Corey Morris
Updated updated date
28d4d6a
raw
history blame
10.2 kB
import streamlit as st
import pandas as pd
import plotly.express as px
from result_data_processor import ResultDataProcessor
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
def plot_top_n(df, target_column, n=10):
top_n = df.nlargest(n, target_column)
# Initialize the bar plot
fig, ax1 = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 5))
# Set width for each bar and their positions
width = 0.28
ind = np.arange(len(top_n))
# Plot target_column and MMLU_average on the primary y-axis with adjusted positions
ax1.bar(ind - width, top_n[target_column], width=width, color='blue', label=target_column)
ax1.bar(ind, top_n['MMLU_average'], width=width, color='orange', label='MMLU_average')
# Set the primary y-axis labels and title
ax1.set_title(f'Top {n} performing models on {target_column}')
ax1.set_xlabel('Model')
ax1.set_ylabel('Score')
# Create a secondary y-axis for Parameters
ax2 = ax1.twinx()
# Plot Parameters as bars on the secondary y-axis with adjusted position
ax2.bar(ind + width, top_n['Parameters'], width=width, color='red', label='Parameters')
# Set the secondary y-axis labels
ax2.set_ylabel('Parameters', color='red')
ax2.tick_params(axis='y', labelcolor='red')
# Set the x-ticks and their labels
ax1.set_xticks(ind)
ax1.set_xticklabels(top_n.index, rotation=45, ha="right")
# Adjust the legend
fig.tight_layout()
fig.legend(loc='center left', bbox_to_anchor=(1, 0.5))
# Show the plot
st.pyplot(fig)
data_provider = ResultDataProcessor()
# st.title('Model Evaluation Results including MMLU by task')
st.title('MMLU-by-Task Evaluation Results for 700+ Open Source Models')
st.markdown("""***Last updated August 10th***""")
st.markdown("""
Hugging Face has run evaluations on over 500 open source models and provides results on a
[publicly available leaderboard](https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard) and [dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/open-llm-leaderboard/results).
The leaderboard currently displays the overall result for MMLU. This page shows individual accuracy scores for all 57 tasks of the MMLU evaluation.
[Preliminary analysis of MMLU-by-Task data](https://coreymorrisdata.medium.com/preliminary-analysis-of-mmlu-evaluation-data-insights-from-500-open-source-models-e67885aa364b)
""")
filters = st.checkbox('Select Models and/or Evaluations')
# Initialize selected columns with "Parameters" and "MMLU_average" if filters are checked
selected_columns = ['Parameters', 'MMLU_average'] if filters else data_provider.data.columns.tolist()
# Initialize selected models as empty if filters are checked
selected_models = [] if filters else data_provider.data.index.tolist()
if filters:
# Create multi-select for columns with default selection
selected_columns = st.multiselect(
'Select Columns',
data_provider.data.columns.tolist(),
default=selected_columns
)
# Create multi-select for models without default selection
selected_models = st.multiselect(
'Select Models',
data_provider.data.index.tolist()
)
# Get the filtered data
filtered_data = data_provider.get_data(selected_models)
# sort the table by the MMLU_average column
filtered_data = filtered_data.sort_values(by=['MMLU_average'], ascending=False)
# Select box for filtering by Parameters
parameter_threshold = st.selectbox(
'Filter by Parameters (Less Than or Equal To):',
options=[3, 7, 13, 35, 'No threshold'],
index=4, # Set the default selected option to 'No threshold'
format_func=lambda x: f"{x}" if isinstance(x, int) else x
)
# Filter the DataFrame based on the selected parameter threshold if not 'No threshold'
if isinstance(parameter_threshold, int):
filtered_data = filtered_data[filtered_data['Parameters'] <= parameter_threshold]
# Search box
search_query = st.text_input("Filter by Model Name:", "")
# Filter the DataFrame based on the search query in the index (model name)
if search_query:
filtered_data = filtered_data[filtered_data.index.str.contains(search_query, case=False)]
# Search box for columns
column_search_query = st.text_input("Filter by Column/Task Name:", "")
# Get the columns that contain the search query
matching_columns = [col for col in filtered_data.columns if column_search_query.lower() in col.lower()]
# Display the DataFrame with only the matching columns
st.dataframe(filtered_data[matching_columns])
# CSV download
filtered_data.index.name = "Model Name"
csv = filtered_data.to_csv(index=True)
st.download_button(
label="Download data as CSV",
data=csv,
file_name="model_evaluation_results.csv",
mime="text/csv",
)
def create_plot(df, x_values, y_values, models=None, title=None):
if models is not None:
df = df[df.index.isin(models)]
# remove rows with NaN values
df = df.dropna(subset=[x_values, y_values])
plot_data = pd.DataFrame({
'Model': df.index,
x_values: df[x_values],
y_values: df[y_values],
})
plot_data['color'] = 'purple'
fig = px.scatter(plot_data, x=x_values, y=y_values, color='color', hover_data=['Model'], trendline="ols")
# If title is not provided, use x_values vs. y_values as the default title
if title is None:
title = x_values + " vs. " + y_values
layout_args = dict(
showlegend=False,
xaxis_title=x_values,
yaxis_title=y_values,
xaxis=dict(),
yaxis=dict(),
title=title
)
fig.update_layout(**layout_args)
# Add a dashed line at 0.25 for the y_values
x_min = df[x_values].min()
x_max = df[x_values].max()
y_min = df[y_values].min()
y_max = df[y_values].max()
if x_values.startswith('MMLU'):
fig.add_shape(
type='line',
x0=0.25, x1=0.25,
y0=y_min, y1=y_max,
line=dict(
color='red',
width=2,
dash='dash'
)
)
if y_values.startswith('MMLU'):
fig.add_shape(
type='line',
x0=x_min, x1=x_max,
y0=0.25, y1=0.25,
line=dict(
color='red',
width=2,
dash='dash'
)
)
return fig
# Custom scatter plots
st.header('Custom scatter plots')
st.write("""
The scatter plot is useful to identify models that outperform or underperform on a particular task in relation to their size or overall performance.
Identifying these models is a first step to better understand what training strategies result in better performance on a particular task.
""")
st.markdown("***The dashed red line indicates random chance accuracy of 0.25 as the MMLU evaluation is multiple choice with 4 response options.***")
# add a line separating the writing
st.markdown("***")
st.write("As expected, there is a strong positive relationship between the number of parameters and average performance on the MMLU evaluation.")
selected_x_column = st.selectbox('Select x-axis', filtered_data.columns.tolist(), index=0)
selected_y_column = st.selectbox('Select y-axis', filtered_data.columns.tolist(), index=3)
if selected_x_column != selected_y_column: # Avoid creating a plot with the same column on both axes
fig = create_plot(filtered_data, selected_x_column, selected_y_column)
st.plotly_chart(fig)
else:
st.write("Please select different columns for the x and y axes.")
# end of custom scatter plots
st.markdown("## Notable findings and plots")
st.markdown('### Abstract Algebra Performance')
st.write("Small models showed surprisingly strong performance on the abstract algebra task. A 6 Billion parameter model is tied for the best performance on this task and there are a number of other small models in the top 10.")
plot_top_n(filtered_data, 'MMLU_abstract_algebra', 10)
fig = create_plot(filtered_data, 'Parameters', 'MMLU_abstract_algebra')
st.plotly_chart(fig)
# Moral scenarios plots
st.markdown("### Moral Scenarios Performance")
st.write("""
While smaller models can perform well at many tasks, the model size threshold for decent performance on moral scenarios is much higher.
There are no models with less than 13 billion parameters with performance much better than random chance. Further investigation into other capabilities that emerge at 13 billion parameters could help
identify capabilities that are important for moral reasoning.
""")
fig = create_plot(filtered_data, 'Parameters', 'MMLU_moral_scenarios', title="Impact of Parameter Count on Accuracy for Moral Scenarios")
st.plotly_chart(fig)
st.write()
fig = create_plot(filtered_data, 'MMLU_average', 'MMLU_moral_scenarios')
st.plotly_chart(fig)
st.markdown("***Thank you to hugging face for running the evaluations and supplying the data as well as the original authors of the evaluations.***")
st.markdown("""
# References
1. Edward Beeching, Clémentine Fourrier, Nathan Habib, Sheon Han, Nathan Lambert, Nazneen Rajani, Omar Sanseviero, Lewis Tunstall, Thomas Wolf. (2023). *Open LLM Leaderboard*. Hugging Face. [link](https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard)
2. Gao, Leo et al. (2021). *A framework for few-shot language model evaluation*. Zenodo. [link](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5371628)
3. Peter Clark, Isaac Cowhey, Oren Etzioni, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, Oyvind Tafjord. (2018). *Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge*. arXiv. [link](https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05457)
4. Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, Yejin Choi. (2019). *HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?*. arXiv. [link](https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07830)
5. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, Jacob Steinhardt. (2021). *Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding*. arXiv. [link](https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03300)
6. Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain Evans. (2022). *TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods*. arXiv. [link](https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07958)
""")