text
stringlengths
9
481
The entire audience applauded at the conclusion of the film. 1
I left the theater with a lilt in my step, joy in my heart and hope for the human race. 1
Duris has a wholesome appearance and gives a fine performance. 1
The rest of the cast also play well. 1
Cinematography noteworthy including fine views of Barcelona and its famed Gaudi towers. 1
About ten minutes into this film I started having second thoughts. 0
About half way through this film I started to dislike it. 0
By the time the film ended, I not only disliked it, I despised it. 0
What this film lacks is a convincing script. 0
The script looks as if only a rough draft was written and shooting began before a finished script was completed. 0
Things happen, characters personalities change, plot twists occur for no real reason other than that script calls for it. 0
The cast is good. 1
For that, it's worth checking out. 1
This is probably the most irritating show I have ever seen in my entire life. 0
It is indescribably the most annoying and idiotic show I have ever seen. 0
Everything about it is just bad. 0
I could not understand, what kind of idiot would produce this mess in the first place not to mention several season. 0
The script is bad, very bad 聳 it contains both cheesiness and unethical joke that you normally see in rated R or NC-17 movie. 0
The casting is also horrible, cause all you see is a really really BAD Actors, period. 0
Final Word: This Show is a real torture!! 0
It is zillion times away from reality. 0
Watching washing machine twirling around wouldn't hurt your eyes as much as this show. 0
Rating: 0/10 (Grade: Z) Note: The Show Is So Bad That Even Mother Of The Cast Pull Her Daughter Out Of The Show. 0
20th Century Fox's ROAD HOUSE 1948) is not only quite a silly noir but is an implausible unmitigated bore of a movie. 0
Full of unconvincing cardboard characters it is blandly written by Edward Chodorov, who also produced, and is surprisingly directed by Jean Negulesco from whom one would expect a great deal more. 0
From here on the Widmark character turns unintentionally comical! 0
His losing his marbles so early in the proceedings is totally implausible and unconvincing. 0
And if that isn't enough of a mess of a movie for you - the picture is also marred with a constant use of studio sets and indoor exteriors. 0
Whatever prompted such a documentary is beyond me! 0
(very serious spoilers) this movie was a huge disappointment. 0
there are so many problems i dont know where to start. 0
the cast was great. 1
steve martin delivers a really funny performance of a middle-aged, upper class, uptight white guy. 1
add betty white and jean smart and you have a great cast - everyone played their parts really well. 1
but the movie makes a lot of serious mistakes. 0
first of all, there are enough racial stereotypes and racial jokes to offend everyone. 0
the movie is littered with overt racial slurs towards the black cast members and in return the whites are depicted as morons and boobs. 0
putting the race card aside, lets look at the major flaw in the film: they destroy latifa's character. 0
there is no real plot. 0
i wouldnt see this movie again for free. 0
STEAMBOAT WILLIE is an amazingly important film to our cinema history. 1
This second appearance of Mickey Mouse (following the silent PLANE CRAZY earlier that year) is probably his most famous film--mostly because it was so ground-breaking. 1
While you don't yet hear Mickey speak, there are tons of sound effects and music throughout the film--something we take for granted now but which was a huge crowd pleaser in 1928. 1
However, after seeing the short again after about 25 years, I was amazed at how timeless the film actually is. 1
It's just adorable seeing Mickey playing "Turkey in the Straw" in a highly imaginative (if occasionally cruel) way. 1
Clever and a real crowd-pleaser--this film still ranks among Mickey's best films even after 80 wonderful years. 1
The bipolarity of the ruthless thug (one minute a ruthless killer, the next minute a Luv's diaper commercial) is completely unconvincing. 0
I'm terribly disappointed that this film would receive so many awards and accolades, especially when there are far more deserving works of film out there. 0
The original Body and Soul (1947) is a masterpiece. 1
John Garfield, Ann revere, Lilli Plmer, William Conrad, Canada Lee...and filmed by one of the greatest cinematographers to ever grace the screen..James Wong Howe. 1
I don't think there are any redeeming qualities in this remake. 0
This may be the only bad film he ever made. 0
So bad...well...it's just bad. 0
This movie is a solid example of a bad plot and a very, very bad idea all the way. 0
It's a shame to see good actors like Thomerson and James make a living in a mess like this. 0
I thought it was bad. 0
Both films are terrible, but to the credit of the 1986 version, it was watchable. 0
Let's start with all the problems聴the acting, especially from the lead professor, was very, very bad. 0
The script is a big flawed mess. 0
The best example of how dumb the writing is when it's established that you can turn the zombie-students back into humans by removing a necklace containing a piece of the meteorite. 0
Director Paul Matthews, who also wrote/directed the weak 1995 monster movie "Grim", clearly doesn't know how to pace his films. 0
The movie is terribly boring in places. 0
The lighting is awful. 0
The film looks cheap and bland. 0
One of the most disappointing aspects is the lack of notable gore. 0
This convention never worked well in the past, and certainly doesn't work here. 0
The visual effects were AWFUL. 0
The CG opening sequence in space looked like it could have been created on Microsoft Slideshow for God's sake! 0
The "explosion" of the Gas tanks at the end was just as awful. 0
Okay, I like to consider myself a fair critic, so I'll give credit where credit's due--the creature effects were actually pretty cool. 1
Gotta love those close-ups of slimy, drooling teeth! 1
To sum the film up, "Breeders" is a terrible, cheaply made horror movie that should be avoided like the Ebola virus. 0
Not recommended. 0
He is almost unbearable to watch on screen, he has little to no charisma, and terrible comedic timing. 0
Aside from it's terrible lead, this film has loads of other debits. 0
I understand that it's supposed to be a cheap popcorn comedy, but that doesn't mean that it has to completely insult our intelligence, and have writing so incredibly hackneyed that it borders on offensive. 0
Lewis Black's considerable talent is wasted here too, as he is at his most incendiary when he is unrestrained, which the PG-13 rating certainly won't allow. 0
The film's sole bright spot was Jonah Hill (who will look almost unrecognizable to fans of the recent Superbad due to the amount of weight he lost in the interim). 1
With the originality and freshness of the first movie now spent, this remake had little else to offer. 0
The budget was evidently very limited. 0
This was reflected not only in the cast, but also in the below-par script, which borrowed much from the earlier classic. 0
However, here there was no decent acting, action or location work to balance things up. 0
Filmiing was less expansive. 0
It failed to convey the broad sweep of landscapes that were a great part of the original. 0
Generally; it just lacked imagination. 0
Not recommended. 0
Is it possible for a movie to get any worse than this? 0
There is no plot here to keep you going in the first place. 0
Even when the women finally show up, there is no sign of improvement; the most expected things happen and by the time the film is over, you might be far asleep. 0
Beware: this is not a trashy cult movie, this is trash -period! 0
I can't believe there's even a sequel to this! 0
Which is precisely why I am giving it such a bad review! 0
Being a 90's child, I truly enjoyed this show and I can proudly say that I enjoyed it big time and even more than the classical WB cartoons. 1
But "Tiny Toons" kept the 90's vibe and delivered one of the most popular, funny, and underrated cartoons ever created. 1
The memories are murky but I can only say that I enjoyed every single episode and product related to the show. 1
Easily, none other cartoon made me laugh in a tender way (before getting into dark sitcoms oriented for teenagers). 1
The characters were all funny and had the peculiarity of not having a true lead character. 1
Every single character was hilarious and deserved to be called a lead. 1
Every element of this story was so over the top, excessively phony and contrived that it was painful to sit through. 0
Her lines seem to have been WRITTEN by a fifteen year old, though they are trying oh so, so hard to sound like how a fifteen year old would really, um, you know, well... talk. 0