The company in question had flagrantly breached the principles of storage restriction and purpose limitation when it was found out to have a large amount of customer data in its databases that was not relevant any longer for any essential purpose of the company. Moreover, there was no data retention period established for this data. In addition to this, the data protection authority discovered that the company had not properly ensured the risk prevention in the data management as well as data security, inter alia, and arguing. The company did not employ any encryption protocols to secure this data.
the company in question had flagrantly breached the principles of storage restriction and purpose limitation when it was found out to have a large amount of customer data in its databases that was not relevant any longer for any essential purpose of the company moreover there was no data retention period established for this data in addition to this the data protection authority discovered that the company had not properly ensured the risk prevention in the data management as well as data security inter alia and arguing the company did not employ any encryption protocols to secure this data
 company  question  flagrantly breach  principles  storage restriction  purpose limitation    find     large amount  customer data   databases    relevant  longer   essential purpose   company moreover    data retention period establish   data  addition    data protection authority discover   company   properly ensure  risk prevention   data management  well  data security inter alia  argue  company   employ  encryption protocols  secure  data