claim: The modelers confused cause and effect, thereby getting the feedback in the wrong direction."
evidences.evidence_id: Correlation does not imply causation:31
evidences.article: Correlation does not imply causation
evidences.evidence: Example 2 In other cases it may simply be unclear which is the cause and which is the effect.
evidences.votes: NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: Hawthorne effect:47
evidences.article: Hawthorne effect
evidences.evidence: [vague] Possible explanations for the Hawthorne effect include the impact of feedback and motivation towards the experimenter.
evidences.votes: NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: Network effect:42
evidences.article: Network effect
evidences.evidence: [citation needed] Because of the positive feedback often associated with the network effect, system dynamics can be used as a modelling method to describe the phenomena.
evidences.votes: NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: Network effect:60
evidences.article: Network effect
evidences.evidence: Just as positive network externalities (network effects) cause positive feedback and exponential growth, negative network externalities create negative feedback and exponential decay.
evidences.votes: NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: Positive feedback:25
evidences.article: Positive feedback
evidences.evidence: When a change occurs in a system, positive feedback causes further change, in the same direction.
evidences.votes: NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO