doc_text: But the lesson that should not be lost is the transcendent one: Clarence Thomas made it in America because he was loved.
  His mother loved him.
  And when she could no longer care for him she gave him to her parents to bring up, and they loved him too.
  And they cared enough to scrape together the money every year to put him in a Catholic school where they hoped the nuns would teach and guide him and they did.
  He got love and love gave him pride and pride gave him confidence that he had a place at the table.
  This is something we in the age of the-family-that-is-not-a-family forget: the raw power of love and how it is the one essential element in the creation of functioning and successful people, and how its absence twists the psyche and the heart.
  (The children of the mother on crack are not consigned to lives of uselessness and pain because AFDC payments are low; they are so consigned because crack has broken the maternal bond that brings with it caring and succor.)
  Lives like Judge Thomas's remind us of this simple truth.
  --- It was once thought that to choose a conservative black for a high appointment put liberals in an uncomfortable position, but we will learn in the Thomas hearings that this is no longer so.
  Not that the hearings will be color blind, it's just that senators are going to use Mr. Thomas's race to prove things about themselves with it.
  Senators of the left will use him to prove they are not minority-whipped.
  They will demonstrate through measured abuse that they are able to treat a black man as their equal.
  Their ferocity, they will think, is proof of their sophistication, a compliment: "Our party doesn't patronize minorities."
  This will be cloud cover for their real intention, which is to serve the interests of the interest groups -- the pro-abortion lobby, the civil rights lobby, labor -- that control their careers.
  Some on the right will use Mr. Thomas's race to demonstrate again that ours is the party of true racial progress, that not a trace of racism clogs the conservative heart.
  Expect an especially spirited defense from Jesse Helms.
  The left will be tough not only because Mr. Thomas represents ideological insult.
  Those on the left are unmoved by Mr. Thomas's climb from nothing to something because he didn't do it the right way -- through them and with their programs.
  His triumph refutes their assumptions; his life declares that a good man of whatever color can rise in this country without the active assistance of the state.
  This is a dangerous thing to assert in a highly politicized age.
  And to make it worse, Judge Thomas didn't "make it on his own."
  He has been helped all his life by affirmative action, but the kind liberals do not see and cannot accept: the uncoerced, unforced affirmative action that Americans tend to take when someone at a disadvantage -- race, physical disability -- needs help.
  When Mr. Thomas made his moving statement at Kennebunkport last week he thanked the people who had helped him along the way, including the nuns who taught him.
  (What a touching and old-fashioned thing to do.
  If Sandra Day O'Connor had thanked the nuns it would have been a skit on "Saturday Night Live" and an issue in her confirmation.)
  The nuns' affirmative action for Clarence Thomas was the only effective, meaningful kind: the kind we perform for individuals, not because it is state-mandated but because it is right, not because we love a race but because we care for people and love our country.
  One strategy to be expected from Mr. Thomas's opponents: deference and respect.
  Expect phrases of rolling sympathy as senators of the left bring up for him his humble origins and congratulate him on his grit and determination.
  Already I can see Joe Biden's telegenic tick of a smile, the one he uses to show how civil he is in spite of his growing moral exasperation.
  He will celebrate Mr. Thomas's gifts and use them against him.
  "But what, Judge Thomas, about those who were not born with your advantages, and by that I mean not wealth and comfort but brilliance and determination and a family.
  What about those poor blacks not greatly gifted or guided -- what about them?"
  --- For Judge Thomas's proponents, two great hopes: One is that the administration will hit America where it lives and go over the heads of the talking suits and straight to the people, presenting as witnesses on television the affirmative action crew that lifted a young boy with nothing to great heights -- the mother who was a maid, the grandmother who saved up the tuition and the nuns who helped open his eyes.
  The force of their presence will remind us that real change in a democracy comes from the people up, not from the government down.
  The second hope: that the administration will demonstrate moral confidence in its choice and not go into a defensive crouch.
  In 1980, '84 and '88, the American people voted overwhelmingly for presidents who promised to appoint conservative jurists.
  The left calls the Thomas appointment a hijacking, a right-wing coup for the court, but this is the opposite of the truth.
  Mr. Thomas's appointment is not a traducing of the people's will but a fulfillment of their directive.
  --- Miss Noonan is a writer in New York.
summary_text: Former Reagan and Bush speech writer Peggy Noonan suggests that Supreme Court nominee is living proof that in America anything is possible.
  He overcame humble beginnings and made it in America because he was loved.
  His triumph declares that a good man of whatever color can rise in this country without the active assistance of the state.
  Ms Noonan hopes that the administration will go straight to the people and present the mother, grandmother, and nuns that helped open his eyes.
  She also hopes that the administration will demonstrate moral confidence in its choice and not become defensive.