Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_individual-f8b5ca63-1af2-442e-96ef-e2c422498db1.jsonl

@@ -160,3 +160,5 @@
 {"tstamp": 1756718005.3858, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1756718004.879, "finish": 1756718005.3858, "ip": "", "conv_id": "440bf777225c4232ae96c8414a0677e9", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Artificial general intelligence\n\nMany interdisciplinary approaches (e.g. cognitive science, computational intelligence, and decision making) consider additional traits such as imagination (the ability to form novel mental images and concepts) and autonomy.\nComputer-based systems that exhibit many of these capabilities exist (e.g. see computational creativity, automated reasoning, decision support system, robot, evolutionary computation, intelligent agent). However, no consensus holds that modern AI systems possess them to an adequate degree.\nPhysical traits\nOther capabilities are considered desirable in intelligent systems, as they may affect intelligence or aid in its expression. These include:\nthe ability to sense (e.g. see, hear, etc.), and\nthe ability to act (e.g. move and manipulate objects, change location to explore, etc.)\nThis includes the ability to detect and respond to hazard.\nTests for human-level AGI\nSeveral tests meant to confirm human-level AGI have been considered, including:\nThe Turing Test (Turing)\nA machine and a human both converse unseen with a second human, who must evaluate which of the two is the machine, which passes the test if it can fool the evaluator a significant fraction of the time. Note: Turing does not prescribe what should qualify as intelligence, only that knowing that it is a machine should disqualify it. The AI Eugene Goostman, imitating a 13-year-old boy, achieved Turing's estimate of convincing 33% of judges that it was human in 2014.\nThe Robot College Student Test (Goertzel)"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1756730467.9849, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1756730465.5973, "finish": 1756730467.9849, "ip": "", "conv_id": "f52312cdd354412daa08b5b1924d74ac", "model_name": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "prompt": "2+2", "output": [["2+2", "2.\n\n2. is the ordinal form of the number two in a number of European languages.\n2. may also refer to:\nAssociation football\n2. Bundesliga, a German association football league.\n2. Bundesliga Nord (1974–81), a defunct division of the 2. Fußball-Bundesliga.\n2. Bundesliga Süd (1974–81), a defunct division of the 2. Fußball-Bundesliga.\n2. Bundesliga (women), a German women's association football league.\n2. Liga Interregional, a Swiss association football league.\n2. Liga (Switzerland), a Swiss association football league.\n2. Liga (Slovakia), a Slovak association football league.\nIce hockey\n2. národní hokejová liga, a Czech ice hockey league.\nRugby union\n2. Rugby-Bundesliga"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1756730467.9849, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1756730465.5973, "finish": 1756730467.9849, "ip": "", "conv_id": "5b8407d09faf4280b88dba2a68608f21", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "2+2", "output": [["2+2", "2 + 2 = 5\n\n2 + 2 = 5 or two plus two equals five is a mathematical falsehood which is used as an example of a simple logical error that is obvious to anyone familiar with basic arithmetic.\nThe phrase has been used in various contexts since 1728, and is best known from the 1949 dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell.\nAs a theme and as a subject in the arts, the anti-intellectual slogan 2 + 2 = 5 pre-dates Orwell and has produced literature, such as Deux et deux font cinq (Two and Two Make Five), written in 1895 by Alphonse Allais, which is a collection of absurdist short stories; and the 1920 imagist art manifesto 2 × 2 = 5 by the poet Vadim Shershenevich.\nSelf-evident truth and self-evident falsehood"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1756735453.1064, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1756735450.739, "finish": 1756735453.1064, "ip": "", "conv_id": "260bec8428e04762af5ada112d57a407", "model_name": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1756735453.1064, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-3-large", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1756735450.739, "finish": 1756735453.1064, "ip": "", "conv_id": "2f43dca0b5a649c5a8dcc1ad78bb652c", "model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}