text
stringlengths 0
6.44k
|
---|
busways |
Department of transit and public |
works, commissioners, neighbors |
and community members, |
employers, transit alliance, use |
Facebook and digital tools for |
outreach |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000041.t004 |
PLOS CLIMATE |
Advancing a hyperlocal approach to community engagement in climate adaptation |
PLOS Climate | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000041 June 8, 2022 20 / 26 |
The design thinking portion of the workshop coalesced items of greatest concern to propose desired outcomes and viable paths forward with the input of community leaders. That |
residents of the two neighborhoods focused on different sets of threats and vulnerabilities |
underscores the importance of the hyperlocal approach to capture greater nuance than more |
conventional solicitations of public opinion (e.g., townhalls or public hearings). The combination of photovoice and design thinking also enables individuals first to contemplate issues in |
their neighborhoods that concern them, and second to hear, in a constructive space, the concerns of others. Having shared their lived experiences, participants are enabled by the design |
thinking process to envision, and with the partnership of community organizations and government agency representatives, implement desired outcomes, transforming the common |
practice of expert-driven, top-down proposals that seek community buy-in, into a community-based collaborative process. For policymakers, the potential to integrate the ICRA with |
workshop results can enhance the capacity to provide locally scaled initiatives. |
Overall, our approach addresses multiple gaps in the literature. First, we address calls for |
improving methods of community engaged processes [e.g., 14, 15] by demonstrating how a |
unique integration of photovoice and design thinking–developed through the lens of communication design [e.g., 19–21] can transform the shortcomings of each process as they are currently practiced into a more desired and normative process. Specifically, the HyLo method |
addresses two of the major limitations reported in the photovoice literature–engagement with |
policy makers and critical discussion [41, 44]. Our process builds relationships with policy |
makers from the beginning of the engagement, with member coming from the first workshop |
and, as their commitment grows, leveraging their connections to invite and include more (and |
more relevant) participation by members of other governmental offices in the final exhibition |
and discussion. The outcomes of this integrated process were evident as community members |
voiced their grievances and frustrations as well their proposals for solutions, enabling policy |
makers to dive deeper into the concerns raised, gather additional information, and provide |
both immediate and long-range assistance. |
Additionally, the inclusion of design thinking provides a mechanism to increase critical discussion around problems and solutions in ways that individual presentations of photovoice |
stories do not [41, 44]. When looking at the results of photovice, we see primarily the reporting |
of the stories and narratives–reporting on critical discussions, moves toward solutions, or |
engagement with policy makers is seldom reported. Additionally, through this process of integrating photovoice and design thinking we show how the process of design thinking can |
become a grassroots process focused on the lived experiences of community members. |
Through bringing their own experiences to life through photovoice, then using those narratives to drive toward solutions, the process is flipped from the typical top-down approach |
focused on a predetermined set of options present in many design thinking studies [47, 50]. |
In addition to the advances in community engaged processes that our method brings, we |
see this work adding to the growing body of knowledge focused on local knowledge and local |
adaptation. Specifically, our work addresses calls for comparative analysis of local communities |
through community based research approaches [35] and demonstrates how local perceptions |
of risks and needs vary within a larger decision-making geography. While the two communities in our study have somewhat similar risk profiles in our ICRA, the process of hyperlocal |
storytelling and design thinking show the variation in perceived risk and opportunity by community, and that there is room for adaptation beyond the large scale infrastructure approaches |
that are prevalent in South Florida. |
This work also contributes to advancing the body of knowledge on mapping and the role of |
geospatial data in examining risk [22]. We demonstrate a process by which geospatial data on |
social, built environment, and physical risk can be combined to provide a different way to |
PLOS CLIMATE |
Advancing a hyperlocal approach to community engagement in climate adaptation |
PLOS Climate | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000041 June 8, 2022 21 / 26 |
assess community risk. While our communities were fairly similar on overall risk scores based |
on the ICRA, when looking at the visual representation of risk on the maps, it is clear that risk |
varies dramatically at the hyperlocal levels of neighborhood parcels or blocks. Additionally, we |
see the ICRA as a tool which can be modified to account for risk in different ways–with |
weightings of risk entered and adjusted based on evaluations by community members or policy makers. This would move the ICRA beyond an equal weighting for each factor, to a tool |
that could prioritize certain concerns. For instance, social vulnerabilities could be weighted |
more heavily to account for ongoing social or economic inequalities that affect individual and |
community ability to adapt to risk. |
Challenges in community-based participatory research during a global |
pandemic |
While we see valuable outcomes from the HyLo method, conducting community based participatory research during a global pandemic is not without challenges. Working in communities |
using digital and online tools reveals both opportunities and the presence of an ongoing digital |
divide and the limits of online collaboration tools. Recent research suggests that online convenings for academic conferences have the potential to increase access and diversity in participation [57–59]. We saw definite advantages as participants were able to join in calls from |
home and even on their commute from work, relieving the burden of finding childcare or |
transportation to a central location, for example. However, some participants struggled with |
viewing and annotating on small screens, such as smart phones, struggled with submitting |
photos to the workshops, and had difficulty accessing digital mapping tools. While we provided trainings on these tools at the start of our workshops, new tools should be mobile device |
friendly, and facilitators need to be adept at finding workarounds. |
We also found that a number of participants were interested in learning more mapping |
skills and in the brief time were able to identify some important intersections between climate |
and social data. We noticed throughout the sessions a progressive advancement of participants’ skillsets and increased levels of observation and assertiveness. We had not expected the |
degree to which participants, who had little to no experience with mapping, would be eager to |
engage with the online maps. This pushed our HyLo team to create a dedicated online map |
portal to enable ongoing participant access and to shift from static to interactive map engagement. County staff members are now also using this HyLo map portal in their resilience work. |
This experience has further inspired us to consider developing a protocol for integrating the |
photovoice work within the map sets to increase the ability to represent hyperlocal issues |
through geotagging and story mapping. |
We had mixed findings on individual and community capacity, but even online we |
increased a sense of community connection and we see potential in this online format for |
increased individual and community capacity; at the same time, would appreciate an opportunity to measure whether engagement, connection, and capacity would improve in face-to-face |
workshops. While our method was able to tap into community concerns and provide voice to |
community members, we would seek to add a measure to assess impact on policy makers as |
well as to monitor implementation of long term solutions. |
Conclusion |
The HyLo method is grounded in an awareness that an urgent need exists for integrated, interdisciplinary knowledge to address the multitude and magnitude of conditions associated with |
climate change, and premised on the understanding that it is possible to elicit and map differential vulnerabilities that impact capacity to adapt [22]. Even more urgent, is the need for the |
PLOS CLIMATE |
Advancing a hyperlocal approach to community engagement in climate adaptation |
PLOS Climate | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000041 June 8, 2022 22 / 26 |
co-production with, and application of, knowledge by those most affected by current and |
future climate effects. This approach seeks to engage the community directly in observation, |
knowledge building, and the development of adaptation strategies. Further evaluation of the |
HyLo method and potential community-led solutions can inform further application in new |
circumstances. Outcomes can lead to hyperlocal adaptation initiatives that can ameliorate conditions for communities, providing climate responsive alternatives to improve daily local life |
that address each neighborhood’s unique concerns that are distinct from ongoing or forthcoming large-scale infrastructure projects. Long term, widespread utilization of this approach |
could result in a portfolio of hyperlocal adaptation solutions that can be matched to communities based on similarities across their ICRAs. This work provides a foundation for a new |
approach to policymaking through which the community becomes the change agent. The |
impact of this transformation would expand the landscape of climate adaptation and create |
opportunities for action at multiple levels, across domains, and with potentially powerful physical, social, and economic outcomes. |