTY G,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$247,700 ",7,BLAKE STREET,CANDOR,NC,27229,123,Montgomery,0,NM,35.354824,-79.772009,FY94,,,,,,,
053HD046,MECKLENBURG GH #11,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$261,600 ",7,1716 LARKHAVEN ROAD,CHARLOTTE,NC,28216,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2858,-80.8724,FY94,,,,,,,
053HD047,MECKLENBURG GH #12,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$261,600 ",7,OLD BELL ROAD,CHARLOTTE,NC,28226,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.128,-80.7686,FY94,,,,,,,
053HD048,AUTISM SOC. MECKLENBURG,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$261,600 ",7,RAVENDALE DRIVE,CHARLOTTE,NC,28216,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2858,-80.8724,FY94
053HD052,MHA MECKLENBURG CO GH #2,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$247,700 ",7,1211 ROBINHOOD CIRCLE,CHARLOTTE,NC,28212,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.214597,-80.749966,FY94
053HD053,MHA BURKE CO. GH,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$311,700 ",7,KING STREET,MORGANTON,NC,28655,23,Burke,3290,"HICKORY-MORGANTON, NC",35.7448,-81.6744,FY95
053HD054,MHA BUNCOMBE CO GH,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$250,600 ",7,RIVERVIEW DRIVE,ASHEVILLE,NC,28804,21,Buncombe,0480,"ASHEVILLE, NC",35.6353,-82.5225,FY94
053HD055,MHA HARNETT COUNTY GH,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$265,400 ",7,WILLOW AT WILLIAMS STREE,ANGIER,NC,27501,85,Harnett,0,NM,35.4921,-78.724,FY94
053HD056,MHA CARTERET CO. APTS.,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$572,200 ",9,BROOK STREET,MOREHEAD CITY,NC,28557,31,Carteret,0,NM,34.7374,-76.7527,FY95
053HD064,WNC COMMUNITY APTS #5,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$280,300 ",7,1607 N. NEW HOPE ROAD,GASTONIA,NC,28054,71,Gaston,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2896,-81.1561,FY95
053HD065,ARC HDS ROCKINGHAM CO. G,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$280,300 ",7,1309 W Academy St,Madison,NC,27025,157,Rockingham,0,NM,36.38298,-79.97624,FY94
053HD066,ARC HDS LEE CO GH #2,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$283,400 ",7,"LOT 1, BLK B KNOLLWOOD D",SANFORD,NC,27330,105,Lee,0,NM,35.465,-79.1776,FY94
053HD067,ARC HDS STANLY CO GH #4,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$267,900 ",7,RIDGE ST,ALBEMARLE,NC,28001,167,Stanly,0,NM,35.3451,-80.19,FY94
053HD068,MHA WAYNE CO. GH,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$271,300 ",7,ELM,GOLDSBORO,NC,27530,191,Wayne,2980,"GOLDSBORO, NC",35.377,-77.9844,FY95
053HD069,MHA RANDOLPH CO. GH,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$276,300 ",7,PINEVIEW STREET,ASHEBORO,NC,27203,151,Randolph,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.7148,-79.8332,FY95
053HD070,ORANGE COMMUNITY RESIDEN,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$301,300 ",7,1700 N Greensboro St,Carrboro,NC,27510,135,Orange,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.9123,-79.0817,FY94
053HD071,MHA STANLY CO APTS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$690,400 ",11,N 5TH ST AND PEE DEE AVE,ALBEMARLE,NC,28001,167,Stanly,0,NM,35.3513,-80.1935,FY95
053HD072,MHA ANSON CO. GH,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$271,100 ",7,PARK ROAD,WADESBORO,NC,28170,7,Anson,0,NM,34.969,-80.0876,FY95
053HD073,MHA METROLINA GH #3,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$283,600 ",7,4342 CARMEL FOREST DRIVE,CHARLOTTE,NC,28226,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1015,-80.8419,FY94
053HD074,MHA CUMBERLAND CO APTS #,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$659,300 ",11,1140 CAMDEN ROAD,FAYETTEVILLE,NC,28306,51,Cumberland,2560,"FAYETTEVILLE, NC",35.0371,-78.894,FY95
053HD075,MHA GASTON CO APTS.,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$701,300 ",11,CLYDE STREET,GASTONIA,NC,28052,71,Gaston,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2319,-81.2047,FY95
053HD076,ARC HDS ROCKINGHAM CO GH,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$267,900 ",7,SOUTH MADISON STREET,EDEN,NC,27288,157,Rockingham,0,NM,36.526,-79.74,FY94
053HD081,ARC HDS ROBESON CO GH #4,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$309,900 ",7,GERTRUDE & SOUTH MAIN ST,FAIRMONT,NC,28340,155,Robeson,0,NM,34.491,-79.115,FY95
053HD082,ARC HDS ORANGE CO GH #3,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$309,900 ",7,HAMILTON ROAD,CHAPEL HILL,NC,27514,135,Orange,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.933,-79.0122,FY95
053HD083,ARC HDS FORSYTH CO GH #7,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$289,700 ",7,BRANDYWINE ROAD,WINSTON-SALEM,NC,27105,67,Forsyth,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.1167,-80.2162,FY95
053HD084,ARC HDS MOORE CO QUADRAP,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$282,200 ",4,BETHUNE AVE,ABERDEEN,NC,28315,125,Moore,0,NM,35.1328,-79.4043,FY96
053HD085,ARC HDS RICHMOND CO QUAD,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$278,600 ",4,148 STEELE STREET,ROCKINGHAM,NC,28379,153,Richmond,0,NM,34.9422,-79.7663,FY96
053HD087,MHA NC ALAMANCE CO APTS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$691,800 ",11,AVON AVENUE,BURLINGTON,NC,27215,1,Alamance,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.0704,-79.4555,FY95
053HD092,THP APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,663,900 ",25,2102 Wickham Ave,High Point,NC,27265,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.98761,-79.98332,FY95
053HD093,RSS INDEPENDENT LIVING A,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$240,800 ",3,6101 BENT,CHARLOTTE,NC,28212,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1933,-80.7422,FY95
053HD094,MHA HIGH POINT GH #2,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$274,200 ",7,NORTH WARD STREET,HIGH POINT,NC,27262,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.9541,-80.019,FY95
053HD095,THE HAVENS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,927,800 ",25,1336 BRIAR CREEK ROAD,CHARLOTTE,NC,28205,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2111,-80.7921,FY95
053HD098,MHA BURKE COUNTY APTS.,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$700,300 ",11,CHESTNUT STREET,MORGANTON,NC,28655,23,Burke,3290,"HICKORY-MORGANTON, NC",35.7365,-81.7397,FY96
053HD101,MHA FORSYTH-STOKES CONDO,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$561,400 ",8,1735 S Hawthorne Rd,Winston Salem,NC,27103,67,Forsyth,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.077869,-80.290627,FY96
053HD103,ARCHDS DAVIDSON CO. GH #,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$317,700 ",7,123 DELTA STREET,LEXINGTON,NC,27292,57,Davidson,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.8543,-80.2668,FY96
05410002,INDIAN LAND,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/221MR ,ZSJ,Impvmts,"$120,700 ",52,1728 INDIAN LAND DR.,NEWBERRY,SC,29108,71,Newberry,0,NM,34.2856,-81.6096,FY96,34444,CONTINENTAL SECURITIES CORP,34444,CONTINENTAL SECURITIES CORP,34444,CONTINENTAL SECURITIES CORP,NY
05411022,WELLINGTON APARTMENTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,700,000 ",92,OVERBROOK ROAD,GAFFNEY,SC,29340,21,Cherokee,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",35.0772,-81.6236,FY94,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,75148,GE CAPITAL ASSET MGTMT CORP,TX
05411025,AUTUMN CHASE APARTMENTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/223f,REK,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,780,000 ",96,1480 GREENVILLE HWY,SPARTANBURG,SC,29301,83,Spartanburg,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",34.9264,-81.9895,FY94,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,PA
05411026,BILTMORE APTS. (THE),4,Columbia,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,230,000 ",186,2050 N Beltline Blvd,Columbia,SC,29204,79,Richland,1760,"COLUMBIA, SC",34.016697,-80.988475,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05411033,WESTWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,617,600 ",166,1022 WEST BUFORD ST.,GAFFNEY,SC,29340,21,Cherokee,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",35.0791,-81.662,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05411034,BOSQUET APARTMENTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,694,800 ",124,1 Bosquet Ct,Summerville,SC,29485,35,Dorchester,1440,"CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC",32.979983,-80.185485,FY96,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
05412002,ABBOTT ARMS APARTMENTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/236 ,ZSR,Impvmts,"$393,600 ",100,2011 WILKINSON STREET,CAYCE,SC,29033,63,Lexington,1760,"COLUMBIA, SC",33.9661,-81.0698,FY95,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05414001,ASHLEY ARMS APTS.,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/BMIR ,ZSL,Impvmts,"$1,077,700 ",100,1120 CROLL DRIVE,CHARLESTON,SC,29407,19,Charleston,1440,"CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC",32.7979,-80.0113,FY95,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05414002,COLUMBIA GARDENS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/BMIR ,ZSL,Impvmts,"$1,575,500 ",188,4000 PLOWDEN ROAD,COLUMBIA,SC,29205,79,Richland,1760,"COLUMBIA, SC",33.9675,-80.9866,FY95,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05414003,WILLOW RUN APARTMENTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/BMIR ,ZSL,Impvmts,"$1,018,000 ",200,511 ALCOTT DRIVE,COLUMBIA,SC,29203,79,Richland,1760,"COLUMBIA, SC",34.0609,-81.0252,FY95,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
05422001,PEPPER HILL NURSING CENT,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,500,000 ",132,3525 AUGUSTUS ROAD,AIKEN,SC,29801,3,Aiken,0600,"AUGUSTA-AIKEN, GA-SC",33.5375,-81.7213,FY95,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,CA
05422002,ABBEVILLE NURSING HOME,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,329,900 ",94,578 THOMPSON CIRCLE,ABBEVILLE,SC,29620,1,Abbeville,0,NM,34.1825,-82.3778,FY96,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,CA
05422003,FOREST VIEW MANOR,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$616,500 ",28,HIGHWAY 67,MC CORMICK,SC,29835,65,McCormick,0,NM,33.9153,-82.2732,FY96,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,CA
05422004,DRIFTWOOD HEALTH CARE CE,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,409,200 ",160,2375 BAKER HOSPITAL BLVD,NORTH CHARLESTON,SC,29405,19,Charleston,1440,"CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC",32.8396,-79.9708,FY96,34531,SIMS MORTGAGE FUNDING INC,34531,SIMS MORTGAGE FUNDING INC,34531,SIMS MORTGAGE FUNDING INC,NY
05435549,VERDAE APARTMENTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,008,500 ",160,VERDAE BOULEVARD,GREENVILLE,SC,29607,45,Greenville,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",34.819,-82.3474,FY96,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,CA
05435550,COLUMBIANA LAKES,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$8,683,000 ",204,CROSS BOW DRIVE,LEXINGTON COUNTY,SC,29212,63,Lexington,1760,"COLUMBIA, SC",34.0741,-81.1795,FY94,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,GA
05435552,OLD SOUTH APARTMENTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$7,169,100 ",144,BUKINGHAM PLANTATION DRI,BLUFFTON,SC,29910,13,Beaufort,0,NM,32.2447,-80.8713,FY94,74952,PATRICIAN FINANCIAL COMPANY,74952,PATRICIAN FINANCIAL COMPANY,74952,PATRICIAN FINANCIAL COMPANY,MD
05435554,FAIRWIND APARTMENTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,955,700 ",168,8755 FAIRWIND DR.,NORTH CHARLESTON,SC,29418,19,Charleston,1440,"CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC",32.9651,-80.0577,FY94,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,CA
05435559,CENTRAL STATION APARTMEN,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,221,000 ",122,S.C. HIGHWAY 93,CENTRAL,SC,29630,77,Pickens,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",34.7398,-82.7925,FY96,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,GA
05435564,OLD SOUTH APTS. PHASE II,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$10,513,800 ",176,BUCKINGHAM PLANTATION DR,BLUFFTON,SC,29910,13,Beaufort,0,NM,32.2447,-80.8713,FY96,42162,GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION PA,42162,GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION PA,42162,GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION PA,PA
05443059,SPRING ARBOR OF ROCK HIL,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$2,084,100 ",57,INDIA HOOK RD & HERLONG,ROCK HILL,SC,29732,91,York,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",34.964,-81.035,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05443060,SPRING ARBOR OF SPARTANB,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Asst'd Living,RNL,NC/SR,"$2,025,800 ",52,104 Dillon Dr,Spartanburg,SC,29307,83,Spartanburg,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",34.9802,-81.8659,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
054EE002,LITTLE PEE DEE MANOR,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,346,800 ",53,U. S. HIGHWAY 76,MARION COUNTY,SC,29574,67,Marion,0,NM,34.2046,-79.2536,FY94,,,,,,,
054EE003,UJIMA APARTMENTS,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,605,700 ",36,RACE STREET,BAMBERG,SC,29003,9,Bamberg,0,NM,33.2966,-81.0152,FY94,,,,,,,
054EE009,JEFFERSON PLACE,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,377,900 ",41,JEFFERSON PLACE,MYRTLE BEACH,SC,29575,51,Horry,5330,"MYRTLE BEACH, SC",33.6265,-78.9781,FY95,,,,,,,
054EH159,REGENCY WOODS,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,891,300 ",40,SMITH ROAD,NEWBERRY,SC,29108,71,Newberry,0,NM,34.2699,-81.6116,FY94,,,,,,,
054HD004,AYERS HOUSING,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$867,500 ",16,LAUREL DRIVE,GREENVILLE COUNTY,SC,29607,45,Greenville,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",34.8263,-82.3514,FY94,,,,,,,
054HD010,"C.L.C. COMMUNITY LIVING,",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$840,200 ",16,GEORGIA AVENUE,CHESNEE,SC,29323,83,Spartanburg,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",35.1467,-81.8649,FY94,,,,,,,
054HD018,PINEBROOK OF CHARLESTON,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$432,500 ",8,PINEHURST STREET,Charleston,SC,29420,19,Charleston,1440,"CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC",32.9406,-80.0869,FY94,,,,,,,
054HD023,INDEPENDENCE PLACE,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$581,700 ",12,EDGEWOOD DRIVE,MANNING,SC,29102,27,Clarendon,0,NM,33.6682,-80.2005,FY94,,,,,,,
054HD026,"UNION SERVICES, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$250,500 ",3,ARTHUR BLVD.,UNION,SC,29379,87,Union,0,NM,34.7279,-81.6232,FY95,,,,,,,
054HD030,"KEY HOMES, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$852,200 ",12,RHOAD STREET,ORANGEBURG,SC,29115,75,Orangeburg,0,NM,33.5143,-80.8401,FY94,,,,,,,
054HD034,"NEH, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$428,700 ",8,JEWEL STREET,NEW ELLENTON,SC,29809,3,Aiken,0600,"AUGUSTA-AIKEN, GA-SC",33.4116,-81.6817,FY94
054HD038,"HOME, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,001,900 ",20,"601 YORK STREET, N.E.",AIKEN,SC,29801,3,Aiken,0600,"AUGUSTA-AIKEN, GA-SC",33.5694,-81.7129,FY95
054HD039,"NEW HOPE, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$630,500 ",12,2004 S. PINE FOREST DR.,FLORENCE COUNTY,SC,29505,41,Florence,2655,"FLORENCE, SC",34.156435,-79.751446,FY95
054HD040,"JTD HOMES, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$820,800 ",12,EUTAW STREET,HOLLY HILL,SC,29059,75,Orangeburg,0,NM,33.3187,-80.4005,FY94
054HD042,"SFN, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$597,200 ",12,HOLMES,LAURENS,SC,29360,59,Laurens,0,NM,34.4981,-82.01,FY95
054HD043,"INDEPENDENT LIVING, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$641,500 ",9,219 LEE STREET,SUMTER,SC,29150,85,Sumter,8140,"SUMTER, SC",33.9383,-80.3313,FY95
054HD044,BROWNING DEVPMT INC,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$635,800 ",9,MAYWOOD DRIVE,GREENVILLE COUNTY,SC,29606,45,Greenville,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",34.8263,-82.3514,FY95
054HD045,"ARH, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$265,300 ",4,HAYNE AVENUE,Aiken,SC,29801,3,Aiken,0600,"AUGUSTA-AIKEN, GA-SC",33.5886,-81.7106,FY95
054HD046,"GAULT GROVE, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$995,400 ",20,OFF HAFLEY COURT,CAYCE,SC,29033,63,Lexington,1760,"COLUMBIA, SC",33.963,-81.0667,FY95
054HD047,"DENA BANK APARTMENTS, IN",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$796,300 ",16,ZIMALCREST DRIVE,RICHLAND COUNTY,SC,29210,79,Richland,1760,"COLUMBIA, SC",34.0479,-81.1076,FY95
054HD048,"BCI, HOMES, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$471,000 ",8,1211 Dyson Dr,Moncks Corner,SC,29461,15,Berkeley,1440,"CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC",33.1599,-80.0381,FY96
054HD052,"BROWN VILLAS, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$626,600 ",12,LONGVIEW ROAD,YORK COUNTY,SC,29732,91,York,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",34.940203,-81.05199,FY95
054HD055,ABILITIES UNLIMITED INC.,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$846,500 ",12,19 RADCLIFF DRIVE,SUMTER,SC,29151,85,Sumter,8140,"SUMTER, SC",33.9169,-80.3568,FY95
054HD056,SHAMROCK HOMES,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$423,200 ",6,CORNER PARK & HARLIN STS,ELLOREE,SC,29047,75,Orangeburg,0,NM,33.4877,-80.566,FY96
054HD057,ORANGEWOOD HOMES INC.,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$237,000 ",3,WOODLAND & CHESTNUT,ORANGEBURG,SC,29115,75,Orangeburg,0,NM,33.5169,-80.8731,FY96
054HD058,"LAWTON HOUSING, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$423,200 ",6,CALHOUN ROAD,ST. MATTHEWS,SC,29135,17,Calhoun,0,NM,33.6543,-80.8115,FY96
054HD068,"STRATTON HOMES, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$445,000 ",6,2324 HAMPTON COURT,KERSHAW COUNTY,SC,29078,55,Kershaw,0,NM,34.23681,-80.66924,FY96,,,,,,,
054HH006,"CLC ALTERNATIVE LIVING,",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$633,233 ",12,NOT IDENTIFIED,Spartanburg,SC,29304,83,Spartanburg,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",34.9296,-81.967,FY94,,,,,,,
054HH007,LEXINGTON FOUR-NINETY,4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$770,600 ",16,NS,LEXINGTON,SC,29230,79,Richland,1760,"COLUMBIA, SC",34.1402,-81.0648,FY94,,,,,,,
05611007,VISTAS DEL MAR,4,Caribbean,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,976,200 ",152,OSVALDO MOLINA ST,FAJARDO MUNICIPIO,PR,00738,,,,,,,FY95,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,DC
05611008,SANTA JUANITA APTS.,4,Caribbean,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,410,100 ",45,38TH ST,BAYAMON MUNICIPIO,PR,00956,,,,,,,FY95,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,DC
056EE001,EBENEZER GARDENS,4,Caribbean,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,727,800 ",42,"PARCEL 9F, ESTATE HOSPIT",ST THOMAS,VI,00801,,,,,,,FY96,,,,,,,
056EE007,OVIDIO LAMOSO COIRA,4,Caribbean,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$5,220,500 ",93,"STATE ROAD 149, KM 16.4",CIALES MUNICIPIO,PR,00638,,,,,,,FY95,,,,,,,
056EE011,EGIDA PETRA SOTO PASCUAL,4,Caribbean,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,828,900 ",67,MUNICIPAL ROAD VAYAS TOR,PONCE MUNICIPIO,PR,00731,,,,,,,FY95,,,,,,,
056EH325,PRINCE STREET RESIDENCE,4,Caribbean,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$632,500 ",10,CORNER OF HILL AND PRINC,ST CROIX,VI,00801,,,,,,,FY94,,,,,,,
06110002,HOOVER CREEK PLANTATION II,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/207 ,ZSB,Impvmts,"$2,664,700 ",276,12300 Apache Ave,SAVANNAH,GA,31419,51,Chatham,7520,"SAVANNAH, GA",31.97841,-81.17006,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06111082,HAMPTON PLACE APTS.,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$12,307,600 ",390,5850 Hampton Ct,Columbus,GA,31907,215,Muscogee,1800,"COLUMBUS, GA-AL",32.531517,-84.879697,FY94,74932,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE LP,70970,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE,70970,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE,MA
06111091,NORTHRIDGE APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,537,500 ",128,3901 Northside Dr,Macon,GA,31210,21,Bibb,4680,"MACON, GA",32.89423,-83.68462,FY95,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06111092,FOREST RIDGE APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,443,700 ",94,2074 Forest Hill Rd,Macon,GA,31210,21,Bibb,4680,"MACON, GA",32.90162,-83.70439,FY94,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,75148,GE CAPITAL ASSET MGTMT CORP,TX
06111098,ENGLLISH OAKS APTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$5,484,900 ",278,9400 ABERCORN ST,SAVANNAH,GA,31406,51,Chatham,7520,"SAVANNAH, GA",31.993,-81.1294,FY95,54663,WASHINGTON CAPITAL ASSO,54663,WASHINGTON CAPITAL ASSO,54663,WASHINGTON CAPITAL ASSO,VA
06111099,THE WEATHERLEY,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,768,800 ",224,1700 WEATHERLEY DRIVE,STONE MOUNTAIN,GA,30083,89,DeKalb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.8169,-84.1929,FY94,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
06111100,CHASE VILLAGE APTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$5,610,000 ",176,100 CHASE VILLAGE DR,MORROW,GA,30236,63,Clayton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.55385,-84.35578,FY94,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06111101,CENTER WEST VILLAS APTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,910,000 ",160,1075 BEATRON ROAD,AUGUSTA,GA,30911,245,Richmond,0600,"AUGUSTA-AIKEN, GA-SC",33.4591,-81.9729,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06111102,SOUTHERN WOODS APARTMENT,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,181,800 ",13,1286 SOUTHERN WOODS DR,GWINNETT COUNTY,GA,30084,135,Gwinnett,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.890617,-84.212989,FY94,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,CA
06111104,GREEN ISLE APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/223f,REK,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,948,300 ",204,3800 FLAT SHOALS ROAD,DECATUR,GA,30034,89,DeKalb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.6973,-84.2643,FY95,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06111105,QUIET MEADOWS DUPLEXES,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,955,000 ",66,MCCLURE DR,OAKWOOD,GA,30542,139,Hall,0,NM,34.1825,-83.9009,FY95,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06111107,OAK HILL APTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$782,000 ",36,3330 RIDGE AVE,Macon,GA,31204,21,Bibb,4680,"MACON, GA",32.85558,-83.67841,FY95,71748,ARIES CAPITAL INC,71748,ARIES CAPITAL INC,71748,ARIES CAPITAL INC,IL
06111108,LINKWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,062,500 ",67,116 LISA DRIVE,WARNER ROBINS,GA,31088,153,Houston,4680,"MACON, GA",32.602493,-83.662502,FY96,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,GA
06111111,KENRIDGE APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$10,455,000 ",326,3893 KENSINGTON ROAD,Atlanta,GA,30303,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.7524,-84.3885,FY96,70970,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE,70970,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE,70970,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE,MA
06111112,MARTINIQUE APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$5,056,800 ",192,1750 Briarwood Rd NE,Atlanta,GA,30329,89,DeKalb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.841981,-84.321694,FY96,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,AL
06111113,WOODLAND APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,102,500 ",86,319 BRADY DRIVE,WARNER ROBINS,GA,31088,153,Houston,4680,"MACON, GA",32.613,-83.6649,FY96,71748,ARIES CAPITAL INC,71748,ARIES CAPITAL INC,71748,ARIES CAPITAL INC,IL
06111114,PARK AT BOULDERCREST,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRS,Refi/ Pchse,"$8,109,700 ",438,26 Bouldercrest Ln SE,Atlanta,GA,30316,89,DeKalb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.686491,-84.312327,FY96,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,AL
06111116,SUMMERGLEN APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$6,155,600 ",166,6425 OAKLEY ROAD,UNION CITY,GA,30291,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.5781,-84.5303,FY96,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,AL
06111126,BELLE CHASE APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,973,600 ",116,1500 BELLEMEADE DRIVE,MARIETTA,GA,30060,67,Cobb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.923,-84.5744,FY96,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,AL
06122006,FT.GAINES NURSING HOME,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$935,000 ",60,101 HARTFORD ROAD,FORT GAINES,GA,31751,61,Clay,0,NM,31.6438,-85.0401,FY95,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,TN
06135448,SCANDINAVIAN HOUSE,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$14,037,000 ",535,710 PEACHTREE ST NE,ATLANTA,GA,30326,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.8477,-84.3572,FY95,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,GA
06135449,FOUNTAIN LAKES APARTMENT,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,116,400 ",100,1000 FOUNTAIN LAKE DR,BRUNSWICK,GA,31520,127,Glynn,0,NM,31.1904,-81.4829,FY94,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
06135450,WHISPERING PINES APARTME,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,873,100 ",120,1515 HOGANSVILLE ROAD,TROUP COUNTY,GA,30240,285,Troup,0,NM,33.056682,-84.98633,FY94,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
06135451,WESTPARK APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,726,000 ",136,196 Jennings Mill Rd,Athens,GA,30606,59,Clarke,0500,"ATHENS, GA",33.926508,-83.46122,FY96,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,DC
06135453,GALLERIA PARK APTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,069,000 ",152,ROBBINS WEST DR,WARREN ROBINS,GA,71748,39,Dallas,0,NM,33.9054,-92.4366,FY95,71748,ARIES CAPITAL INC,71748,ARIES CAPITAL INC,71748,ARIES CAPITAL INC,IL
06135455,STERLING RIVERSIDE APTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$11,389,100 ",224,1000 DULUTH HIGHWAY,Lawrenceville,GA,30243,135,Gwinnett,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.96829,-84.03524,FY95,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06135456,THE VINEYARDS OF CARTERS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,399,800 ",152,10 SHEFFIELD PLACE,BARTOW,GA,30120,15,Bartow,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",34.1872,-84.8186,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06135459,TOWNE LAKE HILLS APARTME,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$15,307,800 ",264,TOWNE LAKE SOUTH DRIVE,WOODSTOCK,GA,30188,57,Cherokee,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",34.1146,-84.5064,FY95,74932,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE LP,74932,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE LP,74932,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE LP,MA
06135460,TECHWOODCLARK HOWELL,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$3,972,600 ",181,114 MERRITTS,ATLANTA,GA,30303,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.756526,-84.392333,FY96,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,GA
06135461,GEORGETOWN GROVE APARTME,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$10,563,100 ",220,GROVE POINT R0AD,SAVANNAH,GA,31406,51,Chatham,7520,"SAVANNAH, GA",31.9891,-81.0978,FY96,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,GA
06135462,MANER ROAD APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$22,460,600 ",399,MANER ROAD & I-285,SMYRNA,GA,30305,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.8299,-84.3848,FY95,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,AL
06135463,FOREST VALE APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$8,790,000 ",264,1128 FOREST VALE LANE,NORCROSS,GA,30093,135,Gwinnett,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.8896,-84.1994,FY96,74658,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE CORP,74658,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE CORP,74658,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE CORP,IL
06143078,MIDDLE GA PRESBYTERIAN V,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$2,272,400 ",40,FOSTER ROAD,BIBB COUNTY,GA,31201,21,Bibb,4680,"MACON, GA",32.8448,-83.6002,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06143080,"ST. GEORGE'S WOODS, INC.",4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232 ,RND,NC/SR,"$1,543,700 ",26,OLD MACON ROAD,SPALDING COUNTY,GA,30223,255,Spalding,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.24402,-84.305105,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06143084,FOUNTAIN VIEW CTR-GER.CA,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$5,283,000 ",120,NORTH DRUID HILLS ROAD,Atlanta,GA,30319,89,DeKalb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.8672,-84.3339,FY94,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06143088,KEYSVILLE NURSING HOME,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$2,187,200 ",64,HWY 88,BURKE COUNTY,GA,30816,33,Burke,0,NM,33.1678,-82.1722,FY94,12739,CAMBRIDGE REALTY CAPITAL IL,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
061EE005,QUALITY LIVING HAVEN,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$5,478,100 ",120,"CAMPBELLTON ROAD, S.W.",ATLANTA,GA,30318,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.7693,-84.4044,FY94,,,,,,,
061EE009,"BROADWAY TOWERS, INC.",4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$4,154,500 ",75,APPLEWOOD DRIVE,LAWRENCEVILLE,GA,30244,135,Gwinnett,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.8953,-84.0641,FY94,,,,,,,
061EE013,HAMILTON MEDICAL CENTER,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,457,400 ",48,ST UNNAMED,DALTON,GA,30720,313,Whitfield,0,NM,34.7637,-84.9891,FY96,,,,,,,
061EE014,UCR OF ROME,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,217,500 ",40,ST UNNAMED,ROME,GA,30163,115,Floyd,0,NM,34.2853,-85.2263,FY95
061EE015,UCR OF WINDER,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,176,100 ",40,ST UNNAMED,WINDER,GA,30660,317,Wilkes,0,NM,33.7843,-82.9099,FY95
061EE028,BUCKINGHAM PLACE CHURCH,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,945,400 ",40,101 Buckingham Pl,Brunswick,GA,31525,127,Glynn,0,NM,31.205236,-81.478114,FY95
061EE029,AHEPA NATIONAL HOUSING C,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$4,282,300 ",68,LUDOVIE LANE,Atlanta,GA,30324,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.8209,-84.3549,FY95
061HD006,"ORAN HOUSING, INC",4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$194,100 ",5,107 N. 5TH AVENU,CHATSWORTH,GA,30705,213,Murray,0,NM,34.7642,-84.7949,FY94
061HD007,"GLYNN PATON FOUNDATION,",4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$194,100 ",5,107 Baybridge Dr,Brunswick,GA,31525,127,Glynn,0,NM,31.21903,-81.47887,FY94
061HD008,CHERKOKEE DAY TRAINING C,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$402,000 ",10,1 Etowah Ter,Canton,GA,30114,57,Cherokee,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",34.2384,-84.5007,FY94
061HD010,INDEPENDENT LIVING HORIZ,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$207,000 ",6,714 MONTE SANTO,AUGUSTA,GA,30901,245,Richmond,0600,"AUGUSTA-AIKEN, GA-SC",33.4591,-81.9729,FY95
061HD011,COMMUNITY HOUSING INC,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$201,000 ",5,1179 Russell Dr,Decatur,GA,30030,89,DeKalb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.759568,-84.274675,FY95
061HD013,RESOURCES FOR RETARDED A,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$841,800 ",15,AZALEA DRIVE,FULTON COUNTY,GA,30213,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.5646,-84.5809,FY95
061HD018,GA REHAB INSTITUTE,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$568,900 ",9,ST UNNAMED,AUGUSTA,GA,30901,245,Richmond,0600,"AUGUSTA-AIKEN, GA-SC",33.4591,-81.9729,FY95
061HD019,GA REHAB INSTITUTE,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$240,300 ",6,ST UNNAMED,AUGUSTA,GA,30901,245,Richmond,0600,"AUGUSTA-AIKEN, GA-SC",33.4591,-81.9729,FY95
061HD021,SOUTHWEST GA EASTER SEAL,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$478,300 ",10,LAND LOT 46 EAST OAK STR,UNADILLA,GA,31701,95,Dougherty,0120,"ALBANY, GA",31.5683,-84.1633,FY95
061HD023,RESOURCES FOR RETARDED A,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$827,000 ",15,1604 DIXIE LAKE,UNION CITY,GA,30076,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",34.0232,-84.3044,FY95
061HD024,DEKALB MR AUXILIARY INC,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$203,800 ",4,1536 DUNSTANS ROAD STONE,DE KALB COUNTY,GA,30058,89,DeKalb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.7501,-84.0964,FY95
061HD032,DEKALB MR AUXILIARY INC,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$209,300 ",4,1116 ALFORD ROAD,STONE MOUNTAIN,GA,30319,89,DeKalb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.8672,-84.3339,FY95
06211031,AZALEA HILL APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,420,000 ",144,5801 EAST SHIRLEY LN.,MONTGOMERY,AL,36117,101,Montgomery,5240,"MONTGOMERY, AL",32.3699,-86.2088,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211033,PANORAMA EAST,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,037,500 ",200,3073 PANORAMA TERRACE E.,BIRMINGHAM,AL,35216,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.4118,-86.7889,FY94,40229,PLAZA MORTGAGE INC,40229,PLAZA MORTGAGE INC,51385,DAVIS-PENN MORTGAGE CO,TX
06211038,CAHABA FOREST APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$8,181,200 ",250,"CAHABA FOREST COVE, HIGH",BIRMINGHAM,AL,35243,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.4453,-86.7413,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211040,FOXCROFT APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,446,500 ",128,5701 CALMAR DRIVE,MONTGOMERY,AL,36116,101,Montgomery,5240,"MONTGOMERY, AL",32.33,-86.2291,FY94,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06211041,PHEONIX PARK APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,817,300 ",250,1040 Dauphin Island Pky,Mobile,AL,36605,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.6359,-88.0894,FY94,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,75148,GE CAPITAL ASSET MGTMT CORP,TX
06211042,CHESTNUT TREE APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,453,300 ",110,2207 Sumpter St,Birmingham,AL,35226,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.429299,-86.824423,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211049,ROYAL OAKS APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$5,865,000 ",200,1400 ROYAL OAKS DRIVE,HOOVER,AL,35244,117,Shelby,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.3542,-86.7891,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211050,THE WILLOWS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,213,900 ",170,3565 LORNA ROAD,HOOVER,AL,35216,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.3863,-86.7949,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211052,RIVER PLACE APTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/223f,REK,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,732,000 ",213,4501 Old Caldwell Mill R,Birmingham,AL,35242,117,Shelby,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.413894,-86.740622,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211053,TIMBERFALLS APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,650,400 ",176,316 BEACON CREST LANE,BIRMINGHAM,AL,35209,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.471,-86.8216,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211054,HERITAGE APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/223f,REK,Refi/ Pchse,"$591,100 ",40,410-416 NORTH EUFAULA AV,EUFAULA,AL,36027,5,Barbour,0,NM,31.9008,-85.146,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211055,SHADOWOOD APTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,412,900 ",76,1930 COLEMAN ROAD,CALHOUN COUNTY,AL,35201,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.5212,-86.8058,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211057,PELICAN BAY APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,767,800 ",58,2200 E Bay Dr,Daphne,AL,36526,3,Baldwin,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.632372,-87.911661,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211059,MOUNTAIN WOODS APARTMENT,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,595,200 ",92,1000 Beacon Pky E,Birmingham,AL,35209,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.4716,-86.8063,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211060,GREEN VALLEY APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,419,500 ",50,3801 GREEN VALLEY DRIVE,BIRMINGHAM,AL,35243,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.4597,-86.7415,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211061,ROYAL HILLS APTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,250,000 ",150,500 SNOWS MILL AVENUE,TUSCALOOSA,AL,35406,125,Tuscaloosa,8600,"TUSCALOOSA, AL",33.2234,-87.56,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06211063,BRIARWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$612,000 ",40,507 BRIARWOOD,ENTERPRISE,AL,36330,31,Coffee,0,NM,31.328,-85.8073,FY96,04951,GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORP,04951,GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORP,04951,GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORP,PA
06211065,CLEARVIEW APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,788,400 ",112,639 AZALEA ROAD,Mobile,AL,36609,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.65638,-88.14443,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06212001,SUMMIT RIDGE APTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/236 ,ZSR,Impvmts,"$1,993,100 ",200,149 Haversham Drive,Birmingham,AL,35215,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.66498,-86.689,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06235445,WESTWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d3,MMI,NC/SR,"$1,934,100 ",88,4400 UNIVERSITY DR.,HUNTSVILLE,AL,35806,89,Madison,3440,"HUNTSVILLE, AL",34.743,-86.6715,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06235447,ROBINWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$1,634,000 ",136,6001 OLD SHELL RD.,MOBILE,AL,36608,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.69,-88.181,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06235450,LAKEHOUSE APts,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,942,300 ",120,ALABAMA HWY 150,BIRMINGHAM,AL,35244,117,Shelby,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.3613,-86.806,FY96,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06235453,TAYLOR CROSSING II APART,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$3,676,900 ",104,HAMBLETON ROAD,MONTGOMERY,AL,36117,101,Montgomery,5240,"MONTGOMERY, AL",32.3721,-86.1823,FY94,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06235460,DAUPHINE APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$4,705,600 ",167,2A DAUPHINEWOOD DRIVE,MOBILE,AL,36606,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.6849,-88.1004,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06235472,FESTIVAL APTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$7,699,300 ",184,WOODMERE BLVD,MONTGOMERY,AL,36117,101,Montgomery,5240,"MONTGOMERY, AL",32.3722,-86.1823,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06241001,DAUPHIN NORTH APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,738,400 ",110,3250 DAUPHIN STREET,MOBILE,AL,36606,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.6894,-88.122,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06241002,NORTHGATE APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,741,700 ",110,3250 DAUPHIN STREET,MOBILE,AL,36606,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.6894,-88.122,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06241003,SOUTH OF DAUPHIN APARTME,4,Birmingham,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,515,200 ",100,3105 DAUPHIN STREET,MOBILE,AL,36606,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.6897,-88.117,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06241004,QUEENS COURT II APARTMEN,4,Birmingham,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 221MR ,ZFJ,,"$410,700 ",40,910 OWEN STREET,PRICHARD,AL,36610,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.7273,-88.1003,FY96,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,GA
062EE002,GRESHAM HILLS,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,696,200 ",41,MARS HILL RD.,FLORENCE,AL,35630,77,Lauderdale,2650,"FLORENCE, AL",34.8187,-87.6969,FY94,,,,,,,
062EE003,WILLOW TREE TOWERS,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,340,600 ",76,RIDEOUT RD.,HUNTSVILLE,AL,35805,89,Madison,3440,"HUNTSVILLE, AL",34.711,-86.6183,FY94,,,,,,,
062EE012,EPISCOPAL PLACE II,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,263,300 ",41,2503 11TH AVENUE SO.,BIRMINGHAM,AL,35205,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.5036,-86.7882,FY94,,,,,,,
062EE015,OXFORD SENIOR HOUSING,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,249,000 ",43,1000 Luttrell St,Oxford,AL,36203,15,Calhoun,0450,"ANNISTON, AL",33.60992,-85.83418,FY95,,,,,,,
062EE016,BAY MINETTE ROTARY VILLA,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,434,000 ",50,PERRY LANE AND BAY MINET,BAY MINETTE,AL,36507,3,Baldwin,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.8607,-87.766,FY95,,,,,,,
062EE018,AHEPA 23-II,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,505,300 ",71,SYLVEST DRIVE,MONTGOMERY,AL,36117,101,Montgomery,5240,"MONTGOMERY, AL",32.3906,-86.1946,FY95,,,,,,,
062HD001,FOLEY VOA LIVING CENTER,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,049,000 ",21,200 SUNFLOWER AVE.,FOLEY,AL,36535,3,Baldwin,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.4008,-87.6861,FY96,,,,,,,
062HD002,DECATUR VOA LIVING CENTE,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$322,500 ",7,SE CORNER OF MORGAN & CE,DECATUR,AL,36301,69,Houston,2180,"DOTHAN, AL",31.2042,-85.4168,FY95,,,,,,,
062HD011,HALLS MILL VOA LIVING CE,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$347,900 ",7,HALLS MILL RD.,MOBILE,AL,36605,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.6028,-88.0691,FY95,,,,,,,
062HD013,CARC I HOUSING,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$323,000 ",9,MCINTYRE AVENUE,JACKSON,AL,36545,25,Clarke,0,NM,31.5616,-87.8988,FY95,,,,,,,
062HD020,AGAPE HOUSE,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$940,000 ",18,2100 AVE. H,BIRMINGHAM,AL,35218,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.5092,-86.895,FY94,,,,,,,
062HD021,PINE VIEW APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$947,400 ",20,103 OAK STREET,EAST BREWTON,AL,36426,53,Escambia,0,NM,31.1187,-87.0711,FY95,,,,,,,
062HH008,SOUTHERN AL VOA LIVING C,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$371,200 ",11,1609 GOVERNMENT ST.,MOBILE,AL,36604,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.6791,-88.076,FY94,,,,,,,
06311017,BRIERWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,780,000 ",196,8880 OLD KINGS ROAD,JACKSONVILLE,FL,32219,31,Duval,3600,"JACKSONVILLE, FL",30.4085,-81.7577,FY94,75600,SILVERSTATE FINANCIAL CORP,75600,SILVERSTATE FINANCIAL CORP,75600,SILVERSTATE FINANCIAL CORP,CO
06311018,REGENCY OAKS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,028,600 ",65,7831 TIPPIN AVENUE,PENSACOLA,FL,32514,33,Escambia,6080,"PENSACOLA, FL",30.5069,-87.1959,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06311020,FEILDCREST APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$5,865,000 ",238,7932 SOUTHSIDE BLVD.,JACKSONVILLE,FL,32256,31,Duval,3600,"JACKSONVILLE, FL",30.2268,-81.5523,FY95,19469,MNC MORTGAGE CORPORATION,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
06311022,PINEBROOK APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,708,000 ",208,7500 POWERS AVENUE,JACKSONVILLE,FL,32217,31,Duval,3600,"JACKSONVILLE, FL",30.2427,-81.6096,FY96,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
06335234,PADDOCK CLUB II,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$4,751,800 ",112,1900 CENTRE POINT BLVD.,TALLAHASSEE,FL,32306,73,Leon,8240,"TALLAHASSEE, FL",30.4421,-84.2963,FY95,70970,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE,70970,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE,70970,BERKSHIRE MORTGAGE FINANCE,MA
06335235,WINDGATE APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,362,300 ",112,4041 E OLIVE RD.,PENSACOLA,FL,32504,33,Escambia,6080,"PENSACOLA, FL",30.50952,-87.18793,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06335236,UNIVERSITY PLACE APARTME,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$9,012,000 ",176,WILLISTON STREET,GAINESVILLE,FL,32608,1,Alachua,2900,"GAINESVILLE, FL",29.6013,-82.3532,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06341001,THE MOORINGS APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,904,200 ",200,8491 Old Spanish Trail R,Pensacola,FL,32514,33,Escambia,6080,"PENSACOLA, FL",30.514324,-87.171059,FY95,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,PA
06341002,SUTTON PLACE APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,243,700 ",160,4350 W. FAIRFIELD DRIVE,PENSACOLA,FL,32505,33,Escambia,6080,"PENSACOLA, FL",30.4342,-87.2759,FY95,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,PA
063HD001,CPJ HOUSING,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$316,600 ",6,2418 SCHUMACHER AVE,JACKSONVILLE,FL,32207,31,Duval,3600,"JACKSONVILLE, FL",30.299,-81.6294,FY95,,,,,,,
063HH005,NEW OUTLOOK,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$857,923 ",17,GANDY & TALLAHASSEE ROAD,JACKSONVILLE,FL,32208,31,Duval,3600,"JACKSONVILLE, FL",30.3903,-81.6827,FY94,,,,,,,
06535434,PLANTATION APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,794,900 ",152,STATE LINE ROAD,OLIVE BRANCH,MS,38654,33,DeSoto,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",34.9663,-89.8687,FY94,23002,LAMAR LIFE INSURANCE CO.,23002,LAMAR LIFE INSURANCE CO.,75553,CIMARRON MORTGAGE COMPANY,MS
06535438,WESTOVER APARTMENTS II,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$1,747,600 ",48,WESTOVER DRIVE,HATTIESBURG,MS,39402,73,Lamar,3285,"HATTIESBURG, MS",31.3074,-89.3625,FY94,23002,LAMAR LIFE INSURANCE CO.,23002,LAMAR LIFE INSURANCE CO.,75553,CIMARRON MORTGAGE COMPANY,MS
06535439,HIDDEN OAKS APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$7,551,300 ",181,PASS ROAD,BILOXI,MS,39532,59,Jackson,0920,"BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS",30.4513,-88.8704,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535440,MARK TRACE APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,925,000 ",168,RICE RD & OLD CANTON RD,RIDGELAND,MS,39157,89,Madison,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.4213,-90.1062,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535441,HIGHPOINTE APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$7,281,700 ",168,HIGHWAY 80 WEST,BRANDON,MS,39042,121,Rankin,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.2436,-90.0042,FY94,70270,DEPOSIT GUARANTY MTG CO OF FL,70270,DEPOSIT GUARANTY MTG CO OF FL,70270,DEPOSIT GUARANTY MTG CO OF FL,MS
06535442,LANDINGS AT OPENWOOD,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,723,400 ",120,OAKLEIGH DRIVE,VICKSBURG,MS,39180,149,Warren,0,NM,32.3254,-90.8519,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535443,BRADFORD PLACE APARTMENT,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,177,600 ",120,SIWELL AND TERRY ROAD,JACKSON,MS,39212,49,Hinds,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.186,-90.2603,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535445,TRACE RIDGE APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,393,400 ",136,OLD HIGHWAY 45,TUPELO,MS,38801,81,Lee,0,NM,34.2541,-88.7187,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535447,DELTA BLUFF APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,714,300 ",152,HIGHWAY 61 NORTH,WALLS,MS,38680,33,DeSoto,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",34.9678,-90.127,FY95,21454,STATE TREASURER-EMP RET FUND,21454,STATE TREASURER-EMP RET FUND,21454,STATE TREASURER-EMP RET FUND,MI
06535448,HAMPTON HOUSE APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,217,000 ",128,BEAT LINE ROAD,LONG BEACH,MS,39560,47,Harrison,0920,"BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS",30.393,-89.1713,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535449,COTTONWOOD APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$4,729,700 ",120,COLORADO STREET,GREENVILLE,MS,38701,151,Washington,0,NM,33.3803,-91.0454,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535450,RIVER POINTE APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,607,900 ",152,OLD HIGHWAY 61,TUNICA,MS,38664,143,Tunica,0,NM,34.8096,-90.3,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535455,CREEKWOOD NORTH APARTMEN,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$8,173,800 ",204,CORNER OF DEPEW AND O'NE,GULFPORT,MS,39501,47,Harrison,0920,"BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS",30.3832,-89.0965,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06535458,HERITAGE PLACE APARTMENT,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$3,173,700 ",80,HWY 51 NORTH,SENATOBIA,MS,38668,137,Tate,0,NM,34.6153,-89.9574,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535459,FOXGATE APTS & RACQUET C,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,653,400 ",160,FORD DRIVE,HATTIESBURG,MS,39401,35,Forrest,3285,"HATTIESBURG, MS",31.338,-89.2965,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535460,SOUTHWIND APARTMENTS II,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,227,000 ",128,260 LOWE CIRCLE,RICHLAND,MS,39218,121,Rankin,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.2279,-90.1554,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535461,MARK TRACE PHASE II,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$4,200,000 ",96,1399 RICE ROAD,RIDGELAND,MS,39157,89,Madison,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.4114,-90.1241,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535463,RIVERCHASE III,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$3,830,200 ",88,NORTHTOWN DRIVE,JACKSON,MS,39218,121,Rankin,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.2079,-90.1571,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535466,VILLAGE AT CROSSGATES,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$5,271,700 ",168,330 CROSS PARK DRIVE,PEARL,MS,39208,121,Rankin,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.2875,-90.0423,FY96,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
06535468,EASTGATES APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,897,700 ",96,3500 HWY 39 NORTH,MERIDIAN,MS,39301,75,Lauderdale,0,NM,32.3955,-88.6797,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535470,PLANTATION APTS. - II,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$8,265,100 ",184,8305 STATE LINE ROAD,OLIVE BRANCH,MS,38654,33,DeSoto,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",34.991,-89.857,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06541001,BEAUVOIR MANOR APARTMENT,4,Jackson,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,311,200 ",150,264 STENNIS DRIVE,BILOXI,MS,39531,47,Harrison,0920,"BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS",30.4,-88.983,FY94,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,CA
06543097,DELTA MANOR,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$5,300,600 ",130,U. S. HIGHWAY 322,CLARKSDALE,MS,38614,27,Coahoma,0,NM,34.2043,-90.5775,FY94,74886,J P MORTGAGE CO,74988,BANC ONE CAPITAL FUNDING CORP,74988,BANC ONE CAPITAL FUNDING CORP,VA
06543098,ROLLING HILLS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$5,377,900 ",130,200 Womack St,Starkville,MS,39759,105,Oktibbeha,0,NM,33.481792,-88.812836,FY94,74886,J P MORTGAGE CO,74988,BANC ONE CAPITAL FUNDING CORP,74988,BANC ONE CAPITAL FUNDING CORP,VA
06543099,CANTON MANOR,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$5,330,300 ",130,145 E. TISDALE,CANTON,MS,39046,89,Madison,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.6186,-90.0037,FY94,74886,J P MORTGAGE CO,74988,BANC ONE CAPITAL FUNDING CORP,74988,BANC ONE CAPITAL FUNDING CORP,VA
06543102,BENCHMARK HEALTH CARE CE,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$3,945,000 ",142,6434 Dale Dr,Marion,MS,39342,75,Lauderdale,0,NM,32.4191,-88.6514,FY96,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
065EE001,CORINTHIAN ARBORS,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,888,000 ",40,3123 HARPER ROAD,CORINTH,MS,38834,3,Alcorn,0,NM,34.9453,-88.4965,FY94,,,,,,,
065EE003,CARITAS MANOR,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,438,100 ",33,10TH AVENUE,PETAL,MS,39465,35,Forrest,3285,"HATTIESBURG, MS",31.3259,-89.2481,FY95,,,,,,,
065EE004,EAGLE WING ESTATES,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,039,400 ",24,PALMER CROSSING,HATTIESBURG,MS,39401,35,Forrest,3285,"HATTIESBURG, MS",31.3272,-89.2789,FY95,,,,,,,
065EE006,JACKSON RUN,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,904,000 ",60,SHAW ROAD & HWY 80,JACKSON,MS,39209,49,Hinds,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.3182,-90.2431,FY95,,,,,,,
065EE007,COTTONWOOD GLEN,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,853,400 ",40,4 PLANATION DRIVE,GREENWOOD,MS,38930,83,Leflore,0,NM,33.5158,-90.1725,FY95,,,,,,,
065EE008,CARLOW MANOR,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,456,200 ",40,BARBARA STREET,GULFPORT,MS,39507,47,Harrison,0920,"BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS",30.3954,-89.0517,FY96,,,,,,,
065EE009,SOUTHERN PINES APARTMENT,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,865,100 ",41,TULANE ROAD,HORN LAKE,MS,38637,33,DeSoto,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",34.9547,-90.0523,FY95,,,,,,,
065EE011,JACKSON VOA,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,257,200 ",64,RAYMOND ROAD,JACKSON,MS,39218,121,Rankin,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.2161,-90.1705,FY96,,,,,,,
065HD002,RIVER HEIGHTS APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$742,800 ",15,JACKSON STREET,WEST POINT,MS,39773,25,Clay,0,NM,33.624,-88.6818,FY94,,,,,,,
065HD003,FIRST AVENUE GROUP HOME,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$366,100 ",9,SECOND AVENUE,LAUREL,MS,39440,67,Jones,0,NM,31.6897,-89.1525,FY95,,,,,,,
065HD004,CROSSCREEKS APARTMENTS,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$637,100 ",12,SUNSET DRIVE,PEARL,MS,39213,89,Madison,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.4905,-90.2243,FY95,,,,,,,
065HD005,GROUP HOME FOR MENTALLY,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$278,300 ",8,1110 WEST 7TH STREET,HATTIESBURG,MS,39401,35,Forrest,3285,"HATTIESBURG, MS",31.3354,-89.3139,FY96,,,,,,,
06611037,OAKLAND PINES APTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,850,000 ",230,"5156 NE 6TH AVE, SUITE 2",OAKLAND PARK,FL,33334,11,Broward,2680,"FORT LAUDERDALE, FL",26.1907,-80.1393,FY94,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06611043,LAKESHORE APARTMENT,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,139,400 ",181,1260 NW 95th St,Miami,FL,33147,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.860836,-80.218427,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06611048,WEST DADE II APTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/223f,REK,Refi/ Pchse,"$8,452,400 ",209,974 NW 2nd St,MIAMI,FL,33128,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.77492,-80.21139,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06611049,DORSET HOUSE APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,916,500 ",60,2895 NE 32ND STREET,FORT LAUDERDALE,FL,33306,11,Broward,2680,"FORT LAUDERDALE, FL",26.1679,-80.1069,FY95,68061,MIDLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CO,68061,MIDLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CO,68061,MIDLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CO,FL
06611050,SUMMERFIELD APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,528,600 ",153,3200 NW 84TH AVENUE,SUNRISE,FL,33351,11,Broward,2680,"FORT LAUDERDALE, FL",26.1653,-80.2618,FY95,68061,MIDLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CO,68061,MIDLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CO,68061,MIDLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CO,FL
06611052,CARRIAGE WALKCROWN COURT,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,099,200 ",74,SCATTERED SITES1300-1450,BOCA RATON,FL,33486,99,Palm Beach,8960,"WEST PALM BEACH-BOCA RATON, FL",26.3466,-80.1099,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06611053,GREEN TEE APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,746,500 ",123,1830 Maravilla Ave,Fort Myers,FL,33901,71,Lee,2700,"FORT MYERS-CAPE CORAL, FL",26.614817,-81.87561,FY95,73723,GREYSTONE SERVICING CORP INC,34407,WHITEHALL FUNDING INC,34407,WHITEHALL FUNDING INC,IN
06611054,THE WATERMARKE APARTMENT,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$7,905,400 ",217,500 N Congress Ave,West Palm Beach,FL,33401,99,Palm Beach,8960,"WEST PALM BEACH-BOCA RATON, FL",26.713683,-80.082533,FY95,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06615002,PROSPERITY OAKS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,12,Other FHA,Optg loss 221MR,XTJ,Other,"$4,676,200 ",288,11381 Prosperity Farm,PALM BEACH GARDENS,FL,33410,99,Palm Beach,8960,"WEST PALM BEACH-BOCA RATON, FL",26.8487,-80.0868,FY95,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
06635214,FAIRWAY VIEW APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$14,517,100 ",301,6881 NW 173rd Dr,Miami,FL,33015,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.928333,-80.3128,FY94,68061,MIDLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CO,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06635225,SUNSET GARDENS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$11,822,200 ",208,75 SW 107TH AVE,MIAMI,FL,33174,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.7673,-80.368,FY95,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,09632,AMERICAN CAPITAL RESOURCE INC,GA
06641001,STOCK ISLAND APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$3,282,600 ",130,5501 THIRD AVENUE,KEY WEST,FL,33040,87,Monroe,0,NM,24.5688,-81.7388,FY95,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
06643075,CONCORDE II RETIREMENT C,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$3,825,000 ",71,SE CORNER OF SW 10TH & 2,DEERFIELD BEACH,FL,33314,11,Broward,2680,"FORT LAUDERDALE, FL",26.0682,-80.226,FY95,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06643076,FLORIDA CLUB CARE,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH A7,REQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$6,419,700 ",180,220 SIERRA DRIVE,MIAMI,FL,33179,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.9538,-80.197,FY94,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
066EE002,VILLA SAN CARLOS II,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,957,100 ",54,LISTER ST. & LISTER WATE,PORT CHARLOTTE,FL,32222,31,Duval,3600,"JACKSONVILLE, FL",30.23,-81.8127,FY94,,,,,,,
066EE003,VILLA FRANCISCAN,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$4,668,200 ",85,200 W. 20TH STREET,RIVIERA BEACH,FL,33404,99,Palm Beach,8960,"WEST PALM BEACH-BOCA RATON, FL",26.7788,-80.0591,FY95,,,,,,,
066EE011,UN CH RESIDENCES OF IMMO,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,235,800 ",40,HOPE CIRCLE,COLLIER COUNTY,FL,33934,21,Collier,5345,"NAPLES, FL",26.4197,-81.4266,FY96,,,,,,,
066EE017,FEDERATION LANDINGS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$4,400,400 ",77,5010 N Nob Hill Rd,Sunrise,FL,33351,11,Broward,2680,"FORT LAUDERDALE, FL",26.18573,-80.28389,FY94,,,,,,,
066EE019,TWIN LAKES,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$5,693,200 ",100,"NW 7TH AVE., STATE ROAD",MIAMI,FL,33130,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.7678,-80.2057,FY94,,,,,,,
066EE022,D.E.E.D.C.O GARDENS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$4,443,400 ",77,MOWRY DR. & TENNES,HOMESTEAD,FL,33030,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.4695,-80.4611,FY96,,,,,,,
066EE023,AHEPA 18 APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$5,600,600 ",98,4332 Community Dr,West Palm Beach,FL,33409,99,Palm Beach,8960,"WEST PALM BEACH-BOCA RATON, FL",26.72048,-80.11055,FY95,,,,,,,
066EE035,BLUE LAGOON APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$7,199,400 ",110,"BLUE LAGOON CENTRE, NW 5",MIAMI,FL,33130,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.7678,-80.2057,FY95,,,,,,,
066EH249,PHOENIX MANOR,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,133,800 ",20,3941 S.W. 89TH. AVENUE,MIAMI,FL,33165,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.733,-80.3399,FY95,,,,,,,
066EH253,LOCK TOWNS IND LVG APTS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,081,100 ",20,2300 NW 135TH STREET,OPA-LOCKA,FL,33054,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.8948,-80.2681,FY95,,,,,,,
066EH271,GOLDEN PONDS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$5,174,000 ",100,NW 155TH TERRACE,MIAMI,FL,33193,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.7005,-80.4402,FY94,,,,,,,
066HD004,MARTY'S PLACE,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$202,000 ",3,1515-1519 BERTHA STREET,KEY WEST,FL,33040,87,Monroe,0,NM,24.5541,-81.7799,FY94,,,,,,,
066HD011,SHELBOURNE HOUSE,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,564,700 ",24,3890 BISCAYNE BLVD.,MIAMI BEACH,FL,33137,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.8126,-80.1893,FY95,,,,,,,
06711045,COUNTRY CLUB APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRS,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,953,300 ",240,1155 N Courtenay Pky,Merritt Island,FL,32953,9,Brevard,4900,"MELBOURNE-TITUSVILLE-PALM BAY, FL",28.377473,-80.701985,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06711049,TEALWOOD PARKE APARTMENT,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,227,000 ",108,4704 LUCIER COURT,WINTER PARK,FL,32792,95,Orange,5960,"ORLANDO, FL",28.6059,-81.2884,FY94,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,CA
06711050,TIFFANY SQUARE APTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,380,000 ",88,333 W Columbia Ave,Kissimmee,FL,34741,97,Osceola,5960,"ORLANDO, FL",28.307711,-81.406498,FY95,34444,CONTINENTAL SECURITIES CORP,34444,CONTINENTAL SECURITIES CORP,34444,CONTINENTAL SECURITIES CORP,NY
06711052,THE PARK APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,606,100 ",120,2420 CENTRAL PARK DRIVE,MELBOURNE,FL,32935,9,Brevard,4900,"MELBOURNE-TITUSVILLE-PALM BAY, FL",28.1446,-80.6648,FY94,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
06711053,THE PINES APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,284,800 ",217,3016 PINEWOOD DRIVE NE,PALM BAY,FL,32905,9,Brevard,4900,"MELBOURNE-TITUSVILLE-PALM BAY, FL",28.0397,-80.617,FY94,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
06711058,CATALINA CLUB APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,867,500 ",136,1090 Loring Dr,Merritt Island,FL,32953,9,Brevard,4900,"MELBOURNE-TITUSVILLE-PALM BAY, FL",28.375017,-80.699035,FY95,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,24038,HEARTLAND SAVINGS BANK FSB,24038,HEARTLAND SAVINGS BANK FSB,MO
06711059,SUMMERSET APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$6,290,000 ",224,2269 SOLSTICS STREET,MELBOURNE,FL,32935,9,Brevard,4900,"MELBOURNE-TITUSVILLE-PALM BAY, FL",28.1462,-80.6586,FY95,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,24038,HEARTLAND SAVINGS BANK FSB,24038,HEARTLAND SAVINGS BANK FSB,MO
06711063,FORESTLAKE APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,290,000 ",120,132 FOREST LAKE BLVD.,DAYTONA BEACH,FL,32119,127,Volusia,2020,"DAYTONA BEACH, FL",29.1651,-81.0462,FY95,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06711064,BRANDON OAKS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,369,600 ",160,110 SUMMERFIELD WAY,BRANDON,FL,33510,57,Hillsborough,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.9477,-82.2859,FY95,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06711065,THE BREAKERS APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,850,000 ",208,778 JIMMY ANN DRIVE,DAYTONA BEACH,FL,32114,127,Volusia,2020,"DAYTONA BEACH, FL",29.2091,-81.0696,FY95,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
06722001,T L C ST. PETERSBURG,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$6,800,000 ",272,1735 9th St S,Saint Petersburg,FL,33705,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.752693,-82.646893,FY95,12739,CAMBRIDGE REALTY CAPITAL IL,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06722003,PARRIS HOUSE ASSISTED LI,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,183,900 ",56,5703 W. MONTATA AVE,NEW PORT RICHEY,FL,34652,101,Pasco,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.2479,-82.7201,FY96,24864,CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INC,24864,CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INC,24864,CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INC,IN
06735302,GLENBROOK APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMD,NC/SR,"$1,976,500 ",40,8121 45TH COURT,SARASOTA,FL,34243,81,Manatee,7510,"SARASOTA-BRADENTON, FL",27.390141,-82.505654,FY94,24864,CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INC,24864,CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INC,24864,CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INC,IN
06741001,BROOKSIDE SQUARE APARTME,4,Jacksonville,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$1,521,500 ",142,"200 72ND AVENUE, N.",ST. PETERSBURG,FL,33702,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.8376,-82.6369,FY95,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
06743088,MEADOWBROOK MANOR OF BRA,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$6,817,400 ",150,"105 15TH STREET, EAST",BRADENTON,FL,34208,81,Manatee,7510,"SARASOTA-BRADENTON, FL",27.4992,-82.5485,FY94,76815,DDM MORTGAGE CORP,76815,DDM MORTGAGE CORP,76815,DDM MORTGAGE CORP,NC
06743089,PALM TERRACE RESIDENT CA,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Asst'd Living,RNL,NC/SR,"$4,839,300 ",73,5121 E Serena Dr,Tampa,FL,33617,57,Hillsborough,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.043017,-82.3988,FY96,77349,REILLY MORTGAGE ASSOCIATES LP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
06743090,BELLA VITA,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH A7,REQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$6,359,100 ",120,1420 E Venice Ave,Venice,FL,34292,115,Sarasota,7510,"SARASOTA-BRADENTON, FL",27.099284,-82.413001,FY95,77472,CAPITAL FUNDING GROUP,60092,WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS BK,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
06792011,LAKE WALES GARDENS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,12,Other FHA,old 207s PMM sale,HRF,Other,"$1,180,400 ",96,504 S. 4TH ST.,LAKE WALES,FL,33853,105,Polk,3980,"LAKELAND-WINTER HAVEN, FL",27.8934,-81.5839,FY94,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
067EE003,CASA SANTA MARTA II,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,488,600 ",52,1576 8TH ST.,SARASOTA,FL,34236,115,Sarasota,7510,"SARASOTA-BRADENTON, FL",27.3428,-82.5393,FY94,,,,,,,
067EE008,"GIS-SUNCOAST, INC.",4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$4,456,000 ",94,2351 Alderman Rd,Palm Harbor,FL,34683,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.093482,-82.744982,FY94,,,,,,,
067EE018,NCR OF DAYTONA BEACH,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,363,000 ",63,956 DERBYSHIRE ROAD,DAYTONA BEACH,FL,32117,127,Volusia,2020,"DAYTONA BEACH, FL",29.2297,-81.0633,FY95,,,,,,,
067EE022,ASCENSION HOUSING APARTM,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,752,200 ",76,2960 PINEAPPLE AVE,MELBOURNE,FL,32935,9,Brevard,4900,"MELBOURNE-TITUSVILLE-PALM BAY, FL",28.1555,-80.6396,FY94,,,,,,,
067EE024,ST. PATRICK'S HOUSING CO,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$4,103,900 ",82,4500 BLOCK OF SOUTH MANH,TAMPA,FL,33611,57,Hillsborough,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.8953,-82.5009,FY94,,,,,,,
067EE026,HOLY CROSS (CASA SANTA C,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,803,600 ",76,7825 54TH AVE NORTH,ST. PETERSBURG,FL,33709,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.8205,-82.7461,FY94,,,,,,,
067EE031,PRINCE OF PEACE HOUSING,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,610,500 ",70,W OF NOVA RD-N OF HAND A,VOLUSIA COUNTY,FL,32174,127,Volusia,2020,"DAYTONA BEACH, FL",29.2826,-81.089,FY95,,,,,,,
067EE036,KISSIMMEE OAKS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,695,800 ",50,NORTH CENTRAL AVE.,KISSIMMEE,FL,34746,97,Osceola,5960,"ORLANDO, FL",28.3091,-81.4839,FY95,,,,,,,
067EE037,NCR OF PALMETTO,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,854,700 ",72,HABEN BLVD,PALMETTO,FL,34221,81,Manatee,7510,"SARASOTA-BRADENTON, FL",27.6007,-82.5616,FY95,,,,,,,
067EH297,MAGNOLIA GARDENS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$4,352,400 ",88,1031 FOURTH STREET,DAYTONA BEACH,FL,32217,31,Duval,3600,"JACKSONVILLE, FL",30.34018,-81.64182,FY95,,,,,,,
067HD007,BRADENTON VOA LIVING CEN,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$713,900 ",9,CORNER OF 11TH AND 68TH,BRADENTON,FL,34217,81,Manatee,7510,"SARASOTA-BRADENTON, FL",27.5148,-82.7229,FY95,,,,,,,
067HD012,HARDY STREET APT,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$805,600 ",16,8410 Hardy St,Port Richey,FL,34668,101,Pasco,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.278414,-82.709106,FY94,,,,,,,
067HD013,THE PASADENA DRIVE,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$203,900 ",4,5429 PASADENA DRIVE,NEW PORT RICHEY,FL,34652,101,Pasco,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.2286,-82.7256,FY94,,,,,,,
067HD014,FOREST MEADOWS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$977,100 ",15,51 AVE. N. 1 BLOCK E OF,PINELLAS COUNTY,FL,34664,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.8402,-82.7137,FY95,,,,,,,
067HD015,FOREST LANE APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,296,400 ",24,NE CORNER 71 AVE. & 53 S,PINELLAS PARK,FL,34665,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.8402,-82.7137,FY95,,,,,,,
067HD020,MORNINGSIDE,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$338,600 ",6,2500 HARN BLVD.,CLEARWATER,FL,34624,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.9467,-82.7329,FY96,,,,,,,
067HD021,FOUNTAIN SQUARE,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$541,200 ",8,1799 N. HIGHLAND AVENUE,CLEARWATER,FL,34615,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.9862,-82.7756,FY96,,,,,,,
067HD023,THE ZEPHYRHILLS DUPLEX,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$312,200 ",6,39141 6TH AVE,ZEPHYRHILLS,FL,33540,101,Pasco,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.2369,-82.1705,FY96,,,,,,,
067HD028,CITRUS CO. ASSOC. RETARD,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$938,800 ",18,222 PLEASANT GROVE RD.,INVERNESS,FL,32652,17,Citrus,0,NM,28.8335,-82.3527,FY95,,,,,,,
08111012,VALLEY FORGE APARTMENTS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,696,000 ",229,176 Hillview Ave,Memphis,TN,38109,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.048146,-90.05845,FY94,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,24038,HEARTLAND SAVINGS BANK FSB,24038,HEARTLAND SAVINGS BANK FSB,MO
08111013,THE GARDEN APARTMENTS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,275,000 ",96,6371 WINCHESTER ROAD,MEMPHIS,TN,38115,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.0497,-89.8509,FY94,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,71163,TRI CAPITAL CORP,CA
08111014,WOODLAKE APARTMENTS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,608,000 ",122,3314 SO. WOODLAKE CIR.,MEMPHIS,TN,38118,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.0511,-89.9527,FY94,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,24038,HEARTLAND SAVINGS BANK FSB,24038,HEARTLAND SAVINGS BANK FSB,MO
08111016,THE SHRINE BUILDING,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,377,600 ",83,66 MONROE AVENUE,MEMPHIS,TN,38103,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.1441,-90.0537,FY94,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,SC
08111017,MEADOW OAKS APTS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/223f,REK,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,400,000 ",270,3634 Colonial Oak Ln,Memphis,TN,38116,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.0308,-90.0113,FY94,73754,LOAN SERVICES INC,04951,GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORP,42162,GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION PA,PA
08111019,PINEWOOD MANOR APTS.,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,806,700 ",142,965 RAINES ROAD EAST,MEMPHIS,TN,38116,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.0352,-90.0317,FY95,17399,LEADER FEDERAL MORTGAGE INC,49044,LEADER FEDERAL BANK FOR SAVING,49044,LEADER FEDERAL BANK FOR SAVING,TN
08111020,KIMBALL CABANA APTS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/223f,REK,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,659,200 ",252,2856 KIMBALL AVENUE,MEMPHIS,TN,38114,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.0951,-89.9676,FY94,60188,LOVE FUNDING CORPORATION,24038,HEARTLAND SAVINGS BANK FSB,24038,HEARTLAND SAVINGS BANK FSB,MO
08111023,CAMELOT MANOR APTS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,960,200 ",302,3135 Ashwood St,Memphis,TN,38118,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.063184,-89.927993,FY95,75077,METROPOLITAN FUNDING CORP,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
08111024,COLONIAL ESTATES,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,485,000 ",83,"2600 COLONIAL TWRS DR.,",MEMPHIS,TN,38018,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.201436,-89.768883,FY96,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,CA
08115001,FOX ACRES,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,12,Other FHA,Optg loss 220h,XTH,Other,"$888,100 ",120,2180 MANGRUM RD,Memphis,TN,38134,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.185,-89.86029,FY94,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,PA
08135205,THE WOODS AT POST HOUSE,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,368,900 ",122,MOIZE RD,JACKSON,TN,38305,113,Madison,3580,"JACKSON, TN",35.685,-88.8278,FY94,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,SC
08141001,BREEZY POINT APARTMENTS,4,Nashville,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$780,900 ",179,2801 Raja Dr,Memphis,TN,38127,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.201882,-90.01363,FY95,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
08141002,ROLLINGS HILLS APT,4,Nashville,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$760,200 ",138,2818 Green Terrace Dr,Memphis,TN,38127,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.202162,-90.00442,FY95,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
08143027,GERMANTOWN ASSISTED LIVI,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$4,320,000 ",96,RAINES ROAD,MEMPHIS,TN,38109,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.0272,-90.075,FY96,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
08143030,KIRBY OAKS GUEST HOME,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH A7,REQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,358,400 ",82,6551 KNIGHT ARNOLD ROAD,MEMPHIS,TN,38115,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.0605,-89.8465,FY96,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,CA
081EE008,WESLEY AT MARTIN,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,891,700 ",41,US 45 BYPASS SO HANNINGS,MARTIN,TN,38111,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.1072,-89.9442,FY94,,,,,,,
081EE009,WESLEY AT ADAMSVILLE,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,277,800 ",25,CORNER OF MAPLE AND BIRC,ADAMSVILLE,TN,38310,109,McNairy,0,NM,35.2618,-88.4219,FY95,,,,,,,
081EE014,GOOD SAMARITAN VILLAGE,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,130,300 ",40,POST OAK ROAD,CAMDEN,TN,38320,5,Benton,0,NM,36.0576,-88.1093,FY95,,,,,,,
081EE016,BETHEL AME CHURCH,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,267,000 ",62,ALCY ROAD,MEMPHIS,TN,38116,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.0652,-90.0165,FY96,,,,,,,
081HD008,SRVS HOME III,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$379,900 ",6,1178 Rutland Rd # 80,Memphis,TN,38114,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.096975,-89.963458,FY95,,,,,,,
081HD010,WILLOW APARTMENTS,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,222,300 ",21,FINDLEY ROAD,DYERSBURG,TN,38024,45,Dyer,0,NM,36.0315,-89.365,FY95,,,,,,,
081HD012,EVERGREEN APARTMENTS,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,123,800 ",21,SCHOOL DRIVE,UNION CITY,TN,38237,183,Weakley,0,NM,36.3416,-88.8554,FY95,,,,,,,
08310013,GUARDIAN COURT APTS,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/221MR ,ZSJ,Impvmts,"$2,225,500 ",128,6100 LACLEDE LANE,LOUISVILLE,KY,40219,111,Jefferson,4520,"LOUISVILLE, KY-IN",38.1405,-85.6779,FY94,34531,SIMS MORTGAGE FUNDING INC,20494,STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST CO,78327,CRIIMI MAE SERVICES LP,MD
08310014,THE HUNNINGTON II,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/223f ,ZSM,Impvmts,"$1,302,400 ",132,951 Red Mile Rd,Lexington,KY,40504,67,Fayette,4280,"LEXINGTON, KY",38.04052,-84.524173,FY95,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08310015,LINCOLNSHIRE NORTH APART,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/221MR ,ZSJ,Impvmts,"$1,354,300 ",108,1001 Pennbrooke St,Owensboro,KY,42301,59,Daviess,5990,"OWENSBORO, KY",37.76481,-87.14453,FY96,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08310016,LINCOLNSHIRE APARTMENTS,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/221MR ,ZSJ,Impvmts,"$1,018,100 ",100,1001 Pennbrooke St,Owensboro,KY,42301,59,Daviess,5990,"OWENSBORO, KY",37.76481,-87.14453,FY96,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08311032,VILLAGE SQUARE APTS,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,745,600 ",120,535 MAHAFFEY DRIVE,RICHMOND,KY,40475,151,Madison,4280,"LEXINGTON, KY",37.738,-84.3081,FY95,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08311034,WENTWORTH APARTMENTS,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,762,500 ",134,7601 CAROLE LANE,FLORENCE,KY,41042,15,Boone,1640,"CINCINNATI, OH-KY-IN",38.98,-84.6338,FY94,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
08311036,GRANDVIEW APTS,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,331,900 ",104,500 HILLCREST MANOR DR,Winchester,KY,40391,49,Clark,4280,"LEXINGTON, KY",38.00126,-84.20989,FY94,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08311037,SOUTHWIND,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,262,000 ",96,771 LAKEVIEW DRIVE,HENDERSON,KY,42420,101,Henderson,2440,"EVANSVILLE-HENDERSON, IN-KY",37.8681,-87.5633,FY95,74388,P-R MORTGAGE AND INVEST CORP,74388,P-R MORTGAGE AND INVEST CORP,74388,P-R MORTGAGE AND INVEST CORP,IN
08312001,HILLSIDE APTS,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/236 ,ZSR,Impvmts,"$435,300 ",48,98 DERBY CT,CYNTHIANA,KY,41031,97,Harrison,0,NM,38.3919,-84.285,FY95,74974,FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,74974,FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,74974,FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,KY
08315003,SAYRE VILLAGE PHASE III,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,12,Other FHA,Optg loss 221MR,XTJ,Other,"$570,400 ",101,580 GREENFIELD DR,Lexington,KY,40517,67,Fayette,4280,"LEXINGTON, KY",37.97428,-84.50522,FY94,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
08335445,ST. JAMES PLACE,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4 SRO ,OMR,NC/SR,"$749,000 ",100,CORRAL & DEWEESE,LEXINGTON-FAYETTE,KY,40508,67,Fayette,4280,"LEXINGTON, KY",38.0497,-84.4924,FY94,16396,KENTUCKY HOUSING CORP,16396,KENTUCKY HOUSING CORP,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08335446,VIRGINIA PLACE,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$985,200 ",56,1155 Horsemans Ln,Lexington,KY,40504,67,Fayette,4280,"LEXINGTON, KY",38.042598,-84.527058,FY94,75509,PHARES COMPANY,16396,KENTUCKY HOUSING CORP,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08335450,PADDOCK CLUB FLORENCE,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$9,804,400 ",200,MALL ROADCONNECTOR DRIVE,FLORENCE,KY,41042,15,Boone,1640,"CINCINNATI, OH-KY-IN",38.996817,-84.665686,FY94,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08335451,SAYRE VILLAGE PHASE III,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d3,REH,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,148,100 ",101,580 Greenfield Dr,Lexington,KY,40517,67,Fayette,4280,"LEXINGTON, KY",37.974282,-84.50522,FY94,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
08335454,WELCOME HOUSING,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d3,MMI,NC/SR,"$1,681,500 ",20,1102-1116 GREENUP STREET,COVINGTON,KY,41011,117,Kenton,1640,"CINCINNATI, OH-KY-IN",39.079,-84.5054,FY95,16276,PNC BANK KENTUCKY INC,16276,PNC BANK KENTUCKY INC,16276,PNC BANK KENTUCKY INC,KY
08343087,SHELBY MANOR HEALTH CNTR,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$4,205,500 ",153,100 Church View St,Shelbyville,KY,40065,211,Shelby,0,NM,38.2154,-85.2249,FY94,75504,BANKERS MRTGAGE CORP,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08343088,MOUNTAIN MANOR OF PAINTS,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$4,238,200 ",110,1025 EUCLID AVENUE,PAINTSVILLE,KY,41240,115,Johnson,0,NM,37.8115,-82.7988,FY94,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08343090,LIBERTY CARE CENTER,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$2,623,800 ",100,US 127,LIBERTY,KY,42539,45,Casey,0,NM,37.3161,-84.9667,FY94,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08343091,HOMESTEAD NURSING CENTER,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$3,114,800 ",136,1608 Versailles Rd,Lexington,KY,40504,67,Fayette,4280,"LEXINGTON, KY",38.048397,-84.533051,FY95,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
083EE017,WESTBROOKE APARTMENTS,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,210,100 ",24,HAILS KNOB ROAD,SOMERSET,KY,42501,199,Pulaski,0,NM,37.0766,-84.604,FY94,,,,,,,
083EE025,FLORENCE APTS,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,299,400 ",40,OLD TOLL ROAD,FLORENCE,KY,41042,15,Boone,1640,"CINCINNATI, OH-KY-IN",38.9876,-84.6306,FY95,,,,,,,
083EE027,SMITHLAND ELDERLY HSG,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$619,400 ",12,RUDD STREET,SMITHLAND,KY,42081,139,Livingston,0,NM,37.1208,-88.3859,FY95,,,,,,,
083EE031,COOLOCK HOUSE,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,805,500 ",50,2120 PAYNE STREET,LOUISVILLE,KY,40206,111,Jefferson,4520,"LOUISVILLE, KY-IN",38.2525,-85.7077,FY95,,,,,,,
083EE035,FRIENDSHIP HOUSE-OWENSBO,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,072,000 ",54,HGWY 54 AT RAGU DRIVE,OWENSBORO,KY,42303,59,Daviess,5990,"OWENSBORO, KY",37.7557,-87.0792,FY96,,,,,,,
083EE039,CHAPEL HOUSE - TAYLORSVI,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,168,000 ",20,30 Creekside Dr,Taylorsville,KY,40071,215,Spencer,0,NM,38.0498,-85.3913,FY95,,,,,,,
083HD019,DAY SPRING GROUP HOME,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$585,700 ",16,ILLINOIS AVENUE,LOUISVILLE,KY,40217,111,Jefferson,4520,"LOUISVILLE, KY-IN",38.216,-85.741,FY94,,,,,,,
083HD025,FRANKFORT APTS,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$664,600 ",13,DEEPWOOD DRIVE,FRANKFORT,KY,40601,73,Franklin,0,NM,38.141,-84.9366,FY94,,,,,,,
083HD027,ASHLAND 811 GROUP HOME,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$227,200 ",4,MOORE STREET TWIN OAKS,ASHLAND,KY,41101,19,Boyd,3400,"HUNTINGTON-ASHLAND, WV-KY-OH",38.478355,-82.637993,FY95,,,,,,,
083HD028,MOREHEAD 811 GROUP HOME,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$227,200 ",4,VALLEY VIEW ACRES LOT 9,MOREHEAD,KY,40351,205,Rowan,0,NM,38.1961,-83.4436,FY95,,,,,,,
083HD029,BROWN-MACKINNON APTS,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,714,600 ",24,900 EAST LIBERTY STREET,LOUISVILLE,KY,40204,111,Jefferson,4520,"LOUISVILLE, KY-IN",38.2502,-85.7363,FY95,,,,,,,
083HD030,CEDAR LAKE-ABIGAIL,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$227,100 ",5,2913 Abigail Dr,Louisville,KY,40205,111,Jefferson,4520,"LOUISVILLE, KY-IN",38.224897,-85.651456,FY94,,,,,,,
083HD031,1882 PRINCETON,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$242,700 ",4,1882 PRINCETON DRIVE,LOUISVILLE,KY,40205,111,Jefferson,4520,"LOUISVILLE, KY-IN",38.2236,-85.6983,FY96,,,,,,,
08611028,NORTHWOODS APARTMENTS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,037,600 ",112,WEST CONCORD DRIVE,MONTGOMERY COUNTY,TN,37040,125,Montgomery,1660,"CLARKSVILLE-HOPKINSVILLE, TN-KY",36.521,-87.3489,FY95,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,05120,MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,PA
08611029,CHARLESTON HALL APTS-I,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,992,400 ",122,351 Sam Ridley Pky E,Smyrna,TN,37167,149,Rutherford,5360,"NASHVILLE, TN",35.996344,-86.494376,FY94,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,SC
08615004,AUSTIN HEWITT HOUSE,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,12,Other FHA,Optg loss 232,XTQ,Other,"$236,300 ",46,322 E WASHINGTON ST,Pulaski,TN,38478,55,Giles,0,NM,35.20051,-87.02699,FY95,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,20494,STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST CO,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,SC
08635244,VILLAGES AT SPRING HILL,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,866,400 ",176,KENDRON ROAD,SPRING HILL,TN,37174,119,Maury,0,NM,35.7159,-86.9062,FY94,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,SC
08635248,CHARLESTON HALL APTS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$2,951,900 ",72,GIL STREET,SMYRNA,TN,37167,149,Rutherford,5360,"NASHVILLE, TN",35.9719,-86.5083,FY95,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,SC
08643035,CEDARS NURSING HOME,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$9,837,900 ",290,932 E Baddour Pky,Lebanon,TN,37087,189,Wilson,5360,"NASHVILLE, TN",36.2297,-86.2996,FY95,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,TN
08643036,CEDAR HILL RETIREMENT CN,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$2,681,400 ",46,NOTTINGHAM DRIVE,COOKEVILLE,TN,38501,141,Putnam,0,NM,36.1772,-85.514,FY95,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,SC
086EE004,CHRISTIAN TOWERS OF GALL,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,411,300 ",55,PRINCE STREET,GALLATIN,TN,37066,165,Sumner,5360,"NASHVILLE, TN",36.3776,-86.4425,FY96,,,,,,,
086EE010,OAK HILL APARTMENTS,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,080,200 ",24,EAST BRONSON ST,SPARTA,TN,38583,185,White,0,NM,35.9294,-85.485,FY95,,,,,,,
08711011,SANDY SPRINGS TOWNHOUSES,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,630,300 ",64,1489 LORI LEA DR,MARYVILLE,TN,37801,9,Blount,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",35.7326,-83.9692,FY94,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
08711014,SOUTHWOOD GARDEN APTS,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,269,100 ",111,2710 SEVIER AVE,KNOXVILLE,TN,37920,93,Knox,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",35.9544,-83.8965,FY95,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
08711015,BRANDYMILL APTS,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,981,000 ",144,2416 E STONE DR,KINGSPORT,TN,37660,163,Sullivan,3660,"JOHNSON CITY-KINGSPORT-BRISTOL, TN-VA",36.5455,-82.5039,FY95,73723,GREYSTONE SERVICING CORP INC,73723,GREYSTONE SERVICING CORP INC,73723,GREYSTONE SERVICING CORP INC,VA
08741001,TOWNVIEW TERRACE I APTS,4,Knoxville,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$2,061,500 ",200,300 MULVANEY ST,KNOXVILLE,TN,37915,93,Knox,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",35.9694,-83.9155,FY95,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
08741002,LYNNWOOD APTS,4,Knoxville,Presv 241f,7,Presv 241f,241f 236,ZFR,,"$543,500 ",100,1300 BLUEFIELD AVE,ELIZABETHTON,TN,37643,19,Carter,3660,"JOHNSON CITY-KINGSPORT-BRISTOL, TN-VA",36.3417,-82.2015,FY94,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
08743030,OAKS AT BRANDY MILL,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$1,825,400 ",54,STONE DR,KINGSPORT,TN,37664,163,Sullivan,3660,"JOHNSON CITY-KINGSPORT-BRISTOL, TN-VA",36.5072,-82.5186,FY94,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,SC
08743033,IVY HALL NURSING HOME,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$4,139,600 ",100,WATAUGA H&I STS,ELIZABETHTON,TN,37643,19,Carter,3660,"JOHNSON CITY-KINGSPORT-BRISTOL, TN-VA",36.3458,-82.2002,FY94,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
08743034,ERWIN HEALTH CARE CTR,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$3,601,600 ",131,100 Stalling Ln,Erwin,TN,37650,171,Unicoi,3660,"JOHNSON CITY-KINGSPORT-BRISTOL, TN-VA",36.125165,-82.428176,FY94,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,73032,FIRST KNOXVILLE BANK,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
087EE006,CHERRY HILL APTS,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,467,200 ",31,MCGOFFIN AVE,SPRING CITY,TN,37381,143,Rhea,0,NM,35.6923,-84.8422,FY94,,,,,,,
087EE007,WALNUT CREEK APTS,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,101,500 ",24,COMMERCE RD,BENTON,TN,37830,1,Anderson,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",36.016,-84.2621,FY94,,,,,,,
087EE012,WOODLAND PARK APTS,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,605,000 ",55,HARDIN LANE,SEVIERVILLE,TN,37863,155,Sevier,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",35.8023,-83.6047,FY95,,,,,,,
087HD007,UNAKA DEVELOPMENT CORP,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$237,600 ",9,1123 KING SPRINGS RD,JOHNSON CITY,TN,37601,179,Washington,3660,"JOHNSON CITY-KINGSPORT-BRISTOL, TN-VA",36.3151,-82.3281,FY95,,,,,,,
087HD008,UNAKA RESIDENCE INC,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$262,000 ",9,804 DRESDEN AVE,JOHNSON CITY,TN,37604,179,Washington,3660,"JOHNSON CITY-KINGSPORT-BRISTOL, TN-VA",36.2977,-82.3974,FY96,,,,,,,
087HD011,TIFFIN HOME,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$252,700 ",7,111 TIFFIN DR,OAK RIDGE,TN,37830,1,Anderson,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",36.004,-84.2657,FY95,,,,,,,
087HD015,ORANGE GROVE DEV NO 7,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$509,100 ",15,535 N SEMINOLE DR,CHATTANOOGA,TN,37411,65,Hamilton,1560,"CHATTANOOGA, TN-GA",35.0357,-85.2503,FY96,,,,,,,
087HD016,ORANGE GROVE DEV NO 5,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$437,300 ",12,CARTER DR,CHATTANOOGA,TN,37404,65,Hamilton,1560,"CHATTANOOGA, TN-GA",35.042,-85.2469,FY96,,,,,,,
087HH001,HOLSTON RESID INC,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$269,800 ",9,MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE,KINGSPORT,TN,37664,163,Sullivan,3660,"JOHNSON CITY-KINGSPORT-BRISTOL, TN-VA",36.534,-82.5213,FY95,,,,,,,
087HH003,KINGSPORT RESID DEV CORP,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$556,500 ",11,TRANBARGER DR,KINGSPORT,TN,37660,163,Sullivan,3660,"JOHNSON CITY-KINGSPORT-BRISTOL, TN-VA",36.5143,-82.5569,FY95,,,,,,,
087HH009,ORANGE GROVE DEV NO 3,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$215,900 ",5,DELASHMITT RD,CHATTANOOGA,TN,37421,65,Hamilton,1560,"CHATTANOOGA, TN-GA",35.0242,-85.1462,FY95,,,,,,,
087HH012,ORANGE GROVE DEV NO 6,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$369,000 ",10,SHADY FORKHIGHWOOD,CHATTANOOGA,TN,37415,65,Hamilton,1560,"CHATTANOOGA, TN-GA",35.1167,-85.2877,FY94,,,,,,,
06111125,WILLOW BRANCH,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,335,000 ",186,822 N. INDIAN CREEK DRIVE,CLARKSTON,GA,30021,89,DeKalb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.80152,-84.23804,FY96,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,AL
05311105,SAND RIDGE II APTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,593,700 ",40,1192 HARBOUR DRIVE,WILMINGTON,NC,28401,129,New Hanover,9200,"WILMINGTON, NC",34.19561,-77.92759,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05311106,CEDAR GREENE APTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,803,500 ",224,CRAIGHEAD DRIVE,CHARLOTTE,NC,28217,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1577,-80.9067,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05335655,MOSS CREEK APTS,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$2,150,500 ",40,UNION ROAD,GASTONIA,NC,28054,71,Gaston,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2377,-81.13,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
05411035,GATEWOOD APTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,212,700 ",134,PINE LOG ROAD,AIKEN,SC,29801,3,Aiken,0600,"AUGUSTA-AIKEN, GA-SC",33.5677,-81.7051,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06322001,ROSEWOOD MANOR,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,742,200 ",155,3107 NORTH H. STREET,PENSACOLA,FL,32501,33,Escambia,6080,"PENSACOLA, FL",30.4436,-87.2315,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06622001,SUNRISE HEALTH CARE,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$19,525,000 ",325,4800 NOB HILL ROAD,SUNRISE,FL,33351,11,Broward,2680,"FORT LAUDERDALE, FL",26.18305,-80.2838,FY96,77472,CAPITAL FUNDING GROUP,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
05435560,PEPPER RIDGE APTS,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,898,800 ",161,SPRINGSTEEN RD. & DAVE L,ROCK HILL,SC,29730,91,York,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",34.9412,-80.9787,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535465,LAURELWOOD APTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$6,385,000 ",152,OLD AMY ROAD,LAUREL,MS,39440,67,Jones,0,NM,31.72,-89.149,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06535467,BRADFORD PLACE II APTS,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,442,000 ",120,SIWELL ROAD,JACKSON,MS,39212,49,Hinds,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.193,-90.2544,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
08310018,KENTUCKY TOWERS,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/221MR ,ZSJ,Impvmts,"$1,349,100 ",285,515 SOUTH FIFTH STREET,LOUISVILLE,KY,40202,111,Jefferson,4520,"LOUISVILLE, KY-IN",38.2509,-85.7594,FY96,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
08711016,PARK CREST APTS,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,780,000 ",112,2108 Congress Pkwy NW,Athens,TN,37303,107,McMin,0,NM,35.44478,-84.63107,FY96,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
08711017,PARK OAKS APTS,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$6,727,600 ",250,1159 Harrison Pike,Cleveland,TN,37311,11,Bradley,0,NM,35.16362,-84.88886,FY96,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,60152,REILLY MORTGAGE GROUP,VA
08635253,NORTHFIELD COMMONS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$7,719,100 ",152,NORTH RUTHERFORD BLVD,MURFREESBORO,TN,37130,149,Rutherford,5360,"NASHVILLE, TN",35.8506,-86.3914,FY96,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,CA
08743037,LAKE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTER,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$4,817,600 ",152,204 Industrial Park Rd,Lake City,TN,37769,1,Anderson,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",36.2037,-84.1382,FY96,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,TN
08743038,ARBOR TERRACE,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$6,041,500 ",98,CROSS PARK DR,KNOXVILLE,TN,37923,93,Knox,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",35.9268,-84.0846,FY96,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,74788,HEARTLAND CAPITAL CORP,TN
08312002,VILLAGE WEST APTS II,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/236 ,ZSR,Impvmts,"$3,075,600 ",220,1015 W CHESTNUT ST,LOUISVILLE,KY,40203,111,Jefferson,4520,"LOUISVILLE, KY-IN",38.25,-85.7684,FY96,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08312003,VILLAGE WEST APTS III,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/236 ,ZSR,Impvmts,"$3,708,900 ",150,1015 W CHESTNUT ST,LOUISVILLE,KY,40203,111,Jefferson,4520,"LOUISVILLE, KY-IN",38.25,-85.7684,FY96,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08314001,VILLAGE WEST APTS,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/BMIR ,ZSL,Impvmts,"$3,733,200 ",162,1015 W CHESTNUT ST,LOUISVILLE,KY,40203,111,Jefferson,4520,"LOUISVILLE, KY-IN",38.25,-85.7684,FY96,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,75509,PHARES COMPANY,KY
08311039,DRIFTWOOD APTS,4,Louisville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$6,614,800 ",258,1900 #1 DENZIL DRIVE,HOPKINSVILLE,KY,42240,47,Christian,1660,"CLARKSVILLE-HOPKINSVILLE, TN-KY",36.8503,-87.49707,FY96,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,78618,FLEET REAL ESTATE CAPITAL INC,SC
05322003,LEXINGTON HEALTH CARE CE,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,227,500 ",110,17 Cornelia St,Lexington,NC,27292,57,Davidson,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",35.8172,-80.24163,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06543105,COTTAGE GROVE NURSING HO,4,Jackson,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 232,RNF,NC/SR,"$3,428,700 ",120,1116 FOREST AVENUE,JACKSON,MS,39206,49,Hinds,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.37034,-90.19307,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
05422005,BAY VIEW NURSING CENTER,4,Columbia,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$5,406,500 ",192,11 SOUTH TODD DRIVE,BEAUFORT,SC,29901,13,Beaufort,0,NM,32.4162,-80.7379,FY96,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,70324,PFC CORPORATION,CA
06611055,SEVEN SUNS APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$6,205,000 ",168,9805 - 9817 W. OKEECHOBE,HIALEAH GARDENS,FL,33016,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.8811,-80.3597,FY96,98310,GMAC MORTGAGE CORP,98310,GMAC MORTGAGE CORP,98310,GMAC MORTGAGE CORP,PA
06611061,TAMARAC POINTE APARTMENT,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$8,695,000 ",200,6527 NW 70TH AVENUE,TAMARAC,FL,33321,11,Broward,2680,"FORT LAUDERDALE, FL",26.1968,-80.2399,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06711066,LORENZO-CAROLINA APARTME,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,032,000 ",40,"1405, 1407, 1409 S.LOREN",TAMPA,FL,33629,57,Hillsborough,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.9211,-82.5072,FY96,68061,MIDLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CO,68061,MIDLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CO,68061,MIDLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CO,FL
05311107,FRIENDLY HILLS APARTMENT,4,Greensboro,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$12,884,400 ",502,63 Quail Hollow Rd,Greensboro,NC,27410,81,Guilford,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.08783,-79.89524,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
08700027,WEST POINTE COMM,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,12,Other FHA,MobHome,HRC,Other,"$2,222,900 ",150,OAK RIDGE HWY,KNOXVILLE,TN,37931,93,Knox,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",35.99112,-84.07083,FY96,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
062HD008,LAMAR HAVEN,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$306,500 ",7,RR 1,Vernon,AL,35592,92,Lamar,0,NM,33.7612,-88.0959,FY96,,,,,,,
062HH010,"GREENWOOD HOMES, INC.",4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$585,100 ",11,SEVENTH AVENUE NORTH,PELL CITY,AL,35125,115,St. Clair,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.5948,-86.3376,FY96,,,,,,,
062EE019,BREWTON ELDERLY HOUSING,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,802,800 ",38,U. S. HIGHWAY 31,BREWTON,AL,36426,53,Escambia,0,NM,31.1495,-87.0718,FY96,,,,,,,
054HD050,"CHARLESTON HSG OPPRTNTS,",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$296,100 ",4,LOT A1 FORT JOHNSON ROAD,CHARLESTON COUNTY,SC,29412,19,Charleston,1440,"CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC",32.7314,-79.9539,FY96,,,,,,,
053HD058,MHA ORANGE CO APTS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$954,600 ",14,CLARK ROAD AT LONGVIEW,CHAPEL HILL,NC,27514,135,Orange,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.9213,-79.0381,FY96,,,,,,,
053HD086,AS MECKLENBURG CO GH #4,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$286,100 ",5,5300 KELLY STREET,CHARLOTTE,NC,28205,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.1866,-80.7756,FY96,,,,,,,
053HD088,WNC COMMUNITY HOME #6,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$317,700 ",7,LOT 1 DOGWOOD HILLS & RI,HAYESVILLE,NC,28904,43,Clay,0,NM,35.0401,-83.7854,FY96
053HD091,SHADE HILL APARTMENTS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$517,400 ",7,3014 POOLE ROAD,RALEIGH,NC,27610,183,Wake,6640,"RALEIGH-DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL, NC",35.7721,-78.5891,FY96
053EE046,PROVIDENCE PLACE II,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,597,900 ",24,NORTH POPLAR STREET,ABERDEEN,NC,28315,125,Moore,0,NM,35.1328,-79.4043,FY96
053HD105,ARCHDS ALAMANCE CO QUADR,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$290,900 ",4,KIVETT STREET,BURLINGTON,NC,27217,1,Alamance,3120,"GREENSBORO--WINSTON-SALEM--HIGHPOINT, NC",36.1216,-79.4763,FY96
065EE012,LEFLEUR HAVEN,4,Jackson,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,257,200 ",64,BRIARWOOD DRIVE,JACKSON,MS,39206,49,Hinds,3560,"JACKSON, MS",32.3693,-90.1748,FY96
066EH255,BUENA VISTA VILLAS,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,378,100 ",20,ELDRON DRIVE,MIAMI SPRINGS,FL,33189,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.5662,-80.3587,FY96
067EE023,PLANT CITY LIVING CENTER,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,233,400 ",42,N. WHEELER & HERRING ST,PLANT CITY,FL,33566,57,Hillsborough,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.0187,-82.1258,FY96
067HH014,UPARC HOUSING IV,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$485,500 ",14,1235 BERMUDA ST,CLEARWATER,FL,34615,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.9959,-82.7865,FY96
067HH015,UPARC V,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$483,400 ",14,NS,PINELLAS COUNTY,FL,34625,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.9729,-82.745,FY96
067HD017,GULF COAST JEWISH FAMILY,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$565,900 ",7,LOTS 19-24 VERMONT & MAD,NEW PORT RICHEY,FL,34652,101,Pasco,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.2329,-82.7325,FY96
066HD020,NEW HORIZONS OF TREASURE,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,504,800 ",24,1001 SE MONTEREY RD,MARTIN COUNTY,FL,34994,85,Martin,2710,"FORT PIERCE-PORT ST. LUCIE, FL",27.1749,-80.2355,FY96
087HD014,WOODHAVEN APTS,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$420,500 ",8,33 ORIOLE DR,CHATTANOOGA,TN,37411,65,Hamilton,1560,"CHATTANOOGA, TN-GA",35.0216,-85.245,FY96
081EE015,ST. MATTHEWS MANOR,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,336,500 ",27,2575 VIKING DRIVE,HUMBOLDT,TN,38343,53,Gibson,0,NM,35.8397,-88.9082,FY96
083EE038,SEPT PLACE RET VILLAGE,4,Louisville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$321,900 ",6,137 E MAIN ST,BEATTYVILLE,KY,41311,129,Lee,0,NM,37.5805,-83.6946,FY96
054HD053,"CLC ACCESSIBLE LIVING, I",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$259,300 ",3,3818 MAID MARION LANE,SPARTANBURG COUNTY,SC,29302,83,Spartanburg,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",34.9064,-81.871,FY96
054HD054,"CLC SUPPORTED LIVING, IN",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$694,500 ",9,MAULDEN STREET,SPARTANBURG,SC,29303,83,Spartanburg,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",35.0131,-82.0503,FY96
054HD059,"CHESTNUT COURT, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,040,700 ",20,CHESTNUT FERRY ROAD,CAMDEN,SC,29020,55,Kershaw,0,NM,34.2922,-80.6404,FY96,,,,,,,
054HD060,"CLC INMAN ESTATES, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$448,100 ",6,191 W. CLARK ROAD,INMAN,SC,29349,83,Spartanburg,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",35.0499,-82.0761,FY96,,,,,,,
054HD065,"LAURELWOOD, INC.",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,034,200 ",20,LAURELWOOD DR.,SPARTANBURG COUNTY,SC,29304,83,Spartanburg,3160,"GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-ANDERSON, SC",34.9296,-81.967,FY96,,,,,,,
053EE033,J. D. FULLER PLACE,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,892,600 ",47,EASTWOOD AVENUE,FAYETTEVILLE,NC,28304,51,Cumberland,2560,"FAYETTEVILLE, NC",35.0283,-78.9705,FY96,,,,,,,
053HD099,METRO HOUSE,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$671,400 ",9,FOURTH STREET,WASHINGTON,NC,27889,13,Beaufort,0,NM,35.5404,-77.0502,FY96,,,,,,,
053EE038,SPRUCE PINE HOUSING,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,646,200 ",25,MARTHA DRIVE,SPRUCE PINE,NC,28777,121,Mitchell,0,NM,35.8832,-82.0452,FY96,,,,,,,
053HD102,THE ARC-RSS CONDOS,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$321,100 ",4,2501 E. KILBOURNE DRIVE,CHARLOTTE,NC,28205,119,Mecklenburg,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",35.2203,-80.7711,FY96,,,,,,,
053HD104,ARCHDS ASHE CO QUADRAPLE,4,Greensboro,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$289,900 ",4,KNOLL VIEW DRIVE,JEFFERSON,NC,28640,9,Ashe,0,NM,36.4216,-81.4824,FY96,,,,,,,
067HD011,THE FOREST AVE TRIPLEX,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$197,000 ",3,6837-41 FOREST AVE,NEW PORT RICHEY,FL,34653,101,Pasco,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.2563,-82.7134,FY96,,,,,,,
066EE044,SIERRA PROJECT,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$5,398,000 ",80,NE 2ND COURT AND SIERRA,MIAMI,FL,33179,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.9544,-80.1977,FY96,,,,,,,
066EE045,CUTLER,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$6,743,900 ",100,SW 216TH STREET,MIAMI,FL,33157,25,Dade,5000,"MIAMI, FL",25.6083,-80.3911,FY96,,,,,,,
066EE047,VILLA MADONNA,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$6,797,200 ",99,LAKE WORTH RD,WEST PALM BEACH,FL,33411,99,Palm Beach,8960,"WEST PALM BEACH-BOCA RATON, FL",26.6949,-80.2201,FY96,,,,,,,
066HD023,DAVID LAWRENCE CENTER,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$767,800 ",10,COLLIER COUNTY,EAST NAPLES,FL,33999,21,Collier,5345,"NAPLES, FL",26.1904,-81.7097,FY96,,,,,,,
067HD036,WINDJAMMER CONDO,4,Jacksonville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$625,000 ",10,1900 GANDY BLVD.,ST. PETERSBURG,FL,33703,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.8174,-82.6261,FY96,,,,,,,
06711068,PARK 46 APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$1,200,600 ",64,4603 WHITEWAY DRIVE,TAMPA,FL,33617,57,Hillsborough,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.0468,-82.4096,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06735320,AUDUBON VILLAS AT HUNTER,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$21,099,200 ",352,HUNTERS CREEK BLVD.,ORLANDO,FL,32817,95,Orange,5960,"ORLANDO, FL",28.60354,-81.23771,FY96,24864,CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INC,24864,CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INC,24864,CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE INC,IN
06635242,WAVERLEY PLACE APARTMENT,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,5,223a7 Refi Apts,A7/221d4,REJ,Refi/ Pchse,"$12,030,000 ",300,5300 HEMMINGWAY LANE,NAPLES,FL,33999,21,Collier,5345,"NAPLES, FL",26.1904,-81.7097,FY96,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06711072,SUNSCAPE APARTMENTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,724,200 ",128,13617 FLETCHER DRIVE,TAMPA,FL,33613,57,Hillsborough,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",28.06964,-82.44449,FY96,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,34489,WMF-HUNTOON PAIGE ASSOCIATES,NJ
06711073,EL DORADO,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$2,240,000 ",122,5520 CASA BLANCA LANE,ORLANDO,FL,32807,95,Orange,5960,"ORLANDO, FL",28.53149,-81.31284,FY96,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
06711077,FLAGLER POINTE APARTMENT,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$7,485,000 ",416,2540 ROY HANNA DRIVE SOU,ST. PETERSBURG,FL,33712,103,Pinellas,8280,"TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL",27.71002,-82.66755,FY96,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,70654,FIRST MARYLAND MORTGAGE CORP,MD
06111110,HOME STATION APTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$7,310,000 ",200,1150 SIGMAN ROAD,ROCKDALE COUNTY,GA,30207,247,Rockdale,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.67571,-83.98987,FY96,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06122013,JONESBORO FELLOWSHIP HOUSE,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$4,042,900 ",100,6907 Tara Blvd,Jonesboro,GA,30296,63,Clayton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.58163,-84.37695,FY96,12739,CAMBRIDGE REALTY CAPITAL IL,12739,CAMBRIDGE REALTY CAPITAL IL,12739,CAMBRIDGE REALTY CAPITAL IL,IL
06122014,CARROLLTON MANOR,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,700,000 ",100,2484 Oak Grove Church Rd,Carroll County,GA,3000,45,Carroll,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.51743,-85.08741,FY96,78775,HEALTH RESOURCE CAPITAL LLC,78775,HEALTH RESOURCE CAPITAL LLC,78775,HEALTH RESOURCE CAPITAL LLC,GA
06143103,DOGWOOD FORREST OF ALPHARETTA,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$2,083,200 ",43,256 NORTH MAIN STREET,ALAPAHA,GA,30303,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.7524,-84.3885,FY96,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06211064,LES CHATEAUX APTS LTD,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$949,100 ",48,1000 MEDICAL CENTER PARK,SELMA,AL,36701,47,Dallas,0,NM,32.4325,-87.0585,FY96,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,20660,CONTINENTAL WINGATE ASSOC INC,MA
06235459,BERKSHIRE APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$2,681,100 ",106,4001 SEABREEZE,MOBILE,AL,36609,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.6637,-88.1538,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06235482,BEACON RIDGE APARTMENTS,4,Birmingham,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,407,900 ",120,SHELL FIELD ROAD,ENTERPRISE,AL,36330,31,Coffee,0,NM,31.3283,-85.85,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
06622002,ORANGE BLOSSOM MANOR,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,NH 223f,RNQ,Refi/ Pchse,"$3,803,300 ",144,3535 SW 52ND AVENUE,Pembrooke Park,FL,32038,23,Columbia,0,NM,29.9228,-82.7103,FY96,73709,BEACON HILL MORTGAGE CORP,73709,BEACON HILL MORTGAGE CORP,73709,BEACON HILL MORTGAGE CORP,OH
06735318,UNIVERSITY PARK APTS,4,Jacksonville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$12,238,900 ",214,UNIVERSITY PARKWAY,SARASOTA,FL,34243,81,Manatee,7510,"SARASOTA-BRADENTON, FL",27.4192,-82.5181,FY96,76982,WRH MORTGAGE INC,76982,WRH MORTGAGE INC,76982,WRH MORTGAGE INC,FL
08643037,KINGSBURY,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$1,330,500 ",32,KINGS LANE,TULLAHOMA,TN,37388,3,Bedford,0,NM,35.4298,-86.3052,FY96,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,SC
08711018,MEADOWOOD APTS,4,Knoxville,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRI,Refi/ Pchse,"$5,437,500 ",235,4000 Pleasant Ridge RD,Knoxville,TN,37912,93,Knox,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",35.98427,-83.97726,FY96,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
061EE043,"UNITED CHURCH HOMES, INC",4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$2,895,900 ",54,ROCKMART HWY.,CEDARTOWN,GA,30125,233,Polk,0,NM,33.9661,-85.3261,FY96,,,,,,,
061HD033,MIDDLE GEORGIA EASTER SE,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$560,500 ",11,"LOT 3, HILLCREST CONNECT",DUBLIN,GA,31040,175,Laurens,0,NM,32.5667,-82.8714,FY96
061HD031,IRWIN ASSOC FOR RETARDED,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$235,900 ",5,APRICOT ST,OCILLA,GA,31774,155,Irwin,0,NM,31.6286,-83.3028,FY96
061HD041,THOMASTON VOA HOUSING,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$764,200 ",13,HANNAHS MILL ROAD,THOMASTON,GA,30286,293,Upson,0,NM,32.901,-84.3249,FY96
061HD044,DOUGLASVILLE VOA HOUSING,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$904,100 ",13,WEST FOREST AVE.,DOUGLASVILLE,GA,30135,97,Douglas,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.682,-84.7543,FY96
061HD022,UNION TOWNS VOLUNTEERS,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$248,200 ",5,LOT 7A&B HICKORY RIDGE R,BLAIRSVILLE,GA,30512,291,Union,0,NM,34.8725,-83.9666,FY96
061EE026,QUALITY LIVING SERVICES,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,455,500 ",64,331 FAIRBURN ROAD SW,ATLANTA,GA,30331,121,Fulton,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.7466,-84.5089,FY96
061HD026,GEORGIA REHAB INSTITUTE,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,449,000 ",20,3005 LEE STREET,AUGUSTA,GA,30906,245,Richmond,0600,"AUGUSTA-AIKEN, GA-SC",33.4277,-82.0418,FY96
061EE038,BUCKINGHAM PLACE CHURCH,4,Atlanta,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$1,021,300 ",20,101 BUCKINGHAM PLACE,BRUNSWICK,GA,31520,127,Glynn,0,NM,31.2041,-81.4755,FY96
062HD022,"COMMUNITY CONCEPTS, INC.",4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$522,400 ",7,SANDER COURT,HOMEWOOD,AL,35209,73,Jefferson,1000,"BIRMINGHAM, AL",33.4716,-86.8063,FY96
062EE021,AHEPA 310-VI,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,626,700 ",6,COTTAGE HILL RD,MOBILE,AL,36607,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.712,-88.1117,FY96
062HD017,C.A.P.E.,4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$261,800 ",7,OFF BANKHEAD RD.,CARBON HILL,AL,35549,127,Walker,0,NM,33.9064,-87.5391,FY96
062HD023,"MOBILE SUPPORTIVE HSG, I",4,Birmingham,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$1,075,500 ",15,124 NORTH ANN STREET,MOBILE,AL,36604,97,Mobile,5160,"MOBILE, AL",30.691,-88.065,FY96
054EE010,"VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA, I",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$3,164,100 ",62,AFFIRMATION BOULEVARD,CHARLESTON,SC,29412,19,Charleston,1440,"CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC",32.7314,-79.9539,FY96
054HD064,"INC.,COMMUNITY ALTERNATI",4,Columbia,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$954,300 ",12,1217 SAPAUGH STREET,ROCK HILL,SC,29732,91,York,1520,"CHARLOTTE-GASTONIA-ROCK HILL, NC-SC",34.9659,-81.0061,FY96
087HD017,VICTORY HOUSE,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$238,100 ",9,4425 PLYMOUTH ST,KNOXVILLE,TN,37917,93,Knox,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",35.9975,-83.9156,FY96
087EE022,ROY J. MESSER APTS,4,Knoxville,202/811,1,202/811,202 Cap Adv,ZPE,NC/SR,"$605,000 ",12,MAIN ST,WHITE PINE,TN,37890,89,Jefferson,3840,"KNOXVILLE, TN",36.0756,-83.3298,FY96
086HD003,CARROLL STREET RESIDENTI,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$234,900 ",4,DANIEL ST & CARROLL ST,WAVERLY,TN,37185,85,Humphreys,0,NM,36.0865,-87.7976,FY96,,,,,,,
086HD002,CLEARVIEW RESIDENTIAL,4,Nashville,202/811,1,202/811,811 Cap Adv,ZPD,NC/SR,"$150,100 ",2,207 CLEARVIEW DRIVE,LEBANON,TN,37087,189,Wilson,5360,"NASHVILLE, TN",36.2088,-86.3183,FY96,,,,,,,
06112003,CLAIRMONT OAKS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,6,241 Impvmts Apts,241/236 ,ZSR,Impvmts,"$658,100 ",298,441 CLAREMONT AVENUE,DECATUR,GA,30030,89,DeKalb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.78048,-84.29728,FY96,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,AL
06111124,COUNTRY OAKS APARTMENTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,4,223f Pchse/ Refi Apts,223F Apts,HRS,Refi/ Pchse,"$16,677,000 ",654,2047 WOODLAKE DRIVE,MARIETTA,GA,30060,67,Cobb,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.9004,-84.4938,FY96,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,AL
08135208,DEXTER ROAD APTS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$20,144,700 ",324,DEXTER ROAD,MEMPHIS,TN,38114,157,Shelby,4920,"MEMPHIS, TN-AR-MS",35.1201,-90.003,FY96,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,54363,FIRST VIRGINIA MORTGAGE CO,VA
08635254,INDIAN PARK APTS,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$9,034,300 ",176,SHELBYVILLE ROAD,MURFREESBORO,TN,37129,149,Rutherford,5360,"NASHVILLE, TN",35.836,-86.4546,FY96,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,01377,HIGHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,AL
08635252,KEYSTONE FARMS APARTMENT,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$5,953,700 ",90,5368 EDMONDSOM PIKE,NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON,TN,37211,37,Davidson,5360,"NASHVILLE, TN",36.0471,-86.7436,FY96,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,SC
06135480,COLONY PARK APTS,4,Atlanta,Basic FHA,2,FHA NC/SR Apts,221d4,OMI,NC/SR,"$9,805,600 ",175,1200 West Stewart's Mill Road,Douglasville,GA,30135,97,Douglas,0520,"ATLANTA, GA",33.71813,-84.76453,FY96,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,01174,COLLATERAL MORTGAGE LTD,AL
08643038,MORNINGSIDE,4,Nashville,Basic FHA,3,232 Health Care,Board & Care,RNT,NC/SR,"$2,065,500 ",45,MORNINGSIDE DRIVE,FRANKLIN,TN,37064,187,Williamson,5360,"NASHVILLE, TN",35.93185,-86.85788,FY96,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,47219,FLEET MORTGAGE CORP,SC
| en |
converted_docs | 022987 | **2.7 Sustained Acceleration Exposure:**
Definitions of speed, velocity, and acceleration
Types of acceleration (linear, angular, Gx, Gy, Gz)
Variables affecting acceleration
Sources of acceleration forces in aerospace operations
Physiological effects (cardiovascular, pulmonary, CNS, urinary,
musculoskeletal)
Symptoms and signs of acceleration exposure (including definitions of
G-tolerance, G-induced loss of consciousness or G-LOC, red-out,
gray-out, black-out)
The G-LOC Syndrome
Effects of acceleration exposure on human performance
Predisposing and contributing factors to decreased G tolerance
Countermeasures and preventive measures (anti-G suits, anti-G maneuvers,
positive pressure breathing, counter-pressure jerkin, seat tilting)
Emergency ejection issues (type of acceleration exposure, effects,
protective measures)
James E. Whinnery Ph.D., M.D.
Aeromedical Research Division
Civil Aerospace Medical Institute
Sustained Acceleration
Numerous stresses exist for humans here on Earth. By virtue of their
very presence here on Earth humans, and the other currently surviving
organisms, have successfully evolved to cope with the routine stresses
that they encounter. These successful organisms, including humans, have
evolved psychophysiological mechanisms that can adapt to stressful
changes in the environment to maintain short and long term viability.
These mechanisms ensure that the organism has the ability to maintain
homeostasis in the face of terrestrial stresses. Some types of stress
are only occasionally present while others are always present. The
singular stress that has constantly been present for all of us on Earth
is gravity. We have adapted fairly well over evolutionary time to this
ever-present gravitational stress.
Assuming that life on Earth has existed for 2 billion years and land
animals have existed for 275 million years, we humans have had
considerable time to evolve as upright creatures that can tolerate the
Earth's gravitational stress. Based on these estimates of time, we can
define the apparent rate of onset of gravitational stress we humans have
adapted to as we have arisen to an upright posture in the Earth's
gravitational field. The rate of onset of that gravitational stress
would be estimated as approximately 1g of stress developing over 275
million years.
In terms of onset rate of the gravitational stress over time we could
say that this represents 0.00000000000000011 G/s over evolutionary time.
This has evidently been an adequate time for humans to adapt such that
we have few problems with gravitational stress on a daily basis. It is
only rarely that we experience symptoms, such as being lightheaded or
dizzy when we rise too rapidly in the gravitational field. These
represent acute symptoms associated with exceeding the evolutionary
mechanisms existing in the upright human exposed to the Earth's
gravitational stress.
In some individuals, the inability of the normal psychophysiologically
protective mechanisms to respond can be compromised and other acute
symptoms, such as loss of consciousness, may develop. Ultimately, in the
long run of a lifetime, we humans all succumb to this relatively mild
but constant level of gravitational stress. We are all familiar with the
skin, cardiac, vascular, and skeletal system manifestations of the
long-term effects of a lifetime in the constant gravitational stress
field on earth. At least part of the effects of aging on the body is due
to the ever-present gravitational stress.
To enter the aerospace environment, above the Earth, exposes humans to
additional stresses that as terrestrial creatures we have had very
little time for protective mechanisms to evolve. It is therefore not
surprising that we humans are susceptible to more frequent and severe
symptoms and potential problems with maintaining normal homeostasis. To
even enter the aerospace environment is life threatening. We have become
so accustomed to flying in shirtsleeves we sometimes forget this fact.
Immediately, the exposure to altitude requires that we be supplied
oxygen to prevent loss of consciousness or death. Protective equipment
and techniques must be provided when we leave the terrestrial
environment in which we have evolved. Increased gravitational stress,
which we call acceleration stress, is also one of the several stresses
that are experienced when we humans navigate in the aerospace
environment. The most effective approach to understanding tolerance to
acceleration and the problems associated with exceeding tolerance to
acceleration is in terms of the evolutionary aspects of how the body has
adapted to gravitational stress.
Physics and physiology
One of the most interesting and perplexing forces that exists in nature
is gravity. It has occupied the minds of the most talented scientists
for centuries. Aerospace medical specialists should be counted in the
list of those who have at least a basic understanding of gravity and
acceleration.
Physics
A free-falling object is an object that is falling under the sole
influence of gravity; such an object has an acceleration of 9.81 m/s/s,
downward (on Earth). This numerical value for the acceleration of a
free-falling object is known as the acceleration of gravity - the
acceleration for any object moving under the sole influence of gravity.
This important quantity has been given a special symbol to denote it -
the symbol "g." According to Newton's 3^rd^ Law of Motion, for every
action (an acceleration) there is an equal and opposite action (an
inertial force).
It was only in the last century that the relationship between gravity
and acceleration was refined by Einstein in the Principle of
Equivalence. Einstein proposed that no experiment can distinguish
between the acceleration due to gravity and the inertial acceleration
due to a change of velocity. The Theory of Relativity considers that the
gravitational force of acceleration is identical to the inertial force
of acceleration.
Acceleration in an aircraft as it maneuvers generates centripetal
acceleration that is opposed by an equal and opposite inertial or
centrifugal force. By constantly changing the direction of the mass of
the aircraft (and the pilot), a *centripetal* force is produced that
results in a *centrifugal* force on the pilot that stresses their normal
homeostasis. We quantitate this inertial force on the restrained pilot
in multiples of the acceleration due to gravity (multiples of 9.81m/s/s)
and describe it in dimensionless units of "G." For the 3 axes of the
body, the nomenclature has evolved to symbolize the physiological
effects that result from the inertial forces. +G~z~ (the inertial force)
is produced from *head-to-foot* as the aircraft maneuvers in a tight
"inside" turn. --G~z~ would result from an "outside" turn
(foot-to-head). ±G~x~ and ±G~y~ refer to the direction of transverse and
lateral G on the body, respectfully as illustrated in Figure 1.
{width="1.9756944444444444in" height="2.30625in"}
**Figure 1.** Conventions used to describe the inertial forces on the
body; +G~z~ = Head to foot inertial force; +G~y~ = Left to right
inertial force; +G~x~ = Front to back inertial force.
[]{.mark}
Physiology
In aerospace medicine it is important to understand that it is the air
or spacecraft that generates the acceleration "g." The human within the
craft is indeed accelerated along with the craft; however, it is the
equal and opposite action, the inertial force "G", that alters
physiology and can cause problems that affect aerospace safety.
In this aerospace medical discussion, we are interested in the effects
of +G~z~ because we are focusing on the stress that can more frequently
cause symptoms in pilots, including loss of consciousness in civilian
aerobatics. Neurologic symptoms, including loss of consciousness
resulting from +G~z~ (G-LOC), develops as a result of the differential
location of the central nervous system (CNS) and the heart within the
+G~z~ field. The effects of +G~z~ are such that blood flow to the CNS
locations above the heart can be compromised and thereby produce
symptoms that cause operational problems for the pilot of an aircraft.
The heart must generate higher driving pressure to maintain perfusion in
the head as acceleration stress increases. When inadequate perfusion
pressure occurs the neurological tissues become ischemic and symptoms
result.
It is convenient to recognize that each integral increase in G reduces
eye-level blood pressure by approximately 20 mmHg (actually by 22 mmHg
for each increase in +1G~z~-stress). If the blood pressure at heart
level is 130/80 mmHg (mean arterial pressure being 105 mmHg) at rest in
the Earth's normal gravitational environment of +1G~z~, then mean
eye-level blood pressure would be about 85 mmHg. This eye-level mean
arterial perfusion pressure is decreased by 20 mmHg for each increase of
+1G~z~. If no physiological responses are generated, this would mean
that eye-level mean arterial pressure would be close to 0 mmHg around
+5G~z,~ see Figure 2. We would expect neurological symptoms to result if
inadequate arterial perfusion (ischemia) persists for a sufficient
period of
{width="4.170138888888889in" height="2.45625in"}
**[Figure 2.]{.mark}** Heart and eye level blood pressures at resting
+1G~z~ and +6G~z~.
time. Our evolutionary development has thus provided a considerable
cushion against exceeding tolerance to +G~z~-stress, specifically about
4G worth of buffer before neurological symptoms occur when exposed to
+G~z~-stress. This is a generous cushion when we operate within the
terrestrial +1G~z~ environment. It is an inadequate cushion when a high
performance aircraft generates +9G~z~ within one second and sustains it
for a long time.
G-tolerance in normal humans
As previously mentioned, we have successfully evolved to tolerate the
constant gravitational stress of Earth (+1G~z~ stress on the body). In
just the past 100 years we have not only learned to fly, but we have
developed aircraft that have remarkable maneuverability that can exceed
the tolerance of normal humans. Human tolerance to acceleration is more
complicated than it might appear. It depends not only on the direction
of the stress relative to the body, as mentioned above (+G~z~), it also
depends on the level of the stress, the rate at which the stress is
applied, and the duration of the stress. Finally, tolerance also depends
on the anatomy and physiology of the individual at the time of exposure.
An extremely useful concept for understanding G-tolerance in normal
individuals is the G-time tolerance curve as shown in Figure 3. This
curve is actually a combination of two curves defining neurological
symptoms resulting from various G-onset rates that rapid and exceed
cardiovascular reflex responses and that G-onset rates that are gradual
enough to allow cardiovascular reflex response.
{width="3.1819444444444445in"
height="2.3993055555555554in"}
**[Figure 3.]{.mark}** The G-time tolerance curve; +G~z~-level in G
units vs. Time in seconds.
*Level or magnitude*
We shall now consider the average acceleration (+G~z~) tolerance of
"normal" individuals. It is important to note that individuals with
medical irregularities can have normal tolerance significantly altered.
In civilian aviation, as compared to military fighter aviation, the use
of protective equipment (G-suits, for example) is frequently not
present. Assuming that no protective equipment is utilized, the average
human would be expected to tolerate about +4 to +5G~z~. That's not all
that must be considered, however.
*Onset rate*
This average level of tolerance depends on several other things beside
just how high a level one can tolerate, it also includes how rapid the
onset of the acceleration stress is. The average tolerance of a normal
human mentioned above, being about +4 to +5G~z~, assumes that the onset
is gradual enough for the cardiovascular system to respond and augment
the perfusion pressure to the cephalic nervous system. If the onset is
rapid, such that the stress is applied faster than the cardiovascular
system can respond, the average tolerance is decreased to about +3 to
+4G~z~. The cardiovascular system can respond fully if the onset rate is
on the order of 0.1G/s or less, not very rapid even for civilian
aircraft. Rapid onset stress can be as high as 10 G/s or more in
civilian aerobatic aircraft and military fighters. Compared to our
evolutionarily developed tolerance, it is no wonder that 10G/s grossly
exceed our current human design characteristics as previously described.
It is evident that even 0.5G/ is greater than what our human
cardiovascular system can fully respond to.
*Duration*
Normal human tolerance also depends on the duration that the +G~z~
stress is applied to the individual. If the stress is of very short
duration, that is only 2 to 3 seconds of exposure to levels above the
ground level of +1G~z~, then very high levels can be tolerated. If the
duration exceeds 5 seconds then the tolerance would be expected to be
within the levels described above. Sustained acceleration is considered
to be present if the acceleration lasts for greater that 5 seconds.
Fatigue of the musculoskeletal system can result with sustained
acceleration. Fatigue results in the inability of a human to tense their
muscles and allows the adverse effects of acceleration to reduce or
overcome human tolerance. If the leg and abdominal muscles are not
contracted blood will pool in the capacitance vessels (veins) in those
areas. Such pooling of blood reduces the volume of blood that is
available to the central circulation for ultimately supplying the brain
with oxygenated blood. Pooling of the blood in the extremities and
abdomen can reduce +G~z~ tolerance.
*Other tolerance considerations*
We have mentioned only the main aspects of +G~z~ tolerance. Other
considerations include the ability to perform an effective protective
anti-G straining maneuver (training), how long one is able to
effectively perform and maintain the straining maneuver (physical
conditioning/rest), recent/frequent exposure to the high-G environment
(acclimation to the environment), individual characteristics (for
example: anatomy, short may be more tolerant than tall; physiology, very
low blood pressure can predispose to lower tolerance), and a host of
medical conditions that can adversely alter tolerance. On any given day,
a unique combination of events that can reduce tolerance may combine to
reduce an individual's normal tolerance by just enough to cause a G-LOC
episode in-flight.
*Structural Tolerance*
Musculoskeletal and other pathological injury to the body can result
from exposure to acceleration. Neck injuries are frequent in military
fighter pilots exposed to acceleration stress. Movement of the head and
neck while wearing helmets and oxygen masks is a frequent contributor to
neck and back injuries. Neck and back muscular strengthening exercises
are recommended for anyone anticipating high G exposure. Muscular
warm-up and stretching prior to acute exposure is also recommended to
prevent musculoskeletal injury. Exposure to -G~z~ acceleration can
result in hemorrhages above the heart (such as conjunctival hemorrhages)
resulting from breach of integrity of the vascular system. Any existing
structural abnormality in the skeletal or other system could produce a
susceptibility to reduced structural tolerance.
[Exceeding G-tolerance]{.underline}
The usual criteria utilized for defining G-tolerance are associated with
+G~z~-stress and the ischemic/hypoxic effects on the neurological
system. Although the main effect is the +G~z~--induced ischemia on the
cephalic portion of the central nervous system, a hypoxic aspect results
from the ventilation-perfusion mismatch that occurs in the lungs. The
magnitude of the hypoxic component increases as the duration of the
+G~z~--stress increases. Acceleration stress along the other axes is not
generally signaled by abrupt incapacitation. In the prone position
(-G~x~) the head requires support and in both the prone and supine
(+G~x~) positions chest compression becomes a problem. Lateral
acceleration (±G~y~) stress usually has more of an impact on performance
such as controlling the aircraft. The symptoms associated with exceeding
+G~z~ --stress that are of the most concern are associated with sudden
incapacitation, specifically +G~z~ --induced loss of consciousness
(G-LOC).
The G-LOC Syndrome
The entire symptom complex associated with the loss and recovery of
consciousness has been defined as the G-LOC syndrome. The G-LOC syndrome
complex is described in Table I.
Table 1. The G-LOC Syndrome
Loss of peripheral vision
Tunnel vision
Blackout (complete loss of vision)
Loss of consciousness
Loss of motor control (purposeful movement)/output from the brain
Loss of sensory input to the brain
Lack of memory formation
Electroencephalographic synchronization (slow - delta waves)
Myoclonic convulsions
Vocalizations (occasional moaning or groaning)
Dreamlets
Recovery of consciousness
Neurological reintegration
Self-touching reflex (Sensory-motor integration)
Neurological external environment reorientation
Return of purposeful movement
Transient tingling or slight numbness of the extremities and/or
periorally
Alteration of psychological state (anxiety, confusion, giddiness,
embarrassment)
General preservation of cardiorespiratory function
*[Not part of the G-LOC syndrome:]{.underline}* Loss of bowel or bladder
control; only rarely does tongue biting occur and it is usual in
association with the myoclonic convulsions; respiration is preserved; no
relationship between cardiac dysrhythmias and G-LOC has been observed.
The most common symptom associated with exceeding G-tolerance is a
progressive compromise of vision. The progressive, regional lack of
blood flow to the retina begins with loss of peripheral vision and
increases to tunnel vision and then blackout. Blackout is complete loss
of vision with preservation of consciousness. Vision is vitally
important to aerospace safety, representing 80% of the input necessary
for optimally piloting an aircraft. The visual symptoms, with
preservation of consciousness, result from regional ischemic (hypoxic)
differences within the cephalic nervous system. The eye has an increased
pressure compared to the remainder of the cephalic nervous system,
intraocular pressure that may be around 20 mmHg, which is equivalent to
+1G~z~ reduced tolerance to ischemia/hypoxia. This is important to
recognize because the other G-LOC syndrome symptoms can also be linked
to regional ischemic differences within the cephalic nervous system. The
key system that is immediately necessary for piloting an aircraft is the
neurological system. Vision and consciousness degradation immediately
compromise the safety of flight. Any abnormality or disease, as
discussed below that ultimately affects the neurological system, is a
concern in aerospace medicine because of the potential for compromise of
normal neurological processes.
G-LOC Syndrome Kinetics
It is important to have a detailed understanding of the kinetics of the
G-LOC syndrome. The time relationship of the symptoms induced by
+G~z~-stress provides insight to the anatomic basis of ischemic
compromise of the structures within the cephalic central nervous system.
Accident and incident investigation is also facilitated by the kinetics
of G-LOC. As shown in Figure 4, the key features of the G-LOC syndrome
are shown.
For rapid onset +Gz exposures, which can produce G-LOC without warning,
the loss of consciousness induction time (LOCINDTI) is about 5 -- 7
seconds. This is the time from the onset of the +G~z~-stress to the
onset of loss of consciousness. The period of unconsciousness is called
the absolute incapacitation period (ABSINCAP) and lasts on the average
12 seconds. This is followed by a period of relative incapacitation
(RELINCAP) that also lasts on the average 12 seconds. Together these two
periods make up the total incapacitation period (TOTINCAP) that lasts on
the average 24 seconds.
The TOTINCAP represents the time period from the loss of aircraft
control (loss of consciousness) to the return of purposeful movement at
the end of the relative incapacitation. Myoclonic convulsions are a part
of the G-LOC syndrome about 70% of the time. They occur at during the
last 4 seconds of the absolute incapacitation period and end coincident
with the return of consciousness. The relative incapacitation has an
initial period of 5 seconds where neurologic system reintegration occurs
followed by a period of 7 seconds where reorientation to the external
environment occurs. Once the reintegration and reorientation occurs the
pilot is able to make purposeful movements to control the aircraft.
Short dreams (dreamlets) are often experienced during the recovery
process.
{width="4.407638888888889in"
height="2.8118055555555554in"}
**[Figure 4.]{.mark}** G-LOC kinetics, the time relationship of G-LOC
syndrome events. LOCINDTI = loss of consciousness induction time (for
rapid onset profile); G-LOC = onset +G~z~-induced loss of consciousness;
ROC = Return of consciousness; RPM = Return of purposeful movement;
ABSINCAP = absolute incapacitation period; RELINCAP = relative
incapacitation period; TOTINCAP = total incapacitation; Convulsion free
period = Period during unconsciousness where myoclonic convulsions do
not occur; Convulsion period = Myoclonic convulsion period;
Reintegration period = Period where neurological reintegration occurs
following loss of consciousness; Reorientation period = Period where
reorientation to the environment occurs ending in the return of
purposeful movement; Dream period = period where dreamlets often occur.
*G-LOC is a protective mechanism*
The symptoms of the G-LOC syndrome are all part of a protective
mechanism that has evolved to protect the human in a gravitational field
and to ensure the optimum protection of the organ system that is the key
to its evolutionary success on Earth, the brain. First of all, the
neurological system is placed in the safest anatomical compartment we
have, the skull and the spinal column skeletal system.
From the initiation of +G~z~-stress the cardiovascular and neurological
systems have built in cushions of blood pressure and flow such that
functional compromise does not occur easily. A significant increase in
+G~z~-stress above +1G~z~ must be applied before symptoms occur. The
cardiovascular and neurovascular systems have compensatory responses
that can increase tolerance to +G~z~-stress when the threat of exceeding
these cushions occurs.
The visual symptoms of greyout, tunnel vision and blackout warn that the
cardiovascular system cushion and reflex response are inadequate for the
magnitude of the stress and that evasive action is required immediately.
If evasive action is not taken then loss of consciousness occurs. This
occurs only when brain becomes threatened by ischemia/hypoxia and cannot
function reliably. The response is to place the heart and brain at the
same level in the +G~z~-field (horizontal). This action facilitates the
cardiac ability to get the needed blood flow to the brain. The loss of
motor function results in the body falling to the horizontal position.
The brain is placed in a minimal energy expenditure condition with the
loss of sensory, motor and consciousness function. This is just the
optimum condition for the neurons when there is inadequate blood flow.
The electroencephalogram shows a synchronized slow wave pattern. When
blood flow begins to return, myoclonic convulsions occur. This serves to
contract the muscles in the extremities and abdomen thereby enhancing
return of blood to the central circulation and ultimately the brain.
We consider the dreamlets to serve as a mechanism to alert the
individual that the loss of consciousness has occurred. Without the
dreamlet, G-LOC episodes can frequently go unnoticed and unreported by
an individual. If unnoticed, the individual may not recognize the
importance of future threat avoidance with subsequent G-LOC episodes
occurring. The relative incapacitation period serves to ensure that the
sensory, motor and consciousness functions are all thoroughly
reintegrated. The self-touch mechanism serves as a built-it test to
ensure that neurologic reintegration is complete.
Once the reintegration is complete and tested the nervous system
requires a short time to reorient to the external environment to ensure
that no movement is made prior to being capable of making a safe
purposeful move. Most of the +G~z~-protective methodology we have
developed to protect ourselves have their basis in what nature had
already accomplished. G-LOC is a protective response with the components
of the G-LOC Syndrome being normal responses that can be produced in
everyone given a high enough magnitude of +G~z~ exposure.
*The Human Centrifuge*
Aeromedical scientists have had the need to have a convenient method to
investigate the response to +G~z~-stress in a safe, controlled
laboratory environment. Although research in aircraft is very important
and safety in the operational environment is the ultimate goal of
aerospace medicine, the cost of flying high performance aircraft is very
high. In addition, the risk of high +G~z~-stress inducing performance
degrading neurological symptoms that could compromise flight safety is
unacceptably high. For these reasons, human centrifuges were developed
to simulate the high-G environment. Scientific investigation of the
human response to +G~z~-stress, in a safe environment has been a
critical discipline in aerospace medicine. Figure 5 illustrates the
simulation of +G~z~-stress on a centrifuge compared to the stress in a
maneuvering aircraft. The majority of our aeromedical knowledge of the
human response to acceleration stress has been generated from centrifuge
research.
{width="3.795138888888889in"
height="2.5902777777777777in"}
**[Figure 5.]{.mark}** The simulation of +G~z~-stress on a laboratory
centrifuge compared to the +G~z~-stress in a maneuvering aircraft.
Protection
Military aircraft have rapid-onset (9G/s), high (+9G~z~), sustained
(\>5s) +G~z~ capabilities that can exceed unprotected human G-tolerance.
Individuals in the civilian community now fly many of these high
performance aircraft. In addition, civilian aerobatics can expose pilots
to significant ±G~z~-stress. Protection in the G-stress environment can
be approached by consideration of aircraft design, applying equipment to
be worn by the pilot and by changes to pilot anatomy and physiology.
Aircraft Design
The orientation of the pilot, or other passengers, within the aircraft
is important. Protection against +G~z~-stress can be approached by
orienting the pilot such that the maneuvers of the aircraft reduce the
magnitude of +G~z~-stress and transfer it to +G~x~, ~y~-stress.
Reclining the aircraft seat and lifting the heel line have accomplished
this, as has been done in the F-16. The recumbent (+G~y~-stress) or
prone (-G~y~-stress) positions serve to reduce the +G~z~-stress but they
have not been considered operationally optimal positions to accomplish
the overall mission. Even the F-16 seat configuration (30^o^ reclined
from horizontal) does not significantly enhance +G~z~-level tolerance,
although it does have G-enhancing characteristics.
Protective Equipment
The standard anti-G protection for military fighter pilots flying high
performance fighter aircraft is the G-suit. By covering the lower
extremities and abdomen with inflatable bladders +G~z~ tolerance is
enhanced by preventing pooling of blood below the heart. The most modern
anti-G suit ensembles have assisted positive pressure breathing and
chest counter pressure garments to provide enhanced protection.
Pilot Anatomy and Physiology
There are a lot of factors that combine to determine overall G-tolerance
on a given day. Short pilots have a higher tolerance than tall pilots
based on their respective differences in heart to eye-brain distances.
Individuals with higher blood pressure have a higher tolerance than
those with lower blood pressure. Being sick with dehydration and being
bed-ridden (0G~z~-stress) can acutely reduce G-tolerance.
Military pilots are required to have centrifuge high-G training to
ensure they are proficient in performing protective anti-G straining
maneuvers (AGSM). The AGSM is a combination of tensing the muscles in
the abdomen and extremities while performing a repetitive, respiratory
Valsalva-like maneuver to increase the driving pressure to get blood to
the brain.
Military pilots are required to maintain currency in their aircraft.
This serves to maintain physiological acclimation to G-stress. Physical
conditioning and strength training are important adjuncts to ensure
safety in the acceleration environment.
Finally, a solid base of information concerning G-tolerance, especially
the G-LOC syndrome, is key for all who enter the high-G environment.
G-LOC can be difficult to recognize by a pilot who experiences it. This
is important for all pilots to understand and be alert for such
symptoms.
Medical problems that may decrease G-tolerance
Neurological Problems
Any abnormality of the neurological or neurovascular system should be
reason for concern because of the potential for sudden incapacitation
during exposure to G-stress. Any abnormality that would contribute to
compromising blood supply to the cephalic nervous system is of extreme
concern. In addition, it should be remembered that exposure to high,
sustained +G~z~-stress while performing a vigorous anti-G straining
maneuver can put the blood vessels under increased pressure.
Cardiovascular Problems and Associated Medications
The cardiovascular system is the system that is primarily affected by
+G~z~-stress. Compromise of the cardiovascular system leads to
compromise of the neurological system. Since it can be compromised in
its support of the cephalic nervous system even in normal humans, any
abnormality in cardiovascular anatomy or physiology is reason for
concern in aerospace safety.
Medications that alter cardiovascular physiology should also be viewed
with caution, specifically pharmacological agents that alter blood
pressure and/or cardiac dynamics.
Acceleration is known to be a dysrhythmogenic stress. Propensities for
cardiac rate, rhythm or conduction disturbances that adversely affect
cardiac output are a threat to safety. Tachydysrhythmias (ventricular
tachycardia, supraventricular and frequent premature atrial and
ventricular premature beats) are most common during +G~z~-stress and
although they can also occur following the +G~z~-stress the
bradydysrhythmias (marked sinus arrhythmia, bradycardia, ectopic atrial
rhythm, prolonged periods of asystole) predominate the post-+G~z~-stress
period. The main concern with all the dysrhythmias is the potential for
their compromising cardiac output and the subsequent neurologic symptoms
that result.
Musculoskeletal Problems
The neck and back are of particular concern during +G~z~-stress. Any
anatomical abnormality that decreases neck or spinal strength or
stability should be carefully considered before exposure to
+G~z~-stress. Neck and back muscle strengthening should be considered
for anyone anticipating exposure to high, sustained +G~z~-stress. Any
muscular injury that could compromise the ability to perform a
proficient anti-G straining maneuver should be allowed to resolve prior
to high, sustained +G~z~-stress.
Pulmonary Problems
+G~z~-stress results in ventilation -- perfusion changes (mismatch) in
the lungs that alter optimum oxygenation of the blood. Increasing
degrees of hypoxia do result from sustained +G~z~-stress. Compromise of
neurological function therefore results from a combination of ischemia
and a varying degree of hypoxia. Any abnormality of the pulmonary system
that would contribute to hypoxia should be of concern for reducing
tolerance to +G~z~-stress. Breathing increased concentrations (100%)
oxygen can also cause problems, when wearing an anti-G suit, by virtue
of causing the distal alveoli to collapse. This is a self-limiting
problem known as aeroatelectasis, with symptoms of retrosternal chest
pain and coughing. Coughing itself usually reverses the problem by
re-expanding the collapsed alveoli.
Tolerance to --G~z~-stress
Negative G~z~-stress is typically encountered when a military aircraft
pushes its nose over or in specific civilian aerobatics maneuvers
involving an outside loop. The physiological effects from --G~z~-stress
result from blood being displaced *toward* the head. The body has not
evolved in an environment where --G~z~-stress is common and it therefore
tolerates this type of stress poorly. The blood vessels in the head are
much more fragile than those in the lower extremities where
gravitational stress (+1G~z~) has been ever present. Petechial
hemorrhages produced in the conjunctiva are not uncommon even at
moderate levels of --G~z~-stress (-2 to -3G~z~).
The physiological response to a sensed over-pressurization of the
cephalic nervous system is to rapidly reduce the threat of the
over-pressurization. The carotid baroreceptors inhibit the cardiac drive
causing the over-pressurization, resulting in dramatic slowing of the
heart rate.
Because of the potential for pathologic insult to the cephalic nervous
system and structures in the head, experimental investigation of
--G~z~-stress has been avoided in healthy humans. The specific tolerance
to --G~z~-stress has therefore not been thoroughly investigated. The
symptoms that result from --G~z~-stress have therefore not been
thoroughly investigated either.
A frequently reported symptom such as "red-out" does not have a
well-documented basis. Red-out has been attributed to the lower eyelid
being deviated upward with red vision resulting from light passing
through the lower lid. It has also been attributed from engorged retinal
blood vessels producing red vision.
Exposure to --G~z~-stress is therefore risky especially in the
unacclimated individual. There is evidence that individuals who do
participate in civilian aerobatics do build up a tolerance for short
exposures to --G~z~-stress. Civilian aerobatics does have exposure to
short duration moderate levels of --G~z~-stress.
There is a specific sequence of exposure to ±G~z~-stress that deserves
special consideration. It has become known as a "push-pull maneuver"
that involves exposure to --G~z~-stress rapidly followed by
+G~z~-stress. The problem that is posed by this sequence is that
--G~z~-stress with its reflex slowing of cardiac response followed by
+G~z~-stress that requires rapid response of the cardiac system could
result in a lower tolerance to +G~z~-stress with G-LOC.
| en |
all-txt-docs | 295595 |
PROGNOSTIC DISCUSSIONS FOR 6 TO 10 AND 8 TO 14 DAY OUTLOOKS
NWS CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER CAMP SPRINGS MD
300 PM EST FRI OCT 31 2003
6 TO 10 DAY OUTLOOK FOR NOV 06 - NOV 10 2003
. . . . . . .
THE MODELS AT DAY 5 ARE IN FAIRLY GOOD AGREEMENT IN DEPICTING A RIDGE
JUST OFF THE SOUTHEAST COAST...A POSITIVELY TILTED TROUGH OVER THE
WESTERN THIRD OF THE CONUS...A RIDGE IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC EXTENDING
NORTHEASTWARD TOWARD THE PANHANDLE OF ALASKA AND A WEAK SUBTROPICAL
LOW IN THE GULF OF MEXICO. THE NOGAPS IS MUCH SLOWER WITH THE
PROGRESSION OF THE WESTERN TROUGH COMPARED TO ALL THE OTHER MODELS
WHILE THE ECMWF IS MUCH LESS PHASED WITH THIS TROUGH AS IT SHEARS
OUT THE ENERGY IN THE NORTHERN STREAM.
DURING THE 6 TO 10 DAY PERIOD THE MODELS REMAIN IN GOOD AGREEMENT IN
DEPICTING A CLOSED-OFF RIDGE CENTERED EAST OF FLORIDA...A POSITIVELY
TILTED TROUGH CENTERED OVER THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST EXTENDING
SOUTHWESTWARD TO OFF THE CALIFORNIA COAST AND A CLOSED-OFF RIDGE
CENTERED NORTHEAST OF HAWAII. THE 0Z OPERATIONAL GFS IS A BIT MORE
AMPLIFIED AND LESS PROGRESSIVE WITH THE TROUGH IN THE WEST COMPARED
TO THE ECMWF. THE GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN...DAVA AND 6Z GFS ARE IN BASIC
AGREEMENT WITH THE 0Z OPERATIONAL GFS AND ECMWF...THOUGH THE DAVA
AND 6Z GFS ARE A BIT MORE SUPPRESSED WITH THE RIDGE IN THE SOUTHEAST.
THE GFS BASED SOLUTIONS SHOW THE BEST CONTINUITY WITH RESPECT TO THE
SOLUTIONS FROM YESTERDAY. THE GFS ENSEMBLE SPAGHETTI DIAGRAMS INDICATE
VERY LITTLE SPREAD OVER THE CONUS AND SOMEWHAT LARGER SPREAD OVER THE
EAST PACIFIC AND NEAR ALASKA.
MODEL OF THE DAY: GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN
FORECAST CONFIDENCE FOR THE 6 TO 10 DAY PERIOD IS WELL ABOVE AVERAGE
TODAY... 5 ON A SCALE FROM 1 TO 5... DUE TO GOOD AGREEMENT AMONGST
THE MODELS AND TOOLS.
THE OFFICIAL HEIGHT PROG FOR TODAY CONSISTS OF 20 PERCENT OF TODAYS
0Z GFS OPERATIONAL RUN CENTERED ON DAY 8...25 PERCENT OF TODAYS ECMWF
SOLUTION CENTERED ON DAY 7...50 PERCENT OF TODAYS GFS ENSEMBLE
MEAN CENTERED ON DAY 8 AND 5 PERCENT OF TODAYS DAVA CENTERED ON DAY 8.
THE TEMPERATURE PROG IS BASED ON THE KLEIN...NEURAL NET AND FIRST
GUESS SPECIFICATIONS FROM THE OFFICAL BLENDED HEIGHT FIELD...MOS
TEMPERATURES FROM THE GFS ENSEMBLE...BIAS CORRECTED 850-HPA
TEMPERATURES FROM THE 0Z OPERATIONAL GFS...ANALOGS TO THE VARIOUS
MODELS AND BLENDED HEIGHT FIELD AND TELECONNECTIONS ON A POSITIVE
HEIGHT CENTER AT 38N 78W AND ON A NEGATIVE HEIGHT CENTER AT 40N 115W.
THE PRECIPITATION PROG IS BASED ON CALIBRATED PRECIPITATION FROM THE
GFS ENSEMBLE MEMBERS...THE NEURAL NET SPECIFICATIONS FROM THE OFFICIAL
BLENDED HEIGHT FIELD...ANALOGS TO THE BLENDED HEIGHT FIELD AND
INDIVIDUAL MODELS...THE BIAS CORRECTED PRECIPITATION FROM THE 0Z
OPERATIONAL GFS AND ON TELECONNECTIONS ON A POSITIVE HEIGHT CENTER
AT 38N 78W AND ON A NEGATIVE HEIGHT CENTER AT 40N 115W.
. . . . . . .
8 TO 14 DAY OUTLOOK FOR NOV 08 - NOV 14 2003
FOR WEEK 2 THE 0Z OPERATIONAL GFS SHEARS SOME OF THE ENERGY FROM THE
WESTERN TROUGH TO THE EAST...WHICH ACTS TO SUPPRESS THE RIDGE IN THE
SOUTHEAST TO THE SOUTH AND WEST. THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE TROUGH IS
FORECAST TO HANG BACK JUST OFF THE CALIFORNIA COAST. THE RESULT IS
THAT MUCH OF THE CONUS...ESPECIALLY THE EASTERN HALF...IS DOMINATED
BY FAST ZONAL FLOW. THE GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN IS LESS SUPPRESSED WITH THE
RIDGE IN THE SOUTHEAST AND LEAVES LESS TROUGH BEHIND OFF THE
CALIFORNIA COAST COMPARED TO THE 0Z OPERATIONAL GFS. THE 6Z GFS
AND DAVA FORECAST A DEAMPLIFICATION OF THE FLOW PATTERN AND INDICATE
A COAST TO COAST ZONAL FLOW REGIME. THE MODELS SHOW GOOD CONTINUITY
WITH RESPECT TO THEIR SOLUTIONS FROM YESTERDAY. THE GFS ENSEMBLE
SPAGHETTI DIAGRAMS INDICATE A MODERATE AMOUNT OF SPREAD OVER THE
WESTERN CONUS AND OVER THE EASTERN PACIFIC AND EASTERN ATLANTIC.
CONFIDENCE IN THE WEEK 2 FORECAST IS ABOVE AVERAGE TODAY...4 ON
A SCALE OF 1 TO 5...DUE TO GOOD MODEL AGREEMENT...MODERATE ENSEMBLE
SPREAD AND GOOD CONTINUITY FROM DAYS 6-10.
THE OFFICIAL 500-HPA HEIGHT PROG FOR TODAY CONSISTS OF 50 PERCENT
OF TODAYS ENSEMBLE MEAN CENTERED ON DAY 11...40 PERCENT OF TODAYS
0Z GFS OPERATIONAL RUN CENTERED ON DAY 11 AND 10 PERCENT OF TODAYS
DAVA CENTERED ON DAY 11.
THE TEMPERATURE PROG IS BASED ON THE KLEIN...NEURAL NET AND FIRST
GUESS SPECIFICATIONS FROM THE OFFICIAL 500-HPA HEIGHT PROG...ANALOGS
TO THE GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN AND BLENDED HEIGHT CHART...THE BIAS CORRECTED
850-HPA TEMPERATURES FROM THE 0Z OPERATIONAL GFS AND
TELECONNECTIONS ON A POSITIVE HEIGHT CENTER AT 35N 86W.
THE PRECIPITATION PROG IS BASED ON CALIBRATED PRECIPITATION FROM THE
0Z GFS...ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION FROM THE GFS RUNS...NEURAL NET
SPECIFICATIONS FROM THE OFFICIAL 500-HPA HEIGHT PROG...ANALOGS
TO THE GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN AND BLENDED HEIGHT FIELDS AND ON
TELECONNECTIONS ON A POSITIVE HEIGHT CENTER AT 35N 86W.
FORECASTER: R. SCHECHTER
. . . . . . .
NOTES:
AUTOMATED FORECASTS ARE ISSUED ON SATURDAY AND SUNDAY. OTHERWISE -
FORECASTS INCORPORATE FORECASTER INPUT.
THE NOTATION FOR THE CATEGORICAL FORECAST INDICATED ON THE MAPS IS
THE SAME AS THAT IN THE TABLES: A-ABOVE N-NEAR NORMAL B-BELOW
IN THE SOUTHWEST AND OTHER CLIMATOLOGICALLY DRY REGIONS - THERE WILL
BE A GREATER THAN 33.3% CHANCE OF NO PRECIPITATION AND OCCASIONALLY
EVEN A NORMAL (I.E. MEDIAN) VALUE OF ZERO - ESPECIALLY DURING THE DRY
SEASONS. IN SUCH CASES A FORECAST OF NEAR NORMAL IS EFFECTIVELY A
FORECAST OF LITTLE OR NO PRECIPITATION.
THE NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE FORECAST PATTERNS FOR TEMPERATURE
AND PRECIPITATION FOR BOTH THE 6-10 OR 8-14 DAY PERIODS HAS BEEN
DISCONTINUED. THE STATE TABLES FOR BOTH THE 6-10 AND 8-14 DAY
PERIODS ARE NOW CONTAINED IN THIS MESSAGE...AVAILABLE AS PMDMRD ON
AWIPS.
. . . . . . .
GLOSSARY AND DEFINITIONS:---------------------------------------------
AC - ANOMALY CORRELATION - A MEASURE OF HOW WELL A MODEL FORECASTS
THE HEIGHT OR HEIGHT ANOMALY FIELD OBTAINED BY CORRELATING THE
IMPLIED GRADIENTS OF THE TWO ANOMALY PATTERNS BEING COMPARED.
ANALOG (NATURAL ANALOG) - A WEATHER MAP THAT RESEMBLES ANOTHER
WEATHER MAP - USUALLY FROM DIFFERENT YEARS BUT THE SAME SEASON IN
THE HISTORICAL RECORD. THE CRITERION FOR SELECTING AN ANALOG IS
OFTEN THE PATTERN CORRELATION BETWEEN THE MAPS. TWO MAPS WILL JUST
BEGIN TO RESEMBLE EACH OTHER TO THE HUMAN EYE AT A PATTERN
CORRELATION OF ABOUT 40%. TO BE USEFUL - ANALOGS NEED TO HAVE MUCH
HIGHER CORRELATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL MAP THAN THAT - 80% OR MORE.
ANALOGS ARE INCREASINGLY DIFFICULT TO FIND AS THE GEOGRAPHIC REGION
BEING STUDIED INCREASES IN SIZE. PERFECT ANALOGS TO THE ENTIRE
NORTHERN HEMISPHERE SIMPLY DO NO EXIST - FOR PRACTICAL PURPOSES.
THIS IS WHY SIMPLE NATURAL ANALOG FORECAST METHODS DO NOT WORK VERY
WELL.
ANOMALY - THE ARITHMETIC DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE VALUE OF A VARIABLE
AT A GIVEN PLACE AND TIME AND THE LONG-TERM AVERAGE OF THAT VARIABLE
AT THAT PLACE AND TIME OF YEAR.
AO - ARCTIC OSCILLATION - A MEASURE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE
MEAN MID-TROPOSPHERIC HEIGHT OR SEA LEVEL PRESSURE ANOMALY OVER THE
POLAR BASIN AND THE CORRESPONDING AVERAGE ANOMALY IN A RING
SURROUNDING THE POLAR BASIN AT MIDDLE LATITUDES. THE AO IS
CONSIDERED TO BE THE LEADING MODE OF CLIMATE VARIABILITY OF THE
EXTRATROPICAL NORTHERN HEMISPHERE. THE AO CAN ALSO BE CONSIDERED TO
INCLUDE THE NAO (NORTH ATLANTIC OSCILLATION) WITH WHICH IT IS
POSITIVELY CORRELATED - BUT NOT IDENTICAL. THE PHASE OF THE AO IS
CONSIDERED TO BE POSITIVE WHEN HEIGHTS OR PRESSURES ARE BELOW NORMAL
OVER THE ARCTIC BASIN AND ABOVE NORMAL OVER SURROUNDING MID-
LATITUDES - AND IS NEGATIVE FOR THE REVERSE ANOMALY PATTERN.
BLEND - A WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF 500-HPA HEIGHT FORECAST MAPS FROM
SEVERAL MODELS. WEIGHTS ARE CURRENTLY ASSIGNED SUBJECTIVELY BY THE
FORECASTER. THE SUM OF THE WEIGHTS MUST BE 1. WEIGHTS ARE APPLIED
BY MULTIPLYING EACH 500-HPA MAP BY ITS WEIGHT AND ADDING ALL OF THE
WEIGHTED MAPS TOGETHER TO MAKE THE OFFICIAL 500-HPA FORECAST.
CONUS - CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES.
DAVA - DIVERGENT ANOMALY VORTICITY ADVECTION MODEL. THIS IS A
BAROTROPIC MODEL WITH DIVERGENCE IN IT TO ALLOW MORE ACCURATE
PREDICTION OF LONG WAVES THAN A STANDARD BAROTROPIC MODEL.
REFERENCE: QIN J. AND H.M. VAN DEN DOOL - 1996: SIMPLE EXTENSIONS
OF AN NWP MODEL. MON. WEA. REV. - VOL 124 - PP 277-287.
EL NINO - THE WARM PHASE OF ENSO.
ENSO - EL NINO/SOUTHERN OSCILLATION.
FLOW PATTERN - THE PATTERN OF WIND INFERRED BY THE 500-HPA CONTOURS -
THE WIND TENDS TO BLOW PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS WITH LOW HEIGHT ON
THE LEFT - IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE - THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE IN THE
SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE. WIND SPEED IS INVERSELY PROPORTIONAL TO THE
SPACING BETWEEN THE CONTOURS.
GFS - GLOBAL FORECAST SYSTEM. THIS REFERS TO ANY OF THE GLOBAL
MODELS RUN AT NCEP FOUR TIMES A DAY THAT USED TO BE REFERRED TO AS
THE MRF AND AVN MODELS. THE MODEL RUN INITIATED AT 00Z (00 GMT) IS
CURRENTLY THE ONLY ONE USED BY CPC IN ITS OFFICIAL BLEND FORECAST -
ALTHOUGH THE OTHERS CAN BE CONSIDERED BY THE FORECASTER IN
FORMULATING THE TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION FORECASTS.
GFS ENSEMBLE - A SET OF GFS FORECASTS WHICH ARE ALL VALID AT THE SAME
TIME BUT WHOSE STARTING CONDITIONS DIFFER BY SMALL AMOUNTS. THERE
ARE CURRENTLY 25 MEMBERS IN THE GFS ENSEMBLE. THE AVERAGE OF THESE
IS THE GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN.
500-HPA HEIGHT IS THE HEIGHT - IN METERS - ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL -
WHICH ABOUT HALF OF THE MASS OF THE ATMOSPHERE LIES ABOVE AND BELOW -
AS MEASURED BY THE PRESSURE. UPPER AIR STORM SYSTEMS TEND TO BE
STEERED IN THE DIRECTION OF THE WINDS AT 500-HPA. 500-HPA SYSTEMS
CORRELATE STRONGLY WITH SURFACE WEATHER.
HPA - HECTO-PASCALS. 1 HPA = 1 MILLIBAR.
LA NINA - THE COLD PHASE OF ENSO.
MERIDIONAL FLOW PATTERN - OCCURS WHEN 500-HPA CONTOURS EXHIBIT LARGE
NORTHWARD AND SOUTHWARD EXCURSIONS WITH EXTENSIVE AREAS OF SOUTHERLY
AND NORTHERLY FLOW.
MODEL BIAS - THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE MODEL CLIMATOLOGY AND THE
OBSERVED CLIMATOLOGY - EXPRESSED AS BIAS = MODEL CLIMO - OBSERVED
CLIMO.
MODEL OF THE DAY - FOR 6-10 DAYS - IS THE MODEL WHOSE SOLUTION IS
CONSIDERED TO BE MORE RELIABLE THAN USUAL - AND MAY BE GIVEN HIGHER
THAN TYPICAL WEIGHT IN THE BLEND. NO MODEL OF THE DAY IS CHOSEN FOR
8-14 DAYS.
MOS - MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS - A STATISITCAL TOOL FOR SPECIFYING THE
SURFACE TEMPERATURE (AND ITS ANOMALY) FROM MODEL FIELDS - CORRECTING
AUTOMATICALLY FOR BOTH BIASES IN THE MODEL FIELDS AND THE
SPECIFICATION METHOD. IT IS VALID AS LONG AS A GIVEN CONFIGURATION
OF A MODEL IS NOT CHANGED OR MODIFIED.
MJO - MADDEN-JULIAN OSCILLATION - ALSO CALLED TROPICAL INTRA-SEASONAL
OSCILLATION - A SERIES OF WAVES WITH A PERIOD AVERAGING 50 DAYS THAT
MOVES SLOWLY EASTWARD NEAR THE EQUATOR ALTERNATELY ENHANCING AND
SUPRESSING PRECIPITATION.
NAO - NORTH ATLANTIC OSCILLATION TELECONNECTION PATTERN. IT CAN ALSO
BE VIEWED AS THE ATLANTIC HALF OF THE AO (ARCTIC OSCILLATION)
TELECONNECTION PATTERN - STRONGLY INFLUENCES TEMPERATURES OVER EUROPE
AND MUCH OF NORTH AMERICA - ESPECIALLY DURING THE COLD SEASONS - AND
DETERMINES THE MEAN LATITUDE OF THE PREVAILING STORM TRACKS ACROSS
THE NORTH ATLANTIC. THE PHASE OF THE NAO IS CONSIDERED POSITIVE WHEN
PRESSURES AND HEIGHTS ARE BELOW NORMAL OVER GREENLAND AND ICELAND
(STRONG ICELANDIC LOW) AND ABOVE NORMAL AT MIDDLE AND SUBTROPICAL
LATITUDES (STRONG BERMUDA-AZORES HIGH) - AND NEGATIVE FOR THE
REVERSE ANOMALIES.
PNA - PACIFIC NORTH AMERICAN TELECONNECTION PATTERN.
PROG - PROGNOSIS - OR FORECAST.
PROGRESSION OR PROGRESSIVE MOTION - THE NORMAL MOVEMENT OF
ATMOSPHERIC WEATHER SYSTEMS (HIGHS... LOWS... RIDGES... OR TROUGHS)
FROM WEST TO EAST IN THE MIDDLE LATITUDES.
RETROGRESSION OR RETROGRADE MOTION - A TYPE OF MOTION SOMETIMES
OBSERVED IN WEATHER SYSTEMS WHEN THEY END UP IN POSITIONS FURTHER TO
THE WEST THAN THEIR ORIGINAL LOCATIONS - CONTRARY TO THEIR USUAL WEST
TO EAST MOTION.
RIDGE - A REGION OF UNUSUALLY HIGH 500-HPA HEIGHT.
SHORT WAVES - RELATIVELY LOW-AMPLITUDE - FAST-MOVING DISTURBANCES OF
THE 500-HPA FIELD.
SOUTHERN STREAM - A FLOW PATTERN WITH UNUSUALLY STRONG FLOW ACROSS
THE SOUTHERN U.S. - ACCOMPANIED BY UNUSUAL STORMINESS IN THE SOUTH
AND SOUTHEAST.
SPECIFICATIONS - KLEIN AND NEURAL NETWORK SPECIFICATIONS GIVE THE
HISTORICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN 500-HPA HEIGHT ANOMALIES AND SURFACE
TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION. KLEIN SPECIFICATIONS TEND TO
EMPHASIZE REGIONAL TELECONNECTIONS WHILE THOSE FROM THE NEURAL
NETWORK WORK FROM GLOBAL TELECONNECTIONS.
. . . . . . .
TELECONNECTIONS GIVE THE HISTORICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE 500-HPA
HEIGHT AT A GIVEN POINT AND ALL OTHER POINTS ON A MAP FOR A GIVEN
TIME OF YEAR. WE AVERAGE THE TOP/BOTTOM 10% OF DAILY MAPS FROM
1950-1999 FOR THE SAME TIME OF YEAR HAVING THE HIGHEST/LOWEST 500-HPA
HEIGHT AT THE SPECIFIED POINT.
TROUGH - A REGION OF UNUSUALLY LOW 500-HPA HEIGHT.
UTC - UNIVERSAL TIME COORDINATED - SAME AS GREENWICH MEAN TIME (GMT).
WESTERLY WIND - WIND BLOWING FROM WEST TO EAST.
EASTERLY WIND - WIND BLOWING FROM EAST TO WEST.
NORTHERLY WIND - WIND BLOWING FROM NORTH TO SOUTH
SOUTHERLY WIND - WIND BLOWING FROM SOUTH TO NORTH.
ZONAL FLOW PATTERN - OCCURS WHEN 500-HPA CONTOURS LIE IN AN EAST-WEST
DIRECTION PARALLEL TO LATITUDE CIRCLES WITH NEARLY PURE WEST-TO-EAST
FLOW.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THE NEXT MONTHLY AND SEASONAL OUTLOOKS WILL BE RELEASED ...
THURSDAY NOV 20 2003.
ANALOGS TO THE 5 DAY MEAN OBSERVED PATTERN CENTERED 3 DAYS AGO (D-3)
FOR THE REGION FROM 20N TO 70N LATITUDE AND 175E TO 60W LONGITUDE
INCLUDE THE 5 DAY PERIODS CENTERED ON THE FOLLOWING DATES:
19591110 - 19661104 - 19861107 - 19911020 - 19861110
ANALOGS TO THE 7 DAY MEAN OBSERVED PATTERN CENTERED 4 DAYS AGO (D-4)
FOR THE REGION FROM 20N TO 70N LATITUDE AND 175E TO 60W LONGITUDE
INCLUDE THE 7 DAY PERIODS CENTERED ON THE FOLLOWING DATES:
19591110 - 19861107 - 19861110 - 19501108 - 19931103
6 to 10 day Outlook Table
STATE TEMP PCPN STATE TEMP PCPN STATE TEMP PCPN
WASHINGTON B B OREGON B B NRN CALIF B B
SRN CALIF B N IDAHO B B NEVADA B N
W MONTANA B N E MONTANA B A WYOMING B A
UTAH B A ARIZONA B A COLORADO B A
NEW MEXICO B A N DAKOTA N A S DAKOTA N A
NEBRASKA N A KANSAS N A OKLAHOMA N A
N TEXAS N A S TEXAS A A W TEXAS N A
MINNESOTA N A IOWA N A MISSOURI A A
ARKANSAS A A LOUISIANA A A WISCONSIN A A
ILLINOIS A A MISSISSIPPI A A MICHIGAN A A
INDIANA A A OHIO A A KENTUCKY A A
TENNESSEE A A ALABAMA A N NEW YORK A B
VERMONT A B NEW HAMP A B MAINE N B
MASS A B CONN A B RHODE ISL A B
PENN A N NEW JERSEY A N W VIRGINIA A N
MARYLAND A N DELAWARE A N VIRGINIA A N
N CAROLINA A N S CAROLINA A N GEORGIA A N
FL PNHDL A N FL PENIN A N AK N SLOPE B A
AK ALEUTIAN A N AK WESTERN N A AK INT BSN N A
AK S INT N N AK S COAST B N AK PNHDL B N
8 to 14 day Outlook Table
STATE TEMP PCPN STATE TEMP PCPN STATE TEMP PCPN
WASHINGTON B N OREGON B B NRN CALIF B B
SRN CALIF B N IDAHO B B NEVADA B B
W MONTANA B N E MONTANA N N WYOMING N N
UTAH B B ARIZONA B N COLORADO B N
NEW MEXICO N A N DAKOTA N A S DAKOTA N A
NEBRASKA N A KANSAS N A OKLAHOMA A A
N TEXAS N A S TEXAS A A W TEXAS N A
MINNESOTA N A IOWA A A MISSOURI A A
ARKANSAS A A LOUISIANA A A WISCONSIN A A
ILLINOIS A A MISSISSIPPI A A MICHIGAN A A
INDIANA A A OHIO A N KENTUCKY A N
TENNESSEE A N ALABAMA A N NEW YORK A N
VERMONT A N NEW HAMP A B MAINE N B
MASS A B CONN A B RHODE ISL A B
PENN A N NEW JERSEY A B W VIRGINIA A N
MARYLAND A B DELAWARE A B VIRGINIA A B
N CAROLINA A B S CAROLINA A B GEORGIA A B
FL PNHDL A B FL PENIN A N AK N SLOPE B B
AK ALEUTIAN N N AK WESTERN N B AK INT BSN B N
AK S INT B N AK S COAST B N AK PNHDL B A
LEGEND
TEMPS WITH RESPECT TO NORMAL PCPN WITH RESPECT TO MEDIAN
A - ABOVE N - NEAR NORMAL A - ABOVE N - NEAR MEDIAN
N - NEAR NORMAL B - BELOW B - BELOW
THE FORECAST CLASSES REPRESENT AVERAGES FOR EACH STATE. NORMAL
VALUES - WHICH MAY VARY WIDELY ACROSS SOME STATES - ARE
AVAILABLE FROM YOUR LOCAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECAST OFFICE.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SEE MESSAGE FXUS06 KWBC - ON AWIPS AS
PMDMRD.
$$
| en |
log-files | 860234 |
gnt_infrm: **********************************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_proc on sequence 74004000
gnt_infrm: **********************************************
Thu Apr 27 07:25:15 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: (do_proc) Root directory is /tproc/nandra/processing/
gnt_infrm: (do_proc) Deleting sequence 74004000...
gnt_infrm: (do_proc) Creating sequence 74004000...
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_getf
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:25:18 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Using rcp to copy aux/ files...
fa960321_0548.1200.gz
ft960321_0548_1200.mkf.gz
ft960321_0548_1200_mkfc.ps.gz
ft960321_0548_1200_mkfm.ps.gz
ft960321_0548_1200_mkfs.ps.gz
gnt_infrm: Copying screened/ files...
ad74004000g200170m.evt.gz
ad74004000g200270h.evt.gz
ad74004000g300170m.evt.gz
ad74004000g300270h.evt.gz
ad74004000s000102m.evt.gz
ad74004000s000202h.evt.gz
ad74004000s000212h.evt.gz
ad74004000s000302l.evt.gz
ad74004000s100102m.evt.gz
ad74004000s100202h.evt.gz
ad74004000s100212h.evt.gz
ad74004000s100302l.evt.gz
gnt_infrm: Copying unscreened/ files...
ad74004000g200170m.unf.gz
ad74004000g200270h.unf.gz
ad74004000g200370l.unf.gz
ad74004000g300170m.unf.gz
ad74004000g300270h.unf.gz
ad74004000g300370l.unf.gz
ad74004000s000102m.unf.gz
ad74004000s000201h.unf.gz
ad74004000s000202h.unf.gz
ad74004000s000212h.unf.gz
ad74004000s000302l.unf.gz
ad74004000s100102m.unf.gz
ad74004000s100201h.unf.gz
ad74004000s100202h.unf.gz
ad74004000s100212h.unf.gz
ad74004000s100302l.unf.gz
gnt_infrm: Unzipping all files...
gnt_infrm: Unzipped all files in /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened.
gnt_infrm: Unzipped all files in /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/screened.
gnt_infrm: Unzipped all files in /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux.
gnt_infrm: Getting object name from attitude file...
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_getf
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:25:47 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: (do_proc) Sequence directory is /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000.
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_cats
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:25:48 EDT 2000
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel] cat
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!cat:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!cat > set datadir ../unscreened
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!cat > set DUMPCAT
Obscat listing off
!cat > set inst sis0
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 4
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 8
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
!cat:ASCA-SIS0 > set datamode BRIGHT
!cat:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > make obscat cat_filt=DEF lststr='ad*s0*.unf'
''Using default selection expression: ONTIME>100&&NEVENTS>0&&COORDPRO!='ERROR'&&INSTRUME=='SIS0'&&DATAMODE=='BRIGHT'
!cat:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save obscat s0_bright.cat clobber=yes
!cat:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set datamode BRIGHT2
!cat:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT2 > make obscat cat_filt=DEF lststr='ad*s0*.unf'
''Using default selection expression: ONTIME>100&&NEVENTS>0&&COORDPRO!='ERROR'&&INSTRUME=='SIS0'&&DATAMODE=='BRIGHT2'
!cat:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT2 > save obscat s0_bright2.cat clobber=yes
!cat:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT2 > set inst sis1
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 4
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 8
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
!cat:ASCA-SIS1 > set datamode BRIGHT
!cat:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > make obscat cat_filt=DEF lststr='ad*s1*.unf'
''Using default selection expression: ONTIME>100&&NEVENTS>0&&COORDPRO!='ERROR'&&INSTRUME=='SIS1'&&DATAMODE=='BRIGHT'
!cat:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save obscat s1_bright.cat clobber=yes
!cat:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set datamode BRIGHT2
!cat:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT2 > make obscat cat_filt=DEF lststr='ad*s1*.unf'
''Using default selection expression: ONTIME>100&&NEVENTS>0&&COORDPRO!='ERROR'&&INSTRUME=='SIS1'&&DATAMODE=='BRIGHT2'
!cat:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT2 > save obscat s1_bright2.cat clobber=yes
!cat:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT2 > set inst gis2
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
!cat:ASCA-GIS2 > make obscat cat_filt=DEF lststr='ad*g2*.unf'
''Using default selection expression: ONTIME>100&&NEVENTS>0&&HV_RED=='OFF'&&HVH_LVL==3&&HVL_LVL==4&&COORDPRO!='ERROR'&&INSTRUME=='GIS2'
!cat:ASCA-GIS2 > save obscat g2.cat clobber=yes
!cat:ASCA-GIS2 > set inst gis3
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
!cat:ASCA-GIS3 > make obscat cat_filt=DEF lststr='ad*g3*.unf'
''Using default selection expression: ONTIME>100&&NEVENTS>0&&HV_RED=='OFF'&&HVH_LVL==3&&HVL_LVL==4&&COORDPRO!='ERROR'&&INSTRUME=='GIS3'
!cat:ASCA-GIS3 > save obscat g3.cat clobber=yes
!cat:ASCA-GIS3 > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Makefilter file is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/ft960321_0548_1200.mkf
gnt_infrm: Determining datamode...
gnt_infrm: Determining BR_EARTH angle...
rm: No match.
rm: No match.
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_cats
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:26:07 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: (do_proc) The dominant datamode is: BRIGHT.
gnt_infrm: (do_proc) The BR_EARTH angle is: 20.
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_scrn
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:26:08 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: The datamode is BRIGHT.
gnt_infrm: Determining the CCD mode...
CCD EXP_TIME
--------------------------
1 7.046991758927703E+03
1 3.277941319569945E+03
1 4.200470151007175E+01
-------------------------------------
Exposure time in 1-CCD mode: 10366
Exposure time in 2-CCD mode: 0
Exposure time in 4-CCD mode: 0
-------------------------------------
gnt_infrm: Using 1-CCD mode.
****** ASCASCREEN V.0.51 ******
Applies standard clean criteria to all modes of ASCA data.
Output:
-- A single cleaned events file (.evt) except in MPC mode
-- An image for the entire detector (.img) except in FAST and MPC modes
-- The timing filters (.gti) in MPC mode
-- A lightcurve (.lc) and spectrum (.pha) in MPC mode.
-- The Dark Frame Error history file (.dfe) for FAINT mode.
-- A reduced obscat (.cat)
Try ascascreen -h for help.
Report problems to ascahelp@athena.gsfc.nasa.gov
A return will accept the default.
For character replies, the default is in upper case.
Okay, I'll only write the xco file
To use it, say:
xselect @output_root.xco
I will choose all the minor modes.
Okay, I will use the defaults.
Got data directory: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened
Got instrument SIS0
Got datamode BRIGHT
Using HIGH bit rate data.
Using MEDIUM bit rate data.
Using LOW bit rate data.
Analysing files for your chosen mode, please wait.
Using 0.01 for Maximum allowed angular deviation
Using 30 for Bright Earth Angle
Using 10 for minimum elevation
Using 6 for minimum cutoff rigidity
Using 275 for Radiation Belt Monitor upper-threshold
Using 100 for SIS Pixel rejection upper-threshold for chips 1 .
I will start up SAOImage, and leave you in Xselect at the end
Writing command file 74004000_sis0.xco
Index NEVENTS ONTIME S0CCDMOD S0CCDLST S0_ARENA
0 86354 20872.6 1 1111 0
Removing Hot and Flickering Pixels.
Performing Grade selection ( keeping 0,2,3, and 4 ).
Command file written, goodbye
****** ASCASCREEN V.0.51 ******
Applies standard clean criteria to all modes of ASCA data.
Output:
-- A single cleaned events file (.evt) except in MPC mode
-- An image for the entire detector (.img) except in FAST and MPC modes
-- The timing filters (.gti) in MPC mode
-- A lightcurve (.lc) and spectrum (.pha) in MPC mode.
-- The Dark Frame Error history file (.dfe) for FAINT mode.
-- A reduced obscat (.cat)
Try ascascreen -h for help.
Report problems to ascahelp@athena.gsfc.nasa.gov
A return will accept the default.
For character replies, the default is in upper case.
Okay, I'll only write the xco file
To use it, say:
xselect @output_root.xco
I will choose all the minor modes.
Okay, I will use the defaults.
Got data directory: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened
Got instrument SIS1
Got datamode BRIGHT
Using HIGH bit rate data.
Using MEDIUM bit rate data.
Using LOW bit rate data.
Analysing files for your chosen mode, please wait.
Using 0.01 for Maximum allowed angular deviation
Using 20 for Bright Earth Angle
Using 10 for minimum elevation
Using 6 for minimum cutoff rigidity
Using 275 for Radiation Belt Monitor upper-threshold
Using 100 for SIS Pixel rejection upper-threshold for chips 3 .
I will start up SAOImage, and leave you in Xselect at the end
Writing command file 74004000_sis1.xco
Index NEVENTS ONTIME S1CCDMOD S1CCDLST S1_ARENA
0 95324 20872.6 1 3333 0
Removing Hot and Flickering Pixels.
Performing Grade selection ( keeping 0,2,3, and 4 ).
Command file written, goodbye
****** ASCASCREEN V.0.51 ******
Applies standard clean criteria to all modes of ASCA data.
Output:
-- A single cleaned events file (.evt) except in MPC mode
-- An image for the entire detector (.img) except in FAST and MPC modes
-- The timing filters (.gti) in MPC mode
-- A lightcurve (.lc) and spectrum (.pha) in MPC mode.
-- The Dark Frame Error history file (.dfe) for FAINT mode.
-- A reduced obscat (.cat)
Try ascascreen -h for help.
Report problems to ascahelp@athena.gsfc.nasa.gov
A return will accept the default.
For character replies, the default is in upper case.
Okay, I'll only write the xco file
To use it, say:
xselect @output_root.xco
I will choose all the minor modes.
Okay, I will use the defaults.
Got data directory: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened
Got instrument GIS2
Got datamode PH
Using HIGH bit rate data.
Using MEDIUM bit rate data.
Using LOW bit rate data.
Analysing files for your chosen mode, please wait.
Using 0.01 for Maximum allowed angular deviation
Using 5 for minimum elevation
Using standard GIS particle BGD rejection criterion
I will start up SAOImage, and leave you in Xselect at the end
Removing ring and calibration sources
Using the region:
CIRCLE(128.50,128.50,88.00)
-ELLIPSE(167.50,220.00,24.66,28.95,245.298)
Writing command file 74004000_gis2.xco
Index NEVENTS ONTIME RAWXBINS RISEBINS TIMEBINS PHA_BINS POS_DET
0 50523 19233.9 256 32 1 1024 FLF
Using Rise Time window bkgd. rejection
Command file written, goodbye
****** ASCASCREEN V.0.51 ******
Applies standard clean criteria to all modes of ASCA data.
Output:
-- A single cleaned events file (.evt) except in MPC mode
-- An image for the entire detector (.img) except in FAST and MPC modes
-- The timing filters (.gti) in MPC mode
-- A lightcurve (.lc) and spectrum (.pha) in MPC mode.
-- The Dark Frame Error history file (.dfe) for FAINT mode.
-- A reduced obscat (.cat)
Try ascascreen -h for help.
Report problems to ascahelp@athena.gsfc.nasa.gov
A return will accept the default.
For character replies, the default is in upper case.
Okay, I'll only write the xco file
To use it, say:
xselect @output_root.xco
I will choose all the minor modes.
Okay, I will use the defaults.
Got data directory: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened
Got instrument GIS3
Got datamode PH
Using HIGH bit rate data.
Using MEDIUM bit rate data.
Using LOW bit rate data.
Analysing files for your chosen mode, please wait.
Using 0.01 for Maximum allowed angular deviation
Using 5 for minimum elevation
Using standard GIS particle BGD rejection criterion
I will start up SAOImage, and leave you in Xselect at the end
Removing ring and calibration sources
CIRCLE(128.50,128.50,88.00)
-ELLIPSE(217,95,21.56,25.92,169.216)
Writing command file 74004000_gis3.xco
Index NEVENTS ONTIME RAWXBINS RISEBINS TIMEBINS PHA_BINS POS_DET
0 55905 19231.9 256 32 1 1024 FLF
Using Rise Time window bkgd. rejection
Using the region:
Command file written, goodbye
Running extractions
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000s000102m.unf
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
61273 43425 0 17848 0 0
Writing events file
43425 events written to the output file
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000s000302l.unf
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
2430 67 0 2363 0 0
Writing events file
43492 events written to the output file
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000s000202h.unf
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
22651 20347 0 2304 0 0
Writing events file
63839 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
86354 63839 0 22515 0 0
in 10431. seconds
CLEANSIS_V1.6
allocating image arrays...
PROGRAM TO MAKE AN SIS SCIENCE FILE CLEANED OF ANOMALOUS PIXELS.
* Anomalous pixels may consist of at least two populations.
1. Persistent HOT pixels are removed by comparing to the chip mean.
2. Flickering WARM pixels are removed by comparing to the cell mean.
3. In faint areas (zero bgd), flickering pixels are removed with a
cutoff threshold.
Hints:
Choose cell size and thresholds based on the expected background and the PSF.
Use the DIRTYSIS option to examine the anomalous pixel spectra.
Try a multiple pass clean:
Choose a PHA cut to optimize the S/N of the flickering pixels,
then a broad band clean.
Be suspicious of extended source cleans.
For very bright sources you may need to turn off the iteration option.
See the help page for further info (fhelp cleansis)
Poisson clean cell size : 5
Poisson probability threshold : 0.631E-05
Zero Bgd Cutoff threshold (>) : 3
Iterate : T
Dirtysis : F
Minimum PHA value (inclusive) : 0
Maximum PHA value (inclusive) : 4095
open output file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/ascascr
reading data file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/ascascr
copying primary header to output file...
making chip image...
Total counts in chip images : 63839
copy bad pix array...
cleaning chip # 0
cleaning chip # 1
Hot pixels & counts : 3 3181
Flickering pixels iter, pixels & cnts : 1 47 307
cleaning chip # 2
cleaning chip # 3
Number of pixels rejected : 50
Number of (internal) image counts : 63839
Number of image cts rejected (N, %) : 3488 5.46
By chip : 0 1 2 3
Pixels rejected : 0 50 0 0
Image counts : 0 63839 0 0
Image cts rejected: 0 3488 0 0
Image cts rej (%) : 0.00 5.46 0.00 0.00
filtering data...
Total counts : 0 63839 0 0
Total cts rejected: 0 3488 0 0
Total cts rej (%) : 0.00 5.46 0.00 0.00
Number of clean counts accepted : 60351
writing history cards...
copying extensions...
writing out hot pixs...
Number of rejected pixels : 50
updating NEVENTS keywords...
closing data file...
closing clean file...
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: ascascreen_sis0_in_event.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 57860 0 0 0 0
Writing events file
57860 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 57860 0 0 0 0
in 10431. seconds
Image has 57860 counts for 5.547 counts/sec
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel] ascascreen_sis0
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA > set mission ASCA
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA > set instru SIS0
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 4
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 8
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0 > set datadir /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened
Setting data directory to /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/
Setting mkf directory to /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0 > set dumpcat
Obscat listing off
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0 > set datamode BRIGHT
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > make obscat cat_filt=@74004000_sis0_obscat.sel lststr = '[af][dt]*[Ss]0*[HhMmLl].unf'
''!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > choose 1-** switch=yes
Setting datamode to BRIGHT
Got the minimum time resolution of the chosen data: 0.40000E+01,
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 2047
Number of files read in: 3
Files currently in use:
1 ad74004000s000102m.unf
2 ad74004000s000302l.unf
3 ad74004000s000202h.unf
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set image detector
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > select mkf @74004000_sis0_mkf.sel
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract events
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > sisclean clean=2 cellsize=5 log_prob=-5.24 bkg_thr=3 clean_phalow=0 clean_phahi =4095 sis_plot2=no saoimage2=no
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > select events "grade==0||(grade>=2&&grade<=4)" save_file=no
The select output will overwrite the cleaned event list
if you have not saved it already.
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract "event image"
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save obscat 74004000_sis0 clobberit = yes
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > $rm -f ascascreen_sis0*.cat 74004000_sis0_list.tmp 74004000_sis0_obscat.lis
Spawning...
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save all 74004000_sis0 clobberit=yes use_events=yes
Saving the Image:
Wrote image to file 74004000_sis0.img
Saving the Cleaned events list(s):
Wrote cleaned events file to 74004000_sis0.evt
Changing Data directory from:
/local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/
to the current working directory.
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear mkf
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set dumpcat
Obscat listing on
!ascascreen_sis0:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > exit save=no
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000s100102m.unf
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
62425 43497 0 18928 0 0
Writing events file
43497 events written to the output file
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000s100302l.unf
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
9598 81 0 9517 0 0
Writing events file
43578 events written to the output file
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000s100202h.unf
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
23301 20741 0 2560 0 0
Writing events file
64319 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
95324 64319 0 31005 0 0
in 10303. seconds
CLEANSIS_V1.6
allocating image arrays...
PROGRAM TO MAKE AN SIS SCIENCE FILE CLEANED OF ANOMALOUS PIXELS.
* Anomalous pixels may consist of at least two populations.
1. Persistent HOT pixels are removed by comparing to the chip mean.
2. Flickering WARM pixels are removed by comparing to the cell mean.
3. In faint areas (zero bgd), flickering pixels are removed with a
cutoff threshold.
Hints:
Choose cell size and thresholds based on the expected background and the PSF.
Use the DIRTYSIS option to examine the anomalous pixel spectra.
Try a multiple pass clean:
Choose a PHA cut to optimize the S/N of the flickering pixels,
then a broad band clean.
Be suspicious of extended source cleans.
For very bright sources you may need to turn off the iteration option.
See the help page for further info (fhelp cleansis)
Poisson clean cell size : 5
Poisson probability threshold : 0.631E-05
Zero Bgd Cutoff threshold (>) : 3
Iterate : T
Dirtysis : F
Minimum PHA value (inclusive) : 0
Maximum PHA value (inclusive) : 4095
open output file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/ascascr
reading data file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/ascascr
copying primary header to output file...
making chip image...
Total counts in chip images : 64319
copy bad pix array...
cleaning chip # 0
cleaning chip # 1
cleaning chip # 2
cleaning chip # 3
Hot pixels & counts : 7 14426
Flickering pixels iter, pixels & cnts : 1 55 754
Number of pixels rejected : 62
Number of (internal) image counts : 64319
Number of image cts rejected (N, %) : 1518023.60
By chip : 0 1 2 3
Pixels rejected : 0 0 0 62
Image counts : 0 0 0 64319
Image cts rejected: 0 0 0 15180
Image cts rej (%) : 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.60
filtering data...
Total counts : 0 0 0 64319
Total cts rejected: 0 0 0 15180
Total cts rej (%) : 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.60
Number of clean counts accepted : 49139
writing history cards...
copying extensions...
writing out hot pixs...
Number of rejected pixels : 62
updating NEVENTS keywords...
closing data file...
closing clean file...
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: ascascreen_sis1_in_event.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 47121 0 0 0 0
Writing events file
47121 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 47121 0 0 0 0
in 10303. seconds
Image has 47121 counts for 4.574 counts/sec
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel] ascascreen_sis1
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA > set mission ASCA
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA > set instru SIS1
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 4
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 8
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1 > set datadir /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened
Setting data directory to /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/
Setting mkf directory to /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1 > set dumpcat
Obscat listing off
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1 > set datamode BRIGHT
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > make obscat cat_filt=@74004000_sis1_obscat.sel lststr = '[af][dt]*[Ss]1*[HhMmLl].unf'
''!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > choose 1-** switch=yes
Setting datamode to BRIGHT
Got the minimum time resolution of the chosen data: 0.40000E+01,
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 2047
Number of files read in: 3
Files currently in use:
1 ad74004000s100102m.unf
2 ad74004000s100302l.unf
3 ad74004000s100202h.unf
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set image detector
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > select mkf @74004000_sis1_mkf.sel
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract events
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > sisclean clean=2 cellsize=5 log_prob=-5.24 bkg_thr=3 clean_phalow=0 clean_phahi =4095 sis_plot2=no saoimage2=no
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > select events "grade==0||(grade>=2&&grade<=4)" save_file=no
The select output will overwrite the cleaned event list
if you have not saved it already.
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract "event image"
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save obscat 74004000_sis1 clobberit = yes
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > $rm -f ascascreen_sis1*.cat 74004000_sis1_list.tmp 74004000_sis1_obscat.lis
Spawning...
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save all 74004000_sis1 clobberit=yes use_events=yes
Saving the Image:
Wrote image to file 74004000_sis1.img
Saving the Cleaned events list(s):
Wrote cleaned events file to 74004000_sis1.evt
Changing Data directory from:
/local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/
to the current working directory.
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear mkf
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set dumpcat
Obscat listing on
!ascascreen_sis1:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > exit save=no
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000g200170m.unf
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
31930 24282 4803 2845 0 0
Writing events file
24282 events written to the output file
No events selected from file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000g200370l.unf
Writing events file
24282 events written to the output file
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000g200270h.unf
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
14433 11902 2265 266 0 0
Writing events file
36184 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
46363 36184 7068 3111 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Infile # of rows Outfile # of rows # filtered
---------------- ----------------- ----------
36184 35440 744
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: ascascreen_gis2_in_event.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 35440 0 0 0 0
Writing events file
35440 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 35440 0 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Image has 35440 counts for 3.218 counts/sec
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel] ascascreen_gis2
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA > set mission ASCA
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA > set instru GIS2
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2 > set datadir /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened
Setting data directory to /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/
Setting mkf directory to /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2 > set dumpcat
Obscat listing off
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2 > set datamode PH
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > make obscat cat_filt=@74004000_gis2_obscat.sel lststr = '[af][dt]*[Gg]2*[HhMmLl].unf'
''!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > choose 1-** switch=yes
Setting datamode to PH
Got the minimum time resolution of the chosen data: 0.20000E+01,
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 1023
Number of files read in: 3
Files currently in use:
1 ad74004000g200170m.unf
2 ad74004000g200370l.unf
3 ad74004000g200270h.unf
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set image detector
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > select mkf @74004000_gis2_mkf.sel
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter region 74004000_gis2_randc.reg
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract events
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > gisclean
Using table:/software/lheasoft/develop/refdata/rti_gis_1024_040693.fits
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract "event image"
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save obscat 74004000_gis2 clobberit = yes
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > $rm -f ascascreen_gis2*.cat 74004000_gis2_list.tmp 74004000_gis2_obscat.lis
Spawning...
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save all 74004000_gis2 clobberit=yes use_events=yes
Saving the Image:
Wrote image to file 74004000_gis2.img
Saving the Filtered Events list:
Wrote events list to file 74004000_gis2.evt
Changing Data directory from:
/local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/
to the current working directory.
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > clear mkf
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > clear region all
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set dumpcat
Obscat listing on
!ascascreen_gis2:ASCA-GIS2-PH > exit save=no
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000g300170m.unf
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
36063 28496 4085 3482 0 0
Writing events file
28496 events written to the output file
No events selected from file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000g300370l.unf
Writing events file
28496 events written to the output file
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/ad74004000g300270h.unf
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
15851 13661 1894 296 0 0
Writing events file
42157 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
51914 42157 5979 3778 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Infile # of rows Outfile # of rows # filtered
---------------- ----------------- ----------
42157 41423 734
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: ascascreen_gis3_in_event.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 41423 0 0 0 0
Writing events file
41423 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 41423 0 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Image has 41423 counts for 3.762 counts/sec
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel] ascascreen_gis3
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA > set mission ASCA
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA > set instru GIS3
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3 > set datadir /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened
Setting data directory to /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/
Setting mkf directory to /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3 > set dumpcat
Obscat listing off
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3 > set datamode PH
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > make obscat cat_filt=@74004000_gis3_obscat.sel lststr = '[af][dt]*[Gg]3*[HhMmLl].unf'
''!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > choose 1-** switch=yes
Setting datamode to PH
Got the minimum time resolution of the chosen data: 0.20000E+01,
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 1023
Number of files read in: 3
Files currently in use:
1 ad74004000g300170m.unf
2 ad74004000g300370l.unf
3 ad74004000g300270h.unf
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set image detector
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > select mkf @74004000_gis3_mkf.sel
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > filter region 74004000_gis3_randc.reg
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract events
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > gisclean
Using table:/software/lheasoft/develop/refdata/rti_gis_1024_040693.fits
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract "event image"
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save obscat 74004000_gis3 clobberit = yes
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > $rm -f ascascreen_gis3*.cat 74004000_gis3_list.tmp 74004000_gis3_obscat.lis
Spawning...
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save all 74004000_gis3 clobberit=yes use_events=yes
Saving the Image:
Wrote image to file 74004000_gis3.img
Saving the Filtered Events list:
Wrote events list to file 74004000_gis3.evt
Changing Data directory from:
/local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/unscreened/
to the current working directory.
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > clear mkf
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > clear region all
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set dumpcat
Obscat listing on
!ascascreen_gis3:ASCA-GIS3-PH > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Checking for G3BITFIX problem...
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_scrn
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:27:26 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_cent
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:27:26 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Getting RA and DEC from attitude file...
gnt_infrm: Getting OTIME from attitude file...
gnt_infrm: Checking permanent area...
gunzip: No match.
gnt_infrm: Files not in permanent area; performing centroiding...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS PHA_BINS
1 MKN501_N1 PH MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:23 0.11E+05 35440 1024
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 22308 12238 0 0 894
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 22308 12238 0 0 894
in 11012. seconds
Spectrum has 22308 counts for 2.026 counts/sec
... written the PHA data Extension
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 2202 33109 0 0 129
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 2202 33109 0 0 129
in 11012. seconds
Spectrum has 2202 counts for 0.2000 counts/sec
... written the PHA data Extension
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_gis2.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 1023
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 0.50000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter region gis2_src_reg.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter pha_cutoff 60 900
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract spectrum
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save spectrum gis2_spec_src.tmp clobber=yes group=no
Wrote spectrum to gis2_spec_src.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter region gis2_bgd_reg.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract spectrum
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save spectrum gis2_spec_bgd.tmp clobber=yes group=no
Wrote spectrum to gis2_spec_bgd.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > exit save=no
****** statistics for /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/gis2_spec_src.tmp ******
The sum of the selected image = 22170.000000
The mean of the selected image = 32.893175
The standard deviation of the selected image = 38.919119
The number of points used in calculation = 674
The minimum of selected image = -1.0
The maximum of selected image = 256.0
The location of minimum is at pixel number = (1,1)
The location of maximum is at pixel number = (16,19)
****** successfully exited ******
****** statistics for /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/gis2_spec_bgd.tmp ******
The sum of the selected image = 2158.000000
The mean of the selected image = 0.376812
The standard deviation of the selected image = 0.651500
The number of points used in calculation = 5727
The minimum of selected image = -1.0
The maximum of selected image = 4.0
The location of minimum is at pixel number = (1,1)
The location of maximum is at pixel number = (90,41)
****** successfully exited ******
gnt_infrm: SDS = 1369.66
gnt_infrm: Source was detected with confidence because S = 1369.66
gnt_infrm: The scripts will find centroids from smoothed sky images.
gnt_infrm: The source coordinates will be X and Y of the centroid.
gnt_infrm: Centroid for sis0...
gnt_infrm: Centroiding region is circle(182,114,33).
gnt_infrm: Creating sky image for sis0...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS S0CCDPOW
1 MKN501_N1 BRIGHT MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:13 0.10E+05 60351 0100
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 50424 7436 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 50424 7436 0 0 0
in 10431. seconds
Image has 50424 counts for 4.834 counts/sec
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_sis0.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 4
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 8
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 2047
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 4.0000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > filter region init_reg.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save image sis0_sky.tmp clobber=yes
Wrote image to file sis0_sky.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Smoothing sky image for sis0...
gnt_infrm: Finding maximum pixel (centroid) for sis0...
****** statistics for /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/sis0_sky_sm.tmp ******
The sum of the selected image = 50423.999980
The mean of the selected image = 8.556593
The standard deviation of the selected image = 14.316337
The number of points used in calculation = 5893
The minimum of selected image = 0.0
The maximum of selected image = 90.2
The location of minimum is at pixel number = (1,1)
The location of maximum is at pixel number = (177,114)
****** successfully exited ******
gnt_infrm: Initial sky posns are 177, 114
gnt_infrm: Converting to det co-ordinates
/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_subevt.tmp
The sum of the selected column is 4559951.0
The mean of the selected column is 447.36103
The standard deviation of the selected column is 8.6465992
The minimum of selected column is 425.00000
The maximum of selected column is 471.00000
The number of points used in calculation is 10193
The sum of the selected column is 4867983.0
The mean of the selected column is 477.58099
The standard deviation of the selected column is 9.4509879
The minimum of selected column is 452.00000
The maximum of selected column is 505.00000
The number of points used in calculation is 10193
gnt_infrm: Writing source region for sis0...
gnt_infrm: Writing SIS background region for sis0...
111,119
gnt_infrm: Centroid for sis1...
gnt_infrm: Centroiding region is circle(182,114,33).
gnt_infrm: Creating sky image for sis1...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS S1CCDPOW
1 MKN501_N1 BRIGHT MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:13 0.10E+05 49139 0001
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 41851 5270 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 41851 5270 0 0 0
in 10303. seconds
Image has 41851 counts for 4.062 counts/sec
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_sis1.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 4
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 8
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 2047
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 4.0000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > filter region init_reg.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save image sis1_sky.tmp clobber=yes
Wrote image to file sis1_sky.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Smoothing sky image for sis1...
gnt_infrm: Finding maximum pixel (centroid) for sis1...
****** statistics for /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/sis1_sky_sm.tmp ******
The sum of the selected image = 41851.000027
The mean of the selected image = 7.133288
The standard deviation of the selected image = 11.891356
The number of points used in calculation = 5867
The minimum of selected image = 0.0
The maximum of selected image = 73.8
The location of minimum is at pixel number = (1,1)
The location of maximum is at pixel number = (177,114)
****** successfully exited ******
gnt_infrm: Initial sky posns are 177, 114
gnt_infrm: Converting to det co-ordinates
/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_subevt.tmp
The sum of the selected column is 3803106.0
The mean of the selected column is 446.63605
The standard deviation of the selected column is 8.9150529
The minimum of selected column is 423.00000
The maximum of selected column is 469.00000
The number of points used in calculation is 8515
The sum of the selected column is 4371407.0
The mean of the selected column is 513.37722
The standard deviation of the selected column is 9.1928186
The minimum of selected column is 489.00000
The maximum of selected column is 540.00000
The number of points used in calculation is 8515
gnt_infrm: Writing source region for sis1...
gnt_infrm: Writing SIS background region for sis1...
111,128
gnt_infrm: Centroid for gis2...
gnt_infrm: Centroiding region is circle(138,108,14).
gnt_infrm: Creating sky image for gis2...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS PHA_BINS
1 MKN501_N1 PH MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:23 0.11E+05 35440 1024
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 23202 12238 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 23202 12238 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Image has 23202 counts for 2.107 counts/sec
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_gis2.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 1023
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 0.50000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter region init_reg.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save image gis2_sky.tmp clobber=yes
Wrote image to file gis2_sky.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Smoothing sky image for gis2...
gnt_infrm: Finding maximum pixel (centroid) for gis2...
****** statistics for /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/gis2_sky_sm.tmp ******
The sum of the selected image = 23201.999987
The mean of the selected image = 12.602933
The standard deviation of the selected image = 19.165552
The number of points used in calculation = 1841
The minimum of selected image = 0.0
The maximum of selected image = 83.0
The location of minimum is at pixel number = (1,1)
The location of maximum is at pixel number = (136,110)
****** successfully exited ******
gnt_infrm: Initial sky posns are 136, 110
gnt_infrm: Converting to det co-ordinates
/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_subevt.tmp
The sum of the selected column is 1034590.0
The mean of the selected column is 105.82958
The standard deviation of the selected column is 2.2907818
The minimum of selected column is 101.00000
The maximum of selected column is 112.00000
The number of points used in calculation is 9776
The sum of the selected column is 1125236.0
The mean of the selected column is 115.10188
The standard deviation of the selected column is 2.3191524
The minimum of selected column is 109.00000
The maximum of selected column is 121.00000
The number of points used in calculation is 9776
gnt_infrm: Writing source region for gis2...
gnt_infrm: Writing GIS background region for gis2...
105,115
gnt_infrm: Centroid for gis3...
gnt_infrm: Centroiding region is circle(138,108,14).
gnt_infrm: Creating sky image for gis3...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS PHA_BINS
1 MKN501_N1 PH MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:23 0.11E+05 41423 1024
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 28607 12816 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 28607 12816 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Image has 28607 counts for 2.598 counts/sec
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_gis3.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 1023
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 0.50000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > filter region init_reg.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save image gis3_sky.tmp clobber=yes
Wrote image to file gis3_sky.tmp
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Smoothing sky image for gis3...
gnt_infrm: Finding maximum pixel (centroid) for gis3...
****** statistics for /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/gis3_sky_sm.tmp ******
The sum of the selected image = 28606.999981
The mean of the selected image = 15.538838
The standard deviation of the selected image = 24.302670
The number of points used in calculation = 1841
The minimum of selected image = 0.0
The maximum of selected image = 107.6
The location of minimum is at pixel number = (1,1)
The location of maximum is at pixel number = (137,109)
****** successfully exited ******
gnt_infrm: Initial sky posns are 137, 109
gnt_infrm: Converting to det co-ordinates
/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_subevt.tmp
The sum of the selected column is 1459555.0
The mean of the selected column is 111.59531
The standard deviation of the selected column is 2.2883735
The minimum of selected column is 106.00000
The maximum of selected column is 117.00000
The number of points used in calculation is 13079
The sum of the selected column is 1500746.0
The mean of the selected column is 114.74471
The standard deviation of the selected column is 2.2045319
The minimum of selected column is 109.00000
The maximum of selected column is 121.00000
The number of points used in calculation is 13079
gnt_infrm: Writing source region for gis3...
gnt_infrm: Writing GIS background region for gis3...
111,114
gnt_infrm: Comparing SIS and GIS centroids respectively...
gnt_infrm: Combining respective sky images...
gnt_infrm: Comparing combined GIS centroid to SIS0 and SIS1...
****** statistics for /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/gis_sky_sm.tmp ******
The sum of the selected image = 51808.999878
The mean of the selected image = 49.015137
The standard deviation of the selected image = 72.721694
The number of points used in calculation = 1057
The minimum of selected image = 0.0
The maximum of selected image = 402.3
The location of minimum is at pixel number = (1,1)
The location of maximum is at pixel number = (136,109)
****** successfully exited ******
gnt_infrm: Copying .reg files to permanent area...
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_cent
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:28:16 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_prod
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:28:16 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Running extraction procedure for 74004000...
gnt_infrm: Running SISPI...
SISPI v1.1.1
SISPI v1.1.1
gnt_infrm: DATAMODE = BRIGHT.
gnt_infrm: BITFIX = n.
gnt_infrm: Extracting src data for sis0...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS S0CCDPOW
1 MKN501_N1 BRIGHT MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:13 0.10E+05 60351 0100
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 57860 0 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 57860 0 0 0 0
in 10431. seconds
Image has 57860 counts for 5.547 counts/sec
Processing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0.evt
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 55513 2347 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 55513 2347 0 0 0
in 10431. seconds
Spectrum has 55513 counts for 5.322 counts/sec
... written the PHA data Extension
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - SIS0 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 10431. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 6.16990E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - none Associated background file
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - none Associated redistribution matrix file
ANCRFILE - none Associated ancillary response file
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 512 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 512 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
... QUALITY
...
... -------
... QUALITY
... -------
... Bad Channels (Channel - Channel)
... ---------------------------------------------
... 0 - 16 have quality 5
... ---------------------------------------------
...
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_sis0_src.pha
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 54057 2347 0 0 1456
Writing events file
54057 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 54057 2347 0 0 1456
in 10431. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 40567 2347 0 0 14946
Writing events file
40567 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 40567 2347 0 0 14946
in 10431. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 13531 2347 0 0 41982
Writing events file
13531 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 13531 2347 0 0 41982
in 10431. seconds
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_sis0.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 4
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 8
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 2047
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 4.0000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set xybinsize 4
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save image clobber=yes 74004000_sis0_sky.img
Wrote image to file 74004000_sis0_sky.img
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set image det
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > select events CCDID.EQ.1
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > filter region 74004000_sis0_src.reg
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract spectrum
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save spectrum group=yes clobber=yes 74004000_sis0_src.pha
Wrote spectrum to 74004000_sis0_src.pha
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 140 1723
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis0_src.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis0_src.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 140 560
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis0_src_soft.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis0_src_soft.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 560 1723
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis0_src_hard.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis0_src_hard.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear region all
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Extracting src data for sis1...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS S1CCDPOW
1 MKN501_N1 BRIGHT MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:13 0.10E+05 49139 0001
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 47121 0 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 47121 0 0 0 0
in 10303. seconds
Image has 47121 counts for 4.574 counts/sec
Processing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1.evt
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 45540 1581 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 45540 1581 0 0 0
in 10303. seconds
Spectrum has 45540 counts for 4.420 counts/sec
... written the PHA data Extension
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - SIS1 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 10303. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 5.63770E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - none Associated background file
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - none Associated redistribution matrix file
ANCRFILE - none Associated ancillary response file
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 512 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 512 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
... QUALITY
...
... -------
... QUALITY
... -------
... Bad Channels (Channel - Channel)
... ---------------------------------------------
... 0 - 16 have quality 5
... ---------------------------------------------
...
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_sis1_src.pha
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 44414 1581 0 0 1126
Writing events file
44414 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 44414 1581 0 0 1126
in 10303. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 33266 1581 0 0 12274
Writing events file
33266 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 33266 1581 0 0 12274
in 10303. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 11186 1581 0 0 34354
Writing events file
11186 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 11186 1581 0 0 34354
in 10303. seconds
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_sis1.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 4
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 8
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 2047
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 4.0000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set xybinsize 4
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save image clobber=yes 74004000_sis1_sky.img
Wrote image to file 74004000_sis1_sky.img
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set image det
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > select events CCDID.EQ.3
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > filter region 74004000_sis1_src.reg
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract spectrum
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save spectrum group=yes clobber=yes 74004000_sis1_src.pha
Wrote spectrum to 74004000_sis1_src.pha
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 140 1723
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis1_src.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis1_src.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 140 560
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis1_src_soft.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis1_src_soft.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 560 1723
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis1_src_hard.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis1_src_hard.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear region all
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Extracting src data for gis2...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS PHA_BINS
1 MKN501_N1 PH MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:23 0.11E+05 35440 1024
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 35440 0 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 35440 0 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Image has 35440 counts for 3.218 counts/sec
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 28707 6733 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 28707 6733 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Spectrum has 28707 counts for 2.607 counts/sec
... written the PHA data Extension
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 28149 6733 0 0 558
Writing events file
28149 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 28149 6733 0 0 558
in 11012. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 11331 6733 0 0 17376
Writing events file
11331 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 11331 6733 0 0 17376
in 11012. seconds
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_gis2.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 1023
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 0.50000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set xybinsize 1
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save image clobber=yes 74004000_gis2_sky.img
Wrote image to file 74004000_gis2_sky.img
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set image det
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter region 74004000_gis2_src.reg
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract spectrum
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save spectrum group=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis2_src.pha
Wrote spectrum to 74004000_gis2_src.pha
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter pha_cutoff 43 850
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis2_src.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_gis2_src.evt
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter pha_cutoff 170 850
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis2_src_hard.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_gis2_src_hard.evt
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Extracting BITFIX=n src data for gis3...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS PHA_BINS
1 MKN501_N1 PH MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:23 0.11E+05 41423 1024
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 41423 0 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 41423 0 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Image has 41423 counts for 3.762 counts/sec
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 34941 6482 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 34941 6482 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Spectrum has 34941 counts for 3.173 counts/sec
... written the PHA data Extension
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 34340 6482 0 0 601
Writing events file
34340 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 34340 6482 0 0 601
in 11012. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 14217 6482 0 0 20724
Writing events file
14217 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 14217 6482 0 0 20724
in 11012. seconds
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_gis3.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 1023
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 0.50000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set xybinsize 1
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save image clobber=yes 74004000_gis3_sky.img
Wrote image to file 74004000_gis3_sky.img
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set image det
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > filter region 74004000_gis3_src.reg
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract spectrum
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save spectrum group=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis3_src.pha
Wrote spectrum to 74004000_gis3_src.pha
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > filter pha_cutoff 43 850
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis3_src.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_gis3_src.evt
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > filter pha_cutoff 170 850
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis3_src_hard.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_gis3_src_hard.evt
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Extracting bgd data for sis0...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS S0CCDPOW
1 MKN501_N1 BRIGHT MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:13 0.10E+05 60351 0100
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 57860 0 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 57860 0 0 0 0
in 10431. seconds
Image has 57860 counts for 5.547 counts/sec
Processing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0.evt
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 1606 56254 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 1606 56254 0 0 0
in 10431. seconds
Spectrum has 1606 counts for 0.1540 counts/sec
... written the PHA data Extension
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - SIS0 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 10431. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 3.11520E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - none Associated background file
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - none Associated redistribution matrix file
ANCRFILE - none Associated ancillary response file
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 512 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 512 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
... QUALITY
...
... -------
... QUALITY
... -------
... Bad Channels (Channel - Channel)
... ---------------------------------------------
... 0 - 16 have quality 5
... ---------------------------------------------
...
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_sis0_bgd.pha
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 1544 56254 0 0 62
Writing events file
1544 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 1544 56254 0 0 62
in 10431. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 1097 56254 0 0 509
Writing events file
1097 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 1097 56254 0 0 509
in 10431. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 448 56254 0 0 1158
Writing events file
448 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
57860 448 56254 0 0 1158
in 10431. seconds
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_sis0.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 4
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 8
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 2047
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 4.0000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set xybinsize 4
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save image clobber=yes 74004000_sis0_sky.img
Wrote image to file 74004000_sis0_sky.img
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > set image det
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > select events CCDID.EQ.1
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > filter region 74004000_sis0_bgd.reg
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract spectrum
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save spectrum group=yes clobber=yes 74004000_sis0_bgd.pha
Wrote spectrum to 74004000_sis0_bgd.pha
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 140 1723
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis0_bgd.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis0_bgd.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 140 560
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis0_bgd_soft.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis0_bgd_soft.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 560 1723
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis0_bgd_hard.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis0_bgd_hard.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > clear region all
!xsel:ASCA-SIS0-BRIGHT > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Extracting bgd data for sis1...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS S1CCDPOW
1 MKN501_N1 BRIGHT MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:13 0.10E+05 49139 0001
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 47121 0 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 47121 0 0 0 0
in 10303. seconds
Image has 47121 counts for 4.574 counts/sec
Processing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1.evt
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 1074 46047 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 1074 46047 0 0 0
in 10303. seconds
Spectrum has 1074 counts for 0.1042 counts/sec
... written the PHA data Extension
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - SIS1 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 10303. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 3.75100E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - none Associated background file
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - none Associated redistribution matrix file
ANCRFILE - none Associated ancillary response file
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 512 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 512 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
... QUALITY
...
... -------
... QUALITY
... -------
... Bad Channels (Channel - Channel)
... ---------------------------------------------
... 0 - 16 have quality 5
... ---------------------------------------------
...
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_sis1_bgd.pha
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 1004 46047 0 0 70
Writing events file
1004 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 1004 46047 0 0 70
in 10303. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 681 46047 0 0 393
Writing events file
681 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 681 46047 0 0 393
in 10303. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /local/data/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/xsel_work1001.xsl
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 323 46047 0 0 751
Writing events file
323 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
47121 323 46047 0 0 751
in 10303. seconds
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_sis1.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 4
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 8
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 2047
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 4.0000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set xybinsize 4
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save image clobber=yes 74004000_sis1_sky.img
Wrote image to file 74004000_sis1_sky.img
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > set image det
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > select events CCDID.EQ.3
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > filter region 74004000_sis1_bgd.reg
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract spectrum
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save spectrum group=yes clobber=yes 74004000_sis1_bgd.pha
Wrote spectrum to 74004000_sis1_bgd.pha
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 140 1723
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis1_bgd.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis1_bgd.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 140 560
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis1_bgd_soft.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis1_bgd_soft.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > filter pha_cutoff 560 1723
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_sis1_bgd_hard.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_sis1_bgd_hard.evt
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > clear region all
!xsel:ASCA-SIS1-BRIGHT > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Extracting bgd data for gis2...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS PHA_BINS
1 MKN501_N1 PH MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:23 0.11E+05 35440 1024
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 35440 0 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 35440 0 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Image has 35440 counts for 3.218 counts/sec
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 2282 33158 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 2282 33158 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Spectrum has 2282 counts for 0.2072 counts/sec
... written the PHA data Extension
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 2187 33158 0 0 95
Writing events file
2187 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 2187 33158 0 0 95
in 11012. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 1120 33158 0 0 1162
Writing events file
1120 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
35440 1120 33158 0 0 1162
in 11012. seconds
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_gis2.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 1023
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 0.50000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set xybinsize 1
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save image clobber=yes 74004000_gis2_sky.img
Wrote image to file 74004000_gis2_sky.img
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > set image det
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter region 74004000_gis2_bgd.reg
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract spectrum
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save spectrum group=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis2_bgd.pha
Wrote spectrum to 74004000_gis2_bgd.pha
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter pha_cutoff 43 850
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis2_bgd.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_gis2_bgd.evt
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > filter pha_cutoff 170 850
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis2_bgd_hard.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_gis2_bgd_hard.evt
!xsel:ASCA-GIS2-PH > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: Extracting BITFIX=n bgd data for gis3...
OBJECT DATAMODE BIT_RATE DATE-OBS TIME-OBS ONTIME NEVENTS PHA_BINS
1 MKN501_N1 PH MEDIUM 21/03/96 05:48:23 0.11E+05 41423 1024
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 41423 0 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 41423 0 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Image has 41423 counts for 3.762 counts/sec
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 2131 39292 0 0 0
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 2131 39292 0 0 0
in 11012. seconds
Spectrum has 2131 counts for 0.1935 counts/sec
... written the PHA data Extension
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 2033 39292 0 0 98
Writing events file
2033 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 2033 39292 0 0 98
in 11012. seconds
extractor v3.75 8 Mar 2000
Getting FITS WCS Keywords
Doing file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.evt
10% completed
20% completed
30% completed
40% completed
50% completed
60% completed
70% completed
80% completed
90% completed
100% completed
Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 1123 39292 0 0 1008
Writing events file
1123 events written to the output file
===============================================================================
Grand Total Good Bad: Region Time Phase Cut
41423 1123 39292 0 0 1008
in 11012. seconds
** XSELECT V2.0 **
!> Enter session name >[xsel]
Notes: XSELECT set up for ASCA
Time keyword is TIME in units of s
Default timing binsize = 16.000
Command not found; type ? for a command listing
!xsel:ASCA > clear all proceed=yes
WARNING: CLEAR ALL will remove all temporary files
!xsel > set datadir ./
Setting data directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
Setting mkf directory to /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/
!xsel > read e 74004000_gis3.evt
Setting...
Image keywords = X Y with binning = 1
WMAP keywords = DETX DETY with binning = 1
Energy keywords = PI with binning = 1
Getting Min and Max for Energy Column...
Got min and max for PI: 0 1023
Got the minimum time resolution of the read data: 0.50000
Number of files read in: 1
******************** Observation Catalogue ********************
Data Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
HK Directory is: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set binsize 128
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set image sky
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set xybinsize 1
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract image
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save image clobber=yes 74004000_gis3_sky.img
Wrote image to file 74004000_gis3_sky.img
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > set image det
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > filter region 74004000_gis3_bgd.reg
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract spectrum
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save spectrum group=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis3_bgd.pha
Wrote spectrum to 74004000_gis3_bgd.pha
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > filter pha_cutoff 43 850
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis3_bgd.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_gis3_bgd.evt
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > clear events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > clear pha_cutoff
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > filter pha_cutoff 170 850
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > extract events
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > save events use=no clobber=yes 74004000_gis3_bgd_hard.evt
Wrote events list to file 74004000_gis3_bgd_hard.evt
!xsel:ASCA-GIS3-PH > exit save=no
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_prod
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:29:50 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_spec
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:29:50 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Group .pha files for 74004000...
gnt_infrm: Minimum channels are 60 (gis2), 60 (gis3).
gnt_infrm: Creating grouped spectrum files for sis0...
grppha
Thu Apr 27 07:29:59 EDT 2000
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - SIS0 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 10431. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 6.16990E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - none Associated background file
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - none Associated redistribution matrix file
ANCRFILE - none Associated ancillary response file
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 512 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 512 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_sis0_src.pha.tmp
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
grppha
Thu Apr 27 07:29:59 EDT 2000
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - SIS0 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 10431. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 6.16990E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - 74004000_sis0_bgd.pha
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - 74004000_sis0.rmf
ANCRFILE - 74004000_sis0.arf
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 512 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 512 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
...... Channel 512 is not within the channel range !
...... Upper channel reset to last channel : 511
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_sis0_src_20.pha
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
ascaarf
Thu Apr 27 07:30:00 EDT 2000
ascaarf 74004000_sis0_src.pha.tmp 74004000_sis0.rmf 74004000_sis0.arf point=yes simple=yes clobber=yes
ASCAARF vers 3.00 6 Oct 1998.
xrtrsp : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_ea_v2_0.fits
xrtpsf : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_psf_v2_0.fits
Input WMAP array has size 45 by 42 bins
expanded to 45 by 42 bins
First WMAP bin is at detector pixel 264 296
8 detector pixels per WMAP bin
WMAP bin size is 0.21600 mm
0.21216 arcmin
Selected region size is 71.096 arcmin^2
Optical axis is detector pixel 662.72 559.02
1180 energies from RMF file
Effective area fudge applied
Arf filter applied
Point source at 447.00 467.00 (detector coordinates)
Point source at 26.97 11.50 (WMAP bins wrt optical axis)
Point source at 6.22 23.10 (... in polar coordinates)
Total counts in region = 5.54600E+04
Weighted mean angle from optical axis = 6.061 arcmin
gnt_infrm: Creating grouped spectrum files for sis1...
grppha
Thu Apr 27 07:31:34 EDT 2000
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - SIS1 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 10303. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 5.63770E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - none Associated background file
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - none Associated redistribution matrix file
ANCRFILE - none Associated ancillary response file
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 512 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 512 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_sis1_src.pha.tmp
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
grppha
Thu Apr 27 07:31:34 EDT 2000
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - SIS1 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 10303. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 5.63770E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - 74004000_sis1_bgd.pha
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - 74004000_sis1.rmf
ANCRFILE - 74004000_sis1.arf
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 512 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 512 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
...... Channel 512 is not within the channel range !
...... Upper channel reset to last channel : 511
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_sis1_src_20.pha
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
ascaarf
Thu Apr 27 07:31:34 EDT 2000
ascaarf 74004000_sis1_src.pha.tmp 74004000_sis1.rmf 74004000_sis1.arf point=yes simple=yes clobber=yes
ASCAARF vers 3.00 6 Oct 1998.
xrtrsp : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_ea_v2_0.fits
xrtpsf : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_psf_v2_0.fits
Input WMAP array has size 45 by 38 bins
expanded to 45 by 38 bins
First WMAP bin is at detector pixel 264 328
8 detector pixels per WMAP bin
WMAP bin size is 0.21600 mm
0.21216 arcmin
Selected region size is 64.963 arcmin^2
Optical axis is detector pixel 618.28 773.83
1180 energies from RMF file
Effective area fudge applied
Arf filter applied
Point source at 447.00 483.00 (detector coordinates)
Point source at 21.41 36.35 (WMAP bins wrt optical axis)
Point source at 8.95 59.51 (... in polar coordinates)
Total counts in region = 4.55030E+04
Weighted mean angle from optical axis = 8.328 arcmin
gnt_infrm: Creating grouped spectrum files for gis2...
grppha
Thu Apr 27 07:33:00 EDT 2000
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - GIS2 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 11012. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 3.66360E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - none Associated background file
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - none Associated redistribution matrix file
ANCRFILE - none Associated ancillary response file
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 1024 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 1024 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_gis2_src.pha.tmp
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
grppha
Thu Apr 27 07:33:00 EDT 2000
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - GIS2 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 11012. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 3.66360E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - 74004000_gis2_bgd.pha
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - 74004000_gis2.rmf
ANCRFILE - 74004000_gis2.arf
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 1024 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 1024 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_gis2_src_20.pha
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
ascaarf
Thu Apr 27 07:33:00 EDT 2000
ASCAARF vers 3.00 6 Oct 1998.
bethick : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/gis/bcf/s2bev1.fits
grid : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/gis/bcf/s2gridv3.fits
xrtrsp : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_ea_v2_0.fits
xrtpsf : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_psf_v2_0.fits
Input WMAP array has size 54 by 54 bins
expanded to 128 by 128 bins
First WMAP bin is at detector pixel 42 52
1 detector pixels per WMAP bin
WMAP bin size is 0.25000 mm
0.24555 arcmin
Selected region size is 144.80 arcmin^2
Optical axis is detector pixel 133.00 130.96
201 energies from RMF file
Effective area fudge applied
Arf filter applied
Point source at 104.50 114.50 (detector coordinates)
Point source at 28.50 16.46 (WMAP bins wrt optical axis)
Point source at 8.08 30.01 (... in polar coordinates)
Total counts in region = 2.86780E+04
Weighted mean angle from optical axis = 7.852 arcmin
gnt_infrm: Creating grouped spectrum files for gis3...
grppha
Thu Apr 27 07:41:18 EDT 2000
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - GIS3 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 11012. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 3.66360E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - none Associated background file
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - none Associated redistribution matrix file
ANCRFILE - none Associated ancillary response file
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 1024 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 1024 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_gis3_src.pha.tmp
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
grppha
Thu Apr 27 07:41:18 EDT 2000
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - GIS3 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 11012. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 3.66360E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - 74004000_gis3_bgd.pha
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - 74004000_gis3.rmf
ANCRFILE - 74004000_gis3.arf
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 1024 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 1024 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_gis3_src_20.pha
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
ascaarf
Thu Apr 27 07:41:19 EDT 2000
ASCAARF vers 3.00 6 Oct 1998.
bethick : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/gis/bcf/s3bev1.fits
grid : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/gis/bcf/s3gridv3.fits
xrtrsp : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_ea_v2_0.fits
xrtpsf : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_psf_v2_0.fits
Input WMAP array has size 54 by 54 bins
expanded to 128 by 128 bins
First WMAP bin is at detector pixel 48 51
1 detector pixels per WMAP bin
WMAP bin size is 0.25000 mm
0.24555 arcmin
Selected region size is 144.80 arcmin^2
Optical axis is detector pixel 119.36 134.44
201 energies from RMF file
Effective area fudge applied
Arf filter applied
Point source at 110.50 113.50 (detector coordinates)
Point source at 8.86 20.94 (WMAP bins wrt optical axis)
Point source at 5.58 67.07 (... in polar coordinates)
Total counts in region = 3.49050E+04
Weighted mean angle from optical axis = 5.367 arcmin
gnt_infrm: Creating response matrix for sis0...
Sisrmg Version 1.1, Configured 04/97
This version resolves *all* known keyword incompatibilities with
other FTOOLS tasks. If you have previously fudged *any* keywords
in the PHA file to compensate, incorrect results will follow.
Setting 1st PHA channel to 0
Making v1.1 1180x512 S0C1 Bright PI RMF
Calibration data files:
ecd = /software/lheasoft/release/refdata/sisdata/sis0c1p40_290296.fits
cti = /software/lheasoft/release/refdata/sisdata/sisph2pi_110397.fits
echo = /software/lheasoft/release/refdata/sisdata/sisechos_290296.fits
rdd = /software/lheasoft/release/refdata/sisdata/sisrddis_290296.fits
Please stand by...
...Done.
gnt_infrm: Creating response matrix for sis1...
Sisrmg Version 1.1, Configured 04/97
This version resolves *all* known keyword incompatibilities with
other FTOOLS tasks. If you have previously fudged *any* keywords
in the PHA file to compensate, incorrect results will follow.
Setting 1st PHA channel to 0
Making v1.1 1180x512 S1C3 Bright PI RMF
Calibration data files:
ecd = /software/lheasoft/release/refdata/sisdata/sis1c3p40_290296.fits
cti = /software/lheasoft/release/refdata/sisdata/sisph2pi_110397.fits
echo = /software/lheasoft/release/refdata/sisdata/sisechos_290296.fits
rdd = /software/lheasoft/release/refdata/sisdata/sisrddis_290296.fits
Please stand by...
...Done.
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_spec
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:50:20 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_expo
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:50:21 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Grouping channels and creating new 4-channel .pha files...
gnt_infrm: Creating 4-channel spectrum for sis0...
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - SIS0 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 10431. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 6.16990E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - 74004000_sis0_bgd.pha
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - 74004000_sis0.rmf
ANCRFILE - 74004000_sis0.arf
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 512 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 512 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
minchan(nocom) 21
maxchan(nocom) 67
numchan(nocom) 47
minchan(nocom) 68
maxchan(nocom) 171
numchan(nocom) 104
minchan(nocom) 172
maxchan(nocom) 240
numchan(nocom) 69
minchan(nocom) 241
maxchan(nocom) 343
numchan(nocom) 103
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_sis0_4_ch.pha
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
gnt_infrm: Creating efficiency map for sis0...
ASCAEFFMAP vers 2.27 5 May 1999.
xrtrsp : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_ea_v2_0.fits
193 grouped channels from the PHA file
Bin size is 0.0270 (mm) = 0.0265(arcmin)
Optical axis is 662.72 559.02
WMAP size is 45 x 42
WMAP offset is 264 296
WMAP bin factor is 8
512 ungrouped channels from the RMF file
pha bin = 22, E = 0.615 - 1.989 keV ( 1 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 36.33258 weight = 2.9813044E-04
pha bin = 23, E = 1.989 - 5.027 keV ( 2 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 79.21223 weight = 4.5109697E-05
pha bin = 24, E = 5.027 - 7.042 keV ( 3 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 66.49036 weight = 5.6651688E-06
pha bin = 25, E = 7.042 - 10.035 keV ( 4 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 35.62314 weight = 1.6292030E-06
wrote /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0.effmap
gnt_infrm: Creating 4-channel spectrum for sis1...
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - SIS1 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 10303. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 5.63770E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - 74004000_sis1_bgd.pha
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - 74004000_sis1.rmf
ANCRFILE - 74004000_sis1.arf
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 512 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 512 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
minchan(nocom) 21
maxchan(nocom) 67
numchan(nocom) 47
minchan(nocom) 68
maxchan(nocom) 171
numchan(nocom) 104
minchan(nocom) 172
maxchan(nocom) 240
numchan(nocom) 69
minchan(nocom) 241
maxchan(nocom) 343
numchan(nocom) 103
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_sis1_4_ch.pha
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
gnt_infrm: Creating efficiency map for sis1...
ASCAEFFMAP vers 2.27 5 May 1999.
xrtrsp : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_ea_v2_0.fits
193 grouped channels from the PHA file
Bin size is 0.0270 (mm) = 0.0265(arcmin)
Optical axis is 618.28 773.83
WMAP size is 45 x 38
WMAP offset is 264 328
WMAP bin factor is 8
512 ungrouped channels from the RMF file
pha bin = 22, E = 0.615 - 1.989 keV ( 1 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 32.40228 weight = 3.3628070E-04
pha bin = 23, E = 1.989 - 5.027 keV ( 2 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 68.85242 weight = 5.2121701E-05
pha bin = 24, E = 5.027 - 7.043 keV ( 3 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 53.94123 weight = 6.9770163E-06
pha bin = 25, E = 7.043 - 10.049 keV ( 4 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 26.67245 weight = 2.6649404E-06
wrote /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1.effmap
gnt_infrm: Creating 4-channel spectrum for gis2...
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - GIS2 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 11012. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 3.66360E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - 74004000_gis2_bgd.pha
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - 74004000_gis2.rmf
ANCRFILE - 74004000_gis2.arf
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 1024 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 1024 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
minchan(nocom) 61
maxchan(nocom) 170
numchan(nocom) 110
minchan(nocom) 171
maxchan(nocom) 425
numchan(nocom) 255
minchan(nocom) 426
maxchan(nocom) 594
numchan(nocom) 169
minchan(nocom) 595
maxchan(nocom) 848
numchan(nocom) 254
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_gis2_4_ch.pha
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
gnt_infrm: Creating efficiency map for gis2...
ASCAEFFMAP vers 2.27 5 May 1999.
bethick : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/gis/bcf/s2bev1.fits
grid : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/gis/bcf/s2gridv3.fits
xrtrsp : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_ea_v2_0.fits
240 grouped channels from the PHA file
Bin size is 0.2500 (mm) = 0.2456(arcmin)
Optical axis is 133.00 130.96
WMAP size is 54 x 54
WMAP offset is 78 88
WMAP bin factor is 1
1024 ungrouped channels from the RMF file
pha bin = 62, E = 0.719 - 2.016 keV ( 1 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 62.14574 weight = 9.1234753E-03
pha bin = 63, E = 2.016 - 5.022 keV ( 2 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 71.12430 weight = 4.6457751E-03
pha bin = 64, E = 5.022 - 7.014 keV ( 3 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 60.83490 weight = 7.7953795E-04
pha bin = 65, E = 7.014 - 10.008 keV ( 4 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 20.88796 weight = 6.4438058E-04
wrote /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.effmap
gnt_infrm: Creating 4-channel spectrum for gis3...
-------------------------
MANDATORY KEYWORDS/VALUES
-------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTNAME - SPECTRUM Name of this BINTABLE
TELESCOP - ASCA Mission/Satellite name
INSTRUME - GIS3 Instrument/Detector
FILTER - NONE Instrument filter in use
EXPOSURE - 11012. Integration time (in secs) of PHA data
AREASCAL - 1.0000 Area scaling factor
BACKSCAL - 3.66360E-02 Background scaling factor
BACKFILE - 74004000_gis3_bgd.pha
CORRSCAL - 1.0000 Correlation scaling factor
CORRFILE - none Associated correlation file
RESPFILE - 74004000_gis3.rmf
ANCRFILE - 74004000_gis3.arf
POISSERR - TRUE Whether Poissonian errors apply
CHANTYPE - PI Whether channels have been corrected
TLMIN1 - 0 First legal Detector channel
DETCHANS - 1024 No. of legal detector channels
NCHAN - 1024 No. of detector channels in dataset
PHAVERSN - 1.1.0 OGIP FITS version number
STAT_ERR - FALSE Statistical Error
SYS_ERR - TRUE Fractional Systematic Error
QUALITY - TRUE Quality Flag
GROUPING - FALSE Grouping Flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
minchan(nocom) 61
maxchan(nocom) 170
numchan(nocom) 110
minchan(nocom) 171
maxchan(nocom) 425
numchan(nocom) 255
minchan(nocom) 426
maxchan(nocom) 594
numchan(nocom) 169
minchan(nocom) 595
maxchan(nocom) 848
numchan(nocom) 254
...... exiting, changes written to file : 74004000_gis3_4_ch.pha
** grppha 2.9.0 completed successfully
gnt_infrm: Creating efficiency map for gis3...
ASCAEFFMAP vers 2.27 5 May 1999.
bethick : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/gis/bcf/s3bev1.fits
grid : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/gis/bcf/s3gridv3.fits
xrtrsp : /FTP/caldb/data/asca/xrt/bcf/xrt_ea_v2_0.fits
240 grouped channels from the PHA file
Bin size is 0.2500 (mm) = 0.2456(arcmin)
Optical axis is 119.36 134.44
WMAP size is 54 x 54
WMAP offset is 84 87
WMAP bin factor is 1
1024 ungrouped channels from the RMF file
pha bin = 62, E = 0.719 - 2.016 keV ( 1 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 72.52058 weight = 7.6872609E-03
pha bin = 63, E = 2.016 - 5.022 keV ( 2 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 83.31652 weight = 4.0431018E-03
pha bin = 64, E = 5.022 - 7.014 keV ( 3 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 74.69223 weight = 6.4937246E-04
pha bin = 65, E = 7.014 - 10.008 keV ( 4 / 4) calculating ...
<efficiency> = 28.07950 weight = 6.1319326E-04
wrote /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.effmap
gnt_infrm: Creating exposure map for sis0...
instfile=/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0.effmap
ASCAEXPO_V0.9b
reading data file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0.evt
reading gti ext: STDGTI
reading hp ext: HOT_PIXELS
querying CALDB...
reading cal file: /FTP/caldb/data/asca/sis/bcf/s0_teldef_070294.fits
reading inst file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0.effm
making an inst map...
SIS AREA DISC ENABL OFF
CHIP: 0 1 2 3
CCD POWER ON/OFF: OFF ON OFF OFF
AREA DISC IN/OUT: OUT OUT IN IN
AREA DISC H START: 6 6 6 316
AREA DISC H STOP: 425 425 200 425
AREA DISC V START: 2 2 2 2
AREA DISC V STOP: 422 422 150 112
multiply inst map...
reading att file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/fa960321_0548.1200
making a sky image...
writing sky image: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_sky_
making an exposure map...
Aspect RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5200 39.8403 286.5829
Mean RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5003 39.8202 286.5829
Pnt RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5594 39.8667 286.5829
Image rebin factor : 1
Attitude Records : 11461
Hot Pixels : 50
GTI intervals : 15
Total GTI (secs) : 10430.938
Max attitude excursion (arcsecs) : 15.000
0 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 0.00 0.00
10 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 1999.50 1999.50
20 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 10430.94 10430.94
100 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 10430.94 10430.94
Number of attitude steps used: 4
Number of attitude steps avail: 11033
Mean RA/DEC pixel offset: -53.0631 -70.2879
writing expo file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_raw.
closing attitude file...
closing data file...
gnt_infrm: Creating exposure map for sis1...
instfile=/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1.effmap
ASCAEXPO_V0.9b
reading data file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1.evt
reading gti ext: STDGTI
reading hp ext: HOT_PIXELS
querying CALDB...
reading cal file: /FTP/caldb/data/asca/sis/bcf/s1_teldef_070294.fits
reading inst file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1.effm
making an inst map...
SIS AREA DISC ENABL OFF
CHIP: 0 1 2 3
CCD POWER ON/OFF: OFF OFF OFF ON
AREA DISC IN/OUT: OUT OUT OUT OUT
AREA DISC H START: 6 6 6 6
AREA DISC H STOP: 425 425 425 425
AREA DISC V START: 2 2 2 2
AREA DISC V STOP: 422 422 422 422
multiply inst map...
reading att file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/fa960321_0548.1200
making a sky image...
writing sky image: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_sky_
making an exposure map...
Aspect RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5200 39.8403 286.5958
Mean RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5205 39.8237 286.5958
Pnt RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5392 39.8631 286.5958
Image rebin factor : 1
Attitude Records : 11461
Hot Pixels : 62
GTI intervals : 14
Total GTI (secs) : 10302.938
Max attitude excursion (arcsecs) : 15.000
0 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 0.00 0.00
10 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 1999.50 1999.50
20 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 10302.94 10302.94
100 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 10302.94 10302.94
Number of attitude steps used: 4
Number of attitude steps avail: 11033
Mean RA/DEC pixel offset: -56.3963 -16.3996
writing expo file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_raw.
closing attitude file...
closing data file...
gnt_infrm: Creating exposure map for gis2...
instfile=/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.effmap
ASCAEXPO_V0.9b
reading data file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.evt
reading gti ext: STDGTI
querying CALDB...
reading cal file: /FTP/caldb/data/asca/gis/bcf/gis2_ano_on_flf_180295.fits
reading inst file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.effm
making an inst map...
rebin gis: 1
multiply inst map...
reading att file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/fa960321_0548.1200
making a sky image...
writing sky image: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_sky_
making an exposure map...
Aspect RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5200 39.8403 286.5931
Mean RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5228 39.8122 286.5931
Pnt RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5367 39.8748 286.5931
Image rebin factor : 1
Attitude Records : 11461
GTI intervals : 7
Total GTI (secs) : 11012.013
Max attitude excursion (arcsecs) : 15.000
0 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 0.00 0.00
10 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 1844.01 1844.01
20 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 11012.01 11012.01
100 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 11012.01 11012.01
Number of attitude steps used: 3
Number of attitude steps avail: 10961
Mean RA/DEC pixel offset: -9.1907 -2.0708
writing expo file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_raw.
closing attitude file...
closing data file...
gnt_infrm: Creating exposure map for gis3...
instfile=/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.effmap
ASCAEXPO_V0.9b
reading data file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.evt
reading gti ext: STDGTI
querying CALDB...
reading cal file: /FTP/caldb/data/asca/gis/bcf/gis3_ano_on_flf_180295.fits
reading inst file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.effm
making an inst map...
rebin gis: 1
multiply inst map...
reading att file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/aux/fa960321_0548.1200
making a sky image...
writing sky image: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_sky_
making an exposure map...
Aspect RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5200 39.8403 286.5892
Mean RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5167 39.8366 286.5892
Pnt RA/DEC/ROLL : 253.5428 39.8504 286.5892
Image rebin factor : 1
Attitude Records : 11461
GTI intervals : 7
Total GTI (secs) : 11012.013
Max attitude excursion (arcsecs) : 15.000
0 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 0.00 0.00
10 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 1844.01 1844.01
20 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 11012.01 11012.01
100 Percent Complete: Total/live time: 11012.01 11012.01
Number of attitude steps used: 3
Number of attitude steps avail: 10961
Mean RA/DEC pixel offset: -1.1383 -1.2709
writing expo file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_raw.
closing attitude file...
closing data file...
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_expo
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:53:59 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_lcvs
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:54:00 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Making lightcurves with 3 binsizes and 3 energy bands...
gnt_infrm: Time ordering...
gnt_infrm: Source, full-band, 16s bin, SIS/GIS...
nbint = 1277
gnt_infrm: Command...
lcurve nser=1 cfile1=@/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/lcvs.tmp
window=/home/rosserv/nandra/tartarus/scripts3.2/win_full2.wi dtnb=16 nbint=1277 tunits=1 clobber=yes
outfile=/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_16s.flc rescale=2.0 plot=no
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_src.evt
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 54057 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS0
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 15 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Series 1 file 2:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_src.evt
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 44414 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS1
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 14 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
**** Warning : Infiles for series 1 overlap in time
Having > 1 intv or using time winds. might cause data loss !
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449900 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 4.0000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 5104
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1276
Default Newbins per Interval are: 512
(giving 3 Intervals of 512 Newbins each)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1277 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
**** Warning: All results and errors will be multiplied by 2.000000
1277 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:10:39
Ser.1 Avg 4.738 Chisq 582.2 Var 0.1349 Newbs. 639
Min 3.469 Max 5.875 expVar 0.1481 Bins 98472
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_16s
nbint = 1197
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_src.evt
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
No. of Rows ....... 28149 Bin Time (s) ...... 0.5000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA GIS2
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 4- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:37:11.420
No. of Rows ....... 7 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Series 1 file 2:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_src.evt
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
No. of Rows ....... 34340 Bin Time (s) ...... 0.5000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA GIS3
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 4- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:37:11.420
No. of Rows ....... 7 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
**** Warning : Infiles for series 1 overlap in time
Having > 1 intv or using time winds. might cause data loss !
Expected Start ... 10163.27582661775 (days) 6:37:11:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49730820270 (days) 11:56: 7:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 0.50000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 38273
Default Newbin Time is: 37.418868 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1197
Default Newbins per Interval are: 512
(giving 3 Intervals of 512 Newbins each)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1197 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
**** Warning: All results and errors will be multiplied by 2.000000
1197 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:37:19
Ser.1 Avg 2.837 Chisq 710.2 Var 0.9165E-01 Newbs. 687
Min 1.906 Max 3.688 expVar 0.8865E-01 Bins 62490
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_src_16s
gnt_infrm: Source, full-band, 256/5760s bin, SIS/GIS...
nbint = 80
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_16s.f
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE;
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `RATE ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 639 Bin Time (s) ...... 16.00
Right Ascension ... Internal time sys.. Literal
Declination ....... Experiment ........
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 3- Y-axis; 4- Y-error; 5- Fractional exposure;
File contains binned data.
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449853 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 16.000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 1276
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 256.00000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 80
Default Newbins per Interval are: 80
(giving 1 Interval of 80 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 80 Newbins of 256.000 (s)
80 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:12:39
Ser.1 Avg 9.483 Chisq 38.51 Var 0.5284E-01 Newbs. 27
Min 9.121 Max 10.03 expVar 0.3704E-01 Bins 639
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_256
nbint = 75
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_src_16s.f
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE;
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `RATE ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.420
No. of Rows ....... 687 Bin Time (s) ...... 16.00
Right Ascension ... Internal time sys.. Literal
Declination ....... Experiment ........
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 3- Y-axis; 4- Y-error; 5- Fractional exposure;
File contains binned data.
Expected Start ... 10163.27582661775 (days) 6:37:11:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49730809879 (days) 11:56: 7:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 16.000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 1196
Default Newbin Time is: 37.418850 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 256.00000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 75
Default Newbins per Interval are: 75
(giving 1 Interval of 75 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 75 Newbins of 256.000 (s)
75 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:39:19
Ser.1 Avg 5.686 Chisq 36.54 Var 0.2193E-01 Newbs. 37
Min 5.336 Max 6.070 expVar 0.2221E-01 Bins 687
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_src_256
nbint = 4
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_16s.f
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE;
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `RATE ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 639 Bin Time (s) ...... 16.00
Right Ascension ... Internal time sys.. Literal
Declination ....... Experiment ........
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 3- Y-axis; 4- Y-error; 5- Fractional exposure;
File contains binned data.
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449853 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 16.000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 1276
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 5760.0000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 4
Default Newbins per Interval are: 4
(giving 1 Interval of 4 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 4 Newbins of 5760.00 (s)
4 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:58:31
Ser.1 Avg 9.490 Chisq 8.201 Var 0.9482E-02 Newbs. 4
Min 9.406 Max 9.655 expVar 0.3837E-02 Bins 639
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_576
nbint = 4
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_src_16s.f
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE;
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `RATE ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.420
No. of Rows ....... 687 Bin Time (s) ...... 16.00
Right Ascension ... Internal time sys.. Literal
Declination ....... Experiment ........
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 3- Y-axis; 4- Y-error; 5- Fractional exposure;
File contains binned data.
Expected Start ... 10163.27582661775 (days) 6:37:11:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49730809879 (days) 11:56: 7:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 16.000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 1196
Default Newbin Time is: 37.418850 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 5760.0000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 4
Default Newbins per Interval are: 4
(giving 1 Interval of 4 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 4 Newbins of 5760.00 (s)
4 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 7:25:11
Ser.1 Avg 5.670 Chisq 6.354 Var 0.4149E-02 Newbs. 4
Min 5.587 Max 5.738 expVar 0.2205E-02 Bins 687
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_src_576
gnt_infrm: Source, soft-band, 16s/5760s bin, SIS...
nbint = 1277
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_src_soft
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 40567 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS0
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 15 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Series 1 file 2:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_src_soft
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 33266 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS1
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 14 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
**** Warning : Infiles for series 1 overlap in time
Having > 1 intv or using time winds. might cause data loss !
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449900 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 4.0000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 5104
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1276
Default Newbins per Interval are: 512
(giving 3 Intervals of 512 Newbins each)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1277 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
**** Warning: All results and errors will be multiplied by 2.000000
1277 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:10:39
Ser.1 Avg 3.552 Chisq 599.4 Var 0.1041 Newbs. 639
Min 2.594 Max 4.531 expVar 0.1110 Bins 73834
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_16s
nbint = 4
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_16s_s
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE;
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `RATE ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 639 Bin Time (s) ...... 16.00
Right Ascension ... Internal time sys.. Literal
Declination ....... Experiment ........
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 3- Y-axis; 4- Y-error; 5- Fractional exposure;
File contains binned data.
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449853 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 16.000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 1276
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 5760.0000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 4
Default Newbins per Interval are: 4
(giving 1 Interval of 4 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 4 Newbins of 5760.00 (s)
4 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:58:31
Ser.1 Avg 7.111 Chisq 4.341 Var 0.4058E-02 Newbs. 4
Min 7.052 Max 7.216 expVar 0.2873E-02 Bins 639
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_576
gnt_infrm: Source, hard-band, 16s/5760s bin, SIS/GIS...
nbint = 1277
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_src_hard
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 13531 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS0
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 15 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Series 1 file 2:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_src_hard
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 11186 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS1
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 14 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
**** Warning : Infiles for series 1 overlap in time
Having > 1 intv or using time winds. might cause data loss !
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449900 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 4.0000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 5104
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1276
Default Newbins per Interval are: 512
(giving 3 Intervals of 512 Newbins each)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1277 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
**** Warning: All results and errors will be multiplied by 2.000000
1277 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:10:39
Ser.1 Avg 1.190 Chisq 663.7 Var 0.3862E-01 Newbs. 639
Min 0.6562 Max 1.750 expVar 0.3718E-01 Bins 24718
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_16s
nbint = 4
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_16s_h
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE;
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `RATE ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 639 Bin Time (s) ...... 16.00
Right Ascension ... Internal time sys.. Literal
Declination ....... Experiment ........
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 3- Y-axis; 4- Y-error; 5- Fractional exposure;
File contains binned data.
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449853 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 16.000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 1276
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 5760.0000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 4
Default Newbins per Interval are: 4
(giving 1 Interval of 4 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 4 Newbins of 5760.00 (s)
4 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:58:31
Ser.1 Avg 2.387 Chisq 11.50 Var 0.2430E-02 Newbs. 4
Min 2.310 Max 2.446 expVar 0.9668E-03 Bins 639
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_576
nbint = 1197
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_src_hard
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
No. of Rows ....... 11331 Bin Time (s) ...... 0.5000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA GIS2
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 4- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:37:11.420
No. of Rows ....... 7 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Series 1 file 2:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_src_hard
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
No. of Rows ....... 14217 Bin Time (s) ...... 0.5000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA GIS3
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 4- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:37:11.420
No. of Rows ....... 7 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
**** Warning : Infiles for series 1 overlap in time
Having > 1 intv or using time winds. might cause data loss !
Expected Start ... 10163.27582661775 (days) 6:37:11:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49730820270 (days) 11:56: 7:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 0.50000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 38273
Default Newbin Time is: 37.418868 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1197
Default Newbins per Interval are: 512
(giving 3 Intervals of 512 Newbins each)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1197 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
**** Warning: All results and errors will be multiplied by 2.000000
1197 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:37:19
Ser.1 Avg 1.159 Chisq 741.6 Var 0.3912E-01 Newbs. 687
Min 0.5938 Max 1.781 expVar 0.3624E-01 Bins 25549
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_src_16s
nbint = 4
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_src_16s_h
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE;
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `RATE ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.420
No. of Rows ....... 687 Bin Time (s) ...... 16.00
Right Ascension ... Internal time sys.. Literal
Declination ....... Experiment ........
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 3- Y-axis; 4- Y-error; 5- Fractional exposure;
File contains binned data.
Expected Start ... 10163.27582661775 (days) 6:37:11:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49730809879 (days) 11:56: 7:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 16.000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 1196
Default Newbin Time is: 37.418850 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 5760.0000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 4
Default Newbins per Interval are: 4
(giving 1 Interval of 4 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 4 Newbins of 5760.00 (s)
4 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 7:25:11
Ser.1 Avg 2.321 Chisq 9.748 Var 0.1699E-02 Newbs. 4
Min 2.268 Max 2.366 expVar 0.9034E-03 Bins 687
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_src_576
gnt_infrm: Background, full-band, 16s/5760s bin, SIS/GIS...
nbint = 1277
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_bgd.evt
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 1544 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS0
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 15 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Series 1 file 2:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_bgd.evt
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 1004 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS1
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 14 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
**** Warning : Infiles for series 1 overlap in time
Having > 1 intv or using time winds. might cause data loss !
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449900 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 4.0000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 5104
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1276
Default Newbins per Interval are: 512
(giving 3 Intervals of 512 Newbins each)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1277 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
**** Warning: All results and errors will be multiplied by 2.000000
1277 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:10:39
Ser.1 Avg 0.1228 Chisq 602.1 Var 0.3619E-02 Newbs. 639
Min 0.000 Max 0.3750 expVar 0.3841E-02 Bins 2549
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_bgd_16s
nbint = 4
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_bgd_16s.f
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE;
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `RATE ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 639 Bin Time (s) ...... 16.00
Right Ascension ... Internal time sys.. Literal
Declination ....... Experiment ........
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 3- Y-axis; 4- Y-error; 5- Fractional exposure;
File contains binned data.
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449853 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 16.000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 1276
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 5760.0000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 4
Default Newbins per Interval are: 4
(giving 1 Interval of 4 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 4 Newbins of 5760.00 (s)
4 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:58:31
Ser.1 Avg 0.2460 Chisq 0.2996 Var 0.7310E-05 Newbs. 4
Min 0.2427 Max 0.2496 expVar 0.9957E-04 Bins 639
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_bgd_576
nbint = 1197
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_bgd.evt
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
No. of Rows ....... 2187 Bin Time (s) ...... 0.5000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA GIS2
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 4- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:37:11.420
No. of Rows ....... 7 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Series 1 file 2:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_bgd.evt
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
No. of Rows ....... 2033 Bin Time (s) ...... 0.5000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA GIS3
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 4- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:37:11.420
No. of Rows ....... 7 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
**** Warning : Infiles for series 1 overlap in time
Having > 1 intv or using time winds. might cause data loss !
Expected Start ... 10163.27582661775 (days) 6:37:11:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49730820270 (days) 11:56: 7:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 0.50000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 38273
Default Newbin Time is: 37.418868 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1197
Default Newbins per Interval are: 512
(giving 3 Intervals of 512 Newbins each)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1197 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
**** Warning: All results and errors will be multiplied by 2.000000
1197 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:37:19
Ser.1 Avg 0.1915 Chisq 696.0 Var 0.6064E-02 Newbs. 687
Min 0.000 Max 0.4375 expVar 0.5986E-02 Bins 4221
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_bgd_16s
nbint = 4
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_bgd_16s.f
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE;
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `RATE ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.420
No. of Rows ....... 687 Bin Time (s) ...... 16.00
Right Ascension ... Internal time sys.. Literal
Declination ....... Experiment ........
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 3- Y-axis; 4- Y-error; 5- Fractional exposure;
File contains binned data.
Expected Start ... 10163.27582661775 (days) 6:37:11:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49730809879 (days) 11:56: 7:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 16.000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 1196
Default Newbin Time is: 37.418850 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 5760.0000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 4
Default Newbins per Interval are: 4
(giving 1 Interval of 4 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 4 Newbins of 5760.00 (s)
4 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 7:25:11
Ser.1 Avg 0.3842 Chisq 2.655 Var 0.7067E-04 Newbs. 4
Min 0.3709 Max 0.3937 expVar 0.1500E-03 Bins 687
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_bgd_576
gnt_infrm: Background, soft-band, 16s bin, SIS...
nbint = 1277
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_bgd_soft
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 1097 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS0
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 15 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Series 1 file 2:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_bgd_soft
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 681 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS1
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 14 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
**** Warning : Infiles for series 1 overlap in time
Having > 1 intv or using time winds. might cause data loss !
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449900 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 4.0000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 5104
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1276
Default Newbins per Interval are: 512
(giving 3 Intervals of 512 Newbins each)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1277 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
**** Warning: All results and errors will be multiplied by 2.000000
1277 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:10:39
Ser.1 Avg 0.8578E-01 Chisq 617.0 Var 0.2591E-02 Newbs. 639
Min 0.000 Max 0.2812 expVar 0.2684E-02 Bins 1779
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_bgd_16s
gnt_infrm: Background, hard-band, 16s bin, SIS/GIS...
nbint = 1277
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_bgd_hard
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 448 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS0
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 15 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Series 1 file 2:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_bgd_hard
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 323 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS1
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 14 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
**** Warning : Infiles for series 1 overlap in time
Having > 1 intv or using time winds. might cause data loss !
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449900 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 4.0000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 5104
Default Newbin Time is: 39.921783 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1276
Default Newbins per Interval are: 512
(giving 3 Intervals of 512 Newbins each)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1277 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
**** Warning: All results and errors will be multiplied by 2.000000
1277 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:10:39
Ser.1 Avg 0.3702E-01 Chisq 707.4 Var 0.1284E-02 Newbs. 639
Min 0.000 Max 0.1562 expVar 0.1160E-02 Bins 772
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_bgd_16s
nbint = 1197
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_bgd_hard
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
No. of Rows ....... 1120 Bin Time (s) ...... 0.5000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA GIS2
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 4- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:37:11.420
No. of Rows ....... 7 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Series 1 file 2:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_bgd_hard
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
No. of Rows ....... 1123 Bin Time (s) ...... 0.5000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA GIS3
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 4- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:37:11.420
No. of Rows ....... 7 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
**** Warning : Infiles for series 1 overlap in time
Having > 1 intv or using time winds. might cause data loss !
Expected Start ... 10163.27582661775 (days) 6:37:11:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49730820270 (days) 11:56: 7:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 0.50000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 38273
Default Newbin Time is: 37.418868 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 512 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1197
Default Newbins per Interval are: 512
(giving 3 Intervals of 512 Newbins each)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1197 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
**** Warning: All results and errors will be multiplied by 2.000000
1197 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:37:19
Ser.1 Avg 0.1018 Chisq 702.3 Var 0.3254E-02 Newbs. 687
Min 0.000 Max 0.3125 expVar 0.3183E-02 Bins 2244
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_bgd_16s
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_lcvs
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:54:25 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_cols
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:54:25 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Determine countrates for sis0 and sis1 in 2 energy bands...
gnt_infrm: Determining scaling factor...
gnt_infrm: Calculating values...
gnt_infrm: Countrate for SIS full-band...
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_bgd.evt
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 1544 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS0
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 15 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449900 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 4.0000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 5104
Default Newbin Time is: 4.0000000 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 5104 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1276
Default Newbins per Interval are: 1276
(giving 1 Interval of 1276 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1276 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
1276 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:10:39
Ser.1 Avg 0.1474 Chisq 644.8 Var 0.9182E-02 Newbs. 647
Min 0.000 Max 0.5000 expVar 0.9213E-02 Bins 1544
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_bgd_16
gnt_infrm: Countrate for SIS soft-band...
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_bgd_soft
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 1097 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS0
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 15 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449900 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 4.0000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 5104
Default Newbin Time is: 4.0000000 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 5104 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1276
Default Newbins per Interval are: 1276
(giving 1 Interval of 1276 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1276 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
1276 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:10:39
Ser.1 Avg 0.1047 Chisq 627.8 Var 0.6350E-02 Newbs. 647
Min 0.000 Max 0.3750 expVar 0.6545E-02 Bins 1097
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_bgd_16
gnt_infrm: Countrate for SIS hard-band...
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_bgd_hard
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:10:31.429
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
No. of Rows ....... 448 Bin Time (s) ...... 4.000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA SIS0
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 7- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:10:31.429
No. of Rows ....... 15 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:50:47.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Expected Start ... 10163.25730820270 (days) 6:10:31:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49360449900 (days) 11:50:47:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 4.0000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 5104
Default Newbin Time is: 4.0000000 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 5104 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1276
Default Newbins per Interval are: 1276
(giving 1 Interval of 1276 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1276 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
1276 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:10:39
Ser.1 Avg 0.4279E-01 Chisq 686.0 Var 0.2836E-02 Newbs. 647
Min 0.000 Max 0.2500 expVar 0.2675E-02 Bins 448
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_bgd_16
gnt_infrm: Countrate for GIS full-band...
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_bgd.evt
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
No. of Rows ....... 2187 Bin Time (s) ...... 0.5000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA GIS2
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 4- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:37:11.420
No. of Rows ....... 7 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Expected Start ... 10163.27582661775 (days) 6:37:11:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49730820270 (days) 11:56: 7:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 0.50000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 38273
Default Newbin Time is: 1.9137157 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 10000 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1197
Default Newbins per Interval are: 1197
(giving 1 Interval of 1197 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1197 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
1197 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:37:19
Ser.1 Avg 0.1987 Chisq 708.7 Var 0.1281E-01 Newbs. 687
Min 0.000 Max 0.5625 expVar 0.1242E-01 Bins 2187
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_bgd_16
gnt_infrm: Countrate for GIS hard-band...
lcurve 1.0 (xronos5.16)
Series 1 file 1:/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_bgd_hard
Selected FITS extensions: 1 - RATE TABLE; 2 - GTIs
Source ............ MKN501_N1 Start Time (d) .... 10163 06:37:11.420
FITS Extension .... 1 - `EVENTS ` Stop Time (d) ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
No. of Rows ....... 1120 Bin Time (s) ...... 0.5000
Right Ascension ... 2.5352E+02 Internal time sys.. Converted to TJD
Declination ....... 3.9840E+01 Experiment ........ ASCA GIS2
Filter ............ NONE
Corrections applied: Vignetting - No ; Deadtime - No ; Bkgd - No ; Clock - No
Selected Columns: 1- Time; 4- E-Channel;
File contains arrival-time data.
FITS Extension .... 2 - `STDGTI ` First GTI Start ... 10163 06:37:11.420
No. of Rows ....... 7 Last GTI Stop ..... 10163 11:56:07.429
Selected Columns: 1 - GTI Start; 2 - GTI Stop
Expected Start ... 10163.27582661775 (days) 6:37:11:420 (h:m:s:ms)
Expected Stop .... 10163.49730820270 (days) 11:56: 7:429 (h:m:s:ms)
Minimum Newbin Time 0.50000000 (s)
for Maximum Newbin No.. 38273
Default Newbin Time is: 1.9137157 (s) (to have 1 Intv. of 10000 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Newbin Time ...... 16.000000 (s)
Maximum Newbin No. 1197
Default Newbins per Interval are: 1197
(giving 1 Interval of 1197 Newbins)
Type INDEF to accept the default value
Maximum of 1 Intvs. with 1197 Newbins of 16.0000 (s)
1197 analysis results per interval
1% completed
2% completed
3% completed
4% completed
5% completed
6% completed
7% completed
8% completed
9% completed
10% completed
11% completed
12% completed
13% completed
14% completed
15% completed
16% completed
17% completed
18% completed
19% completed
20% completed
21% completed
22% completed
23% completed
24% completed
25% completed
26% completed
27% completed
28% completed
29% completed
30% completed
31% completed
32% completed
33% completed
34% completed
35% completed
36% completed
37% completed
38% completed
39% completed
40% completed
41% completed
42% completed
43% completed
44% completed
45% completed
46% completed
47% completed
48% completed
49% completed
50% completed
51% completed
52% completed
53% completed
54% completed
55% completed
56% completed
57% completed
58% completed
59% completed
60% completed
61% completed
62% completed
63% completed
64% completed
65% completed
66% completed
67% completed
68% completed
69% completed
70% completed
71% completed
72% completed
73% completed
74% completed
75% completed
76% completed
77% completed
78% completed
79% completed
80% completed
81% completed
82% completed
83% completed
84% completed
85% completed
86% completed
87% completed
88% completed
89% completed
90% completed
91% completed
92% completed
93% completed
94% completed
95% completed
96% completed
97% completed
98% completed
99% completed
100% completed
Intv 1 Start 10163 6:37:19
Ser.1 Avg 0.1018 Chisq 642.4 Var 0.5949E-02 Newbs. 687
Min 0.000 Max 0.3750 expVar 0.6363E-02 Bins 1120
Writing output file: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_bgd_16
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_cols
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:54:30 EDT 2000
[1] 8343
gnt_infrm: Starting do_kill - checking for infinite xspec loop...
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_fits
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:54:31 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Performing spectral fitting to a powerlaw...
Xspec 11.0.1 07:54:38 27-Apr-2000
http://xspec.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Plot device not set, use "cpd" to set it
Type "help" or "?" for further information
XSPEC>@plfit.xcm
!XSPEC> set xs_return_result 1;
!XSPEC> open fit_result_pl.dat w
!XSPEC> set fileid [open fit_result_pl.dat w];
!XSPEC> log plfit.log;
!XSPEC> data 1:1 74004000_sis0_src_20;
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 1 5.017 +/- 2.4018E-02( 94.3% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_sis0.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_sis0.arf
using background file... 74004000_sis0_bgd.pha
1 data set is in use
!XSPEC> data 2:2 74004000_sis1_src_20;
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 2 4.263 +/- 2.1386E-02( 96.5% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_sis1.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_sis1.arf
using background file... 74004000_sis1_bgd.pha
2 data sets are in use
!XSPEC> data 3:3 74004000_gis2_src_20;
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 3 2.520 +/- 1.5535E-02( 96.7% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_gis2.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_gis2.arf
using background file... 74004000_gis2_bgd.pha
3 data sets are in use
!XSPEC> data 4:4 74004000_gis3_src_20;
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 4 3.092 +/- 1.7106E-02( 97.4% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_gis3.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_gis3.arf
using background file... 74004000_gis3_bgd.pha
4 data sets are in use
!XSPEC> ignore bad;
!XSPEC> ignore 1-4:0.1-0.6;
!XSPEC> ignore 1-4:10.0-20.0;
!XSPEC> ignore 1-4:5.0-7.5;
!XSPEC> setplot energy;
!XSPEC> query no;
Querying disabled - assuming answer is no
!XSPEC> model con*wabs*po ;1.0,-1, 0,0,1,1 ;0.0, 0.02,0,0,10000,10000 ;2.,0.2,-1,- ...
Model: constant[1]*wabs[2]( powerlaw[3] )
!Param# 1 : 1.0,-1, 0,0,1,1
!Param# 2 : 0.0, 0.02,0,0,10000,10000
!Param# 3 : 2.,0.2,-1,-1,3,3
!Param# 4 : .001,.0002,0,0,1e4,1e4
!Param# 5 : 0.99,0.01,0,0,2,2
!Param# 6 : =2
Equating parameter powerlaw:nH to parameter wabs:nH * 1
!Param# 7 : =3
Equating parameter constant:PhoIndex to parameter powerlaw:PhoIndex * 1
!Param# 8 : =4
Equating parameter wabs:norm to parameter constant:norm * 1
!Param# 9 : 0.99,0.01,0,0,2,2
!Param# 10 : =2
Equating parameter constant:nH to parameter wabs:nH * 1
!Param# 11 : =3
Equating parameter wabs:PhoIndex to parameter powerlaw:PhoIndex * 1
!Param# 12 : =4
Equating parameter powerlaw:norm to parameter constant:norm * 1
!Param# 13 : 0.99,0.01,0,0,2,2
!Param# 14 : =2
Equating parameter :nH to parameter wabs:nH * 1
!Param# 15 : =3
Equating parameter :PhoIndex to parameter powerlaw:PhoIndex * 1
!Param# 16 : =4
Equating parameter :norm to parameter constant:norm * 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model: constant[1]*wabs[2]( powerlaw[3] )
Model Fit Model Component Parameter Unit Value Data
par par comp group
1 1 1 constant factor 1.000 frozen 1
2 2 2 wabs nH 10^22 0.000 +/- 0.000 1
3 3 3 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.000 +/- 0.000 1
4 4 3 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 +/- 0.000 1
5 5 4 constant factor 0.9900 +/- 0.000 2
6 2 5 wabs nH 10^22 0.000 = par 2 2
7 3 6 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.000 = par 3 2
8 4 6 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 = par 4 2
9 6 7 constant factor 0.9900 +/- 0.000 3
10 2 8 wabs nH 10^22 0.000 = par 2 3
11 3 9 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.000 = par 3 3
12 4 9 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 = par 4 3
13 7 10 constant factor 0.9900 +/- 0.000 4
14 2 11 wabs nH 10^22 0.000 = par 2 4
15 3 12 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.000 = par 3 4
16 4 12 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 = par 4 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chi-Squared = 126081.8 using 1010 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 125.5795 for 1004 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 0.00
!XSPEC> fit 25;
Chi-Squared Lvl Fit param # 1 2 3 4
5 6 7
2160.17 -1 1.000 9.2678E-02 2.047 3.9216E-02
1.035 1.080 1.096
1276.24 -2 1.000 0.1018 2.196 4.4017E-02
1.062 1.112 1.132
1187.37 -3 1.000 0.1130 2.203 4.5605E-02
1.060 1.113 1.134
1182.93 -4 1.000 0.1122 2.195 4.5629E-02
1.060 1.113 1.133
1182.93 2 1.000 0.1122 2.195 4.5629E-02
1.060 1.113 1.133
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variances and Principal axes :
2 3 4 5 6 7
1.22E-08 | -0.05 -0.02 1.00 0.01 0.01 0.01
4.53E-06 | 0.94 -0.31 0.04 -0.08 0.05 0.07
2.85E-05 | -0.10 0.03 0.00 -0.86 0.18 0.46
2.04E-04 | 0.31 0.95 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01
1.06E-04 | 0.04 0.00 0.02 -0.47 -0.65 -0.60
3.60E-05 | -0.01 0.00 0.00 -0.19 0.74 -0.65
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model: constant[1]*wabs[2]( powerlaw[3] )
Model Fit Model Component Parameter Unit Value Data
par par comp group
1 1 1 constant factor 1.000 frozen 1
2 2 2 wabs nH 10^22 0.1122 +/- 0.4879E-02 1
3 3 3 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.195 +/- 0.1359E-01 1
4 4 3 powerlaw norm 4.5629E-02 +/- 0.5373E-03 1
5 5 4 constant factor 1.060 +/- 0.6754E-02 2
6 2 5 wabs nH 10^22 0.1122 = par 2 2
7 3 6 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.195 = par 3 2
8 4 6 powerlaw norm 4.5629E-02 = par 4 2
9 6 7 constant factor 1.113 +/- 0.8063E-02 3
10 2 8 wabs nH 10^22 0.1122 = par 2 3
11 3 9 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.195 = par 3 3
12 4 9 powerlaw norm 4.5629E-02 = par 4 3
13 7 10 constant factor 1.133 +/- 0.7729E-02 4
14 2 11 wabs nH 10^22 0.1122 = par 2 4
15 3 12 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.195 = par 3 4
16 4 12 powerlaw norm 4.5629E-02 = par 4 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chi-Squared = 1182.927 using 1010 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 1.178214 for 1004 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 7.461E-05
!XSPEC> tclout param 2;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set par2 [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> tclout param 3;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set par3 [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> tclout param 4;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set par4 [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> tclout dof;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set dof [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $par2 { } cpar2;
!XSPEC> split $cpar2
!XSPEC> set lpar2 [split $cpar2];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $par3 { } cpar3;
!XSPEC> split $cpar3
!XSPEC> set lpar3 [split $cpar3];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $par4 { } cpar4;
!XSPEC> split $cpar4
!XSPEC> set lpar4 [split $cpar4];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $dof { } cpar5;
!XSPEC> split $cpar5
!XSPEC> set lpar5 [split $cpar5];
!XSPEC> lindex $lpar2 0
!XSPEC> set nh [lindex $lpar2 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $lpar3 0
!XSPEC> set gamma [lindex $lpar3 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $lpar4 0
!XSPEC> set norm [lindex $lpar4 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $lpar5 0
!XSPEC> set dof [lindex $lpar5 0];
!XSPEC> show fit
Chi-Squared = 1182.927 using 1010 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 1.178214 for 1004 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 7.461E-05
!XSPEC> set chisq [show fit];
!XSPEC> error max 15 4.61 2
Parameter Confidence Range ( 4.610)
2 0.102692 0.121460
!XSPEC> set str [error max 15 4.61 2];
!XSPEC> lindex $str 0
!XSPEC> set nhlo [lindex $str 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $str 1
!XSPEC> set nhhi [lindex $str 1];
!XSPEC> expr ($nhhi - $nhlo)/2.0
!XSPEC> set nh_err [expr ($nhhi - $nhlo)/2.0];
!XSPEC> error max 15 4.61 3
Parameter Confidence Range ( 4.610)
3 2.17086 2.21987
!XSPEC> set str [error max 15 4.61 3];
!XSPEC> lindex $str 0
!XSPEC> set glo [lindex $str 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $str 1
!XSPEC> set ghi [lindex $str 1];
!XSPEC> expr ($ghi - $glo)/2.0
!XSPEC> set g_err [expr ($ghi - $glo)/2.0];
!XSPEC> puts $fileid "$nh $nh_err $gamma $g_err $norm $chisq $dof";
!XSPEC> close $fileid;
!XSPEC> notice 1-4:5.0-7.5;
A total of 239 more channels will be noticed
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 1 4.764 +/- 2.3209E-02( 94.4% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_sis0.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_sis0.arf
using background file... 74004000_sis0_bgd.pha
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 2 4.076 +/- 2.0766E-02( 96.6% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_sis1.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_sis1.arf
using background file... 74004000_sis1_bgd.pha
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 3 2.414 +/- 1.5154E-02( 96.8% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_gis2.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_gis2.arf
using background file... 74004000_gis2_bgd.pha
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 4 2.966 +/- 1.6708E-02( 97.5% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_gis3.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_gis3.arf
using background file... 74004000_gis3_bgd.pha
Chi-Squared = 1378.214 using 1249 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 1.108780 for 1243 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 4.237E-03
!XSPEC> ignore bad;
Chi-Squared = 1378.214 using 1249 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 1.108780 for 1243 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 4.237E-03
!XSPEC> save all 74004000_webfit;
!XSPEC> show files;
Information for file 1
belonging to plot group 1, data group 1
telescope = ASCA , instrument = SIS0 , channel type = PI
Current data file : 74004000_sis0_src_20.pha
with integration time 1.0431E+04
effective area 1.000
selected region area 6.1699E-02
Background file : 74004000_sis0_bgd.pha
with integration time 1.0431E+04
and effective area 1.000
selected region area 3.1152E-02
No current correction
Response (RMF) file : 74004000_sis0.rmf
Auxiliary (ARF) file : 74004000_sis0.arf
Weighting method is standard
Information for file 2
belonging to plot group 2, data group 2
telescope = ASCA , instrument = SIS1 , channel type = PI
Current data file : 74004000_sis1_src_20.pha
with integration time 1.0303E+04
effective area 1.000
selected region area 5.6377E-02
Background file : 74004000_sis1_bgd.pha
with integration time 1.0303E+04
and effective area 1.000
selected region area 3.7510E-02
No current correction
Response (RMF) file : 74004000_sis1.rmf
Auxiliary (ARF) file : 74004000_sis1.arf
Weighting method is standard
Information for file 3
belonging to plot group 3, data group 3
telescope = ASCA , instrument = GIS2 , channel type = PI
Current data file : 74004000_gis2_src_20.pha
with integration time 1.1012E+04
effective area 1.000
selected region area 3.6636E-02
Background file : 74004000_gis2_bgd.pha
with integration time 1.1012E+04
and effective area 1.000
selected region area 8.7402E-02
No current correction
Response (RMF) file : 74004000_gis2.rmf
Auxiliary (ARF) file : 74004000_gis2.arf
Weighting method is standard
Information for file 4
belonging to plot group 4, data group 4
telescope = ASCA , instrument = GIS3 , channel type = PI
Current data file : 74004000_gis3_src_20.pha
with integration time 1.1012E+04
effective area 1.000
selected region area 3.6636E-02
Background file : 74004000_gis3_bgd.pha
with integration time 1.1012E+04
and effective area 1.000
selected region area 8.7402E-02
No current correction
Response (RMF) file : 74004000_gis3.rmf
Auxiliary (ARF) file : 74004000_gis3.arf
Weighting method is standard
!XSPEC> setplot command ma 17 on 2;
!XSPEC> setplot command la t Energy spectrum;
!XSPEC> setplot command la y Counts;
!XSPEC> setplot command time off;
!XSPEC> setplot command cs 1.3;
!XSPEC> setplot command h web_pha.gif/gif;
!XSPEC> plot ldata ratio;
!XSPEC> ignore 1-4:5.0-7.5;
Chi-Squared = 1182.927 using 1010 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 1.178214 for 1004 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 7.461E-05
!XSPEC> query no;
Querying disabled - assuming answer is no
!XSPEC> model con*(wabs*po+wabs*po) ;1.0,-1, 0,0,1,1 ;0.03, 0.005,0,0,10,10 ;3.,0. ...
Model: constant[1]( wabs[2]( powerlaw[3] ) + wabs[4]( powerlaw[5] ) )
!Param# 1 : 1.0,-1, 0,0,1,1
!Param# 2 : 0.03, 0.005,0,0,10,10
!Param# 3 : 3.,0.05,1.5,1.5,5,5
!Param# 4 : .001,.0002,0,0,1e4,1e4
!Param# 5 : 1.0,0.01,0,0,1e5,1e5
!Param# 6 : 2.,0.05,-1,-1,3,3
!Param# 7 : .001,.0002,0,0,1e4,1e4
!Param# 8 : 0.99,0.01,0,0,2,2
!Param# 9 : =2
Equating parameter wabs:nH to parameter wabs:nH * 1
!Param# 10 : =3
Equating parameter powerlaw:PhoIndex to parameter powerlaw:PhoIndex * 1
!Param# 11 : =4
Equating parameter constant:norm to parameter wabs:norm * 1
!Param# 12 : =5
Equating parameter wabs:nH to parameter powerlaw:nH * 1
!Param# 13 : =6
Equating parameter powerlaw:PhoIndex to parameter constant:PhoIndex * 1
!Param# 14 : =7
Equating parameter wabs:norm to parameter wabs:norm * 1
!Param# 15 : 0.99,0.01,0,0,2,2
!Param# 16 : =2
Equating parameter constant:nH to parameter wabs:nH * 1
!Param# 17 : =3
Equating parameter wabs:PhoIndex to parameter powerlaw:PhoIndex * 1
!Param# 18 : =4
Equating parameter powerlaw:norm to parameter wabs:norm * 1
!Param# 19 : =5
Equating parameter wabs:nH to parameter powerlaw:nH * 1
!Param# 20 : =6
Equating parameter powerlaw:PhoIndex to parameter constant:PhoIndex * 1
!Param# 21 : =7
Equating parameter :norm to parameter wabs:norm * 1
!Param# 22 : 0.99,0.01,0,0,2,2
!Param# 23 : =2
Equating parameter :nH to parameter wabs:nH * 1
!Param# 24 : =3
Equating parameter :PhoIndex to parameter powerlaw:PhoIndex * 1
!Param# 25 : =4
Equating parameter :norm to parameter wabs:norm * 1
!Param# 26 : =5
Equating parameter :nH to parameter powerlaw:nH * 1
!Param# 27 : =6.
Equating parameter :PhoIndex to parameter constant:PhoIndex * 1
!Param# 28 : =7
Equating parameter :norm to parameter wabs:norm * 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model: constant[1]( wabs[2]( powerlaw[3] ) + wabs[4]( powerlaw[5] ) )
Model Fit Model Component Parameter Unit Value Data
par par comp group
1 1 1 constant factor 1.000 frozen 1
2 2 2 wabs nH 10^22 3.0000E-02 +/- 0.000 1
3 3 3 powerlaw PhoIndex 3.000 +/- 0.000 1
4 4 3 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 +/- 0.000 1
5 5 4 wabs nH 10^22 1.000 +/- 0.000 1
6 6 5 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.000 +/- 0.000 1
7 7 5 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 +/- 0.000 1
8 8 6 constant factor 0.9900 +/- 0.000 2
9 2 7 wabs nH 10^22 3.0000E-02 = par 2 2
10 3 8 powerlaw PhoIndex 3.000 = par 3 2
11 4 8 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 = par 4 2
12 5 9 wabs nH 10^22 1.000 = par 5 2
13 6 10 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.000 = par 6 2
14 7 10 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 = par 7 2
15 9 11 constant factor 0.9900 +/- 0.000 3
16 2 12 wabs nH 10^22 3.0000E-02 = par 2 3
17 3 13 powerlaw PhoIndex 3.000 = par 3 3
18 4 13 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 = par 4 3
19 5 14 wabs nH 10^22 1.000 = par 5 3
20 6 15 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.000 = par 6 3
21 7 15 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 = par 7 3
22 10 16 constant factor 0.9900 +/- 0.000 4
23 2 17 wabs nH 10^22 3.0000E-02 = par 2 4
24 3 18 powerlaw PhoIndex 3.000 = par 3 4
25 4 18 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 = par 4 4
26 5 19 wabs nH 10^22 1.000 = par 5 4
27 6 20 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.000 = par 6 4
28 7 20 powerlaw norm 1.0000E-03 = par 7 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chi-Squared = 125376.1 using 1010 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 125.2509 for 1001 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 0.00
!XSPEC> chatter 0;
!XSPEC> fit 100;
!XSPEC> chatter 10;
!XSPEC> fit 100;
Chi-Squared Lvl Fit param # 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9
10
1180.87 -2 1.000 0.1285 2.308 4.7539E-02
2.498 2.051 4.8434E-03 1.058 1.115
1.136
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variances and Principal axes :
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1.53E-08 | -0.05 -0.02 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.01 0.01 0.01
1.25E-07 | 0.12 -0.04 -0.35 0.00 -0.01 0.93 -0.01 0.00 0.00
1.00E-05 | -0.97 0.15 -0.09 0.00 -0.01 0.10 0.09 -0.06 -0.07
3.46E-05 | 0.12 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 -0.19 -0.43
4.51E-05 | -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.17 0.73 -0.66
1.29E-04 | 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.45 -0.65 -0.61
1.14E-02 | -0.15 -0.96 -0.02 -0.01 -0.24 -0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.32E-02 | 0.04 0.22 0.01 0.34 -0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.13E+01 | 0.01 0.09 0.00 -0.94 -0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model: constant[1]( wabs[2]( powerlaw[3] ) + wabs[4]( powerlaw[5] ) )
Model Fit Model Component Parameter Unit Value Data
par par comp group
1 1 1 constant factor 1.000 frozen 1
2 2 2 wabs nH 10^22 0.1285 +/- 0.4439E-01 1
3 3 3 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.308 +/- 0.3170 1
4 4 3 powerlaw norm 4.7539E-02 +/- 0.4989E-02 1
5 5 4 wabs nH 10^22 2.498 +/- 3.168 1
6 6 5 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.051 +/- 1.114 1
7 7 5 powerlaw norm 4.8434E-03 +/- 0.5045E-02 1
8 8 6 constant factor 1.058 +/- 0.7358E-02 2
9 2 7 wabs nH 10^22 0.1285 = par 2 2
10 3 8 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.308 = par 3 2
11 4 8 powerlaw norm 4.7539E-02 = par 4 2
12 5 9 wabs nH 10^22 2.498 = par 5 2
13 6 10 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.051 = par 6 2
14 7 10 powerlaw norm 4.8434E-03 = par 7 2
15 9 11 constant factor 1.115 +/- 0.8968E-02 3
16 2 12 wabs nH 10^22 0.1285 = par 2 3
17 3 13 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.308 = par 3 3
18 4 13 powerlaw norm 4.7539E-02 = par 4 3
19 5 14 wabs nH 10^22 2.498 = par 5 3
20 6 15 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.051 = par 6 3
21 7 15 powerlaw norm 4.8434E-03 = par 7 3
22 10 16 constant factor 1.136 +/- 0.8601E-02 4
23 2 17 wabs nH 10^22 0.1285 = par 2 4
24 3 18 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.308 = par 3 4
25 4 18 powerlaw norm 4.7539E-02 = par 4 4
26 5 19 wabs nH 10^22 2.498 = par 5 4
27 6 20 powerlaw PhoIndex 2.051 = par 6 4
28 7 20 powerlaw norm 4.8434E-03 = par 7 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chi-Squared = 1180.874 using 1010 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 1.179694 for 1001 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 6.770E-05
!XSPEC> notice 1-4:5.0-7.5;
A total of 239 more channels will be noticed
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 1 4.764 +/- 2.3209E-02( 94.4% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_sis0.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_sis0.arf
using background file... 74004000_sis0_bgd.pha
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 2 4.076 +/- 2.0766E-02( 96.6% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_sis1.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_sis1.arf
using background file... 74004000_sis1_bgd.pha
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 3 2.414 +/- 1.5154E-02( 96.8% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_gis2.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_gis2.arf
using background file... 74004000_gis2_bgd.pha
Net count rate (cts/s) for file 4 2.966 +/- 1.6708E-02( 97.5% total)
using response (RMF) file... 74004000_gis3.rmf
using auxiliary (ARF) file... 74004000_gis3.arf
using background file... 74004000_gis3_bgd.pha
Chi-Squared = 1381.972 using 1249 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 1.114493 for 1240 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 2.871E-03
!XSPEC> ignore bad;
Chi-Squared = 1381.972 using 1249 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 1.114493 for 1240 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 2.871E-03
!XSPEC> save all 74004000_2plfit;
!XSPEC> open fit_result_flux.dat w
!XSPEC> set fileid [open fit_result_flux.dat w];
!XSPEC> flux 0.5 2.0
Model flux 4.4899E-02 photons ( 7.1870E-11 ergs)cm**-2 s**-1 ( 0.500- 2.000) DtSet : 1
Model flux 4.7518E-02 photons ( 7.6063E-11 ergs)cm**-2 s**-1 ( 0.500- 2.000) DtSet : 2
Model flux 5.0046E-02 photons ( 8.0119E-11 ergs)cm**-2 s**-1 ( 0.500- 2.000) DtSet : 3
Model flux 5.0976E-02 photons ( 8.1609E-11 ergs)cm**-2 s**-1 ( 0.500- 2.000) DtSet : 4
!XSPEC> set flux1 [flux 0.5 2.0];
!XSPEC> flux 2.0 10.0
Model flux 1.3933E-02 photons ( 8.6218E-11 ergs)cm**-2 s**-1 ( 2.000- 10.000) DtSet : 1
Model flux 1.4746E-02 photons ( 9.1248E-11 ergs)cm**-2 s**-1 ( 2.000- 10.000) DtSet : 2
Model flux 1.5535E-02 photons ( 9.6126E-11 ergs)cm**-2 s**-1 ( 2.000- 10.000) DtSet : 3
Model flux 1.5823E-02 photons ( 9.7913E-11 ergs)cm**-2 s**-1 ( 2.000- 10.000) DtSet : 4
!XSPEC> set flux2 [flux 2.0 10.0];
!XSPEC> lindex $flux1 1
!XSPEC> set s0_flux1 [lindex $flux1 1];
!XSPEC> lindex $flux2 1
!XSPEC> set s0_flux2 [lindex $flux2 1];
!XSPEC> puts $fileid "$s0_flux1 $s0_flux2";
!XSPEC> close $fileid;
!XSPEC> tclout param 2;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set par2 [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> tclout param 3;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set par3 [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> tclout param 4;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set par4 [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> tclout param 5;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set par5 [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> tclout param 6;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set par6 [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> tclout param 7;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set par7 [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> tclout dof;
!XSPEC> string trim $xspec_tclout
!XSPEC> set par8 [string trim $xspec_tclout];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $par2 { } cpar2;
!XSPEC> split $cpar2
!XSPEC> set lpar2 [split $cpar2];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $par3 { } cpar3;
!XSPEC> split $cpar3
!XSPEC> set lpar3 [split $cpar3];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $par4 { } cpar4;
!XSPEC> split $cpar4
!XSPEC> set lpar4 [split $cpar4];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $par5 { } cpar5;
!XSPEC> split $cpar5
!XSPEC> set lpar5 [split $cpar5];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $par6 { } cpar6;
!XSPEC> split $cpar6
!XSPEC> set lpar6 [split $cpar6];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $par7 { } cpar7;
!XSPEC> split $cpar7
!XSPEC> set lpar7 [split $cpar7];
!XSPEC> regsub -all { +} $par8 { } cpar8;
!XSPEC> split $cpar8
!XSPEC> set lpar8 [split $cpar8];
!XSPEC> lindex $lpar2 0
!XSPEC> set nhs [lindex $lpar2 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $lpar3 0
!XSPEC> set gs [lindex $lpar3 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $lpar4 0
!XSPEC> set norms [lindex $lpar4 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $lpar5 0
!XSPEC> set nhh [lindex $lpar5 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $lpar6 0
!XSPEC> set gh [lindex $lpar6 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $lpar7 0
!XSPEC> set normh [lindex $lpar7 0];
!XSPEC> show fit
Chi-Squared = 1381.972 using 1249 PHA bins.
Reduced chi-squared = 1.114493 for 1240 degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis probability = 2.871E-03
!XSPEC> set chisq [show fit];
!XSPEC> error max 15 4.61 2
Parameter Confidence Range ( 4.610)
Chi-Squared when model parameter 2= 3.3176E-02
is 1377.3728, which is < previous minimum 1381.9719
(critical delta = 0.0100)
!XSPEC> set str [error max 15 4.61 2];
!XSPEC> lindex $str 0
!XSPEC> set nhs_lo [lindex $str 0];
!XSPEC> lindex $str 1
!XSPEC> set nhs_hi [lindex $str 1];
!XSPEC> expr ($nhs_hi - $nhs_lo)/2.0
XSPEC>exit
XSPEC: quit
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_fits
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:56:11 EDT 2000
[1] + Done /home/rosserv/nandra/tartarus/scripts3.2/do_kill ...
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_mosa
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:56:11 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Creating the exposure corrected sky image and sky images...
[1] 9515
Executing: /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/SAOtng -title SAO042700072574004000 -xrm *cmapDir1:/usr/local/saord/Colormaps/ -xrm *port:-1 -xrm *geometry:+5+5 -xrm *errorlog:SAO042700072574004000_error.log
Welcome to SAOtng 1.9.1
Setting current scaling limits: data
Setting current scale: linear
Resetting zoom factor: 2 centered at: 256.5,256.5
Setting current scale: log
gnt_infrm: Making sis0 detector image...
Received new filename '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_det.img'
No WCS information available for image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_det.img'
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_det.img' complete!
Setting current scaling limits: data
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_det.img' complete!
Setting current scaling limits: user 1 347
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0_det.img' complete!
Executing GIF creation command '(/usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaget 'SAO042700072574004000' colormap display > /tmp/saotng.lut; /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaget 'SAO042700072574004000' display_data | /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/fits2gif -luts /tmp/saotng.lut > /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis0.gif; echo "GIF file created!" | /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaset SAO042700072574004000 message) &'
Destroying image '74004000_sis0_det.img-9524'
gnt_infrm: Making sis1 detector image...
Received new filename '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_det.img'
No WCS information available for image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_det.img'
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_det.img' complete!
Setting current scaling limits: data
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_det.img' complete!
Setting current scaling limits: user 1 251
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1_det.img' complete!
Executing GIF creation command '(/usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaget 'SAO042700072574004000' colormap display > /tmp/saotng.lut; /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaget 'SAO042700072574004000' display_data | /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/fits2gif -luts /tmp/saotng.lut > /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis1.gif; echo "GIF file created!" | /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaset SAO042700072574004000 message) &'
Destroying image '74004000_sis1_det.img-9524'
gnt_infrm: Making gis2 detector image...
Received new filename '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_det.img'
No WCS information available for image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_det.img'
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_det.img' complete!
Setting current scaling limits: data
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_det.img' complete!
Setting current scaling limits: user 1 258
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2_det.img' complete!
Executing GIF creation command '(/usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaget 'SAO042700072574004000' colormap display > /tmp/saotng.lut; /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaget 'SAO042700072574004000' display_data | /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/fits2gif -luts /tmp/saotng.lut > /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis2.gif; echo "GIF file created!" | /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaset SAO042700072574004000 message) &'
Destroying image '74004000_gis2_det.img-9524'
gnt_infrm: Making gis3 detector image...
Received new filename '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_det.img'
No WCS information available for image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_det.img'
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_det.img' complete!
Setting current scaling limits: data
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_det.img' complete!
Setting current scaling limits: user 1 371
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3_det.img' complete!
Executing GIF creation command '(/usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaget 'SAO042700072574004000' colormap display > /tmp/saotng.lut; /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaget 'SAO042700072574004000' display_data | /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/fits2gif -luts /tmp/saotng.lut > /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis3.gif; echo "GIF file created!" | /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaset SAO042700072574004000 message) &'
Destroying image '74004000_gis3_det.img-9524'
gnt_infrm: Adding images for the SIS...
gnt_infrm:adding and smoothing
gnt_infrm: Adding images for the GIS...
****** successfully exited ******
****** successfully exited ******
gnt_infrm: Making web page image with target marker...
Setting current colormap: Heat
Received new filename '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_sky_sm.img'
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_sky_sm.img' complete!
circle(253.4675d,39.7602d,10.0)
Setting current scaling limits: data
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_sky_sm.img' complete!
Setting current scaling limits: user 1 402.344
Display of image '/tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_sky_sm.img' complete!
Executing GIF creation command '(/usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaget 'SAO042700072574004000' colormap display > /tmp/saotng.lut; /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaget 'SAO042700072574004000' display_data | /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/fits2gif -luts /tmp/saotng.lut > /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_sky_sm.gif; echo "GIF file created!" | /usr/local/saord/bin.linux/xpaset SAO042700072574004000 message) &'
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_mosa
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:58:05 EDT 2000
All done!
XPA$ERROR no 'xpaset' access points match template: 04_27_00.07:25
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_html
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:58:06 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Creating the web page for sequence 74004000...
gnt_infrm: Setting all variables...
spectrum
spectrum: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/web_pha.gif
lightcurve
lightcurve: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_sis_src_5760s.flc
sky image
sky image: /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/74004000_gis_sky_sm.gif
countrate
countrate: 9.0359 0.4395 6.7960 2.2473 5.5127 2.2336
general info (.evt)
centroid
datamode
ccdmode
bitfix
spectral fit
gnt_warng(html): File fit_result_2pl.dat does not exist
warning
fatal
sds
name
object
version
gnt_infrm: Making veron.96 table...
gnt_infrm: Making images for the web page...
pha
flc
gnt_infrm: Creating the web page...
gnt_infrm: Creating the download web page...
gnt_infrm: Writing an entry into browse.table...
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_html
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 07:58:24 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_tran
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 07:58:24 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Copying the files to the database (universe)...
gnt_infrm: Transferring web page files to html area...
(remove /www/tartarus/restricted/html/74004000)
(create /www/tartarus/restricted/html/74004000)
(set permissions)
74004000.html
74004000_gis_sky_sm.gif
74004000_flc.gif
74004000_pha.gif
74004000_sis0.gif
74004000_sis1.gif
74004000_gis2.gif
74004000_gis3.gif
veron96.txt
gnt_infrm: Tarring selected files...
74004000.tar ...
74004000_spectral.tar ...
gnt_infrm: Gzipping the tar files...
gnt_infrm: Transferring tar files to ftp area...
(remove /www/tartarus/restricted/ftp/74004000/*.tar)
gnt_infrm: Removing tar files, attitude file(s), raw exposure maps and raw sky images...
gnt_infrm: Gzipping all files in /tproc/nandra/processing/74004000/work/...
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_tran
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 08:00:29 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: ========================
gnt_infrm: End of procedure do_proc
gnt_infrm: ========================
Thu Apr 27 08:00:29 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: *************************
gnt_infrm: Running procedure do_rslt
gnt_infrm: *************************
Thu Apr 27 08:00:33 EDT 2000
gnt_infrm: Quality control procedure...
gnt_infrm: Finding warng/error/fatal messages...
down up up
gnt_infrm: Updating the web pages...
gnt_infrm: Updating sequence index...
gnt_infrm: Transferring web page and sum,log files...
rm: No match.
rm: No match.
| en |
converted_docs | 905027 | **Using a Visible and Near IR Spectral Variance Index in Rio Tinto,
Spain to Combine Datasets of Different Spatial Resolution**
Leah Hutchison
*Department of Geological Sciences*
*Brown University*
*Box 1846, Providence, RI 02906*
*USA*
<Leah_Hutchison@brown.edu>
David Fernández-Remolar
*Centro de Astrobiología*
*INTA-CSIC*
*SPAIN*
John F. Mustard
*Department of Geological Sciences*
*Brown University*
*USA*
Ricardo Amils
*Centro de Biología, UAM*
*and Centro de Astrobiología, INTA*
*SPAIN*
Aline Gendrin
*Department of Geological Sciences*
*Brown University*
*USA*
Linda A. Amaral-Zettler
*The Bay Paul Center*
*Marine Biological Laboratory*
*USA*
We are using spectroscopic studies of Rio Tinto, a Martian mineralogic
analog to develop criteria for identifying potential similar
environments on Mars. Others have shown Rio Tinto supports an amazing
prokaryotic and eukaryotic diversity and is an analog for possible
chemolithotropic ecosystems on Mars. We are interested in mineralogic
deposits, their spectroscopic expression, and how distinguishing
spectral signatures are affected by scaling from centimeter to decimeter
scale. We measured centimeter and meter-scale field spectra, collected
samples for lab spectroscopy, and acquired Hymap hyperspectral data of
Rio Tinto. Although mineralogy detection becomes less specific with
spatial scaling, we can still extract meaningful mineralogic information
from spatially coarse spectra by using spectral complexity as a proxy
for mineral diversity.
We apply the Spectral Variance Index (SVI) (Alonso-Martinez et al.
2005), to discover regions with greater-than average spectral
complexity. We apply the technique to Hymap data and assess the results
in context with field spectra; one of the most mineralogically diverse
areas we visited in the field, Anabel's Garden, also had very high
spectral variance. We identify geologic or land cover boundaries and
mineralogically diverse areas as having high spectral complexity.
Spectral variance is highest in mine tailings near the river's source
and drops off in the riverbanks further downstream. Areas identified
through SVI would be ideal targets for future field spectroscopy. Using
the SVI allows us to integrate spectra of different spatial resolutions,
taking advantage of the large-scale mapping ability of remotely sensed
spectra and the mineral identification ability of field spectra.
| en |
converted_docs | 510432 | **[April 4, 2002 Mid-Atlantic States PCEF Meeting Minutes]{.underline}**
## Approval of Minutes from October 31, 2002 Meeting in Manassas, VA
Minutes from October 31, 2001 meeting approved.
## A) Subcommittee Status Reports by Chairmen
**1. Production/Construction (P/C)**
> **Group was advised that a Chairman for the Production/Construction
> Subcommittee was needed.**
Former Chairman developed a ballot on acceptable cracking in prestressed
concrete members. PCI is developing a Manual for repair of prestressed
concrete members. Five sections have been developed that include
identifying defects and how to repair a defect. The Manual should be
available within a year. Ed Wasserman of the Tennessee DOT is chairing
the effort to produce the Manual. PCI should make the Manual available
for review before its publication. Acceptable cracking in prestressed
concrete members should be included therein. The New England PCI group
is also working toward the same goal.
The PCEF subcommittee was also addressing other issues that included:
allowable strand sizes, use of draped or debonded strands, practices on
development lengths, concrete properties, ultimate and de-tensioning
values, minimum release hours, and maximum w/c ratio. Also, corrosion
protection efforts (additives, reinforcement, clearances), inspection
level of State inspectors, use of Consultants to conduct plant & on-site
inspections, inspection reciprocity by States, inspection
certifications, handling, storing and erecting members. Other possible
issues included use of self consolidated concrete, beam sweep, use of
SIP forms, tolerances and inspection guidelines.
To date, no results of the Subcommittee's work are available. After the
entire PCEF group evaluated the Subcommittee's efforts toward
prioritizing issues, it was decided to eliminate the strand size
criteria study and that tolerances were part of the QA/QC subcommittee's
work. Inspection criteria study will remain as part of the P/C
subcommittee's work, along with handling, storage and erection issues.
Since transportation issues are controlled by States' permitting
regulations, it was decided to also delete those aspects from being part
of the Subcommittee's work.
## 2. Materials & QC/QA
Draft 4 of the Specification Guidelines for Precast/Prestressed Concrete
Bridge Products had been distributed and discussed during the Manassas,
VA meeting. Sections 4.4 to 4.7 have been added into the Draft version,
including PCI requirements where appropriate. Committee members were
asked to review the Draft 5 distributed on this date, and to submit any
comments to the co-chairmen before the next Subcommittee meeting, which
will be held at the end of May. QA/QC issues will be addressed as a
separate effort.
Sections 4.4 to 4.7 include criteria on forming, finishing, stripping,
handling and storage. A discussion as to use of corrosion inhibitors in
grout mixes developed. This is especially true when dealing with post
tensioning and filling ducts with grout. There should be awareness when
dealing with grout mix specifications. It was suggested that grout mix
criteria should be a part of the guidelines.
An updated ballot taking into account the new sections 4.4 to 4.7, and
any pertinent discussions at the subcommittee's May meeting, will be
distributed to appropriate State DOT personnel for formal voting later
this summer.
B) **Status Report by Each State DOT on Implementation of High
Performance Concrete (HPC) and PCEF Bulb-T**
MDSHA -- no action yet on use of PCEF Bulb T; however, will continue to
investigate appropriate project with the State Bridge Engineer..
Studying a completed construction project, an HPC deck slab and use of a
7000 HPC psi mix for fabrication of AASHTO Type 4 girders.
DELDOT -- no action on use of PCEF Bulb T; have one deck project under
design that will utilize HPC.
NYSDOT -- use the New England Bulb T shape; will allow use of the PCEF
Bulb T as an alternate or re-design by the Contractor. 5 bridges built
last year with HPC -- 8 bridge projects underway -- have ongoing effort
to pre-approve HPC mix designs.
VDOT - have several projects in design using PCEF Bulb T. Some aspects
of HPC have been used. Bayshore Concrete Products still needs forms, and
is pushing for narrower width bottom flange.
PennDOT -- allowing Producers to use PCEF Bulb T, but no response yet
from Industry. HPC -- have used up to an 8000 psi prestressed concrete
HPC mix design. 2 HPC decks built that resulted in extensive cracking.
WVDOT -- no action on use of PCEF Bulb T. HPC being studied -- have
formed task group to study the use of HPC and PCEF bulb-T.
NJ DOT -- have included, in its Design Manual, guidance on the
availability of the PCEF Bulb T shape. 6 to 8 projects underway on use
of HPC for deck slabs. HPC will be primary deck slab type. Question was
raised on the Abrasion testing specification that is stated in the FHWA
HPC guidelines. ASTM C944, specified in FHWA guidelines, is not a test
method performed by most labs. Suggested that ASTM C779 should be
adopted as labs can more readily perform the ASTM C779 test. NJIT is
researching deck cracking for the DOT.
FLDOT -- looking at major projects to make form acquisition worthwhile.
NCDOT -- looking at deck cracking. Now use 54" and 72" PCI bulb-Ts. Have
built 2 HPC decks with AASHTO Type V girders.
The issue of deck cracking is still receiving much attention. In
addition to references from the States at this meeting, a national
pooled fund study is being solicited, with the KSDOT taking the lead.
Purpose of the effort will be to implement the most cost-effective
techniques for improving bridge deck life through reducing cracking.
Contact Dick McReynolds at KSDOT (785-291-3841, or <dick@ksdot.org>). A
1996 NCHRP Study #380, "Transverse Cracking in Newly Constructed Bridge
Decks" produced many findings on causes. This current study will
followup.
C) **Self-Consolidated Concrete (SCC) -- Presentation by Dr. Celik
Ozyildirim, VDOT**
Mr. Rod Meyers of Masterbuilders gave a general presentation on SCC, as
Dr. Ozyildirim was unable to attend. (Hard copy attached)
Also, a specific example of Virginia DOT's use of SCC was presented by
Mr. Paul Ramsburg of Oldcastle Precast. Findings and results were as
follows:
- No deviations in slump test results were noted between using the
slump cone upright and using it in the inverted position
- W/c \< 0.40 should be easily attained
- Do a cost comparison before using modified fine aggregate instead of
a viscosity modifying agent
- Good permeability results with SCC
- No difference in freeze-thaw durability characteristics
- Cores showed no segregation of the SCC mix
Producer benefits included: reduced cleanup efforts; faster placements;
vibrator noise eliminated; and 8 man-hours per day were eliminated.
Producer concerns included: need for training; need to maintain member
tolerances; moisture contents of concrete and aggregates need to be
monitored closely; and need to apply form release agent properly (excess
form oil creates bug holes).
Costs: Leaner mix was only \$1.45/cy more than conventional concrete
mix, and \$1.78/cy greater than normal concrete mix for Bebo arches. A
\$4-\$5 increase is seen in precast concrete prices.
NJDOT suggested that future discussions of SCC should address DOT
owners' experiences and benefits gained. States need to know that they
are getting equal or better quality at equal cost. Also, SCC looks
promising for design/build projects and for buildings.
PADOT has had positive experiences so far with initial testing of the
effects of long-term creep using SCC. MDSHA noted that control of mixing
water is critical for SCC. They and VDOT are developing specifications
for SCC. VDOT has submitted an SCC project to the FHWA Innovative Bridge
Research & Construction Program. DELDOT noted that placing and curing
requirements of SCC appear to be the same as for conventional concrete,
but that drop height issues need to be addressed. NC noted that there
might be application for SCC in drilled shafts.
##
##
## D) Subcommittee Status Reports by Chairmen
## 1. Subcommittee on Standardization
Subcommittee developed details on use of steel diaphragms for
prestressed concrete superstructures. Status of States' use of the
standard drawing was queried. Delaware DOT no use reported -- will study
use steel diaphragms. New Jersey has adopted a standard drawing that is
based on the Subcommittee's work. A proposal for the adoption of the
Subcommittee's standard drawing for use of steel intermediate diaphragm
for prestressed concrete superstructures was made. State representatives
voted to adopt the PCEF standard drawing. Representatives also voted to
adopt the Subcommittee's standard drawing for diaphragm layout.
Use of spliced girders, haunched girders and lightweight concrete will
be the next issues to be undertaken by the Subcommittee. A soon-to-be
completed NCHRP study on spliced girders will be evaluated by the group.
The group will also look at standard details for positive moment
connections.
**2. Subcommittee on Design Parameters (need Chairman)**
> Due to the lack of a Chairman for this group over the past couple of
> years, it was suggested that the Subcommittee be joined with
> Standardization Subcommittee.
**E) Precast Concrete Elements**
It was questioned whether the PCEF wished to address standardization of
precast concrete elements as part of their general efforts. The
committee had previously agreed that it would be a positive move to do
so. There are enough concerns for DOT's to look at, including noise
walls, drainage components, as well as other precast items. QA/QC is one
item to look at. Survey form will be developed to obtain input from
States. Issues such as technician certification would be an item that
can be studied. Reciprocity between States for approval of plants should
be studied. Industry's input would be critical. Delaware DOT and
Virginia DOT have limited interest. New York would show interest
dependent on type of structures looked at. New Jersey cautioned
direction of proposed study so that legal implications would be avoided.
**F) Other Issues**
February 11, 12, 13, 2003 are dates of the next Mid-Atlantic States
Quality Assurance Workshop, at the Holiday Inn in Charleston, WV. We
will tentatively target 2/13/03 as the date of next PCEF meeting in
Charlestown, West Virginia.
| en |
converted_docs | 689774 | **REPORT ON EMWIN TESTING AT WALLOPS CDAS**
**February 22 to 24 2005**
**Prepared by**
**Peter Woolner**
**Mitretek Systems**
**SUMMARY**
Following a successful but short test performed on February 2, 2005 at
Avtec's facility at Chantilly VA, additional tests were made at the
Wallops CDA Station on February 22 to 24, 2005. These tests were
performed using the revised Avtec receive software and IF Adapter
designed for operation at 19.2 kbps user data rate. The EMWIN signal was
Offset Quadrature Phase Shift Keyed (OQPSK) modulated and used a pulse
shaping filter. The same Forward Error Correction (FEC) coding that was
used in the previous 9.6 kbps implementation was also applied to this
signal at double the data rate.
The tests were made with the Avtec transmit and receive equipment
connected back-to-back on the bench, but with the real GOES East receive
signals added to prove the receiver could tolerate that level of
interference. This was a close approximation of the level of
interference that is expected from the GOES N/P satellites.
The test results show the prototype EMWIN receive system met the
required performance criterion of one frame missing or one frame with
errors in 10,000, when the receive E~B~/N~0~ (roughly equivalent to the
signal to noise ratio) is between 3.0 and 4.5 dB. This is considered an
excellent result. It shows that any existing EMWIN user, i.e. one
receiving the current EMWIN signal at 9.6 kbps, will probably not need
to upgrade the figure of merit (G/T) of the receive system when they
change to the new EMWIN signal which is to be broadcast through the GOES
N/P series of satellites.
The new EMWIN signal format, using OQPSK and a pulse shaping filter, has
not yet been tested through its allocated transponder on a GOES N/P
series satellite. Therefore the amount of degradation caused by
non-linearities or other imperfections in that transponder is still
unknown. The tests results shown in this report indicate that satellite
degradation of up to 4.7 dB can be tolerated without requiring the
receive G/T be better than the NOAA standard that was recommended for
the existing EMWIN links on the GOES I/M series of satellites. This
writer believes it is unlikely the satellite degradation will exceed
this amount, but tests are scheduled to measure that degradation as soon
as a satellite is available.
**TEST DESCRIPTION**
All tests were performed with the equipment configured as shown figure
1.
**Figure 1. Block Diagram of Test Configuration**
All the FER tests were made using OQPSK modulation at 19.2 kbps user
data rate, but with the start and stop bits removed and the Attached
Sync Marker and frame header bits added. The FEC coding used was a rate
½ Convolutional inner code concatenated with a RS (255,223) outer code.
The level of the EMWIN signal into the receiver was set at -55 dBm. The
signal received from GOES East was combined with the test signal out of
the EMWIN modulator so that the level of the LRIT and EMWIN-I signals
from GOES East were 7 dB stronger than the EMWIN signal. The noise
generator output level was then adjusted as necessary to provide the
desired E~B~/N~0~ value.
For all tests, the frame sync parameters were set to Search Threshold =
0, Lock Threshold = 6, Check Frames = 0, and Flywheel frames = 4.
Prior to the start of the Frame Error Rate (FER) tests, the power out of
the modulator when modulated, was compared to its output power when
unmodulated. In each condition, the modulator output was fed to the
Boonton wattmeter. The power when modulated was found to be 1.0 dB
greater than when not modulated. That 1.0 dB correction has been applied
to all measurements recorded herein.
At the start of each test the C/N~0~ was measured for an unmodulated
carrier using a spectrum analyzer with internal averaging set at 100.
The offset for the N~0~ part of the measurement was chosen at the
frequency that produced the lowest noise. The C/N~0~ was also measured
at the end of each FER test and averaged with the start value to provide
the reference for that test. The E~B~/N~0~ values were then calculated
as:
E~B~/N~0~ = C/N~0~ + 1.0 -- 10\*LOG(15400) = C/N~0~ -- 40.9 dB/Hz
In each FER test, the carrier was modulated with a recorded EMWIN data
set, then the receiver was locked and allowed to run for a
pre-determined period of time. The numbers of frames transmitted and
received were recorded, plus the numbers of frames that are
uncorrectable by the RS code, Viterbi sync errors, frames missing, and
data frame sequence errors. This last item was used as a way to measure
of how many separate error events had occurred.
The count of missing frames included the uncorrectable frames, as well
as those frames that were missed because the Attached Sync Marker could
not be correctly identified. Since either event will result in a frame
that is omitted from the data passed to the user, it was the total
number of missing frames that was recorded and used to derive the FER.
The FER was calculated by dividing the total number of missing frames by
the total number of transmitted frames. Frames transmitted count was
derived from the receiver monitor values by subtracting from the
received frames count the number of fill frames (if any) then adding the
total number of missing frames minus the uncorrectable frames.
The timing of the start of each test was controlled by manually setting
the receive monitor parameters to zero, after the system had shown it
was in lock. Each test was ended by taking a screen shot of the receiver
monitor parameters at the pre-determined time. The values shown for each
parameter were used in the subsequent calculations.
**TEST RESULTS**
The following table shows the results of these tests, arranged in order
of increasing E~B~/N~0~.
------ ----------- -------------- -------- -------------- --------- -----------
Test E~B~/N~0~ Total Frames No. of Missing or FER Errors per
Nbr dB/Hz Transmitted Events Error Frames Event
3 2.3 3160 31 58 1.8E-02 1.87
1 2.6 904 48 75 8.3E-02 1.56
9 2.8 24042 54 113 4.7E-03 2.09
4 2.9 115504 82 645 5.6E-03 7.87
2 3.0 10000 15 15 1.5E-03 1.00
8 3.1 23554 2 2 8.5E-05 1.00
5 3.95 23237 6 34 1.5E-03 5.67
7 4.25 116023 1 79 6.8E-04 79.00
6 4.3 24104 0 1 4.1E-05 0.00
10 5.0 120012 0 1 8.3E-06 0.00
------ ----------- -------------- -------- -------------- --------- -----------
The following chart is a plot of these results for E~B~/N~0~ versus FER,
with some additional annotations that are discussed in the following
section.
> {width="5.67007874015748in"
> height="5.034645669291338in"}
**Chart 1. Back-to-Back Frame Error Rate Test Results**
**DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS**
1. The two points shown with red circles actually experienced no errors
or missing frames during that test period. One error was
artificially added to the result for each of these tests in order to
produce the points plotted on the chart. The actual error rates for
these points are unknown. It is probable, but not certain, that they
lie some unknown distance below these plotted points.
2. Test 7 (the point third from the right in the chart) was
significantly different from all other test results. There was one
error event in which 13 frames were uncorrectable and 66 were
missing, giving a total of 79 frame errors in that single event.
This is an order of magnitude worse than the next closest errors per
event. It seems reasonable to consider this an anomaly. (The event
occurred during an overnight test and had no witnesses.)
3. Even if this point is eliminated, the fourth point from the right in
the chart will remain, producing a curve that does not follow the
normal "waterfall" shape. No explanation was found for this unusual
effect. The only way this could be resolved was to make many more
measurements with E~B~/N~O~ values between 3.0 and 4.0 dB/Hz and
determine which point is supported by the additional tests. No time
was available to perform such a check, so these results create a
degree of extra uncertainty in the actual performance of the system.
4. Two dashed lines were added to the chart to signify the boundaries
within which this writer believes the true FER curve would lie if a
sufficiently long test time had been available to collect enough
measurement points to determine that curve with accuracy and at a
high degree of confidence.
5. These two dashed lines cross the FER value of 10^-4^ (the pass/fail
criterion) at E~B~/N~0~ values of 3.0 and 4.5 dB/Hz. All the test
results obtained are consistent with receiver performance within
this range. However, even if the worst case value of 4.5 dB/Hz was
the correct one, the system would be considered acceptable.
Using this worst case value, the minimum EIRP expected from the GOES N
series satellites of 44.8 dBmi, an EMWIN terminal G/T of -0.3 dB/K, and
the actual transmitted user data rate before FEC codes are added of 15.4
kbps, the worst case available E~B~/N~0~ is calculated at 11.2 dB/Hz.
(See Appendix A for the full link calculations.) Then:
> Margin = Available E~B~/N~0~ -- Back-to-back E~B~/N~0~ -- Satellite
> degradation
= 11.2 -- 4.5 -- 2.0 (If the satellite degradation is 2 dB.)
= 4.7 dB
The 4.7 dB margin is 2.7 dB over the minimum recommended operating
margin for this link, 2 dB, and is therefore available as an additional
contingency if future tests should show the actual satellite degradation
is more than the 2 dB estimated above. If the actual receiver
performance is better than the worst case as explained above, even more
satellite degradation could occur and an acceptable link performance
would still be provided.
Since the satellite transponder was not designed to carry a signal with
the modulation and using a pulse shaping root raised cosine filter as is
used on the EMWIN signal, more than usual degradation due to the
satellite transponder is expected to occur. However, as long as that
degradation does not exceed 4.7 dB, the EMWIN link as currently designed
will provide acceptable performance. It is considered unlikely that the
satellite degradation will exceed 4.7 dB, but this cannot be known for
sure until the link is tested through an actual GOES N series satellite.
**APPENDIX A. REFERENCE LINK BUDGET**
--------------- ------------------------------------------- ------------ -----------
**EMWIN LINK
CALCULATIONS
FOR 19200 bps
NOMINAL RATE**
**Parameter** **Units** **Value**
Data Rate (before framing and coding) bps 15514
Modulation Type OQPSK
FEC Coding Type Conv+RS
FEC Coding Rate 0.437
**Ground Uplink
Transmitter**
Uplink Frequency MHz 2034.70
Transmit EIRP dBmi 76.7
Antenna dB 0.5
Pointing Loss
**Earth - To -
Space**
Path Distance (for 5 deg elevation) km 41127
Free Space Loss dB 190.9
Atmospheric dB 0.4
Attenuation
**S/C Receive
Performance**
Polarization dB 0.2
Loss
U/L Incident dBmi -115.3
Power
Antenna Gain (from 5 deg elevation) dBi 14.8
G/T (incl cable dB/K -14.2
losses)
Boltzmann dBm/Hz/K -198.6
constant
Uplink Thermal dB/Hz 69.1
C/No
**S/C Transmit
Performance**
Downlink Frequency MHz 1692.70
Transmit EIRP dBmi 44.8
(to 5 deg
elevation)
**Space - To -
Earth**
Path Distance (for 5 deg elevation) km 41127
Free Space Loss dB 189.3
Atmospheric dB 0.4
Attenuation
**Ground
Downlink
Receiver**
Downlink dBmi -144.9
Incident Power
Pwr Flux Density Rqmt (EOC in 4 kHz) dBW/m2 -154
Power Flux Density (EOC in 4 kHz) dBW/m2 -159.0
E/S G/T dB/K -0.3
Polarization dB 0.2
Loss
Boltzmann dBm/Hz/K -198.6
constant
Downlink dB/Hz 53.2
Thermal C/No
**Eb/No Overall
Calculation**
Overall dB/Hz 53.1
Composite C/No
Data Rate in dB dB-Hz 41.9
Eb/No dB 11.2
Calculated
--------------- ------------------------------------------- ------------ -----------
---------------- ------------------------------------------- ------------ -----------
**Required Eb/No
Adjustments**
Required BER 1E-06
Theoretical dB 10.6
Eb/No with no
coding
Theoretical dB 8.0
coding gain
Theoretical dB 2.6
Eb/No with FEC
coding
Ground Segment dB 1.9
Implementation
Loss
Satellite dB 4.7
Segment
Degradations
Required Eb/No dB 9.2
**Eb/No MARGIN** **dB** **2.0**
---------------- ------------------------------------------- ------------ -----------
| en |
converted_docs | 287189 | **A Model for the Formation of Sub-Basement Fossil Soil drilled in the
North Pacific (ODP, Leg 197): A possible Novel Analog for a Deep
Subsurface Biosphere on Earth and Mars**
Rosalba Bonaccorsi
*Space Science Division*
# NASA Ames Research Center
*M.S. 245-3 Moffett Field, CA 94035*
*USA*
bonaccor@units.it
Rocco L. Mancinelli
# SETI-Institute/ NASA Ames Research Center
*M.S. 239-4 Moffett Field, CA 94035*
*USA*
Searching for life preserved in potential subsurface ecosystems on Mars,
where conditions at the surface (low T-P, UV-radiation, oxidants)
prevent extant life, is one key objective of Astrobiology. If life
evolved on Mars, indeed, fossil organics and possibly extant life might
exist at depth \[1-2\].
[]{.mark}
We propose as a model system for the search for fossil and extant life
within the Martian deep subsurface, the formation of deeply buried
Late-Paleocene/Eocene soils that were drilled under the volcanic
basement (\~310-mbsf) during the ODP Leg-197 \[3\].
The red soils were formed\~\>56Ma ago from the weathering of basalts
atop subsiding seamounts, as Hawaii today \[4\]. Soils were subsequently
overridden by lava flows. Burial rates up to ten times higher than
subsidence rates, e.g., present-day\~avg.2.5 mm/years produced
conditions for the isolation of the fossil soil from the atmosphere and
ocean under the eruptive sub-basement until they were drilled.
Furthermore, these soils are Fe-oxides/oxy-hydroxides-rich, receive no
sunlight, are primarily anoxic and organics-poor (C~-org~=0.01-0.12%Wt,
±0.02%). They have a C-N stable isotope signature more negative than
that of surface Hawaiian counterparts, indicating that some
significative diagenesis of pristine surface organics occurred over
time. These data may be used to determine the source of organics in the
soils sample \[e.g. 4\] and their potential as subsurface biosphere on
Earth.
These features would make appropriate the use of the fossil soil as
novel deep Mars-like soil and plausible analog for a Subsurface
Biosphere on Mars. Data from these soils will help better interpreting
chemical and mineralogical composition of subsurface Martian
regolith/soil samples.
References: \[1\] Mancinelli, 2000; \[2\] Zent & McKay, 1994; \[4\]
Holmes, 1995; \[3\] Tarduno et al., 2002; \[4\] Bonaccorsi & Mancinelli,
2003
Key words: paleosoils, Martian subsurface, biosignatures
| en |
markdown | 061907 | # Presentation: 061907
## China building fireproof standard system and building performance fireproof design
**Chen Jinghui**
** ****The institute of building fire research. China academy of building research**
## Mainly content
**Existing building fireproof standard systems of china**
**Building fireproof performance design **
**conclusions **
- Olympic games will be held in china, world trading fair and Weston development in china are stimulating the Chinese building market which china and the whole world are giving great attention. So many new buildings with definite function will be built, which should show the modernization of china and the science and technology of comparable developments with the world. The construct of these buildings raise requirement to our country existing building code system, so we should face this situation actively. These buildings are usually with multifunction, especially crowd, so fire safety is a more important subject.
- All of the worlds are never stopping the research work on building fire. Through much more research of this field, varieties of fireproof testing methods and the construction fireproof standards are developed. As the building fire bring great personnel casualty and properties loss every year in China, our government and society now are paying more and more attention to building fireproof. We unceasingly strengthen the building fire research work, at the same time the government organize relative exports to establish and modify the building fireproof standard system time after time.
## 1 Existing building fireproof standard systems of china
- 1.1 Code for building design fireproof
- 1.2 Professional design code
- 1.3 Code for fire extinguishing system design
- 1.4 Building material and product standards
- 1.5 Construction and acceptance code
## 1.1 Code for building design fireproof
- GBJ16-87 < Code for fire protection design of buildings > and GBJ 0045-95< Code for fire protection design of high raise buildings> are the core code of our country building fireproof. These two codes present definite demand to the building fireproof and design of the architecture system, which involved building materials, building structure and element, personnel evacuation, prevent and exhaust smoke, fire alarm, fire extinguishing system. The government inspected the building fire designed also according to these tow codes.
## 1.2 Professional design code
- On the basis of the < code for fire protection design of buildings > and < code for fire protection design of high raise buildings > the architecture related fields fined the design requirement, and now existing codes are as follows:
- Code for fire protection design of building inside decoration GB 50222-95
- Code for fire automatic alarm system design GB50116-98
- Code for auto water-jet fire extinguishing system GB50084-2001
## 1.3 Code for fire extinguishing system design
- Because of the difference of fire extinction mode and material of fire extinction the form of fire extinction is various. The government established codes to face this situation:
- Code for alkyl halide1211 fire extinguishing system design. GBJ110-87
- Code for low multiple foam extinguishing system design. GB50151-92
- Code for alkyl halide1301 fire extinguishing system design. GB50193-93
- Code for high and medium multiple-foam extinguishing system design GB50196-93
- Code for water spraying fire extinguishing system design system GB 50219-95
## 1.4 Building material and product standards
- Every kinds of building materials and products should meet to the building fireproof requirement before entered the building market. There are many standards and testing methods for these materials and products mainly contents are as follows:
- Building material burning performance grade method GB8624-1997 ,which classify building materials as four grades . In building engineering the materials and products can be used in building based on the grade.
## Kinds of fireproof materials and products standards are as follows.
- GB 14907-2002 fire resistive coating for steel structures
- GB 15442.1-1995 classification and test methods for fire retardancy of finishing fire retardant paints classication for fire retardancy
- GB 15930-1995 fire dampers tests
- GB 16807-1997 fire intumescent seals
- GB 12955-1991 general technical conditions for steel fire door
- GB 14101-1993 wood fire door general technical conditions
## 1.5 Construction and acceptance code
- On the basis of above codes and the practical construction experience we defined the specification of construction, and regulated check construction quality standards after engineering finished.
- Building inside decoration fireproof construction and acceptance code (in the course of establish)
- GB50166-92 Fire automatic alarm system construction and acceptance design code
- GB 50261-96 Auto water-jet fire extinguishing system construction and acceptance code
- GB 50263-97 Gas fire extinguishing system construction and acceptance code
- GB 50281-98 Foam fire extinguishing system construction and acceptance code
- Other codes for construction and acceptance are in the course of establishing.
## 2 Building fireproof performance design
- 2.1 The contents of performance design
- 2.2 Step of performance design
- 2.3 Proceeding fireproof performance design
## 2.1 The contents of performance design
- From above building fireproof standard system we can draw a conclusion that the building fireproof standard system generally conformed to relative fireproof code strictly, which called “prescription” or “instruction” usually. But as the development of building technology building design is more characterized with individuation. These designs usually exceeded the requirement of existing codes in certain aspect or involved some contents not be contained in exist code. This phenomenon may lead the fireproof safety to without guarantee which building have to achieve, and on the other hand although these individual design of these buildings will not induce danger to fireproof safety but which must be modified because of the requirement of existing code not be met. All these make the requirement of building proprietor and projector no way to be satisfied and hampered the development of building market to certain extent. In some special cases that the “prescription” could not be carried out usually we have to hold an export demonstration conference. Some experts make decision through experience eventually form an exports’ opinion as a reference of design.
- Now there is a popular tendency turned from instruction fireproof design to performance fireproof design. Some country has promulgated performance fireproof design code and was used in practical building design with indigenous instruction design method to solute the design problem which instruction code could not solute. Performance fireproof design method is a new building fireproof design method based on fireproof safety engineering. It uses the principle and method of fireproof safety engineering. In the first way it makes sure the safety object and every plant to achieve the safety goal and then take quantitative forecast and assessment based on the building structure, use, combustible material property and distribution. Performance fireproof design accounts the fire extension and control, smoke extension and control, fire detecting and warning, initiative and passive fire extinction measure, personnel evacuation and so on. So it can draw an economical and reasonable fireproof design scheme. The performance fireproof method is a consequent tendency of world fireproof design development. The proceeding performance design contents included: reasonable organization evacuation and succor; single layer area larger enough to fireproof division and evacuation difficulty; smoke exhaust design; structure fireproof; fire extension and fireproof separation problem.
## 2.2 Step of performance design
- Performance analysis assessment is very important to performance design, which verify the achievement of requirement level of the old fireproof design scheme and raise improvement suggestion on the basis of fireproof safety engineering.
## Simply performance analysis assessment steps
- Collect engineering related data
- Determinate the fireproof safety goal
- Define safety performance aim
- Fire model design
- Assessment design scheme
- Report assessment result
## Collect engineering related data
- The detailed design drawing list and any complementary material relative to fireproof system that conclude the proper quality of building, building operation quality, user specificity. Such as whether there have special or individual work field, the use or storage of dangerous substance, rare equipment field; whether elder, children, handicapped or other men who need others help existed; man in the soberness or in sleep and so on.
## Determinate the fireproof safety goal
- The requirement of the building self-safety quality, the requirement of protect personal security, the requirement of protect functions of use. Such as ensure man not to be damaged by smoke; protect handicapped with safe asylum; protect the building structure not to be destroyed.
## Define safety performance aim
- We should achieve the safety aim according to the practical situation. Such as the visibility, thermal radiation intensity, smoke temperature and toxicity gas strength should be under the extent of safety in the environment which all people stayed before they go to safety field to ensure the safety evacuation of people.
## Fire model design
- On different assessment goal and building concrete circumstance and correlated statistics data we analyze the fire happened position, fire property, fire scale, state of fire-protection service, finally we determine the most disadvantageous fire circumstance.
## Assessment design scheme
- Establish the analytic model of fire develop extension, smoke temperature flowing, personnel evacuation, fireproof ambulance and analyze whether scheme achieved design goal and modification needed on design such as: increase smoke detector or auto sprinkle facility, modification of aeration characteristic, change building material, inside decoration and layout of building inside.
## Report assessment result
- Illustration the assessment method and the source, restriction, reliability of adoption tool, then give an assessment outcome and suggestion.
- Because our country has not related code of building fireproof performance design we usually refer international universal design method and related techniques and incorporate the domestic practical situation. The different project possibly need different performance design and assess content but the work procedure is identical elementally as followed diagram. (fig.1)
**FIG.1 ****Performance assessment flow diagram**
## 2.3 Proceeding fireproof performance design
- According to characteristic of Olympic gymnasium and some modern building engineering we conducted fire performance design as follows:
- National Olympic gymnasium fireproof performance design(almost finished)
- Beijing Wukesong physical education culture center fireproof performance design(almost finished)
- Capital airport 3# flight station fireproof performance design inspected assessment(almost finished)
- Olympic meeting center fireproof performance inspected assessment(under way)
- National Olympic bicycle gymnasium fireproof performance design(under way)
## 3 conclusions
- At present the process of building fireproof performance design should be granted by local government include: choice of performance design range, definition of design goal, committed step and so on. Performance design is in the starting phase so we should confer overseas mature experience. We hope we can gain more support from our government; as well we should do more research work on the field to perfect the building fireproof performance design. | en |
converted_docs | 495996 | Flight Projects Directorate Diversity Council Charter
The Flight Projects Directorate (FPD) Diversity Council is responsible
for serving as an advocate for diversity issues within the Directorate,
to address any barriers to cross cultural communication, and when
necessary to raise issues to the Center-level Diversity Council. The
Diversity Council's purpose is to assist the Director in creating an
environment that values, respects and fosters the recognition,
development, understanding and utilization of each employee's talents.
The Council encourages appreciation and utilization of the staff in the
FPD organization.
I. AUTHORITY
The FPD establishes and sanctions the Code 400 Diversity Council. It
operates under this Charter and is consistent with the efforts of the
Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Diversity Council and the Agency's
Diversity initiatives.
II. PURPOSE
The Code 400 Diversity Council's purpose is to assist all levels of
management in creating an environment that is conducive to the
recognition, development, understanding, and utilization of each
employee's abilities, skills, and knowledge in order to achieve maximum
productivity.
III. OBJECTIVES
The Council is chartered to:
A. Provide advice, guidance and recommendations to the Director in
planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the Directorate's
Diversity Program.
B. Serve as a focal point for the concerns of employees with regard to
diversity.
C. Provide education forums for employees and managers on diversity and
diversity-related matters.
D. Help resolve Directorate-wide problems related to diversity
```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
IV. MEMBERSHIP
> The membership of the Council will consist of FPD employees dedicated
> to promoting diversity initiatives within the Directorate and working
> on diversity--related activities. Also the Directorate representatives
> to the Advisory Groups will serve on the Council. The Director of FPD
> will appoint the members. Council members are appointed to serve a
> minimum two-year term..
>
> Members may serve longer than two years if they have demonstrated that
> they are productive and dedicated members of the council. The Director
> of FPD will approve extensions beyond the nominal two-year term. The
> Council structure and selection process will be reviewed in the Fall
> of each year. The year is from January through December which allows
> for a smooth transition during the fall quarter.
>
> In constituting the Diversity Council, consideration will be given to
> representation of a broad range of ethnic groups, job titles and
> technical and administrative personnel and include individuals holding
> management and non-management positions. It will be re-evaluated as
> individual terms expire.
V. COUNCIL FUNCTIONS
A. Contribute to the Center's annual updates of the Center's Diversity
plan.
B. Develop, monitor and evaluate implementation of the FPD Diversity
Strategic Plan recommending actions to improve performance in
implementing the plan to the Director FPD.
C. Receive, consider, and transmit, as appropriate, proposals, areas of
concern, and recommendations relating to diversity in the
Directorate. These topics will normally be Directorate-wide in
scope or encompass more than one Division. When necessary the
Council will raise issues to the Center-level Diversity Council.
D. Maintain liaison with similar committees at GSFC.
E. Meet at least once annually with the Director and Deputy Director of
FPD.
F. Evaluate the effectiveness of the Council's structure and activities
annually. Report to the Director annually and recommend any changes
in the role and structure of the Council.
G. Take the lead role in planning and implementing activities
surrounding Diversity related activities (i.e., Celebrate Goddard
Day).
```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
V. COUNCIL OFFICERS
> The Council will elect a Chair, Vice Chair and Executive Secretary
> from among its members who will serve for a period of one year. The
> same individual may not serve as chair for more than two consecutive
> years. Subcommittee chairs will be selected as needed.
VI. COUNCIL MEETINGS (FREQUENCY AND ABSENCES)
> Meetings will be held once a month on the second Thursday from 1:00 pm
> -- 2:30 pm. Members will determine the need for additional meetings.
> Meetings of sub-committees will be on an as needed basis. If a member
> knows in advance that they will be absent, they must notify the Chair.
VII. FILLING VACANCIES
> Vacancies occurring on the committee for any reason will be filled in
> the same manner that the position was originally filled. The vacancy
> will be filled until the expiration of the appointment of the vacating
> member, at which time the new member may be reappointed to serve a
> full term.
VIII. COUNCIL DURATION
> The Council will be a standing Council of indefinite duration with
> continuance dependent on the annual evaluation and Director approval.
IX. COMMITTEES
> The Council will form committees as it considers necessary on a
> continuing or ad hoc basis.
X. COUNCIL CHARTER AMENDMENTS
> This charter stands until revised by the Council and with final
> approval by the Director of FPD.
>
> APPROVED:
>
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
>
> Director of FPD Date
Diversity Council Operating Agreements
*How we will work together as a team*
- The Chair or Vice Chair will review commitments, expectations and
Operating Agreements with each new member to ensure they understand
their role.
- Non-attribution: We will not attribute information shared by Council
members without their explicit permission.
- As team members, we agree that we will use the "formal process" for
raising issues to the Center-level Diversity Council (we will not go
directly to that level individually, as this degrades the integrity
of this Council)
- We will address difficult issues, questions or challenges
face-to-face in Council meetings (not via email)
- We will speak to each other one-to-one if/when necessary to
raise and/or resolve questions and issues
- If an issue is important for the full Council's involvement we
will put it on the agenda for a future meeting
- We will take 15 minutes at the start of each meeting or "Diversity
Dialogue" (we will rotate leadership for the topic and discussion)
- We will notify the Chair in advance when we can not attend a Council
meeting or activity
- If we can not be present, we will take responsibility to ensure that
our role in the meeting is covered by another Council member
- We will all continue to seek out other diverse members of the
Directorate to participate on the Council
| en |
markdown | 192509 | # Presentation: 192509
## Ionic and Electronically Conducting
- Development of a capability for the design and fabrication of ionic and electronically conducting ceramic materials
- Two patents were obtained as a result of this program
- Novel heterogeneous catalysis method and plasma coating for corrosion protection
** ****COMMERCIALIZATION**
- Conducting ceramic components are currently fabricated by Eltron and are commercially available
- Commercialization of over $700K in the natural gas and energy related industries
- Refining processes for titanium, neodymium, and beryllium
***ELTRON RESEARCH, INC.***
***BOULDER, CO***
**S****mall**
**B****usiness**
**I****nnovation **
**R****esearch**
** ****GOVERNMENT/SCIENCE APPLICATIONS**
- Replacement of carbon anodes for aluminum production
- Lithium-oxygen and calcium-oxygen storage batteries
- Remediation of lead from copper alloys
- Ability to conveniently obtain oxygen from extraterrestrial metal oxides
- 1986 Phase 2; SS-96; 10/26/95
- Johnson Space Center
**Ionic and Electronically Conducting**
**Ceramic Materials** | en |
converted_docs | 719389 | August 22, 1966 M20-2
CHAPTER 3. SAMPLING VARIATION IN QUALITY CONTROL
3.01 RECOGNITION OF SAMPLING VARIATION
a\. Some form of sampling is used in almost all quality control
procedures to estimate quality levels, to evaluate operations in quality
terms, and frequently as the basis for management decisions affecting
the quality of operations. Any form of sampling involves chance sampling
variation which is unavoidable and cannot be eliminated. Sampling
variation or sampling \"error\" refers to the chance differences that
occur among the statistics derived from different samples drawn from the
same population.
b\. Therefore, the limitations arising from sampling variability must be
recognized when quality control methods or other sampling procedures are
used in estimating the underlying \"true\" error rate or other
characteristic of the sampled population. These limitations apply to all
sampling, whether from finite populations, such as claims folders in the
files, or the theoretically infinite population that is generated by a
work process, such as the processing of applications for compensation
and pension benefits.
3.02 ERROR DISTRIBUTION\--SMALL FINITE POPULATION
a\. To illustrate the chance variation which cannot be eliminated in
sample results, consider a very small finite population of only five end
products. The end products are classified as being either \"correct\" or
\"in error,\" and the population is as follows:\
\
[End Product]{.underline} [Classification]{.underline}\
\
A Correct\
B Correct\
C In Error\
D Correct\
E In Error
b\. Therefore, three (60%) of these five end products are \"correct\"
and two (40%) are \"in error.\" If a random sample of two end products
is to be drawn from this population, it follows that every combination
of two end products out of the population of five then has an equal
chance of being selected as the sample. The different sample
combinations possible are:
Possible Combinations
SampleNo. of End Products\
\
1 A & B\
2 A & C\
3 A & D\
4 A & E\
5 B & C\
6 B & D\
7 B & E\
8 C & D\
9 C & E\
10 D & E
3.03 CHARACTERISTICS OF SAMPLE COMBINATIONS
The tabulation in the preceding paragraph shows 10 different sample
combinations which could be selected if a random sample of two end
products is to be drawn from the population of five end products in the
above example. Each combination is as likely to be selected as any other
if the sample of two end products is selected purely at random. However,
these 10 possible sample combinations have varying characteristics.
Sample I gives
3-1
M20-2 August 22, 1966
two \"correct\" end products, sample 2 contains one \"correct\" and one
\"in error,\" etc. The 10 possible sample results may be listed as
follows:
Sample No. of \"Correct\" [End Products]{.underline} \"In
[Error\"]{.underline}
No. End Products No. Percent
1 2 0 0
2 1 1 50
3 2 0 0
4 1 1 50
5 1 1 50
6 2 0 0
7 1 1 50
8 1 1 50
9 0 1 100
10 1 1 50
3.04 FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF POSSIBLE SAMPLE COMBINATIONS
a\. Note carefully the last column of the tabulation shown in the
preceding paragraph. It illustrates that the percent of end products
\"in error\" in the sample may be either 0%, 50%, or 100%, depending
upon which of the 10 sample combinations happens to be selected. But,
these varying results do not occur with equal frequency. The following
data summarizes the previous information as to frequency of occurrence:
Percent of Sample Number of Proportion of\
End Products Sample All Sample\
\"In Error\" Combinations Combinations\
\
0% 3 .30\
50% 6 .60\
100% 1 .10\
10 1.00
b\. This summary indicates what is likely to happen if the selection of
a random sample of two end products from this same population of five
end products were repeated many, many times. Since all sample
combinations are equally likely to be selected, the probabilities are
that about 60% of the samples drawn at random will contain one end
product \"in error,\" 30% will contain no end products \"in error,\" and
10% will contain two end products \"in error.\"
3.05 VARIABILITY IN A RANDOM SAMPLE RESULT
a\. The illustration described in the preceding paragraphs is an extreme
one, of course, because the population size (five) and the sample size
(two) are both extremely small. The probability that the sample result
assumes either one extreme value, 0% \"in error,\" or the other, 100%
\"in error,\" is very large. This example does show, however, that some
uncertainty must be attached to any sample result, since it is only one
of a number of different possible sample results.
b\. The degree or amount of variability among sample proportions of end
products \"in error\" is directly related to the proportion of end
products \"in error\" in the population from which the sample is
selected. It also is inversely related to the sample size. Sampling
variability is reduced as the sample size is made larger. Sampling
variation cannot be eliminated\--except by abandoning sampling.
c\. In sampling many finite populations, it would be possible\--but not
necessarily wise\--to examine the entire population. But in sampling to
determine the underlying quality level of the output from a work
\"process,\" sampling cannot be replaced by inspection of the total
population, since a \"process\" is regarded as an infinite population,
and even a recognized in quality control procedures to avoid erroneous
conclusions and decisions. The mathematical principles involved will
remain true and will affect the reliability of sample
3 -2
August 22, 1966 M20-2
3.06 APPLYING PRINCIPLES OF STATISTICAL SAMPLING TO QUALITY CONTROL
a\. Statistical Control. The word control has a special technical
meaning in the language of SQC. process is described as in statistical
control when a stable system of chance causes is operating. We must be
satisfied with the variation due to chance causes,
or else change the work process fundamentally. This principle is
illustrated below.
b\. Example: A container of 2,000 beads was used to represent a work
process. Each bead represented a work unit. Forty (2.O%) of the beads
were red. These were regarded as representing work units with one or
more errors. The remaining 1,960 beads were white, and were regarded as
work units without errors. A paddle with 100 holes was used to scoop up
random samples of 100 beads. Since the beads were returned to the
container after each scoop, each random sample was drawn from a
continuing \"operation\" in which the \"error rate\" remained constant
at a known 2.0%. In effect, this experiment simulated the infinite
population associated with a work process, since under the procedure
followed the population could not be exhausted by sampling. The results
of 100 random scoops shown as 25 samples of 400 each (4 successive
scoops per sample) are shown in the following tabulation of sample
results;
Sample Sample Number of Work Units Percent of Work Units\
Number Size \"In Error\" I/ \"in Error\" I/\
\
1 400 5 1.25\
2 400 8 2.00\
3 400 6 1.50\
4 400 5 1.25\
5 400 13 3.25\
6 400 10 2.50\
7 400 7 1.75\
8 400 14 3.50\
9 400 5 1.25\
10 400 9 2.25\
11 400 3 0.75\
12 400 2 0.50\
13 400 16 4.00\
14 400 5 1.25\
15 400 11 2.75\
16 400 4 1. 00\
17 400 5 1.25\
18 400 7 1.75\
19 400 10 2.50\
20 400 10 2.50\
21 400 10 2.50\
22 400 11 2.75\
23 400 10 2.50\
24 400 8 2.00\
25 7 1.75\
10,000 201 2.01
[1/]{.underline} The number of red beads in each sample is taken to
represent the \"number of work units in error.\"
c\. In the sample results tabulated above, note carefully the variation
in the number of work units in error (number of red beads) that occurred
in the successive random samples of 400 work units (total number of
beads in sample) drawn from the population having a known constant error
rate of 2.O%. They ranged from a low of 2 errors (0.50%) in sample
number 12 to a high of 16 errors (4.00%) in sample number 13. Only two
of the samples, numbers 2 and 24, contained exactly 2.O% \"in error,\"
the known constant \"error rate\" of the population. The differences
between the error rates of the different samples and the true error rate
of the population represents \" sampling variability\" or \" sampling
error\" (not to be
3-3
M20-2 August 22, 1966
confused with a sample \"error rate\"). In sampling from a work process,
which represents an infinite population, sampling error cannot be
eliminated, but it may be reduced by taking larger samples.
d\. The \"process\" illustrated above has to be \"in control\" because
each sample was drawn from the same population, in which the \"error
rate\" was a known 2.0%. For this error rate and a sample size of 400,
the table of \"Three Standard Deviation Control Limits\" in appendix E
shows control limits of 0.00% and 4. 1O%. Note that all of the sample
error rates tabulated above fell within these control limits.
e\. Any similar experiment of drawing samples from a population will
demonstrate the same point; i.e., that successive sample estimates will
vary, within limits, due to chance causes alone. This same kind of
variation occurs with respect to any random sample of work units drawn
from a work process to estimate and evaluate the quality level.
Therefore, [reliable estimates and]{.underline} evaluations [of quality
levels cannot be made based on]{.underline} [sample data]{.underline}
unless allowance is made for [the possible]{.underline} variation which
could be due to chance [causes alone]{.underline}.
f\. This principle of statistical control is fundamental and must be
recognized in the interpretation of sample results. Assume, for example,
that the population in the illustration cited above represented
completed compensation and pension rating actions, with a standard
percent in error of 2.0%. [If adjective evaluations were assigned to
individual]{.underline} [sample]{.underline} results, a higher
evaluation [could not be assigned reliably to sample number]{.underline}
12 (containing 0.50% \"in error\") [than could be assigned to sample 13
(containing 4.00% \"in]{.underline} [error\").]{.underline} Both samples
yielded an error rate which could come from the same population, with an
underlying \"error rate\" of 2.0% and, in the illustration, both error
rates in fact did come from the same population. Unless it can be shown
with a high degree of confidence that the different sample results
reflect different quality levels, it would be a serious measurement
error to label the quality level as better on the basis of any one
sample result compared to another.
3 -4
| en |
converted_docs | 258553 | Required Report - public distribution
**Date:** 11/10/2005
**GAIN Report Number:** FR5068
FR5068
**France**
**Planting Seeds**
**Annual**
**2005**
**Approved by:**
Elizabeth B. Berry
U.S. Embassy
**Prepared by:**
Marie-Cécile Hénard
**Report Highlights:**
France is the largest European producer and the world\'s third leading
exporter of planting seeds. However, France has a seed trade deficit
with the United States. The main product exported by the United States
to France is corn for sowing. The French planting seed industry, which
favors biotechnology, has been affected in the past few years by the
destruction of many biotech test plots by opponents to biotechnology,
and the EU Commission delay of the regulation process to set thresholds
for the adventitious biotech presence in planting seeds. In addition,
French planting seed farmers need to adapt to the reformed CAP measures
in 2006 including fully decoupled direct payments and environmental
restrictions for direct payments.
Includes PSD Changes: No
Includes Trade Matrix: No
Annual Report
Paris \[FR1\]
\[FR\]
Table of Contents
[**Executive Summary 3**](#executive-summary)
[Production 3](#production)
[General 3](#general)
[Production Policy 4](#production-policy)
[Seed Certification -- Variety Approval
4](#seed-certification-variety-approval)
[Intellectual Property Rights 5](#intellectual-property-rights)
[Biotechnology 5](#biotechnology)
[Pending EU Regulation on Biotech in Planting Seeds
5](#pending-eu-regulation-on-biotech-in-planting-seeds)
[Open Field Test Plots and Production in 2005
6](#open-field-test-plots-and-production-in-2005)
[Testing for Biotech in Planting Seeds
6](#testing-for-biotech-in-planting-seeds)
[Trade 6](#trade)
# Executive Summary
France is a major producer and exporter of planting seeds but maintains
a trade deficit in planting seeds with the United States. The leading
product exported by the U.S. to France is corn for sowing. The French
planting seed industry, which favors biotechnology, has been affected in
the past few years by the destruction of test plots by opponents to
biotechnology and the EU Commission's failure to set thresholds for the
adventitious presence of biotech in planting seeds. In addition, French
planting seed farmers need to adapt to the reformed CAP, and principally
fully decoupled payments in 2006 and environmental restrictions for
direct payments.
# Production
##
## General
France is the largest seed producer in the European Union. Its planting
seed sector employs 15,000 people in 300 companies and involves 25,000
producers. According to the French planting seed association (GNIS), the
trends and breakdown of French production of certified seeds is
illustrated in the following graph. Since 1997/98, total production of
planting seeds has been relatively stable at approximately 1.3 million
MT. The leading categories produced by France are wheat and potato
planting seeds. However, production trends are opposite for these
products: while the production wheat for sowing has gradually declined,
the production of potatoes for planting has increased in the past few
years.
Of major interest for U.S. trade are corn seeds and soybean seeds. The
above graph indicates that corn for sowing is a major category of seeds
produced in France and that French production has been very stable in
the past few years. By contrast, French oilseed production is marginal
compared to the other categories of planting seeds produced. The graph
below indicates the breakdown and trends of the French production of
certified oilseeds. French production of certified rapeseed for planting
increased significantly in 2003/04 while soybean and sunflowerseed
production decreased. The increase follows the implementation of French
governmental incentives to produce biodiesel processed from rapeseed.
(For more information, please see FR5046 dated June 30, 2005, and FR5018
dated March 7, 2005)
## Production Policy
In 2006, production policy will be subject to several changes. Pursuant
to the Common Agricultural Policy, direct payments to farmers growing
planting seeds will be decoupled. Farmers with historical references
will receive direct payments but there will be no incentive for new
farmers to start such production. In addition, payments will be subject
to the environmental impact of farm practices (eco-conditionality),
whereby the quantity of chemical products is limited by the European
Phytosanitary Directive. This can penalize French farmers growing
planting seeds especially due to the limitations on the herbicides and
nitrogen inputs.
In addition, French producers of corn planting seeds are subject to the
current suspension of authorization of the seed treatment with two
insecticides (Bayer's Gaucho and BASF's Regent). While it is forbidden
to use these insecticides in France, French corn planting seed producers
favor the production of planting seeds treated with these chemicals to
be exported to countries where these products are still authorized. This
chemical ban on French corn seed exports could penalize French exports.
The French authority examining laws (Conseil d'Etat) is currently
reviewing the issue.
# Seed Certification -- Variety Approval
##
The French and EU seed registration systems are fully integrated,
therefore, seeds registered in any EU member state are also registered
in France, and vice versa.
The French seed sector is regulated by three main organizations. The
\"Permanent Technical Committee for Seed Selection\" (in French:
\"Comite Technique Permanent de la Selection,\" or CTPS) is a technical
committee answering to the French Minister of Agriculture (MinAg). CTPS
is made up of representatives of the French MinAg, seed producers,
traders and end users. CTPS sets the technical rules for registering
seed varieties in the French Seed Catalogue. Any petitioner registering
a new seed variety in the French Seed Catalogue must submit a detailed
file to the CTPS.
To get into the French Seed Catalogue, a new variety has to pass several
tests. These tests compare its agronomic and technical values to control
varieties and measure its stability and homogeneity. The Study and
Control Group for Varieties and Seeds (in French: \"Groupe d\'Etudes et
de Controle des Varietes et des Semences,\" or GEVES) conducts these
studies on 100,000 test plots across France. GEVES is comprised of
representatives from the French MinAg, the National Institute of
Agricultural Research (INRA), and the French seed industry organization
(in French: \"Groupement National Interprofessionnel des Semences,\" or
GNIS). Please see GEVES website for more information:
[http://www.geves.fr]{.underline} (in French)
If a new variety passes its tests, it is listed in the French Official
Seed Catalogue and is thus also registered for the entire EU. Varieties
registered in the European seed catalogue are listed on the GNIS
website, which also contains information in French and in English on
seed certification: [http://www.gnis.fr]{.underline}
Certified seed production is controlled by the \"Service Officiel de
Controle et de Certification\" (SOC), which is the joint responsibility
of GNIS and MinAg. The MinAg establishes the official criteria for
certification. Random tests in the field and at processing plants verify
the sanitary status of the seeds, the germination capacity and the
moisture level. The SOC has the power to levy administrative and
economic penalties, including fines and plant closures.
# Intellectual Property Rights
##
In France, the framework protecting new seed varieties is the 1961 UPOV
(Union pour la Protection des Obtentions Vegetales) Convention, which
was strengthened by the 1991 Act (UPOV 1991). In contrast to the patent
process used in the United States, these Conventions allow the use of a
Plant Variety Protection (PVP) to develop another variety without having
to pay a fee. The UPOV system is designed to protect the work of
breeders, to accommodate users' needs, and to specifically reserve
rights for further variety development. The production and sale of a
protected variety is subject to the approval of the variety breeder.
The Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO), based in Angers, France, is
the European authority implementing the European system for the
protection of plant variety rights. CPVO works with the French GEVES and
the other seed evaluation groups in EU Member States.
[http://www.cpvo.eu.int](http://www.cpvo.eu.int/)
France put its national law into compliance with Directive 98/44
(regulating intellectual property rights on plant varieties) in the law
2004-1338 of December 8, 2004 available at
<http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/WAspad/UnTexteDeJorf?numjo=ECOX0100118L>
The French law allows plant breeders making varietal selections to
freely use (copyrighted) plant varieties to create new varieties.
# Biotechnology
##
## Pending EU Regulation on Biotech in Planting Seeds
A European regulation setting thresholds for adventitious presence of
biotech planting seeds has been in discussion for several years. The
French planting seed industry believes that the lack of European biotech
regulation is counter to the interests of the European industry and
farmers. In late 2003, the European Scientific Committee proposed the
following thresholds of adventitious presence of biotech in planting
seeds: 0.3% for rapeseed, 0.5% for corn, and 0.7% for soybeans. Organic
farmers favor the lower threshold of 0.1%, which is the biotech
detection limit. The French planting seed industry believes European
Scientific Committee thresholds are too low and that, likewise, the
proposed organic threshold is untenable.
## Open Field Test Plots and Production in 2005
Several biotech test plots in France were destroyed during the summer of
2005. (see FR5054 dated July 28, 2005 and 5045 dated June 22, 2005).
Nevertheless, French farmers planted at least 500 hectares of biotech
corn in 2005. (see FR5060 dated September 13, 2005).
## Testing for Biotech in Planting Seeds
The Fraud Control Office of the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and
Industry (DGCCRF) conducts tests on planting seeds for biotech content.
In 2003/2004, DGCCRF tested 103 samples of rapeseed, corn and soybean
planting seeds taken from seed companies, importers, and distributors
across France. The 103 samples included 82 samples of French origin and
21 samples imported into France (2 from the United States). DGCCRF
detected GM content in 4 samples out of the 103 tested.
The Food Directorate of the French Ministry of Agriculture (DGAL)
conducts GM content tests on plantings seeds as they are imported into
France. In 2003, DGAL tested 238 samples of corn seeds, 38 samples of
tomato seeds, and 6 samples of soybean seeds. The tests showed that for
GM content 20 percent of the corn planting seeds had adventitious
content (all below 0.3 percent, most below 0.1 percent), all the tomato
seeds samples were negative and that two of the six soybean samples were
positive but both below the rate of 0.1 percent.
# Trade
France is the world's third largest exporter of planting seeds with
exports valued at 600 million euros. On the import side, in 2003/2004,
France imported seeds worth 372 million euros. As indicated in the graph
below, both imports and exports have gradually increased in the past few
years.
{width="4.458333333333333in"
height="3.0416666666666665in"}
The United States is France's second largest supplier of planting seeds
after the Netherlands, as indicated in the graph below.
Although France is a net exporter of total planting seeds, it has a
trade deficit with the United States, particularly in corn, soybean and
sunflower seeds. The graph below indicates that corn seeds are, by far,
the leading category of France's imports of U.S. seeds.
{width="4.770833333333333in"
height="3.0104166666666665in"}
The U.S. is France's largest supplier of corn seeds. The U.S. market
share for corn seeds remained relatively stable in 2004/05 at 27
percent. In the French market, U.S. corn seeds for sowing principally
compete with Chilean, Hungarian and Austrian products. Total French
imports of corn seeds for planting declined in 2004/05 as a result of
the lower acreage of corn in France planted for production.
| en |
markdown | 364028 | # Presentation: 364028
## Securing Your Home Computer
**Presenter:** Donnie Green
**Date:** February 11, 2009
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- www.nasa.gov
## Outline
- Background
- The Need For Protection
- Ten Things To Secure Your Computer
- Firewalls
- User Account
- Passwords
- Antivirus Software
- System Scans
- Software Updates
- Safe Browsing
- Freeware
- Email Security
- WiFi Security
- Links
## Background
- Every system connected to the Internet is susceptible to a wide array of threats. These threats include:
- Viruses/Worms/Trojans
- Spyware/Malware
- Denial of Service attacks
- Unauthorized access
- Phishing
- SPAM
- Each year security professionals see an increase in the complexity of attacks and the cost (time and money) to recover from a successful compromise
## The Need For Protection
- So how do you protect yourself from hackers and their attempts to compromise your system and steal your information?
- We have come up with 10 things you can do to protect yourself from most Internet threats.
- Deceptive Dialogs
- Fake Antivirus
- Ebay Phishing Scam
- Fake Windows security alert
- Valentine’s Day virus
## Ten Things To Secure Your Computer
- Firewalls
- User Accounts
- Passwords
- Antivirus software
- System Scans
- Software Updates
- Safe Browsing
- Freeware
- Email Security
- WiFi Security
## Firewalls
- Ensure your system is equipped with a personal firewall
- Windows _[XP](http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/security/winfirewall.mspx)_/_[VISTA](http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/Windows/en-US/Help/bfe523a9-7eec-4d3f-add1-2f68b9cfa1c01033.mspx)_ operating system firewall
- Third party personal firewalls (e.g., _[ZoneAlarm](http://www.zonealarm.com/security/en/computer-security.htm)_, _[Norton](http://www.symantec.com/norton/internet-security)_, _[BitDefender](http://www.bitdefender.com/)_)
- Keep third party personal firewalls subscriptions current and configure them to receive updates automatically.
- Also, enable firewalls embedded in your network router and wireless router.
- Enabling the router firewall adds another level of protection
- Be mindful of how you configure it because it can add complexity
## User Accounts
- Create a **Limited** (_[XP](http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/winxp/accounts.mspx)__)/_**Standard** (_[VISTA](http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/Windows/en-US/Help/68a1c4fd-b3f6-4cb9-93a1-8a6023836e531033.mspx)__) user account with limited privileges_
- The Limited/Standard account
- Limits installation of programs and modification of security settings; those that can be install are installed in the user context
- Reduces the risk of a threat installing malicious programs on your system
- Limits one user from doing anything that can affect other users of the computer
- The **Administrator** account is the first account configured when installing Windows XP/Vista
- This account has privileges to install and modify anything on your system
- Should only be used to install/remove programs, modify settings, and troubleshoot problems
- A **HIGH** security risk if your computer is compromised when you are logged in with this account
## Passwords
- Passwords are the *keys to the city* and should be *strong*
- A _[Strong Password ](http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/create.mspx)__contains_
- 12+ characters
- At least one special character
- At least one character from each of the other three character sets: uppercase, lowercase, numerals
- Passwords should be changed at least annually
- When _[creating a password](http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/create.mspx)__:_
- Avoid using dictionary words
- Never use a blank password
- Test the strength of your password _[here](http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/checker.mspx)__._
## Antivirus Software
- Antivirus software is a computer program that can detect, prevent, quarantine, and remove malicious programs from your computer
- Purchase and install antivirus software that detects the latest viruses and malware, allows automatic updates, permits customizable system scans
- Most Internet security vendors offer _[Security Suites](http://www.pcworld.com/article/158157/top_internet_security_suites_paying_for_protection.html)__ (_**RECOMMENDED**) which include antivirus, anti-spyware, anti-spam, IM security, and firewall software – benefits: cost, single vendor, good tool integration
- NASA HQ offers **FREE** antivirus software to NASA HQ employees. Call the IT Help Desk to request Home Use Software (PC or Mac)
- Configure antivirus software to: 1) auto-protect, 2) perform automatic updates, 3) scan all file types, 4) scan email attachments, and 5) scan the system daily
## System Scans
- System scans are a function of your antivirus software and should be run on a regular basis
- Configure your antivirus software to scan all files and folders at some regular interval (daily)
- By default, some antivirus software is only configured to run on a subset files and folders
- Configure these scans during times of least productivity
## Software Updates
- Software bugs and vulnerabilities are continuously being discovered and could make your system susceptible to compromise. Keeping your system updated is a great way to ensure you are running the latest secure version of software.
- To avoid running vulnerable software:
- Configure the Windows XP/VISTA operating system to _[automatically download and install software/security updates](http://www.microsoft.com/windows/downloads/windowsupdate/automaticupdate.mspx)_
- Configure all non-Windows software (e.g., personal firewall, antivirus, photo authoring tools, games) to *check for new updates* and install them when they become available
## Safe Browsing
- There are many sites on the Internet attempt to steal your information by downloading malicious software in the background, fooling you into entering private information onto fake websites, and
- To protect yourself:
- Install a Internet Security suite that scans attachments and your system (opt: rates sites)
- Ensure “secure” sites use HTTPS and have the SSL icon at the bottom of the page
- Do not open suspicious error dialogs from within in the browser or accept free deals
- Disable use of remembering passwords for sites
- Disable use of remembering what you entered in forms
- Always clear your private data when you close your browser
- Block pop-ups
- Set Internet zone security level
## Freeware
- Freeware is software offered free of charge that can be downloaded from the Internet.
**BEWARE** of “free” software as many sites package freeware with viruses, trojans, keyloggers, adware, and other malicious programs\
- Only download freeware programs from reputable websites; also perform Internet searches to see if other users have reported problems with the software
- Always use antivirus software to scan the software prior to execution or installation
## Email Security
- Email is a popular way for hackers to deliver and spread viruses and malware to a computer
- To ensure you do not infect your computer or others:
- Only open email attachments that come from a trusted source and that are **expected**
- Scan email attachments prior to opening
- Delete unwanted and suspicious messages such as spam
- Never send confidential information through email (e.g., SSN, credit card number and CVN)
- Always type URLs into your browser instead of clicking on the link
## WiFi Security
- Wireless networks are susceptible to the same vulnerabilities as the a wired network but in some ways more vulnerable to snooping.
- Wireless networks are, by default, unencrypted and can be used by anyone who can pick up the signal.
- To _[improve the security of your wireless network](http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/security/wireless.mspx)__, use encryption (WEP, WPA-PSK, WPA2)_
- Any encryption is better than none, but WPA2 is the best
- Configure the WPA2 passphrase using the principles from slide Strong Password
## Links
- Windows Automatic Updates: _[http://www.microsoft.com/windows/downloads/windowsupdate/automaticupdate.mspx](http://www.microsoft.com/windows/downloads/windowsupdate/automaticupdate.mspx)_
- Strong Passwords: _[http://](http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/create.mspx)__[www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/create.mspx](http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/create.mspx)_
- Password Checker: _[http://](http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/checker.mspx)__[www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/checker.mspx](http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/password/checker.mspx)_
- Home Computer Security: _[http://](http://www.cert.org/homeusers/HomeComputerSecurity/)__[www.cert.org/homeusers/HomeComputerSecurity](http://www.cert.org/homeusers/HomeComputerSecurity/)__[/](http://www.cert.org/homeusers/HomeComputerSecurity/)_
- Phishing: http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/phishing/identify.mspx
- Windows Firewall: http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/Windows/en-US/Help/bfe523a9-7eec-4d3f-add1-2f68b9cfa1c01033.mspx#EG
- Limited account: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/winxp/accounts.mspx
- Standard account: http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/Windows/en-US/Help/68a1c4fd-b3f6-4cb9-93a1-8a6023836e531033.mspx
- Internet Security Suites: http://www.pcworld.com/article/158157/top_internet_security_suites_paying_for_protection.html
## Questions & Answers
## SignOffPage
**Notes:**
NASA Presentation Sign-Off Page | en |
markdown | 815095 | # Presentation: 815095
## Effectively Meeting Security Requirements through KVM (Keyboard Video and Mouse) Technology
**Weapons Engineering Computer Support Team**
**Los Alamos National Laboratory**
**Brian Martinez, Computing, Telecommunications, and Networking Division (CTN-3)**
- LA-UR-07-3606
## Objective
**This presentation provides an introduction into a KVM implementation at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. It has been showcased multiple times to other agencies and Laboratories across the complex because of its security advantages. The presentation focuses on the system architecture and some of the tools developed for implementation. **
## Agenda
**Introduction to KVM Technology**
**Weapons Engineering Computer Support Team**
**Weapons Engineering Vault Configuration**
**Questions**
## KVM (Keyboard Video and Mouse)
**Keyboard, Video and Mouse at a users desktop.**
**Stands for the technologies which retain personal computing advantages, while centralizing administration and physical location.**
**More Secure, cheaper to manage**
- No desktop CREM
- Central locations streamline physical support
- “Always on” enables effective remote system management
## Technologies
**5 different KVM technologies available and implemented**
- Currently one size does not fit all
** **** ****High end Graphics VIS-4 Logical Solutions**
** ****Low end Graphics VIS-1 Logical Solutions**
** ****ClearCube Point to Point Solution**
** ****ClearCube IP Solution**
** ****Matrix Switch Solution**
## Weapons Systems Secure Computing Environment
- SRD COMPUTING
*System W/HD*
*(Access control *
*Approved or Equivalent)*
**Remote Access**
**SECURE PTS/Encrypted**
*Approved*
*Office Secure*
*Lock Box*
*Users KVM Work Area*
*(No Writable Media, NO USB)*
## WECS Team Secure Computing Overview
**589 KVM Units Implemented in WECS Support area**
**Service provided to over 800 classified users**
**100% of classified desktop/workstations on a Non-CREM solution.**
**Machine controllers are the only machines left with a disk.**
## KVM installation at TA16-933
- Using 1 “unit” high computers, the black devices in the lower portion, and muti-fiber KVM units, the beige units in the top half of the rack.
- This installation eliminated 65 hard drives that were previously stored in safes when not in use. Furthermore, it eliminates user access to CREM reading and writing devices.
## Standard Weapon Systems vault Configuration
- Weapons Engineering Vault
## Using Clearcube Blade Technology we are able to support 80 blades per rack.
- This rack installation also has 3 UPS units and 4 PDU’s
- ClearCube Rack Configuration (Front side)
## ClearCube Rack Configuration (Back side)
- Clearcube IP based Blade Solutions
## Logical Solutions/Dell 1850 Rack Configuration (front)
- Dell 1u servers/Logical Solutions
- 16 users per Rack
## Logical Solutions/Dell 1850 Rack Configuration (Back)
- Approved PTS Wire Separation
- (Power separated from Video)
## No Mass Storage Devices
**Technology used only enumerates human interface devices (HID) such as mouse and keyboard at the clients workstation.**
**Physical hardware disablement through Jumper setting on motherboard.**
**Software USB disablement and monitoring on all KVM machines.**
## 1u Workstations
**Dell 1750, 1850, 1950**
- Dual core, dual 3.00 ghz processor, 4-8 gig ram, High end Video
- 32 bit and 64 bit Operating System
**HP DL140 G3**
- Dual Core, Dual core, dual 3.00 ghz processor, 4-8 gig ram, High end Video
- 32 bit and 64 bit Operating System
## Point to Point KVM
**Logical Solutions**
- VIS-4- Digital Fiber Optic Transceiver, receiver System
- 1600x1200 Resolution
- Up to 1,000 meters
- VIS-8- Digital Fiber Optic Transceiver, receiver System, Dual Link
- 1920x1200 resolution
- Dual LCD’s available
- Up to 1,000 meters
## Blades
**Blades**
_**New -- Model R1300**_
**Intel 945G chipset**
**Single & Dual Core Pentium 4**
**Integrated Intel® GMA 950 Graphics**
**Integrated Gigabit Ethernet port**
**Secondary 10/100 Ethernet port**
**8 Blades fit into a single Cage**
**USB 2.0 port on front and out back**
**PCI Express Video Option ****– NVS285 w/ 128 MB VRAM**
_**New -- Model R2200**_
**Intel E7525 chipset w/ 800 MHz FSB**
**Dual Intel Xeon Processors with HT**
**1 MB and 2 MB L2 Cache**
**Dual Gigabit Ethernet ports**
**Dual SATA II Hard Drives with HW Raid 0, 1**
**4 Blades fit into a single Cage**
**NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 (128 MB VRAM) Graphics – PCI Express**
## Blade Infrastructure – Chassis & Connection Modules
**112 PC Blades per 42U Rack******
_**New -- R4300 Series**_
## I/Port Model I8330
**I/Port Model I8330**
**Host: **
**Software that runs on existing & future ClearCube blades**
**Runs on Windows XP and Windows 2000**
**Unique video compression and USB extension technology**
**Doesn’t depend on MS RDP, but still runs over routable Ethernet**
**Supports multiple users per blade via virtual machines**
** ****(no WinConnect support)**
**Client:**
**Fully embedded System-on-Chip**** solution (like the C/Port)**
**No configurable items (no OS, ****no removable memory or flash)**
**Supports streaming video and audio (best performance in a 320x240 window)**
**Managed by ClearCube Sentral**
## I/Port I8330 Connections
**Single VGA output (1280x1024, 16-bit max resolution)**
**10/100 Ethernet**
**PS/2 Mouse and Keyboard**
**Audio Out *****and***** Audio In for microphone use**
**4 transparently extended USB ports (bulk-mode and interrupt-mode USB devices including mass storage, scanners, etc.)**
## Software
**Combines previous generation tools into a single integrated console (5****th**** generation)**
**Enterprise Scalability: Powerful Views and Dashboard let admins “slice and dice” their environments**
**Remote Browser-based access and User Roaming**
**Support for virtual machines**
**Modular architecture supports “plug-in” software modules for added functionality (Switching Module and Dynamic Allocation Module)**
**English and Japanese Localization**
## WECS TEAM KVM Visitors
**Livermore National Laboratory**
**Sandia National Laboratory**
**Department of Energy; LA, Abq., DC**
**Pantex**
**Savanna River**
**Nevada Test Site**
**University of California**
**Congressional Members**
**Many Divisions in the Laboratory**
**Acting NNSA Administrator**
**Department of Energy Chief of Staff**
## KVM
**KVM technology has proven to be a secure and cost effective solution to the “ACREM” issue**
**Technology continues to evolve**
**LANL continues to evaluate improvements and development in media-less technologies**
## WECS Classified Computing Future
**Implement new Clearcube I-PORT Technology**
**Cost effective (much cheaper than current KVM)**
**High end computing available for CAD users**
**Easier Maintenance**
***Potential* for entry costs under $1K per user for non-engineering workers (multi-user computers)**
## Contact Information
**Brian Martinez**
**CTN-3 Los Alamos National Laboratory**
**Phone 505-667-3940**
**E-mail Brianm@lanl.gov** | en |
all-txt-docs | 274693 | HDR1012000140060912970800Vegetables
Vegetables
National
Agricultural
Statistics
Service
USDA
Washington, D.C.
Released September 10, 1997, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For
information on "Vegetables " call David Mueller at (202) 720-2157, office
hours 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET.
Processing Production Down 9 Percent from Last Year
Processing vegetable production for the 4 major processing crops is forecast
at 14.3 million tons, down 9 percent from last year and 10 percent less than 2
years ago. Production of processing tomatoes, at 10.0 million tons, is off 11
percent from last year and the lowest since 1993. Snap bean production, at
718,460 tons, is down 3 percent from last year. Sweet corn production, at
3.07 million tons, is off 7 percent from last year, and green pea production,
at 494,680 tons, is up 20 percent from 1996. Acres for harvest for the 4
major processing vegetable crops, at 1.20 million acres, are 4 percent less
than in 1996.
Storage Onion Production Down 2 Percent
Storage onion production (excluding California) is forecast at 35.8 million
hundredweight, up 8 percent from last year and 2 percent more than in 1995.
Total onion production (excluding Nevada) is estimated at 61.8 million
hundredweight, 3 percent more than last year but 2 percent less than 2 years
ago.
Asparagus Production Down 1 Percent
Production of the 1997 asparagus crop is estimated at 1.98 million cwt, 1
percent less than in 1996 and 2 percent less than in 1995. Acres harvested,
at 73,570, are up slightly from last year and 2 percent greater than in 1995.
Fresh production of 1.20 million cwt, is up 7 percent from 1996 and 9 percent
greater than 1995. Processed production, at 38,910 tons, is off 10 percent
from 1996 and 16 percent less than 1995.
Processing Production Down 9 Percent
Snap Beans: Production of snap beans is estimated at 718,460 tons, down 3
percent from last year but 7 percent more than in 1995. A 3 percent decrease
in harvested acreage more than offset a .01 ton per acre increase in yield.
The growing season in California was very good with adequate water supplies
and favorable temperatures. In North Carolina, New Jersey, and parts of
Delaware and Maryland, hot and dry conditions reduced yields, especially on
non-irrigated fields. A cool, wet spring, followed by a dry summer, stunted
the growth of some non-irrigated fields in New York. Irrigated fields have
persevered, and an average crop is expected. The harvesting is late, and
about 30 percent of the New York crop was harvested by the beginning of
September. In Wisconsin, cool temperatures and damp conditions during August,
with scattered heavy rains in the southern part of the state, decreased some
yields.
Sweet Corn: Expected sweet corn production is estimated at 3.07 million tons,
down 7 percent from last year and off 8 percent from 1995. An 8 percent
decrease in acreage more than offset a .11 ton per acre increase in yield. In
Delaware, the harvest has progressed well with fair to good yields reported.
In New York, a long cool spring, followed by a hot dry summer, reduced yield
potentials, especially on non-irrigated land. Harvest was about 60 percent
complete by September 1. In Wisconsin, the crop received adequate moisture.
However, cool conditions in mid-August slowed growth. The late season crop
looks good, with good yields anticipated. Harvest of the crop in Minnesota is
active, and progress, at 64 percent complete, was well ahead of last year and
average. Producers in Idaho reported that their crop had excellent yields and
good quality. Harvests in Oregon and Washington were active and on schedule.
Tomatoes: Tomato production is forecast at 10.0 million tons, 11 percent less
than last year and 10 percent less than the 1995 crop. A 13 percent decrease
in acreage more than offset a .75 ton increase in yield. Cool, wet spring
conditions delayed tomato maturity in the eastern half of the Nation. In
Michigan, the harvest was delayed nearly 3 weeks by the slow-maturing crop.
Yield prospects appear good, provided that the weather stays favorable. In
California, ideal weather conditions in late spring and early summer induced
good growth. However, unexpected cool nights raised concerns about mold
damage. Unseasonable rains in mid-August brought mold damage to some fields in
Yolo County. The extent of the damage was unknown as of September 1.
Processing Vegetables: Area Harvested and Production
by Crop, United States, 1995-97
(Domestic Units)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Area Harvested
:----------------------------------------------------------
Crop : : 1996 : Indicated
: 1995 :-----------------------------: 1997
: Total : Total : Contract 1/ : Contract 1/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Acres
:
All Processing :
Snap Beans : 213,040 198,750 192,700 187,460
Sweet Corn : 483,910 474,200 472,600 434,400
Green Peas 2/ : 304,000 247,200 247,200 282,300
Tomatoes : 344,380 339,120 335,820 291,350
:
Total : 1,345,330 1,259,270 1,248,320 1,195,510
:
Cucumbers for :
Pickles 3/ : 116,890 105,800 91,250
:
Total 5 Vegetables: 1,462,220 1,365,070 1,339,570
:----------------------------------------------------------
: Production
:----------------------------------------------------------
: : 1996 : Indicated
: 1995 :-----------------------------: 1997
: Total : Total : Contract 1/ : Contract 1/
:----------------------------------------------------------
: Tons
:
All Processing :
Snap Beans : 695,450 760,170 739,750 718,460
Sweet Corn : 3,324,150 3,296,330 3,287,010 3,066,420
Green Peas 2/ : 492,590 413,800 413,800 494,680
Tomatoes : 11,286,040 11,408,740 11,277,810 10,018,610
:
Total : 15,798,230 15,879,040 15,718,370 14,298,170
:
Cucumbers for :
Pickles 3/ : 610,460 575,720 481,560
:
Total 5 Vegetables: 16,408,690 16,454,760 16,199,930
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/ Includes acreage from major brokers.
2/ Carried forward from earlier forecast.
3/ Cucumbers for pickles will be published in the January annual.
Processing Vegetables: Area Harvested and Production
by Crop, United States, 1995-97
(Metric Units)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Area Harvested
:----------------------------------------------------------
Crop : : 1996 : Indicated
: 1995 :-----------------------------: 1997
: Total : Total : Contract 1/ : Contract 1/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Hectares
:
All Processing :
Snap Beans : 86,220 80,430 77,980 75,860
Sweet Corn : 195,830 191,900 191,260 175,800
Green Peas 2/ : 123,030 100,040 100,040 114,240
Tomatoes : 139,370 137,240 135,900 117,910
:
Total : 544,450 509,610 505,180 483,810
:
Cucumbers for :
Pickles 3/ : 47,300 42,820 36,930
:
Total 5 Vegetables: 591,750 552,430 542,110
:----------------------------------------------------------
: Production
:----------------------------------------------------------
: : 1996 : Indicated
: 1995 :-----------------------------: 1997
: Total : Total : Contract 1/ : Contract 1/
:----------------------------------------------------------
: Metric Tons
:
All Processing :
Snap Beans : 630,900 689,610 671,090 651,770
Sweet Corn : 3,015,620 2,990,380 2,981,910 2,781,790
Green Peas 2/ : 446,870 375,390 375,390 448,760
Tomatoes : 10,238,530 10,349,840 10,231,000 9,088,680
:
Total : 14,331,920 14,405,220 14,259,390 12,971,000
:
Cucumbers for :
Pickles 3/ : 553,800 522,280 436,860
:
Total 5 Vegetables: 14,885,720 14,927,500 14,696,250
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/ Includes acreage from major brokers.
2/ Carried forward from earlier forecast.
3/ Cucumbers for pickles will be published in the January annual.
Snap Beans for Processing: Area Harvested, Yield, and Production
by State and United States, 1995-97
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Area Harvested
:----------------------------------------------------------------------
State : : 1996 : Indicated
: 1995 :-----------------------------------: 1997
: Total : Total : Contract 1/ : Contract 1/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Acres
:
FL : 1,000
IL : 16,500 18,900 16,000 11,000
IN : 4,100 670 670 2,000
MI : 21,500 21,000 21,000 22,000
NY : 21,400 20,200 20,200 20,600
OR : 23,600 22,500 22,500 23,300
PA : 8,200 4,100 4,100 7,400
WI : 67,900 62,300 61,600 58,500
:
Oth :
Sts 2/: 48,840 49,080 46,630 42,660
:
US : 213,040 198,750 192,700 187,460
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------
: Yield per Acre : Production
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------
: : :Indicated: : 1996 : Indicated
: 1995 : 1996 : 1997 : 1995 :-----------------------: 1997
: Total : Total :Contract : Total : : Contract : Contract
: : : 1/ : : Total : 1/ : 1/
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------
: Tons
:
FL : 2.90 2,900
IL : 2.40 3.90 3.70 39,600 73,710 62,400 40,700
IN : 3.07 2.31 2.80 12,590 1,550 1,550 5,600
MI : 2.86 3.30 3.00 61,490 69,300 69,300 66,000
NY : 3.59 3.50 3.50 76,830 70,700 70,700 72,100
OR : 5.93 5.96 6.80 139,950 134,100 134,100 158,440
PA : 2.25 3.21 3.20 18,450 13,160 13,160 23,680
WI : 3.21 3.72 3.60 217,960 231,760 229,390 210,600
:
Oth :
Sts 2/: 2.57 3.38 3.31 125,680 165,890 159,150 141,340
:
US : 3.26 3.82 3.83 695,450 760,170 739,750 718,460
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/ Includes acreage from major brokers.
2/ 1995 - AZ, AR, CA, DE, ID, GA, MD, MN, MO, NJ, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA,
and WA.
1996 - AR, CA, DE, FL, GA, MD, MN, MO, NJ, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, TX, and WA.
1997 - AR, CA, DE, FL, GA, MD, MN, MO, NJ, NC, OH, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, and
WA.
Sweet Corn for Processing: Area Harvested, Yield, and Production
by State and United States, 1995-97
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Area Harvested
:----------------------------------------------------------------------
State : : 1996 : Indicated
: 1995 :-----------------------------------: 1997
: Total : Total : Contract 1/ : Contract 1/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Acres
:
ID : 14,000 17,500 17,500 15,000
IL : 26,300 22,200 22,100 15,900
MI : 4,100 3,700 3,700
MN : 116,400 120,100 120,100 110,500
NY : 38,500 40,900 40,900 36,700
OR : 48,900 48,300 48,300 45,700
PA : 2,900 2,700 2,700 2,700
WA : 82,700 75,300 75,300 79,000
WI : 123,800 115,900 114,400 102,000
:
Oth :
Sts 2/: 26,310 27,600 27,600 26,900
:
US : 483,910 474,200 472,600 434,400
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------
: Yield per Acre : Production
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------
: : :Indicated: : 1996 : Indicated
: 1995 : 1996 : 1997 : 1995 :-----------------------: 1997
: Total : Total :Contract : Total : : Contract : Contract
: : : 1/ : : Total : 1/ : 1/
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------
: Tons
:
ID : 8.85 9.22 9.50 123,900 161,350 161,350 142,500
IL : 5.10 6.20 5.90 134,130 137,640 137,020 93,810
MI : 6.00 6.75 24,600 24,980 24,980
MN : 5.77 5.99 6.00 671,630 719,400 719,400 663,000
NY : 5.80 5.50 5.00 223,300 224,950 224,950 183,500
OR : 9.25 9.07 9.45 452,330 438,080 438,080 431,870
PA : 5.10 6.30 6.70 14,790 17,010 17,010 18,090
WA : 9.96 9.04 9.30 823,690 680,710 680,710 734,700
WI : 5.58 6.05 6.10 690,800 701,200 692,500 622,200
:
Oth :
Sts 2/: 6.27 6.92 6.57 164,980 191,010 191,010 176,750
:
US : 6.87 6.95 7.06 3,324,150 3,296,330 3,287,010 3,066,420
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/ Includes acreage from major brokers.
2/ 1995 - CA, DE, IA, MD, NJ, OH, and VA.
1996 - DE, IA, MD, NJ, and OH.
1997 - DE, IN, IA, MD, NJ, and TN.
Tomatoes for Processing: Area Harvested, Yield, and Production
by State and United States, 1995-97
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Area Harvested
:----------------------------------------------------------------------
State : : 1996 : Indicated
: 1995 :-----------------------------------: 1997
: Total : Total : Contract 1/ : Contract 1/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Acres
:
CA : 317,000 313,000 310,000 269,000
CO : 180 220 220
IN : 6,700 6,400 6,400 6,500
MI : 4,500 4,400 4,300 3,400
OH : 10,400 10,500 10,400 9,000
PA : 1,400 800 800 1,100
:
Oth :
Sts 2/: 4,200 3,800 3,700 2,350
:
US : 344,380 339,120 335,820 291,350
:----------------------------------------------------------------------
: Yield per Acre : Production
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------
: : :Indicated: : 1996 : Indicated
: 1995 : 1996 : 1997 : 1995 :-----------------------: 1997
: Total : Total :Contract : Total : : Contract : Contract
: : : 1/ : : Total : 1/ : 1/
:-----------------------------------------------------------------------
: Tons
:
CA : 33.46 34.06 34.94 10,606,820 10,660,780 10,540,000 9,400,000
CO : 10.22 17.72 1,840 3,900 3,900
IN : 23.50 28.20 26.00 157,450 180,480 180,480 169,000
MI : 30.00 32.50 34.00 135,000 143,000 138,600 115,600
OH : 25.93 29.30 28.20 269,670 307,650 304,750 253,800
PA : 26.14 27.88 24.00 36,600 22,300 22,300 26,400
:
Oth :
Sts 2/: 18.73 23.85 22.90 78,660 90,630 87,780 53,810
:
US : 32.77 33.64 34.39 11,286,040 11,408,740 11,277,810 10,018,610
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/ Includes acreage from major brokers.
2/ 1995 - DE, IL, MD, NJ, NY, SC, TX, and VA.
1996-97 - DE, IL, MD, NJ, NY, SC, and VA.
Asparagus: Production of the 1997 asparagus crop is estimated at 1.98 million
cwt, 1 percent less than in 1996 and 2 percent less than in 1995. Acres
harvested, at 73,570, are up slightly from last year and 2 percent greater than
in 1995. Fresh production of 1.20 million cwt, is up 7 percent from 1996 and 9
percent greater than 1995. Processed production, at 38,910 tons, is off 10
percent from 1996 and 16 percent less than 1995. Asparagus for canning, at
28,400 tons, is down 19 percent from last year. Frozen asparagus production of
10,505 tons is 23 percent greater than in 1996. Total value of the crop, at
182 million dollars, is 16 percent greater than in 1996 and 3 percent more than
in 1995. Michigan's harvest got off to a slow start due to record cold
temperatures with some frost damage in May. Harvest then proceeded normally.
Above average temperatures in late June shortened the New Jersey harvest.
Quality was generally good and prices were comparable to the previous year.
Harvest is virtually complete in California. Producers reported that the crop
is of good quality. The Washington harvest started at its usual time in
mid-April. However, cooler and wetter than normal spring conditions reduced
yield
potential.
Asparagus for Fresh Market and Processing: Area Planted and Harvested,
Yield, Production, and Value by State and United States, 1995-97
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Area Planted : Area Harvested
State :----------------------------------------------------------------
: 1995 : 1996 : 1997 : 1995 : 1996 : 1997
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Acres
:
CA : 30,800 30,000 32,700 28,000 29,000 30,100
IL : 720 300 200 720 300 200
MI : 17,500 18,000 18,000 17,000 17,500 17,500
NJ : 1,000 1,000 1,000 900 900 1,000
WA : 24,000 24,000 24,000 23,000 23,000 23,000
:
Oth Sts 1/ : 2,720 2,860 1,770 2,720 2,860 1,770
:
US : 76,740 76,160 77,670 72,340 73,560 73,570
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: Yield per Acre : Production
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: 1995 : 1996 : 1997 : 1995 : 1996 : 1997
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: ------------ Cwt ----------- --------- 1,000 Cwt ---------
:
CA : 28 26 27 784 754 813
IL : 10 9 11 7 3 2
MI : 18 17 15 306 298 263
NJ : 28 40 23 25 36 23
WA : 37 36 36 851 828 828
:
Oth Sts 1/ : 19 24 29 51 70 52
:
US : 28 27 27 2,024 1,989 1,981
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: Value
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: Per Cwt : Total
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: 1995 : 1996 : 1997 : 1995 : 1996 : 1997
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: ---------- Dollars --------- ------- 1,000 Dollars -------
:
CA : 117.00 85.90 116.00 91,728 64,769 94,012
IL : 73.10 120.00 141.00 512 360 282
MI : 65.70 67.50 67.70 20,106 20,110 17,792
NJ : 112.00 107.00 107.00 2,800 3,852 2,461
WA : 68.90 76.50 77.50 58,659 63,312 64,204
:
Oth Sts 1/ : 66.00 61.40 70.30 3,365 4,298 3,657
:
US : 87.50 78.80 92.10 177,170 156,701 182,408
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/ IN, MD, MN, and OR.
Asparagus for Fresh Market and Processing: Production and Value
by Utilization, State, and United States, 1995-97
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Utilization : Production
and :----------------------------------------------------------------
State : 1995 : 1996 : 1997
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: 1,000 Cwt
:
Fresh Market :
MI : 36 33 39
NJ : 25 36 23
WA : 231 268 308
Oth Sts 1/ : 808 783 833
:
US : 1,100 1,120 1,203
: Tons
:
Processing :
MI : 13,500 13,260 11,200
WA : 31,000 28,000 26,000
Oth Sts 1/ : 1,680 2,200 1,710
:
US : 46,180 43,460 38,910
:
Canning : 37,550 34,940 28,400
:
Freezing : 8,630 8,520 10,510
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: Value
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: Per Unit : Total
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: 1995 : 1996 : 1997 : 1995 : 1996 : 1997
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: ------- Dollars per Cwt ------ ------- 1,000 Dollars -------
:
Fresh Market :
MI : 71.00 79.00 80.00 2,556 2,607 3,120
NJ : 112.00 107.00 107.00 2,800 3,852 2,461
WA : 109.00 114.00 108.00 25,179 30,552 33,264
Oth Sts 1/ : 116.00 85.50 115.00 93,636 66,985 96,011
:
US : 113.00 92.90 112.00 124,171 103,996 134,856
: ------- Dollars per Ton ------ ------- 1,000 Dollars ------
Processing :
MI : 1,300.00 1,320.00 1,310.00 17,550 17,503 14,672
WA : 1,080.00 1,170.00 1,190.00 33,480 32,760 30,940
Oth Sts 1/ : 1,170.00 1,110.00 1,140.00 1,969 2,442 1,940
:
US : 1,150.00 1,210.00 1,220.00 52,999 52,705 47,552
:
Canning : 1,120.00 1,220.00 1,210.00 41,984 42,581 34,280
:
Freezing : 1,280.00 1,190.00 1,260.00 11,015 10,124 13,272
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/ CA, IL, IN, MD, MN, and OR.
Onions: Annual production of onions (excluding Nevada) is forecast at 61.8
million hundredweight, up 3 percent from comparable production in 1996 but 2
percent less than 1995. Acreage for harvest, at 153,430, is down 3 percent
from last year's comparable acreage. Yield per acre, at 403 cwt, is 20 cwt
more than 1996's comparable yield.
Storage Onions: Production of summer storage onions (excluding California) is
forecast at 35.8 million cwt, 8 percent more than 1996 and 2 percent more than
in 1995. Harvested acreage, at 80,330, is 4 percent more than last year, while
yield at 445 cwt per acre is 17 cwt more than in 1996. In Wisconsin, cool
mid-August conditions promoted weed growth but slowed onion development. Onion
harvest in Michigan is underway. Maturity is behind, but the crop outlook is
excellent. Yield is forecast at a record tying high due to moderate summer
conditions. Dry conditions in New York did not necessarily hurt onion yields.
Recent rainfall should help size onions and improve conditions. Harvest is to
start about a week later than usual due to a wet, cool spring. Overabundance of
precipitation in July and August resulted in disease problems for the Colorado
crop. Producers expect a lower than average yield. The weather in Eastern
Oregon was cooler during the summer than last year. Although the weather has
not been unfavorable for onions, the cooler temperatures could bring lower
yields than in 1996. Western Oregon had a hot, dry summer which could produce
higher yields than in 1996. Washington onions are in good condition and an
excellent harvest is in progress. Size is larger than normal. Producers
expect a record yield at this time.
California production is forecast at 12.8 million cwt, 4 percent less than last
year but 1 percent greater than two years ago. Acres harvested, at 29,000, are
6 percent less than last year. Yield, at 440 cwt per acre, is 10 cwt greater
than in 1996.
Spring Onions: The season end report of spring onions places production at 9.2
million cwt, down 1 percent from last year and 9 percent less than in 1995.
Acreage harvested, at 32,900 acres, is down 11 percent from a year ago, but
yield at 278 cwt per acre is up 26 cwt per acre. The value of the spring crop
is estimated at 172 million dollars, 36 percent greater than last year.
Onions: Area Planted and Harvested, Yield, Production,
and Value, Selected States, 1996-97
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Area : Yield per Acre
Crop :----------------------------------------------------------------
and : Planted : Harvested : :
State :-------------------------------------------: 1996 : 1997
: 1996 : 1997 : 1996 : 1997 : :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ---------------- Acres ---------------- ----- Cwt ----
:
Spring :
AZ : 2,100 1,800 1,900 1,800 400 410
CA : 7,500 7,400 7,200 7,200 380 445
GA : 16,000 16,200 14,700 15,800 120 220
TX : 15,300 12,400 13,000 8,100 310 215
Total : 40,900 37,800 36,800 32,900 252 278
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: Production : Value
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: : : Per Cwt : Total
: 1996 : 1997 :------------------------------------------
: : : 1996 : 1997 : 1996 : 1997
:----------------------------------------------------------------
: --- 1,000 Cwt -- ---- Dollars --- 1,000 Dollars
:
Spring :
AZ : 760 738 8.63 9.91 6,559 7,315
CA : 2,736 3,204 9.80 14.30 26,813 45,817
GA : 1,764 3,476 30.50 25.60 53,800 88,990
TX : 4,030 1,742 9.68 17.20 39,010 29,940
Total : 9,290 9,160 13.60 18.80 126,182 172,062
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Onions: Yield, and Production by Season, Type,
and State, 1995-97
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Area : Yield per Acre
Season :----------------------------------------------------------
and : Harvested : For : : :
State :-------------------: Harvest : 1995 : 1996 : 1997
: 1995 : 1996 : 1997 : : :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ---------- Acres ---------- --------- Cwt ---------
:
Spring : 35,600 36,800 32,900 284 252 278
Summer :
Non-Storage 1/ : 15,700 13,900 11,200 397 400 366
:
Storage :
CO : 17,800 16,000 16,500 345 325 340
ID : 8,700 8,600 8,200 630 650 660
MI : 6,400 5,800 6,000 290 310 340
MN : 520 520 570 240 220 300
NY : 12,600 11,400 11,600 320 240 300
OH : 480 490 460 305 380 350
OR Malheur - : 12,300 12,000 12,000 580 590 590
West : 6,800 6,300 7,400 400 380 400
UT : 2,200 2,100 2,300 440 470 460
WA : 12,500 12,700 13,500 490 510 530
WI : 1,900 1,700 1,800 235 370 350
Subtotal : 82,200 77,610 80,330 428 428 445
:
CA 2/ : 30,500 31,000 29,000 415 430 440
:
Summer Total : 128,400 122,510 120,530 421 425 437
:
US : 164,000 159,310 153,430 391 385 403
:----------------------------------------------------------
: Production
:----------------------------------------------------------
: 1995 : 1996 : 1997
:----------------------------------------------------------
: 1,000 Cwt
:
Spring : 10,110 9,290 9,160
Summer :
Non-Storage 1/ : 6,239 5,558 4,100
:
Storage :
CO : 6,141 5,200 5,610
ID : 5,481 5,590 5,412
MI : 1,856 1,798 2,040
MN : 125 114 171
NY : 4,032 2,736 3,480
OH : 146 186 161
OR Malheur - : 7,134 7,080 7,080
West : 2,720 2,394 2,960
UT : 968 987 1,058
WA : 6,125 6,477 7,155
WI : 447 629 630
Subtotal : 35,175 33,191 35,757
:
CA 2/ : 12,658 13,330 12,760
:
Summer Total : 54,072 52,079 52,617
:
US : 64,182 61,369 61,777
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/ Carried forward from earlier forecast.
2/ Primarily for processing.
The next Vegetables report will be released at 3 p.m. ET on October 8, 1997.
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in
its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age,
disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. Persons with
disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program
information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA's
TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).
To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, USDA, Washington,
D.C., 20250, or call 1-800-245-6340 (voice) or 202-720-1127 (TDD). USDA is an
equal employment opportunity employer.
ACCESS TO REPORTS!!
For your convenience, there are several ways to obtain NASS reports, data
products, and services:
INTERNET ACCESS
All NASS reports are available free of charge on the worldwide Internet. For
access, connect to the Internet and go to the NASS Home Page at:
http://www.usda.gov/nass/. Select "Today's Reports" or Publications and then
Reports by Calendar or Publications and then Search, by Title or Subject.
E-MAIL SUBSCRIPTION
All NASS reports are available by subscription free of charge direct to your
e-mail address. Send an e-mail message to:
usda-reports@usda.mannlib.cornell.edu. In the body of the message type the
word: list.
AUTOFAX ACCESS
NASSFax service is available for some reports from your fax machine. Please
call 202-720-2000, using the handset attached to your fax. Respond to the
voice prompts. Document 0411 is a list of available reports.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PRINTED REPORTS OR DATA PRODUCTS
CALL OUR TOLL-FREE ORDER DESK: 800-999-6779 (U.S. and Canada)
Other areas, please call 703-834-0125 FAX: 703-834-0110
(Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order acceptable for payment.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ASSISTANCE
For assistance with general agricultural statistics or further information
about NASS or its products or services, contact the Agricultural Statistics
Hotline at 800-727-9540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail:
nass@nass.usda.gov.
| en |
log-files | 805699 | # Date 2008-01-16 Time 06:11:21 PST -0800 (1200492681.92 s)
#phil __OFF__
Command line arguments: "../1041.param" "main.number_of_macro_cycles=5" "--overwrite"
HOST = sunbird.lbl.gov
HOSTTYPE = x86_64-linux
USER = phzwart
PID = 8735
JOB_ID = 5159
SGE_ARCH = lx24-amd64
SGE_TASK_FIRST = 1
SGE_TASK_LAST = 1330
SGE_TASK_ID = 1041
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHENIX: Python-based Hierarchical ENvironment for Integrated Xtallography
User: phzwart
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
phenix.refine: Macromolecular Structure Refinement
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phenix developers include:
Paul Adams, Pavel Afonine, Vicent Chen, Ian Davis, Kreshna Gopal,
Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve, Li-Wei Hung, Robert Immormino, Tom Ioerger,
Airlie McCoy, Erik McKee, Nigel Moriarty, Reetal Pai, Randy Read,
Jane Richardson, David Richardson, Tod Romo, Jim Sacchettini,
Nicholas Sauter, Jacob Smith, Laurent Storoni, Tom Terwilliger,
Peter Zwart
Phenix home page:
http://www.phenix-online.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phenix components are copyrighted by:
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Los Alamos National Laboratory
- University of Cambridge
- Duke University
- Texas Agricultural Experiment Station &
Texas Engineering Experiment Station
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major third-party components of Phenix include:
Python, wxwidgets, wxPython, Boost, SCons, Clipper,
CCP4 Monomer Library, CCP4 I/O libraries, PyCifRW, FFTPACK, L-BFGS
Enter phenix.acknowledgments for details.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processing inputs. This may take a minute or two.
Command line parameter definitions:
refinement.main.number_of_macro_cycles = 5
Working crystal symmetry after inspecting all inputs:
Unit cell: (71.3037, 47.1647, 87.2539, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/model.pdb
Monomer Library directory:
"/net/rosie/scratch3/phzwart/CCTBX/Sources/mon_lib"
Total number of atoms: 2823
Number of models: 1
Model: 0
Number of conformers: 2
Conformer: "A"
Number of atoms: 2769
Number of chains: 2
Number of residues, atoms: 302, 2333
Classifications: {'peptide': 302}
Modifications used: {'COO': 1}
Link IDs: {'PTRANS': 7, 'CIS': 1, 'TRANS': 293}
Number of residues, atoms: 436, 436
Classifications: {'water': 436}
Link IDs: {None: 435}
Conformer: "B"
Number of atoms: 2771
Common with "A": 2717
Number of chains: 2
Number of residues, atoms: 302, 2333
Classifications: {'peptide': 302}
Modifications used: {'COO': 1}
Link IDs: {'PTRANS': 7, 'CIS': 1, 'TRANS': 293}
bond proxies already assigned to first conformer: 2332
Number of residues, atoms: 438, 438
Classifications: {'water': 438}
Link IDs: {None: 437}
Time building chain proxies: 3.29, per 1000 atoms: 1.17
================================== X-ray data =================================
F-obs:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:FOBS,SIGMA
R-free flags:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:TEST
Miller array info: /net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:FOBS,SIGMA
Observation type: xray.amplitude
Type of data: double, size=19589
Type of sigmas: double, size=19589
Number of Miller indices: 19589
Anomalous flag: False
Unit cell: (71.3037, 47.1647, 87.2539, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
Systematic absences: 0
Centric reflections: 2427
Resolution range: 15.1984 2.01158
Completeness in resolution range: 0.973657
Completeness with d_max=infinity: 0.970617
Number of F-obs in resolution range: 19589
Number of F-obs <= 0: 0
Refinement resolution range: d_max = 15.1984
d_min = 2.0116
Miller array info: /net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns:TEST
Observation type: None
Type of data: int, size=19589
Type of sigmas: None
Number of Miller indices: 19589
Anomalous flag: False
Unit cell: (71.3037, 47.1647, 87.2539, 90, 90, 90)
Space group: P 21 21 21 (No. 19)
Systematic absences: 0
Centric reflections: 2427
Resolution range: 15.1984 2.01158
Completeness in resolution range: 0.973657
Completeness with d_max=infinity: 0.970617
Test (R-free flags) flag value: 1
Number of work/free reflections by resolution:
work free %free
bin 1: 15.1989 - 4.3041 [2108/2132] 1898 210 10.0%
bin 2: 4.3041 - 3.4292 [2032/2052] 1828 204 10.0%
bin 3: 3.4292 - 2.9995 [2004/2023] 1802 202 10.1%
bin 4: 2.9995 - 2.7270 [1986/2016] 1791 195 9.8%
bin 5: 2.7270 - 2.5325 [1982/2001] 1784 198 10.0%
bin 6: 2.5325 - 2.3838 [1957/1982] 1756 201 10.3%
bin 7: 2.3838 - 2.2648 [1948/1976] 1754 194 10.0%
bin 8: 2.2648 - 2.1665 [1953/1989] 1760 193 9.9%
bin 9: 2.1665 - 2.0833 [1930/1972] 1738 192 9.9%
bin 10: 2.0833 - 2.0116 [1689/1976] 1519 170 10.1%
overall 17630 1959 10.0%
Writing MTZ file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_1041/model_refine_data.mtz
========================== Anomalous scatterer groups =========================
All atoms refined with f_prime=0 and f_double_prime=0.
========================== Set up restraints manager ==========================
Number of disulfides: simple=3, symmetry=0
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 168 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " distance=2.08
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 168 " - " SG BCYS A 201 " distance=1.98
Simple disulfide: " SG CYS A 254 " - " SG CYS A 260 " distance=2.05
Time building geometry restraints manager: 0.14 seconds
Histogram of bond lengths:
1.21 - 1.38: 943
1.38 - 1.56: 1465
1.56 - 1.73: 7
1.73 - 1.90: 21
1.90 - 2.08: 3
Bond restraints sorted by residual:
atom i - atom j ideal model delta weight residual
" SG CYS A 168 " - " SG BCYS A 201 " 2.031 1.983 0.048 2.50e+03 5.87e+00
" C GLN A 88 " - " N GLN A 89 " 1.329 1.360 -0.031 5.10e+03 4.97e+00
" SG CYS A 168 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " 2.031 2.075 -0.044 2.50e+03 4.89e+00
" CB CYS A 201 " - " SG ACYS A 201 " 1.808 1.738 0.070 9.18e+02 4.46e+00
" C PRO A 198 " - " N ILE A 199 " 1.329 1.301 0.028 5.10e+03 4.10e+00
... (remaining 2434 not shown)
Histogram of nonbonded interaction distances:
1.81 - 2.42: 7
2.42 - 3.04: 2169
3.04 - 3.66: 4583
3.66 - 4.28: 8894
4.28 - 4.90: 12224
Nonbonded interactions sorted by model distance:
atom i - atom j model vdw sym.op. j
" CE BMET A 47 " - " O BHOH Z 74 " 1.806 3.460
" O HOH Z 207 " - " O HOH Z 341 " 1.822 3.040 -x+1/2,-y+1,z+1/2
" CZ BARG A 275 " - " O BHOH Z 338 " 2.218 3.270
" NH1BARG A 275 " - " O BHOH Z 338 " 2.341 3.120
" NH2BARG A 275 " - " O HOH Z 335 " 2.406 3.120
... (remaining 27872 not shown)
Histogram of dihedral angle deviations from ideal:
0.01 - 17.19: 754
17.19 - 34.36: 62
34.36 - 51.54: 27
51.54 - 68.71: 23
68.71 - 85.89: 4
Dihedral angle restraints sorted by residual:
" CA PHE A 192 "
" CB PHE A 192 "
" CG PHE A 192 "
" CD1 PHE A 192 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
90.00 7.91 82.09 2 2.50e-03 1.68e+01
" N PRO A 54 "
" CG PRO A 54 "
" CD PRO A 54 "
" CB PRO A 54 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
30.00 -27.17 57.17 3 4.44e-03 1.45e+01
" N PRO A 280 "
" CA PRO A 280 "
" CB PRO A 280 "
" CG PRO A 280 "
ideal model delta periodicty weight residual
-25.00 38.44 56.56 3 4.44e-03 1.42e+01
... (remaining 867 not shown)
==================== Fixing bad ADP in input model (if any) ===================
============================== Scattering factors =============================
----------X-ray scattering dictionary----------
Number of scattering types: 4
Type Number sf(0) Gaussians
S 13 15.96 2
O 902 7.97 2
N 437 6.97 2
C 1471 5.97 2
sf(0) = scattering factor at diffraction angle 0.
====================== Modifying start model if requested =====================
==================== Fixing bad ADP in input model (if any) ===================
================== Extract refinement strategy and selections =================
individual_sites = True
rigid_body = False
individual_adp = True
group_adp = False
tls = False
individual_occupancies = True
group_occupancies = False
group_anomalous = False
size = 2823
n_use = 2823
n_use_u_iso = 2823
n_use_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_site = 0
n_grad_u_iso = 0
n_grad_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_occupancy = 0
n_grad_fp = 0
n_grad_fdp = 0
n_anisotropic_flag = 0
total number of scatterers = 2823
==================== Process input NCS or/and find new NCS ====================
Using existing and finding new NCS is disabled.
Use refinement.main.ncs=true to activate it.
Look at refinement.ncs for more NCS related parameters.
=================== Write initial parameters into .eff file ===================
Writing effective parameters to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_1041/model_refine_001.eff
Writing geometry restraints to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_1041/model_refine_001.geo
CPU time processing inputs: 9.74
============================ Non-default parameters ===========================
A complete record of all parameters was written to the .eff file above.
Below are only the non-defaults.
#phil __ON__
refinement {
crystal_symmetry {
unit_cell = 71.30375 47.16465 87.2539 90 90 90
space_group = "P 21 21 21"
}
input {
pdb {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/model.pdb"
}
xray_data {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns"
labels = "FOBS,SIGMA"
r_free_flags {
file_name = "/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/trial/1e0w.cns"
label = "TEST"
test_flag_value = 1
}
}
}
output {
prefix = "model_refine"
serial = 1
}
main {
number_of_macro_cycles = 5
}
}
#phil __OFF__
============================= ml refinement start =============================
----------structure factors based statistics (before refinement)----------
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3251 r_free= 0.3152 ksol= 0.00 Bsol= 0.00 scale= 0.959 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.39 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.030443 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 15.1989 - 4.8004 0.99 1378 152 0.2787 0.2619 6.3245 6.2358|
| 2: 4.8004 - 3.8303 0.99 1314 147 0.2510 0.2337 6.415 6.3586|
| 3: 3.8303 - 3.3521 0.99 1294 143 0.2765 0.2587 6.3172 6.3291|
| 4: 3.3521 - 3.0483 0.99 1277 146 0.2921 0.3076 6.2071 6.2069|
| 5: 3.0483 - 2.8313 0.99 1287 142 0.3330 0.3246 6.0981 6.1196|
| 6: 2.8313 - 2.6653 0.99 1277 139 0.3457 0.3323 6.0397 5.9475|
| 7: 2.6653 - 2.5325 0.99 1276 140 0.3567 0.3332 5.9962 6.0588|
| 8: 2.5325 - 2.4227 0.98 1244 142 0.3601 0.3479 5.9862 5.9587|
| 9: 2.4227 - 2.3298 0.98 1266 139 0.3597 0.3422 5.9089 5.8903|
| 10: 2.3298 - 2.2496 1.00 1253 143 0.3690 0.3511 5.9087 5.8895|
| 11: 2.2496 - 2.1795 0.97 1251 133 0.3834 0.3742 5.882 5.9098|
| 12: 2.1795 - 2.1174 0.98 1244 141 0.3891 0.4051 5.8108 5.8923|
| 13: 2.1174 - 2.0618 0.99 1266 141 0.3887 0.3732 5.7365 5.6716|
| 14: 2.0618 - 2.0116 0.80 1003 111 0.3791 0.3733 5.6617 5.6389|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 15.1989 - 4.8004 1378 152 0.80 24.81 0.86 0.82 38338.58|
| 2: 4.8004 - 3.8303 1314 147 0.85 20.70 0.97 0.91 40520.54|
| 3: 3.8303 - 3.3521 1294 143 0.82 24.54 0.98 0.92 40481.45|
| 4: 3.3521 - 3.0483 1277 146 0.79 27.45 0.98 0.90 36904.11|
| 5: 3.0483 - 2.8313 1287 142 0.72 33.64 0.97 0.87 32371.13|
| 6: 2.8313 - 2.6653 1277 139 0.72 33.82 0.98 0.87 28167.09|
| 7: 2.6653 - 2.5325 1276 140 0.70 35.31 0.98 0.87 26126.98|
| 8: 2.5325 - 2.4227 1244 142 0.71 34.79 1.00 0.89 24513.34|
| 9: 2.4227 - 2.3298 1266 139 0.71 35.03 1.00 0.89 22878.96|
| 10: 2.3298 - 2.2496 1253 143 0.68 37.17 1.04 0.88 21936.25|
| 11: 2.2496 - 2.1795 1251 133 0.67 38.08 1.01 0.88 21715.65|
| 12: 2.1795 - 2.1174 1244 141 0.67 38.79 1.02 0.90 20764.27|
| 13: 2.1174 - 2.0618 1266 141 0.67 38.84 1.01 0.91 17657.29|
| 14: 2.0618 - 2.0116 1003 111 0.70 36.16 1.01 0.88 13224.78|
|alpha: min = 0.82 max = 0.92 mean = 0.88|
|beta: min = 13224.78 max = 40520.54 mean = 27913.46|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.73|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 89.99 mean = 32.63|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 89.20 mean = 32.13|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
============================== Outliers rejection =============================
basic_wilson_outliers = 0
extreme_wilson_outliers = 0
beamstop_shadow_outliers = 0
total = 0
====================== Target weights (before refinement) =====================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 3.090241 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 89.946 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.667361 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 89.719 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------Initial model statistics (before refinement)----------
|-Geometry statistics: start--------------------------------------------------|
| Histogram of deviations from ideal values for |
| Bonds | Angles | Nonbonded contacts |
| 0.000 - 0.007: 1367 | 0.001 - 0.989: 1519 | 1.806 - 2.115: 2 |
| 0.007 - 0.014: 729 | 0.989 - 1.976: 994 | 2.115 - 2.424: 5 |
| 0.014 - 0.021: 262 | 1.976 - 2.963: 470 | 2.424 - 2.734: 177 |
| 0.021 - 0.028: 63 | 2.963 - 3.950: 196 | 2.734 - 3.043: 1992 |
| 0.028 - 0.035: 15 | 3.950 - 4.938: 66 | 3.043 - 3.353: 1814 |
| 0.035 - 0.042: 0 | 4.938 - 5.925: 29 | 3.353 - 3.662: 2769 |
| 0.042 - 0.049: 2 | 5.925 - 6.912: 16 | 3.662 - 3.972: 4578 |
| 0.049 - 0.056: 0 | 6.912 - 7.899: 2 | 3.972 - 4.281: 4316 |
| 0.056 - 0.063: 0 | 7.899 - 8.887: 3 | 4.281 - 4.591: 5576 |
| 0.063 - 0.070: 1 | 8.887 - 9.874: 4 | 4.591 - 4.900: 6648 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-Geometry statistics: start--------------------------------------------------|
| Type | Count | Deviation from ideal | Targets | Target (sum) |
| | | rmsd max min | | |
| bond | 2439 | 0.010 0.070 0.000 | 0.254 | |
| angle | 3299 | 1.822 9.874 0.001 | 1.000 | |
| chirality | 348 | 0.101 0.314 0.000 | 0.257 | 0.162 |
| planarity | 436 | 0.009 0.055 0.000 | 0.973 | |
| dihedral | 870 | 15.968 85.889 0.013 | 1.071 | |
| nonbonded | 2439 | 4.115 4.900 1.806 | 0.141 | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 12.271)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 5.09 63.06 16.02 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 5.09 63.06 16.02 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 6.19 63.06 36.87 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 5.09 49.51 12.19 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 5.090 - 10.887: 1254 | 5: 34.075 - 39.872: 81 |
| 1: 10.887 - 16.684: 844 | 6: 39.872 - 45.669: 78 |
| 2: 16.684 - 22.481: 225 | 7: 45.669 - 51.466: 64 |
| 3: 22.481 - 28.278: 122 | 8: 51.466 - 57.263: 37 |
| 4: 28.278 - 34.075: 94 | 9: 57.263 - 63.060: 24 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-Occupancies statistics------------------------------------------------------|
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.30 number of occupancies < 0.1 = 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 1 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3251 r_free= 0.3152 ksol= 0.00 Bsol= 0.00 scale= 0.959 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= 0.00 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.39 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.030443 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.3135 r_free= 0.3054 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 64.54 scale= 0.969 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-0.33,-2.10,0.28,-0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= -0.72 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.39 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 6.010033 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 2.807541 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 90.036 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.379398 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 89.462 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.3135 final r-factor (work) = 0.1908 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.3054 final r-factor (free) = 0.2080 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 8.6077 = 2.81 * 0.50 * 6.0166 + 1.00 * 0.1618 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 8.1237 = 2.81 * 0.50 * 5.7425 + 1.00 * 0.0626 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 28 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1908 final r-factor (work) = 0.1761 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.2080 final r-factor (free) = 0.2130 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 2.1851 = 0.38 * 1.00 * 5.7425 + 1.00 * 0.0064 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 2.1246 = 0.38 * 1.00 * 5.5045 + 1.00 * 0.0362 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 7 | number of function evaluations = 18 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 12.271)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 66.58 16.79 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 66.58 16.79 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 4.99 64.94 37.91 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 66.58 12.91 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 6.658: 323 | 5: 33.288 - 39.945: 95 |
| 1: 6.658 - 13.315: 1216 | 6: 39.945 - 46.603: 103 |
| 2: 13.315 - 19.973: 602 | 7: 46.603 - 53.260: 83 |
| 3: 19.973 - 26.630: 224 | 8: 53.260 - 59.918: 47 |
| 4: 26.630 - 33.288: 121 | 9: 59.918 - 66.575: 9 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1761 r_free = 0.2130 target_work(ml) = 5.512 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.30 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1756 r_free = 0.2126 target_work(ml) = 5.510 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.11 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 2 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1756 r_free= 0.2126 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 64.54 scale= 1.014 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-0.33,-2.10,0.28,-0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3= -0.72 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.22 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.509926 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1749 r_free= 0.2113 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 69.63 scale= 0.985 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-1.96,-2.59,-1.11,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.89 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.23 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.510886 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 1.623582 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 98.369 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.298213 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 89.498 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1749 final r-factor (work) = 0.1385 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.2113 final r-factor (free) = 0.1752 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 4.5417 = 1.62 * 0.50 * 5.5175 + 1.00 * 0.0626 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 4.4385 = 1.62 * 0.50 * 5.4013 + 1.00 * 0.0537 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 28 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1385 final r-factor (work) = 0.1311 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1752 final r-factor (free) = 0.1690 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.6325 = 0.30 * 1.00 * 5.4013 + 1.00 * 0.0217 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.6000 = 0.30 * 1.00 * 5.2768 + 1.00 * 0.0264 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 24 | number of function evaluations = 24 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 12.271)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 78.22 17.14 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 78.22 17.14 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 6.09 75.36 39.72 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 78.22 13.00 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 7.822: 542 | 5: 39.112 - 46.934: 97 |
| 1: 7.822 - 15.645: 1354 | 6: 46.934 - 54.756: 92 |
| 2: 15.645 - 23.467: 393 | 7: 54.756 - 62.579: 73 |
| 3: 23.467 - 31.289: 141 | 8: 62.579 - 70.401: 19 |
| 4: 31.289 - 39.112: 104 | 9: 70.401 - 78.223: 8 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1311 r_free = 0.1690 target_work(ml) = 5.260 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.11 number of occupancies < 0.1: 0 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1311 r_free = 0.1689 target_work(ml) = 5.259 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.04 number of occupancies < 0.1: 2 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 3 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1311 r_free= 0.1689 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 69.63 scale= 0.990 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-1.96,-2.59,-1.11,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.89 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.17 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.259418 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1311 r_free= 0.1688 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 69.61 scale= 0.990 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.17,-2.37,-0.99,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.84 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.18 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.259280 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 2.142333 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 116.293 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.251531 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 92.915 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1311 final r-factor (work) = 0.1174 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1688 final r-factor (free) = 0.1605 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 5.7061 = 2.14 * 0.50 * 5.2768 + 1.00 * 0.0537 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 5.6408 = 2.14 * 0.50 * 5.2056 + 1.00 * 0.0648 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 26 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1174 final r-factor (work) = 0.1161 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1605 final r-factor (free) = 0.1590 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.3194 = 0.25 * 1.00 * 5.2056 + 1.00 * 0.0100 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 1.3093 = 0.25 * 1.00 * 5.1708 + 1.00 * 0.0087 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 24 | number of function evaluations = 32 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 12.271)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 79.13 16.90 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 79.13 16.90 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 0.00 76.25 39.35 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.93 79.13 12.78 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 7.913: 558 | 5: 39.566 - 47.479: 95 |
| 1: 7.913 - 15.826: 1375 | 6: 47.479 - 55.392: 93 |
| 2: 15.826 - 23.739: 369 | 7: 55.392 - 63.305: 62 |
| 3: 23.739 - 31.653: 131 | 8: 63.305 - 71.218: 18 |
| 4: 31.653 - 39.566: 117 | 9: 71.218 - 79.131: 5 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1161 r_free = 0.1590 target_work(ml) = 5.164 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.04 number of occupancies < 0.1: 2 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1160 r_free = 0.1589 target_work(ml) = 5.164 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 3 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 4 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1160 r_free= 0.1589 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 69.61 scale= 0.988 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.17,-2.37,-0.99,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.84 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.16 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.164088 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1160 r_free= 0.1590 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 63.67 scale= 0.992 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.09,-2.12,-0.84,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.68 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.16 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.164265 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 2.512939 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 143.403 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 0.916940 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 141.305 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1160 final r-factor (work) = 0.1121 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1590 final r-factor (free) = 0.1592 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 6.5621 = 2.51 * 0.50 * 5.1711 + 1.00 * 0.0648 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 6.5398 = 2.51 * 0.50 * 5.1486 + 1.00 * 0.0707 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 28 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1121 final r-factor (work) = 0.1115 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1592 final r-factor (free) = 0.1603 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 4.7296 = 0.92 * 1.00 * 5.1486 + 1.00 * 0.0086 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 4.7267 = 0.92 * 1.00 * 5.1444 + 1.00 * 0.0097 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 18 | number of function evaluations = 20 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 12.271)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 80.59 16.81 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 80.59 16.81 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 0.00 77.52 39.61 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 80.59 12.63 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 8.059: 650 | 5: 40.294 - 48.352: 93 |
| 1: 8.059 - 16.118: 1303 | 6: 48.352 - 56.411: 91 |
| 2: 16.118 - 24.176: 349 | 7: 56.411 - 64.470: 61 |
| 3: 24.176 - 32.235: 142 | 8: 64.470 - 72.528: 18 |
| 4: 32.235 - 40.294: 111 | 9: 72.528 - 80.587: 5 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1115 r_free = 0.1603 target_work(ml) = 5.149 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 3 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1114 r_free = 0.1603 target_work(ml) = 5.149 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 3 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*********************** REFINEMENT MACRO_CYCLE 5 OF 5 *************************
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1114 r_free= 0.1603 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 63.67 scale= 0.988 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-2.09,-2.12,-0.84,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.68 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.16 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.149230 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1113 r_free= 0.1602 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 63.67 scale= 0.993 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-1.88,-1.88,-0.64,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.47 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.16 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.149332 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc |
| wxc = 2.572528 wxc_scale = 0.500 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: 161.009 (deg) |
| |
| ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu |
| wxc = 9.878042 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 |
| angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: 98.468 (deg) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ xyz refinement ===============================
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1113 final r-factor (work) = 0.1109 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1602 final r-factor (free) = 0.1615 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 6.6881 = 2.57 * 0.50 * 5.1447 + 1.00 * 0.0707 |
| |
| T_final = wxc * wxc_scale * Exray + wc * Echem |
| 6.6904 = 2.57 * 0.50 * 5.1477 + 1.00 * 0.0691 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 25 | number of function evaluations = 27 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
================================ ADP refinement ===============================
----------Individual ADP refinement----------
|-LBFGS minimization----------------------------------------------------------|
| start r-factor (work) = 0.1109 final r-factor (work) = 0.1107 |
| start r-factor (free) = 0.1615 final r-factor (free) = 0.1627 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| T_start = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 50.8590 = 9.88 * 1.00 * 5.1477 + 1.00 * 0.0096 |
| |
| T_final = wxu * wxu_scale * Exray + wu * Eadp |
| 50.8703 = 9.88 * 1.00 * 5.1487 + 1.00 * 0.0114 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| number of iterations = 22 | number of function evaluations = 23 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 12.271)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 90.51 16.93 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 90.51 16.93 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 1.10 84.02 40.68 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 90.51 12.57 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.000 - 9.051: 956 | 5: 45.253 - 54.303: 87 |
| 1: 9.051 - 18.101: 1143 | 6: 54.303 - 63.354: 77 |
| 2: 18.101 - 27.152: 261 | 7: 63.354 - 72.404: 42 |
| 3: 27.152 - 36.202: 133 | 8: 72.404 - 81.455: 11 |
| 4: 36.202 - 45.253: 106 | 9: 81.455 - 90.505: 7 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
======================= Individual occupancy refinement =======================
|-individual occupancy refinement: start--------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1107 r_free = 0.1627 target_work(ml) = 5.153 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 3 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-individual occupancy refinement: end----------------------------------------|
| r_work = 0.1107 r_free = 0.1627 target_work(ml) = 5.153 |
| occupancies: max = 1.00 min = 0.00 number of occupancies < 0.1: 3 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1107 r_free= 0.1627 ksol= 0.33 Bsol= 63.67 scale= 0.988 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-1.88,-1.88,-0.64,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.47 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.17 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.153338 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 15.1989 - 4.8004 0.99 1378 152 0.0998 0.1349 5.4016 5.5371|
| 2: 4.8004 - 3.8303 0.99 1314 147 0.0830 0.1106 5.4307 5.6241|
| 3: 3.8303 - 3.3521 0.99 1294 143 0.1025 0.1519 5.4687 5.8766|
| 4: 3.3521 - 3.0483 0.99 1277 146 0.1191 0.1589 5.461 5.6038|
| 5: 3.0483 - 2.8313 0.99 1287 142 0.1322 0.1877 5.3478 5.613|
| 6: 2.8313 - 2.6653 0.99 1277 139 0.1197 0.1931 5.234 5.4823|
| 7: 2.6653 - 2.5325 0.99 1276 140 0.1279 0.1595 5.1781 5.3594|
| 8: 2.5325 - 2.4227 0.98 1244 142 0.1118 0.1744 5.0632 5.3729|
| 9: 2.4227 - 2.3298 0.98 1266 139 0.1134 0.1720 5.0338 5.2753|
| 10: 2.3298 - 2.2496 1.00 1253 143 0.1102 0.1862 4.9703 5.2977|
| 11: 2.2496 - 2.1795 0.97 1251 133 0.1154 0.1765 4.967 5.2494|
| 12: 2.1795 - 2.1174 0.98 1244 141 0.1120 0.1817 4.9078 5.264|
| 13: 2.1174 - 2.0618 0.99 1266 141 0.1137 0.1792 4.8309 5.1021|
| 14: 2.0618 - 2.0116 0.80 1003 111 0.1048 0.1832 4.7018 4.9969|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 15.1989 - 4.8004 1378 152 0.94 9.71 0.97 0.94 7721.05|
| 2: 4.8004 - 3.8303 1314 147 0.95 8.01 1.00 0.98 9279.79|
| 3: 3.8303 - 3.3521 1294 143 0.93 11.19 1.02 1.01 10457.23|
| 4: 3.3521 - 3.0483 1277 146 0.92 13.74 1.00 0.98 10671.13|
| 5: 3.0483 - 2.8313 1287 142 0.90 16.29 0.99 0.96 8914.48|
| 6: 2.8313 - 2.6653 1277 139 0.90 16.42 0.98 0.95 7631.55|
| 7: 2.6653 - 2.5325 1276 140 0.90 16.16 0.98 0.95 6492.61|
| 8: 2.5325 - 2.4227 1244 142 0.91 14.82 0.98 0.96 5300.91|
| 9: 2.4227 - 2.3298 1266 139 0.91 15.35 0.98 0.94 5104.16|
| 10: 2.3298 - 2.2496 1253 143 0.90 15.44 0.98 0.93 4478.98|
| 11: 2.2496 - 2.1795 1251 133 0.89 17.18 0.97 0.93 4689.21|
| 12: 2.1795 - 2.1174 1244 141 0.91 15.72 0.99 0.97 4255.34|
| 13: 2.1174 - 2.0618 1266 141 0.90 16.66 0.97 0.94 3721.10|
| 14: 2.0618 - 2.0116 1003 111 0.91 15.40 0.94 0.90 2855.23|
|alpha: min = 0.90 max = 1.01 mean = 0.96|
|beta: min = 2855.23 max = 10671.13 mean = 6630.62|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.91|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 89.92 mean = 14.37|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 89.36 mean = 13.90|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling ======================
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1106 r_free= 0.1613 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 65.00 scale= 0.994 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-1.62,-1.61,-0.39,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.21 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.17 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.151659 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----------X-ray data----------
|--(resolution: 2.01 - 15.20 A; n_refl. = 19589)------------------------------|
| |
| r_work= 0.1106 r_free= 0.1613 ksol= 0.32 Bsol= 65.00 scale= 0.994 |
| |
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis; B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-1.62,-1.61,-0.39,-0.00,-0.00,-0.00); trace/3= -1.21 |
| |
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.17 A |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections: 5.151659 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bin Resolution Compl. No. Refl. R-factors Targets |
|number range work test work test work test|
| 1: 15.1989 - 4.8004 0.99 1378 152 0.1001 0.1287 5.3967 5.5142|
| 2: 4.8004 - 3.8303 0.99 1314 147 0.0837 0.1085 5.4276 5.6139|
| 3: 3.8303 - 3.3521 0.99 1294 143 0.1028 0.1496 5.4645 5.8608|
| 4: 3.3521 - 3.0483 0.99 1277 146 0.1186 0.1581 5.4554 5.6017|
| 5: 3.0483 - 2.8313 0.99 1287 142 0.1322 0.1867 5.3455 5.6082|
| 6: 2.8313 - 2.6653 0.99 1277 139 0.1196 0.1927 5.2324 5.4808|
| 7: 2.6653 - 2.5325 0.99 1276 140 0.1278 0.1593 5.1778 5.3592|
| 8: 2.5325 - 2.4227 0.98 1244 142 0.1117 0.1746 5.0627 5.3727|
| 9: 2.4227 - 2.3298 0.98 1266 139 0.1133 0.1723 5.0337 5.2753|
| 10: 2.3298 - 2.2496 1.00 1253 143 0.1101 0.1862 4.9703 5.2985|
| 11: 2.2496 - 2.1795 0.97 1251 133 0.1154 0.1768 4.9669 5.2498|
| 12: 2.1795 - 2.1174 0.98 1244 141 0.1120 0.1816 4.9077 5.2632|
| 13: 2.1174 - 2.0618 0.99 1266 141 0.1137 0.1794 4.8309 5.1021|
| 14: 2.0618 - 2.0116 0.80 1003 111 0.1048 0.1832 4.702 4.9972|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|R-free likelihood based estimates for figures of merit, absolute phase error,|
|and distribution parameters alpha and beta (Acta Cryst. (1995). A51, 880-887)|
| |
| Bin Resolution No. Refl. FOM Phase Scale Alpha Beta |
| # range work test error factor |
| 1: 15.1989 - 4.8004 1378 152 0.94 9.40 0.97 0.94 7325.40|
| 2: 4.8004 - 3.8303 1314 147 0.95 7.85 1.00 0.99 8964.12|
| 3: 3.8303 - 3.3521 1294 143 0.94 11.02 1.02 1.02 10233.29|
| 4: 3.3521 - 3.0483 1277 146 0.92 13.63 1.00 0.99 10507.70|
| 5: 3.0483 - 2.8313 1287 142 0.90 16.22 1.00 0.97 8855.27|
| 6: 2.8313 - 2.6653 1277 139 0.90 16.40 0.99 0.96 7599.03|
| 7: 2.6653 - 2.5325 1276 140 0.90 16.15 0.99 0.96 6488.01|
| 8: 2.5325 - 2.4227 1244 142 0.91 14.81 0.99 0.97 5297.28|
| 9: 2.4227 - 2.3298 1266 139 0.91 15.36 0.99 0.95 5105.95|
| 10: 2.3298 - 2.2496 1253 143 0.90 15.44 0.99 0.94 4481.03|
| 11: 2.2496 - 2.1795 1251 133 0.89 17.18 0.99 0.94 4689.40|
| 12: 2.1795 - 2.1174 1244 141 0.91 15.72 1.00 0.99 4254.63|
| 13: 2.1174 - 2.0618 1266 141 0.90 16.66 0.98 0.96 3720.60|
| 14: 2.0618 - 2.0116 1003 111 0.91 15.41 0.96 0.92 2858.65|
|alpha: min = 0.92 max = 1.02 mean = 0.96|
|beta: min = 2858.65 max = 10507.70 mean = 6541.02|
|figures of merit: min = 0.00 max = 1.00 mean = 0.91|
|phase err.(work): min = 0.00 max = 89.82 mean = 14.30|
|phase err.(test): min = 0.00 max = 89.04 mean = 13.81|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-ADP statistics (Wilson B = 12.271)------------------------------------------|
| Atom | Number of | Isotropic or equivalent| Anisotropy lmin/max |
| type |iso aniso | min max mean | min max mean |
| - - - - |- - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - - -| - - - - - - - - - - |
| all : 2823 0 0.00 90.51 16.93 None None None |
| all(noH): 2823 0 0.00 90.51 16.93 None None None |
| Sol. : 438 0 1.11 84.02 40.68 None None None |
| Mac. : 2385 0 0.00 90.51 12.57 None None None |
| Hyd. : 0 0 None None None None None None |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| Distribution of isotropic (or equivalent) ADP for non-H atoms: |
| Bin# value range #atoms | Bin# value range #atoms |
| 0: 0.003 - 9.054: 956 | 5: 45.256 - 54.306: 87 |
| 1: 9.054 - 18.104: 1143 | 6: 54.306 - 63.357: 77 |
| 2: 18.104 - 27.155: 261 | 7: 63.357 - 72.407: 42 |
| 3: 27.155 - 36.205: 133 | 8: 72.407 - 81.458: 11 |
| 4: 36.205 - 45.256: 106 | 9: 81.458 - 90.508: 7 |
| =>continue=> |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
========== residual map mFobs-DFmodel: highest peaks and deepst holes =========
----------peaks----------
Number of peaks found at mFobs-DFmodel map (map cutoff=3.00 sigma)= 301
Filter by distance & map next to the model:
mapped sites are within: 0.447 - 4.799
number of sites selected in [dist_min= 0.70, dist_max= 6.00]: 294 from: 301
mapped sites are within: 0.706 - 4.799
peak= 5.703 closest distance to " O HOH Z 111 " = 2.228
peak= 5.514 closest distance to " CB GLN A 223 " = 1.420
peak= 5.157 closest distance to " CG PRO A 54 " = 1.329
peak= 5.027 closest distance to " O HOH Z 232 " = 2.279
peak= 4.901 closest distance to " CB SER A 63 " = 1.206
peak= 4.860 closest distance to " CB GLN A 183 " = 1.258
peak= 4.666 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 11 " = 1.049
peak= 4.657 closest distance to " CG PRO A 213 " = 1.177
peak= 4.641 closest distance to " O HOH Z 15 " = 2.193
peak= 4.632 closest distance to " O HOH Z 78 " = 1.689
peak= 4.623 closest distance to " CB ARG A 79 " = 1.402
peak= 4.599 closest distance to " CB PRO A 54 " = 0.933
peak= 4.566 closest distance to " CB ARG A 190 " = 1.627
peak= 4.563 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 2.003
peak= 4.526 closest distance to " CB ARG A 275 " = 0.933
peak= 4.497 closest distance to " CA TYR A 30 " = 0.978
peak= 4.430 closest distance to " CG PRO A 198 " = 1.239
peak= 4.419 closest distance to " O HOH Z 369 " = 2.158
peak= 4.414 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 1.883
peak= 4.411 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 218 " = 1.064
peak= 4.392 closest distance to " CB LEU A 228 " = 1.097
peak= 4.251 closest distance to " CG PRO A 90 " = 1.079
peak= 4.248 closest distance to " O HOH Z 368 " = 2.164
peak= 4.226 closest distance to " O HOH Z 261 " = 1.955
peak= 4.220 closest distance to " O HOH Z 189 " = 2.649
peak= 4.216 closest distance to " C PRO A 198 " = 1.504
peak= 4.204 closest distance to " O HOH Z 427 " = 3.114
peak= 4.182 closest distance to " CB TYR A 169 " = 0.748
peak= 4.153 closest distance to " CB TRP A 266 " = 0.979
peak= 4.134 closest distance to " CB ASN A 148 " = 1.457
peak= 4.128 closest distance to " O HOH Z 180 " = 2.175
peak= 4.126 closest distance to " CB GLU A 277 " = 3.733
peak= 4.087 closest distance to " CB GLU A 128 " = 1.063
peak= 4.085 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 300 " = 1.214
peak= 4.052 closest distance to " O HOH Z 53 " = 2.498
peak= 4.045 closest distance to " CG PRO A 243 " = 1.027
peak= 4.034 closest distance to " O HOH Z 142 " = 1.597
peak= 4.031 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 69 " = 2.593
peak= 4.025 closest distance to " CE LYS A 76 " = 0.830
peak= 4.005 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 187 " = 1.351
peak= 3.981 closest distance to " O HOH Z 158 " = 3.031
peak= 3.980 closest distance to " O HOH Z 133 " = 2.341
peak= 3.974 closest distance to " O HOH Z 287 " = 2.081
peak= 3.973 closest distance to " CB ASP A 124 " = 0.714
peak= 3.963 closest distance to " CG2 VAL A 257 " = 0.884
peak= 3.956 closest distance to " CD ALYS A 290 " = 0.941
peak= 3.928 closest distance to " O HOH Z 234 " = 3.842
peak= 3.927 closest distance to " CB ASP A 140 " = 1.017
peak= 3.910 closest distance to " O HOH Z 250 " = 1.525
peak= 3.896 closest distance to " CA ARG A 195 " = 1.214
peak= 3.890 closest distance to " CB VAL A 202 " = 1.626
peak= 3.887 closest distance to " O HOH Z 346 " = 1.646
peak= 3.877 closest distance to " O HOH Z 303 " = 2.133
peak= 3.872 closest distance to " NZ LYS A 117 " = 3.379
peak= 3.859 closest distance to " O HOH Z 203 " = 1.735
peak= 3.855 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 1.741
peak= 3.844 closest distance to " CB GLU A 152 " = 1.159
peak= 3.842 closest distance to " O HOH Z 316 " = 3.136
peak= 3.836 closest distance to " O HOH Z 43 " = 1.887
peak= 3.834 closest distance to " NH1AARG A 145 " = 1.281
peak= 3.820 closest distance to " CD ARG A 269 " = 0.924
peak= 3.806 closest distance to " C ILE A 106 " = 1.892
peak= 3.805 closest distance to " O HOH Z 63 " = 1.995
peak= 3.804 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 156 " = 1.181
peak= 3.796 closest distance to " CA ALA A 51 " = 0.905
peak= 3.785 closest distance to " CA ASP A 124 " = 0.706
peak= 3.780 closest distance to " CB VAL A 265 " = 1.247
peak= 3.776 closest distance to " O HOH Z 54 " = 2.360
peak= 3.776 closest distance to " O HOH Z 40 " = 1.704
peak= 3.773 closest distance to " CD ARG A 66 " = 2.333
peak= 3.770 closest distance to " CA ARG A 36 " = 1.154
peak= 3.764 closest distance to " O HOH Z 21 " = 1.825
peak= 3.758 closest distance to " O HOH Z 214 " = 2.068
peak= 3.751 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 1.960
peak= 3.747 closest distance to " CG1 ILE A 33 " = 1.210
peak= 3.740 closest distance to " CB SER A 212 " = 1.103
peak= 3.712 closest distance to " O HOH Z 61 " = 1.641
peak= 3.711 closest distance to " CB TYR A 116 " = 0.795
peak= 3.702 closest distance to " O HOH Z 147 " = 1.815
peak= 3.701 closest distance to " O HOH Z 272 " = 1.907
peak= 3.688 closest distance to " CB SER A 3 " = 1.309
peak= 3.688 closest distance to " CA MET A 40 " = 1.182
peak= 3.684 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 297 " = 0.879
peak= 3.671 closest distance to " CG2 THR A 221 " = 1.110
peak= 3.660 closest distance to " O SER A 87 " = 2.332
peak= 3.659 closest distance to " CA ASN A 215 " = 1.179
peak= 3.659 closest distance to " CA MET A 105 " = 1.042
peak= 3.657 closest distance to " CG LEU A 167 " = 1.258
peak= 3.652 closest distance to " O HOH Z 313 " = 1.959
peak= 3.648 closest distance to " O HOH Z 44 " = 2.261
peak= 3.645 closest distance to " O BHOH Z 338 " = 2.391
peak= 3.645 closest distance to " CD ARG A 159 " = 0.791
peak= 3.639 closest distance to " O HOH Z 285 " = 2.525
peak= 3.637 closest distance to " O HOH Z 411 " = 3.801
peak= 3.637 closest distance to " O HOH Z 1 " = 2.179
peak= 3.625 closest distance to " O HOH Z 368 " = 3.705
peak= 3.615 closest distance to " O HOH Z 280 " = 2.961
peak= 3.611 closest distance to " O HOH Z 423 " = 1.897
peak= 3.608 closest distance to " CA TYR A 30 " = 1.048
peak= 3.606 closest distance to " CB ASN A 39 " = 0.924
peak= 3.604 closest distance to " O HOH Z 172 " = 3.642
peak= 3.601 closest distance to " O HOH Z 197 " = 3.085
peak= 3.598 closest distance to " O HOH Z 108 " = 2.860
peak= 3.597 closest distance to " O HOH Z 403 " = 1.385
peak= 3.591 closest distance to " N ASN A 127 " = 1.278
peak= 3.589 closest distance to " NE2 HIS A 207 " = 1.292
peak= 3.587 closest distance to " CD LYS A 166 " = 1.284
peak= 3.585 closest distance to " O HOH Z 135 " = 1.720
peak= 3.580 closest distance to " O HOH Z 66 " = 2.149
peak= 3.580 closest distance to " CB GLU A 46 " = 1.003
peak= 3.579 closest distance to " O HOH Z 426 " = 1.655
peak= 3.570 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 96 " = 0.712
peak= 3.554 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 153 " = 0.969
peak= 3.552 closest distance to " O HOH Z 291 " = 1.624
peak= 3.547 closest distance to " O HOH Z 213 " = 2.019
peak= 3.546 closest distance to " CB TRP A 179 " = 1.496
peak= 3.546 closest distance to " O THR A 220 " = 1.201
peak= 3.544 closest distance to " O HOH Z 406 " = 1.591
peak= 3.540 closest distance to " O HOH Z 391 " = 2.894
peak= 3.527 closest distance to " CB ASN A 187 " = 1.427
peak= 3.526 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 110 " = 1.591
peak= 3.525 closest distance to " O HOH Z 128 " = 2.130
peak= 3.525 closest distance to " O HOH Z 245 " = 1.252
peak= 3.524 closest distance to " O ALA A 165 " = 1.510
peak= 3.518 closest distance to " O HOH Z 353 " = 2.687
peak= 3.516 closest distance to " CG1BVAL A 72 " = 1.779
peak= 3.514 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 38 " = 1.256
peak= 3.513 closest distance to " CA THR A 221 " = 0.958
peak= 3.510 closest distance to " O HOH Z 305 " = 3.618
peak= 3.504 closest distance to " O HOH Z 359 " = 1.485
peak= 3.502 closest distance to " CB MET A 47 " = 1.044
peak= 3.502 closest distance to " O HOH Z 132 " = 2.685
peak= 3.496 closest distance to " O HOH Z 325 " = 2.487
peak= 3.491 closest distance to " OG BSER A 164 " = 2.320
peak= 3.490 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 249 " = 0.859
peak= 3.489 closest distance to " O HOH Z 403 " = 1.625
peak= 3.485 closest distance to " CD2 TRP A 179 " = 1.355
peak= 3.484 closest distance to " O HOH Z 59 " = 2.159
peak= 3.471 closest distance to " CB ALA A 34 " = 0.979
peak= 3.470 closest distance to " O HOH Z 126 " = 1.631
peak= 3.469 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 120 " = 1.065
peak= 3.467 closest distance to " CB ILE A 120 " = 1.282
peak= 3.463 closest distance to " N ARG A 156 " = 1.393
peak= 3.457 closest distance to " CE1 TYR A 186 " = 1.409
peak= 3.452 closest distance to " O HOH Z 148 " = 3.404
peak= 3.449 closest distance to " CA ALA A 154 " = 1.015
peak= 3.448 closest distance to " CD GLU A 152 " = 0.794
peak= 3.443 closest distance to " O HOH Z 134 " = 1.284
peak= 3.440 closest distance to " CB LEU A 143 " = 1.160
peak= 3.438 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 234 " = 0.831
peak= 3.436 closest distance to " CA THR A 264 " = 0.895
peak= 3.436 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 2.149
peak= 3.433 closest distance to " O HOH Z 128 " = 2.371
peak= 3.430 closest distance to " CD ARG A 66 " = 2.327
peak= 3.428 closest distance to " O HOH Z 10 " = 1.842
peak= 3.424 closest distance to " CA ASN A 176 " = 1.830
peak= 3.422 closest distance to " CA ALA A 158 " = 1.197
peak= 3.417 closest distance to " CD LYS A 119 " = 1.248
peak= 3.417 closest distance to " CB GLN A 89 " = 1.291
peak= 3.411 closest distance to " CD LYS A 76 " = 2.068
peak= 3.409 closest distance to " CA ALA A 160 " = 0.919
peak= 3.409 closest distance to " O TYR A 116 " = 1.304
peak= 3.406 closest distance to " CA ALA A 21 " = 1.210
peak= 3.406 closest distance to " CA VAL A 125 " = 1.176
peak= 3.404 closest distance to " ND1 HIS A 86 " = 1.763
peak= 3.403 closest distance to " CB THR A 82 " = 1.453
peak= 3.401 closest distance to " O ALA A 158 " = 1.266
peak= 3.400 closest distance to " O HOH Z 66 " = 2.210
peak= 3.395 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 249 " = 1.901
peak= 3.393 closest distance to " OE1 GLN A 11 " = 2.117
peak= 3.392 closest distance to " O HOH Z 9 " = 2.098
peak= 3.392 closest distance to " CA ALA A 295 " = 1.130
peak= 3.391 closest distance to " O HOH Z 171 " = 3.886
peak= 3.389 closest distance to " CB ARG A 139 " = 0.902
peak= 3.386 closest distance to " O HOH Z 365 " = 2.911
peak= 3.382 closest distance to " CB MET A 40 " = 0.792
peak= 3.377 closest distance to " O THR A 251 " = 1.318
peak= 3.375 closest distance to " CB ASN A 142 " = 1.048
peak= 3.367 closest distance to " O HOH Z 383 " = 2.134
peak= 3.366 closest distance to " O HOH Z 88 " = 4.036
peak= 3.363 closest distance to " O HOH Z 294 " = 1.564
peak= 3.354 closest distance to " O HOH Z 344 " = 3.285
peak= 3.353 closest distance to " O HOH Z 425 " = 1.319
peak= 3.353 closest distance to " CB SER A 141 " = 0.993
peak= 3.352 closest distance to " O HOH Z 166 " = 3.821
peak= 3.351 closest distance to " O HOH Z 371 " = 3.219
peak= 3.350 closest distance to " CB ALA A 291 " = 1.289
peak= 3.350 closest distance to " O HOH Z 329 " = 3.988
peak= 3.349 closest distance to " CA SER A 87 " = 1.076
peak= 3.345 closest distance to " O HOH Z 80 " = 1.571
peak= 3.335 closest distance to " O HOH Z 290 " = 0.885
peak= 3.332 closest distance to " O ASN A 74 " = 1.548
peak= 3.327 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 286 " = 2.901
peak= 3.323 closest distance to " O HOH Z 227 " = 1.715
peak= 3.322 closest distance to " O HOH Z 299 " = 4.531
peak= 3.321 closest distance to " ND1 HIS A 81 " = 1.608
peak= 3.318 closest distance to " N VAL A 126 " = 1.376
peak= 3.310 closest distance to " O HOH Z 425 " = 1.917
peak= 3.309 closest distance to " O HOH Z 133 " = 3.253
peak= 3.306 closest distance to " CA ASP A 191 " = 0.867
peak= 3.304 closest distance to " O HOH Z 417 " = 3.208
peak= 3.304 closest distance to " CB ALA A 1 " = 4.799
peak= 3.303 closest distance to " CG BARG A 275 " = 1.443
peak= 3.302 closest distance to " O HOH Z 402 " = 1.378
peak= 3.301 closest distance to " N ASN A 39 " = 1.367
peak= 3.291 closest distance to " CB ARG A 138 " = 0.989
peak= 3.287 closest distance to " CB SER A 216 " = 0.894
peak= 3.286 closest distance to " O HOH Z 20 " = 1.669
peak= 3.283 closest distance to " O HOH Z 40 " = 1.322
peak= 3.282 closest distance to " CG MET A 185 " = 1.180
peak= 3.282 closest distance to " CE LYS A 48 " = 1.016
peak= 3.267 closest distance to " CB LYS A 193 " = 0.925
peak= 3.265 closest distance to " CD ARG A 219 " = 1.077
peak= 3.263 closest distance to " O HOH Z 273 " = 2.890
peak= 3.263 closest distance to " NE ARG A 79 " = 1.103
peak= 3.262 closest distance to " CB ALA A 9 " = 1.610
peak= 3.261 closest distance to " CB ALA A 242 " = 0.911
peak= 3.256 closest distance to " CA ALA A 233 " = 1.539
peak= 3.255 closest distance to " CA ALA A 100 " = 1.142
peak= 3.253 closest distance to " CB ALA A 248 " = 0.980
peak= 3.252 closest distance to " OG SER A 22 " = 2.806
peak= 3.251 closest distance to " O BHOH Z 74 " = 1.252
peak= 3.250 closest distance to " OG BSER A 134 " = 2.941
peak= 3.250 closest distance to " O HOH Z 163 " = 1.733
peak= 3.249 closest distance to " CZ3 TRP A 266 " = 1.155
peak= 3.248 closest distance to " N ARG A 190 " = 1.040
peak= 3.245 closest distance to " CB LEU A 83 " = 0.778
peak= 3.243 closest distance to " O HOH Z 185 " = 1.870
peak= 3.241 closest distance to " CB GLN A 103 " = 0.839
peak= 3.240 closest distance to " O THR A 251 " = 1.901
peak= 3.240 closest distance to " O HOH Z 124 " = 1.801
peak= 3.239 closest distance to " CB ASP A 200 " = 1.094
peak= 3.238 closest distance to " O HOH Z 422 " = 2.749
peak= 3.238 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 192 " = 0.894
peak= 3.238 closest distance to " O HOH Z 90 " = 2.374
peak= 3.237 closest distance to " O HOH Z 327 " = 1.784
peak= 3.231 closest distance to " CB THR A 31 " = 1.770
peak= 3.231 closest distance to " CD1 ILE A 106 " = 0.789
peak= 3.228 closest distance to " C TYR A 214 " = 1.553
peak= 3.225 closest distance to " CB GLN A 88 " = 1.240
peak= 3.224 closest distance to " CA ASN A 217 " = 1.226
peak= 3.218 closest distance to " CB ALA A 104 " = 0.748
peak= 3.217 closest distance to " CA ALA A 291 " = 0.809
peak= 3.214 closest distance to " O HOH Z 109 " = 2.709
peak= 3.205 closest distance to " CD1AILE A 234 " = 0.918
peak= 3.204 closest distance to " O HOH Z 285 " = 1.670
peak= 3.203 closest distance to " OE2 GLU A 53 " = 2.077
peak= 3.200 closest distance to " NH2AARG A 275 " = 3.599
peak= 3.198 closest distance to " O HOH Z 295 " = 1.495
peak= 3.197 closest distance to " O HOH Z 213 " = 2.456
peak= 3.197 closest distance to " CG GLU A 37 " = 0.868
peak= 3.189 closest distance to " O HOH Z 421 " = 1.910
peak= 3.188 closest distance to " CA ALA A 84 " = 1.379
peak= 3.186 closest distance to " CB HIS A 108 " = 0.814
peak= 3.185 closest distance to " O HOH Z 409 " = 3.100
peak= 3.185 closest distance to " O HOH Z 44 " = 3.183
peak= 3.183 closest distance to " CB LYS A 117 " = 1.158
peak= 3.180 closest distance to " CA SER A 146 " = 1.758
peak= 3.179 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 20 " = 1.240
peak= 3.178 closest distance to " O HOH Z 97 " = 2.042
peak= 3.177 closest distance to " CZ2 TRP A 179 " = 1.698
peak= 3.177 closest distance to " O HOH Z 258 " = 1.703
peak= 3.167 closest distance to " CA ARG A 159 " = 1.263
peak= 3.166 closest distance to " CG2 VAL A 197 " = 1.142
peak= 3.166 closest distance to " CB SER A 26 " = 1.776
peak= 3.165 closest distance to " O HOH Z 163 " = 1.593
peak= 3.163 closest distance to " NH1BARG A 145 " = 0.990
peak= 3.161 closest distance to " O HOH Z 339 " = 2.237
peak= 3.158 closest distance to " CE2 PHE A 16 " = 0.899
peak= 3.153 closest distance to " N GLY A 98 " = 1.123
peak= 3.142 closest distance to " CA ARG A 102 " = 1.145
peak= 3.139 closest distance to " O HOH Z 261 " = 1.570
peak= 3.138 closest distance to " CG GLN A 11 " = 1.573
peak= 3.133 closest distance to " O HOH Z 183 " = 1.252
peak= 3.129 closest distance to " O HOH Z 430 " = 3.885
peak= 3.126 closest distance to " CA GLU A 46 " = 0.780
peak= 3.124 closest distance to " O HOH Z 419 " = 1.909
peak= 3.118 closest distance to " CG LYS A 76 " = 0.937
peak= 3.115 closest distance to " O HOH Z 116 " = 1.868
peak= 3.113 closest distance to " CG ARG A 159 " = 0.884
peak= 3.098 closest distance to " O THR A 182 " = 1.405
peak= 3.097 closest distance to " CB TYR A 169 " = 1.228
peak= 3.096 closest distance to " CA ALA A 154 " = 1.095
peak= 3.091 closest distance to " O HOH Z 421 " = 2.954
peak= 3.089 closest distance to " CB TRP A 150 " = 1.274
peak= 3.086 closest distance to " O HOH Z 327 " = 1.947
peak= 3.067 closest distance to " O HOH Z 49 " = 2.259
peak= 3.066 closest distance to " O HOH Z 88 " = 1.939
peak= 3.066 closest distance to " N TYR A 247 " = 1.070
peak= 3.064 closest distance to " O HOH Z 188 " = 2.338
peak= 3.062 closest distance to " O HOH Z 248 " = 1.586
peak= 3.034 closest distance to " O TRP A 274 " = 1.840
peak= 3.027 closest distance to " O GLN A 278 " = 1.549
peak= 3.018 closest distance to " CB VAL A 265 " = 1.991
----------holes----------
Number of peaks found at mFobs-DFmodel map (map cutoff=3.00 sigma)= 219
Filter by distance & map next to the model:
mapped sites are within: 0.822 - 5.812
number of sites selected in [dist_min= 0.70, dist_max= 6.00]: 219 from: 219
mapped sites are within: 0.822 - 5.812
peak= -4.517 closest distance to " CD GLN A 58 " = 0.958
peak= -4.502 closest distance to " CD ARG A 156 " = 2.040
peak= -4.432 closest distance to " CD ARG A 14 " = 3.505
peak= -4.419 closest distance to " CB PRO A 243 " = 2.652
peak= -4.409 closest distance to " O HOH Z 266 " = 5.339
peak= -4.358 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 112 " = 2.643
peak= -4.284 closest distance to " OE1 GLN A 223 " = 2.023
peak= -4.280 closest distance to " O VAL A 67 " = 2.752
peak= -4.276 closest distance to " O HOH Z 231 " = 2.257
peak= -4.263 closest distance to " O HOH Z 377 " = 2.038
peak= -4.134 closest distance to " CE2 TYR A 30 " = 2.720
peak= -4.122 closest distance to " N ALA A 43 " = 2.697
peak= -4.022 closest distance to " CZ3 TRP A 179 " = 1.181
peak= -4.018 closest distance to " OG SER A 97 " = 2.210
peak= -4.011 closest distance to " CB ALA A 161 " = 2.652
peak= -4.003 closest distance to " CA GLY A 241 " = 3.213
peak= -4.002 closest distance to " O HOH Z 10 " = 1.535
peak= -3.997 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 250 " = 2.660
peak= -3.994 closest distance to " O HOH Z 198 " = 2.099
peak= -3.973 closest distance to " C HIS A 108 " = 1.081
peak= -3.939 closest distance to " O HOH Z 196 " = 1.985
peak= -3.906 closest distance to " CD2 TYR A 293 " = 1.967
peak= -3.879 closest distance to " OG BSER A 134 " = 1.306
peak= -3.848 closest distance to " O HOH Z 389 " = 1.985
peak= -3.834 closest distance to " O PRO A 198 " = 1.341
peak= -3.815 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 88 " = 1.937
peak= -3.814 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 112 " = 2.932
peak= -3.810 closest distance to " O HOH Z 73 " = 2.180
peak= -3.778 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 49 " = 2.772
peak= -3.765 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 148 " = 1.508
peak= -3.743 closest distance to " CB ALA A 291 " = 2.336
peak= -3.742 closest distance to " O HOH Z 372 " = 2.405
peak= -3.723 closest distance to " NH2AARG A 275 " = 5.493
peak= -3.693 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 101 " = 2.441
peak= -3.691 closest distance to " O HOH Z 38 " = 1.288
peak= -3.685 closest distance to " CE MET A 105 " = 2.325
peak= -3.683 closest distance to " O HOH Z 166 " = 1.896
peak= -3.679 closest distance to " CA GLY A 203 " = 2.411
peak= -3.676 closest distance to " CD1 PHE A 59 " = 1.943
peak= -3.659 closest distance to " O HOH Z 185 " = 2.336
peak= -3.648 closest distance to " OXT GLY A 302 " = 3.030
peak= -3.646 closest distance to " C ASN A 187 " = 1.906
peak= -3.645 closest distance to " CG2 ILE A 263 " = 2.400
peak= -3.638 closest distance to " O HOH Z 51 " = 1.585
peak= -3.633 closest distance to " O HOH Z 393 " = 1.365
peak= -3.622 closest distance to " CA ASP A 298 " = 1.071
peak= -3.622 closest distance to " O HOH Z 43 " = 1.626
peak= -3.614 closest distance to " O HOH Z 52 " = 1.470
peak= -3.610 closest distance to " O GLY A 211 " = 1.441
peak= -3.608 closest distance to " O HOH Z 407 " = 3.363
peak= -3.607 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 45 " = 1.085
peak= -3.606 closest distance to " O HOH Z 435 " = 2.812
peak= -3.598 closest distance to " O HOH Z 394 " = 1.485
peak= -3.594 closest distance to " O HOH Z 114 " = 3.382
peak= -3.593 closest distance to " CG ARG A 269 " = 2.538
peak= -3.583 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 45 " = 1.839
peak= -3.568 closest distance to " O PRO A 163 " = 2.142
peak= -3.564 closest distance to " CB ALA A 129 " = 2.441
peak= -3.563 closest distance to " CD2 PHE A 192 " = 2.018
peak= -3.554 closest distance to " O HOH Z 353 " = 2.118
peak= -3.547 closest distance to " C ASN A 285 " = 2.507
peak= -3.544 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 79 " = 1.529
peak= -3.541 closest distance to " C GLY A 17 " = 1.187
peak= -3.537 closest distance to " CA GLY A 241 " = 2.307
peak= -3.533 closest distance to " CG2 VAL A 189 " = 2.212
peak= -3.527 closest distance to " O HOH Z 211 " = 1.559
peak= -3.508 closest distance to " CG HIS A 86 " = 1.061
peak= -3.507 closest distance to " O VAL A 189 " = 2.569
peak= -3.496 closest distance to " CB ASN A 39 " = 2.367
peak= -3.494 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 45 " = 1.323
peak= -3.490 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 171 " = 1.838
peak= -3.490 closest distance to " O HOH Z 348 " = 2.255
peak= -3.489 closest distance to " C LEU A 143 " = 1.172
peak= -3.486 closest distance to " O HOH Z 6 " = 2.295
peak= -3.485 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 59 " = 1.723
peak= -3.482 closest distance to " O HOH Z 290 " = 1.324
peak= -3.481 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 125 " = 1.946
peak= -3.480 closest distance to " CA GLY A 241 " = 2.865
peak= -3.478 closest distance to " CG MET A 105 " = 0.971
peak= -3.470 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 249 " = 2.507
peak= -3.466 closest distance to " O ALA A 10 " = 1.693
peak= -3.464 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 194 " = 1.840
peak= -3.463 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 60 " = 1.417
peak= -3.453 closest distance to " CG GLU A 277 " = 1.109
peak= -3.452 closest distance to " CB ALA A 291 " = 2.280
peak= -3.449 closest distance to " CB ASP A 132 " = 2.339
peak= -3.443 closest distance to " O HOH Z 292 " = 4.677
peak= -3.440 closest distance to " O HOH Z 60 " = 2.512
peak= -3.430 closest distance to " CB ALA A 43 " = 2.670
peak= -3.428 closest distance to " CG ARG A 66 " = 2.366
peak= -3.421 closest distance to " CG GLU A 53 " = 1.545
peak= -3.419 closest distance to " O HOH Z 44 " = 2.284
peak= -3.414 closest distance to " O HOH Z 114 " = 1.432
peak= -3.411 closest distance to " CE2 PHE A 218 " = 2.396
peak= -3.410 closest distance to " O HOH Z 198 " = 1.485
peak= -3.406 closest distance to " CD2 TYR A 293 " = 2.142
peak= -3.405 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 228 " = 2.388
peak= -3.403 closest distance to " CE BMET A 47 " = 1.812
peak= -3.403 closest distance to " CA VAL A 67 " = 2.937
peak= -3.399 closest distance to " CD ARG A 195 " = 5.134
peak= -3.396 closest distance to " CE3 TRP A 150 " = 2.188
peak= -3.395 closest distance to " O HOH Z 103 " = 1.802
peak= -3.392 closest distance to " O HOH Z 6 " = 1.492
peak= -3.387 closest distance to " CB TYR A 15 " = 2.230
peak= -3.385 closest distance to " OD1 ASP A 171 " = 1.562
peak= -3.384 closest distance to " O HOH Z 243 " = 2.153
peak= -3.373 closest distance to " CE2 PHE A 61 " = 2.636
peak= -3.368 closest distance to " O HOH Z 311 " = 3.779
peak= -3.366 closest distance to " OD1 ASP A 191 " = 1.658
peak= -3.362 closest distance to " CA GLY A 133 " = 2.326
peak= -3.355 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 159 " = 2.367
peak= -3.355 closest distance to " C ALA A 158 " = 1.303
peak= -3.355 closest distance to " O HOH Z 111 " = 1.946
peak= -3.354 closest distance to " CG PHE A 283 " = 2.720
peak= -3.342 closest distance to " C SER A 206 " = 1.518
peak= -3.340 closest distance to " O HOH Z 396 " = 1.747
peak= -3.340 closest distance to " CD2 PHE A 225 " = 1.141
peak= -3.339 closest distance to " O HOH Z 351 " = 1.487
peak= -3.337 closest distance to " O PHE A 218 " = 1.507
peak= -3.335 closest distance to " N ALA A 226 " = 2.151
peak= -3.333 closest distance to " CD2 TYR A 247 " = 2.398
peak= -3.330 closest distance to " N ALA A 248 " = 1.625
peak= -3.330 closest distance to " SG ACYS A 201 " = 2.055
peak= -3.326 closest distance to " O SER A 210 " = 1.975
peak= -3.324 closest distance to " CG GLN A 11 " = 1.705
peak= -3.320 closest distance to " ND2BASN A 224 " = 1.734
peak= -3.316 closest distance to " CG TRP A 266 " = 1.867
peak= -3.315 closest distance to " O HOH Z 426 " = 1.694
peak= -3.315 closest distance to " O HOH Z 216 " = 1.781
peak= -3.309 closest distance to " O HOH Z 102 " = 1.582
peak= -3.305 closest distance to " N MET A 105 " = 2.621
peak= -3.302 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 69 " = 1.738
peak= -3.302 closest distance to " NE2 GLN A 103 " = 1.736
peak= -3.298 closest distance to " O HOH Z 322 " = 1.593
peak= -3.296 closest distance to " O HOH Z 232 " = 1.731
peak= -3.289 closest distance to " O HOH Z 313 " = 1.976
peak= -3.288 closest distance to " CB TRP A 85 " = 2.381
peak= -3.288 closest distance to " O HOH Z 295 " = 1.538
peak= -3.286 closest distance to " OG BSER A 134 " = 1.870
peak= -3.278 closest distance to " O HOH Z 323 " = 1.500
peak= -3.276 closest distance to " O HOH Z 253 " = 4.124
peak= -3.274 closest distance to " O HOH Z 350 " = 1.998
peak= -3.273 closest distance to " CB PHE A 16 " = 2.589
peak= -3.269 closest distance to " O HOH Z 106 " = 1.857
peak= -3.267 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 1.306
peak= -3.260 closest distance to " OE1 GLN A 223 " = 2.158
peak= -3.260 closest distance to " O SER A 95 " = 1.660
peak= -3.251 closest distance to " N THR A 264 " = 1.345
peak= -3.245 closest distance to " O HOH Z 193 " = 1.644
peak= -3.243 closest distance to " O HOH Z 166 " = 1.706
peak= -3.239 closest distance to " O HOH Z 324 " = 2.246
peak= -3.237 closest distance to " CB ASP A 286 " = 2.149
peak= -3.228 closest distance to " CD ARG A 139 " = 1.640
peak= -3.226 closest distance to " CG PRO A 243 " = 1.797
peak= -3.224 closest distance to " CB PRO A 163 " = 2.521
peak= -3.221 closest distance to " CD1 ILE A 239 " = 2.112
peak= -3.216 closest distance to " OD1 ASN A 187 " = 1.536
peak= -3.214 closest distance to " O ALA A 34 " = 2.578
peak= -3.213 closest distance to " OH TYR A 247 " = 1.843
peak= -3.207 closest distance to " O HOH Z 90 " = 1.722
peak= -3.207 closest distance to " C PHE A 59 " = 1.352
peak= -3.205 closest distance to " O HOH Z 139 " = 2.997
peak= -3.205 closest distance to " OE1 GLN A 88 " = 1.192
peak= -3.204 closest distance to " O HOH Z 191 " = 5.812
peak= -3.203 closest distance to " CG ASP A 231 " = 0.822
peak= -3.202 closest distance to " O HOH Z 265 " = 2.284
peak= -3.199 closest distance to " O SER A 135 " = 1.478
peak= -3.194 closest distance to " CB ALA A 100 " = 2.114
peak= -3.192 closest distance to " O HOH Z 241 " = 1.440
peak= -3.188 closest distance to " CG1BVAL A 41 " = 2.841
peak= -3.181 closest distance to " O HOH Z 275 " = 1.576
peak= -3.180 closest distance to " CZ PHE A 155 " = 1.338
peak= -3.179 closest distance to " ND2 ASN A 60 " = 4.122
peak= -3.175 closest distance to " CZ TYR A 169 " = 1.798
peak= -3.171 closest distance to " O HOH Z 264 " = 1.815
peak= -3.169 closest distance to " O HOH Z 252 " = 4.186
peak= -3.162 closest distance to " C GLY A 13 " = 0.977
peak= -3.157 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 125 " = 2.319
peak= -3.154 closest distance to " O HOH Z 175 " = 4.040
peak= -3.152 closest distance to " CB PRO A 54 " = 2.507
peak= -3.148 closest distance to " O HOH Z 322 " = 1.321
peak= -3.148 closest distance to " CG1AVAL A 41 " = 2.804
peak= -3.144 closest distance to " OG SER A 87 " = 1.521
peak= -3.144 closest distance to " CB ALA A 248 " = 2.426
peak= -3.138 closest distance to " C MET A 188 " = 1.349
peak= -3.136 closest distance to " CD ARG A 79 " = 1.096
peak= -3.136 closest distance to " O HOH Z 234 " = 4.350
peak= -3.134 closest distance to " CG ASN A 301 " = 2.001
peak= -3.133 closest distance to " O HOH Z 298 " = 2.471
peak= -3.132 closest distance to " N VAL A 232 " = 2.297
peak= -3.129 closest distance to " O HOH Z 11 " = 1.752
peak= -3.128 closest distance to " O HOH Z 134 " = 2.827
peak= -3.128 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 300 " = 2.679
peak= -3.128 closest distance to " CD1 LEU A 297 " = 2.506
peak= -3.123 closest distance to " CG1 VAL A 197 " = 2.284
peak= -3.122 closest distance to " OD2 ASP A 191 " = 1.588
peak= -3.122 closest distance to " O GLY A 203 " = 2.360
peak= -3.119 closest distance to " O HOH Z 414 " = 1.714
peak= -3.115 closest distance to " O GLY A 80 " = 2.502
peak= -3.108 closest distance to " O HOH Z 76 " = 1.967
peak= -3.106 closest distance to " O HOH Z 123 " = 2.482
peak= -3.101 closest distance to " O TRP A 70 " = 1.472
peak= -3.096 closest distance to " O HOH Z 174 " = 3.058
peak= -3.093 closest distance to " CE3 TRP A 70 " = 1.845
peak= -3.092 closest distance to " SD MET A 188 " = 2.289
peak= -3.083 closest distance to " OG ASER A 134 " = 1.232
peak= -3.083 closest distance to " O HOH Z 317 " = 2.240
peak= -3.081 closest distance to " O GLN A 240 " = 2.503
peak= -3.081 closest distance to " CG2 THR A 221 " = 2.302
peak= -3.078 closest distance to " O HOH Z 184 " = 1.601
peak= -3.076 closest distance to " CD2 PHE A 59 " = 2.523
peak= -3.072 closest distance to " O GLY A 80 " = 2.640
peak= -3.064 closest distance to " CB ALA A 10 " = 2.247
peak= -3.064 closest distance to " CD2 LEU A 237 " = 2.901
peak= -3.050 closest distance to " NH2BARG A 275 " = 1.922
peak= -3.048 closest distance to " NH2 ARG A 66 " = 2.157
peak= -3.047 closest distance to " O ARG A 24 " = 1.609
peak= -3.041 closest distance to " O HOH Z 70 " = 2.227
peak= -3.016 closest distance to " O HOH Z 357 " = 2.037
================= overall refinement statistics: step by step =================
****************** REFINEMENT STATISTICS STEP BY STEP ******************
leading digit, like 1_, means number of macro-cycle
0 : statistics at the very beginning when nothing is done yet
1_bss: bulk solvent correction and/or (anisotropic) scaling
1_xyz: refinement of coordinates
1_adp: refinement of ADPs (Atomic Displacement Parameters)
1_occ: refinement of individual occupancies
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R-factors, x-ray target values and norm of gradient of x-ray target
stage r-work r-free xray_target_w xray_target_t
0 : 0.3251 0.3152 6.030443e+00 6.016968e+00
1_bss: 0.3135 0.3054 6.010033e+00 5.990792e+00
1_xyz: 0.1908 0.2080 5.567142e+00 5.643284e+00
1_adp: 0.1761 0.2130 5.512117e+00 5.668226e+00
1_occ: 0.1756 0.2126 5.509926e+00 5.666866e+00
2_bss: 0.1749 0.2113 5.510886e+00 5.667018e+00
2_xyz: 0.1385 0.1752 5.305383e+00 5.494065e+00
2_adp: 0.1311 0.1690 5.259789e+00 5.459196e+00
2_occ: 0.1311 0.1689 5.259418e+00 5.458966e+00
3_bss: 0.1311 0.1688 5.259280e+00 5.457641e+00
3_xyz: 0.1174 0.1605 5.176760e+00 5.406117e+00
3_adp: 0.1161 0.1590 5.164466e+00 5.394721e+00
3_occ: 0.1160 0.1589 5.164088e+00 5.394495e+00
4_bss: 0.1160 0.1590 5.164265e+00 5.394727e+00
4_xyz: 0.1121 0.1592 5.148687e+00 5.393657e+00
4_adp: 0.1115 0.1603 5.149194e+00 5.399407e+00
4_occ: 0.1114 0.1603 5.149230e+00 5.399841e+00
5_bss: 0.1113 0.1602 5.149332e+00 5.399902e+00
5_xyz: 0.1109 0.1615 5.152212e+00 5.408510e+00
5_adp: 0.1107 0.1627 5.153240e+00 5.413000e+00
5_occ: 0.1107 0.1627 5.153338e+00 5.413239e+00
5_bss: 0.1106 0.1613 5.151659e+00 5.408953e+00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage k_sol b_sol b11 b22 b33 b12 b13 b23
0 : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_bss: 0.316 64.539 -0.334 -2.096 0.284 -0.000 0.000 0.000
1_xyz: 0.316 64.539 -0.334 -2.096 0.284 -0.000 0.000 0.000
1_adp: 0.316 64.539 -0.334 -2.096 0.284 -0.000 0.000 0.000
1_occ: 0.316 64.539 -0.334 -2.096 0.284 -0.000 0.000 0.000
2_bss: 0.334 69.626 -1.957 -2.593 -1.109 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
2_xyz: 0.334 69.626 -1.957 -2.593 -1.109 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
2_adp: 0.334 69.626 -1.957 -2.593 -1.109 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
2_occ: 0.334 69.626 -1.957 -2.593 -1.109 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_bss: 0.332 69.607 -2.174 -2.368 -0.986 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_xyz: 0.332 69.607 -2.174 -2.368 -0.986 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_adp: 0.332 69.607 -2.174 -2.368 -0.986 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3_occ: 0.332 69.607 -2.174 -2.368 -0.986 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_bss: 0.327 63.673 -2.085 -2.124 -0.841 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_xyz: 0.327 63.673 -2.085 -2.124 -0.841 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_adp: 0.327 63.673 -2.085 -2.124 -0.841 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
4_occ: 0.327 63.673 -2.085 -2.124 -0.841 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_bss: 0.327 63.673 -1.879 -1.884 -0.643 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_xyz: 0.327 63.673 -1.879 -1.884 -0.643 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_adp: 0.327 63.673 -1.879 -1.884 -0.643 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_occ: 0.327 63.673 -1.879 -1.884 -0.643 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
5_bss: 0.324 65.000 -1.622 -1.611 -0.391 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage <pher> fom alpha beta
0 : 32.580 0.7321 0.8840 27914.458
1_bss: 31.581 0.7418 0.8801 25595.922
1_xyz: 19.490 0.8682 0.9898 10957.453
1_adp: 20.226 0.8605 0.9848 11472.053
1_occ: 20.192 0.8607 0.9846 11408.140
2_bss: 20.174 0.8610 0.9442 11432.679
2_xyz: 16.183 0.8968 0.9640 7787.200
2_adp: 15.308 0.9045 0.9605 7213.432
2_occ: 15.305 0.9045 0.9604 7207.712
3_bss: 15.284 0.9047 0.9615 7170.978
3_xyz: 14.235 0.9132 0.9669 6487.899
3_adp: 13.938 0.9158 0.9616 6368.058
3_occ: 13.935 0.9158 0.9615 6364.671
4_bss: 13.943 0.9158 0.9668 6365.298
4_xyz: 13.937 0.9158 0.9681 6383.257
4_adp: 14.048 0.9150 0.9595 6443.641
4_occ: 14.059 0.9149 0.9593 6447.191
5_bss: 14.061 0.9149 0.9667 6448.334
5_xyz: 14.207 0.9137 0.9651 6583.938
5_adp: 14.316 0.9128 0.9558 6628.652
5_occ: 14.320 0.9128 0.9557 6630.892
5_bss: 14.254 0.9133 0.9645 6541.283
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu geom_target
0 : 1.822 0.010 0.101 15.968 0.009 4.115 1.6179e-01
1_bss: 1.822 0.010 0.101 15.968 0.009 4.115 1.6179e-01
1_xyz: 1.032 0.008 0.068 15.195 0.004 4.115 6.2633e-02
1_adp: 1.032 0.008 0.068 15.195 0.004 4.115 6.2633e-02
1_occ: 1.032 0.008 0.068 15.195 0.004 4.115 6.2633e-02
2_bss: 1.032 0.008 0.068 15.195 0.004 4.115 6.2633e-02
2_xyz: 0.972 0.006 0.071 14.370 0.004 4.128 5.3695e-02
2_adp: 0.972 0.006 0.071 14.370 0.004 4.128 5.3695e-02
2_occ: 0.972 0.006 0.071 14.370 0.004 4.128 5.3695e-02
3_bss: 0.972 0.006 0.071 14.370 0.004 4.128 5.3695e-02
3_xyz: 1.038 0.009 0.077 14.537 0.004 4.115 6.4761e-02
3_adp: 1.038 0.009 0.077 14.537 0.004 4.115 6.4761e-02
3_occ: 1.038 0.009 0.077 14.537 0.004 4.115 6.4761e-02
4_bss: 1.038 0.009 0.077 14.537 0.004 4.115 6.4761e-02
4_xyz: 1.074 0.010 0.082 14.637 0.004 4.119 7.0684e-02
4_adp: 1.074 0.010 0.082 14.637 0.004 4.119 7.0684e-02
4_occ: 1.074 0.010 0.082 14.637 0.004 4.119 7.0684e-02
5_bss: 1.074 0.010 0.082 14.637 0.004 4.119 7.0684e-02
5_xyz: 1.059 0.010 0.081 14.571 0.004 4.120 6.9117e-02
5_adp: 1.059 0.010 0.081 14.571 0.004 4.120 6.9117e-02
5_occ: 1.059 0.010 0.081 14.571 0.004 4.120 6.9117e-02
5_bss: 1.059 0.010 0.081 14.571 0.004 4.120 6.9117e-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximal deviations:
stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu |grad|
0 : 9.874 0.070 0.314 85.889 0.055 1.806 2.4377e-01
1_bss: 9.874 0.070 0.314 85.889 0.055 1.806 2.4377e-01
1_xyz: 8.099 0.044 0.237 85.005 0.031 2.281 6.5618e-02
1_adp: 8.099 0.044 0.237 85.005 0.031 2.281 6.5618e-02
1_occ: 8.099 0.044 0.237 85.005 0.031 2.281 6.5618e-02
2_bss: 8.099 0.044 0.237 85.005 0.031 2.281 6.5618e-02
2_xyz: 7.013 0.040 0.212 81.145 0.037 2.379 4.1938e-02
2_adp: 7.013 0.040 0.212 81.145 0.037 2.379 4.1938e-02
2_occ: 7.013 0.040 0.212 81.145 0.037 2.379 4.1938e-02
3_bss: 7.013 0.040 0.212 81.145 0.037 2.379 4.1938e-02
3_xyz: 7.563 0.044 0.235 83.090 0.036 2.374 4.7095e-02
3_adp: 7.563 0.044 0.235 83.090 0.036 2.374 4.7095e-02
3_occ: 7.563 0.044 0.235 83.090 0.036 2.374 4.7095e-02
4_bss: 7.563 0.044 0.235 83.090 0.036 2.374 4.7095e-02
4_xyz: 7.336 0.046 0.264 83.112 0.037 2.356 5.0408e-02
4_adp: 7.336 0.046 0.264 83.112 0.037 2.356 5.0408e-02
4_occ: 7.336 0.046 0.264 83.112 0.037 2.356 5.0408e-02
5_bss: 7.336 0.046 0.264 83.112 0.037 2.356 5.0408e-02
5_xyz: 7.368 0.050 0.261 83.028 0.036 2.368 4.9251e-02
5_adp: 7.368 0.050 0.261 83.028 0.036 2.368 4.9251e-02
5_occ: 7.368 0.050 0.261 83.028 0.036 2.368 4.9251e-02
5_bss: 7.368 0.050 0.261 83.028 0.036 2.368 4.9251e-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|-----overall-----|---macromolecule----|------solvent-------|
stage b_max b_min b_ave b_max b_min b_ave b_max b_min b_ave
0 : 63.06 5.09 16.02 49.51 5.09 12.19 63.06 6.19 36.87
1_bss: 63.06 5.09 16.02 49.51 5.09 12.19 63.06 6.19 36.87
1_xyz: 63.06 5.09 16.02 49.51 5.09 12.19 63.06 6.19 36.87
1_adp: 66.58 0.00 16.79 66.58 0.00 12.91 64.94 4.99 37.91
1_occ: 66.58 0.00 16.79 66.58 0.00 12.91 64.94 4.99 37.91
2_bss: 66.58 0.00 16.79 66.58 0.00 12.91 64.94 4.99 37.91
2_xyz: 66.58 0.00 16.79 66.58 0.00 12.91 64.94 4.99 37.91
2_adp: 78.22 0.00 17.14 78.22 0.00 13.00 75.36 6.09 39.72
2_occ: 78.22 0.00 17.14 78.22 0.00 13.00 75.36 6.09 39.72
3_bss: 78.22 0.00 17.14 78.22 0.00 13.00 75.36 6.09 39.72
3_xyz: 78.22 0.00 17.14 78.22 0.00 13.00 75.36 6.09 39.72
3_adp: 79.13 0.00 16.90 79.13 0.93 12.78 76.25 0.00 39.35
3_occ: 79.13 0.00 16.90 79.13 0.93 12.78 76.25 0.00 39.35
4_bss: 79.13 0.00 16.90 79.13 0.93 12.78 76.25 0.00 39.35
4_xyz: 79.13 0.00 16.90 79.13 0.93 12.78 76.25 0.00 39.35
4_adp: 80.59 0.00 16.81 80.59 0.00 12.63 77.52 0.00 39.61
4_occ: 80.59 0.00 16.81 80.59 0.00 12.63 77.52 0.00 39.61
5_bss: 80.59 0.00 16.81 80.59 0.00 12.63 77.52 0.00 39.61
5_xyz: 80.59 0.00 16.81 80.59 0.00 12.63 77.52 0.00 39.61
5_adp: 90.51 0.00 16.93 90.51 0.00 12.57 84.02 1.10 40.68
5_occ: 90.51 0.00 16.93 90.51 0.00 12.57 84.02 1.10 40.68
5_bss: 90.51 0.00 16.93 90.51 0.00 12.57 84.02 1.11 40.68
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stage Deviation of refined
model from start model
max min mean
0 : 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_bss: 0.000 0.000 0.000
1_xyz: 1.264 0.021 0.261
1_adp: 1.264 0.021 0.261
1_occ: 1.264 0.021 0.261
2_bss: 1.264 0.021 0.261
2_xyz: 0.938 0.018 0.319
2_adp: 0.938 0.018 0.319
2_occ: 0.938 0.018 0.319
3_bss: 0.938 0.018 0.319
3_xyz: 0.915 0.039 0.365
3_adp: 0.915 0.039 0.365
3_occ: 0.915 0.039 0.365
4_bss: 0.915 0.039 0.365
4_xyz: 1.044 0.048 0.381
4_adp: 1.044 0.048 0.381
4_occ: 1.044 0.048 0.381
5_bss: 1.044 0.048 0.381
5_xyz: 1.149 0.060 0.389
5_adp: 1.149 0.060 0.389
5_occ: 1.149 0.060 0.389
5_bss: 1.149 0.060 0.389
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU time actual refinement: 364.87
============================== Exporting results ==============================
Writing refined structure to PDB file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_1041/model_refine_001.pdb
n_use = 2823
n_use_u_iso = 2823
n_use_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_site = 0
n_grad_u_iso = 0
n_grad_u_aniso = 0
n_grad_occupancy = 106
n_grad_fp = 0
n_grad_fdp = 0
n_anisotropic_flag = 0
total number of scatterers = 2823
Writing 2mFobs-DFmodel XPLOR map to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_1041/model_refine_001_2mFobs-DFmodel.map
Writing mFobs-DFmodel XPLOR map to file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_1041/model_refine_001_mFobs-DFmodel.map
Writing map coefficients to MTZ file:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_1041/model_refine_001_map_coeffs.mtz
Writing default parameters for subsequent refinement:
/net/cci-filer1/vol1/tmp/phzwart/tassos/noshake/run_1041/model_refine_002.def
=============================== Detailed timings ==============================
Pure refinement (no I/O, processing, etc)= 364.72
Macro-tasks:
bulk solvent and scale = 38.53
individual site refinement = 166.23
weights calculation = 29.84
collect and process = 6.76
model show statistics = 0.12
TOTAL for macro-tasks = 241.48
Micro-tasks:
mask = 1.81
f_calc = 118.85
alpha_beta = 8.14
target = 1.15
gradients_wrt_atomic_parameters = 132.02
fmodel = 6.91
r_factors = 0.26
phase_errors = 10.99
foms = 0.22
TOTAL for micro-tasks = 280.35
NUMBER OF MASK CALCS= 4
Time per interpreted Python bytecode instruction: 4.892 micro seconds
Total CPU time: 6.31 minutes
from_scatterers_fft: 709 calls, 118.48 s
gradients_fft: 654 calls, 115.74 s
=========================== phenix.refine: finished ===========================
# Date 2008-01-16 Time 06:17:41 PST -0800 (1200493061.22 s)
Start R-work = 0.3251, R-free = 0.3152 (no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale)
Final R-work = 0.1305, R-free = 0.1779 (no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale)
Start R-work = 0.3135, R-free = 0.3054
Final R-work = 0.1106, R-free = 0.1613
| en |
markdown | 124144 | # Presentation: 124144
## VASA VA Statisticians’ Association
- HSRD Breakfast Session
- 02/15/2008
- 7:00am
## VASA Officers
- President: **Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou**
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System
- Vice President: **Susan Loveland**
- VA New England Health Care System
- Program Committee Chair: **Roslyn Stone**
- VA Pittsburgh Health Care System
- Acting Secretary: **Christina Cho**
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System
## Mark Glickman - VA New England Health Care System
Stephen Hillis- CRIISP, Iowa City
Kelvin Lee- Palo Alto Cooperative Studies
Martin Lee – VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System
Susan Loveland - VA New England Health Care System
Cindy Christiansen –VA Bedford Health Care System
Roslyn Stone - VA Pittsburgh Health Care System
Linda Young- North Florida/South Georgia Health Care System
Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou - VA Puget Sound Health Care System
- Mark Glickman - *VA New England Health Care System** *
- Stephen Hillis- *CRIISP, Iowa City*
- Kelvin Lee-* Palo Alto Cooperative Studies*
- Martin Lee – *VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System *
- Susan Loveland - *VA New England Health Care System*
- Cindy Christiansen –*VA Bedford Health Care System*
- Roslyn Stone - *VA Pittsburgh Health Care System*
- Linda Young-* **North Florida/South Georgia Health Care System*
- Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou - *VA Puget Sound Health Care System *
## Promote & disseminate statistical methodological research relevant to VA studies;
Facilitate communication & collaboration among VA-affiliated statisticians;
Promote good statistical practice;
Increase participation & visibility of statisticians;
VA HSR&D
ASA Joint Statistical Meetings
Increase participation of statisticians in VA research merit review.
- Promote & disseminate statistical methodological research relevant to VA studies;
- Facilitate communication & collaboration among VA-affiliated statisticians;
- Promote good statistical practice;
- Increase participation & visibility of statisticians;
- VA HSR&D
- ASA Joint Statistical Meetings
- Increase participation of statisticians in VA research merit review.
## 74 current members
VASA Members in the 15 Centers of Excellence
Ann Arbor, MI: 1 member
Bedford, MA: 4 members
Boston, MA: 6 members
Durham, NC: 7 members
Gainesville, FL: 5 members
Hines IL: 4 members
Houston, TX: 5 members
- 74 current members
- VASA Members in the 15 Centers of Excellence
- Ann Arbor, MI: 1 member
- Bedford, MA: 4 members
- Boston, MA: 6 members
- Durham, NC: 7 members
- Gainesville, FL: 5 members
- Hines IL: 4 members
- Houston, TX: 5 members
## VASA Members in the 15 Centers of Excellence
Indianapolis, IN: 1 member
Iowa City, IA: 1 member
Little Rock, AR: 1 member
Minneapolis, MN: 6 members
Palo Alto, CA: 7 members
Pittsburg, PA: 10 members
Seattle, WA: 2 member
Sepulveda, CA: 1 member
- VASA Members in the 15 Centers of Excellence
- Indianapolis, IN: 1 member
- Iowa City, IA: 1 member
- Little Rock, AR: 1 member
- Minneapolis, MN: 6 members
- Palo Alto, CA: 7 members
- Pittsburg, PA: 10 members
- Seattle, WA: 2 member
- Sepulveda, CA: 1 member
##
VASA website http://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/vasa/
Mission
Current and upcoming VASA activities
Contact information
**VASA website** _[http://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/vasa/](http://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/vasa/)_
- Mission
- Current and upcoming VASA activities
- Contact information
## HSR&D National Meeting 2008
Workshops:
Multilevel Models in Health Services Research-Christiansen
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Health Care Costs-Zhou
Statistical Methods:
Differential Item Functioning in a Graded Response IRT Model: A Bayesian Approach to Item Discrimination-Glickman
Comparison of Statistical Methods to Account for Missing Race in VA Administrative Data-Mor
A Data Security Framework for Research Study Databases Using Metadata-Obrosky
- HSR&D National Meeting 2008
- Workshops:
- Multilevel Models in Health Services Research-Christiansen
- Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Health Care Costs-Zhou
- Statistical Methods:
- Differential Item Functioning in a Graded Response IRT Model: A Bayesian Approach to Item Discrimination-Glickman
- Comparison of Statistical Methods to Account for Missing Race in VA Administrative Data-Mor
- A Data Security Framework for Research Study Databases Using Metadata-Obrosky
## JSM 2009- Washington, DC
August 2-6, 2009
2009 HSR&D National Meeting
Hosted by Ann Arbor COE
- JSM 2009- Washington, DC
- August 2-6, 2009
- 2009 HSR&D National Meeting
- Hosted by Ann Arbor COE
## VASA contact information:
Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou
Andrew.Zhou@va.gov
(206) 277-3588
- Christina Cho
Christina.Cho@va.gov
(206) 277-4170
- VASA contact information:
- Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou
- _[Andrew.Zhou@va.gov](mailto:Andrew.Zhou@va.gov)_
- (206) 277-3588
- - Christina Cho
- _[Christina.Cho@va.gov](mailto:Christina.Cho@va.gov)_
- (206) 277-4170 | en |
converted_docs | 929007 | **Table 7**. Example cartographic object codes used in the GeoPnt.pat
table.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
**CartoObjID** **Name**
---------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
52 Null point symbol
2055 Inclined bedding symbol - color black (24K)
2056 Approximate inclined bedding symbol - color black (24K)
2057 Inclined crenulated or warped bedding symbol - color
black (24K)
2058 Inclined bedding w/tops known symbol - color black (24K)
2059 Overturned bedding symbol - color black (24K)
2060 Overturned bedding w/tops known symbol - color black
(24K)
2062 Vertical bedding symbol - color black (24K)
2064 Vertical bedding w/tops known symbol - color black (24K)
2076 Generic inclined foliation symbol - color black, open
triangle (24K)
2093 Inclined eutaxitic foliation symbol - color black (24K)
2143 Minor anticline symbol - color red (24K)
2165 Fault attitude symbol - color black (24K)
2172 Circle with filled central circle (USGS 26.2.5) - color
black (24K)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| en |
all-txt-docs | 237737 | 98 ANCESTRY, LIFE, AND TIMES OF
excitement of the times, vainly sought to be allayed, swelled
skyward like a rising flood, and coastward, carrying every-
thing before it, yet, mselstrdm-like, and with ascending swirl,
beneath whose great gyration the spires of churches, domes
of capitols, and literary institutions, even the halls of Con-
gress, disappeared, submerged. It was the one all-engulfing
question of the day. Shall the new territories be organized
so as to protect slavery? Shall Congress interfere, extending
the Missouri compromise line of 1820 to the Pacific, on
the parallel of thirty-six degrees, thirty minutes, all north of
this free, all south of it bond? Shall that line be repealed!
Shall the whole question be submitted, by both sections of the
country, to the federal judiciary ? Shall the territories be
allowed to determine their own institutions? Is slavery
national or sectional? Does the flag protect it wherever it
floats ? What power has Congress, what power has the national
executive, in the premises ? Nay more, what is the relation
of the federal government to the several state governments
to whom it owes its being ? These were the questions which,
in connection with the territorial interest, disturbed the peace
of the country, ran the plowshare of division not only between
North and South, but through the heart of both sections, sun-
dering, frequently, the tenderest ties and dearest relations.
On the one side was the glittering abstraction, in the mouth
of the Declaration of Independence, that "all men are born
free and equal," a proposition as defective as that all house*
are built the same height and furnished in the same style. On
the other hand were the positive and constitutionally guar-
anteed right of the master to the rendition of the fugitive,
and the conceded right of the several states to determine their
own domestic institutions; Georgia to become free to-day, if
she chose, Vermont to become slave if her people preferred
it. What shall the future of the great American nation be?
that was the all-controlling question of the time. It was in
1848-1849 that Mr. Sibley entered Congress. It was in 1852,
the two great national conventions, the one assembled at Bal-
timore, the other at Philadelphia, the one Democratic, the
other Whig, agreed, the one to resist, the other to discounte-
nance, all further agitation of the question; upon which a
third party was formed, and the agitation arose to intensity
so great as only to be closed by the bloodiest arbitrament the
nineteenth century has known. We, of to-day, live this side | en |
all-txt-docs | 657633 |
000
FPAK52 PAFC 161253
ZFPALU
ALASKA ZONE WEATHER FORECASTS FOR ALASKA
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE ANCHORAGE AK
500 AM AKDT MON MAR 16 2009
SPOT TEMPERATURES AND PROBABILITIES OF MEASURABLE PRECIPITATION
ARE FOR TODAY...TONIGHT...AND TUESDAY.
AKZ151-170000-
KUSKOKWIM VALLEY-
INCLUDING...MCGRATH...ANIAK
500 AM AKDT MON MAR 16 2009
...WIND CHILL ADVISORY NOW IN EFFECT UNTIL 4 PM AKDT THIS
AFTERNOON...
.TODAY...MOSTLY SUNNY. HIGHS 10 BELOW TO ZERO. NORTH WIND 15 TO
30 MPH. WIND CHILLS 30 BELOW TO 40 BELOW THROUGH LATE THIS AFTERNOON.
.TONIGHT...MOSTLY CLEAR. LOWS 10 BELOW TO 20 BELOW. NORTH WIND
10 TO 15 MPH. WIND CHILLS 25 BELOW TO 35 BELOW.
.TUESDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS 5 BELOW TO 5 ABOVE. NORTH WIND
5 TO 15 MPH. WIND CHILLS 20 BELOW TO 30 BELOW IN THE MORNING.
.TUESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY IN THE EVENING THEN BECOMING
PARTLY CLOUDY. LOWS 5 BELOW TO 20 BELOW. NORTH WIND 5 TO 15 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS 5 BELOW TO ZERO. NORTH WIND
5 TO 15 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY NIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY. LOWS ZERO TO 15 BELOW.
.THURSDAY AND THURSDAY NIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS ZERO TO
10 ABOVE. LOWS ZERO TO 10 BELOW.
.FRIDAY THROUGH SUNDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS IN THE TEENS. LOWS
5 BELOW TO 5 ABOVE.
&&
TEMPERATURE / PRECIPITATION
MCGRATH -3 -20 -2 / 0 0 0
$$
AKZ155-170000-
KUSKOKWIM DELTA-
INCLUDING...BETHEL...HOOPER BAY...NUNIVAK ISLAND
500 AM AKDT MON MAR 16 2009
...WIND CHILL ADVISORY REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 4 PM AKDT THIS
AFTERNOON...
...STRONG WIND THIS MORNING THROUGH TONIGHT ALONG THE COAST...
.TODAY...MOSTLY SUNNY. AREAS OF BLOWING SNOW. VISIBILITY OCCASIONALLY
REDUCED TO LESS THAN ONE HALF MILE ALONG THE COAST. HIGHS 5 BELOW TO
ZERO. NORTH WIND 20 TO 35 MPH...GUSTING TO 45 MPH ALONG THE COAST.
WIND CHILLS 30 BELOW TO 40 BELOW THROUGH LATE THIS AFTERNOON.
.TONIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY. AREAS OF BLOWING SNOW IN THE EVENING.
LOWS 5 BELOW TO 10 BELOW. NORTH WIND 20 TO 30 MPH...GUSTING TO 45 MPH
ALONG THE COAST DURING THE EVENING. WIND CHILLS 20 BELOW TO 35 BELOW.
.TUESDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS ZERO TO 5 ABOVE. NORTH WIND 15 TO
25 MPH. WIND CHILLS 20 BELOW TO 30 BELOW IN THE MORNING.
.TUESDAY NIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY IN THE EVENING THEN BECOMING
MOSTLY CLOUDY. LOWS 5 BELOW TO 10 BELOW. NORTH WIND 10 TO 25 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS ZERO TO 5 ABOVE. NORTH WIND
10 TO 15 MPH SHIFTING TO THE NORTHWEST 15 TO 30 MPH IN THE
AFTERNOON.
.WEDNESDAY NIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY. LOWS 5 BELOW TO 5 ABOVE.
.THURSDAY THROUGH FRIDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS 10 TO 15. LOWS
5 BELOW TO 5 ABOVE.
.FRIDAY NIGHT THROUGH SUNDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY. LOWS 10 TO 15 ABOVE.
HIGHS 20 TO 25.
&&
TEMPERATURE / PRECIPITATION
BETHEL -4 -11 0 / 0 0 0
$$
AKZ161-170000-
BRISTOL BAY-
INCLUDING...KING SALMON...DILLINGHAM...NAKNEK...PILOT POINT
500 AM AKDT MON MAR 16 2009
...WIND CHILL ADVISORY REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 10 PM AKDT THIS
EVENING...
...STRONG WIND THIS MORNING THROUGH TONIGHT...
.TODAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS 5 BELOW TO 5 ABOVE. NORTH WIND 20 TO
35 MPH...GUSTING TO 45 MPH THROUGH CHANNELED TERRAIN. WIND CHILLS 20
BELOW TO 40 BELOW.
.TONIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH ISOLATED SNOW SHOWERS. LOWS
ZERO TO 15 BELOW...COLDEST INLAND. NORTH WIND 15 TO 30 MPH...GUSTING
TO 45 MPH THROUGH CHANNELED TERRAIN DURING THE EVENING. WIND CHILLS
20 BELOW TO 40 BELOW DURING THE EVENING.
.TUESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS ZERO TO 10 ABOVE. NORTH WIND 15 TO 30
MPH. WIND CHILLS 15 BELOW TO 30 BELOW IN THE MORNING.
.TUESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY IN THE EVENING THEN BECOMING
PARTLY CLOUDY. LOWS ZERO TO 10 BELOW. NORTH WIND 10 TO 25 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS 5 TO 10 ABOVE. NORTHWEST WIND
10 TO 20 MPH. GUSTS TO 35 MPH IN THE AFTERNOON.
.WEDNESDAY NIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY. LOWS ZERO TO 10 BELOW.
.THURSDAY AND THURSDAY NIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS 5 TO 15. LOWS
5 BELOW TO 5 ABOVE.
.FRIDAY AND FRIDAY NIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS IN THE TEENS.
LOWS ZERO TO 10 ABOVE.
.SATURDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS IN THE 20S.
.SATURDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY. LOWS 5 TO 15.
.SUNDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SNOW. HIGHS IN THE 20S.
&&
TEMPERATURE / PRECIPITATION
KING SALMON 0 -13 6 / 0 20 0
DILLINGHAM 1 -11 7 / 0 0 0
ILIAMNA -2 -12 4 / 0 20 0
$$
AKZ181-170000-
ALASKA PENINSULA-
INCLUDING...COLD BAY...SAND POINT
500 AM AKDT MON MAR 16 2009
...STRONG WIND THIS MORNING THROUGH TUESDAY AFTERNOON...
.TODAY...SNOW SHOWERS. AREAS OF BLOWING SNOW OCCASIONALLY REDUCING
VISIBILITY TO LESS THAN ONE MILE. SNOW ACCUMULATION UP TO 1 INCH.
HIGHS IN THE UPPER TEENS. NORTH WIND 35 TO 45 MPH WITH LOCAL GUSTS
TO 65 MPH.
.TONIGHT...NUMEROUS SNOW SHOWERS. AREAS OF BLOWING SNOW OCCASIONALLY
REDUCING VISIBILITY TO LESS THAN ONE MILE. SNOW ACCUMULATION UP TO 1
INCH. LOWS AROUND 10 ABOVE. NORTH WIND 30 TO 40 MPH WITH LOCAL
GUSTS TO 50 MPH.
.TUESDAY...NUMEROUS SNOW SHOWERS. AREAS OF BLOWING SNOW. SNOW
ACCUMULATION UP TO 1 INCH. HIGHS AROUND 20. NORTH WIND 25 TO 35 MPH
WITH GUSTS TO 45 MPH.
.TUESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH SCATTERED SNOW SHOWERS. LOWS
AROUND 15. NORTH WIND 20 TO 30 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH ISOLATED SNOW SHOWERS. HIGHS IN
THE LOWER 20S. NORTH WIND 25 TO 40 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH SCATTERED SNOW SHOWERS.
LOWS 15 TO 20.
.THURSDAY THROUGH FRIDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SNOW.
HIGHS IN THE MID 20S. LOWS 15 TO 20.
.FRIDAY NIGHT THROUGH SUNDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF
SNOW. LOWS IN THE LOWER 20S. HIGHS 25 TO 30.
&&
TEMPERATURE / PRECIPITATION
COLD BAY 18 10 19 / 80 60 60
SAND POINT 18 11 20 / 80 60 60
$$
AKZ185-170000-
EASTERN ALEUTIANS-
INCLUDING...UNALASKA...NIKOLSKI
500 AM AKDT MON MAR 16 2009
.TODAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH SCATTERED SNOW SHOWERS. HIGHS IN THE MID
TO UPPER 20S. NORTH WIND 15 TO 30 MPH.
.TONIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY. ISOLATED SNOW SHOWERS. LOWS IN THE LOWER
20S. NORTHEAST WIND 15 TO 30 MPH.
.TUESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH ISOLATED SNOW SHOWERS. HIGHS IN THE
MID 20S. NORTH WIND 15 TO 30 MPH.
.TUESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH ISOLATED SNOW SHOWERS. LOWS
IN THE LOWER 20S. NORTH WIND 20 TO 30 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH ISOLATED SNOW SHOWERS. HIGHS IN
THE UPPER 20S. NORTH WIND 25 TO 35 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH ISOLATED SNOW SHOWERS. LOWS
IN THE MID 20S.
.THURSDAY THROUGH FRIDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF
SNOW. HIGHS 25 TO 30. LOWS 25 TO 30.
.SATURDAY...CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SNOW AND RAIN. VERY WINDY.
HIGHS IN THE MID 30S.
.SATURDAY NIGHT AND SUNDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SNOW
AND RAIN. LOWS IN THE LOWER 30S. HIGHS IN THE MID 30S.
&&
TEMPERATURE / PRECIPITATION
UNALASKA 27 23 25 / 40 20 20
$$
AKZ187-170000-
CENTRAL ALEUTIANS-
INCLUDING...ATKA AND ADAK
500 AM AKDT MON MAR 16 2009
.TODAY...SNOW AND RAIN. NO SNOW ACCUMULATION. HIGHS IN THE MID TO
UPPER 30S. EAST WIND 20 TO 30 MPH.
.TONIGHT...RAIN AND SNOW LIKELY IN THE EVENING...THEN SNOW LIKELY
AFTER MIDNIGHT. LITTLE OR NO SNOW ACCUMULATION. LOWS IN
THE LOWER TO MID 30S. SOUTHEAST WIND 15 TO 25 MPH.
.TUESDAY...NUMEROUS SNOW AND RAIN SHOWERS IN THE MORNING...THEN
SCATTERED SNOW SHOWERS IN THE AFTERNOON. LITTLE OR NO SNOW
ACCUMULATION. HIGHS IN THE MID 30S. EAST WIND 10 TO 20 MPH.
.TUESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SNOW. LOWS IN THE
LOWER 30S. EAST WIND 10 TO 15 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS IN THE MID 30S. EAST WIND 10 TO
15 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY. LOWS 30 TO 35.
.THURSDAY AND THURSDAY NIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS IN THE MID
30S. LOWS 30 TO 35.
.FRIDAY THROUGH SATURDAY NIGHT...CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF RAIN AND
SNOW. VERY WINDY. HIGHS IN THE MID 30S. LOWS IN THE MID 30S.
.SUNDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SNOW. HIGHS 30 TO 35.
&&
TEMPERATURE / PRECIPITATION
ADAK 39 34 35 / 80 60 60
$$
AKZ191-170000-
WESTERN ALEUTIANS-
INCLUDING...SHEMYA AND AMCHITKA
500 AM AKDT MON MAR 16 2009
.TODAY...NUMEROUS SNOW AND RAIN SHOWERS. NO SNOW ACCUMULATION. HIGHS
IN THE MID 30S. WEST WIND 10 TO 25 MPH.
.TONIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY. SCATTERED SNOW AND RAIN SHOWERS
IN THE EVENING...THEN SCATTERED SNOW SHOWERS AFTER MIDNIGHT. LOWS
IN THE LOWER 30S. WEST WIND 10 TO 25 MPH.
.TUESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH SCATTERED SNOW SHOWERS. HIGHS IN
THE MID 30S. NORTHWEST WIND 10 TO 25 MPH.
.TUESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH ISOLATED SNOW SHOWERS. LOWS
IN THE LOWER 30S. NORTH WIND 10 TO 15 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS IN THE MID 30S. VARIABLE WIND TO 10
MPH.
.WEDNESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY. LOWS 30 TO 35.
.THURSDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS IN THE MID 30S.
.THURSDAY NIGHT THROUGH SATURDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A
CHANCE OF RAIN AND SNOW. VERY WINDY. LOWS IN THE LOWER 30S. HIGHS IN
THE MID 30S.
.SUNDAY...CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF SNOW. VERY WINDY. HIGHS 30 TO
35.
&&
TEMPERATURE / PRECIPITATION
SHEMYA 35 32 34 / 60 20 20
$$
AKZ195-170000-
PRIBILOF ISLANDS-
INCLUDING...SAINT PAUL
500 AM AKDT MON MAR 16 2009
.TODAY...NUMEROUS SNOW SHOWERS. SNOW ACCUMULATION UP TO 1 INCH.
HIGHS AROUND 15. NORTHEAST WIND 20 TO 30 MPH.
.TONIGHT...NUMEROUS SNOW SHOWERS. SNOW ACCUMULATION LESS THAN 1 INCH.
LOWS AROUND 10 ABOVE. NORTH WIND 20 TO 30 MPH.
.TUESDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY WITH SCATTERED SNOW SHOWERS. HIGHS
AROUND 20. NORTH WIND 15 TO 25 MPH.
.TUESDAY NIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH ISOLATED SNOW SHOWERS. LOWS
AROUND 15. NORTH WIND 20 TO 25 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS AROUND 20. NORTH WIND 20 TO
25 MPH.
.WEDNESDAY NIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY. LOWS 15 TO 20.
.THURSDAY THROUGH FRIDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY. HIGHS IN THE MID 20S.
LOWS 20 TO 25.
.FRIDAY NIGHT THROUGH SUNDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF
SNOW. LOWS IN THE MID 20S. HIGHS IN THE LOWER 30S.
&&
TEMPERATURE / PRECIPITATION
SAINT PAUL 16 10 17 / 60 60 40
$$
| en |
markdown | 410279 | # Presentation: 410279
**Tier 1 Team Workshop #2005-01**
## OUR AGENDA! “Underway on Nuclear Power”
**Workshop Goals**
**Point to Ponder**
**Workshop Participants and Responsibilities**
**ESH&Q (Tier I) Inspections – Subject Area**
**Fourth Qtr CY 04 Tier 1 Inspection Results**
**A Year in Review**
** **
## Point to Ponder
**“****Keep your eyes wide open before marriage, half shut afterwards.”**
** ****- Benjamin Franklin **
** **
- _[ ](http://www.geocities.com/Athens/3067/hume/h_index.html)__ _
- _[ ](http://www.ushistory.org/franklin/quotable/quote24.htm)__ _
** **
## Common Misunderstandings (Myths) about Human Performance
**Myth 1**
**If there are no events, there is no human performance problem.**
## Slide 5
## Tier 1 Team Workshop
_**Workshop Goals:**_
**To drive and sustain ESH&Q improvement at the Laboratory:**
**To review ESH&Q (Tier 1) Inspection tracking/trending data at the organizational and/or institutional levels;**
**To identify Laboratory-wide issues and program vulnerabilities/gaps and share information to facilitate lessons learned in process/program effectiveness;**
**To discuss corrective actions taken and evaluate their effectiveness; and**
**To identify the path forward toward continual improvement, the potential institutional impact and the need for institutional corrective action(s).**
** **
## Tier 1 Team Workshop
**List of Personnel Designated to attend ESH&Q Inspection Workshop:**
**Instrumentation**** **** ****Bob DiNardo**
**ESH&Q**** **** **** ****Kay Conkling**
**F&O**** **** **** ****Nick Houvener; Peder Martino**
**Life Sciences**** **** ****Bob Colichio**
**CFN**** **** **** ****Arnie Moodenbaugh**
**ISD**** **** **** ****Madeline Windsor**
**ITD**** **** **** **** ****Mary Lynn Heinrich**
**HR & OMC**** **** ****Donna Dowling**
**CAD**** **** **** ****Dick Savage; Dave Passarello (alt.)**
**Physics**** **** **** ****Ron Gill**
**BES**** **** **** ****John Taylor**
**EENS**** **** **** ****Pat Carr; John Boccio (alt.)**
**MSD**** **** **** ****Bob Sabatini**
**Finance**** **** **** ****April Gray, Greg Ogeka**
**CEGPA**** **** **** ****Scott Bronson, Rick Backofen**
**S&HSD**** **** **** ****Jack Ellercamp**
## Tier 1 Team Workshop
**Workshop Participants and Responsibilities:**
**The Laboratory’s Quality Management Office will schedule and facilitate the workshop.**
**Line Management designates representatives who are knowledgeable of the results of the Tier 1 program and data (e.g. ESH Coordinator, Tier 1 Leader) in their directorate, and who have the authority to identify, develop and support institutional corrective actions as needed.**
**Representatives are required to summarize and submit data one month prior to the scheduled Tier 1 Improvement Workshop.**
**Data are to be summarized and submitted based on the Deficiency Category Table and must include: Date of Tier 1, Buildings/Facilities in each deficiency category.**
**Action items will be identified**
**Tracking will be by institutional ATS**
## Disaster Pyramid
- Source: Frank Bird, Jr., *Practical Loss Control Leadership*, Det Norske Veritas (formerly International Loss Control Institute), 1969.
- 600
- 1
- 30
- 10
**Notes:**
The error that caused a major accident and the error that is one of hundreds with no consequence can be the same error that has historically been overlooked or uncorrected. Significance is determined by degree of consequence to the core process, the physical plant. Therefore, for a significant event to occur, breakdowns in multiple defenses have to occur. The existence of so many flawed defenses can only be an outcome of faults in the organization or management control domains. (Frank Bird, Jr., Practical Loss Control Leadership, Det Norske Veritas (formerly International Loss Control Institute), 1969.)
## Fourth Qtr CY 04 Tier 1 Inspection Results
## Fourth Qtr CY 04 Tier 1 Inspection Majority Results
## Percent of Total Findings for the Top Three Categories
## BNL ORPS by Calendar Year Report Submitted
- As of 02/08
## ORPS Reportable and Nonreportable Cat Entries as of 12/31/2004
## Programmatic Bins A Year in Review!
**Personnel Contamination**
**Medical Department**
**NSLS**
**Physics**
**CA-D**
**BGRR Project**
**Utilities Struck**
**Railroad Tracks**
**Material Transportation**
**Electrical Shock Hazards**
**Material Handling Issues**
** **** **
## Programmatic Review
**Personnel Contamination – 2004**
**04/14 – 5,000 dpm on top of worker’s shoe at BGRR (RAR) **
**05/21 – <50,000 dpm cont on experimenters at AGS**
**08/31 – ~ 200 dpm/100cm2 on experimenter at PET **
** **** **
## Programmatic Review
_**Medical department, 2004**_
**01/27 – MEL hot cell filters not replaced at age of 66 months**
**02/03 – Water leak floods 490 with 150 gallons**
**02/03 – Slip and fall on slick floor **
**03/10 – Failed HEPA filter efficiency test at B-801**
**03/12 – 20ml leak from D-waste storage tank in B-801**
**04/08 – Chill water spill at 801 during seasonal flushing**
**04/28 – BLIP target shaft leaks water to secondary containment**
**05/09 – New target window at BLIP leaking**
**05/25 – Herpes-B Virus Precautions in Animal Facility (SC3)**
**07/30 – Minor leak from “D” waste valve in B-801**
**08/10 – Minor I-135 spill in B-490 (RAR)**
**08/16 – Carpenter drills into water line in B-490**
**10/29 – RWP and Trans Safety Violations in B-490 (SC3) **
** **
## Programmatic Review
_**NSLS, 2004**_
**01/16 – Pre-action SS spurious trip **
**02/07 – Unapproved work in laser hutch (Bldg. 729)**
**04/18 – Unauthorized SDL operation**
**05/13 – Window pane falls from second floor**
**06/03 – Improper cable connection on exp floor **
**07/12 – Worker feels mild electrical tingling in his finger**
**07/22 – Hydrofluoric Acid Contamination of Technician**
**08/07 – Trace amts. of H-sulfide leaked from gas cylinder **
**08/10 – Worker experiences electric shock (SC3)**
**09/22 – Voltage leakage through hook on crane at NSLS**
** **
** **
## Programmatic Review
- _Physics, 2004_
**07/01 – Laser interlock check overdue by 3 weeks @ ATF**
**10/21 – Trimmed tree branch breaks window at physics**
## Programmatic Review
- _CA-D, 2004_
**01/13 - Worker breaks ankle while preparing for cable pull**
**03/22 - Welder’s helper receives minor eye irritation**
**05/17 - Damaged detector at STAR after 10 foot drop**
**05/21 - <50,000 dpm cont on experimenters at AGS**
**07/14 - Fire in a RHIC RF cavity power supply in Bldg 1004A**
**08/11 - Heating element inside cold box causes burn to hand (SC 3)**
**10/15 - Potential fire hazard in AGS cable tray (SC4)**
**10/15 - Low voltage leakage through hook on crane at bldg 930**
**11/08 - Fire Inside Power Supply Cabinet (SC4)**
**12/02 - Unauthorized access into the STAR hall**
## Programmatic Review
- _BGRR Project, 2004_
**04/14 - 5,000 dpm on top of worker’s shoe (RAR)**
**05/03 - Leakage of cont water from Sea-Land Container (SC4)**
**05/11 - Filter cart sep from resp during work in rad/cont area (SC3)**
**09/03 - DSB work performed outside of procedure (SC4)**
**10/05 - Injury due to steel plate falling at bldg 701 (SC3)**
** **
** **
## Programmatic Review
_**Utilities struck:**_
_**2004**_
**04/19 – Electrical utility conduit strike**
**07/07 – Domestic water main strike**
**09/07 – Comm. cable severed during excavation work**
**12/09 – Unexpected **_**discovery**_** of 2.4K deenergized cables during excavation**
**12/15 – Pre-Identified 0 voltage leak detection line severed during excavation**
## Programmatic Review
_**Railroad Tracks, 2004**_
**09/03 - Empty railroad car derailed at BNL track switch**
**09/04 - Off-site train car derailment (SC4)**
**09/14 - Inadequate rail safety procedures (SC4)**
** **
** **
## Programmatic Review
_**Material Transportation, 2004**_
** **** ****- 06/25 - B-52 waste cont support chnl rain water **** ****accumulation (SC4)**
** **** ****- 07/26 - ****Transportation of Solidified Liquid Low-**** ****Level Waste**** (SC1)**
** **_**Note:**_** “suspected radioactive contamination occurs involving shipment of radioactive materials” = SC1**
## Programmatic Review
_**Electrical Shock Hazards**_
_**2004**_
**07/12 - Worker feels mild electrical tingling in his finger @ NSLS**
**08/10 - Worker experiences electric shock @ NSLS**
## Programmatic Review
- _Material Handling Issues_
_**2004**_
**03/05, Load Falls off Flatbed Truck, (SC3)**
**03/24, Recurring Material Handling Problems, (SCR)**
**05/17, Damaged detector at STAR after 10 foot drop**
**06/11, 500 # steel block falls (3 – 4 feet) from forklift**
**10/05, Injury due to steel plate falling at bldg 701 (SC3)**
** **
## Tier 1 Team Workshop
**Tier 1 Team Action Item Review**
**Meeting Evaluation and Wrap-Up**
- _[ ](http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/teams/bos)_ | en |
converted_docs | 193700 | **Practice 2: Counseling Frequency**
Once your clinic has implemented a quality improvement strategy for
methadone dosing and a system for measuring improvement, it may be
appropriate to begin reviewing your clinic's current policies regarding
one of the other three target practice areas discussed in the following
sections. Quality improvement can be made in more than one target
practice area at a time.
*"That was surprising* \[that our counseling frequency was low\]. *It
seems like we see patients all the time, but I guess it's just that we
see so many of them.*
---*clinic coordinator*
{width="1.65625in" height="1.604861111111111in"}
Opioid Agonist therapy (OAT) clinics provide a wide array of services
beyond simply dispensing methadone and LAAM. These services generally
include drug abuse counseling, urine monitoring, and social work
services, and may include medical and psychiatric care, employment and
educational counseling, and family services. While the major goal of OAT
is to reduce illicit opioid use, much more has come to be expected of
OAT, including reduced use of other drugs and alcohol, reduced criminal
behavior, increased productive activity, and increased psychological
well-being and social functioning (Cacciola, Alterman, Rotherford, McKay
& McLellan, 1998). Beyond adequate methadone dosing, controversy
continues regarding which elements of methadone maintenance therapy can
be considered "active ingredients." If methadone dosing alone were
sufficient to prompt client change in the multiple outcomes that OAT
clinics are expected to effect, unnecessary and expensive psychosocial
services could be eliminated and more patients could be enrolled in OAT
clinics. Logically, it seems unrealistic that dosing alone could have
such a broad impact on so many areas of patients' lives. In fact, there
is a strong clinical consensus that dosing alone does not meet
appropriate standards of treatment for opiate addiction.
The clinical consensus that patient contact beyond dosing is a necessary
ingredient in OAT is supported by a particularly well designed,
randomized, controlled study comparing three levels of psychosocial
services (McLellan, Arndt, Metzger, Woody, &O'Brien, 1993). Patients in
all conditions received a minimum dose of 60mg of methadone. Minimal
methadone services (MMS) consisted of virtually no counseling.
Counselors saw patients for 15-minute appointments once per month.
Standard methadone services (SMS) consisted of weekly counseling visits
in the first month. After the first month, if a patient showed
improvement (e.g., decreased illicit opioid-positive urine screens and
positive social change), counseling could be reduced to twice monthly.
Patients who did not improve, or whose performance declined, were asked
to attend sessions twice a week or more. Enhanced methadone services
(EMS) consisted of counseling, as described for SMS, plus on-site
medical and psychiatric, employment, and family therapy services. The
results indicated that patients receiving MMS had significantly greater
cocaine and illicit opioid use throughout the six-month treatment
compared to the patients assigned to SMS or EMS. In addition, patients
receiving SMS had significant changes in legal, family, and psychiatric
problems that were not seen in the MMS group. Patients receiving EMS
demonstrated significantly greater improvement than SMS patients in the
same areas did. Most significantly, 69% of patients in MMS were
protectively transferred to SMS because of eight consecutive illicit
opioid or cocaine positive urine screens or three emergencies requiring
immediate health care. Of the transferred patients, significant
reductions in illicit opioid and cocaine use were evident within four
weeks of the transfer with no change in methadone dose.
Kraft and her colleagues completed a cost-effectiveness study comparing
the three conditions from the above study (Kraft, Rothbard, Hadley,
McLellan, & Asch, 1997). They concluded that large amounts of support
for methadone patients (EMS) improve outcomes as compared to moderate
amounts of support (SMS), but only to a modest degree. On the other
hand, moderate amounts of support improve outcomes as compared to
minimum support (MMS) to a degree that offsets the additional expense of
increased counseling. They concluded that SMS is the most cost-effective
of the three treatment conditions, and that the findings of their
analysis suggest a level below which supplementary support should not be
allowed to fall.
In summary, it appears that "more is better" when considering services
to offer as part of an OAT program. However, the incremental benefit of
additional services may decline as more services are added. Given budget
constraints that may effect many clinics, a *minimum* standard of weekly
counseling visits in the first month of OAT involvement and monthly
counseling visits during the next year is a reasonable standard.
However, the design of the McLellen et al. (1993) study suggests that it
is not simply time spent with a counselor but rather the responsiveness
of the OAT program to patient behavior that affects patient outcomes.
Several other studies have found that involvement of the patient with
the program staff is an essential ingredient of effective OAT programs
(Broome, Simpson, & Joe, 1999; Hser, Grella, Hsieh, Anglin & Brown,
1999; Joe, Simpson, & Broome, 1999; Magura, Nwakeze, & Demsky, 1998).
Therefore, while monthly visits are set as a minimum standard for a
stable patient, programs are encouraged to increase counseling frequency
contingent on client behavior. For example, as in the McLellan study,
patients who do not demonstrate a reduction in illicit opioid-positive
urine tests in the first month of treatment should not have their
counseling schedule reduced, and patients who enter a period of crisis
(e.g., relapse, medical, interpersonal) should have their counseling
schedule increased. Additional services such as medical and psychiatric
care, employment counseling, and family services are encouraged.
If clinic leadership determines that increasing compliance with
counseling frequency is an appropriate QI goal, there are several
factors to consider. First, is it the clearly stated policy of the
clinic that new patients (i.e., enrolled less than one month) and
unstable patients (i.e., those testing positive for illicit substances)
should be seen by their case manager a minimum of once per week, and
that stable patients should be seen by their case manager a minimum of
once per month? If not, the first step toward meeting best-practice
recommendations is to make policy changes supportive of these
recommendations and to clearly communicate these expectations to the
clinic staff and patients.
If counseling frequency consistent with recommended levels is already
clinic policy, the next step would be to assess clinic caseloads. In
general, a caseload of no more than 50 clients is considered reasonable
for a full-time case manager. However, this number assumes that case
managers have a case mix that includes stable, long-term patients as
well as new and unstable patients who require significantly greater time
to manage. If a case manager has predominately new or unstable patients,
a caseload of 35 to 40 may be more reasonable. If this is not possible,
the clinic may have to limit the number of new intakes until the clinic
census stabilizes at a level that can be adequately served by the
existing staff.
If policies supporting counseling frequency recommendations are in place
and clearly communicated to staff, and caseloads are assessed to be
within a reasonable range, it may be a matter of educating staff about
the importance of regular case management contact to client outcomes.
The monthly *Case Management Forms* can be used by the clinic leadership
to monitor an individual case manager's progress toward meeting
counseling expectations.
Counseling frequency is a relatively simple practice to monitor, but
implementing changes may be more challenging, depending on your clinic's
current policies and available resources (e.g., staffing, program
funding).
# **[Selected References]{.underline}**
Cacciola, J. S., Alterman, A. I., Rutherford, M. J., McKay, J. R., &
McLellan, A. T. (1998). The early course of change in methadone
maintenance. *Addiction, 93*(1), 41-49.
Kraft, M. K., Rothbard, A. B., Hadley, T. R., McLellan, A. T., & Asch,
D. A. (1997). Are supplementary services provided during methadone
maintenance cost-effective? *American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(*9),
1214-1219.
McLellan, A. T., Arndt, I. O., Metzger, D. S., Woody, G. E., & O'Brien,
C. P. (1993). The effects of psychosocial services in substance abuse
treatment. *Journal of the American Medical Association, 269*(15),
1953-1959.
Broome, K. M., Simpson, D. D., & Joe, G. W. (1999). Patient and program
attributes related to treatment process indicators in DATOS. *Drug and
Alcohol Dependence, 57*, 127-135.
Hser, Y., Grella, C. E., Hsieh, S., Anglin, M. D., & Brown, B. S.
(1999). Prior treatment experience related to process and outcomes in
DATOS. *Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57,* 137-150.
Joe, G. W., Simpson, D. D., & Broome, K. M. (1999). Retention and
patient engagement models for different treatment modalities in DATOS.
*Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57,* 113-125.
Magura, S., Nwakeze, P. D., & Demsky, S. Y. (1998). Pre- and
in-treatment predictors of retention in methadone treatment using
survival analysis. *Addiction, 93*(1), 51-60.
| en |
markdown | 007095 | # Presentation: 007095
## DATA CENTER RESEARCH AT THE LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY 7x24 EXCHANGE 2004 FALL CONFERENCE
- Steve Greenberg
- segreenberg@lbl.gov
- Sponsored by: Public Interest Energy Research (PIER)California Energy Commission and administered by
- California Institute for Energy Efficiency (CIEE)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- DATA CENTER RESEARCH AT THELAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY 7x24 EXCHANGE 2004 FALL CONFERENCE
- 10-18-04
## Acknowledgements
- California Energy Commission
- Pacific Gas and Electric Company
- 7 x 24 Exchange
- Uptime Institute
- Critical Facilities Round Table
- EYP Mission Critical Facilities
- Rumsey Engineers
- RMI
- E Source
- Industry Partners (Too many to name all)
- Overview
## Energy Intensive High-tech Buildings
- Overview
## We also operate data centers...
- Overview
## Why Look at Data Centers?
- Utilities were receiving requests for unrealistic power densities
- A lot of misinformation was circulating
- Large continually operating base loads
- Other High-Tech buildings energy efficiency opportunities were very large
- Technology improvements are transferable to other building types
- Overview
## Electricity Flows in Data Centers
- local distribution lines
- to the building, 480 V
- HVAC system
- lights, office space, etc.
- UPS
- PDU
- computer racks
- backup diesel generators
- computer
- equipment
- uninterruptible
- load
- Overview
## Current Data Center Research Activities
- Benchmarking and Best Practices
- Load intensity
- Performance Benchmarks
- Self-benchmarking Protocol
- Investigate UPS Efficiency Improvement
- Investigate Power Supply Improvement
- Demonstration Projects
- Technology Transfer
- Overview
## Current Benchmarking Work
- Current Benchmarking Work
- Benchmarking
- Benchmark (measure) energy use in 6-10 additional data centers
- Solicit additional benchmarks
- Identify and analyze better performing systems and document in “Best Practices” summary
- Develop self-benchmarking protocol
## Data Center Benchmarking
- Benchmarking
- Both LBNL and Uptime Institute found average IT equipment loading at ~25 W/ft2
## Projecting Computing Load When Fully Loaded (W/Sq.Ft. of electrically active floor space)
- Projecting Computing Load When Fully Loaded** ** (W/Sq.Ft. of electrically active floor space)
- Benchmarking
## Data Center Benchmarking
- Benchmarking
## Chiller Comparison
- Benchmarking
- Average 0.75
## Total Chilled Water System Efficiency
- Benchmarking
- Average 1.69
## Several Sources
Heaters
Battery chargers
Transfer switches
Fuel management systems
Heaters alone (many operation hours) use more electricity than produced by the generator (few operating hours)
May be possible to eliminate heaters, batteries, and chargers
- Standby Generation Loss
- Several Sources
- Heaters
- Battery chargers
- Transfer switches
- Fuel management systems
- Heaters alone (many operation hours) use more electricity than produced by the generator (few operating hours)
- May be possible to eliminate heaters, batteries, and chargers
- Benchmarking
## Common Findings
- Benchmarking
- Humidity Control and CRAC unit fighting
- Lighting Control
- Air side Economizing
- Variable Speed Drives – pumps, chillers, fans
- Control strategies - setpoints, cooling tower staging
- High ceilings important with Underfloor (thermal stratification)
- Air management common problem
- Low UPS loading
## Follow-up Audits
- Benchmarking
- We are contacting prior benchmark sites:
- 7 sites interviewed to date
- 60 total measures recommended, ranging from O&M lighting to new UPSs or chillers
- 20 completed, 7 planned
- No estimates of savings to date
## Conclusions from follow-up:
- Benchmarking
- Further follow-up with other centers and estimated savings will be pursued
- Measures weren’t completed for various reasons, from
- economic downturn to operational constraints
- Savings difficult to estimate (instrumentation, masking)
## General Recommendations
- Benchmarking
- Benchmark to know where you stand
- Life-cycle cost analysis
- Facilities partnership with IT professionals
- Evaluate Load Spreading vs Compaction
## Available benchmark data?
- Sources of other benchmark data?
- Please contact LBNL:
- - Steve Greenberg: segreenberg@lbl.gov
- Bill Tschudi: _[wftschudi@lbl.gov](mailto:wftschudi@lbl.gov)_
- Project site: http://hightech.lbl.gov
- Benchmarking
## Future Direction
- Develop concensus on performance benchmarks, collect data, quantify energy savings potential
- Incorporate other industry benchmark data
- Benchmarking
## Current Work on UPSs
- UPS Systems
- Determine the range of current UPS efficiencies, highlight more efficient designs, and provide a means for comparing their total cost of ownership (TCO).
- Propose a new efficiency specification for UPSs that could be considered by Energy Star and other third-party efficiency labeling organizations.
- Conduct a scoping study to analyze the energy efficiency savings potential and performance of a complete DC power architecture for data centers
## UPS System Benchmarking
- UPS Systems
## Progress Update
- UPS Systems
- Completed technical review of efficiency versus load (based on specification) for current generation static and inertial UPS topology.
***Based on review of more than 100 static UPS models***
## UPS Measured Performance
***Sample of 12 field measurements.***
- UPS Systems
## Measuring UPS efficiency to show impact of “high efficiency” option.
- UPS Systems
- Measured Result
- Manufacturer Spec
***On average, existing high efficiency modes can make a 4 to 5 % difference in UPS efficiency.***
## Analyzing UPS performance in “high efficiency” option.
- UPS Systems
***In “high efficiency” mode, there can be one cycle ***
***(16.6 msec for 60 Hz) of voltage deviation on the output of the UPS. Power supplies downstream of the UPS can ride through this.***
## Progress Update
- UPS Systems
- Researching high efficiency inertial units currently available in the market.
***Quoted efficiencies are in the 96% range and higher; we will be collecting field/lab test data to quantify the efficiency of inertial UPS systems; advantages of non-battery alternatives could also be significant based on manufacturer spec.***
- Caterpillar
- Pentadyne
- Piller
## Labeling
- Efficiency and Reliability
- Data collection protocol.
- Technical review of efficiency versus load (based on specification) for current generation static and inertial UPS.
- Simplified calculation tools for comparing AC powering versus DC powering and evaluation of cost savings for higher efficiency UPS.
- Testing of UPS to show impact of “high efficiency” option on static UPS
- Coordinating with International labeling effort for quality & efficiency.
- UPS Systems
- Possible UPS Efficiency Labeling Criteria
## Progress Update: UPS Q/E Matrix
- UPS Systems
## Future Direction
- UPS Systems
- Sponsor for rack level demonstration of DC powering architecture
- Sponsor for high efficiency static or rotary UPS technology demonstration
- Identify “host” for UPS Q/E matrix in US
- Participate in European Code of Conduct meeting and any potential IEC standard activity for harmonizing UPS efficiency standard
## Current Power Supply Work
- Power Supplies
- Current Power Supply Work
- Document efficiencies of current server power supplies
- Field testing to document achievable energy savings
- Recommend new efficiency levels to Server System Infrastructure Initiative (SSI) for consideration
- Assess other PS saving opportunities in DC applications
## Power Supplies in IT Equipment
- Power Supplies
## Power Supplies in IT Equipment
- Power Supplies
## Progress Update: Server Power Supply Efficiency Lab Test Setup
- Power Supplies
- Electronic Load Banks
- Yokogawa Digital Power Meter
- Fluke 41 Power Harmonic Analyzer
- Power Supply Load Test Fixtures
- Server Power Supply
- Computer Interface
## Progress Update: Sample Power Supply Test Report
- A consistent test protocol, loading guideline & test report format will allow more visibility on power supply efficiency
- Power Supplies
## Progress Update: How Loaded are the Server Power Supplies?
- Power Supplies
## Progress Update: Power Supply Loading Versus Redundancy
- Power Supplies
**Versus**
## Power Supply Efficiency
- Developed loading guidelines and test protocol for testing AC/DC power supplies for 1U, 2U and pedestal servers.
- Calculation tool for evaluating impact of improving power conversion process efficiency at rack level.
- Coordination with Server System Infrastructure (SSI) members to adopt loading guidelines and recommend higher efficiency levels for server power supplies.
- Evaluate “real life” server PS loading level and processor usage activity for servers.
- Power Supplies
## Power Supply Efficiency
- Power Supplies
- Very Low Processor Activity...
- ...does not relate to very low power consumption
*Most of the time the GHz processor is doing activities that can be done by a MHz processor but the input power consumption is not changing much*
## Future Direction
- Power Supplies
- A more focused and broader assessment of:
- Server activity profile based on application/server type
- Correlation of server activity and power consumption
- Develop industry interest and support for benchmarking for energy efficiency
- Develop efficiency guidelines based on performance metrics
## LBNL’s Role in Demonstrations
- Scoping demonstrations of technologies or strategies to improve energy efficiency in high- tech buildings
- Showcase New/Emerging or Under-utilized Technologies or Approaches
- Demonstrations
## Potential demonstrations for Data
- Demonstrations
- Potential demonstrations for Data
- Centers:
- Airflow visualization via helium bubbles
- Combined Heat and Power
- UPS efficiency improvement
## LBNL portal
- Technology Transfer
- Website:
- http://hightech.lbl.gov
## Thank you Questions?
- Thank youQuestions?
- 10-18-04 | en |
converted_docs | 262064 | +-------+-----------------------------------+----+---------------------+
| > | > 6720 | > | > July 14, 2001 |
| File | | D | |
| > | | at | |
| Code: | | e: | |
+-------+-----------------------------------+----+---------------------+
| > | | | |
| Route | | | |
| > To: | | | |
+-------+-----------------------------------+----+---------------------+
| | | | |
+-------+-----------------------------------+----+---------------------+
| > Sub | > *[72 Hour Brief---Thirtymile | | |
| ject: | > Fire Fatality | | |
| | > Investigation]{.underline}* | | |
+-------+-----------------------------------+----+---------------------+
| | | | |
+-------+-----------------------------------+----+---------------------+
| > To: | > Chief | | |
+-------+-----------------------------------+----+---------------------+
**[Narrative:]{.underline}**
Forest Service Northwest Regular #6 Type II Fire Crew was entrapped by
wildland fire, caused by an abandoned picnic cooking fire along Chewuch
River 30 miles north of Winthrop,Washington. Fourteen crew members were
involved in the entrapment, as well as two civilians who arrived at the
entrapment site while trying to exit the area following a camping
excursion. Fourteen shelters were deployed. One shelter contained one
Forest Service person and the two civilians. Ten Forest Service
personnel and the two civilians survived the burnover. Four individuals
deployed approximately 100\' upslope from the road. One person deployed
an unknown distance upslope from these four. The remaining people,
including the civilians, deployed on the road. After the initial
deployment some of the individuals relocated to the river. The
civilian\'s vehicle was destroyed by fire. The Forest Service vehicle
sustained minor damage, but was driveable.
**[Preliminary Factual Findings:]{.underline}**
1) fourteen members of a 21-person fire crew were trapped after
attempting to extinguish a spot fire adjacent to a road ahead of an
uncontrolled fire;
2) the initial crew assignment was reinforcement for the purpose of
completing containment lines and mopup;
3) the fire transitioned to active fire behavior during the early
afternoon;
4) after entrapment the crew took a position on a suitable deployment
site;
5) the crew had adequate time to prepare and deploy shelters; two
civilians shared a shelter with one of the crew;
6) 10 Forest Service personnel and 2 civilians survived; 4 Forest
Service personnel died;
7) one survivor had severe burns and several others had minor burns;
8) preliminary autopsy reports show cause of death was inhalation of
superheated air;
9) radio communication was not a contributing factor;
10) no significant weather event contributed to the entrapment;
11) the fire was located in a steep canyon, with a variety of fuel
conditions and loadings (mixed conifer and riparian);
12) Energy Release Component was approaching maximum levels for this
time of year.
JAMES R. FURNISH
Deputy Chief NFS
Investigation Team Leader
enclosure
---------------------------- --------------- ------------ -------------------- -------------- --------------
***Thirty Mile Incident
Investigation Team***
**Work Location** **Work** **Cell**
**[Position]{.underline}** **Name** **Agency** **Address** **Phone** **Phone**
Team Leader Jim Furnish USFS National 202-205-1523 202-329-6086
Headquarters
P. O. Box 96090
Washington, DC
20090-6090
Line Officer Kent USFS Pacific Southwest 707-562-9000 n/a
Connaughton Region
Representative 1323 Club Drive
Vallejo, CA 94592
Equipment Specialist George Jackson USFS Missoula Technology 406-329-3967 406-240-3153
&
Development Center 406-240-8238
Fort Missoula Bldg
#1
Missoula, MT 59804
Fire Behavior Rich Lasko USFS Northern Region 406-329-3232 406-239-5692
P. O. Box 7669
Missoula, MT 59807
Human Factors Tony Kern USFS National Interagency 208-344-3427 208-850-5357
Fire
Center
Industrial Drive
Boise, ID
Safety Manager Chuck Whitlock USFS Missoula Technology 406-329-3924 406-544-0617
&
Development Center
Fort Missoula Bldg
#1
Missoula, MT 59804
Photographer/ Ben Croft USFS Missoula Technology 406-329-3900 406-360-3999
&
Videographer Development Center
Fort Missoula Bldg
#1
Missoula, MT 59804
Fire Operations Dave Dash BLM-AK Alaska Fire Service 907-356-5642 907-388-3089
P. O Box 35005
Fort Wainwright, AK
99703
Weather Specialist Brenda Graham USFS Northern California 530-226-2730 n/a
Service Center
6101 Airport Road
Redding, CA 96002
Weather Specialist Jim Prange NWS National Weather 206-526-6088 801-556-1259
Service
7600 Sand Pointway
N. E.
Seattle, WA
98115-0070
Chief Investigator Alan Chockie Link Technologies 206-367-1908
Seattle, WA
Compliance Officer Michael OSHA OSHA- Bellevue 206-553-7520 206-696-2251
Bonkowski
Leader
Bellevue, WA
Compliance Officer Dave Baker OSHA OSHA- Bellevue 206-553-7520 206-696-2249
Bellevue, WA
Plans/Documentation Jeanne USFS Tahoe National 530-478-6221 530-93-2823
Pincha-Tulley Forest
631 Coyote Street
Nevada City, CA
95959
Documentation Shari Miller USFS Okanogan-Wenatchee 509-662-4224 509-421-7002
NF
215 Melody Lane
Wenatchee, WA 98801
Equipment Specialist Leslie Anderson USFS Missoula Technology 406-329-1043 406-239-3932
&
Development Center
Fort Missoula Bldg
#1
Missoula, MT 59804
Union Representative Joe Duran USFS Los Padres National 805-925-9538 805-448-6617
Forest
1616 Carlotti Drive ext. 220
Santa Maria, CA
93454
Law Enforcement Bill McConnell USFS Colville National 509-684-7186 509-675-2186
Forest
Liaison 765 Main St.
Colville, WA 99114
Information Officer Ron DeHart USFS Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie
NF
Mount Lake Terrace,
WA
GPS/GIS Ron Gross USFS Okanogan-Wenatchee 509-997-9752 home \#
NF
Methow Valley RD front office: 509-997-3237
509-997-2131
Twisp, WA
Okanogan- Troy Corn USFS Okanogan-Wenatchee 509-784-1511 509-679-9293
NF
Wenatchee Liaison Entiat Ranger
District
Entiat, WA
---------------------------- --------------- ------------ -------------------- -------------- --------------
| en |
log-files | 607791 | <!-- Title: Eve shift. Fri Mar 30, 2001 -->
<!-- SciCo: Alan Sill -->
<!-- DAQAce: Ivan Vila -->
<!-- MonAce: Francesco Palmonari -->
<!-- CO: Will Bell -->
<!-- OpManager: Seve Hahn -->
<!-- Notes: -->
<pre>Plan:
Do all calibrations, as possible. Test YKK's new trigger
table(s), see below.
Follow with L3 torture test with BEAMGAS_COSMIC_MAR28[1,98],
which will occupy most if not all of remainder of shift.</pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 16:08:22 2001 -->
Hadron TDC crate returned to service. TDC cabled for wedges 4-7 only. Please include in DAQ if possible.
<!-- Author: Jonathan Lewis -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 16:13:49 2001 -->
<table border=0><td><tr><td bgcolor=#e0e030>
<pre>created a trigger table
INTEGRATION_MINBIAS_CAL_TRIGGERS_v-2
for Peter Wilson and Greg Field to test timining between
CLC and calorimeter triggers.
The table contains
------------------------------------------
Description Threshold Prescale
------------------------------------------
Minimum bias (CLC E*W) 1
Sum Et > 50 1
Sum Et > 50 * Minimum bias 1
Central Jet Et > 20 10
Central Jet Et > 20 * Minimum bias 10
Plug Jet > 20 1
Plug Jet > 20 * Minimum bias 1
------------------------------------------
Please test this table with proton bem and let ykk
(ykkim@fnal.gov, x5007) know the rate of each trigger since
the CLC trigger rate may need to have a large prescale
factor depending on the beam condition.
</pre></td></tr></td></table>
<!-- Author: Young-Kee -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 16:47:00 2001 -->
<pre>Made the LED_ALL configuration file "invisible". The only option the ACES have now is to use ACE_LED_ALL. One needs to go into
"expert mpde" to do that.</pre>
<!-- Author: Vaia, Bill, Ivan -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 17:02:29 2001 -->
<pre>/fp/
CURRENT SLOW CONTROL STATUS:
-> SILICON RE-WIRING RTDs
(THAT HAD GENERATED LOW DP ALARM ON ISL EAST -> acknowledge)
-> COT/CMU/CMX/CMP/BMU in STANDBY
-> WORK ON VOLTMAN IS FINISHED
(NOTE FOR THE FUTURE: EXPERT INSTRUCTED US TO WAIT AT LEAST
15 MINUTES BEFORE TO CONFIRM AN ALARM BECAUSE THIS TIME SCALE
IS ABOUT THE REFRESH TIME OF VOLTMAN AND SOME TIMES ALARMS
ARE GENERATED ONLY FROM BAD COMUNICATIONS)
</pre>
<!-- Author: F.Palmonari -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 17:13:25 2001 -->
<pre>Recent files in the /data1/consumer/results/TrigMon area:
28 105505CalTrigger_Summary.txt
28 107866CalTrigger_Summary.txt
30 107313CalTrigger_Summary.txt
30 107886CalTrigger_Summary.txt
31 110067CalTrigger_Summary.txt
33 101500CalTrigger_Summary.txt
33 109038CalTrigger_Summary.txt
33 110014CalTrigger_Summary.txt
34 110070CalTrigger_Summary.txt
36 101547CalTrigger_Summary.txt
38 108709CalTrigger_Summary.txt
39 106357CalTrigger_Summary.txt
40 107757CalTrigger_Summary.txt
41 107604CalTrigger_Summary.txt
41 107606CalTrigger_Summary.txt
41 109588CalTrigger_Summary.txt
42 107759CalTrigger_Summary.txt
42 107811CalTrigger_Summary.txt
43 101559CalTrigger_Summary.txt
43 101587CalTrigger_Summary.txt
43 105406CalTrigger_Summary.txt
45 101560CalTrigger_Summary.txt
46 107758CalTrigger_Summary.txt
53 108672CalTrigger_Summary.txt
55 108708XFTTrigger_Summary.txt
56 109817XFTTrigger_Summary.txt
64 108103CalTrigger_Summary.txt
69 101545CalTrigger_Summary.txt
70 107776CalTrigger_Summary.txt
83 107744CalTrigger_Summary.txt
83 109229CalTrigger_Summary.txt
91 107807CalTrigger_Summary.txt
97 108602XFTTrigger_Summary.txt
106 103568CalTrigger_Summary.txt
110 108709XFTTrigger_Summary.txt
115 107651CalTrigger_Summary.txt
116 108710CalTrigger_Summary.txt
123 101586CalTrigger_Summary.txt
127 107775CalTrigger_Summary.txt
163 101502CalTrigger_Summary.txt
164 101501CalTrigger_Summary.txt
282 101591CalTrigger_Summary.txt
385 101480CalTrigger_Summary.txt
Clearly the TrigMon output, essentially all of which consists of
the following message, has swollen a lot lately... there are now
14 Gb of such stuff...
-- event number =1 eta = 16, phi = 0
clustering_word_sim[word=0][card=0][block=0] = 0 -- clustering_word_Real[word=0][card=0][block=0] = fc00fc00
Can someone look at why this is happening, please?</pre>
<!-- Author: AFS -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 17;16;54 comment by...AFS -->
<pre>Actually 12 Gb:
33 /data1/consumer/results % du -hsm * | sort -n
1 led.root
1 Monitor1.tcl
1 PhysMon
54 Stage0
86 LumMon
890 XMon
945 YMon
12283 TrigMon
</pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 17:35:47 2001 -->
<pre>XTRP fails coldstart transition.... Messenger process suspended.
Reboot XTRP.</pre>
<!-- Author: Peter Wilson -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 17:50:32 2001 -->
<pre>Testing new RC (devel) with DIRAC track inputs masked for
wedges without XTRP boards. All L1CAL, L2CAL, East PCAL, XTRP.</pre>
<!-- Author: Peter and Greg :: (run 110753) -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 18;18;05 comment by...Peter -->
<pre>Had trouble getting events to disk. End run after 10000 events.</pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 18:02:38 2001 -->
<pre>Calibrations do not seem to be making it into the database.
Ace and Vaia are looking into it.
Also, ypbind seemed to be taking 98% of the cpu on b0dap29.
Called Jim Patrick to ask that he look at it.
Possibly related or not, it is also true that Will is having
trouble printing from b0dap50.</pre>
<!-- Author: AFS -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 18;05;15 comment by...patrick -->
ypbind on b0dap29 corrected.
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 18:19:03 2001 -->
<pre>Start new run including Central cal and XFT crates.</pre>
<!-- Author: Peter and Greg :: (run 110758) -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 18;21;22 comment by...Peter -->
<pre>Done timeout from ccal00, 01, 02. Removed from run and starting
again.</pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 18:19:37 2001 -->
<pre>Trying to do LED and Xenon calibrations.
The LED calibration we did was done with the "old" RC.
For the Xenon we tried first the "New" RC and then switched to
the "old" (Run 110752) since in the "new" the run number is set to -1.
In all calibrations with either "old" or "new" RC we get
in the log file:
Abnormal Termination caused by signal: 15 Framework abort.
The QIEPED calibration (run 110748) we did right before the
led and Xenon runs worked fine and the data went in data base.
Tony is looking into the "abort job" problem and Bill is trying
to fix the run number problem in "new" RC. </pre>
<!-- Author: Ivan, Vaia :: (run 110752) -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 18:39:54 2001 -->
New Xenon Calibration after Tony fixes on the CSL
It seems not work again,i.e, no table shows up in
the database. I checked for any differences between
the consumer logfiles before and after the fix, they
are identical.
<!-- Author: Ivan :: (run 110768) -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 18:42:53 2001 -->
<table border=0><td><tr><td bgcolor=#e0e030><pre>
Created a trigger table for the end of 1x8 collisions.
Trigger table name : 1x8_END_1_v-2
The information can be found from
http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/internal/cdfoperations/trigger_table_1x8_end.html
</pre></td></tr></td></table>
<!-- Author: Young-Kee -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 18:53:13 2001 -->
<pre>Tony thinks that we have some network problems connecting
with the consumer server, this thing can translate with
the problems transfering tables to the data base. </pre>
<!-- Author: Ivan -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 19:02:18 2001 -->
It is clear that we have extensive network problems on the
online machines. (b0dap29, an exception, is actually on the
offline network according to Steve H.; Will notes that 25 is
also OK but the b0dap5x machines all seem to be affected.)
Calls to both of the online computer experts and to the Run Control pager went unanswered. Now trying to reach Jeff Schmidt.
<!-- Author: Alan Sill -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 19;10;36 comment by...Arnd -->
That's not completely true ... I immediately went to the control room (answering the RC pager), but I couldn't do anything about the problem and told people to wait for the network experts.
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 22;07;22 comment by...patrick -->
b0dap29 is still on the online network. However
its configuration was not changed like the
b0dap5X and 6X machines were.
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 19:10:40 2001 -->
<pre>We tryed new Qie Calibration to check the consumer
behavior, It seems that again there are problems
communication with the consumer server...Tony
suggest to wait until the network problem is fixed.
The experts are working of that. </pre>
<!-- Author: Ivan -->
<!-- Comment: Sat Mar 31 18;54;13 comment by...Tony Vaiciulis -->
<pre>clarification: I think the consumers had no problem
communicating with the CSL. After receiving a begin-of-run event
the consumer apparently was trying to make some network
connection (to a database?) which it could not do. Therefore
the consumer never requested any events except the begin-of-run,
which it received.
</pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 19:40:19 2001 -->
<table border=0><td><tr><td bgcolor=#e0e030><pre>
Created a trigger table for the beginning of 1x8 collisions
1x8_BEGIN_1_v-1
The information can be found from
http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/internal/cdfoperations/trigger_table_1x8_begin.html
</pre></td></tr></td></table>
<!-- Author: Young-Kee -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 19:45:49 2001 -->
Network is still crisped in various ways as mentioned above,
preventing us from logging data but leaving us alive in other
ways, so we decide to proceed with testing the above trigger tables.
Presently have coalseced beam at 150 GeV in the machine. Will start
by testing INTEGRATION_MINBIAS_CAL_TRIGGERS_v-2
<!-- Author: AFS -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 20;19;00 comment by...AFS -->
(Failed due to hardware database problem, see below.)
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 19:49:22 2001 -->
<pre>Getting this error when connection to database:
2001.03.30 19:48:44 java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00257: archiver
error. Connect internal only, until freed.
Yikes!
</pre>
<!-- Author: W.Badgett -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 19;52;40 comment by...W.Badgett -->
<pre>Found that the archive log disk had filled:
b0dau35> df -k .
Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/vx/dsk/oradg/archlogvol
7340032 7335122 4910 100% /dbs8
</pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 19:59:19 2001 -->
Waiting to have fixed our network problem and
hardware database.
<!-- Author: Ivan -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 20:12:42 2001 -->
<pre>The physical disks of b0dau35 volume /dev/vx/dsk/oradg/archlogvol
had some spare space, so I increased the volume size
by 2Gb. This should keep us sitting pretty for a while.
</pre>
<!-- Author: W.Badgett -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 20:21:18 2001 -->
Have placed official help call through FNAL help desk.
E-mail sent with description of problem.
<!-- Author: AFS -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 20;32;07 comment by...AFS -->
Phil Demar arrives to look at network problem.
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 20:42:50 2001 -->
Approx. after 20min. of starting the consumer the calibration run 110779 appears in the <a href="http://cdfdbb.fnal.gov:8520/cdfr2/databases?cs=d&minor=&col=RUNDATE&whr-RUNDATE=&col=WRITEDATE&fmt-WRITEDATE=T&whr-WRITEDATE=&col=PERIOD&fmt-PERIOD=&whr-PERIOD=&col=CALIB_RUN&major=-CALIB_RUN&fmt-CALIB_RUN=&whr-CALIB_RUN=&col=CALIB_TABLE&whr-CALIB_TABLE=&col=DATA_STATUS&whr-DATA_STATUS=&col=CALIB_VERSION&fmt-CALIB_VERSION=&whr-CALIB_VERSION=&skip=&limit=50&email=&type=gen-tbl&do=d&src=3&tbl=DATE_RUNLIST_VIEW">table</a>.
<!-- Author: William Bell :: (run 110779) -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 21;12;03 comment by...AFS -->
<table border=0><td><tr><td bgcolor=#e0e030>
<pre>However the date is wrong, as in this example:<br>
30.03.2001 19:24:55 2001 Mar 29 19:25CST 13 110,787 COTCHANT0 BAD 1</pre></td></tr></td></table>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 21:00:49 2001 -->
<pre>-----------------------------------------------------------------
RUN 110752
PHYSIC TABLE: INTEGRATION_MINBIAS_CAL_TRIGGERS_v-2[2,101]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RUN DESCRIPTION:
ALL CAL CRATES
L2 & L3 CAL TRIG CRATES
ALL COT CRATES BUT B0COT17 SLOT 17 AND BOCOT18 SLOT 12
ALL CMU CMP CMX_01 IMU_00
SCINT CRATES
HAD TIMING
SCALERS
MEASURED TRIGGER RATES:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Description Threshold Prescale RATE PRESC.RATE
Hz Hz
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum bias (CLC E*W) 1 12 12
Sum Et > 50 1 22 22
Sum Et > 50 * Minimum bias 1 00 00
Central Jet Et > 20 10 05 0.6
Central Jet Et > 20 * Minimum bias 10 00 00
Plug Jet > 20 1 00 00
Plug Jet > 20 * Minimum bias 1 00 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------
</pre>
<!-- Author: Ivan & Francesco :: (run 110752) -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 21;22;11 comment by...sempre noi ! -->
<pre>run stopped after 116397 events</pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 21:03:23 2001 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-381&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-382 width='300' align='top'></td><td>FANTASTICO !! </a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Ivan & Francesco -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 21:08:18 2001 -->
Jim Patrick called, thinks the b0dap5x network problems and the
csl problems are unrelated, but will check. Immediately thereafter, Phil Demar called back saying they would like to
do an "interface restart" - asked him to coordinate
this with Jim.
<!-- Author: AFS -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 21:27:04 2001 -->
<pre>STEVE will re-initialize the timer crate
</pre>
<!-- Author: F.Palmonari -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 21:27:26 2001 -->
At approx. 21:20 our network and consumer difficulties cleared up. A running YMon took roughly 3000 events before the network was fully visible to the problem machines.
<!-- Author: William Bell -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 21:35:32 2001 -->
<pre>This afternoon Jeff Schmidt changed the access configuration
on the b0dap5x and b0dap6x nodes so that they would only
see subnet 236/237 addresses plus some other required addresses.
fnprt was left off the allowed list, this was an oversight.
There should have been no restrictions on access within the
236 and 237 subnets, so if this caused a problem with data
taking we need to find out why. Why it would affect consumers
is a mystery, if it in fact did.
The access configuration was restored so something like
it has been recently, which prevents incoming connections
from outside the lab but doesn't have too many other restrictions.
We will have to figure out the correct configuration next week.
Recall the online security plan calls for limiting access
to the online subnet to whatever is necessary for data taking.</pre>
<!-- Author: patrick -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 21:52:51 2001 -->
<pre>PHYSICALLY REBOOTED THE CRATE b0tsi03
(NO MORE LINK WITH HIM VIA VXLOGIN OR MINICOM)
</pre>
<!-- Author: Ivan & Francesco -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 22;10;18 comment by...patrick -->
At least once per day this processor gets its heap corrupted,
as shown on the vxmon display, and eventually must be
physically reset.
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 21:58:47 2001 -->
We started a new run, with the same configuration as
the previous run but this time using the physics
table 1x8_END_1[2,101]
<!-- Author: Ivan :: (run 110794) -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 22:09:05 2001 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-383&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-384 width='300' align='top'></td><td>Fred rates</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Ivan -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 22:09:36 2001 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-385&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-386 width='300' align='top'></td><td>Fred Prescaled</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Ivan -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 22:11:16 2001 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/elog/notebooks/2001/Fri_Mar_30_2001_Eve.221045.ps align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-388 align='top'></td><td>Hot muon chambers, shown in the event display, seem to fire often.</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: William Bell -->
<!-- Comment: Sat Mar 31 11;15;12 comment by...hyunsoo -->
<pre>Those are well known spots although their locations are
not correctly displayed on evd.</pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 22:14:52 2001 -->
<pre>GAS ALARM briefly sound
-> no way to track what it was, got in contact with the
tech. downstairs but also for him, no way to know
what it was...we look forward </pre>
<!-- Author: F.Palmonari -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 22;25;51 comment by...AFS -->
This was the second case of an alarm occurring and clearing too quickly to be seen this shift! Suggestion: can IFIX have an overall summary and log of alarm conditions (counting occurrences and not just listing them, of course, in case they com too quickly, and logging the most recent time that each occurred)?
Note some few IFIX pages have such historical logs, but there is no overall summary page of them as far as I know.
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 22;37;15 comment by...F.Palmonari -->
<pre>Thanks to Steeve we know what it was:
glitch in the LS-BOTBUBHI-ALM bubbler </pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 22:19:58 2001 -->
<pre>IT SEEMS THAT THE PRESCALING IS NOT WORKING FOR THE LAST TABLE
(SEE PLOTS)</pre>
<!-- Author: Ivan :: (run 110795) -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 22;26;33 comment by...ole ! -->
<pre>
this is the run were we tested the 1X8_START trigger table</pre>
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 22;38;58 comment by...AFS -->
(maybe due to clock problems?)
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 22:34:58 2001 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-389&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-390 width='300' align='top'></td><td>Fred trigger rates</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Ivan -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 22;35;19 comment by...Ivan -->
1x8_BEGIN
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 22:36:58 2001 -->
<table><tr><td><a href=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-391&button=yes target='xxx' onclick='jswindow()'; align=top><img src=/cgi/elog/elog.pl?nb=2001&action=view&page=-392 width='300' align='top'></td><td>Fred Prescaled, too many zeros... 1x8_BEGIN</a></td></tr></table>
<!-- Author: Ivan -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 22:47:45 2001 -->
We stop the run with physics 1x8_begin after 100kevents
<!-- Author: Ivan :: (run 110797) -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 22:54:30 2001 -->
After testing the trigger tables, we go back to
the Xenon calibration since the network problem
is solved.
The table appears in the database... !!!!
<!-- Author: Ivan & Francesco :: (run 110798) -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 23:00:22 2001 -->
Ivan Vila pointed out that the clock scope in the clock rack was displaying incorrectly. On closer investigation, it was very wrong. None of the signals (usually from 1 to 4, CDF_CLK, CDF_BC, CDF_B0, and one of the beam pickups) was syncing to the external trigger. All of these signals except for the beam pickup are generated in the adjacent clock fanout crate, so they should be synced to each other.
<p>
This crate may have gone down during the power outage earlier today (there is no good way to tell that I know of). If so, the clock would need to be reinitialized and downloaded as per the clock instructions. I did that, but the scope picture was still not synced.
<p>
I called Steve Chappa, and he tried to debug it over the phone with me as his waldo. Basically, he did not understand what I was seeing either, and so he is coming in. One thing I noticed while playing with the scope inputs was that the external trigger is a -1 V pulse; however, it appears to have a sinusoid superimposed on it such that this pulse varies between -1 V and 0 V. The last thhing Steve had me try was to use "PCC A TRIG" out of the sequencer module in the clock crate as the external trigger. When I did that CDF_CLK and CDF_BC looked stable, but the other two (CDF_B0? and beam pickup) did not. Huh?
<!-- Author: Steve Hahn -->
<!-- Comment: Sat Mar 31 01;08;15 comment by...Steve Chappa -->
As per Steve Hahn's request, I came in to verify/fix the Clock's operation. I have no way of knowing what was initially displayed on the scope and what, if any, problems there were. What I found was: 1) The scope's trigger was incorrect. I instructed Steve to use the Prog-Trig output from the Sequencer's front panel. Instead, Heused the BC_PH_Trig output. This caused the scope to trigger three times per revolution and trying to look at a signal (B_ZERO, the third scope trace) that only happens once a revolution. The result is the scope will display an incorrect picture of B_ZERO. 2) The cable used for the scope trigger was not plugged in all the way. This could futher cause some uncertainty in what the scope is displaying. 3) The Clock was in Normal mode and the accelerator was doing dumps and injections. This will cause Sync_Timing errors and Seq_Hold errosrs. This is not an problem with the Clock, it is just displaying the accurate beam to Clock sync operation. 4) After setting up the scope properly, I found no problem with the Clock's operation. I do not know what Steve saw or what, if any, problem there really was.
I suspect that the initial alarm over the scope picture was over confusion as to what the scope was actually displaying and what the viewer thought the scope was displaying. Add to this, the RF_Locking mode of operation is not quit the same as Free_Run mode. The Clock uses and generates vaious cyclical and patterned signals. Unless you know exactly what the scope is monitoring and what the trigger is, it can very confusing and thus would bring one to the conclusion that somehow the Clock is operating incorrectly. Also, I suspect that upon re-initializing the Sequencer operation, the Prog_Trig was not loaded. If not loaded via the Set Prog_Trig button (a numeral "6" must be entered) in the Clock operating software, the Sequencer will not generate the Prog_Trig and thus the scope, under the standard picture setup, will not get an external trig. This will then make the scope signals appear to operate independantly and thus it will look like the Clock is really messing up.
A helpful suggestion: I usually leave the scope with a standard timing picture. If you are unsure as to what you are seeing, DO NOT just open the door and start fiddling with the scope and the cables going to the scope. Chances are, you do not know what you are doing. Ask the ops manager. I do not want to be called in to just set up the scope. (I exempt you Steve from this "hint")
The Clock is now in RF_Locking mode. Remember, a Sync_Timing error on the PCC is usually normal for this mode of operation, especially when the accelerator is doing dumps, injections etc. The Clock is not trying to sync to the accelerator anyway. Do not confuse this error with incorrect operation. As I leave it, The Clock seems to be operating OK; as I left it Friday morning.
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 23:02:09 2001 -->
<pre>Had to reset cmx00 - trying to run TDCtest on the muons
</pre>
<!-- Author: dan -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 23;02;33 comment by...dan -->
<pre>tdc's had "dropped"
</pre>
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 23;16;01 comment by...dan -->
<pre>TDCtest successful on muons. Ran cratesum - noticed that it copied over several cot crates as well as the muons.</pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 23:03:08 2001 -->
LED Calibration also makes its way to the DB.
It seems that the network problems where
the origin of the database/consumer problems.
<!-- Author: Ivan & Francesco :: (run 110799) -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 23:17:31 2001 -->
<pre>COT CALIBRATION
THE SUGGESTED PARAMETER TO RUN THE COT CALIBRATION SEEMS
OUT OF DATE (...350/2000/2000... -> ...350/3500/3500...)
WE RUN LEAVING THE DEFAULT VALUES (THAT DIFFERS FROM THE
ONE SUGGESTED IN THE WEB)
</pre>
<!-- Author: Ivan,F.Palmonari :: (run 110800) -->
<!-- Comment: Mon Apr 2 10;33;36 comment by...Bill Orejudos -->
<pre>3350 is the correct value...this is now updated
in the documentation</pre>
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 23:24:32 2001 -->
<pre>Noticed that IMU01 is in the muon calibration configuration. I removed the crate from the configuration. Will return it, when the crate is fixed.
</pre>
<!-- Author: dan -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 23:30:53 2001 -->
<pre>MUON CALIBRATION: RUN NUMBER 110805
-----------------------------------
(JUST FOR FUN) WITH THE NEW RC A CRATE (b0tsi02) FAIL
TO SETUP (-> RETURN CROSS POINT CRATE ERROR)
WE GO BACK TO THE OLD RC AND EVERYTHING GOES SMOOTH
</pre>
<!-- Author: Ivan and Francesco :: (run 110805) -->
<!-- Date: Fri Mar 30 23:42:12 2001 -->
<pre>SMX CALIBRATION: RUN NUMBER 110807
----------------------------------
NB: CRATE pcal01 INCLUDED !
</pre>
<!-- Author: Ivan & Francesco :: (run 110807) -->
<!-- Comment: Fri Mar 30 23;56;33 comment by...Ivan -->
we redo the SMX calibration because the previous
one wasn't showing up in the database
run number 110808
<!-- Comment: Sat Mar 31 00;07;50 comment by...rob snihur -->
This problem is because the calibration consumer is not found.
<!-- Date: Sat Mar 31 00:01:46 2001 -->
<font color=red>Shift Summary: </font><pre>Network problems due to access changes, see above, caused various
problems that eventually stopped data taking. These were cleared
up by Jim w/ onlooker's assistance from the FNAL network people.
Some clock confusion -- Steve Chappa came in and showed it was
OK all along.
We completed all calibrations except CLC QIE and CLC LED, plots
filed.
We are now set up for the scheduled offline data writing test.
See run plan ON WEB (not paper copies).</pre>
<br><b>End of Shift Numbers</b>
<table><tr><td width=60% align=left>
<b>CDF Run II <p></b>
<pre>
Runs lots o' junk
Delivered Luminosity 0 pb-1
Acquired Luminosity 0 pb-1
Efficiency 100
</td></tr></table></pre>
<!-- Author: Alan Sill -->
| en |
all-txt-docs | 637478 | Calculate Cross Sections from Resonance Parameters (RECENT 2000-1)
==============================================================================
Retrieval Criteria----------- MAT
File 2 Mimimum Cross Section- 1.00000-10
Reactions with No Background- Output (Resonance Contribution)
Calculate/Edit Mode---------- Calculate. List Resonance ParameterS.
Negative Cross Sections------ Make = 0 (No Negative Output)
Monitor Mode----------------- On
==============================================================================
ENDF/B Input and Output Data Filenames
ENDF.IN
RECENT.OUT
==============================================================================
Requested MAT Ranges
==============================================================================
Mimimum Maximum
==============================================================================
1 9999
==============================================================================
Allowable Uncertainty
==============================================================================
Energy Uncertainty per-cent
==============================================================================
0.0 1.000000-2 1.000
==============================================================================
ENDF/B Tape Label
==============================================================================
ENDF/B-VII submitted 03/2005 1
******************************************************************************
Processing 28-Ni-61 MAT= 2834
******************************************************************************
Based on the Format and Contents of MF=1, MT=451
(1) ENDF/B-VI Format.
(2) Material is NOT Fissile (LFI=0).
(3) Resonance Parameters are Given (LRP=1).
(4) Projectile ZA = 1 (Neutron).
(5) Temperature of Background 0.0 Kelvin.
==============================================================================
Listing of All Resonance Parameters
==============================================================================
Element or Material------------------ 28-Ni-61
Atomic Weight Ratio------------------ 6.040800+1
Number of Isotopes------------------- 1
==============================================================================
Isotope Number----------------------- 1
Isotope------------------------------ 28-Ni-61
Fractional Abundance----------------- 1.000000+0
LFW (Fission Widths)----------------- 0 (No Fission Widths)
Number of Energy Ranges-------------- 1
==============================================================================
Lower Limit of the Energy Range------ 1.000000-5 eV
Upper Limit of the Energy Range------ 70000.0000 eV
LRU (Type of Region)----------------- 1 (Resolved Region)
LRF (Type of Resolved Parameters)---- 3 (Reich-Moore)
NRO (Scattering Radius)-------------- 0 (Energy Independent)
NAPS (Channel Radius)---------------- 1 (= Scattering Radius)
==============================================================================
Nuclear Spin of Target--------------- 1.500000+0
Scattering Radius-------------------- 6.500000-1
Number of L Values------------------- 1
==============================================================================
Atomic Weight Ratio of Isotope------- 6.040800+1
L Dependent Scattering Radius-------- 6.500000-1
Angular Momentum (L)----------------- 0
Number of Resonances----------------- 32
==============================================================================
Reich-Moore Resonance Parameters
==============================================================================
Energy J Value Neutron Capture Fission-1 Fission-2
(eV) (eV) (eV) (eV) (eV)
==============================================================================
7152.00000 1.00 7.333300+1 2.500000+0 0.0 0.0
14020.0000 1.00 1.733300+1 3.100000+0 0.0 0.0
16700.0000 1.00 8.000001+2 2.200000+0 0.0 0.0
17830.0000 1.00 1.866700+2 1.600000+0 0.0 0.0
24620.0000 1.00 1.293300+2 1.400000+0 0.0 0.0
29110.0000 1.00 4.133300+2 2.400000+0 0.0 0.0
31130.0000 1.00 7.600001+2 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
33680.0000 1.00 6.666700+1 2.800000+0 0.0 0.0
41340.0000 1.00 2.000000+2 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
45490.0000 1.00 6.666700+1 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
46160.0000 1.00 5.400000+1 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
50510.0000 1.00 1.333300+2 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
54810.0000 1.00 1.893300+2 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
58160.0000 1.00 1.773300+2 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-5590.00000 2.00 8.080001+2 2.200000+0 0.0 0.0
7545.00000 2.00 1.800000+2 2.300000+0 0.0 0.0
8745.00000 2.00 6.000000+0 2.600000+0 0.0 0.0
12640.0000 2.00 7.200000+1 1.700000+0 0.0 0.0
13600.0000 2.00 6.080000+1 1.600000+0 0.0 0.0
18830.0000 2.00 7.200000+1 9.000000-1 0.0 0.0
28210.0000 2.00 5.040000+0 3.000000+0 0.0 0.0
30640.0000 2.00 1.520000+1 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
31830.0000 2.00 1.000000+1 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
32700.0000 2.00 2.120000+2 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
37130.0000 2.00 1.440000+2 3.000000+0 0.0 0.0
43250.0000 2.00 1.000000+1 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
43610.0000 2.00 3.000000+1 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
53300.0000 2.00 1.408000+2 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
56490.0000 2.00 1.192000+2 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
64070.0000 2.00 5.360000+2 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
65870.0000 2.00 1.432000+3 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
68770.0000 2.00 1.100000+3 2.220000+0 0.0 0.0
==============================================================================
Reconstructing Cross Sections from Resonance Parameters
==============================================================================
E-Low E-High Points Type of Resonance Region
(eV) (eV) Generated Messages
==============================================================================
1.000000-5 70000.0000 2730 Resolved
==============================================================================
Entire Resonance Region 2730 Points
==============================================================================
Combining File 2 and File 3 Data
==============================================================================
Reaction File 2 File 3 Combined
Points Points Points Comments
==============================================================================
Total 2730 2511 5237
Elastic 2730 2538 5264
Capture 2730 26 2752
==============================================================================
==============================================================================
Total Execution Time 0.41 Seconds
==============================================================================
******************************************************************************
End of ENDF/B Input Data
******************************************************************************
Core Allocation and Requirements
==============================================================================
Sections Nodes Parameter
Storage
==============================================================================
Allocated 200 120000 120000
Required 1 34 32
==============================================================================
End of Run
==============================================================================
==============================================================================
Total Execution Time 0.41 Seconds
==============================================================================
| en |
converted_docs | 404423 | **Before the**
**Federal Communications Commission**
**Washington, D.C. 20554**
+----------------------------------+---+------------------------------+
| In the Matter of: | * | CSR-6117-A |
| | * | |
| Frontier, A Citizens | ) | |
| Communications Company | * | |
| | * | |
| Petition for Reconsideration | | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | ) | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | ) | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | ) | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | ) | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | ) | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | ) | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | ) | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
| | ) | |
| | * | |
| | * | |
+----------------------------------+---+------------------------------+
ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION
**Adopted: August 9, 2004** **Released: August 12, 2004**
By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau:
# introduction
1. Rancho Palos Verdes Broadcasters, Inc., licensee of television
broadcast station KXLA (Ch. 44), Rancho Palos Verdes, California
("KXLA"), has requested reconsideration of the Media Bureau's
decision granting the market modification request of Frontier, A
Citiziens Communication Company ("Frontier") to exclude KXLA from
its cable system serving Needles, California.[^1] An opposition to
this petition was filed on behalf of Frontier to which KXLA replied.
# background
2. In its request for modification, Frontier sought to exclude the
community of Needles from KXLA's market. Both Frontier's cable
system and KXLA's city of license are considered to be part of the
Los Angeles, California designated market area ("DMA"). The Bureau
granted Frontier's request, finding that Frontier adequately met the
four statutory market modification factors. Based on the information
provided by Frontier, KXLA was found to be geographically distant,
with no history of carriage, no Grade B contour, no locally-focused
programming, and no viewership in the subject community.
# discussion
3. In support of its request, KXLA argues that Bureau misapplied the
market modification factors by giving priority to distance, terrain
and coverage at the expense of local programming and population
considerations. KXLA maintains that the *Bureau Order* failed to
give adequate weight to the local service benefits to
Asian-Americans in Needles, and throughout the Los Angeles market,
provided by KXLA's unique programming.[^2] KXLA states that the
*Bureau Order* relied instead on the coverage component as
dispositive; an outdated approach to localism that fails to account
for the growing multicultural population in southern California.[^3]
While the *Bureau Order* properly recognized that KXLA's status as a
new specialty station minimized its lack of historical carriage and
viewership, KXLA argues that it failed to acknowledge the
significance of the locally-focused programming that it currently
offers.[^4] KXLA states that it offers a variety of Asian-language
programming tailored to Asian-American residents in the Los Angeles
market, including prime-time news broadcasts.[^5] Given the value of
this programming, KXLA argues that the instant proceeding presents a
situation in which the Commission should look to factors beyond the
technical Grade B contour requirement in considering coverage and
local service.[^6] Indeed, KXLA points out that the Commission has
stated that although "as a general matter Grade B coverage
demonstrates service to cable communities and serves as a measure of
a station's natural economic market, it is not an exclusive
test."[^7] KXLA maintains that in order to effectively promote the
principles of localism underpinning the must carry rules, the
Commission must not treat the signal strength contour as outcome
determinative.[^8]
4. KXLA argues further that emphasis on narrow geographic
considerations is especially inappropriate where the Asian-American
communities that serve as KXLA's audience form communities that
cross city and county lines and transform the entire Los Angeles
market into groups of interrelated markets.[^9] KXLA contends that
the decision in *Fouce Amusement Enterprises, Inc.* supports this
broader, more practical definition.[^10] KXLA also maintains that
the Bureau's decision in *Comcast Cablevision of Danbury, Inc.,*
where the station's lack of local programming was not treated as
outcome determinative, should have been applied to the situation
here.[^11] KXLA argues that its programming addresses the needs and
interests of Korean, Vietnamese, and Japanese speaking residents in
southern California, including Needles and that these minority
communities are presently underserved by Frontier's cable
system.[^12]
5. In opposition, Frontier states that KXLA, a station whose city of
license is located over 228 miles from Needles, is precisely the
type of non-local station which prompted Congress to adopt the
market modification procedures contained in Section 614(h)(1)(C) of
the Communications Act.[^13] Although KXLA argues that the *Bureau
Order* gave priority to distance, terrain and coverage at the
expense of local programming, Frontier points out that the Bureau is
not required to weigh each market modification factor equally.[^14]
In any event, Frontier states, KXLA provided no evidence that such a
premise was correct, particularly in the face of the lack of local
program offerings provided by KXLA that were specifically targeted
to Needles and the abundance of local programming received from more
local stations currently carried by Frontier.[^15] Frontier also
notes that in *Time Warner Entertainment/Advance Newhouse
Partnership d/b/a Time Warner Cable* the Bureau recently ruled that
KXLA was too remote from a much closer cable system located in the
community of Barstow and that it did not provide meaningful or
sustained local coverage the community.[^16] Frontier argues that
KXLA offers no reason here to depart from the precedent set in *Time
Warner*, especially as Needles is even farther from Rancho Palos
Verdes than Barstow.
6. Frontier argues further that although KXLA consistently maintains
that the *Bureau Order* was incorrect in its holding, at no time
does KXLA describe specifically how it serves the community of
Needles.[^17] KXLA relies instead on sweeping statements regarding
its allegedly "local" service to the entire vast Los Angeles DMA or
all of San Bernardino County without once demonstrating that it
addresses any specific local issues involving Needles which is
located at the other end of the Los Angeles DMA and San Bernardino
County from KXLA.[^18] Moreover, Frontier asserts that KXLA's
contention that the *Bureau Order* relied exclusively on Grade B
coverage, distance and geography in making its determination is
misplaced. Frontier states that it provided demonstrations pursuant
to all of the market modification factors designated by Congress, as
well as additional information, that KXLA could not be considered
"local" to Needles.[^19] More importantly, Frontier states, the
*Bureau Order* noted the importance of a number of factors in its
decision -- carriage history, distance, Grade B coverage, lack of
locally-targeted programming, local service by other stations, lack
of viewership -- and these factors represent a sizable portion of
the Bureau's rationale in making its decision.[^20] Notwithstanding
this, Frontier argues that Grade B coverage, distance and geographic
barriers are crucial factors in determining whether or not to modify
a station's DMA. Indeed, they are among the factors established by
Congress in considering market modification petitions.[^21] Frontier
points out that the legislative history of the 1992 Cable Act
"reflect a recognition that the Commission may conclude that a
community within a station's \[DMA\] may be so far removed from the
station that it cannot be deemed part of the station's market."[^22]
Following this congressional directive, Frontier states that the
Commission has focused on these factors in rulemakings and in
hundreds of market modification decisions.[^23]
7. In reply, KXLA argues that Frontier fails to counter its arguments
that the market modification decision should be reversed. While KXLA
states that it does not take issue with the Bureau's discretion to
tailor its market modification analysis to the specific facts of
individual proceedings, it does contend that, in this instance, it
abused its discretion by giving short shrift to KXLA's local
programming and falling back on distance and coverage to decide the
instant proceeding.[^24] Further, while Frontier argues that the
*Bureau Order* properly encompassed all of the statutory factors,
KXLA states that such argument fails to recognize that the first and
fourth statutory factors carried little weight due to KXLA's status
as a specialty station.[^25] The only important factors left,
therefore, were coverage and local service and carriage of other
local stations. KXLA does not agree with Frontier that the Bureau
acted reasonably in basing its decision on just these factors.
8. We agree with the arguments raised by Frontier and will deny KXLA's
petition for reconsideration. The Commission has stated repeatedly
that the "fact that a station is new or of specialized appeal does
not mean that its logical market area is without limits or that it
should be exempt from the Section 614(h) market modification
process."[^26] In order to make a fair determination, we have to
look at a combination of factors and no one factor has more
relevance than another. We note that the Commission has recognized
that specialty stations, such as KXLA, often fail to meet the
historic carriage factor and often have no appreciable audience
shares due to the nature of their programming. In analyzing market
modification requests involving specialty stations, therefore, we
give little weight to these factors and focus on the other factors.
However, while to a certain extent they may not be controlling,
taken in conjunction with a totality of factors they must be taken
into account.
9. We also reject KXLA's argument suggesting that regardless of the
Section 614(h) process, it should in this instance essentially be
guaranteed the right to carriage throughout the Los Angeles DMA
because of its programming. The statute specifically provides that
the Commission may, where appropriate, exclude communities from a
station's DMA.[^27] Moreover, the must carry rules, as written, are
content neutral. The type of programming that a station carries,
therefore, does not influence whether a station is entitled to
carriage under the rules. The legislative history notes that when
making its market determination, the Commission may conclude that a
community within a station's DMA may be "so far removed" from the
station that it cannot be deemed to be part of the station's
market.[^28] The Bureau correctly determined that such was the case
in this proceeding. Further, we note that KXLA's reliance on *Fouce
Amusement* and *Comcast Cablevision* are misplaced. In both
instances, the stations involved, while admittedly falling short in
meeting the local programming factor, were geographically close to
the communities at issue providing either Grade A or Grade B
coverage. These factors were a strong support in demonstrating the
stations' service to the communities.
10. Finally, with respect to the local programming evidence presented by
KXLA, we cannot conclude that a station must be considered "local,"
as Congress intended that term to mean in Section 614 of the
Communications Act, solely by airing programming that is not
specifically associated with the community in question, but more
general in nature.[^29] The programming that KXLA cites in support
of local service appears in large part to be general interest
programming, rather than programming focused on the community at
issue. KXLA itself has stated that "it offers a variety of
Asian-language programming tailored to Asian-Americans residing in
the Los Angeles market."[^30] Indeed, the three television programs
KXLA references "provide native language programming to the
Korean-American and Vietnamese-American communities in San
Bernardino, Riverside and Orange Counties."[^31] KXLA has not
provided any examples of programming that specifically focuses on
the community of Needles.[^32]
# ordering clause
11. Accordingly, **IT IS ORDERED** that the petition for reconsideration
filed by Rancho Palos Verdes Broadcasters, Inc. **IS DENIED.**
12. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Sections
0.283 and 1.106 of the Commission's rules.[^33]
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
William H. Johnson
Deputy Chief
Media Bureau
[^1]: ^?^*Frontier, A Citizens Communications Company,* 18 FCC Rcd 9589
(2003) (*"Bureau Order"*).
[^2]: ^?^Reconsideration at 2.
[^3]: ^?^*Id.*
[^4]: ^?^*Id.* at 3.
[^5]: ^?^*Id.* at 3-4.
[^6]: ^?^*Id.* at 4.
[^7]: ^?^*Id.,* citing *Suburban Cable TV Co., Inc.,* 16 FCC Rcd 10790,
10797 (2001) (citing *Must Carry Order,* 8 FCC Rcd 2965, 2977
(1993)).
[^8]: ^?^*Id.* at 4.
[^9]: ^?^*Id.* at 4-5.
[^10]: ^?^*Id.* at 5, citing 10 FCC Rcd 668 (1995).
[^11]: ^?^*Id.* at 5-6, citing 18 FCC Rcd 274 (2003).
[^12]: ^?^*Id.* at 6. KXLA states that to its knowledge no station
currently carried by Frontier offers such programming.
[^13]: ^?^Opposition at 1-2; *see also* 47 U.S.C. § 534(h)(1)(C).
[^14]: ^?^*Id.* at 2.
[^15]: ^?^*Id.*
[^16]: ^?^*Id.*, citing 18 FCC Rcd 4990 (2003).
[^17]: ^?^*Id.* at 3.
[^18]: ^?^*Id.*
[^19]: ^?^*Id.* at 4; *see also* Modification Petition at 3-15.
[^20]: ^?^*Id.*
[^21]: ^?^*Id.* at 5, citing 47 U.S.C. § 534(h)(1)(C)(ii).
[^22]: ^?^*Id.*, citing H.R. Rep. No. 628, 102d Cong., 2d Sess. 97
(1992) (*"House Report"*).
[^23]: ^?^*Id.* at 6.
[^24]: ^?^Reply at 2.
[^25]: ^?^*Id.*
[^26]: ^?^*See e.g., MediaOne of Los Angeles, Inc.,* 15 FCC Rcd 19386,
19396 (2000); *Cable Satellite of South Miami, Inc.,* 13 FCC Rcd
298, 306 (1998); *Rifkin/Narragansett South Florida CATV Limited
Partnership, d/b/a Gold Coast Cablevision,* 11 FCC Rcd 21090, 21104
(1996), *recon. denied,* 14 FCC Rcd 13788 (1999).
[^27]: ^?^47 U.S.C. § 534(h)(1)(C)(i).
[^28]: ^?^*House Report* at 97-98.
[^29]: ^?^47 U.S.C. § 534(h)(1)(A).
[^30]: ^?^*See* Reconsideration at 3.
[^31]: ^?^*Id.* at 4. These programs are "Korean Christian," "KTE,' and
"Little Saigon."
[^32]: ^?^*See Mediacom California LLC,* 18 FCC Rcd 16206 (2003).
[^33]: ^?^47 C.F.R. §§ 0.283 and 1.106.
| en |
converted_docs | 322466 | **[NOAA's NWS Partners' Workshop -- Silver Spring, MD]{.underline}**
**[June 23, 2005 -- Notes and Actions]{.underline}**
**Dennis McCarthy (Director, NWS OCWWS) -- Opening:**
- This is your meeting. We want to listen to your concerns.
**John Jones (NWS DAA):**
\- We want to reach out to you to better understand problems and work
with you to solve them.
\- NOAA is enhancing its protection of the public from tsunamis.
\- We are here to listen to you.
**Ed Johnson (NWS OSP) -- Implementation of NOAA Partnership Policy:**
\- Policy has garnered much mistrust and fear.
\- Details -- Policy now fully in place:
> \- 4 main policy directives -1-10 (umbrella policy), 2 instructions --
> 1-1001, 1-1002, and Policy 10-102.
1-1001 -- designed to make it easier to keep track of information
service changes in NWS
1-1002 -- termination -- provides partners with procedures to raise
concerns
Fears:
\- NOAA will use policy to begin an era of frank competition with the
private sector. NWS has no ulterior motive. We are not competing with
you.
\- Competition we face is other federal budget priorities. Policy
recognizes private sector role. NOAA recognizes the diversity of the
private sector.
\- Many things have gone unchanged from the past. It is just now in
writing. Policy
does not change a single NOAA product.
\- It did change NOAA's approach to managing conflicts.
\- Vision of policy is founded on better communication which should lead
to better working relationship and better service to the public. Sets a
very high standard to the NWS. This is a challenge.
\- Importance of Private Sector:
> \- NWS has accepted responsibility for health and growth of the
> private sector. NWS' job to make that happen. Private sector provides
> services beyond the capacity and capability the government can
> provide. NWS creates the market for weather information.
\- Ways NWS can help make the enterprise better:
> \- Globalweatherpages.com -- basic yellow pages of private sector
> companies by category. Replaced a list that NWS maintained on SP
> website.
\- Fire weather services:
> \- NWS provide spot forecasts only when a fire is out of control, or
> when controlled burn follows under Interagency MOU, or when a public
> official certifies it is essential for public safety.
>
> \- States are having trouble finding private sector fire weather
> service providers. Will become a category on the globalweatherpages
> site.
\- Spirit of policy requires NOAA to coordinate with the private sector
much earlier in the advances of science and technology -- opening up new
opportunities.
**Margaret Fowke (NWS OSP) - Environment and Human Health:**
\- Scientific advances bring environmental information and human health
together.
\- Opportunities where we can all support human health -- Education,
Decision support/Expert assistance, R&D, Information services.
\- Weather education in medical community -- most misunderstandings --
need your help!
- Rip Currents -- undertow and rip tides are same as rip currents,
don't know how to escape, don't know can occur in lakes.
- Space Weather -- don't know origin, greatest hazards, geomagnetic
storms, solar flares, radio blackouts.
- Lightning -- don't know basic safety rules (e.g., 30/30 rule).
- UV -- suntan is healthy, wearing sunscreen protects you so you can
sunbathe much longer.
- Hurricanes -- don't understand cone of uncertainty, how people most
die from hurricanes, relationship between strength and size.
- Wind Chill -- possible to get frostbite if temp is above freezing
but wind chill is below freezing.
- Air Quality -- ozone/particle pollution affects.
- Seafood Safety -- don't understand methylmercury, fish sticks unsafe
to eat.
- Fire Weather -- believe NWS picks prescribed burn locations, safety
if trapped in smoky environment (wet vs. dry cloths)
- Heat -- crack the window helps ventilating, and will provide
hyperthermia. It will not!
**Listening Session:**
Johnson: 15% of GDP spent on health care.
Jim Giraytys -- Shenair Institute at James Madison -- air quality
institute -- work with NWS in air quality areas. Partnership with U VA,
Fairfax Comm. College. Valley Air Now -- outreach program they are
developing. Develop decision support tools to make decisions related to
health care.
Joel Martin (U of OK) -- read high level statement -- NEXRAD Level II
data reliability. To be discussed further at FOS meeting in afternoon.
Clay Anderson (WRC4 -- TV, Washington, DC) -- Air and seaborne illnesses
-- is NWS/NOAA working with private sector to develop information for
the public related to homeland security concerns? Need to look into
this.
Ian Miller (TWC) -- Frustration with pace of completion of projects
(VTEC). Is a process going to be put in place to assign resources more
effectively to finish projects on time?
John Jones -- we face challenges within the Federal government. FY06
budget - \$50M taken out of NOAA budget to go to DoJ. We do not have a
boundless basin of resources. We need your help to find ways to meet
these challenges. We are trying to take care of a wide spectrum of
products. Dennis -- we are frustrated too! Our staff are handling
multiple projects and putting out fires.
John -- we take a serious look at all our projects and resources based
on budget. NWS sustained \$37M cut in FY05 in non-labor. Labor resources
will remain unchanged.
Deirdre Jones (OST) -- OSIP process -- project out resources for new and
existing process. Corporate process overseen by John Jones.
Rich Okulski -- Is TWC using VTEC? Ian -- yes, but implementation has
been hard. Look at other options/vehicles like XML. Project has taken so
long; we now have better ways to accomplish the project.
John Jones -- we need to find better ways to communicate, and take a
look at past decisions based on your input. Ed -- Most Federal agencies
are not agile. NWS considered a best practice federal agency. Since lack
of agility and federal budget process, it makes it difficult to work
together. Need to find ways to accommodate differences in timescales
between us. Difficult to reallocate resources once allocated. Current
NWS budget planning is for FY08!
Steve Smith (AccuWeather) -- XML gets developed and completed before
VTEC. Both ways to disseminate critical information. Why can't we work
together on things like this? When is the message from meetings like
this going to go to the WFOs? Can we redeploy staff and bend to meet the
goals? Ed -- we can do better with this. Institute approaches to make
objections more visible. Need to have more of a culture of how our
decisions and products affect the private sector enterprise. We are not
doing a good enough job in looking at strategic decisions. Need to focus
as a whole community on what is important. We welcome your challenges of
our process and decisions.
Joel Martin -- the SP of the NWS doesn't seem to mesh well with the DoC
SP.
Steve S. -- how do you make the linkage between what we are doing in HQ
and meetings like this to the WFO?
Jim G. -- Local communities/governments are very important. They are the
decision makers on land usage, road decisions, etc. They are critical to
the overall weather enterprise. They distribute information. We need
some sort of relationship with them. They are currently not part of the
weather enterprise. Ed -- we do have good relationships with local EM
community. We do need to expand relationships with zoning boards,
planning commissions, etc. Jim -- there are state and private sector
resources which can be tapped to help NWS.
Paul Pisano (Fed. Highway Admin.) -- Need advancements from public and
private sector and work with transportation community to find integrated
solutions to highway issues (travel deaths related to weather, etc.).
How does NWS make decisions on priorities? John -- highest priorities
are those related to our mission of protecting lives and property. Done
on a case-by-case basis. Just recently submitted priorities for FY08-12.
**Breakout Session Summary:**
Glenn Austin -- Digital Services:
- More and more folks using our data.
- They want more communication on our future plans.
- Efficiency of the data exchange is an issue. How do customers know
when updated information is available? Is NDFD data going to be
available via NOAAPort? Have new distribution methods (i.e.,
Unidata). Will evaluate best means to make available.
> \- People want GIS vision (action Bob Bunge). XML transition. Will it
> become operational (action Bob Bunge)
Mike Campbell -- Observations/Surface Weather:
- Data quality is a big issue.
- Latency of observations -- need higher resolution data.
- Discussion on Ridge radar display. Some suggestions made to make it
better.
- Development of ISOS and its tie in the US system and GEOS.
- NERON update given.
- Need augmentation of ASOS data.
Mark Tew -- Severe/Watch by County/Dissemination:
- VTEC key milestones were discussed, along with plans for Nov. 1 (9
products to be turned on).
- Strict assessments made. 97.1% for Nov 1 OT&E. Most errors due to
post editing.
- Positive feedback on headline standardization.
- Warning by Polygon -- we still warn by counties. Polygons are area
of maximum threat. Dissemination is big limiting factor (via NWR and
text).
- GIS also came up -- what is NWS role?
**Next Meeting -- February 2, 2006 (during AMS meeting in Atlanta).**
NWS would like to try to nail day down for meetings here in Silver
Spring. Open this up for an email discussion (second or third Thursday
of June? -- Action -- John Simensky).
We will be building a website for the Partners. Will be done within the
next few days. All meeting notes and presentations will be posted on the
site.
| en |
converted_docs | 221987 | NASA Earth Science Enterprise
Earth Science Applications Program
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Earth Science for Disaster Management
Disaster Management Program Element Plan: 2004-2008
(v.7, 2-11-2004)
{width="1.1901574803149606in"
height="0.9838582677165354in"}{width="1.3200787401574803in"
height="1.1456692913385826in"}
Earth Science Exploration Serving Society
Accelerating the realization of economic
and societal benefits from Earth science,
information, and technology ...
Table of Contents
Page
[I. Purpose and Scope 3](#i.-purpose-and-scope)
[II. Disaster Management Program: Goals and Objectives
4](#ii.-disaster-management-program-goals-and-objectives)
Short-term Objectives
(04-05)...........................................................................
.4
[Long-term Objectives (FY06-FY08) 6](#long-term-objectives-fy06-fy08)
[III. Program Leadership and Partners
6](#iii.-program-leadership-and-partners)
[Program Management 6](#program-management)
[Networks 6](#networks)
[IV. Decision Support Tools and Disaster Management Issues
8](#iv.-decision-support-tools-and-disaster-management-issues)
[Priority Decision Support Systems for FY2004-2005:
8](#priority-decision-support-systems-for-fy2004-2005)
[Disaster Management Issues 10](#disaster-management-issues)
[Cross-Application Activities 10](#cross-application-activities)
[Disaster Management Program Management: Integrated System Solutions
Diagram
11](#disaster-management-program-management-integrated-system-solutions-diagram)
[V. Program Activities: Projects, Solicitations, and Program Support
12](#v.-program-activities-projects-solicitations-and-program-support)
[Application Projects 12](#application-projects)
[Competitive Sourcing and Solicitations
16](#competitive-sourcing-and-solicitations)
[Solid Earth and Natural Hazards NRA
16](#solid-earth-and-natural-hazards-nra)
[Research, Education, and Applications Solutions Network Projects
16](#research-education-and-applications-solutions-network-projects)
[Program Management Activities and Studies
17](#program-management-activities-and-studies)
[VI. Schedule and Milestones 22](#vi.-schedule-and-milestones)
[VII. Program Management and Performance Measures
22](#vii.-program-management-and-performance-measures)
[Program Management Measures (Internally Focused)
23](#program-management-measures-internally-focused)
[Performance Measures (Externally Focused)
23](#performance-measures-externally-focused)
[VIII: Disaster Management Roadmap
25](#viii-disaster-management-roadmap)
[IX: FY04/05/06/07/08 Budget and Resource Expectations
26](#ix-fy0405060708-budget-and-resource-expectations)
[SENH NRA2002 (FY2004-2005) Budget Breakdown
26](#senh-nra2002-fy2004-2005-budget-breakdown)
[Congressionally Mandated Projects
26](#congressionally-mandated-projects)
*Note: This plan is based on the President's proposed FY2004 budget.*
NASA Earth Science Enterprise - Earth Science Applications Program
Earth Science for Disaster Management
Disaster Management Element Plan: 2004-2008
# I. Purpose and Scope
The Disaster Management program element is one of 12 elements in the
Earth Science Enterprise (ESE) Earth Science Applications Program. NASA
and the Earth Science Applications Program collaborate with partner
organizations to enable and enhance the application of NASA's Earth
science research results to serve national priority policy and
management decision-support tools. The desired outcome is for partner
organizations to use project results, such as prototypes and benchmark
reports, to enable expanded use of Earth science products and to enhance
their decision-support tools, systems, and capabilities.
The ESE Disaster Management program element extends products derived
from Earth science research results information, models, technology, and
other capabilities into partners' decision support tools (DSTs) for
Disaster Management issues. The Disaster Management Program addresses
issues of concern and decision-making related to volcanoes, earthquakes,
drought, wildfire, hurricanes, climate, wind, tornadoes, and flooding
planning, compliance, and forecasting. The ESE Disaster Management
Program is designed to advance the use of products from NASA's 18
satellite missions and 80 sensors to improve our knowledge of Earth
system processes and instrument capabilities and to extend these
benefits to society.
The Disaster Management Program focuses on decision
support tools serving the following classes of issues related to the
disaster cycle:
• Preparedness -- Planning how to respond to a disaster
• Mitigation -- Minimizing the effects of a disaster
• Response -- Minimizing the hazards created by an emergency
• Recovery -- Returning the community or environment to normal
NASA partners with Federal agencies and with regional-national
organizations that have Disaster Management responsibilities and
mandates to support Disaster Management managers. Primary partners are
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The Disaster
Management Program may include international organizations and
activities provided a U.S. partner is involved. Some of the Disaster
Management Program's activities may also benefit the ESE Application
Division's Aviation, Homeland Security, Energy Management, Ecological
Forecasting, Public Health, Air Quality, and Water Management program
elements. Through the Disaster Management Program, NASA provides results
that support the White House Committee on Environment and Natural
Resources (CENR) and the interagency programs on Climate Change Science
and Technology (CCSP, CCTP). This Program also works through such
international agencies as the World Meteorological
Organization/International Global Observing System (WMO/IGOS), the
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO), the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS), and
other international countries and partners.
Priority Earth science missions for the Disaster Management Program
include Terra, Aqua, the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite
(ICESat), the Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT), CloudSAT, National
Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS),
NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP), Topography Experiment (TOPEX), Shuttle
Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission
(TRMM), Landsat, and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE).
Sensors include the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
(MODIS), Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), Advanced Microwave
Scanning Radiometer -- E (AMSR-E), Geo-science Laser Altimeter System
(GLAS), Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS), SeaWinds, Enhanced Thematic
Mapper (ETM), and other multispectral and visible sensors. Priority
Earth science models include the Pennsylvania State University/National
Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (MM5), Global Climate
Model (GCM), ETA, Wind, Tree Blowdown, the National Weather Service
(NWS) FLDWAV, WAVEWATCH III, and other models. The project plans
associated with the Disaster Management Program designate specific
sensors and models, and they state specific partnership activities to
extend Earth science measurements, environmental data records, and
geophysical parameters.
This plan covers objectives, projects, and activities for Fiscal Years
2004-2008. In Fiscal Year 2004 (FY04), the Program's priority activities
focus on extending the ability of the Hazards U.S. Multi-Hazard
(HAZUS-MH) Decision Support System (DSS) and of wind modeling for
coastal flood inundation information, as well as improved earthquake
information from the Southern California Integrated Global Positioning
System (GPS) Network (SCIGN). In FY05-08, the Program's priorities focus
on extending the capability of HAZUS-MH to incorporate NASA satellite
technologies in the fire and combined flood and wind modules for
multi-hazard assessments. FY05-FY08 expands the types of satellite
measurements and model products that enhance other decision support
tools, such as NOAA's Hazard Mapping System and the NWS Advanced Weather
Information Processing System (AWIPS).
# II. Disaster Management Program: Goals and Objectives
The goal of the Disaster Management Program is as follows:
*Enable partners' beneficial use of Earth science research results,
observations, models, and technologies to enhance decision support
capabilities serving their Disaster Management and policy
responsibilities.*
Major tenets of the Disaster Management Program's goals include the
following:
• Develop and nurture partnerships with appropriate Disaster Management
organizations
• Identify and assess partners' Disaster Management responsibilities,
plans, and decision support tools, and evaluate the capacity of NASA
Earth science results to support these partners
• Validate and verify application of Earth science results with
partners, including development of products and prototypes to meet
partners' requirements
• With partners, document, verify, and validate the value of Earth
science results in decision support tools and support the tools'
adoption into operational use
• Communicate results and partners' achievements to appropriate Disaster
Management communities and stakeholders
## Objectives
The Disaster Management Program serves the NASA Strategic Plan
Objectives 1.2 and 3.1, and the NASA Integrated Budget and Performance
Document (IBPD) Performance Measures 5ESA2, 5ESA4, 5ESA6, 5ESA7, 5ESA8,
and 5ESA9 (*www.ifmp.nasa.gov/codeb/budget2004).*
Specifically, the Disaster Management Program pursues the following
short-term (2-year) and long-term (5-year) objectives:
### Short-term Objectives (FY04-05)
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| February | Complete Evaluation Report on HAZUS. Develop work plan |
| 2004 | with the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) |
| | to enhance HAZUS-MH using NASA technologies and models |
| | |
| | (WAVEWATCH Model, surface roughness, Landsat, Advanced |
| | Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer |
| | (ASTER), and SRTM digital elevation model (DEM)) |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| February | Deliver evaluation report on the HAZUS-MH Hurricane Model |
| 2004 | to stakeholders |
| | |
| | (WAVEWATCH Model, surface roughness, Landsat, ASTER DEM, |
| | SRTM DEM) |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| March | Progress Report review |
| 2004 | |
| | Finalize memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Federal |
| | Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/DHS through the FEMA |
| | Disaster Response and Recovery Division |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| June | Quarterly Review of HAZUS-MH WAVEWATCH research results. |
| 2004 | |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| S | Complete first year report on wind module work with NIBS; |
| eptember | coordinate results with FEMA |
| 2004 | |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| December | Publish article/paper on Earth science input to Disaster |
| 2004 | Management decision tools |
| | |
| | *WAVEWATCH, ASTER, QuikSCAT* |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| February | Complete a verification/validation report and schedule a |
| 2005 | results conference/workshop on satellite product benefits |
| | to wind models |
| | |
| | Complete evaluation report on at least one additional |
| | Disaster Management decision support tool (Hazard Mapping |
| | System (HMS)) - r*eport to specify Earth science |
| | measurements and models* |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| March | Validate Earth science inputs from at least three sensors |
| 2005 | and models into at least two separate Disaster Management |
| | decision tools and policy/management activities -- |
| | includes NOAA Hazard Mapping System and addition of fire |
| | assessment capability in HAZUS-MH |
| | |
| | Complete at least one benchmark report and conduct at |
| | least one results conference on Earth science inputs into |
| | Disaster Management activities and decision tools, |
| | including a wildfire or an earthquake activity |
| | |
| | *Terra, Aqua, GRACE, QuikSCAT* |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
## Long-term Objectives (FY06-FY08)
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| November | Establish agreements with at least two federal partners |
| 2005 | and at least one non-federal partner in disaster |
| | management |
| | |
| | Establish final report summary on 10 projects funded |
| | through a Solid Earth and Natural Hazards (SENH) NASA |
| | Research Announcement (NRA) showing how projects met the |
| | integrated systems solutions diagrams |
| | |
| | Complete evaluation report on at least one additional |
| | Disaster Management decision support tool (AWIPS) ‑ |
| | r*eport to specify Earth science measurements and models* |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Sept. | Complete benchmark reports and conduct a results |
| 2006 | conference on Earth science support to at least three |
| | Disaster Management decision support tools |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Sept. | Publish at least three articles on Disaster Management |
| 2007 | applications of Earth science, including at least one in |
| | a peer-reviewed journal |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Sept. | Complete benchmark reports and conduct results |
| 2008 | conferences on at least four separate Disaster Management |
| | issues and corresponding decision support tools |
+----------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
# III. Program Leadership and Partners
## Program Management
Disaster Management Program Manager: *Stephen Ambrose,
NASA-Headquarters*
• Program development, strategy, plans, and budgets
• Program representation, advocacy, and issues to ESE management and
beyond
• Communication of ESE priorities and directives to Disaster Management
Program team/network
• Implementation of interagency agreements and partnerships
• Monitoring of Disaster Management Program metrics and performance
evaluation
Disaster Management Deputy Program Manager: *Dr. Bruce Davis,
NASA-Stennis Space Center*
• Leadership on project plans, development, performance, and partnership
relationships
• Communication of project metrics, performance, status, and issues to
Program Manager
• Leadership and communication to Disaster Management Program team and
network
• Coordination between NASA Centers on Disaster Management Program
activities
• Management for grants funded through Stennis Space Center (SSC) and
cooperative agreements
• Management of Disaster Management Program tasks at SSC
## Networks
Primary contacts within NASA Centers and Federal partner agencies that
are enabling NASA capabilities to the Disaster Management Program are
listed below. This list is not exhaustive; only the primary program
managers and focal points for specific and major projects or subject
areas are provided.
### NASA Center and HQ Contacts:
Mr. Ron Blom (Geology) ‑ Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
Dr. James Brass/Vince Ambrosia (Wildfire) ‑ Ames Research Center (ARC)
Dr. Steve Goodman (Weather, Severe Storms) -- Marshall Space Flight
Center (MSFC)
Dr. Shahid Habib (Hurricane, Landslide, Precipitation, Fire) -- Goddard
Space Flight Center (GSFC)
Dr. John Murray (Weather, U.S. Weather Research Program (USWRP) --
Langley Research Center (LaRC)
Dr. John LaBrecque -- Geodetic Imaging, Hazard Research (Code YS)
Ms. Myra Bambacus -- Geospatial Interoperability Office (GIO), GSFC
Ms. Tanye Coleman -- Business Division (Code YB)
Dr. James Dodge -- Research Division (Weather) (Code YS)
Dr. Gran Paules -- Technology Division (Code YF)
Ms. Kitty Kavens -- International and Interagency Activities (Code I)
Ms. Elizabeth Williams -- International Affairs (Code I)
Dr. Tod Companion -- Interagency Activities Code I
### Primary Federal Partners
DHS
Claire Drury -- FEMA, Mitigation Division
Ed Laatche -- FEMA, Program Policy and Assessment Branch
Margaret Lawless ‑ FEMA (Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction (SDR)
Representative)
Nancy L. Suski -- DHS, Emergency Preparedness and Response (EP&R)
Mr. Paul Rooney -- FEMA, Floodplain Mapping Division
Mr. John J. Perry -- FEMA, EP&R
Dr. Randolph Langenbach -- FEMA Earthquake Program
NOAA
Helen Wood -- NOAA National Environmental Satellite, Data and
Information Service (NESDIS) (SDR Chair)
Bruce Ramsey -- NOAA/NESDIS, Office of Research and Applications (ORA)
Dave Helms -- NWS Headquarters
Donna McNamara -- NOAA/NESDIS
USGS
Ms. Roz Helz -- USGS, Earthquakes and Volcanoes
Mr. Tim Cohn -- USGS (SDR Representative, Grand Challenges
Representative)
Dr. Wayne Thatcher -- USGS, Menlo Park, GPS Networks
USDA
Mr. Tom Bobbe -- Forest Service, Remote Sensing Applications Center
Mr. Paul Greenfield -- Forest Service Headquarters
### International, National, and Regional Organizations
Mr. Michael Hales -- NOAA/NESDIS International Affairs ‑ CEOS -- World
Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD)
Dr. Pricilla Nelson -- NSF
Ms. Leslie Curtin ‑ State Department, Humanitarian Information Unit
(HIU)
Mr. James Weber -- International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the
Environment (ISRSE) Organization
Dr. Charles Hutchison -- University of Arizona
Domestic
Climate Change Technology Program -- The ESE Applications Division leads
a CCTP task group on measurements and monitoring supported by the
Disaster Management Program.
The Climate Change Science Program -- A joint federal program of the
President's Committee on Climate Change Science and Technology
Integration has issued its strategic plan to address some of the most
complex questions and problems dealing with long-term global climate
variability and change.
U.S. Weather Research Program -- Weather research initiative to improve
weather modeling through intensive field campaigns.
Solid Earth Science Working Group (SESWG) -- Blue-Ribbon panel produced
document on solid Earth science and research.
CENR Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction (and associated Working Groups)
-- Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) subcommittee and joint
effort from all Federal agencies; NASA is co-chair of the Remote Sensing
Applications Working Group (RSAWG)
Geospatial One Stop (GOS) -- GIO collaboration to bring interoperability
to the federal community.
Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) -- NASA participates in the
standards committee for Homeland Security and Geographic Information.
Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) ‑
Disaster Management played a role in the selection of the current
contractor (University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)) and
continues to participate in GLOBE-sponsored events and school
visitations.
Interagency Program Office (IPO) for NPOESS -- This interagency office
that has NASA representation is participating in assessing and
validating future NPOESS instruments and science.
International
International Global Observing System -- Through the Earth Observation
Summit and the World Meteorological Organization, ESE contributes by
providing NASA capabilities for research.
Global Climate Observing Strategy (GCOS) -- NASA participates in
international meetings related to GCOS and related data management
issues.
World Summit for Sustainable Development (and 4 Working Groups) -- the
Disaster Management Program leads *Module 3 -- Disaster Management and
Conflict* of the type-2 partnerships under the WSSD.
International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment
The Disaster Management Program interacts with the Nation Applications,
Croscutting Elements and other ESE programs (e.g., Education, Outreach,
DEVELOP, and GIO) to support appropriate projects.
# IV. Decision Support Tools and Disaster Management Issues
## Priority Decision Support Systems for FY2004-2005:
### HAZUS-MH
The HAZUS-MH Loss Estimation Tool is a geographic information system
(GIS) based DSS tool developed by the U.S. Federal Government for
estimation of loss caused by natural hazards. FEMA oversees HAZUS-MH
activities at large, whereas the National Institute for Building
Sciences (NIBS) manages this tool's development and implementation for
use by the Federal, State, and Municipal emergency management
communities. FEMA initially released HAZUS in 1999 as HAZUS-99 SR2,
primarily as a tool for earthquake disaster risk assessment.
The HAZUS-MH Hurricane Module, referred to as the "Preview" Hurricane
Model, has been recently released. A full-capability Hurricane model,
tentatively scheduled for release in 2006, includes the ability to
estimate risk of property damage and loss from hurricane wind, storm
surge, waves, and flooding damage. HAZUS-MH is also being expanded to
address other forms of wind hazards, including tornados, extra-tropical
storms, hail storms, and thunderstorms.
Each HAZUS-MH module (earthquake, wind, flood) allows the user to map,
assess, and display geospatial data pertaining to a specific natural
hazard to assess and mitigate hazard risk. HAZUS-MH also enables
estimation of physical damage to buildings, critical facilities, and
other infrastructure. In addition, each hazard-specific module gives
estimates of economic loss (e.g., lost jobs, business interruption,
repair costs, construction costs) and social impacts (e.g., identifying
requirements for shelters and medical aid).
NASA's role in HAZUS-MH is to benefit the HAZUS-MH application through
the infusion of NASA Earth science research results. For example, NASA
observation technologies and modeling expertise in wind, precipitation,
and digital elevation modeling, through QuikSCAT, TRMM, and ASTER
sensors, respectively, can improve the HAZUS-MH DSS through broader
observations and improvements to HAZUS‑MH models. The Disaster
Management Program measures the resulting improvements to the HAZUS-MH
system to determine the benefits of these global measurements to local
communities.
### HAZARD MAPPING SYSTEM
The Hazard Mapping System (HMS), developed by the NOAA, NESDIS,
Interactive Processing Branch, is a multiplatform remote sensing DST for
detecting fires and smoke over the United States and adjacent areas of
Canada and Mexico. This computer-based system is an integral part of the
NOAA Satellite Services Division's near-real-time hazard detection and
mitigation efforts. The HMS currently uses NOAA\'s Geostationary
Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) and Polar Operational
Environmental Satellites (POES), and the MODIS instrument on NASA\'s
Terra and Aqua spacecrafts. A meteorologist sitting at a computer
terminal outlines the areas of fire and smoke. Automated fire detection
algorithms are employed for each of the satellites while smoke is
annotated by a satellite image analyst. The resulting product is
provided to the National Weather Service, the U.S. Geological Survey,
the U.S. Forest Service, the Environmental Protection Agency, and
numerous state and local land and air quality managers. Major
improvements are needed to use the full capabilities of MODIS Rapid
Response (RR) and other satellite sensors for this DSS. The Disaster
Management Program is working closely with the University of Maryland
Department of Geography on the integration of MODIS fire and land
use/land cover products into the HMS.
### Advanced Weather Interactive Processing System
A high-speed, technologically advanced processing, display, and
telecommunication decision support system called the Advanced Weather
Interactive Processing System (AWIPS) is the centerpiece of National
Weather Service operations. AWIPS is an interactive computer system that
integrates all meteorological, hydrological, satellite, and radar data
into one computer workstation that forecasters use to create their daily
products. AWIPS allows forecasters the interactive capability to view,
analyze, combine, and manipulate large amounts of graphical and
alphanumeric weather data, such as weather, flood, air quality, and
marine weather forecasts.
AWIPS is installed in all 119 NWS Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs), 13
regional River Forecast Centers (RFCs), and in several national weather
centers. AWIPS utilizes a number of satellite products and applications
that can be enhanced by NASA research and applications; when partnered
with NOAA, NASA products can improve the information provided to NWS
field Offices.
The Disaster Management Program works with NWS to improve AWIPS' ability
to incorporate more of NASA's assets into the meteorologists'
decision-making processes. For example, TRMM satellite observations of
lightning can improve NWS forecasts of severe weather. The NASA
Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT) Center is
improving lightning detection methods and is working with the NWS
Southern Regional Headquarters to put this information into the hands of
forecasters.
NASA also has a wealth of data management, data communications, and
complex modeling experience that may provide significant improvement to
AWIPS. By providing the NWS with NASA satellite expertise and data
communications experience, the NWS can enhance the AWIPS to provide more
satellite data and model outputs to the NWS field offices. Increases in
satellite utilization with future NPOESS and NPP data, as well as future
geostationary satellite data coming from the Geosynchronous Imaging
Fourier Transform Spectrometer (GIFTS), make improved communications and
data processing capabilities essential to maximizing AWIPS' usefulness.
## Disaster Management Issues
The application team continually consults with its partners to identify
important issues facing the Disaster Management community, to examine
associated decision support tools, and to determine priorities within
the Disaster Management portfolio. Topics are listed below with
application partners given in parentheses.
• Severe weather (SPoRT Center/lightning detection/NWS)
• Disaster management programs for Homeland Security (cross-cutting)
• International disaster management issues and coordination (CEOS-WSSD,
Earth Observation)
• Earthquake improvements as a result of Interferometric Synthetic
Aperture Radar (InSAR/Restless Planet Initiative) and other techniques
to predict earthquakes or the precursors to earthquakes
• Humanitarian Information and Geospatial Improvements to Global
Monitoring (State Department and Pacific Disaster Center/Center of
Excellence)
• Disaster Management Policy and Grand Challenges (Subcommittee on
Disaster Reduction and National Science Foundation)
• Disaster Issues of Relevance for the Nation -- The National Academies
Disaster Roundtable
## Cross-Application Activities
The Disaster Management Program crosscuts the other 11 Earth Science
Applications in the Applications Division. Specific Cross-application
activities related to Homeland Security and Public Health are currently
underway and others are anticipated.
The Disaster Management Program also has a strong connection to the
Solid Earth and Natural Hazards Program of the ESE Science Division
(Code YS). This Program directly links to Disaster Management activities
for applications of remote sensing in detecting and predicting
earthquakes, landslides, and volcanic activity; another Code YS link
relates to Land Use/Land Cover research activities concerning wildfires,
carbon cycle, and agriculture.
I[ntegrated Benchmarked Systems Program (IBS)]{.underline}
The Integrated Benchmarked Systems Program is that part of the Cross
Cutting Solutions Program whose objective is to provide the systems
engineering services and support to perform evaluation, verification,
validation, and benchmarking required by Earth Science Applications'
twelve Earth Science Applications programs. System engineering services
and support includes such activities as system design, synthesis,
integration, requirements analysis, testing, verification, validation,
and uncertainty analysis.
The goal of the Integrated Benchmarked Systems Program is to assure the
integrity, quality and reliability of innovative solutions delivered by
the Earth Science Applications Program to its customers, thereby
enhancing the decision-making capacities of partner agencies and their
customers.
The Disaster Management Program Element utilizes the IBS program to
evaluate, verify, validate, and benchmark the solutions used to improve
decision support tools, such as the HAZUS-MH system. More information on
schedule and deliverables can be found in the IBS program plan. This
includes the requested amounts from the IBS program to support the
Evaluation, Validation, and Benchmarking of the NASA's Earth science
research results into HAZUS-MH.
## Disaster Management Program Management: Integrated System Solutions Diagram
{width="6.304166666666666in"
height="4.731944444444444in"}The figure below illustrates how Earth
science measurements, model products, and data fusion techniques support
the Disaster Management Program's partners and their decision support
tools and shows the value and benefits of Earth science to society.
# V. Program Activities: Projects, Solicitations, and Program Support
## Application Projects
The Disaster Management Program authorizes directed projects to support
the Program's goals and objectives. The respective project managers are
responsible for developing project plans, proposals, or work plans and
for managing activities to support the Program, the ESE, and its
partners in the following projects.
Project Plans specify Earth science research, observations, models, and
other outputs for the potential use in decision support tools identified
in this Program Plan. Where multiple project managers are specified,
each has a specific role in the project managed at a NASA Center or
Research Laboratory. Project Plans are submitted to the Program Manager
for review and approval. These project plans, proposals, or work plans
may be solicited or unsolicited.
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| > **Project | | | | | |
| > HAZUS-MH | | | | | |
| > | | | | | |
| (Earthquake, | | | | | |
| > | | | | | |
| Deformation, | | | | | |
| > and | | | | | |
| > L | | | | | |
| andslides)** | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Purpose: To | | | | Bu | |
| insert | | | | dg | |
| NASA's | | | | et | |
| remote | | | | ( | |
| sensing | | | | K) | |
| technologies | | | | | |
| from remote | | | | | |
| sensing | | | | | |
| measurements | | | | | |
| and models | | | | | |
| into the | | | | | |
| HAZUS-MH DSS | | | | | |
| for | | | | | |
| earthquakes, | | | | | |
| deformation, | | | | | |
| and | | | | | |
| landslides. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Goals: To | | | | | |
| transfer | | | | | |
| NASA's Earth | | | | | |
| science | | | | | |
| results to | | | | | |
| HAZUS-MH for | | | | | |
| earthquake | | | | | |
| information, | | | | | |
| deformation | | | | | |
| m | | | | | |
| easurements, | | | | | |
| and USGS | | | | | |
| shakemap | | | | | |
| products. To | | | | | |
| improve | | | | | |
| earthquake | | | | | |
| detection | | | | | |
| and | | | | | |
| prediction | | | | | |
| systems for | | | | | |
| early | | | | | |
| earthquake | | | | | |
| warning. | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 0 |
| | | | | 04 | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Project | Centers | Timeframe | Partners | FY | 2 |
| Managers | | | | 05 | 00 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Ron Blom -- | JPL, | FY04-FY08 | DHS | FY | 2 |
| JPL | GSFC | | /FEMA/USGS/NIBS, | 06 | 00 |
| | | | REASoN | | |
| Shahid Habib | | | | | |
| -- GSFC | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 3 |
| | | | | 07 | 00 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 2 |
| | | | | 08 | 00 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Earth | SRTM, | | | O | |
| Science | InSAR, | | | th | |
| Products | GRACE, | | | er | |
| | Terra, | | | A | |
| | Aqua | | | pp | |
| | | | | s. | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Deliverables | 1\) Use | | | Av | |
| | the | | | ia | |
| | S | | | ti | |
| | outhern | | | on | |
| | Cal | | | ( | |
| | ifornia | | | Vo | |
| | Int | | | lc | |
| | egrated | | | an | |
| | GPS | | | ic | |
| | Network | | | A | |
| | to | | | sh | |
| | provide | | | ), | |
| | results | | | W | |
| | of | | | at | |
| | r | | | er | |
| | esearch | | | Ma | |
| | and | | | na | |
| | impro | | | ge | |
| | vements | | | me | |
| | to USGS | | | nt | |
| | sh | | | | |
| | akemaps | | | | |
| | that go | | | | |
| | into | | | | |
| | H | | | | |
| | AZUS-MH | | | | |
| | calcul | | | | |
| | ations. | | | | |
| | P | | | | |
| | roject: | | | | |
| | C | | | | |
| | omplete | | | | |
| | mapping | | | | |
| | of GPS | | | | |
| | V | | | | |
| | elocity | | | | |
| | Field | | | | |
| | in the | | | | |
| | I | | | | |
| | nterior | | | | |
| | Western | | | | |
| | United | | | | |
| | States | | | | |
| | (USG | | | | |
| | S/JPL). | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | 2\) | | | | |
| | I | | | | |
| | mproved | | | | |
| | la | | | | |
| | ndslide | | | | |
| | asse | | | | |
| | ssments | | | | |
| | for | | | | |
| | HA | | | | |
| | ZUS-MH. | | | | |
| | Through | | | | |
| | GSFC | | | | |
| | and | | | | |
| | their | | | | |
| | hurri | | | | |
| | cane/la | | | | |
| | ndslide | | | | |
| | p | | | | |
| | rogram, | | | | |
| | new | | | | |
| | tec | | | | |
| | hniques | | | | |
| | for | | | | |
| | pr | | | | |
| | oviding | | | | |
| | inputs | | | | |
| | to the | | | | |
| | H | | | | |
| | AZUS-MH | | | | |
| | model | | | | |
| | will be | | | | |
| | p | | | | |
| | rovided | | | | |
| | using | | | | |
| | TRMM | | | | |
| | precip | | | | |
| | itation | | | | |
| | data | | | | |
| | and | | | | |
| | hu | | | | |
| | rricane | | | | |
| | appli | | | | |
| | cations | | | | |
| | (\$25K | | | | |
| | F | | | | |
| | Y2003). | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | 3\) | | | | |
| | Hold a | | | | |
| | Hurri | | | | |
| | cane/La | | | | |
| | ndslide | | | | |
| | Con | | | | |
| | ference | | | | |
| | (GSFC) | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | 4\) | | | | |
| | Demo | | | | |
| | nstrate | | | | |
| | i | | | | |
| | mproved | | | | |
| | de | | | | |
| | tection | | | | |
| | of | | | | |
| | ear | | | | |
| | thquake | | | | |
| | thermal | | | | |
| | pre | | | | |
| | cursors | | | | |
| | using | | | | |
| | NASA | | | | |
| | assets | | | | |
| | (J | | | | |
| | PL/SSC) | | | | |
| | (\$200K | | | | |
| | FY | | | | |
| | 2002) | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| > **Project | | | | | |
| > HAZUS-MH | | | | | |
| > (Wind | | | | | |
| > (H | | | | | |
| urricane))** | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Purpose: To | | | | Bu | |
| insert | | | | dg | |
| NASA's Earth | | | | et | |
| science | | | | ( | |
| results into | | | | K) | |
| HAZUS-MH | | | | | |
| capabilities | | | | | |
| with remote | | | | | |
| sensing and | | | | | |
| model | | | | | |
| development | | | | | |
| for wind and | | | | | |
| wave | | | | | |
| assessments. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Goals: | | | | | |
| Provide | | | | | |
| improved | | | | | |
| remote | | | | | |
| sensing data | | | | | |
| sources for | | | | | |
| HAZUS | | | | | |
| hurricane, | | | | | |
| wind, and | | | | | |
| surge models | | | | | |
| to include | | | | | |
| NASA remote | | | | | |
| sensing | | | | | |
| t | | | | | |
| echnologies, | | | | | |
| such as | | | | | |
| TRMM, | | | | | |
| QuikSCAT, | | | | | |
| and MODIS. | | | | | |
| Validate | | | | | |
| surface | | | | | |
| roughness | | | | | |
| parameters | | | | | |
| (sensitivity | | | | | |
| analysis) | | | | | |
| for this | | | | | |
| application | | | | | |
| as well as | | | | | |
| satellite | | | | | |
| input | | | | | |
| i | | | | | |
| mprovements. | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 4 |
| | | | | 04 | 99 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Project | Centers | Timeframe | Partners | FY | 6 |
| Managers | | | | 05 | 50 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Bruce Davis | SSC | FY04-FY08 | DHS/FEMA/NOAA | FY | 8 |
| -- SSC | | | | 06 | 60 |
| | | | NIBS/ARA. REASoN | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 7 |
| | | | | 07 | 80 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 6 |
| | | | | 08 | 00 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Earth | WAVEWAT | | | O | |
| Science | CH III, | | | th | |
| Products | ASTER, | | | er | |
| | L | | | A | |
| | andsat, | | | pp | |
| | Terra, | | | s. | |
| | Aqua, | | | | |
| | Q | | | | |
| | uikSCAT | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Deliverables | 1\) | | | A | |
| | Deliver | | | vi | |
| | eva | | | at | |
| | luation | | | io | |
| | report, | | | n, | |
| | a | | | Pu | |
| | greemen | | | bl | |
| | t/joint | | | ic | |
| | deve | | | H | |
| | lopment | | | ea | |
| | plan, | | | lt | |
| | be | | | h, | |
| | nchmark | | | Ag | |
| | report, | | | ri | |
| | results | | | cu | |
| | con | | | lt | |
| | ference | | | ur | |
| | through | | | e, | |
| | funded | | | W | |
| | c | | | at | |
| | ontract | | | er | |
| | with | | | Ma | |
| | N | | | na | |
| | IBS/ARA | | | ge | |
| | | | | me | |
| | 2\) | | | nt | |
| | Verify, | | | | |
| | va | | | | |
| | lidate, | | | | |
| | and | | | | |
| | be | | | | |
| | nchmark | | | | |
| | WA | | | | |
| | VEWATCH | | | | |
| | III | | | | |
| | results | | | | |
| | to use | | | | |
| | remote | | | | |
| | sensing | | | | |
| | inputs | | | | |
| | for | | | | |
| | i | | | | |
| | mproved | | | | |
| | wav | | | | |
| | e/surge | | | | |
| | calcu | | | | |
| | lations | | | | |
| | for | | | | |
| | H | | | | |
| | AZUS-MH | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| > **Project | | | | | |
| > HAZUS-MH | | | | | |
| > (Flood)** | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Purpose: To | | | | Bu | |
| apply NASA's | | | | dg | |
| Earth | | | | et | |
| Science | | | | ( | |
| results to | | | | K) | |
| HAZUS-MH | | | | | |
| capabilities | | | | | |
| with remote | | | | | |
| sensing and | | | | | |
| model | | | | | |
| development | | | | | |
| for improved | | | | | |
| flood | | | | | |
| assessments. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Goals: | | | | | |
| Validate | | | | | |
| improvements | | | | | |
| to HAZUS-MH | | | | | |
| as a result | | | | | |
| of NASA | | | | | |
| remote | | | | | |
| sensing | | | | | |
| t | | | | | |
| echnologies, | | | | | |
| such as LIS, | | | | | |
| Landsat ETM, | | | | | |
| SeaWinds, | | | | | |
| and MODIS. | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 0 |
| | | | | 04 | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Project | Centers | Timeframe | Partners | FY | 1 |
| Managers | | | | 05 | 50 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Bruce Davis | SSC, | FY04-FY08 | DHS/FEM | FY | 1 |
| -- SSC | GSFC | | A/USGS/NOAA/USDA | 06 | 50 |
| | | | | | |
| Shahid Habib | | | NIBS/ARA. REASoN | | |
| -- GSFC | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 3 |
| | | | | 07 | 00 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 1 |
| | | | | 08 | 00 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Earth | Digital | | | O | |
| Science | El | | | th | |
| Products | evation | | | er | |
| | Models, | | | A | |
| | Li | | | pp | |
| | ghtning | | | s. | |
| | P | | | | |
| | roduct, | | | | |
| | Web Map | | | | |
| | S | | | | |
| | ervices | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Deliverables | 1\. | | | A | |
| | Through | | | vi | |
| | GSFC | | | at | |
| | and | | | io | |
| | their | | | n, | |
| | hurri | | | Pu | |
| | cane/la | | | bl | |
| | ndslide | | | ic | |
| | p | | | H | |
| | rogram, | | | ea | |
| | new | | | lt | |
| | tec | | | h, | |
| | hniques | | | Ag | |
| | for | | | ri | |
| | pr | | | cu | |
| | oviding | | | lt | |
| | inputs | | | ur | |
| | to the | | | e, | |
| | HAZUS | | | W | |
| | model | | | at | |
| | will be | | | er | |
| | p | | | Ma | |
| | rovided | | | na | |
| | under | | | ge | |
| | the | | | me | |
| | hu | | | nt | |
| | rricane | | | | |
| | r | | | | |
| | esearch | | | | |
| | p | | | | |
| | rogram. | | | | |
| | Impro | | | | |
| | vements | | | | |
| | to | | | | |
| | hu | | | | |
| | rricane | | | | |
| | in | | | | |
| | tensity | | | | |
| | fo | | | | |
| | recasts | | | | |
| | are | | | | |
| | ex | | | | |
| | pected. | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | 2\. | | | | |
| | Impro | | | | |
| | vements | | | | |
| | to | | | | |
| | li | | | | |
| | ghtning | | | | |
| | data | | | | |
| | for | | | | |
| | severe | | | | |
| | storm | | | | |
| | fore | | | | |
| | casting | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | 3\. Web | | | | |
| | Map | | | | |
| | S | | | | |
| | ervices | | | | |
| | to | | | | |
| | provide | | | | |
| | impro | | | | |
| | vements | | | | |
| | to | | | | |
| | H | | | | |
| | AZUS-MH | | | | |
| | data | | | | |
| | and | | | | |
| | m | | | | |
| | etadata | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| > **Project | | | | | |
| > HAZUS-MH | | | | | |
| > | | | | | |
| (WildFire)** | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Purpose: To | | | | Bu | |
| evaluate | | | | dg | |
| NASA's | | | | et | |
| science | | | | ( | |
| results in | | | | K) | |
| land | | | | | |
| use/land | | | | | |
| cover to | | | | | |
| benefit | | | | | |
| HAZUS-MH, | | | | | |
| Forest | | | | | |
| Service, and | | | | | |
| NOAA | | | | | |
| capabilities | | | | | |
| with remote | | | | | |
| sensing and | | | | | |
| model | | | | | |
| development | | | | | |
| for wildfire | | | | | |
| detection. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Goals: Add | | | | | |
| Fire | | | | | |
| assessment | | | | | |
| capability | | | | | |
| to HAZUS-MH | | | | | |
| using NASA | | | | | |
| assets to | | | | | |
| integrate | | | | | |
| NASA remote | | | | | |
| sensing | | | | | |
| t | | | | | |
| echnologies, | | | | | |
| such as | | | | | |
| TRMM, | | | | | |
| QuikSCAT,, | | | | | |
| and MODIS | | | | | |
| into | | | | | |
| HAZUS-MH | | | | | |
| a | | | | | |
| pplications. | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 0 |
| | | | | 04 | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Project | Centers | Timeframe | Partners | FY | 1 |
| Managers | | | | 05 | 50 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Bruce Davis | SSC, | FY04-FY08 | DHS/FEMA/U | FY | 1 |
| -- SSC | ARC | | SGS/NOAA/USDA/FS | 06 | 50 |
| | | | | | |
| Vince | | | NIBS. REASoN | | |
| Ambrosia -- | | | | | |
| ARC | | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 3 |
| | | | | 07 | 00 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 1 |
| | | | | 08 | 00 |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Earth | MODIS | | | O | |
| Science | Rapid | | | th | |
| Products | Re | | | er | |
| | sponse, | | | A | |
| | Fire | | | pp | |
| | Fuels | | | s. | |
| | Mo | | | | |
| | deling, | | | | |
| | Veg | | | | |
| | etation | | | | |
| | Stress | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
| Deliverables | 1\. | | | A | |
| | Coo | | | vi | |
| | rdinate | | | at | |
| | the | | | io | |
| | needs | | | n, | |
| | of the | | | Pu | |
| | w | | | bl | |
| | ildfire | | | ic | |
| | co | | | H | |
| | mmunity | | | ea | |
| | to | | | lt | |
| | provide | | | h, | |
| | requi | | | Ag | |
| | rements | | | ri | |
| | for | | | cu | |
| | w | | | lt | |
| | ildfire | | | ur | |
| | asse | | | e, | |
| | ssments | | | W | |
| | related | | | at | |
| | to | | | er | |
| | p | | | Ma | |
| | roperty | | | na | |
| | damage. | | | ge | |
| | | | | me | |
| | 2\. | | | nt | |
| | In | | | | |
| | tegrate | | | | |
| | MODIS | | | | |
| | Rapid | | | | |
| | R | | | | |
| | esponse | | | | |
| | image | | | | |
| | a | | | | |
| | nalysis | | | | |
| | into | | | | |
| | H | | | | |
| | AZUS-MH | | | | |
| | for | | | | |
| | fire | | | | |
| | r | | | | |
| | esponse | | | | |
| | p | | | | |
| | lanning | | | | |
+--------------+---------+---------------+------------------+----+----+
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| > | | | | | |
| **Project | | | | | |
| > M | | | | | |
| ODIS-VIIRS | | | | | |
| > Land | | | | | |
| > | | | | | |
| Processing | | | | | |
| > System | | | | | |
| > (Wi | | | | | |
| ldfires)** | | | | | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| Purpose: | | | | Bu | |
| To | | | | dg | |
| integrate | | | | et | |
| the MODIS | | | | ( | |
| Land Rapid | | | | K) | |
| Response | | | | | |
| System | | | | | |
| (MLRRS) | | | | | |
| into NOAA | | | | | |
| O | | | | | |
| perations. | | | | | |
| Project | | | | | |
| Title: | | | | | |
| M | | | | | |
| ODIS-VIIRS | | | | | |
| Land | | | | | |
| Surface | | | | | |
| Processing | | | | | |
| System. | | | | | |
| The | | | | | |
| University | | | | | |
| of | | | | | |
| Maryland | | | | | |
| (UMD) will | | | | | |
| provide a | | | | | |
| proposal | | | | | |
| to NOAA | | | | | |
| and NASA. | | | | | |
| This | | | | | |
| system | | | | | |
| will move | | | | | |
| from an | | | | | |
| ex | | | | | |
| perimental | | | | | |
| system to | | | | | |
| operations | | | | | |
| and | | | | | |
| prepare | | | | | |
| NOAA for | | | | | |
| Visibl | | | | | |
| e/Infrared | | | | | |
| Imager/ | | | | | |
| Radiometer | | | | | |
| Suite | | | | | |
| (VIIRS) | | | | | |
| instrument | | | | | |
| data from | | | | | |
| NPOESS and | | | | | |
| NPP. NASA | | | | | |
| will | | | | | |
| enable | | | | | |
| NOAA with | | | | | |
| the | | | | | |
| ability to | | | | | |
| transition | | | | | |
| the | | | | | |
| research | | | | | |
| to | | | | | |
| o | | | | | |
| perations. | | | | | |
| NOAA will | | | | | |
| take on | | | | | |
| the | | | | | |
| operation. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Enable | | | | | |
| col | | | | | |
| laboration | | | | | |
| with the | | | | | |
| NASA | | | | | |
| SERVIR | | | | | |
| activity | | | | | |
| of | | | | | |
| Ecological | | | | | |
| F | | | | | |
| orecasting | | | | | |
| related to | | | | | |
| fire | | | | | |
| m | | | | | |
| anagement. | | | | | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 1 |
| | | | | 04 | 46 |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| Project | Centers | Timeframe | Partners | FY | 0 |
| Managers | | | | 05 | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| Stephen | HQ | FY04-FY06 | NOAA (ORA/SSD), UMD, | FY | 0 |
| Ambrose | | | Regional | 06 | |
| | | | Visualization and | | |
| | | | Monitoring System | | |
| | | | (SERVIR) | | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 0 |
| | | | | 07 | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 0 |
| | | | | 08 | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| Earth | MODIS | | | O | |
| Science | Rapid | | | th | |
| Products | Response | | | er | |
| | Product | | | A | |
| | | | | pp | |
| | | | | s. | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| De | Demo | | | A | |
| liverables | nstration | | | ir | |
| | after | | | Qu | |
| | first | | | al | |
| | year of | | | it | |
| | Op | | | y, | |
| | erational | | | A | |
| | MLRRS at | | | vi | |
| | NOAA | | | at | |
| | op | | | io | |
| | erations. | | | n, | |
| | A | | | E | |
| | lgorithms | | | co | |
| | meet | | | F | |
| | op | | | or | |
| | erational | | | ec | |
| | req | | | as | |
| | uirements | | | ti | |
| | for a | | | ng | |
| | fully | | | | |
| | op | | | | |
| | erational | | | | |
| | product | | | | |
| | and risk | | | | |
| | reduction | | | | |
| | analysis. | | | | |
| | Project | | | | |
| | to | | | | |
| | a | | | | |
| | ccelerate | | | | |
| | when when | | | | |
| | agreement | | | | |
| | and | | | | |
| | c | | | | |
| | ommitment | | | | |
| | of NOAA | | | | |
| | signed. | | | | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| > | | | | | |
| **Project | | | | | |
| > AWIPS | | | | | |
| > Products | | | | | |
| > for | | | | | |
| > Severe | | | | | |
| > Storms | | | | | |
| > and | | | | | |
| > T | | | | | |
| ornadoes** | | | | | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| Purpose: | | | | Bu | |
| To | | | | dg | |
| integrate | | | | et | |
| NASA's | | | | ( | |
| research | | | | K) | |
| in | | | | | |
| lightning | | | | | |
| and severe | | | | | |
| storms | | | | | |
| into the | | | | | |
| NWS | | | | | |
| Advanced | | | | | |
| Weather | | | | | |
| I | | | | | |
| nteractive | | | | | |
| Processing | | | | | |
| System | | | | | |
| o | | | | | |
| perations, | | | | | |
| including | | | | | |
| the | | | | | |
| d | | | | | |
| evelopment | | | | | |
| of | | | | | |
| int | | | | | |
| eroperable | | | | | |
| operations | | | | | |
| for AWIPS | | | | | |
| and | | | | | |
| geospatial | | | | | |
| access to | | | | | |
| AWIPS | | | | | |
| satellite | | | | | |
| products. | | | | | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 50 |
| | | | | 04 | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| Project | Centers | Timeframe | Partners | FY | 1 |
| Managers | | | | 05 | 50 |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| Steve | MSFC | FY04-FY08 | NOAA/NWS, FAA, DOD | FY | 1 |
| Goodman -- | (SPoRT), | | | 06 | 50 |
| MSFC | | | | | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 3 |
| | | | | 07 | 00 |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| | | | | FY | 1 |
| | | | | 08 | 00 |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| Earth | LIS, Wind | | | O | |
| Science | and | | | th | |
| Products | Prec | | | er | |
| | ipitation | | | A | |
| | Products | | | pp | |
| | | | | s. | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
| De | I | | | A | |
| liverables | ntegrated | | | ir | |
| | NASA | | | Qu | |
| | t | | | al | |
| | echnology | | | it | |
| | and data | | | y, | |
| | ass | | | A | |
| | imilation | | | vi | |
| | into NWS | | | at | |
| | AWIPS | | | io | |
| | Op | | | n, | |
| | erations. | | | W | |
| | Transfer | | | at | |
| | of NASA | | | er | |
| | interop | | | Ma | |
| | erability | | | na | |
| | knowledge | | | ge | |
| | to NOAA | | | me | |
| | AWIPS | | | nt | |
| | de | | | | |
| | velopers. | | | | |
+------------+-----------+-----------+----------------------+----+----+
+---------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+----+---+
| > **IBS | | | | | |
| > Engineering | | | | | |
| > Support | | | | | |
| > (Funds | | | | | |
| > requested | | | | | |
| > from | | | | | |
| > | | | | | |
| Crosscutting | | | | | |
| > IBS | | | | | |
| > Program)** | | | | | |
+---------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+----+---+
| Purpose: | | | | *B | |
| | | | | ud | |
| 1\. Refine | | | | ge | |
| technical | | | | t* | |
| requirements | | | | | |
| related to | | | | * | |
| the | | | | (R | |
| geospatial | | | | eq | |
| components | | | | ue | |
| associated | | | | st | |
| with | | | | ed | |
| | | | | fr | |
| NASA Earth | | | | om | |
| observing | | | | I | |
| data products | | | | BS | |
| for HAZUS-MH. | | | | )* | |
| | | | | | |
| 2\. Advise on | | | | | |
| the selection | | | | | |
| of NASA ESE | | | | | |
| data products | | | | | |
| for | | | | | |
| incorporation | | | | | |
| into | | | | | |
| HAZUS-MH. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 3\. Perform | | | | | |
| V&V of NASA | | | | | |
| products | | | | | |
| through use | | | | | |
| of in situ | | | | | |
| measurements | | | | | |
| and ground | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| networks and | | | | | |
| benchmark | | | | | |
| product | | | | | |
| performance | | | | | |
| through | | | | | |
| technical | | | | | |
| publicati | | | | | |
| on/memoranda. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 4\. Develop a | | | | | |
| "checklist" | | | | | |
| of model | | | | | |
| attributes | | | | | |
| that should | | | | | |
| be examined | | | | | |
| when | | | | | |
| comparing and | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| evaluating | | | | | |
| models for | | | | | |
| incorporation | | | | | |
| into | | | | | |
| HAZUS-MH. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 5\. Perform | | | | | |
| risk | | | | | |
| assessments | | | | | |
| through JPL | | | | | |
| developed | | | | | |
| software and | | | | | |
| risk | | | | | |
| reduction | | | | | |
| studies | | | | | |
| through | | | | | |
| resources at | | | | | |
| MSFC. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 6\. | | | | | |
| Collaborate | | | | | |
| this work | | | | | |
| through the | | | | | |
| efforts of | | | | | |
| Carbon | | | | | |
| Management. | | | | | |
+---------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+----+---+
| | | | | FY | 1 |
| | | | | 04 | 0 |
| | | | | | 0 |
+---------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+----+---+
| *PS Managers* | *Centers* | *Timeframe* | *Partners* | FY | 1 |
| | | | | 05 | 0 |
| | | | | | 0 |
+---------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+----+---+
| Bruce Davis | SSC | FY04-05 | MSFC, JPL | FY | 0 |
| | | | | 06 | |
+---------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+----+---+
| | | | | FY | 0 |
| | | | | 07 | |
+---------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+----+---+
| | | | | FY | 0 |
| | | | | 08 | |
+---------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+----+---+
| *Earth | > Identified | | | *O | |
| Science | > through | | | th | |
| Products* | > HAZUS-MH | | | er | |
| | > and | | | Ap | |
| | > evaluation | | | ps | |
| | > efforts | | | .* | |
| | > with | | | | |
| | > DHS/FEMA, | | | Cr | |
| | > SSC, JPL, | | | os | |
| | > and MSFC | | | sc | |
| | | | | ut | |
| | | | | ti | |
| | | | | ng | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | S | |
| | | | | ol | |
| | | | | ut | |
| | | | | io | |
| | | | | ns | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Ca | |
| | | | | rb | |
| | | | | on | |
| | | | | Ma | |
| | | | | na | |
| | | | | ge | |
| | | | | me | |
| | | | | nt | |
+---------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+----+---+
| * | > Reports, | | | | |
| Deliverables* | > formal | | | | |
| | > rec | | | | |
| | ommendations | | | | |
| | > for | | | | |
| | > action, | | | | |
| | > technical | | | | |
| | > memoranda | | | | |
| | > | | | | |
| | > JPL risk | | | | |
| | > assessment | | | | |
| | > software | | | | |
| | > calibrated | | | | |
| | > and | | | | |
| | > modified | | | | |
| | > to fit the | | | | |
| | > needs of | | | | |
| | > this risk | | | | |
| | > assessment | | | | |
+---------------+--------------+-------------+-------------+----+---+
## Competitive Sourcing and Solicitations
The Disaster Management Program leverages appropriate activities,
expertise, and assets selected through other Earth Science Enterprise
solicitation announcements that serve the Program's objectives; the
Disaster Management Program may provide supplemental funding to develop
or target specific application-oriented activities in a proposal. The
program and project managers facilitate appropriate partnerships between
solicitation recipients and application partners.
## Solid Earth and Natural Hazards NRA
In FY02, 10 proposals were chosen for FY2003-FY2005 funding from the
SENH NRA. The first year of funding in FY03 totalled \$1.58M, FY04
\$1.5M, and FY05 \$1.4M These projects are listed in the table below.
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| PI | Hazard | Program Relationship |
| | Class | |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Bra | flood | Flood application based on ESE products with |
| ckenridge | | outstanding international partnership |
| | | |
| Dartmouth | | |
| U. | | |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Fielding | sub | Land subsidence SAR application pushing the |
| | sidence | data, technology, applied use to the limit |
| JPL | | |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Pieri | volcano | Use of airborne technology for volcano hazard |
| | | characterization and monitoring (one-year |
| ARC | | project funded in FY03 only) |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Johnson | mult | Pushes commercial LIDAR acquisition to limit |
| | ihazard | of technology and industry capabilities |
| USGS | | |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Arsenault | flood/ | Innovative use of Land Data Assimilation |
| | drought | Systems (LDAS) output for flood/drought |
| U. of MD | | decision support by reclamation |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Sohlberg | w | First sustained support for new |
| | ildfire | product/service innovation in MODIS RR |
| U. of MD | | |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Kasischke | coastal | ESE coastal change study to characterize |
| | | regional/local sea level change |
| U. of MD | | |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Bourgeau | w | Application of SAR technology for wildfire |
| | ildfire | risk analysis |
| Veridian | | |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Kim | flood/w | Advanced utilization of the SCIGN array for |
| | ildfire | flood and wildfire prediction |
| U. of CA | | |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Bock | seismic | Unique real-time civilian infrastructure |
| | | strain monitoring applications of SCIGN array |
| U. of San | | |
| Diego | | |
+-----------+---------+-----------------------------------------------+
The success of these projects is determined through periodic monitoring
and contact, guiding the researchers to obtain significant results in
alignment with program goals, and providing these results to the
research and applications community. These activities culminate in
FY2005. The Disaster Management program maintains continual contact with
all 10 Principal Investigators to develop synergy with the Disaster
Management goals and program planning.
## Research, Education, and Applications Solutions Network Projects
Several Research, Education, and Applications Solutions Network (REASoN)
projects managed by SSC are assigned to the Disaster Management Program.
Two projects are fully funded by REASoN and one project is jointly
funded by REASoN, Code M, Code YS, and Code YO as described below:
1\. University of South Carolina -- "Development of Remote
Sensing-assisted Natural and Technological Hazards Decision Support
Systems" -- Improve the utilization of NASA data sources, modeling, and
systems engineering in disaster management and homeland security. Model
human risk and vulnerability to hazards; develop system for rapid
identification of remote sensing assets. Channels new NASA data sources
into disaster management applications. Responds to the FEMA DSS -- well
connected with user organizations. Project builds on existing
capabilities by stakeholders. The total REASoN funds for the five-year
project is \$2,054,323; FY04 is \$616,696.
2\. NASA Wildfire Response Research and Development, Applications and
Technology Implementation, Vince Ambrosia, P. I. Collaboration with the
U.S. Forest Service to extend the use of NASA data sources, modeling,
and systems engineering to tactical wildfire response. The project:
Benchmarks the use of UAVs and improved telecommunications for disaster
management with potential extension to Homeland Security; Combines
existing technology with new platforms and instrumentation to address
decision support requirements in tactical situations; Responds to high
priority research and operational needs of the USFS partner; and,
Collaborates closely with the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT),
which who received a Congressionally-directed project in FY2003. The
total REASoN funds for the five-year project is \$2,643,082; FY04 is
\$600,000.
3\. Center for Real-Time GPS Data and Products, P.I. Yoas Bar-Sever,
JPL. The results of this project improves GPS technologies and in turn
improves GPS earthquake monitoring stations. Funding: \$100K from REASoN
for 5 years, \$100K from Code YS, and \$400K for 5 years from Code M.
The Disaster Management Program plans to participate in a joint project
solicitation for projects in FY05-08 through a Earth Science
Applications Program solicitation. The Program plans to coordinate the
Disaster Management priorities with EPA, DHS/FEMA, USDA, and NASA ESE
Code YS, all of which have expressed an interest in future
solicitations.
## Program Management Activities and Studies
The Disaster Management Program authorizes studies, working group
participation, program reviews, and other endeavors to ensure the
Program's overall success.
**Activity:** CENR Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction and related Remote
Sensing and Applications Workgroup
**Purpose:** To help guide Presidential policy on disaster management
through this OSTP group of agencies
**Manager:** Stephen Ambrose, NASA HQ
**Goals:** The SDR coordinates and creates policy documents that are
reviewed by agencies and signed by the OSTP CENR. For example, the first
document completed this year was "Reducing Disaster Vulnerability
Through Science and Technology." This collaborative document identified
current disaster risks and agency activities. In FY04, SDR activities
are structured to work closely with the Earth Observation Summit
activities and implementation plans, both nationally and
internationally, as well as to improve interagency coordination of
challenges facing the hazards community.
**Budget:** \$35K (FY04)
**Activity:** Congressionally mandated projects at RIT
**Purpose:** To develop a wildfire monitoring system for first
responders called "Wildfire Airborne Sensor Program" (WASP). This
program, closely integrated and coordinated with the Forest Service and
NASA, will develop an airborne sensor capability to respond to
wildfires.
**Managers:** Steve Ambrose, Bruce Davis (SSC), Carlos Del Castillo
(SSC), Jim Brass (JPL)
**Goals:** FY04 -- To collaborate with RIT, JPL, and other centers to
make sure RIT is aligned to NASA objectives related to fire monitoring
**Budget:** \$1,200K
**Activity:** Congressionally mandated project at the University of
Miami, Center for Southeastern Tropical Advanced Remote Sensing (CSTARS)
**Purpose:** To further develop the data center to serve the needs of
the research community. This center's satellite access now reaches to
Central America, and its activities in obtaining commercial satellite
data for research has been exceptional.
**Managers:** Steve Ambrose, Bruce Davis (SSC), Carlos Del Castillo
(SSC)
**Goals:** FY04 -- Develop CSTARS' capabilities for ingesting a variety
of satellite data from federal and commercial data sources. Recently
SPOT was added to the list of available satellite agreements. Tim Dixon
is the CSTARS manager.
**Budget:** \$1,800K
**Activity:** USGS partnership to enhance the Rapid Land Change Program
**Purpose:** To provide information on natural disasters to emergency
response agencies. Collaboration to verify and validate NASA remote
sensing technologies for improved USGS products.
**Managers:** Steve Ambrose, Bruce Davis (SSC)
**Goals:** The Rapid Land Change Program is a real-time system to
provide information to emergency response agencies. Working closely with
the USGS and FEMA, requirements will be developed to enhance this system
with NASA mission capabilities.
**Budget:** \$0K
**Activity:** U.S. Weather Research Program (USWRP)
**Purpose:** NASA participates in USWRP activities, such as THORPEX. The
SPoRT Center at MSFC participates in severe weather research to benefit
model inputs to USWRP research activities.
**Managers:** John Murray (LaRC), Steve Goodman (MSFC)
**Goals:** Ensure NASA assets are included in program experiments under
the USWRP.
**Budget:** \$0K
**Activity:** State Department Partnership, Humanitarian Information
Unit
**Purpose:** Work with the State Department in implementing DSSs for the
HIU. Coordinate geospatial data inputs with the GIO.
**Managers:** Steve Ambrose, Bruce Davis (SSC), Myra Bambacus (GIO)
**Goals:** Demonstrate NASA capabilities to improve interoperability and
humanitarian support.
**Budget:** \$0K
**Activity:** SPoRT Center
**Purpose:** Work with the MSFC SPoRT Center to develop requirements for
a Lightning Imaging Sensor. The SPoRT Center has transitioned NASA MODIS
and lightning data into the forecast and warning operations of two
Weather Forecast Offices (Huntsville and Birmingham, AL), with a third
office (Nashville, TN) set for product transition at the end of
September. NWS forecast offices at Jacksonville and Melbourne, FL, and
at Mobile, AL, have also requested MODIS data access from SPoRT. The
NASA investment, outside of the Applications Division, in SPoRT to date
is \~\$1.3M. The LIS/TRMM near-real-time, quick-look orbit data is
available to all NWS forecast offices through NOAAport via the LIS
Science Computing Facility (SCF).
**Manager:** Steve Goodman (MSFC)
**Goals:** Infuse NASA lightning monitoring and severe weather
assessment into NWS operations. Establish benchmark for future lightning
sensor development.
**Budget:** \$0K (FY04)
**Activity:** GWU Grant: Earth Science Research and Applications
**Purpose:** This grant to the GWU Space Policy Institute investigates
improving knowledge of the Earth system, moving research to operations,
and measuring the impact of GIFTS.
**Manager:** Ray Williamson (GWU)
**Goals:** Improve the ability of NASA to measure the impact of Earth
science research results and the transition from research to operational
satellite systems.
**Budget:** \$75K (FY03)
**Activity:** CEOS World Summit for Sustainable Development Type 2
Partnership -- Module 3 Disaster Management and Conflict
**Purpose:** Establish a plan to improve Earth observations for a
third-world country (Africa).
**Managers:** Steve Ambrose, Jeff Morrisette (GSFC), Bruce Davis (SSC)
**Goals:** Present Module 3 plan to CEOS WSSD committee in FY04\
**Budget:** \$0K
**Activity:** Natural Hazards Research and Applications Center
**Purpose:** To include societal impacts of disaster management in the
program element. This center is supported by NASA to advance the
understanding of hazards on society. The Disaster Management program
manager is on the advisory committee of this non-profit center.
**Manager:** Kathleen Tierney (University of Colorado)
**Goals:** To influence the disaster management community to utilize
social science as a requirements input for disaster management research
and applications development.
**Budget:** \$50K (FY04)
**Activity:** Program Planning and Disasters RoundTable
**Purpose:** Support interagency coordination and activities related to
Disaster Managmeent. Funds to support studies, reports, and other
activities sponsored through the RoundTable and other organizations,
especially activities related to use of Earth science results.
**Manager:** Steve Ambrose
**Goals:** To influence the disaster management community to utilize
social science as a requirements input for disaster management research
and applications development.
**Budget:** \$50K (FY04)
**Activity:** Wildfire Management (NV, CA) -- DEVELOP activity
**Purpose:** This 3-D visualization uses Earth science information to
map and monitor invasive and noxious plant species that are rapidly
encroaching the northern Nevada territory and are considered wildfire
fuel on the reservation. Proposed NASA source data: SRTM, ICESat, Aqua
**Manager:** DEVELOP/Crosscutting Solutions Program Element
**Goals:** To incorporate NASA satellite data into wildfire management
and to demonstrate this capability to the wildfire management community.
**Budget:** \$0K
**Activity:** Goetz Grant: "Moving Spectroscopic Remote Sensing
Techniques for the Identification of Swelling Potential of Expansive
Clays into Engineering Practice.
**Purpose:** Implement a cooperative effort with the geotechnical
industry to develop a new method for rapidly testing soil samples using
reflectance spectroscopy to determine their swell potential.
**Managers:** Stephen Ambrose, Alexander Goetz (P.I.), University of
Colorado
**Goals:** An SENH legacy project that has some relevance to the solid
earth portion of disaster management but this activity ends in FY2004.
**Budget:** \$49,726
**Activity:** Warren Muir Grant: Planning for Catastrophe
**Purpose:** A study to examine the social aspects of castastrophe.
**Program Manager:** Stephen Ambrose, Warren Muir (National Academies)
**Goals:** An SENH legacy project that has some relevance to the goals
of disaster management but this activity ends in FY2004.
**Budget:** \$57K
**Activity:** Education Fellowships
**Purpose:** The Education Program funds a number of student
fellowships. The projects related to disaster management are monitored
and mentored.
**Goals:** To ensure the results of this Earth science research are
carried forward into the user community.
**Budget**: \$0K (Cost covered by Education)
Projects for FY2004 relevant to the Disaster Management program element.
----------------- ---------------- ------------------------------------ -------------
**Student Name** **Student **Proposal Title** **Advisor**
Organization**
Barbour, Jonathan Lamont Doherty Landslides, Typhoons, and TRMM: Weissel,
Earth Linking Climate and Geomorphology in Jeffrey K
Observatory Taiwan through a New Application of
Radar Precipitation Measurements
Bordoni, Simona University of Investigations of Links between Stevens,
California at Subtropical Stratocumulus and Bjorn B
Los Angeles Monsoons
Dayem, Katherine University of Topographic Forcings on Climate and Molnar, Peter
Colorado Boulder Climatic Forcings on Topography: H.
Using the Solid Earth to Predict
Climate Change
Fleishman, Stanford Modeling Deformation on the Northern Zebker,
Michael University San Andreas Fault System Using Howard A
Permanent Scatterer Radar
Interferometry
Goss, Adam Cornell An Integrated Approach to Modeling Kay, Suzanne
University the Evolution of Large Silicic M
Calderas in the Central Andes: The
Bonete-Incapillo Volcanic Complex
(28ºS), Argentina
Harvey, Janet University of Mapping Active Fault Zones in Peltzer,
California Los Southern California using MASTER Gilles F
Angeles Multispectral Data.
Jiang, Haiyan University of Variability of Ice and Liquid Zipser,
Utah Precipitation Contents and Shape of Edward J
Radar Reflectivity Profiles in
Tropical Cyclones
Liu, Desheng University of Systematic Evaluation of Machine Gong, Peng
California at Learning Approaches for Remote
Berkeley Sensing Land Cover Classification
Mercuri, Pablo Purdue Terrain Analysis and Surface Engel,
University Hydrologic Modeling Strategies Using Bernard A
High-Resolution Global Digital
Topography
Sahetapy-Engel, Hawaii Institute Eruptive Patterns of an Active Lava Flynn, Luke P
Steve of Geophysics Dome in Santiaguito, Guatemala: a
and Planetology Multi-Dataset Approach Using
Satellite and Ground-Based Thermal
Remote Sensing and Infrasound
Smith, Bridget University of Body Force Models of Plate Boundary Sandwell,
California, San Deformation and their Implications David T
Diego (UCSD) for Earthquake Hazard
----------------- ---------------- ------------------------------------ -------------
**Activity:** New Investigator Program (NIP)
**Purpose:** The Education Program of Code Y supports a number of new
investigators.
**Goals:** To ensure the results of this Earth science research are
carried forward to the user community.
**Budget:** \$0K (Cost covered by Education)
Projects for FY2004 relevant to the Disaster Management program element.
--------- --------------------------- ----------------- -----------------
**PI Last **Proposal Title** **PI **Department**
Name** Organization**
Hurtado Integrated Field Work and University of Department of
Remote Sensing Studies for Texas at El Paso Geological
the Assessment of Geologic Sciences
Hazards and Groundwater
Hydrology in the Southern
Rio Grande Rift
Niemi Developing Digital Methods University of Institute for
for Using Remotely Sensed California Santa Crustal Studies
Data in the Field for Data Barbara
Collection and Analysis
Wen Earth\'s Geodynamical State University Geosciences
Models Consistent with of New York at
Surface Geodynamical Stony Brook
Observations and Their
Evolutions
Gomez Constraining Long- and University of Geological
Short-Term Tectonic and Missouri - Sciences
Erosional Processes in Columbia
Active Mountains Using
Multi-Spectral Imagery,
InSAR, and DEM Data
Poland Quantifying Deformation at US Geological Cascades Volcano
Central American Volcanoes Survey Observatory
Using SAR Interferometry: A
Unique Opportunity to
Involve University Students
in Technologically
Advanced, Innovative, and
Vital Research
--------- --------------------------- ----------------- -----------------
# VI. Schedule and Milestones
{width="6.120833333333334in"
height="4.723611111111111in"}
# VII. Program Management and Performance Measures
The Disaster Management team uses performance measures to track
progress, to identify issues, to evaluate projects, to make adjustments,
and to establish results of the program element. These measures serve as
condition indicators to help monitor progress within and across specific
project activities to ensure that the Program meets its goals and
objectives. The management team continually analyzes these measures,
tracking conditions and identifying issues to keep the Program aligned
with this Plan to meet its objectives.
The Program uses two performance measures: Program Management measures
assess activities within the program, and Performance measures whether
external program activities are serving their intended purpose. The
Earth Science Applications Division also uses this information in
preparing IBPD directions and U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) responses.
## Program Management Measures (Internally Focused)
+---------+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Inputs | Potential issues and DSTs identified for Disaster |
| | Management -- *number, type, range* |
| | |
| | Eligible partners to collaborate with -- *number, type, |
| | range* |
| | |
| | Potential results/products identified to serve Disaster |
| | Management -- *number, type, range* |
+---------+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Outputs | Assessments or evaluations of DSTs -- *number, range* |
| | |
| | Assessments of Earth science results/products to serve |
| | DSTs -- *number, range* |
| | |
| | Agreements with partners -- *presence* |
| | |
| | Reports (evaluation, validation, and benchmarks) -- |
| | *number, type* |
+---------+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Quality | Earth science results/products -- *number used per DST, |
| & | ratio of utilized to potential* |
| Eff | |
| iciency | Agreements -- *ratio of agreements to committed partners* |
| | |
| | Reports -- *partner satisfaction, timeliness, time to |
| | develop* |
| | |
| | Reports -- *ratio of validations to potential products, |
| | ratio of benchmarks to validations* |
+---------+------------------------------------------------------------+
## Performance Measures (Externally Focused)
+---------+------------------------------------------------------------+
| O | Earth science products adopted in DSTs -- *number, type, |
| utcomes | range; use in DST over time* |
| | |
| | Earth science products in use -- *ratio of products used |
| | by partners to reports produced* |
| | |
| | > Partner & DST performance -- *change in partner DST |
| | > performance, number & type of public recognition of use |
| | > & value of Earth science data in DST* |
+---------+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Impacts | Partner value -- *change in partner metrics (improvements |
| | in value of partner decisions)* |
+---------+------------------------------------------------------------+
In addition to the stated measures, the Disaster Management Program
Manager periodically requests an assessment of its plans, goals,
priorities, and activities through external review. The Disaster
Management team uses these measures, along with comparisons to
programmatic benchmarks, to support assessments of the Earth Science
Applications Program (e.g., internal NASA reviews and OMB PART).
Specifically, the Disaster Management Program manager uses comparisons
to similar activities in the following programs (i.e., program
benchmarks) to evaluate its progress and achievements:
\- Environmental and Societal Impacts Group at the National Center for
Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
\- Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES)
\- President's Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction (OSTP/CENR/SDR)
### FY05 Performance Measures Satisfied by the Program -- IBPD
This Program demonstrates that it plans to satisfy the following IBPD
Performance Measures for FY2004 and FY2005:
[Outcome Goal 1.2.1]{.underline}: Through 2012, benchmark the
assimilation of observations (geophysical parameters, climate data
records) provided from 20 of the 80 remote sensing systems deployed on
26 NASA Earth observation research satellites.
The Disaster Management Program will benchmark at least three 3 (e.g.,
MODIS, SeaWinds, LIS) of the 20 remote sensing systems from at least 3
of the 26 Earth observation research satellites. This goal is
accomplished through results of the SENH, REASoN, other projects and
moved into operational use through ESE tools, models, products, and
data.
[Outcome Goal 1.2.2:]{.underline} By 2012, benchmark the assimilation of
5 specific types of predictions resulting from Earth Science Model
Framework (ESMF) of 22 NASA Earth system science models.
[Goal 5ESA6 -- Crosscutting Solutions:]{.underline} Benchmark solutions
associated with at least 5 decision support systems that assimilate
predictions from Earth system science models developed and maintained by
the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), the Geophysical Fluid
Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), NCEP, SPoRT, and the JPL Earth Science
laboratories. The Disaster Management Program currently has linkages
with NASA DEVELOP, SYNERGY, and Cross Cutting Solutions activities. NASA
research laboratories, such as the SPoRT Center, are moving Earth
science research results forward through direct connection with such
operational entities as NOAA. The Disaster Management Program also works
closely with the USGS in assimilating research results in the solid
Earth science areas for the benefit of the user agencies, such as
DHS/FEMA.
By 2008, the Disaster Management Program will benchmark solutions to one
of the five 5ESA6 decision support systems: HAZUS-MH. The HAZUS-MH
decision support system has such flexibility and modularity that it
covers at least three of the Earth science research areas -- flood,
wind, and earthquake -- and may cover wildfire in the future. These
areas have been identified by partners DHS, FEMA, USGS, and NOAA as
important areas that can be addressed by Earth systems science.
The value of applications in these areas have also been identified in
the OSTP Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction policy documents as well as
in the strategic plans of the partner agencies.
# VIII: Disaster Management Roadmap
The Disaster Management Roadmap shows the migration of NASA Earth
science research results to improvements in risk assessments and loss
estimation of the HAZUS Multi-Hazard DST. The Roadmap ties to the
priorities and expected plans and results of the ESE Science Division.
State 1 is the ability to use HAZUS-MH for earthquake preparedness and
mitigation. State 2 takes HAZUS-MH to the level of wind, flood, severe
storms, and wildfire -- areas where NASA's Earth science research
results can be applied effectively. The modularity of HAZUS-MH makes the
integration of satellite observations and models useful, but the
challenge is the integration of global technologies to regional and
local scales.
Earth science research plays a valuable role in ensuring that NASA's
Earth science results meet the needs of our partner agencies by
integrating technology and science into the hazard response community in
a cost-effective and useful manner.
{width="6.5in" height="4.875in"}
# IX: FY04/05/06/07/08 Budget and Resource Expectations
### Disaster Management Program Element Funding FY04-FY08
## SENH NRA2002 (FY2004-2005) Budget Breakdown
------------------- ------------------------ --------------- ---------------
**PI** **HazClass** **FY2004** **FY2005**
Brackenridge flood 67,332 70,027
Fielding subsidence 124,980 72,175
Johnson multihazard 159,418 161,044
Arsenault flood/drought 146,427 149,701
Sohlberg wildfire 227,512 224,690
Kasischke coastal 135,382 141,226
Bourgeau-Cha wildfire 226,608 226,605
Kim flood/wildfire 213,101 223,733
Bock seismic 217,784 160,132
**TOTAL** **1,518,544** **1,429,333**
------------------- ------------------------ --------------- ---------------
## Congressionally Mandated Projects
----------------- ---------------------- --------------- ---------------
**PI** **Institution** **Topic** **FY2003 (K)**
Dixon U. of Miami Tropical and 1,800
Solid Earth
Vodocek RIT Wildfires 1,200
**TOTAL** 3,000
----------------- ---------------------- --------------- ---------------
**NASA Earth Science Enterprise -- Earth Science Applications Program**
*Earth Science for Disaster Management*
This document contains the Disaster Management Program Plan for
FY2004-2008. This plan derives direction established in the NASA
Strategic Plan, ESE Strategy, Earth Science Applications Plan, Earth
Science Applications Program Plan, and OMB/OSTP guidance on research and
development. The plan aligns with and serves the commitments established
in the NASA Integrated Budget and Performance Document.
The Program Manager and the Earth Science Applications Program
Leadership have reviewed the plan and agree that the plan appropriately
reflects the goals, objectives, and activities for the Program Element
to serve the Earth Science Applications Program, ESE, NASA, the
Administration, and Society.
Stephen Ambrose Date
Program Manager, Disaster Management
Earth Science Applications Program
NASA Earth Science Enterprise
Lawrence Friedl Date
Lead, Earth Science Applications
Earth Science Applications Program
NASA Earth Science Enterprise
Ronald J. Birk Date
Director, Earth Science Applications Division
NASA Earth Science Enterprise
| en |
markdown | 514189 | # Presentation: 514189
## Tabletop probes for TeV physics: the search for electric dipole moments
- EDMs and new physics
- how to detect an EDM
- electron EDM in atoms & molecules
- the state of the art electron EDM search
- the next generation
- our approach: PbO*
- D. DeMille
*Yale University*
*Physics Department*
- Funding: NSF, Packard, CRDF, NIST, Sloan, Research Corp.
**Review:**
- Fortson, Sandars, & Barr
- Physics Today June 2003
**Notes:**
Get more complete chart of EDM predictions from Yong
Get better group picture
## An EDM Violates P and T
- CPT theorem T-violation = CP-violation
- Purcell
- Ramsey
- Landau
## T-violation: a window to new physics
- • CP-violation observed in K- and B-mesons
- T is _***NOT***_ conserved in nature
- K-, B-meson observations consistent with
- SM/CKM description including O(1) phase
- _***but also***_ consistent w/models containing
- new sources of T-violation
- • CP-violation in SM is minimal:
- SM extensions typically include _***NEW***_ sources of T-violation
- • Observed baryon asymmetry in universe
- _***REQUIRES***_ new sources of T-violation
## Virtual exotic particles can generate EDMs
- e
- = E-field
*X*
- (new heavy particle)
*f’**e**i***
*f*
- Dimensionless
- coupling
- constant
- T-violating
- phase
- “natural” assumptions
*ff’*/ħc
- sin(**) ~ 1
*m**X** * ~ 100 GeV
-
- typical e-*EDM~*
*d**e**~****B *
*(****/***)N (me/mX)2 sin()
*d**e** **100-1× *
- current limit!
- (1 vs. 2 loops)
## Electron EDM in various SM extensions
**not renormalizable ******** loop diagrams**
**Experimental limit:**
**|d****e****| < 1.6********10****-27**** e********cm**
| Physics model | |de| |
| --- | --- |
| Standard Model | ~10-41 e·cm |
| Left-right symmetric | 10-26-10-28 e·cm |
| Lepton flavor-changing | 10-26-10-29 e·cm |
| Multi-Higgs | 10-27-10-28 e·cm |
| Technicolor | 10-27-10-29 e·cm |
| Supersymmetry | < 10-25 e·cm |
- B. Regan, E. Commins, C. Schmidt,
- D. DeMille, PRL **88**, 071805 (2002)
*Models assume*
*new physics at ~100 GeV*
*& CP-violating phases ~1*
## Searching for SUSY w/ the electron EDM
- Implications of current and ongoing electron EDM searches
## Current status of ALL EDM searches
| | n (ILL,PNPI) | Hg (Seattle) | Tl (Berkeley) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EDM | <710-26 | <210-28 | <110-24 |
| dn | 710-26 | 210-25 | |
| de | | 1510-27 | 1.610-27 |
| QCD | 410-10 | 210-10 | |
| q/l, SUSY | 110-2 | 210-3 | 110-2 |
| xq/l, LR
| 110-2 | 110-3 | 310-2 |
| Higgs | 3/tan | 0.4/tan | 0.3/tan |
*Current status of ALL EDM searches*
- Best limits on “natural” parameters from 3 complementary experiments:
## General method to detect an EDM
- Energy level picture:
- Figure of merit for
- statistical sensitivity:
## E-field on an electron? (part I)
*E-field on an electron? (part I)*
- electric forces can be cancelled by _***magnetic***_ forces:** **
- <**F**tot> = <**F**el + **F**mag> = 0, <**E**eff> = -<**F**mag>/e
- magnetic forces
- arise from
- spin-orbit interaction:
## E-field on an electron? (part II)
- simple estimate: |<**E**eff>| Z32 (e/a02) P
- ~ P 1011 V/cm @ Z~80!
- polarization P required to unbalance
- vector average of **F***mag* (external **E** necessary!)
- <**E**int> = 0
- Sandars
## Tl EDM schematic
- State of the art
- electron EDM search:the Berkeley
- Tl beam experiment
- Thermal beam of
- atomic Tl (Z=81)
- Efficient laser/rf spin
- polarization & detection
- count rate ~ 109/s
- E =120 kV/cm (P ~10-3)
- Eint = 70MV/cm
- L=100 cm T3 ms
- Counterpropagating
- vertical beams to cancel
- systematic effects from
- **B**motional = **E ** **v**/c
- (*but:* complex procedure
- to null residuals)
- B-field noise rejection with side-by-side regions
- Na atoms
- (low Z, small enhancement)
- as “co-magnetometer”
- to check systematics
- (*but:* little utility in practice)
**New electron EDM limit:**
- B. Regan, E. Commins, C. Schmidt, D. DeMille
- Phys. Rev. Lett. **88**, 071805 (2002)
**|d****e****| < 1.6********10****-27**** e********cm (90% c.l.)**
## Systematic effects: B correlated with E (part 1)
- Example 1:
- leakage current **I** **E** **B**E **E**
- electron
- magnetic
- moment
- e 1016 de!
- Very small
- values
- BE ~ 10-11 G significant
- |**B**tot|
- = |**B**0 + **B**E|
- changes
- on reversal of **E**
**B**0
**B**E
**E**
## Systematic effects: B correlated with E (part 2)
- y = v(x)E(z)
- E(z)
- misaligned B0
- Btotal (+E)
- Btotal (-E)
- Bmot (+E)
- Bmot (-E)
- If **B**0** **and **E** are not exactly parallel,
- |**B**tot| = |**B**0 + **B**mot| changes on reversal of **E**:
_**Solution:**_** **avg. over counterpropagating beams residuals are product of two imperfections (i.e., one v-mismatch one wrong B-component)
- Example 2: motional magnetic field **B**mot = **E****v**/c
## A new generation of electron EDM searches
| Group | System | Advantages | Projected gain |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| D. Weiss (Penn St.) | Trapped Cs | Long coherence | ~100 |
| D. Heinzen (Texas) | Trapped Cs | Long coherence | ~100 |
| H. Gould (LBL) | Cs fountain | Long coherence | ? |
| L. Hunter (Amherst) | GdIG | Huge S/N | 100? |
| S. Lamoreaux (LANL) | GGG | Huge S/N | 100?-100,000? |
| E. Hinds (Imperial) | YbF beam | Internal E-field | 2-? |
| D. DeMille (Yale) | PbO* cell | Internal E-field | 100-10,000? |
| E. Cornell (JILA) | trapped HBr+ | Int. E + long T | ?? |
| N. Shafer-Ray (Okla.) | trapped PbF | Int. E + long T | ?? |
## Electron EDM with cold trapped atoms
- Linear Photodiode
- Array
- 10 cm
*Electron EDM with cold trapped atoms*
- and guide beams
- Atoms loaded from below
- David Weiss *et al. *(& similar D. Heinzen *et al. *)
- Coherence time:
- Atom number:
- Cs (Z=55) EDM
- plus Rb(Z=37) comagnetometer
- x100 for Cs Eint
- de ~ 10-29 ecm
- for both Cs and Rb
- in ~1 day
## Solid state electron EDM searches
- Shapiro
- Lamoreaux
- DeMille
## A new direction in EDM searches: using molecules to search for de
**** ***Extremely*** large effective E-field
- with lab-size external field:
**P ****~ 1 ******** E****eff**** ~ 10****11**** V/cm **
- (For atoms, P ~ 10-3 @ Eext ~ 100kV/cm)
**** Smaller signals due to
- thermal distribution over rotational levels (~10-4)
**** Molecules with unpaired electron spins are thermodynamically disfavored
- high temperature chemistry, even smaller signals
## Addressing some problems with molecules: the metastable a(1)[3+] state of PbO
- PbO is thermodynamically stable
- (routinely purchased and vaporized)
- a(1) populated via laser excitation** **(replaces chemistry)
** **
- a(1) has very small -doublet splitting
****** **complete polarization with very small fields (>10 V/cm),
- equivalent to E 107 V/cm on an atom!
** **
****** ****can work in vapor cell**
- (***MUCH*** larger density and volume than beam)
**PbO Cell:**** **** **** **** Tl Beam:**
- N = nV ~ 1016 N = nV ~ 108
## Amplifying the electric field E with a polar molecule
**E****int**
**Pb****+**
**O****–**
- Eext
**Complete molecular polarization **
**of PbO* **
**achieved at **
**E****ext**** ~ 10 V/cm**
**Explicit calculations indicate valence electron feels **
**E****int ****~ ********2****Z****3**** e/a****0****2**** ~ 1.8 - 4.0 ******** 10****10**** V/cm**
- semiempirical: M. Kozlov & D.DeMille, PRL **89**, 133001 (2002);
*ab initio*: T. Isaev *et al.*, PRA **69**, 030501 (2004); A. Titov, priv. comm.
## Populating the a(1) [3+] state of PbO
- Laser pulse
- ~ 571 nm
- bandwidth ~
- 1 GHz ~ Doppler
## An aside: what’s an -doublet?
-
- Non-rotating molecule
- has internal
- tensor Stark shift
## Spin alignment & molecular polarization in PbO (no EDM)
## EDM measurement in PbO*: New mechanisms for suppressing systematics!
* **Most systematics *
* **cancel in *
* **comparison!*
## The cruel reality of precision measurements (c.f. S. Freedman)
****
**Farmer ****::**** Pig ****::**** Truffle**** **
**Theorist ****:: ****Experimentalist ****:: ****Fact**
## PbO vapor cell and oven
**Sapphire **
**windows**
**bonded to ceramic frame with **
**gold foil “glue”**
**quartz oven body**
**800 C capability**
**wide optical access**
**w/non-inductive heater **
**for fast turn-off**
**Gold foil electrodes and “feedthroughs”**
## Present Experimental Setup
- Pulsed Laser Beam
- 5-40 mJ @ 100 Hz
- ~ 1 GHz
**** **B**
- Larmor
- Precession
- ~ 100 kHz
- Photo-
- multiplier tube
**B**
- solid quartz
- light
- pipes
- Data
- Processing
- Vacuum
- chamber
**E**
## The PbO EDM lab
- .001 km
## Zeeman quantum beats in PbO
*Zeeman quantum beats in PbO*
- Excellent fit to Monte Carlo w/PbO motion, known lifetime
- Shot-noise limited S/N in frequency extraction
## RF electric resonance in PbO
- Zeeman splitting ~ 450 kHz
- Zeeman splitting slightly different in lower level
- ~11 MHz RF E-field
- drives transitions
- ~1.6 ppt shift
- in Zeeman
- beat freq.
- g/g =
- 1.6(4) 10-3
*** ****-doublet will be near-ideal *
*co-magnetometer*
- Also:
- = 11.214(5) MHz;
- observed low-field
- DC Stark shift
## Current status: a proof of principle
- PbO vapor cell technology in place
- Collisional cross-sections as expected anticipated density OK
- Signal sizes large, consistent with expectation;
- straightforward improvements will reach target count rate: 1011/s.
- Shot-noise limited frequency measurement
- using quantum beats in fluorescence
- g-factors of -doublet states match precisely
- co-magnetometer will be very effective
- E-fields of required size applied in cell; no apparent problems
****** *****First EDM data in fall 2004;***
*******d******e***** ~ 10****-29**** *****e************cm within ~2 years***
- [D. Kawall *et al.,* PRL **92**, 133007 (2004)]
## The PbO EDM group
_*Postdocs:*_
**David Kawall**
**Val Prasad**
_*Grad students:*_
- Frederik Bay
**Sarah Bickman**
**Yong Jiang**
**Jonathan Jerke**
_*Undergrads:*_
- Cliff Cheung
**Yulia Gurevich**
_*Visitors:*_
**Rich Paolino (USCGA)** | en |
converted_docs | 536671 | > U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
>
> DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
>
> TARGET AMERICA:
>
> TRAFFICKERS, TERRORISTS & YOUR KIDS
>
> A NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NARCO-TERRORISM
>
> Hosted by the DEA Museum & Visitors Center
>
> Tuesday, December, 4, 2001
>
> 10:04 a.m.
>
> DEA Headquarters
>
> 700 Army Navy Drive
>
> Arlington, Virginia
>
> P R O G R A M
>
> PAGE
>
> **Welcoming Remarks**
>
> William Alden, President, AFFNA DEA Museum
>
> Museum 3
>
> Asa Hutchinson, DEA Administrator 5
>
> **General Remarks**
>
> Congressman Mark Souder 9
>
> **Opening Remarks**
>
> Moderator: Mr. Robert Novak 20
>
> **Panelist Remarks**
>
> Mr. Raphael Perl, Policy Analyst,
>
> Congressional Research Service 23
>
> Mr. Steven Casteel, Assistant
>
> Administrator for Intelligence, DEA 32
>
> Mr. Larry Johnson, Principal,
>
> Berg Associates, LLC 44
>
> General Jose Rosso Serrano, Retired,
>
> Colombian National Police 53
>
> Mr. Stephen Pasierb, President,
>
> Partnership for a Drug-Free America 62
>
> Mr. Brian Dyak, President, Entertainment
>
> Industries Council 75
>
> **Opening Questions & Discussion with**
>
> **Panelists** 85
>
> **Questions & Discussion with Audience**
>
> **Members** 98
>
> **Conclusion and Future Plans**
>
> Peter Bensinger, Former DEA Administrator 120
>
> [P]{.underline} [R]{.underline} [O]{.underline} [C]{.underline}
> [E]{.underline} [E]{.underline} [D]{.underline} [I]{.underline}
> [N]{.underline} [G]{.underline} [S]{.underline}
>
> MR. ALDEN: Good morning. My name is Bill Alden, and I\'m president of
> the AFFNA DEA Museum Foundation, and along with Administrator
> Hutchinson, pleased to be your host for today\'s symposium.
>
> First of all, I\'d like to explain for those of you who are unfamiliar
> with AFFNA, what AFFNA, the DEA AFFNA Museum is. AFFNA is an acronym
> for the Association of Former Federal Narcotic Agents, and the
> foundation is a nonprofit foundation whose mission is to educate the
> American public on the history of drugs, drug abuse, and drug law
> enforcement in the United States in partnership with the Drug
> Enforcement Administration.
>
> The foundation works to support the efforts of the DEA Museum and
> Visitors Center through fund-raising, advocacy, and outreach, exhibit
> sponsorship, and educational program development like today\'s
> symposium that we\'re having here at DEA headquarters.
>
> The board members for the foundation came from various places around
> the country and, with the exception of one member who is currently in
> the air right now, are all here for today\'s symposium. I\'d like the
> board members who are seated in the second row to please stand up and
> be recognized.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. ALDEN: Thank you. It is through the work of the various board
> members that were just recognized that we\'re able to sponsor this
> today.
>
> And now it\'s my pleasure to introduce the administrator of the Drug
> Enforcement Administration. Asa Hutchinson was confirmed as the
> administrator of DEA on August 8th, 2001. While he was serving his
> third term in the U.S. Congress, he was asked by the president to
> serve as the administrator of DEA. Something unique happened after
> that. He, in a bipartisan vote by the U.S. Senate, it was a vote of 98
> to 1, which is kind of unusual for this U.S. Senate. But prior to
> that, prior to coming to Washington, Mr. Hutchinson was an attorney
> practicing law in Arkansas, in rural Arkansas for 21 years. During
> that period of time he also served as the U.S. attorney for the
> Western District of Arkansas under President Reagan. He was also where
> the rubber meets the road. He tried over 100 jury trials while he
> served as a lawyer and U.S. attorney in Arkansas.
>
> In Washington, while he was in the U.S. Congress, he also served on
> the Speaker\'s Drug Task Force for a Drug-Free America, which also
> helped pave his way for the position at DEA.
>
> It is my pleasure, then, to introduce Mr. Asa Hutchinson.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> ADMINISTRATOR HUTCHINSON: Thank you, Bill. I\'ll say this for Bob
> Novak, I want to express appreciation to the AFFNA Foundation for
> their idea and for their support of the DEA. I particularly want to
> also thank the board of directors of the museum. I think they have
> done a terrific job. I appreciate the support and the encouragement
> for this particular symposium.
>
> This is a great opportunity for us to focus our country on the
> extraordinary connection between drugs and terrorism. When President
> Bush asked me to head up the DEA about 3 months ago, after I was
> confirmed, I did not anticipate that the events of September 11, of
> course, would even occur, but how it would significantly change the
> viewpoint of America and the attitude of our country toward drugs and
> how it would shape America\'s view of our nation\'s fight against
> drugs.
>
> History tells us that in times of national emergency, our country has
> a way of clarifying our national values. The fuzziness has a way of
> going away. Things are more clear. Responsibility is emphasized. And,
> clearly, September 11 was a national emergency that has had a way of
> clarifying the values of our country, what is really important, what
> really is wrong and what really is right.
>
> And if you look back in World War II, during other times of national
> emergency, we had the lowest level of drug use in our nation\'s
> history. And so I hope that we will be entering a phase in our nation
> that moral values are emphasized, responsibility is emphasized and
> that we, as an agency, the DEA can take advantage of that opportunity.
> Law enforcement has understood the connection between drugs, and
> terrorism, and violence for many, many years, but now there is a
> growing public awareness of that.
>
> Just yesterday I saw Congresswoman Sue Kelly, who was telling me that
> she spoke in a school in which the principal was talking about how
> drug use had actually gone down in the school, and he believed that it
> was because the students understood that they not only do something
> illegal and something that is harmful, but something that also helps
> those people that would do violence in our society, and they don\'t
> want to be a part of that. And so I am grateful for that kind of
> leadership.
>
> I am particularly grateful for the leadership of one member who is
> with us today, Congressman Mark Souder of Indiana, who is a member of
> Congress, who I got to know, who preceded me in Congress, and I knew
> him immediately as someone who provided leadership, who knew his
> values,a need his responsibility, an dhe spoke very clearly and with
> great articulation about the values that are very important in our
> fight against drugs.
>
> I happened to follow him as he spoke to a meeting of National Guard
> folks, and I\'ve never heard a clear articulation of the necessity of
> our fight against drugs, what it means to our nation\'s future and
> what he stated that day.
>
> For those reasons, among others, Congressman Mark Souder has been
> appointed by Speaker Hastert to head up the Speaker\'s Task Force for
> a Drug-Free America. In that capacity, he has traveled to other
> countries. He is very familiar with the issues. He has just returned
> from Europe. He has certainly been a leader in the Congress and even
> internationally on our fight against drugs. So I am delighted that he
> can join us today.
>
> Please join me in welcoming Congressman Mark Souder for his remarks.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. SOUDER: Well, it\'s a great privilege to be here this morning, and
> I am excited to have my friend as DEA administrator, and I\'m sure
> he\'ll do a great job, as he did in Congress.
>
> And as he mentioned, this issue of the interrelationship between
> terrorism and drugs is not new; as we\'ve worked on our Oversight
> Committee since the Republicans took over Congress in \'94, in looking
> at these different links under Bill Zellif, under our now-Speaker
> Denny Hastert, under John Mica, and now on the Oversight Committee
> that I chair. We were over at Khobar Towers. We had Larry Johnson in
> numerous times to talk and look at the interrelationships, as we saw
> how terrorists work in Colombia and other places around the world, and
> the Middle East and how it related to the drug trade.
>
> I wanted to share a few opening comments that I am sure you will hear
> multiple elaborations on as we go through the panel discussions.
>
> First, one of the misconceptions that we get in Congress and elsewhere
> is that we\'re somehow going to eliminate certain social problems.
> It\'s not a question of whether we\'re going to eliminate drug use,
> eliminate terrorism, any more than it\'s a question whether we\'re
> going to eliminate spouse abuse, eliminate child abuse, eliminate
> rape.
>
> What you do is you try to minimize, reduce, and then contain, and
> that\'s really where our focus has to be. Because if we set
> unrealistic goals, we will not achieve them, and people will say these
> battles have failed, when they haven\'t, in fact, failed, because I
> believe that the root problem is evil and sin, and no government,
> through any regulation, will ever eliminate sin. Therefore, what you
> do is you try to manage and contain.
>
> Now, when we go through, another variable that we in Congress do is we
> have different crises, and then we declare war. We have a war on
> poverty, we have a war on illiteracy, we have a war on drugs, a war on
> terrorism, a war on juvenile delinquency, a war on teen pregnancy.
> It\'s important\--and since governments have done this in all
> different forms for thousands of years, it\'s unlikely to
> change\--that you do that. Because when a certain problem reaches a
> higher level, you dominate resources in that area, you concentrate the
> resources, and you try to address it, and everything else kind of
> shapes around it. And right now the American focus is on terrorism. It
> doesn\'t mean the other problems disappear, but you look for links.
>
> Thirdly, many people who have worked with this at a high school level
> understand the basic link, and that is when someone does an illegal
> activity, such as a teenager smoking, then they\'re more likely to
> move to drinking, then they\'re more likely to move to marijuana, then
> they\'re more likely to move to cocaine and heroin, then they\'re more
> likely to rob to fund a habit, they\'re more likely then to create a
> violent crime.
>
> Now does that mean that the first puff of a cigarette means you\'re
> going to get the death penalty later on for a violent crime?
> Obviously, not. Not everybody who goes along this chain goes all the
> way through. But you don\'t get to the end of the chain most likely,
> unless you started with an illegal activity at the beginning, and when
> you do one illegal activity, you associate with people who do illegal
> activities and are more likely to get caught up in that.
>
> We also know some direct links where we see the links between
> terrorism and narcotics. Clearly, the Taliban, as well as our enemy,
> the Taliban, as well as our\--I wouldn\'t necessarily call the
> Northern Alliance our friends, but our nonenemies, that control drug
> trade. The Taliban, in particular, since they get funding from the
> drug trade and then they fund, directly or indirectly, al Qaeda, means
> that al Qaeda, who did the 9/11 attack, got their money indirectly
> through the heroin trade, at a minimum, through the Taliban, and that
> means that our terrorism attacks in the United States on September
> 11th were funded, in one way or another, through the drug trade.
> That\'s a direct tie.
>
> We\'ve seen in Colombia, and I\'m sure General Serrano, my long-time
> friend, as he\'s battled there, we met one of the former members of
> the FARC who\--a couple of us were waiting for he and now-Speaker
> Hastert to come on another helicopter\--got to talk with a defector
> from the FARc, and he said his job was to get the fee that they charge
> from the coca people. We asked if he had ever killed anybody, and he
> said yes.
>
> And we said, well, how did you\--
>
> He said, well, the man didn\'t pay what he owed, he said, so I killed
> him.
>
> Well, what do you mean he didn\'t pay what he owed?
>
> He said, well, I warned him three times, and he was supposed to pay us
> 10 percent to help finance our efforts, and he didn\'t.
>
> We said, well, how did you kill him?
>
> He said, well, I went up, he was having lunch in a restaurant, I went
> up behind him, and I shot him. He said, but he didn\'t pay his bill.
>
> Now we\'ve seen the connection, as the FARC does terrorism, that when
> they provide protection and increasingly delivering, that we see the
> funding of the terrorist activities in Colombia.
>
> Now we potentially are going to see, much like I had mentioned, if a
> student does illegal activity and illegal smoking as a teenager at
> school, then he is likely to do illegal alcohol, and if he starts to
> do that, he\'s going to be exposed to other illegal activities. Our
> big concern in this area is we\'re going to see the interconnectedness
> of international terrorist organizations. The IRA maybe is starting to
> connect with the FARC, the Russian mafia is starting to connect. How
> are organizations like HAMAS and Hezbollah\--because one of the things
> I remember in talking with a duma member in Russia and some of their
> businessmen, I asked, why do you sell your weapons to our enemies,
> whether it be Libya or Iraq?
>
> And they said, well, who else is going to buy Russian weapons?
>
> That\'s part of the problem. As we start to do better tracking of
> money, as we crack down on illegal laundering through charitable
> fronts, the money is going to tend to have to go to illegal activities
> to fund terrorist organizations, and the tendency is for those
> terrorist organizations to interconnect around the world.
>
> Lastly, I want to talk about how the drug war and the war on terrorism
> interconnect in some of the things that we\'re seeing. We\'re doing a
> series of border hearings next Monday. It\'ll be in Seattle-Vancouver.
> I was just up with the Canadian Parliament. We did one on the Vermont
> border and the New York border looking at how these things
> interconnect. And, clearly, when you control and look for terrorism,
> you\'re going to be doing a lot of the things you look for and other
> illegal activities.
>
> At Gander, Newfoundland, when they grounded 8,000 people, what they
> found, as they were looking for weapons, was lots of Ecstacy. But when
> we weren\'t doing the bag searches on all bags, we wouldn\'t have
> found the Ecstacy. We\'re going to find the funding patterns for the
> narcotics also as we look for terrorists. We\'re going to see this as
> we look for high-risk immigrants. We\'re going to see overlaps. We\'re
> going to see this as we get organization laws.
>
> In the Netherlands, where they don\'t even give you a penalty if you
> try to escape from prison because it\'s viewed as natural that you
> would want to escape from prison, they don\'t have an organizational
> law where we can turn a criminal inside to find the tracking. As we
> work with them, as we work with Spain on an extradition law, hey,
> doesn\'t this sound strange? We battle with Colombia on extradition,
> we battle with Mexico on extradition, now we\'re battling with Spain
> on extradition. We\'re going to see similarities as we tackle the war
> on terrorism to what we\'ve seen in the war on drugs.
>
> I\'d like to conclude with this. Seventeen thousand Americans died in
> 1988 of drug problems. What we have to realize is that we can\'t back
> off of one effort to address another, that we are under chemical
> attack. We worry about anthrax. As Congressman Cummings, the ranking
> Democrat on our subcommittee said, we\'re already under chemical
> attack. It\'s cocaine and heroin, and we had 17,000 deaths on that and
> other overdoses, and we shouldn\'t back off on one to address the
> other.
>
> Seventy to eighty percent of all crime in the United States is related
> to drug and alcohol abuse. Last night, when I was at Drug-Free Noble
> County, one of the judges came up to me and says, it\'s not just all
> criminal activity. He said 80 percent of cases in civil court are
> related to alcohol and drug abuse, bankruptcy, divorce. He said people
> who don\'t pay their bills or their child support, because of their
> drug habits, they aren\'t meeting their financial goals either. And we
> cannot back off of one war, as we address the other, and we\'re
> increasingly going to see the interconnectedness.
>
> It\'s been a great honor to be here this morning. I look forward to
> hearing the panelists.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> ADMINISTRATOR HUTCHINSON: Thank you, Congressman Souder.
>
> Before we move to the panelists, I did want to recognize some of the
> distinguished guests that we have here. I am delighted that we have
> former administrators of the DEA, Peter Bensinger, and former
> Administrator Donny Marshall with us. We appreciate their
> participation.
>
> We have representatives from the embassies of Thailand, Panama,
> Canada, Mexico, and Great Britain, and I am sure that we have others
> as well that have not been brought to my attention. We have our U.S.
> military counterparts, State Department representatives, Partnership
> for a Drug-Free America officials, representatives from the Office of
> National Drug Control Policy, staff members from the House of
> Representatives, and we also have CIA officials who have joined us for
> this particular occasion.
>
> As Congressman Souder indicated, we have a huge challenge ahead, and
> one of the important parts of it is that, first of all, we share
> intelligence that Congress has directed us to, that we follow the
> money and see where it leads, and then, finally, that we educate the
> public on what is going on. And that is where this symposium plays an
> important role.
>
> We must express the many ways terrorists use drug trafficking against
> us. The DEA and our museum foundation are launching an effort to build
> a first-class museum exhibit about narco-terrorism. As we move into
> the panel, I wanted to take this opportunity to introduce Mr. Robert
> Novak, who has been a great friend of the DEA. He joined us for a
> panel discussion during our 25th anniversary celebration a few years
> ago. During the course of his career, Mr. Novak has covered national
> politics and international events and has interviewed scores of world
> leaders. We are honored to have him moderate today\'s symposium.
>
> Mr. Novak is a commentator for CNN, where he co-hosts the \"Evans, and
> Novak, Hunt, & Shields\" interview program. He appears on and serves
> as co-executive producer of CNN\'s political roundtable \"Capital
> Gang,\" regularly co-hosts \"Crossfire,\" and appears occasionally on
> \"Meet the Press.\"
>
> Mr. Novak also writes \"Inside Report,\" one of the longest-running
> syndicated columns of the nation. He is an author of several widely
> acclaimed books, including his most recent, \"Completing the
> Revolution: A Vision for Victory in 2000.\"
>
> Following service in the United States Army as a lieutenant during the
> Korean War, Mr. Novak worked as a reporter for Associated Press and
> later for the Wall Street Journal. He received his B.A. degree from
> the University of Illinois.
>
> Among many honors and awards, Mr. Novak is a 2001 winner of the
> National Press Club\'s \"Fourth Estate\" award for lifetime
> achievement in journalism.
>
> Please join me in welcoming Mr. Robert Novak and thank him for his
> participation.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. The good news is that I
> am not here as a talking head. I am a moderator and facilitator. That
> was the role I performed I think 3 years ago when one of the questions
> was, is the war against drugs continuing? And the answer, by a panel
> of former DEA directors, was that the war against drugs had never
> started, and I haven\'t seen it start in the last few years either.
>
> What makes this remarkable is that we have a war, a full-fledged war
> against terrorism. And from my\--I am not an expert\--but from my
> reporting, I don\'t think you can separate the narco and the
> terrorism. I think it\'s one word \"narco-terrorism.\" It\'s illegal
> drugs finance terrorism all over the world, and Congressman Souder
> alluded to an unpleasant truth, as he often does, that our new best
> friends who are winning the ground war, helping us to win the ground
> war in Afghanistan, are deeper into the opium trade than the Taliban
> was.
>
> So I really think it has been disappointing that the narco
> effect/aspect of the war on terrorism has been down-played or
> neglected, and I hope that will change soon.
>
> This is going to be an interesting couple of hours because we have a
> cast of thousands of experts here. We have a large major panel, and
> then we have shadow panelists who, oddly, look to me very unethereal.
> They don\'t seem so shadowy to me, but they will be brought in, in due
> time.
>
> Our first phase, however, is I\'m going to introduce each of the major
> panelists, and as I introduce them, they will give a brief 5- to
> 7-minute presentation. I would hope that each is closer to 5 than the
> 7 minutes, and then maybe I\'ll ask each a question, and then when we
> finish that, we will go into a general question period, also bringing
> in the shadow panelists and the audience as a whole.
>
> For a global outlook and the history of the war against illegal
> narcotics, we\'re going to start with Raphael Francis Perl. Mr. Perl
> is the senior policy analyst for international terrorism and narcotics
> issue with the Congressional Research Service of the Library of
> Congress. He has a long background as a writer and expert, and he
> speaks regularly at academic institutions and government police
> functions and has testified before Congress on terrorism, narcotics
> and crime issues.
>
> Mr. Raphael Perl?
>
> MR. PERL: Thank you, Bob.
>
> The links between drug trafficking and terrorist organizations are
> well documented. Recent history confirms that in areas where
> government control of territory is weak, both terrorist and
> drug-trafficking organizations have often thrived. In the past, when
> one looked at areas or nations such as Lebanon, the Balkans, Chechnya,
> Colombia, Peru, Burma, Afghanistan, what organizations or groups have
> stood out? Groups such as the FARC, the ELN, Sendero Luminoso, The
> Kosovo Liberation Army, and Chechen radical groups. Analysts threw our
> attention to Hezbollah and the Bekaa Valley, and more recently
> attention focuses on the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan.
>
> It is well established that in such areas beyond the reach of
> government control and beyond the rule of law, the criminal world, the
> drug-trafficking world, and the terrorist world merge. The line
> between them is becoming increasingly difficult to draw.
>
> Historically, we\'ve also seen in many instances strong connections
> between states that sponsor terrorist activity and those that support
> or condone drug-trafficking activity. It is noteworthy that at least
> four of the seven states on the State Department\'s Sponsors of
> Terrorism list have had at least some history of supporting or
> condoning drug-trafficking activity: Syria, Iran, North Korea and
> Cuba.
>
> If links between drug trafficking and terrorist organizations, the
> so-called \"guns for drugs connection,\" are well established and not
> new, then what are we seeing here today that is new? And I would
> suggest there are basically three phenomenon that have changed.
>
> First of all, what is new is that in today\'s increasingly deregulated
> and interconnected global economy, both legitimate and illegitimate
> activities are expanding in scale, scope, and reach. And the ability
> of illegitimate activities, such as terrorism and drug trafficking, to
> harm the population of the United States and to do damage to important
> United States interests is dramatically expanding as well.
>
> Second, what is also new is that income from the drug trade has become
> increasingly important to terrorist organizations. Terrorist
> organizations need money to operate. But in today\'s globally
> interconnected world economy, state-sponsors are increasingly
> difficult to find. What world leader today in their right mind will
> risk global sanctions by openly sponsoring al Qaeda or funding them?
> Similarly, what state today exists that will risk global sanctions by
> openly funding the FARC in Colombia? Increasingly, terrorist
> organizations must fund themselves, and the illicit drug trade serves
> as an attractive and highly lucrative source of income for them.
>
> And, number three, finally, what is new is the enhanced threat level
> that the combined forces of drug trafficking and terrorism pose to
> U.S. interests, to U.S. stability, to U.S. national security, to our
> future and to our youth.
>
> We always thought of the United States homeland being the prime target
> or a prime target for drug-trafficking activity, but when we thought
> of the targets of international terrorist incidents, we usually
> thought of them as being overseas. The events of September 11th have
> clearly demonstrated the United States homeland is the desired target
> of preference, not only for international drug traffickers, but for
> many international terrorists as well.
>
> There is seemingly no escape once organizations or groups become
> involved in the drug trade. Traditionally, terrorists often had
> political goals which potentially might be achieved or might be
> subject to some form of negotiation for an end to violence. But in the
> case of drug organizations, the trade often becomes addictive to the
> people or the organization involved in the trade. And the danger to
> organizations such as al Qaeda, Hezbollah, or the FARC is that the
> trade becomes institutionalized and impossible to break away from.
>
> If we look back in time a decade or two, we see that links between
> drug trafficking and terrorist groups were recognized, but they were
> often treated as two distinct and separate phenomena. After all, the
> terrorists sought political power and the drug traffickers sought
> profit.
>
> Today, however, the law enforcement, the intelligence, and the
> national security analysts, while recognizing the difference, sees a
> lot more in common here. An analyst studying both drug trafficking and
> terrorism might well note that both terrorism and drug trafficking are
> classic examples of interdisciplinary issues. They cut across
> traditional federal agency jurisdictions and bureaucratic turf. Both
> operate globally and transnationally and benefit from trends
> associated with globalization and an open deregulated environment.
>
> Increasingly, we live in a multiethnic, globally interconnected,
> seamless world. In this world, both terrorists and drug traffickers
> try to merge into unsuspecting local ethnic communities to provide a
> cover for their illicit activities. Both terrorists and drug
> traffickers operate from base countries or regions not under strong
> government control. They seek weak states in which to develop and
> implement operations. Both exploit porous U.S. borders and seek
> loopholes in immigration controls. Generally, they seek to take
> advantage of our trusting and open society. Both rely heavily on
> technology to network and avoid detection. Examples include use of the
> Internet, use of encryption technology, use of satellite and cell
> phones, GPS technology, and surveillance and eavesdropping technology.
>
> Both types of organizations rely on the services of the underworld
> community. They need forged documents, they need safehouses, they need
> items like stolen cars, they need guns, and they need money laundered.
> Both bring violence to our cities. For both, violence is an instrument
> to an end. They both seek to undermine our rule of law. Both seek to
> create a climate of intimidation and fear in our society.
>
> As Congressman Souder mentioned, both are long-term, ongoing phenomena
> for which there are no quick fixes or all-decisive victories. Both
> indiscriminately target populations. For the determined drug
> trafficker, as for the determined terrorist, it is open season with
> the general population as fair game.
>
> Both terrorists and drug traffickers target youth, especially as a
> source of recruitment to their ranks. Moreover, the determined
> terrorist often seeks to demoralize and intimidate a society by
> launching attacks against school children and a variety of youth
> locales, such as clubs and amusement parks. In the case of
> drug-trafficking organizations, youth are targeted for recruitment
> into long-term addiction.
>
> Both terrorists and drug traffickers seek a world incompatible with
> democratic principles, with the types of values Congressman Souder
> talked about, with terrorists seeking to destroy Western democracies
> and the values they represent. Terrorist organizations seek to exploit
> and subordinate the individual to their rule and their ideology.
> Drug-trafficking organizations seek to exploit and enslave the
> individual with their drugs. In societies ruled by terrorists and in
> societies where drug addiction prevails, individuals are not free to
> act and develop their potential.
>
> We, in the United States, we are a caring, open and trusting people.
> We have opened our hearts, and we have opened our borders to the
> world, but increasingly, voices are being heard that the time has come
> to open our eyes to the extent the drug-trafficking and terrorist
> organizations combined pose a serious threat to our society.
>
> Thank you.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: Mr. Perl, President Bush has been articulate and inspiring
> in his call for a war against terrorism and has promised we will win
> the war against terrorism. Do you believe that when you win the war
> against terrorism, you automatically win the war against drugs?
>
> MR. PERL: The answer is no.
>
> MR. NOVAK: That\'s a good answer.
>
> MR. PERL: But to be more specific, I think we have more of a chance of
> winning the war of terrorism by winning the war against drugs because
> it\'s, to a large degree, drug funding today that funds the terrorist
> organizations, and the terrorist organizations cannot operate in
> today\'s world without funding.
>
> We kind of have a global country club in this interconnected world,
> where everybody needs to belong, and states will probably not openly
> support or fund terrorist organizations in this type of a world.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Okay. Our next panelist is Steven W. Casteel, who is
> assistant administrator for Intelligence, of the Drug Enforcement
> Administration.
>
> Mr. Casteel entered the federal service in 1972. That seems like a
> long time ago, but it was 15 years after I got to Washington. Mr.
> Casteel became a special agent that year with the U.S. Department of
> Justice, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, which, as we all
> know, was the forerunner of the DEA.
>
> In July of 1999, Mr. Casteel was named the DEA\'s assistant
> administrator for intelligence, supervising and setting policy for the
> DEA\'s intelligence program and its 700 intelligence analysts
> stationed worldwide.
>
> Steven Casteel?
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. CASTEEL: Thank you, Bob. It\'s always nice to begin a speech with
> someone that makes you feel younger, so I appreciate your comments
> there.
>
> I\'m a bit amazed, as I sit here and look around the room at this
> crowd and think about what we\'re here to talk about. Before the
> events of the 11th, the people would have never thought about these
> three subjects coming together: our kids, terrorism and drugs. But I
> hope after this symposium, that we are now looking at the world a bit
> differently, and we have the opportunity to use this as an advantage
> and to talk about this.
>
> Also, we have a lot of people in this room that have devoted a lot of
> their lives to law enforcement and pursuing these kinds of issues. And
> it is not amazing to us, but it must be to the public, that drugs just
> don\'t suddenly appear. They don\'t just fall out of the sky, and
> appear in your neighborhoods, and appear in your schools, and appear
> at parties down the street from your house. These drugs are produced,
> they\'re transported, and they\'re distributed by very violent
> organizations, and there\'s nothing new about that, but now maybe we
> can look at it a bit differently because now we\'ve linked it to that
> word \"terrorism,\" which has everybody\'s attention.
>
> Now DEA is not a terrorist organization or an antiterrorist
> organization I guess is a better way to say that\--
>
> \[Laughter.\]
>
> MR. CASTEEL: But because of what we do, we bump up against terrorism
> every day. Before the events of the 11th, if you had run the word
> \"terrorist\" in our database, you would have got over 1,200 hits. We
> weren\'t looking for terrorism, but there were 1,200 individuals-plus
> that we came across as part of this. You\'ve heard the speakers before
> talk about it. It\'s not the money, but it\'s the money. And I agree,
> state-sponsored terrorism is diminishing, maybe not as fast as we\'d
> like it to, but it\'s diminishing, and these organizations are looking
> for funding, and drugs bring them one thing\--quick return on their
> investment.
>
> They use gun trafficking, they use white slavery, they use a variety
> of different ways, but guns and drugs seem to be their two favorite,
> and drugs seem to be now becoming their almost number one way of
> approaching this.
>
> Now let the record be clear, a lot of people dance around this
> subject, but let\'s just set the record straight: The Taliban were a
> drug-trafficking group. They sought to be involved in the drug trade,
> they used it as a major source of funding for their control of the
> area, and that is clear as it can be. It is also clear that al Qaeda
> participated with the Taliban in these kind of activities and used
> money and influence out of these associations to get in a position, as
> you see today, of protection and hiding in Afghanistan.
>
> Now the Taliban, you wish they were running your 401(k) plan. In 1995,
> they took a country that was producing a decent amount of opium and
> rose it to 71 percent of the market share. Now the businessmen sitting
> in the audience and ladies would love to run a business that had 71
> percent of any market share.
>
> And by 1999, then you can say 71 percent of the illicit heroin in the
> world started in this region under their control. But then all of a
> sudden something happened. They came out. They said we\'re against
> this, in 1999, and people thought, oh, my golly, you know, they\'re
> really serious about this.
>
> It is our opinion, though, they did this as a business decision.
> Number one, they were looking for some good public relations, they
> were trying to get the world and global community to accept their
> government, and this is one way to do it.
>
> Second of all, as any good businessmen, they were trying to drive the
> price of their product up. And what you saw after that ban is the
> price of opium skyrocketing.
>
> And, thirdly, they were trying to consolidate their market share.
> That\'s clear. They wanted to control opium out of this region, and al
> Qaeda participated in that. They facilitated, and they assisted, and
> they were part of a player. There were three par factions in that
> region. You had the Taliban, you had the al Qaeda, and you had the
> traditional criminal groups, and they came together in a symbiotic
> relationship and supported this.
>
> But also think of why bin Laden or al Qaeda would have an interest in
> this besides simply money. Before the events of the 11th, if you asked
> the average public, stood out on the street corner and said, name the
> weapons of mass destruction, I think probably maybe 10 percent of them
> would be able to name them. Now, after CNN, we all can name them,
> right? We know it\'s all ABC\--atomic, biological, chemical.
>
> Al Qaeda looks at this as D, too, drugs. Drugs is a weapon of mass
> destruction that can be used against Western societies and help bring
> them down. You might think that the attack on America began on 9/11 as
> many of us saw that plane go into the Pentagon behind us. Well, 2 days
> before that, we seized 53 kilos of Afghan heroin in New York being
> distributed, by the way, by Colombians, to show the relationships, and
> I would argue that we\'ve been under attack in this country for a long
> time, and it didn\'t start on the 11th.
>
> But these criminal groups consist around the world, hiding behind
> social change, revolution. Criminal groups have done this for years.
> If you go to Southeast Asia, you have the HUA, the Sha \[ph\] Army in
> the Golden Triangle region. Major source of funding, heroin. Now
> they\'re flooding Southeast Asia with methamphetamine. Nothing new
> about that.
>
> Move to the Middle East, HAMAS, involved in heroin traffic, and by the
> way very active in our hemisphere down in the tri-border region of
> South America in moving money, moving drugs, and things like that.
>
> The Basque, the ETA, those operations in Europe, tied to drug
> trafficking in some way or the other.
>
> But think about it, we all now are afraid of terrorism in the United
> States. Up until the 11th, terrorism was something we saw on CNN, and
> we thought was 12 time zones away. The 11th has brought it home, and I
> would argue it\'s been here all along. Ask a citizen of Colombia, as
> General Serrano, my esteemed colleague, will tell you in a minute,
> were you afraid of narco-terrorism? Their answer would be yes.
>
> We talk about America being violent. We average 6 homicides per
> 100,000 of our population, and people tell us how violent we are. In
> Colombia, they average 77.5 homicides per 100,000. Ask them if they
> like seeing Avianca airplanes blown out of the sky. Ask them if they
> like to see the DOS \[ph\] building, their version of the FBI, blown
> up. Ask them if they like their Supreme Court to be taken over. Ask
> them if they like their presidential candidates to be shot.
>
> We don\'t have to go halfway around the world to see this problem. Go
> to Mexico. I was just down there last week reading in the paper from
> Juarez, two more high police officials killed. If you go to Mexico to
> Culiacon, a city the size of Cincinnati, and in the last 4 years,
> they\'ve had almost 4,500 murders.
>
> But I would ask you to even take a step closer into here. Not that
> many years ago, I talked to a grandmother across the river in
> Southeast D.C., and asked her if terrorism scares here and why she\'s
> afraid to sit on her front porch on a Sunday evening when it\'s warm
> or let her grandkids sit out in front of the house because of drive-by
> shootings, or walk down the hall here and look in the museum and take
> a look at that crack door that\'s hanging up there and ask yourself if
> terrorism hasn\'t affected this country before 9/11.
>
> Now we have a great opportunity here. Two things: Number one, in
> Afghanistan, we have an opportunity to eliminate that part of the drug
> market. It\'s going to be a long, consistent battle of building an
> infrastructure, doing it with our partners, such as the U.K. That can
> be done.
>
> But the second thing we can do is right here in America. Two things
> came out of 9/11 I have found very interesting. The first question is,
> typical American thing, what can I do? And you had people coming
> forward, what can I do? My wife, the nurse, can I go to the hospital
> and work more hours?
>
> DEA had it lucky. We could volunteer to be sky marshals. We could go
> out and look for these criminal organizations. We could go out and
> find the money. The average citizen is still saying, what can I do?
> And I think symposiums like this will give you the opportunity to see
> what you can do.
>
> Because the second thing is one great theme came out of 9/11\--the
> heroes in America. And we heard about those police officers and
> firemen that rushed into that building, and we hear every day about
> our soldiers in Afghanistan, but I would argue there\'s plenty more
> heroes in America. I would argue that a teacher is a hero, a nurse is
> a hero, a volunteer teaching Sunday School Sunday morning is a hero,
> and people in this room, and people outside of this room that try to
> keep us from getting involved in drugs and funding terrorism can be
> heroes too.
>
> Thank you, Mr. Novak.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: Mr. Casteel, maybe DEA intelligence can clear up one thing.
> Every newspaper story or many newspaper stories about the Taliban
> mention that the Taliban had prohibited the growing of opium, with the
> implication that they had gotten out of the narcotics trade. Can you
> explain that.
>
> MR. CASTEEL: Well, I\'m an old farm boy from Central Illinois. I\'m
> happy to hear you went to Illinois. When my father went out and cut
> corn in the fall, he didn\'t sell it. He went, and he put it in a corn
> crib, and he let it dry, and he waited until the market rose, and
> that\'s all the Taliban did.
>
> If you flood any market, like was happening there when they reached
> that 71 percent, the price is going to drop to a point where it\'s
> almost not practical to use. By stockpiling it, and up until extremely
> recently, and it may be part of the war, part of their stockpiles
> running out, up until recently, we saw very little effect. There was
> not a drug availability problem in Eastern and Western Europe. There
> was not a drug availability problem in Russia in the Stanz region
> because they had stockpiled it.
>
> Opium is just like gold. You bury it in the ground in your backyard
> today, and you dig it up a year later, it\'s got the same value. It
> doesn\'t diminish. And so by stockpiling, by making a business
> decision, the Taliban tried to get a positive PR spin. On the other
> hand, they made a business decision to make it more profitable.
>
> They taxed opium production 10 percent. They taxed laboratory
> operations a certain amount. They taxed the movement of drugs. They
> now possess all of this opium. What are they going to do with it? They
> want the highest price for it, and that\'s what they did.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Thank you.
>
> Our next panelist is Larry C. Johnson, who is an owner and founder of
> Berg Associates, which specializing in money-laundering
> investigations, financial analysis and investigations of violations of
> international property rights.
>
> Mr. Johnson is a veteran of the CIA, both operations and intelligence,
> and later was the deputy director of the State Department\'s Office of
> Counterterrorism. Mr. Johnson, with that background, has been a
> valuable guest frequently on television, including on \"Crossfire,\"
> and why I\'m happy to say that we\'re almost always on the same side.
>
> \[Laughter.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: So Larry C. Johnson.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. JOHNSON: Thank you, Bob.
>
> Terrorism does not operate without money. That\'s the bottom line. And
> we have got to recognize in this country that when we start drawing
> these artificial distinctions between what constitutes terrorism, what
> constitutes narco-trafficking, what constitutes\--
>
> MR. NOVAK: Larry, can I interrupt?
>
> MR. JOHNSON: Sure.
>
> MR. NOVAK: The panelists are not speaking directly into the mikes, so
> if you will be careful and do that, we\'d appreciate it.
>
> MR. JOHNSON: I\'ve usually never been accused of having a small, quiet
> voice.
>
> \[Laughter.\]
>
> MR. JOHNSON: Going after the money is critical. And when we look at
> the issue of terrorism, there really are two challenges presented. One
> is that some of the money that is flowing in to terrorist activities
> does come out of the traditional money-laundering arena. That means
> there is a predicate crime. Someone was selling drugs, selling
> weapons, stealing money or stealing the money and then trying to
> launder it so it would be clean. But we\'ve also seen, particularly
> with the bin Laden network, what I\'d call the money-dirtying process.
>
> The money does not start out, in the bin Laden businesses, as dirty
> money. It doesn\'t start out as money generated from illegal
> activities. In fact, in some of the cases, it\'s money generated by
> charitable contributions that flows into bank accounts, flows through
> the system, and it\'s only when it comes out at the other end, is put
> in the hands of those folks who are going to go out and kill and
> murder people, at that point you then have a criminal act.
>
> DEA, in my view, and I cannot be accused of being brainwashed, even
> though two of my partners are former DEA employees, but I\'ve had the
> virtue of working with the State Department, with the Central
> Intelligence Agency, with the FBI in the investigation on Pan Am 103
> and some other issues, with the U.S. military, and we\'ve been
> involved overseas quite a bit.
>
> I can say, hands down, that the best intelligence we have on the
> ground overseas is DEA, and yet, after all of the time I\'ve been
> involved with counterterrorism, not once have I seen a DEA body
> sitting at the table, at the CSG meetings which go on over at the
> White House, where you\'re talking about combatting terrorism. And let
> me, I brought a visual illustration of the links here.
>
> Mr. Whalid Zyad Massise \[ph\], is currently a merchant in the
> cologne-free zone of Panama. Now I came across Mr. Massise 3 years ago
> when we were conducting an undercover investigation looking at the
> selling of products that were violating the intellectual property
> rights of a U.S. corporation. And when we first went into Panama, we
> asked the local DEA office if they could recommend a local Panamanian
> to work with us and help us track this problem, provided someone. We
> worked closely with this individual. The individual was not employed
> by DEA or the U.S. government or the Panamanians, but he worked with
> us. In the course of this, we found Mr. Zyad violating these
> intellectual property rights.
>
> Well, this book is titled, \"Palestine: The Burning Silence,\" and
> I\'m translating from the Spanish. \"The Fundamentals for
> Understanding the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict.\"
>
> Mr. Zyad is really the head of to Intifada in Central America at the
> time that he wrote this book. And he brags in the first couple of
> pages about how he entered Palestine clandestinely, met with leaders
> of the Intifada. Now he also has the distinction of he went to jail in
> Panama for money laundering. And I\'ve said sometimes that if you go
> to jail in Panama for money laundering, you have to really be either
> bad at it\--
>
> \[Laughter.\]
>
> MR. JOHNSON: \--or you were really doing a lot of it, and I\'m not
> sure which is the case in his instance.
>
> But what we\'ve seen over and over again is when this money moves
> through banking systems, these individuals, whether they\'re involved
> with terrorism, whether they\'re involved with drug trafficking, they
> are exploiting the system, and what they come up against, their
> biggest ally in this is how the U.S. government, and I don\'t want to
> use the word is organized to confront this problem, how the U.S.
> government is disorganized to confront the problem, and I will give
> you a very specific case in point.
>
> In 1994-1995, there was a debate raging between the intelligence
> community and some of former colleagues and personal friends out at
> CIA who were in the counter-narcotics center who maintained that the
> FARC was not involved with drug trafficking. Meanwhile, DEA was
> saying, sure, they are. And I did not understand this fully until I
> got out of government and had the opportunities that I\'ve had over
> the last 3 years.
>
> Here is the problem: The CIA analysts were not seeing the DEA-6s, the
> DEA reports that are generated in the course of law-enforcement
> investigations. That information comes together in DEA in isolated, on
> specific cases, is not shared with the intelligence community. They
> didn\'t know. They didn\'t have a reason to know.
>
> And those kinds of\--I call them artificial barriers, which hinder
> understanding the problem, proved to be very difficult in bringing the
> CIA along to finally saying, wait a second, the FARC is involved.
> Because what we saw when the Soviet Union collapsed, particularly
> groups that had previously received funding from the Soviets, like the
> Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, the National Liberation Army
> of Colombia, the Kurdistan Workers Party in Turkey, PKK, all of them
> shifted their activities to making money because, if you\'re going to
> conduct operations, if you\'re going to train soldiers, if you\'re
> going to train terrorists, if you\'re going to buy explosives, you\'ve
> got to have money. American Express doesn\'t issue you your own
> personal credit card just because you\'re a terrorist. You\'ve got to
> have the money in a bank account to pay for this.
>
> Let me close with one final illustration of why I think DEA, in its
> capacity in following drug money, needs to be brought into this
> process. Three years ago when we first set up Berg Associates, we were
> working on supporting the local Police Department in Oakland County,
> Michigan, on a drug trafficking case. We went to meet with the local
> DEA, SAC at that time.
>
> There was myself, my partner, John Moynihan; and former DEA Agent Jack
> Toal, sitting in the room then; two current DEA employees, one of them
> Cliff White.
>
> Jack Toal is the one who arrested Kiki Moscara \[ph\]. Moscara was the
> one who put together the plot that blew up the Avianca plane. Jack
> Toal arrested one of the major terrorists that we were looking for in
> the 1990s and did it in New York City. That was a DEA operation.
>
> Cliff White had been working in Pakistan when Ishtiak Parker \[ph\],
> one of the collaborators of Ramzi Yousef, the first bomber of the
> World Trade Center, was hiding out in Pakistan. Ishtiak Parker walked
> into the U.S. Embassy and said, I know where he is. The embassy did
> not send the CIA, the embassy did not send the FBI, the embassy did
> not send Diplomatic Security. The embassy sent DEA, with their foreign
> employee, to go find Ramzi Yousef.
>
> My point is I\'m not trying to carve out new bureaucratic turf for
> DEA, but I\'m pretty practical about these things. If you\'ve got
> information, and you know what\'s going on, you ought to be at the
> table. And one of the keys in going after the money that is involved
> with drug trafficking, that spills over into international terrorism
> is that DEA has got to be at the table.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: Mr. Johnson, do you think that the Bush administration\'s
> war on terrorism effort to get after money laundering is hitting the
> drug money that you\'re talking about, as of today?
>
> MR. JOHNSON: Yes, they\'re stumbling across it. This is one of the
> things that we\'ve done for a long time in this country, and it\'s
> actually been I\'ll call a bipartisan failure heretofore. We\'ve
> talked about going after the money, but we\'ve never been serious
> about it. And when you go out and start rolling up these terrorist
> assets, what we begin to see is that the channels\-\--let\'s just
> think it through practically.
>
> When the Taliban or even the Northern Alliance, when they sell the
> drugs, they\'re not giving that opium away. They\'re getting something
> in return for it. Sometimes they\'re getting weapons, but they\'re
> also getting dollars. Who buys that from him? Well, that\'s called the
> Russian mob, in part. And when the Russian mob buys that money or buys
> those drugs, they\'re not just pulling it out from under a mattress.
> It\'s sitting in a banking system somewhere. And so when that money
> comes through and is passed to the Taliban, the Taliban also put it in
> banking systems. So, when you track this through and you start going
> after some of the terrorist money, you start disrupting the drug
> networks.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Thank you very much, Larry.
>
> Our next panelist is General Rosso Jose Serrano Cadena. General
> Serrano is one of the heroes of the war against drugs. He\'s one of my
> personal heroes, since I first met him in Colombia a number of years
> ago, when I found that the politicians all, none of them had a good
> word to say for General Serrano because he had that rare combination
> of integrity and competence.
>
> He got after the drug dealers, and he got after the crooks in the
> police force. He has been called, in his role as Director General of
> the Colombian National Police, now retired, as the \"Best Policeman in
> the World,\" and I\'ll second that.
>
> General Serrano?
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> GENERAL SERRANO: \[Interpreted from Spanish.\] I will be speaking in
> Spanish, and I\'ll have an interpreter.
>
> I am delighted that we all agree that there is
> narco-traffic\--narco-terrorism. Before we used to talk about
> narco-traffic and look at terrorism as something very far away, very
> distant. In Colombia, narco-terrorism arose over 15 years ago. Pablo
> Escobar did this, introduced this in order to avoid being extradited
> to the United States.
>
> Moreover, in 1990, Mr. Escobar killed 500 policemen in Medellin. He
> charged between 2- and 3,000 per death. He killed four presidential
> candidates. He killed General Ramirez, who was the director against
> traffic; he killed the attorney general of the nation; and with a car
> bomb, he killed 157 people in Bogota. That is narco-terrorism.
>
> They said they preferred to be dead, to be in a Colombian tomb, rather
> than to be jailed in the United States. So that narco-traffickers use
> terrorism to control both the state and the society. Pablo Escobar
> partially won that battle because he avoided extradition.
>
> After his death, we\'ve seen another form of narco-terrorism. Both the
> organization and self-defense organizations combined with
> narco-traffic promoting this terrorism. But behind the word of
> Ambassador Tambs in Bogota over 15 years ago, there are other crimes
> that we should look into\--arms trafficking. As some of the panelists
> here were explaining, in Latin America, the only ones who buy this are
> the FARC and the self-defense units. Contraband, chemical precursor
> type of traffic, and money laundering itself, these are the series of
> crimes that are behind narco-traffic.
>
> There is a fact that I believe is very important to point out here.
> Since I was the director of the Internarcotics Police in 1991, we saw
> that there were a group of Afghan citizens who had come to Colombia to
> teach us how to grow poppy seeds. They asked for visas through Ecuador
> and Bolivia, and over 100 of them actually entered our country. When
> we in DEA discovered the poppy seed, they had already sold over 4,000
> hectares in Colombia. And the question we face today is who brought
> these Afghan citizens, the FARC or the narco-traffic dealers.
>
> Today, there is more narco-traffic in Colombia than before because
> both the FARC and the self-defense teams have promoted this, despite
> the fact that we no longer have the medellin and the Cali Cartels. In
> my opinion, as long as there is narco-traffic, there will not be peace
> in Colombia.
>
> We have spoken about this with Mr. Souder, FARC and many other people
> who know this problem very well in Colombia, as well as with many
> members of Congress, DEA, and the CIA who know the Colombia problem
> extremely well.
>
> Let\'s work on the basis of knowing that there is narco-terrorism, but
> having a different approach. Let\'s work on the basis of the fact that
> the FARC and the self-defense teams work with this in Colombia, and we
> have to tackle them together. And nowadays they use nonconventional
> weapons, such as gas cylinders that they throw at the police, for
> example, and the population at large. This is a method that the IRA
> taught FARC.
>
> At present, we see international alliances with the Russian mafia,
> which is the one that imports or brings in weapons with the Japanese
> Red Army, with ETA, which have been providing advice to FARC for a
> long time now.
>
> Our problem, therefore, is narco-traffic, which is behind acts of
> terrorism and other crimes affecting our country, but what are we to
> do? In my opinion, international agencies should deal with all of
> these problems and not only with the ones that they deal with directly
> because at times we focus on one single issue, and we forget all
> others. It seems to me that we must go at deeply the narco-traffic
> money. We must get to it.
>
> We feel disappointed because there are banks and there are states that
> are not really going after the money laundering, and this is
> resulting, also, in weapons and other ills. We must pursue the arms
> dealers. Some of them are keeping part of the money of the
> narco-traffic. Bin Laden was one of them. I have often said that bin
> Laden did not use the money that came from his inheritance, as has
> often been alleged, but rather money that came from the heroin
> traffic.
>
> We must look deeper into the international mafia alliances and
> connections. It seems to me that the Russian mafia is becoming a
> leader in narco-traffic, in Europe, Florida, the Caribbean islands and
> some of the South American countries as well.
>
> I also want to warn against an increase in synthetic drugs. The state
> focuses on natural drugs, but I see that there is a deviation towards
> other types of drugs, especially synthetic drugs. It seems to me that
> we must strengthen the connections among all of the various
> intelligence agencies internationally, build confidence, provide
> information selflessly, and make it possible for international
> agencies to work better than narco-traffickers and terrorists.
>
> In my opinion, if we do not do away with narco-traffic, it will be
> extremely difficult to fight against the other crimes.
> Narco-trafficking is the gist of our problems, and countries
> throughout the world have to accept this. We cannot just point our
> finger at others, by saying that that country is a producer, that
> other one a consumer, money-laundering country, a country that
> produces illegally chemical precursors, et cetera. This is a worldwide
> problem, and to the extent that we accept this, we will decrease the
> problem. I am very concerned with the Colombian problem not because of
> the FARC or the self-defense teams, et cetera, but because of
> narco-trafficking as such.
>
> There are new cocaine consumers, such as Europe, which was
> traditionally a heroin consumer. In Russia, Australia and other
> countries cocaine is consumed. Where do they go to get cocaine?
> Colombia. Right now in Afghanistan, since there are war-types of
> controls, they want to seek the very best heroin they can come up
> with. Colombia, Peru, where there are other strains of heroin, and
> Ecuador, to some extent, that\'s where we have to be on the alert. I
> repeat that the problem in the world is narco-traffic, and it\'s two
> aspects, both natural drugs and at present, unfortunately, also
> synthetic drugs.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: General Serrano, thank you. Just briefly, could you tell
> us, in your opinion, what the impact of the Colombian government\'s
> peace initiative with the FARC, which a great deal of land has been
> given to the FARC and peace negotiations have been attempted, what has
> been the impact of this policy on narco-trafficking in your country
> and internationally?
>
> GENERAL SERRANO: \[Interpreted from Spanish.\] In this process, the
> biggest problem is that you have narco-trafficking and terrorism
> meshed in there. President Bush has said that it is narco-traffic that
> promotes terrorism, and this is very important for Colombia. And as
> long as the FARC is not detached, so to speak, from narco-traffic, it
> will be very difficult for this process to really take hold because
> this represents a very big strategic advantage. Because with the money
> that comes from narco-traffic, they buy weapons need they grow.
>
> The state cannot buy arms with money coming from narco-traffic. It has
> to seek help, both from the American Congress and from the American
> government. Unfortunately, for Colombians, this process has been
> losing credibility.
>
> And, in my opinion, if the narco-traffic exists, it\'s very difficult
> to legitimize the self-defense systems because all the laboratories,
> both of heroin and cocaine, are protected by subversive actions. And
> it is increasingly difficult, both for the police and the military
> forces, to deal with this since resistance is even bigger now than in
> the past.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Thank you very much, General. I appreciate it. Our next
> panelist is Stephen J. Pasierb. Mr. Pasierb is the president, has been
> the president since October 1st of the Partnership for a Drug-Free
> America. He has been with the Partnership for a Drug-Free America,
> fighting drug abuse, in cooperation with a national network since
> 1993, and Mr. Pasierb has some visual help to aid in his presentation.
> Mr. Pasierb.
>
> MR. PASIERB: Thank you, Bob, very much. There\'s always the one guy
> with the visual aids. Here today at a conference on Traffickers,
> Terrorists & Your Kids, I see my role today as the \"and your kids\"
> piece of this puzzle.
>
> Clearly what we have heard is that globally drugs and terrorism are
> linked at the hip. So for us in a way drugs are terrorism. They are
> inextricably linked. Drugs are terrorism. And my job today is really
> to release some new information.
>
> We asked the question what does all this that we\'ve talked about
> today mean for parents and the youth? And in the partnerships context,
> parents and youth are essential that we speak to both them. You can\'t
> speak to either one in a vacuum. Parents and kids are linked.
>
> Our existence is really to deliver to the American public persuasive,
> credible, relevant information about what\'s going on around this
> issue, and clearly the events of September 11th, as we have
> established today, have put America on that national stage with other
> folks.
>
> As Steve said, it\'s not 12 time zones away any more. Terrorism is a
> very real thing here in America.
>
> So what is that persuasive information and all that we have learned
> here that really would help influence attitudes?
>
> I want to make the case very strongly to you that attitudes drive
> behavior. Simply generating awareness about something like the link
> between drugs and terrorism isn\'t enough. We have to deliver
> information that helps change people\'s attitudes, shape those
> attitudes around this issue, so their behaviors change.
>
> I want to give you a couple examples in history before we get into the
> new information and the new research we would like to unveil today.
>
> Go back a ways, and you look at the last 15 years of the marijuana
> issue in the United States, and some of the things that happened very
> clearly, you see two key attitudes in the research that changed in
> American history over that last 15 years: perception of risk and
> social disapproval.
>
> As you might imagine, as the perception of risk of marijuana use went
> up, as the social disapproval of marijuana use went up, the result in
> behavior change, drug use went down.
>
> Unfortunately, just like night follows day, we know that when we take
> our eye off the ball, when we take the issue off the front burner of
> the nation, as attitudes change, in this case a weakening of
> perception of risk and a weakening of social disapproval,
> unfortunately you see use go back up.
>
> So clearly what you have here is attitude, resulting behavior,
> attitude, resulting behavior. It\'s very clear.
>
> Compare that to another drug that we have challenged with in this
> country, cocaine, and the progress that we have made as a nation on
> cocaine. We came out of the early 1980s pretty much with cocaine
> actually having a perception of benefit. A lot of people thought it
> was an okay drug, and they didn\'t see the downside of it.
>
> We had the death of Len Bias. We saw what cocaine an crack cocaine did
> to our cities, what it was doing to the American public, and you see
> the rise in the perception of risk in cocaine in America. It should be
> no surprise then that you see the decrease in use. The attitudes
> around this and the behaviors around drug use are inextricably linked.
>
> So for the partnership, really we have to say what are the leverage
> points, who are the people who can influence our kids, who can stop
> the inflow of folks into drug use? Key to everything we do are
> parents. We talk so much about kids. You cannot forget parents, that
> caregiver, that aunt, that uncle, that grandma, that grandpa, that
> person in a child\'s live who provides that nurturing and provides
> love, and the information that they deliver to a child.
>
> Take the example of marijuana once again. Look at teenagers who learn
> nothing about the risks of marijuana from their parents. You see their
> use rates. Fairly high. Because they\'re not learning anything. They
> have a very different attitude set.
>
> You contrast that to kids who learn a lot about marijuana risks and
> problems from their parents, you see major progress. Again, a
> different attitude set, a different behavior set by the information
> that that caregiver in the child\'s life is delivering.
>
> Parents are absolutely essential in this as we talk about the drugs
> and terrorism link. And clearly we know we have huge room for
> progress. We have got to get parents involved with teenagers, because
> you see the leverage they can have. But, unfortunately, only 29
> percent of teens in this nation report that they are learning a lot
> about the risks of drugs from their parents. So we have got 71
> percentage points worth of improvement that we as a nation could make
> and go forward on this issue.
>
> So we have to bring it all around. Would the knowledge of the drugs
> and terrorism link support the demand reduction message? What does the
> drugs and terrorism link mean to parents? What does the drugs and
> terrorism link mean to teenagers?
>
> Partnership went into the field and we did research, talking to
> parents, talking to teenagers exactly about this, and the findings we
> got from that were amazingly surprising, and that\'s the new data that
> we want to release today.
>
> If you look at parents very quickly, clearly, yes, the drugs and
> terrorism link is there. Take a look at parents. Do you think that
> international terrorism is financed, at least in part, by the illegal
> drug trade? You see 54 percent. The outstanding thing about that
> isn\'t the enormous leverage opportunity here and the fact that
> parents have this understanding, it\'s that they think this even
> before there\'s been an education effort on this. They think this
> before there have been symposiums like today and this has come onto
> the national agenda.
>
> So the parents in this nation are already onboard on this. They
> already see the link very clearly.
>
> So you go to the next step and say would knowing this make you more
> likely to talk to your teenager about drug use? Now you\'re getting
> the overwhelming results. Twice as likely, 62 percent, to have that
> conversation with the kids. And we know from the earlier slide the
> value of that conversation with their teenagers.
>
> So you have got the understanding, you\'ve got the opportunity to act
> here, and clearly how do parents want to go about this? There\'s a
> willingness to listen. Parents are looking for more information on
> this. So if we can craft messages to help them understand this linkage
> and motivate them, the pieces they need to talk to their teenagers,
> parents are going to join us on this effort.
>
> But you can\'t have parents just having this conversation. You see it
> right there. Strength in the parental understanding, in the parental
> willingness, in the parental need for information. But where do the
> teenagers sit on all this? What do their kids feel about the same
> thing that we\'ve seen? Ask those same questions of the teenagers, and
> while the line is a little bit less than the parents, clearly 45
> percent of teenagers\--again we are talking about 12 years, 13 years
> old, 14, 15 years old, understand what\'s happening and what\'s going
> on in the world, the terrorism and the drugs are linked.
>
> The same thing with them. Knowing this\--and here is an amazing
> story\--knowing this would help them understand that link, would make
> them less likely to want to use drugs. There\'s real power in the
> drugs-and-terrorism link. Teenagers say the same thing to us. They
> want to have more information delivered on this. They want to
> understand this issue, they want people to be delivering the facts,
> the relevant, the credible information to them about the
> drugs-and-terrorism link.
>
> And you see it again in the summary of the teenage data. There\'s real
> strength in this issue.
>
> Now from the Partnership\'s perspective, an organization that\'s been
> around for 15 years, we have always talked about the disconnect
> between parents and kids, the fact that parents are in a different
> place on this issue than their kids are. This is the first time in our
> history that we have had that clear, clear, strong connection, that
> both mom and dad and the kids are on the same place on this issue,
> they both want information, they are both looking for our help as
> leaders in this nation to provide that information to them, and when
> they get it, they\'re going to act upon it. That\'s real strength.
>
> One of the important points was that any good hypothesis should
> probably stand up to replication. So we went back out into the field a
> month later and we replicated this research. We wanted to see if these
> amazing results that we found truly held up.
>
> What we found a month later was in fact they did. It held up with
> parents in terms of their understanding, it held up with parents in
> terms of their willingness to take action with this understanding.
>
> The same thing held true for teenagers. They see the link, the link
> has held up. Understanding this link would cause them to behave
> differently around drug abuse.
>
> So the power is there, it\'s been proven twice in two separate
> measurements.
>
> So we know from the things that we\'ve looked at today, we can reduce
> demands for drugs. America has made a lot of progress on the drug
> issue. I think it\'s probably one of the biggest secrets in all this
> is we have made enormous progress. The media, communities, the
> government, everyone working together has generated enormous progress.
>
> Attitudes clearly drive behavior. We looked at drugs, but you look at
> it all across life. People\'s attitudes toward a situation, toward a
> product, toward a person, drive their behavior. So attitudes are key.
> That\'s the first step in the puzzle.
>
> Knowledge of the drugs-and-terrorism link positively impacts anti-drug
> attitudes. You see the findings among the parents, more likely to talk
> to their kids. You see the findings among teenagers, less likely to
> use drugs. That\'s enormous power.
>
> But most important is that common ground I spoke of. We have an issue
> here where everyone is ready to listen. What is going on now in the
> world, and Americans\' understanding of their place on the global
> stage, has clearly made them ready to receive this information, and we
> know we need to help inform and educate the public. There is real
> power in this message. The Partnership\'s job is to continue this
> research, to work on the message strategies, to work with our partners
> in the communication industry, to find out what those pieces are, what
> is that relevant credible information. And that is in fact what we\'re
> doing right now. We are doing the research, we are working with
> advertising agencies, we are ready to work with the media to
> communicate out this link.
>
> The Partnership\'s job is to find out what\'s relevant in the lives of
> parents and teenagers and very clearly the drugs-and-terrorism linkage
> is amazingly relevant in folks\' lives, and an important message that
> we\'ve got to deliver.
>
> So, again, we\'ve got the understanding on the part of everybody.
> There\'s an opportunity to act. They are ready to do something with
> this understanding. We\'ve got to provide them the learning. They\'re
> ready to listen to what we have. And if we do this, we believe very
> strongly this is a piece of leverage, this is an ability to motivate
> the country that we have had not over the last 15 years, and it should
> be a part we play in the larger whole of the drugs-and-terrorism link.
>
> Thank you.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: Mr. Pasierb, would you like a little help from the
> government, the U.S. government, which has a very big megaphone? We
> have senior officials on television for many hours every day on cable
> TV and even on network TV. Would you like them to talk about this link
> between narcotics, illegal narcotics and terrorism a little bit more?
>
> MR. PASIERB: Absolutely. Absolutely. The understanding of this link is
> essential, and that\'s what our leaders can do. Leadership in this
> nation can help our people understand this link, give the background
> in it, and really take action.
>
> I mean this data would hold up for anyone, for any leader in the
> community, to be able to deliver this kind of information, is going to
> have real power.
>
> So I would hope after today, and with the understanding that we have
> gotten across this panel, that America would be ready to really take
> this issue on and talk about it openly and actively.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Okay. Thank you. There are several battlefronts in the war
> against drugs. Afghanistan, Colombia, Hollywood. And one of the
> warriors in the Hollywood battleground is Bryan Dyak, our final
> panelist. He is the founding president and chief executive officer of
> the Entertainment Industries Council, Inc., and he is executive
> producer of the Prisms Award, the entertainment industry\'s annual
> recognition of television shows and feature films that accurately,
> accurately portray drug and alcohol use and addiction on screen.
>
> Mr. Brian Dyak.
>
> MR. DYAK: Thank you.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. DYAK: I would like you to take a moment and put yourself in
> another place. The entertainment industry is a small piece of this
> puzzle, but a fairly dynamic piece, given our reach. And what I would
> like you to do is to actually select who you want to be for the next
> six or seven minutes.
>
> There\'s five key people that make up the crux of developing a film or
> a television show. That\'s the writer, the producer, the director, the
> executive in charge of production, and the talent. So you can be a
> celebrity, if you\'d like, you can be a talk show host. You are also
> someone that has an expertise in creating comedy, drama, adventure.
> And I would like you to be in that place of who you now are as a
> creator in the entertainment industry as you listen and think about
> what I have to say.
>
> I would like to first give you now all these new creators of
> entertainment product, some new information, again research that we
> conducted through an independent research group, to look at violence
> in television. And uniquely, when we conducted that survey, we
> discovered that there were elements of the results that were usable
> beyond looking at the term of violence, and specifically gun violence.
>
> We asked the audience to rate 10 film characteristics, factors in
> relationship to their attractiveness of movies and TV shows, and the
> audience preferences were humor; special effects; adventure, right up
> in the 75 to 80 percent selection area; mystery and suspense was at 67
> percent; non-violent action was at 62 percent; sex and romance was at
> 55 percent; physical conflict and non-physical conflict were at 40
> percent; violence in general was at 21 percent; and gun violence was
> at 19 percent.
>
> The study suggested that the audience was already moving away from
> violent film and TV shows prior to September 11th, and there is a
> sense in Hollywood today that the audience has moved even further from
> violence, given the violence we are experiencing in our real life.
>
> Secondly, the study looked at how the audience attitudes are
> influenced. We are concerned as creators about what our audiences
> thinking because we really want to know their attitudes so we can sell
> that to our advertisers to support the shows so we can now write,
> produce, direct, create and star in the television show or the feature
> film.
>
> Again we believe that the results may mirror other attitudes beyond
> violence. The audience\'s own personal experiences were the
> predominant factor, the attitude shaper.
>
> Second was the parents and guardians.
>
> Third was the news. Friends were fourth. Teachers, TV shows and movies
> all tied at 19 percent. Video games were at 18 percent. Books and
> magazines at 13 percent. Music lyrics at 13 percent, and the internet
> was 11 percent.
>
> Our sample was 462 people on the internet. The population was from 18
> to 65, 50 percent, and 50 percent were younger than 18 years of age.
>
> So what can we do to support our nation\'s war on terrorism and get
> involved as creators and this issue of narco-terrorism?
>
> Accurate depiction of important issues, avoiding misinformation to the
> audience is key. So as a creator, when you\'re developing a story
> line, consider showing tolerance as a deterrent to prejudice and
> injustice, and try to avoid ethnic stereotyping.
>
> Discourage paralyzing fear from terrorism and promote preparedness for
> future attacks. As creators, be sensitive to the mental health
> realities of terrorism. It causes shock, grieving, fear, pity,
> helplessness and anger.
>
> When you are developing a character, use the character to help the
> audiences be aware of these feelings and understand coping mechanisms.
>
> Promote restoring emotional well being and a sense of control and
> encourage positive action.
>
> Consider story lines that promote donating goods, donating blood,
> volunteerism in school, victim assistance programs. Display the
> American flag in memory of those lost to terrorism.
>
> When it comes to children, encourage children to help others. Recently
> the Sesame Workshop, the producers of Sesame Street conducted a survey
> of children\'s mental health after September 11th. Half of the
> children studied were from Washington, D.C. and the New York area; the
> other half were from across the United States. Their perspectives were
> really insightful.
>
> Despite expressions of fear and death and violence, many children
> showed empathy and sadness. Almost no children expressed vengeance or
> anger. Children responded to heroism as well as the pop culture. While
> children in previous studies wanted to be like popular entertainers,
> the advent of \'N Sync, Brittany Spears, now they also want to be like
> heroes, real and imaginary, like rescue workers, police officers,
> political leaders, and even Superman.
>
> Children want to help. Many want to fly like a super hero. They want
> to stop the bad guys. And others said they collected money to help
> victims and participated in vigils.
>
> For the children\'s sake as a creator, consider depicting hope for the
> future. Encourage children to talk about events. Assure them that they
> are cared for. Help them recognize that they have shown courage in
> scary situations and empower them so they know that institutions of
> democracy are still in place and our government is intact.
>
> There are a number of other depictions that creators can explore to
> create images and messages that serve our audiences and maybe get us
> some ratings.
>
> Help audiences understand the importance of preparedness. Take
> seriously a family communication plan, an evacuation plan, as well as
> gathering emergency disaster supplies and first aid supplies. Show
> neighbors working together. Show people being vigilant in your
> productions, paying attention to what\'s going on around them, and
> knowing what to do and who to call to report strange situations. Help
> audiences understand what homeland security really means to the safety
> and well being of our great nation, and reinforce patriotism, our
> military, our fire departments, and our law enforcement officers.
>
> Twenty years ago our industry had been charged with pushing the limit
> when it comes to glamorization of drugs. Since then movies like \"The
> Insider,\" \"28 Days,\" \"Trainspotting\" and \"Traffic\" that
> highlighted the important life-threatening work of DEA agents and many
> other films have shown that our industry can create profitable
> entertainment when it takes on issues such as drug trafficking, abuse
> and treatment.
>
> As creators, put terrorism into perspective when it comes to drug
> depiction. Any glamorous drug depiction without a negative consequence
> is supporting terrorism, narco-terrorism, the ultimate story, the
> ultimate drama, and the ultimate adventure, to follow the money.
>
> Consider the story lines and the characters that are sensitive to the
> realities of stress and substance abuse.
>
> Stress increases the potential of self-medication to people never
> exposed to drugs. This is what health science tells us. That among
> drug-free cocaine abusers in treatment, personal stress can lead to
> increased cocaine cravings. Health science tells us that the stressful
> situation induces relapses to cocaine, alcohol and heroin.
>
> As creators, you can promote drug prevention programs, help audiences
> understand if someone is buying and using drugs that they need to
> stop, they need to get help and they need to get into treatment.
>
> It\'s also suggested that creators protect the integrity of our law
> enforcement officers and our agencies, law enforcement agencies doing
> the battle against narco-terrorists.
>
> Help audiences understand the reality of drugs and terrorists. Boost
> the respect, trust and integrity of the good guys, the DEA and other
> government agencies.
>
> You can do all of this as a part of original programming that\'s
> provocative, entertaining, and profitable. Each of you, as writers,
> directors, producers, executives, the celebrity that you\'ve chosen to
> be in this room, can wage a war through the creative process.
>
> These are only suggestions. In this country you as creators have the
> right to produce whatever you want, and that is a freedom that we\'re
> fighting to protect today.
>
> It is for that reason, though, that as a member of the creative
> community, you need to consider the dimensions of the images, the
> characters, the story lines, that touch the audiences as a part of our
> war on terrorism and threats of narco-terrorism.
>
> Consider using your creative gift, your creative talent, to enhance
> the art of making a difference in the lives of your audience.
>
> Thank you.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: Mr. Dyak, briefly, do you think that the leaders of the
> entertainment industry effectively connect that little powdery
> substance called cocaine with terrorism?
>
> MR. DYAK: I think the leaders of the entertainment industry are
> connecting the whole notion of terrorism as it affects us and the
> economy, and the whole notion of drugs. Narco-terrorism is going to be
> a very interesting introduction.
>
> MR. NOVAK: An introduction.
>
> MR. DYAK: I don\'t think anybody is naive in terms of the
> entertainment industry leadership, you know. I mean let\'s look over
> the last 20 years that the Entertainment Industries Council has been
> involved in drug work. Until \"Traffic,\" the connection was minimal.
> So it was just in the last year, prior to our current situation, with
> an Academy Award-winning feature film that was profitable helped make
> the connection, I think.
>
> MR. NOVAK: I\'m going to introduce the shadow panelists now, who are
> actually really human beings. Robert B. Charles is president
> of\--raise your hand, because you don\'t have a sign in front of you,
> when I introduce you. He is the founder of Direct Impact, president of
> the company, which produces strategic consulting communications,
> focusing on law enforcement, counter-narcotics and international
> issues.
>
> Joyce D. Nalepka, who is president of Drug-Free Kids, America\'s
> Challenge.
>
> Ann B. Wrobleski has a long experience in studying the drug problems
> and is now chief operating officer and executive vice president of
> Jefferson Waterman, International, which represents corporations and
> foreign governments.
>
> And Harv Presnell, who is an actor.
>
> Now you may recognize him. If you haven\'t been living in a cave for
> the last several years, you\'ll recognize him. Any of you see
> \"Fargo\"? One of the great movies. You surely remember him from
> \"Fargo.\" He was also in a few other small films like \"Saving Pvt.
> Ryan\" and \"The Legend of Bagger Vance.\" And he\'s also interested
> in fighting narco-terrorism.
>
> Now in exactly\--not exactly, in approximately 11 minutes, we are
> going to open this for questions from the audience, but I am going to
> do something very dangerous in the meantime. I\'m going to let
> the\--this is going to be like an 11-person Capitol Gang. I\'m going
> to ask the people up on the table who have already had a little bit to
> say, and also the shadow panelists, just to comment on what has been
> said in our symposium so far. Just raise your hand, and I\'ll try to
> catch you.
>
> Anybody have a comment on what the rest of you said? Yes, go ahead,
> Harv.
>
> MR. PRESNELL: Well, as a member of the motion picture industry and an
> actor, a player, a Montana rancher, a guy who flies airplanes, I think
> the entertainment industry has in the past been more of the problem
> than the solution. I am sad to say that. I think we are going to
> change some things around here now that our freedom has been once more
> seen to be in jeopardy by those bad guys.
>
> We have a crisis unparalleled in our history, recent history, anyway,
> since the Second World War.
>
> There\'s a couple of things that I would like to say about about the
> money side. We never talk about the problem we have in the money that
> is created by the drug trade and the amount of it and where it is and
> what it\'s being used for, except today. I\'m very proud of this
> agency. It\'s the only government agency I ever heard of that makes
> more money, or takes in more money than it costs to run it.
>
> \[Laughter.\]
>
> MR. PRESNELL: They don\'t seem to be able to get the benefit of it
> because it disappears in some agency called the Treasury that goes
> into the general fund.
>
> I have been involved with the DEA off and on for the last 15 years. I
> am terribly concerned as a grandfather with 12 grandchildren and six
> children, and I am interested very much in what the industry can do to
> put a positive spin on this, and I think it\'s a movie we\'re going to
> do which is already financed, about the money side, recalling the
> currency, getting a handle on the half a trillion dollars that\'s been
> created by the drug trade, money laundering that\'s out there, that\'s
> been there for 10, 12 years, 15 years. Very serious subject. And
> we\'ll do it as a comedy, of course, because that always makes the
> best story.
>
> There is a funny side to it. These guys are a bit inept. I don\'t know
> where they were in any of the revolutions that we\'ve gone through,
> but a friend of mine said it very well during the oil problem a few
> years ago. He asked me and he said, \"Listen, I\'ve got to know
> something from you.\" He said, \"We can put movies on a disk no bigger
> than a sourdough pancake, we can count the warts on a frog\'s ass from
> space, and yet we let a bunch of bandits with towels wrapped around
> their heads get us by the nuts, and when they say tap dance, we tap
> dance.\" He said, \"It\'s the money. It always has been, it always
> will be. The money. Why don\'t you do something about the money? Why
> don\'t you talk about the money?\"
>
> Well, today we\'ve heard something about the money, and there is
> something we can do about it, and if you go to the Bureau of Engraving
> and see what they\'re doing technically, you will find out that they
> are way ahead of the power curve. So let\'s get rid of that half a
> trillion dollars out there. Let\'s bring it home. Let\'s tax it.
> Let\'s reissue new stuff that we can identify from space. The movement
> of bulk currency. How does it get out of the country? Where does the
> float go? How does it get there?
>
> I happen to know one way because they used to confiscate these
> airplanes, and then Jack Lonn asked me one day, can you sell this Lear
> Jet? I said I can fly it and sure, I\'ll try to sell it, and the only
> guys to come up with the money to buy it back was the same guys they
> confiscated it from. So that\'s one of the problems.
>
> Anyway, I\'m very delighted with this panel, delighted to be with you
> folks, and when the movie comes out, I\'ll let you know. We got the
> money for it, and now all we\'ve got to do is do it.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: I neglected to mention somebody else who is sitting with
> the shadow panelists, one of our most distinguished guests, and that
> is Peter Bensinger, former DEA administrator. Peter will be introduced
> and he will speak at greater length later, but he also is a shadow
> panelist.
>
> Any of you other panelists? Yes, sir, go ahead.
>
> MR. CHARLES: I\'m Bobby Charles, and I just wanted to ask a couple of
> questions, actually, and also compliment the DEA in particular, and
> obviously Administrator Hutchinson who has led the charge here, as
> well as Donny Marshall, who previously started this, and Congressman
> Souder, who has really been a leader for almost a decade on this.
>
> I also wanted to compliment the Partnership for a Drug-Free America
> because as I stand here, I think we are all in this room standing more
> or less out of the box, and the cornerstone of my question, which I
> will direct really at maybe Larry, who also used to testify in front
> of us for a number of years when Speaker Hastert was running some of
> these same initiatives, and also I\'ll direct it at Mr. Pasierb,
> Steve.
>
> It\'s a twofold question. The first part of it is how important is it
> that we get the President of the United States to come forward at the
> very front end of this and recognize how real that connection is
> between drugs, which are really the oxygen in the form of the money,
> for terrorism and terrorism itself?
>
> And the second part is\--and this is something that has certainly
> plagued those in policy for as long as we\'ve known about the
> connection\--how do we get this message out? We are all here out of
> the box. It would be great if all of America for a moment, and then
> for an extended period, could be out of the box.
>
> To me, the whole thing boils down really to four words, and those
> words are learn. Learn the facts. Learn that the PKK, the KLA, the
> FARC, the ELN, the ELP, Hezbollah, Hamas, all the bad guys of the
> world get their money chiefly\--not incidentally, not in small
> measure, but chiefly from drugs. That\'s the learn part.
>
> I\'ll go further than any panelist up here. As someone who has spent a
> lot of time working in this area with some of these people, I believe
> that drug funding for terrorism is the seminal, post-Soviet fact
> relating to international stability, bar none.
>
> The second thing is educate. How do we educate kids to do this, to
> learn? How do we educate parents to be brave enough to talk about
> this?
>
> And then finally, the \"don\'t blink\" part reminds that this is bad
> news. When you learn how deep this is, how deeply rooted it is already
> in the United States\--I mean we don\'t have sleeper cells, we\'ve got
> sleepers everywhere, and they\'re all tied to this phenomenon.
>
> It reminds me of Speaker Hastert who in 1997 was traveling with
> Congressman Mark Souder and a couple of other members of Congress down
> to Colombia, and the news was\--he was on top of this. He kept saying
> this, as Congressman Souder and Congressman Asa Hutchinson at that
> point, had been saying this for a long time. This link is real. It\'s
> going to come to bear fruit, and it\'s going to be bad news for
> America.
>
> We landed at Howard Air Force Base, which has now vanished\--different
> story. But we left for Colombia about an hour away in our own plane,
> and diplomatic security came over to me and said, as the guy that was
> the staffer involved, \"We\'ve got some bad news for you. There are
> some things happening in Colombia we need to tell you about.\"
>
> By the way, these same things can happen in the United States and have
> and are in the abstract.
>
> He said, \"We\'ve got 12 sticks of dynamite that they\'ve just
> uncovered underneath the\--and some other explosives underneath the
> Supreme Court. They\'ve just taken down the\--the FARC has just taken
> down three police stations outside of Bogota, and we\'ve got some
> serious problems here.\" And so he said, \"You need to tell the
> leadership about that.\"
>
> So I went and talked to Hastert and I said all these facts to him. And
> he lowered his glasses and coughed a little bit and said, \"Well, it
> seems like we\'re more than halfway there, aren\'t we?\" We\'re more
> than halfway there right now. We need as a nation to not blink and
> keep going, and as bad as the facts become, figure out how to solve
> these problems.
>
> So the two questions are, does the President need to get deeply into
> this, and how deeply? And how do we educate America? How do we get
> that message, which we have not been able to do for a long time?
>
> MR. NOVAK: Mr. Johnson.
>
> MR. JOHNSON: Let me illustrate. Four weeks before September 11th, four
> or five weeks before that, in Colombia, three members of the Irish
> Republican Army were picked up, and if you notice, despite the United
> States not putting the Irish Republican Army on the list of foreign
> terrorist organizations three or four years ago when we first put that
> list out, the IRA consistently refused to disarm.
>
> After September 11th when President Bush went on the offensive, noting
> that we were going to take the battle to the terrorists, to
> international terrorists, it became clear that the IRA also was going
> to be on that list. And it\'s worth noting that after September 11th,
> the IRA finally decided to surrender its weapons and get serious about
> the peace process.
>
> I use that to illustrate that the President\'s role in this is vital,
> and it\'s not just talking about what\'s going overseas, because what
> I have been seeing in Panama, the money that\'s being deposited and
> laundered is not coming out of Panamanian banks, it\'s not coming out
> of Panamanian companies, it\'s coming out of U.S. banks and U.S.
> companies, and in some cases the U.S. companies are witting that
> they\'re taking drug money. And that\'s where it\'s important for
> people like the President to get out in front and put the heat on
> everybody, domestically as well as internationally.
>
> MR. NOVAK: The other question was directed to Mr. Pasierb. Do you have
> a comment?
>
> MR. PASIERB: Absolutely. I think the leadership of the President is
> essential. We\'ve actually had a leader out on this issue in
> Administrator Hutchinson who has been speaking about the links between
> drugs and terrorism, and his leadership on this I think is what
> brought us here today.
>
> But we need to remember\--we\'ve talked about Colombia, we\'ve talked
> about Afghanistan. The drug problem at its roots in America is a
> community problem. It happens where people live, in Wichita, Kansas or
> Fresno, California, or Sarasota, Florida, and that\'s where the moms
> and the dads and the kids are that we need to reach to.
>
> So not only do we need the President on this issue speaking about
> this, we need our leaders in the administration, we need the
> Speaker\'s task force and the folks in Congress. We need our Congress
> people when they\'re back at home, we need our governors, we need our
> mayors, we need our council people to do it.
>
> But at the end of the day, how do we deliver this message? The
> Partnership is going to do its part from that standpoint and deliver
> those messages that are relevant for kids and teenagers. We are going
> to need the media to join us in this and get these messages out in
> front of the public. We are going to need to work with the news media
> to get it out. We are going to need to work with the entertainment
> media to get it out.
>
> So there isn\'t one answer, there\'s a complex series of answers that
> begins with the President, pervades society down to the lowest level,
> but really at the end of the day comes back to parents and kids.
> We\'ve got a linkage here, that drugs are terrorism. Parents believe
> it, kids say knowing it is going to make them less likely to use. They
> are hungry for this information, they are hungry for greater
> understanding, and there has never been, at least in our experience, a
> more compelling way to move parents and to make kids think twice than
> all this.
>
> So we need everybody in this room, from the President on down, to be
> talking about this, and we need the media to join us when those
> messages are finished.
>
> MR. NOVAK: We have to move to the audience now, but Mr. Perl would
> like to make a brief intervention.
>
> MR. PERL: Brief point. I think Mr. Charles made a very important point
> when he talked about education, but I also think there\'s another way
> of looking at the educational issue than the way we\'re looking at it
> today.
>
> The way the Partnership for a Drug-Free America looks at it is it
> brings the message to youth, saying we\'re taking the drug tangent and
> we\'re stressing and we\'re educating you about the links to
> terrorism.
>
> I think what is lacking in our society is looking at it from the other
> way, and that is educating youth about terrorism. Part of the
> education of democracy should be the threats to democracy, and we need
> to develop curriculum to educate children about terrorism, the threat
> to terrorism, and also that way to bring in the drug issue.
>
> So to approach it in kind of a bifurcated approach on the educational
> basis.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Thank you very much, Mr. Perl. Okay, it\'s time for
> questions from the audience now, and I am told that microphones will
> magically appear for people who have questions. But don\'t ask the
> question until the microphone appears.
>
> Okay. Raise your hand if you want to have a question. Yes, ma\'am.
>
> FLOOR QUESTION: Hi. Could you tell me \--
>
> MR. NOVAK: I\'m sorry, if you would direct your questions to any of
> the shadow panelists or any of the major panelists, but don\'t direct
> them to all panelists because that won\'t work.
>
> FLOOR QUESTION: This is for Mr.
>
> Casteel. Could you tell me what the status is of the opium flows out
> of Afghanistan, where the stockpiles are that have been identified,
> what steps the DEA has taken to disrupt these stockpiles and the flow
> of opium?
>
> MR. CASTEEL: Well, you know, that reminds me of those of those
> Rumsfeld questions he\'s always complaining about. There\'s about five
> parts to it. So make sure I hit them all, okay?
>
> As I said, up to the time of the war, even with the supposed
> destruction of the opium crop, we saw no signs of that based on the
> stockpiling.
>
> When the war immediately hit, we saw for a short period of time\--I
> guess the best word to describe it, a fire sale. You started seeing
> people getting the opium out of Afghanistan as far as they could,
> selling it for any price, but that now has stabilized back to the
> original high prices based on the stockpiling.
>
> It is our belief there are still stockpiles in Afghanistan. Not all of
> them. Part of them have been moved out of the country, but there still
> remains some major ones there. We are attempting to identify those
> locations, and I can assure you that we have a good mechanism between
> us and the Department of Defense in providing that information through
> DIA to those locations.
>
> Also beginning tomorrow, I\'m on a plane to London, for example.
> We\'re sitting down with the British authorities and trying to compare
> what intelligence they have available to assist us in this matter.
>
> We recognize that our opportunity with Afghanistan is a short time, a
> small window, and we want to make sure, because this is the time of
> year now when they\'re replanting their crops, that we make every
> opportunity to stabilize that situation from a law enforcement
> perspective and don\'t miss this opportunity.
>
> I think I hit all four of your questions there.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Very good. You can give Rumsfeld some lessons on that.
>
> Ms. Nalepka, do you want to comment?
>
> MS. NALEPKA: I agree with everything that I heard everyone say, and I
> just want to say also I\'m so proud to be in this room with all of
> these people who think on the same plane.
>
> I want to just reassure you that the parents that everyone has
> mentioned, I believe are there and are the key. We just have to begin
> to rebuild that system that existed during the 1980s when Ann
> Wrobleski worked for Nancy Reagan and we were able at that time to
> form over 5000 groups of parents. We asked them to start in your home,
> protect your family, then go to the school, your local legislatures,
> your state and on to the Federal level. It really began to work. And
> our motto during that time was \"Changing America\'s Attitude About
> Drugs.\"
>
> We are working very hard to rebuild that with CADCA and other groups
> that are already in existence, and one of the important things I think
> we need to do, and many of us are aware that DEA is doing that, is to
> notice the drug culture. Educate the American people that there really
> is a pro-drug culture out there and help them understand what it is.
>
> One of the beginnings is to buy yourself as a parent a copy of High
> Times magazine and find out what your kids are reading. This happens
> to be a 1979 issue, and one of the people that I consider to be the
> father of the marijuana epidemic in this country wrote a letter to the
> editor in here, and his name is Keith Stropp. I will quote what he
> said on what the kids had been reading. He says over and over again
> there\'s no evidence that even those few young people who use a great
> deal of marijuana necessarily hurt themselves academically or
> otherwise.
>
> The medical marijuana hoax movement that\'s sweeping the country is
> led by those organizations, and we are working with the help of
> legislators\--Congressman Souder needs to be applauded for this, and
> our DEA administrators, on an express preemption that will essentially
> educate the public and it basically says you cannot change state laws
> that violate Federal laws, but specific to the Controlled Substances
> Act.
>
> We are also working on a non-punitive random school drug testing which
> in the schools where it has been tried really works. We have talked to
> a lot of the principals who say within two years their schools are
> drug-free. And we really do need to think about that.
>
> I would ask all of you here who I consider to be experts in this room,
> and if you weren\'t when you came in, you\'re going to be when you
> leave, when you see an opportunity to write a letter to the editor,
> speak up. If you read letters to the editor regularly, the pro-drug
> groups write all the time. And we now have rebuilt the national
> network that existed during the \'80s to the point that Sunday a week
> ago there was a column criticizing the DEA and talking about the
> medical marijuana initiative. We got the message very early Sunday
> morning, and by Sunday noon we had seven letters on e-mail from people
> who really knew what they were writing about that went directly to The
> Washington Post.
>
> Unfortunately, only one was printed, but if we keep it going, they
> will pick one from time to time.
>
> Should the President be asked to do something? Yes, he should. I like
> what he is saying. I\'m so proud of what\'s happening in this country.
> I\'ve sent a request to the White House asking him, and I would ask
> Administrator Hutchinson and Souder and Marshall and my board member
> Bensinger back here all to encourage him.
>
> I think these young kids are just waiting to be asked to do something.
> Kids are very patriotic, they want to help, and I would love to see
> the President take one of his Saturday radio addresses or, even
> better, a prime time TV time and call to the kids to do something for
> your country in the easiest way possible, and that\'s basically to tie
> back to what Nancy Reagan, refuse to do drugs. Get your friends\--show
> your friends how to have a good time without it. And they can have a
> direct link to stopping trafficking.
>
> The other important thing is to help kids understand that that link is
> direct. When they buy that joint on Saturday night, it goes all the
> way back to Afghanistan and the other countries that are producing.
>
> We are, as everyone has said, producing the market. I\'ll read you
> just one sentence that shows you at the most pathetic level what drugs
> and drug terrorism really is to me. This was published in The
> Washington Post, and I had told my husband that morning, you know, I
> think I\'ve had enough of fighting drugs, I think it\'s time for me to
> go sit in the sand and let somebody else take over. I picked up The
> Washington Post and started to cry, and he said to me, \"What\'s wrong
> with you?\"
>
> There was a story about a crack house in Washington, D.C. It says when
> paramedics arrived, they found not an adult victim, but a tiny
> four-month-old girl. She was dirty and reeked of an awful odor. The
> skin beneath her unchanged diaper was raw, ulcerated and rotting.
> Doctors found two pounds of fecal matter in the diaper of a 10-pound
> baby. And this baby\'s name was Charlette, but since then there\'s
> been Brianna and Caitlin and stories that many of you have read. This
> is the thing that we have to keep foremost in our mind and get this
> drug war refocused on protecting kids and stop paying so much
> attention to the people who are marching around with signs trying to
> get us to legalize everything.
>
> I thank you all and I\'m very proud to be here among you.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: Questions? And I think, if you don\'t mind\--I should have
> asked you before, if you could, questioners, give your name and
> organization, it might be interesting.
>
> FLOOR QUESTION: My name is Maria Franco. I am here representing Voice
> of America, the Spanish branch. We broadcast to all Latin America in
> Spanish, and this question is to General Serrano. Bear with me. I\'m
> going to ask the question in Spanish to him, and then I will tell you
> what I said.
>
> \[Speaking in Spanish.\]
>
> FLOOR QUESTION: What I just asked is if the Colombia people are aware
> of this connection of narco-traffic to terrorism, and if so, what
> impact, if any, has it had in what they do or don\'t do about drugs?
>
> GENERAL SERRANO: The Colombian people know and understand this for
> over 15 years now because terrorism does not discriminate. It is
> against the civil society, it is against the state, et cetera. There
> is no discrimination. But since it was primarily domestic, it did not
> have a bigger impact until the events of September 11th. After
> September 11th, this term of narco-terrorism took on an entirely
> different and very precise meaning and it will be used as such from
> now on in all meetings. Before all of these were isolated factors,
> narco-terrorism, terrorism, money laundering, et cetera, but from now
> on it will belong to all agencies and all governments.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Questions? Yes?
>
> FLOOR QUESTION: I have a question for Mr. Novak which is coming out of
> this seminar, do you think that journalists like you could help us get
> the message across to the American people about the links between
> narcotics trafficking and terrorism?
>
> MR. NOVAK: Yes, I think that is true. I think we can. I think I would
> hope to. I have written a lot about narco-trafficking in Colombia and
> in many other places. I wrote a column about the fact that some of our
> friends in Afghanistan are not very clean on opium, but I could do a
> lot more, and I would hope to, and I hope other journalists would do
> the same.
>
> Yes? Does anybody else have a question? Yes, sir, please. You want to
> give your name and organization?
>
> FLOOR QUESTION: All of you mentioned the horrible problems from drug
> use. The executions, the terrorism, things like that, and yet to my
> knowledge there\'s never been a trafficker who\'s ever had the death
> penalty. There\'s never been one executed.
>
> And on the other hand, on the other side, talking about education, you
> had those charts up there. Mr. Pasierb showed a third of the people
> responding to whether they considered this a big problem and said no.
> And that kind of equates to this idea that there\'s a tremendous use
> of drugs throughout the country where people, it seems to me, can\'t
> be educated. They are under the influence of drugs. They can\'t
> believe these bad things are happening. And, of course, that\'s why I
> agree with Mrs. Nolepka and the student drug test thing because
> that\'s the thing, whether they believe it or not, that gets to the
> students and helps the parents understand there\'s a problem that
> needs to be solved with treatment, not punishment.
>
> Would you all, any of you, comment on this idea that no trafficker has
> ever been executed, received capital punishment for these horrible
> things, and at this other end that you really can\'t educate people
> where the drugs are telling them we\'re all lying?
>
> MR. NOVAK: Anybody have a comment on either of those points? General?
>
> GENERAL SERRANO: In my opinion, Pablo Escobar was the biggest
> Colombian drug terrorist in the history of the country, and if I may
> say so, I would like to make a connection between him and bin Laden.
> He died in the course of a confrontation with the police in Medellin
> in 1993 because he did everything not to be captured. There are many
> people who are being punished presently both here and in the United
> States and in Colombia through extradition. I believe that this is a
> good example of international cooperation.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Anybody want to comment on the death penalty for drug
> traffickers? How about the question I think the gentleman was asking
> of young people not really regarding drug trafficking as a big crime.
> Yes?
>
> MR. DYAK: I believe that there is another way to look at that
> question, and that is starting with an untapped force in terms of
> helping young people talk to other young people, and that is that most
> kids don\'t use drugs. That is an untapped resource. You know,
> programs like DARE, the things that have happened since elementary
> school through to the kind of programming that kids are watching
> today.
>
> Again, most of the audience that we look at in terms of the youth
> culture and the youth ratings, a lot of those kids aren\'t using
> drugs. They are not listening to the President\'s radio address,
> either, by the way.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Questions?
>
> MR. PASIERB: I wanted to add, Bob, if I could that we view that data
> as not a problem but a huge opportunity. That is very promising, very
> hope-generating kind of data that we got out of that poll. Parents see
> the link, kids see the link, and the folks who don\'t, that\'s the
> opportunity of communications is to help them understand the link.
> Because clearly the people who understand the link are willing to take
> action.
>
> Parents are going to talk, kids are going to act differently, and
> that\'s really the opportunity of communications. We were surprised
> when we did this data that it was as strong as it was, and for us it
> underscores the point. The situation isn\'t hopeless, we are not
> helpless. There\'s power in this message, and as Brian said, you\'ve
> got to come from the basis that most kids don\'t use. Most kids are
> already on our side.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Do you want to come up to the microphone, please?
>
> MS. NALEPKA: Certainly. We have to look at the fact that teachers,
> particularly in their school\--I mean in their city areas, tell us
> that six, 10, 20 percent of the kids are using, and we are all yelling
> at the teachers because the kids aren\'t learning. If we put in place
> the systems such as drug testing and those kids know there\'s going to
> be accountability, we have to get that 10 percent or 16 percent off of
> drugs so they stop interfering with the learning of the other children
> and can learn themselves.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Questions from the audience? Yes?
>
> FLOOR QUESTION: I\'m Donna Leinwand with USA Today. I guess this could
> go for Mr. Perl or Mr. Casteel or Mr. Johnson, whoever wants to answer
> it.
>
> What does the United States and the international community need to do
> in terms of law enforcement and changing banking laws to deal with the
> money laundering that so obviously took place between say, you know,
> the terrorists who passed their money through Deutschebank and, you
> know, the banking laws?
>
> MR. JOHNSON: Well, let me take some credit, not for me, but for my
> partner, John Moynihan, who testified before the House Finance
> Committee six weeks ago, and one of the specific recommendations he
> made that was later incorporated into the act, was specifically going
> after these money remitting businesses.
>
> Prior to that act, it was possible that you could be an unlicensed
> money remitter, and under U.S. law at the time, you could plead
> ignorance. Well, I didn\'t know I needed to be licensed. And ignorance
> was an excuse. That has now been changed, and one of the money
> remitting houses that was shut down after that law went into effect,
> Al Barakat, came out because of that.
>
> You know, there\'s an enormous amount of information that is generated
> by the financial sector that sits untapped and unused, an enormous
> amount of leads. And part of the problem is to go out and take those
> financial leads and do the financial analysis to track it through. To
> develop viable money laundering cases does require some manpower. It
> needs to be done, in my view, with\--you know, you\'ve got FBI running
> off in one direction, you\'ve got U.S. Customs going in another
> director, and you\'ve got DEA, and yet everybody\'s really trying to
> accomplish the same goal with the financial investigation. And so
> therefore I think we need to tap into those resources and add to that
> the capabilities at CIA for a more focused attack upon these financial
> networks.
>
> Someone made the point earlier that when the security measures went
> into effect, you didn\'t find any weapons, but you were finding
> Ecstasy. And we found the same thing in the Gulf War when security
> measures were put in place to boost aviation security around the
> world. We don\'t know if we deterred terrorism, but we caught a lot of
> people with stolen tickets, with drugs, with\--you know, engaged with
> criminal activity.
>
> My point is that when you target this and when you go after it, you
> will catch the people who are engaged with the criminal activity.
>
> MR. NOVAK: I\'d like to call on ann Rowleski, who was the architect of
> the \"Just Say No\" campaign. Ann.
>
> MS. ROWLESKI: Actually, I was going to ask a question that was just
> asked, which was about money laundering, but I guess since all of you
> are here, I would ask you, since you\'ve got Congressman Souder here
> and you\'ve got some people who know a little bit about appropriations
> issues in the audience. It seemed to me that I guess when\--I guess
> maybe three months ago, the drug war seemed to be a state where we
> seemed to be winding down, to a certain extent. There was a lot of
> questions about what we\'re doing in Colombia, are we doing the right
> things. There was a lot of questions in Colombia about the way the war
> was being waged, we are spreading the right thing, we are spreading
> the wrong thing. It\'s a presidential year, as the general well knows.
> And it seemed to me that there was sort of this feeling that the drug
> war needed new energy, refocusing. Joyce was talking about refocusing
> parents. And clearly this entire issue of narcotics trafficking and
> terrorism is a new issue.
>
> So if you have a clean slate, you\'ve got what seems to me to be a
> willing audience in Congress and the American people, not to mention
> America\'s children, what\'s the one or two things that you need
> today, in the next 30 days, in the next 60 days, that will make a
> difference?
>
> We all know, everybody in this room has been in this long enough to
> know that there are no silver bullets. But there has to be one or two
> things on the financial side\--and, Larry, you just answered that
> question\--but are there things that can be done or policy changes or
> legislative changes or attitudinal changes that will make a
> difference? And I guess we can start with Raphael.
>
> MR. PERL: I would go back to a point that Larry Johnson made, and I
> think that in combatting terrorism the DEA has a lot to offer, and
> it\'s important to plug them into the policy process as much as
> possible.
>
> At the same time we have to be careful that we don\'t overemphasize
> the value that going after drug trafficking can add to going after
> terrorism. Because if we focus too much on drug trafficking, it can
> detract, perhaps, from more effective ways of going after terrorism.
>
> So you need to strike a healthy balance here.
>
> MR. NOVAK: Anybody else want to make a quick comment on that?
>
> MR. PASIERB: Ann, you put it in the frame of the next 30 days. And
> personally one of the things I\'d like to see is I\'d like to see the
> President talk about this issue, both to parents from their unique
> viewpoint of this, and to kids, to make that appeal to parents, to
> have that conversation with their kid, that dialogue, and to talk to
> teenagers about what they can do. Because Steve made the point very
> early on, which I think should pervade everything we talked about
> here, Americans can asking what can they do. And I think they need to
> hear that from the President in the context of a lot of the other
> things he\'s asked America to do.
>
> We know if we make progress on this front, we\'re going to make
> progress on a lot of others. So it needs to be back on the front
> burner. It\'s a limited stove, but on the front burner of the American
> agenda.
>
> MR. NOVAK: All right. It\'s time now for closing comments from one of
> our really distinguished experts on this subject. Peter Bensinger is
> the president and chief executive officer of Bensinger, Dupont &
> Associates, which is a privately-owned firm providing professional
> services, including the promotion of a drug-free workplace. Mr.
> Bensinger is well remembered in Washington. In January of 1976, he was
> appointed by President Ford as the administrator of the U.S. Drug
> Enforcement Administration, and he served\--Mr. Hutchinson, listen to
> this\--he served for over five and a half years in that post.
>
> \[Laughter.\]
>
> MR. NOVAK: And served very well, indeed. So, Peter Bensinger.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. PERL: Peter, could I just respond still for a second to Ann\'s
> question?
>
> MR. BENSINGER: Please.
>
> MR. PERL: That would be I would suggest a bumper sticker \"Fight
> Terror, Fight Drugs.\" Okay. Just a very simple bumper sticker. I
> think it could draw a lot of attention.
>
> MR. BENSINGER: I would add to your comment, Raphael, that I think you
> need, in answer to Ann\'s question, and you raised a couple of
> suggestions, attitudinal changes, legislative changes, the President
> speaking. I think you need all of it.
>
> I think what we have tended to do over the years is look for one magic
> solution, whether it\'s interdiction, demand reduction, law
> enforcement, international. We need to do all of them well at once.
> Some of the suggestions made today I think would go a long way to
> doing just that.
>
> I want to thank Bob Novak for his leadership in this field long before
> arriving at this podium.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. BENSINGER: I also think, from a personal standpoint, I think the
> terrorism on September 11th, a tragic incineration of 5000 souls in
> New York and here, was different than the American public perceived as
> terrorism in the past when terrorists targeted government buildings,
> military ships, embassies. All of a sudden, the attacks were against
> citizens. Innocent citizens. I think this got America\'s attention and
> unification, and it\'s been different than the type of terrible
> terrorist attacks against Supreme Court justices or candidates for
> president, or embassies.
>
> I also think we\'ve had too high a tolerance for violence in this
> country, and that the drug traffickers are the terrorists in our inner
> cities, and the turf battles there are being waged daily by gangs and
> people are dying, and the money and the fear and the drugs are
> intermittently linked.
>
> So this is not just a battle, as I think Steve suggested, 12 time
> zones away, it\'s in our own cities every day.
>
> I think Asa Hutchinson is to be commended for his leadership, and my
> personal hope is that he will exceed my tenure as DEA administrator.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. BENSINGER: I want to express my gratitude to Raphael Perl, Larry
> Johnson, Steve Casteel, General Jose Serrano, Steve Pasierb, Brian
> Dyak, to Bill Alden, the president of the DEA Museum Foundation, to
> the shadow panelists who have been introduced, and to the audience and
> media. And the media plays an important role, and it was raised
> several times because this message and the linkage between terrorism
> and drug trafficking, which are interwoven like two poisonous vipers
> that breed off each other, this message has to get to the public, to
> the parents, to the kids, and the media can carry the message of
> today\'s colloquium, today\'s conference symposium, and I hope will do
> so.
>
> This is the first major proactive DEA event of its kind on the issue
> of narco-terrorism. It\'s only the beginning. As Bill Alden mentioned
> at the beginning, AFFNA, an association of former federal narcotic
> agents, and the DEA Museum Foundation are working to develop, with DEA
> support, a nationally touring museum exhibit that will reach
> throughout the country on narco-terrorism, and will also reach, we
> hope, Capitol Hill and Washington and our permanent exhibit, which I
> hope you will visit later.
>
> The Partnership\'s effort to educate American public on the links
> between drugs and terrorism is real important. I am delighted that
> that effort is going forward. The exhibit here will complement those
> efforts that will appear on the national media, those efforts that the
> parent group movement will extol.
>
> I would again remind you that as you leave, you will see there is a
> display in the DEA museum across the lobby from this auditorium
> featuring illegal drugs in America. A comprehensive look over 150
> years of drugs and drug abuse.
>
> Museums are a wonderful institution. They give truthful messages,
> objective, factual, and this one is not only interesting but
> important. I hope you will look.
>
> I want to thank everyone for participating today. I want to take a
> message of commitment away with me that carries this message from this
> day forward to make a safer America for all of us.
>
> Thank you very much. The meeting is adjourned.
>
> \[Applause.\]
>
> MR. BENSINGER: If the panelists and the shadow panelists and moderator
> would remain for any questions from the media. The other members of
> the audience are invited to tour the museum. Have a good lunch and a
> good afternoon at this time. We will remain here for a moment.
>
> \[Whereupon, at 12:32 p.m., the conference was concluded.\]
| en |
all-txt-docs | 024017 | Braille Book Review
September-October 2008
Volume 77, Number 5
_Braille Book Review_ is published bimonthly in large-print,
braille, and computer diskette formats and distributed
free to blind and physically handicapped individuals who
participate in the Library of Congress free reading program.
It lists braille magazines and books available through a
network of cooperating libraries. The braille edition also
lists recorded books, giving abbreviated annotations. News
about library services is featured in both editions.
The annotated list in this issue is limited to titles
recently added to the national collection, which contains
thousands of fiction and nonfiction titles, including
classics, biographies, gothics, mysteries, and how-to and
self-help guides. To learn more about the wide
range of books in the national collection, readers may order
catalogs and subject bibliographies from cooperating
libraries. Librarians can check other resources for titles
and answer requests for special materials. Readers can
receive _Braille Book Review_ and other information
through the Internet by accessing the the NLS
home page at http://www.loc.gov/nls.
To order books or for subscription changes,
contact your local cooperating library.
Correspondence regarding editorial matters should be sent
to Publications and Media Section, National Library Service
for the Blind and Physically Handicapped, Library of
Congress, Washington, DC 20542.
Library of Congress, Washington 2008
Library of Congress
Catalog Card Number 53-31800
ISSN 0006-873X
Contents:
In Brief
Books for Adults
Nonfiction
Fiction
Books for Children
Nonfiction
Fiction
Braille Magazines
###
In Brief
The following information is reprinted from an issue of NLS
Flash, a newsletter created to bring current information on
NLS progress in digital technology to patrons, library
staff, and other interested individuals.
NLS Flash
July 2008
volume 4 issue 2
Contracts awarded for digital talking-book player,
cartridge mailing container, and training
On behalf of the National Library Service for the Blind and
Physically Handicapped (NLS), the Library of Congress has
awarded contracts for three critical elements necessary for
implementation of the digital talking-book system. Shinano
Kenshi Corporation Ltd. of Japan and its subsidiary
Plextor-LLC of Culver City, California, will produce the
digital talking-book players; LC Industries in Hazlehurst,
Mississippi, will produce the digital talking-book
cartridge mailing containers; and SI International in
Reston, Virginia, will develop training strategies for the
network of cooperating libraries. The award of the
cartridge contract is pending.
Digital talking-book players
Shinano Kenshi/Plextor will produce the standard and
advanced digital talking-book players. Plextor, the
electronic equipment division of Shinano Kenshi, produces
the Plextalk line of DAISY talking-book players and other
computer components including players for compact discs
(CDs), DVDs, and Blu Ray discs.
The player contract's base period is for three years with a
unilateral government option of an additional four years.
More than $35 million has been obligated to fund the
initial production of 223,837 players. The first players
will be manufactured in late 2008.
Digital talking-book cartridge mailing containers
LC Industries, a Javits-Wagner-O'Day contractor, has
produced injection-molded plastic mailing containers used
by NLS for more than 15 years. The company will initially
produce 500,000 blue plastic mailing containers for digital
talking books. NLS is working out details regarding the
network purchase of the mailing containers and will notify
the network when the containers are available for purchase.
Training contract
SI International has designed training applications for
deployment over the Internet since 1998. NLS has engaged
the company to assist with preparing strategies for
training the staffs of the 128 cooperating libraries
serving blind and physically handicapped readers throughout
the country and in U.S. territories. SI International will
gather information to recommend training models appropriate
for preparing library staff to handle three specific tasks:
using and explaining the digital talking-book machine;
downloading digital talking books and signing up patrons
for the download project, NLS BARD; and duplicating digital
talking books at the local level.
The goal is to provide a variety of training materials for
each task and to identify the best methods of delivery. The
materials will be designed to assist current and future
network library staffs.
Newsstand
The following announcement may be of interest to readers.
The National Library Service for the Blind and Physically
Handicapped reserves the right to publish announcements
selectively, as space permits. The item mentioned, however,
is not part of the NLS program, and its listing does not
imply endorsement.
Bookshare.org offers free text reader for visually impaired
students
At the beginning of the 2008?2009 school year, visually
impaired students with access to the Internet on a Windows
PC will be able to use the free Read:OutLoud, Bookshare.org
Edition, text reader to access the more than thirty-six
thousand electronic books, magazines, and newspapers
available in the Bookshare.org online library. Memberships
to Bookshare.org are now free to all U.S. students with
qualifying disabilities.
This software tool was designed to serve elementary and
secondary students who receive special education services
and qualify for free reading materials under the 1996
Chafee Amendment to
the Copyright Law. The text reader was designed to align
with state educational standards and provides audio
feedback, electronic highlighting, and note-taking
features. A Macintosh version of the text reader will be
introduced in 2009. For more information, visit
bookshare.org.
###
_Books for Adults_
The following books were recently produced for the NLS
program. To order books, contact your braille-lending
library.
_Note:_ For the infomation of the reader, a notice may
appear immediately following the book description to
indicate occurrences of strong language, explicit
descriptions of sex, or violence. The word "some" before any
of these terms indicates an occasional or infrequent
occurence, as in "some strong language."
Adult Nonfiction
How to Read the Bible: History, Prophecy, Literature?Why Modern Readers
Need to Know the Difference, and What It Means for Faith Today
BR 16659
by Steven L. McKenzie
3 volumes
Biblical scholar contends that recognizing the Bible's various literary
genres is vital to accurate interpretation. Relies on textual clues to
analyze the meaning of passages such as that of Jonah, which McKenzie
posits is not a literal account of a man swallowed by a whale but a
humorous satire. 2005.
BR 16659
##
Not Even Wrong: Adventures in Autism
BR 16664
by Paul Collins
2 volumes
Memoirist recounts his experiences after his two-year-old son was
diagnosed with symptoms of autism, a developmental disorder affecting
communication and social skills. Intersperses episodes of his family's
daily life with anecdotes from his own personal journey to understand
the world of autists and the meaning of "normal." Includes resources.
2004.
BR 16664
##
Captured by Grace: No One Is beyond the Reach of a Loving God
BR 16672
by David Jeremiah
2 volumes
Pastor reflects on the message of grace as found in John Newton's hymn
"Amazing Grace" and the letters of the apostle Paul. Explores the
transcendent power of mercy and forgiveness. Discusses how anyone can
admit transgressions, access divine grace, and create a life of purpose
and peace. 2006.
BR 16672
##
Captain John Smith: Jamestown and the Birth of the American Dream
BR 16673
by Dorothy Hoobler and Thomas Hoobler
3 volumes
A chronicle of explorer John Smith (1580?1631), who founded and led the
Jamestown colony from 1607 to 1609. Uses Smith's writings, colonists'
diaries, and archives to trace his adventures, including his arrival in
the New World facing possible execution, and to demythologize his
relationship with Pocahontas and portray wilderness life. 2006.
BR 16673
##
Safe Sex 101: An Overview for Teens
BR 16675
by Margaret O. Hyde and Elizabeth H. Forsyth
1 volume
A science writer and a child psychiatrist discuss the physical and
emotional aspects of human sexuality including anatomy, contraception,
abstinence, social pressures, and diseases such as AIDS. Presents
scenarios that teens may encounter and practical responses to them. For
senior high and older readers. 2006.
BR 16675
##
When Bad Things Happen to Good People
BR 16801
by Harold S. Kushner
1 volume
Impelled by personal tragedy in his own life, the author, a rabbi,
helps others cope with grief, guilt, rage, bitterness, and bewilderment
at God's "unfairness." In his search for answers to why tragedies
seemingly strike those undeserving of them, he offers comfort and
reassurance to the troubled. 1981.
BR 16801
##
American Medical Association Guide to Living with Diabetes: Preventing
and Treating Type 2 Diabetes?Essential Information You and Your Family
Need to Know
BR 16922
by American Medical Association and Boyd E. Metzger
3 volumes
Lifestyle guidelines for people with type 2 diabetes including diet,
exercise, and personal care. Covers diagnosis, treatment, medication,
alternative therapies, children, pregnancy, and complications. 2006.
BR 16922
##
The First Scientific American: Benjamin Franklin and the Pursuit of
Genius
BR 16941
by Joyce E. Chaplin
5 volumes
Harvard professor highlights the scientific discoveries of American
founding father Benjamin Franklin (1706?1790) that enabled his
involvement in political affairs. Describes the transatlantic community
of Enlightenment scientists and Franklin's international renown due to
his pathbreaking research on electricity, asbestos, the Gulf Stream,
and other topics. 2006.
BR 16941
##
Singin' and Swingin' and Gettin' Merry like Christmas
BR 16943
by Maya Angelou
2 volumes
In this third volume of her memoirs, following Gather Together in My
Name (BR 16910), Angelou covers her twenties. Describes her
relationship with the white world, her early motherhood, and her show
business career that began when she was a dancer in a San Francisco
club. 1976.
BR 16943
##
Tigers in Red Weather: A Quest for the Last Wild Tigers
BR 17143
by Ruth Padel
5 volumes
British poet describes the plight of tigers as she travels to their
habitats in India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Russia, Korea, China,
Southeast Asia, and Indonesia. Padel discusses tiger lore and history,
the work of scientists and conservators in the field, and the reasons
for the near extinction of tigers. 2006.
BR 17143
##
Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are
BR 17152
by Frans de Waal
3 volumes
Explores the parallels between bonobo, chimpanzee, and human behaviors
in expressing control, sexual attraction, violence, and kindness.
Contrasts the power-hungry and brutal chimp with the peace-loving,
empathetic, and erotic bonobo and examines the combination of these
traits in human nature. Also discusses human ancestry. Descriptions of
sex. 2005.
BR 17152
##
The Essential Talmud
BR 17167
by Adin Steinsaltz
3 volumes
Rabbi presents an overview of the beliefs, attitudes, and customs
associated with the Talmud, the sacred Jewish text that he calls "a
book of holy intellectualism." Presents the Talmud's history,
methodology, and structure and content, including Jewish law regarding
diet, crime, marriage, divorce, prayers, and festivals. 2006.
BR 17167
##
Understanding Herpes
BR 17172
by Lawrence R. Stanberry
1 volume
Physician offers an overview and history of the common herpes simplex
virus family that includes chicken pox, shingles, mononucleosis,
roseola, Epstein-Barr, and Kaposi's sarcoma. Concentrates on
prevention, identification, treatment, and psychological impact of
genital herpes. 2006.
BR 17172
##
Jesus of Nazareth: From the Baptism in the Jordan to the
Transfiguration
BR 17214
by Pope Benedict XVI
3 volumes
Pope Benedict pens a biography of the flesh-and-blood Jesus as revealed
in the Gospels. The pope shares his understanding of Jesus of Nazareth
as the central figure of Christianity, who brought God to Earth along
with faith, hope, and love. Bestseller. 2007.
BR 17214
##
The Diana Chronicles
BR 17228
by Tina Brown
6 volumes
British writer and former editor of the New Yorker interviews
colleagues and friends of the late Princess Diana (1961?1997) to
provide a personal profile of Her Royal Highness. Discusses Diana's
marriage to Prince Charles, their divorce, and assertions of her
manipulation of the press. Some strong language. Bestseller. 2007.
BR 17228
##
Selected Poems, 1947?1995
BR 17241
by Allen Ginsberg
4 volumes
Beat Generation poet Allen Ginsberg (1926?1997) presents a half century
of verse in a variety of forms and themes including the political,
sexual, devotional, and spiritual. Contains selections from Howl,
Kaddish, The Fall of America, Plutonian Ode, White Shroud, and others.
Descriptions of sex and strong language. 1996.
BR 17241
##
The Avenger Takes His Place: Andrew Johnson and the Forty-five Days
That Changed the Nation
BR 17255
by Howard Means
3 volumes
Traces the events surrounding President Abraham Lincoln's April 14,
1865, assassination, when Vice President Andrew Johnson from Tennessee
unexpectedly became the nation's leader. Highlights Johnson's May 29,
1865, unilateral decision to grant amnesty to Confederates who took a
loyalty oath. Discusses his battles with the radical Republicans in
Congress. 2006.
BR 17255
##
Plato and a Platypus Walk into a Bar . . . : Understanding Philosophy
through Jokes
BR 17268
by Thomas Cathcart and Daniel Klein
1 volume
Authors present dialogs, one-liners, and limericks to illuminate key
concepts of Western philosophy. Cathcart and Klein show how humor often
contains philosophy and exposes hidden truths about life. Topics
include ethics, epistemology, existentialism, logic, metaphilosophy,
metaphysics, and relativity, as well as theories of language, politics,
society, and religion. Bestseller. 2007.
BR 17268
##
Outliving Heart Disease: The Ten New Rules for Prevention and Treatment
BR 17304
by Richard A. Stein
3 volumes
Cardiologist presents to people with heart disease his plan for "living
well with your heart until you die of something else." Describes
scientific breakthroughs in tests, treatments, and medications;
suggests lifestyle changes in diet and exercise; discusses alternative
and complementary therapies; and covers the mind-body connection. 2008.
BR 17304
##
The Hellenistic Age: A Short History
BR 17327
by Peter Green
3 volumes
Classics professor surveys three centuries of ancient Greek history
from the era of Philip of Macedon and Alexander the Great in 336 B.C.E.
to the death of Cleopatra of Egypt in 31 B.C.E. Highlights ruthless
leaders, political machinations, and battles that eventually gave way
to Roman control. 2007.
BR 17327
##
The Loved Dog: The Playful, Nonaggressive Way to Teach Your Dog Good
Behavior
BR 17359
by Tamar Geller
2 volumes
Humane Society advisor and owner of a cage-free boarding facility
offers a training manual based on positive reinforcement, not
punishment. Discusses effective communication techniques and nonviolent
ways to attain good behavior, such as sitting and walking on a leash,
and to correct bad behavior, such as jumping and begging. 2007.
BR 17359
##
Doing It Right: Making Smart, Safe, and Satisfying Choices about Sex
BR 17361
by Bronwen Pardes
1 volume
The author, a sex education teacher, explains puberty and reproductive
anatomy and provides information on sexually transmitted diseases
(STDs), birth control, sexual abuse, and gender identity issues.
Includes resources, definitions, and a question-and-answer section. For
senior high and older readers. 2007.
BR 17361
##
Scambusters! More than Sixty Ways Seniors Get Swindled and How They Can
Prevent It
BR 17363
by Ron Smith
2 volumes
Concise manual on recognizing fraudulent activity and avoiding becoming
a victim. Describes dozens of scenarios involving banking and credit,
nursing homes, health care, online pharmacies, insurance, investments,
the Internet, car repairs, charitable donations, shopping, and
telemarketing. Includes resources. 2006.
BR 17363
##
The Amputee's Guide to Sex
BR 17374
by Jillian Weise
1 volume
The author, an amputee with a prosthetic leg, offers her poetic
meditations on the emotional and physical complexities of sexual
intimacy. In the poem "The Old Questions" a new lover seems more
interested in the author's artificial limb than in having sex. Some
strong language. 2007.
BR 17374
##
Andrew Jackson
BR 17386
by Sean Wilentz
2 volumes
Princeton historian analyzes the seventh American president, Andrew
Jackson (1767?1845), in the context of his times. Portrays Jackson as a
military hero who endorsed the concept of the people as a sovereign
power. Highlights Jackson's 1828 election at the dawn of the Age of the
Democratic Revolution. 2005.
BR 17386
##
Julia Child
BR 17477
by Laura Shapiro
2 volumes
Award-winning food writer describes the unlikely career path of
American chef Julia Child (1912?2004), who championed French cuisine on
television and published Mastering the Art of French Cooking (BR 12229
and BR 12230). Discusses Child's passion for cooking and appetite for
life. 2007.
BR 17477
##
Breast Cancer Clear and Simple: All Your Questions Answered; from the
Experts at the American Cancer Society
BR 17478
by American Cancer Society
1 volume
Offers an overview of breast cancer, available treatments, and recovery
issues. Suggests questions to ask one's physician and discusses
possible treatment side effects, breast reconstruction options,
insurance issues, and choices for healthy living. 2008.
BR 17478
##
###
Adult Fiction
Comfort and Joy
BR 16603
by Kristin Hannah
2 volumes
School librarian Joy Candellaro takes an impromptu vacation during the
holidays when she learns that her ex-husband and her sister are having
a baby. After surviving a crash landing in a remote forest, Joy
encounters reclusive Daniel and his eight-year-old son Bobby?or did she
imagine them? 2005.
BR 16603
##
Dead Water: An Inspector Roderick Alleyn Mystery
BR 16906
by Ngaio Marsh
2 volumes
When a week of death threats at a controversial faith-healing resort
ends with a ghastly murder, Inspector Roderick Alleyn is faced with a
puzzling and painful case. One of the two main suspects is an old
friend of Alleyn's and the other is the victim herself. 1963.
BR 16906
##
The Shelters of Stone: Earth's Children, Book 5
BR 17151
by Jean M. Auel
9 volumes
Continues the saga of prehistoric society from The Plains of Passage
(BR 17119). Ayla and Jondalar, with their two horses and a wolf, arrive
at the caves of the Zelandonii?Jondalar's people?and receive a mixed
welcome. Ayla, as an outsider with strange customs, strives to win
acceptance. Some explicit descriptions of sex. Bestseller. 2002.
BR 17151
##
Cat Pay the Devil: A Joe Grey Mystery
BR 17173
by Shirley Rousseau Murphy
2 volumes
California. Escaped convict Cage Jones targets former federal agent
Wilma Getz. When Wilma goes missing, feline sleuths Dulcie and Kit set
out to infiltrate Cage's hideout. Meanwhile, tomcat Joe Grey, who is
preoccupied with local murders, and his human companion Clyde retrace
Wilma's last known whereabouts. Some strong language. 2007.
BR 17173
##
At Some Disputed Barricade: A World War I Novel
BR 17174
by Anne Perry
3 volumes
The Western Front, 1917. British intelligence officer Matthew Reavley
tracks a traitor called Peacemaker. Meanwhile, his brother Joseph, a
chaplain, and sister Judith, an ambulance driver, experience
ambivalence when twelve British soldiers face execution for killing an
incompetent officer. Sequel to Angels in the Gloom (BR 16291). Some
violence. 2007.
BR 17174
##
Falling Man
BR 17211
by Don DeLillo
2 volumes
On September 11, 2001, businessman Keith emerges from the World Trade
Center rubble and makes his way to the apartment of his estranged wife
Lianne. She tries to understand their apparent reconciliation, while
Keith reaches out to fellow survivor Florence. Some descriptions of sex
and some strong language. Bestseller. 2007.
BR 17211
##
The 6th Target: A Women's Murder Club Mystery
BR 17215
by James Patterson and Maxine Paetro
2 volumes
San Francisco. When a mass shooting on a ferry wounds Women's Murder
Club member Claire Washburn, Sergeant Lindsay Boxer investigates and
attorney Yuki Castellano prosecutes. Lindsay also delves into a child
kidnapping case involving a dead nanny. Strong language, some
descriptions of sex, and some violence. Bestseller. 2007.
BR 17215
##
The Tale of the Children of H?rin: Narn I Ch?n H?rin
BR 17216
by J.R.R. Tolkien
2 volumes
A tale of the Elder Days of Middle-earth, variations of which appeared
in Unfinished Tales of Numenor and Middle-earth (BR 05039) and The
Silmarillion (BR 11510). Describes the fates of H?rin?cursed lord of
Dor-l?min?and his children T?rin and Ni?nor. Restored, edited, and
introduced by the author's son, Christopher Tolkien. Bestseller. 2007.
BR 17216
##
Christmas Letters
BR 17218
by Debbie Macomber
2 volumes
Seattle medical transcriptionist and ghostwriter Katherine "K.O."
O'Connor meets prominent child psychologist Wynn Jeffries, whose
parenting principles her sister has adopted. K.O. disagrees with Wynn's
theories, claiming that they have turned her twin nieces into little
monsters, but falls in love with the attractive doctor. 2006.
BR 17218
##
Forever in Blue: The Fourth Summer of the Sisterhood
BR 17231
by Ann Brashares
2 volumes
Carmen, Lena, Bridget, and Tibby, from Girls in Pants (BR 15872), share
the magic blue jeans during the summer after their freshman year in
college. The four relish their long friendship while experiencing
grown-up dilemmas and romance. Some descriptions of sex. For senior
high readers. 2007.
BR 17231
##
Old Filth
BR 17240
by Jane Gardam
2 volumes
1990s. Widower and former judge Edward Feathers, known as Old FILTH
(Failed In London Try Hong Kong), nearly eighty and living alone,
recalls his past. Muses on his childhood in Malaya, military service
and law career, relationships with women, and reasons for retiring to
England. Some descriptions of sex. 2004.
BR 17240
##
Murder at the Opera: A Capital Crimes Novel
BR 17253
by Margaret Truman
3 volumes
Washington, D.C. A promising young Canadian singer is found murdered
backstage at the Kennedy Center. Law professor Mac Smith?an extra in
the Washington National Opera's upcoming production of Puccini's Tosca?
and his wife Annabel investigate. Aided by PI Ray Pawkins the pair
uncover a far-reaching international conspiracy. 2006.
BR 17253
##
Light Thickens: An Inspector Roderick Alleyn Mystery
BR 17257
by Ngaio Marsh
2 volumes
A London acting troupe putting on Shakespeare's Macbeth suspects the
play is cursed after several pranks disrupt rehearsals. Their
apprehension turns to horror when an actor is murdered on stage during
a performance. Scotland Yard Chief Superintendent Roderick Alleyn, who
happens to be in the audience, investigates. 1982.
BR 17257
##
The Killer's Tears
BR 17259
by Anne-Laure Bondoux
1 volume
When on-the-run criminal Angel Allegria arrives at the Poloverdos' farm
in southernmost Chile, he murders the parents but spares their child
Paolo. Angel's paternal bond with Paolo is challenged by Luis Secunda,
a well-educated man who moves in nearby. Some violence. For senior high
and older readers. Batchelder Honor. 2003.
BR 17259
##
The House of the Scorpion
BR 17298
by Nancy Farmer
3 volumes
In a future where humans despise clones, Matt has special privileges as
the young clone of El Patr?n?the 140-year-old leader of a corrupt drug
empire. When Matt gets a glimpse of his fate, he rebels. Some violence
and some strong language. For junior and senior high readers. Newbery
Honor Book; National Book Award. 2002.
BR 17298
##
Harley's Ninth
BR 17312
by Cat Bauer
2 volumes
For sixteen-year-old Harley Columba, October 9th is a momentous day,
featuring her opening in a New York City gallery, a fight and
reconciliation with her newly found father, and the arrival of her
period five days late. Sequel to Harley, like a Person (BR 13382). Some
descriptions of sex. For senior high readers. 2007.
BR 17312
##
The Hooded Hawke: An Elizabeth I Mystery
BR 17325
by Karen Harper
2 volumes
England, 1569. Queen Elizabeth Tudor and her court, which includes
Francis Drake, are traveling in the countryside to escape the London
summer when archers attack them and kill the queen's falconer.
Elizabeth and her herbalist Meg Milligrew investigate the crime?
suspecting political rivals, Spanish enemies, and even the queen's
relatives. 2007.
BR 17325
##
Play Dirty
BR 17340
by Sandra Brown
4 volumes
Former quarterback Griff Burkett,just released from jail after serving
time for throwing a game for the mob, is hired by Texas paraplegic
millionaire Foster Speakman to impregnate his wife Laura. Griff takes
the money while being stalked by crooked Dallas cop Stanley Rodarte.
Explicit descriptions of sex. Bestseller. 2007.
BR 17340
##
The S?ance
BR 17341
by Heather Graham
3 volumes
A series of murders in Orlando was originally pinned on a cop who was
shot and killed. When the murders begin again, the cop's ghost asks
reluctant Christina Hardy to help prove his innocence posthumously and
catch the real killer. Explicit descriptions of sex, violence, and
strong language. Bestseller. 2007.
BR 17341
##
Thirteen Little Blue Envelopes
BR 17357
by Maureen Johnson
2 volumes
Timid seventeen-year-old Ginny receives from her recently deceased
favorite aunt a packet of mysterious envelopes that send Ginny from New
Jersey on a scavenger hunt across Europe. Along the way Ginny meets new
people, finds love, and has adventures that transform her life. For
senior high readers. 2005.
BR 17357
##
Limitations
BR 17358
by Scott Turow
2 volumes
Appellate court judge George Mason, from Personal Injuries (BR 12406),
deliberates the case of four men charged with raping an African
American teenager. As George considers the statute of limitations, he
confronts memories of his own sexual indiscretion. Some explicit
descriptions of sex, some violence, and some strong language. 2006.
BR 17358
##
Back on Blossom Street
BR 17360
by Debbie Macomber
3 volumes
Colette, a young widow who left her job after an affair with her boss;
Alix, a jittery bride-to-be; and flower store owner Susannah join A
Good Yarn's newest knitting class. Under instructor Lydia's tutelage,
they learn to make prayer shawls?and to cope with their problems. Some
descriptions of sex. 2007.
BR 17360
##
Up in Honey's Room
BR 17362
by Elmore Leonard
2 volumes
Federal marshal Carl Webster, from Hot Kid (BR 16125), travels to
Detroit in 1944 to search for escaped German POWs. Webster interviews
beautiful Honey Deal, the divorced wife of Nazi meatcutter Walter
Schoen, and investigates Ukrainian spy Vera Mezwa. Strong language and
some violence. 2007.
BR 17362
##
The Lottery and Other Stories
BR 17368
by Shirley Jackson
2 volumes
Twenty-five short stories ranging from adventure to horror. In the
title piece, a village puts a terrifying twist on the luck of the draw.
In "The Witch" a stranger on a train regales a young boy with a
chilling tale of murder. Some violence. 1948.
BR 17368
##
Howard Who? Stories
BR 17370
by Howard Waldrop
2 volumes
Twelve short stories. In "Heirs of the Perisphere" a robot dog, duck,
and rodent spontaneously animated in a long-abandoned cartoon automaton
factory find a world much different from their own. Also includes the
Nebula and World Fantasy Award-winning "The Ugly Chickens" and "Horror,
We Got." 1986.
BR 17370
##
Slaughterhouse-Five; or, The Children's Crusade?a Duty-Dance with Death
BR 17373
by Kurt Vonnegut
2 volumes
Billy Pilgrim, adrift in time, randomly revisits past and present
manifestations: senile widower stalked by an assassin, hopeful young
newlywed, giraffe on the planet Tralfamadore?where time is an illusion?
and, most crucially, American POW during the firebombing of Dresden in
World War II. Strong language. 1969.
BR 17373
##
Knots
BR 17377
by Nuruddin Farah
4 volumes
Mogadiscio, Somalia. Cambara returns to her native land from Toronto
after the accidental death of her son. Cambara reclaims her parents'
house from a local warlord, organizes a play with the help of women
activists, and falls in love. Companion to Links (BR 16276). 2007.
BR 17377
##
To Have and Have Not
BR 17381
by Ernest Hemingway
2 volumes
Key West, Florida. Swindled by an American who chartered his boat for
deep-sea fishing, Harry Morgan turns to smuggling goods from Cuba to
provide for his family. Changing his moral compass, Harry progresses
from running rum to transporting riskier human contraband. Some strong
language. 1937.
BR 17381
##
The Land of Mango Sunsets
BR 17385
by Dorothea Benton Frank
3 volumes
New York socialite Miriam Swanson, estranged from her grown sons, has
become a miserable social pariah since her divorce. But, after visiting
her aging hippie mother in Sullivans Island, South Carolina, Miriam
changes her attitude. With the help of her tenants she begins to enjoy
life. 2007.
BR 17385
##
A Version of the Truth
BR 17476
by Jennifer Kaufman and Karen Mack
2 volumes
Topanga Canyon, California. Widowed, dyslexic high school dropout
Cassie lies on her resum? to obtain a local university job assisting
animal behavior professor Conner. Cassie, already a wildlife expert,
discovers a different world of education, refinement, and love. Strong
language and some descriptions of sex. Bestseller. 2008.
BR 17476
##
###
_Books for Children_
The following books were recently produced for the NLS
program. To order books, contact your braille-lending
library.
Children's Nonfiction
Canterbury Tales
BR 17220
retold by Barbara Cohen
1 volume
Four of Geoffrey Chaucer's tales retold in modern English. The nun's
priest recounts the barnyard adventures of prideful rooster
Chauntecleer, the pardoner teaches a lesson about greed, the wife of
Bath relates a baffled knight's dilemma, and the franklin celebrates
courtly love. For grades 5-8 and older readers. 1988.
BR 17220
##
Venturing the Deep Sea
BR 17353
by Laurie Lindop
1 volume
Discusses the relatively uncharted realm of the deep sea and a
collection of data and specimens that biologists and geologists
gathered using underwater cameras, remotely operated robot explorers,
and manned submersibles. Examines mid-ocean ridges, hydrothermal vents,
and bioluminescent creatures. Describes a submarine expedition in the
Arctic. For grades 5-8. 2006.
BR 17353
##
Chasing Tornadoes
BR 17355
by Laurie Lindop
1 volume
Explains the formation of tornadoes and the science of forecasting
their arrival. Discusses the contributions of "storm chasers," who
conduct experiments from airplanes and ground vehicles in the section
of the midwestern United States known as Tornado Alley. Features
scientist Ted Fujita and his rating scale. For grades 5-8. 2003.
BR 17355
##
Hip-Hop: A Short History
BR 17376
by Rosa Waters
1 volume
Traces the musical movement that began in neighborhoods in the Bronx in
the 1970s and became a major cultural, political, and philanthropic
force around the world. Discusses hip-hop's African origins and other
influences in its development. Focuses on the positive aspects of the
form. For grades 5-8. 2007.
BR 17376
##
Dinosaur Tracks
BR 17390
by Kathleen Weidner Zoehfeld
1 volume
Explains that fossils of dinosaur footprints found today are the result
of tracks made and preserved millions of years ago. Includes an
activity for making your own fossil handprints or footprints. For
grades 2-4. 2007.
BR 17390
##
Should I Play the Piano?
BR 17483
by Nicola Barber
1 volume
Explains how a piano works, what types of music can be played on it,
and who some of the famous players are. Offers suggestions for finding
a teacher. For grades 3-6. 2007.
BR 17483
##
Should I Play the Guitar?
BR 17484
by Richard Spilsbury
1 volume
Presents the history of the instrument and the music that can be played
on it. Explains the parts of the guitar and how they work together to
produce sound. Discusses the advantages of learning and playing this
instrument and deciding whether it is right for you. For grades 3-6.
2007.
BR 17484
##
###
Children's Fiction
The Noonday Friends
BR 16609
by Mary Stolz
1 volume
Franny Davis enjoys spending lunchtime with her best friend Simone
Orgella, because after school Franny is busy with lots of household
responsibilities. She worries that Simone prefers her rich friend Lila,
who has more time to play. For grades 5-8. Newbery Honor Book. 1965.
BR 16609
##
Things Not Seen
BR 17135
by Andrew Clements
2 volumes
When fifteen-year-old Bobby wakes up and can't see his body, his
relationship with the physical world and his parents changes. He
confides his invisibility situation to new friend Alicia, who was
blinded two years before, and they try to figure out what happened to
him. For grades 6-9. Schneider Family Book Award. 2002.
BR 17135
##
Joey Pigza Loses Control
BR 17300
by Jack Gantos
1 volume
In this sequel to Joey Pigza Swallowed the Key, Joey is spending the
summer with his long-absent alcoholic dad, who convinces Joey to stop
wearing his medication patches. Soon wired again, Joey clashes with his
dad's own out-of-control personality. For grades 5-8. Newbery Honor
Book. 2000.
BR 17300
##
The Wanderer
BR 17302
by Sharon Creech
2 volumes
Thirteen-year-old Sophie and her cousin Cody record their transatlantic
voyage by sailboat, along with other relatives, to visit their
grandfather Bompie in England. The family's journey of discovery
becomes especially important for Sophie, who was adopted only three
years ago. For grades 5-8. Newbery Honor Book. 2000.
BR 17302
##
Jackson Jones and the Curse of the Outlaw Rose
BR 17310
by Mary Quattlebaum
1 volume
Elderly gardener Mr. Kerring enlists ten-year-old Jackson and his
friend Reuben to "rustle roses" from a graveyard. Poison ivy, broken
bones, and stinging bees make the boys believe that the rose cutting is
cursed. Sequel to Jackson Jones and Mission Greentop (BR 17103). For
grades 3-6. 2006.
BR 17310
##
Star in the Storm
BR 17366
by Joan Hiatt Harlow
1 volume
1912. Twelve-year-old Maggie's Newfoundland dog Sirius is a valued
member of her family. But all non-sheepherding dogs are outlawed, so
Maggie hides Sirius. When a steamship founders during a storm, Maggie
must decide whether to send Sirius to rescue passengers or keep him
safely hidden. For grades 3-6. 2000.
BR 17366
##
Our Only May Amelia
BR 17367
by Jennifer L. Holm
2 volumes
In 1899, twelve-year-old May Amelia lives with her Finnish American
family in the small Washington community of Nasel. A tomboy with seven
brothers, May becomes anxious about her family's bad luck. Some strong
language. For grades 4-7. Newbery Honor Book. 1999.
BR 17367
##
Penny from Heaven
BR 17369
by Jennifer L. Holm
2 volumes
New Jersey, 1953. During the summer, eleven-year-old Penny carries her
uncle Dominic's lucky bean, almost loses her arm, reconciles with her
mother's beau, and discovers the cause of her father's death. Best of
all, she reunites her feuding family. For grades 5-8. Newbery Honor
Book. 2006.
BR 17369
##
Wringer
BR 17372
by Jerry Spinelli
1 volume
Palmer LaRue dreads turning ten, the age at which boys become wringers?
those who break the necks of wounded birds at the town's annual pigeon
shoot. A pigeon appears at Palmer's window and becomes his pet, a fact
that the boy conceals until the day of the shoot, when he faces a tough
moral decision. For grades 4-7. Newbery Honor Book. 1997.
BR 17372
##
Lily's Crossing
BR 17375
by Patricia Reilly Giff
1 volume
In the summer of 1944, Lily goes to Rockaway Beach, New York, with her
grandmother. There Lily meets Albert, a young Hungarian refugee orphan
who fled from the Nazis. When Lily tells lies to impress Albert, there
are unexpected consequences. For grades 5-8. Newbery Honor Book. 1997.
BR 17375
##
Muggie Maggie
BR 17378
by Beverly Cleary
1 volume
Third-grader Maggie refuses to learn cursive writing. After consulting
with the principal, her parents, and a psychologist, Maggie's teacher
appoints Maggie mail messenger and has her deliver notes that are
written in cursive. Maggie suspects the messages concern her and
finally teaches herself to read them. For grades 2-4. 1990.
BR 17378
##
Squirrel's World
BR 17379
by Lisa Moser
1 volume
This four-chapter tale follows a cheerful, busy squirrel who is always
on the "go, go, go." Squirrel, who likes to play "leap, leap,
leapfrog," and Turtle, who prefers "sleep, sleep, sleepfrog," find
something they both like in "the perfect game." Easy reader. For grades
K-3. 2007.
BR 17379
##
Dear Emma
BR 17380
by Johanna Hurwitz
1 volume
New York City, 1910. Eighth-grader Dossi, a Russian Jewish immigrant,
writes to her Vermont friend Emma, whom she met on a Fresh Air Fund
vacation, as told in Faraway Summer (BR 11930). Dossi describes her new
brother-in-law, the diphtheria epidemic, and the Triangle Shirtwaist
Factory fire. For grades 5-8. 2002.
BR 17380
##
A Dog for Life
BR 17382
by L.S. Matthews
1 volume
John Hawkins, his older brother Tom, and their dog Mouse can read one
another's thoughts. But that doesn't help when Tom becomes seriously
ill and his mother plans to take Mouse to the pound. Instead John and
Mouse run away. For grades 4-7. 2006.
BR 17382
##
The Silver Donkey
BR 17384
by Sonya Hartnett
1 volume
France, World War I. An English army deserter, blinded by war and
clutching a small silver donkey good-luck charm, is discovered in the
woods by two young sisters. He relates four tales about donkeys while
the girls arrange his return home across the Channel. For grades 5-8.
2004.
BR 17384
##
Meet the Austins
BR 17486
by Madeleine L'Engle
2 volumes
The arrival of ten-year-old, spoiled, recently orphaned Maggy Hamilton
disrupts the happy routines of the Austin family. Maggy annoys and
exasperates siblings Vicky, Rob, Suzy, and John as they struggle to
understand her. For grades 5-8. 1960.
BR 17486
##
###
Braille Magazines
The following is a list of braille magazines in the Library
of Congress program. Readers may obtain free personal
subscriptions to these magazines. For information
on the availability of specific magazines, consult the
library that send you braille materials.
Boys' Life (for children and teens, monthly)
Braille Book Review (bimonthly)
Braille Chess Magazine (British quarterly)
Braille Music Magazine (British monthly)
Conundrum (British monthly)
Cooking Light (10 issues)
ESPN: The Magazine (biweekly)
Harper's (literary; monthly)
Health Newsletters (includes Harvard Health Letter, Mayo
Clinic Health Letter, and University of California at
Berkeley Wellness Letter, monthly)
Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine (monthly)
Ladies' Home Journal (monthly)
Martha Stewart Living (home and entertaining; 10 issues)
Muse (for children; 10 issues)
The Musical Mainstream (quarterly)
National Geographic (monthly)
The New York Times Large Type Weekly (weekly)
News (NLS quarterly)
Parenting (monthly except January and July)
PC World (personal computing; monthly)
Playboy (monthly)
Poetry (11 issues)
Popular Communications (monthly)
Popular Mechanics (monthly)
Popular Music Lead Sheets (irregular)
Rolling Stone (popular culture; 24 issues)
Science News (weekly)
Seventeen (for teens; monthly)
Short Stories (British monthly)
Spider: The Magazine for Children (monthly)
Stone Soup (children's writings; 5 issues)
Update (NLS quarterly)
The Washington Post Book World (weekly)
The following sports schedules are also available:
American Baseball League Schedule
National Baseball League Schedule
National Basketball Association Schedule
National Football League Schedule
National Hockey League Schedule
Women's National Basketball Association Schedule
###
| en |
converted_docs | 080908 | **Laboratory Instructor's Manual**
**Table of Contents**
Introduction to Lab Instructor 1
Week 1 - Aggregate Testing 5
Week 2 - Binder Testing, Mixing and Compacting Asphalt Concrete 12
Week 3 - Asphalt Concrete Testing 20
**INSTRUCTOR'S MANUAL**
**Materials Needed Prior to Start of Class**
55-gal drum of coarse aggregate stockpile
55-gal drum of fine aggregate stockpile
5-gal of asphalt split into quart cans
**Lab Sessions**
The lab sessions are organized so that they can be completed in three
3-hour laboratory periods (Table 1). If more time is available, a second
week of aggregate testing by the students is recommended rather than
just the demonstrations. The binder tests are limited to demonstrations
for undergraduate classes because of the complexity of the equipment and
the ease with which it can be damaged. All demonstrations should provide
the raw data and the students should complete the required calculations.
All of the mixture tests are hands on.
A maximum of 16 students, divided into 4 groups, per lab session works
best. Set up four work stations, one for each of the hands on tests.
Demonstrations can be given to the entire lab class at one time.
**Lab Reports**
The lab assignment for the students is presented in the form of client
letter requesting the services of a consulting laboratory. The student's
report should be prepared as a response to this letter. This is as much
an exercise in technical writing as a laboratory report. Instructions to
the students, a sample letter assignment and a sample laboratory report
are included in the student's manual.
**TABLE 1. Recommended Organization for Laboratories.**
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| Lab Session | Tests Covered | Demo | Class or |
| Topic | | or | Individual |
| | | Hands | Groups |
| | | On | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| Aggregates | Material Finer Than | Demo | Entire lab |
| | 75-μm by Washing | | class |
| (Week 1) | | | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Flat and Elongated | Demo | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Percent Crushed Faces | Demo | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Fine Aggregate | Demo | |
| | Angularity | | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Sand Equivalent | Demo | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Gradation Analysis for | Hands | Individual |
| | Each Stockpile | On | Groups |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Specific Gravity of Fine | Hands | Individual |
| | Aggregates | On | Groups |
| | | | |
| | | | (2 groups at |
| | | | a time) |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Specific Gravity of | Hands | Individual |
| | Coarse Aggregates | On | Groups |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| Asphalt Cement | Rotational Viscometer | Demo | Entire lab |
| | | | class |
| Asphalt Concrete | | | |
| Mixing and | | | |
| Compaction | | | |
| | | | |
| (Week 2) | | | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Dynamic Shear Rheometer | Demo | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Bending Beam Rheometer | Demo | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Rolling Thin Film Oven | Demo | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Pressure Aging Vessel | Demo | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Mixing | Hands | Individual |
| | | On | Groups |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Compaction | Hands | Individual |
| | | On | Groups |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| Asphalt Concrete | Moisture Sensitivity | Demo | Entire lab |
| Testing | | | class |
| | | | |
| (Week 3) | | | |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Maximum Specific Gravity | Hands | Individual |
| | | On | Groups |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Bulk Specific Gravity | Hands | Individual |
| | | On | Groups |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
| | Calculations for Mix | Cla | Entire lab |
| | Design | ssroom | class |
+------------------+--------------------------+--------+--------------+
Week 1
Aggregate Testing
**Week 1**
**Demonstrations**
**AASHTO 11-91 Materials Finer than 75-μm (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral
Aggregates by Washing**
***Equipment needed:***
Plastic bucket with handle (about 1-gal size or slightly larger)
75-μm (No. 200) sieve
Either a 2.36 (No. 8) or 1.18 (No. 16) mm sieve
Bottle of liquid dish soap
Large metal pan
Access to at least one sink
***Prepare before class:***
> One ziplock bags (1-gal size) with 2,500 g of dry coarse aggregate
> (note dry mass on outside of each bag).
***Steps for Class:***
1. Record dry mass of aggregate on sieve analysis data sheet.
2. Stack sieves with No. 200 on bottom and place in sink
3. Put aggregate in bucket and enough water to cover aggregate
4. Agitate sample so that fine material is washed off of aggregate
surface
5. Immediately pour water with suspended fine material over sieves
6. Repeat until water is reasonably clean after agitation
7. Empty aggregate from bucket into pan
8. Wash any material retained on each sieve into pan
9. (This is described - not necessary for demo) Place pan in oven and
dry overnight. Record dry mass in appropriate spot on sieve analysis
data sheet.
**Week 1**
**Demonstrations**
**ASTM D4791-95 Flat Particles, Elongated particle, or Flat and
Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate**
***Equipment needed:***
Proportional Caliper Device
***Prepare before class:***
> Sieve a small amount of coarse aggregate until about 100 particles of
> aggregate retained on the 12.5 mm (½ in) sieve are obtained
***Steps for Class:***
1. Select an aggregate and set end of calipers farthest away from pivot
point to longest dimension.
2. Without moving the calipers, remove aggregate and try to fit
narrowest dimension in caliper opening at the other end
3. If aggregate fits in second opening, put it in the flat and
elongated pile.
4. If aggregate does not fit in second opening, put it in another pile.
5. At the end, record number of particles in each pile. Record.
6. When finished, store in labeled ziplock bag for future use.
**Week 1**
**Demonstrations**
**ASTM D 5821 Determining the Percentage of Fractured Particles in
Coarse Aggregate**
***Equipment needed:***
None
***Prepare before class:***
> Sieve a small amount of the coarse aggregate stockpile over a 4.75 mm
> sieve. Prepare a sample of about 500 grams of the material retained on
> this sieve. Wash and dry this material. Store in ziplock bag.
***Steps for Class:***
1. Spread aggregate on clean flat surface
2. If an aggregate face has at least one fractured face at least the
width of the maximum cross sectional area, put it in the "fractured
face" pile.
3. Create a second pile of aggregates which do not meet this criteria.
4. Determine the number of particles in each pile. Record numbers.
5. Recombine sample and repeat to determine percentage with two or more
fractured faces.
6. When finished, store in labeled ziplock bag for future use.
**Week 1**
**Demonstrations**
**AASHTO T 304 Uncompacted Void Content of Fine Aggregate (Method A)**
***Equipment needed:***
Fine aggregate angularity apparatus (funnel on stand, 100 cm^3^
cylinder)
Metal spatula (about 100 mm long by about 20 mm wide)
Scale that is readable to 0.1 grams
Large pan (cookie sheet works well).
***Prepare before class:***
Wash and dry about 1,5000 gram of fine aggregate
> Sieve dry aggregate over stack of sieves (4.75, 2.36, 1.18, 0.6, 0.3
> mm + pan)
>
> Combine fractions to meet mass per sieve size shown in test method and
> store in small labeled ziplock bag
***Steps for Class:***
1. Determine the mass of the cylinder. Record on data sheet.
> 2\. Place cylinder under funnel.
3. Place finger over bottom of funnel.
4. Pour aggregate into top of funnel.
5. Remove finger and let aggregate flow into cylinder.
6. Use spatula to strike off excess aggregate on top of cylinder. Take
care not to bump or vibrate cylinder.
7. Brush off excess aggregate on cylinder.
8. Determine the mass of the aggregate and the cylinder. Record on data
sheet.
9. After test is complete, save material in ziplock bag. It can be used
again for other labs to save preparation time.
**Week 1**
**Demonstrations**
**ASTM D 2419 Sand Equivalent Value of Soils and Fine Aggregate**
***Equipment needed:***
2 Graduated cylinder and stopper
3-oz penetration tins with lid
Straight edged spatula
Funnel
Working solution in bottle with hose, hose clamp, and irrigation tube
Rod and assembly (see test method)
***Prepare before class:***
Screen fines stockpile over a 4.75 mm sieve
> Dampen material, heap in pile, and fill tin until overly full. Strike
> off excess and pour sample into one of the graduated cylinders.
Repeat for second graduated cylinder
Irrigate one cylinder before class. Shake this one about 20 minutes
before needed.
***Steps for Class:***
1. Demonstrate irrigation of sand in cylinder. Stopper and shake.
2. Use second cylinder to take reading by inserting rod into cylinder
and reading both the sand and clay values. Record.
**Week 1**
**Hands On**
**AASHTO T 84-95 Specific Gravity and Absorption of Fine Aggregates**
***Equipment needed (need 2 sets so that 2 groups can work at the same
time):***
Digital scale which can be read to the nearest 0.1 grams
500 ml glass volumetric flask
Metal cone mold and tamper
Hair drier (for warm, gently moving air)
> Large flat metal pan if non-absorptive surface not available (large
> cookie sheet works in a pinch)
Pan turner
4 large metal pans (for drying aggregate)
Wash bottle filled with water
Felt pens for labeling pans
***Prepare before class:***
> Screen fine aggregate over 4.75 mm screen and keep material that
> passes screen
Place 1,000 g of this material in each of four ziplock bags
> Add about 4 percent water by mass of aggregate (this assumes that the
> absorption of the aggregate is less than 4 percent) and seal bag.
***Steps for Class:***
1. Empty damp aggregate onto cookie sheet and spread out.
2. Use hair drier to help dry aggregate to saturated surface dry (SSD).
3. Use pan turner to continually move aggregate around so that it dries
uniformly.
4. When aggregate approaches SSD, clear a space on cookie sheet, place
metal cone in center and loosely fill with aggregate.
5. Lightly tamp aggregate with 25 light drop starting about 0.5 mm (0.2
inches) above the surface each time.
6. Firmly hold cone and brush aggregate away from base.
7. Lift mold vertically. At least a portion of the aggregate won't be
able to hold its shape at SSD.
8. Repeat steps 2 through 7 until SSD condition is reached.
9. Partially fill flask (pycnometer) with water and add 500 ± 10 g of
SSD aggregate. Record mass of SSD aggregate used.
10. Fill flask with additional water until about 90% full. Roll and
gently agitate to eliminate all air bubbles. The tip of a paper
towel can be used to disperse foam.
11. Bring the water level in the flask up to the volumetric mark.
Determine and record mass of flask, water, and aggregate.
12. Tare pan, record mass, and empty aggregate and water into pan. Use
wash bottle to rinse flask into pan.
13. Label pan and place in oven to dry overnight.
14. Next morning, remove pans from oven, cool to room temperature and
determine the mass of the pan and aggregate. Post results for
students.
**Week 1**
**Hands On**
**AASHTO T 85-91 Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate**
***Equipment needed:***
Scale which reads to 0.1 grams with an attachment for weighing samples
under water
Wire basket with handle
Water tank
4 buckets or large pans for soaking aggregates
Large terry cloth towels
Spray bottle filled with water
***Prepare before class:***
Screen a large sample of the coarse aggregate over a 4.75 mm screen
Save the material retained and waste the material passing
Prepare 4 samples of:
2,500 g of coarse aggregate, washed and left in pan under water
***Steps for Class:***
1. Determine mass of basket under water. Record.
> 2\. Pour excess water off of aggregate.
3. Empty aggregate onto predampened towel.
4. Dry aggregate until surface is uniformly dull (no free water). Take
care to keep aggregate not being dried covered with sides of towel.
5. Empty aggregate into wire basket and determine mass of aggregate at
SSD. Record mass.
6. Hang basket under water and determine mass under water. Record.
7. Remove basket from water. Tare pan, record mass, and empty aggregate
into pan. Take care not to lose any material. Dry overnight.
8. Next morning: Remove pans from oven, cool to room temperature,
determine dry mass of pan and aggregate. Post for students.
**Week 1**
**Hands On**
**AASHTO T 27-93 Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate**
***Equipment needed:***
Stack of sieves from 12.5 to 0.075 mm with pan and lid
Mechanical shaker
Soft brushes for cleaning fine mesh screens
Wire brushes for cleaning large wire screens
Misc. pans for transferring aggregates from sieves after weighing
***Prepare before class:***
> Obtain an aggregate sample from each stockpile (see test method for
> amount for a given size aggregate)
>
> Oven dry, record the oven dry mass, and wash each sample the day
> before class (or earlier). Store in ziplock bag with original mass
> information if done further ahead than one day.
***Steps:***
1. Clean, tare (record), and stack sieves with the largest on top and
the smallest on the bottom.
2. Pour oven dry aggregate from T11-91 into top of sieve stack, place
lid on stack, and position in the mechanical shaker.
3. Start shaker and run for 10 minutes.
4. After equipment stops shaking, take stack out, separate sieves and
obtain the mass of both the sieve and the aggregate retained on each
one. Record each measurement.
5. Clean and re-stack sieves.
**Week 2**
**Binder Testing**
**Mixing and Compaction of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures**
**Week 2**
**Binder Demonstrations**
**AASHTO TP 5-93 Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt
Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR)**
***Equipment needed:***
> Dynamic Shear Rheometer.
>
> Test plates - base plate which screws into DSR unit and spindle;
> either 8 mm for intermediate or 25 mm for high temperature testing.
Specimen Mold - silicone rubber mold for forming asphalt binder
specimens.
Trimmer - specimen trimmer with straight edge at least 4 mm wide.
***Prepare before class:***
Heat asphalt to 135 C.
Turn control box on by switch on back right of box.
Screw base plate into unit hand tight.
Turn software on by clicking DSR icon.
> Turn temperature control on in software.
Set temperature to desired range.
Place spindle on base plate to heat to temperature.
Set gap after equilibrated. Refer to manual.
Pour asphalt into specimen mold.
***Steps for Class:***
1\. Place asphalt specimen on preheated spindle.
2\. Lower spindle on to base plate.
3\. Trim sample flush to edges of plates and remove excess material.
4\. Place cover into base plate to allow for thermal conditioning.
5\. Press start on software.
6\. Discuss G\* and phase angle.
7\. After sample has run, print results.
**Week 2**
**Binder Demonstrations**
**AASHTO TP 48-96 Viscosity Determination of Asphalt Binder Using
Rotational Viscometer** ***Equipment needed:***
Brookfield (or similar) viscometer with all attachments
Thermosel temperature control system
1 oven set at 135^o^C
1 three ounce container
1 scale that measures to the nearest 0.1 gram
Protective gloves for handling equipment subjected to heat
1 extraction tool to handle the hot sample chamber
1 stop watch for timing 3 one-minute intervals
***Prepare before class:***
Set Thermosel to the desired test temperature (135^o^C)
Preheat sample chamber, spindle, and the 3-oz. Container of asphalt
Level viscometer and thermo container
Set up viscometer to handle the desired spindle number (#27)
Weigh sample chamber
Prepare asphalt sample and set equipment for testing (10.5 ± 0.1 g
asphalt)
Equilibrate the sample temperature
***Steps for Class:***
1. Set the motor speed by pressing the "speed" key on the keypad.
2. Use the arrow keys to set the desired testing speed at 20 rpm. (For
soft binder samples, the speed may need to be increased in order to
increase the torque value so that it falls within the acceptable
range of 2-98% torque).
3. Set the display to read viscosity by pressing the "Set Display" key
until the viscosity in centipoise (cP) is shown in the upper left
corner of the display.
4. During the calibration period, observe the viscosity. The viscosity
will decrease as the temperature of the sample rises. When the
viscosity reading remains constant, the temperature is considered
equilibrated.
5. Read and record a viscosity value at one-minute intervals for a
total of three readings. The viscosity measurements are in units of
centipoise (cP). Convert cP to Pascal\*seconds (Pa\*s) by dividing
by 1,000.
6. Record the test temperature, spindle number, spindle speed (rpm),
and viscosity (Pa\*s) to the nearest 0.1 Pa\*s.
**Week 2**
**Binder Demonstrations**
**AASHTO TP 1-93 Determining the Flexural Creep Stiffness of Asphalt
Binder Using the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR)**
***Equipment needed:***
Bending Beam Rheometer.
Aluminum Molds - at least 2 beams
> Calibration Equipment - Step Block, 4 weights at 100 g. each,
> stainless steel beams (one thick, one thin).
***Prepare before class:***
Heat PAV aged asphalt to 135 C.
Turn Nitrogen on at bottle and at 2 way valve.
Calibrate machine by following steps in software.
Make beam mold. Refer to manual.
Pour asphalt into mold and let cool for 45 minutes.
Trim beam and remove beam from mold.
Place beam in bath for 60 [+]{.underline} 5 minutes.
***Steps for Class:***
1\. Test beam according to software.
2\. Discuss thermal cracking and low temp cracking.
3\. Print Report.
**Week 2**
**Binder Demonstrations**
**AASHTO PP 1-93 Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized
Aging Vessel (PAV)**
***Equipment needed:***
PAV Unit
Stainless Steel Pans
Balance - readable to 0.1 gram.
Bottled Air
***Prepare before class:***
Day before class: RTFO 8 bottles of material.
Scrape material from bottles into single container.
Pour 50 g. into pan each pan
Place pans in rack and place rack into PAV.
Tighten bolts on lid to 50 psi with torque wrench.
When PAV reaches temperature, push start button.
PAV test takes 20 hours plus handling time.
Plan test so completion is at appropriate time.
***Steps for Class:***
1\. Make sure pressure is released when test is completed.
2\. Remove bolts from lid.
3\. Take rack from PAV and transfer material into container.
4\. Discuss long term aging.
**Week 2**
**Binder Demonstrations**
**AASHTO T Rolling Thin Film Oven Aging**
***Equipment needed:***
RTFO Oven
Bottles - at least 3 - 1 empty, 1 before test, 1 after test
***Prepare before class:***
Place 35 g of asphalt in two of the three jars. Keep one for "show and
tell"
> Place the other in the RTF oven and heat until the jar is completely
> coated. Take the jar out, cool down and use as an example of how the
> jar will look after test is complete.
***Steps for Class:***
1\. Show class bottles.
2\. Open door to oven
3\. Turn sample rack on.
4\. Demonstrate air flow set to 4000 ml/min.
**Week 2**
**Binder Demonstrations**
**AASHTO T?? (new test method) Direct Tension Testing**
***Equipment needed:***
Direct Tension Tester
Aluminum Molds - at least 4 specimens
Plastic End Pieces
***Prepare before class:***
Heat PAV aged asphalt to 135 C.
Make DTT mold. Refer to manual.
Pour asphalt into mold and let cool for 45 minutes.
Trim mold and remove specimen from mold.
Place specimen in bath for 60 [+]{.underline} 5 minutes.
***Steps for Class:***
1\. Place specimen into position.
2\. Test specimen. Refer to manual.
3\. Discuss fracture properties.
**Week 2**
**Hands On**
**AASHTO TP 4-93 Preparing and Determining the Density of Hot Mix
Asphalt Specimens by Means of the SHRP Gyratory Compactor**
***Equipment needed:***
Large mixer with wire whip
Scale with at least 20,000 gram capacity
2 Ovens - one for heating aggregates, one for heating asphalt (hot pot
works also)
Gyratory compactor
Spatulas or large spoons for stirring mix
Pans for heating aggregates
***Prepare before class:***
> Prepare twelve 4,500 gram pans of aggregates blended to meet target
> gradation and place in oven at least 6 hours prior to class
>
> Preheat asphalt (in quart cans in oven, at least 2 hours prior to
> class - MAKE SURE TO VENT CANS.
Preheat mixing bowl and molds
> Predetermine for the students: asphalt contents, appropriate mixing
> and compaction temperatures, and numbers of gyrations
Note: The test method calls for three samples at each of three asphalt
contents. It is suggested that two samples/group be compacted using 4
asphalt contents so that as many students as possible have a change to
get "hands on" experience. The test method also calls for short term
aging, but this would make labs too long. Explain that this would occur,
but in order to fit work into lab period, this step has been eliminated.
That is, compact the samples immediately after mixing.
***Steps for Class:***
1. Take bowl out of oven and place on scale. Gently add aggregate to
bowl and use spoon to make a depression in center of aggregate.
2. Add a predetermined amount of asphalt (1 group = 1 asphalt content)
3. Place on mixer and mix thoroughly.
4. (Would normally place in shallow pan here but because of time
constraints, place mix directly into hot mold).
5. Place mold in compactor per manufacturer's directions and compact to
desired number of gyrations.
6. Repeat steps 1 through 5 for second sample.
7. For third sample, repeat steps 1 through 3 only. Do not compact the
third sample. This will be used for determining the maximum specific
gravity in the next lab session. Empty mix from bowl into pan,
cover, label, and store.
**Week 3**
**Testing of Asphalt Concrete Samples**
**Week 3**
**Hands On**
**AASHTO T 166-93 Bulk Specific Gravity of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures
Using Saturated Surface-Dry Specimens**
***Equipment needed:***
Scale which reads to 0.1 grams with apparatus for weighing under water
Water bath
Large terry cloth towels
Spray bottle filled with water
***Prepare before class:***
Use samples compacted by students the previous week
***Steps for Class:***
1. Dampen towel.
2. Determine the mass of the dry specimens. Record.
3. Place specimen in water for 3 to 5 minutes. Determine mass under
water at the end of this time. Record.
4. Remove specimen from water and quickly blot dry on damp towel (dull
finish is SSD condition).
5. Place SSD specimen on scale and determine mass. Record.
**Week 3**
**Hands On**
**AASHTO T 209-94 Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of
Bituminous Paving Mixtures**
***Equipment needed:***
Scale which reads to 0.1 grams with apparatus for weighing under water
Water bath
Large flat tray or cookie sheet
Dual stage vacuum pump with fittings per test method
Residual vacuum manometer
Shaker table
Metal bowl with vacuum lid
***Prepare before class:***
Use loose mix sample prepared by students the previous week
***Steps for Class:***
1. Warm sample and break up clumps.
2. Determine mass of bowl (without lid) under water. Record.
3. Determine the oven dry mass and place sample in metal bowl.
4. Cover with water, place vacuum lid on bowl, then place entire set up
on shaker table. Clamp down.
5. Start vacuum pump and gradually increase pressure until residual
vacuum manometer reads 3.7 ± 0.3 kPa. Start shaker table and
maintain both pressure and agitation for 15 ± 2 minutes.
6. Stop shaker table and pump. Gradually release pressure and remove
top.
7. Suspend bowl and sample under water for 10 minutes then determine
the mass under water. Record.
**Week 3**
**Demonstration**
**ASTM D4867 Effect of Moisture on Asphalt Concrete Paving Mixtures.**
***Equipment needed:***
25^o^C water bath
60^o^C water bath
Load frame which moves at 50 mm/minute
Indirect tensile breaking head
***Prepare before class:***
> Mix and compact a set of six samples at an optimum asphalt content and
> between 6 to 8 percent air voids
Determine the bulk specific gravity of the sample. Record.
Determine the heights of the samples. Record.
Record appropriate maximum specific gravity for the mix used.
Calculate the air voids. Record.
Saturate samples 3 of the 6 and determine the SSD mass. Record.
Soak overnight in the 60^o^C water bath
2 hours before class, put samples in 25^o^C water bath
***Steps:***
1. Give all recorded data to the students.
2. Take samples out of water bath and put in breaking head.
3. Place breaking head and sample in load frame.
4. Determine the maximum load the sample can take before the load
begins to drop off.
5. Repeat until all samples (dry included) have been tested.
| en |
converted_docs | 071006 | Guidelines
Centers
of
Research Translation
**National Institute of Arthritis and**
**Musculoskeletal and**
**Skin Diseases**
**National Institutes of Health**
**Department of Health and Human Services**
**September 2006**
**TABLE OF CONTENTS**
[GUIDELINES FOR THE CENTERS OF RESEARCH TRANSLATION (CORT)
1](#__RefHeading___Toc82583646)
[I. The NIAMS Centers of Research Translation Program
1](#__RefHeading___Toc82583647)
[I.A. Introduction 1](#__RefHeading___Toc82583648)
[I.B. Overview of the Centers of Research Translation (CORT) Program
1](#__RefHeading___Toc82583649)
[I.C. Structure of a CORT 2](#__RefHeading___Toc82583650)
[II. Application and Review Process 3](#__RefHeading___Toc82583651)
[II.A. Preapplication Process and Letter of Intent
3](#__RefHeading___Toc82583652)
[II.B. Application Procedure 4](#__RefHeading___Toc82583653)
[II.C. Review Process 5](#__RefHeading___Toc82583654)
[II.D. Center Evaluation Procedure 5](#__RefHeading___Toc82583655)
[III. Presentation of the Proposed Center
6](#__RefHeading___Toc82583656)
[III.A. Overview 6](#__RefHeading___Toc82583657)
[III.B. Qualifications of the Center Leadership
7](#__RefHeading___Toc82583658)
[III.C. Research Base for the CORT 8](#__RefHeading___Toc82583659)
[III.D. Institutional Environment and Resources
8](#__RefHeading___Toc82583660)
[III.F. Program for Pilot and Feasibility Projects
9](#__RefHeading___Toc82583661)
[III.G. Administrative Core 9](#__RefHeading___Toc82583662)
[III.H. Projects 11](#OLE_LINK2)
[III.I. Research Core(s) 13](#__RefHeading___Toc82583664)
[III.J. Review Criteria for the Overall Application
14](#__RefHeading___Toc82583665)
[IV. Suggested content order for application
15](#__RefHeading___Toc82583666)
[IV.A. General Information 15](#__RefHeading___Toc82583667)
[IV.B. Content Order for the CORT Application
15](#__RefHeading___Toc82583668)
[IV.B.1. Face Page of Form PHS 398. 15](#__RefHeading___Toc82583669)
[IV.B.2 Page 2, Description 15](#__RefHeading___Toc82583670)
[IV.B.3. Table of Contents 15](#__RefHeading___Toc82583671)
[IV.B.4. Budgets 15](#__RefHeading___Toc82583672)
[IV.B.5. Biographical Sketches 16](#__RefHeading___Toc82583673)
[IV.B.6. Assurance Documentation 16](#__RefHeading___Toc82583674)
[IV.B.7. Narrative Sections 16](#__RefHeading___Toc82583675)
[IV.B.8. Budgeted Components 17](#__RefHeading___Toc82583676)
[IV.C. Appendices 17](#__RefHeading___Toc82583677)
[V. Noncompeting Applications: Annual Reporting Requirements
19](#__RefHeading___Toc82583678)
[VI. Guidelines for Pilot and Feasibility Projects
21](#__RefHeading___Toc82583679)
[VII. Guidelines for Supplemental Applications
22](#__RefHeading___Toc82583680)
[Exhibit I Sample Table of Contents 23](#__RefHeading___Toc82583682)
[Exhibit II Grants Supporting the Research Base
26](#__RefHeading___Toc82583770)
[Exhibit III Consolidated Budget for 1^st^ Year of Requested Support
27](#__RefHeading___Toc82583771)
[Exhibit IV Initial Budget Period 28](#__RefHeading___Toc82583772)
[Exhibit V Budget for Entire Proposed Project Period
29](#__RefHeading___Toc82583775)
[Exhibit VI Approval Dates 30](#__RefHeading___Toc82583777)
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583646 .anchor}GUIDELINES FOR THE CENTERS OF
RESEARCH TRANSLATION (CORT)
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583647 .anchor}I. The NIAMS Centers of Research
Translation Program
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583648 .anchor}I.A. Introduction
The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin
Diseases (NIAMS) leads the federal effort for the conduct and support of
research into the causes, treatment and prevention of arthritis and
musculoskeletal and skin diseases, the training of basic and clinical
scientists to carry out this research, and the dissemination of
information on research progress in these diseases.
In fulfilling its mission to support research and research training,
NIAMS employs a number of support mechanisms. These include various
types of research projects, program projects, and career development
programs; institutional training grants and individual training
fellowships; and a number of center grant mechanisms. The center grants
are interrelated to and interdependent upon all of the other support
mechanisms.
The following guidelines provide information about the Centers of
Research Translation program, suggestions for preparation of an
applications and criteria for review.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583649 .anchor}I.B. Overview of the Centers of
Research Translation (CORT) Program
Two major features of the CORT program include: 1) the overarching aim
of disease-specific research translation, and 2) the inclusion of
resources and an administrative structure to facilitate research
translation. The expectation for a CORT is that the projects will be
translational in nature, directed at elucidating the relevance of basic
research to a human disease.
Translational research is applied and clinical scientific research that
is directed towards testing the validity and limits of applicability of
knowledge derived from basic science and engineering to the
understanding of human diseases and health. It could be research
involving living human subjects (i.e., clinical) but it might also be
non-clinical involving the study of human genes, tissues, specimens, or
cells. Thus, although it is directed towards generation of knowledge
about humans, it could be non-clinical or clinical research. It could be
knowledge useful to persons (individuals, families, populations)
affected by or at risk for specific diseases.
Overall, the CORT should encompass a multidisciplinary approach to a
disease-targeted theme with individual projects providing synergy for
the theme. For purposes of the projects within a CORT, translation is
NOT to be interpreted as requiring one project to depend on another.
That is, the outcomes of a clinical research project would not be
dependent on the outcome of a basic research project. Rather, the
projects should demonstrate a synergy in which the outcomes of each
project inform the others.
- A CORT will be focused on one of the diseases in the NIAMS mission.
The focus cannot be generic, e.g., autoimmune diseases,
musculoskeletal disorders, or skin diseases. The diseases within the
NIAMS mission may be found at:
<http://www.niams.nih.gov/rtac/funding/faq.htm>.
- There must be an existing research base supporting the projects.
- The projects must represent a multidisciplinary approach to the
theme. Principal investigators should be drawn from different
research disciplines, and may be based in different departments,
divisions and/or institutions.
- There must be a minimum of three highly meritorious projects with at
least one basic and one clinical project. Overall the CORT concept
is dual, embracing both the translation of new scientific
information to clinical application and of clinical findings to new
research.
- [Clinical research]{.underline}. NIH defines human clinical
research as: (1) Patient-oriented research. Research conducted
with human subjects (or on material of human origin such as
tissues, specimens and cognitive phenomena) for which an
investigator (or colleague) directly interacts with human
subjects. Excluded from this definition are in vitro studies
that utilize human tissues that cannot be linked to a living
individual. Patient-oriented research includes: (a) mechanisms
of human disease, (b) therapeutic interventions, (c) clinical
trials, or (d) development of new technologies. (2)
Epidemiologic and behavioral studies. (3) Outcomes research and
health services research. Note: Studies falling under Exemption
4 for human subjects research are not considered clinical
research by this definition.
- Each CORT will have an advisory group that includes scientific
members who can facilitate the translational process and lay members
who can bring the patient perspective about the disease to the
group. The advisory group will have a dual role. One role will be to
provide scientific and lay oversight of the ongoing progress of the
CORT projects. A second role will be to review and recommend pilot
and feasibility project applications for submission to NIAMS.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583650 .anchor}I.C. Structure of a CORT
The minimal structure for a CORT will be:
- At least three highly meritorious translational research projects
with at least one basic and one clinical project;
- An Administrative Core with an advisory group that includes
scientific and lay members.
- The CORT Director should also be the principal investigator of one
of the research projects.
One or more research cores may also be proposed if they are critical to
at least two of the projects and will enhance the quality of the
research.
Once a CORT is established, pilot and feasibility projects to develop
new directions in the translational theme may be submitted to NIAMS as
administrative supplements. Pilot and feasibility projects will be
solicited once per year during the second and third year of CORT
funding. Up to three projects may be submitted annually. The scientific
review of these individual pilot and feasibility project applications
will directed by the CORT advisory group. The role of NIAMS will be to
determine funding based on funds available and the institute's
portfolio. Pilot and feasibility projects are optional.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583651 .anchor}II. Application and Review
Process
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583652 .anchor}II.A. Preapplication Process and
Letter of Intent
Applications are solicited by Requests for Applications published in the
NIH Guide to Grants and Contracts. See the NIAMS website for current
RFAs:
[http://www.niams.nih.gov/rtac/funding/grants/rfalist.htm]{.underline}
**Individuals with a potential interest in applying for a CORT grant are
strongly encouraged to talk with a NIAMS program director to review
their concept for a CORT application.** The NIAMS program directors and
the scientific areas of their portfolios may be found at
<http://www.niams.nih.gov/rtac/index.htm>
Consultation between NIAMS staff and potential applicants prior to
submission of the formal application may be useful. Applicants should
not construe advice given by the NIAMS staff as assurance of favorable
review. The staff will not evaluate or discuss the merit of the
scientific aspects of the proposal.
The letter of intent and any inquiries about the overall program, should
be directed to:
Madeline Turkeltaub, CRNP, Ph.D., FAAN
Deputy Director, Extramural Program
NIAMS/NIH
6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800 -- MSC 4872
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872
\[Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)\]
Phone: (301) 594-2463
FAX: (301) 402-7478
For fiscal and administrative matters, contact:
Melinda Nelson
Grants Management Officer
NIAMS/NIH
6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800 -- MSC 4872
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872
\[Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)\]
Telephone: (301) 594-3535
FAX: (301) 480-5450
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583653 .anchor}II.B. Application Procedure
The research Grant Application Form PHS 398 is to be used in applying
for these centers. These forms are available at most institutional
offices of sponsored research and from the Division of Extramural
Outreach and Information Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7910 Bethesda, MD 20892‑7910, telephone (301)
435‑0714, E‑mail: grantsinfo@nih.gov or from the Internet Web site at:
[http://grants.nih.gov/grants/forms.htm]{.underline}
Each project and each core included in the CORT application should be
written as an individual project using form PHS 398. Page limitations
will apply to the individual projects. It is desirable for CORT
applications to be arranged in a specified format. A detailed Table of
Contents is strongly suggested (see Exhibit I). This not only makes it
easier for reviewers to use, but it can also serve as a checklist for
the applicant institution in preparing the application. The arrangement
of materials should follow both the instructions in the form PHS 398
application kit and the more specific instructions detailed in Section
IV of these guidelines.
Receipt dates for CORT applications are announced in the Request for
Applications. *For applications submitted in response to RFAs, the
application must ARRIVE AT NIH on or before the receipt date.*
**The RFA label available in the application package must be affixed to
the bottom of the face page. Failure to use this label could result in
delayed processing of the application such that it may not reach the
review committee in time for review.**
The original and three (3) signed, exact photocopies of the application
should be sent to:
Center for Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040 - MSC 7710
Bethesda MD 20892-7710
\[Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)\]
In addition to mailing the application to the Center for Scientific
Review send two (2) copies of the application and [ALL 5 copies of any
appendix material]{.underline} to:
Madeline Turkeltaub, CRNP, Ph.D., FAAN
Deputy Director, Extramural Program
NIAMS/NIH
6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800 -- MSC 4872
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872
\[Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)\]
Phone: (301) 594-2463
FAX: (301) 480-4543
All appendix material must be clearly marked with the name of Center
Director and the appropriate project or core. Separate copies of
appendix material should be supplied for each core or project to which
it is applicable (See Section IV.C.).
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583654 .anchor}II.C. Review Process
Applications submitted for CORT grants will first be screened for
completeness by the Center for Scientific Review and for responsiveness
by NIAMS staff. Applications which are complete and responsive will be
evaluated for scientific merit by a group of expert consultants convened
by the Review Branch of the NIAMS. Each application should be complete
upon submission. Site visits are not anticipated. A second level of
review will be performed by the National Arthritis and Musculoskeletal
and Skin Diseases Advisory Council.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583655 .anchor}II.D. Center Evaluation Procedure
Since the NIAMS is interested in funding only the most highly
meritorious research, individual components of lesser quality may not be
funded, even if recommended, under the \"umbrella\" of the Center grant
mechanism. Each project and core (including the administrative unit)
will be individually reviewed for scientific merit and assigned a rating
by committee consensus. Merit ratings will also be voted for the center
elements: qualifications of the center leadership, the research base,
the institutional environment and resources. To be funded, there must be
at least three highly meritorious translational projects, including one
basic and one clinical research project.
After the review of the individual components of the application, an
application may be judged Anon-competitive@ and not scored, or may be
discussed and assigned an overall priority score. This score will
reflect not only the individual quality of the projects, cores, and
administration, but also how the proposed CORT will bring together all
these elements in a workable unit. The overall score may be higher or
lower than the Aaverage@ of the descriptors based on the assessment of
whether the Awhole is greater than the sum of its parts.@ (See Section
III.J.)
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583656 .anchor}III. Presentation of the Proposed
Center
This section of the guidelines describes the required and optional
components of the proposed CORT and the review criteria to be applied.
The suggested content order for the overall application will be covered
in Section IV. Note that these applications will be reviewed by a
committee that will have three or more applications to review;
therefore, it is very helpful for investigators to use cross-references
in these center applications. A detailed Table of Contents is especially
invaluable in providing a key for cross-references, e.g., *see Section
I.A.2. for more details.* Exhibit I is an example of a detailed Table of
Contents.
Note that NIH has policies for the inclusion of women, minorities and
children which **must** be addressed in **each** project proposal and in
**each** core, even if only to indicate why a full discussion is not
applicable. The reviewers will be instructed to address the adequacy of
inclusion plans for the work proposed as part of the scientific and
technical merit evaluation. These policies may be accessed at the
following sites:
Women & Minorities:
[http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/women_min.htm]{.underline}
Children:
[http://www.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm]{.underline}
The NIH expects investigators supported by NIH funding to make their
research data available to the scientific community for subsequent
analysis based on a data sharing plan approved as part of the award; see
the NIH Data Sharing Policy website at
<http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/>. This requirement on
data sharing is an extension to NIH policy regarding sharing research
resources, which expects that recipients of NIH support will provide
prompt and effective access to research tools. The data sharing plan for
the center should be described in the Administrative Core.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583657 .anchor}III.A. Overview
Each application should have an OVERVIEW - a narrative section that
serves as a synopsis of the key elements of the proposed Center of
Research Translation, the qualifications of the Center Director,
Associate Director and CORT advisory group, the research theme, research
base, and the resources and environment for the Center. *This section is
intended to be read by all reviewers, even if they are not assigned to
projects within this application, so that each reviewer can get a
comprehensive view of the proposed Center.*
An additional purpose of the Overview is to provide reviewers with a
sense of how the Center will leverage its resources. A Center operates
on two levels. The first level is to assemble outstanding proposals and
carry out the proposed research. The second level is to provide
leadership at an institutional or broader level to promote quality
research through the intellectual and material resources of the Center.
The Overview serves to introduce the proposed program, to identify the
theme for the disease to be addressed in the proposed Center and to
state the Center objectives. Describe the disciplines brought together
for the proposed Center and explain the strategy for achieving the
objectives of the overall program. It is important to emphasize the
events that have led to the current application, and **especially to
describe the anticipated unique opportunities for translational research
within the proposed CORT**. Briefly describe each of the proposed
projects, identifying whether it is basic or clinical, and how that
project qualifies as translational research and addresses the
translational theme of the Center. Briefly describe any research cores
that are included in the application and how each core will assist each
of the proposed projects.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583658 .anchor}III.B. Qualifications of the CORT
Leadership
The emphasis in this section should be on the qualifications of the
Center leaders. The administrative plans are presented in the
Administrative Core (see Section III.G.)
The Director of the CORT, aided by an Associate Director and an advisory
group, is expected to provide leadership to focus all research projects
on translational aims relevant to the disease theme. Either the Center
Director or Associate Director must be a clinical investigator who is
responsible for the translation of basic research to clinical research
to assure a mutually supportive interaction between scientists
conducting basic research and those performing clinical investigation.
The qualifications of the clinical investigator and the plan to promote
patient based research should be described.
The advisory group should consist of 3 to 6 members and meet formally at
least annually to review the scientific progress and to identify and
review new opportunities for research translation. The members of the
advisory group should include scientists, both from the parent and from
other research institutions, and one or more lay members who can bring
the patient perspective about the disease to the group. The advisory
group will play a role in determining which applications for pilot and
feasibility projects are submitted to NIAMS.
Describe the qualifications of the Center Director and Associate
Director to lead the CORT. Describe the qualifications of each member of
the advisory group and the rationale for including these individuals.
Applicants are advised to include sufficient information to address the
following review criteria:
*Review Criteria for CORT leadership:*
- Do the Director and Associate Director have the leadership and
research qualifications to lead a Center? Does the leadership team
(Director, Associate Director, and advisory group) have the
collective expertise to assure focused development and
implementation of high quality and meaningful translational research
projects?
- Is the management program proposed appropriate for soliciting,
reviewing and prioritizing pilot and feasibility project
applications for submission to NIAMS?
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583659 .anchor}III.C. Research Base for the CORT
Describe the research base upon which the CORT builds, including
descriptions of independently funded research projects so that reviewers
can determine the extent and quality of research activities related to
the proposed CORT. The descriptions should include: the principal
investigator and other key research personnel, the project=s objectives
and progress toward them; the project=s relevance to the NIAMS disease
area, and up to 5 important publications that have resulted from this
research in the past five years. In addition, it is helpful to include a
table of the relevant research grants (see Exhibit II). Describe how
members of this research base will interact with the proposed CORT.
Applicants are advised to include sufficient information to address the
following review criteria:
*Review Criteria for Research Base:*
Is there a substantial productive and funded research base? Is the
research base sufficiently broad to foster new multidisciplinary
translational research?
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583660 .anchor}III.D. Institutional Environment
and Resources
Briefly describe the features of the institutional environment that are
relevant to the effective implementation of the proposed program. As
appropriate, describe available resources, such as clinical and
laboratory facilities, participating and affiliated units, patient
populations, geographic distribution of space and personnel, and
consultative resources. Indicate if any of the proposed cores will
utilize or expand cores already existing at the institution. What
institutional commitments for space or other resources are there for the
proposed CORT? Include any letters of support for the proposed Center by
appropriate institutional officials.
Applicants from institutions that have a General Clinical Research
Center (GCRC) funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources
may wish to identify the GCRC as a resource for conducting the proposed
research. Details of the interactions of the CORT staff with the GCRC
staff and research personnel may be provided in a statement describing
the collaborative linkages being developed. A letter of agreement from
the GCRC Program Director must be included with the application.
Applicants are advised to include sufficient information to address the
following review criteria:
*Review Criteria for Institutional Environment and Resources:*
Is there evidence of a supportive institutional environment for the
proposed CORT? Will the CORT add an important multidisciplinary element
to the institutional environment? Does the proposed CORT utilize
available resources well?
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583661 .anchor}III.F. Program for Pilot and
Feasibility Projects
It is envisioned that the synergy present in the research projects of
the CORT will lead to new ideas and the need to test new hypotheses
relevant to the translational theme of the CORT. The CORT advisory group
will review such proposals and recommend which should be submitted to
NIAMS for consideration. NIAMS will determine the priority for funding
all submitted pilot and feasibility projects applications and make
appropriate administrative supplemental awards to the CORTs.
The primary eligibility criteria for a CORT pilot and feasibility
project are:
- The hypothesis to be tested arises from the CORT research and
addresses the CORT theme;
- The hypothesis to be tested has the potential for developing
ground-breaking technology or methodology that may lead to
significant expansions of biomedical research horizons, precipitate
a paradigm shift in research, or lead to substantial improvements in
human health;
- The work proposed does not overlap with the aims of currently
supported projects but should be integrated with the translational
theme;
- The investigator should be clearly independent and have a faculty
appointment; the investigator may be a new investigator or be well
established;
- CORT pilot and feasibility projects may request up to \$50,000 per
year in direct costs for one or two years.
Pilot and feasibility projects will not be a part of the initial CORT
application. Once each CORT is established, pilot and feasibility
projects will be solicited once a year during the second and third year
for funding in years three and four. Up to three projects may be
submitted each time. Describe how the CORT, in consultation with the
CORT advisory group, will solicit, review, and prioritize pilot and
feasibility projects applications for submission to NIAMS.
The structure of a pilot and feasibility project application is
described in Section VI.
*Review Criterion for the Pilot and Feasibility Project Program:*
Is the management program proposed appropriate for soliciting,
reviewing and prioritizing pilot and feasibility project applications
for submission to NIAMS?
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583662 .anchor}III.G. Administrative Core
The purpose of a CORT is to exploit translational opportunities for a
disease targeted theme through a minimum of three research projects. The
Administrative Core is responsible for the planning, development,
coordination, and overall administration of the CORT. A key role of this
unit is to foster productive interactions at the host institution
through Center personnel and the CORT advisory group.
**Leadership.** The Center Director is responsible for the organization
and operation of the Center. An Associate Director should be named who
will be involved in the administrative and scientific aspects of the
Center, and will serve as Acting Center Director in the absence of the
Director. Either the Center Director or Associate Director must be a
clinical investigator who is responsible for the translation of basic
research to clinical research to assure a mutually supportive
interaction between scientists conducting basic research and those
performing clinical investigation. The qualifications of the clinical
investigator and the plan to promote patient based research should be
described.
**Lines of authority**. Describe in detail, and by diagram if
appropriate, the chain of responsibility for decision‑making and
administration. Include to whom the Center Director reports and the
administrative structure as it relates to the investigators responsible
for the research projects and core units.
**CORT Advisory Group**. A CORT advisory group representing scientific
expertise and lay persons relevant to the disease theme should be
identified. Their collective expertise should reflect key issues
addressed in the disease theme. (Their qualifications are to be
presented elsewhere in the application in a section on Qualifications of
the Center Leadership - see Section III.B.) Describe the structure for
using the advisory group to provide scientific oversight for all active
CORT research studies. Describe how lay input from the advisory group
will be incorporated.
**Enrichment Program.** The Administrative Core may include limited
funds for program enrichment (i.e., seminars, visiting scientists, etc).
Plans for an enrichment program should be included in the application
and in the budget of the Administrative Core.
**Data Sharing Plan.** The NIH expects investigators supported by NIH
funding to make their research data available to the scientific
community for subsequent analysis based on a data sharing plan approved
as part of the award; see the NIH Data Sharing Policy website at
<http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/>. A data sharing plan
for the research data from the CORT should be included in the
Administrative Core.
**Time Commitment**. The CORT director is expected to make a commitment
of at least 15 percent effort to the overall administration of the
program plus 20 percent effort as a principal investigator of a CORT
project. The CORT Associate Director is expected to commit at least 10%
effort to administration. Administrative support personnel may be
budgeted in at no more than one full time equivalent (FTE) which may be
divided among one or more positions. This FTE must be fully justified.
**CORT Travel**. Applications should include \$2,500 yearly travel
expenses in the Administrative Core to pay for two individuals to attend
one 2 day meeting related to the CORT program.
*Review Criteria for the Administrative Core:*
- []{#OLE_LINK2 .anchor}Is there scientific and administrative
leadership, commitment and ability, and adequate time commitment of
the CORT Director and Associate Director for the effective
management of the CORT? Is either the Center Director or Associate
Director a clinical investigator who will be responsible for the
translation of basic research to clinical research?
- Is the management proposed appropriate for scientific administration
as well as fiscal administration, procurement, property and
personnel management, planning, budgeting, etc.?
- Is there a plan for the establishment and maintenance of internal
communication and cooperation among the CORT investigators? Are
there plans for effective use of the CORT advisory group?
- Is the management program proposed appropriate for soliciting,
reviewing and prioritizing pilot and feasibility project
applications for submission to NIAMS?
III.H. Projects
Using Form PHS 398, name and number each project sequentially so that it
can be readily distinguished from other projects in the program. Each
research project should be clearly identified by the same title as that
provided in the Table of Contents. The project should begin with the
abstract and budget pages and should follow the instructions for Form
PHS 398. Describe each section in the same detail and format as required
for a regular research grant application so that the scientific merit
can be judged on the basis of the written proposal. Adhere to the page
restrictions indicated in the instructions for Form PHS 398.
**For each project begin Section B, Background and Significance, with a
paragraph that clearly states how that project contributes to the theme
of the CORT as a whole, and the translational nature of each project. If
it is a clinical research project, describe the rationale of including
it as a clinical research project within the theme of the CORT.**
The budget for each research project should reflect the instructions for
Form PHS 398. A detailed budget is required for the first year; budget
estimates are required for all subsequent years of support. Explicit and
detailed budget justifications must be included for all years. Budget
pages must be labeled so that they can be readily associated with the
particular projects to which they apply.
The project principal investigator should devote at least 20 percent
effort to the research.
Each project using human subjects must include a detailed plan for
protection of human subjects and inclusion of women, minorities, and
children as described in the PHS 398 instructions.
If the proposed project is a clinical trial, a data safety and
monitoring plan must be included in the project proposal. The following
activities should be included in a monitoring plan:
- Overview of the research protocol with emphasis on data integrity
and patient safety issues.
- Monitoring of adverse effects and determining stopping rules for the
trial.
- Protecting the confidentiality of the trial data and the results of
monitoring.
- Twice yearly review of recruitment and adverse events by a Safety
Officer or a Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB).
Note that the NIAMS will determine at the time of award whether a Safety
Officer or a DSMB will be appointed for each clinical trial. NIAMS will
appoint the Safety Officer or DSMB members in consultation with the
principal investigator. The Safety Officer or DSMB members must not be
affiliated with the host institution. NIAMS will provide logistical
support when a DSMB is required and will provide any travel funds or
consultant fees for DSMB members.
If the proposed project will use vertebrate animals, a complete
description of their use and care must be included as found in the
instructions for the PHS 398 application.
*Review Criteria for projects:*
- Significance\
Does this study address an important problem? What will be the
effect of these studies on the concepts, methods, technologies,
treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this
field? Does this study clearly address the theme of the CORT? Will
the outcomes inform the other projects in the CORT? If the aims of
the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be
advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts
or methods that drive the field? Does the project advance the theme
of the CORT and inform the other projects?
- Approach
> Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately
> developed, well integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the
> project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and
> consider alternative tactics?
- Innovation\
Is the project original and innovative? For example: Does the
project challenge existing paradigms or clinical practice, and
address an innovative hypothesis or critical barrier to progress in
the field? Does the project develop or employ novel concepts,
approaches, methodologies, tools, or technologies for this area? Are
the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge
existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies?
- Investigators
> Are the investigators appropriately trained and well suited to carry
> out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience
> level of the principal investigator and other researchers? Does the
> investigative team bring complementary and integrated expertise to the
> project (if applicable)?
- Environment
> Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done
> contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed studies take
> advantage of unique features of the scientific environment, or subject
> populations, or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there
> evidence of institutional support?
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583664 .anchor}III.I. Research Core(s)
Each core must be written using Grant Application Form PHS 398. Name and
assign a letter designation to each unit. An abstract must be written
for each core.
A core may be a unit designed just for the CORT projects or may be an
institutional core unit. However, funds may only be requested for CORT
use, and the core must serve a minimum of two projects within the CORT,
with no project dominating use of the core.
The core principal investigator should devote at least 15 percent effort
to the core.
Describe the core unit and the various services it would provide. The
justification for the core must include the value added by having
services provided through the core rather than within the individual
projects.
Describe the personnel, facilities, management and any special
arrangements such as cooperation with other established cores. The
techniques to be used and the quality control procedures should be
documented and justified. Indicate which core services each project
would utilize.
It is helpful in presenting the scope of the core to prepare a table
indicating the research projects each core unit will serve and the
estimated proportion of the cost (in dollars) of the core unit
associated with each research project.
Each core using human subjects must include a detailed plan for
protection of human subjects and inclusion of women, minorities, and
children.
If the core proposes to use vertebrate animals, a detailed description
of animal care and use must be included (see the PHS 398 instructions).
*Review Criteria for research cores:*
Will the core have utility to at least two of the CORT projects?
Is the quality of services high? Are there procedures for quality
control? Is the core cost effective?
Do the services offered best fit within a core structure? If this is
an add on to a preexisting core, what is the benefit to the CORT over
direct purchase of services from the existing core?
Are the personnel appropriate?
Are the facilities and equipment adequate? Is there institutional
commitment to the core?
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583665 .anchor}III.J. Review Criteria for the
Overall Application
After the review of the individual components of the application, an
overall priority score will be assigned to the application. This score
will reflect not only the individual quality of the projects, cores, and
administration, but also how the proposed CORT will bring together all
these elements in a workable unit. The overall score may be higher or
lower than the Aaverage@ of the descriptors based on the assessment of
whether the Awhole is greater than the sum of its parts:@
- The scientific excellence of the Center\'s research base as well as
the relevance and interrelation of these separately-funded research
projects to the goals of the Center and the likelihood for
meaningful collaboration among Center investigators. The application
must convey how the proposed Center will enhance significantly the
established research base of the host institution.
- The overall environment for a Center. This includes the
institutional commitment to the program, including lines of
accountability regarding management of the Center, and the
institution\'s partnership with the Center, and the institutional
commitment to individuals responsible for conducting essential
Center functions. This also includes the academic environment and
resources in which the activities will be conducted, including the
availability of space, equipment, facilities, and the potential for
interaction with scientists from other departments and schools to
enhance a multidisciplinary approach.
- The overall priority score assigned to the application will also
reflect how well the policies regarding (a) the inclusion of women,
minorities and children in study populations, and (b) the protection
of human subjects from research risks.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583666 .anchor}IV. Suggested content order for
application
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583667 .anchor}IV.A. General Information
It is desirable for CORT applications to be arranged in a specified
format. This not only makes it easier for NIAMS staff and reviewers to
find all the center components to be reviewed, but it can also serve as
a checklist for the applicant institution in preparing the application.
Form PHS 398 is required for all applications. (See II.B. for how to
obtain this form). Each budget unit (project or core) should be written
in the style and within the page limitation described in the PHS 398
instruction kit. To aid in the review of these applications, the
applicant should assemble the component units following the format
described below. Applicants may also consult with NIAMS staff concerning
the technical aspects of preparing the application.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583668 .anchor}IV.B. Content Order for the CORT
Application
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583669 .anchor}**IV.B.1. Face Page of Form PHS
398**.
Complete all items on the face page as directed. In the title block,
item 1, put \"NIAMS: CORT.\" Mark item 2 \"yes\" and write in the RFA
code as listed in the NIH Guide to Grants and Contracts and \"NIAMS:
CORT\" for the title.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583670 .anchor}IV.B.2 Page 2, Description
Describe the goals and objectives of the CORT overall and of the
component projects and cores. Do not exceed the space allowed. Key
personnel are those doctoral level investigators with a percent effort
on the grant: Director and Associate Director, investigators on the
projects and cores, and consultants.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583671 .anchor}IV.B.3. Table of Contents
Discard this page from Form PHS 398 and write a Table of Contents
appropriate for the CORT grant application. See Exhibit I for a
suggested format. The Table of Contents is paginated to follow the list
of Key Personnel. **Do not use letters (e.g., 4a, 4b, 4c, etc.)** The
Table of Contents should list all components. Each project and core
should be listed by the title and Principal Investigator. Specifically
list the locations of the checklist and the various requested supporting
documents, e.g., animal and human subject assurances.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583672 .anchor}IV.B.4. Budgets
For budget pages, see Exhibits III, IV, and V. Use form pages 4 and 5 in
PHS Form 398 for all budgets. Justify and document all costs for current
and future years throughout.
To provide budget information in a format that is clear to reviewers and
therefore provides the most positive review possible, presentation of a
consolidated budget for the first 12 months in a tabular form such as
the sample shown as Exhibit III is suggested. The overall Center budget,
\"Summary Center Budget,\" is presented first using form PHS 398 page 4
entitled \"Detailed Budget for First 12-Month Period\" (see Exhibit IV).
Note that no details need be given for the individual categories. Page 5
of form PHS 398, \"Budget Estimates for All Years of Support Requested
Direct Costs Only,\" should then follow a composite like that in Exhibit
IV, summarizing all individual budgets (see suggested format in Exhibit
V). For the purpose of establishing future year budget requests, the
applicant should use cost escalations as specified in the RFA or less.
However, **the direct cost budget cannot exceed \$1,000,000 in any
year**. For purposes of establishing the \$1,000,000 direct cost limit,
the F&A (indirect) costs of subcontracts will not be counted. (See NOT
OD-04-040:
<http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-04-040.html> )
Both first 12 month and 5 year individual budgets should be included *in
the sections for each project and core.* Details and justifications for
all budget items must be part of the individual budgets.
- This grant mechanism is not intended for the acquisition of
equipment. Costly items of equipment should be funded through other
sources.
- A separate, detailed budget for each project subcontracted to a
consortium institution is required as well as a form PHS 398 face
page signed by the principal investigator and appropriate officials
in the consortium institution.
- It is not the purpose of a CORT grant to provide funding for
alterations or renovations.
- Support for research training positions is not to be included.
- The production of audiovisual material with CORT grant funding is
not appropriate.
###
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583673 .anchor}IV.B.5. Biographical Sketches
Biographical sketches are required for all doctoral level personnel who
are listed with a percent effort (including consultants) in the CORT
application. The forms found in Form PHS 398 should be used. Begin with
the CORT Director and place the remaining individual sketches in
alphabetical order after the budget pages. These pages should not be
duplicated in the individual component projects and cores.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583674 .anchor}IV.B.6. Assurance Documentation
See sample suggested table, Exhibit VI. In addition to the assurance
pages, a master table listing the status of vertebrate animals and human
subject approval dates and the human subjects education requirement
certification will aid in the timely processing of your application.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583675 .anchor}IV.B.7. Narrative Sections
See Section III for content information. Present in the following order
using continuation pages:
- **Overview**
- **Qualifications of the Center Leadership**
- **Research Base for the CORT**
- **Institutional Environment and Resources**
- **Pilot and Feasibility Project Program**
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583676 .anchor}IV.B.8. Budgeted Components
See Section III. for content information. Present each individual
project and core in the following order using the PHS 398 forms.
- **Administrative Core**
- **Translational Projects (minimum of 3)**
- **Research Cores (optional)**
Each component should be written as a separate unit following these
guidelines and the instructions accompanying form PHS 398. It is
important that each component include a section on vertebrate animals
and on human subjects, gender and minority inclusion, and inclusion of
children as participants in research involving human subjects, even if
to indicate that a full discussion is not applicable. An individual
target enrollment table must be included with each project using human
subjects. Cores may cross reference detailed presentations to projects
and vice versa as appropriate to avoid lengthy repetitions of complex
arrangements.
A cover page for an individual component is needed only when that
component will be administered through a subcontract to another
institution. Facilities and administrative (indirect) costs from these
subcontracts do not count against the \$1,000,000 cap for direct costs
for a CORT.
An abstract and key personnel page must be included for each
component.
A detailed budget for the initial budget period and budget for the
entire proposed period of support \[pages 4 and 5 of form PHS 398\] must
be included with each component. The budget justification should be
thorough. Do not assume that any item or percent effort is obvious. Note
that the following percent efforts are expected: CORT Director: 15% for
the Administrative Core, 20% as project principal investigator;
Associate Director: 10% for the Administrative Core; 20% as project
principal investigator: Other Core Directors: 15%.
The biographical sketches are put centrally in one location (see IV.
B.) and should not be duplicated in the individual component.
A resources page should be included for each component.
The checklist page needs to be included with each institutional face
page.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583677 .anchor}IV.C. Appendices
See the instructions in the PHS 398 booklet for appropriate appendix
materials.
Following these suggestions will insure that correct appendix material
can be sent to the appropriate reviewers:
- Each piece should be marked with (1) the name of the CORT Director -
not the name of the component PI and (2) a **single** component of
the application to which it pertains - CORT Leadership, Research
Base, Resources and Environment, Administrative Core, or individual
cores and projects.
- The marked materials should be grouped by the identified components.
Thus, all five copies of appendices pertaining to a given project or
component should be grouped together.
- The five sets of all appendix material, and a CD including all
appendices, should be sent directly to the NIAMS and **NOT** to the
Center for Scientific Review:
Madeline Turkeltaub, CRNP, Ph.D., FAAN
Deputy Director, Extramural Program
NIAMS/NIH
> 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800 -- MSC 4872
>
> Bethesda, MD 20892-4872
>
> \[Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)\]
>
> Phone: (301) 594-2463
FAX: (301) 402-7478
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583678 .anchor}V. Noncompeting Applications:
Annual Reporting Requirements
Annual progress reports, submitted as part of the noncompeting
continuation application, are due two months before the anniversary date
of the award. These reports are used by the National Institute of
Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases to review the Center and
its progress. They serve to verify in detail the achievement of the
objectives outlined in the initial application and award and are an
important source of material for program staff in preparing reports,
planning programs, and communicating scientific accomplishments.
The application for continuation of a PHS Grant, PHS Form 2590, is used
to file the annual report. In addition, an overall progress report
containing the following information should be included:
• A summary (equivalent to no more than four single space typewritten
pages) of the goals and significant activities of the CORT. This summary
should be prepared for a general audience. Honors and/or promotions of
professional personnel should be mentioned.
• A discussion of the effectiveness of the CORT grant in furthering the
goals of the CORT program. This should include a summary of the specific
accomplishments that can be attributed to the CORT grant, e.g., new
research funding, changes in curricula, or organizational improvements
within the institution and in the community.
• An itemization of collaborative efforts the CORT established.
• A list of publications relevant to CORT funding should be provided.
• A discussion of problems that impede accomplishment of the stated
goals in the administration of the CORT grant and plans to overcome
them.
• The administrative component report should include a list of
administrative meetings held, evaluations from advisory groups, speakers
or symposia sponsored. These may be included as appendix material.
• A table listing the assurance dates for IACUC, IRB and certifications
education for the protection of human research participants for key
personnel for all CORT funded projects is optional, but will assist the
timely processing of the award. (See Exhibit VI). The notice describing
the requirement for education for the protection of human subject
participants may be found at
<http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html>.
• A detailed summary of each CORT funded component (including the
Administrative Core) and project, including the title, principal
investigator and key personnel, their percent effort, proposed budgets,
description, progress, and evaluation. This progress report should
include all CORT supported projects. It is especially important that the
significance and ultimate utility of each project be discussed in the
summary description and that this discussion be in terms understandable
to an informed nonscientist.
• A budget page for the coming year for each component and project
funded by the CORT.
• The timely review of the application will be facilitated by the
inclusion of a composite budget for the entire CORT as illustrated in
Exhibit IV.
• Other information that, from year to year, may be requested by the
NIAMS staff.
The expanded progress report is in addition to, and does not replace,
other management reports required by PHS policy.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583679 .anchor}VI. Guidelines for Pilot and
Feasibility Projects
See Section III.F. for a discussion of the Pilot and Feasibility Project
Program. Pilot and feasibility projects are NOT to be included in the
CORT grant application.
Present each study separately using Form PHS 398. Follow the
instructions and include:
\(1\) Face page, signed by the business office, and the description
page, page 2;
(2) Budget with justifications (An individual application may request up
to \$50,000 direct costs and for no more than two years.);
(3) **Justification of eligibility: How does this project relate to the
CORT theme? Where can the project lead?** This information should be
included as part of the Background and Significance Section.
(4) Scientific proposal using form PHS 398 (including justification for
core use if applicable); Note that items a - d of the Research Plan
**(Specific Aims, Background and Significance, and Research Design
and Methods) may not exceed a total of 15 pages.** This page
limitation does not apply to subsections e -- i; and
(5) Sections on Human Subjects, including the Inclusion of Women
Minorities, and Children; Vertebrate Animals;
Consultants/Collaborators; Consortium/Contractual Arrangements; and
Literature Cited. If not applicable, mark them N/A.
Applicants are advised to include sufficient information to address the
following review criteria:
*Review Criteria for a Pilot and Feasibility Project:*
Significance: Will the proposed work likely yield meaningful preliminary
data leading to a research proposal?
> Approach: Are the experimental approaches adequate?
Innovation: Is the research topic one that advances the translational
theme and promotes innovative new research related to the CORT?
Investigator: Is the investigator qualified to carry out the work
proposed?
Environment: Is the project appropriate to the CORT and its resources?
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583680 .anchor}**[VII. Guidelines for
Supplemental Applications]{.smallcaps}**
Applications submitted for supplemental projects to an NIAMS CORT
program must have prior approval of the NIAMS CORT Program
Scientific/Research Contact. Applications submitted without prior
approval will be withdrawn and returned to the applicant. Approval will
be based upon the following:
A component research project was recommended for less time than was
the rest of the CORT in order to permit an early assessment of progress;
A persuasive case can be made that an alternative, additional or
expanded project is important for the CORT program AND the new total
direct cost budget for the CORT will not exceed the budget cap.
Supplemental applications will undergo a competitive review by an
Initial Review Group (IRG) convened by the NIAMS Review Branch. In
general, applications should be submitted so that at least two years
remain on the parent grant at the time of award of the supplement. Major
factors to be considered in the evaluation of a supplemental application
will include:
1\. The relevance of the proposed research to the CORT concept outlined
in these guidelines;
2\. If a request for continuation, what findings have been developed
that justify additional years;
3\. Scientific merit of the proposed project, including significance,
approach and innovation;
4\. Competence of the investigators to accomplish the proposed research
goals, their commitment, and the time they will devote to the research
program;
5\. How the CORT environment enhances the project;
6\. Appropriateness of the budget for the proposed program; and
7\. Appropriateness of plans to include children, women, and minorities
in the study populations.
A supplemental project will be assigned a priority score based on its
merit as an individual research project. The review will also comment on
how the proposed project fits with the CORT program. Funding will be
based on merit, program relevance and availability of funds.
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583682 .anchor}Exhibit I Sample Table of
Contents
ABC University
Application for a Center of Research Translation
SAMPLE \-- Table of Contents
Page \#
I. General Material
A. Face Page
B. Abstract
C. Key Personnel
D. Table of Contents
E. Detailed Summary (Composite) Center Budget -- See Exhibit III
F. Detailed Overall Budget for Initial Budget Period-- See Exhibit
IV
G. Overall Budget for Entire Proposed Period of Support-- See
Exhibit V
H. Biographical Sketch -- Principal Investigator
I. Other Biographical Sketches -- for Key Personnel in alphabetical
order
J. Table of Assurances (See Exhibit VI)
K. Human Subject Education Certifications
L. Overall Resources
II. Narrative Sections
A. Overview
B. Qualifications of the Center Leadership
C. Research Base for CORT
1. Table of Grant Support for Research Base -- See Exhibit II
D. Institutional Environment and Resources
1. Letters of Support
E. Future Pilot and Feasibility Project Program
III. Budgeted Components
A. Title page - Administrative Core: CORT Director, degrees.
1. Abstract/Performance Site/Key Personnel
2. Table of Contents
3. Detailed Budget for Initial Budget Period
4. Budget for Proposed Period of Support
5. Budgets Pertaining to Consortium/Contractual Arrangements.
6. Resources
7. Research Plan
a. Specific Aims
b. Structure to Accomplish Aims
1. Leadership and Organizational Structure
2. CORT Advisory Group
3. Administrative/Leadership Goals
4. Enrichment Program
8. Consortium/Contractual Arrangements
9. Letters of Support
B. Title Page - Project 1: Title; Principal Investigator,
degree(s)
1. Abstract/Performance Site/Key Personnel
2. Table of Contents
3. Detailed Budget for Initial Budget Period
4. Budget for Entire Proposed Period of Support
5. Budgets Pertaining to Consortium/Contractual arrangements
6. Resources
7. Research Plan
a. Specific Aims
b. Background and Significance
c. Preliminary Studies
d. Research Design and Methods
e. Human Subjects
1. Protection of Human Subjects
2. Inclusion of Women
3. Inclusion of Minorities
4. Inclusion of Children
5. Data Safety and Monitoring Plan
6. Target Enrollment Table
f. Vertebrate Animals
g. Literature Cited
h. Consortium/Contractual Arrangements
i. Letters of Support
C. Project 2: see above example
D. Project 3: see above example
E. Title Page: Research Core: Title; Principal Investigator,
degree(s).
1. Abstract/Performance Site/Key Personnel
2. Table of Contents
3. Detailed Budget for Initial Budget Period
4. Budget for Proposed Period of Support
5. Budgets Pertaining to Consortium/Contractual Arrangements.
6. Resources
7. Research Plan
a. Specific Aims
b. Background and Significance
c. Preliminary Studies
d. Research Design and Methods
e. Human Subjects
1. Protection of Human Subjects
2. Inclusion of Women
3. Inclusion of Minorities
4. Inclusion of Children
5. Data Safety and Monitoring Plan
6. Target Enrollment Table
f. Vertebrate Animals
g. Literature Cited
h. Consortium/Contractual Arrangements
i. Letters of Support
IV. Checklists
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583770 .anchor}Exhibit II Grants Supporting the
Research Base
*SAMPLE OF SUGGESTED FORMAT*
+------------+----------+----------------+-----------+----------------+
| ** | **Key | **Title** | **Project | **Current |
| Supporting | Per | | Period** | Annual |
| Or | sonnel** | | | Amount** |
| ganization | | | | |
| &** | | | | |
| | | | | |
| **Grant | | | | |
| Number** | | | | |
+------------+----------+----------------+-----------+----------------+
| NIH 5 R01 | Chen, | New | 3/1/2004 | \$467,000 |
| ARnnnnn | C | Therapeutic | -- | |
| | hing-mei | Agents for | 2/28/2009 | |
| | (PI) | Autoimmune | | |
| | | Disease | | |
| | Doe, | | | |
| | John | | | |
+------------+----------+----------------+-----------+----------------+
| | | | | |
+------------+----------+----------------+-----------+----------------+
| | | | | |
+------------+----------+----------------+-----------+----------------+
| | | | | |
+------------+----------+----------------+-----------+----------------+
| | | | | |
+------------+----------+----------------+-----------+----------------+
| | | | | |
+------------+----------+----------------+-----------+----------------+
| **TOTAL:** | | | | |
+------------+----------+----------------+-----------+----------------+
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| []{#__ | | | | | | | |
| RefHeading__ | | | | | | | |
| _Toc82583771 | | | | | | | |
| .ancho | | | | | | | |
| r}**[Exhibit | | | | | | | |
| III]{. | | | | | | | |
| smallcaps}** | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated | | | | | | | |
| Budget for | | | | | | | |
| 1^st^ Year | | | | | | | |
| of Requested | | | | | | | |
| Support | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| ***SAMPLE OF | | | | | | | |
| SUGGESTED | | | | | | | |
| FORMAT*** | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| BUDGET | Pro | Pro | Pro | Admin | Core | Core | TOTAL |
| CATEGORY | ject | ject | ject | Unit | B | C | |
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | | | | |
| | | | | Core | | | |
| | | | | A | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| Personnel | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| Consultant | | | | | | | |
| Costs | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| Equipment | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| Supplies | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| Domestic | | | | | | | |
| Travel | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| Foreign | | | | | | | |
| Travel | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| Patient Care | | | | | | | |
| Costs | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| Alteration | | | | | | | |
| and | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Renovation | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| Contractual | | | | | | | |
| Costs | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| Other | | | | | | | |
| Expenses | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
| **Total | | | | | | | |
| Direct | | | | | | | |
| Costs** | | | | | | | |
+--------------+------+------+------+-------+------+-------+----------+
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583772 .anchor}Exhibit IV Initial Budget Period
<table>
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 18%" />
<col style="width: 6%" />
<col style="width: 4%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
<col style="width: 8%" />
<col style="width: 3%" />
<col style="width: 3%" />
<col style="width: 1%" />
<col style="width: 10%" />
<col style="width: 2%" />
<col style="width: 9%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
<col style="width: 2%" />
<col style="width: 0%" />
<col style="width: 2%" />
<col style="width: 11%" />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="6">Principal Investigator/Program Director (Last, First,
Middle):</td>
<td colspan="10"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="16"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="10" rowspan="2"><h1
id="detailed-budget-for-initial-budget-period">DETAILED BUDGET FOR
INITIAL BUDGET PERIOD</h1>
<h1 id="direct-costs-only">DIRECT COSTS ONLY</h1></td>
<td colspan="2">FROM</td>
<td colspan="4">THROUGH</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2">7/1/2006</td>
<td colspan="4">6/30/2007</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="4">PERSONNEL <em>(Applicant organization only)</em></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">%</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="7">DOLLAR AMOUNT REQUESTED <em>(omit cents)</em></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2">NAME</td>
<td colspan="2">ROLE ON<br />
PROJECT</td>
<td>TYPE<br />
APPT.<br />
<em>(months)</em></td>
<td colspan="3">EFFORT<br />
ON<br />
PROJ.</td>
<td>INST.<br />
BASE<br />
SALARY</td>
<td colspan="2">SALARY<br />
REQUESTED</td>
<td colspan="4">FRINGE<br />
BENEFITS</td>
<td>TOTAL</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="2">Principal<br />
Investigator</td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="3"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="3"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="3"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="3"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="3"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="3"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="3"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="9"><blockquote>
<p>SUBTOTALS</p>
</blockquote></td>
<td colspan="2">443,180</td>
<td colspan="4">137,525</td>
<td>580,705</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="15"><p>CONSULTANT COSTS</p>
<p> </p></td>
<td>15,000</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="15"><p>SUPPLIES</p>
<p> </p></td>
<td>212,485</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="15"><p>TRAVEL</p>
<p> </p></td>
<td>6,500</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td rowspan="2">PATIENT CARE COSTS</td>
<td colspan="2">INPATIENT</td>
<td colspan="12"> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2">OUTPATIENT</td>
<td colspan="12"> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="15"><p>ALTERATIONS AND RENOVATIONS <em>(Itemize by
category)</em></p>
<p> </p></td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="15"><p>OTHER EXPENSES <em>(Itemize by category)</em></p>
<p> </p></td>
<td>28,595</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="13">SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS FOR INITIAL BUDGET PERIOD</td>
<td colspan="2">$</td>
<td>843,285</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="7" rowspan="2">CONSORTIUM/CONTRACTUAL COSTS</td>
<td colspan="7">DIRECT COSTS</td>
<td colspan="2">156,715</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="7">FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS</td>
<td colspan="2">139,487</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="13">TOTAL DIRECT COSTS FOR INITIAL BUDGET PERIOD <em>(Item
7a, Face Page)</em></td>
<td colspan="2">$</td>
<td>1,139,487</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583775 .anchor}Exhibit V Budget for Entire
Proposed Project Period
<table style="width:100%;">
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 10%" />
<col style="width: 2%" />
<col style="width: 9%" />
<col style="width: 16%" />
<col style="width: 10%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 15%" />
<col style="width: 0%" />
<col style="width: 2%" />
<col style="width: 11%" />
<col style="width: 0%" />
<col style="width: 1%" />
<col style="width: 13%" />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="5">Principal Investigator/Program Director (Last, First,
Middle):</td>
<td colspan="8"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="13"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="13"><h1
id="budget-for-entire-proposed-project-period-direct-costs-only">BUDGET
FOR ENTIRE PROPOSED PROJECT PERIOD<br />
DIRECT COSTS ONLY</h1></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3" rowspan="2">BUDGET CATEGORY<br />
TOTALS</td>
<td rowspan="2">INITIAL BUDGET<br />
PERIOD<br />
<em>(from Form Page 4)</em></td>
<td colspan="9">ADDITIONAL YEARS OF SUPPORT REQUESTED</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2">2<sup>nd</sup></td>
<td>3rd</td>
<td colspan="4">4th</td>
<td colspan="2">5<sup>th</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3">PERSONNEL: <em>Salary and fringe benefits. Applicant
organization only</em>.</td>
<td>580,705</td>
<td colspan="2">580,705</td>
<td>580,705</td>
<td colspan="4">580,705</td>
<td colspan="2">580,705</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="3">CONSULTANT COSTS</td>
<td>15,000</td>
<td colspan="2">15,000</td>
<td>15,000</td>
<td colspan="4">15,000</td>
<td colspan="2">15,000</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3">EQUIPMENT</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="3">SUPPLIES</td>
<td>212,485</td>
<td colspan="2">212,485</td>
<td>212,485</td>
<td colspan="4">212,485</td>
<td colspan="2">212,485</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3">TRAVEL</td>
<td>6,500</td>
<td colspan="2">6,500</td>
<td>6,500</td>
<td colspan="4">6,500</td>
<td colspan="2">6,500</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td rowspan="2">PATIENT CARE<br />
COSTS</td>
<td colspan="2">INPATIENT</td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2">OUTPATIENT</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="3">ALTERATIONS AND<br />
RENOVATIONS</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="4"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3">OTHER EXPENSES</td>
<td>28,595</td>
<td colspan="2">28,595</td>
<td>28,595</td>
<td colspan="4">28,595</td>
<td colspan="2">28,595</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="3">SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS</td>
<td>843,285</td>
<td colspan="2">843,285</td>
<td>843,285</td>
<td colspan="4">843,285</td>
<td colspan="2">843,285</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2" rowspan="2">CONSORTIUM/<br />
CONTRACTUAL<br />
COSTS</td>
<td>DIRECT</td>
<td>156,715</td>
<td colspan="2">156,715</td>
<td>156,715</td>
<td colspan="4">156,715</td>
<td colspan="2">156,715</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>F&A</td>
<td>139,487</td>
<td colspan="2">139,487</td>
<td>139,487</td>
<td colspan="4">139,487</td>
<td colspan="2">139,487</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3">TOTAL DIRECT COSTS</td>
<td>1,139,487</td>
<td colspan="2">1,139,487</td>
<td>1,139,487</td>
<td colspan="4">1,139,487</td>
<td colspan="2">1,139,487</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="9">TOTAL DIRECT COSTS FOR ENTIRE PROPOSED PROJECT PERIOD
<em>(Item 8a, Face Page)</em></td>
<td><strong>–––––</strong></td>
<td colspan="2">$</td>
<td>5,697,435</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3"><p>SBIR/STTR Only</p>
<p>Fee Requested</p></td>
<td> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
<td colspan="3"> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="10"><p>SBIR/STTR Only: Total Fee Requested for Entire
Proposed Project Period</p>
<p>(Add Total Fee amount to “Total direct costs for entire proposed
project period” above and Total F&A/indirect costs from Checklist
Form Page, and enter these as “Costs Requested for Proposed Period of
Support on Face Page, Item 8b.)</p></td>
<td colspan="2">$</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc82583777 .anchor}Exhibit VI Approval Dates
***SAMPLE OF SUGGESTED FORMAT***
**HUMAN SUBJECTS APPROVAL DATES**
**HUMAN SUBJECTS EDUCATION REQUIREMENT**
**ANIMAL SUBJECTS APPROVAL DATES**
[General:]{.smallcaps}
1\. [Initial application]{.underline}: IRB approval and certification is
not required with the submission or prior to review and may be listed as
pending prior to the review. The certification of IACUC approval must be
submitted with the application or within 60 days after the application
receipt date.
2\. [Initial funding]{.underline}: Additional information may be
required prior to funding. The NIH no longer requires IRB approval and
certification prior to NIH review. This information will be required
when a decision is made to fund the application. Certifications for the
Human Subjects Education Requirement may be submitted at the time of
application but are not required until a funding decision is made. If
the Human Subjects Education Requirement certification is not included
in the application, please mark Apending@.
3\. [Yearly progress reports]{.underline}: This table should be updated
and included with each yearly progress report. Human Subjects Education
Requirement Certifications are needed only for investigators new to the
grant. Mark Apreviously submitted@ for continuing investigators.
[Specific]{.smallcaps}:
Please make a table for each Performance Site. If there is only one
performance site, then only one table is needed. A certification letter
must be attached for each project using Human Subjects. Each letter
should include the registered IRB number from the Office of Human
Research Protections.
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Performance | | | | |
| Site: | | | | |
| University A | | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| * | **P | **IACUC | **IRB | **Human |
| *Principal** | roject** | Approval | Approval | Subjects |
| | | Date\*** | Date\*** | Education |
| **In | | | | Requirement |
| vestigator** | | | | \*** |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Dr. A | 1 | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Dr. B | 2 | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Dr. C | 3 | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Dr. E | 5 | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Dr. B | Core A | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Dr. D | Core B | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Performance | | | | |
| Site: | | | | |
| University B | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Human | | | | |
| Subjects | | | | |
| assurance | | | | |
| number: | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Animal | | | | |
| welfare | | | | |
| assurance | | | | |
| number. | | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| * | **P | **IACUC | **IRB | **Human |
| *Principal** | roject** | Approval | Approval | Subjects |
| | | Date\*** | Date\*** | Education |
| **In | | | | Req |
| vestigator** | | | | uirement\*** |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Dr. X | 1 | | | |
| | (sub | | | |
| | project) | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Dr. D | 4 | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
| Dr. Y | Core B | | | |
| | (sub | | | |
| | project) | | | |
+--------------+----------+------------+--------------+--------------+
\* Attach certification letter or mark NA if not applicable
| en |
all-txt-docs | 392936 |
000
FXUS66 KPDT 161754 AAB
AFDPDT
AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PENDLETON OR
955 AM PST MON FEB 16 2009
UPDATED AVIATION DISCUSSION
.SHORT TERM...LATEST IR SATL WAS SHOWING SOME SHOWERS DEVELOPING
ACROSS NORTH CENTRAL OREGON ALONG WITH THE GORGE AND CENTRAL OREGON.
THIS IS IN RESPONSE TO STRONG LOW PRESSURE OFF THE CALI COAST THAT
IS PUMPING UP MOISTURE INTO OUR AREA. THE SHOWERS MAY EXPAND IN
COVERAGE ACROSS NORTH CENTRAL OREGON AND SOUTH CENTRAL WA AS THE DAY
PROGRESSES AND THIS MAY NEED ADJUSTING. ALSO SOME SNOW SHOWERS WERE
FALLING ACROSS THE HIGHEST ELEVATIONS OF THE BLUES MTNS. IN ADDITION
AREAS OF FOG AND FRZG FOG PERSIST ACROSS THE FOOTHILLS OF THE BLUE
MTNS AND CENTRAL OREGON AND WILL LET THIS CONTINUE THIS MORNING.
OTHERWISE THE REMAINDER OF THE FORECAST APPEARS ON TRACK FOR NOW.
&&
.AVIATION DISCUSSION...18Z TAFS...AREAS OF FOG AND LOW CLOUDS WILL
PERSIST THROUGH EARLY AFTERNOON OVER MOST AREAS...ESPECIALLY AT KPDT
AND KALW...CAUSING PERIODS OF MVFR/IFR CONDITIONS. CONDITIONS WILL
IMPROVE BY LATE AFTERNOON WITH ALL AREAS VFR. THE LOW LEVEL MOISTURE
LEFT BEHIND RECENT PRECIPITATION COMBINED WITH SOME CLEARING TONIGHT
AND LIGHT WINDS WILL ALLOW MVFR AND POSSIBLY IFR CONDITIONS TO
REDEVELOP OVERNIGHT TONIGHT. WINDS WILL REMAIN LIGHT AND UNDER 10
KTS THROUGH TUESDAY MORNING. 88
&&
.PRELIMINARY POINT TEMPS/POPS...
PDT 41 31 43 31 / 10 10 10 20
ALW 39 31 45 33 / 10 10 10 20
PSC 42 30 45 30 / 10 10 10 10
YKM 40 30 45 29 / 10 10 10 10
HRI 42 33 45 31 / 10 10 10 10
ELN 39 30 45 28 / 10 10 10 0
RDM 40 28 42 27 / 20 40 30 10
LGD 39 26 41 29 / 10 10 30 20
GCD 38 25 41 27 / 20 30 40 20
DLS 41 35 45 33 / 10 10 20 10
&&
.PDT WATCHES/WARNINGS/ADVISORIES...
OR...FREEZING FOG ADVISORY UNTIL 10 AM PST THIS MORNING FOR ORZ042-
043.
DENSE FOG ADVISORY UNTIL 10 AM PST THIS MORNING FOR ORZ501.
WA...DENSE FOG ADVISORY UNTIL 10 AM PST THIS MORNING FOR WAZ029.
&&
$$
TI:GGG
FOR ADDITIONAL WEATHER INFORMATION, CHECK OUR WEB SITE AT...
WWW.WEATHER.GOV/PENDLETON
97/88
| en |
converted_docs | 432192 | **Subject:** AIRPORT PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT **Date:** 9/01/06 **AC No:**
150/5380-7A
PROGRAM **Initiated by:** AAS-100 **Change:**
**1. PURPOSE OF THIS ADVISORY CIRCULAR.**
This advisory circular (AC) discusses the Airport Pavement Management
System (APMS) concept, its essential components, and how it can be used
to make cost-effective decisions about pavement maintenance and
rehabilitation.
**2. WHAT THIS AC CANCELS.**
This AC cancels AC 150/5380-7, Pavement Management System, dated
September 28, 1988.
**3. WHO THIS AC AFFECTS.**
This AC is intended for the airport operators, engineers, and
maintenance personnel responsible for implementing an airport pavement
management system.
**4. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS.**
Send comments or suggestions for improving this AC to---
Manager, Airport Engineering Division
Federal Aviation Administration
ATTN: AAS-100
800 Independence Avenue SW
Washington DC 20591
**5. COPIES OF THIS AC.**
The Office of Airport Safety and Standards makes its ACs available
online at
**http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/airports/resources/advisory_circulars/**.
{width="2.5034722222222223in"
height="0.5847222222222223in"}
David L. Bennett
Director, Office of Airport Safety and Standards
# {#section .AC-header1}
This page intentionally blank
###### TABLE OF CONTENTS
[1.0 BACKGROUND. 1](#background.)
[2.0 NEW DECISION-MAKING PROCESS. 1](#new-decision-making-process.)
[3.0 AIRPORT PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (APMS).
2](#airport-pavement-management-system-apms.)
[FIGURE 1. Typical Pavement Condition Life Cycle
3](#__RefHeading___Toc144685744)
[3.1 BENEFITS OF AN AIRPORT PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
4](#benefits-of-an-airport-pavement-management-system.)
[3.2 COMPONENTS OF AN AIRPORT PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
4](#components-of-an-airport-pavement-management-system.)
[4.0 MICRO PAVER^TM^ AND OTHER COMMERCIAL PMS SOFTWARE.
6](#micro-pavertm-and-other-commercial-pms-software.)
[4.1 MANAGEMENT LEVELS. 6](#management-levels.)
[4.2 REPORT GENERATION AND USAGE. 7](#report-generation-and-usage.)
[4.3 SOURCES OF PMS SOFTWARE. 8](#sources-of-pms-software.)
[APPENDIX 1. RELATED READING MATERIAL
A1-1](#appendix-1.-related-reading-material)
# {#section-1 .AC-header1}
# {#section-2 .AC-header1}
This page intentionally blank
# {#section-3 .AC-header1}
# {#section-4 .AC-header1}
# {#section-5 .AC-header1}
# {#section-6 .AC-header1}
# **1.0 BACKGROUND.** {#background. .AC-header1}
**a.** Historically, most airport sponsors have made decisions about
pavement maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) based on immediate need or
experience rather than long-term planning or documented data. This
approach did not allow the airport sponsors to evaluate the cost
effectiveness of alternative maintenance and repair strategies, and it
led to an inefficient use of funds.
**b.** Every airport sponsor must decide how to allocate its available
funds most effectively. Typically, this is done using one of the
following methods:
**(1).** Many airport sponsors use an "ad hoc" approach, whereby the
staff applies the maintenance and repair procedure that their experience
indicates is the best solution for the immediate problem. This approach
usually results in the repeated application of a select few alternatives
and may not lead to the selection of a preferred rehabilitation strategy
that considers pavement performance and a life-cycle cost (LCC)
analysis.
**(2).** The "existing condition" approach is also used. Here, the
pavement network is first evaluated by means of various condition
indicators. Based on an analysis of these indicators, maintenance and
repair alternatives are selected. This method does not take into account
life-cycle cost comparisons of the alternatives because decisions are
based solely on the current condition of the pavement. This approach
selects the maintenance and repair procedures that relate to the current
deficiencies in the pavement, but the choice may not be the most
cost-effective method based on life-cycle costing.
**c.** Since these approaches worked reasonably well in the past, they
became part of the standard operating procedure in some agencies. Today,
however, with limited money to spend on maintenance and rehabilitation
and new technologies providing more options for repair, these
established procedures do not answer some basic questions. For example,
what if funds are available to do only half the overlays that the
procedure indicates are necessary in a particular year? Should some
pavements be overlaid to the proper thickness while the remaining
pavements receive no overlay? Should the thickness be reduced and a thin
overlay placed on all pavements? It is evident that decisions made today
will have an effect on the pavements' condition in future years. The
question must then become, which course of action should be taken and
what are the immediate and future consequences of such decisions.
# 2.0 NEW DECISION-MAKING PROCESS. {#new-decision-making-process. .AC-header1}
**a.** The selection of the best course of action can be determined
based on the predicted effects of each action. For example, by placing a
thin overlay on all pavements, there will be an immediate improvement to
all the pavements. However, due to rapid deterioration of the overlays,
there will probably be a need for further rehabilitation in a short
period of time. If, in addition to other pavements needing work, some of
the overlaid pavements need rehabilitation action again next year, the
overall condition of the pavement network will eventually deteriorate.
Alternatively, if a few selected pavements receive the full thickness
overlay, they will not need rehabilitation for many years. During
subsequent years, remaining pavements can then receive full thickness
overlays, so the number of pavements needing rehabilitation will
ultimately decrease. With this strategy, however, overall pavement
condition will be worse in the short term because those pavements that
have not been overlaid will continue to deteriorate until they are
rehabilitated.
In order to determine which of these actions is preferable, we must be
able to predict the future consequences of the various scenarios. This
requires an understanding of the life span of a thick (e.g., 4-inch)
versus thin (2-inch) overlay. Practitioners should also have a good
understanding of the rate of pavement deterioration, with and without
maintenance, and the causes of current pavement deterioration, such as
environmental conditions or pavement loading conditions.
**b.** Predicting consequences of rehabilitation scenarios requires
using "engineering judgment" in the decision-making process. However, if
the consequences are predicted using a predetermined methodology, it
becomes possible to analyze previous predictions and improve on the
prediction procedure over a period of time---regardless of management or
staff turnover.
**c.** One such methodology is an Airport Pavement Management System
(APMS), which can improve on the decision-making process, expand its
scope, allow for feedback based on choices made, and ensure that
consistent decisions are made throughout an organization.
# **3.0 AIRPORT PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (APMS).** {#airport-pavement-management-system-apms. .AC-header1}
An APMS---as identified in Appendix 1 of AC 150/5380-6, Guidelines and
Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements---provides a consistent,
objective, and systematic procedure for establishing facility policies,
setting priorities and schedules, allocating resources, and budgeting
for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation. It can also quantify
information and provide specific recommendations for actions required to
maintain a pavement network at an acceptable level of service while
minimizing the cost of maintenance and rehabilitation.
**a. Theory Behind an Airport Pavement Management System.** An APMS not
only evaluates the present condition of a pavement, but also predicts
its future condition through the use of a pavement condition indicator.
By projecting the rate of deterioration, a life-cycle cost analysis can
be made for various alternatives. This analysis will help determine the
optimal time for applying the best alternative. Such a decision is
necessary to avoid higher maintenance and repair costs in the future.
Figure 1 illustrates how a pavement generally deteriorates and the
relative cost of rehabilitation at various times throughout its life. A
pavement generally performs well for the majority of its life, after
which it reaches a "critical condition" and begins to deteriorate
rapidly. Several studies have shown that maintaining a pavement in good
condition versus periodically rehabilitating a pavement in poor
condition is four to five times less expensive. The number of years a
pavement stays in "good" condition before rapidly deteriorating depends
on several factors, including construction type and quality, pavement
use, climate, and maintenance.
Figure 1 also shows that the ideal time for major rehabilitation is just
as a pavement's rate of deterioration begins to increase. Maintenance
and rehabilitation solutions would be easy to plan if pavements
exhibited clear signs they had reached this point, but unfortunately,
they do not. The shape of the deterioration curve, and therefore the
optimal maintenance and repair points, vary considerably within a
pavement network. A pavement experiencing a sudden increase in
operations or aircraft loading will have a tendency to deteriorate more
rapidly than a pavement deteriorating solely from environmental causes.
A pavement deteriorating from environmental damage may have a number of
cracks that need filling but still remain structurally sound.
Conversely, this same pavement may be in the early stages of load damage
deterioration, which can only be detected with proper testing.
Because it is difficult to determine when a pavement has reached the
critical condition, an APMS can help identify the optimal rehabilitation
point and help decision-makers target available resources where they
will be most effective. The APMS can do this by making use of data from
a pavement condition rating system that will predict future conditions
and indicate whether the distress is load or environmentally related.
{width="5.870833333333334in"
height="4.020833333333333in"}
[]{#__RefHeading___Toc144685744 .anchor}**FIGURE 1. Typical Pavement
Condition Life Cycle** (Springer 2005)
**b. Cost-Effective Solutions.** Information on pavement deterioration,
by itself, is not sufficient to answer questions involved in selecting
cost-effective maintenance and repair strategies. For example, should a
pavement be sealed, recycled, or resurfaced? This type of decision
requires information on the cost of various maintenance and repair
procedures and their effectiveness. Effectiveness in this case means---
- The proposed solution targets the source of the deficiency and will
improve the pavement's condition rating.
- The pavement will stay in this improved condition for several years
to optimally recover the cost of the solution.
A pavement management system will enable a user to store pavement
condition and maintenance information in a database and use the
program's resources to determine the most cost-effective solution for
pavement maintenance issues.
# **3.1 BENEFITS OF AN AIRPORT PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.** {#benefits-of-an-airport-pavement-management-system. .AC-header1}
An APMS can provide several benefits, including---
- Providing an objective and consistent evaluation of the condition of
a network of pavements.
- Providing a systematic and documentable engineering basis for
determining maintenance and rehabilitation needs.
- Identifying budget requirements necessary to maintain pavements at
various levels of serviceability.
- Providing documentation on the present and future condition of the
pavements in a network.
- Determining life-cycle costs for various maintenance and
rehabilitation alternatives.
- Identifying the impact on the pavement network as a result of
performing no major repairs.
# **3.2 COMPONENTS OF AN AIRPORT PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.** {#components-of-an-airport-pavement-management-system. .AC-header1}
In order to take full advantage of a pavement management system,
pavement condition information must be collected and periodically
updated. Alternative rehabilitation strategies must be identified along
with decision criteria and maintenance policy that will determine which
rehabilitation procedures are employed. Further, the pavement management
system must contain models for prediction of performance, cost of
alternate strategies, and optimization procedures that consider the
entire pavement life cycle.
A system for accomplishing these objectives must generally include---
- A systematic means for collecting and storing information.
- An objective and repeatable system for evaluating pavement
condition.
- Procedures for predicting future pavement condition.
- Procedures for modeling pavement performance (both past and future
condition).
- Procedures for determining the consequence on pavement condition and
life-cycle costing for a given M&R budget.
- Procedures for determining budget requirements to meet management
objectives, such as maintaining a minimum condition.
- Procedures for formulating and prioritizing M&R projects. A project
normally consists of multiple pavement sections and may include
different M&R actions for different sections.
The essential components of a pavement management system include---
**a. Database.** There are several elements critical to making good
pavement maintenance and repair decisions: pavement structure;
maintenance history, including costs; traffic data; and information on
the condition of a pavement. This data can be stored in an APMS
database.
**(1). Pavement Structure.** Knowing when the pavement was originally
built, the structural composition (material and thickness), and
subsequent overlays, rehabilitation, etc., is key to analyzing problems
and designing solutions. "As built" records should provide this
information. If they are not available or if records are suspect, it
will be necessary to core the existing pavement to establish the
thickness and composition of the structural layers.
**(2). Maintenance History.** A history of maintenance performed and its
associated costs will provide valuable information on the effectiveness
of various maintenance procedures on flexible and rigid pavements. The
cost of each maintenance procedure is necessary when performing a
life-cycle cost analysis.
**(3). Traffic Data.** Data about the number of operations and type of
aircraft using the pavement is necessary when analyzing probable causes
of deterioration and when considering alternate M&R procedures.
**(4). Pavement Condition Data.** A fundamental component of any
pavement management system is the ability to track pavement condition.
This requires an evaluation process that is objective, systematic, and
repeatable. A pavement condition rating system---such as the pavement
condition index (PCI) rating system described in *ASTM D 5340, Standard
Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys* (and discussed
below), provides a rating of the surface condition of a pavement with
implications of structural performance. Periodically collecting
condition data is essential for tracking pavement performance, modeling
pavement performance, and determining when to schedule M&R.
**b. System Capabilities.**
**(1). Predicting Future Pavement Condition.** A pavement management
system must be capable of predicting future pavement condition.
Condition predictions are necessary in developing optimum, multi-year
M&R plans.
**(2). Determining Optimum M&R Plans for a Given Budget.** An APMS
should be capable of producing an optimum M&R plan that identifies where
and when M&R is required and approximately how much it will cost. This
data will assist in setting priorities that fit predetermined M&R
budgets.
**(3). Determining Budget Requirements to Meet Management Objectives.**
An APMS should be capable of determining the budget requirements for
meeting specified management objectives. Typical management objectives
include maintaining pavements above a specified condition and
eliminating major M&R requirements over a specified number of years.
**(4). Facilitating the Formulation and Prioritization of M&R
Projects.** In addition to developing optimum M&R plans at the section
level, an APMS should facilitate the formulation and prioritization of
M&R projects. Engineering judgment, however, remains a key component in
transforming the optimum M&R plans into practical executable projects.
# 4.0 MICRO PAVER^TM^ AND OTHER COMMERCIAL PMS SOFTWARE. {#micro-pavertm-and-other-commercial-pms-software. .AC-header1}
When developing an APMS, airports can make use of several existing
software options. Micro Paver^TM^ is a pavement management system (PMS)
application being used by airport pavement networks at the state and
local level. The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory
under contract to the Federal Aviation Administration developed this
computer program. The program has been continually updated by the FAA,
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Corp of Engineers, U.S. Air Force,
U.S. Navy, and other authorities to meet the needs of current users. In
addition, various consulting firms have developed similar software using
the concept originally developed in Micro Paver^TM^.
PMS software allows for storage of pavement condition history,
nondestructive testing data, and construction and maintenance history,
including cost data. It provides many capabilities, including evaluation
of current conditions, prediction of future conditions, identification
of maintenance and rehabilitation needs, inspection scheduling, economic
analysis, and budget planning. PMS software not only evaluates the
present condition of the pavement using the PCI system described in
*ASTM D 5340,* but can also predict its future condition.
Note: The PCI is a numerical indicator that reflects the structural
integrity and surface operational condition of a pavement. It is based
on an objective measurement of distress type, severity, and quantity. By
projecting the rate of deterioration, a life-cycle cost analysis can be
performed for various M&R alternatives. Not only can the best
alternative be selected, but the optimal time of application can also be
determined.
# {#section-7 .AC-header1}
# 4.1 MANAGEMENT LEVELS. {#management-levels. .AC-header1}
Once an APMS has been established, PMS software can be used to assist in
making pavement management decisions. Managing a pavement system
effectively requires decision-making at two levels:
**a. Network-Level Management.** In network-level management, questions
are answered about short-term and long-term budget needs, the overall
condition of the network (currently and in the future), and pavements to
be considered at the project level. Decisions are made about the
management of an entire pavement network. At a local level, this might
comprise all the pavements on an airport, and at a state level, all the
pavements in the state airport system.
**(1).** **Using PMS Software at the Network Level.** In addition to
providing an automated tool for storing information about specific
pavements, PMS software provides a series of routines that access the
database and produce customized or user-defined reports. These reports
can help the user make decisions about inspection scheduling, pavements
needing rehabilitation, budget forecasting, routine maintenance
projects, current pavement conditions, and future condition predictions.
**(2). Condition Prediction.** Condition prediction is used as the basis
for developing inspection schedules and identifying pavements requiring
maintenance or rehabilitation. Once pavements requiring future work have
been identified, a budget for the current year and for several years
into the future can be developed. By using an agency's prioritization
scheme, maintenance policy, and M&R costs and then comparing the budget
to the actual funds available for the current year, the software
produces a list of potential projects. This list becomes the link into
project-level management.
**b.** P**roject-Level Management.** In project-level management,
decisions are made about the most cost-effective M&R alternative for the
pavements identified in the network analysis. At this level, each
specified pavement should have a detailed condition survey. In addition,
nondestructive and/or destructive tests should be made to determine the
pavement's load-carrying capacity. Roughness and friction measurements
may be useful for project development.
**(1).** **Roughness.** Roughness measurements can be helpful when there
is evidence of roughness, usually in the form of frequent pilot
complaints. Roughness measurement is of greater value when the pavement
is in very good condition with little or no distress. It has less value
if reconstruction is imminent.
**(2).** **Friction.** Friction measurements, on the other hand, should
be made on a periodic basis to measure the textural properties of the
pavement and determine the amount of deterioration that has occurred. AC
150/5320-12, *Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid
Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces,* provides recommendations for
friction measurements.
**(3).** **Using PMS Software at the Project Level.** PMS software can
use a number of engineering measurements to quantify a pavement's
condition. Nondestructive test data, friction measurements, roughness
measurements, and drainage information may be entered into the APMS
database. This information is used to identify feasible alternatives
that can correct existing deficiencies. The various alternatives
identified, including no action, are then compared on a life-cycle cost
basis. The results, combined with budget and management constraints,
produce the current year's maintenance and repair program.
# **4.2 REPORT GENERATION AND USAGE.** {#report-generation-and-usage. .AC-header1}
Micro Paver^TM^ and other PMS software can assist in the decision-making
process by allowing the user to run several standard reports. Standard
and customized reporting functions vary among PMS software packages. The
recommended minimum set of reports and the use of each report is
outlined below. PMS software should allow the user to customize the
reports to include only the pavements and/or conditions of interest and
to generate various budget/condition scenarios.
**a. Inventory Report.** This report lists all pavements in a network
and contains information such as surface type, location, area, and
pavement function, i.e., runway, taxiway, apron.
**b. Inspection Scheduling Report.** This report allows the user to
schedule inspections based on minimum acceptable condition levels and
rates of deterioration.
**c. Pavement Condition Report.** This report provides the user with a
tabulation of pavement condition for the current or future years. The
report should provide the condition of individual pavement sections and
the overall network condition. The projected condition can be used to
assist in planning future maintenance and repair needs and to inform
management of present and future conditions.
**d. Budget Planning Report.** This report allows the user to project
the budgets required to maintain the pavement network above a
user-specified condition level. For each pavement selected, the report
predicts the year in which the minimum condition or PCI will be reached
and calculates the cost of repair. To obtain this report, the user must
input three forms of data:
**(1).** Minimum pavement condition (often PCI) for each pavement type,
**(2).** Average unit repair costs based on surface type and PCI ranges,
and
**(3).** Inflation rate during the analysis period.
# {#section-8 .AC-header1}
**e. Network Maintenance Report.** This report uses the agency's
maintenance strategy, which is stored in the database, and applies it to
the distresses identified in the latest PCI survey. This report can be
used to estimate both the type and cost of routine maintenance for the
development of an annual work plan.
**f. Economic Analysis Report.** This report can assist the user in
selecting the most cost-effective alternative for a pavement repair. For
each feasible alternative, the user must input initial costs, periodic
maintenance costs, one-time future maintenance costs, interest rates,
and discount rates. The program performs a life-cycle cost analysis and
provides the user with a means of comparing the effectiveness of the
various repair alternatives. The program should allow the user to vary
interest rates, repair costs, and timing so their effect on alternatives
can be analyzed.
# **4.3 SOURCES OF PMS SOFTWARE**. {#sources-of-pms-software. .AC-header1}
**a. Micro Paver^TM^.** The Micro Paver^TM^ software package may be
obtained from an authorized distribution center. Currently, there are
two distribution centers, with each center responsible for establishing
individual fees for distribution and providing updates and corrections
as they become available. The fees vary according to the service
provided to the user (training, user guides, implementation assistance,
user's group membership, etc.). Users should contact each center and
determine which one will best suit their needs. The location of the
distribution centers, user manuals, and product updates are provided on
the Micro Paver^TM^ website at **http://www.cecer.army.mil/paver/.**
**b. Other PMS Software.** Other PMS software has been developed and
used by consulting engineer firms that provide pavement evaluation and
management services. Some firms may offer or sell their software
programs for use by an individual or an agency.
# {#section-9 .AC-header1}
This page intentionally blank.
# APPENDIX 1. RELATED READING MATERIAL {#appendix-1.-related-reading-material .AC-header1}
**1.** Electronic copies of the latest versions of the following FAA
publications are available on the FAA website at
**http://www.faa.gov/**. Printed copies can be requested from the
Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, Ardmore
East Business Center, 3341 Q 75th Ave, Landover, MD 20785. The
Department of Transportation, however, will charge a fee for some of
these documents.
**a.** AC 150/5320-12, Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of
Skid Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces.
**b.** AC 150/5370-11, Use of Nondestructive Testing Devices in the
Evaluation of Airport Pavements.
**c.** AC 150/5380-6, Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of
Airport Pavements.
**2.** Copies of *(ASTM) D 5340, Standard Test Method for Airport
Pavement Condition Index Surveys,* can be obtained from the American
Society for Testing and Materials at **http://www.astm.org/.**
**3.** "Pavement Management for Airports, Roads, and Parking Lots", M.Y.
Shahin, Second Edition, Springer, 2005.
| en |
converted_docs | 930787 | 6055-01
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR LITERACY
National Institute for Literacy Advisory Board
AGENCY: National Institute for Literacy
ACTION: Notice of Meeting
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and a summary of the agenda
for an upcoming meeting of the National Institute for Literacy Advisory
Board (Board). The notice also describes the functions of the Board.
Notice of this meeting is required by section 10 (a) (2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. This document is intended to notify the general
public of their opportunity to attend the meeting. Individuals who will
need accommodations for a disability in order to attend the meeting
(e.g., interpreting services, assistive listening devices, or materials
in alternative format) should notify Liz Hollis at telephone number
(202) 233-2072 no later than September 28. We will attempt to meet
requests for accommodations after this date but cannot guarantee their
availability. The meeting site is accessible to individuals with
disabilities.
DATE AND TIME: Open sessions -- October 13, 2004, from 8:30 am to 5:30
pm, October 14, 2004, from 8:30 am to 5:30 pm, and October 15, 2004,
from 8:30 am to 2:00 pm.
ADDRESS: The University of Texas System, Ashbel Smith Hall, 9^th^ Floor,
201 West 7^th^ Street, Austin, Texas 78701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Liz Hollis, Special Assistant to the
Director; National Institute for Literacy, 1775 I Street, NW, Suite 730,
Washington, DC 20006; telephone number: (202) 233-2072; email:
ehollis@nifl.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board is established under section 242 of
the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, P.L. 105-220 (20 U.S.C. 9252). The
Board consists of ten individuals appointed by the President with the
advice and consent of the Senate. The Board advises and makes
recommendations to the Interagency Group, composed of the Secretaries of
Education, Labor, and Health and Human Services, which administers the
National Institute for Literacy (Institute). The Interagency Group
considers the Board \'s recommendations in planning the goals of the
Institute and in implementing any programs to achieve those goals.
Specifically, the Board performs the following functions: (a) makes
recommendations concerning the appointment of the Director and the staff
of the Institute; (b) provides independent advice on operation of the
Institute; and (c) receives reports from the Interagency Group and the
Institute's Director.
The National Institute for Literacy Advisory Board meeting on October
13-15, 2004, will focus on future and current program activities,
presentations by education researchers, and other relevant literacy
activities and issues.
Records are kept of all Advisory Board proceedings and are available for
public inspection at the National Institute for Literacy, 1775 I Street,
NW, Suite 730, Washington, DC 20006, from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
Dated: September 15, 2004
Sandra L. Baxter, Interim Director
| en |
markdown | 282620 | # Presentation: 282620
## When are Voluntary Noise Abatement Procedures not Voluntary?
- *Legislation
- *Acceptable Practices
- *Effects – Mandatory Noise Abatement
## Controlling Legislation
- Title 49 USC Subtitle VII Section 40103(a)(1) states:
- >*The United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States*
## Noise Restrictions
***PREEMPTION***
*** ******>Local actions cannot regulate such things as the maximum noise level of an aircraft in flight, the route of an aircraft, the altitude of an aircraft, the time of day an aircraft flies (curfew), or the procedures used by the flight crew.***
## Controlling Legislation – Noise Restrictions
- Compliance with the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (ANCA) and 14 CFR Part 161
- Compliance with ANCA, 49 U.S.C. 47521 et seq. and 14 CFR Part 161 (1991)
- Grant Assurances (49 USC 47107(a)(1))
- Surplus obligations (49 USC 47152)
- Non-Surplus obligations (49 USC 47125)
## Noise Restrictions
***ANCA***
*** ******>ANCA and Part 161 prescribe the requirements and process under which the FAA reviews noise or access restrictions that impact Stage 2 or Stage 3 aircraft.***
*** ******>Airport sponsors must consider their Federal obligations and/or surplus and non-surplus obligations in addition to meeting the requirements of ANCA.***
## Congress Finds That:
- Community noise concerns have led to uncoordinated and inconsistent restrictions on aviation which could impede the national air transportation system;
- A noise policy must be implemented at the national level
## Noise Restrictions
- Objective:
- Given an airport specific noise restriction situation, identify whether the restriction is consistent with the sponsor’s grant assurances, ANCA, and other applicable laws and policy
## Noise Restrictions
***Why Do We Care About Noise Restrictions?***
***>Serious impact on the Nation’s airport system!***
***>Possible conflict with Federal obligations to make airport available to the public on reasonable terms and without unjust discrimination***
## Noise Restrictions
***What Is A Noise Restriction?***
***A compulsory noise-based action by an airport sponsor that results in a decrease in the ability of airport users to use or access the airport and its facilities***
## Noise Restrictions
- >***A noise restriction is an access restriction imposed by an airport sponsor on airport users with the intent to reduce noise impacts.***
*** ******>A noise restriction is not “just another noise mitigation tool.”***
## Noise Restrictions
***3 Categories of Noise Restrictions***
***>Voluntary Restrictions***
***>Hidden Restrictions***
***>Mandatory Restrictions***
## Types of Noise Restrictions
- Full Curfews
- Noise-Based Restrictions (77dBA limit)
- Stage-Based Restrictions (Stage 2)
- Limits on Hours of Operation
- Touch & Go Restrictions
- Restrictions Imposed through Leases
- Noise Abatement Procedures
- Run-up Restrictions
- Mandatory Runway Use Programs
## Noise Restrictions
***Any Restriction...***
*** ******>Must be Reasonable (FAA Determines)***
*** ******>Cannot Unjustly Discriminate***
*** ******>Cannot grant an Exclusive Right***
*** ******>Cannot create an undue burden on interstate commerce (if unreasonable or unjustly discriminatory-this applies)***
*** ******>Cannot compromise safety or efficient use of airspace (defined by FS or AT)***
## Acceptable Noise Abatement Practices - Voluntary
*FAA strongly supports Voluntary Noise Abatement Procedures at an airport*
*Sponsor and FAA should work together to educate and encourage pilots to use the procedures whenever possible*
*Our number one concern is Pilot Safety!*
## Mandatory Noise Abatement Procedures
***Why not? Certain weather and flight conditions could result in the Noise Abatement Procedures compromising pilot safety.***
***Do not create incentives for pilots to compromise safety through a concern that they could lose their hangar or other lease privileges. *Do not regulate noise with such language in your ground leases!!! ***
## Would you Consider these Lease Clauses Voluntary?
***The lease requires glider companies to educate glider pilots about raptor protection and would allow for the termination of the lease by the City for repeated violations of the raptor protection sections of the lease.***
***The lease requires that operators shall not tow any gliders over a particular area marked on a map, or the lease could be terminated.***
## Noise Restrictions
***“******UNDER COVER” OR HIDDEN RESTRICTIONS,***
*** ****** ***
*** ******>Restrictions imposed through leases or other agreements***
*** ******>Restrictions imposed under the excuse of SAFETY***
*** ******>”Voluntary” – associated with ******fines or other penalties***
## Noise Restrictions
***Reasonableness***
***Noise Justification***
***Recognized Noise Problem (65 dnl off airport)***
***Recognized Noise Impact Area***
***Valid Non-compatible Land Uses***
***What Can You Do?***
## Noise Restrictions
***Balanced Approach***
***Consideration of Non-Restrictive Alternatives (evaluate in a Part 150):***
***>Noise Abatement Procedures***
***>Flight Tracks***
***>Land and Easement Acquisition***
***>Preferential Runway Programs***
***>Sound Insulation***
***>Residential Development within Impacted Areas***
## Non-Restrictive Alternatives
***For a “Balanced Approach”, airport sponsors must explore all non-restrictive alternatives first before even considering a noise-based restriction. ***
***If no actual or potential liability exists, then a restriction would be preempted.***
***To date, we have not “approved” a noise restriction (without it being a compliance issue – Naples).***
## Potential Unjust Discrimination:
***>Not restricting similarly noisy or noisier aircraft***
***>Exempting based aircraft***
***>Using only stage designations***
***>Arbitrary parameters***
***>Discriminating against aircraft based on propulsion type***
***>Targeting only jets or helicopters***
***>Discrimination against GA, Cargo or Air Carriers***
***>Curfews***
***>Charging fees (in the name of noise/safety) to new leases (in an attempt to limit expansion)***
***>Requiring landscaping, hangar insulation, etc.***
## Conclusion – Noise Restrictions
***Encourage Voluntary Noise Abatement Procedures***
***Educate your pilots***
***Discourage incompatible land uses around the airport***
***If the 65 dnl goes off your airport – initiate a Part 150***
***Don’t allow any form of noise-based restrictions or requirements in your leases***
## Handout: Land Releases and Changes in Use
- Please read the handout which provides some “Rules of Thumb” for a variety of Land Acquisition Circumstances!
- Call your ADO’s if you have any questions! | en |
markdown | 488689 | # Presentation: 488689
## Madden/Julian Oscillation: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Forecasts
**Update prepared by**
**Climate Prediction Center / NCEP**
** ****December 5, 2005**
## Outline
** ****Overview**
** ****Recent Evolution and Current Conditions**
** ****Madden Julian Oscillation Forecast **
** ****Summary**
## Overview
- The MJO remains weak with signals across the global tropics more regional in nature and associated with more localized forcing such as that from SSTs and linkages with the extratropical circulation.
- Enhanced convection is evident across the eastern Indian Ocean, sections of Indonesia, and the far western Pacific Ocean and is associated with a continuation of a quasi-persistent pattern of convection present during the last several weeks. Connections with the extratropics also resulted in areas of enhanced convection across east-central Brazil and southeast Africa. Strong suppressed convection is also observed across Central America and areas of northern South America. Westerly low-level wind anomalies have strengthened in the Indian Ocean and have also expanded eastward to cover sections of Indonesia. These anomalies have aided in the generating of circulations both north and south of the equator during the past few weeks over the eastern Indian Ocean and Bay of Bengal. Easterly wind anomalies in the tropical western Pacific Ocean remain.
- Based on the latest observational evidence and statistical and dynamical forecasts, the MJO is expected to remain weak during the upcoming period.
- Although the MJO remains weak, there are potential global benefits/hazards during the forecast period. During week 1, Hurricane Epsilon is expected to impact the Central Atlantic with heavy rainfall, strong winds, and high seas during the period. An elevated chance of above average rainfall exists across east-central Brazil and southeast Africa as periodic frontal systems continue to interact with tropical moisture in these regions. An elevated chance of tropical cyclone activity exists in the Bay of Bengal associated with continued westerly wind anomalies and a continued environment favorable for convection.
- For both weeks 1 and 2, there is an increased chance of above average rainfall from the eastern Indian Ocean across Indonesia into the western Pacific Ocean as a quasi-persistent pattern of convection associated with above average SSTs and other intraseasonal tropical variability is expected to continue.
- The western Pacific Ocean will need to be closely monitored, both north and south of the equator, for tropical cyclogenesis throughout the forecast period.
## 850-hPa Vector Wind Anomalies (m s-1)
**850-hPa Vector Wind Anomalies (m s****-1****)**
**Note that shading denotes the magnitude of the anomalous wind vectors.**
**Easterly wind anomalies remain across the western Pacific Ocean**
**Westerly wind anomalies have strengthened across the Indian Ocean and have expanded eastward to cover sections of Indonesia**
## Low-level (850-hPa) Zonal (east-west) Wind Anomalies (m s-1)
**Low-level (850-hPa) Zonal (east-west) Wind Anomalies (m s****-1****)**
**Longitude**
**Time**
**Weaker-than-average easterlies or westerlies (orange/red shading). **
**Stronger-than-average easterlies (blue shading).**
**Equatorial easterly anomalies near and west of the date line have weakened.**
**Equatorial westerly anomalies in the eastern Indian Ocean have shifted eastward during the past ten days **
## Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR) Anomalies (7.5°S-7.5°N)
**Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR) Anomalies (7.5°S-7.5°N****)**
**Drier-than-average conditions (/red shading) **
**Wetter-than-average conditions (blue shading)**
**Longitude**
**Time**
**Most recently, equatorial OLR anomalies are weak. **
**Weak MJO activity was evident during July and again in September as OLR anomalies propagated eastward from the Indian Ocean to the western Pacific Ocean. **
**Also, suppressed convection was evident across Central America in late November. **
## Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR) Anomalies (2.5°N-17.5°N)
**Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR) Anomalies (2.5°N-17.5°N****)**
**Drier-than-average conditions (orange/red shading) **
**Wetter-than-average conditions (blue shading)**
**Longitude**
**Time**
**Enhanced convection north of the equator was mainly located in the Indian Ocean, the Bay and Bengal, and the Arabian Sea during the past ten days**
**Suppressed convection was evident across Central America during late November and early December.**
## Anomalous OLR and 850-hPa Wind: Last 30 days
**Anomalous OLR and 850-hPa Wind: Last 30 days**
**Easterly anomalies in the western Pacific strengthened during the last half of November.**
**During the past 30 days, enhanced convection has been evident across the eastern Indian Ocean and Indonesia. During the most recent period, convection has weakened across the Maritime Continent **
- 1 DEC 2005
## 200-hPa Velocity Potential Anomalies (5°S-5°N)
**200-hPa Velocity Potential Anomalies (5°S-5°N****)**
**Negative anomalies (green shading) indicate favorable conditions for precipitation.**
**Positive anomalies (brown shading) indicate unfavorable conditions for precipitation.**
**Longitude**
**Most recently, upper-level divergence (green) is confined to sections of Africa, the Indian Ocean, and Indonesia while upper-level convergence (brown) is located in the Western Hemisphere. **
**Time**
**Weak to moderate MJO activity was observed from July into October. **
## 200-hPa Vector Winds and Anomalies (m s-1)
**Note that shading denotes the magnitude of the anomalous wind vectors.**
**Westerly wind anomalies are evident across much of the Pacific Ocean**
**Strong anti-cyclonic circulations in the central Pacific Ocean**
## Heat Content Evolution in the Eq. Pacific
**Through 2004 and 2005 there were several cases of eastward-propagating oceanic Kelvin waves (indicated by dashed black lines in the figure).**
**Each Kelvin wave was initiated when the easterlies weakened over the equatorial Pacific in association with Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) activity.**
**During February 2005, a strong Kelvin wave (initiated by persistent westerly anomalies near the date line unrelated to the MJO) developed and continued to strengthen during March and reached the South American coast during early April. Heat content has been above average in the western Pacific since June while cooler water has been observed across the eastern Pacific with an westward extension evident during November. **
**Heat Content Evolution**** ****in the Eq. Pacific**
**Longitude**
**Time**
## MJO Index (Magnitude and Phase)
**MJO Index (Magnitude and Phase)**
- The current state of the MJO as determined by an index based on Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis using combined fields of near-equatorially-averaged 850 hPa zonal wind, 200 hPa zonal wind, and satellite-observed outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) (Wheeler and Hendon, 2004).
- The axes represent the time series of the two leading modes of variability and are used to measure the amplitude while the triangular areas indicate the phase or location of the enhanced phase of the MJO. The farther away from the center of the circle the stronger the MJO. Different color lines indicate different months.
- The MJO strengthened in early September with enhanced convection propagating eastward into the month of October at weak to moderate levels
- The MJO remains very weak as the projection from the most recent data is located within the unit circle
## Statistical OLR MJO Forecast
_**Statistical OLR MJO Forecast**_
**The MJO is forecast to remain weak during the next 6-10 days **
## Global Forecast System Precipitation Forecast
_**Global Forecast System Precipitation Forecast**_
## Potential Benefits/Hazards – Week 1
_**Potential Benefits/Hazards – Week 1**_
**1. Hurricane Epsilon will impact the central Atlantic with above average rainfall, strong winds, and higher than normal seas **
**2. An increased chance of above average rainfall across central Brazil**
**3. An increased chance of above average rainfall across sections of southeast Africa**
**4. An increased chance of tropical cyclone activity in the Bay of Bengal**
**5. An increased chance of above average rainfall extending from the eastern Indian Ocean across Indonesia into the western Pacific Ocean**
**5**
**2**
**1**
**4**
**3**
## Potential Benefits/Hazards –Week 2
_**Potential Benefits/Hazards –Week 2**_
**1. An increased chance of above average rainfall extending from the eastern Indian Ocean across Indonesia into the western Pacific Ocean**
**1**
## Summary
- The MJO remains weak with signals across the global tropics more regional in nature and associated with more localized forcing such as that from SSTs and linkages with the extratropical circulation.
- Enhanced convection is evident across the eastern Indian Ocean, sections of Indonesia, and the far western Pacific Ocean and is associated with a continuation of a quasi-persistent pattern of convection present during the last several weeks. Connections with the extratropics also resulted in areas of enhanced convection across east-central Brazil and southeast Africa. Strong suppressed convection is also observed across Central America and areas of northern South America. Westerly low-level wind anomalies have strengthened in the Indian Ocean and have also expanded eastward to cover sections of Indonesia. These anomalies have aided in the generating of circulations both north and south of the equator during the past few weeks over the eastern Indian Ocean and Bay of Bengal. Easterly wind anomalies in the tropical western Pacific Ocean remain.
- Based on the latest observational evidence and statistical and dynamical forecasts, the MJO is expected to remain weak during the upcoming period.
- Although the MJO remains weak, there are potential global benefits/hazards during the forecast period. During week 1, Hurricane Epsilon is expected to impact the Central Atlantic with heavy rainfall, strong winds, and high seas during the period. An elevated chance of above average rainfall exists across east-central Brazil and southeast Africa as periodic frontal systems continue to interact with tropical moisture in these regions. An elevated chance of tropical cyclone activity exists in the Bay of Bengal associated with continued westerly wind anomalies and a continued environment favorable for convection.
- For both weeks 1 and 2, there is an increased chance of above average rainfall from the eastern Indian Ocean across Indonesia into the western Pacific Ocean as a quasi-persistent pattern of convection associated with above average SSTs and other intraseasonal tropical variability is expected to continue.
- The western Pacific Ocean will need to be closely monitored, both north and south of the equator, for tropical cyclogenesis throughout the forecast period. | en |
markdown | 265047 | # Presentation: 265047
## V4 – Executive Summary
**Provide online add/delete of I/O to support continuous operation.**
**Provide redundant control of remote I/O to support improved reliability.**
**Provide name introspection and domain control in support of seamless integration of large control systems**
**Provide triggers, filters, and rate limits to improve resource use of network and client side processing**
**Provide atomic read/write of multiple fields in **_***a***_** record**
**Remove limitations on string lengths, device states, number of input links to support arbitrary sizes.**
**Record Library to provide pluggable functionality**
*Provide hierarchical devices to support higher level view of application in the front-end processors.*
*write with read-back*
*Provide channel access diagnostics*
- _Provide a Channel Access Server to Sequences and their diagnostic information_
- _Revisit Database Library_
- _Alternate protocols_
- Provide automatic backup and restore to support bump-less reboot and synchronization of redundant controllers.
- Support international users with uni-code and time.
**Bold – Must do**_, _*italic – would like to do*_, underline – someone else can do in parallel _plain – lower priority/no effort
## V4 – Online Add / Delete
- Support hardware address change during operation
- Allow new record instances to be loaded at any time
- Support addition of hardware of an already supported type (64x)
- Support addition of new hardware during operation.
- Remove records during operation.
## V4 – Redundancy: Multiple masters of remote I/O
- Support name responses from multiple controllers of the same database.
- Support request for all fields from a primary database to its backup.
- Support a request for all fields that have changed since the last synchronization of the backup to the primary.
- Support a mechanism for switching from the primary to the backup.
- Provide a mechanism for synchronizing primary and the backup.
- Support multiple communication paths that provide
- an isolated network for synchronization traffic
- redundant checks to synchronize switch over behavior.
- Provide a mechanism to start/stop scanning
- Provide a mechanism to start/stop sequences
- Provide a mechanism to start/stop drivers from scanning
## V4 – Name Resolution Extensions
- Allow wildcard searches
- Allow request to send all names supported in the IOC
- Support redundancy by allowing connections to specify that they are not active
- Support multiple name servers by allowing connections to specify how close to the source they are.
- Name aliasing supported.
## V4 – Data Acquisition Capabilities
- New subscription parameters
- Rate limit
- Value changes (as before but also % change)
- Triggers
- Filters
- Examples
- Send BPM at 1 Hz (where 1 Hz across IOCs is the same)
- Send BPM when trigger specifies that this pulse is e-
- Send RF reading when filter says that vacuum is higher than 10e-6 torr
- Allows more accurate requests for data on client applications
- Indexed array access
- Reduces the amount of network and client CPU usage
- Specify priority for circuit - QOS
## V4 – Structure and Array Support
- Allows definition and access to complex devices and multi-dimensional arrays
- Name hierarchy in Channel Access
- <arbitrary string>.structure. Element[n]
- e.g. Arc3PwrSupply.readback.status, ArcPwrSupply.readback.value
- Device description in database
- Support arbitrary number of inputs to calculations and subroutines.
- Support multi-state devices of an arbitrary number of states
## V4 – Automatic Backup and Restore
- Provide a standard tool to backup all fields that are changed as a result of channel access puts.
- Provide a restore utility that replaces these fields into the IOC on reboot.
- May use same mechanism used by redundant IOCs to provide the backup and restore capability.
- Provide a mechanism to determine if the automatic restore should be disabled (such as time passed)
- Should SNL programs also be supported?
## V4 – Device Read/Write Operations
- Allows multiple fields to be read/written as an atomic operation
- Reads/Writes can be triggered
- e.g. Put( Corr1.K, Corr2.K, Corr3.K, on trigger event)
- All puts take place when the trigger event occurs
- Write with return data support (Command/Response)
- Ramping/arb function outputs – given two end points
## V4 – Time Stamp Internationalization
- Support ISO 8601 Format
- Year-month-date-hours-minutes-seconds-fractional seconds
- Country specific time stamps
- Support Locale Settings for conversions
- ,02 as 2 hundreds of a second
## V4 – CA Server with the Sequencer
- Provide access to variables that are defined in SNL
- State
- Variables defined in the SNL Program
- Last State
- Time in State
- Etc...
- SNL Diagnostics
- Number of external channels defined
- Number of external channels connected
- Number of tcp/ip connections
- Etc.....
## V4 – Channel Access Diagnostics
- Server Diagnostics – available from ca clients
- Connections
- Channels
- Events per second
- State of Health
- Beacon Periodicity
- Etc...
- Client Diagnostics
- Number of connections per server per client
- Number of channels
- Events per second
- State of connection
- Etc.....
## V4 – Support Large / Multi-segmented Control System
- Support load balancing between multiple data sources (1st order gateway, 2nd order gateway, IOC, and load).
- Support domain control independent of network topology
- Beamline data is not available to the control room
- Only insertion gap and beam quality information is available to the beamline controls from the ring control room.
## V4 – Extendable Metadata / Properties
- Metadata can be extendable –
- Add array dimensions
- Add time base to an array
- Application programmers can add metadata
- Specify metadata by field rather than record
- Only get metadata when it is meaningful
- No display limits for the high display limit
- Calc and subroutine records have arrays of inputs
- No limit to the number of variables
## V4 – Limitations Remediation
- Multi-line text
- Variable length strings
- Removes current limitations of 40 characters
- Reduces size of memory use in most cases
- Reduces network traffic in most cases
- Unicode
- Support alternate character sets
- Multidimensional arrays
- Variable size arrays | en |
all-txt-docs | 428521 | Expires:200808180015;Remove:200808180015;530848
WUUS56 KPQR 172335
SVRPQR
ORC005-180015-
/O.NEW.KPQR.SV.W.0030.080817T2335Z-080818T0015Z/
BULLETIN - EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED
SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WARNING
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PORTLAND OR
435 PM PDT SUN AUG 17 2008
THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN PORTLAND HAS ISSUED A
* SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WARNING FOR...
EASTERN CLACKAMAS COUNTY IN NORTHWEST OREGON...
* UNTIL 515 PM PDT.
* AT 427 PM PDT...NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DOPPLER RADAR INDICATED A
SEVERE THUNDERSTORM CAPABLE OF PRODUCING PENNY SIZE HAIL...AND
DAMAGING WINDS IN EXCESS OF 60 MPH. THIS STORM WAS LOCATED 9 MILES
SOUTHWEST OF TIMOTHY LAKE...OR 20 MILES SOUTH OF GOVERNMENT CAMP...
AND MOVING NORTH AT 36 MPH.
* THE SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WILL BE NEAR...
THREE LYNX AROUND 440 PM PDT...
RHODODENDRON AROUND 500 PM PDT...
WELCHES AND ZIGZAG AROUND 505 PM PDT...
IN ADDITION TO LARGE HAIL AND DAMAGING WINDS...CONTINUOUS CLOUD TO
GROUND LIGHTNING IS OCCURRING WITH THIS STORM. MOVE INDOORS
IMMEDIATELY. LIGHTNING IS ONE OF NATURES NUMBER ONE KILLERS.
REMEMBER...IF YOU CAN HEAR THUNDER...YOU ARE CLOSE ENOUGH TO BE
STRUCK BY LIGHTNING.
LAT...LON 4534 12219 4537 12178 4501 12179 4497 12205
TIME...MOT...LOC 2335Z 170DEG 31KT 4509 12194
$$
WEATHER.GOV/PORTLAND
| en |
markdown | 262274 | # Presentation: 262274
## Disclosure
**I have financial relationships with commercial entities and the content of my presentation does not include discussion of off-label/investigative use of medicine(s), medical devices, or procedures. **
_**Research Grants**_
**AstraZeneca**
** ****TAP Pharmaceuticals**
## NIDDK Network of Research Minority Investigators Annual Workshop
**Familial Barrett’s Esophagus**
- Yvonne Romero, M.D.
- Assistant Professor
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Department of Epidemiology
- Department of Otolaryngology
- April 19, 2007
## Outline
- Phenotypes
- Evidence for familial aggregation
- GERD Symptoms
- Reflux esophagitis
- Barrett’s esophagus
- Barrett’s Esophagus Genomic Study Group
- Susceptibility loci for familial GERD
- Esophageal Adenocarcinoma & Barrett’s Esophagus Registry
## Normal Anatomy
## Erosive Reflux Esophagitis – Los Angeles Classification
**Erosive Reflux Esophagitis –****Los Angeles Classification**** **
**Notes:**
Erosive esophagitis – summary of Los Angeles classification
This slide summarises the information provided in the previous four slides.
## Slide 6
## Slide 8
## Slide 9
## 1
**CP1020012-6**
**1**
**2**
**3**
**4**
## Slide 11
## Incidence of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus in Population-Based Studies
**CP1020012-1**
- Incidence of Adenocarcinoma of theEsophagus in Population-Based Studies
**Cases/100,000/year**
**Olmsted County**
**Connecticut Cancer Registry**
**Natl Cancer Institute**
**Birmingham, England**
**Vaud, Switzerland**
**Median year of observation period**
## Barrett’s Esophagus and Endoscopy
**CP1020012-9**
- Olmsted County
**Upper endoscopy/100,000**
**Endoscopy**
**Long Barrett’s**
**Short Barrett’s**
**Year**
**New diagnosis Barrett’s/100,000**
## Outline
- Phenotypes
- Evidence for familial aggregation
- GERD Symptoms
- Reflux esophagitis
- Barrett’s esophagus
- Barrett’s Esophagus Genomic Study Group
- Susceptibility loci for familial GERD
- Esophageal Adenocarcinoma & Barrett’s Esophagus Registry
## Known Risk Factors
_**Barrett’s esophagus**_
**Age**
**Sex**
**Ethnicity**
**GERD symptoms**
**Tobacco**
_**Esoph adenocarcinoma**_
**Age **
**Sex**
**Ethnicity**
**GERD symptoms**
**Tobacco**
**Obesity**
**Barrett’s esophagus**
## Case Reports of GERD in families
**Twins**
**Henry, 1954**
**Carre ́, 1957**
**Masse and Badder, 1957**
**Sidd, Gilliam and Bushueff, 1966**
**Gelfand, 1983**
**Fahmy and King, 1993**
**One generation**
**Clerf and Manges, 1934 **** **
**Wamberg, 1947**** **** **
**Thomsen, 1955**** **** **
**Bouma, 1962**** **** **
**Chaiken, 1968**** **** **
**Carre ́, 1965**** **** **
**Prior and Whorwell, 1986**** **
**Two generations**
**Myles, 1939**
**Seé, 1947**
**Roviralta, 1952**
**Chaiken, 1968**** **** **
**Goodman, **
**Everhart, 1978**
**Lehman, 1979**
**Eng, 1993**
**Three generations**
**Chaiken, 1968**
**Carre ́and Froggart, 1970**
**Schulze-Delrieu and Anuras, 1983**
**Crabb, et al, 1985**
**Jochem, et al, 1992**
**Four generations**
**Fahmy and King, 1993**
## GERD Symptoms - Swedish Twin Study
- _Nationwide Swedish Twin Registry_
- Sample Size: N = 2178 MZ, N = 6223 DZ twin pairs
- Concordance for GERD symptoms: MZ >> DZ
- Obesity, smoking and ETOH, not significant
**Heritability for GERD symptoms is 31%**
- Cameron AJ, Gastroenterology 2002
## Familial Aggregation of GERD Symptoms
- N = 243 adult first-degree relatives of index patients
- N = 230 relatives of spouses (controls)
- The parents and siblings of Barrett’s esophagus or esophageal adenocarcinoma index patients met criteria for GERD symptoms twice as often as did the parents and siblings of their spouses
_**Conclusion**_** **
**GERD symptoms aggregate in families**
- Romero, et al, Gastroenterology 1997
- Trudgill, et al, Am J Gastro 1999
- Chak, et al., Gut 2002
## Familial Aggregation of Barrett’s Esophagus and Reflux Esophagitis
- Prospective Cohort Study
- Inclusion criteria:
- No prior upper endoscopy
- Sx: weekly heartburn or acid regurg Controls GERD symptoms
- Non-Sx: asymptomatic or rare symptoms
- Controls scoped for diarrhea_ _
## Results
- 260 of 529 (49%) Barrett’s esophagus index patients
- 1014 of 1606 (63%) living adult first-degree relatives
**Results:**** ****315 of 808 (39%) relatives **
** **** **** ****360 of 360 (100%) controls **
** **** **** **underwent endoscopy
## Results: Symptomatic Subjects
## Non-Symptomatic Subjects: Do Not Meet Criteria for GERD & Completely Asymptomatic Subjects
## Results
- _Independent predictors of Barrett’s esophagus_
- Age (p=0.001)
- Male sex (p=0.005)
- GERD symptom duration (p=0.001)
- After adjustment there was an over **2-fold increase in risk for relatives to have Barrett’s esophagus compared to controls.**** **
## Outline
- Phenotypes
- Evidence for familial aggregation
- GERD Symptoms
- Reflux esophagitis
- Barrett’s esophagus
- Barrett’s Esophagus Genomic Study Group
- Susceptibility loci for familial GERD
- Esophageal Adenocarcinoma & Barrett’s Esophagus Registry
## Barrett’s Esophagus Genomic Study (BEGS) Group
## Barrett’s Esophagus Genomic Study Group
- Established in August 1998
- 156 physicians
- Collaborate to identify families
- **101 informative families**
## Outline
- Phenotypes
- Evidence for familial aggregation
- GERD Symptoms
- Reflux esophagitis
- Barrett’s esophagus
- Barrett’s Esophagus Genomic Study Group
- Susceptibility loci for familial GERD
- Esophageal Adenocarcinoma & Barrett’s Esophagus Registry
## Aim
- **To map susceptibility loci in familial Barrett’s esophagus pedigrees by genome-wide linkage analysis using ****phenotype(s):**
**GERD symptoms**
**Hiatal hernia**
**Reflux esophagitis**
**Barrett’s esophagus**
**Esophageal adenocarcinoma**** **
## Methods
**Endoscopy and surgery reports**
**Pathology slides reviewed**
**Prioritize kindreds **
**potential informativeness**
**affected members**
**blood available for analysis**
## Methods
**278/440 individuals provided blood samples for DNA analysis**
**ABI PRISM® Linkage Mapping Set version 2.5 **
**Genome-wide screen using 403 ****microsatellite**** ****markers covering all autosomes ****at ~10cM resolution**
**Methods**
## Genotyping Methods
**Genotypes were assigned using ABI GeneMapper (v 3.5) software package**
**Genotyping Methods**
## Linkage Analysis
- Model-based (parametric) approach
- Autosomal dominant inheritance
- Reduced penetrance of a rare gene
- SIMWALK
- Two-point and multipoint analyses
- Various combinations of clinically meaningful phenotypes were tested
## Slide 33
## LOD scores
- _LOD score_ _Result is due to chance_
- 2 1/100
- 3 1/1000
- -2 excludes linkage
- Heterogeneity (HLOD) score:
- Accounts for variation among families
## Results
## D2S2259
**HLOD = 3.07**
**D2S2259**** **
**Barrett’s Esophagus: Chromosome 2p16**
**2p16**
## Slide 37
## Main Linkage Results for Barrett’s Esophagus
| Chromosome | cM | Marker | HLOD |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2p16 | 66.9 | D2S2259 | 3.07
2.79 (BE or ACA) |
| 2p11 | 79.43 | D2S391-337 | 2.51 |
| 2p25 | 8.64 | D2S2211 | 1.57 |
| 12q13 | 73.55 | D12S368 | 1.52 |
| 19q12 | 43.9 | D19S414 | 1.41 |
| 19q13 | 71.06 | D19S902 | 1.47 |
| 13 | -- | all | ~0 |
## Main Linkage Results for Barrett’s Esophagus
| Chromosome | cM | Marker | HLOD |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2p16 | 66.9 | D2S2259 | 3.07
2.79 (BE or ACA) |
| 2p11 | 79.43 | D2S391-337 | 2.51 |
| 2p25 | 8.64 | D2S2211 | 1.57 |
| 12q13 | 73.55 | D12S368 | 1.52 |
| 19q12 | 43.9 | D19S414 | 1.41 |
| 19q13 | 71.06 | D19S902 | 1.47 |
| 13 | -- | all | ~0 |
## Main Linkage Results for Barrett’s Esophagus
| Chromosome | cM | Marker | HLOD |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2p16 | 66.9 | D2S2259 | 3.07
2.79 (BE or ACA) |
| 2p11 | 79.43 | D2S391-337 | 2.51 |
| 2p25 | 8.64 | D2S2211 | 1.57 |
| 12q13 | 73.55 | D12S368 | 1.52 |
| 19q12 | 43.9 | D19S414 | 1.41 |
| 19q13 | 71.06 | D19S902 | 1.47 |
| 13 | -- | all | ~0 |
## Slide 41
## Slide 42
## Slide 43
## Summary of Linkage Findings
- Linkage to chromosome 2p for Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma
- Potential regions on chromosomes 12q and 19q for Barrett’s esophagus
## Summary of Linkage Findings
- Linkage to chromosome 12q for hiatal hernia and GERD symptoms
- Potential regions on chromosome 7q for hiatal hernia and esophagitis
## Conclusions based on Linkage Analysis
- These results provide strong evidence for major susceptibility genes for familial
- Barrett’s esophagus
- Esophageal adenocarcinoma
- Hiatal hernia
- GERD symptoms
## Outline
- Phenotypes
- Evidence for familial aggregation
- GERD Symptoms
- Reflux esophagitis
- Barrett’s esophagus
- Barrett’s Esophagus Genomic Study Group
- Susceptibility loci for familial GERD
- Esophageal Adenocarcinoma & Barrett’s Esophagus Registry
## EABE Registry Consortia
**90 members**
- 19 Departments/Divisions
- Mayo Clinic Arizona
- Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
- Mayo Clinic Rochester
_**Industry Partners**_
- Affymetrix
- AstraZeneca
- Eisai
- TAP
- Wyeth
- Biostatistics
- Gastroenterology
- Genetic Epidemiology
- Medical Oncology
- Molecular Biology/Genetics
- Pathology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonary
- Radiation Oncology
- Thoracic Surgery
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
## EABE Registry
- Large bank
- Fresh-frozen & formalin-fixed tissue
- Blood
- Demographic, symptom and risk factor data
- To facilitate identification of:
- Genetic pathways important in the neoplastic transformation from Barrett’s to cancer
- Novel biomarkers of risk, early detection, response to treatment
- Novel therapeutic or chemoprevention targets
## EABE Registry
- Large bank
- Fresh-frozen & formalin-fixed tissue
- Blood
- Demographic, symptom and risk factor data
- To facilitate identification of:
- Genetic pathways important in the neoplastic transformation from Barrett’s to cancer
- Novel biomarkers of risk, early detection, response to treatment
- Novel therapeutic or chemoprevention targets
## EABE Registry
- Large bank
- Fresh-frozen & formalin-fixed tissue
- Blood
- Demographic, symptom and risk factor data
- To facilitate identification of:
- Genetic pathways important in the neoplastic transformation from Barrett’s to cancer
- Novel biomarkers of risk, early detection, response to treatment
- Novel therapeutic or chemoprevention targets
## “Ultra Rapid” Consent Process
- Patients located anywhere on campus
- Takes 15-45 minutes, family process
- Education about Barrett’s esophagus** **
## Consented Patients
- Blood collected once
- Questionnaires collected by Survey Research
- baseline
- annual
*Tissue collected every opportunity*** **
## Slide 54
## Mayo Clinic Rochester As of April 18, 2007 (Consecutive recruitment since Sept. 10, 2001) N = 2787 Met Entry Criteria
**1569 (56%) Consent**
- 636 (23%) declined
- 428 evaluation in progress
## MCR Phenotypes N = 1569 LSBE = 827 (53%) BE + ACA = 283 (18%) ACA only = 187 (12%) Squamous = 105 ( 7%)
- Blood and tissue collected _at least once_ from 1353 and 659 patients, respectively
## Mayo Clinic Jacksonville As of April 18, 2007 (Recruitment September 13, 2005 to February 1, 2006, April 18, 2006 – to present) N = 71 Met Entry Criteria
**51 (72%) Consent**
- 5 ( 7%) declined
- 15 evaluation in progress
## Take Home Points
- Increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma not due to Barrett’s esophagus
- GERD aggregates in families
- Susceptibility loci for _familial_ Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma are on different chromosomes than loci for _familial_ hiatal hernia and GERD symptoms
## Take Home Points
- Increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma not due to Barrett’s esophagus
- GERD aggregates in families
- Susceptibility loci for _familial_ Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma are on different chromosomes than loci for _familial_ hiatal hernia and GERD symptoms
## Take Home Points
- Increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma not due to Barrett’s esophagus
- GERD aggregates in families
- Susceptibility loci for _familial_ Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma are on different chromosomes than loci for _familial_ hiatal hernia and GERD symptoms
## Conclusion
- Multi-center, multi-disciplinary Academic-NIH-Industry collaboration will facilitate discoveries that translate into improved patient outcomes
## Acknowledgments
- _Genotyping Core Lab_
- Julie Cunningham, PhD
- _Genetic Biostatisticians_
- Mariza de Andrade, Ph.D.
- Joshua P. Slusser, B.S.
- _Gastroenterology_
- Alan J. Cameron, M.D.
- _Genetic Epidemiology_
- Gloria M. Petersen, Ph.D.
- _Study Coordinators_
- Betsy Cayer
- Mary Fredericksen, C.C.R.P.
- Deb Geno, C.C.R.P
**286 Clinicians & Scientists of the EABE Registry & the BEGS Group**
**Partners in Industry**
**Supporters at the NIH**
## Gracias!
**Gracias!**
## ROCHESTER
**ROCHESTER**
** ****MN**
**ROCHESTER**
** ****MN**
## Slide 65
## Simple (Monogenic) disorder
**Simple (Monogenic) disorder**
**Peltonen & McKusick, Science 291:1224, 2001**
## Complex disorder
**Complex disorder**
**Peltonen & McKusick, Science 291:1224, 2001** | en |
converted_docs | 509074 | **Digital Video for Science**
Erik Meesters
The Netherlands Institute of Sea Research
P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg
The Netherlands
Ph. 31-(0)-222-369530
Fax 31-(0)222-319674
Email erikm@nioz.nl
**Table of Contents**
**(to quickly go to the page you want, double-click on the page
number)**
**1. Introduction**
2\. From light to dig
3\. Dig photo cameras versus DVs
4\. Transfer of dig data
5\. Image analysis
6\. Notes from users
6.1 Extra UW-lights or not?
6.2 Highest quality image
6.3 Instruction tape for digs
6.4 Failing auto-focus
6.5 DCR-VX700 vs. DCR-VX1000 (about U\$ 2000 difference)
6.6 Custom made UW-housings
6.7 Photo camera
6.8 Cheap devices for UW
6.9 Amphibico housings\...\...
6.10 Dubbing
6.11 Japanese, European, American models
6.12 Image grabbing
6.13 Damaged viewfinder
7\. Other digitizing possibilities
8\. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
9\. WWW pages
**Before you read further**
Because I've become allergic to the words digital and video, I'm using
abbreviations in this overview. Dig means digital; DV, dig video camera;
Photo camera, dig photo camera; cameras are always dig, whether DV or
photo cameras, unless otherwise specified.
I do not claim to be a specialist on digital cameras, frame grabbers, or
image analysis, so don't blame me for any mistakes (including the
language). This is an extremely fast developing field, so reported
prices are probably already lower. If you profited in any way from this
review, you're allowed to send/email a nice postcard to my address. I'd
appreciate constructive comments and tips at my email address:
erikm@nioz.nl.
# Introduction
Why this review? Scientists often collect images and need to do
measurements on these images. Collecting images with dig cameras appears
to offer a number of attractive advantages for many research fields.
Since most data processing and analysis is dig, direct collection of dig
data can offer a great gain in speed of data collection, processing, and
data transfer. Dig pictures offer high quality (3 times as much color
bandwidth as analogue recording formats) and can be copied instantly
without loss of quality. Images area stable in that, unlike film dyes,
dig images never fade or change color.
Dig photography eliminates the specialist consumables required at each
stage of the photographic process - for example, there is no need to
store film in refrigerators (more space for beer), no need for bikes, to
take the film to and from the lab (no loss of calories) and no more
scanning for reproduction (more money for beer). Instead of developing a
roll of film, making prints and then scanning them, dig pictures can be
transferred to computers directly without loss of quality. Images are
available for viewing instantly on screen and ready for import into a
project.
Duplicate images are identical to the original in every respect and can
be made, on demand, without any special equipment or material. This, in
turn, cuts down the administration and paperwork that has to be
processed by office and accounts staff, if you have any (otherwise, you
might be able to use them more efficiently or, alternatively, fire
them).
Without a doubt, all of us will be using dig image capturing devices in
less than 5 years, if not for data collection than for pictures of our
vacations. There are already DVs that are smaller than your normal photo
camera. So if you need to buy a new DV, dig is the way to go.
Before buying anything you should determine exactly why you need the
camera: what data do you want to collect and how are you going to
analyze your data. A very important question is whether you will need to
analyze moving images or just still pictures.
# From light to dig
Dig cameras are similar to their film-based brethren, except that
incoming light hits a charge-coupled device (CCD) and the resulting
electrical signal is stored digly.
CCDs are light-sensitive integrated circuits with a mosaic of thousands
or millions of pixels. Place one in a camera\'s image plane, where the
film would normally go, and the light falling onto it causes a minute
electrical charge to be held in each pixel of the CCD. These charges are
analogue, because they are proportional to the brightness of the light.
When read in an ordered way and amplified, the pixels can be displayed
in the same order, reconstructing the original image. CCDs elements are
arranged in a variety of ways. Linear arrays consist of light-sensing
elements arranged in a single row. Tri-linear arrays are three such
rows, each with a red, green or blue filter in front of it, usually
cemented together. Area arrays have their separate light-sensing
elements arranged in a two dimensional grid pattern. They are suitable
for capturing monochrome images instantly. With suitable filtration they
can be used to analyze color.
# Dig photo cameras versus DVs
Because dig handycams are offering greater flexibility, sufficient image
quality, and lower overall price, dig camcorders may soon eclipse dig
still cameras as multimedia production tools and surely as digital image
capturing devices.
The transfer from stored image to computer appears to be better designed
in photo cameras. Some DVs still have no dig output, while the pc-cards
from the photo cameras take your digital image directly to the computer.
If no dig output is available, the DV signal needs to be transferred via
the analogue output. The device at the other end of the cable then
converts the analogue pictures back into dig for editing. Each
analogue/dig conversion deteriorates image quality, however, a point to
remember is that the analogue output from a DV is still of superior
quality when compared with analogue brothers. To the unaided eye the
difference in quality between the dig image and the direct analogue
output from a DV is indiscernible. Also, many frame-grabbers have no dig
input, so if you buy a DV and you want to get the most out of it, make
sure you use a dig frame-grabber as well (e.g. DV-Master from Fast).
Sony DVs have a dig output and Sony offers a framegrabber that works
with the DV output. Sony has also just released its dig VCRs.
The DV units are as portable as any of the traditional camcorders on the
market, and they delivery a very good image quality \-- resolutions as
high as 500 lines, almost twice that of standard TV. Some models even
have a still-image mode that generates higher resolution. Like dig still
cameras, images are available for immediate preview and use. And,
obviously, dig camcorders can capture full motion as well as stills.
Three-CCD models from Sony and Panasonic are priced at less than
\$4,000. They include such features as 10X optical zoom and 20X dig
zoom, shutter-speed control and color viewfinders. Less expensive
models, each using only one CCD chip, sell for around \$1,000.
Dig. photo camera. cameras generally have a higher resolution (more
pixels), but their price is much higher, especially for the higher
resolution cameras, and the storage capacity of dig. photo camera.
cameras is a lot less than that of DVs. DVs often have a 10/20x zoom so
you can improve image quality by making close ups. DVs use tape, photo
cameras use mostly (more expensive) pc-cards. Storage capacity on tapes
is much higher than on pc-cards. Another problem with photo cameras is
the limited availability of underwater housings. If analysis is to be
done on the computer screen, image quality of DVs is probably sufficient
in most instances. Who needs to analyze wall-size pictures?
Because I feel that at the moment most people will be more interested in
dig video cameras than in dig photo cameras, the rest of this overview
will only discuss dig. video cameras.
# Transfer of dig data
To transport dig data a new standard has been developed, however, most
vids do not yet support this standard. Since 1,393 standards had already
been considered, the new standard became known as IEEE 1394. Apple
preferred a less numeric name and called their version of IEEE 1394,
FireWire (tm of Apple Computer). For more information consider the WWW
addresses given at the end of this overview.
There are only a few plug-in cards that work with the DV interface. Most
cards still need the analogue input that all vids offer. Sony has a card
that uses the DV signal from its DVs, the DVBK-1000, but you can only
use it to grab single images. The PCI board DV MasterTM from Fast
accepts dig data directly from digital (DV) camcorders and VCRs in
real-time. Sony has also developed a Digital VCR, which has just come
out. For more details you should take a look at the web pages given
below.
# Image analysis
There are a number of image analysis programs that may be used together
with your vid. One of the most popular (public domain) programs is NIH
Image (developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and available
on the Internet at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/). *Image* directly
supports four frame grabber cards for acquiring images from video
sources, such as TV cameras and VCR\'s: the Data Translation
QuickCapture, the Scion LG-3, Scion AG-5, and the Scion VG-5. All allow
brightness, contrast and pseudocolor to be adjusted during \"live\"
capture. All allow continuous histogram display and \"live\" paste,
which can be useful for image alignment.
# Notes from users
## Extra UW-lights or not?
Apparently, the high-end DVs function well under low light intensities.
Under clear conditions a blue light filter renders the images in 'true'
colors down to 20m. This may be especially useful under turbid
conditions were back-scatter of vid lights may render your images
useless.
## Highest quality image
If you only want the highest quality, you can have your pictures
transferred on a CD, which will give you the highest resolution. This is
expensive, and is only done by dealers.
## Instruction tape for digs
I would suggest you purchase a VHS instructional vid tape on this
camera. It\'s a 100 minute program about the camera and how to use it
(the SONY manual is difficult to read). The tape title and the company
that sells it is:
SONY\'s VX-700 and VX-1000 Dig Vid Camcorders
\$49.95 +SH item: DV-CAM-2
Knowledge Path vid
1630 N. Main street, Suite 132
Walnut Creek, CA, 94596
1-800-537-3050 or 1-510-932-2282
e-mail: knowledgepath@msn.com
## Failing auto-focus
One problem I have encountered taping underwater occurs in shallow water
when there is \"flickering\" light. If you set up the camera to run on a
tripod under these conditions, the stationary objects on the edges of
the frame appear to wave slightly. It is a very annoying effect and I
think it is caused by the auto iris compensating for the sudden
increases and decreases in light and thus changing the depth of focus of
the lens (or something like that). The way to solve it, I think, is to
over-ride the auto-exposure control and use manual exposure.
Another way, apparently, is to put your camera on the maximum depth of
field position.
## DCR-VX700 vs. DCR-VX1000 (about U\$ 2000 difference)
My organization has just purchased a Sony DCR-VX700 DV with a Stingray
VX700 housing and Sunray 5500 lights to make underwater counts of fish
populations. We considered the VX1000 but were advised that the
difference in quality between the two was extremely difficult to detect
underwater. A 3 CCD camera may have been marginally better, but we felt
we couldn\'t justify the extra cost.
## Custom made UW-housings
We have built underwater housings for COHU CCD high resolution vids
using microscope optics to photograph micro bubbles in breaking waves.
If you need information about uw connectors or mounting hardware we can
help you, also we use a software package that is very powerful in
regards to real time analysis of vid data.
## Photo camera
The developments are faster than I can type. At the moment there's a
photo camera by Kodak ( DC120) with 1.2 million pixels, costing only
about U\$ 1200 (comparable to the polaroid that cost U\$ 5000 only 6
months ago). But again, no underwater ready-made housing.
## Cheap devices for UW
EWA underwater bag which I strongly DO NOT recommend\--in about 7 months
I\'ve been through four bags\--they keep leaking on me. The bags are
designed for recreational use and do not withstand daily use. The camera
is great with fantastic resolution and works great in low light
conditions.
## Amphibico housings\...\...
Although most people are happy with these houses, people that use the
Amphibico housing intensively have had problems with it. All houses seem
to have their problems every now and then, however, it's good to know
what to expect if you're out their under water.
They use to be a company with a very strong product and equally strong
reputation\... it would seem that with this latest housing they have
some problems\.... and are not prepared to face up to it if reports I
hear are to be believed. The main problem on the housing it seems are
the small green buttons that operate the camera functions. I know of
several instances where these buttons have \"popped\" off and flooded
the housing\... destroying the camera inside. This happened to me
recently on a filming trip to the Red in March. I was using multiple
cameras for the shoot using three VX1000 and Amphibico housings. The
button on the back of the housing \"popped\" off whilst I was operating
it. Fortunately I still had my finger on the button and, realizing that
if I let go of the button water would flood into the housing I managed
to surface\.... a small amount of water inside and luckily no damage.
Two of my colleagues were not so fortunate and destroyed their cameras
with the same problem\.... one only last week!!
Other problems I have encountered\... Intermittent problems with
electronics controlling the camera functions.. Water flooding into the
handles Buttons on the handles breaking off. Of the three camera systems
I used in the Red Sea every one had a problem at some point in the
shoot! I have not personally written to Amphibico about these design
problems but my colleagues did write and were rebuffed by Amphibico who
could only suggest it was the operators fault \... not the design. As a
professional cameraman who has used this housing I could not give it my
recommendation. It nicely finished and well made in many respects but is
simply not reliable enough in my experience and the flooding problem
with the buttons is of serious concern. The Sony VX1000 is a nice camera
for research work and data collection\..... I suggest the Stingray
housing as a possible alternative to the Amphibico. In using this
housing you have to modify the camcorder by removing the handle. I have
not used this housing with the VX1000 but the housings have been used
extensively with other cameras for a number of years by the Australian
Institute of Marine Science for their field data collection without
major problems.
Also (other user)\.... Both Richard and I tested our cameras in our
separate Amphibico housings and both of us had difficulties. At 180\' my
housing stopped functioning. The manual aperture button stuck would not
release once pushed to the \"on\" position, neither would the zoom or
focus buttons operate. The only function that would work at that depth
was the record-on/off button. Function resumed to normal once I returned
to depths above 150\' a few minutes later. Likewise, Richard\'s camera
failed to function at even deeper depths. According to the person using
it (not Richard) the camera took on a \"mind of its own\" and began to
focus and record etc. without hitting the buttons. These problems seem
to be related to the housing and not the camera.
## Dubbing
Regarding the \"Firewire\" dig connection that Bruce mentioned\.....
with the PAL version of the camera you can only do dig dubbing to a
\"home\" DV recorder as the camcorder does not have a Record Input like
the NTSC version from the USA.
The camera otherwise functioned superbly and produces excellent images.
Moreover with the digital copying capability of the SONY cameras we
could make exact copies between the various cameras available to us in
Palau (seven SONY 1000\'s at one time in one place!) using the FireWire
(I noted that someone mentioned the Panasonic digital camera has a
better viewfinder which might be useful, but as of now, you cannot make
digital copies off of the Panasonic camera which I find to be a distinct
disadvantage of the Panasonic camera).
## Japanese, European, American models
The Japanese and European models of the Sony are similar but not the
same, so check out the model you want to buy.
## Image grabbing
Screen-machine from Fast, a frame-grabber, is better than the Sony card,
according to a salesperson who has used both. A disadvantage is that the
Screen-machine uses the analogue output of your DV. However, the primary
image from the analogue output from a dig vid is a lot better than the
image from an analogue camera. This means that the use of image grabbers
that require analogue inputs will still give you better quality than
images from non-dig cameras. In this respect, analogue image grabbers
(e.g. from Fast or Scion Corporation) may be good alternatives for the
Sony dig frame grabber. The Sony dig frame grabber does not appear to be
able to show you the image at the size of your computer screen, while
for example the Screen Machine does (pers com sales person Fast). I
haven't compared the two framegrabbers yet, but will next month. Anyone,
who has?.
## Damaged viewfinder
One other point for amateur videophiles like me: don\'t let the sun
directly hit the viewfinder on your camera! This can easily happen on a
boat when you pass it up to someone else. The sun leaves nasty permanent
greenish smudges on the viewfinder screen!
# Other digitizing possibilities
Slides and photos can be scanned with slide scanners that transform your
slide to high resolution dig images. A relatively cheap option is the
Nikon Coolscan II with a maximum resolution of 2592 x 3888 pixels (see
http://www.klt.co.jp/Nikon).
Images can also be read and stored on CD (giving the highest resolution
possible, according to Kodak employee). However, this requires the
images to be sent away, since the necessary equipment is very expensive.
# Acknowledgments
I like to thank the people that have contributed to this overview:
Amanda Bourque \<seacatz@MIT.EDU\>
Bruce Carlson \<carlson@soest.hawaii.edu\>
Christian Lott\<100342.3407@CompuServe.COM\>
David Booth \<David.Booth@uts.edu.au\>
Gerard Nieuwland \<gerard@nioz.nl\>
Helge Peter Vogt \<106300.475@compuserve.com\>
John Kirkwood \<kirkwoj@dpi.qld.gov.au\>
Paul Marshall \<paul.marshall@jcu.edu.au\>
Stever Gardner \<coralsea@ozemail.com.au\>
Suzanne Dorsey \<dorsey@sunbeach.net\>
William W Gardiner \<ww_gardiner@ccmail.pnl.gov\>
Sorry, if I forgot someone.
The number of people in the marine science community that are using dig.
cameras does not appear to be very high yet. Only 11 answered my call
for information, but many more asked for information. However, most
people do not digly process their images for data analysis. This is
likely to change in the near future, when more frame grabbers that use
dig input become available.
I would also like to thank all the people that have put information on
the WWW. Possibly, I've not included every single address that I've used
at the end of this summary.
# WWW pages
+---------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| **Firewire/ IEEE | http://firewire.org/ |
| 1394** | |
| | http://www.vxm.com/index.html |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| | http://www.skipstone.com/ |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| **Sony VX1000 vid** | http://www.sel.s |
| | ony.com/SEL/consumer/camcorder/dcr_vx1000.html |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| **Digital photo | http://wpxx02.toxi.uni |
| cameras** | -wuerzburg.de/\~winstel/walter/nikon.html#digi |
| | |
| | http://www |
| | .nikonusa.com/corpinfo/press/960911ixlens.html |
| | |
| | http://www.klt.co.jp/ |
| | |
| | N |
| | ikon/http://www.klt.co.jp/Nikon/EID/index.html |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| **U/W housings** | http://www.scubatimes.com/scubatim/vid_1.html |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| **Framegrabbers** | http://www.2fast4u.com/PRESS/DVM111896.HTML |
| | |
| | http://www.sel.sony.com/SEL/consumer/ dvf.html |
| | |
| | http://www.scioncorp.com |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| **Image analysis** | http:/ |
| | /www.chemie.uni-marburg.de/\~becker/image.html |
| | |
| | http://www |
| | .dac.neu.edu/units/artsSci/MSC/ColorImage.html |
| | |
| | http://www.dac.ne |
| | u.edu/units/artsSci/MSC/AdvancedImaging92.html |
| | |
| | http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/ |
| | |
| | nih4: |
| | http://r |
| | sb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/manual/Contents.html |
| | |
| | http://www.fastmultimedia.com/AltHome.html |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| **Digital | htt |
| Background info** | p://www.2fast4u.com/DEVICENOTES/DVBACKGRND.HTM |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| | |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| en |