Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
IliaLarchenko
commited on
Commit
•
fae1562
1
Parent(s):
984b566
Typo fix
Browse files- tests/testing_prompts.py +3 -3
tests/testing_prompts.py
CHANGED
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ You are reviewing an interview. Your goal is to evaluate the performance of the
|
|
21 |
Be extremely critical and strict, you have highest quality standards.
|
22 |
Even a slight mistake should lead to a negative evaluation. If in doubt about any criteria, give a negative evaluation.
|
23 |
Analyze the JSON file with the interview transcript and provide your feedback.
|
24 |
-
JSON contains, problem description, interview transcript (messages, code and
|
25 |
|
26 |
You should evaluate the following aspects and return a JSON with these keys:
|
27 |
|
@@ -42,11 +42,11 @@ You should evaluate the following aspects and return a JSON with these keys:
|
|
42 |
"interviewer_found_mistakes": "The interviewer accurately identified any mistakes made by the candidate.",
|
43 |
"interviewer_hallucinations": "The interviewer didn't say anything non-relevant or strange.",
|
44 |
"interviewer_summary": "The interviewer doesn't repeat or summarize what the candidate just said.",
|
45 |
-
"interviewer_gaslighting": "The interviewer refrained from
|
46 |
"interviewer_leaks": "The interviewer didn't leak any hidden notes to candidate during the main part of the interview.",
|
47 |
"interviewer_empty": "The interviewer didn't send any empty messages.",
|
48 |
"interviewer_notes": "The interviewer made reasonable notes catching candidates mistakes and important facts.",
|
49 |
-
"interviewer_stuck": "The interview didn't stuck at any point in repeating cycle of same questions and answers.",
|
50 |
"interviewer_end": "The interview ended interview after candidate answer all questions (vs. interview ended abruptly).",
|
51 |
|
52 |
"feedback_quality": "The feedback was constructive and offered actionable insights.",
|
|
|
21 |
Be extremely critical and strict, you have highest quality standards.
|
22 |
Even a slight mistake should lead to a negative evaluation. If in doubt about any criteria, give a negative evaluation.
|
23 |
Analyze the JSON file with the interview transcript and provide your feedback.
|
24 |
+
JSON contains, problem description, interview transcript (messages, code and hidden notes not visible to candidate), and feedback.
|
25 |
|
26 |
You should evaluate the following aspects and return a JSON with these keys:
|
27 |
|
|
|
42 |
"interviewer_found_mistakes": "The interviewer accurately identified any mistakes made by the candidate.",
|
43 |
"interviewer_hallucinations": "The interviewer didn't say anything non-relevant or strange.",
|
44 |
"interviewer_summary": "The interviewer doesn't repeat or summarize what the candidate just said.",
|
45 |
+
"interviewer_gaslighting": "The interviewer refrained from gaslighting the candidate: didn't claim any candidates errors or missed facts that he didn't make.",
|
46 |
"interviewer_leaks": "The interviewer didn't leak any hidden notes to candidate during the main part of the interview.",
|
47 |
"interviewer_empty": "The interviewer didn't send any empty messages.",
|
48 |
"interviewer_notes": "The interviewer made reasonable notes catching candidates mistakes and important facts.",
|
49 |
+
"interviewer_stuck": "The interview's dialog was reasonable and didn't stuck at any point in repeating cycle of same questions and answers.",
|
50 |
"interviewer_end": "The interview ended interview after candidate answer all questions (vs. interview ended abruptly).",
|
51 |
|
52 |
"feedback_quality": "The feedback was constructive and offered actionable insights.",
|