minimaxir commited on
Commit
c4de695
1 Parent(s): 7f3f245

image upload test

Browse files
Files changed (3) hide show
  1. .gitignore +1 -0
  2. README.md +8 -4
  3. img/example1.webp +0 -0
.gitignore ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
 
 
1
+ .DS_Store
README.md CHANGED
@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ A LoRA for SDXL 1.0 Base which improves output image quality after loading it an
16
 
17
  Benefits of using this LoRA:
18
 
 
19
  - Higher color saturation and vibrance
20
- - Higher detail in textures/fabrics
21
  - Higher sharpness for blurry/background objects
22
  - Better at anatomically-correct hands
23
  - Less likely to have random artifacts
@@ -54,12 +54,16 @@ During inference, use `wrong` as the negative prompt.
54
 
55
  Left is the base model output (no LoRA) + refiner, right is base + LoRA and refiner. The generations use the same seed.
56
 
 
 
 
 
57
  ## Methodology
58
 
59
- The methodology and motivation for creating this LoRA is similar to my [wrong SD 2.0 textual inversion embedding](https://huggingface.co/minimaxir/wrong_embedding_sd_2_0) by training on a balanced variety of undesirable outputs, except trained as a LoRA since textual inversion on SDXL is complicated. The base images were generated from SDXL itself, with some prompt weighting to emphasize undesirable attributes for test images.
60
 
61
  ## Notes
62
 
63
- - The intuitive way to think about how this LoRA works
64
- - It's possible to use `not wrong` in the prompt itself but in testing it has no effect.
65
  - You can use other negative prompts in conjunction with the `wrong` prompt but you may want to weight them appropriately.
 
16
 
17
  Benefits of using this LoRA:
18
 
19
+ - Higher detail in textures/fabrics, particularly at full 1024x1024 resolution.
20
  - Higher color saturation and vibrance
 
21
  - Higher sharpness for blurry/background objects
22
  - Better at anatomically-correct hands
23
  - Less likely to have random artifacts
 
54
 
55
  Left is the base model output (no LoRA) + refiner, right is base + LoRA and refiner. The generations use the same seed.
56
 
57
+ `realistic human Shrek blogging at a computer workstation, hyperrealistic award-winning photo for vanity fair` (cfg = 13, seed = 56583700)
58
+
59
+ ![](img/example1.webp)
60
+
61
  ## Methodology
62
 
63
+ The methodology and motivation for creating this LoRA is similar to my [wrong SD 2.0 textual inversion embedding](https://huggingface.co/minimaxir/wrong_embedding_sd_2_0) by training on a balanced variety of undesirable outputs, except trained as a LoRA since textual inversion with SDXL is complicated. The base images were generated from SDXL itself, with some prompt weighting to emphasize undesirable attributes for test images.
64
 
65
  ## Notes
66
 
67
+ - The intuitive way to think about how this LoRA works is that on training start, it indicates an undersirable area of the vast highdimensional latent space which the rest of the diffusion process will move away from. This may work more effectively than textual inversion but more testing needs to be done.
68
+ - It's possible to use `not wrong` in the normal prompt itself but in testing it has not much effect.
69
  - You can use other negative prompts in conjunction with the `wrong` prompt but you may want to weight them appropriately.
img/example1.webp ADDED