File size: 3,027 Bytes
ded9a5f 19028d8 ece4ebe 0a793f2 ece4ebe ded9a5f 19028d8 ded9a5f 0a793f2 19028d8 0a793f2 19028d8 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 |
---
license: apache-2.0
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/train-*
- split: test
path: data/test-*
dataset_info:
features:
- name: question
dtype: string
- name: answer
dtype: string
- name: task
dtype: string
- name: context
dtype: string
- name: context_type
dtype: string
- name: options
sequence: string
- name: program
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 52823429
num_examples: 14377
- name: test
num_bytes: 15720371
num_examples: 4673
download_size: 23760863
dataset_size: 68543800
---
<p align="left">
<img src="bizbench_pyramid.png">
</p>
# BizBench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance
Public dataset for [BizBench](https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06602).
Answering questions within business and finance requires reasoning, precision, and a wide-breadth of technical knowledge.
Together, these requirements make this domain difficult for large language models (LLMs).
We introduce BizBench, a benchmark for evaluating models' ability to reason about realistic financial problems.
BizBench comprises **eight quantitative reasoning tasks**, focusing on question-answering (QA) over financial data via program synthesis.
We include three financially-themed code-generation tasks from newly collected and augmented QA data.
Additionally, we isolate the reasoning capabilities required for financial QA: reading comprehension of financial text and tables for extracting intermediate values, and understanding financial concepts and formulas needed to calculate complex solutions.
Collectively, these tasks evaluate a model's financial background knowledge, ability to parse financial documents, and capacity to solve problems with code.
We conducted an in-depth evaluation of open-source and commercial LLMs, comparing and contrasting the behavior of code-focused and language-focused models.
We demonstrate that the current bottleneck in performance is due to LLMs' limited business and financial understanding, highlighting the value of a challenging benchmark for quantitative reasoning within this domain.
We have also develop a heavily curated leaderboard with a held-out test set open to submission: [https://benchmarks.kensho.com/](https://benchmarks.kensho.com/). This set was manually curated by financial professionals and further cleaned by hand in order to ensure the highest quality. A sample pipeline for using this dataset can be found at [https://github.com/kensho-technologies/benchmarks-pipeline](https://github.com/kensho-technologies/benchmarks-pipeline).
## Dataset Statistics
| Dataset | Train/Few Shot Data | Test Data |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Program Synthesis** | | |
| FinCode | 7 | 47 |
| CodeFinQA | 4668 | 795 |
| CodeTATQA | 2856 | 2000 |
| **Quantity Extraction** | | |
| ConvFinQA (E) | | 629 |
| TAT-QA (E) | | 120 |
| SEC-Num | 6846 | 2000 |
| **Domain Knowledge** | | |
| FinKnow | | 744 |
| ForumlaEval | | 50 |
|