DeepResearchEval: An Automated Framework for Deep Research Task Construction and Agentic Evaluation
Abstract
DeepResearchEval presents an automated framework for creating complex research tasks and evaluating them through agent-based methods that adapt to task specifics and verify facts without relying on citations.
Deep research systems are widely used for multi-step web research, analysis, and cross-source synthesis, yet their evaluation remains challenging. Existing benchmarks often require annotation-intensive task construction, rely on static evaluation dimensions, or fail to reliably verify facts when citations are missing. To bridge these gaps, we introduce DeepResearchEval, an automated framework for deep research task construction and agentic evaluation. For task construction, we propose a persona-driven pipeline generating realistic, complex research tasks anchored in diverse user profiles, applying a two-stage filter Task Qualification and Search Necessity to retain only tasks requiring multi-source evidence integration and external retrieval. For evaluation, we propose an agentic pipeline with two components: an Adaptive Point-wise Quality Evaluation that dynamically derives task-specific evaluation dimensions, criteria, and weights conditioned on each generated task, and an Active Fact-Checking that autonomously extracts and verifies report statements via web search, even when citations are missing.
Community
Deep research systems are widely used for multi-step web research, analysis, and cross-source synthesis, yet their evaluation remains challenging. Existing benchmarks often require annotation-intensive task construction, rely on static evaluation dimensions, or fail to reliably verify facts when citations are missing. To bridge these gaps, we introduce DeepResearchEval, an automated framework for deep research task construction and agentic evaluation. For task construction, we propose a persona-driven pipeline generating realistic, complex research tasks anchored in diverse user profiles, applying a two-stage filter Task Qualification and Search Necessity to retain only tasks requiring multi-source evidence integration and external retrieval. For evaluation, we propose an agentic pipeline with two components: an Adaptive Point-wise Quality Evaluation that dynamically derives task-specific evaluation dimensions, criteria, and weights conditioned on each generated task, and an Active Fact-Checking that autonomously extracts and verifies report statements via web search, even when citations are missing.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- DeepResearch Bench II: Diagnosing Deep Research Agents via Rubrics from Expert Report (2026)
- DEER: A Comprehensive and Reliable Benchmark for Deep-Research Expert Reports (2025)
- DeepSynth-Eval: Objectively Evaluating Information Consolidation in Deep Survey Writing (2026)
- IDRBench: Interactive Deep Research Benchmark (2026)
- Mind2Report: A Cognitive Deep Research Agent for Expert-Level Commercial Report Synthesis (2026)
- ToolGym: an Open-world Tool-using Environment for Scalable Agent Testing and Data Curation (2026)
- How Far Are We from Genuinely Useful Deep Research Agents? (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
arXiv explained breakdown of this paper 👉 https://arxivexplained.com/papers/deepresearcheval-an-automated-framework-for-deep-research-task-construction-and-agentic-evaluation
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper