--- language: - fr license: - unknown size_categories: - 10K @article{NOTHMAN2013151, title = {Learning multilingual named entity recognition from Wikipedia}, journal = {Artificial Intelligence}, volume = {194}, pages = {151-175}, year = {2013}, note = {Artificial Intelligence, Wikipedia and Semi-Structured Resources}, issn = {0004-3702}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.006}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370212000276}, author = {Joel Nothman and Nicky Ringland and Will Radford and Tara Murphy and James R. Curran}, keywords = {Named entity recognition, Information extraction, Wikipedia, Semi-structured resources, Annotated corpora, Semi-supervised learning}, abstract = {We automatically create enormous, free and multilingual silver-standard training annotations for named entity recognition (ner) by exploiting the text and structure of Wikipedia. Most ner systems rely on statistical models of annotated data to identify and classify names of people, locations and organisations in text. This dependence on expensive annotation is the knowledge bottleneck our work overcomes. We first classify each Wikipedia article into named entity (ne) types, training and evaluating on 7200 manually-labelled Wikipedia articles across nine languages. Our cross-lingual approach achieves up to 95% accuracy. We transform the links between articles into ne annotations by projecting the target articleʼs classifications onto the anchor text. This approach yields reasonable annotations, but does not immediately compete with existing gold-standard data. By inferring additional links and heuristically tweaking the Wikipedia corpora, we better align our automatic annotations to gold standards. We annotate millions of words in nine languages, evaluating English, German, Spanish, Dutch and Russian Wikipedia-trained models against conll shared task data and other gold-standard corpora. Our approach outperforms other approaches to automatic ne annotation (Richman and Schone, 2008 [61], Mika et al., 2008 [46]) competes with gold-standard training when tested on an evaluation corpus from a different source; and performs 10% better than newswire-trained models on manually-annotated Wikipedia text.} } ## This Dataset ## License Unknow