Updated readme

README.md

@@ -11,12 +11,40 @@ tags:
 base_model: unsloth/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2-bnb-4bit
 ---
 
+# What is this?
+Dump the full text of a court case into this model and it will summarize it for you
+
 # Uploaded  model
 
 - **Developed by:** simmo
 - **License:** apache-2.0
 - **Finetuned from model :** unsloth/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2-bnb-4bit
 
-This mistral model was trained 2x faster with [Unsloth](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth) and Huggingface's TRL library.
 
-[<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/unslothai/unsloth/main/images/unsloth%20made%20with%20love.png" width="200"/>](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth)
+# Model Output
+```
+{
+""Case Name"": "Hogle Holdings Ltd. v. National Specialty Cars Ltd.",
+""Court"": "Superior Court of Justice, Cour superieure de justice",
+""Date of Judgement"": "June 14, 2004",
+""Overview"": "The case involves two motions: one by the plaintiff for various orders due to difficulties in obtaining document production and examination for discovery from the defendant, and another by the defendant for an order to strike out the plaintiff’s statement of defence and counterclaim for non-compliance with timetable orders.",
+""Facts"": "The plaintiff encountered difficulties in obtaining document production and examination for discovery from the defendant. The defendant's response was characterized by delays and obstruction, leading the plaintiff to seek various orders including permission to search the defendant's premises for relevant documents.",
+""Legal Issue"": "The legal issues revolve around the plaintiff's request for an order striking out the defendant’s statement of defence and counterclaim due to non-compliance with timetable orders, and the plaintiff's motion for permission to enter the defendant’s premises and search for relevant documents.",
+""Arguments"": "The plaintiff argued that it had a right to search the defendant's premises for relevant documents and make copies of them based on Rule 32, while the defendant argued against such an order. The plaintiff also argued that it deliberately failed to comply with timetable orders to pressure the defendant into producing documents.",
+""Courts Decision"": "The court denied the plaintiff's request for permission to search the defendant’s premises and make copies of relevant documents. The court also declined to strike out the defendant's statement of defence and counterclaim due to non-compliance with timetable orders, but ordered both parties not to be awarded costs on either motion.",
+""Legal Precedents"": "The court did not provide any explicit legal precedents in the given case."
+}
+```
+
+# Recommended Grammar
+```
+root ::= Case
+Case ::= "{"   ws   "\"\"Case Name\"\":"   ws   string   ","   ws   "\"\"Court\"\":"   ws   string   ","   ws   "\"\"Date of Judgement\"\":"   ws   string   ","   ws   "\"\"Overview\"\":"   ws   string   ","   ws   "\"\"Facts\"\":"   ws   string   ","   ws   "\"\"Legal Issue\"\":"   ws   string   ","   ws   "\"\"Arguments\"\":"   ws   string   ","   ws   "\"\"Courts Decision\"\":"   ws   string   ","   ws   "\"\"Legal Precedents\"\":"   ws   string   "}"
+Caselist ::= "[]" | "["   ws   Case   (","   ws   Case)*   "]"
+string ::= "\""   ([^"]*)   "\""
+boolean ::= "true" | "false"
+ws ::= [ \t\n]*
+number ::= [0-9]+   "."?   [0-9]*
+stringlist ::= "["   ws   "]" | "["   ws   string   (","   ws   string)*   ws   "]"
+numberlist ::= "["   ws   "]" | "["   ws   string   (","   ws   number)*   ws   "]"
+```