Datasets:

TheFinAI

/

flare-convfinqa

like 1

Follow

The Fin AI 40

convfinqa0

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 26 | 2009 annual report in fiscal 2008 , revenues in the credit union systems and services business segment increased 14% ( 14 % ) from fiscal 2007 . all revenue components within the segment experienced growth during fiscal 2008 . license revenue generated the largest dollar growth in revenue as episys ae , our flagship core processing system aimed at larger credit unions , experienced strong sales throughout the year . support and service revenue , which is the largest component of total revenues for the credit union segment , experienced 34 percent growth in eft support and 10 percent growth in in-house support . gross profit in this business segment increased $ 9344 in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 , due primarily to the increase in license revenue , which carries the highest margins . liquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company 2019s cash and cash equivalents increased to $ 118251 at june 30 , 2009 from $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 103102</td><td>$ 104222</td><td>$ 104681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash expenses</td><td>74397</td><td>70420</td><td>56348</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in receivables</td><td>21214</td><td>-2913 ( 2913 )</td><td>-28853 ( 28853 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>change in deferred revenue</td><td>21943</td><td>5100</td><td>24576</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>change in other assets and liabilities</td><td>-14068 ( 14068 )</td><td>4172</td><td>17495</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 206588</td><td>$ 181001</td><td>$ 174247</td></tr></table> year ended june 30 , cash provided by operations increased $ 25587 to $ 206588 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2009 as compared to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 . this increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in receivables compared to the same period a year ago of $ 21214 . this decrease is largely the result of fiscal 2010 annual software maintenance billings being provided to customers earlier than in the prior year , which allowed more cash to be collected before the end of the fiscal year than in previous years . further , we collected more cash overall related to revenues that will be recognized in subsequent periods in the current year than in fiscal 2008 . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2009 was $ 59227 and includes $ 3027 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . capital expenditures for fiscal 2009 were $ 31562 compared to $ 31105 for fiscal 2008 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2009 was $ 24684 compared to $ 23736 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 94675 and includes the repurchase of 3106 shares of our common stock for $ 58405 , the payment of dividends of $ 26903 and $ 13489 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 3773 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock ( through the employee stock purchase plan ) and $ 348 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2008 , net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . beginning during fiscal 2008 , us financial markets and many of the largest us financial institutions have been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . since that time , these and other such developments have resulted in a broad , global economic downturn . while we , as is the case with most companies , have experienced the effects of this downturn , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collection efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity will be minimized by cash generated by recurring sources of revenue and due to our access to available lines of credit. . Conversations: Question: what is the net cash from operating activities in 2009? Answer:

206588.0

convfinqa1

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 26 | 2009 annual report in fiscal 2008 , revenues in the credit union systems and services business segment increased 14% ( 14 % ) from fiscal 2007 . all revenue components within the segment experienced growth during fiscal 2008 . license revenue generated the largest dollar growth in revenue as episys ae , our flagship core processing system aimed at larger credit unions , experienced strong sales throughout the year . support and service revenue , which is the largest component of total revenues for the credit union segment , experienced 34 percent growth in eft support and 10 percent growth in in-house support . gross profit in this business segment increased $ 9344 in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 , due primarily to the increase in license revenue , which carries the highest margins . liquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company 2019s cash and cash equivalents increased to $ 118251 at june 30 , 2009 from $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 103102</td><td>$ 104222</td><td>$ 104681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash expenses</td><td>74397</td><td>70420</td><td>56348</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in receivables</td><td>21214</td><td>-2913 ( 2913 )</td><td>-28853 ( 28853 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>change in deferred revenue</td><td>21943</td><td>5100</td><td>24576</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>change in other assets and liabilities</td><td>-14068 ( 14068 )</td><td>4172</td><td>17495</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 206588</td><td>$ 181001</td><td>$ 174247</td></tr></table> year ended june 30 , cash provided by operations increased $ 25587 to $ 206588 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2009 as compared to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 . this increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in receivables compared to the same period a year ago of $ 21214 . this decrease is largely the result of fiscal 2010 annual software maintenance billings being provided to customers earlier than in the prior year , which allowed more cash to be collected before the end of the fiscal year than in previous years . further , we collected more cash overall related to revenues that will be recognized in subsequent periods in the current year than in fiscal 2008 . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2009 was $ 59227 and includes $ 3027 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . capital expenditures for fiscal 2009 were $ 31562 compared to $ 31105 for fiscal 2008 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2009 was $ 24684 compared to $ 23736 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 94675 and includes the repurchase of 3106 shares of our common stock for $ 58405 , the payment of dividends of $ 26903 and $ 13489 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 3773 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock ( through the employee stock purchase plan ) and $ 348 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2008 , net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . beginning during fiscal 2008 , us financial markets and many of the largest us financial institutions have been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . since that time , these and other such developments have resulted in a broad , global economic downturn . while we , as is the case with most companies , have experienced the effects of this downturn , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collection efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity will be minimized by cash generated by recurring sources of revenue and due to our access to available lines of credit. . Conversations: q0: what is the net cash from operating activities in 2009? 206588.0 Question: what about in 2008? Answer:

181001.0

convfinqa2

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 26 | 2009 annual report in fiscal 2008 , revenues in the credit union systems and services business segment increased 14% ( 14 % ) from fiscal 2007 . all revenue components within the segment experienced growth during fiscal 2008 . license revenue generated the largest dollar growth in revenue as episys ae , our flagship core processing system aimed at larger credit unions , experienced strong sales throughout the year . support and service revenue , which is the largest component of total revenues for the credit union segment , experienced 34 percent growth in eft support and 10 percent growth in in-house support . gross profit in this business segment increased $ 9344 in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 , due primarily to the increase in license revenue , which carries the highest margins . liquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company 2019s cash and cash equivalents increased to $ 118251 at june 30 , 2009 from $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 103102</td><td>$ 104222</td><td>$ 104681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash expenses</td><td>74397</td><td>70420</td><td>56348</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in receivables</td><td>21214</td><td>-2913 ( 2913 )</td><td>-28853 ( 28853 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>change in deferred revenue</td><td>21943</td><td>5100</td><td>24576</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>change in other assets and liabilities</td><td>-14068 ( 14068 )</td><td>4172</td><td>17495</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 206588</td><td>$ 181001</td><td>$ 174247</td></tr></table> year ended june 30 , cash provided by operations increased $ 25587 to $ 206588 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2009 as compared to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 . this increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in receivables compared to the same period a year ago of $ 21214 . this decrease is largely the result of fiscal 2010 annual software maintenance billings being provided to customers earlier than in the prior year , which allowed more cash to be collected before the end of the fiscal year than in previous years . further , we collected more cash overall related to revenues that will be recognized in subsequent periods in the current year than in fiscal 2008 . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2009 was $ 59227 and includes $ 3027 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . capital expenditures for fiscal 2009 were $ 31562 compared to $ 31105 for fiscal 2008 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2009 was $ 24684 compared to $ 23736 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 94675 and includes the repurchase of 3106 shares of our common stock for $ 58405 , the payment of dividends of $ 26903 and $ 13489 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 3773 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock ( through the employee stock purchase plan ) and $ 348 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2008 , net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . beginning during fiscal 2008 , us financial markets and many of the largest us financial institutions have been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . since that time , these and other such developments have resulted in a broad , global economic downturn . while we , as is the case with most companies , have experienced the effects of this downturn , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collection efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity will be minimized by cash generated by recurring sources of revenue and due to our access to available lines of credit. . Conversations: q0: what is the net cash from operating activities in 2009? 206588.0 q1: what about in 2008? 181001.0 Question: what is the difference? Answer:

25587.0

convfinqa3

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 26 | 2009 annual report in fiscal 2008 , revenues in the credit union systems and services business segment increased 14% ( 14 % ) from fiscal 2007 . all revenue components within the segment experienced growth during fiscal 2008 . license revenue generated the largest dollar growth in revenue as episys ae , our flagship core processing system aimed at larger credit unions , experienced strong sales throughout the year . support and service revenue , which is the largest component of total revenues for the credit union segment , experienced 34 percent growth in eft support and 10 percent growth in in-house support . gross profit in this business segment increased $ 9344 in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 , due primarily to the increase in license revenue , which carries the highest margins . liquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company 2019s cash and cash equivalents increased to $ 118251 at june 30 , 2009 from $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 103102</td><td>$ 104222</td><td>$ 104681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash expenses</td><td>74397</td><td>70420</td><td>56348</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in receivables</td><td>21214</td><td>-2913 ( 2913 )</td><td>-28853 ( 28853 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>change in deferred revenue</td><td>21943</td><td>5100</td><td>24576</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>change in other assets and liabilities</td><td>-14068 ( 14068 )</td><td>4172</td><td>17495</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 206588</td><td>$ 181001</td><td>$ 174247</td></tr></table> year ended june 30 , cash provided by operations increased $ 25587 to $ 206588 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2009 as compared to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 . this increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in receivables compared to the same period a year ago of $ 21214 . this decrease is largely the result of fiscal 2010 annual software maintenance billings being provided to customers earlier than in the prior year , which allowed more cash to be collected before the end of the fiscal year than in previous years . further , we collected more cash overall related to revenues that will be recognized in subsequent periods in the current year than in fiscal 2008 . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2009 was $ 59227 and includes $ 3027 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . capital expenditures for fiscal 2009 were $ 31562 compared to $ 31105 for fiscal 2008 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2009 was $ 24684 compared to $ 23736 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 94675 and includes the repurchase of 3106 shares of our common stock for $ 58405 , the payment of dividends of $ 26903 and $ 13489 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 3773 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock ( through the employee stock purchase plan ) and $ 348 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2008 , net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . beginning during fiscal 2008 , us financial markets and many of the largest us financial institutions have been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . since that time , these and other such developments have resulted in a broad , global economic downturn . while we , as is the case with most companies , have experienced the effects of this downturn , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collection efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity will be minimized by cash generated by recurring sources of revenue and due to our access to available lines of credit. . Conversations: q0: what is the net cash from operating activities in 2009? 206588.0 q1: what about in 2008? 181001.0 q2: what is the difference? 25587.0 Question: what percentage change does this represent? Answer:

0.14136

convfinqa4

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: substantially all of the goodwill and other intangible assets recorded related to the acquisition of allied are not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the merger had been completed as of january 1 , 2007 . the unaudited pro forma information presented below has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) ( unaudited ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited )</td><td>year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 9362.2</td><td>$ 9244.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income from continuing operations available to common stockholders</td><td>285.7</td><td>423.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per share</td><td>.76</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>.75</td><td>1.09</td></tr></table> the above unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes . assets held for sale as a condition of the merger with allied in december 2008 , we reached a settlement with the doj requiring us to divest of certain operations serving fifteen metropolitan areas including los angeles , ca ; san francisco , ca ; denver , co ; atlanta , ga ; northwestern indiana ; lexington , ky ; flint , mi ; cape girardeau , mo ; charlotte , nc ; cleveland , oh ; philadelphia , pa ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; and fort worth , houston and lubbock , tx . the settlement requires us to divest 87 commercial waste collection routes , nine landfills and ten transfer stations , together with ancillary assets and , in three cases , access to landfill disposal capacity . we have classified the assets and liabilities we expect to divest ( including accounts receivable , property and equipment , goodwill , and accrued landfill and environmental costs ) as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were republic 2019s prior to the merger with allied have been adjusted to the lower of their carrying amounts or estimated fair values less costs to sell , which resulted in us recognizing an asset impairment loss of $ 6.1 million in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were allied 2019s prior to the merger are recorded at their estimated fair values in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2008 in accordance with the purchase method of accounting . in february 2009 , we entered into an agreement to divest certain assets to waste connections , inc . the assets covered by the agreement include six municipal solid waste landfills , six collection operations and three transfer stations across the following seven markets : los angeles , ca ; denver , co ; houston , tx ; lubbock , tx ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; charlotte , nc ; and flint , mi . the transaction with waste connections is subject to closing conditions regarding due diligence , regulatory approval and other customary matters . closing is expected to occur in the second quarter of 2009 . republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements %%transmsg*** transmitting job : p14076 pcn : 106000000 ***%%pcmsg|104 |00046|yes|no|02/28/2009 21:07|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| . Conversations: Question: what were revenues in 2008? Answer:

9362.2

convfinqa5

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: substantially all of the goodwill and other intangible assets recorded related to the acquisition of allied are not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the merger had been completed as of january 1 , 2007 . the unaudited pro forma information presented below has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) ( unaudited ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited )</td><td>year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 9362.2</td><td>$ 9244.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income from continuing operations available to common stockholders</td><td>285.7</td><td>423.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per share</td><td>.76</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>.75</td><td>1.09</td></tr></table> the above unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes . assets held for sale as a condition of the merger with allied in december 2008 , we reached a settlement with the doj requiring us to divest of certain operations serving fifteen metropolitan areas including los angeles , ca ; san francisco , ca ; denver , co ; atlanta , ga ; northwestern indiana ; lexington , ky ; flint , mi ; cape girardeau , mo ; charlotte , nc ; cleveland , oh ; philadelphia , pa ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; and fort worth , houston and lubbock , tx . the settlement requires us to divest 87 commercial waste collection routes , nine landfills and ten transfer stations , together with ancillary assets and , in three cases , access to landfill disposal capacity . we have classified the assets and liabilities we expect to divest ( including accounts receivable , property and equipment , goodwill , and accrued landfill and environmental costs ) as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were republic 2019s prior to the merger with allied have been adjusted to the lower of their carrying amounts or estimated fair values less costs to sell , which resulted in us recognizing an asset impairment loss of $ 6.1 million in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were allied 2019s prior to the merger are recorded at their estimated fair values in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2008 in accordance with the purchase method of accounting . in february 2009 , we entered into an agreement to divest certain assets to waste connections , inc . the assets covered by the agreement include six municipal solid waste landfills , six collection operations and three transfer stations across the following seven markets : los angeles , ca ; denver , co ; houston , tx ; lubbock , tx ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; charlotte , nc ; and flint , mi . the transaction with waste connections is subject to closing conditions regarding due diligence , regulatory approval and other customary matters . closing is expected to occur in the second quarter of 2009 . republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements %%transmsg*** transmitting job : p14076 pcn : 106000000 ***%%pcmsg|104 |00046|yes|no|02/28/2009 21:07|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| . Conversations: q0: what were revenues in 2008? 9362.2 Question: what were they in 2007? Answer:

9244.9

convfinqa6

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: substantially all of the goodwill and other intangible assets recorded related to the acquisition of allied are not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the merger had been completed as of january 1 , 2007 . the unaudited pro forma information presented below has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) ( unaudited ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited )</td><td>year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 9362.2</td><td>$ 9244.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income from continuing operations available to common stockholders</td><td>285.7</td><td>423.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per share</td><td>.76</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>.75</td><td>1.09</td></tr></table> the above unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes . assets held for sale as a condition of the merger with allied in december 2008 , we reached a settlement with the doj requiring us to divest of certain operations serving fifteen metropolitan areas including los angeles , ca ; san francisco , ca ; denver , co ; atlanta , ga ; northwestern indiana ; lexington , ky ; flint , mi ; cape girardeau , mo ; charlotte , nc ; cleveland , oh ; philadelphia , pa ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; and fort worth , houston and lubbock , tx . the settlement requires us to divest 87 commercial waste collection routes , nine landfills and ten transfer stations , together with ancillary assets and , in three cases , access to landfill disposal capacity . we have classified the assets and liabilities we expect to divest ( including accounts receivable , property and equipment , goodwill , and accrued landfill and environmental costs ) as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were republic 2019s prior to the merger with allied have been adjusted to the lower of their carrying amounts or estimated fair values less costs to sell , which resulted in us recognizing an asset impairment loss of $ 6.1 million in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were allied 2019s prior to the merger are recorded at their estimated fair values in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2008 in accordance with the purchase method of accounting . in february 2009 , we entered into an agreement to divest certain assets to waste connections , inc . the assets covered by the agreement include six municipal solid waste landfills , six collection operations and three transfer stations across the following seven markets : los angeles , ca ; denver , co ; houston , tx ; lubbock , tx ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; charlotte , nc ; and flint , mi . the transaction with waste connections is subject to closing conditions regarding due diligence , regulatory approval and other customary matters . closing is expected to occur in the second quarter of 2009 . republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements %%transmsg*** transmitting job : p14076 pcn : 106000000 ***%%pcmsg|104 |00046|yes|no|02/28/2009 21:07|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| . Conversations: q0: what were revenues in 2008? 9362.2 q1: what were they in 2007? 9244.9 Question: what was the net change? Answer:

117.3

convfinqa7

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: substantially all of the goodwill and other intangible assets recorded related to the acquisition of allied are not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the merger had been completed as of january 1 , 2007 . the unaudited pro forma information presented below has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) ( unaudited ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited )</td><td>year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 9362.2</td><td>$ 9244.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income from continuing operations available to common stockholders</td><td>285.7</td><td>423.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per share</td><td>.76</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>.75</td><td>1.09</td></tr></table> the above unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes . assets held for sale as a condition of the merger with allied in december 2008 , we reached a settlement with the doj requiring us to divest of certain operations serving fifteen metropolitan areas including los angeles , ca ; san francisco , ca ; denver , co ; atlanta , ga ; northwestern indiana ; lexington , ky ; flint , mi ; cape girardeau , mo ; charlotte , nc ; cleveland , oh ; philadelphia , pa ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; and fort worth , houston and lubbock , tx . the settlement requires us to divest 87 commercial waste collection routes , nine landfills and ten transfer stations , together with ancillary assets and , in three cases , access to landfill disposal capacity . we have classified the assets and liabilities we expect to divest ( including accounts receivable , property and equipment , goodwill , and accrued landfill and environmental costs ) as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were republic 2019s prior to the merger with allied have been adjusted to the lower of their carrying amounts or estimated fair values less costs to sell , which resulted in us recognizing an asset impairment loss of $ 6.1 million in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were allied 2019s prior to the merger are recorded at their estimated fair values in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2008 in accordance with the purchase method of accounting . in february 2009 , we entered into an agreement to divest certain assets to waste connections , inc . the assets covered by the agreement include six municipal solid waste landfills , six collection operations and three transfer stations across the following seven markets : los angeles , ca ; denver , co ; houston , tx ; lubbock , tx ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; charlotte , nc ; and flint , mi . the transaction with waste connections is subject to closing conditions regarding due diligence , regulatory approval and other customary matters . closing is expected to occur in the second quarter of 2009 . republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements %%transmsg*** transmitting job : p14076 pcn : 106000000 ***%%pcmsg|104 |00046|yes|no|02/28/2009 21:07|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| . Conversations: q0: what were revenues in 2008? 9362.2 q1: what were they in 2007? 9244.9 q2: what was the net change? 117.3 Question: what is the percent change? Answer:

0.01269

convfinqa8

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5742</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 7983</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>4139</td><td>4128</td><td>5817</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 1603</td><td>$ 1235</td><td>$ 2166</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: what was the total of net sales in 2001? Answer:

5363.0

convfinqa9

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5742</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 7983</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>4139</td><td>4128</td><td>5817</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 1603</td><td>$ 1235</td><td>$ 2166</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the total of net sales in 2001? 5363.0 Question: and what was that in 2000? Answer:

7983.0

convfinqa10

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5742</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 7983</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>4139</td><td>4128</td><td>5817</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 1603</td><td>$ 1235</td><td>$ 2166</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the total of net sales in 2001? 5363.0 q1: and what was that in 2000? 7983.0 Question: what was, then, the change in the total of net sales over the year? Answer:

-2620.0

convfinqa11

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5742</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 7983</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>4139</td><td>4128</td><td>5817</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 1603</td><td>$ 1235</td><td>$ 2166</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the total of net sales in 2001? 5363.0 q1: and what was that in 2000? 7983.0 q2: what was, then, the change in the total of net sales over the year? -2620.0 Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that total in 2000, in percentage? Answer:

-0.3282

convfinqa12

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: what was the change in the performance of the united parcel service inc . from 2004 to 2009? Answer:

-24.05

convfinqa13

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the performance of the united parcel service inc . from 2004 to 2009? -24.05 Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2004, in percentage? Answer:

-0.2405

convfinqa14

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the performance of the united parcel service inc . from 2004 to 2009? -24.05 q1: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2004, in percentage? -0.2405 Question: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2009? Answer:

102.11

convfinqa15

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the performance of the united parcel service inc . from 2004 to 2009? -24.05 q1: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2004, in percentage? -0.2405 q2: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2009? 102.11 Question: what was, then, the change in that performance from 2004 to 2009? Answer:

2.11

convfinqa16

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the performance of the united parcel service inc . from 2004 to 2009? -24.05 q1: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2004, in percentage? -0.2405 q2: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2009? 102.11 q3: what was, then, the change in that performance from 2004 to 2009? 2.11 Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2004, in percentage? Answer:

0.0211

convfinqa17

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the performance of the united parcel service inc . from 2004 to 2009? -24.05 q1: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2004, in percentage? -0.2405 q2: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2009? 102.11 q3: what was, then, the change in that performance from 2004 to 2009? 2.11 q4: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2004, in percentage? 0.0211 Question: what is, then, the difference between the percent representation of the united parcel service inc . and the s&p 500 index? Answer:

-0.2616

convfinqa18

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: what was the fluctuation of the performance price of the ups from 2004 to 2006? Answer:

-8.94

convfinqa19

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the fluctuation of the performance price of the ups from 2004 to 2006? -8.94 Question: and how much does this fluctuation represent in relation to that price in 2004? Answer:

-0.0894

convfinqa20

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the fluctuation of the performance price of the ups from 2004 to 2006? -8.94 q1: and how much does this fluctuation represent in relation to that price in 2004? -0.0894 Question: and from this year to 2009, what was the fluctuation for that stock? Answer:

-24.05

convfinqa21

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the fluctuation of the performance price of the ups from 2004 to 2006? -8.94 q1: and how much does this fluctuation represent in relation to that price in 2004? -0.0894 q2: and from this year to 2009, what was the fluctuation for that stock? -24.05 Question: what is this fluctuation as a percentage of the 2004 price? Answer:

-0.2405

convfinqa22

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the fluctuation of the performance price of the ups from 2004 to 2006? -8.94 q1: and how much does this fluctuation represent in relation to that price in 2004? -0.0894 q2: and from this year to 2009, what was the fluctuation for that stock? -24.05 q3: what is this fluctuation as a percentage of the 2004 price? -0.2405 Question: and for the s&p 500 index price, what was the fluctuation in those five years? Answer:

2.11

convfinqa23

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the fluctuation of the performance price of the ups from 2004 to 2006? -8.94 q1: and how much does this fluctuation represent in relation to that price in 2004? -0.0894 q2: and from this year to 2009, what was the fluctuation for that stock? -24.05 q3: what is this fluctuation as a percentage of the 2004 price? -0.2405 q4: and for the s&p 500 index price, what was the fluctuation in those five years? 2.11 Question: and what percentage does this fluctuation represent in relation to the 2004 price of this stock? Answer:

0.0211

convfinqa24

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the fluctuation of the performance price of the ups from 2004 to 2006? -8.94 q1: and how much does this fluctuation represent in relation to that price in 2004? -0.0894 q2: and from this year to 2009, what was the fluctuation for that stock? -24.05 q3: what is this fluctuation as a percentage of the 2004 price? -0.2405 q4: and for the s&p 500 index price, what was the fluctuation in those five years? 2.11 q5: and what percentage does this fluctuation represent in relation to the 2004 price of this stock? 0.0211 Question: what is, then, the difference between the ups percentage and this s&p 500 index one, for this five year period? Answer:

-0.2616

convfinqa25

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: tax returns for 2001 and beyond are open for examination under statute . currently , unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to change significantly over the next 12 months . 19 . stock-based and other management compensation plans in april 2009 , the company approved a global incentive plan which replaces the company 2019s 2004 stock incentive plan . the 2009 global incentive plan ( 201cgip 201d ) enables the compensation committee of the board of directors to award incentive and nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , shares of series a common stock , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and incentive bonuses ( which may be paid in cash or stock or a combination thereof ) , any of which may be performance-based , with vesting and other award provisions that provide effective incentive to company employees ( including officers ) , non-management directors and other service providers . under the 2009 gip , the company no longer can grant rsus with the right to participate in dividends or dividend equivalents . the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2009 gip is equal to 5350000 shares plus ( a ) any shares of series a common stock that remain available for issuance under the 2004 stock incentive plan ( 201csip 201d ) ( not including any shares of series a common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2004 sip or any shares of series a common stock that were issued pursuant to awards under the 2004 sip ) and ( b ) any awards under the 2004 stock incentive plan that remain outstanding that cease for any reason to be subject to such awards ( other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the award to the extent that such award is exercised for or settled in vested and non-forfeitable shares ) . as of december 31 , 2010 , total shares available for awards and total shares subject to outstanding awards are as follows : shares available for awards shares subject to outstanding awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares available for awards</td><td>shares subject to outstanding awards</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 global incentive plan</td><td>2322450</td><td>2530454</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2004 stock incentive plan</td><td>-</td><td>5923147</td></tr></table> upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company by reason of death or disability or by the company without cause ( as defined in the respective award agreements ) , an award in amount equal to ( i ) the value of the award granted multiplied by ( ii ) a fraction , ( x ) the numerator of which is the number of full months between grant date and the date of such termination , and ( y ) the denominator of which is the term of the award , such product to be rounded down to the nearest whole number , and reduced by ( iii ) the value of any award that previously vested , shall immediately vest and become payable to the participant . upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company for any other reason , any unvested portion of the award shall be forfeited and cancelled without consideration . there was $ 19 million and $ 0 million of tax benefit realized from stock option exercises and vesting of rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 the company reversed $ 8 million of the $ 19 million tax benefit that was realized during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . deferred compensation in april 2007 , certain participants in the company 2019s 2004 deferred compensation plan elected to participate in a revised program , which includes both cash awards and restricted stock units ( see restricted stock units below ) . based on participation in the revised program , the company expensed $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 8 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , related to the revised program and made payments of $ 4 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 to participants who left the company and $ 28 million to active employees during december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 1 million remains to be paid during 2011 under the revised program . as of december 31 , 2009 , there was no deferred compensation payable remaining associated with the 2004 deferred compensation plan . the company recorded expense related to participants continuing in the 2004 deferred %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d77691 pcn : 132000000 ***%%pcmsg|132 |00011|yes|no|02/09/2011 18:22|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| . Conversations: Question: how many shares are subject to outstanding awards is under the 2009 global incentive plan? Answer:

2530454.0

convfinqa26

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: tax returns for 2001 and beyond are open for examination under statute . currently , unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to change significantly over the next 12 months . 19 . stock-based and other management compensation plans in april 2009 , the company approved a global incentive plan which replaces the company 2019s 2004 stock incentive plan . the 2009 global incentive plan ( 201cgip 201d ) enables the compensation committee of the board of directors to award incentive and nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , shares of series a common stock , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and incentive bonuses ( which may be paid in cash or stock or a combination thereof ) , any of which may be performance-based , with vesting and other award provisions that provide effective incentive to company employees ( including officers ) , non-management directors and other service providers . under the 2009 gip , the company no longer can grant rsus with the right to participate in dividends or dividend equivalents . the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2009 gip is equal to 5350000 shares plus ( a ) any shares of series a common stock that remain available for issuance under the 2004 stock incentive plan ( 201csip 201d ) ( not including any shares of series a common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2004 sip or any shares of series a common stock that were issued pursuant to awards under the 2004 sip ) and ( b ) any awards under the 2004 stock incentive plan that remain outstanding that cease for any reason to be subject to such awards ( other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the award to the extent that such award is exercised for or settled in vested and non-forfeitable shares ) . as of december 31 , 2010 , total shares available for awards and total shares subject to outstanding awards are as follows : shares available for awards shares subject to outstanding awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares available for awards</td><td>shares subject to outstanding awards</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 global incentive plan</td><td>2322450</td><td>2530454</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2004 stock incentive plan</td><td>-</td><td>5923147</td></tr></table> upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company by reason of death or disability or by the company without cause ( as defined in the respective award agreements ) , an award in amount equal to ( i ) the value of the award granted multiplied by ( ii ) a fraction , ( x ) the numerator of which is the number of full months between grant date and the date of such termination , and ( y ) the denominator of which is the term of the award , such product to be rounded down to the nearest whole number , and reduced by ( iii ) the value of any award that previously vested , shall immediately vest and become payable to the participant . upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company for any other reason , any unvested portion of the award shall be forfeited and cancelled without consideration . there was $ 19 million and $ 0 million of tax benefit realized from stock option exercises and vesting of rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 the company reversed $ 8 million of the $ 19 million tax benefit that was realized during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . deferred compensation in april 2007 , certain participants in the company 2019s 2004 deferred compensation plan elected to participate in a revised program , which includes both cash awards and restricted stock units ( see restricted stock units below ) . based on participation in the revised program , the company expensed $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 8 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , related to the revised program and made payments of $ 4 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 to participants who left the company and $ 28 million to active employees during december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 1 million remains to be paid during 2011 under the revised program . as of december 31 , 2009 , there was no deferred compensation payable remaining associated with the 2004 deferred compensation plan . the company recorded expense related to participants continuing in the 2004 deferred %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d77691 pcn : 132000000 ***%%pcmsg|132 |00011|yes|no|02/09/2011 18:22|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| . Conversations: q0: how many shares are subject to outstanding awards is under the 2009 global incentive plan? 2530454.0 Question: what about under the 2004 stock incentive plan? Answer:

5923147.0

convfinqa27

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: tax returns for 2001 and beyond are open for examination under statute . currently , unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to change significantly over the next 12 months . 19 . stock-based and other management compensation plans in april 2009 , the company approved a global incentive plan which replaces the company 2019s 2004 stock incentive plan . the 2009 global incentive plan ( 201cgip 201d ) enables the compensation committee of the board of directors to award incentive and nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , shares of series a common stock , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and incentive bonuses ( which may be paid in cash or stock or a combination thereof ) , any of which may be performance-based , with vesting and other award provisions that provide effective incentive to company employees ( including officers ) , non-management directors and other service providers . under the 2009 gip , the company no longer can grant rsus with the right to participate in dividends or dividend equivalents . the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2009 gip is equal to 5350000 shares plus ( a ) any shares of series a common stock that remain available for issuance under the 2004 stock incentive plan ( 201csip 201d ) ( not including any shares of series a common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2004 sip or any shares of series a common stock that were issued pursuant to awards under the 2004 sip ) and ( b ) any awards under the 2004 stock incentive plan that remain outstanding that cease for any reason to be subject to such awards ( other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the award to the extent that such award is exercised for or settled in vested and non-forfeitable shares ) . as of december 31 , 2010 , total shares available for awards and total shares subject to outstanding awards are as follows : shares available for awards shares subject to outstanding awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares available for awards</td><td>shares subject to outstanding awards</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 global incentive plan</td><td>2322450</td><td>2530454</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2004 stock incentive plan</td><td>-</td><td>5923147</td></tr></table> upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company by reason of death or disability or by the company without cause ( as defined in the respective award agreements ) , an award in amount equal to ( i ) the value of the award granted multiplied by ( ii ) a fraction , ( x ) the numerator of which is the number of full months between grant date and the date of such termination , and ( y ) the denominator of which is the term of the award , such product to be rounded down to the nearest whole number , and reduced by ( iii ) the value of any award that previously vested , shall immediately vest and become payable to the participant . upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company for any other reason , any unvested portion of the award shall be forfeited and cancelled without consideration . there was $ 19 million and $ 0 million of tax benefit realized from stock option exercises and vesting of rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 the company reversed $ 8 million of the $ 19 million tax benefit that was realized during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . deferred compensation in april 2007 , certain participants in the company 2019s 2004 deferred compensation plan elected to participate in a revised program , which includes both cash awards and restricted stock units ( see restricted stock units below ) . based on participation in the revised program , the company expensed $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 8 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , related to the revised program and made payments of $ 4 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 to participants who left the company and $ 28 million to active employees during december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 1 million remains to be paid during 2011 under the revised program . as of december 31 , 2009 , there was no deferred compensation payable remaining associated with the 2004 deferred compensation plan . the company recorded expense related to participants continuing in the 2004 deferred %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d77691 pcn : 132000000 ***%%pcmsg|132 |00011|yes|no|02/09/2011 18:22|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| . Conversations: q0: how many shares are subject to outstanding awards is under the 2009 global incentive plan? 2530454.0 q1: what about under the 2004 stock incentive plan? 5923147.0 Question: how many total shares are subject to outstanding awards? Answer:

8453601.0

convfinqa28

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: tax returns for 2001 and beyond are open for examination under statute . currently , unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to change significantly over the next 12 months . 19 . stock-based and other management compensation plans in april 2009 , the company approved a global incentive plan which replaces the company 2019s 2004 stock incentive plan . the 2009 global incentive plan ( 201cgip 201d ) enables the compensation committee of the board of directors to award incentive and nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , shares of series a common stock , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and incentive bonuses ( which may be paid in cash or stock or a combination thereof ) , any of which may be performance-based , with vesting and other award provisions that provide effective incentive to company employees ( including officers ) , non-management directors and other service providers . under the 2009 gip , the company no longer can grant rsus with the right to participate in dividends or dividend equivalents . the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2009 gip is equal to 5350000 shares plus ( a ) any shares of series a common stock that remain available for issuance under the 2004 stock incentive plan ( 201csip 201d ) ( not including any shares of series a common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2004 sip or any shares of series a common stock that were issued pursuant to awards under the 2004 sip ) and ( b ) any awards under the 2004 stock incentive plan that remain outstanding that cease for any reason to be subject to such awards ( other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the award to the extent that such award is exercised for or settled in vested and non-forfeitable shares ) . as of december 31 , 2010 , total shares available for awards and total shares subject to outstanding awards are as follows : shares available for awards shares subject to outstanding awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares available for awards</td><td>shares subject to outstanding awards</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 global incentive plan</td><td>2322450</td><td>2530454</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2004 stock incentive plan</td><td>-</td><td>5923147</td></tr></table> upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company by reason of death or disability or by the company without cause ( as defined in the respective award agreements ) , an award in amount equal to ( i ) the value of the award granted multiplied by ( ii ) a fraction , ( x ) the numerator of which is the number of full months between grant date and the date of such termination , and ( y ) the denominator of which is the term of the award , such product to be rounded down to the nearest whole number , and reduced by ( iii ) the value of any award that previously vested , shall immediately vest and become payable to the participant . upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company for any other reason , any unvested portion of the award shall be forfeited and cancelled without consideration . there was $ 19 million and $ 0 million of tax benefit realized from stock option exercises and vesting of rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 the company reversed $ 8 million of the $ 19 million tax benefit that was realized during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . deferred compensation in april 2007 , certain participants in the company 2019s 2004 deferred compensation plan elected to participate in a revised program , which includes both cash awards and restricted stock units ( see restricted stock units below ) . based on participation in the revised program , the company expensed $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 8 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , related to the revised program and made payments of $ 4 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 to participants who left the company and $ 28 million to active employees during december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 1 million remains to be paid during 2011 under the revised program . as of december 31 , 2009 , there was no deferred compensation payable remaining associated with the 2004 deferred compensation plan . the company recorded expense related to participants continuing in the 2004 deferred %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d77691 pcn : 132000000 ***%%pcmsg|132 |00011|yes|no|02/09/2011 18:22|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| . Conversations: q0: how many shares are subject to outstanding awards is under the 2009 global incentive plan? 2530454.0 q1: what about under the 2004 stock incentive plan? 5923147.0 q2: how many total shares are subject to outstanding awards? 8453601.0 Question: what about under the 2004 stock incentive plan? Answer:

5923147.0

convfinqa29

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: tax returns for 2001 and beyond are open for examination under statute . currently , unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to change significantly over the next 12 months . 19 . stock-based and other management compensation plans in april 2009 , the company approved a global incentive plan which replaces the company 2019s 2004 stock incentive plan . the 2009 global incentive plan ( 201cgip 201d ) enables the compensation committee of the board of directors to award incentive and nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , shares of series a common stock , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and incentive bonuses ( which may be paid in cash or stock or a combination thereof ) , any of which may be performance-based , with vesting and other award provisions that provide effective incentive to company employees ( including officers ) , non-management directors and other service providers . under the 2009 gip , the company no longer can grant rsus with the right to participate in dividends or dividend equivalents . the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2009 gip is equal to 5350000 shares plus ( a ) any shares of series a common stock that remain available for issuance under the 2004 stock incentive plan ( 201csip 201d ) ( not including any shares of series a common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2004 sip or any shares of series a common stock that were issued pursuant to awards under the 2004 sip ) and ( b ) any awards under the 2004 stock incentive plan that remain outstanding that cease for any reason to be subject to such awards ( other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the award to the extent that such award is exercised for or settled in vested and non-forfeitable shares ) . as of december 31 , 2010 , total shares available for awards and total shares subject to outstanding awards are as follows : shares available for awards shares subject to outstanding awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares available for awards</td><td>shares subject to outstanding awards</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 global incentive plan</td><td>2322450</td><td>2530454</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2004 stock incentive plan</td><td>-</td><td>5923147</td></tr></table> upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company by reason of death or disability or by the company without cause ( as defined in the respective award agreements ) , an award in amount equal to ( i ) the value of the award granted multiplied by ( ii ) a fraction , ( x ) the numerator of which is the number of full months between grant date and the date of such termination , and ( y ) the denominator of which is the term of the award , such product to be rounded down to the nearest whole number , and reduced by ( iii ) the value of any award that previously vested , shall immediately vest and become payable to the participant . upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company for any other reason , any unvested portion of the award shall be forfeited and cancelled without consideration . there was $ 19 million and $ 0 million of tax benefit realized from stock option exercises and vesting of rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 the company reversed $ 8 million of the $ 19 million tax benefit that was realized during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . deferred compensation in april 2007 , certain participants in the company 2019s 2004 deferred compensation plan elected to participate in a revised program , which includes both cash awards and restricted stock units ( see restricted stock units below ) . based on participation in the revised program , the company expensed $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 8 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , related to the revised program and made payments of $ 4 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 to participants who left the company and $ 28 million to active employees during december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 1 million remains to be paid during 2011 under the revised program . as of december 31 , 2009 , there was no deferred compensation payable remaining associated with the 2004 deferred compensation plan . the company recorded expense related to participants continuing in the 2004 deferred %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d77691 pcn : 132000000 ***%%pcmsg|132 |00011|yes|no|02/09/2011 18:22|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| . Conversations: q0: how many shares are subject to outstanding awards is under the 2009 global incentive plan? 2530454.0 q1: what about under the 2004 stock incentive plan? 5923147.0 q2: how many total shares are subject to outstanding awards? 8453601.0 q3: what about under the 2004 stock incentive plan? 5923147.0 Question: what proportion does this represent? Answer:

0.70067

convfinqa30

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. . Conversations: Question: what was the net change in value of litigation reserves during 2012? Answer:

0.5

convfinqa31

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. . Conversations: q0: what was the net change in value of litigation reserves during 2012? 0.5 Question: what was the value of litigation reserves at the start of 2012? Answer:

3.2

convfinqa32

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. . Conversations: q0: what was the net change in value of litigation reserves during 2012? 0.5 q1: what was the value of litigation reserves at the start of 2012? 3.2 Question: what was the percent change? Answer:

0.15625

convfinqa33

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. . Conversations: Question: what was the difference in the company 2019s warranty liability between 2011 and 2012? Answer:

16.0

convfinqa34

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in the company 2019s warranty liability between 2011 and 2012? 16.0 Question: and the percentage change of this value? Answer:

0.15686

convfinqa35

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table identifies the company 2019s aggregate contractual obligations due by payment period : payments due by period . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property and casualty obligations [1]</td><td>$ 21885</td><td>$ 5777</td><td>$ 6150</td><td>$ 3016</td><td>$ 6942</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>life annuity and disability obligations [2]</td><td>281998</td><td>18037</td><td>37318</td><td>40255</td><td>186388</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt obligations [3]</td><td>9093</td><td>536</td><td>1288</td><td>1613</td><td>5656</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>723</td><td>175</td><td>285</td><td>162</td><td>101</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations [4] [5]</td><td>1764</td><td>1614</td><td>120</td><td>14</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other long-term liabilities reflected onthe balance sheet [6] [7]</td><td>1642</td><td>1590</td><td>2014</td><td>52</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 317105</td><td>$ 27729</td><td>$ 45161</td><td>$ 45112</td><td>$ 199103</td></tr></table> [1] the following points are significant to understanding the cash flows estimated for obligations under property and casualty contracts : reserves for property & casualty unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses include case reserves for reported claims and reserves for claims incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) . while payments due on claim reserves are considered contractual obligations because they relate to insurance policies issued by the company , the ultimate amount to be paid to settle both case reserves and ibnr is an estimate , subject to significant uncertainty . the actual amount to be paid is not determined until the company reaches a settlement with the claimant . final claim settlements may vary significantly from the present estimates , particularly since many claims will not be settled until well into the future . in estimating the timing of future payments by year , the company has assumed that its historical payment patterns will continue . however , the actual timing of future payments will likely vary materially from these estimates due to , among other things , changes in claim reporting and payment patterns and large unanticipated settlements . in particular , there is significant uncertainty over the claim payment patterns of asbestos and environmental claims . also , estimated payments in 2005 do not include payments that will be made on claims incurred in 2005 on policies that were in force as of december 31 , 2004 . in addition , the table does not include future cash flows related to the receipt of premiums that will be used , in part , to fund loss payments . under generally accepted accounting principles , the company is only permitted to discount reserves for claim and claim adjustment expenses in cases where the payment pattern and ultimate loss costs are fixed and reliably determinable on an individual claim basis . for the company , these include claim settlements with permanently disabled claimants and certain structured settlement contracts that fund loss runoffs for unrelated parties . as of december 31 , 2004 , the total property and casualty reserves in the above table of $ 21885 are gross of the reserve discount of $ 556 . [2] estimated life , annuity and disability obligations include death and disability claims , policy surrenders , policyholder dividends and trail commissions offset by expected future deposits and premiums on in-force contracts . estimated contractual policyholder obligations are based on mortality , morbidity and lapse assumptions comparable with life 2019s historical experience , modified for recent observed trends . life has also assumed market growth and interest crediting consistent with assumptions used in amortizing deferred acquisition costs . in contrast to this table , the majority of life 2019s obligations are recorded on the balance sheet at the current account value , as described in critical accounting estimates , and do not incorporate an expectation of future market growth , interest crediting , or future deposits . therefore , the estimated contractual policyholder obligations presented in this table significantly exceed the liabilities recorded in reserve for future policy benefits and unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses , other policyholder funds and benefits payable and separate account liabilities . due to the significance of the assumptions used , the amounts presented could materially differ from actual results . as separate account obligations are legally insulated from general account obligations , the separate account obligations will be fully funded by cash flows from separate account assets . life expects to fully fund the general account obligations from cash flows from general account investments and future deposits and premiums . [3] includes contractual principal and interest payments . payments exclude amounts associated with fair-value hedges of certain of the company 2019s long-term debt . all long-term debt obligations have fixed rates of interest . long-term debt obligations also includes principal and interest payments of $ 700 and $ 2.4 billion , respectively , related to junior subordinated debentures which are callable beginning in 2006 . see note 14 of notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of long-term debt obligations . [4] includes $ 1.4 billion in commitments to purchase investments including $ 330 of limited partnerships and $ 299 of mortgage loans . outstanding commitments under these limited partnerships and mortgage loans are included in payments due in less than 1 year since the timing of funding these commitments cannot be estimated . the remaining $ 759 relates to payables for securities purchased which are reflected on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . [5] includes estimated contribution of $ 200 to the company 2019s pension plan in 2005 . [6] as of december 31 , 2004 , the company has accepted cash collateral of $ 1.6 billion in connection with the company 2019s securities lending program and derivative instruments . since the timing of the return of the collateral is uncertain , the return of the collateral has been included in the payments due in less than 1 year . [7] includes $ 52 in collateralized loan obligations ( 201cclos 201d ) issued to third-party investors by a consolidated investment management entity sponsored by the company in connection with synthetic clo transactions . the clo investors have no recourse to the company 2019s assets other than the dedicated assets collateralizing the clos . refer to note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of . Conversations: Question: what is the value of obligations due within 1 year? Answer:

27729.0

convfinqa36

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table identifies the company 2019s aggregate contractual obligations due by payment period : payments due by period . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property and casualty obligations [1]</td><td>$ 21885</td><td>$ 5777</td><td>$ 6150</td><td>$ 3016</td><td>$ 6942</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>life annuity and disability obligations [2]</td><td>281998</td><td>18037</td><td>37318</td><td>40255</td><td>186388</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt obligations [3]</td><td>9093</td><td>536</td><td>1288</td><td>1613</td><td>5656</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>723</td><td>175</td><td>285</td><td>162</td><td>101</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations [4] [5]</td><td>1764</td><td>1614</td><td>120</td><td>14</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other long-term liabilities reflected onthe balance sheet [6] [7]</td><td>1642</td><td>1590</td><td>2014</td><td>52</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 317105</td><td>$ 27729</td><td>$ 45161</td><td>$ 45112</td><td>$ 199103</td></tr></table> [1] the following points are significant to understanding the cash flows estimated for obligations under property and casualty contracts : reserves for property & casualty unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses include case reserves for reported claims and reserves for claims incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) . while payments due on claim reserves are considered contractual obligations because they relate to insurance policies issued by the company , the ultimate amount to be paid to settle both case reserves and ibnr is an estimate , subject to significant uncertainty . the actual amount to be paid is not determined until the company reaches a settlement with the claimant . final claim settlements may vary significantly from the present estimates , particularly since many claims will not be settled until well into the future . in estimating the timing of future payments by year , the company has assumed that its historical payment patterns will continue . however , the actual timing of future payments will likely vary materially from these estimates due to , among other things , changes in claim reporting and payment patterns and large unanticipated settlements . in particular , there is significant uncertainty over the claim payment patterns of asbestos and environmental claims . also , estimated payments in 2005 do not include payments that will be made on claims incurred in 2005 on policies that were in force as of december 31 , 2004 . in addition , the table does not include future cash flows related to the receipt of premiums that will be used , in part , to fund loss payments . under generally accepted accounting principles , the company is only permitted to discount reserves for claim and claim adjustment expenses in cases where the payment pattern and ultimate loss costs are fixed and reliably determinable on an individual claim basis . for the company , these include claim settlements with permanently disabled claimants and certain structured settlement contracts that fund loss runoffs for unrelated parties . as of december 31 , 2004 , the total property and casualty reserves in the above table of $ 21885 are gross of the reserve discount of $ 556 . [2] estimated life , annuity and disability obligations include death and disability claims , policy surrenders , policyholder dividends and trail commissions offset by expected future deposits and premiums on in-force contracts . estimated contractual policyholder obligations are based on mortality , morbidity and lapse assumptions comparable with life 2019s historical experience , modified for recent observed trends . life has also assumed market growth and interest crediting consistent with assumptions used in amortizing deferred acquisition costs . in contrast to this table , the majority of life 2019s obligations are recorded on the balance sheet at the current account value , as described in critical accounting estimates , and do not incorporate an expectation of future market growth , interest crediting , or future deposits . therefore , the estimated contractual policyholder obligations presented in this table significantly exceed the liabilities recorded in reserve for future policy benefits and unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses , other policyholder funds and benefits payable and separate account liabilities . due to the significance of the assumptions used , the amounts presented could materially differ from actual results . as separate account obligations are legally insulated from general account obligations , the separate account obligations will be fully funded by cash flows from separate account assets . life expects to fully fund the general account obligations from cash flows from general account investments and future deposits and premiums . [3] includes contractual principal and interest payments . payments exclude amounts associated with fair-value hedges of certain of the company 2019s long-term debt . all long-term debt obligations have fixed rates of interest . long-term debt obligations also includes principal and interest payments of $ 700 and $ 2.4 billion , respectively , related to junior subordinated debentures which are callable beginning in 2006 . see note 14 of notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of long-term debt obligations . [4] includes $ 1.4 billion in commitments to purchase investments including $ 330 of limited partnerships and $ 299 of mortgage loans . outstanding commitments under these limited partnerships and mortgage loans are included in payments due in less than 1 year since the timing of funding these commitments cannot be estimated . the remaining $ 759 relates to payables for securities purchased which are reflected on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . [5] includes estimated contribution of $ 200 to the company 2019s pension plan in 2005 . [6] as of december 31 , 2004 , the company has accepted cash collateral of $ 1.6 billion in connection with the company 2019s securities lending program and derivative instruments . since the timing of the return of the collateral is uncertain , the return of the collateral has been included in the payments due in less than 1 year . [7] includes $ 52 in collateralized loan obligations ( 201cclos 201d ) issued to third-party investors by a consolidated investment management entity sponsored by the company in connection with synthetic clo transactions . the clo investors have no recourse to the company 2019s assets other than the dedicated assets collateralizing the clos . refer to note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of . Conversations: q0: what is the value of obligations due within 1 year? 27729.0 Question: what is the amount due between 1-3 years? Answer:

45161.0

convfinqa37

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table identifies the company 2019s aggregate contractual obligations due by payment period : payments due by period . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property and casualty obligations [1]</td><td>$ 21885</td><td>$ 5777</td><td>$ 6150</td><td>$ 3016</td><td>$ 6942</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>life annuity and disability obligations [2]</td><td>281998</td><td>18037</td><td>37318</td><td>40255</td><td>186388</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt obligations [3]</td><td>9093</td><td>536</td><td>1288</td><td>1613</td><td>5656</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>723</td><td>175</td><td>285</td><td>162</td><td>101</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations [4] [5]</td><td>1764</td><td>1614</td><td>120</td><td>14</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other long-term liabilities reflected onthe balance sheet [6] [7]</td><td>1642</td><td>1590</td><td>2014</td><td>52</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 317105</td><td>$ 27729</td><td>$ 45161</td><td>$ 45112</td><td>$ 199103</td></tr></table> [1] the following points are significant to understanding the cash flows estimated for obligations under property and casualty contracts : reserves for property & casualty unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses include case reserves for reported claims and reserves for claims incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) . while payments due on claim reserves are considered contractual obligations because they relate to insurance policies issued by the company , the ultimate amount to be paid to settle both case reserves and ibnr is an estimate , subject to significant uncertainty . the actual amount to be paid is not determined until the company reaches a settlement with the claimant . final claim settlements may vary significantly from the present estimates , particularly since many claims will not be settled until well into the future . in estimating the timing of future payments by year , the company has assumed that its historical payment patterns will continue . however , the actual timing of future payments will likely vary materially from these estimates due to , among other things , changes in claim reporting and payment patterns and large unanticipated settlements . in particular , there is significant uncertainty over the claim payment patterns of asbestos and environmental claims . also , estimated payments in 2005 do not include payments that will be made on claims incurred in 2005 on policies that were in force as of december 31 , 2004 . in addition , the table does not include future cash flows related to the receipt of premiums that will be used , in part , to fund loss payments . under generally accepted accounting principles , the company is only permitted to discount reserves for claim and claim adjustment expenses in cases where the payment pattern and ultimate loss costs are fixed and reliably determinable on an individual claim basis . for the company , these include claim settlements with permanently disabled claimants and certain structured settlement contracts that fund loss runoffs for unrelated parties . as of december 31 , 2004 , the total property and casualty reserves in the above table of $ 21885 are gross of the reserve discount of $ 556 . [2] estimated life , annuity and disability obligations include death and disability claims , policy surrenders , policyholder dividends and trail commissions offset by expected future deposits and premiums on in-force contracts . estimated contractual policyholder obligations are based on mortality , morbidity and lapse assumptions comparable with life 2019s historical experience , modified for recent observed trends . life has also assumed market growth and interest crediting consistent with assumptions used in amortizing deferred acquisition costs . in contrast to this table , the majority of life 2019s obligations are recorded on the balance sheet at the current account value , as described in critical accounting estimates , and do not incorporate an expectation of future market growth , interest crediting , or future deposits . therefore , the estimated contractual policyholder obligations presented in this table significantly exceed the liabilities recorded in reserve for future policy benefits and unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses , other policyholder funds and benefits payable and separate account liabilities . due to the significance of the assumptions used , the amounts presented could materially differ from actual results . as separate account obligations are legally insulated from general account obligations , the separate account obligations will be fully funded by cash flows from separate account assets . life expects to fully fund the general account obligations from cash flows from general account investments and future deposits and premiums . [3] includes contractual principal and interest payments . payments exclude amounts associated with fair-value hedges of certain of the company 2019s long-term debt . all long-term debt obligations have fixed rates of interest . long-term debt obligations also includes principal and interest payments of $ 700 and $ 2.4 billion , respectively , related to junior subordinated debentures which are callable beginning in 2006 . see note 14 of notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of long-term debt obligations . [4] includes $ 1.4 billion in commitments to purchase investments including $ 330 of limited partnerships and $ 299 of mortgage loans . outstanding commitments under these limited partnerships and mortgage loans are included in payments due in less than 1 year since the timing of funding these commitments cannot be estimated . the remaining $ 759 relates to payables for securities purchased which are reflected on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . [5] includes estimated contribution of $ 200 to the company 2019s pension plan in 2005 . [6] as of december 31 , 2004 , the company has accepted cash collateral of $ 1.6 billion in connection with the company 2019s securities lending program and derivative instruments . since the timing of the return of the collateral is uncertain , the return of the collateral has been included in the payments due in less than 1 year . [7] includes $ 52 in collateralized loan obligations ( 201cclos 201d ) issued to third-party investors by a consolidated investment management entity sponsored by the company in connection with synthetic clo transactions . the clo investors have no recourse to the company 2019s assets other than the dedicated assets collateralizing the clos . refer to note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of . Conversations: q0: what is the value of obligations due within 1 year? 27729.0 q1: what is the amount due between 1-3 years? 45161.0 Question: what is the sum? Answer:

72890.0

convfinqa38

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table identifies the company 2019s aggregate contractual obligations due by payment period : payments due by period . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property and casualty obligations [1]</td><td>$ 21885</td><td>$ 5777</td><td>$ 6150</td><td>$ 3016</td><td>$ 6942</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>life annuity and disability obligations [2]</td><td>281998</td><td>18037</td><td>37318</td><td>40255</td><td>186388</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt obligations [3]</td><td>9093</td><td>536</td><td>1288</td><td>1613</td><td>5656</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>723</td><td>175</td><td>285</td><td>162</td><td>101</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations [4] [5]</td><td>1764</td><td>1614</td><td>120</td><td>14</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other long-term liabilities reflected onthe balance sheet [6] [7]</td><td>1642</td><td>1590</td><td>2014</td><td>52</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 317105</td><td>$ 27729</td><td>$ 45161</td><td>$ 45112</td><td>$ 199103</td></tr></table> [1] the following points are significant to understanding the cash flows estimated for obligations under property and casualty contracts : reserves for property & casualty unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses include case reserves for reported claims and reserves for claims incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) . while payments due on claim reserves are considered contractual obligations because they relate to insurance policies issued by the company , the ultimate amount to be paid to settle both case reserves and ibnr is an estimate , subject to significant uncertainty . the actual amount to be paid is not determined until the company reaches a settlement with the claimant . final claim settlements may vary significantly from the present estimates , particularly since many claims will not be settled until well into the future . in estimating the timing of future payments by year , the company has assumed that its historical payment patterns will continue . however , the actual timing of future payments will likely vary materially from these estimates due to , among other things , changes in claim reporting and payment patterns and large unanticipated settlements . in particular , there is significant uncertainty over the claim payment patterns of asbestos and environmental claims . also , estimated payments in 2005 do not include payments that will be made on claims incurred in 2005 on policies that were in force as of december 31 , 2004 . in addition , the table does not include future cash flows related to the receipt of premiums that will be used , in part , to fund loss payments . under generally accepted accounting principles , the company is only permitted to discount reserves for claim and claim adjustment expenses in cases where the payment pattern and ultimate loss costs are fixed and reliably determinable on an individual claim basis . for the company , these include claim settlements with permanently disabled claimants and certain structured settlement contracts that fund loss runoffs for unrelated parties . as of december 31 , 2004 , the total property and casualty reserves in the above table of $ 21885 are gross of the reserve discount of $ 556 . [2] estimated life , annuity and disability obligations include death and disability claims , policy surrenders , policyholder dividends and trail commissions offset by expected future deposits and premiums on in-force contracts . estimated contractual policyholder obligations are based on mortality , morbidity and lapse assumptions comparable with life 2019s historical experience , modified for recent observed trends . life has also assumed market growth and interest crediting consistent with assumptions used in amortizing deferred acquisition costs . in contrast to this table , the majority of life 2019s obligations are recorded on the balance sheet at the current account value , as described in critical accounting estimates , and do not incorporate an expectation of future market growth , interest crediting , or future deposits . therefore , the estimated contractual policyholder obligations presented in this table significantly exceed the liabilities recorded in reserve for future policy benefits and unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses , other policyholder funds and benefits payable and separate account liabilities . due to the significance of the assumptions used , the amounts presented could materially differ from actual results . as separate account obligations are legally insulated from general account obligations , the separate account obligations will be fully funded by cash flows from separate account assets . life expects to fully fund the general account obligations from cash flows from general account investments and future deposits and premiums . [3] includes contractual principal and interest payments . payments exclude amounts associated with fair-value hedges of certain of the company 2019s long-term debt . all long-term debt obligations have fixed rates of interest . long-term debt obligations also includes principal and interest payments of $ 700 and $ 2.4 billion , respectively , related to junior subordinated debentures which are callable beginning in 2006 . see note 14 of notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of long-term debt obligations . [4] includes $ 1.4 billion in commitments to purchase investments including $ 330 of limited partnerships and $ 299 of mortgage loans . outstanding commitments under these limited partnerships and mortgage loans are included in payments due in less than 1 year since the timing of funding these commitments cannot be estimated . the remaining $ 759 relates to payables for securities purchased which are reflected on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . [5] includes estimated contribution of $ 200 to the company 2019s pension plan in 2005 . [6] as of december 31 , 2004 , the company has accepted cash collateral of $ 1.6 billion in connection with the company 2019s securities lending program and derivative instruments . since the timing of the return of the collateral is uncertain , the return of the collateral has been included in the payments due in less than 1 year . [7] includes $ 52 in collateralized loan obligations ( 201cclos 201d ) issued to third-party investors by a consolidated investment management entity sponsored by the company in connection with synthetic clo transactions . the clo investors have no recourse to the company 2019s assets other than the dedicated assets collateralizing the clos . refer to note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of . Conversations: q0: what is the value of obligations due within 1 year? 27729.0 q1: what is the amount due between 1-3 years? 45161.0 q2: what is the sum? 72890.0 Question: what is the sum divided by total obligations due? Answer:

0.22986

convfinqa39

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years . stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives . the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria . annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached . a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td><td>2728290</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>192563</td><td>92729</td><td>185333</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-3267 ( 3267 )</td><td>-200284 ( 200284 )</td><td>-1167 ( 1167 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>2994197</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vested during the year</td><td>21074</td><td>408800</td><td>66299</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>compensation expense recorded</td><td>$ 6713155</td><td>$ 6930381</td><td>$ 17365401</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year</td><td>$ 17386949</td><td>$ 7023942</td><td>$ 21768084</td></tr></table> weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options . we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 . a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price . the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan . the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year . in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) . the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively . substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on . Conversations: Question: what was the total, in millions, capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options in the year of 2013? Answer:

4.5

convfinqa40

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years . stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives . the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria . annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached . a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td><td>2728290</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>192563</td><td>92729</td><td>185333</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-3267 ( 3267 )</td><td>-200284 ( 200284 )</td><td>-1167 ( 1167 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>2994197</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vested during the year</td><td>21074</td><td>408800</td><td>66299</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>compensation expense recorded</td><td>$ 6713155</td><td>$ 6930381</td><td>$ 17365401</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year</td><td>$ 17386949</td><td>$ 7023942</td><td>$ 21768084</td></tr></table> weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options . we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 . a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price . the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan . the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year . in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) . the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively . substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on . Conversations: q0: what was the total, in millions, capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options in the year of 2013? 4.5 Question: and what was it in 2012, also in millions? Answer:

4.1

convfinqa41

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years . stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives . the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria . annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached . a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td><td>2728290</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>192563</td><td>92729</td><td>185333</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-3267 ( 3267 )</td><td>-200284 ( 200284 )</td><td>-1167 ( 1167 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>2994197</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vested during the year</td><td>21074</td><td>408800</td><td>66299</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>compensation expense recorded</td><td>$ 6713155</td><td>$ 6930381</td><td>$ 17365401</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year</td><td>$ 17386949</td><td>$ 7023942</td><td>$ 21768084</td></tr></table> weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options . we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 . a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price . the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan . the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year . in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) . the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively . substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on . Conversations: q0: what was the total, in millions, capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options in the year of 2013? 4.5 q1: and what was it in 2012, also in millions? 4.1 Question: what was, then, in millions, the total sum that was capitalized in those two years? Answer:

8.6

convfinqa42

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years . stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives . the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria . annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached . a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td><td>2728290</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>192563</td><td>92729</td><td>185333</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-3267 ( 3267 )</td><td>-200284 ( 200284 )</td><td>-1167 ( 1167 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>2994197</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vested during the year</td><td>21074</td><td>408800</td><td>66299</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>compensation expense recorded</td><td>$ 6713155</td><td>$ 6930381</td><td>$ 17365401</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year</td><td>$ 17386949</td><td>$ 7023942</td><td>$ 21768084</td></tr></table> weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options . we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 . a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price . the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan . the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year . in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) . the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively . substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on . Conversations: q0: what was the total, in millions, capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options in the year of 2013? 4.5 q1: and what was it in 2012, also in millions? 4.1 q2: what was, then, in millions, the total sum that was capitalized in those two years? 8.6 Question: including the year of 2011, what would then be the total sum capitalized in the three years, in millions? Answer:

12.0

convfinqa43

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the net decrease in the 2016 effective tax rate was due , in part , to the 2016 asset impairments in the u.s . and to the current year benefit related to a restructuring of one of our brazilian businesses that increases tax basis in long-term assets . further , the 2015 rate was impacted by the items described below . see note 20 2014asset impairment expense for additional information regarding the 2016 u.s . asset impairments . income tax expense increased $ 101 million , or 27% ( 27 % ) , to $ 472 million in 2015 . the company's effective tax rates were 41% ( 41 % ) and 26% ( 26 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the net increase in the 2015 effective tax rate was due , in part , to the nondeductible 2015 impairment of goodwill at our u.s . utility , dp&l and chilean withholding taxes offset by the release of valuation allowance at certain of our businesses in brazil , vietnam and the u.s . further , the 2014 rate was impacted by the sale of approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s interest in masin aes pte ltd. , which owns the company 2019s business interests in the philippines and the 2014 sale of the company 2019s interests in four u.k . wind operating projects . neither of these transactions gave rise to income tax expense . see note 15 2014equity for additional information regarding the sale of approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s interest in masin-aes pte ltd . see note 23 2014dispositions for additional information regarding the sale of the company 2019s interests in four u.k . wind operating projects . our effective tax rate reflects the tax effect of significant operations outside the u.s. , which are generally taxed at rates lower than the u.s . statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . a future proportionate change in the composition of income before income taxes from foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions could impact our periodic effective tax rate . the company also benefits from reduced tax rates in certain countries as a result of satisfying specific commitments regarding employment and capital investment . see note 21 2014income taxes for additional information regarding these reduced rates . foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) in millions were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aes corporation</td><td>$ -50 ( 50 )</td><td>$ -31 ( 31 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>chile</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>-30 ( 30 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>colombia</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>29</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mexico</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>philippines</td><td>12</td><td>8</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>13</td><td>11</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>argentina</td><td>37</td><td>124</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total ( 1 )</td><td>$ -15 ( 15 )</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 11</td></tr></table> total ( 1 ) $ ( 15 ) $ 107 $ 11 _____________________________ ( 1 ) includes gains of $ 17 million , $ 247 million and $ 172 million on foreign currency derivative contracts for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company recognized a net foreign currency transaction loss of $ 15 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 primarily due to losses of $ 50 million at the aes corporation mainly due to remeasurement losses on intercompany notes , and losses on swaps and options . this loss was partially offset by gains of $ 37 million in argentina , mainly due to the favorable impact of foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables . the company recognized a net foreign currency transaction gain of $ 107 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 primarily due to gains of : 2022 $ 124 million in argentina , due to the favorable impact from foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables , partially offset by losses from the devaluation of the argentine peso associated with u.s . dollar denominated debt , and losses at termoandes ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) primarily associated with cash and accounts receivable balances in local currency , 2022 $ 29 million in colombia , mainly due to the depreciation of the colombian peso , positively impacting chivor ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) due to liabilities denominated in colombian pesos , 2022 $ 11 million in the united kingdom , mainly due to the depreciation of the pound sterling , resulting in gains at ballylumford holdings ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) associated with intercompany notes payable denominated in pound sterling , and . Conversations: Question: what was the total of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation in 2015, in millions? Answer:

-31.0

convfinqa44

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the net decrease in the 2016 effective tax rate was due , in part , to the 2016 asset impairments in the u.s . and to the current year benefit related to a restructuring of one of our brazilian businesses that increases tax basis in long-term assets . further , the 2015 rate was impacted by the items described below . see note 20 2014asset impairment expense for additional information regarding the 2016 u.s . asset impairments . income tax expense increased $ 101 million , or 27% ( 27 % ) , to $ 472 million in 2015 . the company's effective tax rates were 41% ( 41 % ) and 26% ( 26 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the net increase in the 2015 effective tax rate was due , in part , to the nondeductible 2015 impairment of goodwill at our u.s . utility , dp&l and chilean withholding taxes offset by the release of valuation allowance at certain of our businesses in brazil , vietnam and the u.s . further , the 2014 rate was impacted by the sale of approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s interest in masin aes pte ltd. , which owns the company 2019s business interests in the philippines and the 2014 sale of the company 2019s interests in four u.k . wind operating projects . neither of these transactions gave rise to income tax expense . see note 15 2014equity for additional information regarding the sale of approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s interest in masin-aes pte ltd . see note 23 2014dispositions for additional information regarding the sale of the company 2019s interests in four u.k . wind operating projects . our effective tax rate reflects the tax effect of significant operations outside the u.s. , which are generally taxed at rates lower than the u.s . statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . a future proportionate change in the composition of income before income taxes from foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions could impact our periodic effective tax rate . the company also benefits from reduced tax rates in certain countries as a result of satisfying specific commitments regarding employment and capital investment . see note 21 2014income taxes for additional information regarding these reduced rates . foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) in millions were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aes corporation</td><td>$ -50 ( 50 )</td><td>$ -31 ( 31 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>chile</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>-30 ( 30 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>colombia</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>29</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mexico</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>philippines</td><td>12</td><td>8</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>13</td><td>11</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>argentina</td><td>37</td><td>124</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total ( 1 )</td><td>$ -15 ( 15 )</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 11</td></tr></table> total ( 1 ) $ ( 15 ) $ 107 $ 11 _____________________________ ( 1 ) includes gains of $ 17 million , $ 247 million and $ 172 million on foreign currency derivative contracts for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company recognized a net foreign currency transaction loss of $ 15 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 primarily due to losses of $ 50 million at the aes corporation mainly due to remeasurement losses on intercompany notes , and losses on swaps and options . this loss was partially offset by gains of $ 37 million in argentina , mainly due to the favorable impact of foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables . the company recognized a net foreign currency transaction gain of $ 107 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 primarily due to gains of : 2022 $ 124 million in argentina , due to the favorable impact from foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables , partially offset by losses from the devaluation of the argentine peso associated with u.s . dollar denominated debt , and losses at termoandes ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) primarily associated with cash and accounts receivable balances in local currency , 2022 $ 29 million in colombia , mainly due to the depreciation of the colombian peso , positively impacting chivor ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) due to liabilities denominated in colombian pesos , 2022 $ 11 million in the united kingdom , mainly due to the depreciation of the pound sterling , resulting in gains at ballylumford holdings ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) associated with intercompany notes payable denominated in pound sterling , and . Conversations: q0: what was the total of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation in 2015, in millions? -31.0 Question: and what was it in 2014, also in millions? Answer:

-34.0

convfinqa45

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the net decrease in the 2016 effective tax rate was due , in part , to the 2016 asset impairments in the u.s . and to the current year benefit related to a restructuring of one of our brazilian businesses that increases tax basis in long-term assets . further , the 2015 rate was impacted by the items described below . see note 20 2014asset impairment expense for additional information regarding the 2016 u.s . asset impairments . income tax expense increased $ 101 million , or 27% ( 27 % ) , to $ 472 million in 2015 . the company's effective tax rates were 41% ( 41 % ) and 26% ( 26 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the net increase in the 2015 effective tax rate was due , in part , to the nondeductible 2015 impairment of goodwill at our u.s . utility , dp&l and chilean withholding taxes offset by the release of valuation allowance at certain of our businesses in brazil , vietnam and the u.s . further , the 2014 rate was impacted by the sale of approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s interest in masin aes pte ltd. , which owns the company 2019s business interests in the philippines and the 2014 sale of the company 2019s interests in four u.k . wind operating projects . neither of these transactions gave rise to income tax expense . see note 15 2014equity for additional information regarding the sale of approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s interest in masin-aes pte ltd . see note 23 2014dispositions for additional information regarding the sale of the company 2019s interests in four u.k . wind operating projects . our effective tax rate reflects the tax effect of significant operations outside the u.s. , which are generally taxed at rates lower than the u.s . statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . a future proportionate change in the composition of income before income taxes from foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions could impact our periodic effective tax rate . the company also benefits from reduced tax rates in certain countries as a result of satisfying specific commitments regarding employment and capital investment . see note 21 2014income taxes for additional information regarding these reduced rates . foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) in millions were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aes corporation</td><td>$ -50 ( 50 )</td><td>$ -31 ( 31 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>chile</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>-30 ( 30 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>colombia</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>29</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mexico</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>philippines</td><td>12</td><td>8</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>13</td><td>11</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>argentina</td><td>37</td><td>124</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total ( 1 )</td><td>$ -15 ( 15 )</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 11</td></tr></table> total ( 1 ) $ ( 15 ) $ 107 $ 11 _____________________________ ( 1 ) includes gains of $ 17 million , $ 247 million and $ 172 million on foreign currency derivative contracts for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company recognized a net foreign currency transaction loss of $ 15 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 primarily due to losses of $ 50 million at the aes corporation mainly due to remeasurement losses on intercompany notes , and losses on swaps and options . this loss was partially offset by gains of $ 37 million in argentina , mainly due to the favorable impact of foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables . the company recognized a net foreign currency transaction gain of $ 107 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 primarily due to gains of : 2022 $ 124 million in argentina , due to the favorable impact from foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables , partially offset by losses from the devaluation of the argentine peso associated with u.s . dollar denominated debt , and losses at termoandes ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) primarily associated with cash and accounts receivable balances in local currency , 2022 $ 29 million in colombia , mainly due to the depreciation of the colombian peso , positively impacting chivor ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) due to liabilities denominated in colombian pesos , 2022 $ 11 million in the united kingdom , mainly due to the depreciation of the pound sterling , resulting in gains at ballylumford holdings ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) associated with intercompany notes payable denominated in pound sterling , and . Conversations: q0: what was the total of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation in 2015, in millions? -31.0 q1: and what was it in 2014, also in millions? -34.0 Question: by how much, then, did that total change over the period? Answer:

3.0

convfinqa46

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the net decrease in the 2016 effective tax rate was due , in part , to the 2016 asset impairments in the u.s . and to the current year benefit related to a restructuring of one of our brazilian businesses that increases tax basis in long-term assets . further , the 2015 rate was impacted by the items described below . see note 20 2014asset impairment expense for additional information regarding the 2016 u.s . asset impairments . income tax expense increased $ 101 million , or 27% ( 27 % ) , to $ 472 million in 2015 . the company's effective tax rates were 41% ( 41 % ) and 26% ( 26 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the net increase in the 2015 effective tax rate was due , in part , to the nondeductible 2015 impairment of goodwill at our u.s . utility , dp&l and chilean withholding taxes offset by the release of valuation allowance at certain of our businesses in brazil , vietnam and the u.s . further , the 2014 rate was impacted by the sale of approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s interest in masin aes pte ltd. , which owns the company 2019s business interests in the philippines and the 2014 sale of the company 2019s interests in four u.k . wind operating projects . neither of these transactions gave rise to income tax expense . see note 15 2014equity for additional information regarding the sale of approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s interest in masin-aes pte ltd . see note 23 2014dispositions for additional information regarding the sale of the company 2019s interests in four u.k . wind operating projects . our effective tax rate reflects the tax effect of significant operations outside the u.s. , which are generally taxed at rates lower than the u.s . statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . a future proportionate change in the composition of income before income taxes from foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions could impact our periodic effective tax rate . the company also benefits from reduced tax rates in certain countries as a result of satisfying specific commitments regarding employment and capital investment . see note 21 2014income taxes for additional information regarding these reduced rates . foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) in millions were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aes corporation</td><td>$ -50 ( 50 )</td><td>$ -31 ( 31 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>chile</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>-30 ( 30 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>colombia</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>29</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mexico</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>philippines</td><td>12</td><td>8</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>13</td><td>11</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>argentina</td><td>37</td><td>124</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total ( 1 )</td><td>$ -15 ( 15 )</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 11</td></tr></table> total ( 1 ) $ ( 15 ) $ 107 $ 11 _____________________________ ( 1 ) includes gains of $ 17 million , $ 247 million and $ 172 million on foreign currency derivative contracts for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company recognized a net foreign currency transaction loss of $ 15 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 primarily due to losses of $ 50 million at the aes corporation mainly due to remeasurement losses on intercompany notes , and losses on swaps and options . this loss was partially offset by gains of $ 37 million in argentina , mainly due to the favorable impact of foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables . the company recognized a net foreign currency transaction gain of $ 107 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 primarily due to gains of : 2022 $ 124 million in argentina , due to the favorable impact from foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables , partially offset by losses from the devaluation of the argentine peso associated with u.s . dollar denominated debt , and losses at termoandes ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) primarily associated with cash and accounts receivable balances in local currency , 2022 $ 29 million in colombia , mainly due to the depreciation of the colombian peso , positively impacting chivor ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) due to liabilities denominated in colombian pesos , 2022 $ 11 million in the united kingdom , mainly due to the depreciation of the pound sterling , resulting in gains at ballylumford holdings ( a u.s . dollar functional currency subsidiary ) associated with intercompany notes payable denominated in pound sterling , and . Conversations: q0: what was the total of foreign currency transaction gains ( losses ) for aes corporation in 2015, in millions? -31.0 q1: and what was it in 2014, also in millions? -34.0 q2: by how much, then, did that total change over the period? 3.0 Question: and what was that change over the subsequent year, from 2015 to 2016? Answer:

-19.0

convfinqa47

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>attala costs</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>6.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>base revenue</td><td>5.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-4.0 ( 4.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-2.7 ( 2.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 498.8</td></tr></table> the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. . Conversations: Question: what is the difference between the net revenue of 2008 and 2007? Answer:

11.9

convfinqa48

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>attala costs</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>6.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>base revenue</td><td>5.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-4.0 ( 4.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-2.7 ( 2.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 498.8</td></tr></table> the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. . Conversations: q0: what is the difference between the net revenue of 2008 and 2007? 11.9 Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the net revenue of 2007? Answer:

0.02444

convfinqa49

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: baker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k | 85 the total intrinsic value of rsus ( defined as the value of the shares awarded at the current market price ) vested and outstanding in 2017 was $ 17 million and $ 38 million , respectively . the total fair value of rsus vested in 2017 was $ 19 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was $ 98 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested rsus , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years . note 12 . equity common stock we are authorized to issue 2 billion shares of class a common stock , 1.25 billion shares of class b common stock and 50 million shares of preferred stock each of which have a par value of $ 0.0001 per share . on july 3 , 2017 , each share of baker hughes common stock was converted into one share of class a common stock in the company . the number of class a common stock and class b common stock shares outstanding at december 31 , 2017 is 422 million and 707 million , respectively . we have not issued any preferred stock . ge owns all the issued and outstanding class b common stock . each share of class a and class b common stock and the associated membership interest in bhge llc form a paired interest . while each share of class b common stock has equal voting rights to a share of class a common stock , it has no economic rights , meaning holders of class b common stock have no right to dividends and any assets in the event of liquidation of the company . former baker hughes stockholders immediately after the completion of the transactions received a special one-time cash dividend of $ 17.50 per share paid by the company to holders of record of the company's class a common stock . in addition , during 2017 the company declared and paid regular dividends of $ 0.17 per share and $ 0.18 per share to holders of record of the company's class a common stock during the quarters ended september 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . the following table presents the changes in number of shares outstanding ( in thousands ) : class a common class b common . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>class a common stock</td><td>class b common stock</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2016</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issue of shares on business combination at july 3 2017</td><td>427709</td><td>717111</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>issue of shares upon vesting of restricted stock units ( 1 )</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>issue of shares on exercises of stock options ( 1 )</td><td>256</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock repurchase program ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>-6047 ( 6047 )</td><td>-10126 ( 10126 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2017</td><td>422208</td><td>706985</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) share amounts reflected above are net of shares withheld to satisfy the employee's tax withholding obligation . ( 2 ) on november 2 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized bhge llc to repurchase up to $ 3 billion of its common units from the company and ge . the proceeds of this repurchase are to be used by bhge to repurchase class a common stock of the company on the open market , which if fully implemented would result in the repurchase of approximately $ 1.1 billion of class a common stock . the class b common stock of the company , that is paired with repurchased common units , was repurchased by the company at par value . the $ 3 billion repurchase authorization is the aggregate authorization for repurchases of class a and class b common stock together with its paired unit . bhge llc had authorization remaining to repurchase up to approximately $ 2.5 billion of its common units from bhge and ge at december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) during 2017 , we repurchased and canceled 6046735 shares of class a common stock for a total of $ 187 million . we also repurchased and canceled 10126467 shares of class b common stock from ge which is paired together with common units of bhge llc for $ 314 million. . Conversations: Question: what is the number of class b shares issued in 2017 times 1000? Answer:

1250.0

convfinqa50

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: baker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k | 85 the total intrinsic value of rsus ( defined as the value of the shares awarded at the current market price ) vested and outstanding in 2017 was $ 17 million and $ 38 million , respectively . the total fair value of rsus vested in 2017 was $ 19 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was $ 98 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested rsus , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years . note 12 . equity common stock we are authorized to issue 2 billion shares of class a common stock , 1.25 billion shares of class b common stock and 50 million shares of preferred stock each of which have a par value of $ 0.0001 per share . on july 3 , 2017 , each share of baker hughes common stock was converted into one share of class a common stock in the company . the number of class a common stock and class b common stock shares outstanding at december 31 , 2017 is 422 million and 707 million , respectively . we have not issued any preferred stock . ge owns all the issued and outstanding class b common stock . each share of class a and class b common stock and the associated membership interest in bhge llc form a paired interest . while each share of class b common stock has equal voting rights to a share of class a common stock , it has no economic rights , meaning holders of class b common stock have no right to dividends and any assets in the event of liquidation of the company . former baker hughes stockholders immediately after the completion of the transactions received a special one-time cash dividend of $ 17.50 per share paid by the company to holders of record of the company's class a common stock . in addition , during 2017 the company declared and paid regular dividends of $ 0.17 per share and $ 0.18 per share to holders of record of the company's class a common stock during the quarters ended september 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . the following table presents the changes in number of shares outstanding ( in thousands ) : class a common class b common . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>class a common stock</td><td>class b common stock</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2016</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issue of shares on business combination at july 3 2017</td><td>427709</td><td>717111</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>issue of shares upon vesting of restricted stock units ( 1 )</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>issue of shares on exercises of stock options ( 1 )</td><td>256</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock repurchase program ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>-6047 ( 6047 )</td><td>-10126 ( 10126 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2017</td><td>422208</td><td>706985</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) share amounts reflected above are net of shares withheld to satisfy the employee's tax withholding obligation . ( 2 ) on november 2 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized bhge llc to repurchase up to $ 3 billion of its common units from the company and ge . the proceeds of this repurchase are to be used by bhge to repurchase class a common stock of the company on the open market , which if fully implemented would result in the repurchase of approximately $ 1.1 billion of class a common stock . the class b common stock of the company , that is paired with repurchased common units , was repurchased by the company at par value . the $ 3 billion repurchase authorization is the aggregate authorization for repurchases of class a and class b common stock together with its paired unit . bhge llc had authorization remaining to repurchase up to approximately $ 2.5 billion of its common units from bhge and ge at december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) during 2017 , we repurchased and canceled 6046735 shares of class a common stock for a total of $ 187 million . we also repurchased and canceled 10126467 shares of class b common stock from ge which is paired together with common units of bhge llc for $ 314 million. . Conversations: q0: what is the number of class b shares issued in 2017 times 1000? 1250.0 Question: what is the total class b shares outstanding divided by that product? Answer:

0.5656

convfinqa51

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 ( 1 ) weighted average interest rate at december 31 , 2011 . ( 2 ) the company has interest rate swaps and interest rate option agreements in an aggregate notional principal amount of approximately $ 3.6 billion on non-recourse debt outstanding at december 31 , 2011 . the swap agreements economically change the variable interest rates on the portion of the debt covered by the notional amounts to fixed rates ranging from approximately 1.44% ( 1.44 % ) to 6.98% ( 6.98 % ) . the option agreements fix interest rates within a range from 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) to 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the agreements expire at various dates from 2016 through 2028 . ( 3 ) multilateral loans include loans funded and guaranteed by bilaterals , multilaterals , development banks and other similar institutions . ( 4 ) non-recourse debt of $ 704 million and $ 945 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , was excluded from non-recourse debt and included in current and long-term liabilities of held for sale and discontinued businesses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . non-recourse debt as of december 31 , 2011 is scheduled to reach maturity as set forth in the table below : december 31 , annual maturities ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>annual maturities ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 2152</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>1389</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>1697</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>851</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>2301</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>7698</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total non-recourse debt</td><td>$ 16088</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2011 , aes subsidiaries with facilities under construction had a total of approximately $ 1.4 billion of committed but unused credit facilities available to fund construction and other related costs . excluding these facilities under construction , aes subsidiaries had approximately $ 1.2 billion in a number of available but unused committed revolving credit lines to support their working capital , debt service reserves and other business needs . these credit lines can be used in one or more of the following ways : solely for borrowings ; solely for letters of credit ; or a combination of these uses . the weighted average interest rate on borrowings from these facilities was 14.75% ( 14.75 % ) at december 31 , 2011 . on october 3 , 2011 , dolphin subsidiary ii , inc . ( 201cdolphin ii 201d ) , a newly formed , wholly-owned special purpose indirect subsidiary of aes , entered into an indenture ( the 201cindenture 201d ) with wells fargo bank , n.a . ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) as part of its issuance of $ 450 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) senior notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior notes due 2021 ( the 201c7.25% ( 201c7.25 % ) 2021 notes 201d , together with the 2016 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) to finance the acquisition ( the 201cacquisition 201d ) of dpl . upon closing of the acquisition on november 28 , 2011 , dolphin ii was merged into dpl with dpl being the surviving entity and obligor . the 2016 notes and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes are included under 201cnotes and bonds 201d in the non-recourse detail table above . see note 23 2014acquisitions and dispositions for further information . interest on the 2016 notes and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes accrues at a rate of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) and 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) per year , respectively , and is payable on april 15 and october 15 of each year , beginning april 15 , 2012 . prior to september 15 , 2016 with respect to the 2016 notes and july 15 , 2021 with respect to the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes , dpl may redeem some or all of the 2016 notes or 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes at par , plus a 201cmake-whole 201d amount set forth in . Conversations: Question: what is the total amount available under the committed credit facilities as of december 31, 2011, in billions? Answer:

2.6

convfinqa52

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 ( 1 ) weighted average interest rate at december 31 , 2011 . ( 2 ) the company has interest rate swaps and interest rate option agreements in an aggregate notional principal amount of approximately $ 3.6 billion on non-recourse debt outstanding at december 31 , 2011 . the swap agreements economically change the variable interest rates on the portion of the debt covered by the notional amounts to fixed rates ranging from approximately 1.44% ( 1.44 % ) to 6.98% ( 6.98 % ) . the option agreements fix interest rates within a range from 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) to 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the agreements expire at various dates from 2016 through 2028 . ( 3 ) multilateral loans include loans funded and guaranteed by bilaterals , multilaterals , development banks and other similar institutions . ( 4 ) non-recourse debt of $ 704 million and $ 945 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , was excluded from non-recourse debt and included in current and long-term liabilities of held for sale and discontinued businesses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . non-recourse debt as of december 31 , 2011 is scheduled to reach maturity as set forth in the table below : december 31 , annual maturities ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>annual maturities ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 2152</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>1389</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>1697</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>851</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>2301</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>7698</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total non-recourse debt</td><td>$ 16088</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2011 , aes subsidiaries with facilities under construction had a total of approximately $ 1.4 billion of committed but unused credit facilities available to fund construction and other related costs . excluding these facilities under construction , aes subsidiaries had approximately $ 1.2 billion in a number of available but unused committed revolving credit lines to support their working capital , debt service reserves and other business needs . these credit lines can be used in one or more of the following ways : solely for borrowings ; solely for letters of credit ; or a combination of these uses . the weighted average interest rate on borrowings from these facilities was 14.75% ( 14.75 % ) at december 31 , 2011 . on october 3 , 2011 , dolphin subsidiary ii , inc . ( 201cdolphin ii 201d ) , a newly formed , wholly-owned special purpose indirect subsidiary of aes , entered into an indenture ( the 201cindenture 201d ) with wells fargo bank , n.a . ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) as part of its issuance of $ 450 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) senior notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior notes due 2021 ( the 201c7.25% ( 201c7.25 % ) 2021 notes 201d , together with the 2016 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) to finance the acquisition ( the 201cacquisition 201d ) of dpl . upon closing of the acquisition on november 28 , 2011 , dolphin ii was merged into dpl with dpl being the surviving entity and obligor . the 2016 notes and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes are included under 201cnotes and bonds 201d in the non-recourse detail table above . see note 23 2014acquisitions and dispositions for further information . interest on the 2016 notes and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes accrues at a rate of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) and 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) per year , respectively , and is payable on april 15 and october 15 of each year , beginning april 15 , 2012 . prior to september 15 , 2016 with respect to the 2016 notes and july 15 , 2021 with respect to the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes , dpl may redeem some or all of the 2016 notes or 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) 2021 notes at par , plus a 201cmake-whole 201d amount set forth in . Conversations: q0: what is the total amount available under the committed credit facilities as of december 31, 2011, in billions? 2.6 Question: and as of that same date, how much did the non-recourse debt due in 2014 represent in relation to the total debt, in percentage? Answer:

0.10548

convfinqa53

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 136.18</td><td>$ 186.17</td><td>$ 204.57</td><td>$ 221.68</td><td>$ 298.31</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.03</td><td>183.26</td><td>200.42</td><td>201.40</td><td>258.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.75</td><td>174.57</td><td>201.06</td><td>197.92</td><td>242.94</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.99</td><td>153.55</td><td>174.55</td><td>176.95</td><td>198.10</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) . Conversations: Question: what was the value of the kbw bank index in 2016? Answer:

258.82

convfinqa54

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 136.18</td><td>$ 186.17</td><td>$ 204.57</td><td>$ 221.68</td><td>$ 298.31</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.03</td><td>183.26</td><td>200.42</td><td>201.40</td><td>258.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.75</td><td>174.57</td><td>201.06</td><td>197.92</td><td>242.94</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.99</td><td>153.55</td><td>174.55</td><td>176.95</td><td>198.10</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) . Conversations: q0: what was the value of the kbw bank index in 2016? 258.82 Question: and what was the change in value of the stock from 2011 to 2016? Answer:

158.82

convfinqa55

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 136.18</td><td>$ 186.17</td><td>$ 204.57</td><td>$ 221.68</td><td>$ 298.31</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.03</td><td>183.26</td><td>200.42</td><td>201.40</td><td>258.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.75</td><td>174.57</td><td>201.06</td><td>197.92</td><td>242.94</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.99</td><td>153.55</td><td>174.55</td><td>176.95</td><td>198.10</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) . Conversations: q0: what was the value of the kbw bank index in 2016? 258.82 q1: and what was the change in value of the stock from 2011 to 2016? 158.82 Question: how much does that change represent in relation to the original 2011 value? Answer:

1.5882

convfinqa56

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>backlog</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>4</td></tr></table> income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. . Conversations: Question: what was the weighted average useful life for trademarks? Answer:

9.0

convfinqa57

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>backlog</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>4</td></tr></table> income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. . Conversations: q0: what was the weighted average useful life for trademarks? 9.0 Question: what was, then, the average annual amortization expense for that segment? Answer:

11.11111

convfinqa58

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>backlog</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>4</td></tr></table> income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. . Conversations: q0: what was the weighted average useful life for trademarks? 9.0 q1: what was, then, the average annual amortization expense for that segment? 11.11111 Question: and what was it for the purchased technology one? Answer:

16.66667

convfinqa59

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2022 timing of available information , including the performance of first lien positions , and 2022 limitations of available historical data . pnc 2019s determination of the alll for non-impaired loans is sensitive to the risk grades assigned to commercial loans and loss rates for consumer loans . there are several other qualitative and quantitative factors considered in determining the alll . this sensitivity analysis does not necessarily reflect the nature and extent of future changes in the alll . it is intended to provide insight into the impact of adverse changes to risk grades and loss rates only and does not imply any expectation of future deterioration in the risk ratings or loss rates . given the current processes used , we believe the risk grades and loss rates currently assigned are appropriate . in the hypothetical event that the aggregate weighted average commercial loan risk grades would experience a 1% ( 1 % ) deterioration , assuming all other variables remain constant , the allowance for commercial loans would increase by approximately $ 35 million as of december 31 , 2014 . in the hypothetical event that consumer loss rates would increase by 10% ( 10 % ) , assuming all other variables remain constant , the allowance for consumer loans would increase by approximately $ 37 million at december 31 , 2014 . purchased impaired loans are initially recorded at fair value and applicable accounting guidance prohibits the carry over or creation of valuation allowances at acquisition . because the initial fair values of these loans already reflect a credit component , additional reserves are established when performance is expected to be worse than our expectations as of the acquisition date . at december 31 , 2014 , we had established reserves of $ .9 billion for purchased impaired loans . in addition , loans ( purchased impaired and non- impaired ) acquired after january 1 , 2009 were recorded at fair value . no allowance for loan losses was carried over and no allowance was created at the date of acquisition . see note 4 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . in determining the appropriateness of the alll , we make specific allocations to impaired loans and allocations to portfolios of commercial and consumer loans . we also allocate reserves to provide coverage for probable losses incurred in the portfolio at the balance sheet date based upon current market conditions , which may not be reflected in historical loss data . commercial lending is the largest category of credits and is sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the alll . we have allocated approximately $ 1.6 billion , or 47% ( 47 % ) , of the alll at december 31 , 2014 to the commercial lending category . consumer lending allocations are made based on historical loss experience adjusted for recent activity . approximately $ 1.7 billion , or 53% ( 53 % ) , of the alll at december 31 , 2014 has been allocated to these consumer lending categories . in addition to the alll , we maintain an allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . we report this allowance as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet . we maintain the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable losses on these unfunded credit facilities . we determine this amount using estimates of the probability of the ultimate funding and losses related to those credit exposures . other than the estimation of the probability of funding , this methodology is very similar to the one we use for determining our alll . we refer you to note 1 accounting policies and note 3 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for further information on certain key asset quality indicators that we use to evaluate our portfolios and establish the allowances . table 41 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs ( a )</td><td>-531 ( 531 )</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>273</td><td>643</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3331</td><td>$ 3609</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.27% ( .27 % )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.63</td><td>1.84</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -55 ( 55 )</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs ( a )</td><td>-476 ( 476 )</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -531 ( 531 )</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.04% ( .04 % )</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>0.62</td><td>1.07</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 273 million for 2014 compared to $ 643 million for 2013 . the primary drivers of the decrease to the provision were improved overall credit quality , including lower consumer loan delinquencies , and the increasing value of residential real estate which resulted in greater expected cash flows from our purchased impaired loans . for 2014 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses increased by $ 64 million , or 178% ( 178 % ) , from 2013 primarily due to continued growth in the commercial book , paired with slowing of the reserve releases related to credit quality improvement . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 434 million , or 71% ( 71 % ) , from 2013 . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 81 . Conversations: Question: what is the impact of total net charge-offs in the balance of allowance for loan and lease losses during 2014? Answer:

531.0

convfinqa60

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2022 timing of available information , including the performance of first lien positions , and 2022 limitations of available historical data . pnc 2019s determination of the alll for non-impaired loans is sensitive to the risk grades assigned to commercial loans and loss rates for consumer loans . there are several other qualitative and quantitative factors considered in determining the alll . this sensitivity analysis does not necessarily reflect the nature and extent of future changes in the alll . it is intended to provide insight into the impact of adverse changes to risk grades and loss rates only and does not imply any expectation of future deterioration in the risk ratings or loss rates . given the current processes used , we believe the risk grades and loss rates currently assigned are appropriate . in the hypothetical event that the aggregate weighted average commercial loan risk grades would experience a 1% ( 1 % ) deterioration , assuming all other variables remain constant , the allowance for commercial loans would increase by approximately $ 35 million as of december 31 , 2014 . in the hypothetical event that consumer loss rates would increase by 10% ( 10 % ) , assuming all other variables remain constant , the allowance for consumer loans would increase by approximately $ 37 million at december 31 , 2014 . purchased impaired loans are initially recorded at fair value and applicable accounting guidance prohibits the carry over or creation of valuation allowances at acquisition . because the initial fair values of these loans already reflect a credit component , additional reserves are established when performance is expected to be worse than our expectations as of the acquisition date . at december 31 , 2014 , we had established reserves of $ .9 billion for purchased impaired loans . in addition , loans ( purchased impaired and non- impaired ) acquired after january 1 , 2009 were recorded at fair value . no allowance for loan losses was carried over and no allowance was created at the date of acquisition . see note 4 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . in determining the appropriateness of the alll , we make specific allocations to impaired loans and allocations to portfolios of commercial and consumer loans . we also allocate reserves to provide coverage for probable losses incurred in the portfolio at the balance sheet date based upon current market conditions , which may not be reflected in historical loss data . commercial lending is the largest category of credits and is sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the alll . we have allocated approximately $ 1.6 billion , or 47% ( 47 % ) , of the alll at december 31 , 2014 to the commercial lending category . consumer lending allocations are made based on historical loss experience adjusted for recent activity . approximately $ 1.7 billion , or 53% ( 53 % ) , of the alll at december 31 , 2014 has been allocated to these consumer lending categories . in addition to the alll , we maintain an allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . we report this allowance as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet . we maintain the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable losses on these unfunded credit facilities . we determine this amount using estimates of the probability of the ultimate funding and losses related to those credit exposures . other than the estimation of the probability of funding , this methodology is very similar to the one we use for determining our alll . we refer you to note 1 accounting policies and note 3 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for further information on certain key asset quality indicators that we use to evaluate our portfolios and establish the allowances . table 41 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs ( a )</td><td>-531 ( 531 )</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>273</td><td>643</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3331</td><td>$ 3609</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.27% ( .27 % )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.63</td><td>1.84</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -55 ( 55 )</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs ( a )</td><td>-476 ( 476 )</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -531 ( 531 )</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.04% ( .04 % )</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>0.62</td><td>1.07</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 273 million for 2014 compared to $ 643 million for 2013 . the primary drivers of the decrease to the provision were improved overall credit quality , including lower consumer loan delinquencies , and the increasing value of residential real estate which resulted in greater expected cash flows from our purchased impaired loans . for 2014 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses increased by $ 64 million , or 178% ( 178 % ) , from 2013 primarily due to continued growth in the commercial book , paired with slowing of the reserve releases related to credit quality improvement . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 434 million , or 71% ( 71 % ) , from 2013 . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 81 . Conversations: q0: what is the impact of total net charge-offs in the balance of allowance for loan and lease losses during 2014? 531.0 Question: what about the balance of allowance for loan and lease losses as of december 31, 2014? Answer:

3609.0

convfinqa61

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2022 timing of available information , including the performance of first lien positions , and 2022 limitations of available historical data . pnc 2019s determination of the alll for non-impaired loans is sensitive to the risk grades assigned to commercial loans and loss rates for consumer loans . there are several other qualitative and quantitative factors considered in determining the alll . this sensitivity analysis does not necessarily reflect the nature and extent of future changes in the alll . it is intended to provide insight into the impact of adverse changes to risk grades and loss rates only and does not imply any expectation of future deterioration in the risk ratings or loss rates . given the current processes used , we believe the risk grades and loss rates currently assigned are appropriate . in the hypothetical event that the aggregate weighted average commercial loan risk grades would experience a 1% ( 1 % ) deterioration , assuming all other variables remain constant , the allowance for commercial loans would increase by approximately $ 35 million as of december 31 , 2014 . in the hypothetical event that consumer loss rates would increase by 10% ( 10 % ) , assuming all other variables remain constant , the allowance for consumer loans would increase by approximately $ 37 million at december 31 , 2014 . purchased impaired loans are initially recorded at fair value and applicable accounting guidance prohibits the carry over or creation of valuation allowances at acquisition . because the initial fair values of these loans already reflect a credit component , additional reserves are established when performance is expected to be worse than our expectations as of the acquisition date . at december 31 , 2014 , we had established reserves of $ .9 billion for purchased impaired loans . in addition , loans ( purchased impaired and non- impaired ) acquired after january 1 , 2009 were recorded at fair value . no allowance for loan losses was carried over and no allowance was created at the date of acquisition . see note 4 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . in determining the appropriateness of the alll , we make specific allocations to impaired loans and allocations to portfolios of commercial and consumer loans . we also allocate reserves to provide coverage for probable losses incurred in the portfolio at the balance sheet date based upon current market conditions , which may not be reflected in historical loss data . commercial lending is the largest category of credits and is sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the alll . we have allocated approximately $ 1.6 billion , or 47% ( 47 % ) , of the alll at december 31 , 2014 to the commercial lending category . consumer lending allocations are made based on historical loss experience adjusted for recent activity . approximately $ 1.7 billion , or 53% ( 53 % ) , of the alll at december 31 , 2014 has been allocated to these consumer lending categories . in addition to the alll , we maintain an allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . we report this allowance as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet . we maintain the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable losses on these unfunded credit facilities . we determine this amount using estimates of the probability of the ultimate funding and losses related to those credit exposures . other than the estimation of the probability of funding , this methodology is very similar to the one we use for determining our alll . we refer you to note 1 accounting policies and note 3 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for further information on certain key asset quality indicators that we use to evaluate our portfolios and establish the allowances . table 41 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs ( a )</td><td>-531 ( 531 )</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>273</td><td>643</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3331</td><td>$ 3609</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.27% ( .27 % )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.63</td><td>1.84</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -55 ( 55 )</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs ( a )</td><td>-476 ( 476 )</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -531 ( 531 )</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.04% ( .04 % )</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>0.62</td><td>1.07</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 273 million for 2014 compared to $ 643 million for 2013 . the primary drivers of the decrease to the provision were improved overall credit quality , including lower consumer loan delinquencies , and the increasing value of residential real estate which resulted in greater expected cash flows from our purchased impaired loans . for 2014 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses increased by $ 64 million , or 178% ( 178 % ) , from 2013 primarily due to continued growth in the commercial book , paired with slowing of the reserve releases related to credit quality improvement . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 434 million , or 71% ( 71 % ) , from 2013 . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 81 . Conversations: q0: what is the impact of total net charge-offs in the balance of allowance for loan and lease losses during 2014? 531.0 q1: what about the balance of allowance for loan and lease losses as of december 31, 2014? 3609.0 Question: what proportion is related to total net charge-offs? Answer:

0.14713

convfinqa62

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2022 timing of available information , including the performance of first lien positions , and 2022 limitations of available historical data . pnc 2019s determination of the alll for non-impaired loans is sensitive to the risk grades assigned to commercial loans and loss rates for consumer loans . there are several other qualitative and quantitative factors considered in determining the alll . this sensitivity analysis does not necessarily reflect the nature and extent of future changes in the alll . it is intended to provide insight into the impact of adverse changes to risk grades and loss rates only and does not imply any expectation of future deterioration in the risk ratings or loss rates . given the current processes used , we believe the risk grades and loss rates currently assigned are appropriate . in the hypothetical event that the aggregate weighted average commercial loan risk grades would experience a 1% ( 1 % ) deterioration , assuming all other variables remain constant , the allowance for commercial loans would increase by approximately $ 35 million as of december 31 , 2014 . in the hypothetical event that consumer loss rates would increase by 10% ( 10 % ) , assuming all other variables remain constant , the allowance for consumer loans would increase by approximately $ 37 million at december 31 , 2014 . purchased impaired loans are initially recorded at fair value and applicable accounting guidance prohibits the carry over or creation of valuation allowances at acquisition . because the initial fair values of these loans already reflect a credit component , additional reserves are established when performance is expected to be worse than our expectations as of the acquisition date . at december 31 , 2014 , we had established reserves of $ .9 billion for purchased impaired loans . in addition , loans ( purchased impaired and non- impaired ) acquired after january 1 , 2009 were recorded at fair value . no allowance for loan losses was carried over and no allowance was created at the date of acquisition . see note 4 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . in determining the appropriateness of the alll , we make specific allocations to impaired loans and allocations to portfolios of commercial and consumer loans . we also allocate reserves to provide coverage for probable losses incurred in the portfolio at the balance sheet date based upon current market conditions , which may not be reflected in historical loss data . commercial lending is the largest category of credits and is sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the alll . we have allocated approximately $ 1.6 billion , or 47% ( 47 % ) , of the alll at december 31 , 2014 to the commercial lending category . consumer lending allocations are made based on historical loss experience adjusted for recent activity . approximately $ 1.7 billion , or 53% ( 53 % ) , of the alll at december 31 , 2014 has been allocated to these consumer lending categories . in addition to the alll , we maintain an allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . we report this allowance as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet . we maintain the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb estimated probable losses on these unfunded credit facilities . we determine this amount using estimates of the probability of the ultimate funding and losses related to those credit exposures . other than the estimation of the probability of funding , this methodology is very similar to the one we use for determining our alll . we refer you to note 1 accounting policies and note 3 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for further information on certain key asset quality indicators that we use to evaluate our portfolios and establish the allowances . table 41 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs ( a )</td><td>-531 ( 531 )</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>273</td><td>643</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3331</td><td>$ 3609</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.27% ( .27 % )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.63</td><td>1.84</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -55 ( 55 )</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs ( a )</td><td>-476 ( 476 )</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -531 ( 531 )</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.04% ( .04 % )</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>0.62</td><td>1.07</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 273 million for 2014 compared to $ 643 million for 2013 . the primary drivers of the decrease to the provision were improved overall credit quality , including lower consumer loan delinquencies , and the increasing value of residential real estate which resulted in greater expected cash flows from our purchased impaired loans . for 2014 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses increased by $ 64 million , or 178% ( 178 % ) , from 2013 primarily due to continued growth in the commercial book , paired with slowing of the reserve releases related to credit quality improvement . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 434 million , or 71% ( 71 % ) , from 2013 . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 81 . Conversations: q0: what is the impact of total net charge-offs in the balance of allowance for loan and lease losses during 2014? 531.0 q1: what about the balance of allowance for loan and lease losses as of december 31, 2014? 3609.0 q2: what proportion is related to total net charge-offs? 0.14713 Question: what is the ratio of provision for credit losses in 2014 to 2013? Answer:

0.42457

convfinqa63

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: long-term product offerings include alpha-seeking active and index strategies . our alpha-seeking active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile , and leverage fundamental research and quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both alpha-seeking active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . net flows in institutional index products generally have a small impact on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2017 equity aum totaled $ 3.372 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 130.1 billion . net inflows included $ 174.4 billion into ishares etfs , driven by net inflows into core funds and broad developed and emerging market equities , partially offset by non-etf index and active net outflows of $ 25.7 billion and $ 18.5 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s equity revenues and effective fee rate . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2017 at $ 1.855 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 178.8 billion . in 2017 , active net inflows of $ 21.5 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows into municipal , unconstrained and total return bond funds . ishares etfs net inflows of $ 67.5 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and treasury bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 89.8 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2017 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312016</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fximpact</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 176675</td><td>$ -2502 ( 2502 )</td><td>$ 17387</td><td>$ 4985</td><td>$ 196545</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>149432</td><td>23925</td><td>24532</td><td>1577</td><td>199466</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>68395</td><td>-1047 ( 1047 )</td><td>7522</td><td>8819</td><td>83689</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>505</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td><td>119</td><td>2014</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 395007</td><td>$ 20330</td><td>$ 49560</td><td>$ 15381</td><td>$ 480278</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) futureadvisor amounts do not include aum held in ishares etfs . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 18.9 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 20.8 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2017 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 1.1 billion reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 5.8 billion in 2017 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 41% ( 41 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 16% ( 16 % ) organically in 2017 , with net inflows of $ 23.9 billion . institutional investors represented 93% ( 93 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 87% ( 87 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary active asset allocation overlay model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . underlying investments are primarily index products . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of investment management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. . Conversations: Question: what is the net change in value of the balance of asset allocation from 2016 to 2017? Answer:

19870.0

convfinqa64

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: long-term product offerings include alpha-seeking active and index strategies . our alpha-seeking active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile , and leverage fundamental research and quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both alpha-seeking active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . net flows in institutional index products generally have a small impact on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2017 equity aum totaled $ 3.372 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 130.1 billion . net inflows included $ 174.4 billion into ishares etfs , driven by net inflows into core funds and broad developed and emerging market equities , partially offset by non-etf index and active net outflows of $ 25.7 billion and $ 18.5 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s equity revenues and effective fee rate . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2017 at $ 1.855 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 178.8 billion . in 2017 , active net inflows of $ 21.5 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows into municipal , unconstrained and total return bond funds . ishares etfs net inflows of $ 67.5 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and treasury bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 89.8 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2017 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312016</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fximpact</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 176675</td><td>$ -2502 ( 2502 )</td><td>$ 17387</td><td>$ 4985</td><td>$ 196545</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>149432</td><td>23925</td><td>24532</td><td>1577</td><td>199466</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>68395</td><td>-1047 ( 1047 )</td><td>7522</td><td>8819</td><td>83689</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>505</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td><td>119</td><td>2014</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 395007</td><td>$ 20330</td><td>$ 49560</td><td>$ 15381</td><td>$ 480278</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) futureadvisor amounts do not include aum held in ishares etfs . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 18.9 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 20.8 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2017 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 1.1 billion reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 5.8 billion in 2017 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 41% ( 41 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 16% ( 16 % ) organically in 2017 , with net inflows of $ 23.9 billion . institutional investors represented 93% ( 93 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 87% ( 87 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary active asset allocation overlay model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . underlying investments are primarily index products . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of investment management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. . Conversations: q0: what is the net change in value of the balance of asset allocation from 2016 to 2017? 19870.0 Question: what was the 2016 value? Answer:

176675.0

convfinqa65

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: long-term product offerings include alpha-seeking active and index strategies . our alpha-seeking active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile , and leverage fundamental research and quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both alpha-seeking active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . net flows in institutional index products generally have a small impact on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2017 equity aum totaled $ 3.372 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 130.1 billion . net inflows included $ 174.4 billion into ishares etfs , driven by net inflows into core funds and broad developed and emerging market equities , partially offset by non-etf index and active net outflows of $ 25.7 billion and $ 18.5 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s equity revenues and effective fee rate . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2017 at $ 1.855 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 178.8 billion . in 2017 , active net inflows of $ 21.5 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows into municipal , unconstrained and total return bond funds . ishares etfs net inflows of $ 67.5 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and treasury bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 89.8 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2017 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312016</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fximpact</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 176675</td><td>$ -2502 ( 2502 )</td><td>$ 17387</td><td>$ 4985</td><td>$ 196545</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>149432</td><td>23925</td><td>24532</td><td>1577</td><td>199466</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>68395</td><td>-1047 ( 1047 )</td><td>7522</td><td>8819</td><td>83689</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>505</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td><td>119</td><td>2014</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 395007</td><td>$ 20330</td><td>$ 49560</td><td>$ 15381</td><td>$ 480278</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) futureadvisor amounts do not include aum held in ishares etfs . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 18.9 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 20.8 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2017 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 1.1 billion reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 5.8 billion in 2017 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 41% ( 41 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 16% ( 16 % ) organically in 2017 , with net inflows of $ 23.9 billion . institutional investors represented 93% ( 93 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 87% ( 87 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary active asset allocation overlay model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . underlying investments are primarily index products . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of investment management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. . Conversations: q0: what is the net change in value of the balance of asset allocation from 2016 to 2017? 19870.0 q1: what was the 2016 value? 176675.0 Question: what is the percent change? Answer:

0.11247

convfinqa66

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: of exercise for stock options exercised or at period end for outstanding stock options , less the applicable exercise price . the company issued new shares to satisfy exercised stock options . compensation expense the company recorded $ 43 million , $ 34 million , and $ 44 million of expense related to stock awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded $ 17 million , $ 13 million , and $ 17 million as a tax benefit related to stock awards and stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , of $ 41 million , $ 53 million , and $ 32 million , respectively , from the issuance of stock in settlement of stock awards , and $ 4 million , $ 5 million , and $ 4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , from the exercise of stock options . unrecognized compensation expense as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had less than $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with rsrs granted in 2015 and 2014 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 year , and $ 25 million of unrecognized expense associated with rpsrs granted in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.6 years . as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had no unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options . compensation expense for stock options was fully recognized as of december 31 , 2013 . 20 . unaudited selected quarterly data unaudited quarterly financial results for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , are set forth in the following tables: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 1st qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 2nd qtr ( 1 )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 3rd qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 4th qtr ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 1570</td><td>$ 1745</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ 1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>156</td><td>269</td><td>200</td><td>144</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) before income taxes</td><td>133</td><td>244</td><td>175</td><td>80</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>87</td><td>156</td><td>111</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.80</td><td>$ 3.22</td><td>$ 2.31</td><td>$ 1.07</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.79</td><td>$ 3.20</td><td>$ 2.29</td><td>$ 1.06</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in the second quarter of 2015 , the company recorded a $ 59 million goodwill impairment charge . during the same period , the company recorded $ 136 million of operating income as a result of the aon settlement . ( 2 ) in the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company recorded $ 16 million goodwill impairment and $ 27 million intangible asset impairment charges. . Conversations: Question: what is the compensation expense the company recorded in 2015? Answer:

43.0

convfinqa67

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: of exercise for stock options exercised or at period end for outstanding stock options , less the applicable exercise price . the company issued new shares to satisfy exercised stock options . compensation expense the company recorded $ 43 million , $ 34 million , and $ 44 million of expense related to stock awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded $ 17 million , $ 13 million , and $ 17 million as a tax benefit related to stock awards and stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , of $ 41 million , $ 53 million , and $ 32 million , respectively , from the issuance of stock in settlement of stock awards , and $ 4 million , $ 5 million , and $ 4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , from the exercise of stock options . unrecognized compensation expense as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had less than $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with rsrs granted in 2015 and 2014 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 year , and $ 25 million of unrecognized expense associated with rpsrs granted in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.6 years . as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had no unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options . compensation expense for stock options was fully recognized as of december 31 , 2013 . 20 . unaudited selected quarterly data unaudited quarterly financial results for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , are set forth in the following tables: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 1st qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 2nd qtr ( 1 )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 3rd qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 4th qtr ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 1570</td><td>$ 1745</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ 1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>156</td><td>269</td><td>200</td><td>144</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) before income taxes</td><td>133</td><td>244</td><td>175</td><td>80</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>87</td><td>156</td><td>111</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.80</td><td>$ 3.22</td><td>$ 2.31</td><td>$ 1.07</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.79</td><td>$ 3.20</td><td>$ 2.29</td><td>$ 1.06</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in the second quarter of 2015 , the company recorded a $ 59 million goodwill impairment charge . during the same period , the company recorded $ 136 million of operating income as a result of the aon settlement . ( 2 ) in the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company recorded $ 16 million goodwill impairment and $ 27 million intangible asset impairment charges. . Conversations: q0: what is the compensation expense the company recorded in 2015? 43.0 Question: what about in 2014? Answer:

34.0

convfinqa68

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: of exercise for stock options exercised or at period end for outstanding stock options , less the applicable exercise price . the company issued new shares to satisfy exercised stock options . compensation expense the company recorded $ 43 million , $ 34 million , and $ 44 million of expense related to stock awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded $ 17 million , $ 13 million , and $ 17 million as a tax benefit related to stock awards and stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , of $ 41 million , $ 53 million , and $ 32 million , respectively , from the issuance of stock in settlement of stock awards , and $ 4 million , $ 5 million , and $ 4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , from the exercise of stock options . unrecognized compensation expense as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had less than $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with rsrs granted in 2015 and 2014 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 year , and $ 25 million of unrecognized expense associated with rpsrs granted in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.6 years . as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had no unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options . compensation expense for stock options was fully recognized as of december 31 , 2013 . 20 . unaudited selected quarterly data unaudited quarterly financial results for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , are set forth in the following tables: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 1st qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 2nd qtr ( 1 )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 3rd qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 4th qtr ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 1570</td><td>$ 1745</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ 1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>156</td><td>269</td><td>200</td><td>144</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) before income taxes</td><td>133</td><td>244</td><td>175</td><td>80</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>87</td><td>156</td><td>111</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.80</td><td>$ 3.22</td><td>$ 2.31</td><td>$ 1.07</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.79</td><td>$ 3.20</td><td>$ 2.29</td><td>$ 1.06</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in the second quarter of 2015 , the company recorded a $ 59 million goodwill impairment charge . during the same period , the company recorded $ 136 million of operating income as a result of the aon settlement . ( 2 ) in the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company recorded $ 16 million goodwill impairment and $ 27 million intangible asset impairment charges. . Conversations: q0: what is the compensation expense the company recorded in 2015? 43.0 q1: what about in 2014? 34.0 Question: what is the total compensation expense the company recorded in 2015 and 2014? Answer:

77.0

convfinqa69

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: of exercise for stock options exercised or at period end for outstanding stock options , less the applicable exercise price . the company issued new shares to satisfy exercised stock options . compensation expense the company recorded $ 43 million , $ 34 million , and $ 44 million of expense related to stock awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded $ 17 million , $ 13 million , and $ 17 million as a tax benefit related to stock awards and stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , of $ 41 million , $ 53 million , and $ 32 million , respectively , from the issuance of stock in settlement of stock awards , and $ 4 million , $ 5 million , and $ 4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , from the exercise of stock options . unrecognized compensation expense as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had less than $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with rsrs granted in 2015 and 2014 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 year , and $ 25 million of unrecognized expense associated with rpsrs granted in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.6 years . as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had no unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options . compensation expense for stock options was fully recognized as of december 31 , 2013 . 20 . unaudited selected quarterly data unaudited quarterly financial results for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , are set forth in the following tables: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 1st qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 2nd qtr ( 1 )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 3rd qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 4th qtr ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 1570</td><td>$ 1745</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ 1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>156</td><td>269</td><td>200</td><td>144</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) before income taxes</td><td>133</td><td>244</td><td>175</td><td>80</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>87</td><td>156</td><td>111</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.80</td><td>$ 3.22</td><td>$ 2.31</td><td>$ 1.07</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.79</td><td>$ 3.20</td><td>$ 2.29</td><td>$ 1.06</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in the second quarter of 2015 , the company recorded a $ 59 million goodwill impairment charge . during the same period , the company recorded $ 136 million of operating income as a result of the aon settlement . ( 2 ) in the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company recorded $ 16 million goodwill impairment and $ 27 million intangible asset impairment charges. . Conversations: q0: what is the compensation expense the company recorded in 2015? 43.0 q1: what about in 2014? 34.0 q2: what is the total compensation expense the company recorded in 2015 and 2014? 77.0 Question: what is the total expenses including 2013? Answer:

121.0

convfinqa70

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: of exercise for stock options exercised or at period end for outstanding stock options , less the applicable exercise price . the company issued new shares to satisfy exercised stock options . compensation expense the company recorded $ 43 million , $ 34 million , and $ 44 million of expense related to stock awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded $ 17 million , $ 13 million , and $ 17 million as a tax benefit related to stock awards and stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , of $ 41 million , $ 53 million , and $ 32 million , respectively , from the issuance of stock in settlement of stock awards , and $ 4 million , $ 5 million , and $ 4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , from the exercise of stock options . unrecognized compensation expense as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had less than $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with rsrs granted in 2015 and 2014 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 year , and $ 25 million of unrecognized expense associated with rpsrs granted in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.6 years . as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had no unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options . compensation expense for stock options was fully recognized as of december 31 , 2013 . 20 . unaudited selected quarterly data unaudited quarterly financial results for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , are set forth in the following tables: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 1st qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 2nd qtr ( 1 )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 3rd qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 4th qtr ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 1570</td><td>$ 1745</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ 1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>156</td><td>269</td><td>200</td><td>144</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) before income taxes</td><td>133</td><td>244</td><td>175</td><td>80</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>87</td><td>156</td><td>111</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.80</td><td>$ 3.22</td><td>$ 2.31</td><td>$ 1.07</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.79</td><td>$ 3.20</td><td>$ 2.29</td><td>$ 1.06</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in the second quarter of 2015 , the company recorded a $ 59 million goodwill impairment charge . during the same period , the company recorded $ 136 million of operating income as a result of the aon settlement . ( 2 ) in the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company recorded $ 16 million goodwill impairment and $ 27 million intangible asset impairment charges. . Conversations: q0: what is the compensation expense the company recorded in 2015? 43.0 q1: what about in 2014? 34.0 q2: what is the total compensation expense the company recorded in 2015 and 2014? 77.0 q3: what is the total expenses including 2013? 121.0 Question: what is the average for three years? Answer:

40.33333

convfinqa71

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 19 . subsequent events 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes and warrants offering 2014in january 2003 , the company issued 808000 units , each consisting of ( 1 ) $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 of a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( ati notes ) and ( 2 ) a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock of the company , for gross proceeds of $ 420.0 million . the gross offering proceeds were allocated between the ati notes ( $ 367.4 million ) and the fair value of the warrants ( $ 52.6 million ) . net proceeds from the offering aggregated approximately $ 397.0 million and were or will be used for the purposes described below under amended and restated loan agreement . the ati notes accrue no cash interest . instead , the accreted value of each ati note will increase between the date of original issuance and maturity ( august 1 , 2008 ) at a rate of 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) per annum . the 808000 warrants that were issued together with the ati notes each represent the right to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock at $ 0.01 per share . the warrants are exercisable at any time on or after january 29 , 2006 and will expire on august 1 , 2008 . as of the issuance date , the warrants represented approximately 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) of the company 2019s outstanding common stock ( assuming exercise of all warrants ) . the indenture governing the ati notes contains covenants that , among other things , limit the ability of the issuer subsidiary and its guarantors to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness , create liens , pay dividends or make other equity distributions , enter into agreements restricting the restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability to pay dividends , purchase or redeem capital stock , make investments and sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies . the ati notes rank junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness , including all indebtedness outstanding under the credit facilities , and are structurally senior in right of payment to all existing and future indebtedness of the company . amended and restated loan agreement 2014on february 21 , 2003 , the company completed an amendment to its credit facilities . the amendment provides for the following : 2022 prepayment of a portion of outstanding term loans . the company agreed to prepay an aggregate of $ 200.0 million of the term loans outstanding under the credit facilities from a portion of the net proceeds of the ati notes offering completed in january 2003 . this prepayment consisted of a $ 125.0 million prepayment of the term loan a and a $ 75.0 million prepayment of the term loan b , each to be applied to reduce future scheduled principal payments . giving effect to the prepayment of $ 200.0 million of term loans under the credit facility and the issuance of the ati notes as discussed above as well as the paydown of debt from net proceeds of the sale of mtn ( $ 24.5 million in february 2003 ) , the company 2019s aggregate principal payments of long- term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 268496</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>131262</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>195082</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>538479</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>1065437</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1408783</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3607539</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: what is the sum value of expected payments for principal of long-term debt in 2003 and 2004? Answer:

399758.0

convfinqa72

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 19 . subsequent events 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes and warrants offering 2014in january 2003 , the company issued 808000 units , each consisting of ( 1 ) $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 of a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( ati notes ) and ( 2 ) a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock of the company , for gross proceeds of $ 420.0 million . the gross offering proceeds were allocated between the ati notes ( $ 367.4 million ) and the fair value of the warrants ( $ 52.6 million ) . net proceeds from the offering aggregated approximately $ 397.0 million and were or will be used for the purposes described below under amended and restated loan agreement . the ati notes accrue no cash interest . instead , the accreted value of each ati note will increase between the date of original issuance and maturity ( august 1 , 2008 ) at a rate of 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) per annum . the 808000 warrants that were issued together with the ati notes each represent the right to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock at $ 0.01 per share . the warrants are exercisable at any time on or after january 29 , 2006 and will expire on august 1 , 2008 . as of the issuance date , the warrants represented approximately 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) of the company 2019s outstanding common stock ( assuming exercise of all warrants ) . the indenture governing the ati notes contains covenants that , among other things , limit the ability of the issuer subsidiary and its guarantors to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness , create liens , pay dividends or make other equity distributions , enter into agreements restricting the restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability to pay dividends , purchase or redeem capital stock , make investments and sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies . the ati notes rank junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness , including all indebtedness outstanding under the credit facilities , and are structurally senior in right of payment to all existing and future indebtedness of the company . amended and restated loan agreement 2014on february 21 , 2003 , the company completed an amendment to its credit facilities . the amendment provides for the following : 2022 prepayment of a portion of outstanding term loans . the company agreed to prepay an aggregate of $ 200.0 million of the term loans outstanding under the credit facilities from a portion of the net proceeds of the ati notes offering completed in january 2003 . this prepayment consisted of a $ 125.0 million prepayment of the term loan a and a $ 75.0 million prepayment of the term loan b , each to be applied to reduce future scheduled principal payments . giving effect to the prepayment of $ 200.0 million of term loans under the credit facility and the issuance of the ati notes as discussed above as well as the paydown of debt from net proceeds of the sale of mtn ( $ 24.5 million in february 2003 ) , the company 2019s aggregate principal payments of long- term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 268496</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>131262</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>195082</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>538479</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>1065437</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1408783</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3607539</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what is the sum value of expected payments for principal of long-term debt in 2003 and 2004? 399758.0 Question: what is the total sum value including 2005? Answer:

594840.0

convfinqa73

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 . there were no gross realized losses for 2003 . maturities stated are effective maturities . f . restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . g . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively . in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . h . investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 . the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>furniture and equipment</td><td>$ 98387</td><td>$ 90893</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leasehold improvements</td><td>66318</td><td>65294</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>computers</td><td>18971</td><td>18421</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>software</td><td>18683</td><td>16411</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total property and equipment gross</td><td>202359</td><td>191019</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>147826</td><td>126794</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total property and equipment net</td><td>$ 54533</td><td>$ 64225</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: what was the net loss on disposal of assets in 2005? Answer:

344000.0

convfinqa74

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 . there were no gross realized losses for 2003 . maturities stated are effective maturities . f . restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . g . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively . in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . h . investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 . the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>furniture and equipment</td><td>$ 98387</td><td>$ 90893</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leasehold improvements</td><td>66318</td><td>65294</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>computers</td><td>18971</td><td>18421</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>software</td><td>18683</td><td>16411</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total property and equipment gross</td><td>202359</td><td>191019</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>147826</td><td>126794</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total property and equipment net</td><td>$ 54533</td><td>$ 64225</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the net loss on disposal of assets in 2005? 344000.0 Question: what was the value in 2004? Answer:

43000.0

convfinqa75

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 . there were no gross realized losses for 2003 . maturities stated are effective maturities . f . restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . g . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively . in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . h . investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 . the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>furniture and equipment</td><td>$ 98387</td><td>$ 90893</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leasehold improvements</td><td>66318</td><td>65294</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>computers</td><td>18971</td><td>18421</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>software</td><td>18683</td><td>16411</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total property and equipment gross</td><td>202359</td><td>191019</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>147826</td><td>126794</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total property and equipment net</td><td>$ 54533</td><td>$ 64225</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the net loss on disposal of assets in 2005? 344000.0 q1: what was the value in 2004? 43000.0 Question: what was the change in value? Answer:

301000.0

convfinqa76

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 . there were no gross realized losses for 2003 . maturities stated are effective maturities . f . restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . g . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively . in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . h . investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 . the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>furniture and equipment</td><td>$ 98387</td><td>$ 90893</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leasehold improvements</td><td>66318</td><td>65294</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>computers</td><td>18971</td><td>18421</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>software</td><td>18683</td><td>16411</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total property and equipment gross</td><td>202359</td><td>191019</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>147826</td><td>126794</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total property and equipment net</td><td>$ 54533</td><td>$ 64225</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the net loss on disposal of assets in 2005? 344000.0 q1: what was the value in 2004? 43000.0 q2: what was the change in value? 301000.0 Question: what was the percent change? Answer:

7.0

convfinqa77

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 105</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 198</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>146</td><td>149</td><td>172</td><td>228</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>132</td><td>109</td><td>141</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>98</td><td>121</td><td>93</td><td>122</td><td>168</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: what is the fraction change of the investment in s&p500 from 2008 to 2013? Answer:

2.28

convfinqa78

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 105</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 198</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>146</td><td>149</td><td>172</td><td>228</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>132</td><td>109</td><td>141</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>98</td><td>121</td><td>93</td><td>122</td><td>168</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what is the fraction change of the investment in s&p500 from 2008 to 2013? 2.28 Question: what is the initial value in 2008? Answer:

100.0

convfinqa79

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 105</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 198</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>146</td><td>149</td><td>172</td><td>228</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>132</td><td>109</td><td>141</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>98</td><td>121</td><td>93</td><td>122</td><td>168</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what is the fraction change of the investment in s&p500 from 2008 to 2013? 2.28 q1: what is the initial value in 2008? 100.0 Question: what percentage change does this repreent? Answer:

0.0228

convfinqa80

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis fully phased-in capital ratios the table below presents our estimated ratio of cet1 to rwas calculated under the basel iii advanced rules and the standardized capital rules on a fully phased-in basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>$ 73597</td><td>$ 71267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets net of deferred tax liabilities</td><td>-3196 ( 3196 )</td><td>-3468 ( 3468 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions</td><td>-4928 ( 4928 )</td><td>-9091 ( 9091 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other adjustments</td><td>-1213 ( 1213 )</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cet1</td><td>$ 64260</td><td>$ 58219</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basel iii advanced rwas</td><td>$ 577869</td><td>$ 594662</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>basel iii advanced cet1 ratio</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>standardized rwas</td><td>$ 627444</td><td>$ 635092</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>standardized cet1 ratio</td><td>10.2% ( 10.2 % )</td><td>9.2% ( 9.2 % )</td></tr></table> although the fully phased-in capital ratios are not applicable until 2019 , we believe that the estimated ratios in the table above are meaningful because they are measures that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the estimated fully phased-in basel iii advanced and standardized cet1 ratios are non-gaap measures as of both december 2014 and december 2013 and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies ( as of those dates ) . these estimated ratios are based on our current interpretation , expectations and understanding of the revised capital framework and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for information about our transitional capital ratios , which represent our binding ratios as of december 2014 . in the table above : 2030 the deduction for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets , net of deferred tax liabilities , represents goodwill of $ 3.65 billion and $ 3.71 billion as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 515 million and $ 671 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , net of associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 964 million and $ 908 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively . 2030 the deduction for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions represents the amount by which our investments in the capital of nonconsolidated financial institutions exceed certain prescribed thresholds . the decrease from december 2013 to december 2014 primarily reflects reductions in our fund investments . 2030 other adjustments primarily include the overfunded portion of our defined benefit pension plan obligation , net of associated deferred tax liabilities , and disallowed deferred tax assets , credit valuation adjustments on derivative liabilities and debt valuation adjustments , as well as other required credit risk-based deductions . supplementary leverage ratio the revised capital framework introduces a new supplementary leverage ratio for advanced approach banking organizations . under amendments to the revised capital framework , the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies approved a final rule that implements the supplementary leverage ratio aligned with the definition of leverage established by the basel committee . the supplementary leverage ratio compares tier 1 capital to a measure of leverage exposure , defined as the sum of our quarterly average assets less certain deductions plus certain off-balance-sheet exposures , including a measure of derivatives exposures and commitments . the revised capital framework requires a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ( comprised of the minimum requirement of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) and a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) buffer ) for u.s . banks deemed to be g-sibs , effective on january 1 , 2018 . certain disclosures regarding the supplementary leverage ratio are required beginning in the first quarter of 2015 . as of december 2014 , our estimated supplementary leverage ratio was 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , including tier 1 capital on a fully phased-in basis of $ 73.17 billion ( cet1 of $ 64.26 billion plus perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock of $ 9.20 billion less other adjustments of $ 290 million ) divided by total leverage exposure of $ 1.45 trillion ( total quarterly average assets of $ 873 billion plus adjustments of $ 579 billion , primarily comprised of off-balance-sheet exposure related to derivatives and commitments ) . we believe that the estimated supplementary leverage ratio is meaningful because it is a measure that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the supplementary leverage ratio is a non-gaap measure and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies . this estimated supplementary leverage ratio is based on our current interpretation and understanding of the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies 2019 final rule and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . 60 goldman sachs 2014 annual report . Conversations: Question: what is the net change in standardized rwas from 2013 to 2014? Answer:

-7648.0

convfinqa81

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis fully phased-in capital ratios the table below presents our estimated ratio of cet1 to rwas calculated under the basel iii advanced rules and the standardized capital rules on a fully phased-in basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>$ 73597</td><td>$ 71267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets net of deferred tax liabilities</td><td>-3196 ( 3196 )</td><td>-3468 ( 3468 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions</td><td>-4928 ( 4928 )</td><td>-9091 ( 9091 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other adjustments</td><td>-1213 ( 1213 )</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cet1</td><td>$ 64260</td><td>$ 58219</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basel iii advanced rwas</td><td>$ 577869</td><td>$ 594662</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>basel iii advanced cet1 ratio</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>standardized rwas</td><td>$ 627444</td><td>$ 635092</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>standardized cet1 ratio</td><td>10.2% ( 10.2 % )</td><td>9.2% ( 9.2 % )</td></tr></table> although the fully phased-in capital ratios are not applicable until 2019 , we believe that the estimated ratios in the table above are meaningful because they are measures that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the estimated fully phased-in basel iii advanced and standardized cet1 ratios are non-gaap measures as of both december 2014 and december 2013 and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies ( as of those dates ) . these estimated ratios are based on our current interpretation , expectations and understanding of the revised capital framework and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for information about our transitional capital ratios , which represent our binding ratios as of december 2014 . in the table above : 2030 the deduction for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets , net of deferred tax liabilities , represents goodwill of $ 3.65 billion and $ 3.71 billion as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 515 million and $ 671 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , net of associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 964 million and $ 908 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively . 2030 the deduction for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions represents the amount by which our investments in the capital of nonconsolidated financial institutions exceed certain prescribed thresholds . the decrease from december 2013 to december 2014 primarily reflects reductions in our fund investments . 2030 other adjustments primarily include the overfunded portion of our defined benefit pension plan obligation , net of associated deferred tax liabilities , and disallowed deferred tax assets , credit valuation adjustments on derivative liabilities and debt valuation adjustments , as well as other required credit risk-based deductions . supplementary leverage ratio the revised capital framework introduces a new supplementary leverage ratio for advanced approach banking organizations . under amendments to the revised capital framework , the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies approved a final rule that implements the supplementary leverage ratio aligned with the definition of leverage established by the basel committee . the supplementary leverage ratio compares tier 1 capital to a measure of leverage exposure , defined as the sum of our quarterly average assets less certain deductions plus certain off-balance-sheet exposures , including a measure of derivatives exposures and commitments . the revised capital framework requires a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ( comprised of the minimum requirement of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) and a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) buffer ) for u.s . banks deemed to be g-sibs , effective on january 1 , 2018 . certain disclosures regarding the supplementary leverage ratio are required beginning in the first quarter of 2015 . as of december 2014 , our estimated supplementary leverage ratio was 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , including tier 1 capital on a fully phased-in basis of $ 73.17 billion ( cet1 of $ 64.26 billion plus perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock of $ 9.20 billion less other adjustments of $ 290 million ) divided by total leverage exposure of $ 1.45 trillion ( total quarterly average assets of $ 873 billion plus adjustments of $ 579 billion , primarily comprised of off-balance-sheet exposure related to derivatives and commitments ) . we believe that the estimated supplementary leverage ratio is meaningful because it is a measure that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the supplementary leverage ratio is a non-gaap measure and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies . this estimated supplementary leverage ratio is based on our current interpretation and understanding of the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies 2019 final rule and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . 60 goldman sachs 2014 annual report . Conversations: q0: what is the net change in standardized rwas from 2013 to 2014? -7648.0 Question: what is the balance of standardized rwas in 2013? Answer:

635092.0

convfinqa82

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis fully phased-in capital ratios the table below presents our estimated ratio of cet1 to rwas calculated under the basel iii advanced rules and the standardized capital rules on a fully phased-in basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>$ 73597</td><td>$ 71267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets net of deferred tax liabilities</td><td>-3196 ( 3196 )</td><td>-3468 ( 3468 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions</td><td>-4928 ( 4928 )</td><td>-9091 ( 9091 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other adjustments</td><td>-1213 ( 1213 )</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cet1</td><td>$ 64260</td><td>$ 58219</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basel iii advanced rwas</td><td>$ 577869</td><td>$ 594662</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>basel iii advanced cet1 ratio</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>standardized rwas</td><td>$ 627444</td><td>$ 635092</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>standardized cet1 ratio</td><td>10.2% ( 10.2 % )</td><td>9.2% ( 9.2 % )</td></tr></table> although the fully phased-in capital ratios are not applicable until 2019 , we believe that the estimated ratios in the table above are meaningful because they are measures that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the estimated fully phased-in basel iii advanced and standardized cet1 ratios are non-gaap measures as of both december 2014 and december 2013 and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies ( as of those dates ) . these estimated ratios are based on our current interpretation , expectations and understanding of the revised capital framework and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for information about our transitional capital ratios , which represent our binding ratios as of december 2014 . in the table above : 2030 the deduction for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets , net of deferred tax liabilities , represents goodwill of $ 3.65 billion and $ 3.71 billion as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 515 million and $ 671 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , net of associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 964 million and $ 908 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively . 2030 the deduction for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions represents the amount by which our investments in the capital of nonconsolidated financial institutions exceed certain prescribed thresholds . the decrease from december 2013 to december 2014 primarily reflects reductions in our fund investments . 2030 other adjustments primarily include the overfunded portion of our defined benefit pension plan obligation , net of associated deferred tax liabilities , and disallowed deferred tax assets , credit valuation adjustments on derivative liabilities and debt valuation adjustments , as well as other required credit risk-based deductions . supplementary leverage ratio the revised capital framework introduces a new supplementary leverage ratio for advanced approach banking organizations . under amendments to the revised capital framework , the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies approved a final rule that implements the supplementary leverage ratio aligned with the definition of leverage established by the basel committee . the supplementary leverage ratio compares tier 1 capital to a measure of leverage exposure , defined as the sum of our quarterly average assets less certain deductions plus certain off-balance-sheet exposures , including a measure of derivatives exposures and commitments . the revised capital framework requires a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ( comprised of the minimum requirement of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) and a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) buffer ) for u.s . banks deemed to be g-sibs , effective on january 1 , 2018 . certain disclosures regarding the supplementary leverage ratio are required beginning in the first quarter of 2015 . as of december 2014 , our estimated supplementary leverage ratio was 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , including tier 1 capital on a fully phased-in basis of $ 73.17 billion ( cet1 of $ 64.26 billion plus perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock of $ 9.20 billion less other adjustments of $ 290 million ) divided by total leverage exposure of $ 1.45 trillion ( total quarterly average assets of $ 873 billion plus adjustments of $ 579 billion , primarily comprised of off-balance-sheet exposure related to derivatives and commitments ) . we believe that the estimated supplementary leverage ratio is meaningful because it is a measure that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the supplementary leverage ratio is a non-gaap measure and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies . this estimated supplementary leverage ratio is based on our current interpretation and understanding of the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies 2019 final rule and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . 60 goldman sachs 2014 annual report . Conversations: q0: what is the net change in standardized rwas from 2013 to 2014? -7648.0 q1: what is the balance of standardized rwas in 2013? 635092.0 Question: what percentage change does this represent? Answer:

-0.01204

convfinqa83

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: maturity requirements on long-term debt as of december 31 , 2018 by year are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 124176</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>159979</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>195848</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>267587</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>3945053</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024 and thereafter</td><td>475000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5167643</td></tr></table> credit facility we are party to a credit facility agreement with bank of america , n.a. , as administrative agent , and a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders and other agents ( as amended from time to time , the 201ccredit facility 201d ) . as of december 31 , 2018 , the credit facility provided for secured financing comprised of ( i ) a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 201crevolving credit facility 201d ) ; ( ii ) a $ 1.5 billion term loan ( the 201cterm a loan 201d ) , ( iii ) a $ 1.37 billion term loan ( the 201cterm a-2 loan 201d ) , ( iv ) a $ 1.14 billion term loan facility ( the 201cterm b-2 loan 201d ) and ( v ) a $ 500 million term loan ( the 201cterm b-4 loan 201d ) . substantially all of the assets of our domestic subsidiaries are pledged as collateral under the credit facility . the borrowings outstanding under our credit facility as of december 31 , 2018 reflect amounts borrowed for acquisitions and other activities we completed in 2018 , including a reduction to the interest rate margins applicable to our term a loan , term a-2 loan , term b-2 loan and the revolving credit facility , an extension of the maturity dates of the term a loan , term a-2 loan and the revolving credit facility , and an increase in the total financing capacity under the credit facility to approximately $ 5.5 billion in june 2018 . in october 2018 , we entered into an additional term loan under the credit facility in the amount of $ 500 million ( the 201cterm b-4 loan 201d ) . we used the proceeds from the term b-4 loan to pay down a portion of the balance outstanding under our revolving credit facility . the credit facility provides for an interest rate , at our election , of either libor or a base rate , in each case plus a margin . as of december 31 , 2018 , the interest rates on the term a loan , the term a-2 loan , the term b-2 loan and the term b-4 loan were 4.02% ( 4.02 % ) , 4.01% ( 4.01 % ) , 4.27% ( 4.27 % ) and 4.27% ( 4.27 % ) , respectively , and the interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) . in addition , we are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee with respect to the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at an applicable rate per annum ranging from 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) to 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) depending on our leverage ratio . the term a loan and the term a-2 loan mature , and the revolving credit facility expires , on january 20 , 2023 . the term b-2 loan matures on april 22 , 2023 . the term b-4 loan matures on october 18 , 2025 . the term a loan and term a-2 loan principal amounts must each be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) of principal through june 2019 , increasing to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) of principal through june 2021 , increasing to 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) of principal through june 2022 and increasing to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) of principal through december 2022 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in january 2023 . the term b-2 loan principal must be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) of principal through march 2023 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in april 2023 . the term b-4 loan principal must be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) of principal through september 2025 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in october 2025 . we may issue standby letters of credit of up to $ 100 million in the aggregate under the revolving credit facility . outstanding letters of credit under the revolving credit facility reduce the amount of borrowings available to us . borrowings available to us under the revolving credit facility are further limited by the covenants described below under 201ccompliance with covenants . 201d the total available commitments under the revolving credit facility at december 31 , 2018 were $ 783.6 million . global payments inc . | 2018 form 10-k annual report 2013 85 . Conversations: Question: what was the total of annual payments for 2024 and thereafter? Answer:

475000.0

convfinqa84

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: maturity requirements on long-term debt as of december 31 , 2018 by year are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 124176</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>159979</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>195848</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>267587</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>3945053</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024 and thereafter</td><td>475000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5167643</td></tr></table> credit facility we are party to a credit facility agreement with bank of america , n.a. , as administrative agent , and a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders and other agents ( as amended from time to time , the 201ccredit facility 201d ) . as of december 31 , 2018 , the credit facility provided for secured financing comprised of ( i ) a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 201crevolving credit facility 201d ) ; ( ii ) a $ 1.5 billion term loan ( the 201cterm a loan 201d ) , ( iii ) a $ 1.37 billion term loan ( the 201cterm a-2 loan 201d ) , ( iv ) a $ 1.14 billion term loan facility ( the 201cterm b-2 loan 201d ) and ( v ) a $ 500 million term loan ( the 201cterm b-4 loan 201d ) . substantially all of the assets of our domestic subsidiaries are pledged as collateral under the credit facility . the borrowings outstanding under our credit facility as of december 31 , 2018 reflect amounts borrowed for acquisitions and other activities we completed in 2018 , including a reduction to the interest rate margins applicable to our term a loan , term a-2 loan , term b-2 loan and the revolving credit facility , an extension of the maturity dates of the term a loan , term a-2 loan and the revolving credit facility , and an increase in the total financing capacity under the credit facility to approximately $ 5.5 billion in june 2018 . in october 2018 , we entered into an additional term loan under the credit facility in the amount of $ 500 million ( the 201cterm b-4 loan 201d ) . we used the proceeds from the term b-4 loan to pay down a portion of the balance outstanding under our revolving credit facility . the credit facility provides for an interest rate , at our election , of either libor or a base rate , in each case plus a margin . as of december 31 , 2018 , the interest rates on the term a loan , the term a-2 loan , the term b-2 loan and the term b-4 loan were 4.02% ( 4.02 % ) , 4.01% ( 4.01 % ) , 4.27% ( 4.27 % ) and 4.27% ( 4.27 % ) , respectively , and the interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) . in addition , we are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee with respect to the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at an applicable rate per annum ranging from 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) to 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) depending on our leverage ratio . the term a loan and the term a-2 loan mature , and the revolving credit facility expires , on january 20 , 2023 . the term b-2 loan matures on april 22 , 2023 . the term b-4 loan matures on october 18 , 2025 . the term a loan and term a-2 loan principal amounts must each be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) of principal through june 2019 , increasing to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) of principal through june 2021 , increasing to 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) of principal through june 2022 and increasing to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) of principal through december 2022 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in january 2023 . the term b-2 loan principal must be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) of principal through march 2023 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in april 2023 . the term b-4 loan principal must be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) of principal through september 2025 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in october 2025 . we may issue standby letters of credit of up to $ 100 million in the aggregate under the revolving credit facility . outstanding letters of credit under the revolving credit facility reduce the amount of borrowings available to us . borrowings available to us under the revolving credit facility are further limited by the covenants described below under 201ccompliance with covenants . 201d the total available commitments under the revolving credit facility at december 31 , 2018 were $ 783.6 million . global payments inc . | 2018 form 10-k annual report 2013 85 . Conversations: q0: what was the total of annual payments for 2024 and thereafter? 475000.0 Question: and what was it for 2019? Answer:

124176.0

convfinqa85

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: maturity requirements on long-term debt as of december 31 , 2018 by year are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 124176</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>159979</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>195848</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>267587</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>3945053</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024 and thereafter</td><td>475000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5167643</td></tr></table> credit facility we are party to a credit facility agreement with bank of america , n.a. , as administrative agent , and a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders and other agents ( as amended from time to time , the 201ccredit facility 201d ) . as of december 31 , 2018 , the credit facility provided for secured financing comprised of ( i ) a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 201crevolving credit facility 201d ) ; ( ii ) a $ 1.5 billion term loan ( the 201cterm a loan 201d ) , ( iii ) a $ 1.37 billion term loan ( the 201cterm a-2 loan 201d ) , ( iv ) a $ 1.14 billion term loan facility ( the 201cterm b-2 loan 201d ) and ( v ) a $ 500 million term loan ( the 201cterm b-4 loan 201d ) . substantially all of the assets of our domestic subsidiaries are pledged as collateral under the credit facility . the borrowings outstanding under our credit facility as of december 31 , 2018 reflect amounts borrowed for acquisitions and other activities we completed in 2018 , including a reduction to the interest rate margins applicable to our term a loan , term a-2 loan , term b-2 loan and the revolving credit facility , an extension of the maturity dates of the term a loan , term a-2 loan and the revolving credit facility , and an increase in the total financing capacity under the credit facility to approximately $ 5.5 billion in june 2018 . in october 2018 , we entered into an additional term loan under the credit facility in the amount of $ 500 million ( the 201cterm b-4 loan 201d ) . we used the proceeds from the term b-4 loan to pay down a portion of the balance outstanding under our revolving credit facility . the credit facility provides for an interest rate , at our election , of either libor or a base rate , in each case plus a margin . as of december 31 , 2018 , the interest rates on the term a loan , the term a-2 loan , the term b-2 loan and the term b-4 loan were 4.02% ( 4.02 % ) , 4.01% ( 4.01 % ) , 4.27% ( 4.27 % ) and 4.27% ( 4.27 % ) , respectively , and the interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) . in addition , we are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee with respect to the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at an applicable rate per annum ranging from 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) to 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) depending on our leverage ratio . the term a loan and the term a-2 loan mature , and the revolving credit facility expires , on january 20 , 2023 . the term b-2 loan matures on april 22 , 2023 . the term b-4 loan matures on october 18 , 2025 . the term a loan and term a-2 loan principal amounts must each be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) of principal through june 2019 , increasing to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) of principal through june 2021 , increasing to 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) of principal through june 2022 and increasing to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) of principal through december 2022 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in january 2023 . the term b-2 loan principal must be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) of principal through march 2023 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in april 2023 . the term b-4 loan principal must be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) of principal through september 2025 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in october 2025 . we may issue standby letters of credit of up to $ 100 million in the aggregate under the revolving credit facility . outstanding letters of credit under the revolving credit facility reduce the amount of borrowings available to us . borrowings available to us under the revolving credit facility are further limited by the covenants described below under 201ccompliance with covenants . 201d the total available commitments under the revolving credit facility at december 31 , 2018 were $ 783.6 million . global payments inc . | 2018 form 10-k annual report 2013 85 . Conversations: q0: what was the total of annual payments for 2024 and thereafter? 475000.0 q1: and what was it for 2019? 124176.0 Question: by how much, then, did it increase over those years? Answer:

350824.0

convfinqa86

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: maturity requirements on long-term debt as of december 31 , 2018 by year are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 124176</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>159979</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>195848</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>267587</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>3945053</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024 and thereafter</td><td>475000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5167643</td></tr></table> credit facility we are party to a credit facility agreement with bank of america , n.a. , as administrative agent , and a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders and other agents ( as amended from time to time , the 201ccredit facility 201d ) . as of december 31 , 2018 , the credit facility provided for secured financing comprised of ( i ) a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 201crevolving credit facility 201d ) ; ( ii ) a $ 1.5 billion term loan ( the 201cterm a loan 201d ) , ( iii ) a $ 1.37 billion term loan ( the 201cterm a-2 loan 201d ) , ( iv ) a $ 1.14 billion term loan facility ( the 201cterm b-2 loan 201d ) and ( v ) a $ 500 million term loan ( the 201cterm b-4 loan 201d ) . substantially all of the assets of our domestic subsidiaries are pledged as collateral under the credit facility . the borrowings outstanding under our credit facility as of december 31 , 2018 reflect amounts borrowed for acquisitions and other activities we completed in 2018 , including a reduction to the interest rate margins applicable to our term a loan , term a-2 loan , term b-2 loan and the revolving credit facility , an extension of the maturity dates of the term a loan , term a-2 loan and the revolving credit facility , and an increase in the total financing capacity under the credit facility to approximately $ 5.5 billion in june 2018 . in october 2018 , we entered into an additional term loan under the credit facility in the amount of $ 500 million ( the 201cterm b-4 loan 201d ) . we used the proceeds from the term b-4 loan to pay down a portion of the balance outstanding under our revolving credit facility . the credit facility provides for an interest rate , at our election , of either libor or a base rate , in each case plus a margin . as of december 31 , 2018 , the interest rates on the term a loan , the term a-2 loan , the term b-2 loan and the term b-4 loan were 4.02% ( 4.02 % ) , 4.01% ( 4.01 % ) , 4.27% ( 4.27 % ) and 4.27% ( 4.27 % ) , respectively , and the interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) . in addition , we are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee with respect to the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at an applicable rate per annum ranging from 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) to 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) depending on our leverage ratio . the term a loan and the term a-2 loan mature , and the revolving credit facility expires , on january 20 , 2023 . the term b-2 loan matures on april 22 , 2023 . the term b-4 loan matures on october 18 , 2025 . the term a loan and term a-2 loan principal amounts must each be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) of principal through june 2019 , increasing to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) of principal through june 2021 , increasing to 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) of principal through june 2022 and increasing to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) of principal through december 2022 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in january 2023 . the term b-2 loan principal must be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) of principal through march 2023 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in april 2023 . the term b-4 loan principal must be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) of principal through september 2025 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in october 2025 . we may issue standby letters of credit of up to $ 100 million in the aggregate under the revolving credit facility . outstanding letters of credit under the revolving credit facility reduce the amount of borrowings available to us . borrowings available to us under the revolving credit facility are further limited by the covenants described below under 201ccompliance with covenants . 201d the total available commitments under the revolving credit facility at december 31 , 2018 were $ 783.6 million . global payments inc . | 2018 form 10-k annual report 2013 85 . Conversations: q0: what was the total of annual payments for 2024 and thereafter? 475000.0 q1: and what was it for 2019? 124176.0 q2: by how much, then, did it increase over those years? 350824.0 Question: and as of december 31 of the previous year of this period, what was the amount of the term loan provided ( the 201cterm a loan 201d ), in millions? Answer:

1500.0

convfinqa87

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: maturity requirements on long-term debt as of december 31 , 2018 by year are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 124176</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>159979</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>195848</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>267587</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>3945053</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024 and thereafter</td><td>475000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5167643</td></tr></table> credit facility we are party to a credit facility agreement with bank of america , n.a. , as administrative agent , and a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders and other agents ( as amended from time to time , the 201ccredit facility 201d ) . as of december 31 , 2018 , the credit facility provided for secured financing comprised of ( i ) a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 201crevolving credit facility 201d ) ; ( ii ) a $ 1.5 billion term loan ( the 201cterm a loan 201d ) , ( iii ) a $ 1.37 billion term loan ( the 201cterm a-2 loan 201d ) , ( iv ) a $ 1.14 billion term loan facility ( the 201cterm b-2 loan 201d ) and ( v ) a $ 500 million term loan ( the 201cterm b-4 loan 201d ) . substantially all of the assets of our domestic subsidiaries are pledged as collateral under the credit facility . the borrowings outstanding under our credit facility as of december 31 , 2018 reflect amounts borrowed for acquisitions and other activities we completed in 2018 , including a reduction to the interest rate margins applicable to our term a loan , term a-2 loan , term b-2 loan and the revolving credit facility , an extension of the maturity dates of the term a loan , term a-2 loan and the revolving credit facility , and an increase in the total financing capacity under the credit facility to approximately $ 5.5 billion in june 2018 . in october 2018 , we entered into an additional term loan under the credit facility in the amount of $ 500 million ( the 201cterm b-4 loan 201d ) . we used the proceeds from the term b-4 loan to pay down a portion of the balance outstanding under our revolving credit facility . the credit facility provides for an interest rate , at our election , of either libor or a base rate , in each case plus a margin . as of december 31 , 2018 , the interest rates on the term a loan , the term a-2 loan , the term b-2 loan and the term b-4 loan were 4.02% ( 4.02 % ) , 4.01% ( 4.01 % ) , 4.27% ( 4.27 % ) and 4.27% ( 4.27 % ) , respectively , and the interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) . in addition , we are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee with respect to the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at an applicable rate per annum ranging from 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) to 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) depending on our leverage ratio . the term a loan and the term a-2 loan mature , and the revolving credit facility expires , on january 20 , 2023 . the term b-2 loan matures on april 22 , 2023 . the term b-4 loan matures on october 18 , 2025 . the term a loan and term a-2 loan principal amounts must each be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) of principal through june 2019 , increasing to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) of principal through june 2021 , increasing to 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) of principal through june 2022 and increasing to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) of principal through december 2022 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in january 2023 . the term b-2 loan principal must be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) of principal through march 2023 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in april 2023 . the term b-4 loan principal must be repaid in quarterly installments in the amount of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) of principal through september 2025 , with the remaining principal balance due upon maturity in october 2025 . we may issue standby letters of credit of up to $ 100 million in the aggregate under the revolving credit facility . outstanding letters of credit under the revolving credit facility reduce the amount of borrowings available to us . borrowings available to us under the revolving credit facility are further limited by the covenants described below under 201ccompliance with covenants . 201d the total available commitments under the revolving credit facility at december 31 , 2018 were $ 783.6 million . global payments inc . | 2018 form 10-k annual report 2013 85 . Conversations: q0: what was the total of annual payments for 2024 and thereafter? 475000.0 q1: and what was it for 2019? 124176.0 q2: by how much, then, did it increase over those years? 350824.0 q3: and as of december 31 of the previous year of this period, what was the amount of the term loan provided ( the 201cterm a loan 201d ), in millions? 1500.0 Question: and what was the annual interest expense incurred from this loan? Answer:

60.3

convfinqa88

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>total cumulative return</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>edwards lifesciences</td><td>$ 127.54</td><td>$ 93.01</td><td>$ 180.17</td><td>$ 223.42</td><td>$ 265.06</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment index</td><td>117.42</td><td>150.28</td><td>181.96</td><td>194.37</td><td>207.46</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: what is the value of an investment in edwards lifesciences in 2016? Answer:

265.06

convfinqa89

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>total cumulative return</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>edwards lifesciences</td><td>$ 127.54</td><td>$ 93.01</td><td>$ 180.17</td><td>$ 223.42</td><td>$ 265.06</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment index</td><td>117.42</td><td>150.28</td><td>181.96</td><td>194.37</td><td>207.46</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what is the value of an investment in edwards lifesciences in 2016? 265.06 Question: what is the net change from the initial investment? Answer:

165.06

convfinqa90

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>total cumulative return</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>edwards lifesciences</td><td>$ 127.54</td><td>$ 93.01</td><td>$ 180.17</td><td>$ 223.42</td><td>$ 265.06</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment index</td><td>117.42</td><td>150.28</td><td>181.96</td><td>194.37</td><td>207.46</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what is the value of an investment in edwards lifesciences in 2016? 265.06 q1: what is the net change from the initial investment? 165.06 Question: what rate of cumulative return does this represent? Answer:

1.6506

convfinqa91

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>total cumulative return</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>edwards lifesciences</td><td>$ 127.54</td><td>$ 93.01</td><td>$ 180.17</td><td>$ 223.42</td><td>$ 265.06</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment index</td><td>117.42</td><td>150.28</td><td>181.96</td><td>194.37</td><td>207.46</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what is the value of an investment in edwards lifesciences in 2016? 265.06 q1: what is the net change from the initial investment? 165.06 q2: what rate of cumulative return does this represent? 1.6506 Question: what about the value if the investment in s&p500 in 2016? Answer:

198.18

convfinqa92

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>total cumulative return</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>edwards lifesciences</td><td>$ 127.54</td><td>$ 93.01</td><td>$ 180.17</td><td>$ 223.42</td><td>$ 265.06</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment index</td><td>117.42</td><td>150.28</td><td>181.96</td><td>194.37</td><td>207.46</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what is the value of an investment in edwards lifesciences in 2016? 265.06 q1: what is the net change from the initial investment? 165.06 q2: what rate of cumulative return does this represent? 1.6506 q3: what about the value if the investment in s&p500 in 2016? 198.18 Question: what is the net change from the initial investment? Answer:

98.18

convfinqa93

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>total cumulative return</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>edwards lifesciences</td><td>$ 127.54</td><td>$ 93.01</td><td>$ 180.17</td><td>$ 223.42</td><td>$ 265.06</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment index</td><td>117.42</td><td>150.28</td><td>181.96</td><td>194.37</td><td>207.46</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what is the value of an investment in edwards lifesciences in 2016? 265.06 q1: what is the net change from the initial investment? 165.06 q2: what rate of cumulative return does this represent? 1.6506 q3: what about the value if the investment in s&p500 in 2016? 198.18 q4: what is the net change from the initial investment? 98.18 Question: what rate of cumulative return does this represent? Answer:

0.9818

convfinqa94

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>total cumulative return</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>edwards lifesciences</td><td>$ 127.54</td><td>$ 93.01</td><td>$ 180.17</td><td>$ 223.42</td><td>$ 265.06</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment index</td><td>117.42</td><td>150.28</td><td>181.96</td><td>194.37</td><td>207.46</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what is the value of an investment in edwards lifesciences in 2016? 265.06 q1: what is the net change from the initial investment? 165.06 q2: what rate of cumulative return does this represent? 1.6506 q3: what about the value if the investment in s&p500 in 2016? 198.18 q4: what is the net change from the initial investment? 98.18 q5: what rate of cumulative return does this represent? 0.9818 Question: what is the difference in returns between s&p500 and edwards lifesciences for this period? Answer:

0.6688

convfinqa95

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: included in other non-current liabilities , because the company believes that the ultimate payment or settlement of these liabilities will not occur within the next twelve months . prior to the adoption of these provisions , these amounts were included in current income tax payable . the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of income , and as a result , no change in classification was made upon adopting these provisions . the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008 include $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions . due to the complexity associated with its tax uncertainties , the company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the period in which it expects to settle the liabilities associated with these uncertain tax positions . the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance november 3 2007</td><td>$ 9889</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>3861</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance november 1 2008</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>4411</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance october 31 2009</td><td>$ 18161</td></tr></table> fiscal year 2004 and 2005 irs examination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 . on january 2 , 2008 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 46 million . the company has concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . the company 2019s initial meetings with the appellate division of the irs were held during fiscal year 2009 . two of the unresolved matters are one-time issues and pertain to section 965 of the internal revenue code related to the beneficial tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under the american jobs creation act . the other matters pertain to the computation of research and development ( r&d ) tax credits and the profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the united states . these latter two matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent years . fiscal year 2006 and 2007 irs examination during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2006 and 2007 . the irs and the company have agreed on the treatment of a number of issues that have been included in an issue resolutions agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns . however , no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues , including the same r&d credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and 2005 , the pricing of intercompany sales ( transfer pricing ) , and the deductibility of certain stock option compensation expenses . during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 195 million . the company concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . with the exception of the analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Conversations: Question: what was the net change in the value of the balance from 2007 to 2009? Answer:

8272.0

convfinqa96

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: included in other non-current liabilities , because the company believes that the ultimate payment or settlement of these liabilities will not occur within the next twelve months . prior to the adoption of these provisions , these amounts were included in current income tax payable . the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of income , and as a result , no change in classification was made upon adopting these provisions . the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008 include $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions . due to the complexity associated with its tax uncertainties , the company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the period in which it expects to settle the liabilities associated with these uncertain tax positions . the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance november 3 2007</td><td>$ 9889</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>3861</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance november 1 2008</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>4411</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance october 31 2009</td><td>$ 18161</td></tr></table> fiscal year 2004 and 2005 irs examination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 . on january 2 , 2008 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 46 million . the company has concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . the company 2019s initial meetings with the appellate division of the irs were held during fiscal year 2009 . two of the unresolved matters are one-time issues and pertain to section 965 of the internal revenue code related to the beneficial tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under the american jobs creation act . the other matters pertain to the computation of research and development ( r&d ) tax credits and the profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the united states . these latter two matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent years . fiscal year 2006 and 2007 irs examination during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2006 and 2007 . the irs and the company have agreed on the treatment of a number of issues that have been included in an issue resolutions agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns . however , no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues , including the same r&d credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and 2005 , the pricing of intercompany sales ( transfer pricing ) , and the deductibility of certain stock option compensation expenses . during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 195 million . the company concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . with the exception of the analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Conversations: q0: what was the net change in the value of the balance from 2007 to 2009? 8272.0 Question: what was the 2009 value? Answer:

9889.0

convfinqa97

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: included in other non-current liabilities , because the company believes that the ultimate payment or settlement of these liabilities will not occur within the next twelve months . prior to the adoption of these provisions , these amounts were included in current income tax payable . the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of income , and as a result , no change in classification was made upon adopting these provisions . the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008 include $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions . due to the complexity associated with its tax uncertainties , the company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the period in which it expects to settle the liabilities associated with these uncertain tax positions . the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance november 3 2007</td><td>$ 9889</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>3861</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance november 1 2008</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>4411</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance october 31 2009</td><td>$ 18161</td></tr></table> fiscal year 2004 and 2005 irs examination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 . on january 2 , 2008 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 46 million . the company has concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . the company 2019s initial meetings with the appellate division of the irs were held during fiscal year 2009 . two of the unresolved matters are one-time issues and pertain to section 965 of the internal revenue code related to the beneficial tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under the american jobs creation act . the other matters pertain to the computation of research and development ( r&d ) tax credits and the profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the united states . these latter two matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent years . fiscal year 2006 and 2007 irs examination during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2006 and 2007 . the irs and the company have agreed on the treatment of a number of issues that have been included in an issue resolutions agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns . however , no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues , including the same r&d credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and 2005 , the pricing of intercompany sales ( transfer pricing ) , and the deductibility of certain stock option compensation expenses . during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 195 million . the company concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . with the exception of the analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Conversations: q0: what was the net change in the value of the balance from 2007 to 2009? 8272.0 q1: what was the 2009 value? 9889.0 Question: what is the percent change? Answer:

0.83648

convfinqa98

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 317</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>236</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>214</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>later years</td><td>597</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum payments required</td><td>$ 1830</td></tr></table> aon corporation . Conversations: Question: what is the difference in value of future minimum rent payments from 2008 to 2009? Answer:

-42.0

convfinqa99

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 317</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>236</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>214</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>later years</td><td>597</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum payments required</td><td>$ 1830</td></tr></table> aon corporation . Conversations: q0: what is the difference in value of future minimum rent payments from 2008 to 2009? -42.0 Question: what is the value of future minimum rent payments in 2008? Answer:

317.0