Datasets:

Ti-Ma

/

wikipedia_2019

like 0

Follow

TimeMachine 2

Towns in Nottinghamshire Places in the Borough of Broxtowe Wikipedia categories named after populated places in England

Beeston, Nottinghamshire

Welcome! Hello, 151.203.6.217, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Alpha Delta Pi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted. There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: Starting an article Your first article Biographies of living persons How to write a great article The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WuhWuzDat == Proposed deletion of Alpha Delta Pi == The article Alpha Delta Pi has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern: non notable While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WuhWuzDat

151.203.6.217

Stanburn is a community in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia, located in the Lunenburg Municipal District in Lunenburg County. ==References== Stanburn on Destination Nova Scotia Communities in Lunenburg County, Nova Scotia General Service Areas in Nova Scotia

Stanburn, Nova Scotia

How to add information on somebody, who has been noted by wikipedia? Do you mean, how to add information to an article that already exists, or how to create a new article? I've put a bunch of links below to help you. // roux   ==Welcome== Hello & Wilkommen! Welkom! Bienvenue! Benvenuti! ようこそ! Välkommen! Witamy! Bem-vindo(a)! ¡Bienvenido! Добро пожаловать! 欢迎! Basically, welcome to Wikipedia! {| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="margin:0em 0em 1em 0em; width:100%" | style="width:45%; vertical-align:top; border:1px solid #fad67d; background-color:#faf6ed;" | Getting Started First steps • FAQ Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Adoption How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Place on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists | style="padding:0em 0.5em 0em 0.5em;" | | style="width:55%; vertical-align:top; border:1px solid #abd5f5; background-color:#f1f5fc;" | Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts |- | |} Click here to respond to this message!

Dombrovskis

John Harrison CBE LLD (17 August 1847–10 July 1922) was a Scottish merchant, master tailor and historical author. He was Master of the Edinburgh Merchant Company and Chairman of the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce. ==Life== He was born at 19 St Patrick Square in Edinburgh on 17 August 1847 the son of Jane Archbald and George Harrison a prominent merchant and later Lord Provost of Edinburgh and owner of Harrison and Sons, a high quality clothier. He was educated at the High School in Edinburgh. His most famous work, The Scot in Ulster, was originally published in sections in the Scotsman newspaper. He lived at "Rockville" on Napier Road in Edinburgh, the masterpiece by Edinburgh architect Sir James Gowans. In 1917 aged 70 he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. His proposers were John Horne, Cargill Gilston Knott, Sir Edmund Taylor Whittaker and Sir James Walker. In 1918 he was created a Commander of the Order of the Bath (CBE). The University of Edinburgh awarded him an honorary doctorate (LLD) in 1919. He died on 10 July 1922. He is buried in Dean Cemetery in western Edinburgh. The grave lies against the north wall of the first northern extension. ==Family== In 1879 he married Helen Georgina Roberts (1856–1949). They had several children including Helen Roberts Harrison MBE ARRC (1888–1969). ==Publications== Oure Tounis Colledge: Sketches of the History of the Old College of Edinburgh (1884) The Scot in Ulster (1888) The Company of Merchants of Edinburgh and its Schools 1694–1920 (1920) The History of the Monastery of the Holyrood and of the Palace of Holyrood House (1919) ==References== 1847 births 1922 deaths People from Edinburgh Scottish historians Burials at the Dean Cemetery Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

John Harrison (historian)

==Kurt Hummel== Please STOP adding Blaine as his boyfriend, they are not least yet. CTJF83

Ahthatgentleman

Winzenburg is a village and a former municipality in the district of Hildesheim in Lower Saxony, Germany. Since 1 November 2016, it is part of the municipality Freden. It comprises four smaller communities, including the village of Winzenburg, which dates from the Middle Ages. Winzenburg is located in the Leinebergland to the north of Bad Gandersheim, between the national parks of the Harz and the Weserbergland, in Lower Saxony, Germany. The municipality (Gemeinde) was formed in March 1, 1974 from the four previously independent communities of Winzenburg, Schildhorst, Westerberg and Klump. It is near the small town of Freden. == Constituent villages == === Winzenburg === Winzenburg is chiefly known for Winzenburg castle, a medieval castle now in ruins, which stands on a spur of the Sackwald. In the vicinity, it is also known for its man-made fishing ponds where one can either fish at one of the five ponds or eat fish at one of the Fischerhütte, the small nearby restaurants. Count Herman II of Winzenburg built the castle at Schöneberg. === Westerberg === The hamlet of Westerberg began as a settlement next to a glassblower founded in 1744. Originally temporary because the property was rented, rather than owned, after the third 8-year extension of the lease, the settlement became permanent. Area clay pits later supported the production of bricks. They are now filled with water and are managed by the Freden sport fishing club. === Klump === Klump is below the Sauberg and started out as small farms and farmers who rented the land they lived and worked on. === Schildhorst === The village is surrounded by forests, which are favored places to walk in summer and ski in winter. There is a bus connection to the railway station at Freden. The village was of greater significance in the 18th and 19th centuries because of Glasfabrik Schildhorst, the glassblowing factory there, which produced white and other glass. The abundance of water, timber and minerals, natural resources required for the production of glass, made the site particularly suitable. In the 20th century, however, the industry left, and with it, the prosperity of Schildhorst. All that remains is a sawmill, a cheesemaker and a few traces of the glassblower. Today, the population is about 70. == References == == External links == 1852 map of Schildhorst (photo 450), 1845 document from glass factory (photo 451) and photo of products from glass factory, 1845 (photo 452) Kreisheimatbund-Hildesheim, official website. Click through to picture numbers, mouse over photo and click on icon for enlarged image. Retrieved February 6, 2011. Hildesheim (district) Former municipalities in Lower Saxony

Winzenburg

== April 2009 == Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Black and Tan Coonhound, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Black and Tan Coonhound was changed by 96.239.139.70 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-30T03:46:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk)

96.239.139.70

== October 2017 == Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Uncle Phil has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG. ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, , remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again. For help, take a look at the introduction. The following is the log entry regarding this message: Uncle Phil was changed by ThePizzasquid (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2017-10-27T20:59:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk)

ThePizzasquid

== October 2017 ==

2602:301:7787:9C60:5D5D:7184:6597:7E88

== April 2011 == Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Junker, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, , remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Junker was changed by 68.66.30.222 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90678 on 2011-04-10T23:02:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk)

68.66.30.222

== April 2009 == Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jamal Crawford, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jamal Crawford was changed by 68.126.196.240 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-04-30T03:47:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk)

68.126.196.240

Fraas is a surname. Notable people with the surname include: Eberhard Fraas (1862–1915), German paleontologist Karl Nikolas Fraas (1810–1875), German botanist Oscar Fraas (1824–1897), German paleontologist ==See also== Fras (disambiguation)

Fraas

== Welcome! == Hello, IOCAC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Eastern Orthodox Church organization. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Introduction and Getting started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article Simplified Manual of Style You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Leschnei (talk) ===Added note=== IOCAC, I noticed, at both Eastern Orthodox Church organization and List of current Christian leaders, that you are having some trouble formatting references. I would strongly encourage you to read the articles linked above, then, if you have further questions, feel free to ask me or at the help sites listed above. Leschnei (talk) == October 2017 == There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must: Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Vanjagenije (talk)

IOCAC

== Contested deletion == The username name was changed per the editor's request. The old username, however, was not commercial nor did it represent a group, so I find the original concern raised rather perplexing. This article should not be deleted for lack of importance because the content it contains is a descriptive (not prescriptive) narrative about the work of a nonprofit organization, the AWD Conservancy, committed to conserving an endangered species (i.e., the African wild dog). It is in no way commercial, rather it is intended to inform, not promote. Yes, I also realize that the encyclopaedia is not a directory of charities, nor should it be. I would be happy to contact an editor to resolve this. Comment added by talk (Hirola 3 contribs) I have declined the speedy deletion request as I believe the article makes sufficient claim of significance. This does not guarantee that the article will not be deleted. Please add reliable third party sources (reports in newspapers, or by the other organisations you say this one is working with, that refer to this organisation) to establish notability - reading ORG might also help. Also please remember that this is an encyclopaedia not a directory of charities. Please do not add promotional material (you'll see I have made some changes to comply with this), remain factual. == External links modified == Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified on African Wild Dog Conservancy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: Added archive to #On-line When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ). Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug)

African Wild Dog Conservancy

==Speedy deletion of Vibgyora== A tag has been placed on Vibgyora requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. VasuVR (talk, contribs) ==Speedy deletion nomination of Vibgyora== A tag has been placed on Vibgyora requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Reconsider! == A belated welcome! == Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tintucraju. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages How to write a great article Editor's index to Wikipedia Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on , consult Questions, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Vanjagenije (talk)

Tintucraju

Welcome! Hello, 24.210.45.80, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Alpha Epsilon Phi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted. There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: Starting an article Your first article Biographies of living persons How to write a great article The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WuhWuzDat == Proposed deletion of Alpha Epsilon Phi == The article Alpha Epsilon Phi has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern: non notable While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WuhWuzDat

24.210.45.80

=== March 2007 === Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Dayanara Torres, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sam Korn (smoddy) Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from . Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Shenme Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --teb728

68.20.178.146

== November 2008 == Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Mayalld (talk) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

82.32.131.143

Lung Fung Restaurant is a 1990 Hong Kong action romantic comedy film directed by Poon Man-kit and starring Max Mok, Stephen Chow, Ellen Chan and Charine Chan. ==Plot== Dragon (Max Mok), an ex-triad member and an ex-convict is employed as a waiter in a restaurant. However, his old triad member friend Rubbish Pool (Stephen Chow) usually hangs out there and his old boss, Kent (Ng Man-tat), usually settles disputes with other gang leaders there so Dragon has a hard time getting pass his old ways. Dragon and Pool meet two bargirls, Gigi (Ellen Chan) and June (Charine Chan). Dragon develops a relationship with Gigi. In an internal gang fight, Uncle Kent and Pool are killed, Dragon is arrested. 6 years after the incident, Dragon is now driving his own taxi and when he is about to go off work Gigi boards his taxi. Gigi is now a sale rep with a family and Dragon has a new girlfriend. ==Cast== ==External links== Lung Fung Restaurant at Hong Kong Cinemagic Hong Kong films 1990 films 1990s action films 1990s romantic comedy films Hong Kong action comedy films Hong Kong romantic comedy films Triad films Cantonese-language films Films set in Hong Kong Films shot in Hong Kong Films directed by Poon Man-kit

Lung Fung Restaurant

== External links modified == Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Robert Mann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: Added archive to When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) == "The first violinist at Juilliard"? == The second sentence of the current article says, "Mann, the first violinist at Juilliard, served on the school's string quartet for over fifty years until his retirement in 1997." I suspect that the intention was to say that Mann played first violin in the Juilliard Quartet--not that he was either (a) the first person to be a violinist at Juilliard or (b) the leading violinist at the school. But not being sure of the intent, I'm reluctant to edit the sentence, and would rather give its original writer (whoever that was) the chance to do (talk)

Robert Mann

Con rispetto parlando is a 1965 Italian comedy film written and directed by Marcello Ciorciolini. ==Plot== ==Cast== Aroldo Tieri Scilla Gabel Umberto D'Orsi Ugo Moretti Dominique Boschero Katina Ranieri Carlo Giuffrè Enzo Andronico Angelo Infanti Renzo Palmer Giusi Raspani Dandolo Carlo Sposito Nino Terzo Luca Sportelli ==External links== 1965 films Italian films Italian-language films Films directed by Marcello Ciorciolini Italian comedy films Films scored by Riz Ortolani 1960s comedy films

Con rispetto parlando

Welcome! Hello, 63.239.75.176, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Alpha Eta Rho, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted. There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: Starting an article Your first article Biographies of living persons How to write a great article The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WuhWuzDat == Proposed deletion of Alpha Eta Rho == The article Alpha Eta Rho has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern: non notable, unreferenced While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WuhWuzDat

63.239.75.176

What does Anceint Greek have to do with anything? Spiros Bousbouras (talk)

Pathétique

== April 2011 == Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Greyfriars Bobby, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — anndelion ※ If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

79.66.245.73

The idea of technology brokering is to span multiple, otherwise disconnected industries, to see how existing technologies could be used to create breakthrough innovations in other markets. Technology brokering requires companies to be strong in two areas. As Andrew Hargadon, technology brokering’s founder, summarized: "Firstly, the company must have the ability to bridge distant communities, usually when a company can move easily across a range of different markets they have a better view of how technologies can be used in new ways. Secondly, technology brokering involves creating new markets and industries from innovative combinations of existing technology. These two strengths are difficult to have simultaneously because the strong ties the companies have with customers and supplies in one industry prevent the company from moving easily into other markets and experimenting with new ideas." Yet, when a company is able to combine these two strengths it can result in being the first to experience technological advances. Technology brokering can teach firms how to effectively shift the focus of traditional R&D teams from trying to invent completely new products to combining previous innovations. New ideas for observation based research pull R&D scientists out of the lab and place them into direct consumer observation to allow them to diagnose problems with products and identify the needs of the customer more accurately. The technology brokering process intertwines with the idea of empathic design, which is basically understanding products from a customers’ point of view and then designing them to fit needs and issues. The advantage of empathic design, especially when combined with technology brokering firms, is that it leads to innovative products that suit the particular problems of the customer. Another perk of empathic design is including marketing and manufacturing people in the product design to get diverse opinions of product success and practicality. ==History== The first examples of technology brokering can be found as early as 1876 with Thomas Edison in his Menlo Park laboratory. In six years, this lab procured over 400 patents. Menlo Park laboratory was such a successful ‘invention factory’ because Thomas Edison had a firm belief in recombinant innovation. There were no inventions from Menlo Park that were truly invented from nothing – each one had some basis that was pulled from another field of technology. Edison and his team worked in many different fields in conjunction with many different companies, in addition to working on individual experiments. All of these projects enabled the team to use their knowledge of various fields to be innovative in creating new solutions for different organizations. Because knowledge of technology across differing fields was disconnected, Edison was able to exploit this and create new solutions from areas of past projects. Henry Ford is another great inventor in history who understood the power of combining past solutions to create a new one. He is famous for the model T automobile and the assembly line, but Ford himself stated that: "I invented nothing new. I simply assembled into a car the discoveries of other men behind whom were centuries of work….Had I worked fifty or ten or even five years before, I would have failed. So it is with every new thing. Progress happens when all the factors that make for it are ready, and then it is inevitable. To teach that a comparatively few men are responsible for the greatest forward steps of mankind is the worst sort of nonsense." The knowledge of recombinant innovation is alive and thriving today. Companies such as IDEO can easily have their processes compared to Edison’s operations of the Menlo Park laboratory. IDEO is arguably one of the largest and most successful design firms of the current times. Since its founding in 1978, it has created 3,000 new products in over 40 industries. Working amidst several different industries is a large factor of success in technology brokering. The more industries that firms are involved in, the broader their understanding of different technologies will be. CEO of IDEO David Kelley has this to say about working in many different fields: "Working with companies in such dissimilar industries as medical instruments, furniture, toys and computers has given us a broad view of the latest technologies available and has taught us how to do quality product development and how to do it quickly and efficiently." Many companies today are restructuring their R&D departments and they are finding the structure of technology brokering to be very successful and cost-effective for innovation. Not only is technology brokering a business foundation for design firms, it can also be used inside large corporations in order to achieve inter-departmental innovations. Andrew Hargadon was really the first person to coin the term ‘technology brokering’ and advocate to industry its advantages. He did this in the late 1980s, early 1990s, now the concept of technology brokering is fairly common. The Hargadon Group currently advises businesses ranging from Fortune 500 companies to start-ups about how to integrate a technology brokering system into their innovation process. ==Examples== ===Firms=== IDEO IDEO is the largest product design consulting firm in the U.S. It focuses on mechanical engineering and industrial design, and pursues products with high performance, ease of manufacturing, and ease of use. The current CEO and President of IDEO is Tim Brown. The Palo Alto (CA) based company has smaller offices in Boston, Chicago, Grand Rapids, London, San Francisco, New York, and Tokyo. Since 1991, IDEO has topped Business Week's list of winners of the annual Industrial Design Excellence Awards, and in 2005, the magazine named IDEO one of the twenty most innovative companies in the world. As Tom Kelly stated in The Ten Faces of Innovation, "IDEO creates innovative products, services, spaces , and experiences for companies such as Procter & Gamble, Pepsi-Cola, and Samsung. IDEO also helps companies build cultures of innovation. Successful designs include Apple mouse, first laptop computer, Polaroid I-Zone instant camera, Palm V, soft-handled Gripper toothbrush for Oral-B, and hundreds of other standard-setting designs." According to Andrew Hargadon and Robert Sutton’s study of IDEO, "IDEO’s clients, ranging from Fortune 50 companies to start-ups, typically hire the firm to design part or all of a product." "Clients are usually charged for the time and materials required in designing a product but they occasionally work in exchange for a percentage of sales or profits from the finished product. Design projects last from a few weeks to three years, with an average of about a year. Results range from sketches of product concepts to crude working models to complete new product designs." Most designers at IDEO are 25 to 40 years old, male (about 80 percent), white (about 80 percent), and usually have a B.S. or an M.S. in engineering. Managers have a similar profile but tend to be older (35 to 50 years old). The support staff also has a similar profile to the designers, but with a larger proportion (approximately 50 percent) of women. Tim Brown believes a good design thinker possesses the following characteristics: empathy integrative thinking, optimism, experimentalism and collaboration. IDEO’s organizational structure provides great support for technology brokering. The design operations at IDEO force individual designers to face a continual flow of new problems which require engineering solutions. This flow of new problems provides incentives and opportunities for them to develop and exploit a wide-ranging knowledge of potential solutions. Within the organization, the engineers do not specialize in any single field, but frequently move to a different industry after completing a project for a company. Engineers also often transfer on and off of long-term projects to prevent ‘burn-out’, this allows them to pursue interests in other areas. This movement between teams and projects not only provides designers with a wide range of experiences, it exposes them to the skills and backgrounds of their colleagues. IBO Group IBO Group, with their high Technology knowledge transfer, assist organizations that want to take advantage of the most cutting-edge technology leading by Israel innovation. its founder Itay Tawili has more than 10 years of experience as Information Technology Manager and System Administrator. with his knowledge and IBO networking, IBO assist its partners to achieve the exact solution that will suit their needs and issues. by using empathic design process technique, IBO providing to its decision-Making Executive Leadership partners effective knowledge for them to decide their technology strategy, and achieve their business goals. Menlo Park Thomas Edison was an inventor, a business man, and most importantly an innovator. In 1875 Edison purchased a single model home in New Jersey. This property is referred to as one of his first major innovations; the first industrial research lab, "Menlo Park." This would be the location of over 400 inventions and prove to be a prime example of Thomas Edison using technology brokering to innovate. Edison has stated that he built this laboratory for the; "Rapid and cheap development of an invention." He also promised, "A minor invention every ten days and a major invention every six months." How could Edison make such bold projections? Edison developed four intertwined work practices that helped him be so innovative. They were: capturing good ideas, keeping these ideas alive, imagining new uses for old ideas, and putting promising concepts to test. Using these concepts, which underline the concepts of technology brokering, Edison is credited with 1,093 U.S. patents as well as patents in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. One of the reasons Edison was so successful was his ability to surround himself with very knowledgeable people. Edison’s team came from all over the world and they were considered experts in various fields. Charles Batchelor, from England, was Edison’s chief mechanical assistant and helped Edison with many of his inventions. Edison also hired people from Germany, Switzerland, and a number of other European countries. In an article written by Andrew Hargadon, he states, "Between the years of 1876 to 1881, the lab (Menlo park) produced numerous innovations in high speed, automatic and repeating, telegraphs; telephones; phonographs; generators, voltmeters; light bulbs; and vacuum pumps." Edison’s first major financial success was the quadruplex telegraph. After creating the quadruplex Edison was unsure how to set the price. He originally thought his product could sell for somewhere between $4,000 and $5,000. After he pitched his product to Western Union, Edison was thrilled to see they offered him $10,000 for the telegraph. This financial success allowed Edison to be the founder of the first institution set up with the specific purpose of producing constant technological innovation and improvement, Menlo Park. It is recognized that Edison understood the concept of technology brokering. And some of his methods were rather elementary. In his own notes it stated, "1st Study the present construction, 2nd Ask for all past experiences…study and read everything you can on the subject." ==Products== The desire of technology brokers to work with old/discontinued, or already in use products/ideas, has provided an array of fascinating products. For instance, obesity has been a problem for years and many people have gone through endless treatments; however, the craving for food that is high in fat and sugar does not go away. IDEO designed a Crave Aid Patch, similar to the Nicotine Patch used to quit smoking. This patch comes in different flavors of unhealthy food, so that when an individual is craving unhealthy food he/she can wear this patch and fight the hunger. Another excellent example of technology brokering is the telephone. Since it was invented, the telephone has undergone a great number of changes: from residential-only, to being portable in a brief case, to more modernized digital cell phones with access to internet and much more. It seemed as though the residential phone would disappear completely due to the technology found in the cellular phones; however, technology brokering was able to bring about a huge change in residential phones. Verizon communications recently introduced the Verizon Hub, a residential phone that allows you to send and receive text-messages, pictures, connect to the internet, and link your cell phone to your Verizon Hub so you can answer your home phone even if not at home. The beauty of technology brokering is not inventing totally new products, it is the ability to reimage or recreate a product while using an old idea/product. For example, the Craving Aid Patch was a product originally designed for smokers and in many cases seen as a medical procedure. Nonetheless, exactly the same idea has now been used to create a totally different product using the same technology. Similar to the Craving Aid Patch, which is just an old idea reinvented into a new product, the Verizon Hub, perhaps the most modern residential phone, is based on the very same idea as when it was first invented, in the years of Alexander Graham Bell. Technology Brokering can make an impact on any kind of product regardless of its nature. For example, a bar tap handle could be pretty much anything, a stick or piece of metal, a button, etc. However, with the help of IDEO, Sam Adams was able to innovate its bar tap handles. The totally redesigned Sam Adams tap continues to have a similar shape as the others, but Sam Adams’ has a blue fluorescent cover displaying the Sam Adams brand while giving a sense of the elegance and class behind the Sam Adams brand. The Light Bulb On December 31, 1879, Edison first displayed his most popular invention. It was the first "practical incandescent, electric lamp. This is a perfect example of Thomas Edison leveraging technology brokering. Edison was not the first person to invent electric light. J.W. Starr filed a patent for an incandescent bulb in 1854. That was 30 years before Edison began working on the light bulb we know today. When Edison first started testing incandescent lamps, the arc light was being used for lighting streets and also for various other applications. When Edison began testing incandescent lamps he ran into a major problem. The problem was Edison wasn’t sure what material to use for the filament. Most of the material he tried would melt. There was too much oxygen and heat created by the electric current. As a result the filaments would always burn. He used two methods to correct this issue. At first Edison had to find a new material to use. He began by using platinum for his filaments with little success. Eventually he made his filaments by carbonizing Bristol board, which is a type of cardboard. He also acquired the best vacuum pumps available at the time. This would reduce the amount of oxygen inside of the bulbs. These two changes made it possible for Edison to create the light bulb we all use today. As mentioned above, Edison did not invent the electric light. However, he did leverage technology brokering in order to piece together many different existing technologies to make a better light bulb. As one could assume, Edison was highly appraised for his accomplishments. Many people today believe he was the first person to invent the electric light when truly he was great at leveraging technology brokering. ==Process model== • Step1: Access According to Andrew Hargadon and Robert Sutton’s study of IDEO, "IDEO has access to dissimilar industries and it enables them to generate product innovations." "Each engineer has a distinct body of technological knowledge from working with IDEO clients, from past technical training and work experience, and from his or her personal interests and backgrounds. The role this diverse knowledge plays in creating new products is evident in a description of how one designer's personal background was the source of new solutions." "IDEO's Methodology Handbook recommends that designers look for opportunities to expand IDEO's network and/or industry knowledge. "IDEO's contact with different technologies comes through the individual engineer’s contact with the industries where those technologies are used." • Step 2: Acquisition According to Andrew Hargadon and Robert Sutton’s study of IDEO, "Expertise in acquiring new knowledge helps IDEO designers to understand and work with a client's existing technologies." "This ongoing process of learning from clients started in IDEO's early days and remains part of all projects." "IDEO's Methodology Handbook states that "As consultants we need to quickly become experts in the client's product area. We want to acclimate ourselves to the market, the buzz words, the competition. We need to orient ourselves to the major pitfalls, alternatives, and opportunities." "IDEO engineers also acquire knowledge by studying an industry's existing products because they serve as records of the technologies in that industry." • Step 3: Storage According to Andrew Hargadon and Robert Sutton’s study of IDEO, there are "two types of routines at IDEO for storing potential technological solutions." Routines for storing specific knowledge "place potential solutions in the memories of individual designers and objects and products that designers collected from their previous work." Routines for maintaining and refreshing that knowledge include "displaying objects where other designers can see them and constant conversations that designers have about who has what design knowledge." "Upper-level managers often direct designers to individuals with relevant expertise by knowing who had worked previously on what projects." • Step 4: Retrieval According to Andrew Hargadon and Robert Sutton’s study of IDEO, "at IDEO, retrieval entails bringing stored knowledge of potentially valuable technological solutions to bear on the design problems of current projects." IDEO designers retrieve technological solutions through "analogical thinking" and through "established routines for sharing the problems of current design projects with other designers in the organization who have relevant and potentially valuable knowledge." "Potential solutions are drawn from IDEO's organizational memory at brainstorming sessions and company-wide Monday morning meetings." "Retrieval also occurs during informal conversations that follow meetings or e-mails", which are facilitated by IDEO's "open office plan" and encounters with other designers. ==See also== Technology transfer ==References== Intellectual property law Technology transfer Research and development

Technology brokering

Minaičiai or Mėnaičiai is a village in Lithuania, located on the Šušvė River. It has a primary school. According to the 2011 census, it had 179 residents. After World War II, the homestead of Stanislovas Miknius hid a bunker of Leonardas Grigonis (codename Užpalis), commander of the Lithuanian partisans of the Resurrection District (Prisikėlimo apygarda). In February 1949, the village was a meeting place of the commanders of the Lithuanian partisans, who established the Union of Lithuanian Freedom Fighters. In spring 1949, the partisans left the village and the bunker was destroyed by Miknius. In 2004, during a construction work, Miknius family found a hidden milk can with more than 2000 pages of various partisan documents. In November 2010, the partisan bunker was reconstructed; it displays a small exhibit of partisan documents and other items. The opening ceremony was attended by President of Lithuania Dalia Grybauskaitė. ==References== Villages in Šiauliai County

Minaičiai

== April 2009 == Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to McLaren F1, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: McLaren F1 was changed by 164.107.107.176 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-30T03:48:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk)

164.107.107.176

==Start== Should this TimVickers/Health translation project be linked on this page as well? Remember (talk) I copied the contents we need, I guess That we should ask TimVickers to delete that page I just redirected it, that won't break any of the incoming links. Tim Vickers (talk) That is great, thank you :-) ==Process== How can we best be of service? Should we focus upon the lowest-rated of these, or those closest to readiness? The best bag-per-buck will probably be in the lowest-rated articles, since a little effort there will yield large improvements in quality. Tim Vickers (talk) ==External editors== It would be nice if the external editors would sign up here. Also the short list needs updating as some of these pages have been reviewed. We should have a central area were we can provide feedback to the reviewers. Well most of the comments are excellent a few are recommendations that do not comply with wiki James (talk · contribs · email) ==Google collaboration== So are the people working with google to provide advice on topics going to get involved in editing? I realize that there are many things wrong with many article but we have so few dedicated editors and so much topic area to cover. What we need is more people with a mind for research interested in editing health topics on Wikipedia. I am trying to get some of my students and colleges interested in editing but everyone is always so James (talk · contribs · email) Here's some of my thoughts: (1) we shouldn't initiate new translations of articles that are "B" or lower. (2) as much as possible, we ought to make use of existing review infrastructure. (3) Getting each of these articles to GA is achievable, measurable, and quantizable. (4) At WikiProject Medicine/Editorial review article list, there are currently 15 "B" articles listed as "B" for "Status as of April 2010". We ought to add a new column for May 2010. I've nominated Dracunculiasis (currently a "B") as a good article, and cleaned it up to the point where I think it could pass. I recommend that each editor who would like to work on this project "adopt" one of these articles. I think this is sound since your example of the Dracunculiasis article which I found well written and needed just updating some facts and additional information about symptoms. BSWSJR (talk) Which articles have already been reviewed? I will probably translate Huntington's disease once it receives its review to Spanish. Bests. I agree that taking these articles to GA is what we should do. I will work on a James (talk · contribs · email) The CF review was very timely as it just failed GAN, so hopefully extra info gets it on its way. Casliber (talk · contribs) Yes and I think all these reviews should occur at that point in the editor process of an James (talk · contribs · email) ==Pages being chosen and process== The google editors have been going through Wikipedia article. On the Erectile dysfunction page Fact Check AMEF has added a lot of tags. They are all appropriate I agree but without an active editor willing to work on implementing these changes I am not convinced they add anything. Most medical pages deserve this many tags. I think the best use of the google editors is too have users nominate pages when they are ready to have them reviewed. Thus someone will be there to implement the recommendation also that user is at a point were they wish a thorough review. When the article on Strep throat was reviewed I was not yet done rewriting it. A review now would be better than when it was James (talk · contribs · email) Another suggestion would be to have them work with some of the students who edit Wikipedia as a class project. Currently we have student working on the page Allergy and Food allergy. Well the regular medical editors do not need much guidance on improving article the student might benefit most from googles help. I've seen edits in Cerebral arteriovenous malformation, Hemorrhoid, Streptococcal pharyngitis, Sleep apnea, Erectile dysfunction, Filariasis, Vaccination schedule.I updated the table of articles under review. In the ED article the reviewer has suggested alternative references on the talkpage for all the tags they added, so having the tags is useful in that it makes clear where the alternative sources need to be added. It does look a bit unsightly at the moment, but hopefully it won't last for long. Tim Vickers (talk) == Ratings == Not all of these articles are properly within the scope of WPMED (e.g., anatomy), but for those that fall squarely in the middle of our 'diseases and treatments' scope, does anyone object to declaring most of them to be "High" priority? WhatamIdoing (talk) okay - syphilis and CF got a good going-over just now. Casliber (talk · contribs) Yes I think most of these are at least high James (talk · contribs · email) I disagree Hypovitaminosis D, Leishmaniasis, Obstetric fistula and other are hardly high priority, they just reflect agenda of focusing in specific undeveloped countries, mainly in Africa. These subjects are (apparently) the most important medical subjects for the majority of people in the world. Is there a particular reason that you believe that these articles should not be considered fairly important to this project? WhatamIdoing (talk) I pointed with examples of problems that afflict only a minority of the world's population. It's sad for them but the majority doesn't care about those issues. It may be agenda to take care of those minorities but most people have more important urges. ::I'm not sure what you think "urges" have to do with it, but perhaps you were unaware that two to three million women have obstetric fistulas. Do you think that these millions of women, and their families, are less important than, say Ancient Greek medicine, equally rare diseases like Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney, minor and self-limiting conditions like Chapped lips, trivial anatomical signs like Café au lait spot, and the like :::::I agree it would be a little like saying obesity is not important as it does not affect Central Africa. It do not think these are of top importance but have no problems with them being of high James (talk · contribs · email) ::::::I changed my mind, although the number of countries is low the number of afflicted people is not. I wasn't responsible for grading those other articles you mentioned. Support promotion. ==Ongoing feedback== Are these editors just doing a review at a single point in time? While they be getting involved in a discussion of their suggestion? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) I've advised them to check back on their reviews, after a few days to see if anybody has any questions. Tim Vickers (talk) How are you communicating with them, Tim? For the sake of transparency these communications should be easily viewable by all Wikipedia editors and readers (IMHO). If there is some reason for overriding transparency, please explain. Thanks,Postpostmod (talk) ==Issues with reviews== I have a number of concerns. The reviewers are tagging stuff as dead links that are not. I am not sure why this is happening. I removed some tags here on the asthma page Than earlier in the asthma article a meta analysis was tagged with non primary source needed tag? A meta analysis is a secondary source... Now I am completely aware that much of the medical content of Wikipedia needs extensive work. The problem is not a lack of tags the problem is a lack of editors making meaningfully improve to these pages. I personally think we should hold off on further reviews. And that reviews should only proceed when someone is available to use the feedback given and is in need of feedback. Finally the reviewers need to become more involved in Wikipedia than just a one off review based on a shaky understanding of Wiki policies and procedures. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) For that one, the reviewer might simply have applied that tag on finding a null-valued |url= in . LeadSongDog come howl Other issues have occurred here with IBS Irritable_bowel_syndrome#SarMarTay_Suggestions_5-5-10_.28Citations_93-115.29Doc James (talk · contribs · email) ==Cervical cancer== I don't know how this process is supposed to work but there are currently some disputed edits in Cervical Cancer, specially between Zodon and the reviewer. Thanks for your note; this page is a good place to get help. There's no dispute, and Zodon hasn't edited anything for several weeks. I've archived the old discussions to reduce the potential for confusion. WhatamIdoing (talk) I missed the years. Never mind about it. Looking at WikiProject Medicine/Editorial review article list I thought that page was already reviewed and that (now archived) discussion was about that (missed the years) but it doesn't look to me now it was reviewed, instead it seems it was incorrectly marked. There are two brief comments from a reviewer here. I don't know whether that's all that the article really needs. WhatamIdoing (talk) == First external review == Hello fellow project participants, I am an externally contracted editor and I have just finished my first review for this stage (Chagas disease). I appreciate the concern of the experienced writers and editors and hope they can provide feedback so that the reviews are as useful and constructive as possible. I would welcome any comments or suggestions on the Chagas review. You can find my contribution on the talk page. Very few edits/tags were made directly to the article. BSW-RMH (talk) BSW-RMH Welcome, and thank you! WhatamIdoing (talk) Thanks for the welcome! BSW-RMH (talk) External review of Hypertension is finished. Questions or comments? BSW-RMH (talk) First of all thanks a lot for your willingness to collaborate, and receive other editors imputs... I have not followed your editions on hypertension and I am not a medical expert (I am a psychologist), however I have been reading your comments there and they seem really sensible. Aditionally another strong point for your work, as opposed to other reviews inside the google project, has been that when changes were not very hard to do you directly made them in the article instead of pointing them out... This article can easily become a good article if some work is made in it. Well done. Thank you for checking the review! I didn't make many direct edits to the Chagas article because it required so much fact checking and technical input, which took most of the available time. That article also appears to have several active writers/editors participating on the talk page that would be available to apply the recommendations if they find them helpful. I tried a different strategy with the Hypertension review (making more direct edits), because there appeared to be fewer active participants. I agree that it made for a more useful review. Also, this direct-edit-of-small-issues approach didn't seem to change the amount of time it took for the review process. It may be that external reviewers will need to tailor the approach for each article depending on the activity of the community and the level of technical input that is required for the review process. These are just a few thoughts at this stage of the process. BSW-RMH (talk) AS there are so many articles under the medicine project scope the hypertension situation (where different people watch the article but few or none are actually active editors) is much more common than the case where there are many active editors for an article. I find much more useful in general the approoach you have choosen here, since at least the small changes have already been done and only the hardest ones appear in the talk page. This seems logical since on the other hand this kind of small changes take almost the same time to name them than to fix them. Bests. ===Infobox for hypertension=== I have done a few edits after the review in the hypertension article (mainly in the history section). Additionally I have noticed that the article does not have an infobox. Could anybody create it? (I do not really know how to do it). Thanks in advance. I added the infobox back, but one of the reviewers was the person who originally removed it so maybe they don't think it belongs. Remember (talk) That infobox was moved during my edit-so I'll can explain my thinking on it. To me it was redudant (already an image of a blood pressure meter in the article later on) and contained both broken, redundant, or too technical links. The edit I did was to move the infobox in question to replace the second image (deleted-older style blood pressure meter) in the more appropriate spot, and the links were just deleted. You'll see that the image in the infobox now appears twice in the article after being restored. If you want to keep the original infobox, you will need to delete the duplicate image. BSW-RMH (talk) Have done so. We try to keep some consistent formating between article per MEDMOS. Only the ICD nine code is broken. Will fix it soon. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) Looks great now. Good job! Thanks for making sure the article is style-compliant. BSW-RMH (talk) Readers who use screen readers have requested that infoboxes and other templates be placed in a predictable order at the top of articles. The order is named at Accessibility. WhatamIdoing (talk) ===List of Completed External Reviews (BSW-RMH)=== Comments, questions, and recommedations welcomed: Chagas disease Hypertension Compliance (medicine) Hepatitis B Huntington's disease 2009 flu pandemic Heartburn Hypovitaminosis D Sexual intercourse BSW-RMH (talk) I like your reviews: concrete, specific, actionable, and friendly. It looks like nobody's home at Compliance (medicine), but the other articles have one or two editors working on the suggestions you've made. We need a system for signalling when a review is being ignored, is stuck, and is finished. I've added a column to the table that might make convenient place for such notes. WhatamIdoing (talk) == Signature hint for new editors == Some talk pages are automatically archived by bots. The bot does this by looking at the very last words in each section, in the hope of finding a timestamp. If it finds an old message, it cuts it off the normal talk page, and pastes it into an archive. One quirk of this system is that the bots need editors to sign their talkpage comments at the end of every ==Major section== on the talk page, rather than at the beginning. If you put your signature/timestamp at the start (thinking, quite reasonably, to indicate "The following message is from me"), then the bot will be unable to find the timestamp, and the comment may hang out for years before anyone happens to notice the problem. This is all easily fixed if someone notices, but if you happen to think of it, please sign each comment at the end. Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) == Warning: Ref numbers change == As a note to new editors: The footnote numbers aren't stable in articles; they're automatically re-numbered every time someone adds, removes, or moves a ref. Consequently, if you refer to "Ref 32" in your comments, editors may not be able to find it. We can usually figure it out in the end by pulling the old versions out of the history, but it's quicker for us, and probably safer in the end, if you find a different way to refer to footnotes (e.g., "Ref 32 (Smith)", but it can be anything that's handy and likely to be unique). WhatamIdoing (talk) ==Heartburn== Heartburn-anyone that can- please weigh in on the talk page concerning this article, re. 'heartburn' meaning just a symptom or a symptom/condition/disease/syndrome, revisions will require a the community consensus on this issue. BSW-RMH (talk) ==So what now?== Most of the reviews have been performed already and only one reviewer is interacting with the wikipedia community and watching articles to see changes and give additional imput. From my point of view the reviews of this reviewer are the most (maybe the only ones) useful. In addition as pointed above there have been some misunderstandings among the reviewers on the preferred sources in wikipedia, which of course since there has been zero interaction with them have not been clarified... Nevertheless we have to look foward. What is going to occur now? Bests. Yes I agree that BSW-RMH interactions have been good. With respect to the editing of Strep throat the review occurred half way through my editing binge and was not updated once I was finished. From my point of view I could use a review of Obesity as I am unsure how to improve it further. I've also been impressed with BSW-RMH's work. I think that what we mostly do right now is to figure out which reviews are being completely neglected and see whether we can round up some editors to work on those. I looked at the first 20 the other day on an archiving run, and while about half were well underway (and congrats to DO11.10 for being the first to completely finish!), there were several that appeared to have zero active editors on the page. If we're waiting for clarification on one page, we can at least try to do the easy stuff on a neglected page. WhatamIdoing (talk) I also think they are using poor sources, easily accessible but poor. == Use of sources == How to deal with MEDRS and these articles? Reviewers are using lay sources (informational web sites) instead of books and formal statements that can be further checked. I want to state that sources like this which collates information covering over 90% of the U.S. population is preferable to a source that you suggested that quotes data from 1998. I wish that I can use tools like Uptodate or the Cochrane library (which many articles that are linked are not available by our institutional subscription), but even working in the largest medical center in the world does not provide me with these resources. BSWSJR (talk) Yes I have seen the same such as here I have left them notes but have not received acknowledgment.

WikiProject Medicine/Google Project

== Welcome == Welcome! Hello, Geoffery1969, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Elizabeth Keates. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place before the question. Again, welcome! EWikistTalk

Geoffery1969

Johannes Marius ("Bok") de Korver (27 January 1883 in Rotterdam – 22 October 1957 in Rotterdam) was a football player from the Netherlands, who twice won a bronze medal with the Netherlands national football team at the Summer Olympics: in 1908 (London) and in 1912 (Stockholm). ==Career== De Korver played for Sparta Rotterdam between 1902 and 1923. He won the Dutch national title five times. De Korver scored his most notable goal in 1912, in a match against AFC Ajax. His goal won Sparta the national title. De Korver played 31 caps for the Netherlands between 1905 and 1913, scoring one goal. He won two Olympic bronze medals, in 1908 and 1912. De Korver captained the latter team. He was also a player of the Dutch national team that beat England for the first time ever, in 1913. Legend has it that De Korver never made a foul during his career. He thought training was unsportsmanlike to the opponent, and he loved to smoke cigars. De Korver was the first Dutch football player to be the subject of a biography, in 1916. Bok de Korver was a civil servant for the municipality of Rotterdam. He ended his career at age 40, after pneumonia. De Korver died on 22 October 1957, aged 74. He was buried in Haren (Groningen). De Korver was an honorary member of Sparta and of the Royal Dutch Football Association. The football club BDK from Amsterdam was named after De Korver. The west stand of Sparta's stadium, Het Kasteel, was renamed Bok de Korver Stand on 1 April 2007. ==Career statistics== ===International=== ====International goals==== Scores and results table. Netherlands's goal tally first: ==References== Dutch Olympic Committee ==External links== Bok de Korver - International Appearances at Profile at 1883 births 1957 deaths Dutch footballers Directors of football clubs in the Netherlands Sparta Rotterdam players Netherlands international footballers Footballers at the 1908 Summer Olympics Footballers at the 1912 Summer Olympics Olympic footballers of the Netherlands Olympic bronze medalists for the Netherlands Footballers from Rotterdam Olympic medalists in football Medalists at the 1912 Summer Olympics Medalists at the 1908 Summer Olympics Association footballers not categorized by position

Bok de Korver

== November 2008 == Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

77.74.230.226