MatthiasC's picture
Improve code and add more example specific text
305fb83
raw
history blame
546 Bytes
One of the dependencies that, when found in the summary but not in the article, indicates a possible error is the "pobj" (object of preposition) dependency.
Furthermore, we only match *pobj* dependencies when the target word is "in", as in this example.
The sentence here is not a factual error per se, but rather a readability issue. The "in" should be dropped to make the sentence correct.
For better examples with this specific dependency, try choosing another article. TODO: readability issue with the dependency graph for this specific issue