|
arXiv:1001.0042v2 [hep-th] 16 Apr 2010Topological Gravity in Seven Dimensions |
|
H. L¨ u†‡and Yi Pang⋆ |
|
†China Economics and Management Academy |
|
Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081 |
|
‡Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Nanhai A ve 3688, Shenzhen 518060 |
|
⋆Key Laboratory of Frontiers in Theoretical Physics |
|
Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100190 |
|
ABSTRACT |
|
We obtain new topological gravity in seven dimensions by add ing two topological terms |
|
to the Einstein-Hilbert action. For certain choice of the co upling constants, these terms |
|
may have an origin as the R4correction to the 3-form field equation of eleven-dimension al |
|
supergravity. We derive the full set of the equations of moti on, and obtain large classes of |
|
solutions including static AdS black holes, squashed seven spheres and Q111spaces.1 Introduction |
|
There has been considerable interest in topological gauge t heories [1] because of their wide |
|
application in physics. The most studied example is the thre e-dimensional one. In addition |
|
to the Einstein-Hilbert term, the theory has the Chern-Simo ns term, given by |
|
S=1 |
|
µ/integraldisplay |
|
d3xTr(dω∧ω−2 |
|
3ω∧ω∧ω), (1) |
|
whereωcan be either a Yang-Mills gauge potential or the connection for gravity. Topo- |
|
logical Yang-Mills theory can provide a fundamental interp retation for anyons [2]; it can |
|
also generate Lorentz violation dynamically [3]. Topologi cal gravity [4] becomes dynamical |
|
with a propagating massive particle, with the mass proporti onal to the coupling constant |
|
µ. Recently, a cosmological constant is added and the corresp onding boundary conformal |
|
field theory (CFT) is discussed [5]. The three-dimensional m assive topological gravity is |
|
conjectured to be unitary for certain parameter region even though the theory has higher |
|
derivatives in time [6]. |
|
The attention on higher dimensional generalizations is con siderably less. The five di- |
|
mensional Yang-Mills Chern-Simons term was discussed in [7 ], but there is no gravity coun- |
|
terpart dueto the fact that the holonomy group SO(1,4) has no invariant rank-3 symmetric |
|
tensor. In seven dimensions, Yang-Mills Chern-Simons term s arise naturally from N= 4 |
|
supergravity [8]. As in the case of three dimensions, we find t hat such terms in the grav- |
|
ity sector can be obtained directly from those in the Yang-Mi lls sector by replacing the |
|
gauge potential Ato the connection Γ. Moreover, as we shall see later, seven-d imensional |
|
topological gravity has a direct origin in eleven-dimensio nal supergravity, while any higher- |
|
dimensional origin of the three-dimensional theory remain s unknown. |
|
In section 2, we present the two topological terms in seven di mensions, and discuss their |
|
properties. Sincethey arenot manifestly invariant underg eneral coordinate transformation, |
|
we find it is more convenient to lift the system to eight dimens ions in order to derive the |
|
equations of motion (EOMs). We obtain the full set. In sectio n 3, we construct large |
|
classes of solutions including static Anti-de Sitter (AdS) black holes, squashed S7andQ111. |
|
We emphasize that all the previously-known static (AdS) bla ck holes remain to be solutions |
|
whenthetopological termsare addedinto theaction. Thisis analogous to threedimensions, |
|
where the BTZ black hole remains to be a solution in topologic al massive gravity. We |
|
conclude in section 4. |
|
22 The theory |
|
In seven dimensions, there are two topological terms; they a re given by |
|
S1=µ/integraldisplay |
|
Ω(7) |
|
1=µ/integraldisplay |
|
Tr(Γ∧Θ+1 |
|
3Γ3)∧Tr(Θ2) =µ/integraldisplay |
|
Ω(3)∧dΩ(3), (2) |
|
S2=ν/integraldisplay |
|
Ω(7) |
|
2=ν/integraldisplay |
|
Tr(Θ3∧Γ+2 |
|
5Θ2∧Γ3+1 |
|
5Θ∧Γ2∧Θ∧Γ+1 |
|
5Θ∧Γ5+1 |
|
35Γ7), |
|
with Ω(3)= Tr(dΓ∧Γ−2 |
|
3Γ3). Here, Θ is the curvature 2-form, defined as Θ ≡dΓ−Γ∧Γ, |
|
andµ,νare two parameters of length dimension 5. (We rescale the tot al action by the |
|
seven-dimensional Newton constant.) The 3-form Ω(3)has the same structure as the Chern- |
|
Simons term in D= 3, except that now Γ depends on seven coordinates. Ω(7) |
|
1and Ω(7) |
|
2are |
|
topological in the same sense as Ω(3)being topological in D= 3. We can lift the system to |
|
D= 8, with the seven-dimensional spacetime as the boundary. T hen, we have |
|
dΩ(7) |
|
1=Y(8) |
|
1≡Tr(Θ∧Θ)∧Tr(Θ∧Θ), dΩ(7) |
|
2=Y(8) |
|
2≡Tr(Θ∧Θ∧Θ∧Θ).(3) |
|
As we have mentioned earlier, these terms can be derived from the Yang-Mills Chern- |
|
Simons terms in [8] by changing the gauge potential to the con nection.1Note that the |
|
Pontryagin term is proportional to Y(8) |
|
1−2Y(8) |
|
2, corresponding to ν=−2µ. In eleven- |
|
dimensional supergravity, there is an R4correction to the field equation, namely d∗F(4)= |
|
1 |
|
2F(4)∧F(4)+X(8), whereX(8)is given by |
|
X(8)∝Y(8) |
|
1−4Y(8) |
|
2. (4) |
|
Thus forν=−4µ, the topological terms can be obtained from the S4reduction of super- |
|
gravity inD= 11, and the coupling constant is proportional to the 4-form M5-brane fluxes. |
|
For large fluxes, this topological term dominates the higher -order corrections. |
|
To derive the contribution to the EOMs from the Chern-Simons terms, it is necessary |
|
to perform their variation with respect to the metric. These topological terms are not |
|
manifestly invariant under the general coordinate transfo rmation, but Y(8) |
|
1andY(8) |
|
2are. |
|
Wefindthataconvenient waytoderivethevariationistolift thesystemtoeightdimensions. |
|
Let us first consider the variation of S1. In terms of coordinate components, we have |
|
/integraldisplay |
|
dΩ(7) |
|
1=1 |
|
16/integraldisplay |
|
d8xǫν1ν2ν3ν4ν5ν6ν7ν8Rµ1µ2ν1ν2Rµ2µ1ν3ν4Rµ3µ4ν5ν6Rµ4µ3ν7ν8. (5) |
|
1In [8], the field strength 2-form is defined by F=dB+gB∧B, with gauge coupling g= 2. Then by |
|
rescaling the field B→B/gandF→F/gand setting g=−2, one can obtain the same expressions as the |
|
ones given here. |
|
3Here we use Greek letters to denote the eight-dimensional co ordinates and Latin letters to |
|
represent the seven-dimensional ones hereafter. We adopt t he convention ǫ12345678= 1. |
|
For an infinitesimal variation of the metric δg, using the Bianchi identity and the fol- |
|
lowing relation |
|
δRµ |
|
ναβ=δΓµ |
|
νβ;α−δΓµ |
|
να;β, (6) |
|
we find that |
|
/integraldisplay |
|
dδΩ(7) |
|
1=−1 |
|
2/integraldisplay |
|
d8x√g/parenleftBig1√gǫν1ν2ν3ν4ν5ν6ν7ν8Rµ1µ2ν1ν2Rµ2µ1ν3ν4Rµ3µ4ν5ν6δΓµ4µ3ν7/parenrightBig |
|
;ν8 |
|
≡1 |
|
2/integraldisplay |
|
d∗J, (7) |
|
where “;” denotes a covariant derivative and ∗is the Hodge dual. For simplicity, we have |
|
introduced a 1-form current J=Jαdxα. Its components are given by |
|
Jα=1√gǫν1ν2ν3ν4ν5ν6ν7αRµ1µ2ν1ν2Rµ2µ1ν3ν4Rµ3µ4ν5ν6δΓµ4µ3ν7. (8) |
|
Clearly, we have d∗J=−√gJα;αd8x, Thus we obtain |
|
δΩ(7) |
|
1=1 |
|
2∗J, (9) |
|
up to a total derivative term. Now restricting the coordinat e indices to seven dimensions |
|
only, we have |
|
δS1= 4µ/integraldisplay |
|
Tr(Θ∧Θ)∧Tr(Θ∧δΓ). (10) |
|
The variation of S2can be obtained in the same manner, given by |
|
δS2= 4ν/integraldisplay |
|
Tr(Θ∧Θ∧Θ∧δΓ). (11) |
|
Finally, we make use of the variation of the connection |
|
δΓi |
|
mj=1 |
|
2gin(δgnm;j+δgnj;m−δgml;n), (12) |
|
and after integrating by parts, we obtain thecontributions to EOMs from the Chern-Simons |
|
terms, given by |
|
Cij |
|
1=δS1√gδgij=µ |
|
4√g[ǫij1j2j3j4j5j6(Ri1 |
|
i2j1j2Ri2 |
|
i1j3j4Rjk |
|
j5j6);k+i↔j], |
|
Cij |
|
2=δS2√gδgij=ν |
|
4√g[ǫij1j2j3j4j5j6(Rk |
|
i1j1j2Ri1 |
|
i2j3j4Rji2 |
|
j5j6);k+i↔j].(13) |
|
For the total action S, which is the sum of the Einstein-Hilbert action, cosmologi cal |
|
constant Λ and S1+S2, the corresponding full set of EOMs is given by |
|
Rij−1 |
|
2gijR+Λgij+Cij |
|
1+Cij |
|
2= 0. (14) |
|
4It should be remarked that under a large gauge transformatio n Γ→ O−1ΓO−O−1dO, |
|
the action transforms as S→S+µv(O)+νw(O), where |
|
v(O) =/integraldisplay |
|
−1 |
|
3d/parenleftBig |
|
Tr(O−1dO)3∧Ω(3)/parenrightBig |
|
;w(O) =−1 |
|
35/integraldisplay |
|
Tr(O−1dO)7.(15) |
|
Thevterm is trivial and gives no restriction to the parameter µ, while the wterm should |
|
be classified by the seventh homotopy group of SO(1,6) |
|
π7[SO(1,6)]≃π7[SO(6)]≃Z. (16) |
|
The invariance of eiSrequires that |
|
ν= 2πn, n = 0,±1,±2.... (17) |
|
This quantization condition is clearly consistent with the M5-brane quantization, since |
|
it has a direct origin in D= 11. This result is completely different from that in three |
|
dimensions, where the SO(1,2) is homotoplically trivial and the mass parameter is not |
|
quantized. Moreover, since νis quantized, S2will not be renormalized in the quantum |
|
theory. This suggests some intriguing properties in the cor responding CFT dual. |
|
3 Solutions |
|
Spherically-symmetric solutions: |
|
Having obtained the full set of EOMs for topological gravity in seven dimensions, we are |
|
in the position to construct solutions. It is clear that the m aximally-symmetric space(time) |
|
is unmodifiedby theinclusion of the topological terms. Then extsimplest case is to consider |
|
the spherically-symmetric ansatz, given by |
|
ds2=−F(r)dt2+dr2 |
|
G(r)+r2dΩ2 |
|
5. (18) |
|
We find that for this ansatz, the contributions from the topol ogical terms Cij |
|
1andCij |
|
2 |
|
vanish identically. This implies that the previously-know n static (AdS) black holes, charged |
|
or neutral, are still solutions when the topological terms a re added to the action. This is |
|
analogous to three dimensions, where the BTZ black hole is st ill a solution in massive |
|
topological gravity. However the thermodynamic quantitie s such as the mass and entropy |
|
will acquire modifications [9, 10]. |
|
S3bundle over S4: |
|
5We now turn our attention to the Euclidean theory. In three di mensions, there exists a |
|
large class of squashed S3or AdS 3[11]. We expect the same in seven dimensions. Without |
|
loss of generality, we set Λ = 30 so that it can give rise to a uni t roundS7. We first consider |
|
the squashed S7that can be viewed as an S3bundle over S4. The metric ansatz is given |
|
by |
|
ds2=α3/summationdisplay |
|
i=1(σi−cos2(1 |
|
2θ)˜σi)2+β/parenleftBig |
|
dθ2+1 |
|
4sin2θ3/summationdisplay |
|
i=1˜σ2 |
|
i/parenrightBig |
|
. (19) |
|
whereσiand ˜σiare theSU(2) left-invariant 1-forms, satisfying dσi=1 |
|
2ǫijkσj∧σkand |
|
d˜σi=1 |
|
2ǫijk˜σj∧˜σk. The metric is Einstein provided that either α=β=1 |
|
4orα=1 |
|
5β=9 |
|
100. |
|
The first case corresponds to the round S7and the second is a squashed S7that is also |
|
Einstein. Now with the contribution from the topological te rms, the EOMs can be reduced |
|
to |
|
2α2+4αβ(7β−2)−β2= 0, (20) |
|
together with |
|
√α(α−β)3(4(10α+β)µ−(55α+7β)ν)+2β6(20αβ−4α−β) = 0.(21) |
|
It is clear from (20) that there exists one and only one positi veαfor any positive β. The |
|
squashing parameter γ≡α/βlies in the range 0 <γ <2+3√ |
|
2. Note that when 2 µ= 3ν, |
|
the squashed S7that is Eisntein remains Einstein. |
|
S1bundle over CP3: |
|
There is another way of squashing an S7, which can be viewed as an S1bundle over |
|
CP3. The metric ansatz is given by |
|
ds2=α(dτ+sin2θ(dψ+B))2+βds2 |
|
CP3, |
|
ds2 |
|
CP3=dθ2+sin2θcos2θ(dψ+B)2+sin2θ/parenleftBig |
|
d˜θ2+1 |
|
4sin2˜θcos2˜θσ2 |
|
3 |
|
+1 |
|
4sin2˜θ(σ2 |
|
1+σ2 |
|
2)/parenrightBig |
|
, |
|
B=1 |
|
2sin2˜θσ3. (22) |
|
It is of a round S7whenα=β= 1. In general, the EOMs imply that |
|
α=β(8−7β),8µ+ν+β3 |
|
10976(β−1)2√α= 0. (23) |
|
The squashing parameter γ≡α/βlies in the range (0 ,8). |
|
Squashed Q111spaces: |
|
6TheQ111space is an Einstein-Sasaki space of U(1) bundle over S2×S2×S2. We |
|
consider the following ansatz |
|
ds2=α/parenleftBig |
|
dψ+3/summationdisplay |
|
i=1cosθidφi/parenrightBig2 |
|
+β3/summationdisplay |
|
i=1(dθ2 |
|
i+sinθ2 |
|
idφ2 |
|
i). (24) |
|
It is ofQ111provided that α=1 |
|
2β= 1/16, and it remains so for ν= 0. In general, we have |
|
α= 4β(1−7β),8(α−β)(2α−β)µ+α(2α−3β)ν+β5(α−8β+60β2) |
|
4α3/2= 0.(25) |
|
Thus the squashing parameter γ≡α/βlies in the range (0 ,4). We expect that many of |
|
the squashed homogeneous spaces in seven dimensions are now solutions in this new gravity |
|
theory, and we shall not enumerate them further. |
|
4 Conclusions |
|
This work is motivated by studying the classical solutions o f Einstein-Chern-Simons gravity |
|
with asymptotic AdS structure. In seven dimensions, there a re two topological Chern- |
|
Simons terms, and we obtain the full set of equations of motio n. We find that spherically- |
|
symmetric solutions are unmodified by the inclusion of these topological terms. We also |
|
obtain squashed S7andQ111spaces, where the squashing parameter is related to the cou- |
|
pling constants of the topological terms. It is intriguing t o see that these known squashed |
|
homogeneous spaces which appear to have no connection can no w be unified under our new |
|
gravity theory. |
|
As in three dimensions, our topological gravity should play an important role in explor- |
|
ing the AdS 7/CFT6correspondence. The CFT 6that describes the world-volume theory of |
|
multiple M5-branes is yet to be known, and our solutions prov ide many new gravity dual |
|
backgrounds. The quantization condition for one of the coup ling constant suggests an un- |
|
usual property of the CFT 6that is absent in lower dimensions. Additional future direc tions |
|
include a classification of all topological gravities in (4 k+3) dimensions, investigating the |
|
linearization of D= 7topological gravity and obtaining the propagating degre es of freedom. |
|
Acknowledgement |
|
We are grateful to Chris Pope for useful discussions. Y.P. is supported in part by the NSFC |
|
grant No.1053060/A050207 and the NSFC group grant No.10821 504. |
|
7References |
|
[1] S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton, “Topologically mas sive gauge theories,” An- |
|
nals Phys. 140, 372 (1982) [Erratum-ibid. 185, 406.1988 APNYA,281,409 (1988 |
|
APNYA,281,409-449.2000)]. |
|
[2] F. Wilczek and A. Zee, “Linking numbers, spin, and statis tics of solitons,” Phys. Rev. |
|
Lett.51, 2250 (1983). |
|
[3] S.M. Carroll, G.B. Field and R. Jackiw, “Limits on a Loren tz and parity violating |
|
modification of electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990). |
|
[4] S. Deser, R. Jackiw and G. ’t Hooft, “Three-Dimensional E instein gravity: dynamics |
|
of flat space,” Annals Phys. 152, 220 (1984). |
|
[5] E. Witten, “Three-dimensional gravity revisited,” arX iv:0706.3359 [hep-th]. |
|
[6] W. Li, W. Song and A. Strominger, “Chiral gravity in three dimensions,” JHEP 0804, |
|
082 (2008) [arXiv:0801.4566 [hep-th]]. E.A. Bergshoeff, O. H ohm and P.K. Townsend, |
|
“Massive gravity in three dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 201301 (2009) |
|
[arXiv:0901.1766 [hep-th]]. |
|
[7] M. Gunaydin, G. Sierra and P.K. Townsend, “Quantization of the gauge coupling |
|
constant in a five-dimensional Yang-Mills/Einstein superg ravity theory,” Phys. Rev. |
|
Lett.53, 322 (1984). |
|
[8] M. Pernici, K. Pilch and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Gauged ma ximally extended super- |
|
gravity in seven-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 143, 103 (1984). |
|
[9] S. Deser and B. Tekin, “Energy in topologically massive g ravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. |
|
20, L259 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0307073]. |
|
[10] Y. Tachikawa, “Black hole entropy in the presence of Che rn-Simons terms,” Class. |
|
Quant. Grav. 24, 737 (2007) [arXiv:hep-th/0611141]. |
|
[11] D.D.K. Chow, C.N. Pope and E. Sezgin, “Exact solutions o f topologically massive |
|
gravity,” arXiv:0906.3559 [hep-th]. |
|
8arXiv:1001.0042v2 [hep-th] 16 Apr 2010Seven-Dimensional Gravity with Topological Terms |
|
H. L¨ u†‡and Yi Pang⋆ |
|
†China Economics and Management Academy |
|
Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081 |
|
‡Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Nanhai A ve 3688, Shenzhen 518060 |
|
⋆Key Laboratory of Frontiers in Theoretical Physics |
|
Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100190 |
|
ABSTRACT |
|
We construct new seven-dimensional gravity by adding two to pological terms to the |
|
Einstein-Hilbert action. For certain choice of the couplin g constants, these terms may be |
|
related to the R4correction to the 3-form field equation of eleven-dimension al supergravity. |
|
We derive the full set of the equations of motion. We find that t he static spherically- |
|
symmetric black holes are unmodified by the topological term s. We obtain squashed AdS 7, |
|
and also squashed seven spheres and Q111spaces in Euclidean signature.1 Introduction |
|
There has been considerable interest in topological gauge t heories [1] because of their wide |
|
application in physics. The most studied example is the thre e-dimensional one. In addition |
|
to the Einstein-Hilbert term, the theory has the Chern-Simo ns term, given by |
|
S=1 |
|
µ/integraldisplay |
|
d3xTr(dω∧ω+2 |
|
3ω∧ω∧ω), (1) |
|
whereωcan be either a Yang-Mills gauge potential or the connection for gravity. Topo- |
|
logical Yang-Mills theory can provide a fundamental interp retation for anyons [2]; it can |
|
also generate Lorentz violation dynamically [3]. Topologi cally massive gravity [4] becomes |
|
dynamical with a propagating massive particle, with the mas s proportional to the coupling |
|
constantµ. Recently, a cosmological constant is added and the corresp onding boundary |
|
conformal field theory (CFT) is discussed [5]. The three-dim ensional massive topological |
|
gravity is conjectured to be unitary for certain parameter r egion even though the theory |
|
has higher derivatives in time [6]. |
|
The attention on higher dimensional generalizations is con siderably less. The five di- |
|
mensional Yang-Mills Chern-Simons term was discussed in [7 ], but there is no gravity coun- |
|
terpart dueto the fact that the holonomy group SO(1,4) has no invariant rank-3 symmetric |
|
tensor. In seven dimensions, Yang-Mills Chern-Simons term s arise naturally from N= 4 |
|
supergravity [8]. As in the case of three dimensions, we find t hat such terms in the grav- |
|
ity sector can be obtained directly from those in the Yang-Mi lls sector by replacing the |
|
gauge potential Ato the connection Γ. As we shall see later, these topological terms in |
|
seven dimensions may be related to the anomaly cancelation t erms in eleven-dimensional |
|
supergravity. |
|
In section 2, we present the two topological terms in seven di mensions, and discuss their |
|
properties. Sincethey arenot manifestly invariant underg eneral coordinate transformation, |
|
we find it is more convenient to lift the system to eight dimens ions in order to derive the |
|
equations of motion (EOMs). We obtain the full set. In sectio n 3, we construct large classes |
|
of solutions. We find that the static spherically-symmetric black holes are unmodified by |
|
the topological terms. This is analogous to three dimension s, where the BTZ black hole |
|
remains to be a solution in topologically massive gravity. I n Euclidean signature, we obtain |
|
squashedS7andQ111spaces. In particular, one of the squashed seven sphere can b e Wick |
|
rotated to become squashed AdS 7. We conclude in section 4. |
|
22 The theory |
|
In seven dimensions, there are two topological terms; they a re given by |
|
S1= ˜µ/integraldisplay |
|
Ω(7) |
|
1= ˜µ/integraldisplay |
|
Tr(Γ∧Θ−1 |
|
3Γ3)∧Tr(Θ2) = ˜µ/integraldisplay |
|
Ω(3)∧dΩ(3), (2) |
|
S2= ˜ν/integraldisplay |
|
Ω(7) |
|
2= ˜ν/integraldisplay |
|
Tr(Θ3∧Γ−2 |
|
5Θ2∧Γ3−1 |
|
5Θ∧Γ2∧Θ∧Γ+1 |
|
5Θ∧Γ5−1 |
|
35Γ7), |
|
with Ω(3)= Tr(dΓ∧Γ+2 |
|
3Γ3). Here, Θ is the curvature 2-form, defined as Θ ≡dΓ+Γ∧Γ, |
|
and ˜µ,˜νare two parameters of length dimension 5. (We rescale the tot al action by the |
|
seven-dimensional Newton constant.) The 3-form Ω(3)has the same structure as the Chern- |
|
Simons term in D= 3, except that now Γ depends on seven coordinates. Ω(7) |
|
1and Ω(7) |
|
2are |
|
topological in the same sense as Ω(3)being topological in D= 3. We can lift the system to |
|
D= 8, with the seven-dimensional spacetime as the boundary. T hen, we have |
|
dΩ(7) |
|
1=Y(8) |
|
1≡Tr(Θ∧Θ)∧Tr(Θ∧Θ), dΩ(7) |
|
2=Y(8) |
|
2≡Tr(Θ∧Θ∧Θ∧Θ).(3) |
|
As we have mentioned earlier, these terms can be derived from the Yang-Mills Chern- |
|
Simons terms in [8] by changing the gauge potential to the con nection.1Note that the |
|
Pontryagin term is proportional to Y(8) |
|
1−2Y(8) |
|
2, corresponding to ˜ ν=−2˜µ. In eleven- |
|
dimensional supergravity, there is an R4correction to the field equation, namely d∗F(4)= |
|
1 |
|
2F(4)∧F(4)+X(8), whereX(8)is given by |
|
X(8)∝Y(8) |
|
1−4Y(8) |
|
2. (4) |
|
Thus for ˜ν=−4˜µ, the topological terms can be obtained from the S4reduction of super- |
|
gravity inD= 11, and the coupling constant is proportional to the 4-form M5-brane fluxes. |
|
For large fluxes, this topological term dominates the higher -order corrections. |
|
To derive the contribution to the EOMs from the Chern-Simons terms, it is necessary |
|
to perform their variation with respect to the metric. These topological terms are not |
|
manifestly invariant under the general coordinate transfo rmation, but Y(8) |
|
1andY(8) |
|
2are. |
|
Wefindthataconvenient waytoderivethevariationistolift thesystemtoeightdimensions. |
|
Let us first consider the variation of S1. In terms of coordinate components, we have |
|
/integraldisplay |
|
dΩ(7) |
|
1=1 |
|
16/integraldisplay |
|
d8xǫν1ν2ν3ν4ν5ν6ν7ν8Rµ1µ2ν1ν2Rµ2µ1ν3ν4Rµ3µ4ν5ν6Rµ4µ3ν7ν8. (5) |
|
1In [8], the field strength 2-form is defined by F=dB+gB∧B, with gauge coupling g= 2. Then by |
|
rescaling the field B→B/gandF→F/gand setting g= 2, one can obtain the same expressions as the |
|
ones given here. |
|
3Here we use Greek letters to denote the eight-dimensional co ordinates and Latin letters to |
|
represent the seven-dimensional ones hereafter. We adopt t he convention ǫ12345678= 1. |
|
For an infinitesimal variation of the metric δg, using the Bianchi identity and the fol- |
|
lowing relation |
|
δRµ |
|
ναβ=δΓµ |
|
νβ;α−δΓµ |
|
να;β, (6) |
|
we find that |
|
/integraldisplay |
|
dδΩ(7) |
|
1=−1 |
|
2/integraldisplay |
|
d8x√g/parenleftBig1√gǫν1ν2ν3ν4ν5ν6ν7ν8Rµ1µ2ν1ν2Rµ2µ1ν3ν4Rµ3µ4ν5ν6δΓµ4µ3ν7/parenrightBig |
|
;ν8 |
|
≡1 |
|
2/integraldisplay |
|
d∗J, (7) |
|
where “;” denotes a covariant derivative and ∗is the Hodge dual. For simplicity, we have |
|
introduced a 1-form current J=Jαdxα. Its components are given by |
|
Jα=1√gǫν1ν2ν3ν4ν5ν6ν7αRµ1µ2ν1ν2Rµ2µ1ν3ν4Rµ3µ4ν5ν6δΓµ4µ3ν7. (8) |
|
Clearly, we have d∗J=−√gJα;αd8x, Thus we obtain |
|
δΩ(7) |
|
1=1 |
|
2∗J, (9) |
|
up to a total derivative term. Now restricting the coordinat e indices to seven dimensions |
|
only, we have |
|
δS1= 4˜µ/integraldisplay |
|
Tr(Θ∧Θ)∧Tr(Θ∧δΓ). (10) |
|
The variation of S2can be obtained in the same manner, given by |
|
δS2= 4˜ν/integraldisplay |
|
Tr(Θ∧Θ∧Θ∧δΓ). (11) |
|
Finally, we make use of the variation of the connection |
|
δΓi |
|
mj=1 |
|
2gin(δgnm;j+δgnj;m−δgml;n), (12) |
|
and after integrating by parts, we obtain thecontributions to EOMs from the Chern-Simons |
|
terms, given by |
|
Cij |
|
1=δS1√gδgij=µ |
|
4√g[ǫij1j2j3j4j5j6(Ri1 |
|
i2j1j2Ri2 |
|
i1j3j4Rjk |
|
j5j6);k+i↔j], |
|
Cij |
|
2=δS2√gδgij=ν |
|
4√g[ǫij1j2j3j4j5j6(Rk |
|
i1j1j2Ri1 |
|
i2j3j4Rji2 |
|
j5j6);k+i↔j].(13) |
|
For the total action S, which is the sum of the Einstein-Hilbert action, cosmologi cal |
|
constant Λ and S1+S2, the corresponding full set of EOMs is given by |
|
Rij−1 |
|
2gijR+Λgij+Cij |
|
1+Cij |
|
2= 0. (14) |
|
4It should be remarked that under a large gauge transformatio n Γ→ OΓO−1−dOO−1, |
|
the action transforms as S→S+ ˜µv(O)+ ˜νw(O), where |
|
v(O) =/integraldisplay |
|
1 |
|
3d/parenleftBig |
|
Tr(dOO−1)3∧Ω(3)/parenrightBig |
|
;w(O) =1 |
|
35/integraldisplay |
|
Tr(dOO−1)7.(15) |
|
Thevterm is trivial and gives no restriction to the parameter ˜ µ, while the wterm should |
|
be classified by the seventh homotopy group of SO(1,6) |
|
π7[SO(1,6)]≃π7[SO(6)]≃Z. (16) |
|
The invariance of eiSrequires that |
|
64π4˜ν= 2πn, n = 0,±1,±2.... (17) |
|
This result is completely different from that in three dimensi ons, where the SO(1,2) is |
|
homotoplically trivial and the mass parameter is not quanti zed. Moreover, since ˜ νis quan- |
|
tized,S2will not be renormalized in the quantum theory. This suggest s some intriguing |
|
properties in the corresponding CFT dual. |
|
3 Solutions |
|
Spherically-symmetric solutions: |
|
Having obtained the full set of EOMs for topological gravity in seven dimensions, we are |
|
in the position to construct solutions. It is clear that the m aximally-symmetric space(time) |
|
is unmodifiedby theinclusion of the topological terms. Then extsimplest case is to consider |
|
the spherically-symmetric ansatz, given by |
|
ds2=−F(r)dt2+dr2 |
|
G(r)+r2dΩ2 |
|
5. (18) |
|
We find that for this ansatz, the contributions from the topol ogical terms Cij |
|
1andCij |
|
2 |
|
vanish identically. This implies that the previously-know n static (AdS) black holes, charged |
|
or neutral, are still solutions when the topological terms a re added to the action. This is |
|
analogous to three dimensions, where the BTZ black hole is st ill a solution in massive |
|
topological gravity. However the thermodynamic quantitie s such as the mass and entropy |
|
will acquire modifications [9, 10]. |
|
As we shall discuss presently, there also exist squashed AdS 7solutions. |
|
S3bundle over S4: |
|
5We now turn our attention to the Euclidean theory. In three di mensions, there exists a |
|
large class of squashed S3or AdS 3[11]. We expect the same in seven dimensions. Without |
|
loss of generality, we set Λ = 30 so that it can give rise to a uni t roundS7. We first consider |
|
the squashed S7that can be viewed as an S3bundle over S4. The metric ansatz is given |
|
by |
|
ds2=α3/summationdisplay |
|
i=1(σi−cos2(1 |
|
2θ)˜σi)2+β/parenleftBig |
|
dθ2+1 |
|
4sin2θ3/summationdisplay |
|
i=1˜σ2 |
|
i/parenrightBig |
|
. (19) |
|
whereσiand ˜σiare theSU(2) left-invariant 1-forms, satisfying dσi=1 |
|
2ǫijkσj∧σkand |
|
d˜σi=1 |
|
2ǫijk˜σj∧˜σk. The metric is Einstein provided that either α=β=1 |
|
4orα=1 |
|
5β=9 |
|
100. |
|
The first case corresponds to the round S7and the second is a squashed S7that is also |
|
Einstein. Now with the contribution from the topological te rms, the EOMs can be reduced |
|
to |
|
2α2+4αβ(7β−2)−β2= 0, (20) |
|
together with |
|
√α(α−β)3(4(10α+β)˜µ−(55α+7β)ν)+2β6(20αβ−4α−β) = 0.(21) |
|
It is clear from (20) that there exists one and only one positi veαfor any positive β. The |
|
squashing parameter γ≡α/βlies in the range 0 <γ <2+3√ |
|
2. Note that when 2˜ µ= 3˜ν, |
|
the squashed S7that is Eisntein remains Einstein. |
|
S1bundle over CP3: |
|
There is another way of squashing an S7, which can be viewed as an S1bundle over |
|
CP3. This example can be generalized to Minkowskian signature t o give rise to squashed |
|
AdS7[12]. The metric ansatz is given by |
|
ds2=α(dτ+sin2θ(dψ+B))2+βds2 |
|
CP3, |
|
ds2 |
|
CP3=dθ2+sin2θcos2θ(dψ+B)2+sin2θ/parenleftBig |
|
d˜θ2+1 |
|
4sin2˜θcos2˜θσ2 |
|
3 |
|
+1 |
|
4sin2˜θ(σ2 |
|
1+σ2 |
|
2)/parenrightBig |
|
, |
|
B=1 |
|
2sin2˜θσ3. (22) |
|
It is of a round S7whenα=β= 1. In general, the EOMs imply that |
|
α=β(8−7β),8˜µ+ ˜ν+β3 |
|
10976(β−1)2√α= 0. (23) |
|
The squashing parameter γ≡α/βlies in the range (0 ,8). |
|
Squashed Q111spaces: |
|
6TheQ111space is an Einstein-Sasaki space of U(1) bundle over S2×S2×S2. We |
|
consider the following ansatz |
|
ds2=α/parenleftBig |
|
dψ+3/summationdisplay |
|
i=1cosθidφi/parenrightBig2 |
|
+β3/summationdisplay |
|
i=1(dθ2 |
|
i+sinθ2 |
|
idφ2 |
|
i). (24) |
|
It is ofQ111provided that α=1 |
|
2β= 1/16, and it remains so for ˜ ν= 0. In general, we have |
|
α= 4β(1−7β),8(α−β)(2α−β)˜µ+α(2α−3β)˜ν+β5(α−8β+60β2) |
|
4α3/2= 0.(25) |
|
Thus the squashing parameter γ≡α/βlies in the range (0 ,4). We expect that many of |
|
the squashed homogeneous spaces in seven dimensions are now solutions in this new gravity |
|
theory, and we shall not enumerate them further. |
|
4 Conclusions |
|
This work is motivated by studying the classical solutions o f Einstein-Chern-Simons gravity |
|
with asymptotic AdS structure. In seven dimensions, there a re two topological Chern- |
|
Simons terms, and we obtain the full set of equations of motio n. We find that spherically- |
|
symmetric solutions are unmodified by the inclusion of these topological terms. We also |
|
obtain squashed AdS 7, and squashed S7andQ111spaces in Euclidean signature, where |
|
the squashing parameter is related to the coupling constant s of the topological terms. It is |
|
intriguing to see that these known squashed homogeneous spa ces which appear to have no |
|
connection can now be unified under our new gravity theory. |
|
As in three dimensions, our topological gravity should play an important role in explor- |
|
ing the AdS 7/CFT6correspondence. The CFT 6that describes the world-volume theory of |
|
multiple M5-branes is yet to be known, and our solutions prov ide many new gravity dual |
|
backgrounds. The quantization condition for one of the coup ling constant suggests an un- |
|
usual property of the CFT 6that is absent in lower dimensions. Additional future direc tions |
|
include a classification of all topological gravities in (4 k+3) dimensions, investigating the |
|
linearization of D= 7topological gravity and obtaining the propagating degre es of freedom. |
|
Acknowledgement |
|
We are grateful to Chris Pope for useful discussions. Y.P. is supported in part by the NSFC |
|
grant No.1053060/A050207 and the NSFC group grant No.10821 504. |
|
7References |
|
[1] S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton, “Topologically mas sive gauge theories,” An- |
|
nals Phys. 140, 372 (1982) [Erratum-ibid. 185, 406.1988 APNYA,281,409 (1988 |
|
APNYA,281,409-449.2000)]. |
|
[2] F. Wilczek and A. Zee, “Linking numbers, spin, and statis tics of solitons,” Phys. Rev. |
|
Lett.51, 2250 (1983). |
|
[3] S.M. Carroll, G.B. Field and R. Jackiw, “Limits on a Loren tz and parity violating |
|
modification of electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990). |
|
[4] S. Deser, R. Jackiw and G. ’t Hooft, “Three-Dimensional E instein gravity: dynamics |
|
of flat space,” Annals Phys. 152, 220 (1984). |
|
[5] E. Witten, “Three-dimensional gravity revisited,” arX iv:0706.3359 [hep-th]. |
|
[6] W. Li, W. Song and A. Strominger, “Chiral gravity in three dimensions,” JHEP 0804, |
|
082 (2008) [arXiv:0801.4566 [hep-th]]. E.A. Bergshoeff, O. H ohm and P.K. Townsend, |
|
“Massive gravity in three dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 201301 (2009) arXiv: |
|
0901.1766 [hep-th]. |
|
[7] M. Gunaydin, G. Sierra and P.K. Townsend, “Quantization of the gauge coupling |
|
constant in a five-dimensional Yang-Mills/Einstein superg ravity theory,” Phys. Rev. |
|
Lett.53, 322 (1984). |
|
[8] M. Pernici, K. Pilch and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Gauged ma ximally extended super- |
|
gravity in seven-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 143, 103 (1984). |
|
[9] S. Deser and B. Tekin, “Energy in topologically massive g ravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. |
|
20, L259 (2003), gr-qc/0307073. |
|
[10] Y. Tachikawa, “Black hole entropy in the presence of Che rn-Simons terms,” Class. |
|
Quant. Grav. 24, 737 (2007), hep-th/0611141. |
|
[11] D.D.K. Chow, C.N. Pope and E. Sezgin, “Exact solutions o f topologically massive |
|
gravity,” arXiv:0906.3559 [hep-th]. |
|
[12] P. Hoxha, R.R. Martinez-Acosta and C.N. Pope, “Kaluza- Klein consistency, Killing |
|
vectors, and Kaehler spaces,” Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 4207 (2000), hep-th/0005172. |
|
8 |