|
1 |
|
00:00:05,900 --> 00:00:07,960 |
|
Assalamualaikum and good morning everyone. Welcome |
|
|
|
2 |
|
00:00:07,960 --> 00:00:10,640 |
|
back to English poetry at the Islamic University |
|
|
|
3 |
|
00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:14,800 |
|
of Gaza. Today we move to a very interesting poet, |
|
|
|
4 |
|
00:00:15,080 --> 00:00:18,820 |
|
critic and a modernist. When we started this |
|
|
|
5 |
|
00:00:18,820 --> 00:00:22,680 |
|
course, I asked you for your favorite definition |
|
|
|
6 |
|
00:00:22,680 --> 00:00:26,500 |
|
of poetry and most of you opted for the |
|
|
|
7 |
|
00:00:26,500 --> 00:00:29,940 |
|
Wordsworthian definition, defining poetry as a |
|
|
|
8 |
|
00:00:29,940 --> 00:00:35,680 |
|
spontaneous overflow of powerful emotions. And I |
|
|
|
9 |
|
00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:38,720 |
|
want that many people would stop here, giving this |
|
|
|
10 |
|
00:00:38,720 --> 00:00:42,080 |
|
definition, and this actually falls short because |
|
|
|
11 |
|
00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:44,340 |
|
there is a second part, there's a significant |
|
|
|
12 |
|
00:00:44,340 --> 00:00:48,000 |
|
part, actually 50% of what the definition is, |
|
|
|
13 |
|
00:00:48,100 --> 00:00:52,370 |
|
which is recollected in tranquility. This |
|
|
|
14 |
|
00:00:52,370 --> 00:00:55,470 |
|
recollection act of remembering and recalling |
|
|
|
15 |
|
00:00:55,470 --> 00:00:58,350 |
|
memories is significant. We're going to see this |
|
|
|
16 |
|
00:00:58,350 --> 00:01:01,290 |
|
in a bit. Before we talk about the features which |
|
|
|
17 |
|
00:01:01,290 --> 00:01:04,970 |
|
we in a way or another mentioned in the lectures |
|
|
|
18 |
|
00:01:04,970 --> 00:01:10,380 |
|
on William Blake. Let's see this canonical text. |
|
|
|
19 |
|
00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:12,520 |
|
I'm sure you're already familiar with this. Some |
|
|
|
20 |
|
00:01:12,520 --> 00:01:15,460 |
|
of you must have studied this before, but it's |
|
|
|
21 |
|
00:01:15,460 --> 00:01:18,620 |
|
always, always good to see how different people do |
|
|
|
22 |
|
00:01:18,620 --> 00:01:24,040 |
|
different things. In my way of studying poetry and |
|
|
|
23 |
|
00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:26,160 |
|
literature in general, I like to focus on the |
|
|
|
24 |
|
00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:30,200 |
|
structure, on the form, on how the poets say what |
|
|
|
25 |
|
00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:34,110 |
|
they say rather than what they actually say. Some |
|
|
|
26 |
|
00:01:34,110 --> 00:01:39,050 |
|
critics would suggest that there are actually a |
|
|
|
27 |
|
00:01:39,050 --> 00:01:42,390 |
|
handful of themes out there. All poetry, all |
|
|
|
28 |
|
00:01:42,390 --> 00:01:44,930 |
|
literature, all writings can be summarized into a |
|
|
|
29 |
|
00:01:44,930 --> 00:01:49,890 |
|
handful of issues. I'm happy, I'm sad, she likes |
|
|
|
30 |
|
00:01:49,890 --> 00:01:52,830 |
|
me, she doesn't like me, life's good, life's bad. |
|
|
|
31 |
|
00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:58,060 |
|
And that's why we have poets, Arab poets, who |
|
|
|
32 |
|
00:01:58,060 --> 00:02:01,080 |
|
suggested almost 2,000 years ago that whatever |
|
|
|
33 |
|
00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:04,360 |
|
they were doing was just repeating themselves and |
|
|
|
34 |
|
00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:08,160 |
|
intertexting or borrowing or quoting other poets. |
|
|
|
35 |
|
00:02:08,340 --> 00:02:11,900 |
|
And this is 2,000 years ago. Ma arana naqulu illa |
|
|
|
36 |
|
00:02:11,900 --> 00:02:15,000 |
|
muaran aw muadan min lafdina makrooro. And Antara |
|
|
|
37 |
|
00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:17,980 |
|
says, hal ghadara ash shuara wa min mutraddami. |
|
|
|
38 |
|
00:02:18,460 --> 00:02:21,800 |
|
Opening his muallaqa, his long poem, saying that, |
|
|
|
39 |
|
00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:25,350 |
|
what should I write about? everything I want to |
|
|
|
40 |
|
00:02:25,350 --> 00:02:29,170 |
|
speak about has already been spoken about by other |
|
|
|
41 |
|
00:02:29,170 --> 00:02:33,690 |
|
poets. But he doesn't just stop there and give us |
|
|
|
42 |
|
00:02:33,690 --> 00:02:40,030 |
|
that one line, the opening, because he knows he is |
|
|
|
43 |
|
00:02:40,030 --> 00:02:44,170 |
|
not, in a way, the idea is being repeated, but how |
|
|
|
44 |
|
00:02:44,170 --> 00:02:46,110 |
|
he is doing his poetry is totally different. |
|
|
|
45 |
|
00:02:46,330 --> 00:02:49,190 |
|
That's why every poem, every poet is a different |
|
|
|
46 |
|
00:02:49,190 --> 00:02:51,390 |
|
experience. Even by the same poet, you'll |
|
|
|
47 |
|
00:02:51,390 --> 00:02:55,820 |
|
experience different different things I have, like |
|
|
|
48 |
|
00:02:55,820 --> 00:02:57,480 |
|
when you study Tamim al-Barghouti, you'll find |
|
|
|
49 |
|
00:02:57,480 --> 00:03:00,580 |
|
that there are common features for his poetry, |
|
|
|
50 |
|
00:03:01,340 --> 00:03:05,160 |
|
right? But once you get into each poem, it's a |
|
|
|
51 |
|
00:03:05,160 --> 00:03:11,560 |
|
microcosm of its own world. One guy said to a |
|
|
|
52 |
|
00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:16,140 |
|
critic, I want to write poetry. I have so many |
|
|
|
53 |
|
00:03:16,140 --> 00:03:19,320 |
|
ideas. I want to write poetry, we do this |
|
|
|
54 |
|
00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:23,580 |
|
sometimes. I want to write poetry, I have so many |
|
|
|
55 |
|
00:03:23,580 --> 00:03:28,000 |
|
ideas. And the critic being a critic said, poetry |
|
|
|
56 |
|
00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:31,940 |
|
my friend is not made with ideas, but with words. |
|
|
|
57 |
|
00:03:34,340 --> 00:03:37,400 |
|
what words to choose, how to use the words, how to |
|
|
|
58 |
|
00:03:37,400 --> 00:03:40,280 |
|
word the words, how to order the words, how to |
|
|
|
59 |
|
00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:43,520 |
|
play with the words, how to use and recruit |
|
|
|
60 |
|
00:03:43,520 --> 00:03:47,480 |
|
literary devices and metaphorical language, |
|
|
|
61 |
|
00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:51,680 |
|
figures of speech. And that's why, again, I like |
|
|
|
62 |
|
00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:57,020 |
|
Samuel Coleridge's definition probably more. He |
|
|
|
63 |
|
00:03:57,020 --> 00:03:59,180 |
|
says in a way, it sounds a stupid definition, but |
|
|
|
64 |
|
00:03:59,180 --> 00:04:05,030 |
|
it's really deep. Poetry is the best words in the |
|
|
|
65 |
|
00:04:05,030 --> 00:04:10,890 |
|
best order. Poetry is the best words in the best |
|
|
|
66 |
|
00:04:10,890 --> 00:04:14,970 |
|
order, where he is focusing more on how the form |
|
|
|
67 |
|
00:04:14,970 --> 00:04:18,170 |
|
and the language should say what they should say. |
|
|
|
68 |
|
00:04:19,590 --> 00:04:21,350 |
|
Now, when we talk about William Wordsworth, we |
|
|
|
69 |
|
00:04:21,350 --> 00:04:23,510 |
|
talk about one of the most, again, important poets |
|
|
|
70 |
|
00:04:23,510 --> 00:04:27,450 |
|
of all times. We talk about the father or the |
|
|
|
71 |
|
00:04:27,450 --> 00:04:30,610 |
|
founder or the co-founder of Romanticism. Along |
|
|
|
72 |
|
00:04:30,610 --> 00:04:35,850 |
|
with Coleridge, they published what is known as |
|
|
|
73 |
|
00:04:35,850 --> 00:04:42,360 |
|
The Lyrical Ballads around 1798. And the book in a |
|
|
|
74 |
|
00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:44,760 |
|
short time sold out. There were no more copies |
|
|
|
75 |
|
00:04:44,760 --> 00:04:47,740 |
|
because people remember we said nanoclassicism was |
|
|
|
76 |
|
00:04:47,740 --> 00:04:49,680 |
|
already in decline and people were looking for |
|
|
|
77 |
|
00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:53,040 |
|
something different, something new. Coleridge |
|
|
|
78 |
|
00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:57,440 |
|
published only his Rymor Ancient Mariner and |
|
|
|
79 |
|
00:04:57,440 --> 00:04:59,560 |
|
Wordsworth published like I'm not sure how many |
|
|
|
80 |
|
00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:04,500 |
|
poems but a bunch of them. Now after two years |
|
|
|
81 |
|
00:05:04,500 --> 00:05:06,400 |
|
they say they said like okay let's |
|
|
|
82 |
|
00:05:08,900 --> 00:05:11,620 |
|
Let's tell people what we're doing. Let's define |
|
|
|
83 |
|
00:05:11,620 --> 00:05:14,640 |
|
poetry, define a poet and tell them what kind of |
|
|
|
84 |
|
00:05:14,640 --> 00:05:17,240 |
|
language, what kind of sensibility we're employing |
|
|
|
85 |
|
00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:17,560 |
|
here. |
|
|
|
86 |
|
00:05:23,880 --> 00:05:27,540 |
|
Coleridge, probably you know this already, |
|
|
|
87 |
|
00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:29,800 |
|
Coleridge was a drug addict. He was an opium |
|
|
|
88 |
|
00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:33,080 |
|
addict. He was high all the time. Not climbing |
|
|
|
89 |
|
00:05:33,080 --> 00:05:39,270 |
|
trees, but high. He didn't participate in writing |
|
|
|
90 |
|
00:05:39,270 --> 00:05:42,150 |
|
the introduction, which is now known as the |
|
|
|
91 |
|
00:05:42,150 --> 00:05:44,750 |
|
preface to the lyrical ballad. It was written, I'm |
|
|
|
92 |
|
00:05:44,750 --> 00:05:47,230 |
|
saying this because some people think that the |
|
|
|
93 |
|
00:05:47,230 --> 00:05:50,710 |
|
preface is what Romanticism is, and this is, to a |
|
|
|
94 |
|
00:05:50,710 --> 00:05:53,910 |
|
large extent, yes, if you consider words worth |
|
|
|
95 |
|
00:05:53,910 --> 00:05:59,020 |
|
everything in Romanticism, and this is wrong. And |
|
|
|
96 |
|
00:05:59,020 --> 00:06:02,000 |
|
I know many of you usually, I like feminism, I |
|
|
|
97 |
|
00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:05,680 |
|
like post-colonialism, I like romanticism. And |
|
|
|
98 |
|
00:06:05,680 --> 00:06:07,980 |
|
then later on you find, you realize that there are |
|
|
|
99 |
|
00:06:07,980 --> 00:06:11,880 |
|
romanticisms, feminisms, and post-colonialisms. |
|
|
|
100 |
|
00:06:13,560 --> 00:06:15,860 |
|
Because when you study what a college is going to |
|
|
|
101 |
|
00:06:15,860 --> 00:06:18,880 |
|
be like, they share these common features, but |
|
|
|
102 |
|
00:06:18,880 --> 00:06:21,740 |
|
they're totally different. Look at Shelley, for |
|
|
|
103 |
|
00:06:21,740 --> 00:06:26,180 |
|
example, Percy Shelley. Lord Byron, Lord Byron, |
|
|
|
104 |
|
00:06:27,670 --> 00:06:30,470 |
|
hates Coleridge and William Wordsworth. He keeps |
|
|
|
105 |
|
00:06:30,470 --> 00:06:33,070 |
|
making fun of them all the time, mocking them. |
|
|
|
106 |
|
00:06:34,190 --> 00:06:40,130 |
|
This is the second generation. Now, so William |
|
|
|
107 |
|
00:06:40,130 --> 00:06:43,450 |
|
Wordsworth wrote the preface himself alone. This |
|
|
|
108 |
|
00:06:43,450 --> 00:06:45,710 |
|
is good again and bad because we have now |
|
|
|
109 |
|
00:06:45,710 --> 00:06:48,210 |
|
something, unlike the metaphysicals, they didn't |
|
|
|
110 |
|
00:06:48,210 --> 00:06:50,290 |
|
write anything to define their poetry, what they |
|
|
|
111 |
|
00:06:50,290 --> 00:06:52,390 |
|
were doing, to tell people about their new |
|
|
|
112 |
|
00:06:52,390 --> 00:06:52,950 |
|
sensibility. |
|
|
|
113 |
|
00:06:56,020 --> 00:06:58,000 |
|
But again, it's bad because some people think that |
|
|
|
114 |
|
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:00,100 |
|
this is all what you need to know about |
|
|
|
115 |
|
00:07:00,100 --> 00:07:02,820 |
|
romanticism. This is also good because later on |
|
|
|
116 |
|
00:07:02,820 --> 00:07:06,760 |
|
Coleridge realized that, oh my God, I didn't |
|
|
|
117 |
|
00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:10,340 |
|
participate in this. And he wrote his own book |
|
|
|
118 |
|
00:07:10,340 --> 00:07:14,480 |
|
known as Biographia Literaria, or Literary |
|
|
|
119 |
|
00:07:14,480 --> 00:07:17,400 |
|
Biography. So it's good that we have two books by |
|
|
|
120 |
|
00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:24,000 |
|
these two amazing poets and critics. This poem, |
|
|
|
121 |
|
00:07:24,660 --> 00:07:28,740 |
|
some say, is the icon, the epitome of |
|
|
|
122 |
|
00:07:28,740 --> 00:07:32,160 |
|
neoclassicism, sorry, romanticism. It contains |
|
|
|
123 |
|
00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:35,480 |
|
almost every feature, as if he wrote this poem |
|
|
|
124 |
|
00:07:35,480 --> 00:07:38,600 |
|
just to show people how to write poetry in terms |
|
|
|
125 |
|
00:07:38,600 --> 00:07:41,800 |
|
of form, of language, of subject matter, of the |
|
|
|
126 |
|
00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:46,240 |
|
new sensibility, of the feelings and emotions and |
|
|
|
127 |
|
00:07:46,240 --> 00:07:47,940 |
|
imagination, individuality, as opposed to |
|
|
|
128 |
|
00:07:47,940 --> 00:07:53,120 |
|
everything that we had in neoclassical Iran. Okay, |
|
|
|
129 |
|
00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:57,400 |
|
so the poem is entitled with the daffodils the |
|
|
|
130 |
|
00:07:57,400 --> 00:08:01,580 |
|
daffodils Probably let's let's read the poem |
|
|
|
131 |
|
00:08:01,580 --> 00:08:04,460 |
|
together for the sake of time just one stanza |
|
|
|
132 |
|
00:08:04,460 --> 00:08:13,460 |
|
each, please I wandered lonely Okay, |
|
|
|
133 |
|
00:08:14,440 --> 00:08:18,220 |
|
can you say again and speak up I wandered lonely |
|
|
|
134 |
|
00:08:18,220 --> 00:08:22,840 |
|
as a cloud that floats high over hills and hills. |
|
|
|
135 |
|
00:08:23,460 --> 00:08:27,160 |
|
When all at once I saw a crowd, a host of golden |
|
|
|
136 |
|
00:08:27,160 --> 00:08:30,800 |
|
daffodils beside the lakes beneath the trees, |
|
|
|
137 |
|
00:08:31,220 --> 00:08:33,420 |
|
fluttering and dancing in the breeze. Thank you |
|
|
|
138 |
|
00:08:33,420 --> 00:08:34,560 |
|
very much. One more, please. |
|
|
|
139 |
|
00:08:49,970 --> 00:08:55,550 |
|
Thank you. Speak up. The waves beside them danced, |
|
|
|
140 |
|
00:08:55,710 --> 00:08:59,250 |
|
but they outdid the sparkling waves indeed. A poet |
|
|
|
141 |
|
00:08:59,250 --> 00:09:03,130 |
|
could not but be gay in such a tokened company. I |
|
|
|
142 |
|
00:09:03,130 --> 00:09:07,700 |
|
gazed and gazed, but little thought what Thank you |
|
|
|
143 |
|
00:09:07,700 --> 00:09:13,920 |
|
very much. One more, please. On my couch. |
|
|
|
144 |
|
00:09:23,020 --> 00:09:27,500 |
|
Very good. |
|
|
|
145 |
|
00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:33,780 |
|
Very good. Okay, so I'll go into a journey through |
|
|
|
146 |
|
00:09:33,780 --> 00:09:36,880 |
|
this poem and show you how I like to usually do |
|
|
|
147 |
|
00:09:36,880 --> 00:09:41,240 |
|
things. But this is a poem that can be studied |
|
|
|
148 |
|
00:09:41,240 --> 00:09:43,020 |
|
from different ideas. You can start with the |
|
|
|
149 |
|
00:09:43,020 --> 00:09:44,880 |
|
features, looking for them, et cetera. But let's |
|
|
|
150 |
|
00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:48,260 |
|
do a close reading, reading between the words and |
|
|
|
151 |
|
00:09:48,260 --> 00:09:53,280 |
|
the lines. Now, the title itself, Daffodils, or |
|
|
|
152 |
|
00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:55,220 |
|
The Daffodils, suggests that |
|
|
|
153 |
|
00:09:58,220 --> 00:10:01,920 |
|
This is a poem that is rooted, or at least |
|
|
|
154 |
|
00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:06,600 |
|
inspired by nature. The daffodils, rather than |
|
|
|
155 |
|
00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:09,460 |
|
paradise lost, paradise regained, rather than any |
|
|
|
156 |
|
00:10:09,460 --> 00:10:13,380 |
|
lofty subject matter, the fairy queen, they say on |
|
|
|
157 |
|
00:10:13,380 --> 00:10:16,560 |
|
criticism, they say on man, that's the daffodils. |
|
|
|
158 |
|
00:10:16,860 --> 00:10:21,640 |
|
Totally different from the neoclassical, the |
|
|
|
159 |
|
00:10:21,640 --> 00:10:24,570 |
|
neoclassicals who were writing before this. When |
|
|
|
160 |
|
00:10:24,570 --> 00:10:27,710 |
|
we read the poem, we realize that this is a poem |
|
|
|
161 |
|
00:10:27,710 --> 00:10:31,870 |
|
that is overwhelmed by nature and natural |
|
|
|
162 |
|
00:10:31,870 --> 00:10:36,990 |
|
elements. It's not a poem that uses nature as some |
|
|
|
163 |
|
00:10:36,990 --> 00:10:39,350 |
|
kind of decoration for the poem. Because some of |
|
|
|
164 |
|
00:10:39,350 --> 00:10:41,410 |
|
you will say, okay, Shakespeare used natural |
|
|
|
165 |
|
00:10:41,410 --> 00:10:44,210 |
|
elements. Marlowe used natural elements in his |
|
|
|
166 |
|
00:10:44,210 --> 00:10:46,730 |
|
poetry. What difference does it make? The |
|
|
|
167 |
|
00:10:46,730 --> 00:10:48,030 |
|
difference is actually |
|
|
|
168 |
|
00:10:51,260 --> 00:10:54,460 |
|
Existential, not just superficial, because in this |
|
|
|
169 |
|
00:10:54,460 --> 00:10:59,120 |
|
poem, in Wordsworth, nature is the poem. The poem |
|
|
|
170 |
|
00:10:59,120 --> 00:11:01,840 |
|
is for nature, nature inspires the poem, nature |
|
|
|
171 |
|
00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:04,020 |
|
everything. Take nature from the poem and you |
|
|
|
172 |
|
00:11:04,020 --> 00:11:07,860 |
|
don't have a poem. But for Shakespeare, probably |
|
|
|
173 |
|
00:11:07,860 --> 00:11:09,800 |
|
for Marlow, if you take nature, you take the |
|
|
|
174 |
|
00:11:09,800 --> 00:11:11,820 |
|
decorations because he's saying that, come live |
|
|
|
175 |
|
00:11:11,820 --> 00:11:14,440 |
|
with me and be my love. I own everything around |
|
|
|
176 |
|
00:11:14,440 --> 00:11:16,980 |
|
me. He's not showing the relationship between him |
|
|
|
177 |
|
00:11:16,980 --> 00:11:19,840 |
|
and nature and how nature is impacting him, his |
|
|
|
178 |
|
00:11:19,840 --> 00:11:24,700 |
|
psychology, his everything here. So nature here, |
|
|
|
179 |
|
00:11:25,180 --> 00:11:27,160 |
|
this is about the impact of nature. The impact, |
|
|
|
180 |
|
00:11:27,220 --> 00:11:30,110 |
|
and again, I don't like to talk about themes |
|
|
|
181 |
|
00:11:30,110 --> 00:11:32,770 |
|
because sometimes they limit the meaning of the |
|
|
|
182 |
|
00:11:32,770 --> 00:11:35,290 |
|
poem. But yeah, there is this thing about how |
|
|
|
183 |
|
00:11:35,290 --> 00:11:37,810 |
|
nature is changing, is impacting him from one |
|
|
|
184 |
|
00:11:37,810 --> 00:11:42,030 |
|
thing to the other. And then the second thing, we |
|
|
|
185 |
|
00:11:42,030 --> 00:11:48,890 |
|
are struck with the I. I wandered lonely as a |
|
|
|
186 |
|
00:11:48,890 --> 00:11:51,330 |
|
cloud. And actually not only I, we have lonely and |
|
|
|
187 |
|
00:11:51,330 --> 00:11:57,170 |
|
we have the singularity of a cloud. I wondered |
|
|
|
188 |
|
00:11:57,170 --> 00:11:59,310 |
|
lonely as there is subjectivity here, there is |
|
|
|
189 |
|
00:11:59,310 --> 00:12:02,740 |
|
individualism. For romanticism, remember we said |
|
|
|
190 |
|
00:12:02,740 --> 00:12:05,260 |
|
that neoclassical poetry was poetry of the |
|
|
|
191 |
|
00:12:05,260 --> 00:12:08,600 |
|
collective, of everybody, for all, not for all |
|
|
|
192 |
|
00:12:08,600 --> 00:12:13,680 |
|
like in this sense where it talks, where it |
|
|
|
193 |
|
00:12:13,680 --> 00:12:17,800 |
|
considers poetry a practice that is, that can be |
|
|
|
194 |
|
00:12:17,800 --> 00:12:20,940 |
|
done by everybody, by any ordinary man with just, |
|
|
|
195 |
|
00:12:21,060 --> 00:12:23,980 |
|
or woman with just some comprehensive sensibility. |
|
|
|
196 |
|
00:12:24,460 --> 00:12:27,820 |
|
It means that you need to write poetry about |
|
|
|
197 |
|
00:12:27,820 --> 00:12:30,740 |
|
significant and lofty issues, issues that touch |
|
|
|
198 |
|
00:12:30,950 --> 00:12:34,170 |
|
Everybody. If your poem is about Adapodil, why |
|
|
|
199 |
|
00:12:34,170 --> 00:12:36,870 |
|
should I care? Adapodil is not important to me. |
|
|
|
200 |
|
00:12:37,570 --> 00:12:40,390 |
|
But God and Adam and Eve and the Queen, these |
|
|
|
201 |
|
00:12:40,390 --> 00:12:43,610 |
|
things are important to everybody. And then he |
|
|
|
202 |
|
00:12:43,610 --> 00:12:47,990 |
|
emphasizes this by saying lonely and then a cloud. |
|
|
|
203 |
|
00:12:48,110 --> 00:12:52,170 |
|
He's wondering, not like clouds or birds, |
|
|
|
204 |
|
00:12:52,250 --> 00:12:55,650 |
|
whatever, it's just one singularity. So when we |
|
|
|
205 |
|
00:12:55,650 --> 00:12:58,330 |
|
say there's subjectivity here, there is |
|
|
|
206 |
|
00:12:58,330 --> 00:13:03,980 |
|
individuality here, Don't get this mixed up with |
|
|
|
207 |
|
00:13:03,980 --> 00:13:06,900 |
|
every, not every I in a poem is individual I, |
|
|
|
208 |
|
00:13:06,980 --> 00:13:08,920 |
|
because some of the I's could be collective I's. |
|
|
|
209 |
|
00:13:09,020 --> 00:13:13,680 |
|
I, an I where the poet is assuming the role of the |
|
|
|
210 |
|
00:13:13,680 --> 00:13:17,220 |
|
spokesperson for everybody, like the we, okay? |
|
|
|
211 |
|
00:13:17,480 --> 00:13:19,800 |
|
Like where, for example, a poet speaks for all |
|
|
|
212 |
|
00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:23,460 |
|
lovers, for all poets, for all people, but with |
|
|
|
213 |
|
00:13:23,460 --> 00:13:26,240 |
|
William Wordsworth, and mostly the romantics, but |
|
|
|
214 |
|
00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:30,480 |
|
in particular, William Wordsworth, The I here is |
|
|
|
215 |
|
00:13:30,480 --> 00:13:34,320 |
|
actually the poet himself. Because for |
|
|
|
216 |
|
00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:38,360 |
|
romanticism, the poem is the poet. And the poet is |
|
|
|
217 |
|
00:13:38,360 --> 00:13:40,520 |
|
the poem. They are interchangeable. That's why |
|
|
|
218 |
|
00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:42,980 |
|
when you discuss romanticism, remember we said |
|
|
|
219 |
|
00:13:42,980 --> 00:13:46,740 |
|
poetry for them is self-expression? You experience |
|
|
|
220 |
|
00:13:46,740 --> 00:13:50,320 |
|
something, you experience something that you |
|
|
|
221 |
|
00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:52,500 |
|
experience yourself in a way or another. It |
|
|
|
222 |
|
00:13:52,500 --> 00:13:55,120 |
|
doesn't have to be a direct experience. We can |
|
|
|
223 |
|
00:13:55,120 --> 00:13:59,110 |
|
talk about this later on. And lonely, this is |
|
|
|
224 |
|
00:13:59,110 --> 00:14:03,050 |
|
loneliness. We'll see at the end how he was not |
|
|
|
225 |
|
00:14:03,050 --> 00:14:06,430 |
|
alone when he had this experience. But there's |
|
|
|
226 |
|
00:14:06,430 --> 00:14:09,590 |
|
somebody he is totally eradicating and erasing |
|
|
|
227 |
|
00:14:09,590 --> 00:14:12,530 |
|
from the poem. Is this anti-feminism? Is this? |
|
|
|
228 |
|
00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:18,780 |
|
self-centeredness or is this and again emphasis on |
|
|
|
229 |
|
00:14:18,780 --> 00:14:21,400 |
|
individuality rather than society and community |
|
|
|
230 |
|
00:14:21,400 --> 00:14:25,860 |
|
which is a romantic feature when he says as a |
|
|
|
231 |
|
00:14:25,860 --> 00:14:29,560 |
|
cloud as is it's a simile thank you and a simile |
|
|
|
232 |
|
00:14:29,560 --> 00:14:35,220 |
|
is a metaphor where you use as or like just and in |
|
|
|
233 |
|
00:14:35,220 --> 00:14:39,540 |
|
general Similes are easier than metaphors. If he |
|
|
|
234 |
|
00:14:39,540 --> 00:14:46,980 |
|
said, I wandered lonely or I floated lonely, we'll |
|
|
|
235 |
|
00:14:46,980 --> 00:14:53,280 |
|
be asking, what does he mean? Why is he floating? |
|
|
|
236 |
|
00:14:53,500 --> 00:14:57,160 |
|
What, is he a bird? Is he a duck? Is he what? |
|
|
|
237 |
|
00:14:58,280 --> 00:15:01,620 |
|
Because the possibilities are open, but he just |
|
|
|
238 |
|
00:15:01,620 --> 00:15:04,060 |
|
closes the door here by saying that, I wandered |
|
|
|
239 |
|
00:15:04,060 --> 00:15:08,110 |
|
lonely as a cloud. That's the end of it. And this |
|
|
|
240 |
|
00:15:08,110 --> 00:15:10,650 |
|
is something some people might be interested in |
|
|
|
241 |
|
00:15:10,650 --> 00:15:14,070 |
|
doing research on. How, for example, the Nihilists |
|
|
|
242 |
|
00:15:14,070 --> 00:15:17,090 |
|
were more into metaphors, you know, make things |
|
|
|
243 |
|
00:15:17,090 --> 00:15:19,610 |
|
complex sometimes, elaborate. That's why we have |
|
|
|
244 |
|
00:15:19,610 --> 00:15:23,630 |
|
the conceit and the Elizabethan conceit. But here, |
|
|
|
245 |
|
00:15:23,950 --> 00:15:26,230 |
|
they go for the simple. We'll see this repeated |
|
|
|
246 |
|
00:15:26,230 --> 00:15:30,870 |
|
again later on as the stars. And then again, a |
|
|
|
247 |
|
00:15:30,870 --> 00:15:35,170 |
|
cloud, not clouds, emphasizing the singularity of |
|
|
|
248 |
|
00:15:35,170 --> 00:15:43,620 |
|
it. But why a cloud? Yeah? Why a cloud? Not a |
|
|
|
249 |
|
00:15:43,620 --> 00:15:51,160 |
|
tree, a bird, a cat, or a drone, or a plane, or a |
|
|
|
250 |
|
00:15:51,160 --> 00:15:56,640 |
|
kite, you know? A kite, paper kite. What does it |
|
|
|
251 |
|
00:15:56,640 --> 00:16:00,340 |
|
indicate possibly? Yeah? Maybe because it's up in |
|
|
|
252 |
|
00:16:00,340 --> 00:16:02,840 |
|
the sky and it's hard to reach. Thank you very |
|
|
|
253 |
|
00:16:02,840 --> 00:16:07,120 |
|
much. It's up in the sky. it's high up above |
|
|
|
254 |
|
00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:13,200 |
|
everything it has this bird's eye view that can it |
|
|
|
255 |
|
00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:17,620 |
|
can look at at things below it can see things from |
|
|
|
256 |
|
00:16:17,620 --> 00:16:21,660 |
|
a comprehensive perspective it's up above that's |
|
|
|
257 |
|
00:16:21,660 --> 00:16:24,480 |
|
one and i think because it is moving slowly so |
|
|
|
258 |
|
00:16:24,480 --> 00:16:27,140 |
|
he's in a state when he is staring at everything |
|
|
|
259 |
|
00:16:27,140 --> 00:16:29,380 |
|
and imagining everything so he couldn't be like |
|
|
|
260 |
|
00:16:29,460 --> 00:16:32,120 |
|
But not necessarily, not all clouds move slowly, |
|
|
|
261 |
|
00:16:32,200 --> 00:16:34,180 |
|
but that could be part of it. Sometimes they move |
|
|
|
262 |
|
00:16:34,180 --> 00:16:37,840 |
|
slowly. So this deliberate movement could be a |
|
|
|
263 |
|
00:16:37,840 --> 00:16:42,340 |
|
possible thing here. There is deliberation in the |
|
|
|
264 |
|
00:16:42,340 --> 00:16:45,360 |
|
process. There could be another reason. Maybe to |
|
|
|
265 |
|
00:16:45,360 --> 00:16:47,740 |
|
show that it's like something that is delicate and |
|
|
|
266 |
|
00:16:47,740 --> 00:16:51,660 |
|
soft. The delicacy of it, okay, the softness. I |
|
|
|
267 |
|
00:16:51,660 --> 00:16:53,020 |
|
heard somebody say something here. |
|
|
|
268 |
|
00:16:56,280 --> 00:16:59,940 |
|
Okay, it's also free, it has this kind of free |
|
|
|
269 |
|
00:16:59,940 --> 00:17:03,280 |
|
will. It's not connected with anything, it just |
|
|
|
270 |
|
00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:10,020 |
|
moves at free will. So there could be these |
|
|
|
271 |
|
00:17:10,020 --> 00:17:15,040 |
|
reasons for a cloud, one cloud, three. I love how |
|
|
|
272 |
|
00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:18,220 |
|
when you examine our friend here, Wordsworth, |
|
|
|
273 |
|
00:17:18,840 --> 00:17:22,500 |
|
we'll see the second poem in a bit. He likes to |
|
|
|
274 |
|
00:17:22,500 --> 00:17:24,640 |
|
position himself. Remember I said, try to |
|
|
|
275 |
|
00:17:24,640 --> 00:17:27,660 |
|
understand where the poet is, what he is or she is |
|
|
|
276 |
|
00:17:27,660 --> 00:17:29,560 |
|
doing now, at the moment the poem is being |
|
|
|
277 |
|
00:17:29,560 --> 00:17:33,460 |
|
written, right? Is he asleep? Is he walking? Is he |
|
|
|
278 |
|
00:17:33,460 --> 00:17:37,320 |
|
eating? Is he in a class? Is he what? In a train, |
|
|
|
279 |
|
00:17:37,460 --> 00:17:42,210 |
|
traveling? The man here positions himself up |
|
|
|
280 |
|
00:17:42,210 --> 00:17:44,950 |
|
above. We see the second poem, he does almost the |
|
|
|
281 |
|
00:17:44,950 --> 00:17:50,170 |
|
same. He distances himself from things. That |
|
|
|
282 |
|
00:17:50,170 --> 00:17:56,310 |
|
floats on high o'er vales and hills. Now, o'er is |
|
|
|
283 |
|
00:17:56,310 --> 00:18:00,710 |
|
over, but over makes it two syllables, or one |
|
|
|
284 |
|
00:18:00,710 --> 00:18:03,770 |
|
syllable. And again, look at nature. This is |
|
|
|
285 |
|
00:18:03,770 --> 00:18:07,490 |
|
something. When all at once I saw a crowd. If you |
|
|
|
286 |
|
00:18:07,490 --> 00:18:10,330 |
|
look at the first two lines, I think there is some |
|
|
|
287 |
|
00:18:10,330 --> 00:18:11,930 |
|
kind of deliberation. Somebody said deliberate |
|
|
|
288 |
|
00:18:11,930 --> 00:18:15,910 |
|
here. They're musical, but they are a little bit |
|
|
|
289 |
|
00:18:15,910 --> 00:18:19,910 |
|
slow. I wandered lonely as a cloud that floats on |
|
|
|
290 |
|
00:18:19,910 --> 00:18:24,270 |
|
high or vales and hills. This line goes even |
|
|
|
291 |
|
00:18:24,270 --> 00:18:27,850 |
|
quicker. When all at once I saw a crowd, a host of |
|
|
|
292 |
|
00:18:27,850 --> 00:18:32,590 |
|
golden daffodils. When all at once, look at this |
|
|
|
293 |
|
00:18:32,590 --> 00:18:37,470 |
|
suddenness here. I saw a crowd. And the crowd |
|
|
|
294 |
|
00:18:37,470 --> 00:18:42,050 |
|
refers to a bunch of daffodils he saw. He |
|
|
|
295 |
|
00:18:42,050 --> 00:18:47,290 |
|
describes them as a crowd doing something called a |
|
|
|
296 |
|
00:18:47,290 --> 00:18:49,850 |
|
personification. Because a crowd of people, we |
|
|
|
297 |
|
00:18:49,850 --> 00:18:52,610 |
|
say. But if crowd is negative, a little bit |
|
|
|
298 |
|
00:18:52,610 --> 00:18:54,970 |
|
negative, because crowd, you don't like crowds, |
|
|
|
299 |
|
00:18:55,050 --> 00:18:56,850 |
|
you're like, it's crowded, I'm not going to go |
|
|
|
300 |
|
00:18:56,850 --> 00:19:01,290 |
|
there. He quickly follows it with a host which is |
|
|
|
301 |
|
00:19:01,290 --> 00:19:05,610 |
|
more welcoming and more inviting. If you are a |
|
|
|
302 |
|
00:19:05,610 --> 00:19:10,090 |
|
guest, the guy taking care of you is the host. And |
|
|
|
303 |
|
00:19:10,090 --> 00:19:13,090 |
|
when you are a guest, somebody's guest, You just |
|
|
|
304 |
|
00:19:13,090 --> 00:19:17,490 |
|
stay there, you enjoy food, you enjoy drinks, you |
|
|
|
305 |
|
00:19:17,490 --> 00:19:22,290 |
|
enjoy just relax, right? But it's the host that |
|
|
|
306 |
|
00:19:22,290 --> 00:19:25,290 |
|
works hard to please you, to make you comfortable. |
|
|
|
307 |
|
00:19:26,430 --> 00:19:29,030 |
|
I'm not sure what he's doing here, but is he |
|
|
|
308 |
|
00:19:29,030 --> 00:19:31,730 |
|
suggesting that the closer you get, the more |
|
|
|
309 |
|
00:19:31,730 --> 00:19:35,090 |
|
beautiful the scene becomes, the more involved you |
|
|
|
310 |
|
00:19:35,090 --> 00:19:37,930 |
|
are, the more inviting and appealing it is, |
|
|
|
311 |
|
00:19:37,930 --> 00:19:41,580 |
|
because it sounded like a crowd, and then they |
|
|
|
312 |
|
00:19:41,580 --> 00:19:47,720 |
|
turn to be a host, which also means a group of |
|
|
|
313 |
|
00:19:47,720 --> 00:19:51,060 |
|
golden daffodils. Now, the daffodils are golden. |
|
|
|
314 |
|
00:19:51,140 --> 00:19:53,780 |
|
Why would you say golden if they are already |
|
|
|
315 |
|
00:19:53,780 --> 00:19:56,060 |
|
there? So there could be some kind of significance |
|
|
|
316 |
|
00:19:56,060 --> 00:19:59,440 |
|
for this color, shiny color. Some people would |
|
|
|
317 |
|
00:19:59,440 --> 00:20:02,120 |
|
suggest that gold, they're precious, they're gold. |
|
|
|
318 |
|
00:20:03,140 --> 00:20:05,120 |
|
Referring to the color, but referring to their |
|
|
|
319 |
|
00:20:05,120 --> 00:20:10,820 |
|
significance. Where? Beneath the lake, beside the |
|
|
|
320 |
|
00:20:10,820 --> 00:20:14,320 |
|
lake, beneath the trees, fluttering and dancing in |
|
|
|
321 |
|
00:20:14,320 --> 00:20:17,120 |
|
the breeze. This is again more for the |
|
|
|
322 |
|
00:20:17,120 --> 00:20:20,080 |
|
personification. They are fluttering like birds |
|
|
|
323 |
|
00:20:20,080 --> 00:20:23,520 |
|
but also they are dancing like human beings. |
|
|
|
324 |
|
00:20:26,840 --> 00:20:29,120 |
|
That's a beautiful opening to a poem, very |
|
|
|
325 |
|
00:20:29,120 --> 00:20:33,480 |
|
ecstatic, very appealing. I'm not sure if this is |
|
|
|
326 |
|
00:20:33,480 --> 00:20:37,800 |
|
soothing to you, but he's inviting you to some, in |
|
|
|
327 |
|
00:20:37,800 --> 00:20:41,060 |
|
a way, to reconsider natural scenes, natural |
|
|
|
328 |
|
00:20:41,060 --> 00:20:45,780 |
|
experiences. I hope you never see daffodils the |
|
|
|
329 |
|
00:20:45,780 --> 00:20:50,380 |
|
same after this poem, or roses, or cats, or birds, |
|
|
|
330 |
|
00:20:50,620 --> 00:20:55,640 |
|
or clouds. Now, I'm not sure what words you find |
|
|
|
331 |
|
00:20:55,640 --> 00:20:58,620 |
|
difficult here. Fluttering, we already mentioned |
|
|
|
332 |
|
00:20:58,620 --> 00:21:04,000 |
|
this before. Veil, veil, veil, veil, valley. |
|
|
|
333 |
|
00:21:05,680 --> 00:21:09,480 |
|
Fluttering, you know breeze, the sweet morning. |
|
|
|
334 |
|
00:21:12,500 --> 00:21:15,560 |
|
What else? I don't think there are difficult words |
|
|
|
335 |
|
00:21:15,560 --> 00:21:17,840 |
|
here. Even the words you're not familiar with, you |
|
|
|
336 |
|
00:21:17,840 --> 00:21:22,380 |
|
still can guess. If you go to the rhyme scheme, |
|
|
|
337 |
|
00:21:24,730 --> 00:21:29,150 |
|
Please. Thank you. Go. A, B, |
|
|
|
338 |
|
00:21:29,930 --> 00:21:35,750 |
|
A, B. Are you sure? Yes. Yes. C, C. Are you sure? |
|
|
|
339 |
|
00:21:35,910 --> 00:21:39,310 |
|
Yes. The letters are different. We have to count |
|
|
|
340 |
|
00:21:39,310 --> 00:21:42,730 |
|
the sound. It's the sound that we care about. |
|
|
|
341 |
|
00:21:43,090 --> 00:21:46,870 |
|
Perfect or? Perfect. Perfect. If you count, just |
|
|
|
342 |
|
00:21:46,870 --> 00:21:48,670 |
|
to save you some time, if you count the syllables, |
|
|
|
343 |
|
00:21:49,530 --> 00:21:53,990 |
|
Each line has eight syllables making four feet, |
|
|
|
344 |
|
00:21:54,150 --> 00:21:56,110 |
|
mostly iambic tetrameter. |
|
|
|
345 |
|
00:21:58,610 --> 00:22:01,430 |
|
You'll find that this time we're not going to find |
|
|
|
346 |
|
00:22:01,430 --> 00:22:05,930 |
|
many poems going for the five feet iambic |
|
|
|
347 |
|
00:22:05,930 --> 00:22:06,570 |
|
pentameter. |
|
|
|
348 |
|
00:22:10,090 --> 00:22:12,810 |
|
And then the second syllable goes for continuous |
|
|
|
349 |
|
00:22:12,810 --> 00:22:19,070 |
|
as the stars that shine. Again, another simile. as |
|
|
|
350 |
|
00:22:19,070 --> 00:22:22,630 |
|
the stars that shine and twinkle on the milky way, |
|
|
|
351 |
|
00:22:22,990 --> 00:22:26,690 |
|
they referring to? And look at this, this is by |
|
|
|
352 |
|
00:22:26,690 --> 00:22:31,130 |
|
the way, this is now a modifying phrase. |
|
|
|
353 |
|
00:22:33,390 --> 00:22:38,610 |
|
The sentence is originally, because they are |
|
|
|
354 |
|
00:22:38,610 --> 00:22:41,470 |
|
continuous, they stretched, or they were |
|
|
|
355 |
|
00:22:41,470 --> 00:22:46,500 |
|
continuous. They stretched. This one of them is |
|
|
|
356 |
|
00:22:46,500 --> 00:22:50,480 |
|
reduced. Continuous as the stars that shine and |
|
|
|
357 |
|
00:22:50,480 --> 00:22:53,860 |
|
twinkle on the Milky Way, they stretched a never |
|
|
|
358 |
|
00:22:53,860 --> 00:22:58,160 |
|
-ending line. Grammatically, it's a never-ending |
|
|
|
359 |
|
00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:01,500 |
|
line because line is one. So there is, again, |
|
|
|
360 |
|
00:23:01,560 --> 00:23:04,920 |
|
because many people still say there's no such |
|
|
|
361 |
|
00:23:04,920 --> 00:23:07,340 |
|
thing as spontaneous overflow of powerful |
|
|
|
362 |
|
00:23:07,340 --> 00:23:11,090 |
|
emotions. there's always a conscious attempt, |
|
|
|
363 |
|
00:23:11,330 --> 00:23:15,650 |
|
deliberate attempt to write poetry. So if this is |
|
|
|
364 |
|
00:23:15,650 --> 00:23:17,650 |
|
a poem with a perfect rhyme scheme and a perfect, |
|
|
|
365 |
|
00:23:17,930 --> 00:23:21,690 |
|
you know, same number of syllables, yes great |
|
|
|
366 |
|
00:23:21,690 --> 00:23:24,750 |
|
poets don't stop and count, they feel the beat, |
|
|
|
367 |
|
00:23:24,850 --> 00:23:28,940 |
|
they feel The rhythm. But here, he's deleting the |
|
|
|
368 |
|
00:23:28,940 --> 00:23:33,080 |
|
أ just to make it fit the eight syllables. The |
|
|
|
369 |
|
00:23:33,080 --> 00:23:37,340 |
|
four feet. Along the margin of a bay, ten thousand |
|
|
|
370 |
|
00:23:37,340 --> 00:23:39,420 |
|
sawyer at once. Look at this. Again, |
|
|
|
371 |
|
00:23:39,560 --> 00:23:43,460 |
|
grammatically, this is called fronting. Fronting, |
|
|
|
372 |
|
00:23:44,060 --> 00:23:47,120 |
|
when you bring something in front. تقدير متأخير in |
|
|
|
373 |
|
00:23:47,120 --> 00:23:52,700 |
|
Arabic. It should be I saw ten thousand subject |
|
|
|
374 |
|
00:23:52,700 --> 00:23:58,060 |
|
verbs at a glance. But why is he doing this? Why |
|
|
|
375 |
|
00:23:58,060 --> 00:24:01,520 |
|
is he starting with ten thousand and then delaying |
|
|
|
376 |
|
00:24:01,520 --> 00:24:05,860 |
|
the subject? The door, the eye? Because the scene |
|
|
|
377 |
|
00:24:05,860 --> 00:24:09,820 |
|
is more important |
|
|
|
378 |
|
00:24:09,820 --> 00:24:12,200 |
|
than the person himself. What kind of scene do we |
|
|
|
379 |
|
00:24:12,200 --> 00:24:14,680 |
|
have here? The daffodils. Very good. So the |
|
|
|
380 |
|
00:24:14,680 --> 00:24:17,740 |
|
daffodils, the scene, thank you, nature is more |
|
|
|
381 |
|
00:24:17,740 --> 00:24:18,840 |
|
significant than he is. |
|
|
|
382 |
|
00:24:21,740 --> 00:24:23,660 |
|
He's bringing nature before, and of course we |
|
|
|
383 |
|
00:24:23,660 --> 00:24:26,320 |
|
don't, how did he know that this is 10,000 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
00:24:26,320 --> 00:24:28,160 |
|
daffodils? |
|
|
|
385 |
|
00:24:30,140 --> 00:24:34,360 |
|
Just, it's again, this is possible, it is possible |
|
|
|
386 |
|
00:24:34,360 --> 00:24:36,660 |
|
that this is an exaggeration, but you could see in |
|
|
|
387 |
|
00:24:36,660 --> 00:24:41,160 |
|
fields, you could see 10,000 roses or flowers in |
|
|
|
388 |
|
00:24:41,160 --> 00:24:43,280 |
|
particular natural scene. |
|
|
|
389 |
|
00:24:46,530 --> 00:24:49,410 |
|
If you, I'm sure you've seen many pictures online, |
|
|
|
390 |
|
00:24:49,910 --> 00:24:52,970 |
|
you will find sometimes actually none in, you look |
|
|
|
391 |
|
00:24:52,970 --> 00:24:55,590 |
|
to the horizon everywhere you'll be surrounded |
|
|
|
392 |
|
00:24:55,590 --> 00:25:00,210 |
|
with, but yeah it could be, could be he's just |
|
|
|
393 |
|
00:25:00,210 --> 00:25:05,300 |
|
creating this perfect Ecstatic image. 10,000 saw I |
|
|
|
394 |
|
00:25:05,300 --> 00:25:08,320 |
|
at a glance, again extending the personification |
|
|
|
395 |
|
00:25:08,320 --> 00:25:11,920 |
|
here, the metaphor, tossing their heads, like |
|
|
|
396 |
|
00:25:11,920 --> 00:25:16,020 |
|
moving their heads in sprightly dance. They're |
|
|
|
397 |
|
00:25:16,020 --> 00:25:18,420 |
|
still dancing. They're dancing here. They're |
|
|
|
398 |
|
00:25:18,420 --> 00:25:20,820 |
|
dancing in the second syllable, in the second |
|
|
|
399 |
|
00:25:20,820 --> 00:25:24,760 |
|
stanza. Dancing and dancing. They're happy. They |
|
|
|
400 |
|
00:25:24,760 --> 00:25:29,000 |
|
inspire joy, inspire happiness. Beauty if you look |
|
|
|
401 |
|
00:25:29,000 --> 00:25:34,400 |
|
at again same eight eight eight four feet each The |
|
|
|
402 |
|
00:25:34,400 --> 00:25:37,200 |
|
rhyme scheme is remember you could continue with |
|
|
|
403 |
|
00:25:37,200 --> 00:25:39,820 |
|
the letters But my advice is when you begin a new |
|
|
|
404 |
|
00:25:39,820 --> 00:25:43,520 |
|
stanza go back to the alphabet to to do this, |
|
|
|
405 |
|
00:25:43,600 --> 00:25:49,240 |
|
please a b a b |
|
|
|
406 |
|
00:25:51,650 --> 00:25:55,050 |
|
C and T, also perfect rhyme. So it's the same, A, |
|
|
|
407 |
|
00:25:55,150 --> 00:25:59,830 |
|
B, A, B, C, C, A, B, A, B, C, C, creating this |
|
|
|
408 |
|
00:25:59,830 --> 00:26:06,830 |
|
perfect world, world, natural element. And then, |
|
|
|
409 |
|
00:26:07,370 --> 00:26:15,090 |
|
standard three, which I love very much. |
|
|
|
410 |
|
00:26:18,010 --> 00:26:20,810 |
|
Now the waves, now look at how nature is |
|
|
|
411 |
|
00:26:20,810 --> 00:26:24,950 |
|
contagious. If you see a beautiful scene, it |
|
|
|
412 |
|
00:26:24,950 --> 00:26:29,090 |
|
inspires beauty everywhere. The waves themselves |
|
|
|
413 |
|
00:26:29,090 --> 00:26:32,890 |
|
were affected by the scene, the inanimate thing |
|
|
|
414 |
|
00:26:32,890 --> 00:26:37,410 |
|
here. The waves beside them danced. Even the way, |
|
|
|
415 |
|
00:26:37,510 --> 00:26:39,970 |
|
this is again, remember this is some kind of |
|
|
|
416 |
|
00:26:39,970 --> 00:26:44,470 |
|
perception. The romantics believe that beauty is |
|
|
|
417 |
|
00:26:44,470 --> 00:26:48,110 |
|
in the eye of the beholder. If you look for |
|
|
|
418 |
|
00:26:48,110 --> 00:26:51,130 |
|
beauty, you will find beauty. This is a man going |
|
|
|
419 |
|
00:26:51,130 --> 00:26:54,910 |
|
out who loves nature, who's looking for beauty. So |
|
|
|
420 |
|
00:26:54,910 --> 00:26:56,970 |
|
definitely he's going to see it. He's going to |
|
|
|
421 |
|
00:26:56,970 --> 00:27:00,790 |
|
look at the daffodils dancing, the trees dancing, |
|
|
|
422 |
|
00:27:00,910 --> 00:27:04,390 |
|
the clouds dancing, the waves dancing. But if he's |
|
|
|
423 |
|
00:27:04,390 --> 00:27:08,710 |
|
not in the mood, if he is dark, sad, if he has |
|
|
|
424 |
|
00:27:08,710 --> 00:27:12,890 |
|
just been through a tough experience, he's going |
|
|
|
425 |
|
00:27:12,890 --> 00:27:17,540 |
|
to be expressing it differently. And this is a |
|
|
|
426 |
|
00:27:17,540 --> 00:27:21,060 |
|
romantic concept. Some people believe this is, we |
|
|
|
427 |
|
00:27:21,060 --> 00:27:25,440 |
|
spoke about this with William Blake. how both read |
|
|
|
428 |
|
00:27:25,440 --> 00:27:29,740 |
|
the Bible day and night. I read, you read black |
|
|
|
429 |
|
00:27:29,740 --> 00:27:33,640 |
|
while I read white. Different people give |
|
|
|
430 |
|
00:27:33,640 --> 00:27:36,560 |
|
different impressions. That's why if it's raining, |
|
|
|
431 |
|
00:27:36,620 --> 00:27:39,600 |
|
it's not raining now, unluckily for us. If you |
|
|
|
432 |
|
00:27:39,600 --> 00:27:44,660 |
|
look at the rain, many people would think that |
|
|
|
433 |
|
00:27:44,660 --> 00:27:48,300 |
|
everybody reacts the same to nature, to rain. We |
|
|
|
434 |
|
00:27:48,300 --> 00:27:50,880 |
|
love rain, all of us. But for some of us who have |
|
|
|
435 |
|
00:27:50,880 --> 00:27:56,280 |
|
had bad experiences some rainy day, if you lost a |
|
|
|
436 |
|
00:27:56,280 --> 00:27:59,320 |
|
dear, a loved one, if you have had this sad |
|
|
|
437 |
|
00:27:59,320 --> 00:28:02,360 |
|
experience, rain is going to bring you all these |
|
|
|
438 |
|
00:28:02,360 --> 00:28:06,320 |
|
feelings of sadness and pain rather than joy and |
|
|
|
439 |
|
00:28:06,320 --> 00:28:13,520 |
|
happiness. So the waves were dancing, but they |
|
|
|
440 |
|
00:28:13,520 --> 00:28:20,820 |
|
again, the daffodils, out dead. They were more |
|
|
|
441 |
|
00:28:22,470 --> 00:28:27,770 |
|
Pleasant, more sparkling, happier than the waves. |
|
|
|
442 |
|
00:28:28,810 --> 00:28:32,950 |
|
Outdid the sparkling waves in glee, in happiness, |
|
|
|
443 |
|
00:28:33,130 --> 00:28:36,790 |
|
in pleasure. A poet could not but be gay. We'll |
|
|
|
444 |
|
00:28:36,790 --> 00:28:42,470 |
|
talk about this in detail now. A poet could not |
|
|
|
445 |
|
00:28:42,470 --> 00:28:50,010 |
|
but be gay in such joking company. I gazed. And |
|
|
|
446 |
|
00:28:50,010 --> 00:28:54,070 |
|
gaze. He could have said, I gazed a lot. Right? We |
|
|
|
447 |
|
00:28:54,070 --> 00:28:58,350 |
|
do this. I gazed a lot. And that's it. I gazed. |
|
|
|
448 |
|
00:28:58,610 --> 00:29:04,070 |
|
This is how he reacts. He just stands there. Once |
|
|
|
449 |
|
00:29:04,070 --> 00:29:07,350 |
|
he was suggesting this beautiful thing, submissive |
|
|
|
450 |
|
00:29:07,350 --> 00:29:12,650 |
|
to nature. You know? Like how the cloud is |
|
|
|
451 |
|
00:29:12,650 --> 00:29:15,510 |
|
submissive to nature, to the wind blowing it here |
|
|
|
452 |
|
00:29:15,510 --> 00:29:18,860 |
|
and there at free will. Because it doesn't control |
|
|
|
453 |
|
00:29:18,860 --> 00:29:21,560 |
|
it. He is exactly like this. He's just standing |
|
|
|
454 |
|
00:29:21,560 --> 00:29:24,880 |
|
there absorbing. You know absorbing in a sponge? |
|
|
|
455 |
|
00:29:25,100 --> 00:29:28,000 |
|
It absorbs water. He's trying to absorb this |
|
|
|
456 |
|
00:29:28,000 --> 00:29:33,860 |
|
beauty, this never-ending beauty. I gaze and gaze. |
|
|
|
457 |
|
00:29:33,900 --> 00:29:36,440 |
|
Look at how he's emphasizing feelings and emotions |
|
|
|
458 |
|
00:29:36,440 --> 00:29:38,940 |
|
over thinking. |
|
|
|
459 |
|
00:29:40,320 --> 00:29:44,760 |
|
But little thought. Not never. Same thing, two |
|
|
|
460 |
|
00:29:44,760 --> 00:29:47,180 |
|
syllables. But little thought. |
|
|
|
461 |
|
00:29:49,730 --> 00:29:52,790 |
|
This is unlike the Age of Reason, the Augustan |
|
|
|
462 |
|
00:29:52,790 --> 00:29:57,050 |
|
Age, where thinking and logic are more important |
|
|
|
463 |
|
00:29:57,050 --> 00:30:01,630 |
|
than feelings and emotions. I gazed, I just kept |
|
|
|
464 |
|
00:30:01,630 --> 00:30:04,570 |
|
looking and looking. And I found this very |
|
|
|
465 |
|
00:30:04,570 --> 00:30:06,590 |
|
beautiful, one of the most fascinating lines. |
|
|
|
466 |
|
00:30:06,950 --> 00:30:09,030 |
|
Because nowadays what we would be doing is just |
|
|
|
467 |
|
00:30:09,030 --> 00:30:11,290 |
|
again take our mobile phones and just snap |
|
|
|
468 |
|
00:30:11,290 --> 00:30:15,190 |
|
pictures just so you show off on social media. You |
|
|
|
469 |
|
00:30:15,190 --> 00:30:20,450 |
|
care more about the picture than just Enjoying the |
|
|
|
470 |
|
00:30:20,450 --> 00:30:24,770 |
|
scene. Submitting yourself to the scene. What |
|
|
|
471 |
|
00:30:24,770 --> 00:30:27,270 |
|
wealth the show to me had brought. There's wealth |
|
|
|
472 |
|
00:30:27,270 --> 00:30:30,390 |
|
here. This is not a businessman looking wow I'm |
|
|
|
473 |
|
00:30:30,390 --> 00:30:34,050 |
|
going to make a lot of money because he said gold |
|
|
|
474 |
|
00:30:34,050 --> 00:30:38,570 |
|
before he So we'll come back after a very, very |
|
|
|
475 |
|
00:30:38,570 --> 00:30:42,130 |
|
short break. So I'm saying here that there's |
|
|
|
476 |
|
00:30:42,130 --> 00:30:44,250 |
|
wealth here, but that's not the financial |
|
|
|
477 |
|
00:30:44,250 --> 00:30:47,790 |
|
materialistic wealth. This is the spiritual, |
|
|
|
478 |
|
00:30:48,210 --> 00:30:52,470 |
|
natural kind of wealth that the romantics look |
|
|
|
479 |
|
00:30:52,470 --> 00:30:57,490 |
|
forward to. Now, I find this very interesting as a |
|
|
|
480 |
|
00:30:57,490 --> 00:30:59,570 |
|
stanza. I think this is the core of the whole |
|
|
|
481 |
|
00:30:59,570 --> 00:30:59,850 |
|
poem. |
|
|
|
482 |
|
00:31:02,660 --> 00:31:05,480 |
|
If we start with the rhyme scheme, can somebody |
|
|
|
483 |
|
00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:13,920 |
|
help me with the rhyme scheme, please? A, B, A, C, |
|
|
|
484 |
|
00:31:14,880 --> 00:31:22,380 |
|
D, D, D. Possible? Possible? But do you have |
|
|
|
485 |
|
00:31:22,380 --> 00:31:27,320 |
|
another suggestion, somebody? Please? Say again? |
|
|
|
486 |
|
00:31:27,940 --> 00:31:35,230 |
|
Okay, begin again. A, B, A, another B, but does |
|
|
|
487 |
|
00:31:35,230 --> 00:31:41,310 |
|
company and glee rhyme? This is glee and this is |
|
|
|
488 |
|
00:31:41,310 --> 00:31:41,830 |
|
company. |
|
|
|
489 |
|
00:31:44,870 --> 00:31:50,210 |
|
Long, short. Okay, so we go for an imperfect rhyme |
|
|
|
490 |
|
00:31:50,210 --> 00:31:51,950 |
|
here, although I find this possible. |
|
|
|
491 |
|
00:31:55,630 --> 00:31:58,830 |
|
And the fact that we differ here, that the first |
|
|
|
492 |
|
00:31:58,830 --> 00:32:01,310 |
|
two sentences were beautiful and perfect. We're |
|
|
|
493 |
|
00:32:01,310 --> 00:32:03,410 |
|
fine with that. But all of a sudden there's |
|
|
|
494 |
|
00:32:03,410 --> 00:32:05,510 |
|
something, there's something that doesn't add up, |
|
|
|
495 |
|
00:32:05,610 --> 00:32:07,210 |
|
something that is imperfect, something that is |
|
|
|
496 |
|
00:32:07,210 --> 00:32:10,050 |
|
making us disagree. The first two sentences made |
|
|
|
497 |
|
00:32:10,050 --> 00:32:15,410 |
|
all of us like, you know, nodding. But here, they, |
|
|
|
498 |
|
00:32:15,650 --> 00:32:21,800 |
|
again, A, B, A, B, Nobody does this, the A, the S, |
|
|
|
499 |
|
00:32:21,940 --> 00:32:25,040 |
|
the B small thing, but I like to do it to indicate |
|
|
|
500 |
|
00:32:25,040 --> 00:32:29,200 |
|
an imperfect triangle. And then another C, another |
|
|
|
501 |
|
00:32:29,200 --> 00:32:33,480 |
|
C. If we just do the last one and come back to |
|
|
|
502 |
|
00:32:33,480 --> 00:32:37,620 |
|
this, it's going to also be A, B. |
|
|
|
503 |
|
00:32:40,180 --> 00:32:44,260 |
|
Perfect? So the only stanza with an imperfection |
|
|
|
504 |
|
00:32:44,260 --> 00:32:47,120 |
|
is stanza number three. That's number one. I was |
|
|
|
505 |
|
00:32:47,120 --> 00:32:49,460 |
|
counting the syllables the other day and I |
|
|
|
506 |
|
00:32:49,460 --> 00:32:55,300 |
|
realized the only line that has an |
|
|
|
507 |
|
00:32:55,300 --> 00:32:56,960 |
|
extra syllable was this one. |
|
|
|
508 |
|
00:32:59,540 --> 00:33:04,840 |
|
Is it this one? One, two, three, four, five, six, |
|
|
|
509 |
|
00:33:05,220 --> 00:33:07,800 |
|
seven, eight. No, which one? Which one was that? |
|
|
|
510 |
|
00:33:09,660 --> 00:33:11,840 |
|
Not this one. I think this one is perfect. Where's |
|
|
|
511 |
|
00:33:11,840 --> 00:33:16,290 |
|
the eraser? This one is also eight lines. I must |
|
|
|
512 |
|
00:33:16,290 --> 00:33:21,090 |
|
have mixed this up with another one. Okay. The |
|
|
|
513 |
|
00:33:21,090 --> 00:33:25,690 |
|
thing I noticed, if you look at this, is that the |
|
|
|
514 |
|
00:33:25,690 --> 00:33:27,670 |
|
poet here, remember this is a first, if this is a |
|
|
|
515 |
|
00:33:27,670 --> 00:33:30,990 |
|
story, this is a first person narrator. I |
|
|
|
516 |
|
00:33:30,990 --> 00:33:36,530 |
|
wondered, saw I at once, I gazed and gazed. And |
|
|
|
517 |
|
00:33:36,530 --> 00:33:42,730 |
|
then all of a sudden, he shifts. He shifts from I |
|
|
|
518 |
|
00:33:42,730 --> 00:33:50,770 |
|
to He or she, a poet. A poet could not but be gay. |
|
|
|
519 |
|
00:33:50,990 --> 00:33:59,230 |
|
He doesn't say I was nothing but gay. Why didn't |
|
|
|
520 |
|
00:33:59,230 --> 00:34:03,750 |
|
he say I was gay, I was happy? Definitely he |
|
|
|
521 |
|
00:34:03,750 --> 00:34:08,910 |
|
didn't care about coming out and people saying |
|
|
|
522 |
|
00:34:08,910 --> 00:34:12,920 |
|
he's gay because it meant happy here. A poet could |
|
|
|
523 |
|
00:34:12,920 --> 00:34:16,840 |
|
not but be gay. Poets should be happy, would be |
|
|
|
524 |
|
00:34:16,840 --> 00:34:20,580 |
|
happy. Can be nothing but happy when they come |
|
|
|
525 |
|
00:34:20,580 --> 00:34:24,180 |
|
face to face with this fascinating scene here. A |
|
|
|
526 |
|
00:34:24,180 --> 00:34:26,760 |
|
poet could not but be gay in such a joking |
|
|
|
527 |
|
00:34:26,760 --> 00:34:30,500 |
|
company. And there is another indication here. I |
|
|
|
528 |
|
00:34:30,500 --> 00:34:33,960 |
|
gazed and gazed. But little thought. The binary, |
|
|
|
529 |
|
00:34:34,080 --> 00:34:37,200 |
|
the opposites. So I gazed, some would be. |
|
|
|
530 |
|
00:34:37,880 --> 00:34:41,860 |
|
thinking. I wandered lonely, I gazed and some |
|
|
|
531 |
|
00:34:41,860 --> 00:34:47,780 |
|
might just be happy. What wealth does he show? He |
|
|
|
532 |
|
00:34:47,780 --> 00:34:53,470 |
|
didn't care about even this kind of wealth. In |
|
|
|
533 |
|
00:34:53,470 --> 00:34:56,730 |
|
other words, he didn't react instantly to the |
|
|
|
534 |
|
00:34:56,730 --> 00:35:00,170 |
|
poem, to the scene here. And we'll talk about two |
|
|
|
535 |
|
00:35:00,170 --> 00:35:03,490 |
|
types of imagination here. There is primary |
|
|
|
536 |
|
00:35:03,490 --> 00:35:06,030 |
|
imagination and there is secondary imagination. |
|
|
|
537 |
|
00:35:06,170 --> 00:35:09,150 |
|
The primary imagination is the instant reaction to |
|
|
|
538 |
|
00:35:09,150 --> 00:35:11,710 |
|
beauty, to nature. You see something beautiful, |
|
|
|
539 |
|
00:35:11,790 --> 00:35:14,270 |
|
you say, wow, and that's it. Or you take a picture |
|
|
|
540 |
|
00:35:14,270 --> 00:35:18,070 |
|
and you just go on. But for the romantics, they |
|
|
|
541 |
|
00:35:18,070 --> 00:35:22,750 |
|
like to absorb. to put it there in their heart and |
|
|
|
542 |
|
00:35:22,750 --> 00:35:27,650 |
|
mind and everything. And later on, two years |
|
|
|
543 |
|
00:35:27,650 --> 00:35:30,030 |
|
later, a day later, one month later, two months |
|
|
|
544 |
|
00:35:30,030 --> 00:35:32,250 |
|
later, they would be reflecting on this. |
|
|
|
545 |
|
00:35:33,490 --> 00:35:34,970 |
|
Recalling, that's why the second part of the |
|
|
|
546 |
|
00:35:34,970 --> 00:35:37,450 |
|
definition is as important. Recollected in |
|
|
|
547 |
|
00:35:37,450 --> 00:35:41,870 |
|
tranquility. But why would the poet shift from, |
|
|
|
548 |
|
00:35:42,170 --> 00:35:44,390 |
|
why is he distancing himself from this experience? |
|
|
|
549 |
|
00:35:45,770 --> 00:35:50,060 |
|
He's not saying, I was happy, right? He's saying a |
|
|
|
550 |
|
00:35:50,060 --> 00:35:58,500 |
|
poet could not but be gay. Yeah, please. Thank you |
|
|
|
551 |
|
00:35:58,500 --> 00:36:01,660 |
|
very much. This could suggest that not only words |
|
|
|
552 |
|
00:36:01,660 --> 00:36:04,980 |
|
worth, but also all poets. That's very good. |
|
|
|
553 |
|
00:36:05,040 --> 00:36:10,420 |
|
That's possible. More. Please. It's also maybe |
|
|
|
554 |
|
00:36:10,420 --> 00:36:14,760 |
|
attack or talking about the previous poet. Not |
|
|
|
555 |
|
00:36:14,760 --> 00:36:18,420 |
|
the, not the, the neo-classical maybe or the poet |
|
|
|
556 |
|
00:36:18,420 --> 00:36:22,980 |
|
that they prefer him. How's that? Because they |
|
|
|
557 |
|
00:36:22,980 --> 00:36:27,640 |
|
maybe not appreciate the nature as, as he does. |
|
|
|
558 |
|
00:36:27,640 --> 00:36:31,040 |
|
But, but he's saying the poet is happy. Could not |
|
|
|
559 |
|
00:36:31,040 --> 00:36:35,380 |
|
be. Please. It might be an advice or advice. |
|
|
|
560 |
|
00:36:38,470 --> 00:36:40,830 |
|
So this is for all poets, but why poets in |
|
|
|
561 |
|
00:36:40,830 --> 00:36:42,190 |
|
particular? Why not everybody? Remember the |
|
|
|
562 |
|
00:36:42,190 --> 00:36:45,410 |
|
romantics believe that a poet is an ordinary man |
|
|
|
563 |
|
00:36:45,410 --> 00:36:49,390 |
|
endowed with comprehensive sensibility. |
|
|
|
564 |
|
00:36:53,590 --> 00:36:57,790 |
|
You're not a poet, but poets don't only write |
|
|
|
565 |
|
00:36:57,790 --> 00:36:58,990 |
|
about happiness, right? |
|
|
|
566 |
|
00:37:02,350 --> 00:37:05,130 |
|
Okay, yeah, like if nature doesn't inspire |
|
|
|
567 |
|
00:37:05,130 --> 00:37:08,410 |
|
happiness and pleasure and beauty, you're not a |
|
|
|
568 |
|
00:37:08,410 --> 00:37:10,530 |
|
poet or you're not a romantic poet. |
|
|
|
569 |
|
00:37:25,980 --> 00:37:29,680 |
|
So when he says a poet, he means that a poet will |
|
|
|
570 |
|
00:37:29,680 --> 00:37:32,800 |
|
see this being something much more than any normal |
|
|
|
571 |
|
00:37:32,800 --> 00:37:35,260 |
|
or ordinary person would see. And this would make |
|
|
|
572 |
|
00:37:35,260 --> 00:37:37,740 |
|
him happy? That would make him happy. |
|
|
|
573 |
|
00:37:40,910 --> 00:37:45,570 |
|
Okay. Thank you very much. Want somebody here? I |
|
|
|
574 |
|
00:37:45,570 --> 00:37:49,070 |
|
think he's here distancing himself from this term |
|
|
|
575 |
|
00:37:49,070 --> 00:37:52,370 |
|
of the poet. Like he's putting himself above this |
|
|
|
576 |
|
00:37:52,370 --> 00:37:55,570 |
|
word. He's considering himself more than just a |
|
|
|
577 |
|
00:37:55,570 --> 00:37:58,570 |
|
poet. Because any other poet would just see the |
|
|
|
578 |
|
00:37:58,570 --> 00:38:01,590 |
|
scenery and be happy and react momentarily to it. |
|
|
|
579 |
|
00:38:01,650 --> 00:38:04,150 |
|
But he sees himself something more than this. So |
|
|
|
580 |
|
00:38:04,150 --> 00:38:06,390 |
|
he is in a way challenging the new classical |
|
|
|
581 |
|
00:38:06,390 --> 00:38:10,980 |
|
people. What's wrong with this? What's wrong with |
|
|
|
582 |
|
00:38:10,980 --> 00:38:11,720 |
|
being happy? |
|
|
|
583 |
|
00:38:14,820 --> 00:38:17,620 |
|
Okay, that's good. Connecting this with the |
|
|
|
584 |
|
00:38:17,620 --> 00:38:18,720 |
|
primary and secondary. |
|
|
|
585 |
|
00:38:22,800 --> 00:38:26,500 |
|
Some kind |
|
|
|
586 |
|
00:38:26,500 --> 00:38:28,680 |
|
of discipline and that, you know, the idea of |
|
|
|
587 |
|
00:38:28,680 --> 00:38:31,640 |
|
spontaneous could be challenged here. |
|
|
|
588 |
|
00:38:40,690 --> 00:38:41,250 |
|
Okay, |
|
|
|
589 |
|
00:38:44,570 --> 00:38:48,270 |
|
so you agree there with Rahaf that the ability to |
|
|
|
590 |
|
00:38:48,270 --> 00:38:50,830 |
|
express this, although not all people can express, |
|
|
|
591 |
|
00:38:50,950 --> 00:38:52,530 |
|
at least they can feel it inside. |
|
|
|
592 |
|
00:38:57,770 --> 00:39:00,670 |
|
Not all poets, remember. Romantic poets. |
|
|
|
593 |
|
00:39:20,860 --> 00:39:24,500 |
|
But what's wrong with being happy? Isn't that |
|
|
|
594 |
|
00:39:24,500 --> 00:39:24,800 |
|
good? |
|
|
|
595 |
|
00:39:36,320 --> 00:39:40,060 |
|
But clearly this poet is expressing himself or |
|
|
|
596 |
|
00:39:40,060 --> 00:39:46,240 |
|
herself by being happy, by being gay. Okay, so |
|
|
|
597 |
|
00:39:46,240 --> 00:39:50,420 |
|
you're taking happiness as just again some kind of |
|
|
|
598 |
|
00:39:50,420 --> 00:39:54,320 |
|
an instant momentary reaction to this, but for the |
|
|
|
599 |
|
00:39:54,320 --> 00:39:57,040 |
|
romantics a primary reaction, for the romantics |
|
|
|
600 |
|
00:39:57,040 --> 00:40:05,320 |
|
it's much more. Okay, sorry? he's beyond he |
|
|
|
601 |
|
00:40:05,320 --> 00:40:07,940 |
|
doesn't find this I think I agree with those who |
|
|
|
602 |
|
00:40:07,940 --> 00:40:10,080 |
|
suggested that this could include some kind of |
|
|
|
603 |
|
00:40:10,080 --> 00:40:12,820 |
|
parody clearly when he said but little thought |
|
|
|
604 |
|
00:40:12,820 --> 00:40:15,340 |
|
again he's putting himself as opposed to the other |
|
|
|
605 |
|
00:40:15,340 --> 00:40:18,500 |
|
Augustan poets I'm different from those people |
|
|
|
606 |
|
00:40:18,500 --> 00:40:22,150 |
|
which is a poet he's Suggesting an ordinary poet, |
|
|
|
607 |
|
00:40:22,450 --> 00:40:25,410 |
|
this is, yes, this emphasizes here couldn't but, |
|
|
|
608 |
|
00:40:26,010 --> 00:40:28,650 |
|
but it includes some negative, the negative of not |
|
|
|
609 |
|
00:40:28,650 --> 00:40:31,750 |
|
here. And the distance, the shift from the I to he |
|
|
|
610 |
|
00:40:31,750 --> 00:40:34,770 |
|
or she, the third person pronoun, suggests that |
|
|
|
611 |
|
00:40:34,770 --> 00:40:36,770 |
|
the poet is distancing himself from this |
|
|
|
612 |
|
00:40:36,770 --> 00:40:40,210 |
|
momentarily artificial reaction to nature. He's |
|
|
|
613 |
|
00:40:40,210 --> 00:40:45,170 |
|
saying an Augustan poet, an ordinary poet, would |
|
|
|
614 |
|
00:40:45,170 --> 00:40:48,770 |
|
just be happy and that's it, bye bye. But I am |
|
|
|
615 |
|
00:40:48,770 --> 00:40:51,470 |
|
different, I am not an ordinary poet, I'm a |
|
|
|
616 |
|
00:40:51,470 --> 00:40:54,630 |
|
romantic poet. Remember the romantics did not call |
|
|
|
617 |
|
00:40:54,630 --> 00:40:57,670 |
|
themselves romantic poets, later critics called |
|
|
|
618 |
|
00:40:57,670 --> 00:41:01,230 |
|
them the romantics or romanticism. Because for him |
|
|
|
619 |
|
00:41:01,230 --> 00:41:05,270 |
|
it's much more than just being happy, than just |
|
|
|
620 |
|
00:41:05,270 --> 00:41:08,510 |
|
the instant reaction to nature. It's about, |
|
|
|
621 |
|
00:41:08,590 --> 00:41:13,070 |
|
remember, absorbing, living the experience, making |
|
|
|
622 |
|
00:41:13,070 --> 00:41:15,970 |
|
it overwhelm you, submitting yourself to this. |
|
|
|
623 |
|
00:41:16,440 --> 00:41:18,860 |
|
making it change your life radically altogether, |
|
|
|
624 |
|
00:41:19,320 --> 00:41:21,940 |
|
as we're going to see in the second, in the last |
|
|
|
625 |
|
00:41:21,940 --> 00:41:26,800 |
|
stanza, in stanza number four. So this, again, |
|
|
|
626 |
|
00:41:26,880 --> 00:41:29,020 |
|
stanza in particular, has this imperfection, which |
|
|
|
627 |
|
00:41:29,020 --> 00:41:31,000 |
|
creates tension, tells us, wait a minute, there's |
|
|
|
628 |
|
00:41:31,000 --> 00:41:37,580 |
|
something there, and then we find the shift from I |
|
|
|
629 |
|
00:41:37,580 --> 00:41:39,980 |
|
to he or she, and then the negative here, |
|
|
|
630 |
|
00:41:40,400 --> 00:41:42,260 |
|
indicating that there's something, a poet is |
|
|
|
631 |
|
00:41:42,260 --> 00:41:46,020 |
|
telling us, calm down, Wait a minute, pay |
|
|
|
632 |
|
00:41:46,020 --> 00:41:48,060 |
|
attention, I'm doing something here. I'm raising a |
|
|
|
633 |
|
00:41:48,060 --> 00:41:54,360 |
|
point that is deeper than probably other ideas. |
|
|
|
634 |
|
00:41:54,660 --> 00:41:57,160 |
|
Some might read this and just keep going. But |
|
|
|
635 |
|
00:41:57,160 --> 00:42:00,120 |
|
yeah, I agree that there is some kind of mockery. |
|
|
|
636 |
|
00:42:00,200 --> 00:42:03,620 |
|
He's mocking previous poets who just react |
|
|
|
637 |
|
00:42:03,620 --> 00:42:09,200 |
|
artificially, momentarily, instantly to nature. To |
|
|
|
638 |
|
00:42:09,200 --> 00:42:12,690 |
|
those people, remember? Nature is a decoration, |
|
|
|
639 |
|
00:42:12,890 --> 00:42:16,650 |
|
but not this man who lives for nature, returns to |
|
|
|
640 |
|
00:42:16,650 --> 00:42:20,430 |
|
nature. And then there is a shift. One important |
|
|
|
641 |
|
00:42:20,430 --> 00:42:24,930 |
|
thing here is that the three stanzas, one, two, |
|
|
|
642 |
|
00:42:24,970 --> 00:42:29,090 |
|
and three, are basically in the past simple tense. |
|
|
|
643 |
|
00:42:31,290 --> 00:42:33,250 |
|
When I ask you the question, where is the poet |
|
|
|
644 |
|
00:42:33,250 --> 00:42:36,990 |
|
now? Probably he is lying on his couch. He's |
|
|
|
645 |
|
00:42:36,990 --> 00:42:38,890 |
|
probably lying on his couch. |
|
|
|
646 |
|
00:42:42,200 --> 00:42:46,580 |
|
He's not high, not as high as Coleridge of course, |
|
|
|
647 |
|
00:42:46,820 --> 00:42:51,960 |
|
as the cloud, not wandering, not gazing anymore. |
|
|
|
648 |
|
00:42:52,460 --> 00:42:57,240 |
|
He's now reliving, replaying, recalling the |
|
|
|
649 |
|
00:42:57,240 --> 00:43:00,620 |
|
experience. For oft, When on my, like often, |
|
|
|
650 |
|
00:43:00,800 --> 00:43:03,500 |
|
right? But often is two syllables and oft is one. |
|
|
|
651 |
|
00:43:04,420 --> 00:43:07,980 |
|
When on my couch I lie in vacant or in pensive |
|
|
|
652 |
|
00:43:07,980 --> 00:43:11,440 |
|
mood, whatever mood I am in, vacancy, pensiveness, |
|
|
|
653 |
|
00:43:12,200 --> 00:43:14,880 |
|
in mood, they, referring again back to the |
|
|
|
654 |
|
00:43:14,880 --> 00:43:17,880 |
|
alphabets, they flash upon the inward eye, |
|
|
|
655 |
|
00:43:18,000 --> 00:43:21,220 |
|
imagination, feelings, which is the bliss of |
|
|
|
656 |
|
00:43:21,220 --> 00:43:28,140 |
|
solitude, solitary. living, solitude, being alone. |
|
|
|
657 |
|
00:43:29,040 --> 00:43:31,900 |
|
And then what happens, it's like an argument, I'm |
|
|
|
658 |
|
00:43:31,900 --> 00:43:35,740 |
|
the same. But not like John Donne, of course. And |
|
|
|
659 |
|
00:43:35,740 --> 00:43:40,080 |
|
then my heart with pleasure fills. This is the |
|
|
|
660 |
|
00:43:40,080 --> 00:43:43,680 |
|
proper reaction. It's not about just, ah, I saw |
|
|
|
661 |
|
00:43:43,680 --> 00:43:49,240 |
|
this beautiful field with daffodils today and |
|
|
|
662 |
|
00:43:49,240 --> 00:43:52,890 |
|
that's it. For this man, experiencing nature is |
|
|
|
663 |
|
00:43:52,890 --> 00:43:57,470 |
|
life-changing experiences. You change, you have to |
|
|
|
664 |
|
00:43:57,470 --> 00:43:59,830 |
|
change. And I said this at the beginning of this |
|
|
|
665 |
|
00:43:59,830 --> 00:44:05,110 |
|
course. Hopefully, when you read texts, they must |
|
|
|
666 |
|
00:44:05,110 --> 00:44:09,410 |
|
have impact on you. And then my heart with |
|
|
|
667 |
|
00:44:09,410 --> 00:44:12,410 |
|
pleasure fills and dances with the affordance. I |
|
|
|
668 |
|
00:44:12,410 --> 00:44:14,790 |
|
love how he at the beginning personified nature |
|
|
|
669 |
|
00:44:14,790 --> 00:44:19,150 |
|
and now he's objectifying himself. He's not |
|
|
|
670 |
|
00:44:19,150 --> 00:44:21,210 |
|
uniting with nature. He's submitting himself to |
|
|
|
671 |
|
00:44:21,210 --> 00:44:23,930 |
|
nature. He's allowing nature to control him. He's |
|
|
|
672 |
|
00:44:23,930 --> 00:44:28,930 |
|
becoming part of nature, mother nature. I return |
|
|
|
673 |
|
00:44:28,930 --> 00:44:32,290 |
|
to nature as a romantic feature. |
|
|
|
674 |
|
00:44:33,690 --> 00:44:36,170 |
|
So the shift from the past simple tense to the |
|
|
|
675 |
|
00:44:36,170 --> 00:44:39,960 |
|
present simple tense is a very interesting thing |
|
|
|
676 |
|
00:44:39,960 --> 00:44:44,240 |
|
because he is reliving. This is the secondary |
|
|
|
677 |
|
00:44:44,240 --> 00:44:46,980 |
|
imagination we talk about. Later on, I'm not sure |
|
|
|
678 |
|
00:44:46,980 --> 00:44:49,740 |
|
how long after the original experience he's |
|
|
|
679 |
|
00:44:49,740 --> 00:44:52,440 |
|
writing this, but he's using the present |
|
|
|
680 |
|
00:44:52,440 --> 00:44:54,480 |
|
simpletons to express that this happens to him all |
|
|
|
681 |
|
00:44:54,480 --> 00:44:56,640 |
|
the time. Every time he's in a vacant or pensive |
|
|
|
682 |
|
00:44:56,640 --> 00:45:00,300 |
|
mood, what does he do? He recollects, he recalls, |
|
|
|
683 |
|
00:45:00,320 --> 00:45:03,580 |
|
he remembers that experience. And every time he |
|
|
|
684 |
|
00:45:03,580 --> 00:45:05,820 |
|
does so, this is again, remember, the baby-like |
|
|
|
685 |
|
00:45:05,820 --> 00:45:09,380 |
|
experience. Every time, experiencing every time, |
|
|
|
686 |
|
00:45:10,180 --> 00:45:12,780 |
|
everything as if it's the first time you've ever |
|
|
|
687 |
|
00:45:12,780 --> 00:45:15,740 |
|
seen this. Reliving again and again and again. |
|
|
|
688 |
|
00:45:15,800 --> 00:45:19,300 |
|
Every time being awestruck by this. This sense of |
|
|
|
689 |
|
00:45:19,300 --> 00:45:22,800 |
|
awe. Sense of wonder. Everything is a miracle. |
|
|
|
690 |
|
00:45:23,000 --> 00:45:28,210 |
|
Everything is a blessing. So this, the present |
|
|
|
691 |
|
00:45:28,210 --> 00:45:32,070 |
|
continuous give it continuity, but also it |
|
|
|
692 |
|
00:45:32,070 --> 00:45:35,230 |
|
indicates how the poet is reliving this experience |
|
|
|
693 |
|
00:45:35,230 --> 00:45:39,450 |
|
now. One last thing I find interesting about this |
|
|
|
694 |
|
00:45:39,450 --> 00:45:44,490 |
|
poem is the last couplet, if you want to say it's |
|
|
|
695 |
|
00:45:44,490 --> 00:45:46,450 |
|
a couplet. I don't like to call it a couplet here, |
|
|
|
696 |
|
00:45:46,530 --> 00:45:56,450 |
|
but okay. The last line, If you do the scan gene, |
|
|
|
697 |
|
00:45:56,510 --> 00:46:00,650 |
|
if you scan the meter here, it should be like this |
|
|
|
698 |
|
00:46:00,650 --> 00:46:09,350 |
|
and da says with the daf bills |
|
|
|
699 |
|
00:46:21,880 --> 00:46:25,020 |
|
Okay, so weak, strong, stressed, unstressed, |
|
|
|
700 |
|
00:46:25,220 --> 00:46:28,480 |
|
stressed, unstressed, stressed, unstressed, and |
|
|
|
701 |
|
00:46:28,480 --> 00:46:34,120 |
|
then stressed. But this way, and you should be |
|
|
|
702 |
|
00:46:34,120 --> 00:46:38,800 |
|
reading it, and dances with the daffodils. And |
|
|
|
703 |
|
00:46:38,800 --> 00:46:41,960 |
|
then my heart with pleasure fills and dances with |
|
|
|
704 |
|
00:46:41,960 --> 00:46:45,540 |
|
the daffodils without stress on with. And then my |
|
|
|
705 |
|
00:46:45,540 --> 00:46:48,460 |
|
heart with pleasure fills and dances with the |
|
|
|
706 |
|
00:46:48,460 --> 00:46:54,710 |
|
daffodils. Which is okay, again. But I think this |
|
|
|
707 |
|
00:46:54,710 --> 00:47:00,050 |
|
should be going back because with is a preposition |
|
|
|
708 |
|
00:47:00,050 --> 00:47:03,330 |
|
remember determiners, articles, prepositions even |
|
|
|
709 |
|
00:47:03,330 --> 00:47:07,410 |
|
auxiliaries are unstressed generally because says |
|
|
|
710 |
|
00:47:07,410 --> 00:47:10,570 |
|
something you add to the syllable to the word to |
|
|
|
711 |
|
00:47:10,570 --> 00:47:12,650 |
|
the main syllable so unstressed and then with |
|
|
|
712 |
|
00:47:12,650 --> 00:47:17,490 |
|
unstressed with two weak syllables here a weak |
|
|
|
713 |
|
00:47:17,490 --> 00:47:21,900 |
|
thought and dances with the daffodils But it |
|
|
|
714 |
|
00:47:21,900 --> 00:47:26,540 |
|
should be read otherwise, with being stressed. And |
|
|
|
715 |
|
00:47:26,540 --> 00:47:31,200 |
|
I find this beautiful and again deliberate with a |
|
|
|
716 |
|
00:47:31,200 --> 00:47:33,580 |
|
spontaneous overflow of powerful emotions stirred |
|
|
|
717 |
|
00:47:33,580 --> 00:47:37,740 |
|
word for word. In this sense, we emphasize the |
|
|
|
718 |
|
00:47:37,740 --> 00:47:42,900 |
|
idea of withness with nature. And then my heart |
|
|
|
719 |
|
00:47:42,900 --> 00:47:46,080 |
|
with pleasure fills and dances with the daffodils. |
|
|
|
720 |
|
00:47:47,360 --> 00:47:52,770 |
|
Emphasizing this is? Not only gain unity, like you |
|
|
|
721 |
|
00:47:52,770 --> 00:47:55,350 |
|
could say unity, I accept that, but this is nature |
|
|
|
722 |
|
00:47:55,350 --> 00:47:58,450 |
|
is overwhelming. He's submitting himself to |
|
|
|
723 |
|
00:47:58,450 --> 00:48:02,010 |
|
nature. He's emphasizing the idea of withness with |
|
|
|
724 |
|
00:48:02,010 --> 00:48:05,910 |
|
nature, unity with nature, going back, a return to |
|
|
|
725 |
|
00:48:05,910 --> 00:48:10,210 |
|
nature, to mother nature, like I said. So I could |
|
|
|
726 |
|
00:48:10,210 --> 00:48:13,670 |
|
ask you a question, for example, why should with |
|
|
|
727 |
|
00:48:13,670 --> 00:48:16,450 |
|
in the last line of the daffodils be stressed? |
|
|
|
728 |
|
00:48:17,090 --> 00:48:22,020 |
|
Please, don't say to emphasize. to emphasize is |
|
|
|
729 |
|
00:48:22,020 --> 00:48:25,700 |
|
not the answer. That's why I'd be asking you this |
|
|
|
730 |
|
00:48:25,700 --> 00:48:30,100 |
|
question, why is he emphasizing with? So the |
|
|
|
731 |
|
00:48:30,100 --> 00:48:32,740 |
|
emphasis here is to indicate this unity, this |
|
|
|
732 |
|
00:48:32,740 --> 00:48:34,960 |
|
total submission to nature. |
|
|
|
733 |
|
00:48:38,140 --> 00:48:43,520 |
|
What a beautiful poem. A critic says, many critics |
|
|
|
734 |
|
00:48:43,520 --> 00:48:47,600 |
|
say, this man was the poet who taught us how to |
|
|
|
735 |
|
00:48:47,600 --> 00:48:51,500 |
|
remember. Because this is about remembering |
|
|
|
736 |
|
00:48:51,500 --> 00:48:52,380 |
|
things. |
|
|
|
737 |
|
00:48:56,260 --> 00:49:00,220 |
|
Now, you could see all the features of romanticism |
|
|
|
738 |
|
00:49:00,220 --> 00:49:02,620 |
|
here. Maybe I forgot something. There's a return |
|
|
|
739 |
|
00:49:02,620 --> 00:49:04,020 |
|
to nature, imagination. |
|
|
|
740 |
|
00:49:07,160 --> 00:49:10,000 |
|
individuality, simplicity of language, anti |
|
|
|
741 |
|
00:49:10,000 --> 00:49:14,220 |
|
mainstream rejection of artistic conventions and |
|
|
|
742 |
|
00:49:14,220 --> 00:49:17,160 |
|
the form is the content, how in the third stanza |
|
|
|
743 |
|
00:49:17,160 --> 00:49:20,700 |
|
when he wanted to make a point to, he just created |
|
|
|
744 |
|
00:49:20,700 --> 00:49:23,240 |
|
this tension and conflict, memory, feelings and |
|
|
|
745 |
|
00:49:23,240 --> 00:49:28,380 |
|
emotions as opposed to reason. There are questions |
|
|
|
746 |
|
00:49:28,380 --> 00:49:30,840 |
|
here, I'll be posting one of them online so we can |
|
|
|
747 |
|
00:49:30,840 --> 00:49:31,920 |
|
continue the discussion. |
|
|
|
748 |
|
00:49:36,330 --> 00:49:37,690 |
|
Probably you mentioned some of them. |
|
|
|
749 |
|
00:49:41,110 --> 00:49:48,010 |
|
Look at this, number five. In real life, by the |
|
|
|
750 |
|
00:49:48,010 --> 00:49:52,210 |
|
way, it was Dorothy who had this entry, this |
|
|
|
751 |
|
00:49:52,210 --> 00:49:56,330 |
|
experience in her diaries. She's totally not |
|
|
|
752 |
|
00:49:56,330 --> 00:50:00,990 |
|
there. So I'm saying here that what is, why is |
|
|
|
753 |
|
00:50:00,990 --> 00:50:03,910 |
|
she, should be why, why is she erased from the |
|
|
|
754 |
|
00:50:03,910 --> 00:50:07,090 |
|
poem? We can continue this discussion online. Is |
|
|
|
755 |
|
00:50:07,090 --> 00:50:10,210 |
|
she erased because he hates her, because he's anti |
|
|
|
756 |
|
00:50:10,210 --> 00:50:15,750 |
|
-feminist, because women are not good enough? Or |
|
|
|
757 |
|
00:50:15,750 --> 00:50:20,010 |
|
is this more to do with the fact that this is a |
|
|
|
758 |
|
00:50:20,010 --> 00:50:24,910 |
|
romantic poem and individuality? Think about this. |
|
|
|
759 |
|
00:50:25,750 --> 00:50:28,090 |
|
But the last question is more important to me. |
|
|
|
760 |
|
00:50:28,350 --> 00:50:30,630 |
|
It's not showing here. I have to show it to you |
|
|
|
761 |
|
00:50:30,630 --> 00:50:34,350 |
|
because it's important. I love this question. |
|
|
|
762 |
|
00:50:38,140 --> 00:50:41,460 |
|
The question says, I'm quoting somebody. |
|
|
|
763 |
|
00:50:44,040 --> 00:50:49,140 |
|
It says, a trivial subject matter, okay? The |
|
|
|
764 |
|
00:50:49,140 --> 00:50:52,940 |
|
question says, a trivial subject matter, as Anne |
|
|
|
765 |
|
00:50:52,940 --> 00:50:58,780 |
|
Seward says or thought a daffodil to be, does not |
|
|
|
766 |
|
00:50:58,780 --> 00:51:04,140 |
|
deserve the ecstatic diction of vacancy, pensive, |
|
|
|
767 |
|
00:51:04,400 --> 00:51:07,880 |
|
and bliss. Like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. This is |
|
|
|
768 |
|
00:51:07,880 --> 00:51:10,900 |
|
just a daffodil, a bunch of daffodils. You don't |
|
|
|
769 |
|
00:51:10,900 --> 00:51:18,000 |
|
write this fascinating poem to react to just a |
|
|
|
770 |
|
00:51:18,000 --> 00:51:23,600 |
|
bunch of daffodils. That's too much. You use this |
|
|
|
771 |
|
00:51:23,600 --> 00:51:28,260 |
|
language and this beautiful reaction, what, to |
|
|
|
772 |
|
00:51:28,260 --> 00:51:33,050 |
|
write about the queen, about More significant |
|
|
|
773 |
|
00:51:33,050 --> 00:51:36,230 |
|
issues. How would you react? How would you reply |
|
|
|
774 |
|
00:51:36,230 --> 00:51:39,750 |
|
to this critic? Clearly, she's trashing the |
|
|
|
775 |
|
00:51:39,750 --> 00:51:43,850 |
|
romantics. Clearly, she is not happy with what the |
|
|
|
776 |
|
00:51:43,850 --> 00:51:46,870 |
|
romantics are doing. This will be our question to |
|
|
|
777 |
|
00:51:46,870 --> 00:51:49,910 |
|
discuss online. Would you agree that, yes, this is |
|
|
|
778 |
|
00:51:49,910 --> 00:51:53,930 |
|
trivial matter? You're causing us a headache with |
|
|
|
779 |
|
00:51:53,930 --> 00:51:57,830 |
|
this just daffodil, just a rose. Why are people |
|
|
|
780 |
|
00:51:57,830 --> 00:52:03,150 |
|
reacting to the poem this way? Now, in the |
|
|
|
781 |
|
00:52:03,150 --> 00:52:05,630 |
|
remaining time, we need to study this again, a |
|
|
|
782 |
|
00:52:05,630 --> 00:52:08,370 |
|
poem by William Wordsworth. I'm sure I'm shifting |
|
|
|
783 |
|
00:52:08,370 --> 00:52:08,850 |
|
quickly. |
|
|
|
784 |
|
00:52:11,430 --> 00:52:14,630 |
|
Upon Westminster Bridge. If you know London, |
|
|
|
785 |
|
00:52:15,290 --> 00:52:20,290 |
|
Westminster Bridge is a famous famous bridge in |
|
|
|
786 |
|
00:52:20,290 --> 00:52:22,250 |
|
London, probably the most famous bridge in London, |
|
|
|
787 |
|
00:52:22,430 --> 00:52:22,670 |
|
Westminster. |
|
|
|
788 |
|
00:52:28,230 --> 00:52:31,370 |
|
Remember, this is a poet of nature. What on earth |
|
|
|
789 |
|
00:52:31,370 --> 00:52:38,850 |
|
is he doing in London? If you reject London and |
|
|
|
790 |
|
00:52:38,850 --> 00:52:42,770 |
|
the corruption and the society, why are you there? |
|
|
|
791 |
|
00:52:44,270 --> 00:52:46,670 |
|
And again, let's examine where he positions |
|
|
|
792 |
|
00:52:46,670 --> 00:52:50,770 |
|
himself in time and in place. Please read the poem |
|
|
|
793 |
|
00:52:50,770 --> 00:52:54,830 |
|
very quickly. Earth has nothing to show my head. |
|
|
|
794 |
|
00:52:55,370 --> 00:52:59,020 |
|
Down would be heat. Would he be of soul who could |
|
|
|
795 |
|
00:52:59,020 --> 00:53:04,040 |
|
pass by a sight so touching in its majesty? This |
|
|
|
796 |
|
00:53:04,040 --> 00:53:08,520 |
|
city now doth like a garment wear the beauty of |
|
|
|
797 |
|
00:53:08,520 --> 00:53:14,700 |
|
the morning, silent there, ships, towers, domes, |
|
|
|
798 |
|
00:53:15,460 --> 00:53:20,980 |
|
theaters, and temples lie open unto the field and |
|
|
|
799 |
|
00:53:20,980 --> 00:53:24,250 |
|
to the sky. All bright and glittering in the |
|
|
|
800 |
|
00:53:24,250 --> 00:53:27,690 |
|
smokeless air, Never did sun more beautifully |
|
|
|
801 |
|
00:53:27,690 --> 00:53:33,330 |
|
steep. In his first splendor valley-bronze |
|
|
|
802 |
|
00:53:33,330 --> 00:53:38,670 |
|
overhead, Mare saw I never felt a calm so deep. |
|
|
|
803 |
|
00:53:39,450 --> 00:53:44,030 |
|
The river glides at his own sweet swell, Dear God, |
|
|
|
804 |
|
00:53:44,450 --> 00:53:48,510 |
|
the very houses he must leap, And all that mighty |
|
|
|
805 |
|
00:53:48,510 --> 00:53:52,850 |
|
heart is lying still. Okay, beautiful reading. |
|
|
|
806 |
|
00:53:53,470 --> 00:53:57,770 |
|
Thank you for this recitation. What do you notice |
|
|
|
807 |
|
00:53:57,770 --> 00:54:00,410 |
|
the first thing before we talk about it? Please. |
|
|
|
808 |
|
00:54:01,370 --> 00:54:05,790 |
|
Fourteen lines, so this is a sonnet. Ah, he's not |
|
|
|
809 |
|
00:54:05,790 --> 00:54:10,500 |
|
only in London. He's also restricting himself. |
|
|
|
810 |
|
00:54:10,700 --> 00:54:12,540 |
|
Where is the spontaneity, the spontaneous |
|
|
|
811 |
|
00:54:12,540 --> 00:54:14,580 |
|
overflow? Remember I told you never believe |
|
|
|
812 |
|
00:54:14,580 --> 00:54:18,300 |
|
critics and teachers. This is where you should |
|
|
|
813 |
|
00:54:18,300 --> 00:54:20,380 |
|
listen to my advice, unless you don't want to |
|
|
|
814 |
|
00:54:20,380 --> 00:54:23,740 |
|
listen to me as being a teacher. So this is a 14 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
00:54:23,740 --> 00:54:29,920 |
|
-line poem. It's a sonnet. Remember a sonnet is |
|
|
|
816 |
|
00:54:29,920 --> 00:54:34,240 |
|
very rigid. It's like what Rome do as Romans do. |
|
|
|
817 |
|
00:54:34,420 --> 00:54:38,250 |
|
So he's doing the same as Romans. Thank you. you |
|
|
|
818 |
|
00:54:38,250 --> 00:54:43,310 |
|
know, putting himself in this cage. So it's a |
|
|
|
819 |
|
00:54:43,310 --> 00:54:45,830 |
|
sonnet, thank you very much. 14 lines, thank you |
|
|
|
820 |
|
00:54:45,830 --> 00:54:50,010 |
|
very much. And what about the rhyme scheme? Could |
|
|
|
821 |
|
00:54:50,010 --> 00:54:51,570 |
|
somebody do it very quickly, the rhyme scheme, |
|
|
|
822 |
|
00:54:52,110 --> 00:54:56,550 |
|
please? A, B, B, |
|
|
|
823 |
|
00:54:58,750 --> 00:55:06,650 |
|
A, leave her alone, yeah? A, B, |
|
|
|
824 |
|
00:55:09,690 --> 00:55:15,830 |
|
B. A. Thank you. C. D. |
|
|
|
825 |
|
00:55:18,750 --> 00:55:22,130 |
|
Deep and |
|
|
|
826 |
|
00:55:22,130 --> 00:55:35,570 |
|
deep. C. Well. D. Asleep. C. And then? That's a |
|
|
|
827 |
|
00:55:35,570 --> 00:55:37,910 |
|
Petrarchan sonnet, not a Shakespearean sonnet. He |
|
|
|
828 |
|
00:55:37,910 --> 00:55:42,970 |
|
doesn't like Shakespeare, clearly. Listen, the |
|
|
|
829 |
|
00:55:42,970 --> 00:55:46,410 |
|
Romantics were called Romantics because |
|
|
|
830 |
|
00:55:46,410 --> 00:55:48,750 |
|
Romanticism, the word Romantic was used to |
|
|
|
831 |
|
00:55:48,750 --> 00:55:52,030 |
|
describe the Middle Ages, the medieval times, when |
|
|
|
832 |
|
00:55:52,030 --> 00:55:56,510 |
|
nature was unregulated, uncivilized, uncontrolled |
|
|
|
833 |
|
00:55:56,510 --> 00:56:01,110 |
|
by man. When nature was, when life was as simple |
|
|
|
834 |
|
00:56:01,110 --> 00:56:06,680 |
|
as it was in a way. So he's leaving, jumping over |
|
|
|
835 |
|
00:56:06,680 --> 00:56:09,940 |
|
all the poets, the giants, the romantic, the |
|
|
|
836 |
|
00:56:09,940 --> 00:56:13,440 |
|
neoclassicists, those poets, and he's going back |
|
|
|
837 |
|
00:56:13,440 --> 00:56:18,580 |
|
to the origin, the origin of things. So I think |
|
|
|
838 |
|
00:56:18,580 --> 00:56:21,800 |
|
this is a deliberate, again, attempt to distance |
|
|
|
839 |
|
00:56:21,800 --> 00:56:25,220 |
|
himself from Shakespeare. I also think that it's a |
|
|
|
840 |
|
00:56:25,220 --> 00:56:28,120 |
|
way of defining critics. Like, if you say I'm not |
|
|
|
841 |
|
00:56:28,120 --> 00:56:30,480 |
|
a poet, I can write upon it just as well. I can, |
|
|
|
842 |
|
00:56:30,560 --> 00:56:33,610 |
|
it could be, yeah. But also it says that the idea |
|
|
|
843 |
|
00:56:33,610 --> 00:56:36,910 |
|
of spontaneity in poetry and writing is a myth. |
|
|
|
844 |
|
00:56:37,830 --> 00:56:39,890 |
|
It's not always true. Sahya, you're right, you |
|
|
|
845 |
|
00:56:39,890 --> 00:56:43,170 |
|
react instantly sometimes. I'm sure you started |
|
|
|
846 |
|
00:56:43,170 --> 00:56:44,810 |
|
writing poetry, some of you. Sometimes you just |
|
|
|
847 |
|
00:56:44,810 --> 00:56:47,590 |
|
get the inspiration and you write a poem and it's |
|
|
|
848 |
|
00:56:47,590 --> 00:56:50,310 |
|
a beautiful poem. But sometimes you go back to |
|
|
|
849 |
|
00:56:50,310 --> 00:56:53,370 |
|
check, you know, on language and diction and |
|
|
|
850 |
|
00:56:53,370 --> 00:56:57,310 |
|
poetic language and everything. Some of you |
|
|
|
851 |
|
00:56:57,310 --> 00:57:00,070 |
|
protested something here. I agree that this is... |
|
|
|
852 |
|
00:57:00,650 --> 00:57:03,730 |
|
Okay, an imperfect rhyme. At the time when he's |
|
|
|
853 |
|
00:57:03,730 --> 00:57:08,410 |
|
talking about the majesty, the majesty here, by |
|
|
|
854 |
|
00:57:08,410 --> 00:57:10,490 |
|
and majesty, there is an imperfect rhyme. Again, |
|
|
|
855 |
|
00:57:10,570 --> 00:57:12,990 |
|
creating some kind of conflict. There is something |
|
|
|
856 |
|
00:57:12,990 --> 00:57:15,670 |
|
that is not right with the city. He's not saying, |
|
|
|
857 |
|
00:57:15,850 --> 00:57:18,150 |
|
okay, I'm sorry, nature is not as good as I |
|
|
|
858 |
|
00:57:18,150 --> 00:57:22,230 |
|
thought, and this is the city of London is more |
|
|
|
859 |
|
00:57:22,230 --> 00:57:27,270 |
|
significant, more important. What is the time in |
|
|
|
860 |
|
00:57:27,270 --> 00:57:32,270 |
|
the poem? Morning? This is at dawn, where did he |
|
|
|
861 |
|
00:57:32,270 --> 00:57:32,950 |
|
say this? |
|
|
|
862 |
|
00:57:39,070 --> 00:57:41,570 |
|
Okay, before the sun, there was something about |
|
|
|
863 |
|
00:57:41,570 --> 00:57:46,690 |
|
the sun there Okay The morning, this is the early |
|
|
|
864 |
|
00:57:46,690 --> 00:57:49,950 |
|
morning hours Where is the poet? |
|
|
|
865 |
|
00:57:52,730 --> 00:57:58,050 |
|
Again, standing up above almost everything High |
|
|
|
866 |
|
00:57:59,270 --> 00:58:04,250 |
|
But again, not as high as Coleridge. Sorry for the |
|
|
|
867 |
|
00:58:04,250 --> 00:58:05,010 |
|
stupid pun. |
|
|
|
868 |
|
00:58:09,470 --> 00:58:11,450 |
|
Thank you very much. And this is the second |
|
|
|
869 |
|
00:58:11,450 --> 00:58:13,430 |
|
question. What else do you notice about the poem? |
|
|
|
870 |
|
00:58:13,510 --> 00:58:19,370 |
|
The poem is people-less. There are no people. And |
|
|
|
871 |
|
00:58:19,370 --> 00:58:21,910 |
|
it's because if there are people, the factors will |
|
|
|
872 |
|
00:58:21,910 --> 00:58:25,630 |
|
be going on and then the smoke and the corruption |
|
|
|
873 |
|
00:58:25,630 --> 00:58:28,550 |
|
and the pollution and the anxiety will be |
|
|
|
874 |
|
00:58:28,550 --> 00:58:32,670 |
|
permeating, overwhelming. So the timing he chooses |
|
|
|
875 |
|
00:58:32,670 --> 00:58:38,810 |
|
is also, so he sees beauty in the heart of the |
|
|
|
876 |
|
00:58:38,810 --> 00:58:43,170 |
|
beast. The heart of London, he could see beauty. |
|
|
|
877 |
|
00:58:43,990 --> 00:58:47,810 |
|
And remember for this, I want you to compare this |
|
|
|
878 |
|
00:58:47,810 --> 00:58:50,850 |
|
poem to a poem called London by William Blake. |
|
|
|
879 |
|
00:58:52,030 --> 00:58:55,330 |
|
Fascinating stark contrast between both of them. |
|
|
|
880 |
|
00:58:56,590 --> 00:58:59,850 |
|
This man looks with beauty, only beauty, mostly |
|
|
|
881 |
|
00:58:59,850 --> 00:59:03,610 |
|
beauty. He was an outsider. This is significant. |
|
|
|
882 |
|
00:59:03,750 --> 00:59:06,590 |
|
He's not a Londoner himself. Blake was a Londoner. |
|
|
|
883 |
|
00:59:07,530 --> 00:59:11,290 |
|
Blake sees corruption. He sees injustice, he sees |
|
|
|
884 |
|
00:59:11,290 --> 00:59:14,930 |
|
blood, he sees poverty, he hears the voices of the |
|
|
|
885 |
|
00:59:14,930 --> 00:59:18,490 |
|
downtrodden, the wretched of the earth. He cares |
|
|
|
886 |
|
00:59:18,490 --> 00:59:21,290 |
|
about them, he raises their voices, he gives them |
|
|
|
887 |
|
00:59:21,290 --> 00:59:25,190 |
|
a voice and a face. But this man, that's why many |
|
|
|
888 |
|
00:59:25,190 --> 00:59:28,190 |
|
people describe William Wordsworth in particular |
|
|
|
889 |
|
00:59:28,190 --> 00:59:33,850 |
|
as an escapist, as |
|
|
|
890 |
|
00:59:36,710 --> 00:59:41,290 |
|
He's doing nothing. For many people, he is running |
|
|
|
891 |
|
00:59:41,290 --> 00:59:44,230 |
|
away, but for others, the act of writing poetry |
|
|
|
892 |
|
00:59:44,230 --> 00:59:50,450 |
|
itself is how bad corruption is. And for this, you |
|
|
|
893 |
|
00:59:50,450 --> 00:59:52,230 |
|
will be surprised by the way, when the second |
|
|
|
894 |
|
00:59:52,230 --> 00:59:56,850 |
|
generation was writing, Shelley, Keats, and Byron, |
|
|
|
895 |
|
00:59:58,090 --> 01:00:00,130 |
|
this man was still alive because he lived like a |
|
|
|
896 |
|
01:00:00,130 --> 01:00:03,700 |
|
hundred years. I'm not sure how old, but he was |
|
|
|
897 |
|
01:00:03,700 --> 01:00:06,320 |
|
very old. But again, the second generation was |
|
|
|
898 |
|
01:00:06,320 --> 01:00:11,180 |
|
taking control. And those people, Chile, you are |
|
|
|
899 |
|
01:00:11,180 --> 01:00:14,240 |
|
many, they are few. He was clearly calling for |
|
|
|
900 |
|
01:00:14,240 --> 01:00:17,100 |
|
revolution, for an actual revolution. And that's |
|
|
|
901 |
|
01:00:17,100 --> 01:00:20,300 |
|
probably one reason why I love him the most, |
|
|
|
902 |
|
01:00:20,780 --> 01:00:26,620 |
|
Chile. Was anti-authoritarian, anti-everything. |
|
|
|
903 |
|
01:00:29,440 --> 01:00:33,540 |
|
So the poem here, Upon Westminster Bridge, shows |
|
|
|
904 |
|
01:00:33,540 --> 01:00:35,700 |
|
how this as a romantic poet would choose a |
|
|
|
905 |
|
01:00:35,700 --> 01:00:37,820 |
|
particular timing and a particular place, again |
|
|
|
906 |
|
01:00:37,820 --> 01:00:40,960 |
|
just to be himself. If you read the poem, I'll |
|
|
|
907 |
|
01:00:40,960 --> 01:00:43,200 |
|
just do some commentary very quickly before we |
|
|
|
908 |
|
01:00:43,200 --> 01:00:49,000 |
|
leave. Earth has nothing, again this is starting |
|
|
|
909 |
|
01:00:49,000 --> 01:00:53,530 |
|
with a stressed syllable. Earth has nothing. has |
|
|
|
910 |
|
01:00:53,530 --> 01:00:59,450 |
|
not anything to show more fair. What? You just |
|
|
|
911 |
|
01:00:59,450 --> 01:01:02,530 |
|
said the daffodils are the most beautiful thing. |
|
|
|
912 |
|
01:01:04,990 --> 01:01:10,110 |
|
Dull would he be of soul who could pass by a sight |
|
|
|
913 |
|
01:01:10,110 --> 01:01:13,130 |
|
so touching in its majesty. |
|
|
|
914 |
|
01:01:15,710 --> 01:01:17,970 |
|
You'd be dull if you don't react to the beauty |
|
|
|
915 |
|
01:01:17,970 --> 01:01:24,300 |
|
here. The city now does I love him using the word |
|
|
|
916 |
|
01:01:24,300 --> 01:01:27,080 |
|
the old English middle English does rather than |
|
|
|
917 |
|
01:01:27,080 --> 01:01:31,340 |
|
does because again he's taking London 300 years |
|
|
|
918 |
|
01:01:31,340 --> 01:01:34,580 |
|
before 200 years before before the industrial |
|
|
|
919 |
|
01:01:34,580 --> 01:01:36,160 |
|
revolution and the factories and the corruption |
|
|
|
920 |
|
01:01:37,380 --> 01:01:40,780 |
|
Does like a garment wear and sadly this is only a |
|
|
|
921 |
|
01:01:40,780 --> 01:01:43,880 |
|
garment he knows this it's only something the |
|
|
|
922 |
|
01:01:43,880 --> 01:01:48,080 |
|
country will shed out will take off in in minutes |
|
|
|
923 |
|
01:01:48,080 --> 01:01:53,540 |
|
or in an hour or so a garment like a dress the |
|
|
|
924 |
|
01:01:53,540 --> 01:01:59,260 |
|
beauty of the morning silent bear the silence here |
|
|
|
925 |
|
01:01:59,260 --> 01:02:01,160 |
|
the lack of people the fact that there are no |
|
|
|
926 |
|
01:02:01,160 --> 01:02:09,160 |
|
people and there ships towers Domes, theaters, |
|
|
|
927 |
|
01:02:10,160 --> 01:02:13,660 |
|
temples, lie. And I think there could be a pun |
|
|
|
928 |
|
01:02:13,660 --> 01:02:17,160 |
|
here. Lie, they're just lying asleep out there, |
|
|
|
929 |
|
01:02:17,540 --> 01:02:21,600 |
|
but the scene lies. It's deceptive. Now it's |
|
|
|
930 |
|
01:02:21,600 --> 01:02:24,900 |
|
beautiful and romantic. In an hour or so, it's |
|
|
|
931 |
|
01:02:24,900 --> 01:02:29,700 |
|
going to be hell breaking loose upon |
|
|
|
932 |
|
01:02:31,510 --> 01:02:35,530 |
|
open onto the fields and to the sky, how it's just |
|
|
|
933 |
|
01:02:35,530 --> 01:02:38,670 |
|
one painting, one image, all bright and glittering |
|
|
|
934 |
|
01:02:38,670 --> 01:02:42,730 |
|
in the smokeless air. I think this is where I mix |
|
|
|
935 |
|
01:02:42,730 --> 01:02:45,810 |
|
things up. This is every line is 10 syllables. |
|
|
|
936 |
|
01:02:46,230 --> 01:02:49,390 |
|
It's basically Iambic Pentameter, but he does |
|
|
|
937 |
|
01:02:49,390 --> 01:02:54,340 |
|
experiment more. He's just not as Symmetric as |
|
|
|
938 |
|
01:02:54,340 --> 01:02:57,740 |
|
others This is the only line that has an extra |
|
|
|
939 |
|
01:02:57,740 --> 01:03:01,180 |
|
syllable unless you want to delete the schwa here |
|
|
|
940 |
|
01:03:01,180 --> 01:03:04,380 |
|
glittering if you go for glittering It's 10 if you |
|
|
|
941 |
|
01:03:04,380 --> 01:03:07,760 |
|
go for glitter glittering. It's just 8 it's |
|
|
|
942 |
|
01:03:07,760 --> 01:03:11,660 |
|
already 11 All bright and glittering in the |
|
|
|
943 |
|
01:03:11,660 --> 01:03:16,100 |
|
smokeless air. Look at this smokeless People is |
|
|
|
944 |
|
01:03:16,100 --> 01:03:18,280 |
|
what else does he go for list? How many listens do |
|
|
|
945 |
|
01:03:18,280 --> 01:03:20,760 |
|
we have? two or more |
|
|
|
946 |
|
01:03:24,020 --> 01:03:26,580 |
|
Smokeless, just one, so glittering in the |
|
|
|
947 |
|
01:03:26,580 --> 01:03:31,760 |
|
smokeless air, never did sun. It should be the sun |
|
|
|
948 |
|
01:03:31,760 --> 01:03:34,700 |
|
because just one sun, right? Or is he considering |
|
|
|
949 |
|
01:03:34,700 --> 01:03:37,520 |
|
him son of nature, son of this? But he doesn't go |
|
|
|
950 |
|
01:03:37,520 --> 01:03:40,670 |
|
for the sun, he's going to break See my point |
|
|
|
951 |
|
01:03:40,670 --> 01:03:44,050 |
|
here? Grammatically it should be the sun which is |
|
|
|
952 |
|
01:03:44,050 --> 01:03:46,130 |
|
going to add an extra syllable. But why did you |
|
|
|
953 |
|
01:03:46,130 --> 01:03:49,790 |
|
add an extra syllable here? I didn't want to add |
|
|
|
954 |
|
01:03:49,790 --> 01:03:52,070 |
|
one here because there is a message he's sending |
|
|
|
955 |
|
01:03:52,070 --> 01:03:54,590 |
|
here. If you dig deeper, you'll find it. |
|
|
|
956 |
|
01:04:00,160 --> 01:04:02,300 |
|
Possible, but I'm not sure whether, because |
|
|
|
957 |
|
01:04:02,300 --> 01:04:04,840 |
|
sometimes you have different texts, I try to look |
|
|
|
958 |
|
01:04:04,840 --> 01:04:07,280 |
|
for the original text, I couldn't find one, just |
|
|
|
959 |
|
01:04:07,280 --> 01:04:10,440 |
|
to see whether this is glittering or glittering, |
|
|
|
960 |
|
01:04:10,500 --> 01:04:14,220 |
|
right? And yeah, you look at texts, if this is the |
|
|
|
961 |
|
01:04:14,220 --> 01:04:16,140 |
|
original text, this is how he wrote it, why is |
|
|
|
962 |
|
01:04:16,140 --> 01:04:22,020 |
|
this capitalized, but not this? Or is this where |
|
|
|
963 |
|
01:04:22,020 --> 01:04:26,060 |
|
society and civilization control overwhelm and |
|
|
|
964 |
|
01:04:26,060 --> 01:04:30,950 |
|
subdue nature, which is not good? never did sun |
|
|
|
965 |
|
01:04:30,950 --> 01:04:34,810 |
|
more beautifully steep in this first in his first |
|
|
|
966 |
|
01:04:34,810 --> 01:04:39,410 |
|
remember his refers to the sun his first splendor |
|
|
|
967 |
|
01:04:39,410 --> 01:04:43,850 |
|
valley rock or hell no so I again never two |
|
|
|
968 |
|
01:04:43,850 --> 01:04:47,470 |
|
syllables no so I again the fronting here I never |
|
|
|
969 |
|
01:04:47,470 --> 01:04:53,470 |
|
saw I never saw never felt there's a lot of |
|
|
|
970 |
|
01:04:53,470 --> 01:04:57,560 |
|
negativity we'll see this in a bit A calm so deep, |
|
|
|
971 |
|
01:04:57,940 --> 01:05:00,120 |
|
a calm beauty, a silence. |
|
|
|
972 |
|
01:05:03,590 --> 01:05:08,490 |
|
The river glides, he goes again for, not glides, |
|
|
|
973 |
|
01:05:09,810 --> 01:05:13,810 |
|
going for old English because he's situating |
|
|
|
974 |
|
01:05:13,810 --> 01:05:16,430 |
|
himself in a different place. Remember this is the |
|
|
|
975 |
|
01:05:16,430 --> 01:05:19,950 |
|
relativity of time and issues of time and shapes |
|
|
|
976 |
|
01:05:19,950 --> 01:05:22,370 |
|
of time Dr. Lyman mentioned before you could use |
|
|
|
977 |
|
01:05:22,370 --> 01:05:25,970 |
|
this as an example. The river glides at his own |
|
|
|
978 |
|
01:05:25,970 --> 01:05:27,150 |
|
sweet will. |
|
|
|
979 |
|
01:05:30,520 --> 01:05:32,440 |
|
I don't think this is a religious, dear God. Some |
|
|
|
980 |
|
01:05:32,440 --> 01:05:34,400 |
|
people would take it as a religious thing. It's |
|
|
|
981 |
|
01:05:34,400 --> 01:05:40,820 |
|
just, dear God, the very houses seem asleep. This |
|
|
|
982 |
|
01:05:40,820 --> 01:05:43,500 |
|
is another personification. People are asleep. |
|
|
|
983 |
|
01:05:44,880 --> 01:05:50,020 |
|
Everything is asleep. And all that mighty heart is |
|
|
|
984 |
|
01:05:50,020 --> 01:05:54,820 |
|
lying still. The mighty heart, London. Is he just |
|
|
|
985 |
|
01:05:54,820 --> 01:05:57,760 |
|
referring to London as a whole? Or the factories? |
|
|
|
986 |
|
01:05:58,040 --> 01:06:02,260 |
|
Or the machines? Remember this is momentarily, |
|
|
|
987 |
|
01:06:02,500 --> 01:06:06,580 |
|
it's going to change. I find the imperfect rhyme, |
|
|
|
988 |
|
01:06:06,960 --> 01:06:08,780 |
|
the extra syllable, and thank you somebody said |
|
|
|
989 |
|
01:06:08,780 --> 01:06:11,160 |
|
the repetition of the never, never, and the not, |
|
|
|
990 |
|
01:06:11,280 --> 01:06:15,120 |
|
not. Things that create tension that tell us that |
|
|
|
991 |
|
01:06:15,120 --> 01:06:18,460 |
|
this is not going to last forever. Because it's |
|
|
|
992 |
|
01:06:18,460 --> 01:06:21,640 |
|
only, and he admits this, he's not deceiving us or |
|
|
|
993 |
|
01:06:21,640 --> 01:06:25,480 |
|
himself. This is a garment, it's just a gown you |
|
|
|
994 |
|
01:06:25,480 --> 01:06:31,380 |
|
put on at night And soon it will be taken off and |
|
|
|
995 |
|
01:06:31,380 --> 01:06:40,040 |
|
a garment of corruption, sins, pollution, smoke. |
|
|
|
996 |
|
01:06:40,940 --> 01:06:46,660 |
|
Smoke will overwhelm, will take over. Such a |
|
|
|
997 |
|
01:06:46,660 --> 01:06:48,800 |
|
beautiful poem. One of the most, again, |
|
|
|
998 |
|
01:06:49,360 --> 01:06:52,920 |
|
interesting poems of all times. But again, he's |
|
|
|
999 |
|
01:06:52,920 --> 01:06:55,360 |
|
not going for Shakespeare. He's jumping over |
|
|
|
1000 |
|
01:06:55,360 --> 01:07:00,020 |
|
Shakespeare. That's the term. Frog leaping or you |
|
|
|
1001 |
|
01:07:00,020 --> 01:07:04,220 |
|
know, it's going back to Petrarch. I think the |
|
|
|
1002 |
|
01:07:04,220 --> 01:07:07,520 |
|
word garment where it goes entirely with the whole |
|
|
|
1003 |
|
01:07:07,520 --> 01:07:11,460 |
|
time idea of lie and lying. The garment? Possibly, |
|
|
|
1004 |
|
01:07:11,540 --> 01:07:16,480 |
|
it's momentarily. It's now this |
|
|
|
1005 |
|
01:07:16,480 --> 01:07:19,600 |
|
beautiful and silent and bare, but in a moment |
|
|
|
1006 |
|
01:07:19,600 --> 01:07:21,500 |
|
it's going to be different. |
|
|
|
1007 |
|
01:07:24,160 --> 01:07:26,700 |
|
More? Please. |
|
|
|
1008 |
|
01:07:36,530 --> 01:07:38,870 |
|
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but look at |
|
|
|
1009 |
|
01:07:38,870 --> 01:07:42,390 |
|
what timing he chooses, what place he places |
|
|
|
1010 |
|
01:07:42,390 --> 01:07:46,430 |
|
himself. That's a romantic concept. If you look at |
|
|
|
1011 |
|
01:07:46,430 --> 01:07:50,750 |
|
these questions, They are very interesting things |
|
|
|
1012 |
|
01:07:50,750 --> 01:07:53,770 |
|
to look into this poem. I'll stop here. If you |
|
|
|
1013 |
|
01:07:53,770 --> 01:07:57,190 |
|
have questions, please stay behind. |
|
|
|
|