question: Hvem bestemmer om et lovforslag er et finanslovsforslag eller ej?
context: Money bill
  Det er ofte en forfatningsmæssig konvention, at overhuset ikke må blokere et pengelovforslag. Der er ofte et andet krav om, at der ikke må knyttes klausuler, der ikke er af pengelovslignende art, til en pengelov. Baggrunden for denne konvention er, at overhuset, der er udpeget eller indirekte valgt, ikke bør have ret til at træffe beslutninger om skatte- og udgiftsrelaterede politikker, som kan udformes af de direkte valgte repræsentanter i underhuset. Derfor er pengelovforslag en undtagelse fra den generelle regel om, at et lovforslag skal godkendes af begge parlamentets kamre - underhuset og overhuset - for at blive gjort til en lov.
context_en: Money bill
  It is often a constitutional convention that the upper house may not block a money bill. There is often another requirement that non-money bill-type clauses may not be attached to a money bill. The rationale behind this convention is that the upper house, being appointed or indirectly elected, should not have any right to decide on taxation and public expenditure-related policies as may be framed by the directly elected representatives of the lower house. Therefore, money bills are an exception to the general rule that for a bill to be enacted into a law, it has to be approved by both Houses of the Parliament—the lower house and the upper house.
title_en: Money bill