A local representative took a picture of the director of a government-owned company while he was tearing (allegedly) off an election poster belonging to the opposition, in the company of his child. The picture was uploaded to Facebook by the representative. While the child’s face was blurred, the representative hinted that it was the director’s daughter. In turn, the director complained that he did not agree or consent to the taking of this photo. NAIH deemed the act of the director to be non-public. Moreover, the photo did not conclusively prove that the director was tearing off the poster.
a local representative took a picture of the director of a governmentowned company while he was tearing allegedly off an election poster belonging to the opposition in the company of his child the picture was uploaded to facebook by the representative while the child’s face was blurred the representative hinted that it was the director’s daughter in turn the director complained that he did not agree or consent to the taking of this photo naih deemed the act of the director to be nonpublic moreover the photo did not conclusively prove that the director was tearing off the poster
 local representative take  picture   director   governmentowned company    tear allegedly   election poster belong   opposition   company   child  picture  upload  facebook   representative   child’ face  blur  representative hint     director’ daughter  turn  director complain     agree  consent   take   photo naih deem  act   director   nonpublic moreover  photo   conclusively prove   director  tear   poster