A local government representative took an unlawful photo of the director of a company tearing off a poster depicting the opposition. Moreover, the director was accompanied by his child. The local representative posted the picture on Facebook and, even though he blurred the child’s face, he alluded the child to be the daughter of the director. When the photo was taken, the company director told the representative that he does not consent to the photo being taken. NAIH concluded that the photo doesn’t directly prove that the director ripped off an election poster, and even that was not a public act. The Data Protection Authority also claimed that only the name of the director was public information and nothing else.
a local government representative took an unlawful photo of the director of a company tearing off a poster depicting the opposition moreover the director was accompanied by his child the local representative posted the picture on facebook and even though he blurred the child’s face he alluded the child to be the daughter of the director when the photo was taken the company director told the representative that he does not consent to the photo being taken naih concluded that the photo doesn’t directly prove that the director ripped off an election poster and even that was not a public act the data protection authority also claimed that only the name of the director was public information and nothing else
 local government representative take  unlawful photo   director   company tear   poster depict  opposition moreover  director  accompany   child  local representative post  picture  facebook  even though  blur  child’ face  allude  child    daughter   director   photo  take  company director tell  representative     consent   photo  take naih conclude   photo ’ directly prove   director rip   election poster  even     public act  data protection authority also claim    name   director  public information  nothing else