update
Browse files- evaluation/intro.txt +5 -5
evaluation/intro.txt
CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
1 |
A popular evaluation framework for code generation models is the [pass@k](https://huggingface.co/metrics/code_eval) metric on [HumanEval](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openai_humaneval) dataset, which was introduced in [Codex paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.03374v2.pdf). The dataset includes 164 handwritten programming problems. In the pass@k metric, k code samples are generated per problem, a problem is considered solved if any sample passes the unit tests and the total fraction of problems solved is reported. Below are some examples for the selcted models.
|
2 |
For most models, we sample 200 candidate program completions, and compute pass@1, pass@10, and pass@100 using an unbiased sampling estimator. The table below shows the humanEval scores of CodeParrot, InCoder, GPT-neo models, GPT-J and Codex (not open-source).
|
3 |
|
4 |
-
<center>
|
5 |
|
6 |
| Model | pass@1 | pass@10 | pass@100|
|
7 |
|-------|--------|---------|---------|
|
@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ For most models, we sample 200 candidate program completions, and compute pass@1
|
|
16 |
|GPT-neo (1.5B)| 4.79% | 7.47% | 16.30% |
|
17 |
|GPT-J (6B)| 11.62% | 15.74% | 27.74% |
|
18 |
|
19 |
-
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
-
To better understand how pass@k metric works, we will illustrate it with some examples. We select 4
|
23 |
|
24 |
```python
|
25 |
|
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ def has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:
|
|
37 |
|
38 |
````
|
39 |
|
40 |
-
```
|
41 |
|
42 |
from typing import List
|
43 |
|
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ def separate_paren_groups(paren_string: str) -> List[str]:
|
|
53 |
|
54 |
````
|
55 |
|
56 |
-
```
|
57 |
|
58 |
def truncate_number(number: float) -> float:
|
59 |
""" Given a positive floating point number, it can be decomposed into
|
|
|
1 |
A popular evaluation framework for code generation models is the [pass@k](https://huggingface.co/metrics/code_eval) metric on [HumanEval](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openai_humaneval) dataset, which was introduced in [Codex paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.03374v2.pdf). The dataset includes 164 handwritten programming problems. In the pass@k metric, k code samples are generated per problem, a problem is considered solved if any sample passes the unit tests and the total fraction of problems solved is reported. Below are some examples for the selcted models.
|
2 |
For most models, we sample 200 candidate program completions, and compute pass@1, pass@10, and pass@100 using an unbiased sampling estimator. The table below shows the humanEval scores of CodeParrot, InCoder, GPT-neo models, GPT-J and Codex (not open-source).
|
3 |
|
4 |
+
<div align="center">
|
5 |
|
6 |
| Model | pass@1 | pass@10 | pass@100|
|
7 |
|-------|--------|---------|---------|
|
|
|
16 |
|GPT-neo (1.5B)| 4.79% | 7.47% | 16.30% |
|
17 |
|GPT-J (6B)| 11.62% | 15.74% | 27.74% |
|
18 |
|
19 |
+
</div>
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
+
To better understand how pass@k metric works, we will illustrate it with some examples. We select 4 problems from the HumanEval dataset and see how the model performs and which code completions pass the unit tests. We will use CodeParrot 🦜 with the three problem below:
|
23 |
|
24 |
```python
|
25 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
38 |
````
|
39 |
|
40 |
+
```python
|
41 |
|
42 |
from typing import List
|
43 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
54 |
````
|
55 |
|
56 |
+
```python
|
57 |
|
58 |
def truncate_number(number: float) -> float:
|
59 |
""" Given a positive floating point number, it can be decomposed into
|