claim: Lindzen and Choi’s paper is viewed as unacceptably flawed by other climate scientists.
evidences.evidence_id: Global warming controversy:91
evidences.article: Global warming controversy
evidences.evidence: Judith Curry has said "This is a completely unconvincing analysis", whereas Naomi Oreskes said that the paper shows "the vast majority of working [climate] research scientists are in agreement [on climate change]... Those who don't agree, are, unfortunately—and this is hard to say without sounding elitist—mostly either not actually climate researchers or not very productive researchers."
evidences.votes: NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: Richard Lindzen:136
evidences.article: Richard Lindzen
evidences.evidence: It received considerable media coverage; 22 then- current or retired MIT professors promptly issued an open letter addressed to Trump saying that Lindzen’s petition doesn’t represent their views or those of the vast majority of other climate scientists.
evidences.votes: SUPPORTS SUPPORTS
evidences.evidence_id: Richard Lindzen:83
evidences.article: Richard Lindzen
evidences.evidence: This claim was criticized by climatologist Gavin Schmidt, Director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, who notes the more generally-accepted understanding of the effects of the Iris effect and cites empirical cases where large and relatively rapid changes in the climate such as El Niño events, the Ultra-Plinian eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991, and recent trends in global temperature and water vapor levels to show that, as predicted in the generally-accepted view, water vapor increases as the temperature increases, and decreases as temperatures decrease.
evidences.votes: SUPPORTS SUPPORTS
evidences.evidence_id: Richard Lindzen:91
evidences.article: Richard Lindzen
evidences.evidence: Lindzen and Choi revised their paper and submitted it to PNAS.
evidences.votes: SUPPORTS SUPPORTS
evidences.evidence_id: Richard Lindzen:94
evidences.article: Richard Lindzen
evidences.evidence: Andrew Dessler published a paper which found errors in Lindzen and Choi 2011, and concluded that the observations it had presented "are not in fundamental disagreement with mainstream climate models, nor do they provide evidence that clouds are causing climate change.
evidences.votes: SUPPORTS SUPPORTS