Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_individual-0325b067-7cac-407c-9ffa-76d99f10c9f7.jsonl

@@ -12,3 +12,14 @@
 {"tstamp": 1722264362.3024, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264362.1658, "finish": 1722264362.3024, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ba2e1f6e5cce435ca5e45f3d4f5cb369", "model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "prompt": "Brave New World Aldous Huxley", "output": [["Brave New World Aldous Huxley", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Can someone identify this book, where children are bred for specific jobs? Things I remember about this book:\n\n\n*\n\n*Every child was selected for a certain job/career;\n\n*If twins were born, one was always killed;\n\n*Seeing colors for the first time (describing the color of an apple);\n\n*Seeing war and death and poverty.\n\n\nDoes anyone have any idea what this book might be?\n\nA: I don't remember the exact details about senses and conditioning, but Huxley's Brave New World fits with the job-specific breeding.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1722264369.8116, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264369.6887, "finish": 1722264369.8116, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ac3189dbc560469ab2063fd71775dd36", "model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "prompt": "Brave New World Aldous Huxley", "output": [["Brave New World Aldous Huxley", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: DefaultParser in Apache Commons CLI I wanted to try out the Apache Commons CLI, and figured a good place to start would be the 'usage' section on its web page.\nhttp://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-cli/usage.html\nNow, the example suggest to create a DefaultParser, however the closest sounding I could find is BasicParser. Is this the thing to use, am I missing something?\n\nA: I used GnuParser() instead of DefaultParser() and it works well.\n\nCommandLineParser parser = new GnuParser();\n\nUpdate : In version 1.3.1 of CLI, GnuParser() is now deprecated. So I simply added import org.apache.commons.cli.DefaultParser;and now I use CommandLineParser parser = new DefaultParser();\nAnd all is fine!\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1722264369.8116, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264369.6887, "finish": 1722264369.8116, "ip": "", "conv_id": "a51cf1f6440d45b9979aa9281c5e3b45", "model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "prompt": "Brave New World Aldous Huxley", "output": [["Brave New World Aldous Huxley", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Can someone identify this book, where children are bred for specific jobs? Things I remember about this book:\n\n\n*\n\n*Every child was selected for a certain job/career;\n\n*If twins were born, one was always killed;\n\n*Seeing colors for the first time (describing the color of an apple);\n\n*Seeing war and death and poverty.\n\n\nDoes anyone have any idea what this book might be?\n\nA: I don't remember the exact details about senses and conditioning, but Huxley's Brave New World fits with the job-specific breeding.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264402.6522, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264378.754, "finish": 1722264402.6522, "ip": "", "conv_id": "c88b2072625f44ac870a0796d89b93f9", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Brave New World Aldous Huxley", "output": [["Brave New World Aldous Huxley", "Brave New World\n\nBrave New World is a dystopian novel by English author Aldous Huxley, written in 1931 and published in 1932. Largely set in a futuristic World State, whose citizens are environmentally engineered into an intelligence-based social hierarchy, the novel anticipates huge scientific advancements in reproductive technology, sleep-learning, psychological manipulation and classical conditioning that are combined to make a dystopian society which is challenged by the story's protagonist. Huxley followed this book with a reassessment in essay form, Brave New World Revisited (1958), and with his final novel, Island (1962), the utopian counterpart. This novel is often compared as an inversion counterpart to George Orwell's 1984 (1949).\nIn 1999, the Modern Library ranked Brave New World at number 5 on its list of the 100 best English-language novels of the 20th century. In 2003, Robert McCrum, writing for The Observer, included Brave New World chronologically at number 53 in \"the top 100 greatest novels of all time\", and the novel was listed at number 87 on The Big Read survey by the BBC. Brave New World  has frequently been banned and challenged since its original publication. It has landed on the American Library Association list of top 100 banned and challenged books of the decade since the association began the list in 1990.\nTitle\nThe title Brave New World derives from Miranda's speech in William Shakespeare's The Tempest, Act V, Scene I:\nShakespeare's use of the phrase is intended ironically, as the speaker is failing to recognise the evil nature of the island's visitors because of her innocence. Indeed, the next speaker\u2014Miranda's father Prospero\u2014replies to her innocent observation with the statement Tis new to thee.\""]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264423.3621, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264412.6556, "finish": 1722264423.3621, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ed482e5a9c214143be094e75b70d6586", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Brave New World Aldous Huxley", "output": [["Brave New World Aldous Huxley", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Is Soma by The Strokes referencing \"Brave New World\"? Is the song Soma, by The Strokes, referencing Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley?\nI am of the opinion that it is, but I am not 100 percent sure. Any info on this would be appreciated. \n\nA: I hate to give you a Wikipedia answer, but the article on the album (that you, in fact, reference in the question) indicates that it is.\nTo quote from the Lyrics section:\n\n\"Soma\" takes influence from Aldous Huxley's 1932 novel Brave New World and its featured imaginary drug, soma. Here Casablancas is discussing drug use in order to fit in with the cool crowd.[**31] \n\nThe footnote for this is:\nHammond, Albert, Jr. (Oct 26, 2013). \"The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time: Number Four - The Strokes\". I P C ignite! Ltd. NME - New Musical Express. p. 83.\nUnfortunately, it's not online (that I can find), so I can't validate it beyond this.  That said, the lyrics seem to support this explanation.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264448.2187, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264448.0619, "finish": 1722264448.2187, "ip": "", "conv_id": "045dbd53db064486abf451990aae9ac3", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Are the 3 laws of robotics sufficient? Do we need more?", "output": [["Are the 3 laws of robotics sufficient? Do we need more?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Do the 3 laws protect animals? Major Stackings made a comment in chat about how the demolition bot seen in the movie hates cats. \nDo the 3 laws also protect animals from the deadly whims of robots?\n\nA: The three (actually four) laws of robotics as outlined by Asimov make no mention of animals:\n\n0) A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to\n  come to harm.\n1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a\n  human being to come to harm.\n2) A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except\n  where such orders would conflict with the First Law.\n3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection\n  does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.\n\nSo a robot following only those laws are free to do to animals what they wish.  The existance of these laws don't preclude other programming being inserted to prevent cruelty to animals though.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264475.164, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264475.0163, "finish": 1722264475.164, "ip": "", "conv_id": "17280bf4605e427db35b181e49b5ce1e", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Are there 3 or 4 laws of robotics?", "output": [["Are there 3 or 4 laws of robotics?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Are The Three Laws of Robotics explicitly defined in one of the Asimov's stories? I want to know if The Three Laws of Robotics are explicitly defined in one of the Asimov's robot stories. In which one? I am asking this question because I remember reading something about the laws being compiled by his editor.\n\nA: According to the Wikipedia article on the Three Laws of Robotics:\n\nThe rules are introduced in his 1942 short story Runaround although they were foreshadowed in a few earlier stories.\n\nThat 1942 story is available at the Internet Archive; the three laws are on p. 100, col. 1.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264493.8827, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264493.727, "finish": 1722264493.8827, "ip": "", "conv_id": "8d98b257bd6e4e9cabe6fe8efce7f149", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "What are the problems with the 3 laws of robotics?", "output": [["What are the problems with the 3 laws of robotics?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Do the Machines in \"The Matrix\" Adhere to the Three Laws of Robotics? In the \"real world\" of the Matrix, do the machines follow Asimov's Three Rules? Were they even programmed with them?\nEDIT: I realize that killing people goes against the 1st law, but by keeping people in the Matrix (which the machines view as a symbiosis) rather than simply killing off these \"annoying\" creatures, I wonder if the killings can be seen as \"preserving the greater good\" or something along those lines; and thus justify violating the laws.\n\nA: \nA robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a\n  human being to come to harm.\nA robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where\n  such orders would conflict with the First Law.\nA robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does\n  not conflict with the First or Second Laws.\n\nNo, no, and no.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264513.7178, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264513.5597, "finish": 1722264513.7178, "ip": "", "conv_id": "591b704b265447ad92e6c59c965566f8", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Are we living in a simulation?", "output": [["Are we living in a simulation?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Deus Ex Machina? I'm looking for a sci-fi story I read about 20 years ago.  It includes the following elements: \n\n\n*\n\n*A lab, and a computer simulation of the universe or earth.\nEvolution (possibly).\n\n*A simulation created with the first simulation by scientists within the first simulation.\n\n*A real world lab technician/scientist entering the simulation(s).\n\n\nI would appreciate some help finding this story, thanks.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264513.9098, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264513.7599, "finish": 1722264513.9098, "ip": "", "conv_id": "b272ba39f1154ad38eca94801e53b1fc", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Are we living in a simulation?", "output": [["Are we living in a simulation?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Deus Ex Machina? I'm looking for a sci-fi story I read about 20 years ago.  It includes the following elements: \n\n\n*\n\n*A lab, and a computer simulation of the universe or earth.\nEvolution (possibly).\n\n*A simulation created with the first simulation by scientists within the first simulation.\n\n*A real world lab technician/scientist entering the simulation(s).\n\n\nI would appreciate some help finding this story, thanks.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264552.0766, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264551.9826, "finish": 1722264552.0766, "ip": "", "conv_id": "a5076131a1f14ae7bcd6bd97a79c44de", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "What are problems with Asimov's 3 laws?", "output": [["What are problems with Asimov's 3 laws?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics in Application The blurb on the back of my copy of Asimov's The Complete Robot includes\n\nAsimov's Three Laws of Robotics were programmed into computers thirty years ago at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology - with surprising results.\n\nThe book was published in 1995, so thirty years ago would have been mid 60s. Does anyone know what happened or what the surprising results were?\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264568.9141, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264568.7644, "finish": 1722264568.9141, "ip": "", "conv_id": "7f9f2445c9024cfb9102de9082b8e1d7", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Could the matrix be real?", "output": [["Could the matrix be real?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: How did Neo know that the \"reality\" Morpheus told him was the real world was not actually just another simulated reality? How did Neo know that the \"reality\" Morpheus told him was the real world was not actually just another simulated reality? I mean if he believed Morpheus' explanation on simulation isnt it logical for him to assume that the real world was also simulated. Wouldnt it be the perfect prison designed by the machines. Design the prison world and a world for those who think they have escaped.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264631.4825, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264631.3198, "finish": 1722264631.4825, "ip": "", "conv_id": "b7266e33d0cb41e4b60041c6ddcfbfd3", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "output": [["Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722264631.6779, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722264631.5192, "finish": 1722264631.6779, "ip": "", "conv_id": "048949c86e1d40d2994ef35fc63d4eda", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "output": [["Why Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}